HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-89-0009RESOLUTION NO. 89"9
A RESOLUTION "AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT, IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE
FORM ATTACHED, TO THE AGREEMENT DATED
SEPTEMBER 20,1988 BETWEEN ERM--SOUTH, INC.,
AND THE CITY OF MIAMI, FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AND ADDITIONAL REMEDIAL ACTION
RELATED TO CONTAMINATED MATERIAL ON BLOCK 24
OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AREA; ESTABLISHING $52,155 FOR
SAID PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND ADDITIONAL
REMEDIAL ACTION, USING FUNDS THEREFOR IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $52,155 FROM 1976
HOUSING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FUND
INTEREST PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED TO THE
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CIP NO. 322029.
WHEREAS, in order to enhance the quality of life for the
residents of the City of Miami, provide affordable housing in
close proximity to the City's major commercial and employment
centers, and promote the strengthening and revitalization of
downtown Miami, the City established the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Community Redevelopment Project as a major priority; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 82-755 on
July 29, 1982 approved in principle the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 84-893 on
July 31, 1984 authorized the City Manager to issue Request for
Unified Development Project Proposals for Phase I of the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, proposals were received, evaluated and four
developers were selected to develop various types of residential
units and commercial space on Blocks 24, 37, 45, 46, 55, and 56
in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment
Project Area; and
WHEREAS, the initial stage of the Phase I development, will
take place on blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55; and
�t
For the City Clerk's reference, there is an attachment to this Resolution.'_
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
JAN 1241989
8.
SOLUTION No. "' o 9
-W
WHEREAS, in order complete the transfer of blocks 24, 37, 46
and 55 to the four Phase I developers, the City of Miami must
provide documentation indicating that no hazardous or toxic waste
has been detected on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, based on a review of submissions, it was determined
to be in the City's best interest to recommend the negotiation
of an agreement with ERM-South, Inc., as a qualified and
experienced firm to provide the required professional services;
and
WHEREAS, by an affirmative vote of 4/5ths of the City
Commission, Resolution 88-582 was passed on June 23, 1988 thereby
adopting, approving and confirming the City Manager's finding
that a valid public emergency existed in connection with the
procurement of professional services related to Environmental
Assessments of blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55 of the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area; and
WHEREAS Resolution 88-582 further authorized the City
Manager to execute an agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, with ERM-South, Inc. to provide professional services
related to the Phase I Environmental Assessments of Blocks 24,
37, 46 and 55 in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Project Area, using funds therefor in an amount not
to exceed a total of $80,000, from 1976 Housing General
Obligation Bonds Fund Interest previously allocated to the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS in accordance with the aforementioned agreement with
ERM-South, Inc., Phase I Environmental Assessments were performed
on Blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55 in the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Project Area; and
WHEREAS, ground water and soils data obtained from the four
Blocks during the Phase I Environmental Assessments were compared
to Federal, State, and County Standards and were further
evaluated in terms of consistency between sample points and
media; and
-2- 8979
i
S
WHEREAS, during the Phase I Environmental Assessments, at
various monitoring wells on the four Blocks, exceedances of
standards were documented for ground water, some but not all of
which were confirmed by elevated levels in soils at the same
sample point; and
WHEREAS, elevated levels of contaminants were found in soil
composites from some of the locations within each of the four
Blocks and although there are no standards for these contaminants
in soils, it is reasonable to expect that these levels could be
causing ground water violations; and
WHEREAS, the presence of certain contaminants in the soil on
each of the four Blocks may cause risks associated with exposure
to said soils on a short term basis by construction workers and
on a long term basis by residents of the developments; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the dumping of septic and vehicular
maintenance waste into an on -site soakage pit, need for the -
excavation and disposal of + 200 cubic yards of contaminated soil
was established on Block 24; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of the conclusions, recommendations
and certification provided to the City in accordance with their
agreement, ERM-South, Inc., recommended Phase II Environmental
Assessments; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 88-772, on September 8, 1988, the
City Manager was authorized to execute an amendment, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, to the agreement dated September
20, 1988, between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami, for
Phase II Environmental Assessments of the aforementioned four
Blocks, including additional professional services and initial
remedial action related to the contaminated material on Block 24;
and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 established $29,800 in fees for y.
� kn
said professional services, $18,000 for the excavation and
. .St
removal of contaminated soil on Block 24 and a $2,200
r
-3-
t�
E.
1Y Fj
it.
Ea.
contingency fund for the project, totalling an amount not to
exceed $50,000, with $20,000 from 1976 Housing General Obligation
Bonds Fund Interest previously allocated to the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project CIP No. 322029
s
and $30,000 in General Funds allocated in FY 87-88 to the
Department of Development Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the Phase II Environmental
Assessments, the Phase I Environmental Assessments complete with
the conclusions, recommendations and certification for each Block
were amended in accordance with the data and findings to indicate
the absence of ground water pollution and soil contamination on
Blocks 37, 46 and 55 at levels exceeding regulatory standards and
qualifications and/or at levels sufficient to pose an
unacceptable risk to the public health or the environment; and
WHEREAS, as a part of the Phase II Environmental
Assessments, work associated with the removal of the estimated
200 cubic yards (260 tons) of contaminated material on Block 24
began; and
WHEREAS, the actual remedial activities included the
excavation of 1,250 tons of soil and debris, 766 tons of which
were transported and disposed of at the South Dade Landfill
Facility; and
WHEREAS, closing of the excavated areas required the
placement of 1,068 tons of clean fill above and below 463 tons of
previously excavated material which did not require removal from
the site; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the aforementioned remedial activities
as well as additional professional and technical services totals
$52,155; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 authorized $18,000 for this work,
thereby leaving an unfunded balance in. costs of $34,155; and
WHEREAS, HUD Jacksonville, Florida has indicated that FHA,
as the insuring agent for the funding of the development of Block
24 will require documentation indicating that the contaminated
material is appropriately removed in order to close on the
financing of this development;
- 4-
E
� � yr
1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 9Y THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section I. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute
an amendment, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, to the
agreement dated September 20, 1988, between ERM-South, Inc., and
the City of Miami, to include professional services and
additional remedial action related to contaminated material on
Block 24 of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Area.
Section 2. The amount of $52,155 is hereby established for said
professional services and additional remedial action from 1976 Housing Special
Obligation Bonds -Budd Interest previously allocated to the Southeast Overtown/
Park West Community Redevelopment Project.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption pursuant to law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 1989.
XAVIER L. S EZ, MAYORs
ATTES
MAT7Y HIRAI, CITY CLERK
FINANCIAL REVIEW & APPROVAL: PLANNING REVIEW & APPROVAL:
Lc' Leo
CARLCW GARCIA, DIRECTOR RGI0 ROD DIRECTOR
FINANCE DEPARTMENT PLANNING ANT
t is
-
r. r'
-5-
f
4 s,. I � :� 1�.- ,.-�'' - , .",.W:'1 ,�-... K", I �- .;:-7" '1' �t' .'''�_
c i'"1:: � ,`-l�-rw"'.�, .'.�..�;i''.w'". ,- . '�e�"Zm.Ai, l.loi,lNlkI".�:�.*., ,, 1 �,,",, .�� l��: _Z�t� !�'. : �',.� ,t I ll' -� I � I I II . I I ,� I �I,. . . I
�'I � I , -` I,
rr, t�
. .I � ".II�1I �I . ��,'1��.I I�
t
.'1,.',- A14� �
i f ) , .A
jj
- . -j'r
flUDDETARY REVIEW & A0t)ftbV-&-L 1.. ,� > INAMCIAL REVIEW & APt�Rt� ALf
�:
. .. �__
.
; , ---,.--,,-A- v . -
? 0 5U r DIRECTOR JE Y ti X DIRECTOR
DEP MT OP BUDGET H SING -ON ERVATION AND
ii I!ii.IVI. �.,-t-�;.1�,'.-� .�,,I,..III��q . :I I.� I�
': .1, 1. , . . ,, I . ."I, I ;-�I , ..� * , .' . � , ,�I II , ,1 �I- � �, :I I I* .-�- . � � . .".,I ,r , , �1� . . I.�.I . .I. I1I -1 ,. -I-I I' . .� . ,- �. . II .I. . . I ��II I.I I . � �� .I .I. . I .I. ,I I. I II. . I .- ... I I I. I�I� . I .1� � .�. 1.I. .� I ..I -I.I .1III � I I�- ,. I -�I� .a. . I I I . �� I III ..I .I I..I,-, - .� �.� ,.. .-I , I� II-tI,- � - I AI. . .�I ,� I .�I�.I I� ..I.I., �I- .� I - .: �III '1I-.�I ..II1..I .-- . I I1 . .� . I I I . �-: I �I 1:1,,.. III. I I' '; .,I. -- . I. ". 'I."I,,I'.. , ,. . , I.
.��,� �,, :, t� ", ,- 'I 'i e'1''_.:.,`" r..-.I .II-N_,; _ - --. .--1�;', ,�"Iz..� *.�II ,.''.;..� r�.: ,_..�;,.:4!.:;.,, �. �.:� ,I- -� .:,,,t�.'1v1',,�)."� ,,1�-'�I _'.'",'- ,-.-; ..�, -�.-�' "''.,-� I. w�-". . I '.'�; ,;�_" . '.�, .'I , ��rI1..:—� �.."��.�'_,.�',,'e.� ��l�.; ,�"*:,—1.. ,�":., ;,�1- ';-I�-,.:: ,I,�I�,l,r!'� -��. *-.� -..:����I.'1'�',-.o�,�'"., "IZ��.� �:1'� `,i- ::�.- I"� .,. ,*.,1;��.'...''.,
- : �.. ,-.. "�-�, :,� .� o-, "., V;I".., .�;�.-.�*-,'_��.�:.- � I,'',, %.'�. 'i , -I— ,�-:':',.. ,,*� -",.�,�-,,1'._,__
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4 t
.I PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
i
! _ t, r . .
1.
' ROBERT C RK
{ CHIRP DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
i
) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESSs
l
-; x
§; l
.,
t' 4 y
=fRG L. E DEZ t k x. 7 4. t. tjj o _
CITY ATT0 EY
f
', + ,
f - I q . Y ' y..
t
`t. r
" 4R,¢t i d:k r" °X$i'Yt '} h -, t F,_ .� 1 t5 a i '}, ry, +c r r P t fi
f. l .. e i".'1 '�• =- n�1. R,, Lb'. A �. ' '` I
3 [_ R
1 i Ru -' ? ) 3. d�'' SF
■
t"a r `' "k i. 1.? ,.�. ... i YF 4; a .a h; +„ �?` w .�i+� y t r i 'r -;3 s, . `h y' YVt -*1 •tr' r .=' } < l :_. _,k
'1 2 -}-,! y a i S
I 4 g 2 f W 5 1 vA f C 4 x F 4 wd f h,
ti. ma y. -e a ':"3 S -b+.r :� c ! :.lat :' . +, 1fi r^ R^ ` i- % "=:5.?,,,+ * a t �. 'k .�''
S ti. .s ¢ s < r 17 t.
r r ``r..�
r A 7 F T V F e Kra { I
'�IzF v11
i .r F
i .+ i ,,r3&xt t a` 3i h yfS v A a 4 Tack #' ��ab.ai�t ti+�{`idrwF'
l s i �' n, y. �`�.tr.fy Y �: hjr 'S'v-.° Zr _TEfI rj' , W.
] `'3h.! R \ $k 3' r ¢_,i f N s r) n,3^ J s %ti` 4 #s +l= � � s t �R4.. 1 -!'.q� 'r( na,
{t +` y� : { r'' r rnz#ram .i rl.".3�a.�4 fi
+ i T fi, �? J Tit 4`' r .°.k'tf .t; ' 7? a,.,'yip .�. 1 'VdC:k � r* u�tY; tYv'Ye a;r-` z
e
,r ) 4 r _ 1 i d4 r SS�sn '* y�t¢y�'S..���� SV '" {�Fa r
} A t bk 1+'k -5 d"! lJF't) �' k' $ ; 'V" 4J�'d, 3 7 i4J. Cr•s,tJY �. �'.•.J �.r'+f .y n r 3h ,j.'ti�.�7,�1 {"FIC�7"•��.�,'. W,.''. - k
r .cz its K y '.k gt sflr
i'*'2'�'4'�i'�`�i¢.3"r;;',a`S re
d t .t.F i,, {*,c, 3 ; '-t ,,.�'X$ ; f �.r<` s J ; iY 7 '+yamrt'
Cr f1S3$ yF'C .ta
i ,t.. 55, S4 `f - F 't rx f� tt a r' 7 - >f rya-�.r t + .' Ir9,
K- s ,,r• 9r�" P 4¢ r ° #a n - ;e ,l "i t 4T.r�L -v ? + y �' .}',' v ^ t
i t j' r 7 r x d t t '+ , xdf` t� +ti C-
k Ct sti fi Fs� i €r � j � d yqr�
r H, r 2 k § trf r, ¢ �+{S•..i .- ri t ..' =, "Y ' y. F'�. t,, c § s rf`iI. L 9" f .� 7 .,r ^F;)r 91 f ic'ry- , d `I
' ,+ 4 4 + �e�y;r r"yk, Y'r¢, 4; ? Y y t 'z..i}i r '. t kx„�y „t,f4 ) �rp�`r :"'�Sr ,r 4,,s x sip 4, - 1`�tr '
' r s qtm a
t `i k e� �.
.. i � t r i N f 'K rs NEti ` N « _ F° ` .
1 ..i®r R 35 f kM f {- C,.tf ¢-j x S) 4 t i > $ 9 4'F' 7 t �P ',' v1'?,,
a :i a to + �$ i")',-5� .t tSY• 1'"�5tF �, +.rl�' ,2,J" -r Y
'f+ ^- k' 9 ? d ri i '¢ d�7q' '�{ '}%"'¢''° 7 a t: xyzs
4 ' r i� i r +,�y. rrll
d w
' r° ,� ¢ "" ' i. -s ;� �, � k Fp ,+ , 7.. 2,r ) ? a F �„ +i 7 L . Yb ') r
'� y' Cam' ' i s y".
..�W& >•5 .`t, s J -'E� i�'T"r�¢ ix d r �� d k r yJ
), 7, h! r tr i Y m yr p. ''f 3 § t -way ror ''i v cn,r ry,�m r
ikdI 1* t fit q,� A t B <{ r t y h�Ir x> r t s
c ,, a. �" y 1: s '' a x s. �, -t i M'"a `ti s P e
..7 rt s i i •c `i 8; ?: t u- 'l ¢ S 1. k R T � t l (. + ¢ r'.. ' r• ,.lf a.,,.x r�i t r }- ) ,l i�, st y �, 'r'
• ,�e s.6 r t - 7 c �• +.�{' L ¢ i r..ys � 1 �l
�` rd �. t. *rE6 � ') c .�'k'Na'. °:�., r IIy��`- � r r 4 }P .n '�¢ 'rt4' a- '
�L _ 1. i y..T �:� `y 7ir.. r + yf a, u.. r .. g� 9y ? �Pyz y 'Nl7y;'.r n .0 4. ' ,'� {, ? .
+ s r. zY J Z... s' ! 1 `b » J'� r"�'� �'k �+n�V��cz'' s.:r�su
c r .� 1 + 2 t tS
'. t ¢ t t r i. y+ ?tot (.i �. s C -'.rya 'sh y y
F' -� r r .� r;J,s,4'- r `Aa 5q- {- t.+`� .S I
a.r, Sa fi �' '` � i �,. z ! �° ;Yt,hti rMov� %rgyA�,x `ts}a,6ya "t4
a._4 ) :4 s s t 1'4k rjer 1 tl* ✓ �'' lra, fr^rxrCRb x iF
3' a ;' - f i ....r *. S .� r t 3 K a 1 J � {''Fi�,$�{
6[ i N < Y �d - i 3 „IS F ff $ 44Y Y try A i.
r r 1a °w sh'.¢ - r yr 1 rr F J �„ ¢{ t', L, L .'.4? %, I. t"t Zk;- . 4 r � .
s. iLi'-. _ .. ..: ...,...a �" , i. ',.:., . ,.*;:. 1 r.....A.� .i.%..J s?tY �': .J'4.c:`r .�F`'", t...`::.i. -.fig,.. `i.,117'�k`.. +, u. ._
AMENDMENT NO. II
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT, made this day of , 1988, to
an Agreement dated September 20, 1988, by and between the City
of Miami, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida,
(hereinafter referred to as the "CITY",) and ERM-South, Inc., a
for profit corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter
referred to as the "CONSULTANT").
a RECITAL
WHEREAS, in order to enhance the quality of life for the
residents of'the City of Miami, provide affordable housing in
close proximity to the City's major commercial and employment
centers, and promote the strengthening and revitalization of
downtown Miami, the City established the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Community Redevelopment Project as a major priority; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 82-755 on
July 29, 1982 approved in principle the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 84-893 on
July 31, 1984 authorized the City Manager to issue Request for
Unified Development Project Proposals for Phase I of the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, proposals were received, evaluated and four
developers were selected t d 1
o eve we various types of residential
units and commercial space on Blocks 24, 37, 45, 46, 55, and 56
i<
in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment
Project Area; and y�
WHEREAS, a total of 1034 one, two and three bedroom;."
apartments will be constructed along with 24,000 sq. ft. of.
commercial space in the initial stage of the Phase I development, t.
which will take place on blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55; and
t
7
{
WHEREAS, by Resolution 87-619, passed June 25, 1987 a
housing emergency was declared in the City of Miami relative to
the severe shortage of housing within the affordable range of
families and individuals of low and moderate income; and !
i
WHEREAS, said emergency need for affordable housing as c
previously recognized in Resolution No. 87-619 is hereby :-
reaffirmed and declared to currently exit; and
1-
WHEREAS, the commencement of development in the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area. is essential in
order to provide affordable housing in close proximity to the
City's major commercial and employment centers; and
WHEREAS, in order complete the transfer of blocks 24, 37, 46
and 55 to the four Phase I developers, the City of Miami must
provide documentation indicating that no hazardous or toxic waste
has been detected on the subject property; and
1
WHEREAS, development of the four Phase I blocks may not
proceed without said documentation; and # WHEREAS, in order to provide documentation indicating that
_j no hazardous or toxic waste has been detected on the subject
-� property environmental assessments, including but not limited to
records search; site visits; review of on and off site
conditions; review of- geotechnical data; investigation of
regulatory problems and requirements; sampling of soil and ground
>s
water and its analysis for 129 priority pollutants as identified
in Chapter 40 Congressional Federal Register, Part 136,(1986),
entitled "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the
Analysis of Pollutants", the professional services of a qualified
and experienced Environmental Analysis and Testing Firm must be
acquired; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority contained in City of
Miami Code, Section 18-52.3,(i), and based upod the facts as set
forth herein, the need to provide documentation indicating that
O-
no hazardous or toxic waste has been detected on blocks 24, 37,
46 and 55 in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Project Area constitutes a Valid Public Emergency
and therefore the immediate procurement of the professional
''
services of an experienced and qualified Environmental Analysis
and Testing Firm, to provide the aforementioned environmental
assessments must be carried out on an emergency basis; and
WHEREAS, in anticipation of the need for said environmental
assessments, three firms engaged in the field of environmental
analysis and testing were contacted, and subsequently provided
proposals to the City; and
WHEREAS, based on a review of the submissions, it was
determined to be in the City's best interest to recommend the
negotiation of an agreement with ERM-South, Inc., as a qualified
and experienced firm to provide the required professional
services; and
WHEREAS,, by an affirmative vote of 4/5ths of the City
Commission, Resolution 88-582 was passed on June 23, 1988 thereby
adopting, approving and confirming the City Manager's finding
that a valid public emergency existed in connection with the
procurement of professional services related to Environmental
Assessments of blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55 of the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area; and
WHEREAS Resolution 88-582 further authorized the Citv
Manager to execute an agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, with ERM-South, Inc. to provide professional services
related to the Phase I Environmental Assessments of Blocks 24,
37, 46 and 55 in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Project Area, using funds therefor in an amount not
to exceed a total of $80,000, from 1976 Housing General
Obligation Bonds Fund Interest previously allocated to the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS in accordance with the aforementioned agreement with
ERM-South, Inc., Phase I Environmental Assessments were performed
on Blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55 in the Southeast bvertown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Project Area; and
a
uy.
WHEREAS, ground water and soils data obtained from the four
Blocks during the Phase I Environmental Assessments were compared
to Federal, State, and County Standards and were further
evaluated in terms of consistency between sample points and
-'
media; and
_
3
,
�
t
WHEREAS, during the Phase I Environmental Assessments, at
various monitoring wells on the four Blocks, exceedances of
standards were documented for ground water, some but not all of
which were confirmed by elevated levels in soils at the same
sample point; and
WHEREAS, elevated levels of contaminants were found in soil
composites from some of the locations within each of the four
Blocks and although there are no standards for these contaminants
in soils, it is reasonable to expect that these levels could be
causing ground water violations; and
WHEREAS, the presence of certain contaminants in the soil on
each'of the four Blocks may cause risks associated with exposure
to said soils on a short term basis by construction workers and
on a long term basis by residents of the developments; and
It f the dum in of industrial and
WHEREAS, as a resu o p g
sanitary wastes into an on -site soakage pit, excavation and
_
disposal of + 200 cubic yards of contaminated soil is required on
Block 24; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of the conclusions, recommendations
and certification provided to the City in accordance with their
agreement, ERM-South, Inc., has recommended a Phase II
Environmental Assessment; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 88-772, on September 8, 1988, the
City Manager was authorized to execute an amendment, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, to the agreement dated September
20, 1988, between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami, for
Phase II Environmental Assessments of the aforementioned four
Blocks, including additional professional services and initial
remedial action related to the contaminated material on Block 24;
and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 established $29,800 in fees for
said professional services, $18,000 for the excavation and,
�Y
removal of contaminated soil on Block 24 and a $2,200 contingency
fund for the project, totalling an amount not to exceed $50,000,
with $20,000 from 1976 Housing General Obligation Bonds Fund
'.
Interest previously allocated to the Southeast Overtown/Park West
-4-
WHEREAS, during the Phase I Environmental Assessments, at
various monitoring wells on the four Blocks, exceedances of
standards were documented for ground water, some but not all of
which were confirmed by elevated levels in soils at the same
sample point; and
WHEREAS, elevated levels of contaminants were found in soil
composites from some of the locations within each of the four
Blocks and although there are no standards for these contaminants
in soils, it is reasonable to expect that these levels could be
causing ground water violations; and
WHEREAS, the presence of certain contaminants in the soil on
each of the four Blocks may cause risks associated with exposure
to said soils on a short term basis by construction workers and
on a long term basis by residents of the developments; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the dumping of industrial and
sanitary wastes into an on -site soakage pit, excavation and
disposal of + 200 cubic yards of contaminated soil is required on
Block 24; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of the conclusions, recommendations
and certification provided to the City in accordance with their
agreement, ERM-South, Inc., has recommended a Phase II
Environmental,Assessment; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 88-772, on September 8, 1988, the
City Manager was authorized to execute an amendment, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, to the agreement dated September
20, 1988, between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami, for
Phase II Environmental Assessments of the aforementioned four
Blocks, including additional professional services and initial
remedial action related to the contaminated material on Block 24;
and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 established $29,800 in fees for
said professional services, $18,000 for the excavation and !
removal of contaminated soil on Block 24 and a $2,200 contingency f=
fund for the project, totalling an amount not to exceed $50,000,
with $20,000 from 1976 Housing General Obligation Bonds Fund
Interest previously allocated to the Southeast Overtown/Parr Test
-4-
Community Redevelopment Project CIP No. 322029 and $30,000 in
General Funds allocated in FY 87-88 to the Department of
Development Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the Phase II Environmental
Assessments, the Phase I Environmental Assessments complete with
the conclusions, recommendations and certification for each Block
were amended in accordance with the data and findings to indicate
the absence of ground water pollution and soil contamination on
Blocks 37, 46 and 55 at levels exceeding regulatory standards and
qualifications and/or at levels sufficient to pose an
unacceptable risk to the public health or the environment; and
WHEREAS, as a part of the Phase II Environmental
Assessments, work associated with the removal of the estimated
200 cubic yards (260 tons) of contaminated material on Block 24
began; and
WHEREAS, the actual remedial activities included the
excavation of 1,250 tons of soil and debris, 766 tons of which
were transported and disposed of at the South Dade Landfill
Facility; and
WHEREAS, closing of the excavated areas required the
placement of 1,068 tons of clean fill above and below 463 tons of
previously excavated material which did not require removal from
the site; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the aforementioned remedial activities
as well as additional professional and technical services totals
$52,155; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 authorized $18,000 for this work,
thereby leaving an unfunded balance in costs of $34,155.
WHEREAS, HUD Jacksonville, Florida has indicated that FHA,
as the insuring agent ,for the funding of the development of Block
24 will require documentation indicating that' the contaminated
material is appropriately removed in order to close on the
financing of this development; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City, as property
owner to more clearly establish the absence and/or presence of
any hazardous material or environmental concerns which may pose
-5 -
=t
r .
potential risks to the health, safety and welfare of those
involved in the development and habitation of those four Blocks
in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 88-772 on September 8, 1988, the City
Commission authorized the execution of an amendment in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, to the agreement dated September
20, 1988 and approved by Resolution 88-582, on June 23, 1988,
between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami, for the Phase I
Environmental Assessments of Blocks 24, 37, 46 and 55 of the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project Area
to include the additional professional services and initial
remedial action related to conducting the Phase II Environmental
Assessments of the aforementioned four Blocks; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-772 further authorized the
expenditure of $29,800 in fees for said professional services,
$18,000 for the excavation and removal of contaminated soil on
Block 24 and a $2,200 contingency fund for the project totalling
an amount not to exceed $50,000 with $20,000 from 1976 Housing
General Obligation Bonds Fund Interest previously allocated to
the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project
CIP No. 322029 and $30,000 in General Funds allocated in FY 87-88
to the Department of Development Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, a Resolution was adopted January 12, 1989 by the
City of Miami Commission which authorized the City Manager to
execute a second amendment to the agreement dated September 20,
1988 between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami for
professional services and additional remedial action related to
contaminated material on Block 24 of the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Community Redevelopment Area; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution adopted January �12,
1989, further
established $52,155 for
said professional services
and additional
remedial action from
1976 Housing G.O. Bond
Funds interest
previously allocated to
the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE TO AMEND THE AGREEMENT AS
FOLLOWS:
-6-
t3-g
SECTION 1. TEPX:
Amend the text as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from May 15, 1998to MY
31, 1989.
SECTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES:
Additional professional services and remedial actions
related to contaminated materials on Block 24 of the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project shall be added
herein for the CONSULTANT to perform and/or supervise and shall
include:
I. Outside Services
1. Samples to be analyzed by Savannah Labs during test
excavation.
2.
'Samples to be analyzed by Savannah Labs during
remediation.
3.
Final sample analyses by Clarke Engineers and
Scientist.
}
4.
Proctor Tests by P.S.I.
},
5.
_r
Dade County tipping fees for disposal of an
estimated 49 tons of construction debris.
I.I. Contractor
Services`
1.
Initial Test Excavation by Mantell Engineering.
2.
,j
Soak Pit/Catchment/Piping Excavation, Transport and
Disposal by MCO Construction.Y_-
3.
ERM-South Services
?
III. Other Services.
i
#
1.
Transport and stockpiling of clean crushed limerock
I
by MCO Construction in a volume sufficient to allow
for compaction (assume 822 cu. yds, or 1068 tons).
=2.
Backfilling and compaction by MCO Construction to
I
Modified Proctor.
l
3.
ERM-South's Services (supervise backfiling and
compaction -- estimated @ 4 days).
's
.4.
Soil Compaction Testing (assume PSI technician for
2 days @ $24/hr).
4 Z7
-SECTION
III. COMPENSATION: '
! t,
`'�
A. The
CITY shall a the CONSULTANT, an amount not tQ,_,` r'r
pay
exceed, $52,155
as compensation for the additional se�rvicea,,
P
t
'•`, YC +. ^ 3. Z a.. i
:. t % �'-1Y�f� a��. / � � Sfhle
T
;t r
fi
required, pursuant to Section II herein, as follows:
9. Compensation shall be made in proportion to the services
performed based on invoices submitted by the CONSULTANT and
approved by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall invoice the CITY on
i
a monthly basis.
y
C. The CITY shall have the right to review and audit the
r:
: time records and related records of CONSULTANT pertaining to any
payments by the CITY.
't
It is further understood that all conditions outlined under
the original agreement dated September 20, 1988, and Amendment I
shall remain in full force and effect as modified herein.
'IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed by their respective officials thereunto
duly authorized this day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
MATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
ATTEST:
WITNESSES:
As to CONSULTANT
(Note: If CONSULTANT is not a t
Corporation, two
witnesses must sign.) ; .,��,.,V,
,
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE
APPROVED AS TO
FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
ae �;
+ M
ti
5 i
< i s
JORGE
�f
L. FERNANDEZ
City Attorney
SQ
Nk _
t ► c� rton
WHEREAS, ERM-South, Inc., desires to enter into Amendment
Y
i
`.f
k�
r�
to an Agreement dated September 20, 1988 with the City of Miami;
and
S
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors at a duly held corporate
meeting has considered the manner in accordance with the By-laws
of the corporation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
that the Principal and Secretary are hereby authorized and
instructed to enter into a
contract in
the name and on
behalf of
this corporation with the
City of Miami
upon the terms
contained
in the proposed Amendment II to which this resolution is
attached. -
Dated this day of 1989.
CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SECRETARY (seal) t -�
Y 7 +< M1k 1
n e f
'ar'a,
i w � si ' ] ,.. z t :att% t � a� � yp �y y. '_ � ,p }(g f s c� f � g k h�`�f Yt •�
s e P Sts ,J�-F+.- .4 z# 3 3' �Y, ,k;r'++hY -Tt '1 t ? ,f-1 �?� • 6 5F4�t
1 . S a i?i r f � t .:�� ` �y,# z. rd S t i� � c .t .� fi ` ✓r f*F1 .. �� ���! n �' } � yr I��� 1 ��r �� ,�
w c �•. .�* �* l r .+ �t f�S.w ,'4 �.� 3� .. y 4r t �, " s a. � r,.ni2 .`tsa -
r j4 ayAF�t � 3
{ - ++,,yy 'k1 t� "��s f �i� 1,;r, M • �r�y. 45 y'�.F�? 3�j"``
Wa
f
ff
,�p.y+p i r
—
�
A
of the city commission
FROM Cesar H. Odio
Environmental Assessments
SU5JL=: phase II: S.E. Overtown/
Park West
itartRamets: For City Commission Mtg.
City Manager Agenda 1/12/89
tNCLosuRts: Resolution, Letters
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the
attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute <an
Amendment, in substantially the form attached, to the Agreement. date
September 20th, 1988 between ERM-South, Inc., and the City of Miami,
for professional services and additional remedial action related to
contaminated material on Block 24 of the Southeast Overtown/Park".West
Community Redevelopment Area; establishing $34,155- for said.
professional services and additional remedial action; : using funds"
therefor in amount not to exceed $34,155 from 1976 Housing G.O. Bond
Funds Interest previously allocated to the Project.
BACKGROUND: _
The, Department of Development recommends the execution of an
Amendment, in substantially the form attached, to the Agreement dated•'
September 20th, 1988 between ERM-South, Inc., and the City, of Miami,
for professional services and additional remedial action related to.
contaminated material on Block 24 of the Southeast Overtown/Park :West;,
r-
Community Redevelopment Area; establishing $34,155 for said,
professional services and additional remedial action; using fttrids
therefor in amount not to exceed $34,155 from 1976 Housing G.O. Bond
` Funds Interest previously allocated to the Project,_
By Resolution 88-582, on June 23, 1988, the. City Manager�tsiw A;
' authorized to execute an agreement with ERM-South Inc.,(EIiM� for Phm�1+s
' I Environmental Assessments of the four phase I Development,:Bce
-24, 37, 46 and 55, of , the Southeast Ovextown/Park Weet Cmm#�i ; ti
Redevelopment Area. Thee Assessments are required for .the ldev�elp,s f;
ao obtain financing. Based on initial findings of F9t+sx�
euce+edances of Federal, State and County standards• and g0idel=ins ► r
ground water and soil, additional testing and related activ3tie9 W�<
tj""
required. - On September 8, 1988 by Resolution 88-772, the'.+C�lty M�n!,
was authorized to execute an amendment to the Agreement �tith;� 4►}
Carry out Phase II Environmental Assessments• r' 4
Ny niial SY4rr .N�� ,,,�� s
s :: ;� t � �arr9x FaS �rrr'.7y�h ut ,y'F 't <�, �{' '� '• S � r"� _
f s
—
}}}k!•rx(i� y kr{E ,yy. , �� } �d! •• ��� �� � I�-=
i'7 i {t t:.
Y
V . 4 k
r
{'
Y
y 'l
Honorable..Mayor and Members-
of the,,City, Commission -
Page,-2
on July 26, 1988 and October 11, 1988, in accordance with their
agreement, ERM-South, Inc., completed Phases I and II respectively of
these extensive, comprehensive Environmental Assessments. The
F. results established that there were no exceedances of Federal, State
and County standards for ground water or soils on Blocks 37, 46=and,
55.
"+ on Block 24, however, soils contaminated with septic and vehicle,,
maintenance waste were found associated with an on -situ
underground soakage pit. This contaminated material had to be
removed and disposed of and then replaced with clean fill in `
accordance -with Federal, State and County; regulations. and-
guidelines.: `.
administered by Dade County Department of Environmental Resources
.. Management, (DERM).
R Based on the original building permit drawings and all other available
' documentation on the underground soakage pit, the material requiring
removal and replacement was estimated to be 260 tons. On the basis oftj
that: volume, :the cost of - this, initial., remedial activity,:...-,generaliy�
including excavation, testing, transportation,..,disposal and ;fi
backfilling of the excavated areas was -estimated. at $18,000. Funding s
to cover this cost was included in the authorization for the Phase II
Environmental Assessment.
As the excavation and testing of the soils adjacent to the source of,: a=
pollution progressed, it became apparent that the area impacted by the,,
soakage -pit was far more extensive than indicated on the available
documentation. In total over 1,250 tons of soil and debris, were
excavated, in stages that provided for ongoing sampling, testing -.,and
analysis to ensure that the remaining soils did not exceed DERM's
# standards and guidelines for soil contaminated with oil and grease,
the indicator pollutant stipulated by DERM.
As a result of negotiations with DERM, only. 766 tons of impacted 3n�
material had to be transported to the South Dade Landfill Facility,-
r
In an effort to assist the City in reducing the. cost
i operation, Dade County waived approximately $20,680 in.;dumping iees
t
($27/ton) and may only be charging the City for the dispcsa..: Oft
construction material associated. with the soakage pit, •�estimat ',
be ' $i, 325) . The total cost of this excavation. tran$pQrtat , 00 s,a t _
r A disposal;. sampling, testing and analysis and :.r.ated pxoas;O'
ic'is $3$, 713.`�
r (�
f
t
� �.r � - � r-. i .w�.� �� x �; xz'�.�' 4 ,(� mot`". r "- r t i•.,t„�-
KKR;
t±1t y
w 1wZ
-
r
buy" s3 Ate' t$ r z'
t t fj S Y
S t' i
t
r4
Hnnorablm Mayor an mis ri r ,
.,,City Commi`bstot�
Page 3 r
Closing of the excavated areas will require the placement of .
approximately 1,068 tons of clean fill, above and below the 463 tons'
of previously excavated material which did not require removal from
the site., The cost of this operation, (backfilling, compaction and
related activities), is estimated at $18,442.
In summary, the cost of the remedial activity and related work equals.
$34 T55. Subtracting the $188000 that has already been authorized for
this activity, the remaining cost totals $34,155.
Theproposed amendment to the City's agreement with ERM-South Inc.,
covers all of the work associated with the remedial action which has
been done by various subcontractors. Also included are the related
additional professional services, as well as coordination with. DERNY'
and other agencies, the developer's engineers, testing labs_;,and`the
> r
,. ,;..'.. various" contractors. h
j
F-unding•`'to cover the total cost of $34,155 is available from the .1976
Housing General"Obligation Bonds"Fund Interest previously allocated to
the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project.
y }
A
It is therefor recommended that is item be placed on"the Agenda of
the January 12, 1989 City'Commission`Meeting
_
Attachments: r
Proposed Resolution
_ :1, 6 t�.t+. SM>GfYy''i1}'.y 7y` 4
Documentation of costs a t "��� _
tt t HJB mim 1 a'' ��+ ai e`s' 3n.
W
.r •. °'` '} { �- iacl'I.'k;ty.•gA `w�r�§NW ..
F75 F es ; 't
ss,.
i - .` >t .. .. -`-, ..• u- ,_ ,z,'t'i_F r ., ..'{`:?.5�.; 4-'F;'.,, ".`.;",_.``a=..�1,++,,,.`afi','� -.-
IwWl I U 46 %% W %.--
la. Transport and stockpiling of clean crushed•._:
limerock by MCO Construction "in a volume =N
sufficient to fill the remediation excavation
(no compaction; assume 613 cu. yds.
t or 797 tons)
$ 6,376.00
Transport and stockpiling of clean crushed
�YEYx{ limerockby MCO Construction in a volume
sufficient to allow for compaction (assume
822 cu. yds, or 1068 tons) $ 8,544.00
2a. Backfilling and compaction by MCO Construction
'� to 95@ Modified Proctor $ 5,50000
or,
2b. Backfilling and compaction by`C4 Construction
M
to 98% Modified Proctor $ 7,60000
36 ERM-South's Services (supervise backfilling
--days) and compaction estimated @ 4 1,648, ,
4..' Soil Compaction Testing (assume PSI technician
for 2 days @ $24/hr) S 390.00�
f
w -
✓ Total Expenditures to Date to be billed through
ERM28
�-South $, 02
Total Expenditures to date for Outside Services to be4
billed directly to the City @�660;gt
` z o al Pro a
t cted- Additional Expenditures,'. assuming:
r
;1 J M�Q supp�.ying clean fill: only yam}
y `7 St 't om} r' inclua ,nq • 4 - bra.., for -:IRK)
y j� .
-
»i tYa7,s:� .'h.d 4sr�.x. .�--Sr.;,£ , •'. .., ,_... .. ,'' _ :_ ,.r' .. .r.,.. ....<t r �. f�u���'��'+ki,�:.�'��..
a
-47
fA
.. Ah
r a 'a-
e`4
i?4i y .
f f '4p
a
r `` r" �k-r 3 Ctw.,i ik $�eix�# Yt6�-,s
R
t ` 1�Fas�� 3' .y +i ��'•7 6. 's"�v i 5 �� � � t `'�t7 'j.'1-` � y.
5 V SPo J �.t "xy
c ? £ t x t
a�CO supplying clean fill sufficient
�..,:c� compact (incl. 4 hrs for 8RM) $ a,60.t�O
:NCO backfilling & compacting
a) to 95% (incl. ERM, PSI) $ 70638.00
b) to 98% (incl. ERM, PSI) $ 9,,638.00
oar bound estimated probable cost for completion
tbackfillinq and compaction) $18,442 00
Upper bound estimated probable cost for remediation$52,154.7ZY
t,
If youiaye any questions, please contact me at 591-3076.1.�g�F
Respe fully
? �{''�3�+ •'� +ice `#
2 r D ` J" ♦ - �x7, F I £' Y� ' ' ail,} r ¢ �x C" �j ,�.1'S�•r ���3k* �,�.e
Steven C. Hess, h;.
Seniot Sc ends y r
At10
: 1.. Estimated Disposal Cosh for .Soak Pit Debri a t'i
.j
2 . Disposal Summary n�{ .
Copy
of MCO construCtiori "` irivoicm foxy
Excavation and Disposal14
$ - Xl Y / 4 �2��: •F
# s r a s r
44
FFI. I
k.. _ .. , - . -.�.. ,._. ....._ � __''� .a _ , ._.<' .. w . p . ,. -,. <,;, ....._ ...� .., # it �.-..:�'^ .: >.-�.• .,°�'-;a.�� r-. 5.. , .aihi�'1`?! .a
7,
MCC Construction, Inc.
7455 W. FIAGLER S 1 MET
SUITE 7
M1AN, FLORIDA 33144
(305) 264.6260
REQUISITION NO. 1
b
r�
OTY. UNIT COST
TOTAL
I
1'. Excavation to approx. 18' BGS
484 Gu.Yd.
$3.25
$ 1,573.00
MCO piles No.2,3,8 & 9
'
2. Excavation to approx. 6' BGS
MCO Piles No.1,6,7,A1,A2,A3
329 Cu.Yd.
$2.93
$ 963.97
& A4
2a.Job site loading & hauling of
'
contaminated soil.
15b Cu.Yd.
52.00
$ 312.00
�,..
MCO Pile No. 4
�
2b.Job site scrubbing, clearing
N.C.
preparation & berming
2
2c:Mobilization & de -mobilization
N."C....
_.3 times at $800 per = $2, 400
3. Optional secondary removal to
N/A
N/A
;..,
20 Ft. `BGS
N/A
4. Loading and transport to
613 Cu.Yd.
$4.75
$ 2,911.75"
S`Dade Landfill
44.tthorized Overtime Work Sat.
12/17/88
x
i) Drivers: 6 x 8.5hrs. x
$ 6/hr. _
$306.00
.;
ii) Operator: 1 x 8.5hrs. x
$10/hr. =
$ 85.00
y
�i.
ii) Supervisor: 1 x 8.5hrs. x
$21.25/hr.=
$180.63
,
iv) Proj. Mgr.. 1 x 8.5hrs. x
$30/hr. =
N.C.
N.C.
v°
S
1)' Principal 1 x 3hrs. x
$75/hr. =
f °..
vi) Trucks 6 x 8.5hrs. x
$35/hr. =
N.C.
J�((
t
#
~'vii) Loader 1 x 8.5hrs x
$50/hr. =
N.C.
i w Ssvl+d
TOTAL AUTHORIZED O.T. WORK
✓ '
f
1 YyCtilc,' r:':
E
_
t
5. Disposal of soil and debris
$ 49
$30 03T.OQ }< 2
at S. Dade Landfill
613 Cu.Yd.
�r
5a . CREDIT
Disposal Fee
Solid Was,
766 Tons
$27
y" ` Y
a
TOTAL AMOUNT DUB THIS REQUISITION
$15,86
��'
Rf**+k��A�rA*ARtRRAtt1MA�1Rfi�AAA��RAR�r�*1R�At�R
� (f�JiF�
y
EE�
.,
n nF3 f yid
�Xi .:
; E
��"FS.Y. �'
s, -
j ) i L'Sj'J � •,'t`Krc
C, #
.. 1 1.l Af..'.
Lr.,?44 '�.T, i.f ^-•, ,:. ., l" t .. '- J:�, 4_
s}.i rFJ aP�
�'c ati z-�razra4"'�``fyS 4 �, .. ��.t���-��.
-1�1 ... rs.�ts..,s�-
'.h
at
H
ff ,
�ty
Y+�` ' =` - r�r+ m+ 'bb'Yf^ vc fir' t
,
$STIMATED DISPOSAL --------------
COST 't
PIT DEBRIS e,
P De: Estimated 90 ' linear feet at 10 lbs/ft. *�
'900 lbs 0.45 tons.
2. catchment: 1 each, approximately 5' high, 4' wide with'
.2.5' wide interior. .
Volume a exterior volume less interior space
}+•; ''n _ C (3.14) (2) 2 (5) ]-I (3.14) (1.25) 2 (5) ]
- 62.8 cu.ft. 24.54 cu.ft. 38.26 cu.ft.
1.42 cu. yds.1
assume 2 tons cu. yd.�,„s
= 1.42 cu.yds. X 2 tons/cu.yd. = 2.84 tons r j �'•tix'
.Soak:. Pit Walls: ,CBS walls, 8" wide, 40, ft. long, ;7
h
high, 4.6 ft. wide.gp
Volume = [2(401)(71)(.6 67') ]+[2 (4.6') (7') (.667'
374 cu.ft. + 43 cu.ft. sY��
p 417 cu.ft./27 cu.ft./cu.yd.
z = 15.44 cu.yds.
M'
�r assume 2 tons/cu.yd.
7,r _ (15.44 cu.yds.) (2 tons/cu.yd.)
= 30.89 tons.
k-
4xQ;; Phi Footers: Assume 18" X 18" X 40 ft. long
F , wide.
ri "
r l ( ) ( ) ( ) ] [ ( ) ( 0 ) (4.66
Volume = 2 1.5' 1.5' 40' + 2 1.5' 1. '')
s a9 s = 180 cu.ft. + 21 cu.ft. ( w
4 y
201 cu. ft./27 cu. ft./cu.yd.
7.45 cu.yds.,d,
s
O „ f assume 2 tons/cu. yd.R
, 7.45 cu.yds. (2 tons/cu.yd.)
14.90 tons
vy t1{t ". 40 F 1 - - r,✓st y a 1�wq. 4x.3 v,5e
�-2.�vt.°ffi J %F �. .. 1 �.J`Y
TAI,►S Item -1: 0.45 tons
f Item 2: 2.04 R4 tO.f�s .
44Fn'r s
g ♦Iitemp� 3 : 30.89 tons
•�� t v 4Y$�C}. girt Item 4: 11.9�8:
,49.08 tons,r1
t!i$pQ9341 Fee. _ $27.00/t6n.
osai Fee
(49,08 to ($2,00to}1Y°<
Y
Fa
-
i
t
}