The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-89-0267Fti Cf/ � J13S-�25E 89-26 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION URGING METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY TO TAKE STEPS WHICH WILL RESULT IN THE INSTALLATION OF STATIONARY STOP SIGNS, "CHILDREN AT PLAY" SIGNS, "20 MPH" SPEED LIMIT 'nr SIGNS AND "NO THRU TRUCKS" SIGNS ALONG KUMQUAT t AVENUE AND LOQUAT AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTHWEST 37TH AND 42ND AVENUES IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA; FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE _ HEREIN NAMED OFFICIALS. WHEREAS, at the March 3, 1989 Miami City Commission meeting, a group of citizens, concerned about undesirable traffic Intrusion Into their neighborhood, requested that vehicular access to Kumquat Avenue and Loquat Avenue be restricted at the westerly side of their intersection with Southwest 37th Avenue; and WHEREAS, at said meeting, the City Commission found that traffic control measures other than the restriction of vehicular = access could be Implemented to control undesirable traffic ' intrusion on Kumquat Avenue and Loquat Avenue between Southwest + - 37th,and 42nd Avenues;' = NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAM1, FLORIDA: Section 1'. The recitals and findings contained in the = �I Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference hereto and. Incorporated herein as If fully set forth In this = IIIIe { section. Section 2. Metropolitan Dade County Is hereby urged to take steps which will result In the Installation of "CHILDREN AT PLAY" = signs, "NO THRU TRUCKS" signs and 020 MPH" speed Limit signs ; h along Kumquat. Avenue and Loquat Avenue between Southwest 37th and ,42nd Avenues and stationary 03-way" stop signs' 4fi the: ` Intersections. of Kumquat Avenue and L 1 nden 'Lang, Kumquat Aven�le: Y; i tY: _ -and Pomona Lane, Loquat Avenue and L I nden Lane, Loquri: AyenuQ: ans ' Pomona Lane, Loquat Avenue and Solana Road, Loquat Anion tlnq 34; a .Justl sonRoad and Loquat Avenue and Frantz Romd I n, M1aml Florida. , �A 'tO r _ - Ell r� k CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM r ROP herAN nADE cio TY, FLORIDA " RECCIVI. METRO-OADE CENTER OFFICE OF COUN" MANA60 t� A TTt,. dune 8 , 1989 sutt�t0 I �1h ! 1 1 III NA ot $tREEt MIAMI, FLORIDA 3311W19 � CITY CL' OW CiT^r OF- PIr:. Ms. Matty Hirai City Clerk 3500 Pan American Drive P.O. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Re: LoquatAvenue between Douglas Road and We ine Road and Kumquat Avenue between +: Douglas and Solana Roads - SRF No. 40982 Hirai: Dear Ms. requesting{; — all -way This is in response to your City Resolutions limit26signs at the above stop NO THRU TRUCKS, and 20 NPH speed , corridors. is An ednation of the traffic conditions and physical characteristics of these corridors was made by the Public Works Department to determine the Their evaluation of the traffic engineering need for ail -way stop sue• operational data revealed that the vehicular volume and other intersecting street along these corridors fall= 1 characteristics required criteria set by the Public Works Departmmt - i y1 short of meetf ng for all -may stop installation. t t for s limits, Dade County Code. 2h With reference_ to .your, reques Peed 7hegeometx3c 4{� §30=299 provides for a residential speed limit of 30 NFH: conditions of these roadways require speed reductions only through ;f Y stave° in Kumquat Avenue approaching Solana Road and on Loquat `Avenue T - s s at Solana Road. The p speed: for the upon approaching bP liadt sins are { x remainder of the sub j ect corridor is 30 M. Sp�e therefore not required. _ L The Public Works Department will install Stop signs on Solana Road._ t Avenue at Solana Road, a turn warning f at Loquat Avenue and on Ktanqua t Avenue 1 sign with a 15 MPH advisory speed limit plate on Ktsa Rid and NO THRU TRUCKS signs on Loquat Avenue at. . t Avenue at Douglas Road• i LeJevne Road and Douglas Road and an Ktmqua This work will be accomplished within 30 days.* While we regret we cannot comply with request, we are pleased toy' have been able to look Into this matter for you.° Sincerely, r? t h r F G• Avino, P.R• , - county Manager. cc: Waltex'A. Hercicbn P.E. t� � Director, Public 'Works. Departmen 'f°r - = - 'fj ti Y t Fc M �1 Yt L r ,., *d5 . � a i 3 i. t.-Y're q°-c�''y�-sit i <* r � �, . t1 •� 1 i . �miyKn' .rl � f S.dirvP±e�d+w4� ` _ � �. j March 28' 1989 Mr. Joaquin Avino _ County Manager Metro -Dade Center ill N.W. 1st Street - Miami; FL 33128-1974 Dear Mr. Avinoz d.>; Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 89-267 which was passed.. and adopted } by the, City of Miami Coimnission at meeting held on March 3; 1989; and which is self-expianatory,< On behalf of the City"of Miami; thank you for your attention_.:' v truly yours; _ _. atty Hirai City Clerk MH z vg '. Enc . a/s ,7 5.+ 99FF i � r le j - OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/C(Ry flail Pan AMWICAr► Drives�/P,0.8ox 3�woe/Miami, Flotid� 3�23 =1 =i TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the C1ty Commission ti FROM Cesar H Odlo Ci ty'Manager RECOMMENDATION: It Is -respectfully recommended that the City Commission NOT; adopt the _'attached Resolution author IzIng the temporary restrlct;Con of vehicular access .to.Kumquat and Loquat."Avenues at"..the wester ly sl,de"of their Intersection with Douglas Road .(S W. 37 Avenue)',. N if temporary street closures are author fzed ,., by ,,' the C Lty t { Coission. a method of financing. their Impl mmementation must tie ri determined. BACKGROUND: 7 At,the, January 12.- 1989 City Commission: meet ing.."ir group of c.i t izens, expressed concern, to the .`_"C l ty Comm l "sz Ion about ;.the f R ntrusIon oundesl'rable traf.fic.Into their neighborhood" Ttie M citizens requested that the Commission consider -the restriction of vehicular traffic on Kumquat and. Loquat Avenues at th;e westerly side of their Intersection, with Douglas Road (S.W. 37 Avenue) on a trial basis. Ti The; closure of these streets will create "dead-end" streets without adequate width'for trucks or emergency. vehicles to, turn around. Additionally, the next avaliabie thru, treat tha# serves is neighborhood,. i s located; two . "b I cacKs .;south of the proposbl r,< .s#reet'. closures. Due to the adVerse effec onMcA"�enoy Vshlo#fie response;..t"Nano. "ths severe .impact: `on":Iraff;lc c;lrcy,latiQn att� h •dead-end•" streets created by `the- closure,,, the `Po1 Ice Ctepartnlen*`��`J> Fire. Roscue and Inspection . Ser.v 1 cos Qopar, #merit Metrt�'o'l ff , 1?a4de County`" Rua 1 i c IMorKs .'Department and the ! *y p 1.> w, ; f. .. Works;: Deoar Nil V; STRONGLY, RECOLOWND_1 AGA1 NST.:.Amt .vehf 4 d!':`t,'e�e9s Ilk y.' Honorable Mayor and Members of the'. C I ty, cam l as !_ on ; As'', the, City 'CommIasIon noted at Its meeting of May•.28, 1888, the .�3 CIty,of MIam1.,has no more funds available: for neI8hborhood`,.street �kf closures. , if the ne Uohborhood and C Ity Comm I as I on des 1 re . to �, Implement ,the street closures, a method of financing they s const Ou' ct' l on and.'maintenance of the temporary barricades must be On February 20,• -1888, the Public Works- Department mailed i et4ters :to;each resldent•within a 1000 foot radius of the proposed. street "c I'psures 41ot l fy i np therti. ,of::the March 3 1888 public ,hear i nysa:r 4V ' - •..0 r 4�Fi � V 7, ' "�;; ��J 3hSa'4`4�a4 ,� .. {4r .: w—, r Yr 1 ..-..4 a _ ..x.i f ^f' <?ea "sad• •F s .� 5 t H. ajx +'"v r � "' 7TT: • S } � � t T '.rid x�{. ,; d4� + f. }iy4 Y } 1s`�h2 i RNr �• A7�' .. - } L�� Y S �k� 1� Y k`w Ti 3i �+ �.j. 1 S y tj 3 12 � _ �' I ,} J < _ s`�jt L•{'"+4 ,f a Y t a44 1" s, �c 1L " r ,� ni r J '•� t n,•.t, a?.%' 3 '!at31�,iE�^,.•7:, _ _ aid �' '4 t i e a r x r r•• c ,y iLL"+ ix 4. �q. �,�i -Y�k i r c - 9 .:x^-r u"r• r � . .�, x:... ... .. r ,; �> `u . ; , .. . .. t:i:'. �' ...,'3`ir.T^ ..+af"�:�azl�f.'�i�r:JJL�fY • . . 1 �s1 u�r Ilia II III Jill iIIIi IIIIIIII�II��iilAii�II�JIP�I��tO1 7 1 1111 1l11l11l1111t11t1llllilil ttlititlllt�ago IIVIIn I wrlm— I t a -- " I�i�ilttitlilllllliliil� � � ' � 1�IIIti�!lIf�9I1tt1tit�� } Donald Cather, Director December 12, 1988 - .,Public Wo DATE: nM SUBJECT: Proposed "Street C1 os'ures J. Lutes, Fire Marshal Chtaf ' Fir.e '�,Preventi on Bureau ,NCti REFERENCES: x ,` y €( ('� 1�7✓H t I ENCLOSURES: ' This memo is in response to your memo dated 12/8/88. Ih the interest of, .pu-blic .safety, we do %not recommend the bloc1cing of Kumquat .aind'.Lo ""4uat, Aven.ues.. s; You�will note by the map -that -the blocking of these streets at 37 Avenue _crates a' very. ,lengthy. dead -:end ""probl mo Th`i s would J save no Access, ,into ;this:;;. area .from 37 ,Avenue°n which rre feed is very ' important fr.-om - an . ,emergency response . view :point. "''` jY r `EJL: bf cc:;: Chief Duke Chief'Crossman Lt. Rhodes vi NO ®.y 1 xF:F i t 4 & s ue 7 + i ZT, ��`�i��.�a r{ss1 t 7 a a r �2T^ 4 �i �e'L'i',l+i f. ' ° "a 1 _ r > r • yl ror Sf`. .� r CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM gg 29 PILE DATE To .. Donald W. cathe>r Director of Public Works sueaECT : proposed Traffic. Restrictions to Ku>pquat _ and Loquat at Douglas t otY � � �a � � � +- '� '. 1 �-'�t �t � T r '� 1" �v�a. r•..m va +.�wE.. y.. �,r �s.. �.. . .. -::. . � . �'. 116. M&Jor Raul Martinez Commander Field Suppo ,At se t ion ru C ew It FROM cits Vern 8 xander Supervisor Enforcement Detail I CITY OF MIAMI, FLOR10A ..' 11 ` �^ INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM"I ?C�" ENCLOSURES: There was a Complaint called in by Ms. Regas on November 8,, 1988 reference speeders. The complaint was written up and placed on the complaint board. On November 14,1988 this area was checked by Officers Garriga and D'Amico. The officers observed the area from 1700 hours to 1800 hours and issued only two (2) summonses. On December 7. 1988 this area was checked by Officers Ina6tilla and Williams.> The officers observed the area from 0700 hours to 0900 hours and issued nine.(9) summonses. on December 8, 1988thisarea was checked by Officer Williams. The officer observed the area from 0725 hours to 0915 hours and_ issued four .(4).summonses. This area has been a c.onstant.complaint and has been constantly:� ,checked by officers that work the area. VA:ow(6636) 1,4 Submitted filto the Mi. pubji', recordin 'COnneciioil iteln OZI Ratty riiiai City cle"k OITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA s INTER-OFFIVE MEMOAANbUM .:' .a Captain Peter Xamenesh March 2, 1989 9911 3 r, TO DATE FILE Commander �~ Traffic Section SUBJECT Traffic Complaint in the area (Thru Channels) of Loquat and Komquat } FROM: Sgt. Raymond Martinez REFERENCES: 5 Supervisor Enforcement Detail ENCLOSURES: Since September 1, 1988, the following various calls for service have been received on Loquat Avenue: Call For Service No Report 20 Report.Made l Accidents 1 Parking or Traffic Complaint 2 r Stolen Tag 2 Stolen Auto 1 False Alarms 20 Burglaries S Larcenies 11 Assualts Disturbances 5 Suspicious Vehicles 1- Suspicious Persons 19 The following calls for service have been received on Romquat Avenue: , Calls For Service No Report 12 Accidents 2 Parking or Traffic Complaint 2 Stolen Tag 2 False Alarms 43 Burglaries 5 2 , Larcenies Assualts... Disturbances 4 Suspicious.Vehicle 1 Suspicious Person 4 " Robbery 1 � _ Shots Fired in Area 1- RM:ow(6636) Submitted, into the. public record in connection with 1 item? 3 on -:► "$ . -�..�. 89_267 ivlatty 11i Cite l f W U R N J i J E� Wz �7 �7 s ' % fitted into the y .. iecotd in connection item �.� on J� Mat TO CITY COMMISSIONSRSt CITY OF MIANI City Clerk f ±6 We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opponed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between bft9lae and LeJeune toads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance south, of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel.between n those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast6 ftiting our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas a and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. t. We do not believe that it is 'fair for some residential streets to be closed off from `r traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat'and Kumquat are approved,.you,may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is 'a price we:pay.for living JA.a residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the Bap, and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity, as.a. place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic probleA►6i. of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat acid' - Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road:: ',a= NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE 'NUMBER'$ - _�i�te cf 1 ✓,2 , - - --------- - ___----3_Cla 3y _ _ _ _ _. ----------------------------------------------------------------___----_ —''t f '=�x+eti��m.� ?. .a •+nsc•'.�;.••.i � fi:w,if � �`� �yn�.n�, p , stlm t �Fy m•n*.-y x. w aretiw•R... S � Vfi b.�.`«r,. Y4,�.aY�^�+.y '7iY-4- �.,.+:J� '��^„}p -�� ..Yv ��. t yr ' ��rX §` , t } w.r^•.K �'{� ,Y {`i'r !-rt AA 4., t}>t+Yax+3 "r r F Rah r z { XY�}'tk _;. ,7,._ _�r .i_�. _., .,�_� ._l �ha•'SF##'-- .:-�.sa.��"�i�ai�'X'1�+�3:r�.z� ;:,".c.tiu"�x�.��`.X��n'T! �.�7 y'�`�'2�Y:` �'t�'�� 7 '' � r W t public record in connection with item '% on PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAMt Matty Hirai City 'Clerk yl We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and Le3sune Roads., Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance south of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. 8xiting our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and ?` pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic '^ levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and Leieune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another.similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off from traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in A residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the -Hay, - and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity as a place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic problems of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road,. NAM STREET ADDRESS /PHONE NUMBER ZriI�Q_5r�t�w1--V�'_�..C_rV 7 LP VA _ S -7ggZ ---- ------ ------------ -�i� 3_ �„r�� - -- ----- -- -- ---- �1�-- --- ---- - - --- --- - --- - -- ------ - - - .--� _ rz J r _ g . Mrt}ra, ia'E aY} �1 n Al c�i rs .:- 4 ��'ia:,•�h� -x�{t �';§; v n.+is�e:�u�Y.3_, .x .� �-ISa}w"S:fk:&� - _.-_-- .,.,...... ..,x.9^wa .. ._-:, sear-mzc ��+.�'�A'.W!` •-.;.lactic e� _ .-•:.a.'1 ,+�n+rr«•- �, T..py rhs fan 's.r•. •;•_-t--�'�� 'S' y �t J jw Yon N11 San— r s i.A�'..�+S'TiEYT x�� i 4 j5 �y5-ja j{ F p / ; } "� b ..�D+t°bl •f _ �.'.4 Y �NM yr i -' •>'� ' is '� ♦L �` tU fSAa h`4 b'#r�� '� �'. oil �. � �•., j vSr : `R�r t � X 3 � �j s4 Y w _.. � ,�un�Fi + � �•� '.. t i'� c' 2`4t�� e C �� 'K�*'- ' _ x E' �"t � r k; � �eynn. � � �.. � rgx J �,•y4� a/ "' F �s1si We the Undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and LWeune Roads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance South of tooqu*at and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exitin our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and g pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result* in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune6 The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in question. The resulting impact Crawford on would be horrendous: traffic levels of.-.,', double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed , into the rush hour -periods. Wedo not believe that it is fair for some residential'streets ,from � to be closed off traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if!barricadgis on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We -realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living.a .in area rea so closejM to the many attractions of the Village Center; 'the Bay, and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the G ty place to ii rove's populari j`-`7Y live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic- blems of our neighborhood, and we pro urge you to deny the request to close off Loqua'�;-' 'and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road. NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER. - ---- ---- - --- -- - - - - - - - 1- - 2- A-1-11t ------ --- "Ye I CAA ------- --------- -- -------- 771 - - -------- --- - ---------- - ---------- - ----------------44( - P ------- X- V 7-7 C--� 897267 7 t T - V y , -. ql� 4, 9 Natty ItUrca City Clerk 06We the the undersigned, residents of Crawford A enue Ain Coconut Grove, are opposed tb the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and LeJeune Roads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance south of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between k+ those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exiting our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and g a� pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another. similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in #,f question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. , We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off from traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in a residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the Hay, _ and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity as;.a } place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic problems of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road. ;*r .t yes. NAM STREET ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER - -----;--------------- - -- - - -- - { _ _ r - -- -- - _Jff 2�� -�''— ---- — 3 �s� --�r — --'= ---- ----- — • --- - --- { i ofq a 89-267rs .r. � �, �, t ' .� i �r�.{ wry Wa • r% a< r ic, gis ✓N�_ �Y #rte public record in connection with item on PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAMIliCll city clerk tr; f51 We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between'tywglae'_ And Leieune Roads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance.00tth of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travail between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exiting r our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result''�— in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another. similar route. Crawford Avenue will be'the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off::from_ traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for liviag'ina , residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village. Center,<.the�Bay, ,} and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity as,a _ place -to live. Barricades are'not an appropriate solution to the traffic,.prob3ems >' -F' of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close tiff I,oquat and �r Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections: with Douglas= -.Road.' #: #} NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE:NUMBER"X_ ely Caw-/c? � X(- - i --- ------ ----- 3 -- I-)- y _ (157 - r y =_-------J--- 7 ---- ------ 89-267 r 4< .. x ' 7 s b � 94 h�"r �; to f�a..� f� ,� _ .✓ 3 � s� .:s 3t R�ri�ri�i S# t..� I ALI- record in Conn F item_ . PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAMI ,z Natty Hirai 6119 00 City clerk, - We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenuee ni Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/'or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and LeJeune Roads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance south of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exiting our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result - in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another. similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in ;E question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off frost `. traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on tkxr"t and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of _ Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in a residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the Bay, ; and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity as a., place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic problems , of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat.and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road.: ADDRESS PHONE NMIM NAMEta /o _ a.-, IUD- 30_ �race Grvv��T`000 {� _ 2,•t F '�11?'' ii= ��(�/rr// �.Zw:.`fai��NfX (///-/4�1P. (/�� (J`{/� _ �< ,. ' /It _______ �Q l —____________ = . eo --- -- --Z -_D 5-_ .�7� D _ _ �------------ Z r C�- ,y�--------- G4----------- yy3 _3a 897267 h. R�'�t"$,..i'�+rw�i r n1 r vinito the P n.�. record in connection with item on-1 ' + PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAMI Math ltti >� t + City Clem r We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat an /or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and Weune Roads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and Lejeune a short distance south of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exiting F- our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children andK r :y pedestrians of all ages are endangered by the speed and volume of present traffic, levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily result in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in f question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of - double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off from. rA; traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in a residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the Hay,. and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Groves popularity as a place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic problems of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas Road.'` NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER Fps 01 ----------- y,r ----------------- ..3 70! ----------'=p---G ' 7 / 71> =r 89-267 t ..........,�P� R F lI , '-On y ' `'P �". +1.*F.�..7ti3f.: `a.,»., -e PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAIM —, ` 1Vlcttty . �ircxi .t City CYetk 14 Aappeet,,t Side St -Lee We the undersigned, residents of Crawford enue,&in Coconut Grove, sire opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between Uoviglae And LeJeune goads. Crawford Avenue, which stretches between Douglas and Ledeune a short distance south of Loquat and Cumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fait. Exiting our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and destrians of all ages are endangered b the speed and volume of I� g g y p present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat would necessarily re6ult in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another.similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair for some residential streets to be closed off from traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will immediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in a - residential area so close to the many attractions of the Village Center, the Say,, and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity ae a place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the traffic problems' of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat and Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with Douglas`Road. NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE NU 94 - ------------------------ 06 &wjt tFo rtt_ O*t-, q +( - c3o ( f. -- ------------------------ - —-------------------------- ------------- =: ---------------------------------------------------------- ------- ----- - ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- ------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ 89-267 . �. 40 �..-� (,.f� f - 5,'� 5 9a 4. tint + r jyjr;�k; �s s F3 '�tl'1UfE#u t4�+{ ta.pf�a�i K,�_..t._. �. ,.r,�ti�:.�.�,_. • , r :+�rc,.?d��t.��s-��'�.t,.,....~�"�sx`��.3.c�.v �._. ��.�c."�k •�. t fttd; `. :public record in connection with P' item —122 on i PETITION TO CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF MIAML Manyiirti City Clerk ra We the undersigned, residents of Crawford Avenue in Coconut Grove, are opposed to the erection of traffic barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquat Avenues between Douglas and LeJeune Roads. Crawford Avenue# which stretches between Douglas and LeJeune a short distance south of Loquat and Kumquat, is already a popular roadway for east -west travel between those two major roads. During rush hours, the traffic is heavy and fast. Exiting'' our driveways is hazardous. Pets have been killed. Playing children and _ pedestrians-_cf_,all ages. are. -endangered ,by._the_speed and,_volume,of.`present traffic levels. The proposed barricades on Loquat and/or Kumquatwould necessarily result in the rerouting of the cars now using those two roads for travel between Douglas _= and LeJeune. The fact that these drivers are already using a residential route suggests that they will seek another similar route. Crawford Avenue will be the very obvious choice, as it is the next throughway south of the two roads in - question. The resulting impact on Crawford would be horrendous: traffic levels of _ double to triple the existing load, mostly compressed into the rush hour periods. We do not believe that it is fair,for some residential streets to be closed off from traffic at the expense of neighboring residential streets. However, if barricades on Loquat and Kumquat are approved, you may be certain that the residents of Crawford Avenue, and probably other nearby east -west avenues, will Ammediately request that access to their streets be restricted as well. We realize that, to some extent, heavy traffic is a price we pay for living in a t= residential area so close to the many attractions 'of the 'Village Center, the Bay, and downtown Miami, a proximity which contributes to the Grove's popularity as a =. place to live. Barricades are not an appropriate solution to the'traffic-problems of our neighborhood, and we urge you to deny the request to close off Loquat and = Kumquat Avenues at the westerly side of their intersections with.Douglas Road. NAME STREET ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ��_C��1,�_ <_ -----��401�.tR_ _51- �ti�1Rt�-&Ly&---1*49=-�g.S.4_ ----------------------------------- --------------- ------ -- - ;Q — ------------------------- -------------- ----- --- ------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- -------------- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --------.------- l'.H ----------------------------------------------------------- -----------,. 89-726 i 41 41 Y e er ri n * w s4 }w ""' . {,'> . � `rr= ,+„ r a _ 3 ' 4 i r`x,•"t '^y� i� l i.;� "�+��.� ay ��' is 1.: 'f _^'4�kSf3`�.i 4 {•' b.• . tot j, 1989 —uevices & Su � Inc SvotimS,41Stm_t,Miami, rjorlds 78 (305) 591-8000 Abraham 4)*tf0V*1 Chairman of the Board Submitted into the Public, record. i n. connection with The` Honorlble: item on r Suarez CITY or 141AIAT .011 City` Nally Hirai Meet Into Drive 1500 pan Ang City QIeric IJ Ids I t1l, meeting Door 14r. Suarez! lot Commission is too Friday, the AI Street block old and installing of /Douglas R I Understand that this as the possibility Read of Lejeune agenda). discuss the area our meeting barriers In etc. (Number 73 On Y or' ts to keep at/Kumquot stroll LoqU on pertain street at Lag barrier' Of that a of plac, the resident the city, the the 4 Wit Ide, disturbing 0 frog consequences t of that area cross traffic appealing, the the, residents "Aif go, and sales a first ide ts of the city at 'or residents nu Of ore mostly negative* number used, -by - 8 . t Grove Col are -and S and Other cross streets ps arts 0 to access veriou 9 d Main . These street 0 ind;ousli 7.0 141951 resId9nt!O through the tr d area -- city of to 9 _secure Douglas and Van It the having t 0 t_fully Vould resu without treats absorbing. a or be 098 of these Is jhvsy are, roVer-o lock anal two or three a any of vhich are nori the residents ts b streets, unfair burden an., to `,the the .96. rill be AO." 20 V balance Ofic. This Will, place this. traffic. Vb treats, etc*, ose on their Is ....... i, ji� streets 9 otb tting barriers 16 f .the insist on pu and In residents of city 's affecting the fire, ative ncluding Police' the -obviOus Other nag Will thus There are vehicles, ad streets ot large. Emergency 'ross these streets, the area jhly traffiCed Vill be unable to c gh big . services, ng through Government and rescue, navigating time. I to t subjlc response also be delayed 1" emergency Will be delaying 181 fing that trash, and garbage Pickup time, all, ncreased traVOI, such as of I t9s because tter traffic their rOu such be sIdents achieve f re to that One could 0 one 11t9ble solution or all the I Will more street$ In question t 'Bad distribution and 8 converting the flov dis, by C1 reducing the traffic general are ad A of the 9, each dIr9ction and way In 4,1 E R IX. Ye y 3 rt't—r a, IF + v U s.�y �,r , 1` l 1 F b, Ly E fv 0 the Honorable Xavier Suarez North 19 1989 Pool two taking the streets safer since cars are likely t6,tre,otIs- file in the middle of the road. Speed limit slon 4 ind stop alone could also be used to slow down traffic. Thank vou for your consideration In this matter. r4crYb "J, '�- V IX, B 5 F John C. Lopez 3200 Grand Avenue j Coconut Grove, FL 33133 January 24, 1989 � : The Honorable Xavier Suarez Mayor of the City of Miami City Hall Miami, Florida r Dear Mr. Mayor: Today, while driving to visit a friend who lives in Coconut Grove, I came - across the barricades,that were'put.there_by the city to close the ,street 4 Not only Aviation Street was barricaded but all the streets leading to that { side of the Grove were closed. I had to drive to Tigertail to get to Jeff- ?. erson.' I am outraged that this action has been taken. I believe that the streets belong to the people and, unless there is a real good reason, they should be,open to be used by all the people. I know that there is a group of res- idents who live in that area who would like to have semiprivate streets. a3: They are the ones that have pushed this through and nothing could be more Al unfair. My three friends who,are residents of that neighborhood all agree with me, it's a very bad idea. Now I would like to point out a few things to you. Besides my inconvenience you are forcing all residents who live in the north part of the Grove to use Tigertail or Bayshore. For years those two streets have suffered from overuse and abuse; how doyouthink the residents who live on Tigertail-are going to feel with more traffic? They pay taxes too. There is also` -the mat- -' ter of police, fire rescue, and emergency vehicles which will be affected = by this action. Sometimes those -extra few minutes it takes.to go around could me an.that some person in desperate need of immediate rescueassistance would have to wait more.time. A fire in someone's home could burro a.little longer ,tom because the streets are closed. A police emergency could.be adversely affec-. ted,because_'a few residents want semiprivate streets! Time, even seconds ,are precious under those 'circumstances.'`It's'dj t''a bad move on the "city' part. You are forcing all residents who need access to grocery stores, shops etc. N3 or who have other business in the commercial part of .the Grove to go ,out of their way._ Y In closing Mr. Mayor I would like to say I also don't like traffic on my street' who does? But I would never take any action to deny anyone the right ful..use of my street. If the barricades are left standing, and the streets =` are permanently closed, you can bet that on election day anyone responsible for this will not get my vote. Submitted into the public Very truly yours, r i w' record jn oonr er.t1* 0n with ; ri� A-V John C. Lopez cc: Miami City Commissioners Yp3Aqt r' C !- cs r Yri R L hiT4 '"f•:� r r'�{ Y'.-� ,9a'.•,�raP' ��''+tirw� _ ti rr J. l_:'j r der f �V.-� t.. .-. .✓• � 'fir{yl �t �y.�. • r G L r� { i �" w► ;^ �.JY.. MILL � . !•'�3 f'-� �. i .`"`3 3{ i �,; r 4 _ �,. �', n k . , ,. __ ,fit --^•. _ ._ _ ,.. .,..,; „tiYL ..�� rk?.�,�s..rsimSele��9^'• January 16; 19$9 L l City Conoissioners VI Citj of A7iami �i °y .Dear Madam/sirs yie the undersignedr residents of tie area bordered ias �toaci (3500 &Hibiscusblocks Street a by gain gigh�iay and Doug including barricades Avocado and Pelnd met�o. Avenues. aide opposed to any and.I.... Devon`Road see attached mad) uat Avenues between Douglas, Ave. Ott n ad on Loquat .and/or Kumc� oin increased" traffime landlocked in the Aside froI%"the r sultneighbornood'to Deco _ 1 ` this would cause our ..• since it would close off a major center of the South Grove -fit access route to our area. using other side streets for uscwith(t (which Apart fromit would leave are much narrower than Loquat Ave.). x alternatives of travelling through the cOrtlu rcial district weekends onut" 3! (a) virtually impossible o Grove , --- �. Sunday nights . 'with 'Festivals and Friday las Road area � (bi ,ahrough the Grand'Ave./Doug alone. iaomen driving which is dangerous or .�� - Y' lunt circle• south on Main .H `g �vyeY to 4 mil (c)une . (3-4 mile drive) • then back North on -7�eJ --` s to alleviate the tle _ar in favor �r taking step nation `wYiereby non -•local tratflc usesthe shortcut;urove current .sat But this: (includin<3 ours:) y residential "n ets,. AX our selves, our children and:our'rsigns, rlgjZt�turn - jeopardizing and, knits. can be:accomplished with.a coui»ination of sop only�sgns, one-way str�etsr- engineers workin wi" } We are certain that the City' into account the` hbOzhoods); can come up with a solution -the residents of our nn ghborhood (and taking z effect on surrounding g ,der which will resolve the 'problem. Jim. Fay - Public works ald Miami Iier cc: Kleinman, - Je-Z re Submitted into the public x, record in connection 'thAV lf f J" itemoa 3 a ty Hirai � ' '� . j City Clerk � 1 A• ,tea$ ., :1 � 1 n! � •_ •+• K 1 .eY6..3rn °�� , t AiY'a�l w , Y �fy �. SisSfF 5ays .�` iu _i 4 � ,>'' ; { y '' S+''£4 r'4 - r'" �` ,• R'�"' A.r 3.f�, of -. . d [ • '- t4. �.;¢ R r ."1..r ,fit :>• R Sy 67 3u� _ dz ' r is T � . ' ! � � T "' } � fer`^F', F'.:d- •.+t`d � � 1 ..�.. 3 2: �{ i •- ' � . � ..-- •...sr�.: :.,__�_.e -_ -;•:xw .. -:a _ *tea:; �v„� - °ir�"`"'"'F"'— - ': v NAME ADDRESS RONATURE Ed tnt. l-'* ,: eAA_ -, y -' 3 s-la �._�� Ti L�i�� YY�.• j is 7 t, Ole ' ti J h '_�••r HF K PMF •�•.'#. �fd s''rfr rR' f,�' t sd µ * T i ,�,1�#��x.,�' �'t`i -i\ 4-�x i %� j �' i >�lsF�`4s ' xM ev � .� ` !. �� a : •Fug£ ---------------- -- V. ^ NAME 0 310 3610 • ` --� 3 1� D PI.( Sh IKAl �in/k ��r✓ 3 s6o /.tt� 0 - rja Submitted into the 'public record in connection 'th item—`3 _.... or f 89-26' Matey Hirai .a City Clerk :.; N "1 h i L� _: I� �h q� -,i .i i�� T t { t \� r � � L y � t , 4n'.•"'i6. ��3� �!r�`" �., wN r�r f �, ^�. �$�f- # � l y�i. }a'b.Ys�� • - - . }RNi 4- f t - r 7f _ P *,�,�„r�4 }-�j 'q � ; � E, yE 1_ ��x�*i x ' �. � i - a � 1'��j�� f ' ,y-Y♦ r31 e ,f � -i �. 'f H ;�'7�. "a y `t •t`b ;y ;rs `r f' C r.. .�.��.d .k7��`'�"''�iJ�r zed ••� '�� t � � t > �t#�r��+'' l °';� t i J i. sse,.. r, ,. af7 a2ii z - 4 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE F . �71oek J.-IS�h�� r ry '` •+�r��h'. � �,J-w'_�J "`J't'.,t }�` � r „�y..{�9 d � CCC nC b 5.1 a j Match 29 1989 City of Miami Department of Public Works 3500 Pan American Drive Dinner Key, Fla. RE: Proposed restriction of vehicular access to Kumquat and Loquat Avenues at Douglas Road. - Dear Sirs: As owner of property located at 3610 Avocado and as renter of property on 3609 Avocado I strongly oppose the measure to block Kumquat and Loquat Avenues. We would be forced to use Douglas Road to leave the Grove or go through the center of the business district, The first solution is dangerous and nd the second, because of: heavy traffic, almost impossible at times. am very sorry I could not.attent this.meeting, but will fight this decision as'long as it -takes. AV: cnc jo P--P public t th6_ Submitted into Submit '.0 record in connection with IL item on Matty Hirai City Clerk VW„ ..�.:. Lili K. Neale 3681 Palmetto Avenue Coconut Grove Florida 33133 (305) 444-5291 Submitted into J iScDu39.ij989 The .City of Miami City Hall record in connection with 3500 Pan American Drite Miamimy on ..� - Florida 33133 Matty Hirai City Clerk Dear Mayor, Commissioners, and Fellow Neighbors, My name is Lili Neale and I live at 3681 Palmetto Avenue. it I have resided there for 15 years. My family and I also own the property next door located at 3675 Douglas Road. I am in opposition to the barricading of Loquat and Kumquat Avenues at Douglas Road. First, I would like to tell my f` neighbors that I sympathize with their problem of the intrusion of undesirable traffic on Loquat and Kumquat Avenues. This is a problem of epidemic proportions which inflict residents all over the City of Miami and Dade.County. _ On Palmetto Avenue and Douglas Roads residents suffer from the intrusion of speeding motorists, thus endangering the - lives of our families, pets, and plantlife. By barricading y= Loquat and Kumquat Avenues, obviously Palmetto Avenue.and 2 other neighboring streets will then receive an increase in traffic and have the same problem. , '-. Everyone wants to live on a barricaded street, yet no one wants to live on the street that will take the burden of `the f traffic. Unless we barricade all the streets in,the_surrounding a* {' area, no one will be happy. Even then, traffic`'wiTl over ow into other residential streets. As an ,alternative to barricades, -1 suggest the following;; 1. Decreasing ;y and enforcing the speed limit to 15 or'20 m.p.h.p on all residential``" streets in the Cit of Miami. ri4 2. Placingmore Stop Si` n's fat strategic, p g g_ points. . 3. Installing speed bump''. 4. Discontinue the practice barricades.s .of Please let us all unite; all 'neighbors, all streets,'. and ,al1.> f'h■ City Officials to put an end to the -intrusion -of vehicular — speeding in our neighborhoods. As the population,continues' kw to rise in South Florida, so will this problem.`,We- :'all;need to work together to find a solution that will satisfy a13 neighbors. 2, ` Thank -you for your time. Sincere '3 Li1i K': Neale a' 3 .* 7 �_` r 1 av�r.a....t. •. r.:.:...aea. ,}. w...ruFa�o..rwM ' >� 470 ------ , ............. PO ..... jrj. /.o�'�..w:.......=�..u.i�.w.. � '. i a.^+._ { ice? ...._. .,. ...e._.... rw^...., f ._.....��,-�...�.....:.. "•""'"'^•h`^.^.-..a...,+.,.1 �� 777777 _=..ry.,.w..w::+w.....wrw-W..i.- �.�...e.*..Y+»..rY.wert...'^✓+a..er T,p�m.� ,.,,.. ....:.-:...: ..u....-...... .: . .......� �Y va..+...+ ,aQ., rw..•vnt-sw.,,,wi,,»,+.Mum <rad +e4 Yr.�+Ys i i �•,.ts.,>w..Ct, �t O.P,tle record in c r wa. item 7 3 : ,n IvIatty Hirai V �IV I rig � r cr t^'M 7JF 3� .s,�„�; '1�" i r 7 `-'�'' .~ i . S i,'ry E t a> "� 4r. y"�4�Fr�+� 's` r �.i.-,.`•[ (' � .cx j 4 1 1t+ r. a+ a r i a � � x . q•-ua. i�- td � �r '� t,�`�`,`jT{`tti'1 ��y�vKy6-r��f��j��;a x'1( i 'P7 { 1 £al 0� xk5^•,a fi ae! Gt•r •tf 1�, '�4h`"l' Ias, 3'.�iY i:k{ �'SyS ' 7Y''•i pp„„r��r�� e, '� .ty a e��4'��+Yfi� ' irr Jl �i�y� '� a -x+�. Q`'a�F`}`r°�'4�.u•ct <W,�t , i,. •' i� � M' k w.i ��,z'`, t '` r 4 t��.ri^� -� y 7 $ �i� �'p�- n.,��3,�, � � .i� p ssu aLIA- u4+ F [ rc �`�� • , :... ' ' ,,fit x 7 • 36 Aff 1 { «..max..-.w.��..-..,.aw........-._.._.,.s..._.,.....a.....«......,....-._....-._...._......__.. _.._.._.. _...,..._..... -.._ a..�... , _ .z ,. _ 1• � � � ... _.. _..._....._.. .._._....._... _...,.....__. _,......-..ate ■ a ........_..,...__....,_._.........�.�_......... '- - � .fit. t i • ! i 4 x 77 tj• i .i ". _ _ Iecoxd lii SLQaY,4G�ilj,(M[i^-TTi+�, w g Yr� Fatty Hixai �. _ �ro, Ciiy Clem 1� Y 1 t � r t 1 t �_:;;� .��{.'`;�t? t„L,_. •�- ,. !'-...�7 :5xi.'i ..� i �'�s�_eir'�s ,�,.�e. ._ _ �:. ,. � [r' �.�P� 4 Hm Mts,M,.{ r Wag 7 t $ S r } He � �S'... .....ao ;a�.. . J.; i7 k f , JAt_.'' 1.5 'Jj' a.. �i. 1?t, - _. ......__._ ,n... ..._... _. ..._w._..�...lo...M-....�.. 'r3.. I., ej, ; z Tn kl tip .4 I`�MH„.''?j4 r+i� uS�� : �5,e�^ L,.} £ ; { ' �rv,yf } . $• r � � as - e t t F t. t(Lr iv isftF�tf1i µ ,, J: st .>✓W"5y�I r 4-Y%+r�tyF R�''�'�* � A' i¢■ fy5},,f.'.t, 'L'N ry Y �1 -' "S i yi! "�d d 4W tRNX.:1 .77. &� tt }_ • K__AA. 5 '. '._. _..... ,,_ i'4 .fvi_c�-..-.mot..... +rA -_..1. :...... .....__._..__.. ... .. ,.-... ..__-..._._-. ._........... .. _ .. "i (iy , `` `` -lift 1 ^y sn t ' 7 j r t a 11 } I 4. � ! (J�`t �i` \J .e-i� ...- -+i. � .•+wd._• -.._ � • � J�.n',�jt+ji"-R��y�§�" «..�14 441 _ Submi#tech-3#0 -#fie __._._...._�E'COSd--3'Zl--C13z3Z1eG#iOIi-wi#h on MattyyHirai 4 a w City Cier� � A t t 8 "'+26 Y rz, gy t �d +¢ t it ..c. r.•t -.-XW., Y f±•4 }j�.'.i' hL. e`k° rf rz xmg3 ta1W fia 4 x4 i '' _ xti r .77 r w•n . ,:_.cm:. ._r. �;'.' 4 . _ f i"r r Y .. "Jo - r j! jr tJ e s a.'.ir1 lt/yl AOS ►,� 1, "n I I 9- a 2'/ 0 Submitted into the public recordin connection with item -y.z.__on 3.3.8' Matte Hirai City Clerk .+- I a, -AA V , /' p 40, ^fi�v-Skfi 5'E 'r' I iF � 4 � �-� Wx x � r x�l C# 7�•�x,ve Soa% ow ,Ji4l t Submitted into the public record in connection with y� item__ on 3 Matty Hirai City Cle�,/ �r4L x T -- o s r I MW i.zfx - a t�. �. .t, ;y...; �..=;.S r:'' +} .,_:.z.:, ,:Z: a:.,y• t;, 2 ;}. + t� �--•i. of .der Aatrd`.�' DTItG CA AS' - TOW. &As: tsA014.1d kAs tid 7710 �l 30 3 aC, 40 !� f rim •�'•I9" 7o _ ' 0 3 7 a f. if- Pilo .f - II: 6 Z37 33 Submitted into the public record in connection with /17 Cf e% RS la hf a d f*1t A M. �>I4 • v Submitted into the public record in connection with ..-_ 0-4 IL -- %.3.092 13 a� Y X I b 77 y .9�,{, T.'ac- ir. f,r J-d r-*#C.9:0, 13 �1 2.0S �D y3 7 -7 Z cool �4 h16 a Olt S bol. � l 42, 6t tiq VA'`,^t bpi 4 we $4 ftpj emitted into the p� -4.7.a -3 record in connection with item ___3 __on ' 3' Matty Hirai City Clerk i�3o :u� &I kot AI 4 32 WWI WMi SZ vSubmitted o the public t 45 record in connection with item 7 3 on 3.3 .91 Malty Hirai City Clerk -rew(C. 3Z6 11w_U U37emse"ACIO ��r' r �,►w aI e HST 50mu-- cz 1Mapj VJUST wwJT 14-- 3z6 Submitted into the public he record in connection with item--- 3.__._on 3.3 ,00q -------------- Matty Hirai Citv r1..0 �� I cW , i 3,9 )1:P M 3 f *23T w,�TT w uWed into the public 1313 record in connection with item 2 - on • 3- Matty Hirai I IIIIII Ililll®110111i l ! � *1 "RtrAt 14 -ru-omu �SZ riw!;T 5"; --- weUT "1 t4.t z y vv== f1F 4 f } T _ ^� WE ► THE FOIWW C "CONCERNED CITIZENS OF SOUTH DROVEn AFE IN F069 OF THE FOLLOWINot , i` to RESTRICTION OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC BY THE PLACING OF BARRICADES ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT AT THE WESTERLY'SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION AT DOUG LAS ROAD, (S.W. 3 7th ANUE) . 2. REDUCTION OF SPEED TO 20 MILES/HOUR ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. 3. CHILDREN PLAYING SIGNS ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. 4. NO TRUCK SIGNS ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. 31 5. THREE WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LINDEN LANE & LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT AND AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF POMONA LANE & LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. OWNERS NAME PRINT SIGNATURE OWNERS ADDRESS pWNiS Pg,#- r 21. 4n5p L+DQuA Avegim S 3 A&a_a_7 n ,wr i j(ayyGp/_ 3g92 doe dl►T "��` ,f� s _ �z��J� ti L �4 e �' •2.. 'i a'..,'^IS-'.wz:'i I�� .rt:i �� ,(:. �'` •`� f"h y i a -q��j ( !0t►" `3 �1Ss'`�• _ 3�f3`' }� Y t "A .ATg—, ;A rs fool A it i t an .. Z..............�... _a+cXi}, .:. _.. E� 1fau..'ti.',.t'i7LS.t.m la'_': -a � tir'�.i � a. a., �:f . .....-.':•.a��.<1Z.r`�w7"'�'.::?a�$.#�.'.�6�'.,if '7ji.'r, .T �idr-%. '. ?�'.i4. r"�ilrl�� .� Iwr�n'I.w I I II. I' • +wwwA f.,.' 6 S J i7 emir' tt r .31' TFF ARE a ..E.a�a�..,�iotzs�...-.::.:s_ ...................a...........�.::w........�,«:._.a.wr.. ...::..�..:w.�:�..y.,....._ - - .a..�._-........,._...... � xa...yew«.._.-..,....«..a...a.....��.s..»._-.. r �' ' •� �.�:.1� ��'��.'C,,�.�_..��f •`,� ..u.�._._. _. _._._._...-=��'�_�...:...�....__.,..�.. ass ` � � 'D :',� rat � .= �.r.r %�•,+.f Tr-.:1 _ . _... _. � .. �� - _ ' ,,�;y _ _ ^ r 7rY. !":#;�.? i ! i'! ,t J;"R,� �' / f /'t•'�'� ' (77) :+4�.r.wi��: V �vr•.rn�.+sn..�..�.•�....:Y..•..:.........-.r..w..�.w..w...... ._. _ __rr-.__...r_._.__- •-'__.. __._... ...--.. _._....... ...-_.._.... _._._.....a.._.0 �.v. �� S �a .�j tt'�ia4��_ Ss4m_ all > ... .1 1' `F Y -w k1 s .•t3 t CID .....i�• a 77 fg�3 '67 ; 1 ; �f' ,;. !,� r '+ fi�I " r �. - _ � yI'!w► 1 d• �7�5• r ,.�4\�k4'r7t ".�v, ,�j�/,� ` ) 7 v .�•^N "r�i'« .'rws.W��A�—wwfl�.r•u•r!'%J:#ia. '„�c.,,,,�._....,� J y+.w"�g�' i�" > � _- .r 4� ta�;M". �• if''S` }„��. nz rfJ'�yiis, tit A 1 . ..� � � r 1- R,: _1 rr tr WE ei1 M y {r s. `-- � _w:� �.�._._L�'...r ..Y.-.��_'.s��!�!1�_..'4�'. • v�;��t_T',C'� r�_,vra � d� . _ 7�'��:.. `� � � .e .rnpt�r�.� ••� , em � f tted 3ni�.77 ri t 1� - — — :�.-`,�'�_. � �, r�L�E=J � t ""gyp �`al�� y '�f�°- �f •' �' �§ � �— f v.a�� a— 't y - r � . r rf`. if 1 %} C � s' a r Ff� a + S } y..�srq„r.,.:' .iq, e � S '' . ♦ [ � Id � � �CaL Q � �''�., K,� � CS�� '.e a',: • — r .. _a, � _ �Y:. mow+--_..«�'+.js'•'I'f`4:'r',yl�i'^'f—+i�-ss:i�,. -ft�r• �..1 �f !! .... - � n / '1�� t` \ � ri y � f yM.a:+ •..,:e.,. .•naw,e.'•�r ,.ct• _ '� a•n•.-..»e.+•,•.,.+'«....„�w,r�++r�•��.+�.+e.*v«J. -". iX5 -VT k eAf.K•,-.'+•+. = y.f�'� �G�"'r�%�,e ;�'vt t �. r;�-> t _ ram' `�L' .' Wi.L„Z _-'-44 .,Ylp a AM ,, �,,.�-.,�..�...,. y..�;�..-.•�.....r. .�-» era e kf�.. d rfr'i •y§ i z ' t .=.,. °� R? G w�"s' ,Y. �-., _ � w kr n � � .t ,�.�}'!'� J'r% } � . •,� r � af" �-• {, f i ,`} n Eywti -7 } t> 4 2 . P a t x€ka- ; f 3 •:`a' s� r-i+` ic,.U!'%. �a Y -+• �.�r��":y .5�. L �4 y/ � � � t "� r� � a+r ��' E 'y. .,•, � U f &'a- k M'x�'� r y.{e w . ! � �� W-�x . .2 Xe-c. a _ .. .: � .�_r,ay � -.. x��y �,= 3 .n,� t �',•� �i i Zry • _ .3� �' � "`kt�{�•.' � �•''��.'�' � ....., �L- � �fir, "� �,s §#.'. :,v: ?� E0011 NE . THE FOLLOWING �' dNG 1aEn G TIti'9Ns SOUTH tOVE" THE rLUM ING C BY THE PLACING OF VEHICULAR TRAF�'BAA$ICADES •RESTRICTION OFHQDAT AT THE V88TNRLY SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION ON LOCjUAT AND AT DOUGLAS ROAD,(S•w• 37th AVENUE). LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT• �. REDUCTION OF SPEED TO 20 MILES/AQUA ON 3. CHILDREN PLAYING SIGNS ON LORUAT AND KUMQUAT.- 0 UAT AND KUMQUAT. ,i 4. NO TRUCK SIGNS ON L R i. SIGNS AT TFiE INTERSECTIoNSOMONAILANE & LOQUATOANDj 5. 'THREE WAY STOP _ AND KUMQUAT AND AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF E KU�:RUAT• OWNERS FROM OWNERS ADDRESS OWNERS NAME PRINT &SIGNATURE - /� 3�$0 WE ------ 13: AV e f ' 3 4 J4 . �� •`� }� was J � �-- ` f, t ' r S Ynitted into tb�e gubUo r' {�Li,3 L TYl _'• L ,xfi 23p.� 1 � ;i } �s�Qxc� T'�'T ��M"Tl'M'1f.'��`Y�T k'i l Jt ��Yr '4 !.�{�{. , � � f' — � 'F�t Jr ,r q�p•y* s� .J� ( f lf��r �' � ^u "S #a� e�}*� �� P ��fx 1 f. e '�eitk( y x •+- ( .f � r� �� X� ¢E�t -iY`7 J ka'. -- '""Yt � 7 t i`" r ai i Y } ( g xt Ana• �# ' n„ �' .3'` WPMG[ P 'i1'�.0 �. Ai'4 �bz� f' W TAE EC�LL W NG ttooNCERNED CITIZENS OpShUT t GRGtfE+' Alit, IN PA K GE FIRE,OLLOWING: I i -RESTRICT t N hE VSHICULAR TRAPPIC BY THE PLACING OF BARRICADES i N t j DAT A M UA' AT THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION AT DOUGLAS ROAD, (S •W • �7th AVENUE)- 2. REDUCTION of SPEED TO 20 MILES/RoUR ON LOQ.UAT AND KUMQUAT. 3. CHILDREr PLAYING SIGNS ON LogUAT AND KUMQUAT. 4. NO TRUCK SIGNS ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. 5. THREE WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE ITOFN'OMONAOF ILANE &ALOQUATt,ANbr AND KUMQUAT AND AT THE INTERSECTIONS Y{UMQUATil OWNERS ADDRESS y06 y �y6ekr OWNERS FHONE, Si ilk �1 'PHE FOLLOWM "CON'CONPID $N t SHUTS GROVE"AAA N fiAi��ii • fib' THE FCLLCWINC , I, R$STAICTIfiN OF V$$ G't1 TRA"tC BY THE PLACING OF RARR%CAbER t $S7E N t1�►?UAT AND KUMQUAT AT THE W'ALY SIDE or, THE INTERSECTION AT DOUG LAS ROAD , (S • w • l7th A'V$NU$ � • 2. REDUCTION �F SPEED TO 20 M ltgs/�t(i(ri ON LOQ•UAT AND , KUMQUAT . _! t 3. CHILDREN PLAYING SIGNS ON LnRUAT ANV,,.KUMQUAT. ty, No TRUCK SIGNS ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. r STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LINDEN LANE A LOQUAT 5. THREE WAY THE INTERSECTIONS OF POMONA LANE & LOQUAT AND AND KUMQUAT AND AT KUMQUAT. OWNERS FHONE J441 IfIfV-Af6!L 44rY, 'a i t iFV'f_.L /vo �. rat}, -- h� t1i64�P� f":r HI: cr rr tF F y ..................... Tllll,,, 1, r•�> nn '" - x�Coard ,� �cianec�ie►�. rovxth � �� ,, -� �_ '� •64+ Vim• t a '.�t^� ;fir � `r.y ,, Ca�fq�ct" k��kp �,'x t • r � t�t� t��i�p? �",. P } ta* ve^ }r t; -i f r: 4 z I� -3` ''�.t +^G'.� 3••`' C+ { F._5?t,.a.n WE THE FOLLOWING flCONCERNED CITIZENS OF SOUTH GROVE" ARE IN FAVOR OF�THE FOLLOWING: Y. RESTRICTION OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC BY THE PLACING OF BARRICADES } oN L,OQUAT AND KUMQUAT AT THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE INTERSECT10V AT DOUGLAS ROAD,(S•W• 37th AVENUE). 2. REDUCTION OF SPEED TO 20 MILESMOUR ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT. _ S ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT- 3- CHILDREN PLAYING SIGN_ f is 4. NO TRUCK SIGNS ON LOQUAT AND KUMQUAT► t THREE WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LINt�EN LANE & Ut?tUA'i' 5. , AND KUMQUAT AND AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF PgA1t)NA LANE � LnC;UA'T AND KUMQUAT. - r oWNEfi5 PHONE OWNERS NAME ( PRINT & SIGNATURE OWNERS ADDRESS 4-Y4 5F3b/.. 17 f: r e N r y° — �.... {r -�77777 I .r f sr 4 x d Mr. ,S11bIYv { tted into: tie pubic record in connection = with .j s �Lr�4: .k� �' $r leg". 't�F�e 1 t'.•��.�;. item7 QQ �:f{I •!►•l�rty �TSTT�i y?L �Yr i _*�w� T .' i I f �r►it 4CY1F t L6 w>"'a ry-