Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-89-0862J-88-943(a) 9/28/89 RESOLUTION NO. 199- 862 A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, CR-3 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (GENERAL) AND CR-1 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (NEIGHBORHOOD), PAGE 4 OF 6, PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, TO PERMIT A DRIVE-IN FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 144 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET, 145 SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET AND 153 SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), AS PER PLANS ON FILE, FOR THE BARNETT BANK BUILDING LOCATED AT 800 BRICKELL AVENUE, AND SUBJECT TO A SIX FOOT (6') HIGH MASONRY WALL STUCCOED AND PAINTED ON BOTH SIDES ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 6 AND 15, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINES OF LOT 14; AN OPEN WROUGHT -IRON FENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 6, WITH BOUGANVILLEA/HEAVY LANDSCAPING ON A FIVE FOOT (5') BUFFER AREA ALONG THE SAID WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 6, TO BE MAINTAINED BY BARNETT BANK ON ITS SIDE, AND BY DR. THEEDE ON HER SIDE; LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLANS TO BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFTER ITS REVIEW OF SAID PLANS WITH DR. THEEDE; ZONED CR-3/7 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (GENERAL) ON LOTS 14 AND 15 AND ZONED CG-2/7 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ON LOT 6, AND THIS SPECIAL EXCEPTION HAS A TIME LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of July 17, 1989, Item 3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution ZB 80-89 by a nine to zero vote (9 - 0), granting the Special Exception as listed in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Schedule of District Regulations, CR-3 Commercial Residential (General) and CR-1 Commercial Residential (Neighborhood), Page 4 of 6, Principal Uses and Structures, to permit a Drive -In Facility for the property located at 144 Southwest 7th Street, 145 Southwest 8th Street and 153 Southwest 8th Street, Miami, Florida (more particularly described herein), as per plans on file, for the i ti Barnett Bank Building located at 800 Brickell Avenue, subject to a six foot (61) high masonry wall stuccoed and painted on both sides along the easterly property line of Lots 6 and 15, and CITY COMMISSION MELTING OF SEP 23 1989 IN No. 149-862 along the westerly and northerly property lines of Lot 14; an open wrought -iron fence along the westerly property line of Lot 6, with bouganvillea/heavy landscaping on a five foot (51) buffer area along the said westerly property line of Lot 6, to be maintained by Barnett Bank on its side, and by Dr. Theede on her side; landscape and site plans to be approved by the Planning Department after its review of said plans with Dr. Theede; zoned CR-3/7 on Lots 14 and 15 and zoned CG-2/7 on Lot 6; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter finds that the application for a Special Exception does meet the applicable requirements of Zoning Ordinance 9500; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The decision of the Zoning Board in granting the Special Exception as listed in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Schedule of District Regulations, CR-3 Commercial Residential (General) and CR-1 Commercial Residential (Neighborhood), Page 4 of 6, Principal Uses and Structures, to permit a Drive -In Facility for the property located at 144 Southwest 7th Street, 145 Southwest 8th Street and 153 Southwest 8th Street, Miami, Florida, as per plans on file, more particularly described as all of Lot 6 and Lots 14 and 15 less the South 10 feet, Block 52 S, Unit B1 of A.L. KNOWLTON'S MAP OF MIAMI, as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, for the Barnett Bank Building located at 800 Brickell Avenue, subject to a six foot (6') high masonry wall stuccoed and painted on both sides along the easterly property line of Lots 6 and 15, and along the westerly and northerly property lines of Lot 6, with bouganvillea/heavy landscaping on a five foot (51) buffer area along the said westerly property line of Lot 6, to be maintained by Barnett Bank on its side, and by Dr. Theede on her side; landscape and site plans to be approved by the Planning Department after its review of said plans with Dr. Theede, and a time limitation of twelve months in which a building permit must 9-19(;z I ,A be obtained; zoned CR-3/7 Commercial Residential (General) on Lots 14 and 15 and zoned CG-2/7 General Commercial on Lot 6; is affirmed and the Special Exception is hereby granted. Section 2. This Resolution shall be operative upon its adoption and the provisions thereof, unless otherwise indicated herein, shall also become effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September , 1989. ATT XAVIER L. SUAR Z, MAYOR Y HIRAT City Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: G. MIRIAM MAER Chief Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JCIRGE FER#ANDEZ C'ty Att6r, GMM/rma/M1278 -3- 1�1 11 ZONING FACT SHEET PZ05 LOCATION/LEGAL 144 SW 7 St., 145 SW 8 St., 153 SW 8 St. Block 52 S Unit B1 of the A.L. YNOWLTON'S MAP OF MIVII (B-41) P.R.O.C. APPLICANT/OWNER Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. 1101 E. Atlantic Boulevard Pompano Beach, FL 33060 Patricia K. Fletcher Weil Gotshal & Mangos 701 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Phone 577-3177 ZONING CR-3/7 on lots 14 and 15 and zoned CG-2/7 on lot 6. REQUEST Special Exception with approval by the City - Commission as listed in Ordinance 9500, as - amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of :4iami Schedule of District Regulations, CR-3 Commercial Residential (General) and CA 1 Commercial Residential (Neighborhood), Page'4 of 6, Principal Uses and Structures, to permit a drive-in facility on above site, as per plane on file for the Barnett Bank building located at 800 Brickell Avenue. RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A SIX FOOT (6') MASONRY WALL AT THE TWO SIDE PROPERTY LINES. The request for a Special Exception for a drive-in facility for a financial institution requiring City Commission approval meets the intent of Zoning Ordinance 9500. The number of teller windows was reduced from five (5) to four (4) , meeting the minimum ten (10) stacking spaces requirewat for each of them, at the requesr of the Planning Department. By reducing the number of teller windows, a five foot (5') buffer was left on both sides of the lot facing SW 8 Street, this buffer would be heavily landacaped. A solid six foot W ) masonry wall painted and stuccoed on both sides should be erected at the two side' property lines to lessen any adverse impact that the proposed use could create on the adjacent ar". Ti.f PUBLIC' WORKS No comment. DADE COUNTY TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION 1. Insufficient stacking Z. F.D.O.Te permit or approval is required for curb cut. 3. Handicap signs and stripping shall be as per DCPW and Florida building code standards. ZONING BOARD At its meetinq,of July 17, 1989, the Zoning Board adopted Resolution ZB-80-89, by a 9 to 0 vote., re- coaMing approval of the above. One opponent was present at the meeting; three proponents were present. One reply in favor received by mail. 6�a���►' a6��REo���1011� seeAae�011 jr, 1 7,Az ��� aopa�o�� �o�a�av� �000 Ir Re_ I "low. ?1.1. Imam �P-smAoom up�onm_ �000�avo �a�Nove L.6 m 89-8(;2 APPLICATION FOR A CLASS D SPECIAL PERMIT OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION File Number DSE-8 Within the City generally,- or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and Intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary to promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance, and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgement of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Class D Special Permits and Special Exceptions. (See Article 28.) Formal public notice and hearing is not mandatory for Class D Special Permits, but is j mandatory for Special Exceptions. In other respects, these classes of special permits are the same. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for ! Class D Special Permits and Special Exceptions. AU applications in these classes of. special permits shall be referred to the director of the Department of Planning for his' recommendations and the direc%r shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Patricia K. Fletcher, as attorney for Owner* hereby apply to the ' City of Miami onmg oar or approval o , c ec one: *Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. i I _ Class D Special Permit —i _. Special Exception for property located at approximately 153 S.W. 8th Street 3 Miami. _{ Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) drive-in teller facility with four tellers for Barnett Bank located at 701 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida. i � I s z Farm I U3 pop I of 3 9 0 1 attach the following' in support or explanation of this applications x I. Two surveys of the property prepared by- a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. X 2. Four copies oft site plan showing (as required) property boundaries, existing and —" proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, screening, eta building elevations (if required) with dimensions and computations of lot area (gross and net), LUI ratios (open space, floor cu . parking, etc.), building spacing and height envelope. Sae Section 2304.2.1(c). X 3. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disci of interest form (Form 4-83 and attach to appftattom). X 4. Certified list of owners of realestate within 375' radious from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application. (Sae Pam 6-83 and attach to ,_ S. Aeasta ttotwo photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). __ 6. Other (SpecVy) X 7. Fee of 5 00 , based an following Xx W Special Exception $MO.00 (c) Surcharge equal to applicable fee from (a) or (b) above iwt to exceed $500 to - be refunded if there if no appeal (City Code Section 83-61). Signature Owner or Authorize* Agent Name Patricia K. Fletcher, ESq. Address 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2100 CIty,State, .Tip Miami, Florida 33131 phone (305) 577-3177 r� STATE OF FLORIDA) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) :? Patricia K. Fletcher being duly sworn, deposes ana says that me is the (owner) autnorizea. agentl of the real property described above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this application form an behalf of the owner. Form 10-83 page 2 of 3 SWORN TO AND UBS IBED before me this day of June 8_ MY COMMISSION E TIRES: WISM PUBLIC. STATE OF FLORIDA. W IMMISSION EXPIRES: MAR. 30. 199E 601tO THRU NOTARY PUMUC UN0X"ltIT[M: 1 Form 1043 tort' u iic, tote or FloricalaT Large a 0 -IFPL_ ..4ft _ AFFTDAVTT STATE OF Fi1�tDAl S$. OCX = OF DAM ) Before me. the underalmad, authorivy, this day personally appeared Patricia K. Fletcher who being by me first duly sworn. upon oath, deposes and says: - 1. That she is the owner, or the legal represw=tive of the owner, tdm the acccgmm= ng application, for a public hikulm.g as required by Ordinance No. 9500 of the Code of the Cite of Munn. Florida, effecting the real prsperc7 located in the City of Miami as described and Listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and trade a part thereof. 2. That all corners whichshe represents • *. any, have given thmir fuU and cc=lete Fenidssion for her to act in t.jdr behalf for the change ,)r mo -M cmt3on of a cl a ssificaTicn or rega2at1oa of zetd mix as set out is the acccmpaa irg petiticn. 3. Tbat the pager attached hereto and made a part of this afmavit =Vaiu the eurreat names,, nailing addressee. phone numbers and legal desc=zpcioaz for the real properly which she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts *as represented in the appiicaticm arA documr~ = subn9.tted is lion with this affidavit are true and correct. Awther Affiant sayeth net. - ow (SOL) (NMI Sworn to and Subscribed before me this /- of J..`� 19 g_ 9� Notary . +State of Florida at la 40TARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MAIL 30. 1992d •ONDW TNRY M mARY Pumma uMi1i warram 0Z; 7� `� - 3• O*V;NI RI S LIST Owner's Name _Barnett Bank of South Florida. N.A. - 100% mailing Address 1101 E. Atlantic 'Boulevard, Pompano Beach,. Florida_,33060 Telephone Number (305) 786-3319 legal Description: All of Lot 6,and Lots 14 and 15, less the south 10 feet thereof, Block 52S, Plat Book B, Page 41, Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Owner's Name mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: _Any other real estate property owned individual s jointly, or severally ;-tiy corporation, partnership or privately) 375' of the subjec site is listed as follows: Ajdlye 0'*7 V. Y--1.r Ir Street Address Leal Description Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description 44 f 0 0 C)LseLOSm OF Masaw 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 6, Block 52S, Plat Book B, Page 41 - 144 S.W. 7th Street Lot 14, Block 52S, Plat Book B, Page 41, less the south 10 feet thereof - 153 S.W. 8th Street Lot 15, Block 52S', Plat Book B Page 41, less the south 10 f thereof - 145 S.W. 8th Street 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and -percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 5419 requires disclosure of all parties aving a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Co=ission. Accordingly, question 42 requires disclosure of all shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 3. L,agul description arAi street a&lresb of owned by any party listed in answer to question V2, 3?5 feet of the subject real property. &= OF FLCRIDA ) COMM OF DADE ) SS: qv - 411 sItIq 4ob—. any t =:al grope: t ; ,) anti (b) located w it1j in Patricia K. Fletcher , being duly sworn, deposes and says that no is the (Owner) Attorney foi Owner) of the real property described in answer to question il, abovet that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and cwVlete1 and (if actirq as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute this Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. S=MANDbur before in this day of Jane r Sq,,_• till CC*�iS�IC<l Q'��F.S s NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE QF MY COMMISSION UPH"* 4 tc amrl 10 r 96&Vvw owl. IPj.=0 at Large 10 WMDA. ~ ? a 0 V EXHIBIT MAIW Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. (NBBSFN) owns 100% of the property. A list of BBSF's officers and directors is attached hereto as Exhibit NA-1.N Shareholders: Barnett Bank, Inc., a Florida corporation (NBBIN), is the sole shareholder of BBSF. At this time, no shareholder owns five percent or greater of BBI. A list of BBI's directors and officers is attached hereto as Exhibit NA-2.0 EXHIBIT "A-1" BaIIi&B&11COf SOUthFlOr1dcrt,N.A. BOARD OF DIRECTORS HUGH E. GENTRY Chairman Barnett Bank of South Florida. N.A. CARLOS 1. ARSOMA Vice Chairman Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. CHARLES W. BOYD Pmwent Charles W. Boyd & Associates, Inc. BRUCEL.•URNHAM Investor W. STANLEY DODD, JR. President Dodd Realty Corporation ALRERTERNEST, JR. President and Chief Operating Officer Barnett Banks. Inc. JOSEPH E. FERGUSON President Ferguson Transportation, Inc. M. AUSTIN FORMAN President American Marketing & Management, Inc. JOHN MICHAEL GARNER Manager Gamer Insurance Agency. and Chairman Garner Mongage Company LEWIS M. GOODKIN President Goodkin Research Corporation ARNOLD GREVIOR Atttimey-at-law C,revlor and Jordan QUENTIN V. LONG Attorney -at -Law t LEE CHA►LIN President and CEO Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. IRMA BAKER LYONS SISTER JEANNE O'LAUGHLIN President Barry University H. JACK PFLEGER, JR. President Pfleger Financial Group RHONDAG. RASMUSSEN Partner Tishman Speyer Properties CHARLES E. RICE Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Barnett Banks, Inc. MORRIS ROSENRERG AKorneyat-law Rosenberg, Reisman & Stein RAFAELA. SANCHEZ President and Chief Executive Officer Miami Moto►sports, Inc. HARRY R. SMITH Attorney-atdaw Ruden, Barnett. McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. STEM J. TORCISE, SR. President Florida Rock & Sand Company. Inc. VERNON W.TURNER AKorney-at•Law EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUGH E. GENTRY Chairman CARLOS 1. ARROLEYA LEE CHAPLIN Vice chairman President and CEO J,m L0,5101 J Tony SeftCuxTr EUa FVP L4rK DOUGLAS F. ARCHWXD JOHN R. CRISWELL Executive Vice President Executive vice President EV P NEIL tJ'. UWON ADOLFO HENRIQUES Executive Vice President Executive Vice President 6o c Sib in9 Pew ehrefi ide E v P EN P E rve Vice President GROUP/REGIONAL SENIOR MANAGEMENT ARTHUR BIGELOW Regional Senior Vice President Commercial Real Estate lending/ Steward BARRYROCKUS Regional Senior Vice President Corporate Banking/Broward POU C. CHRETIEN Regional Senior Vice �deft Corporate Rankin EVERM L COLIY Regional Senior Vice President Institutional Banking/Oade ROBERTG. DUCKWORTH Group Senior Vice President Corporate Financial Services and Operations Administration ROBERT FRITSCHI Group Senior Vice President ILO Administration THOMAS E. HUGHES Group Senior vice President Special Assets RO§ERT W. IRVING Regional Senior Vice President Real Estate Credit GEORGEW, JENNINGS Regional Senior Vice President Commercial Real Estate Lending/ Dade ARNOLD LEIDER Regional Senior Vice President Real Estate Credit MICHAEL LEON Group Senior Vice President Loan Administration 0-1 TAMES E. LOSKI Regional Vice Ptesid, Bra ministratioNBroward NORM 1. McCARTHY Group Senor Vice President Revolving Credit ARTHUR R. ROY, JR. Regional Senior Vice President Corporate National LAX" M. SIMPSON Group Senior Vice President Human Resources LYNDA O. SMITH Group Senior Vice President Branch Administration HARRYWOOLLEY. Regional Senior Vice President Branch Adminimatitw0ade I"NE TEMCHIN General Counsel 41 ea>" 0 V EXHIBIT "A-2" Directors Walter H. Alford Executive Vice President and General Counsel of BellSouth Corporation. Atlanta. Georgia. Joe B. Cordell president and Chief Executive Officer of Walter Industries, Inc.. Tampa, Florida. Jack B. Critchfield President of Florida Progress Corporation, St. Petersburg, Florida. Mrs. jean McArthur Davis Chairman of McArthur Farms, Inc. and McArthur Management Company, MiamL Florida Albert D. Ernest, Jr. President and Chief Operating Officer of Barnett Banks, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida. Carta H. Goleebe President of CHG Consulting. Inc.. Delray Beach, Florida. Earl B. Hadlow Vice Chairman&,egal and Regulatory of Barnett Banks. Inc.. Jacksonville. Florida. Thoum H. jaa"en Vice Chairman/Strategic Planning of Barnett Banks. Inc.. Jacksonville, Florida. Allen L Ludnger, Jr. Vice Chairman and Chief Banking Officer of Barnett Banks. Inc.. Jacksonville. Florida. Charles E. Rice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Barnett Banks. Inc., Jacksonville. Florida. Frederick H. Schultz Private icrieswr. Jacksonville, Florida, former Vice Chairman of The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Stewart Turley Chairman. President and Chief Executive Officer of Jack Eckerd Corporation. Clearwater, Florida. W. Ashley Vaiander Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Heritage Life Insurance Company. Jacksonville, Florida. John A. Williams Chairman of Post Properties. Inc., Atlanta, Georgia :1 Officers Charles E. Rice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Albert D. Ernest, Jr. President and Chief Operating Officer Allen L. Lauinger, Jr. Vice Chairman and Chief Banking Officer Earl B. Hadlaw Vice Chairman/Legal and Regulatory Thomas H. Jacobsen Vice Chairman/Strategic Planning Stephen A. Hansel Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Richard C. Brevver, Jr. Regional Banking Execu wAVestern Region Lee H. Chaplin, Jr. = Regional Banking Executive/South Florida Burnis E. Harnage Regional Banking Executive/Northern Region James E. Mondello Regional Banking Executive/Eastern Region Hugh E. Gentry Chief Corporate Banking Executive Thomas P. Johnson, Jr. Chief Retail Banking Executive Paul T. Kerins Executive Vice President/Human Resources Roger H. Wiegman Executive Vice President/Operations and Computing Brace Anglia Executive Vice President/Real Estate R. David Barnett Executive Vice President/Consumer Credit William M. Fackler Executive Vice President/lviarketing C. Royce Hough Executive Vice President/Corporate and International Banking Charles W. Newman Executive Vice President and Controller Hinton F. Nobles, Jr. Executive Vice President/Special Services and Corporate Secretary Martin T. Farmer Government Relations Executive Director John M. Godfrey Senior Vice President and Chief Economist Cynthia A. Graham Senior Vice President(Merchant Services Robert A. Hawkins Senior Vice President/Commercial Real Estate Andrew L. Higgins Senior Vice President/Corporate Services Sanwel Northrop, Jr. Senior Vice President/U.S. Banking Richard E. Swartley General Counsel Fuis P. Thermenos Senior Vice President/Investments and Asset -Liability Management B rgamin H. Turnbull Senior Vice President/international Banking Kenneth M. Veniard Senior Vice President/Credit Quality Thomas H. Yochum do Senior Vice President/Productivity Management 'FOR SALEO ADDRESS: 90 S01,10mem 7i1' Street HiLh Visihilit anal 1:.\110"ure LOT SIZEI: +_ 14.000 S(luare Peet BUILDING SIZE + 8.200 Square Fact • Gate\\av to Brickell mill Dm\nto\\n ZONING: SPI - 7 • FAiSlill`t strur:ture in C\CC11Cnt R/E, TAXES: 'Q 1.527 lOr \'ear 1988 Condition fur user or interim PRICE: h l .025.000 income potential NOTE: A(l(lltRnl:ll L 011UllltlllS Pill -cal Availahle IOI' asselllhlal2c till-ce-si(led CXIIOSUI-C \'la S01,111MCS1 811' S11-CC . S0ut11\\CS1 1,1 A\'elute and Southwest 7111 Street. Subrn CONTACT: Edward J.Y. Brigham. Associate '"lith P,ric R. Person, Senior Vice President TEILEPHONE: (305) 371-4411 reco-rd -- _�':_vC {:`i: item__._.._.-- 'l viatty Him City Cam® BUSINESS AMERICA'S REAL ESTATE FIRM 800 Brickell Avenue • Suite 1200 • Miami, Florida 33131 89-8 2 No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy of the information contained herein. and same is submitted subject to NML 93837-Z errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by our principals. • All+Y Ii AA oa• • is 7 ►',� ; v > , ttt. Ilia til�i i I i i tl ��l _ -- •t �� � / I i � _ �. _ �M% tom• ` �� k` :4' �j j . t � l 1 rE « + r t {Fyn u�� (:, •! � '`` � : � - y S � �..P ` ��. .-dam d'; y� 7' 4 ' � '` � d '_ )SW *j � .,• } .1'� ' e ,� �. fit,, 'f'' e _, �t r I f' •y �� 's. r y i r i i :"? '";' t•! E T? l � -T '`=• F* F: T ! J T T tJ ! .; 1._I N !• tN(; t.)Tt F(jgA t�ly .:JI LAI F L.. q,,.c ._c,. ,.. .t!,� Fir Sri---:� ,' ..19 J::- r,",t ,.W.,• Scptcrn}x_-'r 27, 1989 CmmI9Si('vv,v At-ha7ie Nm&e V'Limi. City Hall 3500 Pxi Avx ri cmi Drivo KI m7i , FL, 33133 Deaf G:xrmissioncx Athal.ie Ran. gel 1 an writing .for the Board of Di.r_ec'torg of om profcrSs I cxial 't.xohalf of. Dr. Jane The-ede. Dr. Thoode has a prnct-fe located at 150 SW 701 St.. , Miaid, 1't, 33101. O) w turd request:s ttiai' you thu voLe by which a zoning chmige was m de, and ;: v,. ccmission sA,seqi1erir.ly fiwomd 0-ot rho R,ii-nett Rank's applicationfor lvitai.t be considered main. 11-iore are merry suite avid federal studies vtAch show rhiit the stt'tg- nat.im of will errcierCer both perconn l mid arikry_{1 pitients in Dr. Theede's practice. We car rctfer you speii-A.fical.ly to, Air Pollution, The Autombile, and Public tic-alth, Natfcmnl• A�n,,Icjrry Press (198S as a refcrence. Please, sir, reject: this zoifing charge and the BarnvU Mnk rt=gix---t- for buildirte, permit' in the best interest of the Public i-icil_th j,nd W(--I fare • Sincere ly, •� m+�- Submitted into the Public H • Tarry Core, M4, CAS: record in RA(!cuti.ve Vic:' Presidcmt: connection with i Z - xc.: Xavier SiArez, Mayo):item- s on Vi_cror Deyurre, Vice -Mayor Matt Miller Da: vkf is , C: xard s s icner Y Hirai J. L. P,.umj�-x, Cacmtlssioner City Clerk Ath4"' VI Range , C'aimis si cmt~r. DepartmL,nt of Envi_vontle-atal &!Vulat:i_or[ F41A Executive Board — o ! , r . •...I T Q u ;, I:1 ,.•., P,, . L nt tit F, ., .0 L. .• M r?. a ,•{an E - -- __ •—r ,.+-c-_ J o a,.i 11 P• ,, ,� ... f'.,,• P,.�, .t, 1.1 T. „ •. ! I "! 'a,-r .. 1 • .i C c,_rdt,.., r., .a ., r. •,... •1 ... 1,•.. !i V4;-I r'" T.- -.,sI v"I.!,t r I- 1r Till r. ri.( I♦ C l'� t lc L „ III r—A C:w1 13 P•. , 'L ! ,•. Kr t ,.• 4 T' ., I,I 1, er.,. • D, ,1-. -.:. A T •.i t .I o Sn Litt '.4'„•r ,, .1.. '"V f in, .. (' -. •, 5 .�, J„ ,',l TY..''t.i S.flt ,•r• t., s. ..1 I! °.r r'., ,..M f,•..•(?rr r�l.:iafl,�, •. I:Jr,.l,f r:. n.-. �,7:. .i,t., Jrr,[._ .. •,..,I'. 4- W11 (: r;r!,J :ti J1f tin, .i f. ,G.t.,.., [I.,..,� [;;.Ilr•�c •.l Vcic•,�n Jrr F,i.. •5,: ,r4 (.. rlwc,.'I.; Florida Department- of Environmental Regulation Twin lbwers Office Bldg. • 2600 131air Stone Road • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 \�lgjF of fIOR�P Bob Martinez, Governor Dale 'Rvachtniann, Secretary John Shearer, Assistant Secretary September 21, 1989 Dr. Jane Theede, DVM 150 S.W. 7th St. Miami, Florida 33130 Dear Dr. Theede: I have enclosed a copy of the technical memorandum completed for the Department addressing excessive carbon monoxide concentrations within a street canyon in downtown Miami. A street canyon is defined as an area bordered by tall buildings on both sides of a roadway. These buildings can shield the normal wind flow patterns and create conditions for higher pollutant concentrations in the canyon area. This situation seems to have similar characteristics to the building configuration with which you are concerned. The particular street canyon described in the memorandum is no longer measuring concentrations of carbon monoxide above the ambient air quality health -based standard. In fact, carbon monoxide levels throughout the State have been decreasing in recent years. Emission controls required for new automobiles are the primary reason for the improved air quality in this area. This improvement continues to occur as newer, cleaner cars replace older, dirtier ones. Some emission factors appropriate for general analysis of the vehicle fleet are also enclosed for your use. I hope this information will be of use to you. Submitted into the public record in connection with item _ on _Z/`� f /y/ Matty Hirai City Clerk LG/TR/tr Sincerely, +Lar'George Chief, Bureau of Air Monitoring and Assessment cc: Florida Veterinary Medicine Assoc. (w/o enclosure) 89_8a2 Technical Memorandum ANALYSIS OF BAST FLAGLER STREET CARBON 140NOXIDE EXCEEDANCES MIAMI prepared for 1. U.S, Environmental Protection Agency Region IV Atlanta# Georgia by Cambridge Systematics# Inc. 222 Third Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 <s 3a. -Y; f. s=Fr+ Gf �{ •tit l�!-, (� 4 TABLE Off' CONTENTS Introduction Description of the Monitor Site Conditions Associated With CO Exceedances on E. Flagler Street Diurnal variation of CO Levels on E. Flagler Street Diurnal Traffic Patterns on E. Flagler Street Meteorological Conditions During CO Exceedances Modelling Methodology, Data Requirements and Input Assumptions Estimation of Background CO Concentration e-C. r Estimation of Local Emission Source Strength Modelling Results Additional Potential Street Canyon Hotspots in Downtown Miami Implications for Transportation Control Planning Submitted into the public _ record in connection with item dxj q • .2 e• F G �. c7; �Y City Clel: � 1 r?: 4,Ny Page 1 3 7 7 9 10 14 17_- 22 28 31 34 1P .01 LIST Of TABLES, FIGURES AND MAPS Pass TABLE 1. Summary of 8-Hour CO Exceedances on E. Flagler 2 Street, 1982-1984 TABLE 2. Meteorological Conditions Associated With 8-Hour CO 12 Exceedances on E. Flagler Street TABLE 3. Frequency Distribution of the Ratio of Hourly 21 Instantaneous Minimum to Hourly Average CO Concentrations TABLE 4. Relationship Between Hourly Average and Mean 21 Instantaneous Minimum CO Concentrations TABLE S. Diurnal Variation in Hourly CO Averages, Minima 23 and Ratios TABLE 6. Estimate of 8-Hour Average CO Concentration on 29 E. Flagler Streeet, 1982 TABLE 7. Estimate of 8-hour Average CO Concentration on 30 E. Flagler Street, 1987 TABLE 8. Estimate of 8-Hour Average CO Concentration on SE lst 35 Street, 1987 TABLE 9. Estimate of 8-Hour Average CO Concentration on SE 2nd 36 Street, 1987 FIGURE 1. Location of CO Monitor on E. Flagler Street 6 FIGURE 2. Diurnal Variation of CO Concentrations on E. Flagler 8 Street for the Period November -January, 1982-1984 FIGURE 3. Diurnal Traffic Cycle on NE lst Avenue 11 MAP 1. Location of E. Flagler Street Monitor in 4 Downtown Miami MAP 2. Location of Potential Street Canyon CO Hotspots in 33 Downtown Miami Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2 - T at1-y .E-ETC1i Cify Clerk ANALYSIS OF EAST FLAGLER STREET CARBON MONOXIDE EXCEEDANCES DOWNTOWN WAMI INTRODUCTION Ambient carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations have been measured by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Bureau of Air Quality Manage- meet, on East Flagler Street in downtown Miami 'Inca July 1980. During this period, 1%1iffierou exdeedanays of the eight -gout National Ambient Air Quality Standarc (NAAQS) for CO have been recorded. Table 1 summarizes the magnitude and frequency of observed 8-hour CO exceedances, by month, during the period 1982 through 1984. Monitor data for 1985 was not available. 14o exceedances of the 1-hour NAAQS for CO have ever been recorded at this site. These exceedances of the 8-hour CO standard on E. Flagler Street have prompted the State of Florida to propose making a revision to the Florida . State Implementation Plan (SIP). In support of this SIP revision, it is the objective of this memorandum to: (1) describe the monitoring site on E. Flagler Street; (2) present information on the conditions which contribute to the observed 8-hour exceedances; (3) select and apply an appropriate dispersion model for approximating measured CO levels at the site; and ultimately, (4) estimate future (1987) CO concentrations using the model, after accounting for expected changes in local traffic levels and the effects of the Federal Motor vehicle Emission Control Program (FMVECP). The modelling methodology selected is then used to assess the potential for additional 8-hour CO exceedances in downtown Miami. Finally, there is a brief discussion of the type (local versus areawide) and kind (tailpipe versus traf- .-•�•+ — fic/VMT) of additional trans portation control measures (TCMs) likely to be -- Submitted into the public record in connection with 7 Owl item p • Son Matty Hirai 89i"'$62,' City Clerk �+ TABLE 1. Summary of 8-Hour CO Exceedances on E. Plagler Street, 1982-19844 (A11 values are expressed in mg/m3) Quarter: 1- 2-------- 3- 4- Month J _ F _ M. A M `J J A S O N D, , Year 1982 11.3 10.7 10.5 11.6 11.8 10.6 12.2 13.2c 11.9 12.1 14.6b 10.8 10.5 10.7 11.8 10.6 11.9 11.8 11.8 11.9 12.0 x 11.7 11.6 11.3 10.9 11.6 11.7 11.1 10.7 10.9 11.4 11.1 10.7 11.3 10.7 _ 10.6 i 1983 12.7 \ 10.9 11.4 10.6 12.1 13.8b 10.9 10.6 10.6 12.6 r= ` 10.7 12.4 12.3 10.5 s: = 1984 * r w • s • r s • • * . r e s * : • * • 10.5 11.9b _ 11.0a NOTE: The permanent CO monitor on E. Flagler Street was not operational from January through July in 1984. Also, the above statistics do not include the results of a special purpose monitoring study performed in the downtown area in the winter of �. 1981-198 2. >' a The maximum 8-Hour NAAQS for CO is 10 mg/ms, not to be exceeded more than once Pet yeare b denotes maximum 8-hour CO concentration recorded during the year. c denotes 2nd maximum 8-hour CO concentration recorded duringthe 1982-1984 period, Source: National Aerometric Data'Hank Standards Reports, 1982-1984. Submitted into the public record in connection with item ' �� on • R Matty Hirai City Clerk ' -3- effective in attaining the 8-hour NAAQS for CO by 1987, t, -.ziksequent memoran- dum will identify specific transportation control measures rnd assess their effectiveness. The air quality, traffic and other data necessary to perform the follow- ing analysis were collected from a variety of sources and agencies, including the following: • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Florida Department of Environmental Regulation • Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management • Metro -Dade Transportation Administration • Metropolitan Dade County Department of Traffic 6 Transportation • Metropolitan Dade County Department of Public Works • City of Miami, Department of Public Works • Downtown Development Authority • Selected consultant reports The analysis of the data was achieved using a variety of computer -aided analysis tools. Diurnal -variations in CO concentrations and background CO concentrations were tabulated using the database management capabilities of v the software package dBASL 151.`MOBILE3 emission factors were generated from an IBM mainframe version of M aim. t'=The calculations associated with the -- dispersion modelling were performed using the popular spreadsheet package DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITOR SITE Flagler Street is a designated state highway (SR 968) which bisd#s ?'U downtown Miami in the east -west direction (see Map 1). Flagler Stree t is2 described in a recent report as follows: 0 p •� _ Within the downtown, Flagler Street functions as a typical pv =� 'main street' with many business, commercial, and govern- 'd N mental activities lining each side of the roadway. When •� compared with other downtown areas, Flagler Street func- tions as a very -successful urban shopping street. However, 0 shoppers, employees, tourists, trucks, buses, cars, taxis, N 4Z vendors and,landscaping all compete for space in what is rn •�• becoming an increasingly congested environment. 89-862, FA p 3 fffffa 1 NW I5TM 3T jil ( Mielei NW 1�fM ST NE t4TH !T Nereid s• ` `' •i + MAC ARTHUR < k.w. 395 13TH ST. 41 NW 95 1174 ST Y +^+1�---�—'� CAUSEWAY NW R. 11TM ZT Z i fV t�- j, -E NW tOTM \ T I ~ z z Nc toTM ST llee ►/1r 9041 e) NW ~ 1TM f �T Ne !TM ST U c...w.,1w. 41 1 NW DOWNTOWN Y � N�- •TM ! NW ?TM n N( iTM STreede MIAMI ST14 St I N( — lore► 6TM ST NW Mumeipo ►°. t udite iu Y NW !TM = ST. z N (, Z !TM ST. r Z f M�.iw1 r. ►. r1e1lr0y M.C. r04O0 8aY h0 NW 2 •TM 1 Sleiti.w ST N I �ufSfe, •TM �ene.nely Front R • sT tl 7• QerwTOrn IeM P. NW Soo ST ..� ® �CO/wOul Itewwely G �► Post 011lce N.4 311O. ST. renA e/ r sT...� jr""!i1"• Miamo►ino NW 2H0 ST �� N( 2N0 Park f < t ST NE G1.ER� Cov►t NOVte © �,j Park ■ W �FtJ► 'll yCEROM Z OWorni 1Wam. • �6 I bl;eCLibrorr redf%e Cuffwew SW i5T �; T.!lvildiny 5 —zrqn 1 TMwq,w,,,.,.TTT,1U �,Nphirheofre -� MAP 1. Location of E. Flagler Street Monitor in Downtown Miami Submitted into the public record in connection v -ith ,. item�Op - on be: Pwl. L ty t 0 Submitted into the public record. connection Agth -5- iteraq. Matty tii.rcii All of these demands for space currently take place simuleity Clerk taneously within the 70-foot wide public right-of-way on Flagler Street. Within this 70-foot wide zone, which stretches basically from building face to building face, 46 feet is devoted to vehicular use. The remaining 24 feet (12 feet on each side of the roadbed) accommodates pedes- trian sidewalks, light standards, signs, traffic signal poles, landscaping and other various elements found on a 'typical urban' street. At points along the roadway where parking and bus/delivery lay-bys are not provided the curb - to -curb width of the actual roadbed is 26 feet.l on the basis of its general location song multi -story buildings, over a sidewalk, and near a heavily travelled roadway, the E. Flagler Street monitor is a designated HAMS site (2700-018)2 that meets EPA's monitoring objectives for a microscale location.3 The monitor probe is located on the north side of the roadway at 101 E. Flagler Street, near ,the intersection of Flager Street and'NE 'lst Avenue. As illustrated in Figure 1, the location of the monitor probe at the site satisfies EPA probe siting criteria4 which specifies that the monitor be located: • at a distance greater than lom from an intersection; e between 2-10m from the edge of the nearest traffic lane; and, e at a height of 3+ 0.5m. It should be noted, however, that a lay-by exists directly in front of the monitor site, with parking allowed at that location on both sides of the street. 1Sarton-Aschman Associates, Inc. "Flagler Street: Issues and Options - Transportation and Traffic 19840, prepared for the Downtown Development Authority under contract to the Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Ad- ministration, May 1984, p. 2 and S. 2Flocida Department of Environmental Resources Management, Environmental Planning Division, •Ambient Air Quality Data - 1982 Annual Report for Dade County, Florida,' July 1983. 3Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 58, Appendix D. 4Code of Federal• Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 58, Appendix E. W" FIGURE 1. Locat#on of CO Monitor on E, Hagler Street Sidewalk Lay-eY ---- 12-0 --1 10-0--+----1 CO Probe ` 11-0 E 13-0---j-- 10-0 --}--- 12-0 35 W S---�--3 N { NE 1st Avenge 35-0 m a W W Jed into the public - recora in connection with item � • � onA" "-. Matty TTixai City Clerk Submitted into the public -7- record W connection with. itemfz• S on AL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CO EXCEEDANCES ON E. FLAGLER STREET Matty Hirai City Clerk According to available emissions inventory statistics, Over 99 poteattt a Cher Co in Florida' -derives from the exhaust of motor vehicles.5, One would, therefore, expect a strong relationship to exist between the CO levels recorded at the Flagler Street monitor and traffic density on the street. Because they affect pollutant dispersion, the existence and mixing depth of a temperature inversion, as well as wino direction and speed, can also be expected to influence the observed CO concentration. Following is a graphical desription of the air quality, traffic and meteorological conditions found on E. Flagler Street during periods of CO exceedances. This information is . providea as the basis for many of the assumptions and data requirements of the following modelling effort. Diurnal Variation of CO Levels on E. Flagler Street Figure 2 shows the average hourly CO concentrations recorded for the 3 months November through January of the years 1982-1984, for each hour in every day of the week at the Flagler Street monitor. The line above the unshaded _ r area in the figure indicates the mean CO concentrations based upon readings obtained on all days during this period, while the line above the shaded portion indicates the mean CO concentration obtained from recordings only on those days on which 8-hour CO exceedances occurred. The months of November - January were selected because they represent the period during which the highest CO concentrations are typically observed at the site. As expected, the patterns are very different for weekdays and weekends. On weekdays, CO concentrations rise during the morning rush hours (7-9 a.m.) SLetter dated July 12, 1984 from S. Smallwood, Bureau of Air Quality f� Management, to J.T. Wilburn, US EPA - Region IV, Table 5. Hill ilidillill Jwl 111114 11 II RIP Rn FIGURE2. Diurnal Varlatilono(COCars6ontretionson E. Floglor Street for the Period Mwomber-Jenuary, 1982-1984 7, Z: (D 0 tr Is — CD 0 0 0 CD 0 Q 14— P_+. o* CD 12— CD 10 ..... ...... .......... mg/m3 .......... . ................. .. ...... ....... ... ...... . .. .. a 6 todtoatss m*4m CO ommotratim only on logs an wb%b 84mr CO vioktfAn r~44 twMates wwaft CO owmatratiwo for an days during "Uot*d pwiad 0) -C), w co " 'D w Go " c, g C>v m "'o c.C4 c. w co C> v OD 04 -0 ov go ID <> 0 V OD C4 10 0 TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THMSDAY FRIDAY PVNDAY SATtmAY SUEDAY III III 11111 11 III 1 r I and remain at relatively high levels throughout the midday hours. 40!.+cmncar ' 'Atla d gettrally, peak dut.inq the ..*vening ru*h hour (4-5 p.m.) ,arid then ,41AGipata gradually throughout the eventrig. This diurnal pattern is fairly consistent during each weekday. In contrast, Saturday CO levels reflect a midday shopping pattern. Sunday CO levels reflect the low level of activity in the downtown area on that day. Of particular interest is the fact that the diurnal pattern of CO appears to be virtually the same on days in which exceedances occur as on other days. Diurnal Traffic Patterns on E. Flagler Street Although numerous traffic studies have been performed recently in down- town Miami, there exist no hour -by -hour traffic counts on that portion of E. Flagler Street in front of -the CO monitor.6 Average daily traffic levels, as well as peak hour traffic volumes, have been .recorded or estimated on E. Flagler Street, but no complete 24-hour counts have been made either by the consultants performing these studies, by the Dade County Department of Public Works, or by the Florida Department of Transportation. A 24-hour (automatic) -- - traffic recorder is being proposed for installation by the Florida DOT on E. Flagler Street in the near future, however. In the absence of specific traffic data for Flagler Street, we have r reviewed the traffic count data that exists on nearby streets along the same 6See Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. "Flagler Street: Issues and Options - Transportation and Traffic - 1984," prepared for the Downtown Development Authority under contract to the Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Administration, May 1984; Metropolitan Planning Organization, 'Year 2005 Metro -Dade Transportation Plan - 1984 Update," Volume 1, September 1984; also, David Plummer and Associates, Inc., "Downtown Miami Transportation Report' (Draft), prepared for the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, June 1985. , Submitted into the Public record in connection with �F item I • S on._yg . Matty Hirai 897862. City Clerk - 1 0 - major travel paths which include Flagler Street. The major travel. paths used by vehicles travelling on E. Flagler Street were identified as part of a 1984 Flagler Street Traffic Study.? Not unexpectedly, given the one-way street c pattern in the downtown area, a significant proportion of travellers using Flagler Street were found to turn north onto NE 1st Avenue, while the volume of traffic on these roadways is not comparable, it is reasonable to assume that the diurnal pattern of traffic on NE lst Avenue would be similar to that on the block of E. Flagler which fronts the CO monitor. Figure 3 displays the diurnal pattern of traffic on NE lst Avenue, as recorded on a weekday (Thursday) in February 1983. This pattern coincides very closely with the diurnal CO pattern shown in Figure 2. Based on a review of all other available downtown traffic counts, it is also very similar to the; daily pattern of traffic levels experienced throughout the downtown area. According to area transportation officials and Consultants, this pattern is typical of downtown Miami, is quite representative of conditions on E. Flagler Street, and varies little from season to season. r Meteorological Conditions During CO Exceedantes • Table 2 summarizes the primary meteorological conditions reported to have existed at the time of a number of the 8-hour CO exceedances on E. Flagler e= Street. This information was derived from Exceedance Reports which are `f f prepared by DER staff following every exceedance of the NAAQS. According to DER staff, the meteorological data provided in these reports are obtained from 1 Memorandum dated January 22, 1982 from Paul S. Kitsakos, Barton-Aschman - Associates, Inc.r to Kahart M. Pinder, Downtown Development Authority, re: "Flagler Street Enhancement Study - Summary of Field Inventories and Existing Data.• Submitted into the public ! record in connection witl, m rY L item Z on 89-862 b _W..... f.:,. blatty Hirai. City Clolk FIGURE 3. Diurnal Traffic Cycle on NE 1 st Avenue 1000 900 000 - i 700 600 Z 500 `00 300- wAA i'ijii i'iic iii ii •i�iii FSiiFl;i;Fi:;:;:11.F.F�:;F;t,tS�F�iititt}.i;}FtFFFFFF.jt F: {j:It, t}tt�;t.{.;; ;;�t:;2iiii�iiF:1;:iS;F;FjtiF:t:::i;ti;;�;: i;: t; F;F;;i: �1:::F;t:7;!S:SFtFt jSt�ttit;• ;I;i::;i;f:;::;:�:;i;:;ii:;i::;isii;}:;�;ii�:�;F::;:;:tt::;::::2:::::!::::::i:::•;:;i; 200 �i ii�;:;::it:i:;::::::�i:;::i;i::;t;li:i.i�:i::;i:::l;:ii;;i:;i;iiii;i; i.':.•:i is •'!;S !;i;t:fti;i :}1:; ;i;tii;ti: 1M W iii:i iii• iii . t i;ii. i;: t,. 0 mid 2 4 6 8 10 noon 2 4 6 8 10 1 3 5 7 9 11 1 3 5 7 9 11 Hour of day Vehicle count token on Thursday. February 3, 1983 at location northbound on NE i st Avenue — Sou Metropolitan Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportetion, Vehicle Count Record for Automatic Recorders Submitted into the public record in connection with —_ item Z �� on McLtty Hirai y City Clerk: l' TALE 2, Meteorological Conditions Associated With 8-Hour CO Exceedances on E. Flagler Street Predominant Average Date Wind Direction Wind Speed -(mph) Surface Ynversion (Y/N) , 1/28/82 N 14 N 11/8/82 NE ' N 11/16/82 N 2 N 11/22/82 NE 8-10 N 11/23/82 NE 2-4 N 11/24/82 E 4 N 12/9/82 N, NE 8-10 N 12/20/82 N 6-8 N 12/21/82 N 4-8 N 1/4/83 SW 10 N 1/31/83 SE 1 Y u` 11/21/83 NE 3 N 11/22/83 E 4 N - 12/1/83 NE 2 N 12/16/83 N 5 N 12/19/83 NE 3 N 12/21/83 N 2 N 12/23/83 N 3 N 12/19/84 ' *. N 12/20/84 • ' N = ' Not Available Sources DER Exceedance Reports Submitted into the public record in connection with - item Z • Ir on �.• ��. l.T ci,y /\/Kd -13- the University of Miami Marine Laboratory located off of the Rickenbacker Causeway in the Virginia Beach area. W Oh -site collection of meteorological. '�Iii61 on P16,01etstreet had ever been performed. . While the data shown is incomplete, it does suggest that CO exceedances are most likely to occur at the Flagler Street monitor when the wind direction is from the north/northeast, and wind speeds are generally low. Wind speeds recorded in Biscayne Bay as high as those shown in Table 2 suggest lower speeds within the downtown area where the surface roughness and atmospheric stability are generally quite different, particularly during daytime hours.8 Surface inversions have not been found to be highly correlated with the occurrence of the Flagler Street 8-hour CO exceedances. ' r "data- suggest that w athet conditions play a relatively` minor role in " tips; creation`of high CO levels over an extended`�8-hour period on E. Flagler Street. In contrast, the similarity between the diurnal pattern of CO and the diurnal weekday traffic pattern suggests a very strong association between CO exceedanaes.;'and traffic volumes. This relationship is strengthened by the fact that most 8-hour CO exceedances occur during the winter months when (a) traffic volumes on Flagler Street are heaviest due to the influx of winter . tourists, and (b) motor vehicle CO emissions are highest due to lower air Submitted into the public temperatures.9 record in connection with item ' S on q ' )R ' Matty Hire' 8See F.L. Ludwig et al, 'A Practical, Muit7i�i .Wlbrban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide,' prepared for Coordinating Research Council, Inc., NTIS PS 196003, September 1970, p. 34. 9Joel L. Horowitz, Air Quality Analysis for Urban Transportation Planning, The MIT Press, Cambridge. Mass., 1982, p. 45. s9-862 k 0 -14- MODELLING METHODOLOGY, DATA REQUIREMENTS AND INPUT ASSUMPTIONS Given this strong correlation between traffic levels and ambient CO concentrations, and the location of the monitor in downtown Miami, the appropriate modelling methodology for use on Flagler Street is one that combines the "Street Canyon" submodel of the APRAC-lA Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide,10 with the use of MOBILE3 emission factors.11 The APRAC-IA street canyon model is the only model appropriate for predicting CO concentrations along any heavily travelled downtown street which, because it is lined with multi -story buildings, gives rise to cross -street helical air circulation patterns. The literature surrounding the development of the street canyon model defines a street danyon siWatidn as one in which the _ ratio of the�hekght of the Wilding(s) to street width is greater than 7.12 Conditions at the monitoring site on E. Plagler satisfy these conditions. Because it is the most recent EPA -approved program, MOBILE3 is used to estimate the emission factors called for in the street canyon model. lOStanford Research Institute, "User's Manual for the APRAC-IA Urban Diffusion Model Computer Program,' NTIS PB 213,091, September 1972. 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "User's Guide to MOBILES (Mobile Source Emissions Model)," EPA 468/3-84-002, June 1984. 12A complete discussion of street canyon conditions is found in F.L. Ludwig, A.E. Moon, W.B. Johnson, and R.L. Mancuso, "A Practical, Multipurpose Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide", prepared for the Coordinating Research Council, Inc., NTIS PB196003, September 1970; F.L. Ludwig et al, 'Field Study for Initial Evaluation of An Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide," prepared for Coordinating Research Council, Inc. and the US EPA, _ NTIS PB 203 469, June 1971; F.L-Ludwig and W.P. Dabberdt, 'Evaluation of the APRAC-lA Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide," prepared for the Coordinating Research Council and US EPA, NTIS PB 210 819, February 1972; also• R.L. Mancuso and F.L. Ludwig, "User's Manual for the APRAC-LA Urban Diffusion Model Computer Program", prepared for Coordinating Research Council and US EPA, NTIS PB 213 091; September 1972. Submitted into the public record in connection with 89--862 LL item 2 . `on 9 F Matty Hirai.. City Clerk -Is - The APRAC-lA street canyon model for predicting CO concentrations was empirically derived on the basis of data gathered and analyzed in San Jose, California and St. Louis, Missouri. The actual relationship, or equation, appropriate tot use at a particular location depends on the direction of the wind during periods of exceedances and on the actual location of the probe. You will recall from the previous section that the E. Flagler Street monitor is located on the north side of the street, and that the direction of the wind on days of exceedances is predominantly from the north/northeast. Given these conditions, the receptor or monitor is said to be located within the canyon on the leeward side of the building. Moreover, the maximum CO concentration on the leeward side of a building --assuming the wind direction is greater than 30 degrees to the street direction13 is given as: "Submitted into the public C= Cb+CL . record in connection with C+ KQ b (U + 0.5) [(X2 + Z2)1/2 + Lo M Z • onai • mati:y ffirc.i. where Cb = background CO concentration (mg/m3) C_ity Clerk K = an empirically derived congtant equal to 7.0 Q = average rate of emissions along the street (g/ms) U = wind speed (m/s) X = horizontal distance from receptor to center of street (m) Z = vertical distance of receptor above street (m) Lo = vehicle size (approximately 2 meters) 130ata used to develop the street canyon model suggest that a helical circulation pattern develops when the direction of the wind is greater than 30 degrees to the street direction, i.e., in a cross -wind direction. A different relationship than that shown above is appropriate if the wind direction is within 30 degrees of the street direction—i.e., almost parallel to the street. It is assumed for the purpose of this analysis that the north/northeast wind directions cited in the DER Exceedance Reports fall within the 120 degree wind direction interval that would classify them as •cross -winds'. For further information, see F.L. Ludwig et al, "Evaluation of the APRAC-LA Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide,' NTIS PS 210 819, February 1972. s 89--862 r • Submitted iQo the public -16- record i.n connection with item-M•-t-loso— on .__- ,"i�Q" •� In using the above relationship, it is necessary to estimatWJ-Q&PeW4Qxj City Clerk each of the input parameters during each of two years --the design year and the attainment year (1987). The design year is defined as that year during which the design CO value --or second maximum concentration --occurs. To determine the design CO value for modelling purposes, EPA policy requires review of the two most recent and complete quarters of monitoring data for each of the four seasons. Table 1 presented this data for the E. Flagler site and identifies the 2nd maximum dO concsntration during this period as 13+4 mg/e►2.' This value and the year in which it occurred--49$2--are therefore designated as the design CO value and design year. Designation of 1982 as the design year requires that the values of the input parameters be selected for this year, as well as for 1987--the year mandated for attainment of the NAAQS. In addition, because this is an 8-hour CO analysis, all of the input data must be adjusted (if necessary) to reflect the hourly average of the worst $-hour traffic period of the day. The majority of the above data inputs required by the street canyon model are easily obtained. Values of K and L (vehicle size) are established and 0 ; require no further effort. Similarly, the location of the receptor, .or monitor probe, is well established and was shown previously in Figure 1. On the basis of its position, values for X (horizontal) and Z (vertical distance) are set at 9.7 meters and 3.5 meters, respectively. Average wind speeds on the days in which there were 8-hour exceedances were also given previously in Table 2. The "worst -case", or lowest wind speeds most common from the north/northeast direction in the data set shown are on the order of 4-5 mph, As or 2.0-2.5 meters per second. Because this wind speed data was collected at ..; the Marine Laboratory, however, it is not representative of rooftop winds on 0 0 -17- Flagler Street. Previous studies of wind data relationships suggest that 1a*UGP,''V nd APr *df fa 4PPtvximately half of the valu*8 '9Ath*CW&t WOAther ,, Efb"s.14 A wind speed (m) value of 1.0 meter/second has, therefoce, been selected for use in modelling existing conditions. No changes in any of the above parameters are assumed when modelling future year conditions. The remaining data inputs to the model --the background CO concentration (CO) and local emissions source strength (Q)--are not as easily defined. Following is a description of the sources of data and analysis assumptions used in selecting these inputs. _Estimation of Background CO Concentration (C ) b A background CO concentration (Cb) appropriate for use in this analysis was not readily available. By definition, the term background in the above equation refers to that part of an ambient concentration value which comes from any source(s) other than traffic on the nearest� street or intersection (i.e., Flagler Street). It can be expected to vary not only with location, but also with time and averaging time. To actually measure such a background I value, it is necessary to establish a special monitoring site at rooftop level in an upwind location, but as far as possible (at least 100 meters) from E. Flagler Street. Moreover, ambient measurements would then have to be taken under the same meteorological conditions and traffic conditions which produce the highest ambient CO levels at the Flagler Street monitor--i.e., simul- taneously. 14F.L. Ludwig et al, "Evaluation of the APRAC-1A Urban Diffusion Model for Carbon Monoxide", NTIS PS 210 819, February 1972, p. 75. Submitted into the .public record in connection with item ' { on hi-/ Matty Hirai City Clerk _ i o - -- e ptblic 00 record ii onnection witb •18- item on. r, T To our knowledge, no special monitoring of this nature has L) tgfreCf"d in the downtown Miami area. Several estimates of background CO levels in the downtown area have been developed, however, using different methods and tech- niques. In conjunction with the Development of Regional Impact (DRI-) Appli- cation for Development Approval (ADA) for the projects referred to as 1111 Bcickell Avenue and`j!i6aftn Speyer Brickell III, Environmental Engineering Consultants, Inc. conducted a cube month CO monitoring study in January- O ruary 1085 in the Brickell. Avenue area South of SE 7th Street. is The purpose of this study was to.determine a representative background CO concen- tration which could be used for present and future air quality studies. It was the conclusion of this study that an appropriate one -hour background CO d+ihceitstion in this area +ot the downtown would be 4.0 parts per million .,(pin). Assuming a l`••pltraistence factor of 0.7 for conversion to an eight -hour averaging period, and nsied the facto" 0.87 to!conyert oom to micrograms - der cubic meter (mg m these findings suggest an 8-hour background CO 'ter---;� � � • concentration of toughiy 2.4 A�/m In another analysis performed by the Florida DER,16 an estimation of background CO concentration was made using the actual CO data collected at the ti E. Flagler Street monitor. The specific approach used was to calculate the average of the Aaximum 8-hour CO concentration measured on Sundays at the E. f,.. Flagler Street site for November, December and January of 1983. On the basis of this analysis, it was concluded that 2,.7 Y ,m91m3 would be.a reasonable vilue.for an 8-hour background CO concentration. 15Environmental Engineering Consultants, Inc., "Background Carbon Monoxide Air Monitoring Study for Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida," prepared �. for David Plummer & Associates, Inc., February 8, 1985. 16glorida Department of Environmental Regulation, "E. Flagler Street CO ';. Analysis - Preliminary Study," unpublished report. 89-8s2 Y 00 T. -19- ..,i.:. While the above findings are comparable, several deficiencies argue against their direct transferability to this modelling effort. The DRI monitoring study was performed in the Brickell Avenue area which is located . several blocks south of Flagler Street. Although the predominant wind J, direction (NW) and average wind speed (3.3 mph) at the special monitoring site are comparable to conditions on Flagler Street, the monitor was not situated in an upwind location. As a result, there is no assurance that the estimated background CO concentration from this study reflects the contributions of all of the sources affecting background levels on Flagler Street. Similarly, the DER approach does not reflect a concentration measured under the same traffic conditions--i.e., weekday conditions --which contribute to the 8-hour exceedances on Flagler Street. Given the location of Flagler Street in the downtown and an exceedance wind direction of north/northeast, background CO concentrations on Flagler are expected to be influenced by .tbe traffic volumes on streets upwind By evaluating Sunday CO data only, DER is capturing Sunday traffic conditions which are much lower than weekday conditions and may, therefore, be underestimating the contribution of upwind traffic emissions to r background CO levels. To address these concerns, an alternate background CO estimation approach was developed based on studies of urban background CO levels in the San Francisco Bay Area.17 This approach assumes that background CO concentrations at a particular location are most appropriately defined as a 17R.E. DeMandel and T.E. Perardi, 'Urban Background Carbon Monoxide Levels in the Bay Area,' Tech Memo 42, 1982 Bay Area Air Quality Plan, Volume II and Appendix K, Association of Bay Area Goverrunents, Berkeley, CA, January 1983. Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z• on ` Q9 Matty H:.wC 89-8s City C;leik -20- fixed fraction of measured CO values.18 Moreover, the methodology assumes that the ratio of an hour's instantaneous minimum CO value to the hourly average represents a reasonable estimate of this background fraction. Analysis of the E. Flagler Street monitoring data in this way addresses the concerns raised by the above approaches. To calculate minima/average ratios for Flagler Street, strip charts for the Flagler Street monitor were made available by DER and analyzed for the months of November, December and January in the years 1982, 1983, and 1984. For each hour during these months, a minimum instantaneous CO concentration was recorded and compared with the hourly average. A series of frequency distributions were then developed on the basis of, the calculated ratios. Also, previous strip chart analyses have shown that the average ratios based t on more than one hour are within a few percent of the average ratio based one 1-hour data. Consequently, the ratio statistics that are calculated below cah ce assumed to be representative of the ratio statistics appropriate for N estimating the 8-hour CO background ratio on Flagler Street as well. O Tables 3 through 5 contain the results of the strip chart analyses. Table 3 shows that the ratio exceeded 0.40 for nearly half of the hours analyzed, with the greatest concentration of ratios falling in the range of 0.21 to 0.50. Table 4 shows that for CO levels above 2 mg/m3, the ratio is rn ' fairly uniform with increasing CO concentrations. The mean ratio based on all observations is 0.44, while the ratio for hourly averages above 10 mg/m3 is r 18This appears to be reasonable under the additional assumptions (a) that the average wind speed, wind direction and stability condition during periods of exceedances are comparable, and (b) that, on average, time variations in local and upwind emissions are proportional. t ai w f- M � G d O �► .. O � 0 O U s 006. N � O O 89�--862 TABLE 3. Frequency Distribution of the Ratio of Hourly Instantaneous Minimum to Hourly Average CO Concentrations Locations E. Flagler Street Aatio of Instantaneous Minimum to Hourly Average Concentration Period: November, December, January 1982-1984 Percent of Cumulative Occurrences Percentage 0 to .10 15.5 15.5 .11 to .20 4.2 19.7 .21 to .30 11.1 30.8 .31 to .40 16.4 47.2 .41 to .50 16.1 63.3 .51 to .60 9.2 72.5 .61 to .70 6.0 78.5 .71 to .80 6.3 84.8 .81 to .90 1.9 86.7 .91 to 1.00 13.3 100.0 TABLE 4. Relationship Between Hourly Average and Mean Instantaneous Minimum CO Concentrations Location: E. Flagler Street Period: November, December, January 1982-1984 Hourly Average 3. Concentration (mg/m ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 + Mean Instantaneous Minimum Concentration * .77 1.26 1.55 1.86 2.20 2.59 3.02 3.12 3.55 4.08 4.31 4.86 5.16 6.34 Mean Ratio Minimum/Average (1) * .56 .49 .44 .43 .40 .39 .40 .37 .38 .39 .38 .39 .39 .39 Number of Occurrences 1,620 1,093 723 225 404 279 274 144 187 110 105 27 50 24 39 Mean (All Observations): 3.16 1.37 .44 5,304 Mean (Hourly Average > 10 mg/m3): 11.36 4.37 .38 355 1C * Data not nvailab a dS�e to lack of pre ision in measurement. record in connection W t1l item .� Sr on _. 89 8s2,, Matty Hirai City Clerk -22Ob - 0.38. Finally, Table 5 shows the average diurnal pattern of CO concentrations and the minimum/average ratio. You will recall from Figure 2 that moan lt*id Cti� centtationd" �t9h '' C is* if icantly with the onset of, the rning It mmutto hers, maintain Consistently high levels throughout the day, and then WISAipita quickly following:the evening rush hours. The hourly minima follow a similar pattern. Not unexpectedly, the ratios display a different profile, with maximum values occurring when emissions are lowj minimum values when emissions are highest. The results of the above analysis suggest that the 8-hour background CO ratio or fraction appropriate for use on E. Flagler Street is on the order of 0.39. The 8-hour background CO concentration appropriate in 1982, therefore, i is the product of this background fraction and the design value, or 0.39 x 13.2 mg/m3 • 5.1 mg/m3. As discussed later in this memorandum, the background fraction for future year CO concentrations will differ from this fraction as the result of changing traffic conditions in the downtown. Estimation of Local Emission Source Strength (Q) The average rate of emissions (Q) in graims/meter-second called for in the street canyon model is derived by multiplying a composite vehicle emission rate (g/mi) by the average hourly number of vehicles expected to travel on this portion of Flagler Street during a peak 8-hour period. To estimate the composite vehicle emission rate --or local emissions source strength --associated with vehicles on Flagler Street, EPA's MOBiLE3 emission factor computer program was used. As described below, traffic flow data --current and projected --is obtained from a number of recent transportation studies in downtown Miami. Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2 • on Matty Hirai City Clerk 89786 TABLE 5. Diurnal Variation in Hourly Co Averages, :iinima and Ratios Loo�ati-on: E. Flaglet Street Perm= 1982-11984 Dec C�.: aec, January Mean 1-hour Ave. 3 Hour Wdinq Concentration to m 0100 0.96 0200 0.82 0300 0.75 0400 0.66 0500 0.73 0600 1.34 0700 2.93 0800 4.82 0900 4.48 1000 4.72 1100 5.37 1200 5.64 1300 5.61 1400 5.43 1500 5.39 1600 5.67 1700 6.24 1800 4.28 1900 2.31 2000 1.77 2100 1.74 2200 1.61 2300 1.34 2400 1.15 All Bouts: 0600-1900 Hours: 3.16 4.59 [Mean Instant. min. 3 Concentration ma/m ? 0.67 0.59 0.51 0.46 0.50 0.78 1.51 2.17 1.78 1.89 2.01 2.23'.. 2.02 2.03 1.93 2.12 2.32 i 1.62 1.18 1.01 1.02 0.93 0.85 a.76 1.37 1.83 Submitted into the public record in connection with itemy2 • J� on 24 ' f llIat �T i i.YW City Clesi- mean Minimum/ Ave. Ratio ($)- 0.10 0.72 0.68 0.69 0.68 0.58 0.52 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.51 0.57 0.59 0.58 0.64 0.66 0.44 Number o 221 221 221 221 221 221 2: 2- 2- 22_ 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221_ 221 221 221 5,304 0.40 3,094 _ 89-862 -24- • MOBILE3 Input Data, Assumptions and Sources Estimates of emission rates by MOHILE3 require numerous data inputs. Following is a list and description of the data required and used: 0 Vehicle Speeds: For use in estimating 8-hour averages, this speed should reflect the average hourly speed of vehicles travelling on E. Flagler Street during a peak 8-hour period. do speed runs have ever been performed to estimate such a speed. Pedestrian and delivery conflicts along the street, however, argue for relatively low average speeds, particularly during the midday (shopping) hours shown previously to contribute to the observed 8-hour'exceedances. The traffic signal at the corner of E. Flagler and 1st Avenue, in combination with the midblock pedestrian light, also contribute to low travel speeds. For these reasons, an average hourly travel ,speed of 5 mno during an exceedance day is assumed. Given the current and projected,traffic volumes on E. Flagler, and the street's capacity, this same value is assumed to be reasonable for both the 1982 and 1987 analyses. Vehicle Mix: The distribution of vehicles by type on Flagler Street is assumed to be,as follows: 1982 1987 70.7% LDGV 66.7% LDGV 14.2% LDGTl 12.1% LDGT1 9.3% LDGT2 9.01 LDGT2 0.5% LDDV 4.8% LDDV 0.1% LDDT 2.2% LDDT 1.1% HDGV 1.1% HDGV 4.1% HDDV 4.1% HDDV This distribution was derived from a classification survey performed by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. in November 1981 of vehicles entering Flagler Street.19 It is based on the assumptions 19barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., `Flagler Street: Issues and Options - Transportation and Traffic 19840, prepared for the Downtown Development Authority under contract to the Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Administration, May 1984, p. 2. Submitted into the public record in connection with 41- �z r ,item • S on Csi:y -25- (a) that the distribution of light -duty vehicles by type entering Flagler Street is the same as the national average distribution for the years 1982 and 19871 and (b) that roughly ono-b"t: ©l411 'tFuft* entering Plagler Street, lh 1982 as well as 1987 will be diesel -powered vehicles. Vehicle No Miami -specific data is available in this registration/ area. National averages are thus used for both mileage accruals the base (1982) and projection (1987) year. -� Cold start/hot In the absence of local data, the Federal Test start percent- Procedure percentages are used: ages: - 20.6% cold start non -catalyst LDV - 27.3% hot start catalyst LDV - 10.6% cold start catalyst LDV Ambient An;lent tempecature of 43.3 F is used. This Temperature: value was determined by the Florida DER on the basis of an analysis of temperature records in the month of Unuaryl120 Before using MOBILE3, several modifications were made to reflect (a) minor EPA "refinements" to the model made since its release, and (b) adjustments necessary to better approximate low speed emission conditions. The latter adjustment was particularly important'in light of the low average vehicle speeds assumed on E. Flagler Street. EPA staff in the Field Operations and Support Division also developed` Miami -specific tampering rates based upon a 1982 EPA survey of tampering and fuel switching in Dade County.21 Upon analysis, however, these rates were found to produce a slightly lower composite vehicle emissions factor than would result from use of the default national averages for tampering inherent in MOBILE3. In light 20Florida DER, "E. Flagler Street CO Analysis - Preliminary Study," unpublished report, p. 4. 2lLetter from Peter Lidiak, U.S.E.P.A., Office of Air and Radiation, July 18, 1985, containing estimates of zero mileage tampering rates -and deterioration rates for Miami. Submitted into, the public record in connection wiili item PZ - on _.%� • 89-862 Matty Hirai City Clerk -26IV - of the fact that recent tampering surveys performed by ?M have found the iftat.teWe' Ot tampering to be Bauch Higher than that found by ZPA. in 1982, the national default values were subsequently used. e Local Traffic Assumptions and Sources The vehicles per hour (vph) used in this modelling effort should represent the hourly average of the worst condition eight -hour traffic period of the day. As a general rule, the worst continuous 8-hours of traffic equals approximately 48% of the average annual daily traffic (AADT).22 According to this guideline, the hourly average VPH to use in modelling evaluations is about 6% of the AADT for the worst eight -hour period. This compares with a peak hour vph that is usually around 10% of the AADT. The pattern of traffic on Flagler Street, however, differs from this norm. As shown previously in Figure 3, traffic levels are very low prior to morning rush hour, maintain consistently high levels during the midday, and then decrease rapidly during the evening hours. Assuming a distributional pattern similar to that shown* in Figure 3, peak hour traffic in Flagler Street can be estimated to represent closer to 12% of the AADT, and the peak eight -hour period almost 62% of AADT. As stated previously, no 24-hour traffic counts are available for the block on E. Flagler Street where the monitor is located. Therefore, estimates —M of the worst 8-hour traffic period on a winter weekday could not be obtained directly. A review of available traffic statistics and study projections, however, reveals: 22U.S. EPA, Region I, "Region I Mobile Source Modeling Procedures", y January 1, 1985 (Mimeographed). Submitted into the public ,record in connection tiith ,item12___r on ' _• hxatty Hirai ..� ::y Cie-?'c 89-862 , -27- _. (1) that peak hour traffic on E. Flagler Street directly in front of the monitor site in November 1981 was recorded to be 610 vehicles per hour=23 (2) that 1985 peak hour traffic on Flagler Street is estimated at 750 vehicles per hour=24 and, T, (3) that traffic on E. Flagler Street is not expected to increase in the future, even without the street and transit improvements planned for the area.25 Based on the above relationships and figures, it is reasonable to assume that the hourly average of the worst continuous eight -hour period in 1982 was roughly 395 vehicles per hour: AADT - 1.0/.12 * 610 vph - 5,083 vehicles Hourly Average Worst 8-Hour Period (.62 * 5,083) /8 hrs = 394 vph A similar calculation assuming that 1987 traffic levels remain unchanged from 1985 levels yields an hourly average for the worst eight -hour period in 1987 of roughly 485 vehicles per hour. While these estimates are quite reasonable in our opinion, the diurnal pattern of traffic on E. Flagler Street may differ from that on NE 1st Avenue _ (Figure 3), and there may be the need for a,slight seasonal adjustment (5-10%). Given this uncertainty, it is assumed for this analysis that the hourly average of the worst eight -hour traffic period of the day is equal to the 23Memorandum from P.S. Kitsakos, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., to - Kahart M. Pinder, Downtown Development Authority, re: "Flagler Street Enhancement Study - Summary of Field Inventories and Existing Data," January 22, 1982, Figure S. 24David Plummer & Associates, "Downtown Miami Transportation Report" (DRAFT), May 1985, p. 37. 25Ibid, p. 37. Submitted into the public record in connection with ' item - con q n- per" Alatty Hirca.i. City Clel. ', 89-862 -28- average peak hour traffic volume--i.e., 610 vph in 1982 and 7br' vph in 1987. This is felt to be a conservative assumption. MODELLING RESULTS Table 6 summarizes the primary data input values and presents the analysis results for the design year 1982. As shown, the model estimates the peak 8-hour CO concentrations on E. Flagler to be approximately 13.2 mg/m3, which compares exactly with the observed second maximum of 13.2 mg/m3. To estimate the peak 8-hour CO concentration in 1987s an estimate of the CO concentration from local sources on the leeward side of the street is again made on the basis of 1987 conditions. The result of this analysis is presented in Table 7, and shows a predicted local concentration of 6.5 mg/m3. To estimate the total 1987 CO concentration at the site, a background CO concentration must be added to this value. Because traffic and congestion conditions on streets north of Flagler. Street are likely to have changed during the 1982-1987 period in ways different than conditions on Flagler Street, it may not be safe to assume that the same relationship which T existed in 1982 will also exist in 1987. To, obtain a reasonable estimate, it was assumed: (1) that background -,CO -levels -on.Flagler Street are the result almost 4SiCJwely of vehicular emissions from traffic on streets north {Upwind) of the site; (2) that vehicular emission rates duringthe 1982-1987 per io3 on these upwind streets will'decrease'by approximately 0 percent (based on the estimated effect of'the PMVWP at 15 mph); (3) that congestion (average speeds) on these streets will not have changed noticeably, particularly when averaged over an 8-hour period=26 and finally. -- 26Metropolitan Planning organization, Dads County, Florida, 'Year 200S Metro -Dade Transportation Plan - 19 4 Update`, September 1984, Table IV-16► P. 9 Iv-19. Submitted into the putic � record in connection with R item onAW r n Matty Hirai City Clerk it] Cal Ydar:� T/M Program: Me It+tam Prstrawr: Na Vth. Tygi: -- --- LOW - LOOT1 LOCIT7-- Veh. B000dt: 5 O 5.0 0.0 VMT MIS: 0.701 O. 142 0.097 composite 1[mitoion ret:tort too/Miles Total MC: 13.79 21 32 30. 17 Ethaust CO: ' 179.07 26S 26 344 04 ti.haust NOX: 2.79 3.67 _4_„hik- tdle C12: 10.21 t0.61 idle MOX'"-" 0.00 ' ' 0.07 aabitnt To Otoratind MaLOOT Mpay 5. 0 0.011 24.92 31. 72 296.75 449 56 4.07 wo. 5.36 70 0.70 10.27 8.113 0.00 0.06 Rogian Low 3 / 20 6 Altitude, $00 rt LDOV LDOT OV AMC-.- All /9% 7.0 5 0 S 0 9 0 0.005 0.001 0 04 t 0. 000 0.74 1.39 9 47 0 00 16.31 3 39 4 41 35 34 0 00 ;02 ell 2.23 2.69. 34 56 0 00 4 4l 0.03 0 l0 0 36 0 00 0 h6 0. i8 0. 34 0. 8'1 0 00 9 g4 0. is 0.36 - 0. QZ 0 00 0 lit Variable Unit Value K - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emisaion Rate. mg/ms 21.3520 L - Vehicle Size m!. 2.00 X - Vertical Distance mi 3.50 Z - Horizontal Distance m ; 9.70 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO -Emission Factor 9/mile 202.8 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 610 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) mg/m3 8.0930 Background CO Concentration mg/m3 5.1480 Total Predicted CO Concentration mg/m3 13.2410 TABLE 6. Estimate of 8-Hour Average CO Concentration on E. Flagler Street - 1982 Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2 on Matiy Hirai City C:lexl; Ij VIN type: .-... LCQV � Vji. QQ{.a.4i2� Veh ttetedt: 3.0 3.0 5.0 vMT Mfg: 0.647 O. 121 ef Total MC: 4.52 16.63 19 tib i�A vtt Cb: 119.67 2t0.34 246 04 t{�6�vtt1N0%: 2.33 3.96 4 34 Col. Year: t/It Program- No M t d l • C0: b. 00 3 99 t01e Nox: O.O3 0 05 t� Anti taw. Program: No 0.040 Ceweetlte E*/ttien Fattert l0rn/Mll AMMitnt Tt% MOVion: law Operating Mode:'.2�/ 20 6 Attitude. 300 Ft Last -+00v - Lbay LOOt Mogy Mc All S. 0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 0.011 0.049 0.022 O. 04 t 0.000 10.0t :0.05 0.76 t. 19 7 30 O 00 !0 0" 225. 57 290.31 3.43 4.00 20, 32 0 00 132 1 t 4. 12 4,96 1.93 2.26 27, 71 O 00 3. 7S '60&43 0.44 0.03 0. t t 0.21 O 00 0 At 3.97 4 21 0.19 0.25 0.06 0 00 6 24 0.05 0.03 0. 13 0.31 0,53 0 00 0 11 Variable Unit Value R - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emission Rate mg/ms 17.1016 L - Vehicle Size m 2.00 X - Vertical Distance m + 3.50 Z - Horizontal Distance m 9.70 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor g/mile 132.11 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 750 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) lag/tn3 6.4820 Submitted into the public record in connection with item P�. 3 on 5-:% 1vlotty Hi"-C.:' City Clef]:. TABLE 7. Estimate of 8-Hoar Average CO Concentration on E. Flagler Street - 1987 Y `C 89-�8b2 AMMitnt Tt% MOVion: law Operating Mode:'.2�/ 20 6 Attitude. 300 Ft Last -+00v - Lbay LOOt Mogy Mc All S. 0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 0.011 0.049 0.022 O. 04 t 0.000 10.0t :0.05 0.76 t. 19 7 30 O 00 !0 0" 225. 57 290.31 3.43 4.00 20, 32 0 00 132 1 t 4. 12 4,96 1.93 2.26 27, 71 O 00 3. 7S '60&43 0.44 0.03 0. t t 0.21 O 00 0 At 3.97 4 21 0.19 0.25 0.06 0 00 6 24 0.05 0.03 0. 13 0.31 0,53 0 00 0 11 Variable Unit Value R - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emission Rate mg/ms 17.1016 L - Vehicle Size m 2.00 X - Vertical Distance m + 3.50 Z - Horizontal Distance m 9.70 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor g/mile 132.11 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 750 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) lag/tn3 6.4820 Submitted into the public record in connection with item P�. 3 on 5-:% 1vlotty Hi"-C.:' City Clef]:. TABLE 7. Estimate of 8-Hoar Average CO Concentration on E. Flagler Street - 1987 Y `C 89-�8b2 Variable Unit Value R - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emission Rate mg/ms 17.1016 L - Vehicle Size m 2.00 X - Vertical Distance m + 3.50 Z - Horizontal Distance m 9.70 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor g/mile 132.11 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 750 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) lag/tn3 6.4820 Submitted into the public record in connection with item P�. 3 on 5-:% 1vlotty Hi"-C.:' City Clef]:. TABLE 7. Estimate of 8-Hoar Average CO Concentration on E. Flagler Street - 1987 Y `C 89-�8b2 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor g/mile 132.11 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 750 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) lag/tn3 6.4820 Submitted into the public record in connection with item P�. 3 on 5-:% 1vlotty Hi"-C.:' City Clef]:. TABLE 7. Estimate of 8-Hoar Average CO Concentration on E. Flagler Street - 1987 Y `C 89-�8b2 Adh -31- i —r (4) that Ciftth in VMT in the downtown will have taken place at a rate of :01 roughly ' psratnt annuallye Or 5.6 percent during the 5 year �! pet iod. 2i ... On the basis of the above assumptions, the 1987 CO background concentration is estimated to be 3.8 mg/m3: ' 1982 CO Background * impact of * Growth s Estimated 1987 CO •V x '' Level FMVECP Background 5.148 mg/m3 * .70 * 1.056 3 3.8 mg/m The observed 1987 2nd maximum 8-hour CO concentration is then estimated oy adding the predicted local CO and background levels, yielding an estimated value of 10.3 mg/m3: 6.5 mg/m3 + 3.8 mg/m3 ■ 10.3 mg/m3 ADDITIONAL POTENTIAL STREET CANYON HOTSPOTS IN DOWNTOWN MIAMI Conditions on E. Flagler Street are continually referred to as "unique" l in conversation with, and reports by Dade -County and Florida officials. As an example: d, Canyon sites are not the norm in the downtown Miami area and, consequently, this monitor does,not provide a true representation of the entire downtown'area.28 The analyses performed suggest that this assertion cannot be adequately supported. Flagler Street's location in the southern part of downtown Miami, when coupled with a northern wind direction, causes background CO levels to be higher here than at any upwind location on the leeward side of another 27Ibid., Table IV-17, p. IV-21. 28Letter dated July 12, 1984 from Steve Smallwood, Bureau Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Management to James T. Wilburn, Chief -Air Management Branch, US _ EPA - Region IV, pp. 4-S Submitted into the public 7 record in connection with itemon 89-862 - 1 Matty Hirai City Clerk __ -32- east-west street. Although comprehensive traffic flow data are not available, traffic volumes on upwind streets appear to be comparable or lower, suggesting that in relation to these areas, the Flagler Street monitor may indeed represent a "worst -case" location. However, there are a number of streets south of Flagler Street which also meet the street canyon definition of having multi -story buildings and significant traffic volumes. Notwithstanding the results of the special CO monitoring study performed by DERM in October 1981-March 198229, the area of the downtown shown in Map 2 must also be considered a candidate for eight -hour CO exceedances. To estimate future (1987) 8-hour CO concentrations in this area, the APRAC-lA street canyon model was again employed together with the MOBILE3 emissions package, after making necessary. adjustments for differences in conditions between Flagler Street and this arer..' SE 1st and SE 2nd Streets --the area outlined on Map 2--differ from Flagler Street primarily in the traffic volumes they carry and the average speeds travelled. According to the most recent study of traffic conditions in the downtown, peak hour traffic on SE lst Street is projected to number approximately 1180 vehicles in i � r f 1987.30 Approximately 700 vehicles are expected to travel on .SE 2nd Street , during the peak hour in 1987. As was assumed on Flagler Street, the hourly I average of the worst eight -hour traffic period of the day is assumed for modelling purposes to be equal to these peak hour traffic volumes. In I comparison with Flagler Street, however, traffic movement on SE 1st and 2nd Streets is considerably smoother as the result of on -street parking 2910id, p. S. 30David Piummer & Associates, "Downtown Miami Transportation Report" (DRAFT), May 1985, p' oubmitted into the public "Cord in connection with item • 5 on "- " Ilirai - l 1T1T r'11 _1_ ss-�s� ft restrictions and fewer pedestrian conflicts. Although actual speed run data is not available, consultants familiar with the area suggest that average speeds on these streets may be as high as 15 mph when averaged over an 8-hour period. Consequently, it is conservatively assumed for modelling purposes that 8-hour average travel speeds on these streets approximates 7.5 mph. All other analysis assumptions (e.g., vehicle mix, ambient temperature, etc.) necessary to generate MOBILE3 emission factors and apply the street canyon submodel are assumed to be the same as those mane in modelling Flagler Street. The background CO concentration in 1987 is also assumed to be the same as tnat estimated above for E. Flagler Street, although there exists some theoretical basis for increasing this value slightly. The results of modelling under the above assumptions are presented in Table 8 for SE 1st Street, and in Table 9 for SE 2nd Street. As shown, predicted 8-hour CO concentrations' an SE 2nd Street are expected to be well below the 10 mgjm3 standard. However, 8-hour CO exceedances suspected of existing at "street canyon" locations on SE lst Street will continue to exist. Measures to reduce CO emissions on Flagler Street should be selected i so as to maximize the likely emission reductions on this street as well. IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION CONTROL PLANNING The 1967 2nd predicted for Flagler Street and SE 1st Street are quite close to the 8-hour CO-=���� y continuing to be in violation of —` the NAAQS, however, it is necessary to design and implement measures which wi3§,,jnringtethe area into compliance by 1987. The identification and analysis i Ci into the Public of r ordf ;: measures will be the topic of a subsequent memorandum. It is in connection with usaul to make the following observations at this time, however.LLeni on Matty "Hirai C' fV Cler?,. 89 8b� 1 an IL iu Gi . gat - ��,` ,yam- � `�' t -�. .:V-- • - � •+•'; . • 7" —'.� •n.► •.�.' �!�� � _ "• ice" •'.' - IVE 04 �' it tiL7 Ii ' .. � y •• .map * » 7. pp _ 1 as � � - d •� r i ,. - - �. � y fir,.. _ r,- - l el • - - -� .-360 Zzz Submitted into, the puixic 1 a al S �-eet Canyon CO HotspotS in DOwntcwr. uiami MAP 2•redoMtfAnd n�i� �5�ri WILH item -.iron- "mrai lvTatty -- Cal. Year. 19es t/M Progfom: No Ambient tono 43 0•(F) Regian7 Low Anti -tam pregran! me 00eratins Made 20 6 / 27.3 / 20 6 Aititvda• S00 Ft Veh. ty0a: 4V Lbatt LAOT2. LbdT M V LOOV ..LQ.QT .+420V Mom- All.:Vall Veh. soeeds: 7, s 7. s 7. s 7! 7 S 7 S 7. S 7 s VMT Mit. 0.667 0. 121 0.090 0.011 0.040 0.022 0,041 0 000 Composite Emission Factors (OM/Milo) Total MC: 6.89 10. 11 15.33 14.06 17.04 0, 67 1.05 6.63 0. 00 9 0/ - Ilifiauit ' CD- " - 714 29 -- 129. 90 - i50. 99 09.99 235 34 -" 2. 05 '"3. 30 "'- -29*03 '0 00 02. 67 Eshays! NOx: 2.23 3. •1 4.20 3.110 3.08 1.66 2.05 29. 13 0 00 9 94 Net sta1111tid tdlj Emiisiea Factors (Qm/Min) Idle MC: 0, 44 0 41 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.03 0 11 0.31 0 00 0 41 Idle CO.. 7.32 6.00 3.89 3.95 • 21 0. 19 0. 35 0.96 0 00 6 -4 I d I a NOX: 0. 13 0.09 0.05 0.09 0.03 0. 1s 0.31 0,53 0 00 0. It vat iable Unit Value .- K - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emission Rate mg/ms 16.8372 L - Vehicle Size m 2.00 -- X - Vertical Distance ms 3.50 Z -Horizontal Distance m 9.70 U - Wind Speed m/s 1.00 = EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor g/mile 82.67 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 1180 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) mg%m3 6.3818 Background CO Concentration mg/m3 3.8000 Total Predictea CO Concentration mg/m3 10.1818 Submitted intothe Public record in connection with item? dZ • S on • Ft blazty Hira QXur gVi TABLE S. Estimate of age CO Concentration on SE 1st Street - 1987 89-862 '� 0 l Cal Veer Me t/M Prograti No Ambient Tamp. 43 O'1F1 Region, Luw Anti -tam Prootom No Operating Made: 20.6 27 3 1 20 6 Altitude SOO Ft veh T9ee' LCOV VOTI (�lu.^f� .L001 .%pav .Logy J.22JL _aaV MC�� All V92 veb. sseees: 7 7 7 s 7 2 7 0 7 Q 7 5 7 3 1 3 V"T "it- 0 667 0 12t 0.090 0.Ot1 0.040 0.092 0 04t 0.000 Cewedsito Emitsien Total MC: Factors 6.e0 tam/miles to. it 16 33 14 06 17 04 0.67 1.0% 4.63 0.00 9 Ot Itshaust CO: 74 29 129.90 ISO 99 139.99 233 34 2.95 3.30 29 03 0 00 92 61 eshaust NOX: 2. 23 3.91 4 20 3.96 s.Oe 1.66 2.09 20. 13 0 00 3 54 Not sta611iseo tote Emission Factors tC.siMtnt tote NC: 0 44 O. 41 0.49 0. 43 O. 44 0.03 0, it 0131 0 00 0 At lot* CO: 7 32 6.00 9 " 9 95 4 21 0.19 0.39 O. 96 0 00 6 24 Idle WK • 0 is 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.13 0.31 0. 73 0 00 0 it Variable Unit Value X - Constant Term numeric 7.00 Q - Average Emission Rate tog/ms 9.9882 L - Vehicle Size to 2.00 X - Vertical Distance m 3.50 Z - Horizontal Distance m 9.70 U - Wina Speed m/s! 1.00 EXCO - Mobile3 Exhaust CO Emission Factor 9/mile $2.67 VPH - Vehicles Per Hour veh/hr 700 Predicted CO Concentration (Leeward) mg/M3 3.7858 Background CO Concentration mg%m3 3.8000 Total Predicted CO Concentration* mg/m3 7.5858 Submitted into the public record in connection with item iz_-_,r on �. Mttty Hirai City Clerk TABLE 9. Estimate of 8-Hour Average L: Concentration on SE 2nd Street - 1987 1-4NI. -37- Correcting 8-hour violations requires achieving emission reductions that are significant over an 8-hour period. 'While the reduction need not be spread evenly over the 8-hour period in question, emission reduction measures that orient themselves primarily towards peak period traffic --especially peak period work trips --are not likely to be particularly effective on Flagler Street. As''sb&4n previously# peak period traffic volumes on Flagler Street (and presumably on SE lst Street as well) are not significantly higher than TY461"es during other midday hours6 Similarly, measures designed mainly to shift travel from peak periods to other times of the day are also unlikely to affect 6-hour CO concentrations substantially, particularly if their principal effect is to redistribute peak hour traffic within the same 8-hour period in which excessive emissions occur. Traffic routing schemes that divert traffic on Flagler Street or SE 1st Street to alternative routes in the downtown are also to be discouraged if they are being undertaken solely on the basis of air quality. While this kind of action will clearly lower the Flagler Street or SE lst Street contributions to CO levels, background contributions from vehicular emissions on streets upwind will likely rise. Traffic management ' r measures tnat improve traffic flow (average speeds) conditions on these streets will be worthy of consideration,31 although their peak period effects will be diluted when considered over an 8-hour averaging period. The existence of a pedestrian -activated walk light at mid -block positions along Flagler Street makes the estimation of traffic signal timing changes on this street especially difficult to predict throughout an 8-hour period. Based on the conditions described above, the primary and initial focus of control 31see Zamurs, John,."Assessing the Effect of Transportation Control Strategi n U a Ca fbo Monoxide Concentrations", Journal of Air Pollution Control 637-642, 1984. record in in connection with item /Z - on L • 7 Nutty Hiia City Clerk -ir -38- efforts should be placed on tailpipe emissions reducton programs» -like an antiwsmt!'pf"fam--ana other measures aimed to reduce areaaide,tripsaad;� attattids"Otti'-such as public transit improvements and employer programs to promote company bus, vanpool, ana carpool use. These kinds of measures will not only be effective over the 8-hour period desired, but also work in reducing both local and background contributions to measured CO levels. Submitted into the public record in connection vTith item on Nutty .Hij.-ai City Clerk �,, P r ; . r UF M 1 A,;d .! SuL' fitted into the :public record in connection with item • S on• .Z Matty. IIirc R E N A ; N on 1 1 City Clerk .1. f'iRU P V r++ Pd li i- V 00 1 -r o -(' A T- I I Y 4 9 V I. t: 0 2 0 e r n `'` WON No, c? BUSIN34n VICTIM: P�v NI AN A, RES. ('HOW: ( 30n) +'-, ;(�t��t � t0 AVAIL DAY: TIMP: INJURY: L OC A 1 1 ON ON ROOY TYPE OF INJURY: NOT APPITCABLS RELATION TO 0FFVN0-.Q . 41VANfr, Ct)P' ME NT': . : t '• U . .. - 1 0020;7 CURRENT CASE TNFOPMATION PERSON N0 TYPE OF VICTIM! TYPE : f'E RSN RE- PO^TNG NAP4t_ : HE 0 - +AW: A/I: ADULT RACE: !..PIT= .:.. 7DOE: 317-01 9 AGE: 60 YRS. RES. ADDRESS: 350 �W _ 'I APT . h CITY: MIAM.[ AT : rLO IDA ZIP: RE__ .TF`.`US: N/A fill_ INs_S . ,AClDW( . .. , 150 _w _1 . sl AVAIL DAY TIME: ANYTIME O UPA r!ON / i _E _ VET fNJURY: LQC;A fON ON BODY: TYPE OF iN URY. NOT APPLICABLE HO ?1 - 5 f _' TN;[C . RELATION TO OFFENDER: NO /APPLIC BL` SQUAD H: COMMENTS: STATUTE: I r j, i ff V r I "q ._ - - e�l1� rN T CP1.ME `�-CE:NC +Av1, U rnL;f,i C1iTh1c" SC N Pf• 0 'ES VI?F:NC[ 7 0 PR0PF R1 Y UN 'I . 10. TECHNItC TAN P AN # T F C HNICIAN idAM!" DRUG ACTIVI F D?/r=; I,�;'.!JG TYF''i:. N '` } Submitted into the public record in connection with item ' S on r Matty Hira- City Clerk 1 1_N T`?Upg1_ sN }- 1I`_;�: �FYPF tip PRi'it.r�?r�(�; 1114c is 0E N1 Nnf 1 1 tIt_ r T1ii= L T N T C t!Hi. 't t. W H r N. j Fi f✓ U T N1_V =rt #_ I� _ _. 7�1 �� � n� �'i `� �'!l.i -' 57 IN L I TE 0 1,Tf-, nN -i 1-1F (1P011INC) s? 1.; . �: ` r'7`� �.,i# i r��� NI J Rt' t `i' n4 6 R 0 K F I HR0f_I(iFI T1-1! FE14C'i.1:� (1'r I..;"1 �.?i Tii�:. tt(1iC .YPIi;(t F#;R0L)GF# 7,1-1F p0If41 i�1' 1.fd.r!:}' !:�f1�'Cii F ?'1'1711)I! 1�T} r: gINF1 — Efi1"TfZE' NE IC,#-1,C!f Submitted into the public record ink connection with item �-��J _ on ' A Mattk Hirai City Clerk 89-8f62 FORM 86 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLIC? FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPALl AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS s • LAST NAME-FRST NAMk-MIDUL! NAME NAME Or K ARA COUNCIL. COMMISSION• AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTI •' SUAREZ t Xavier L. City of Pj' a� mi Comnli ran MAIIINt� ADDREIS THE WARM COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. Oa COMMITTEE OP WHICH 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF: 3500 Pan American Drive X CIIV ::Cr1UN'TY OTHLR10CAt AGENCY 1 11 CITt COUNTY NAME Or 10MITICAL SUBDIVRION: Miami Dade Mayor ty►TE O* S'N104 VOIA WCURREU MY POSITION IS: � ELECTIVE AlMNTIVE September 28. 1989_ WHO MUST FILE FORM N This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143. Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the taw when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION "2.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited front knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 13 DAPS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by compacting and riling this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the mating, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOI%TED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflictof interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: a You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict In the treasure before partidpating. * You should complete the form and file it within IS days afier the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'i WORM 1. „r XI'y er L. Suarez � hen -by disclose that on ..,,_S�Rt�''�b r �� , 19.89�: (a) A measure come or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private pin; or M Xbwred to the special pin of ��,Ar2�er4" . by whom 1-atI letuned:- (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: .I&z t=rz Prc'S flc; o Item PZ-5, R-89-862: Review of the Special Exception with approval by the.City Commission as listed in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance o`c tie City of Miami, Schedule of District Regulations, CR;J' Commercial Residential (General) and CR-1 Commercial Residential (Neighborhood), Page 4 of 6, Principal Uses and Structures, to permit a drive-in facility on 144 S.W. 7 St., 145 S.W. 8 Street and 153 S.W. 8 Street for the Barnett Bank building located at 800 Brickell Avenue. �a m amr _ M N co /2✓2 —jq Date Flied NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 1112.317 (1015). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. n soum to tam FORM COUNTY, 8B MEMORANDUM OF "VOTING CONFLICT FOR - MUNICIPAL. AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME—rIRST NAME—MIDulk NAME DE Y_URRE, Victor MAILOW- ADMESA CIT% QN Miami WHICH vork ; September 28, 198 Oi aWRQ COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR THE WMftCk COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTMOAITY, OR WHICH 1 SERVk IS A UNII Of: Yniv : ! (TIUNTY • OTHER IOCAt AGENCY ('0UNTY NAAtI: OF POLITICAL 5e1WtVIS10N: Dade Vice Mayor ;ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE C� WHO MUST FILE FORM BB C7 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an ti'pQ7taie ogle board. council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -ad visor bet01'erwh ented =��Irequ-*F`md with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this lawda� ough the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the dtaw. Your responsibilities under the la% when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.314.1, FLORIDA 11TATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding electi%c count)-, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. Jn either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other loal public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a Trotter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his dimction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH - THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. f IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT ET DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within IS bays grief the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER1 OMREST 1. __VV3,t-_t-r n Vr,rrP . hereby disclose that on .rRim nf'om I&X S . 19.89._...: (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) Xinured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: by whom 1 am retained. Item PZ-5, R-89-862: Review of the Special Exception with approval bythe City Commission as listed in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Schedule of District Regulations, CR-3 Commercial Residential (General) and CR-1 Commercial Residential (Neighborhood), Page 4 of 6, Principal Uses and Structures, to permit a drive-in facility on 144 S.W. 7 St., 145'S.W. 8 Street and 153 S.W. 8 Street for the Barnett Bank building located at 800 Brickell Avenue. Date Filed Signature i NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 1112.17 (1"5). A FAILURE 70 MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLO%%.ING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. CI FORM 60 10.16 FACE