The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-10594J-89-308 3/6/89 ORDINANCE NO. 1.0594 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A NEW SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (FIFTEENTH YEAR)," AND APPROPRIATING $11,742,000 FOR EXECUTION OF SAME; FURTHER APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF $1,354,000 FROM FIFTEENTH YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM INCOME AS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR A TOTAL OF $13,096,000; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. n WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development will award to the City of Miami a grant of $11,742,000 entitled Community Development Block Grant Fifteenth Year to provide community development activities for the period commencing June 16, 1989 and ending June 15, 1990; and WHEREAS, the City Department of Community Development projected that income amounting to $1,354,000 will be generated during the period commencing June 16, 1989 and ending June 15, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development approved the programming of said anticipated income of $1,354,000 to provide community development activities -for the period commencing June 16, 1989 and ending June 15, 1990, as set forth in Housing and Urban Development Rules and Regulations Subpart J. Section 570.506, paragraph (c); and WHEREAS, the herein Ordinance is a proper vehicle to appropriate the aforesaid grant; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF M IAM I, FLORIDA: 1.0594 N Section 1. The following Special Revenue Fund is hereby established and resources are hereby appropriated as described herein: FUND TITLE: Community Development Block Grant (15th Year) RESOURCES: Federal Grant-U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development $11,7429000 Community Development Block Grant Program ncome T5T Year) $1935411000 APPROPRIATION: Community Development Block Grant (15th Year) TOTAL: $13,096,000 Section 2. The herein total appropriation of $13;096;000 for Community Development refers to those publicly supported physical development activities and those related social or economic development activities being carried out within a reasonable period of time in accordance with the approved Grant Program Final Statement. Section 3. All Ordinance or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. If any section, part of section; paragraph, clause; phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final reading and adoption hereof, pursuant to law. 10594 PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 27th day of April , 1989. 7th PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of June , 1989. ATTESv CITY CLERK BUDGETARY REVIEW: & ?J v 3ll NA, DIRECTOR DEPT. OF MA A MENT & BUDGET FINANCIAL REVIEW: DEPARlWNT OF FINANCE PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM & CORRECTNESS: C ITY ATTORNEY COMMUNITY DE PMENT REVIEW: L DEPT. OF COMMUNI Y DEVELOPMENT - 3 - 10594 ILI MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookie Williams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 10594 Inthe ............ X........................... Court, was published in said newspaper in the Issues of June 15, 1989 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review Is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, PPand that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously Sa ulished In yday, Sunday and Legal Holid Dade days) andahasach been entered as second class mail matter at the post office In Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding ja'f'fIaf blication of the attached copy of advertisement; and er says that she has neither paid nor promised any or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or the purpose of securing this advertisement for in the saki newsppaap,.er.. `%%%%V1W14jj?jj, d subscribed before me this 15ai�� .... da P��; V. °i Y` o . � . !..... , A.D. 19 .... 8, 9 • ` Ohe�f. `,MMar iner Notaicr Stats of Florida at Large (SEAL).®� My Cornmission a -0 ALAICA2„ 1992; MR 114 • 1. P� CITY All intefested perm 1989, the City Commle ordinances: AN . EMERG.ENCY. OF:ORDINANCE THE° ANNUAL APF YEAR 'ENDING � APPROPRIATION; ERAL SERVICES", SION , BY, 39YS 88 AMOUNT FROM;.TI .ESTABLISHING %NONRECURRING; CONTAINING "AR 'CLAUSE O'PMENT BLOCK APPROVED SY.Th !,:U DEVELOPM'ENT CONTAINING kRI =�'-CLAUSE ,, AN .ORDINANCE,,i OF',THE CITY _,OFh ING THE CHARGE :.: , PARKING -,PASSES BALL;;51 MARINE A SEVER AN ,ORD AMENDII AND 194 AS AMEI ANNUAL FEES FO TION. SE r ne eroc PERM..IT&,FORySTOF . ; LIOUIDS,:ANDPERT BEING NECESSARY COST, CONTAIN, ING ABILITY CLAUSE . a AN, EMER6ENCY:.01 THE`CODE"OF THE': ENTITLED "MEMBEI BOARD), 'AS TO TH AMENDING' SUBSE MEMBER A REGULAi ING,THE:NUMBER•O SECTION (B):TO EN( MANDATE, THAT CE 11 ARCHITECTS,OR EN TION (B) TO ABOLII THE CIVIC AFFAIRS' A,.QUALIFICATIOW T AMENDING' SUCH SI OF AN ALTERNATE REGULAR MEMBERS 'AMENDING SUBSE REQUIREMENT THA BE PUBLISHED: IN A IN THE CITI!'OR`INs REPEALER PROVISI( THEREIN'�TO _DEL CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM The Honorable Mayor and TO Members of the City Commission DATE ��7 � �5�9 F'�- 15th Year Community SUEJECT Development Block Grant (COBG) Application Cesar Odio Commission Agenda Item rQDNA City Manage REFERENCES April 13, 1989 ENCLOSURES RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission approve the attached ordinance and resolution, appropriating Community Development Block Grant funds (Fifteenth Year), authorizing the City Manager to submit a Final Statement to the U.S. Department of Housing b Urban Development (HUD) requesting funds in the amount of 11,742,000 for the proposed Community Development Program during 1989 - 1990, and further authorizing the City Manager, upon approval of said grant by HUD, to accept the same and execute the necessary implementing contracts and agreements. It is further recommended that the City Commission approve the programming of the expected program income of $1,354,000 to be allocated to projects in accordance with the attached information. BACKGROUND: The Department of Community Development has prepared the appropriate legislation for a public hearing on the 15th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program scheduled for April 13, 1989. This will be the only hearing at the City Commission regarding the proposed 15th year allocation. In addition, staff has anticipated that $1,354,000 in program income will be received during -the coming year from Building and Demolition Revenues, Housing and Economic Development loans. This supplement to the City's grant amount brings the total amount of funding available to $13,096,000. With this amount, however, funding still remains inadequate to meet community needs. It is the recommendation of staff and the C.D. Advisory Board that funding 'be concentrated on those activities which will have the greatest positive impart: 1_0 594 7-/ The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -2- Housing . Public Service Programs Economic Development . Public Improvements As in previous years, the fifteenth year Community Development planning process has been a difficult one for staff and Community Development Advisory members alike in making recommendations for pr.ojects funding. During the past year, members of the Community Development Advisory Board have become more involved with all issues affecting their respective communities and they are better able to advise the City on decisions affecting their neighborhoods. By and large, the Community Development Advisory Board concurs with recommendations made by staff regarding the use of funds for 15th Year activities. The only difference between staff recommendations and the board is the funding of the Alternative Program in the Public Service Section. I. HOUSING Since 1978, a major portion of the Ci ty's annual CDBG allocation has been earmarked for the provision of low -interest loans and direct grants to low and moderated income homeowners for the purpose of financing needed home repairs. To date, over $12,600,000 in rehabilitation financing has been provided to 835 qualified homeowners citywide. loan repayments are rolled over into the program and used to provide additional loans and grants. In addition, the CDBG funded multifamily rental housing rehabilitation financing program provides rehabilitation financing for needed repairs to rental housing projects. located in the City's Community Development target areas, at'.interest rates and terms which would not require major rent increase burdens to be passed on to the low income tenants. To date, over $13,700,000 in CDBG rehabilitation financing has been provided, which has leveraged over $8,500,000 in private monies, resulting in the renovation of 53 rental housing projects containing 1,713 dwellings. IL0594 Z The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -3- The Community Development Advisory Board concurs with staff recommendations to fund Housing at the level of $2,000,000 for the 15th Year Community Development Block Grant. The Housing Conservation and Development Agency recommends funding Single Family and Multifamily Rehabilitation Loan Programs at the levels of $600,000 and $1,400,000 as measure to continue to upgrade the City's existing housing inventory. Also in accordance with the Advisory Board, the Department. of Housing and Conservation recommends administrative and programmatic funding at the level of $50,000 each for Tacolcy Economic Development Corporation and the East Little Havana Development Corporation, two housing development community based organizations. Other programs recommended for funding through the 15th Year CDBG Program that are directly or indirectly related to housing include: 1) Continuation of the City's Substandard Structure Demolition Pro.gram - $300,000. 2) Continuation of the Citywide Historic Preservation Program, entailing the inventory of sites of historic and architectural significance within the City, and the development of programs for their preservation - $35,000. 3) Continuation of the Overtown Historic Preservation Program which serves to conserve the history and culture of the Culmer-Overtown area by identifying, collecting, organizing, and processing historical records pertaining to the development of the Culmer-Overtown area and making the collection available to the community - $31,000. 4) Continuation of the Senior Crime Match Security Program, which provides home security improvements in the form of locks and security screens to low income resi.dents on a citywide basis - $55,000. 1.0594 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -4- I I. PUBLIC SERVICES Support services which complement the physical and economic development thrust of the CDBG Program are necessary to assist residents and improve the quality of life in neighborhoods. The public services programs recommended for funding are tailored to meet the needs of the particular neighborhoods and include: meals, elderly services, child care, primary health care, and special needs. Available C.D. funding for public services is limited due to federal regulations have placed a fifteen per cent (15%) cap on the utilization of C.D. funds for social service programs. It is anticipated that the 15th Year entitlement to the City will be increased by 4%, which will increase the available amount for public services by $66,750, from $1,694,550 to $1,761,300. Currently, the City directs the allowable 15% cap of its C.D. allocation for this purpose. The staff recommendation (Attachment II ) includes two (2) funding options for consideration by the City Commission. The first option recommends that all currently funded programs receive an across the board reduction of 5.1%. The second option reflects a reduction of 10.7% and includes a $100,000 allocation to the Camillus House. The enclosed attachment includes the specific recommended allocation by Agency for each funding option. Despite the increase in the City's grant, the reductions are necessary to continue social service programs currently funded by the City. The recommendations include previously funded social service programs not funded through the C.D. process as well as C.D. funded programs and other programs funded with carryover funds from previous years. In order to maintain existing social service programs at current funding levels, a total of $1,853,493 is needed. It should also be noted that the City Commission has discussed the possibility of funding the Camillus House through the City's public service portion of the CDBG entitlement. As a condition of the City's purchase of the current property where the Camillus. House provides its shelter to the homeless, the City agreed to allocate the Agency $100,000 per 1-0594 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -5- annum for a five year period to cover operating costs of the shelter. As indicated above, Option B of the staff recommendation reflects the inclusion funding for this Agency at a level of $100,000. The Citywide Community Development Advisory Board concurs with Option A of the staff recommendation for the allocation of C.D. public service funds with one notable exception. The Board did not approve funding for the Alternative Programs, Inc., allocation of $50,000. Rather, the Board voted to award the $50,000 to Cure Aids Now, Inc. for this Agency's expansion request for staff to provide support services to clients of the currently funded meals for homebound aids patients project and to open an inner City office for the.program. Therefore, the Board recommends that Cure Aids Now, Inc., be awarded $77,887 of 15th Year C.D. funds. The Board further recommends that the City. identify supplemental funds to support the Agency's total request of $158,550. In addition, due to the limited availability of funds, new proposals are not recommended for 15th Year C.D. funding. It should be pointed out that, if new projects are funded or allocations to existing projects are maintained at current levels or increased, then the increased and/or maintenance funding must be taken from other currently funded agencies. During the 14th Year allocation process, $12,887 was allocated to social service agencies from the available balance of unexpended 13th Year C.D. Funds for public services. An additional $25,082 was allocated from the carryover balance from the Special Programs and Accounts: Contingent Fund. These carryover funds were used to restore food programs to 99.7% of the 13th Year C.D. allocation. Once staff is able to determine the available balance of unexpended 14th Year funds for .public services, the City Commission will have the option to redistribute these funds accordingly. Staff has received several new proposals for consideration as well as requests for increased funding from several existing agencies. As discussed earlier, due to budgetary constraints, funding is not recommended for new proposals or increases to existing projects. 10594 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -6- Attachment I clearly overviews C.D. funds allocated by service category and reflects the specific recommended allocation to each agency for each option. Following is a brief summary -of the impact of the reduction on each service category: 1.) C.D. Meals Agencies - Funding would decrease byy $52,390, (from $1,027,259 to $�74;869) under Option A and by a109.906 under Option B (from $1,027,259 to $917,353); 2.) C.D. Healthcare Agencies - Funding would be reduced by $4,469 under Option A (from, $87,612 to $87,613) and by $9,375 under Option B (from $87,612 to $78,237); 3). C.D. Childcare Agencies - Funding would be cut by $14,535 under Option A (from $285,012 to $2,270,477) and $30,497 under Option B (from $285,012 to $254,515); and 4). C.D. Special Needs Agencies - Funding would be increased by $29,416 under Option A (from $403,610 to $433,026) and by $106,814 under Option B (from $403,610 to $510,424). Attachment B summarizes all proposals for new projects. I I I. . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The Department of Community Development presently funds twelve (12) CBO's at a level of fifty -thousand dollars ($50,000) for the 1988-1989 fiscal period. These funds provide for administrative and programmatic operational support. Based on the 1988-89 midyear contractor's evaluation report (See Attachment III) staff is recommending that (11) CEO's be funded. Eight (8) CBO's be awarded contracts of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) each for a one-year period; two CBO's will be placed on probation. Another agency also recommended for funding on probationary status is Martin Luther King Economic Development Corporation and further recommending against funding the Northeast Miami Chambers of Commerce which has failed to satisfactorily adhere and/or comply with the terms of its contract agreement with the City of Miami. It is also recommended that funds be appropriated for Metro -Miami Action Plan (MMAP) in the amount of.$100,000 and Greater Miami United in the amount of $95,000. It should be noted that the eligibility of these projects is still being questioned by HUD and staff is still attempting to resolve these problems. 1L0594 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -7- Administrative funding for the Department of Development in the amount of $200,000 to manage the Southeast Overtown Park West project is also included as part of the CDBG allocations. As is the case with the above two agencies HUD as also cited the Department of Development as an eligibility issue. Staff is presently working to address this matter. In addition, staff recommends providing funds in the amount of $190,000 to Miami Capital Development, Inc., to provide technical and financial assistance to small and/or disadvantaged businesses located in the City of Miami target areas. Likewise, staff proposes to continue funding the Revolving Loan Fund Program at the level of $1,000,000 for Business Development which is used to provide low interest. loans to small and/or. disadvantage businesses located in the target areas. Furthermore, it is also recommended that funding in the amount of $167,300 be -kept for the Target Areas Economic Development and Physical Improvement Projects Pool to provide financial participation in the form of a grant or loan for physical improvement and/or economic development projects within the target areas. Staff also recommends funding the City of. Miami Neighborhood Jobs Program at a level of $376,192 to provide job development services for local area residents by contacting public and private employers for job placement. IV. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS In the past five years the CDBG fund allocations have been primarily utilized in support of housing, economic development and public service programs. However, due to an expressed need in the community for better public improvements and places, staff recommends that $2.4 million be allocated for new street improvements, landscaping and new sidewalks all within the Community Development Neighborhood target areas of Allapattah, Overtown and the Little Haiti section of Edison/Littel River. (See attachment IV) 11.0.5-94 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page -8- V. ADMINISTRATION We are recommending that the level for administration be maintained at the same level percentage of grant -funds (20%).as last year. Administration funds are utilized to cover general administration costs of the program, planning activities and indirect cost contribution to the City. VI. CONTINGENCIES For the next fiscal year, $32, 808 of COBG funds has been set aside for contingencies which will be used to cover costs incurred in activities of an unforeseen nature, to increase the scope of existing projects and make their final completion possible, and to fund new projects suggested by the City Commission during the year. Attachments: Proposed Ordinance and Resolution 'A.QS94 MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE- Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she is the Supervisor of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE RE: AN ORD. ESTABLISHING A NEW SPECIAL REVENUE FUND In the ......X.. A. .X .......................... Court, was published in said newspaper In the issues of May 26, 1989 Afflant further says that the said Miami Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously publlshed in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and hea been entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Miami In said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached co of advertisement; and aflfant further says that she has r r id norpromised any person firm or corporation annt, rebate, commission or re nd for the purpose of t s advertisement for ouhtfcaj,10 in the -laid new p this ,,� l�Q. $y(Ard�A�d subscribed afore me a 89 2 C� gay p r�• e.� ..... Y .......... A.D. 19..... , . Zheryl H. Marmar �Ai, Ary.'�.'PPubl�fL, State of Florida at Large My�C9�rni isslon, gxpl�e+i'AArt02, 1992. MR 11d�t� Ji!li41111G�`4,\, MIAMI FLU Nlt�`'I`I�� ` a�tb1'�Cl��1� t��tt�►.� Notloe Is hereby' given that the City COMMI6111bh bt Miami, Florida,' Wtli cohsider the t6116Wlthg otdinahbba end final'reading bh' June 7, 1989, Comineht3ing at 046 City Commission 'Chambere, 5500 Par? Amerloen`;Dr -Floridat ORDINAN09 NO. 2�83:1r 18'8r'� OF THE S:' AND, PERMITS; FOR ASSEMB INCREASES BEI� IN OPERATIONS ' PROVISION'AND AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CODE t< AMENDED, BY I. RFLATFr1 FFRS SURCHARGE,,-F,UR•THERr`iNCREASING 1tEES CONCERNING APPLICATION, REQUESTS FOR REVIEW OF DECISIONS :OF,THE' ZONING BO;AAD. 20NING ADMINISTRATOR OR DIRECTOR 'OF THE.'bEPARTMENT OF PLANNING;- AND, CONTAIN NO A REPEALER, PROVISION'AND ASEVERABILITY CLAUSE, ORDINANCE_ NO. ' AN ORDINANCE"AMENDING- SECTIONS, ,OF"THE'COOE , OF THE CITY' OF MIAMI' FLORIDA, AS AMENDED,1 ; DEALING•WITH THE -,'OFFICE' OF. P,RO.t=EStibkAL COMPLIANCE;: MORE PARTICULARLY;AMENDING`CObEtt ( r SECTIONS 2.236:2,ANb 42�62 AS,THE SAME PERTAIN TO T ORGANIZATIONAL -STATUS, POWERS AND`DUTIES OF SAID OFFICE AND.PROVIDING FO.R AN'ADVISORY COMMITTEE'FURTHER, AMENDING CODE SECTION:42e83 RELATED TO; THE FILING.AND INVESTIGATION OF r" COMPLAINTS OF WRONGDOING FILED,ACiAINST.i?OLICE OFF ICERS;'FURTHER AMENDING SECTION:4286 ' RELATING, TO THE; REPORTING' OF AN*:INCOMPLETE, 1 REP ED.OR.DEFICIENT-lNy,ESTiGAT10N,�;CONTAINING A BIAS 'sue EALER PROVISION'AND SEVERAB)LITY CLAUSE ORDINANCE'NO: AN ORDINANCE AMEN XNG'CF APTER• 4, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, ARTICLE I.IN GENERAL, OF;THE CODE OF THE CITYOF'MIAMI;rFLORIDA, BY;ADDING A;.NEW r' PARAGRAPH 'TO" SECTION 41,(%)WHICN DEFINES A ` f^. RETAIL SPECIALTY' CENTER; BY AMENDING PARAGRAPH (2) (3) AND (5)'OF,:SECTION'43(C)%TO_PROViDE AN' 41 EXCEPTION FOR SUNDAY SALES 'AND ESTABLISH HOURS 7 , � OF OPERATION TOR, RETAIL` SPECIALTY CENTERS, BY J,'( a ADDING A; NEW,SUBSECTION-(F) TO„SECTION 4.14 TO, i PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION FROM DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS, LIMIT -THE NUMBER OF ESTABLISH ,;?;�'. MENTS AND. RESTRICT SIGNS;"FOR•.AND IN'RETAIL--,' SPECIALTY CENTERS; CONTAINING' A.,REPEALER PROVISION; SEVERABILITY CLAUSE ANb AN EFFECTIVE DATE.. ORDINANCE'NO. AN ORDINANCE ES.TABLISHING 'A NEW SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: : :'Wm UNITYDE ELOP ENT /. M V M BLOCK GRANT (FIFTEENTH YEAR)," AND APPROPRIA TING1$11,7.42,000.FOR`EXECUTION OF SAME, FURTHER APPROPRIATING`.THE r SVM.OF $1,354,000 ;FROM FIFTEENTW.YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBLOC—.'.` .GRANT.>(CDBG).PROGRAMANCOME AS'APPROVEO BY THE DEPARTMENT :OF. HOUSING AND UFIBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)' FOR A .TOTAL: OF $13,0.96,000, .; CONTAINING A- .REPEALER PROVISION SF-VERABICITY;CLA_ USE. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10459, , _:ADOPTED JUI,Y 14, 1988, ,WHICH ESTABLISHED THE MiAMI WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD, BY REQUIRING s THAT THE BOARD SHALL BE INFORMED OF ALL ISSUES CONCERNING THE MAJOR. DEVELOPMENT, AN, , DISPOSITION OF,CITY-0WNED.WATERFRONT:PROPERTY , FOR IT& INPUT'ANDtADVICE 'AT THE SAME,TIME OR BEFORE OTHER CITY'GOMMITTEES. OR' BOARDS ARE ,INFORMED OF'SAID1SSUES;: NTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION`AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING , FOR INCLUSION.IN THE CITY CODE ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 53.135`OF THE..`;' CODEOF.THECITY OF.MIAMI FLORIpA,,As AMENDED BY iNCREAAS.ING THE; CHARGES FOWORANGE'HOWL. STADIUM RESERVED PARKING PASSES"AND: FOR GENERAL, EVENT"•PARKING AND PROVIDING FOR THE APPLICATION Oi?LTHESE INCREASED -RATES. FOR y:: PARKING'AT THE-MIAMI BQI BY MADU,IO-BASEB, STADIUM:'ANp'THE'COMMODORE IiALPH,MUNROE,, MARINE STADIUM' CONTAINING A REPEALER, PROVISION 'ANO A SEVERABILITY'CL.AUSE. " Said.,ordinance.may ba Inspegted by the,publlc at the Office 0if, through Friday, axciuding holidays, b@tWeen the hours`of 800 a ' r and 5:60 p.m. All Interested persons may appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinances. Should any person desire to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to"any matter to be considered at;this meeting, that person shall ensure that a'verbatim record of the proceedings Is made including all teatimony,and evidence upon which any appeal may be based. (6139R) MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK MIAMI, FLORIDA 5128 89-4-052632M