HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #13 - Discussion Item- I III III I - I I IIII LI
111 , 1 1,IfilMi
Cesar H. Odio
City Manager
- . • , ." .. •
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
^I.
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
SUBJECT :
MAY 1 8 1989 "LE
City COmmission meeting of
April 27, 1989; Agenda Item 11.
Coral Way Traffic and ZoniflgS
DISCUSSION ITEMt• - • : : ,
.:,
., .
. .
:
In accordance. - with the ,-..directive of ' the City .. Commission by MOti On. 894
•.
January i 26, 1989, '-: the :'Planning ; Department has prepared the attached
the projected .„Offect Way of the potentlal redevelopmentof the .„„
large pardelt . adjoining the existing Miracle 'Center r:deVelopMent,',On' Coral W.
between. - S.W.' . :'32nd and,•17th : The study concludes with a re0410#440'
6' 'Mai nta in tt).6 . existing fig ',zoning :- along ',Coral: Way based ititi
. • • • .. .....
"TranipPiIatIon : 'Corridors" .c:, methodol ogy. '.- . . . Contingent -al ter
:-.- ._ ••• ' • :denventienalapproaches' ere also presented. : ' ' •.
, I . , • , ,•
' ' ''' : • . . : . ' ':..' ':' - • '-'. - -...H, January .
liACKONGUNP-
2 1989 the City
da intip ,. ,...,6„,,,,;t.:00, stan d ar ds .:- ji. -;- c921 4 '
n traff ic ,. ,
kt.,1,t.s..-,meptin .... -• t:7::-:: — ,;,neio ., It 6,:,1;tonin traf
p -, to
,::'-:.._:, :y.:,:::,......:,.....t4thi nii
ta ,:,, c lt se s:: :0
,C':ec _l l eft-turn
.:7 f i . - s l e o it r . ; ! ! ' ih o i e:: 11 0:: :t..t.s,,,,,,, n at
,:: ,,,,„1)(,)slit.,1c,i, tunen:d.fr,,,,00..,,,sam ;.,,,of addi :,,..,,.,,,,
INP!':-tOeiii,::'::,0,•". --,
l'''''W4 'N .,„ o n ,h-, ":
‘::':: " . • " . • . , : • 1 :..,::.
Miracl a 0
app lied i :... ,1.,Ct';: itie:,;::a....c: „ ; oTlra,,, ..,,,,,_.,,,..zoNouoT:;,:,,,,i6oc 1,,,,.,yr,
,,....i.Opliie67--" ': :,, -:t 6 ' il';.'t41.-- ell'r THE 7.°ttIjT:::.1-'-'m:::A:4„.':,a:':rUT:Y::;::::;
rA ,'ci' ':L*41
bEi?0401:40:411,,!:TN07:,..° - ERIATEL'V-. .. ThE REMAIN
PROPERTIESt-:,'DN'"':..C.1074L.'-.:.",::'1.14AY04$_ MORE cog :SP- -
le" C en ter, .- --.pasSed-. :.- ..- ..,..-....--,. ....T0,,DiRE.
.
sse
.'LlieTiredorl. posi _ . poss .. follows
--
IRAFFIcr.,'AGENDAATPr
.i.r: LANE O M WAY 7()::
DISCUSSION OF LEFT-TURN :
AVENU AfE .. 0
. ..:, PARCELS :: AREA it:;;FLIRTHEIVREQUESTING.- THE CITY 114
BACK WITH T.I4 A ,RECOMMENDATION BY MARG!1 1989. .,,:;'•:',. :i ';
e; ::attached stud .: '.:*: in .response .to ,, ,t0* , :,0*.i*foiit:
REFERENCES : Motion 89.109
City Commission Meeting
ENCLOSURES January 26, 1989
1 11 I
• • •. • ,•• •• •
• • ' t , A• •
• I. • . •...
= --••,1111
• 4.•
; • ZONING AND TRAFFIC STUDY
CORAL WAY ; BETWEEN: S.W. 32ND AND 37TH AVENUES ; •• • . sf.
• . •
1. Introducti on • • ,
At - the Clty c Commission meeting of . January. 26 1989, :‘, Conni sslonbY
Moti on; 894 directed the Ci ty : . Manager as fol 1 °wt.:
•
8_941 INSTRUCTING . THE CITY MANAGER TO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO -.IMMEDIATELY CONDUCT : STUDY OF4 THEREMAINING
PROPERTIES. CORAL • WAY (AS MORE -,-SPECIFICALLYt:-'.'.OUTLINED.4*DURP10)
DISCUSSION N Of .LANE;ON,,CORAL.WAT. SERVEMIRACLECEN
TRAFFIC] ABENDA ESPECIALLY LARGE ;PARCELS - 'BETWEEN:444:4
AVENUE AND S.W. 37 AVENUE,FOR:POSSIBLEREDUCTION OF.4HE REMAININ
PARCELS. ON.. THAT .AREA; FURTHER. ;.• REQUESTING - THE C!TY MANAGER 40 COU
BACK I,.WITH A ,RECOi*IENDA,TiON BYMARCH'i
- .
. ••
The analysis ch 1 ows is in response to the directi
and provides the basis . for - a polIcy decisi on on devel opment
for the subject area. . • - •
• •
'•(.; '.;•
. r
• E*:
" A •
-
4 1, ;!, N.V.A .4 4 :7 • S
Th�e xistlng zfriAg'&fp•r:4hepstutf area 1sCR-
(See .attached zoning and land use. map, Oft
' •
The L',OgIsttng.:11.4.nd
AyenueS:: conslst�nt wft4t4otti004.',.,
present commercial uses are less intenslvely develo
use map, Exhlbit 1).
2.3 • .,.; .0
ti1 U
of resJ • • • ..,. •.. •
• ,•• 4"`"
dentl aJ nel ghborhoods and conine ,
#.0i6kirteSei
-rehtmst*•0':$'
2.4 Existing Traffic
Available data on existing traffic conditions ere • presently 4 limited, •
to vehicular• volume Counts and presumed roadway vehicular'capacitys
i support of the now =obsolete • "V /C." : methodology for'' meastiito ,:•
traffic levels: • of service. Under - the ' adopted :, "Tr..anspdrtati:of : :'
Corridors" 'methodology, ._ these data ' must be supplemented t.'' witti
additional measurements of vehicular passenger occupancy and bus
Service' frequency and ridership ` to provide the basis' for analysis
that will produce` levels' of service measurements' that Conform to..;th6, •
adopted methodology.' It can be noted 'parenthetically. that, " rider . • . •
the V/C - methodology, ' roadways in the study area operate :, at or ''$0.4,
the acceptable'` level of service' (LOS) .. "D ", ' exceptfing "Coral lay
between- S.W. 27th= and' 32nd Avenues, which= is • at LOS "E", which is
acceptable due to• Coral May '.s status as a legislatively,constrained1_
"Scenic.-:" Transportation . •Corridor ". Under -the' • tiOi( ::::`;`
Corridors methodology, these existing 1 evel s' of . service measure ,
could' = be `rio ° l over t (i . e ' "worse ") than 'L Under °the ; of d : techn
(i.e "D" and "E" , and ` it is possible' that they' improve`'
hi OW. as "C" and ' "D" "respectively.
•
2.5 Future Traffic ?• :_.:: •;
Future traffic projections,. calculated, according
methodology, show that additional traffic c- generated by redevelo
permitted : under. - existing _zoning would cause .,a " deterioration ; ; of�
to: the unacceptable grade• of "F" . • However; .this, methodol ogy . •g
, the;; p otential rs -tr ip capacity` available= ih mas ran;i`
could
increases yin• {, "'automobile : Ypassenger occupancy whic
'.abs orb i:increa`ses' :F .. . 'fr -i
.: p 'p
n ;: person �'..�tr
increase: In: 'traffic`` - icongestion At' present, peak: ou ;a
. -occu anc I Of ' :automobile's ' _ Coral , , W. r ' is: -, 39 `= ' ns/ veh
that°"-about 4650 person -trips `are carried by ethe riasse
traveling` (both directions) on =Coral ' >iay durimig- Jafterno
hour::• -:.'In addi tion,-= • an estimateC�,300 - *Ole hoi r person =t r
carried in = 'base "s'. - ='` :Redevelopment: - of: °the Sears'. and :P t
plus .' °r the �:bal ante 'Of ' tie Mi racle ='Center `''block; - 'wool d' . p 'duce
'2600:; additional °k peak =hour° person =trips ors Coral „1iay ; ': 1� - a"
could be acconnodated wi thout: an increase i n .._traffic v umes,
average -:passenger''car occupancy <'were to ihcr ase from ':1.39
persons per vehicle, '; or if a signi f icant percen of is } fin
were . to acconm+aodated. by increased buservi_cior' a;yco mt b inir
both. 'Wh iae `its is snot'llikely :- tthaVthese i'ntrea'ses" shi .tx
.achieved .in the near future, they arewith
pdssibilAity "" �over�' =the-`- .10 =20 �ear'���.�laiini`h 4p►erio�' � <
accelerated l:with r support from ,° th+e� ,� ►t. r recto y s do
�. } *v 7 ti� rr T.r., �w bN'•.;1'€ r�x..
:pro posals , a vance- 'towar_d; real>izatio�.`
•
X1 fl
3. Analysis and Conclusions
•
4.„- Alternatives • , • .• • ...
• .
4.1 Maintain zonieg-,,,,ulong4eral.4,44ar';.#
r,a OpMent.4.0.ii:take place at desi
-• consisteht Ci ty' PI etf.11
•,, fy.'i•-,',,,'90als.'";0.,..-ebjeetiveS.,:and.':: polictes. Thls alternative wou1d,'o
• -per1od oftt me,reSU1t in '
generateC woU
• -be acconnio,daed-:ithrought-,:-.:11■Created utllizatlOn of the person-1
Coral -J.: 1'iay1-4ranspertatiorGC
fOri.ititenti.ficatiOef,;oU land use along
• • • Coral • Way will need to be i h ow t
• will make use of the Corridor' capacity...,
• ,:-..-• - •• - .--•
4.2 As -- Contingent al ternatives-:.to 'the Trantportati on . : CorrirderS'".approa ch
the fol lowing are : conventional .. approaches . •that •,w601.
future trip generation , or '1 provide the !.mians'ifor„
add i ti onal trips gendrated: by i intensifi ed
- • , •
• 4 the:: existing tOuing:::-.-00"?
:jinprove both S.W. 22nd Terrace and S.W
•deslgnate them as supplemental arterl'
'
onoretlepsiyei Plan anienck
.110:
3.1 The existing commercial land uses in the area are generally less
intensive•_than permitted by . zoning; most of.- the existing uses -
Coral Way :maybe.redeVelOPed - at substantially - more intensive levels'. .•
than exi st- at, present. . The.- Sears and P1 tt parcel I, due to their ---:••1 ,
unUsually- 'large si ze, represent significant redevelopment 'potential
3.2 The existing traffit al ong ', Coral Way•• is • at - an LOS, ..es ,
measured . by -conventi onal: V/C .rnethodol ogy . • Redevel opment ofol and
al ong Coral, the' maxi Mum intensity • permitted by existlflg •
zoning woul dAncrease7 traffi c and degrade • existinglevels
to unacceptable levels f existing passenger vehicle occupandy: rates":
- and mass transit ridership Continue as at present. • : ,
.. • • ..•
• t',. .
3.3 The traffi c capability of Coral Way, as deffned
obsol ete V/C methodology : cannot ., be increased :rlght_of.Wa
1 imi tations and the restrlctions , imposed 1, , by its
• statuco: Uti 1 i zing :. the 7 Transportation CorridorVt tiettwidOle
additional person.trlps can ; be tacCOuroodated within the
Corri dor, but perhaps not asrapdlY and to r, the level stilleede
• • support .. :-.'redevel opment 'to the full extent permitted,- by
zoning ,
rr ed ;Alternative . :. kk
> Prefe _
-
t..
� mos rho
k. `as: =the
iimends � : l ternatiwe`= 4 1�' ;
: The` � Pl > anni ng'�.:�Department Y... ; A _
f l d" ermi t Conti riued;:. eve! oilmen
_.,
.400t--007-that . �u � � p . . _- ..
frontage, to reasonabl.etY:urban levels,: whi l.e' accommodating the aaai.;tior
trips ° ger�ated,:-by,` ; intensified develo pment tii thi n i ,the,. coni c < of 11�
en... p * ;The.. ' fp..
City, >sK;, adopted Trarispor, >tati 14ccess
. Corr~idoes >:: 1an
� �implementatlon .of this ° . ' ,al terna'tive "w ll z, requicl ose ,cooperatiok4a
:, support °Ifroma ;they private': sector. }to "help' provide:, the means and incentive,
'necessary ,to, carry out the- Transportation. Corridors concept. °. Failing sucl
cooperation's - and_ ; sup it many, be necessary' to r coJnst_ ier. implementation
n o
t e _. of .the conventional alternatives listed under 4.2" <
o e.
Ci ty funds for the improvement of the local ... streets
arterial standards.
- 4.22 DOWntone the Coral Way frontage: to about 50% of' .its presen
• re potential from S.W. 27th . !Avenue to 7th
Avenue, - : and ; improve S.W. 22nd Terrace and designate' it;' - *.,,
suppl emental arterial , street ; to relieve coral-
al alternative woul ' also require a - rezoning Comprehensive . an
amendment to - the existing residential neighborhood : served x by
S.W. • 22nd Terrace to create a buffer of land uses: :.that V/60141
be Consi wi th proximity to -: an arterial al street; ° _as
the;.cotenitment of .Ci funds for the improvement of the - °,local
street to arterial standards
f =
4.23: Downzone :: _Coral Way ; frontage between S.W.' 27 an
37th: : to ` a l evel : that Matches - , the, .average of existi
1 and_ use'; so . that redevelopment would: not : I ncrease;,the ' pupil
of ::tri ; , over = present 1 eve.! s °. The :. effect ;: of, : .thi s al ternati v
Would be -.to :,freeze - trip :generation -- and resul teht °LOS; a t' 14 i
:present acceptable ;. 1 eve! , _ ,and: -_ make unnecessa
introductiOn . of ; additional traffic; :into
residential neighborhood:::
•■•■111111111p
• • -
• , • . •
NM I I
11, .1 II II I I
• - " • • r7.1.7.11.- ;;;Jr;
16.twoonnimi hift■ol iheijiimat Lana t
II 11
uhlflHt 11111111 11111111 11111111
-W
, .
'.. •
lios■owit
4
1..orromit
«--p ".••
.N SIM , MOE
IMMO . SUM
AV MOM
, taiNe
-1 SEM
)e., IMIN
•
MON
riltal willinta
tam a mime
,P,A, Mug IS Nam mow swami irk
, --
•
f r ANNUM Iiihi,111111,11 MO 111 111,1 11,111111,1.1111111111
• •
- ".• •.:•:iX1`11
:- : of pi.'
t., ., ":. t >.6:•••,.•:.:::.
.. .
—
- 1 ....'w:.'
P.,200; ' - , , ' • .-- :■;.■:,
. ..*:,
.. nrAr Vr.. •'!••••••
Zre0t7g .1 ..;"YrA0 raktX. ::,5"
a O 0%.Z ...,
SIHIIIII
• v./..• ••••••. t , •.. 1 ;.1tan,c, . .
1
.0 Ma IP WM'. 0an• a ...0 :
. :•rt: ca, 0 .:•:,:!0: A-py.,1 - :trt.. gPMe ...
■‘',"'•''-` '''
" ,-; .. 4
:,.$:"^: f: o -:‘ : .....■,,,{1 .. 4
,..:.::! Nnf::.!...:3 •I. .:" t'''':M4 •:::";:,
• if.... • ' ‹...." $ ••>.“:0 0=0 :''-'7..0. ',"`r , YOZ .1. 1
'54 '... •
• -',.:7 .,:.:•:.: :•:•••••,, •
:••••••••
••••••••.•
•••• ••••••:•:,*
: ,:.• •-• •
r•••••: • •:•,7:•Y•A
•
: ....5X•••••11
•
• • ;-:•:
.• • F VW, .P:MVX• ...S ,
G7
30S9PM novSZ1
•t•F,M. !t
_1
" •
fpgowse • ..tm x46.27.^, cit
•ws 24 'Mc::
fd0t05 4 Al2:::$ S4 4
•
C:' ; TOM gik:r4.:
‘7•10:33
k.zma
4.z.; mgss, 747 •>;;:.;;;Z rAM
04 amm
S5r0 mo.
MTP.Ng %%UM
ona2c, f:.4,4 • 4t.'07 "
.•. =IA* p 4X 7'
•••• ••••:•• • •
r:p>.•20s >2>usx.7%
*PS::
. ..
-::.:-:-- --- •.. — --- • • — . -.:::: ....'..::::.:.
110...,:.> :•,..x.: . kk.:•:::: :::::::: ''''
ff c,::.:, • ,,::.Z.);. ,.." "."'
x.":":,: «444. ...:: ,,.:',:,.: 44434 44434 „ ,...., ....:',..:: .....:.:::::.
°raw
44•55•4-4 77
v.
174:54Q
:VA,” 0.5X
0*0*0- f....Terfa
n4 PX
75,5951
,15K
t•••55a
...:•:••• swan
•X•:•1 OMR
5,4•24
*7 0-5550-
•••■••e• 7a•VS,
4840
••••7 aaat
is,. *an
5.00000
704
4.5R43•
$ Teaigeaateea Caterer e as saw Mean Wide* !it ia}esi . alai
eh tam 1•••11•116 i edl N wirria• (Me be — aienre �e. o�taM a
riM lesse Y dlle•l•re N.telr • =1st eaten maw Wty'iai
eseesit ~ism Mer at lam M alone teeqwai). eta er•■•,
arm is 1h .w mu* •Idle « tr ~sag.
Ile 111 a eaiNre aatas• A se /nee as* setea•
pr00•••• prises Ise teerq lee►aeee w • e•IL eeeeit iii
- aa.. ig a sr M WM. 1e far a/r MUaY Mere /al
••al•••••
laM
eapsmeits tnealpat{atlw q•Ir• , Inca; so!. a • Woe ,sell •,
las atlrni.' - iM leefWa. "eiwiilew t� V dl l y
t Naetaf
• the NM. 'Su semis* u i Hone • 'e at
eearM ea Y MpeMe e/, laMl•• eevate 3tWlt etitlem,
ZONING
Area . 1 1.72 X GLA = 1.72 X 258,675 =
Area 2 1.72 X GLA • 1.72 X 160,536 =
Area 3 1.72 X GLA is 1.72•X 361,514 =
Miracle Center 1.72 X GLA = 1.72 X 192,382 •
GROSS; BUILDING
AREA ALLOWED
444,921 sq. .ft.
276,122 sq. ft.
621,804 sq. ft.
330.837 3q. ft.
645,897 sq.; f