The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutM-89-1052To Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROA" g ��CCesar H. 0dio City Manager RECOMMENDATION: 1. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 2 DATE SUBJECT REFERENCES ENCLOSURES NOV 1a1939 Metromover Issues and Recommendations FILE This memorandum is in response to your request for the City Administration to conduct a workshop for the City Commission to discuss the unresolved issues and recommendations regarding the Metromover Extension Project. As you know, the workshop was conducted on Thursday, November 9, 1989, which included the presentations by the Metro Dade County staff. It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission review the following issues pertaining to the Metromover Extension Project and adopt the two (2) resolutions supporting the Bicentennial Park and the Southeast Overtown /Park West stations. Bicentennial Part Station - The proposed alignment locates the Bicentennial Nara station witnin the Lity -owned park. The Public Works Department is in the process of platting the park which will include approximately 50 feet of dedicated easement for the Metromover. The County is requesting that this dedication be proffered by the City at no cost to the county whatsoever. unless an agreement can be reached between the city and county on this_, issue, the County may decide to remove the station from that location. In order to enhance the future development potential of Bicentennial Park, it is imperative that we have a station located near the Park. Also, please note that the City encouraged the County to locate the proposed station at Bicentennial Park. Therefore, it is recommended that the City dedicate only the minimum amount or lama necessary to accoamoaate the station iapproximatety b[,b1UU sq. ft.) 2. Southeast Overtown /Park West Station (located between N. E. 8th `1:h sweets) - the city Administration and surrounding property owners nave expressed objection to the County's proposed reduction of traffic lanes on N. E. 2nd Avenue alignment from three to two lanes. The relocation of two lanes of traffic in Park West would impede the development potential of the area. In order to maintain three traffic lanes, the County has indicated that 12 property would have to be acquired at the Park West Station. Proposals by private property owners were received by the County to dedicate the easements. The County is in the process of negotiating the dedications with the adjacent property owners. However, if no agreements are achieved, the City Administration would recommend the tollowing option: mne city would participate monetarily oy using lax increment Bono proceeds in the soutneast ertown /park west (Sturm) Reaeveiopment area on a bu oasis for acquisition of roperties needed at chat station site and tnat the county would participate iuus to ,acquire other dedications south of N. E. atn Street ono north of N. 1. vtn street. me county nas requested tnat tne city commit to trims proposal tnrougn city commission action. 3. Zoning Considerations - Several adjacent property owners have requested zoning bonuses and otner considerations prior to proffering commitments for dedications to the County. The City Administration has indicated that certain land development incentives have been proposed in the Downtown Master Plan (DTMP), July, 1989, i.e. Park West bonuses for residential development, and proximity to proposed stations. The County would like to know what is the City's policy regarding these issues in order to rinalize negotiations witn tne property owners. me !IMP nas proposed greater zoning intensities in recognition or Metromover. Within these proposals, there are bonuses for proximity to stations and on -site Metromover. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Administration re- examine land development regulations proposea in the Dili' witn the objective or targeting the bonus system even more on participation, cooperation and coordination with Metromover, but still within tne maximum intensities recommended. 4. Municipal Railroad - The City presently owns the abandoned railroad right -of- way between N. t. 10th and N. E. 11th Streets near N. E. 2nd Avenue. A property owner has requested fee simple ownership of a portion of the railroad right -of -way as part of their joint development proposal to the County. It is recommended that the City not accept the proposal by the property owner at that location. me Downtown master vian (uIMV), 19tf9, recommends that site as one or the two tci proposea termini ror the rlon da nign speed wail [PHI). It the proposal is accepted, it would preclude the potential development or r HSR terminal . 5. S. E. 1st Avenue Extension - The City Administration has proposed an extension of s. L. 1st Avenue along the Metromover Alignment from S. E. 6th to S. E. 8th Streets to relieve traffic congestion on Brickell. Property owners in the area have proposed a willingness to share in the costs for the extension of S. E. 1 Avenue. Therefore, it is recommended that the City extend S. E. 1st Avenue from S. E. OUR to S. t. ath streets along the proposed Metromover Right or way and negotiate with the adjacent property owners tor dedication of the necessary s. t. 1 Avenue rignt -ot -way. Attachments Page 2 of 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission 6 ) Cesar H. Odio City Manager ACKGROUNQ CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DALE SUBJEC' AEkEFPENCES ENCLOSURES Page 1 of '3 12 OCT i g 1 `` Discussion: Metroetover Extension Issues Agenda Item: City Commission Meeting of October 26, 1989 DISCUSSION: The purpose of this memloran ld um �tro�0ade p Transportation a Commi ttee of t e Cou Metro. nty Dade County Manager to t e Commission. pertaining to the proposed alignment of the Metromover 'Extension Project dated 2, 1989 (attached); a letter from the County Manager dated October 6, 1989, (attached) and City staff analysis and recommendations so that b) the Commission can establish their policy on key issues. It is important that these key issues be resolved by November 1, 1989,: so' that Metro -Dade County can present a final alignment by that date per the. Metro -Dade County/UMTA funding agreement. • The Commission. is invited to make . motions on each of the five issues on page'2 (as under If necessary, a formalizing resolution will be prepared. On August '31,.. 1989, : an interim alignment was designated and presented - by the County's consultanttengineers for the project, which minimizes the need`to _ private properties by maximizing the use of public rights-of-way for locating the guideway. and .. stations, This proposed al been used b . - County, t1tyy, ODA and consultant-:staff in discussions . with__ property... owners located iadjacentito the prroposed : alignment: to confirm any interest on the part of the private sector in zoning considerations. easement dedications, station connections, and 'air:' rights ao: develops thestations` . -, , y,- ,;-0 i The County, has; received: 12= written : proposals which =will' - - 'impact the Oriigi a l i gnmerit . -• as de i ineated in the Metro,over Environmental° .= Impact' - attached report) Anaiv�„� sis and e c e1! ti On October 2, 1989, the County Manager presented a report to the Transport Committee of the County Commission regarding the impact of the proposed -Ali on properties surrounding the Metromover Extensions. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Cesar N. Odio City Manager CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE SUEkIEC' REFERENCES ENCLOSURES Page 1 of 3 II I I II I II II 1 g `t Agenda Item: City Commission Meeting of October 26, 1989 12 O CT i 1989 Discussion: Metromover Extension Issues DISCUSSION: The purpose of this memorandum is to a) present the recommendations of the Metro Dade County Manager to the Metro -Dade r in p or Lati f h�� a rthe County Co pertaining: to the proposed g Project dated October 2, 1989 (attached); a letter from the County Manager dated October 6, 1989, .(attached) and City staff analysis and recommendations so that b) the Commission can 'establish their policy on , key issues. It is :important that these key issues be resolved by November 1,: , 1989; =., so=.that Metro -Dade ° County can present a final alignment by that'. dater per the Metro -Dade County /UMTA. agreement." The Commi_ssion". invited to make motions on each of, the five issue .ion Page =a2 (e underlined). If necessary, a formalizing resolution wi-11.be prepared BACKGROUND. ..... On August 31, 1989, : interim alignment was= designated and =presented byt County's consultant: engineers for the project, which minimizes, the need =ttor acgit private properties by maximizing the use ofr_public rights'Of way for -locatiin t guidewv and - stations This proposed al ignaent ' :been_ used. the. i:o�any, w: DDA end,,consultant. staff : in discussions) °with -property..owners: =lacated.t adjacen . the proposed.. al:i gnlent;.. to confine any interest on the part of the private. sect in zoning considerations, easement dedications, station connections,. and':', ri htsr'to develop: the.,.stetions. �: g The County.: has 'received -12r written. .proposals " which = Iwill F isipact` align ent as delineated in the Metro.over Envi=ronmentah lmpact`':' 8tat n attached re - ports �, .._ .t ^. f. a; ... ^'Ia Analysis and fecoe m~ndations On October 2, 1989, the County Manager presented a report to TrARS Committee of the County Commission regarding the impact of the;'propos on properties surrounding the Metromover Extensions. On October 9, 1989, the County Manager transmitted a letter to the City Manager enumerating several key issues still unresolved reoui red City Commission action. (See letter attached.) These issues are as follows: 1. Bicentennial Park Station - The proposed alignment locates the Bicentennial Park Station within the City -owned park. The Public Works Department is in the process of platting the park which will include approximately 50 feet of dedicated easement for -the Metromover. The County is repelling that this dedication be proffered by the City at no cost to the County whatsoever. Unless an agreement can be reached between the City and County on this issue, the County may decide to remove the station from that location. In order to enhance the future development potential of Bicentennial Park, it is imperative that we have a station located near the Park. Also, please note that the City encouraged the County to locate the proposed station at Bicentennial Park. - 1 . 2. s. 1 1 • I Station - The City Administration and surrounding property owners have expressed objection to the County's proposed reduction of traffic lanes on N. E. 2nd Avenue alignment from three to two lanes. In order to maintain three traffic lanes, the County has indicated that property. would have to be acquired at the Park West Station. Proposals by private property owners were received by the County to dedicate the easements. The County is in the process of negotiating the dedications with the adjacent property owners. However, if no agreements are achieved. the City Administration would end the following option: The City would participate monetarily on a 50 -50 basis for acouisiti.on of properties needed at that statiop site _and that 8th Street and north of N. E. 9th Street. The County have requested that the City commit to this proposal through City Commission action. 3. Zoning Consideration - Several adjacent property owners have requested zoning bonuses and other considerations prior to proffering commitments for dedications to the County. The City administration have indicated that certain land development incentives have been proposed in the Downtown Master Plan, July, 1989, i.e. Park West bonuses for residential development, and proximity to proposed stations. The County would like to know what is the City's policy regarding these issues in order to finalize negotiations with the property owners 4. anilipal Railroad - The City presently owns the abandoned railroad right-of- way between N. E. 10th and N. E. 11th Streets near N. E. 2nd Avenue. A property owner has requested fee simple ownership of a portion of the railroad right -of -way as part of their joint development proposal to the County. (See page 7 - N.E. 11th Street Station.) fyrther direction is neededardip this tssug. 3. E. 1st. Avenue Extension - The City Administration has proposed an extension of S. E. 1st Avenue along the trot Station.) n nt rt her direction i s needtd . Streets. (See page 16 • Eighth Stre fu regarding this ssue. , It is my understanding that these issues must be resolved before November 1, 1969, due to the County's fundinq hgrthe agreement schedule with the e ta r a nrai ass is r a n sa t . Administration (UMTA), in whic Y alignment. Attachment sae METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, PLOR1DA OOto)er 6, 1989 Mr Cesar Odio C_•y Manager City +: =f Mimi :+, - . yox 33U r "8 M:ea:. 3'L 1313.1 METRO-DADE DENT NORO east""" '" v SUM SID 111 N.W maw, tlDNitA IIIINAINIA 3/11 IrCza tr,Aav tk- vt.? 9 1989 TRANSIT ENGINEERING •rw :, Cctoter 2 1989, the Board of-County Commissioners' r j tosp tat i on t' 1. the eMet reviewed the romover extensions end .granted r. t CLtJ'IYItI'C1tldCiCanS f or • aei it;t:LIei y eppLoval of the • proposed alignment.. These :esc.ommendations axe based on several factors, as well 8*- proposa received from::property owners and.developers <for. ctn .,7deveiopment- project:+ . al various Astation. sit the' cecommendat i ons are several - .issues , that must ne de:ermined:,t'y the C:ty and will require City Commission. w-2t,t:. Mrt ro- )atit Cvu::ty staff is requesting City Commission action i n: 1 4 ,:p 3 3. 1989, County staff met with:Asasatant Cit Cit Planning .. Departlaent : •and : o owftown Man+9get : Herby _Sal ley, s to review la for -, t he: ¢ Pazk_.. C,valoptnsnt Authority p'..os... =trey . t shover St ation .M . Bail]. :proped i t'hait. • .Ci y w3e ' ibi , h n ;... to _ at ne y O .: °bft$is e,� monetar i i san. r �i � �. _ 5�:. , wont t wild t pa ro er s tided at `that ; ` station o P P t tas n ACqu i s i t ion r of . the ne.ded ` percels wou1 fi nVtraffie an $E. And . tt_would.;.].ev emlLQW to - .tatetlece stet iOn 1CCesa T and 4eoign with t he Sou 3vf ratowntPat west Redevelopm. eE:t Program: �► ;�,t ''y a - f:st?..ouon °that z cotnm is tha A,.i tty'-9 to,;a'.50- 5 0R:rpC.oc t a. " ^'a t� rf fs�t e, P.irk V 0t . I,& l or. is ;° ea u.ir .�i.�xt, v. .:�: �.. aids or, . k Mr. a`:Oser Odio page Two OCtob. t b, 1999 Q.A.R. Fopua alt m of r ent are revy ues` the �inco incorporated 91 igntrp in the negotiationu . t.h the County for the dedication of easements and other point development considerations. Recognizing that the City of Miam off ering w zenin the _bonuses under certain conditions. City's policy is at thib time. This information is crucial to the joint development negotiation process. A written exr :chatters of the zoning bonuses that would be offered by ._ 1 to r.'rupectA uwnetr, participating in joint .i. opm nt and prv?vt ry pled: catiars is necessary in order tc nor ?C int 1.1r :r': °.. Manic :pa: 4b:lrns T: is our understanding that the City of Miami owns the ebancored railroad tracks between N.E. 10th and 11th Street on N.E. 2 Avenue. A fee simple ownership of a portion of the railroad right-of-way has been requested by the adjacent property 'weer ls pant of point development proposes.. A dects:or rn ere dlsposttAor► of tine City- abandoned railroad f,ritper• r . ± r eegw cd . h tccn`. ever : 3 . Pa-k rhp r h at :ivP of both the City and the County is to Locate tne Metromover : tatle in such a manner as .to serve blcertennta: Park and the proposed Watertront park development. In order to locate the station at the north end of tne.park, "he dedication of a 50 foot easement from the City would be required as part or tne platting of the park which is underway by the City. We are, coMmiis therefore, s ii tag_ regvet. rj t t^crnr an r City to prnvidinn dive 40, oot dedication without any compensation whatcoever Moditicatlons to the Metromover system alignment and station oCat ions require that the County prepare and submit art amendment to the Environmental impact Statement (EIS.),. The Met:amover project schedule under the County's f ndin agreement with the Urban Mesa Transit Administretie equ: res that a final alr,gnment . for the extensiun3 i *` : ow« •s ed h:• November 1. 1989. Thucefore, lt is sssentie►; 1 . h a t the 'City Jier within tie next two weeks on ; t ee :r viii W. Cellar odio P690 Three Oetc;ter 6, 1989 t npp re=;ate y our continue support and cooperation in thin ptclect . • a ‘...../,' /7 4 Orii u i '' r C. Iv O, P.E.. P.L.S. � County Manager +::, i Mr. $arg z d r lyvn. Mt• 'herb@:'• Malley ll ,, 1.1111 11 A,ia+ 1.1 1 1 _. ALL IJf iJiili_ i _11 PO: FROM: M E M O R A N D U M WI OA Transportation CoMMittee October 2, 1989 Hon. Charles Dusseau, Chair DATE: Hon. Harvey Ruvin Hon. Jorge E. valdea SUBJECT: Metromover Joint H ny bojtlehtr Development Report in G. Avitio, P.E. , P.L.S. aunty Manager Attached for your review is the report pertaining to the joint development presentation has beentoday's pr pared to agenda. This report the Metromover interim alignment on the properties surrounding Extension. The report also outlines the property owners who . from were contacted and the tOCthThe recommendationsvcontained several of those property wners. in this report were with previously forwarded agenda package. Attachments 1111■ 1. Joint Development Opportunities a. Shift guideway and station into the N.E. 15 Street right-of-way to reduce the acquisition of private property. b. Interface station with • a proposed municipal intercept parking garage, bus terminal and air rights development (An alternative to the Omni Station site for thxs facility.) 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Maa a. D. F. Horsfall Estate - residence. b. Mary F. Fleming - residence. c. Jose Sanchez - residence. d. Samuel S. Forman (Trustee) - vacant lot. e. Ben Pumo Building Corporation - warehouse. 3. Proposals Received No joint development proposals have been received for this station. 4. Issues ProPosed for bus terminal; however, this is under review by Metro-Dade Transit Agency due to additional operattonal qonsiderations. 5. Recommeqdations 8. $itAtton,e4ould be ee 4 050 tO the School Board . buk) * as possible, within the four -b1ock area, to sere isMilkorIPO center ti the Area. , 0*144 416iVcar wash slat,. MIRAMAR STATION MIRAMAR STATION AO - school beard N.L 14 St. N.L 16 SL OMNI STATION Joint Development Opportunities, a. right- of- wayatoand reduce the acquisition N.E. Street private property. b. Direct connection to Omni Mall via an overhead walkway. c.. Interface station with a proposed municipal intercept parking facility, bus terminal and air rights development. (The Miramar Station may be an alternate location for this proposed facility). 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map, a. Knight - Ridder Newspapers, Inc. - parking. b. Florida East Coast Properties - parking. - Roy S. Evans, c/o Florida East Coast Properties - service station. - Bessemer Properties. Inc., c/o Cousins Property, Inc. office building. c. Equitable and Real, Estate Investment Management Inc. 3. Proposals Received, • Florida East Coast (FEC) Properti Proposal - Request: - Maintain existin traffic pattern on N.E. IS St ±E«rtt,* .COAglectiOn s to Qmnl Station- A 4 1/004t0-.4t sckuVe wou onvelopa • ;station 111,1 111.1111 . OMNI STATION Offer: .. Easements necessary for construction of Omni Station and guideway. e Equitable Real Estate Investment Management, Inc. - Request: - Exclusive connection rights to Omni Station by way of pedestrian bridge. - Review and Analysis of impact of traffic changes on Omni garage. Offer: - Cost of construction of pedestrian crossing. 4. Issues a. Interim alignment reduces N.E. 15 Street from two -way traffic to two lanes, one -way, westbound. b. Accommodate ih inificantlyrimpactingr bus the Omni Station area. with significantly Recommendations. a. Accept easements from FEC to move station and leave N.E. 15 Street unchanged. b. Evaluate cost impact of elevating Omni Station as requested by FEC. • Accept Equitable proposal with the exception that connection rights be granted., but not exclusively, to the Omni. d.- ,Further.itudy of bus loading areas at the Omni Station. • Request: 011,11AY NON O. N.B. SAY SHORE et a HERALD PLAZA 1. Joint Development Opportunities 2 HERALD PLAZA STATION, [A Proposed Station not Shown in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)] a.' •Additional station in the Miami Herald Plaza. cept.' ptoposal • pending ev4,1ust04 of • 44i;im0 j,rt :cippor4.004,. - . . b. Station may serve as an intermodal station with proposed Miami Beach Light Rail. 2. Property Owner Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Knight-Ridder. Inc. 3. Proposal Received - Make the necessary ,provisions to accommodate a future tation'currently'nOt'inCluded in EIS to' Zer've HoralcUbuiiding and'to 'as witn tuttire'light rail Offer: - Value of the easements for the construction of the gui.dewa and the TUtpiettitiontes Offsat provtsiOfls to made to acconmOdete a future station 4. Issue • Future, station construction funds must be Went ifted - S. Recommendations • . . L 11 $T. 1. 2 . 3. Joint Development Opportunities interfice.with'Bicentennial Park and the proposed waterfrOht Park 'Development Plan. PropertvOwner Contacted (Refer.to Above map) a. City of Miami. Issues a.:Atequires platting of park “inderWayy. , May require:Environmental'Impact'Stateinent/4F Statement. Requires easeMints City. b. c. 4. PropOsils Received No Written proposals have been received; however, staff has been working with the City of Miami to locate the station iz - such'a as to serve Bicentennial Park and the proposed Waterfront Park development. 5. RecomMendation Finarize negotiaiimii 'with the City of Miami for the . necessary easement OdtcatiOn. BICENTENNIAL PARK STATION BICENTENNIAL PARK WATERFRONT PARK (PROPOSED) . , • Issues t.. 10 ST. 21TH STREET STATION Property acquisition of Parcels a and b is r.qu M. L 11 TUMOR 1. Joint Development Opportunities a. Interface access and design with the Southeast Overtown Park /west Redevelopment Program. b. Interface with proposed municipal intercept parking facility. c. Direct connections with properties adjacent to the station. 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Fred and Ida Zisquit - wholesale /retail outlet. b. Tom Post for Henniker Enterprises. 3. Proposals Received • Zisquit Proposal - Request: - CED zoning. - Fee simple ownership of a portion of the railroad track adjacent to his property. - Air rights to any station constructed on or his property. Offer abandoned contiguous to - Easements necessary for construction of iith Street. Station and guideway. 3 a S. Recof nendationS a. Accept proposal with the understanding that zoning matterS and the abandoned railroad right-of-way must be resolved by the City of Miami. b. Air rights can only be granted for property dedicated by owner. — i toms PARK WEST STATION, Osiirieworararairomerroarroo 1. Joint Development Opportunities a. Shift guideway and station into the N.E. 2 Avenue right -of -way to reduce the acquisition of private property. b. WestrRedevelopment edpnProgram Southeast n proposed North Ninth west Street Mall. c. Direct connections with properties adjacent to station. • Development rights above and access right below the Metromover system. -. joint develppment lease with optimum access. the 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Harrington and Company, Inc. - office building. b. Marjorie F. Harrison and James F. Harrison - industrial. c. Thomas R. Post TRS - vacant land. d. Fred and Ida Zisquit - bus terminal. 3. Proposals Received Messrs. Thomas R. Post and Neal L. Harrington propose' providing to the County certain portions of their property necessary for the station so that N.R. 2 Avenue will not be reduced from three to two traffic lanes. In exchange for the property, proposed are: - Exclusive connection rights to the station. - Credit against any special assessments for the Metromover extensions. - payment for out -of- pocket expenses for building ,alterations, business relocation and attorneys' fees. 4. Issues a. business Park West arequires pproximate cost business relb b. In order to maintain three lanes of traffic instead of two .anes, additional properties need to be acquired along N.E. 2 Avenue at an additional cost of about $2 million. c. Reduction of traffic lanes on N.E. 2 Avenue could have a negative tapceductiontineaccsssibility ,potential in the area due 5. Recommendation Maintain three traffic lanes on N.E. 2 Avenue b y ac proposals for the dedication of property y modifications: - oa time, after herightsrcould certain amount of f to others. - Perpetual easement instead of lease. - No credit against any special assessments. If properties are not dedicated, then accept City's proposal to share the cost of the right -of -way acquisition 50 -50. In the event that the County cannot obtain the oe property the City or in cooperation with Y tMiami, staff recommends implementation of the interim alignment which reduces traffic to two lanes and requires no land acquisition. station. P11. 7 1?. .:. :., ; k N.N. • ST. r FREEDOM TOWER STATION 1. Joint Development Opportunities 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Enrique Zuleta b. Florida East Coast Railroad c. Lee and Francien Ruwitch d. Thomas R. Post e. Zaminco Development Co. f. Mateo and Nesina Chediak 3. Proposals Received - Exclusive connection rights to the station. Development rights above and access rights below thei Metromover system. JOht development lease with provls.ion for opttmuma numul lam a. Shift guideway and station more into the N.E. 2 Avenue right -of -way to reduce the acquisition of private property. b. Direct connection to proposed Freedom Tower project. c. Direct connections with properties adjacent to the Messrs. Lee Ruwitch and Thomas R. Post propose providing *to the County certain portions of their property necessary for the station so that N.E. 2 Avenue will not be reduced from three to two traffic lanes. In exchange for the property, proposed are: A credit °forhthelMetromover axtensionsY special assessment paym n��s f rdlocati�ns o and t attorh e y s � ffemoiitions, business e�� 4. . Issue Freedom ToweSationlregiuires acquisition of property at an approximate cost 5. Recommendation Maintain three traffic lanes on S.E. 2 Avenue by accepting the proposals for the dedication property following modifications: - of exclusive whicherightsrcould certain amount others. o, after 9 - Perpetual easement instead of a lease. - Not permit credit for the right -of -way against any special assessment for the Metromover extensions. RIVERWALK STATION 1. Joint Development Opportunities Station platform would be about 60 feet above the ground and requires approximately a 50 foot easement from the property. The station could either be . constructed later when - development on the property occurs, or designed to permit future integration with a removable canopy. Dedication of easements would be sought in exchange for exclusive direct connection of the station with future development of the property. Development rights by the property owner could be maintained above and below the system. 2. Property Owner Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. The Cbdina Group- parking lot. 3. Proposals Received None, however, verbal requests to shift the station as far north and east as possible and to incorporate a mezzanine and 'escalators to facilitate future interconnection with private development have been made. The County would receive necessary easements in exchange for the requested station modifications. 4. Issues Requires property easement from Parcel a. 5. Recommendations` IVIRWALK •TATIOM In the event the verbal proposal cannot be confirmed in writing -the station should be constructed as previously planned without the additional modifications requested by owner. NORTH BRICKELL STATION I. Joint Development Opportunities • round Station platform would be about o 0 feet above the g the a. an dt r P roximately a 50 ert es. app constructed or es, The station could either be p wi development on the P P later when permit future integration with a re movable canopy. De p easements would be soug station canopy• Dedication of the property. Development rights could be maintained above and below the system. exchange for exclusive direct connection of t e em. with future development of has proposed a new street o Stt cta Striehito b. C near the Metromover right-of-way from 5 Street. possible joint use of right-of S.E. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map1 land 2. _ vacant la a. Marwin S. Cassell and The Codina Group lax apartment • duplex s b. Tnmobiliaria Bilcar S.A. - er - vacant land. • c. J,H,w,R. Allen and U.L. wellenhof of Peter d. Peter Cassidy and Associates for Estate o Sanders. 3. Proposal Received �,p ossl from the Co While we have not rec �� Ve �sts W we csamade perbally � . . rou the .following • MiniMi.re amount of privets property necessary by ttovtf station's* far east as possible. orp orate additional. mezzanine i. th level. eta; titan de; II to interconnect w' futiii ld in exchahge for these the Codina provide the necessary easements station and guideway 4. Issue Station may be located a. Sart�t5ivironmental Streets ittipact if easements from Parcel P Statement, are not dedicated. 5. Recommendation • In the event the verbal proposal cannot ashpviously writing, the station should be con planned without the additional modifications requested by the owner. .• Joint Development Opportunities The City has proposed a new street construction within or near the Metromover right -of -way from S.E. 8 Street to S.E. 5 Street. Possible joint use of right -of -way. 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Lingnan Industrial Corporation, Ltd. b. Rosemary E. wickenheiser - residence. c. Mental Health Association of Dade County, Inc. d. The Doran Jason Group e. Gulf Hank f. American Lung Association g. Physician's Pharmacy h. world Union Industrial Corp., Ltd. r vacant land. •3. Proposals Received EIGHTH STREET STATION Although the interim alignment shows the station north: s.14 8 street, proposals have been received on aeha;.t property owners on the southwest corner of (mental health building sate). The proposals offe porV4ons .of the 'property necessary for • the 5;040.41i: hgs, rt - Exclusive Connection rights. • Development rights and access to development. - na increases. - Credit against special assessments. - Payment for expenses and fees. Discussions have taken place with property owners for the dedication of property for the proposed street, in exchange for air rights development over the street. 4. issues a. Interim alignment requires acquisition of Parcels a and b. City to fund and construct street extension next to Mitromover. Street extension may require dedications of easements from Parcels d and e. 5. Recommendations - Reject proposals for the mental health site. - Coordinate street construction with Metromover construction. Street funding by others. - Continue discussions with adjacent property owners. Joint Development Opportunities a. Interface of station access and proposed Tenth Street Promenade b. Connection of station with 100 parking garage. a. Allen Morris Co. Proposal Received Issue Right -of -way required from Parcel a. -411.twol 1. Joint Development Opportunities Direct connection with Brickell Metrorail Station. 2. Property Owner Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Allen Morris Co. 3. Issue The Brickell Metrorail and the Metromover stations do not align for direct connection. The station is as close as possible in the current alignment. 4. Proposal Received Letter of no interest received from the Allen Morris Co. 5. Recommendation Obtain easements on Parcel(s) a. BRICKELL STATION "0 Amps =ow" CORAL WAY STATION 1. Joint Development Opportunities a. Shift the guideway and station into the S.E. 14 Street right -of -way to reduce the acquisition of private . property. b. - Consideration of a municipal intercept parking garage and private air rights development on property adjacent to the station. 2. Property Owners Contacted (Refer to Above Map) a. Richard I. Furman TR - bank parking. b. Southeast Mortgage Company - parking lot. c. Phoenix Investments Company d. Transal Corporation for Richard O'Connell Trustee, c /o' Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. - office building. e. American venture Corporation 3. Proposals Received e American venture Corporation - Request: - Necessary provisions for a future pedestrian bridge to connect station to Brickell Gate development Offer: - Fair-share contribution toward the cost of the br construction. NeCees *ry right -of- way. 4 private property fo the bridge