HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and MapskIle
_ {- ��
71-4City of Miami
i1 [I�+iY["[I P
CCU -:A Planning Department
STAFF ANALYSIS FOR
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
NOTICE
mis suemmal neeec ro ee sceeeuu•e for a pueuc nemmq
rcoreanre limelmes sea roee mme ❑ayrn
M ami C¢le. Theapplicahle tlecision-mabing will
reWewtMeinfoenadon at the pubM1c M1earing to m1dndera
recommeneaoon «e anal eecieon.
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22 //�►
Staff Analysis Report No.
PZ-20-8017
Location
1210, 1222, 1234, and 1250 Northwest 7 Avenue
Area
Approximately 0.59 acres (25,708 SF)
Commission District
District 5 — Commissioner Christine King
Department of Human Service
Neighborhood Service Center
Overtown
Existing FLU Designation
Light Industrial
Proposed FLU Designation
Restricted Commercial
Applicant
Trendy Properties, LLC
Applicant Representative
Alex Uribe
Planner
Ryan Shedd, Planner II
Recommendation
Approval
REQU ES7
Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"), Trendy Properties,
LLC ("the Applicant") is requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map ("FLUM")
of the MCNP to change the designation of the properties at 1210, 1222, 1234, and 1250 Northwest 7 Avenue
("the Property") from "Light Industrial' to "Restricted Commercial'. The proposed amendment contains
approximately 0.59 acres. Small-scale comprehensive plan amendments are those that involve less than 50
acres of property and are subject to the Small -Scale Review Process, as set forth in Section 163.3187, Florida
Statutes. This application is accompanied by PZ-19-8015, a request to modify the zoning for the same site,
from 75-0" (Urban Center Transect Zone — Open) to 76-12-0" (Urban Core Transect Zone — Open).
SITE AND NEIGHBORHOOD DETAILS
The Property consists of four parcels located on the west side of NW 7 Avenue between NW 12 Street and NW
13 Street. The Property consists of 25,708 square feet (approximately 0.59 acres). The aerial photo on the next
page shows the subject property, outlined in red. The legal description of the property is found in ExhibitA of
the legislation and accessible through the Office of Hearing Boards. The general details of the Property are
summarized in the table below:
Table 1. Summa of Existing and Proposed FLU Designations and Zo ing Desi nations
#
ADDRESS
FOLIO
EXISTING
PROPOSED
EXISTING M21
PROPOSED M21
FLU
FLU
ZONING
ZONING
1
1210 NW 7AV
01-3135-019-1520
2
1222 NW 7AV
01-3135-019-1640
Light
Industrial
Restricted
Commercial
T5-0
T6-12-0
3
1234 NW 7AV
01-3135-019-1630
4
1250 NW 7AV
01-3135-019-1620
Page 1 of 12
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
Jam\ 04/06/22
The property is centrally located within the Highland Park neighborhood, which is well defined, bounded by
State Road 836 to the north, the Miami River to the south and west, and Interstate 95 to the east. NW 7th
Ave is the main north -south arterial for the neighborhood. The Property is located within two blocks of the
Culmer Metrorail station, which places it within a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) area and just south
of the Health District. The Properties are also close to east -west arterials such as NW 10 St, NW 11 St, and
NW 14 St, which offer easy access to employment centers in Downtown and Edgewater. Miami Dade
Transit bus service offers countywide accessibility from a stop directly in front of the Properties. The Subject
Property is situated near the Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Area. It is across
the street from BookerT. Washington High School. The Culmer Metrorail Station is less than half a mile
away from the Subject Property. The area is well served by the City of Miami's Trolley and Miami -Dade
County's Metrobus. The map below shows the area and the transit service that is available in the
surrounding area:
Subject Site and
Page 2 of 12
NOTICE
ThiseebmRtal nee tlafobescheduledforapu ,bearing
rcoreanre wanlimelmes sea fodn m,g ❑y or
M ami Cale. Theapplirthle tlP ibk -makingbaywill
reeewme�nto�adon atone puboc M1earing m renders
rmom d,do , afinaldeciuon.
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22 J
EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION(S)
The existing Future Land Use (FLU) designation for the Subject Property is "Light Industrial."
The Future Land Use Map Interpretation of the MCNP describes this designation as follows:
Areas designated as Light Industrial allow all activities included in the Restricted Commercial and
General Commercial designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve
the needs of other businesses; generally, require on and off-loading facilities, and benefit from close
proximity to general commercial areas. These commercial activities (beyond those permitted in the
Restricted Commercial and General Commercial designations) include retailing of second hand items,
new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing
and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are like those uses
described above.
This category also allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients. This land
use category shall not permit storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution of explosive,
flammable or otherwise hazardous materials, scrap yards; and health clinics.
The hazard level of an activity shall be one of the determining factors as to whether that activity shall be
permissible within a Light Industrial district, the detailed provisions of the applicable land development
regulations shall prohibit high-level hazard activities within live/work developments.
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION(S)
The proposed FLU designation for the Subject Property is "Restricted Commercial." The Future Land Use Map
Interpretation describes this designation as follows:
Areas designated as Restricted Commercial allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a
maximum density equivalent to High Density Multifamily Residential subject to the same limiting
conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other residentially
zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation of existing residential development and that
adequate services and amenities exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential
residents; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general
office use; clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily
retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often
located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional
services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general
entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or
entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in
nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living
quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as Restricted Commercial allow a
maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject property, such FLR may be
increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations;
however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties
designated as Restricted Commercial in the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of
17.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as Restricted Commercial in
the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a maximum
floor lot ratio (FLR) of 3 7. 0 times the net lot area of the subject property.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services
included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that supports nonresidential uses within the inside perimeter of
the outside walls of the building including hallways, stairs, closets, thickness of walls, columns and other
features, and parking and loading areas, and excluding only open air corridors, porches, balconies and
roof areas. Page 3 of 12
The existing and proposed FLUM are presented in the table below.
Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Maps
F
1
f I
-- r
E
—�
Existing Future Land Use Map
Proposed Future Land Use Map
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: SOCIODEMOGRAPHICS
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y.All
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
Jam\ 04/06/22
The subject property is located within Census Tract 12086003001. According to the American Community
Survey (ACS), 5-year estimates (2015-2019), the Median Household Income for the Tract is $32,823, which is
three percent lower than the Median Household Income in the City of Miami, and it is 44 percent lower than the
Area Median Income of $59,100. Approximately 20 percent of the population living in the subject Census Tract
live below the poverty line. This is lower than the same statistic for every surrounding Tract, which have
percentages of population living in poverty ranging from 23 percent to almost 50 percent. Most of the residents
in this Census Tract also rent the homes in which they live (80.22 percent). The Median Rent in the area is
$897. Table 2 below summarizes the information about this Census Tract.0]
Table 2. Summary of Census Data for Subject
Topic.
Number of Households
Tract: 12086003001
.
1,168
Number of Housing Units
1,671
Median Household Income
$32,823 (City of Miami: $33,999)
Percent of People under the Poverty Line
20.76%
Percent of Households that rent
80.22%
Median Rent
$897 (53.26% Rental cost burdened)
Unemployment Rate
3.94%
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS
The maps and tables below illustrate and inventory the Future and Existing Land Uses within a study area
encompassing a quarter -mile around the subject properties. The first set shows the Future Land Uses within
the study area. Visible on the map is the fact that "Restricted Commercial" consists of the majority of the
designated study area, particularly to the west and immediate south. "Major Institutional, Public Faclities,
Transportation, and Utilities" also consists of a considerable amount of area, to the east and on the north side
of the 836 expressway. The south part of the study area contains areas of "Medium Density Multifamily
Residential", as well as a small sliver of "Single Family Residential" within the Spring Garden neighborhood.
Quarter -Mile Study Area - Future Land Use
Page 4 of 12
Quarter -Mile Study Area — Future Land Use
r,
Recreation a � `
( .., [95 OFF RArya yf
'aP''a SR &76
N%V ATF, ST
Major PUB. F"C
J.1 e�
Ok
' s
N
Nw908•YFaH
2507500
50
e
eF-I—
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
Jam\ 04/06/22
The
table below inventories all of the Future Land Use designations within the study area. "Restricted
Commercial" and "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, and Utilities", both intensive designations
allowing a variety of uses, consist of almost three quarters of the study area. Less dense, all -residential FLU
designations consist of less than 20 percent of the study area.
Table 3. Future Land Use Inventory within a Quarter -Mile Study Area
Future Land Use
Acres %
Restricted Commercial 48.56 40%
Major Inst, Public Facilities, Transportation And Utilities 38.60 32%
Medium Density Multifamily Residential 20.72 17%
Light Industrial 10.35 8%
Public Parks and Recreation 1.95 2%
Single Family - Residential 1.80 1%
Total 121.97 100%
To better understand the relationship between the existing built environment and the planned, future land uses, staff
analyzed Miami -Dade County's County Land Use Codes (CLUCs) over the City's Future Land Use Map within the
quarter -mile buffer from the Subject Property. CLUCs reveal information about existing land uses. Within this study area,
we observe that there are 671 address points, the majority of which have high density multi -family uses or low -intensity
residential uses. There are institutional uses and traces of retail/commercial uses that emerge with some patterns,
particularly surrounding the central residential area, adjacent to the Health District, I-95, and towards Overtown.
Page 5 of 12
NOTICE
mis suemma, neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
Jam\ 04/06/22
Quarter -Mile Study Area — Existing Land Use
Existing Land Use
Hotel
• Vacant
Q)
Single Fancily Residential
0
Light IndustriallStorage
0 'State of Florida
0
Multifamily Low Density
I
Institutional
J= Subject Property
Ip
Multifamily Medium Density
utllitiesivaCant
0 - -
114-Mile Study Area
�
Commercial#Retail
iq
Parking
■
Parcel
Table 4, below, inventories the existing land uses within the study area. Strikingly the area shows a
high rate of vacancy, with 122 vacant addresses. While they area spread throughout the
neighborhood, as shown on the Existing Land Use map above, there is a high concentration within the
blocks immediately to the west and north. Though the most abundant Future Land Use designation,
"Restricted Commercial", allows a high density of residential development and a high intensity of
commercial uses, "Commercial/Retail" uses only consist of 2.8 percent of the study area's addresses.
The table below documents the findings.
Page 6 of 12
Table 4. Existinq Land Use Inventory within a Quarter -Mile Studv Area
Existing Land Use
Properties
%
Multifamily Medium/High Density
242
36.1%
Vacant
122
18.2%
Institutional
82
12.2%
Multifamily Low Density
80
11.9%
Single Family Residential
70
10.4%
Utilities/Vacant
25
3.7%
Commercial/Retail
19
2.8%
Light Industrial/Storage
14
2.1%
Hotel
12
1.8%
Parking
4
0.6%
State of Florida
1
0.1 %
Total
671
100%
NOTICE
mis suemmai neeec ro ne scneemea for a puboc nea,in9
rcoreanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cabe. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
reeewme inmrmaeon a<ane paboe nearing m renbe, a
re< mene,�onoranna�eeG�aon.
�PZ-20-8017
Jam\ 04/06/22
Site Visit
On September 29, 2021, Planning staff visited the neighborhood to observe the site and its surrounding conditions. Staff
conducted the site visit on a weekday morning after rush hour, so traffic was relatively light along the main NW 7 Ave
corridor. Below are photographs taken during that visit.
O
Photo 1: Two of the subject properties, at 1250
Photo 2: One of the subject properties, at 1222 NW
and 1234 NW 7 Av, are vacant, with no
7 Ave, has a single commercial structure, which
improvements.
contains two spaces.
Photo 3: One of the subject properties, at 1210
Photo 4: The vacant subject properties are located
NW 7 Ave, contains a residential duplex.
at the corner of NW 7 Ave and NW 13 St. The towers
in Park West and Downtown Miami can be seen in
the background.
Page 7 of 12
oto 5: Looking south along NW 7 Ave, adjacent, newer, higher
nsity and intensity development has begun to develop around
Culmer Metrorail station.
ioto 7: Looking north along NW 7 Ave, from the corner of the
bject properties, infrastructure and institutional uses are
Bible, with a communications building in the foreground,
rectly across the street.
oto 9: This vacant lot is two blocks to the west. Many of
properties in the neighborhood are vacant and fenced
oto 11: West of the subject properties, there are additional
ultifamily residential developments, like this one (built in 2014)
,ectly abutting the Culmer Metrorail station.
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
!�\ 04/06/22
Photo 6: The Culmer Metrorail station is located immediately behind this relatively
new (2015) multifamily residential building.
J
Photo 8: Looking east across NW 7 Ave, a property is undergoing demolition of all
of the structures that were once there. Park West and Downtown Miami are visible
in the background.
Photo 10: Looking east, with the subject properties located behind the line of trees
and housing in the background, this is another vacant lot. Also visible are
Downtown Miami, as well as the multifamily development on NW 7 Ave.
! ! a
! !
Photo 12: Northwest of the subject properties, there are yet more
midrise, multifamily residential developments. This building shown was
constructed in 2019. The green space on the right side of the photo is
City -owned parks and recreation space.
Page 8 of 12
NOTICE
This suemmalneeecfo be sceeemee1ha 11. eeanng
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea rune in me cry m
Miami Cotle. The applirztle tlsision-ma kinge ly will
reeewme inmlmaeon at aee pa- neatlng to rentlev a
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
The Planning Department tested levels of service as required for this application. The Leve PZ-20-8017
testing assumes the population will increase from 281 persons to 1,180 persons on the subj 04/06/22 121
analysis does not take into consideration the possibility of density bonuses that might be perms
comprehensive plan, subject to limitations in the applicable land development regulations.
Schools
On November 17, 2020, Miami -Dade County Public Schools submitted its findings that it had tested the
proposed change of land use and zoning and found that the school system has sufficient capacity to serve the
application for the elementary, middle and high school levels. A final determination of school concurrency and
capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent.
Recreation and Open Space
The MCNP requires a 10-minute'/2-mile barrier -free walk to a park entrance to meet public Levels of Service
(LOS). The Planning Department conducted an analysis in GIS to test the LOS for this proposal and found that,
with the increase in population, it meets LOS standards.
Potable Water
The MCNP LOS standard for potable water services is 92.05 gallons per capita per day (PCPD). Consumption
is assumed to be approximately 22,736 by residential uses; however, LOS standards do not take into
consideration the consumption of non-residential uses.
Sanitary Sewer Transmission
The MCNP LOS standards for Sanitary Sewer is 141 GPCD. The MCNP does not require testing of this County
service.
Solid Waste Collectior
The City's LOS standard for Solid Waste is 1.28 tons/resident/year. The Franchise Agreement the City
maintains provides flexibility to address fluctuations in solid waste production.
Transportation
The MCNP has updated its LOS standards for the City with the most recent update of the Transportation
Element. In the April 2020 concurrency review for this application, the Office of Capital Improvements
acknowledged that the difference in PM Peak Hour trips is estimated to be approximately 65 and the difference
in daily trips is estimated to be 766. The applicant is not required to provide a plan for mitigating these trips at
this time; however, a transportation plan will be required when development plans are submitted.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The following is an analysis of the application relative to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the MCNP.
Criteria 1 Future Land Use Policy LU-1.6.4: "Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning
Atlas that has been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use
Plan Map by the Planning Department, shall require a level of service (LOS)
review and a finding from the Planning Department that the proposed
amendment will not result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum
standards described in Policy CI-1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any
element of the MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning
considerations, the Planning Department will forward a recommended action
on said amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its
recommendation to the Citv Commission."
Analysis 1 When the City tested Levels of Service, Miami -Dade County Public Schools
responded indicating that there is adequate capacity at all school levels.
Furthermore, the Office of Capital Improvements indicated that the application,
as tested increases Peak Hour Trips by 65 and daily trips by 766. At the time of
redevelopment, a traffic study will be required, in addition to coordination with
FDOT, as the site would impact SR 7.
Finding 1 The Planning Department recommends increased awareness of the
decreasing capacity within elementary and middle schools within the City due
to increasing residential projects. With proper implementation of R-07-0717,
the Interlocal Agreement to implement public school concurrency, capacity Page 9 of 12
should be properly addressed through cooperation with Miami -Dade County
Public Schools. This policy is Consistent.
Criteria 2
Transportation Policy TR-1.1.1: "As an Urban Infill Area (UTA) and a ;
Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) established by Mia
County, Laws and Regulations, and illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map TR
MN
Data and Analysis, the City will encourage the concentration and intensific
development around centers of activity with the goal of enhancing the livab
residential neighborhoods, supporting economic development, and the viabil
commercial areas. Infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of and
land and structures, redevelopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalizatior
development projects that promote public transportation will be heavily encourag
(See Policy LU-1.1.11.)"
Analysis 2
This area shows a high rate of vacancy. The Culmer Metrorail Station is located i
the Subject Property. Several Miami -Dade County bus routes and City of Miami t
run services near the site. With these services in place, the area is well -suited fo
intense, mixed -use development. Additionally, the Subject Properties are in very
proximity to the Health District, which boasts many employment opportunities.
Finding 2
Consistent
Criteria 3
Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.3: "The City's zoning ordinance provides for prc
of all areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2)
adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade pul
health and safety, or natural or man-made amenities;(3) transportation policies t
divide, or fragment established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public opE
space, environment, and ecology. Strategies to further protect existing neighborhi
through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requir
will be incorporated into the City's land development regulations."
Analysis 3
The MCNP has an awareness that land development should be done in a cohesl
manner. To this end, the current zoning ordinance implements this policy most n(
with the principle of successional zoning. As the subject properties are surround(
Future Land Use designations that are either identical to, or of a development int
similar in nature to, the request, the requested designation would not create a sit
in which new development would encroach on lesser intensity areas.
In fact, the current pattern of Future Land Use designations positions the existinc
Industrial properties between Restricted Commercial, which have largely develor
a strongly residential neighborhood (as indicated by the existing land use inventc
with supportive institutional uses such as public schools. Light Industrial can exis
immediate proximity to residential and non -Light Industrial land uses without delE
effects or the degradation of quality of life. This corridor, however, would be best
oriented to respond to and serve the immediately surrounding neighborhood, witl
existing mostly -residential character and opportunity for greater intensity of mixer
development on the plethora of vacant properties.
Finding 3
Consistent
Criteria 4
Transportation Policy TR-2.1.3: "The City will encourage increased density of
development within walking distance of transit corridors and Metrorail stations (a
referenced in Policy LU-1.1.10. and HO-1.1.9)"
Transportation Policy TR-2.1.4: "The City will ensure a strong interface betweE
(re)developments and the public transportation system by encouraging Multimol
Design Guidelines listed below that emphasize improved connectivity between tr
facilities and (re)developments and incorporate a balanced streetscape design K
to consider the following:
A. Encouraging development of a wide variety of residential and non -resider
land -uses and activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to produce
trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and promote transit opei
and financial efficiencies. The particular uses that are approved in a giver
area should respect the character of the nearby neighborhood, strive to s
needs of the neighborhood, and promote balance in the range of existing
planned land uses along the subject transit line.
Accommodate new development around rapid transit stations that is well
B. designed, conducive to both pedestrian and transit use, and
NOTICE
aubmRtal oe�cm be acdedu for pu fleanng
�oroanu wrtn limelmea see form in me cry m
mi Code. Thea 11. tle dsision-ma 119 1y W11
wmee<1dep�dtienearn9lere sera
recommendation or a flnal d.d. n.
PZ-20-8017
►� 04/06/22 f
ed.
sear
rolleys
close
rtection
the
:)lic
hat
)ods
aments
ve
)tably
A by
ensity
uation
I Light
)ed into
)ry)
t in
:terious
I its
1-use
n
1al
ansit
)rogram
itial
short
-ational
i station
erve the
and
Page 10 of 12
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
architecturally attractive.
H. Increase the density of development within walking distance of rapid
transit stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of each
transit station and existing abutting residential neighborhoods are to be
protected and preserved..."
Analysis 4
The subject properties are located in very close proximity to the Culmer
Metrorail station. Walking distance to the station is approximately 500 feet,
taking only a couple minutes. Bus 77 connecting at the Metrorail station
provides direct access to Downtown Miami, as well as points north. In addition,
the City of Miami Overtown trolley stops immediately adjacent to the site and
circulates through Overtown and the Health District.
Such close proximity to a premium transit facility with connecting bus and
trolley options provides the necessary infrastructure for mixed -use, higher
density, and multi -modal neighborhood where residents and employees have
multiple modes of transportation from which to choose.
While Light Industrial may develop uses that rely on premium mass transit to
some degree, Restricted Commercial better complements premium transit
facilities with the opportunity for greater residential density and employment
opportunities.
Additionally, the properties are located along the NW 7 Ave arterial corridor.
Harmonizing the land use on these properties with those around them would
better unify the corridor radiating out from the Metrorail station, which in turn
would better serve future development elsewhere in the neighborhood.
Finding 4
Consistent
Criteria 5
Transportation Objective TR-1.2: "Encourage the development of an efficient
transportation network that minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle
miles traveled, and reduces the demand for parking."
Analysis 5
The City of Miami's 2018 Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Attachment 3) found that
41 percent of the City's greenhouse gas emissions came from the
transportation sector. Chapter 8 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change's Fifth Assessment Report131 notes the vast reduction in greenhouse
gas emissions when switching travel modes from automobiles to transit,
walking, and bicycling. Furthermore, research has shown that increases in
housing and transit -supportive land uses adjacent to transit typically result in
increased transit ridership141. With Restricted Commercial providing greatly
increased allowable residential density and employment opportunities over
Light Industrial, there would be more opportunity for transit -supportive uses to
be developed on the subject properties, resulting in greater potential
decreases in greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.
Finding 5
Consistent
RECOMMENDATION
04/06/22 /4&
This application seeks to change the designation of 0.59 acres of land from "Light Industrial" to "Restricted
Commercial." Both designations allow intense uses. "Restricted Commercial" allows a significantly higher
density in its residential uses. The Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the MCNP generally incentivize
development when those projects are proximal to transit. Levels of service for most facilities are supportive of
this application. Miami -Dade County Public Schools shows capacity in elementary, middle, and especially in the
high school, located adjacent to the application.
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Report Attachments:
Exhibit A — Legal Description
Attachment 1 — Concurrency Review
Attachment 2 — City of Miami's 2018 Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Page 11 of 12
NOTICE
mis suemmai neetic ro ne scneemea for a pueoc neavin9
rcovtlanre wrtn vmernes sea ronn in me cry m
Miami Cotle. Theapplirztle tlsision-makingb 1y wAll
renewmeinmrmaenn atone paean M1eatlng m rentlera
rxommentletion O! a final tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
[2] The best available data from the Census reports the percentage of people living below the poverty line and unemployment r 04/06/22
opposed to the Block Group level, like the other data points.
121 Data was retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
131 Sims R., R. Schaeffer, F. Creutzig, X. Cruz -Nunez, M. D'Agosto, D. Dimitriu, M.J. Figueroa Meza, L. Fulton, S. Kobayashi, O. Lah, A.
Newman, M. Ouyang, J.J. Schauer, D. Sperling, and G. Tiwari, 2014: Transport. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Con n ution of
Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E.
Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and
J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
141 Robert Cervero, Transit -based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts, Transport Policy, Volume 1, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 174-183,
Sue Trone
Chief of Comprehensive Planning
Page 12 of 12
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING
IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP
PROJECT DETAILS
Project Dox Number: PZ-20-8017
Date: 17-Nov-20
Applicant: Trendy Properties, LLC
Address: 1210,1222, 1234, and 1250 NW 7th Avenue
Boundary Streets: North: NW 13th Street East: NW 7th Avenue
South: NW 12th Street West N/A
Existing Future Land Use Designation: Light Industrial
Residential Density: 0.59 acres @ I 36 DU/acre DUs
Assumed Population Persons
Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Restricted Commercial
Residential Density 0.59 acres @ 150 DU/acre DUs
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION
NET Area Overtown
WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin Basin 0001-3
Moratorium? No
Drainage Subcatchment Basin G3
RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Future Land Use Goal LU-1
Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1
Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1
Capital Improvements Goal CI-1.2
Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2
Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3, a-g
Transportation Objective TR-1.6
Transportation Objective TR-1.5
f1p�
" r -- s `,1 k - I
Awl
NOTICE
This su brnidal needs b te•.ch.&u d br a public hearing
In accortlanre wM1h tlrnellnes set forth in the City &
Miami CWe. The appliwde declsion-rnaXing bwy will
rewewihe inbrmation at the pubc hearing t. render.
rec mentlation or.final decmen.
PZ-20-8017
CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS
04/06/22
Increase in Population:
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4
requires a
10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance.
Concurrency Test Result:
POTABLE WATER
Level of Service standard: 92.05
GCPD
Transmission potential with FLUM change
Policy PW-1.2.1
Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change
Concurrency Test Result:
SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION
Level of Service standard: 141 GPCD
Policy SS-1.3.1
Excess capacity: See Note 1 below.
Concurrency Test Result: FEWER
STORM SEWER CAPACITY
Exfiltration system before change
On -site
Exfiltration system after change
On -site
Concurrency Test Result:
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
Solid waste generation, 1.28 tons/resident/year 316
Excess capacity before change 800
Excess capacity after change 484
Concurrency Test Result:
Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7
Concurrency Test Result:
NOTES
Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known
Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed through the
Interpretation ofthe 2020 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to the detailed
provisions of applicable land development regulations.
Transportation Concurrency is addressed in a separate memorandum provided by the Office of Capital Improvements
land
Min
Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Level of S
® Subject Property
_ Municipally -Owned Park
_ 0.25 Mile Walking Distance
0.25 to 0.5 Mile Walking Distance
QParcel
PZ-20-8017
0 100 200 400 Feet
Created by: City of Miami Planning Department
Date created: December 3, 2020
N:APlanning\GIS\Parks\Parks LOS
411y!arR�
NOTICE
This ae bmmtl [ needs to be ech.&lee br a pu bec hearing
in [cord once wth tim Un. sM forth in the City pf
M ami Cexle. The appllca He decision -ma eingb ly will
rewewtheinfonnation at the pubic hearing to antlers
recommenbation or a hnal tleciaon.
PZ-20-8017
7\\ 04/06/22
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM
Sue Trone, AICP
Chief, Community Planning
FROM: Collin Worth
Transportation Analyst
DATE: December 1
FILE: PZ-20-8017
c HtiVA
NOTICE
This su b,nma[ —& b be sche&Ied for a public nearing
In accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Mi"I CWe.7he app[-c , decon-making bWy.11
renew the Inf—Wn al the public hearing tg render a
recommendation or a final de—.,
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22
SUBJECT: Transportation Concurrency
Analysis
REFERENCES: PZAB File IDs 20-8017
ENCLOSURES:
Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the applications for the project
located at 1210 NW 7t" Avenue, the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip
generation was calculated. The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in
an increase of over 766 daily trips and 65 P.M. peak hour trips.
Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine the
impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment, a traffic study will be required.
The traffic study should include traffic mitigation if significant impacts to operating levels
of service are identified.
Furthermore, as the site impacts SR 7, an FDOT maintained roadway, coordination with
FDOT is required.
11/17/2020 MDCPS - Concurrency Management System - Application Details
`L� Concurrency Management System (CMS)
giving our students
6eWO"d Miami -Dade County Public Schools
Miami -Dade County Public Schools
Concurrency Management System
Preliminary Concurrency Analysis
MDCPS Application Number: PHO120111700538 Local Government (LG)
Date Application Received: 11/17/2020 6:04:43 PM LG Application Number
Type of Application: Public Hearing, Sub Type:
Applicant's Name: Trendy Properties LLC
Address/Location: 1210- 1250 NW 7th Avenue Miami, Florida 33136
Master Folio Number: 0131350191520
Additional Folio Number(s): 0131350191620, 0131350191630, 0131350191640,.
PROPOSED # OF UNITS 67
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS: 0
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS: 0
MULTIFAMILY UNITS: 67
NOTICE
This sv brnitlalneetlato be ech.&u d bra public hearing
In eccortlana wM1h hmellnes set forth in the City &
Mtarni CWtl The pp['. de derision -making buoy will
reWewthe Inbnnation M the public hearing to nder s
reeorn d—, or a hnal tlecivon.
PZ-20-8017
)1�\ 04/06/22
Miami
PZ-20-8017
Land Use
Wom%;vrcikVENLY SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS
Facility Name
Net Ava.
Capacity
Seats
Required
Seats Taken
LOS Met
Source Type
Ar -IACF_NT SF_RVTr-F ARFA RrHOOLS
*An Impact reduction of % included for charter and magnet schools (Schools of Choice).
MCPS has NOT conducted a preliminary public school concurrency review of this application.
1450 NE 2 Avenue, Room 525, Miami, Florida 33132 / 305-995-7285 / concurrency@dadeschools.net
https://concurrency.dadeschools.net/MDSCMSWeb/printapplicationdetails.aspx?appNum=PHO120111700538 1/1
2018
Ih'11�11'll/!11'll�
GREENHOUSE
GAS
T.ORY
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
IN
'PAP
City of Miami has always been vulnerable to hurricanes, storm surge, flooding, and
extreme heat and we have a strong history of thriving in the face of adversity. However,
climate change is increasing these risks and threatening our health and economy. Miami
has led by taking actions to adapt to and mitigate these increasing risks. An equally
important step is to understand Miami's contribution to global warming by taking
inventory of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the City and its operations.
City of Miami's last greenhouse gas inventory was completed in 2008 with baseline years
of 2006 for citywide greenhouse gas emissions and 2007 for government operations
emissions. That inventory was used to develop the City's first climate action plan, MiPlan.
This 2018 inventory will provide the City's first update in over a decade, and likewise will
be used to inform a new climate action plan that will lead us towards Mayor Suarez's
goal of carbon neutrality by 2050.
ca
Iwo
Im
METHODOLOGY
There are national and international standardized protocols
on how to conduct greenhouse gas inventories. Below
is a summary of the basic data used in the Citywide and
Government Operations inventories. Data collected was
input into ICLEI Clearpoint software to calculate emission
totals. ICLEI (formerly International Council for Local
Environmental Issues, now ICLEI - Local Governments
for Sustainability) is a global network of more than 1,750
local and regional governments committed to sustainable
urban development. The organization is a founding partner
of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy,
and proprietor of the Clearpath software, a tool used
worldwide to conduct greenhouse gas inventories. To read
more detail about how each inventory was calculated, read
Appendix 1: Methodology Report.
Emissions totals are reported using carbon dioxide
equivalent (COze) which is calculated using the Global
Warming Potentials (GWP) for methane and nitrous oxide
from the IPCC 5th Assessment Report:
The Global Protocol for Community -scale Greenhouse Gas The Local Government Operations (LGO) Protocol serves as
Emission Inventories (GPC) was used to calculate citywide the national standard, and was used to calculate greenhouse
greenhouse gas emissions. This protocol is the standard gas emissions generated from the City's operations and
used by cities worldwide and required of those in the C40 services.
Cities network.
The citywide inventory accounts for emissions from the
five Basic Emissions Generating Activities (BEGAs). These
activities are:
• Use of electricity by the community
• Use of fuel in residential and commercial stationary
combustion equipment
• On -road passenger and freight motor vehicle travel
• Use of energy in potable water and wastewater treatment
and distribution
• Generation of solid waste by the community
The citywide inventory also includes the following activities:
• Wastewater processing
• Fugitive emissions from natural gas leakage
The following activities are included in the LGO inventory:
• Energy and natural gas consumption from buildings &
facilities
• On -road transportation from employee commute and
vehicle fleet
Most LGO inventories include data about solid waste
generated from government operations. The City's
Department of Solid Waste does not currently track waste
collected from government facilities separately from overall
collections so this emission source was omitted.
CITYWIDE EMISSIONS (2018) i
Total Citywide emissions in the City of Miami in calendar
year 2018 were 3,490,318 metric tons (MT) of carbon
dioxide equivalent (COze).
Here is a breakdown of Citywide emissions in MT by sector:
2018 Citywide Emissions
Water & Wastewater
1% Solid Waste
Industrial
1%
52% of City of Miami's citywide emissions come from 7% of emissions are from solid waste generated and water
the electricity and natural gas used to power residential used by residents, and industrial processes.
and commercial buildings. The next largest emission
generating activity is transportation and mobile sources, The table on the next page details exact emissions from
41%, which accounts for emissions from on -road vehicles, each sector.
freight, and the Metrorail and Metromover. The remaining
2018 Citywide Greenhouse Gas Emission
Distribution by Sector
I ■ Commercial Energy
Sum of CO2 (MT) ■ Industrial Energy
Process & Fugitive Emissions
Sum of CH, (MT) Residential Energy
■ Solid Waste
Sum of N20 (MT) ■ Transportation & Mobile Sources = Mill ■ Water & Wastewater
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
SECTOR
FUEL OR
2018 TOTAL USAGE UNIT
2018 EMISSIONS
SOURCE
USAGE
(MT CO2 E)
Electricity (Florida
21100,317,614 kWh
643,287
RESIDENTIAL
Power & Light)
ENERGY
Natural Gas (TECO
1 3,748,422 Therms
19,936
and Florida City Gas)
(Florida
I ElPowert&
I 3,330,062,614
Residential energy total
I kWh
663,223
I 1,019,935
COMMERCIAL
Lght)
ENERGY
Natural Gas (TECO
123,593,957
Therms
125,488
and Florida City Gas)
Electricity(Florida
Commercial
I 64,107,705
energy total
I kWh
1,145,421
I 19,635
&
INDUSTRIAL ENERGY
Natural gas
(TECO only)
777,731
Therms
Industrial
4,128
Gasoline (passenger
vehicles)
2,861,070,448.65
energy total
VMT
23,761
1,045,928
Diesel (passenger
49,222,717.35
VMT
20,768
ON -ROAD
TRANSPORTATION
vehicles)
Diesel (freight trucks)
206,539,826.3
VMT
339,065
PUBLIC TRANSIT
Diesel (Trolleys)
374,191
Gallons
3,822
'Metrobus is not
Electricity (Metrorail
55,671.9
kWh
17,051
included
and Metromover)
Transportation total
1,426,633
Waste Landfilled
49,271.81
Tons
40,832
SOLID WASTE
Waste -to -Energy
443,446.29
Short Tons
153,703
Potable Water
23,683,267.48
Solid waste total
kWh
194,534
7,260.6
Supplied (Electricity)
Potable Water
173,031.39
Cubic feet
Supplied (Natural gas)
Wastewater Treated
32,912,148.75
kWh
(Electricity)
10,104
Wastewater Treated
505,629.99
Cubic feet
WATER AND
WASTEWATER
(Natural gas)
Digester Gas Produced
1,277,074.5
Cubic feet
1,590.5
(Daily)
Nitrogen Discharge
13,683
kg N
10,396
(Daily N Load)
Septic
16,747.63
Water
People
and wastewater total
2,034.77
31,865
FUGITIVE
I Natural gas leakage
I 28,138,110
I Therms
Fugitive total
I 4,881
4,881
_161111111111�
'Totals shown here are reflective of true totals. Trace sources have been Adjusted for Global Warming Potential, CO, makes up 97% of Citywide
m ltted from this table therefore the summation of the table elements may emissions (CHa makes up 2% and Nz0 makes up the last 1%). The leading
differ sllg htly from the presented values. driverof CHa emissions Is predictably solid waste and similarly the drivers of
NO2 are predictablecar emissions and wastewater processing
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
EMISSIONS (2018)
Total government operations emissions for the calendar
year 2018 were 60,164 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide
equivalent (COze).
Here is a breakdown of emissions from government
operations by sector:
2018 Government Operations Emissions
58% of City of Miami's government operations emissions
come from the electricity and natural gas used to operate
buildings and facilities that City of Miami pays utility
bills on. The next largest emission generating activity is
employee commute, 24%, which was estimated by taking
all employee zip codes of residence and calculating
roundtrip mileage to Miami Riverside Center. At this time
we could not differentiate between travel methods to
work so this estimate assumes all employees drive to work.
Lastly, gasoline and diesel consumed by city vehicles (both
trolleys and all other vehicles) makes up 18% of government
operations emissions.
The table below details exact emissions from each sector
FACILITIES AND I ElPowert& Lght) (Florida I 68,179,300 I kWh I 20,882
STREET LIGHTS Natural gas (TECO) 1 2,644,270 1 Therms 1 14,064
Off -road Gasoline
522
gallons
5
(boats)
Off -road Diesel (boats)
10,749
gallons
III
FLEET
On -road gasoline
298,804
gallons
2,639
On -road Diesel
(trucks and trolleys)
7 69,864
gallons
7,867
EMPLOYEE I Gasoline I 36,823,440 I VMT I 14,599
COMMUTEEmployee Commute total 14,599
Adjusted for Global Warming Potential, CO2 makes up 99.5%of Government
Operations emissions (CHa and N20 split the remaining 05%).
2018 Government Operations Greenhouse Gas Emission Distribution by Sector
■ Facilities & Streetlights
Sum of CO2 (MT) ■ Employee Commute
■ Trolleys
Sum of CH, (MT) ■ Vehicle Fleet
Sum of N20 (MT)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
COMPARISON TO MIPLAN
The only record of the previously conducted greenhouse
gas inventories is the information documented in the
MiPlan report. It was not possible to directly replicate
the process for the 2018 update therefore differences in
greenhouse gas emissions can be explained by a number
of factors but it is not possible to pinpoint exact activities
that led to emission increases and decreases. A detailed
methodology report has been created (see Appendix 1),
documenting the data sources and processes used to
develop the 2018 inventory so direct comparisons will be
possible in the future.
CITYWIDE EMISSIONS EM6-i
When City of Miami last conducted a Citywide greenhouse
gas inventory (2006) the City's population was 404,048
residents and total emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent
(COze) was 4,800,000 MT. Population increased by 16.5%
between 2006 and 2018 to 470,914 residents, meanwhile
emissions dropped 27.29% to 3,490,318 MT COze. This
2006 Citywide Emissions
Solid Waste
3%
Industrial
4%
means that the City of Miami has met the MiPlan goal early
to decrease Citywide emissions by 25% below 2006 levels.
The MiPlan goal for Citywide emissions is set for 2020 but
2020 may have to be considered an outlier due to the
impacts on "business -as -usual" caused by the COVID-19
pandemic.
2018 Citywide Emissions
Water & Wastewater
1% Solid Waste
5%
pp"l -
ransportation It
Industrial
1%
Although there is no record of the exact breakdown of the
2006 Inventory, we can calculate values for the general
activities and analyze changes over the past decade to
hypothesize factors contributing to emissions decrease
2006
•
•
SECTOR•NS
EMISSIONS
DIFFERENCE
CHANGE
NOTES
•
•
•
Improvements to
Corporate Average
Fuel Economy (CAFE)
standards during the
Obama administration
and overall average
TRANSPORTATION 1,872,000
1,426,633
-445,367
-23.79%
increase of fuel
efficiency of vehicles.
Increased densification
of the urban core
leading to decreased
transportation
emissions.
Increased use of natural
gas in FPL's fuel mix:
50%of their fuel mix
COMMERCIAL
1,632,000
1,145,421
-486,579
-29.81%
in 2006 compared to
ENERGY
73% in 2018. Improved
building energy
efficiency due to new
building codes and
more efficient lighting,
HVAC and appliance
RESIDENTIAL
technology. Increased
ENERGY
960,000
663,223
-296,777
-30.91%
densification of the
urban core leading to
more efficient building
operation.
The transformation
INDUSTRIAL
of Wynwood into a
192,000
23,761
-168,239
-87.62%
commercial district
ENERGY
may have decreased
industrial emissions.
Result of population
SOLID WASTE
144,000
194,534
+50,534
+35.09%
increase and decrease
of viable recycling
markets.
WATER AND
N/A
31,865
N/A
N/A
Not accounted for in
WASTEWATER
2006 inventory/MiPlan.
FUGITIVE
N/A
4,881
N/A
N/A
Not accounted for in
EMISSIONS
2006 inventory/MiPlan.
0.
As displayed In the table above, there were emission decreases In very
sector exw pt for Solid Waste. The most significant decrease In emissions,
proportionally, came from Industrial Energy. On the other hand, Commercial
Energy had the biggest decrease In emissions by quantity.
Difference by Sector from 2006 Citywide GHG Inventory to 2018 Citywide GHG Inventory
^y 2,000,000 0 2006
O Emissions
U 1,500,000 ■
2018
f Emissions
missions
c
500,000
W O Transportation Commercial Residential Industrial Solid Waste
Energy Energy Energy
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS&
In 2007, when greenhouse gas emissions for government
operations was last calculated, City of Miami government
operations totaled 82,414 MT of COze, which is
approximately 1.8% of the City's total emissions. In 2018,
government operations emitted 60,164 MT of COze,
2007 Government Operations Emissions
Solid Waste
1%
Although there is no record of the exact breakdown
of the 2006 Inventory, we can calculate values for the
general activities and analyze changes over the past
decade to hypothesize factors contributing to emissions
which is approximately 1.7% of the City's total emissions.
Government operations emissions have decreased 27%
since 2007, therefore, the City of Miami has exceeded the
goal set out in MiPlan to reduce government emissions by
25% by 2015.
2018 Government Operations Emissions
decrease. We would need to conduct further research
with City leadership to determine operational changes
that possibly resulted in emissions decreases.
2006
•
•
SECTOR•NS
EMISSIONS
DIFFERENCE
CHANGE
NOTES
•
•
•
FPL said they could not
separate out streetlight
emissions for the 2018
data request at this time
so their emissions are
included with buildings
FACILITIES AND
and facilities. Streetlights
STREETLIGHTS
44,504
34,945
-9,559
-21.48%
and buildings emissions
combined in 2007
accounted for 54%
of emissions whereas
streetlights and buildings
emissions combined in
2018 accounted for 58%
of emissions.
Fleet emissions may
FLEET
21,428
10,620
-10,808
-50.44%
have decreased due
to increased fuel
efficiency of vehicles.
EMPLOYEE
An employee commute
15,659
14,599
-1,060
-6.77%
survey was conducted
COMMUTE
for the 2007 inventory.
2018 emissions due
to solid waste were
not calculated since
Department of Solid
SOLID WASTE
824
N/A
N/A
N/A
Waste does not
currently track solid
waste collected from
government facilities
separately from overall
collections.
�I
As displayed In the table above, all sectors of government operations
had emissions decreases. Fleet had the greatest decrease In emissions
proportionally and in quantity.
Difference by Sector from 2007 Government Operations GHG Inventory
to 2018 Government Operations GHG Inventory
^y 50,000 ■ 2007
OV 40,000 Emissions
F 2018
i 30,000 Emissions
c 20,000
o_
10,000
W O Facilities and Fleet Employee
Streetlights Commute
1
PROGRESS ON MIPLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Climate Action Plan portion of the MiPlan report
details a number of Initiatives for the City divided into 5
categories: Buildings, Energy, Transportation, Land Use,
and Adaptation. Each category has an emissions reduction
goal along with recommended actions the City take to
achieve that goal and the City's overall emission reduction
goals. While not all actions were implemented over the
past decade, many recommendations were realized in
some fashion.
The top 5 initiatives in MiPlan are:
• Increase energy efficiency in buildings
• Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation
• Reduce emissions from transportation
• Implement more efficient land use planning
• Begin adaptation planning
Here are some actions where the City has made notable
progress since MiPlan was released in 2008.
ACTION
INITIATIVE
ACTION 1-1: FORM AN
1: INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS
City of Miami is currently working with Miami -Dade County and Miami Downtown
ALLIANCE TO ADDRESS
Development Authority to develop and implement an energy benchmarking program,
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN
Building Efficiency 305 (BE305). Both public and private sectors have been involved in
BUILDINGS.
developing this program.
During the economic recession in 2008, City of Miami received $4.7 million from the
ACTION 1-2: REDUCE ENERGY
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG) to conduct energy
CONSUMPTION IN EXISTING
efficiency retrofits in City buildings. These retrofits resulted in significant reductions in
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS.
energy use. In addition, many of the City's outdoor lights have been upgraded to LEDs. The
BE305 program will help the City track energy use and continue to reduce energy use.
ACTION 1-4: REDUCE ENERGY
Miami2l, City of Miami's form based land use code, includes LEED silver requirement for
CONSUMPTION IN ALL NEW
all new construction over 50,000 sq feet as well as expedited permitting and density
CONSTRUCTION.
bonuses for green buildings. It also requires cool roofs on almost all new construction
and/or roof replacements.
ACTION 1-5: REDUCE THE
Miami2l requires new construction to install a cool or green roof and cool pavement
HEAT ISLAND EFFECT.
technologies. The City has an urban forester on staff to promote tree plantings and
maintenance of trees Citywide.
ACTION 1-6: EDUCATE THE
The City renovated a former fire station and opened the Miami Green Lab in
BUSINESS SECTOR AND
October 2012. Previously the site was a venue for environmental education and
THE PUBLIC ON ENERGY
seminars on green building. Additionally, the City is partnered with Dream in Green
EFFICIENCY IN HOMES AND
on related education initiatives.
BUSINESSES.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION GOAL:
REDUCE BUILDINGS EMISSIONS
While close, the City had not quite met this goal in 2018. In 2018, emissions from the
BY 975,000 MT CO,E FROM
building sector were 783,356 MT COze below 2006 levels.
2006 LEVELS BY 2020.
ACTION 2-2. INCREASE THE
USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY
SOURCES.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
GOAL: REDUCE EMISSIONS
FROM ENERGY GENERATION
BY 429,000 MT CO2E FROM
2006 LEVELS.
gUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ENERGY GENERATION
City of Miami has expedited permitting and waived permit fees for rooftop solar
installation. The City promotes financing options for solar via the Solar United Neighbors
Solar Co-op and PACE financing. Lastly, the City is pursuing SolSmart gold certification
to further increase ease of solar installation for residents.
Unable to determine if emissions reduction goal was met due to a lack of baseline data
and methodology.
1
ACTION 3-1• FACILITATE City Commission approved the City's Bicycle Master Plan in October 2009. Since then
ENCOURAGE the City has added bike lanes throughout the City including painted, dedicated bike lanes.
AND
AL AND I V E MEANS OF The City now operates its own free, trolley network with 13 routes and over 5 million rides
TRANSPORTATION. provided per year. Lastly, the City has partnered with private alternative transit programs
including Citibikes and dockless scooters.
ACTION 3-2: INCREASE City departments are free to implement flexible scheduling for their employees.
TELECOMMUTING, The Fire Department actively uses flexible week scheduling for active firefighters.
COMPRESSED WORKWEEKS Coronavirus has shown the viability of many more City employees working from home/
AND FLEXIBLE HOURS. telecommuting.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
GOAL: REDUCE EMISSIONS While close, the City had not quite met this goal in 2018. In 2018, emissions from the
FROM TRANSPORTATION BY transportation sector were 445,367 MT COze below 2006 levels.
565,000 MT CO2E FROM 2006
LEVELS BY 2020.
ACTION 4-1: ADOPT LAND
USE STRATEGIES WHICH Miami2l became the City's effective zoning code in February 2010. The Miami 21 Zoning
ENCOURAGE SMART Code is a Form -Based Code guided by tenets of New Urbanism and Smart Growth
GROWTH. principles.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
GOAL: REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM ENERGY GENERATION Unable to determine if emissions reduction goal was met due to a lack of baseline data BY 429,000 MT COzE FROM and methodology.
2006 LEVELS.
ACTION 5-1: BEGIN PROCESS Climate change is a major component of Citywide long-term planning. Climate
OF PLANNING FOR CLIMATE adaptation/resilience is a top pillar of the City's strategic plan and the City has its own
CHANGE IMPACTS. climate adaptation plan: Miami Forever Climate Ready.
COMPARISONS TO
OTHER JURISDICTIONS
An effective way of comparing emissions across jurisdictions will take to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 and determine
of different sizes is to evaluate differences in per capita what strategies are best to achieve this goal. In 2006, City of
emissions. It is important for the City to know where it stands Miami emissions per capita were 11.57 MT COze and in 2018
in comparison to other cities to evaluate how much work it they had decreased to 7.41 MT COze.
UNITED STATES
& STATE OF FLORIDA
Simi l arly to City of Miami, nationa l greenhouse gas emissions nationally since 2005. The expansion of natural gas and
have been on a decline since the Aughts. As of 2018, net renewable energy production has largely contributed to this
emissions (accounting for carbon sinks) decreased by -10% national decrease in emissions.
8,000
a
O
O 6,000
r
f
0
f
c
2,000
E
w
Total US Greenhouse Emissions by Gas
O m m m m m m m m m o o o o o o o o o o�° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
However, national per capita emissions were significantly
higher than City of Miami - as of 2018, United States per
capita emissions were 18.05 MT COze. This disparity is
likely due to City of Miami's relative lack of carbon intense
activities and fuel sources, as well as its population density.
23.5% of U.S. energy is produced from coal which is more
carbon intensive than natural gas, the leading component
of Florida Power and Light's fuel mix. In addition, HVAC
needs are different in other parts of the Country; many
cities are more reliant on heating than cooling and heating
is more energy intensive than cooling. City of Miami also
does not have commercial agriculture, commercial energy
production, or large industry in the City limits, all of which
have significant greenhouse gas emissions. The United
States has -92 people living per square mile whereas the
City of Miami has -13 500.
Florida's emissions per capita are much closer to City
of Miami's, due to its energy fuel mix statewide and
comparatively lower HVAC emissions. In addition, Florida
is among the top 10 most densely populated states in the
Country, equating to lower per capita emissions. In 2017,
Florida's per capita emissions were 10.86 MT CO e.
■ HFCs, PFCs, SFs & NFs
■ Nitrous Oxide
■ Methane
■ Carbon Dioxide
■ Net Emissions
(including sinks)
US Sources of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2018
C40 CITIES
C40 Cities is a network of 96 cities worldwide, representing economy. Among C40 Cities worldwide in 2019, average
a collective 700+ million citizens and a quarter of the world's per capita emissions were 5.72 MT COze.
C40 Cities Comparison: Emissions per capita
30
25
20
v�
° 5
f
,0
1
1111
1111111111
11111111111111111111111111
Average 5.72
Not
JtcGrc�Ao �a¢of¢ Ao PLO ¢ate°sue AQ°aaP�o,¢"oyae'e� �e,�a ea�� y°�Lcat�� does not
graph
all Coo Cities, just
Ja Qr o,o L¢ PF ¢� the Cities with the
ehlghestt per capita
ns
Q
However, the North American region has a higher average the North American region - at 4.63 MT COze. North America
of 8.28 MT COze per capita. Unsurprisingly, the European is below on the left and Europe is below on the right.
region's average per capita emissions were quite low - half of
C40 Cities North America Comparison:
Emissions per Capita
16 —
14 N
12 — ¢
Le v.
y 10
P�
F
i 6
4
2
0
c o a P' ¢c e °c a A¢5 o o ao0
JS,-'\QoQas\a
NoG PQc�Po�¢
r 4owtc2oxoJ�at
Q �n Ja
Among C40 Cities with similar populations (116,431 to
812,550), our total emissions were slightly below (3.49
million MT COze) the average: 3.75 million MT COze. These
cities, which maybe good to analyze in future comparisons,
include: Washington DC, Boston, Portland, Melbourne,
C40 Cities Europe Comparison:
Emissions per Capita
12
r
v 8
O 6
U
f 4
of 0 ayv �¢ a ON s oP
tia �a¢ra Q°°fir O c¢�
`'�`'0
Seattle, New Orleans, Athens, Venice, Vancouver,
Copenhagen, Oslo, and Heidelberg. The graph below shows
total annual emissions in MT COze for each of these cities in
the year they most recently reported their greenhouse gas
inventories. This snapshot was taken in early 2020.
Maximum 7,196,809
6m
c v 5m
06
4m Avecage_3.7_46,935__—
'^ U ==._.Median 3,606,199
3m F
w f 2m
lm _.Minimum 967,417
Om
ti ¢' O,
Qo'1`� cool ¢raA O a¢�
SOUTHEAST FLORID
More locally, City of Miami's emissions decline follows a
trend seen regionally. Between 2005 and 2015, emissions
in the four counties that make up the Southeast Florida
0
Regional Climate Compact decreased 18%. City of Miami's
change in per capita emissions closely follows that of the
Compact as well.
Per Capita Emissions Changes Over Time
14 ■ City of
12 11.5,7 Miami
w 10 9.69 ■ SEFRCC
OV 8 7-.41 7.92
f
6
4 ••. •• • •
2
0
Before Now
NEXT STEPS
The Office of Resilience and Sustainability is in the
process of hiring a consultant to help create a data -driven,
quantitatively measurable climate action plan that will help
deliver on Mayor Suarez's goal of being a carbon neutral
City by 2050. This goal is impossible without ambitious,
courageous climate action championed by the highest
levels of City leadership. In addition, the strategies and
actions must deliver multiple benefits including supporting
the City's priorities of COVID-19 recovery, fostering a more
resilient and inclusive economy and/or existing climate
adaptation work (outlined in Miami Forever Climate
Ready). It is recommended that the City of Miami complete
a citywide greenhouse gas inventory every two years to
monitor progress on climate actions and goals. There are
a number of policy and protocol changes that could make
future inventories easier and more robust. These will also
be recommended as part of the Climate Action Plan.
-r
KEY MESSAGES
• City of Miami has met the Government Operations goal
set out in MiPlan. Government operations emissions were
27% below 2007 levels in 2018.
• City of Miami has met the Citywide goal of 25% by 2020
set out in MiPlan. Citywide emissions were 27% below
2006 levels in 2018.
• Since MiPlan was released in 2008, a few major initiatives
helped paved the way for emissions reductions and a
more sustainable City:
- Miami2l became effective in early 2010 leading
to development around transportation hubs and
increased densification in the urban core.
- Sustainability requirements and incentives were
integrated into Miami2l such as the LEED Silver
requirement for new large construction and waived
permit fees for rooftop solar. In addition, Florida
Building Code improved its energy efficiency standards
for new construction.
- Creation of and support of low -carbon transit
alternatives including scooters, trolleys, and bikes.
• City of Miami will use this inventory to inform a greenhouse
gas reduction plan aimed at moving the city towards
carbon neutrality by 2050.
- This greenhouse gas reduction plan will complement
the City's climate adaptation plan, Miami Forever
Climate Ready.. With these two plans, the City will have
strategies to address both sides of the climate change
challenge.
- The plan will also prioritize strategies and actions
that promote opportunities for local businesses and
job growth.
• City of Miami is already working on two programs that
will help residents and business owners use. energy more
efficiently and help lower Citywide emissions:
- The Building Efficiency 305 (BE305) energy
benchmarking program will require large buildings in
the City of Miami to publicly report their energy use
and drive efficiency through open -market competition.
- The Keep Safe Miami program will provide energy
efficiency and weatherization audits for affordable
multi -family housing buildings and assist with funding
for renovations for 2-3 properties.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS M
Developing this inventory was an interdepartmental,
interjurisdictional effort. A sincere THANK YOU to the
following departments and entities for providing us with
the data and insight necessary to complete this project:
• City of Miami GSA
• City of Miami Human Resources
• City of Miami Resilience and Public Works
• City of Miami Solid Waste
• Miami -Dade County Office of Resilience
• Miami -Dade County Department of
Solid Waste Management
And finally, special acknowledgement to Alyssa
Hernandez, the intern from Florida International University
who spearheaded this initiative. She collected, organized,
compiled, and input all the data to create this inventory
as well as ensured her process could be replicated in the
future. Her efforts were absolutely crucial in the Office of
Resilience and Sustainability's ability to deliver this report.
• Miami -Dade County Water & Sewer Department
• Florida Department of Transportation
• Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
• Florida Power & Light
• TECO Energy
• Florida City Gas
Tia
L r.
t j
f lit
r
�y
`s
`'1 k - I
fled
" r -- s
/� NOTICE
Exhibit !!/1A mis s.bmnai ne.a. mb s neae emraphbe beahng
F1 ina�ortlan�wip em.nn.ssl<to m"g eirim
Miami CWe. The appliwde tleclsion-rnaXing bwywll
renewihe inh,rmation at the pubic hearing to rentler e
recommenaation or � nnai eeueon.
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTH 50 FEET OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, IN BLOCK 9, OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 12.5 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES,
AND
LOT 15 AND 16, IN BLOCK 9, OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY. FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 17, IN BLOCK 9, LESS THE EAST 12.5 FEET THEREOF OF HIGHLAND PARK. ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 18, IN BLOCK 9, LESS THE EAST 12.4 FEET THEREOF OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN FLAT BOCK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA_
ALSO KNOWN AS;
THE NORTH 50 FEET OF LOTS 1, 2. 3 AND 4, AND LOTS 15, 1€, 17 AND 13. IN BLOCK 9.
CF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT
PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 17.5D
FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES
ALL
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A" NOTICE
Thi .br ta[n dsto be sche&u d fora public hearing
cco,da w timelines dforthinthe Cityof
Mlam Co The.appki da decision-makingboy.[[
,ar_w 1inmm,aeonatthap1buhearing m r�neara
"THIS IS NOT A SURVEY" ' om en°a,;°norafina ldeciaon.
PZ-20-8017
FOR: 04/06/22
TRENDY PROPERTIES LLC
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
1210-1222-1234-1250 NW, 7th AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33136
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THE NORTH 50 FEET OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, IN BLOCK 9, OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 12.5
FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES,
AND
LOT 15 AND 16, IN BLOCK 9, OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT
PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND
LOT 17,IN BLOCK 9, LESS THE EAST 12.5 FEET THEREOF OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND
LOT 18,IN BLOCK 9, LESS THE EAST 12.4 FEET THEREOF OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO KNOWN AS:
THE NORTH 50 FEET OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, AND LOTS 15. 16. 17 AND 18, IN BLOCK 9, OF HIGHLAND PARK, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 17.50 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THIS "SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION", WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND
IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND FURTHER, THAT SAID SKETCH MEETS THE
INTENT OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOURS AND MAPPERS IN
CHAPTER 5J-17 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 427.027 FLORIDA STATUTES.
ALFREDO DIAZ, P.S.M.
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
NOTICE:
h-1J ....
''D'A)fE: 9 08-151202G.
MAPPER LS.6963'
THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, OR ANY PART OF
PARCEL THEREOF.
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE, DATE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SKETCH BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. EACH SHEET AS INCORPORATED THEREIN SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
FULL, VALID AND COMPLETE UNLESS ATTACHED TO THE OTHERS. THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 5J-17 OF THE
FLORIDA ADMINISTRA7IVE CODE.
NOTICE:
NOT FULL AND COMPLETE WITHOUT PAGE 2 OF 2
PREPARED BY: ALFREDO DIAZ, PSM
1842 SW. 124th Place, Miami, FIoridG 33175
PH.: (305) 221-3040 FAX: (305) 221-9040
REV.:
SCALE: N/A
REV.: I JOB No.: 20-0301 B
DATE: OB-15-2020
SHEET: 1 OF 2
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
—_------�---_ NW_ 13th_ STREET
0
o
107.5' (REC.) 107.87' (MEAS•) 17.50 , 17. 0'
�5'
I I 2.50'
I I
I
I I I
LOT 14 I PORTION OF LOT 15 I I
BLOCK 9 I BLOCK 9 35�00 m
P.B. 2, PG. 13 P.B. 2, PG. 13 I I N
I I I -'I
I
-------------------------
I N I�
Ln 3 I I
A [3 I r I y l z
r+1 PORTION OF LOT 16 ! 0
LOT 13 I :� BLOCK 9 A I I �+
BLOCK 9 I P.B. 2, PG. 13 m I r I ' rr
P.B. 2, PG. 13 1 -:.1I m
II ip
I iO
00
I U PORTION OF LOT 17
LOT 12 BLOCK 9 j
P.B L2. PG. 13 I� P.B. 2, PG. 13 I I t 1j
c 17.50' I j D
c — —
—7 I z
--- D { I
I � I
LOT 11 I PORTION OF LOT 18 I I
BLOCK 9 I BLOCK 9 I 4 ON
P.B. 2, PG. 13 P.B. 2, PG. 13 I I 1 v
I e I
z
j� I{ o
y 10 I 1
----4 I I I r
-�--7(REC.)
------I------ --- 102
I � � � n
25o I a { { o I r I l l
LOT 6 m 1 m o I mmo7.50'BLOCK9 m= Q=I NnZ loZIP,B. 2, PG 13 �� ! ��� I� Igo I m
P.B.BLO2. PG. 13 W 9 ! W w "oN i`vo 17.50' i �5'
I I I I I 2.51
{ I I I 35 0'
I I
I I 82.50'1 (REC.) 821.87' (MEAS.)rol I I
1 I POR7 O N OF I PORTION OF S PORTION OF j1� zj
I I 1LOT
I I
N0T10E:
NOT FULL AND COMPLETE WITHOUT PAGE 1 OF 2
PREPARED BY: ALFREDO DIAZ, PSM
1842 SW. 124th Place, Miami, Florida 33175
PH.: (305) 221-3040 FAX: (305) 221-9040
NOTICE
ThissubmRtalned—be sche&u d fora public hearing
ccortlance wAh timelines sel forth in the City of
Mlami C— The appkda de i-'-making bo y,[[
,ehewm, mtom ,bon at the p,bue hea,mg m —d—
recommend— o, a enai d--.
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22
LEGEND:
= MONUMENT LINE
CL = CENTERLINE
REC. = RECORDED
MEAS. = MEASURED
P.B. = PLAT BOOK
PG. = PAGE
SCALE: I" = 40'
0' 20' 40' 80'
REV.. SCALE: 1"=40'
REV.: JOB No.: 20-0301 B
DATE: 08-15-2020 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2
AERIAL
EPLAN ID: PZ-20-8017
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ADDRESSES: 1210, 1222, 1234, & 1250 NW 7 AV
NOTICE
Thls soban"d needs to be scheduled fore public hearing
in rcordance wM timelines ad forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applira he declslon-making body will
retl_the Information at the to btic hearing to render a
recommendati on or a final decid on.
PZ-20-8017
04/06/22
0 125 250 500 Feet I "
�YTY OF
FUTURE LAND USE MAP EXISTING
EPLAN ID: PZ-20-8017
( ) NOTICE
((Naml
neetls to be schetlaletl fore public hearing
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTfon atte setforthinthe City &
mndeThe applica be tleclslon-making body will
foa ndat the, bechearingn rentera
ommentlaA on or a fin.[ tlecitl on.
PZ-20-8017
ADDRESSES: 1210, 1222, 1234, & 1250 NW 7 AV 04/06/22
0 125 250 500 Feet
NW 14TH ST
w
Im
F_
Co
z Light
Industrial Major IIn_st, Public
NW 13TH ST Facilities,
Transp And
Public
Parks and NW 13TH ST
Recreation F
U
NW 13TH ST
r`
z w
Q
Restricted ' z
Commercial
-NWST
w
F-
00
To
NW 11TH RD
77-
\ UNNAMED N
I71 NW 111 V/H ST
�YTY OF
FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROPOSED
EPLAN ID: PZ-20-8017
( ) NOTICE
City &
((Naml
neetls to be schetlaletl fore public hearing
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTtoewtlhtlm¢fines set iorthing t tender
The applicable tleclslon-making body wlll
foop ndat the, bechearingn rentera
ommentlak on or a fin.[ tleci6 on.
PZ-20-8017
ADDRESSES: 1210, 1222, 1234, & 1250 NW 7 AV 04/06/22
0 125 250 500 Feet
NW 14TH ST
w
Im
F_
Co
z Light
Industrial Major IIn_st, Public
NW 13TH ST Facilities,
Transp And
Public
Parks and NW 13TH ST
Recreation F
U
NW 13TH ST Restricted
r`
� Commercial
z w
Q
Restricted ' z
Commercial
-NWST
w
F-
00
To
NW 11TH RD
\ UNNAMED N
I
NW-11 V/H ST
ON
,
IN C a I P., a RAT E6
� Ea�as
f 1l
PLANNING DEPARTMENT-
Project Fact Sheet
y
NOTICE
(004/0.
al needs m be schetlu-d mra public hearingin ancewlth nmellnes setforfh in the Ciry ofe.7he
This document is used to provide a summary for
appk.c , tlxision-making bcdy.11
f. a0on zt the public heeng to n,ndernn,meneaenn
Department related projects.
or a final dedd,nPlanning
PZ-20-8017
61
Project Name: PZ-20-8017
Project Address: 1210, 1222, 1234, and 1250 NW
7 Avenue
Company Name: Trendy Properties, LLC
Primary Contact: Alex Uribe
Email: auribe@wsh-law.com
Secondary Contact:
Email:
Staff recommends approval of the request, as
submitted. Concurrency testing found that the
proposed amendment would not fail any Level of
Service. Staff finds that the request, in compliance
with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, would not
have any deleterious effect on the surrounding
neighborhood and would support the nearby
premium transit facility, helping the City move
closer to reaching greenhouse gas mitigation goals.
Lead Staff: Ryan Shedd
Principal Division: Comprehensive Planning
Email: rshedd@miamigov.com
An amendment to Ordinance No. 10544, the Future
Land Use Map ("FLUM") of the MCNP to change
the designation of approximately 0.59 acres for the
properties at 1210, 1222, 1234, and 1250 NW 7
Ave ("the Properties") from "Light Industrial" to
"Restricted Commercial". The requested change
would increase allowed residential density from 36
dwelling units per acre to 150 dwelling units per
acre. Additionally, the requested change would
increase the allowed uses to include a wide array of
commercial and residential uses.
Webs Link(s):
0 HEPB 0 UDRB ✓❑ City Commission
✓0 PZAB 0 WDRC 0 AIPP
Existing Transect Zone(s): D1
Existing FLUM(s): Light Industrial
Commissioner District(s): District 5 - Commissioner
Christine King
Department of Human Service Neighborhood Service
Center(s): Overtown
Revision Date:06/15/2021
Department Director: Cesar M. Garcia -Pons, AICP, LEEP AP