The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-1068371. 61. J-89--506 6/8/89 ORDINANCE NO. 10683. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 146-170 N.W. 35TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM MULTI -FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; MAKING FINDINGS; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; AND PROVIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 17, 1989, Item No. 2, following an advertised hearing adopted Resolution No. PAB 20-89, by a 6 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this Comprehensive Plan change as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544 the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended, is hereby amended by changing the designation of that certain parcel of property located at approximately 146-170 N.W. 35th Street, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, inclusive, Block 5, WYNWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 5, Page 23, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, from Multi - Family Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. Section 2. It is hereby found that this Comprehensive Plan designation change: a. Is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; b. Involves a residential land use of 5 acres or less and a density of 5 units per acre or less or involves other land use categories, singularly or in combination with residential use, of 3 acres or less and does not, in combination with other changes during the last year, produce a cumulative effect of having changed more than 30 acres; C. The property which is the subject of this amendment has not been the specific subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the last year; and d. The herein amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property provided a Comprehensive Plan change within the last 12 months. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit this Ordinance immediately upon approval of first reading to Thomas Pelham, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399, for 90 day review and comment. Section 4. All ordinances, code sections, or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 5. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty-five (45) days after final reading and adoption hereof, pursuant to law. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 27th day of July , 1989. - 2- 10683, PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 14th day of December , 1989. �..� AT M-MY HIRAI CI4rY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: nd, 1 0 Ada ADRIENNE L. FRIESNER ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JO GE FE NNEZ CITY ATALF/dot/M490 XAVIER ]�.AUAREZ, - 3- 70)it:Q of 4ntamt 1 SERGIO RODRIGUEZ �'" CESAR H. ODIO Director tr Y B City Manager au.. n.nr p December 18, 1989 FLo Mr. Thomas Pelham, Secretary Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Dear Mr. Pelham: The City of Miami adopted four amendments to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, on December 14, 1989. This date is the second adoption period of the 1989 calendar year consistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the 1987 Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, I am pleased to transmit: - Four (4) copies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinances as adopted, including PZ-1, PZ- 2, PZ-4, PZ-10; - Four (4) copies of the "Response to Department of Community Affairs' Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City of Miami -- December 1989"; One (1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support documents on which recommendations are based. As directed in Mr. Paul Bradshaw's letters of November 6, 1989 and November 17, 1989, which transmitted the Department of Community Affairs' Objections, Recommendations, and Comments, to the subject amendments, we are forwarding one (1) copy of these transmittal documents to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. If, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification, you may contact Joseph McManus at (305)579-6086. rSinceretkil r Sergio odriguez, DiJrectoOpy— Planning Department SR/vh vh/89:123 1.0680 Attachments 10681. PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/(305) 579-6086 ,1068,3 Mailing Address - P.O-Box 33070E / Miami, Florida 33233-0706 10685 Y � SERGIO RODRIGUEZ Director Q .goof "..,o Q December 18, 1989 Mr. B. Jack Osterholt, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Dear Mr. Osterholt: CESAR H. ODIO City Manager The City of Miami adopted four amendments to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, on December 14, 1989. This date is the second adoption period of the 1989 calendar year consistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the 1987 Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, and the direction of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to transmit to you one copy of the transmittal documents submitted to the DCA consisting of: - One (1) copy of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinances as adopted, including PZ-1, PZ- 2, PZ-4, PZ-10; - One (1) copy of the "Response to Department of Community Affairs' Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City of Miami -- December 1989"; - One (1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support documents on which recommendations are based. If, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification, you may Win, t Joseph McManus at (305)579-6086. Sincerely, Sergio odriguez, Dir cto Planni/ng Department SR/vh vh/89:123a Attachments 110680 10681. PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N,W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/(305) 579.6086 10683 Mailing Address - P.O.Box 330706 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 ,10685 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Lynn B. Lewis, Attorney for Applicant: Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. April 25, 1989 PETITION 2. APPROXIMATELY 146-170 N.W. 35TH STREET. Lots 6 through 9, inclusive Block 5 WYNDWOOD PARK SUB (5-23) P.R.D.C. Consideration of amending Ordinance 10544, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, Future Land Use Plan Map, by changing the land use designation of the subject property from Multi -Family Medium Density Residential to General Commercial; and recommending the said amendment be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. REQUEST To change the Plan designation of the subject property from Multi -Family Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. ANALYSIS The subject properties are part of Multi -Family Medium Density Residential designated properties lying on both sides of N.W. 35th Street, bounded on the east (along -N. Miami Avenue), on the north (along N.W. 36th Street) and on the west (along N.W. 2nd Avenue) by General Commercial designated property. The proposed change is contrary to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, Future Land Use Plan Map, because it is contrary tn the established land use pattern by introducing General Commercial into a residential area, is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood and City and would adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood, and would be a deterrent to improving adjacent properties in accord with existing regulations. There is no reason why the property cannot be used according to the existing designation and there are other Commercially designated areas in the City permitting such use. PAB 5/17/89 rtem #2 Page 1 of 106193 The proposed change is contrary to such adopted policies as protection from encroachment from incompatible land uses and encouragement of the preservation and enhancement of the City's neighborhoods. A negative traffic impact on N.W. 35th Street could be anticipated. The proposed amendment is unacceptable in that it would allow a more intense commercial use to intrude into the existing homogeneous residential neighborhood, increasing the potential of more intense land uses along both sides of N.W. 35th Street in the residential neighborhood. RECOMMENDATIONS (see analysis memorandum attached) PLANNING DEPT. DENIAL. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting May 17, 1989, the Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution Number PAB 20-89 by a 6 to 0 vote, recommending approval of the above. Four proponents were present at the meeting. Eight replies in favor and eight objections were received by mail. CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of July 27, 1989 the City Commission passed the above on First Reading. PAB 5/ 17/89 Item #2 Page 2 of 2 1068a . 1 ;41 W1, L 10 i 0 7 a_ 4 3 t t gl .3 13 15 la li Pit 19 ± IA EM d 4"RE, ,6,.•.. �. •rjj Wf •--; -.. -^!� _ r...-� -•) 2 � eE 1 Mid'! its N - N.W. _ _ —, ..i'w..b S1,:.. �n '.�t,..1 �� `�yy .-p��w� .,A�'�t.k.�: "l�:.l.:�Ns!iM.� .�} �• � � ,c� - � y ..� '� i13 aw ,{ 4 i .�'•r! �� ' � ,:f �rt � '. � '�"-.. i` .. .-4 ;. ,.N w.s ..'4F•i�" ��! i� �71 ��"rii.y {, r .. M; 1l.MG..' ��""r w!,y ��iyy� �l i�.. `S. w.•. ..i .�.. �, N . W . �35 S7 35 n .c spy i► .N.r.-. F,. LUZ IX Ir �".` - 'h y,,4�!"' ,�+• � �1�!•�i�'.�"'y ,�''�'rI'"'r/I. '�..: ..,•'RN,•. "�'1 .K'—"1.sr - , ��jr? .:f �` � .'ii'ias j,r ,1 A_ t 7� �' �.,• (��' � b ate`-Si6 •� i , .� i• '� • ... :.;•. .._ M� .��'�:�' ''. , �., � _.�+ ,� t= ..fir !•� ', o-•-�... + � a • � `�---- -__ j 1 r. -. �, ,' ' . �. � n sr Ate' � •� ' 1 .w � eT •� _ � �rlr:..1 k � •i J ,.. ,. / - �• - � , _—. ''1 -••�► !NE7 c «. Pr0,, 34 ,;;�' TERR. A f? Ia . 1 .•6i � . v �u -� I 1 !'It, !1. 1 � Y it ...1'� '.� l6 L• '7' L :` ^ ROBERTO CLEMENTE AN cv "'1' `, ► �, 1 p •• t i ;e�6e's.... is t' a PARK • ti :• , '�if'S %,.' �l '� S�Ni •x�t:.411��P�.�y,, f.1Y .,.i. ..�' Note: The Florida Department of Community Affair's Report on Objections, Recommendations and Comments (together with other agency comments) dated November 6 and November 17, 1989, pertaining to Items PZ-1, 2, 4, 9, 13 and 14 is included in Item PZ-1 for brevity. 10683 4a RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS' OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENTS TO PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI Prepared by The City of Miami Planning Department December 1989 10683 47)0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I PZ- 4 (4/27/89)"Ormond" PZ-11 (6/22/89)"City of Miami PZ-21 (6/22/89)"CBAF" PZ-22 (6/22/89)"DCA Def./L.U. SECTION II PZ- 3 (7/27/89)"Gerrits" PZ-13 (7/27/89)"Coconut Grove" 10683 4C, SECTION I Mag Amendments PZ- 4 (4/27/89)"Ormond" PZ-11 (6/22/89)"City of Miami" Text Amendments PZ-21 (6/22/89)"CBRF" PZ-22 (6/22/89)"DCA Def./L.U." SECTION I DCA OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS TO CITY OF MIAMI -- - Comprehensive Plan Amendments FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENTS A. OBJECTIONS None Ana Xsis 1. 9J-5.O06(2)(a) Map Amendment No. PZ-4 (Ormond) is not supported by an analysis of the availability of facilities and services, including traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and potable water, to serve the proposed land use. i The information provided, stating facilities are available, is incomplete. There is no analysis to establish current and forecasted demand on existing facilities and a determination- of available capacity for each facility type. Recommendation Include an analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility type, including traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water to serve the proposed land use. City of Miami Response The attached "Worksheet for Concurrency Management -- Impact Analysis of Proposed Change to Land Use Map" for the PZ-4 (Ormond) amendment contains an analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility type, including d d d table water. traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, soli waste, Iinage an po to serve the proposed land use. It matches these to the required adopted levels of service standards for each facility, and makes a "Concurrency Checkoff" finding. -1- WORKSHEET FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHANGE TO LAND USE MAP •----------------------------------------------------------------s .......................................................... AMENDMENT INFORMATION : CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS : :....................... -................................... ------s : Applicant: Gregg J. Ormond, Esq. ................... -..................................... s (Agent) RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ; : Address: 833-899 N.W.4 St. Population Increment (,000) 0.237 430 & 490 N.M. S.River Drive Space Requirement, acres 0.334 401-449 N.N. 9 Ave. Excess Capacity Before Change 53.97 : Boundary Streets: Excess Capacity After Change 55.64 : North: N.N. South River Drive Concurrency Checkoff OK ; South: N.N. 4 Street ---------------------------------------------------------s East: N.M. South River Drive : POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION ; • West: N.M. 9 Avenue Population Increment, Residents 257 ' Transmission Requirement, gpd 57,368 : Planning District: D. (little Havana) Excess Capacity Before Change >21 above demand Excess Capacity After Change >2Z above demand : Maximum LU Intensity: Concurrency Checkoff OK : Existing 40 DU/acre : ........................................................... : Proposed 100 DU/acre SANITARY SEVER TRANSMISSION . ' Population Increment, Residents 257 : Net Increment With Change: Transmission Requirement, gpd 47,343 Population 257 : Excess Capacity Before Change >21 above demand Dwelling Units 100 : Excess Capacity After Change >2Z above demand Sq.Ft. Floor Space N.A. : ' Concurrency Checkoff OK : County Wastewater Collection Zone 309 ---------------------------------------------------------- STORM SEVER CAPACITY ; : Drainage Subcatchment Basin JI Exfiltration System Before Change On -site : Solid Waste Collection Route 18 Exfiltration System After Change On -site ' Concurrency Checkoff OK : Transportation Corridor Name (1) Civic Center ---------------------------------------------------------; ' (2) Dolphin SOLID WASTE COLLECTION ; Type (1) HS Population Increment, Residents 257 ' (2) HS Solid Waste Generation, tons/year 329 . -----------------------------------------------------------------s Excess Capacity Before Change 400 : : SIGNIFICANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES SUPPORTING AMENDMENT: Excess Capacity After Change >271 ' Concurrency Checkoff OK : . land Use: 1.1.1 ------------------------------------------------------ ' 1.1.3 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION • 1.1.6 Population Increment 257 ' Peak -Period Person -Trip Generation 283 : Interpretation of Future land Use Plan Map LOS Before Change (1) A (2) C : LOS After Change (1) A (2) C : : Housing: 1.1.5 : Concurrency Checkoff OK : : 1.2.7 ......................................................... • 1.3 ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS • 1.3.1 : Population increment is assumed to be all new residents. : • 1.3.2 Peak -hour person -trip generation assumed to be 1.1 per ' resident. Potable water and wastewater transmission : : Transportation: 1.4 : capacities are in accordance with Metro -Dade County : : 1.3.1 : stated capacities and are assumed correct. Service : connections to water and sever mains are assumed to be of: : CIE: 1.2.3 : adequate site; if not, new connections to be installed at: ' : owner's expense. Transportation Corridor capacities and : ' : LOS from Table PT-2, Data and Analysis. : - :----------------------------------------------------------------: ---------------•----------........................-s s.. - 4-� The City did not include an analysis of the need for proposed text Amendment PZ-21, which proposes to eliminate free-standing office and commercial buildings, in the medium density multi -family residential classification, but allow free-standing medical and dental offices in the high density multi -family residential classification. An analysis of the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population relating to types and intensities of use was not provided. .KW Demonstrate that the proposed text amendment is consistent with the existing (or revised) analysis of the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population, including the typesand intensities of use. In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the year 2000. This growth is only 17,000 persons in ten years or about a 4% increase above the 1990 projection of 383,000. The City of Miami is unique in that is is essentially built out. Only about 6.4% (from MCNP Land Use Data and Analysis) of its total area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one acre. In short, Miami is in a redevelopment mode; development on raw acreage is not a viable option. No analysis has ever been prepared as part of the MCNP relating the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population; to do so would be an exercise in futility. The issue, therefore, for the City of Miami is not the amount of land or the categories and acreage of land use needed to accommodate projected populations, but, what is the appropriate mix of uses and scale of redevelopment most compatible with medium and high density residential development. At a density up to 40 dwelling units per acre in medium density residential, the intent is to accommodate a judicious limited mix of uses within the residential buildings at that scale. In the high density residential areas, at densities from 40 to 100 dwelling units per acre the mix of uses would accommodate free-standing hospitals and nursing homes; therefore free-standing medical and dental office buildings would also appear to be appropriate at that scale of redevelopment. 11. The City did not include an analysis of the need for the proposed land use change for map amendments PZ-4 (Ormond) and PZ-11 (City of Miami). An analysis of the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population, including the categories of the land use and the proposed land use densities and intensities of use, the estimated gross acreage by category and the description of the methodology used. 1068�3 _2_ �t 4 9 Include an analysis of the proposed relates to the amount of land needed to projected population, including the intensities of use and how they meet acreage needed by category. land use as it accommodate the densities and estimated gross In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the year 2000. This growth is only 17,000 persons in ten years or about a 4% increase above the 1990 projection of 383,000. The City of Miami is unique in that it is essentially built out. Only about 6.4% (MCNP Land Use Data and Analysis) of its total area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one acre. The issue, therefore, for the City of Miami, is not the amount of land or the categories and acreage of land use needed to accommodate projected populations, but, what population change would result from proposed changes to the Plan Map. Changes in densities resulting from changes in land use would affect the City's population growth projections. PZ-4 (Ormond): Because of Miami's unique situation, the land development needs for the City must be met primarily through the redevelopment of existing underutilized parcels and vacant tracts. The lack of large tracts of undeveloped land, furthermore, requires property development to focus primarily on the revitalization of depressed or declining areas and the stabilization and maintenance of more stable neighborhoods. One method to plan for growth is through increases in land development intensities. As the Planning Fact Sheet (Attachment 1D) indicates, future high density development and redevelopment is anticipated and expected in areas east of MW 8th Avenue, presently designated "Residential -Multifamily High Density". The subject block, west of NW 8th Avenue, if redesignated to the same "Residential - Multifamily High Density", would serve to create a larger base for this redevelopment area, increasing the chances of realizing areawide revitalization. Furthermore, because of the subject block's location diagonally opposite the Victoria Hospital, the development, brought about by redesignation, could stimulate lower intensity revitalization west of NW 8th Avenue as well. This land use change would be consistent with the pattern of similar "Residential -Multifamily High Density" areas along the Miami River Corridor. -3- I The "Analysis of Proposed Plan Amendment" (Attachment 1B) indicates that the proposed land use change, if utilized to the maximum intensity permitted under the requested zoning, would increase the potential density by 100 families or approximately 257 persons (the 1980 Census estimated 2.57 persons per.family). Though an increase in intensity is permitted through this land use change, the percentage distribution of residential land use area compared to other land uses, (i.e. commercial, industrial, institutional/ public, recreational, transportation/ utilities), remains unchanged. PZ-11 (City of Miami): The density, for this parcel, has been scaled back to reflect the predominant dwelling unit type as a response to the recognition of an existing viable single family neighborhood. The present "Residential - Duplex" land use designation would allow the area to increase from its current single family density of 9du/acre to 18du/acre. At 14.5 acres, the land use change would reduce the future population projection by 130 families or 334 persons. Though a decrease in the potential intensity will result through this land use change, the percentage distribution of residential land use area compared to other land uses, (i.e. commercial, industrial, institutional/ public, recreational, transportation/ utilities), remains unchanged. The overall impact on the City from both land use amendments would be a net decrease of 30 families or 77 persons from the total projected population of 400,000 persons through the year 2000. The acreage distribution of residential land use versus other land use categories remains unchanged. None B. COMMENTS The City should take the Metro -Dade Planning Department's comments into consideration when addressing the objections to Map Amendment PZ-4 (Ormond). -4- ILO GS3 4,1 .d HQUSING ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS None. Analysis 1. 9J-5,010(2)(f)4. The proposed changes to the terms in the Land Use Categories for Community Based facilities in Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 are not supported by description of the need for such as they relate to the specific requirements of HB 1269. The City has not provided definitions for new Community Based Facility terms. Also, the language added to Housing Element Objective 1.3 and 1.3.4, "subject to the requirements to the Zoning Ordinance," may make the standards more restrictive for the Community Based Residential Facilities (see the South Florida Regional Planning Council comments dated September 6, 1989). Include an analysis based on and consistent with the requirements of HB 1269 to support those changes to the Housing Element objectives, policies and land use categories and ensure that they are consistent with the intent of this law. Explain and define new terms in the Land Use Categories. Include an explanation of "subject to the requirements and limitations to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that this addition will not make the standards for Community Based Facilities more restrictive. (Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.) Goals, Objectives and Policies Proposed text amendments to Housing Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 appear to be inconsistent with HB 1269 requirements for Community residential homes. The City changed terms for Community residential home types, however, they did not include the change in terms in Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4. Also, the language in Policy 1.3.5 which states "and evaluated to determine the impact of allowing and amended, where warranted" is unclear. 10683 A i Include an analysis of the changes in Housing Element Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 to establish consistency with HB 1269. If the analysis reveals that the objective and policy changes are not consistent with HB 1269, then the City should make appropriate revisions to these policies to ensure they are consistent with this law. Community residential terms should be consistent between the land use categories and Housing Objective and Policy. Include clarification of language "and evaluated to determine the impact of allowing and amended, where warranted". City of Miami Resognse (Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.) B. COMMENTS The City should review the South Florida Regional Planning Council comments and take them into consideration when addressing the responses to the above Housing Element objections. Also, the Department encourages the City to coordinate with the South Florida Regional Planning Council in order to ensure that their concerns are resolved in regard to this matter. City of Miami R snnnse The DCA objections, recommendations and comments are appropriate; this proposed amendment was fashioned in May and June, 1989, and passed 1st reading June 22, 1989, to reflect the then - policy of the City Commission and before the Governor had allowed HB 1269 to become law. Recognizing that HB 1269. would become law, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 10646 (attached) on, September 28, 1989, effective October 28, 1989, which is a comprehensive amendment to Zoning Ordinance 9500 in conformity with HB 1269. The corresponding changes have now been made in PZ-21 to bring the MCNP into conformity with HB 1269. The following changes have been made in response to objections, recommendations and comments: 1. The range of Community Based Residential Facilities has been defined and brought into conformity with HB 1269. A definition of "Community -Based Residential Facilities" has been added to the Land Use Element under the interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map, as follows: "A community based residential facility provides room (with or without board) resident services and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category includes adult congregate living facilities; facilities for physically disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled persons, for non -dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent . 6 - sossa 4 k children, as licensed by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (FHRS); and residential facilities for alcohol and drug rehabilitation and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed and approved by an authorized regulatory agency." Specific conformity to HB 1269 is now evidenced by the revised Zoning Ordinance (see Ordinance 10646 attached). The Zoning Ordinance has been amended so that community -based residential facilities, as defined, for 6 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in all residential zoning districts and that community -based residential facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in two family and multi family zoning districts. 2. Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4 have been clarified and Policy 1.3.5 has been eliminated so that the descriptive phase "subject to the requirements and limitations of the Zoning Ordinance" has been eliminated as pertains to Community Based Residential Facilities, as follows: "Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of housing in, non -isolated residential areas for groap-- hemea---end community -based residential facilities and foster care facilities (including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative- Services). housing for the elderly and the handicapped, stib_ieet "Policy 1.3.4: The City will continue to assist in the development of grouphemee community -based residential facilities and foster care facilities, and ACLF's for low -and moderate -income residents through its existing housing programs limitatiems of the zoning II 3. Policy 1.3.5 has been eliminated so evaluated to determine the impact warranted" has been also eliminated. Policy 1.3.5 read, as follows: that the descriptive phase "and of allowing and amended, where "Policy 1.3.5. The City's zoning ordinance will be reviewed and amended, where warranted, so that family homes (group homes which provide room and board, personal care, rehabilitation service, and Mervision in a family setting to be occupied by not more than eight related or unrelated persons who are developmentally disabled, mentally impaired, physically handicapped or elderly) be allowed as a permitted use in all residential neighborhoods and that a group home (occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use in all residential neighborhoods and that a family group home (occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use in all residential neighborhoods other than single-family (where it shall be allowed on a special use basis).'' 10683 4.` The Zoning Ordinance has been amended so that community -based residential facilities, as defined, for 6 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in all residential zoning districts and that community -based residential facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in two family and multi family zoning districts. At the public hearing of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) on September 6, 1989, City staff orally concurred with SFRPC's comments. It is believed that all of the SFRPC concerns have been addressed. A. OBJECTIONS moor f ma Proposed amended Policy 2.1.3 does not include a quality standard for the revised level of service for drainage. ;- •tu[t-+•- Ushl Revise proposed amended Policy 2.1.3 (drainage level of service) to include performance standards for water quality and flood control. Appropriate local and state regulations specifying stormwater quality standards should be adopted by reference to specific regulations as they exist on the date the plan amendment is adopted as an integral part of the drainage LOS standard to measure performance of systems which are designed to remove pollutants from run-off. Appropriate regulations specifying ambient water quality standards should be referenced to protect and prevent further degradation of surface and groundwaters (by run-off). Section 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2.d cited above under A. OBJECTIONS appliies to level of service standards for potable water facilities, not drainage facilities. We, believe that the citation is a typographical error, and that Section 9J5.0011(2)(c)2.jc was intended. The provisions of Chapter 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2 regarding level of service (LOS) standards for drainage facilities require the adoption of LOS standards for "c. Resign storm frequency for drainage facilities capacity". No mention is made of water quality standards as a requirement of the drainage LOS. 10683 - 8 - 4m Maintenance of water quality standards for stormwater drainage is adressed in the City's Comprehensive Nieghborhood Plan in the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Sanitation and Storm Sewers sub -element: Goal 2; Objective 2.2; Policies 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, and 2.2.5. In future revisions or additions to these policies, the City will consider the DER request that water quality standards be referenced. However, the City declines to include them in its adopted LOS standard at this time. B. COMMENTS The City should take the Department of Environmental Regulation's comments into consideration when addressing the above 9J-5.001 (2)(c)2.d objection. Although there is an implication in the revised Policy 2.1.3 that the "20% of the system brought to standard" applies to the existing drainage system, it would be helpful for clarification purposes if the revised Policy 1.2.3 [sic) was rewritten to include "20% of the existing system". The City will add the word "existing" as requested, causing the proposed amended policy to read as follows: Policy 2.1.3: event. For the ent�i-re storm drainage system as a whole. voithfi. the , 20$s =nt of the existing system storm se" will be desigmed—fer brought to a standard of a one - in -five-year storm event by the year 2000. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS Data None Analysis I. 9J-5.012(e)1. Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase density in what appears to be within the hurricane vulnerability zone. The City did not provide a reassessment of its hurricane evacuation plan in regard to the impacts resulting from this increased density, specifically, additional persons requiring evacuation, evacuation routes, and any special needs of the elderly or handicapped relating to this land use change. 10683a -In [WK#1tfi111:-ft • The City needs to include a reassessment of their Hurricane Evacuation Plan, including all items listed in the above objection as a result of the increased density by the proposed map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond). The reassessment should include impact on hurricane evacuation times. The amendment should not be adopted unless hurricane evacuation times are maintained or reduced. Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is not located within the Hurricane Vulnerability zone (see attached Figure IV.2: "Hurricane Vulnerability Zone"); therefore, this Objection and Recommendation is not applicable (see map attached). Goals. Objectives. and Policies RNEMEWITUMN.1 Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase from a multi -family medium density use, which allows 40 units per acre, to a multi -family high density use, which allows 40-100 units per acre. The proposed amendment is located within the vicinity of the Miami River. The map that the City included identifying the Coastal High Hazard Area is unclear; therefore, it is difficult to determine whether this land use change is located within the 9J-5.003(13) definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area, which includes the V-Zone. Recommendation The City should not encourage High Hazard Area. Include amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is, or If this amendment is located Coastal High Hazard Area, the density. City of Miami Responsg increases in density within the Coastal information identifying whether map is not, located within the FEMA V-Zone. with FEMA V-Zone, which identifies the City should not allow an increase in Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is not located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (FEMA V-zone -- see attached Figure IV.3: Areas Subject to Coastal Flooding and High Hazard Flood Areas:); therefore, this Objection and Recommendation is not applicable (see map attached). 3. 9J-5.013(3)(b)7 and (3)(07. The proposed changes to Policy 4.1.2 to address the Coastal High Hazard Area must include the area within the V-zone and that seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The City proposes only [to] include the V-zone except on Virginia Key, which would use the Coastal Construction Control Line. - 10 - 10683 O In C 1 CD MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN �.� mmu�ivamaim�umme I�` KA one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVE PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 60•167LAWS nF FLDRInA AND ADMINISTERED Pv THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT [ �� a o " r 0 Q g ' 0` 7j.. 1aGSl1 :. MIAM I COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN bN uuumwmiumimnuc V/ one mite CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVE ISIC= PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROORAM AUTHORIZED SY CHAPTER Sli-167 LAW$ nF FLORInA AND ADMINISTERED Pr THc FLORIDA DEPARTMENT C Recommendation Revise Policy 4.1.2 to include all areas of the City that are within the FEMA V-Zane, including Virginia Key. City of Miami Response -- (See Response provided after COMMENTS below.) B. COMMENTS The City should take the specific comments by the Department of Natural Resources into consideration when revising Coastal Management Policy 4.1.2. City of Miami R sgon5e The only part of the City of Miami's coastline that has a designated Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) is the Atlantic Ocean coast of Virginia Key; therefore, that coastline was specifically identified in the proposed amended Policy 4.1.2. It appears, however, that the wording as proposed by the City is not clear to those who might be unaware of this local situational fact. Therefore, the City will revise the proposed amended Policy 4.1.2 to make clear that the FEMA "V" zone aplies to all the City's coastline except on Virginia Key, where there is also a CCCL, causing the proposed amended Policy 4.1.2 to read before and after the change as follows: Before change of wording: Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area. which: it dafinnA me +hn+ me a 111/11 ---- 1... 4.6— r-J..-_1 see map attached). After change of wording: Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Whirh it dnfin,mA me +inn+ „— 4A--4.4S4-A — _ 11111) ---_ L.. LL_ see map attached). nTjW 10683, -11- 4q-) � Z v� CD r n cn C D m N v� r O v� N v M, [rWE t;C' ► R sue= I IT I I ..ms .r. SLUG 7%iatir;� i toGsa MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRE PARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMEN PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZEO BY CHAPTER 66•147 LAWS OF FLORIOA AND ADMINISTERED DV THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OT row L..}`. . T NN N Z 9Mt TT n iC) �c c n= i z m 9 n � v� � S O a 7 � w 06 r a A N 7 10683 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN �% mmnm�mimimmm one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMEM `AA' PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED 8Y CHAPTER 66-167_LAWS OF FLORIDA ANO ADMINISTERED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Or COLD /1 r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS A. OBJECTIONS None ADdlysis None Goals. ObAegtives. and Policies 1. W-5.016(3)(04. Revised Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 does not include a quality standard for the Drainage Level of Service. Recommendation Revise Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 to include a water quality standard for the Drainage LOS. This revised policy should be consistent with the Drainage Policy 2.1.3. Cry of Miami Rgsponse See response to "Drainage Sub -Element", preceding. B. COMMENTS None CONSISTENCY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL POLICY PLAN AND WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. OBJECTIONS 1 • 9J-5..Q21 The following proposed amendments are inconsistent with the State Comprehensive Plan (187.291, F.S.) 10683 12 - a) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, which establishes a Coastal High Hazard Area which is not consistent with Rule 9J-5.003(13) F.A.C., definition and map amendment PZ-4, which possibly allows increased density in a Coastal High Hazard Area, are inconsistent with Policy (7)(b) 24 and 25 which state "require local governments, in cooperation with regional and state agencies, to prepare advance plans for the safe " evacuation of coastal residents" and "require local governments, in cooperation with regional and state agencies, to adopt plans and policies to protect public and private property and human lives for the effects of natural disasters". Recommendation Revise the Coastal High Hazard designation to be consistent with the 9J-5,003(13) definition and ensure that an increase in density does not occur within the Coastal High Hazard area. (See response to "Coastal Management Element", preceding.) 2. Proposed text amendment PZ-22, relating to the revised Drainage LOS does not include a quality standard and would result in additional negative impacts on the surrounding water bodies and marine and other natural resources. Therefore, proposed text amendment PZ-22 is inconsistent with Policies (8) (10) and (12) which state "Protect surface and groundwater quality and quantity in the state" and "eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated stormwater runoff into the waters of the state" and Policies (9)(b)5,6, and 7 which state "Protect coastal resources, marine resources, and dune systems from the adverse effects of development", "Encourage land and water uses which are compatible with the protection of sensitive coastal resources", and "protect and restore long-term productivity of marine fisheries habitat and other aquatic resources". Recommendation Include a water quality standard in the City's revised level of service standard for drainage. (See response to Drainage Sub -Element", preceding.) t06831 3. Proposed text amendments PZ-21, relating to the changes made to Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4, which address adequate sites in residential areas for group homes etc... may make the standards for such more restrictive, therefore, possibly being inconsistent with (5) M l which states "eliminate public policies which result in housing discrimination, and develop policies which encourage housing opportunities for all Florida's citizens." Recommendation Include an explanation of "subject to the requirements and limitations to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that this language will not make the standards for Community Based Facilities more restrictive. City, of Miami Response .(See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.) REGIONAL POLICY PLAN A. OBJECTIONS 1. 9J-5.021s a) Proposed text amendment PZ-21, changes to Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4, is inconsistent with Regional Policy 16.1.0 which states "encourage inclusion of policies in the local government comprehensive plans which prevent exclusion of group homes and foster care facilities by zoning." Recommendation Revise amendments to be compatible with' and further the above referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy Plan. (See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.) b) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, relating to the designation of the Coastal High Hazard area and map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) which possibly proposes an increased density in the Coastal High Hazard Area are inconsistent with Regional concern relating to growth in high hazard areas. Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above - referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy Plan. 10683 - 14 - 4W City of Miami Response (See response to "Coastal Management Element", preceding). c) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, does not include a quality standard in the revised Drainage LOS Policies 1.2.3 and 2.1.3 which is inconsistent with Regional Policy 37.1.4 which states "individual drainage system should not adversely impact water quantity or quality of the surrounding area. Recommendation Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above- referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy Plan. City of Miami Response (See response to "Drainage Sub -Element", preceding.) 106133 - 15 - 4v SECTION II Mag amendments PZ- 3 (7/27/89)"Gerrits" * PZ-13 (7/27/89)"Coconut Grove" * The Department of Community Affairs had no objections, recommendations, or comments to this map amendment. - 16 - -10683 "f W SECTION II DCA OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS TO CITY OF MIAMI Comprehensive Plan Amendments' A. OBJECTIONS None. B. COMMENTS Proposed map amendment PZ-3 proposes to allow a general commercial land use in a residential area which is potentially an incompatible commercial use with the surrounding neighborhood uses. The City has stated that this land use change is supported by Future Land Use Objective 1.2 which requires the City to promote the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted, declining, or threatened commercial and industrial areas. However, the City should include more information concerning why this land use amendment is consistent or supported by Future Land Use Objective 1.2 (identifying it as a blighted area and providing a specific explanation for how this change will promote revitalization and redevelopment in the area). Also, demonstrate that this would ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. The Department suggests the City include an analysis of how the amendment PZ-3 parcel would be developed pursuant to local land development regulations and special conditions in order to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. , The subject parcel, as stated in Attachment 6B of the City's Amendment Transmittal to DCA, is located in the Wynwood Community Development (CD) Target Area. The socio-economic characteristics of the area qualified Wynwood as a CD Target Area, providing resources to improve the quality of its residential and economic environment through, among others, commercial rehabilitation. - 17 - 4X The MCNP Data and Analysis identifies characteristics that demonstrate the declining nature of the area and the need for revitalization. For instance, this area of Wynwood experienced a decrease in population during the 1970-1980 period in the range Of 500 to 1000 residents. The percent of families below the poverty level during the same period increased as well. In 1970 - it was estimated to be between 20% and 30%. By 1980 the percentage had increased to over 30%. These percentages are well above the City average of 16.4% in 1970 and 19.9% in 1980. This trend parallels that of the entire Wynwood Target Area, where figures show that the civilian labor force decreased by -4.7% between 1970 and 1980. One root cause for this decline is the lack of jobs in the area. As noted in Attachment 6B, the City purchased property from the owner/applicant to expand Roberto Clemente Park. The property had been part of the applicant's business site. To mitigate the impact on this established business and possible loss of jobs, additional land was needed. The resulting business expansion effort would serve to stimulate additional employment opportunities in the area. This proposed land use amendment is compatible with the surrounding uses. The parcels are contiguous to those presently owned by the applicant and utilized for his business. The additional parcels would expand an existing business within an established commercial corridor along NW 2nd Ave. The amendment would not detract from, nor divide, the currently established residential neighborhood since the land use to the south is designated as "Recreation". Any development undertaken by the applicant to improve the subject parcels will require local land development regulation permits that ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties. A. OBJECTION None. B. COMMENTS Proposed map amendment PZ-3 would eliminate a maximum of 20 units of medium density multi -family residential units. It appears the City has limited lands available to provide for their projected housing needs. The City should include more analysis of the impacts on the housing needs for the City as it relates to the elimination of 20 units of medium density multi -family residential units. sossa 47Y-1e - Though the City has limited lands available to generate new housing units and the City as a whole desires more affordable housing, the Wynwood Community Development Target Area experienced an increase in the vacancy rate of existing residential units during the 1970-1980 period. In 1980, 881 housing units were vacant compared to 525 vacant units in 1970. This is an increase to 10.78% in 1980 compared to 6.65% in 1970 (MCNP Data & Analysis). The elimination of 20 units by this land use amendment could be sufficiently absorbed through the existing vacancies in the area. Doc:[sys]<comp>dca/orc 12/01/89 IL OGS3 - 19 - 47 Application i Dates CITY, OF" MIAMI PLANNING'DEPARTMENT 275 N.W. 2 STREET _ MIAMI, FCDRIDA- 33129' APPLICATION TO AMEND THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Section 62-17 of the Code of the City of Miami, Periodic review, additions and amendments to the adopted comprehensive plan, reads as follows: - Periodically, but not less often than once in five (5) 'Years or more often than once in two (2) years, adopted comprehensive plans or a portion thereeof shall be reviewed by the planning advisory board to determine whether changes in the amount, kind or direction of development and growth of the city or area thereof, or other reasons, make it necessary or beneficial to make additions or araendaeesrts to the comprehensive plans, or portion thereof. If the city commission desires an aneadment or addition, it may, on its own motion, direct the planning department to prepare such amendment for submission to and review by the planning advisory board. The planning advisory board shall make a recommendation on the proposed plan amendment to the city commission within a. reasonable time as established by the city commission. The procedure for revising, adding to or amending comprehensive plans or portions thereof shall he the same as the procedure for original adoption. This petition is proposed bys ( ) City Commission C ) Planning Department ( 1 Zoning Board ( x; Other & Please Specify: Pro22rty owner: EDWARD J. GERRITS, INC. The subject property is located &k on N.V. rt-. ht-tween N.W. 1 Avenue and N.W. 2nd Avenue,City of Miami AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: Lot(S) 6 through 9, inclusive Block(s) 5 Subdivision WYNWooD PARK sjjBDIZTGION. •_ Plat Book 5, Pay 21 1 of 3 10683 The under signed being the owner or the representative of the owner, of the subject property do( ) respectfully request the app! al of the City of Miami for the following a-wndment(s) to the Miami Compreh.nsive Neighborhood Plan for the above —described property as indicated!E1'd .the Land Use Plan: FROM: Multi -Family Medium Density 'i;a : j� 13 �.d .5 0 TO: General CaTmrcial Please supply a statement indicating why you think the existing plan designation is inappropriate. Please supply a statement justifying your request to change the p'3n to your requested plan designation. - See Attachment Number 2 ' What is the acreage of the property being requested for a change in plan designation? 459 Acre — Page 2 of 3 ., Has the designation or tnis property oeen cnangeo in cne Tasc yedre �f�' Da -you own any other property within 200' of the subject property? If 'As, has, -this other proqperty been granted a change in plan designat anew thin the kastr 12 months? No Have you made a companion application for a change of Zoning for the subject property with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department? Have you filed with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department: -- - - Affidavit of ownership? „Y-ep - List of owners of property within 375' of the subject property `,,,� - Disclosure of ownership form ``ems if not, pleasr.e upply them. SIGNATURE 6 L w; s DATE NAME LA 4k L P'i S A A-f 1 _ l^ G 0---L' ADDRESS LSu; k 3 / T o 1- &,' c ke r I 41J-e h it e PHONE 3�rq - o t `LB�o.� STATE OF FLORIDA) SS: COUNTY OF DADS j -- --=- - , " • . -- ' - L� V, S. sum at e s the uthorI zea Agent for Owner) duly the real property dses and �'ihbed aboves that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if 'acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to, execute this petition on behalf of the owner. II% --(SEAL) SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED � before me this day /! _ of 4aAA1 - N W-fy u c, State of Arlorlda at Largt NOTARY PHLIC STATE OF FLORIDA � NY COMMISSION UP. No. 5,1990 MY C"ISSION EXPIRES: Computation of Fee: Receipt fs Page 3of3 10683 Annex A to Disclosure of Ownership 67 - Application for amendment to Zoning Atlas Filed by Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. April 13, 1989 As of April 11, 1989 the sole shareholders of Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. (the "Corporation"), the addresses of such shareholders and such shareholders' respective shareholder interest in the Corporation were: Percentage of Outstanding Shares in the Corporation Held by Name of Shareholder: Address of Shareholder: Shareholder: Patrick T. Gerrits Michael J. Gerrits cityapp 3465 N.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33127 3465 N.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33127 50% 50% 100% Attachment Number 1 to Application to Amend the Miami comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, filed by Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. STATEMENT WHY APPLICANT BELIEVES THE EXISTING PLAN DESIGNATION IS INAPPROPRIATE (i) Existing Usage Designations The Plan, as adopted in February 1989, designates the Property as Low -Moderate Density Residential. The Property has such designation since 1976, the date of the City's first Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This designation remained in the City's successive Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan of September 1985. The Property lies in a 38 square block neighborhood commonly known as Old San Juan, which is part of the larger neighborhood known as W ood. The Property, which is on the south side of N.W. 35 directly abuts the General Commercial Zone along N.W. 2 Avenue and lies one block south of the General Commercial Zone along�6 Street. Residential Lots on the north side of �� N.W. 35 may be permitted for RG-2 Transitional uses, which allows owners to have offside parking and other uses reflective of the proximity of the residential use to adjacent commercial operations. The Property is directly abutted to the south by a Recreational use, without an intervening barrier. The Recreational use is the proposed Roberto Clemente Park expansion. (ii) Recent Plann Residential D ctions are Ii with In adopting the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, Future Land Use for 1989-2000, the City of Miami, itself, eliminated residential usage in the Wynwood area. The City purchases 10, RG-2 lots and intends that they become part of the Roberto Clemente Park expansion. The single change of land use designation, from the useages in the 1985 Plan, for land immediately adjacent to the Property is to change one half of a city block from Low -Moderate Density Residential to Recreational. This park expansion has two effects on the immediate neighborhood: First, residential use is decreased; and Second, the Recreational Use locatgd only one block south of the Commerical uses on ;i.W. 36 Street causes the 19 residential lots 1 10683 W (including the Subject Property) lying between N.W. 1 Avenue and N.W. 2 Avenue to be hemmed by non-residential usages, without logical intervening boundaries. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, Future Land Use for 1989 -2000 makes 19 land use changes in the entire Wynwood District. Of the 19 changes: (i) Only one involved a change from a higher density residential use to a more restrictive residential use. This single change to more restrictive residential uss is to a parcel which is located 14 block south of the Property; No new residential areas were created and no existing residential areas were expanded; Nine (9) changes altered a form of residential land use to a less restrictive, Commercial, Industrial, Major Public Facility or Recreational Use. Additionally, the City is of record targeting two highly commercial/industrial developments for Wynwood. These are: (i) infrastructure and access improvements ' and comprehensive marketing to draw businesses to the Garment District, in southwesterly Wynwood; and (ii) draw commercial/industrial development to the FEC Railway Yards, which lie less than two block east of the Property, and about which City planners say "future development is expected to trigger a major revival in the area". Perhaps most significantly, City planners have not targeted or materially encouraged residential development or material renovation to existing housing in Wynwood. (iii) Land Use Patterns The 1989 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan cites, for the period from 1970 to 1980, an overall population decrease in excess of 6.5% and a decrease in the number of families living in Wynwood at 14.1%. The absorption rate for rental residences in the neighborhood is stated to be relatively high. Real estate professionals in the area explain the absorption for residential rentals as a result of waves of immigration of Hispanic and Caribbean Basin arrivals to the Miami area. The average rental achieved in Old San Juan for a two bedroom residence is said to be $300 per 2 10G83 o month. City Planning Department records indicate that the area's median contract rental rate is lower than that in the City of Miami. The rental population is said to be transient, so that once a resident has become assimilated and is able to afford better housing and leaves the neighborhood, there exists new emigrees to replace him. City records indicate that a statistically immaterial amount of new residential construction or renovation to existing residences occurred between 1975 and 1980 and this condition has continued into the 19801s. Planning Department records reflect a lower median value for owner -occupied housing than that of the City and a lower percentage of house ownership than that of the City, at large. In the 1975 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City gave Wynwood the next to the lowest possible rating as a neighborhood, because of problems associated with neighborhood decline. The 1985 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan suggested that City -sponsored economic development assistance be targeted to Wynwood, because of its higher than average unemployment. The 1985 Plan included two major planning strategies for Wynwood, both of which were described for "high intensity commercial and/or industrial" activity and for "continued industrial redevelopment" in the Fashion District. In addition to magnetizing commercial expansion in the Garment District and at the FEC Railway Yards, The 1989 Plan seeks to remedy neighborhood deficiencies of crime, high unemployment, low overall private sector investment in improvements by designating the Wynwood area is a Community Development Target Area. (iv) Inappropriate Classification of the Property The Property, which consists of four unimproved lots, totalling less than one half of one acre, directly abuts the Applicant's existing office headquarters building. The offices lie within a commercial -use corridor along N.W. 2 Avenue. The Plan and current Parks Department plans presently designate that the Property will directly abut the City's Roberto Clemente Park, without any natural barrier or street barrier between the Park and the adjoining private landowners. This situation, were residences directly abut public recreational facilities, is considered to be conducive to criminal activities. In the area of Old San Juan, where street crime and drug trafficking are prevelant (see Annex A) the planning concern is heightened. 3 f/ The low to medium density residential classifications which have applied to the Property and its surrounding areas in the Old San Juan section since the 1975 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted are inconsistent with the actual usage trends over the same period. The subarea continues to deteriorate and little private sector investment has occurred. Neither public sector residential development nor public sector incentives to the _ private sector for such residential development are realistically expected. No increase in private sector, residential development investment could be considered probable, in light of low rentals, low property values and high crime. At the same time, the planning objectives for the overall area, which have been espoused since 1975, target commercial usage in the area, rather than residential use. These two facts show support Applicant's belief that residential classification of the Property is inproper. cityapp/1 10 Attachment Number 2 to Application to Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, filed by Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. STATEMENT WHY APPLICANT BELIEVES ITS REQUEST TO CHANGE THE PLAN TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY GENERAL COMMERCIAL IS JUSTIFIED (i) Limited Scope of Chancre Applied for The Applicant is requesting that the four unimproved lots which constitute the Property, each of which is 50' by 1001, (overall acreage of less than one half acre) be changed to a General Commercial classification. The Applicant is applying for this change to enable the Applicant: to expand its existing, one story office headquarters; to centralize, under one roof, storage of the Applicant's business records; and to provide safe parking for the Applicant's employees. The change of land use classification which is requested will only impact four lots, all of which are contiguous and all of which directly abut three lots, which front N.W. 2 Avenue, and which have a long -existing, General/Commercial zoning classification. In the block of N.W. 36 Street between N.W. 1 Avenue and N.W. 2 Avenue, which is only one block north of the Property, there are 11 operating commercial establishments, consisting of an auto parts retail store, 6 manufacturing enterprises, several small warehouses and other uses. Residential lots directly abut these commercial establishments. From N.W. 36 to N.W. 29 Street, there are in excess of 25 commercial businesses along N.W. 2 Avenue, excluding Applicant. -{kThe four lots which make up the Property front on N.W. 35 '4errac and will have, at their rear property lines, Roberto Clemente Park, which the City is currently expanding. The existing or proposed commercial/recreational uses, which surround the Property on two sides, are more conducive to the commercial use anticipated by the Applicant than they are to the low to medium density residential uses which are mandated by the Plan's residential use designation. (ii) Impact of Proposed Change on Neighborhood The Applicant has 24 employees who work in the office headquarters. Between 20 and 25 vehicles, belonging to employees, are parked off -site. The expansion of the office headquarters- is expected to, add no additional employees to 5 10683 - - 13 Applicant's payroll. Centralization of business records to the city from their present off -site location will not add employees. Accordingly, the land use change requested by the Applicant will not appreciably increase vehicular traffic in the neighborhood. Further, the Applicant's expansion, if it is permitted, will not increase the burden on existing City services in the area. The proposed ammendment to the 1989 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan affects less than one half acre of property. The change to commercial usage, which the Applicant requests, will not adversely affect any historical or natural resource areas designated or proposed in the Plan. The proposed change will not increase traffic congestion or overburden existing transportation or utility services. Neighborhood Support for Proposed Chancre of Plan Designation � The other property owners, in both Old San Juan and in the Wynwood Area, favor the Applicant's expansion plans for its office. 'Annex B. This approval comes from both the residents of �tkDld San ��,J,°ou°p and, more significantly, along from the residents of N.W. 35 ik€� between N.W. 1 Avenue and N.W. 2 Avenue. The latter residents will be most affected by the improvements planned by the Applicant. Other business and civic groups in the Wynwood the Applicant's expansion plans. Annex B. cityapp/5 UM R area support 10683/4 STATE OF rL=A) SS. 00t1NTY OF DAM ) AFFIDAVIT 1%0-......� Before ire, the urciersigned authority, this day pernorally appeared L v, who being by me first duly sworn. upon oath, eposes and says: " 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accom;panying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance No. 9500 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and Listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for t".e cimnge ,.)r modi,fi=ti.on of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accarganyirg petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and trade a part of this affidavit contain the current -names, ma's addresses, Phone m nbers and legal descriptions for the real property which ne is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts -as represented in the applicaticn and doctw.ents submitted in conj=ct- cn with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affimt sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscrited before me this day of�19 3 r e,arr Public, Stat of Florida at Large NOTARY PUBLIC :';fv CF FLORIOA Ccmssion !.�xpi.es: NY COMMISSION FYI'5,I99O m' 6 L (SEAL) (Name) 1LOG83 -01.." OWNER'S LIST Owner's (lame ,FdwOXA -3. kr(;h, c.. mailing Address 3 q bCs eJ, w • -L-Ph*%we (,i ON'-'dg , Telephone Number TS 6 5 Legal Description: q ` try, f-- WOV Lo H as �. ,�-s� we , �loc� �dv dui;. �� I � s,3 �, �� Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375` of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address 34L * N ---� . Z �-v e. e_ ',1�� Pv� d a. 331 � �-- Street Address Street Address Legal Description , Pa �3 Legal Description Legal Description 1068�6 k C 1. Legal description arri street address of subject real property: Lots 6 through 9 inclusive, Block 5, WYNWOOD PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded,Plat Book 5, Page 23, less the North 5 feet of Lots 6, 7 and 9. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and -percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 5419 requires disclosure of all parties aving a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 62 requires disclosure of all shareholders of oorporations, beneficiaries of trusts, author any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The fee title holder of records is EDWARD J. GERRITS, INC., a Florida corporation. Annex A reflects the shareholders names, addresses and respective shareholder interests in Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. 3. Legal description and street address cif any z eat, prope::. - t n ) owned by any party ifisted in answer to question *2, and (b) :seated wiWin 375 feet of the subject real pro rty. Lots 10 through 12, inclusive, Block 5 WYNWOOD PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 23 of.the Dade County, Florida Public Records are owned by Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. The street address of such property is: 3465 N.W. 2 Avenue, Miami, Florida Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. Telephone Number: (305) 573-2465 EDWARD J. GERRITS, INC. i� By: 8t�tx�Q�c Patrick T. Gerrits, President STATE OF FLCF-MA SS: COUMY CF DARE ) Patrick T. Gerrits , being duly sworn, deposes and says that ne is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question 41, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and =plate: and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute this Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. EDWARD J. GERRITS, INC. (ML) ( Name l SWOR4 TO AND SUFaSM= beftn-I mA r!iex , day of April �;"T98 9. Notary Public. State of Florida at Large 10683 MY CC'N2aSS11 EPIRES: ►° ., �j • i 6Gr0EU ihnU ��EAAI idf.S.yYJ10.• / WYNWOOD COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. 225 N.E. 34 STREET, SUITE 209 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33156 (305) 576-0440 April 28, 1989 City of Miami Planning and Zoning Board Miami, Florida 33128 RE: Wynwood Park Subdivision, Lots 6 through 9, Block 5: Application to Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and Application for Amendment to Zoning Atlas: Property owner: Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. Ladies and Gentlemen: The Wynwood Community Economic Development Agency is a not -for -profit organization, whose purpose is to improve the economic conditions in the Wynwood Area. Our Agency not only encourages new investment in Wynwood from the public sector and private sector, but also supports those businesses and taxpayers which have operated in Wynwood over the years. The Agency is familiar with Edward J. Gerrits, Inc., whose Headquarters is 3465 N.W. 2 Avenue and which has operated in Wynwood since 1948. Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. has been an active supporter of the Wynwood Area through employment base; contributions to the Agency and other civic groups; sponsorship of an after -school boxing program at Roberto Clemente Park; and other activities. Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. is a model which the Agency uses to attempt to at- tract new businesses to Wynwood. We understand that Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. has a need to expand its office building, having recently sold its of- fice/storage building to the City for the Park Expansion. The Wynwood Community Economic Development Agency urges the City to make a favorable disposition of the Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. application and to allow the property to be rezoned and permitted for commercial use. 10683 /8 Z. Page 2 Garrits, Inc. Very tru y yours, William Rios Executive Director WR/nmv FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY r 1055 EAST 21tt STREET, HIALEAH. FLORIDA 33013 Fi C OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT May 2, 1989 File: 366-59 MIAMI: Wynwood Park Subdivision, Lots 6 through 9, Block 5: Application to Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and Application for Amendment to Zoning Atlas: Property Owner: Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. City of Miami Planning and Zoning Board 275 N.W. 2 Street Miami, Florida Ladies and Gentlemen: Florida East Coast Railway Company owns a 55 acre parcel in the Wynwood area of Miami. We have been advised that the Edward J. Gerrits Company, whose headquarters is at 3465 N.W. Second Avenue, Miami, Florida, has filed an application to rezone four lots owned by Gerrits and also to amend the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. We have been advised that Gerrits has filed these two applications to permit Gerrits' expansion of its office/headquarters facility. As a neighbor in the Wynwood area, Florida East Coast Railway Company has no objection to the two applications of Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. Ver rul y s, R. J. ar_eto "ice President cc: Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. t0683 02,D W CONCERNED CITIZENS OF WYNWOOD. 3430 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE. MIAMI, FLORIDA. 33127 April 27, 1989 City of Miami Planning and Zoning Boards 275 N. W. 2 Street, Miami, Florida. 33128 RE: Wynwood Park Subdivision, Lots 6, through 9, Block 5: Aplication to Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and Aplication for Amendent to Zoning Atlas: Property Owner: EDWARD J. GERRITS INC. Ladies and Gentlemen: The Concerned Citizens of Wynwood is an organization which represents both the commercial and residential interests of the Wynwood Community. We promote not only economic development within the area but also social, recreational and safety concerns for all of our citizens. Edward J. Gerrits Inc, is an active supporter of the Concerned Citizens of Wynwood. We consider Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. to be a responsible citizen of the neighborhood with a long and varied record of supported the after -school boxing program at Roberto Clemente Park; it sponsors extra -curricular activities at Buena Vista Elementary School; it supports the Wynwood Community Economic Development Agency and other activities. We support Edward J. Gerrits Inc, application, to rezone and to amend the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan for those four lots on N. W. 35 St., which are the site of a proposed office expansion for Gerrits. We believe that such an expansion would not only be good for Gerrits and the commercial activities along N. W. 2nd Avenue, but would also be an improvement to the residential neighborhood. Very truly yours, Concnnraad Cit-L er s of Wynwo i By !---✓ Fred Santiago. President. 21 We, the undersigned, are either owners or tenants in the old San Juan Section of Wynwood Park. We are not opposed to and support Edward J. Gerrits Inc.'s application to expand its building and to rezone Gerrits' property to allow this commercial use: Name C� Address ' 2 ;� ;eleLt�oe,, 0 10 12. 13. % 'Llz 7 / l 14. 15. g/o Am) 3 SJ-7- Y /j- /,iwI 10683 Z2 16. 17 . �i}•L,�.� �1� G�� v 18. 1�a4ti zalLtstJ ' 19. ifr �Gy pit Opt 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26.t 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. im 33. t2f1 N • t,.1 , � 577t17- Z g y N, L.J . 3 S i7r 47-. ZS& %). &.J , 3S"" Si 3S"o 1 N.ul. yNo Al"4 /3v NLu 6 S7- r$7 2,3 MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookie Williams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 10683 X X X Inthe ......................................... Court, was published In said newspaper in the Issues of December 21, 1989 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In sold Dade County, Florida each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first p blication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afflant f or says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or rat for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publi on In the �d A. newspaper. n , w �.......... ._......``� ..'r%1VU8,..,).................. ``�� Zx. S►ugLnitoQn�sypt 1lb before me this 21 ; `!; � cem �i . 89 .. day df ..... vA.D. 19...... . W net 8pndhez '• Np� c, Stal0 f p or Id Large (SEAL) 0 ' • • • •' v`� My Commission R►,C�Re� Jat,e 2j r ��%` MR 114A ///ff/tt0RIt1J`%, Ct�`Y Q�IIIIAINM I��.+ID�t��iA ;. All Intbreeted perenne will tttk9 1`10116641`1611 dothe,uth`Bxy.o't= December, 1999, theCity Co11►olltelon of MIAMI; PIONdd adopted' the tollowing titled ordlnenobe: ORDINANCE NO.1076, AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE.ESTAILISFtINq AIEVi) s#1ECIAL REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: "GRAND. 0 X 1l�0"; APPROPRI ATING FUNDS FOR ITS'OPERATION I THE. AMOUNT`OF $760,000 FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OEPARTMENT .OF COMMERCE;'DIVI$ION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; CONTAINING'A REPEALER, PROVISION AND SEVERASILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE N0,1068i1 AN nnnimAkijE ,AMP-NOI140 THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF • NORTHWEST i$fH AND 11TH STREETS; BETWEEN NORTH.' WEST 28TH AND 30TH AVENUES, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PAR- TICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIG, NATION OF THE.SUSJECT PROPERTY FROM DUPLEX REST- DENTIALTO SINGLE+FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; MAKING FINDINGS; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE AFFECTED AGENCY; AND PROVID- ING A'REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERASILITY CLAUSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10t1B1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE -PLAN MAP OF THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989.2000, FOR. PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 833.899 NORTHWEST 4TH STREET, 430 AND 490 NORTHWEST SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, AND 401-449 NORTHWEST, 9TH AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROP- ERTY FROM MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIFAMILY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALIMAKING'FIND•' [NOS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10682 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI- NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF, THE CITY 'OF< MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING,CLASSIFICATION OF '401-449 NORTHWEST 9TH AVENUE, W-809 NORTHWEST. 4TH STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 430 AND 490. NORTHWEST SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM RG•2/5 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TO RG-315 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES. ON F AGE;NO.35 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PARTOF ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY.REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN; ARTICLE 3, SEC- TION 300, THEREOF, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.10683 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE -LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPRE•• HENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989.2000, FOR'PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 146.170 N.W.``35TH`STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN)„ BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF,THE SUBJECT PROP- ERTY FROM MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM MENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERGAAL„ MAKING FINDINGS, INSTRUMNG THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; AND PRO- VIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSEAND' EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10684 AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI- NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 145.170 NORTHWEST 3STH STREET; MIAMI,- FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN)'FROM RG•215 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TO CG-117 GENERAL COMMER- CIAL BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND; BY MAKING ALL THE NEC- = ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 21 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300; THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERASILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.10686 AN ORDINANCE WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING THE FUTURE' LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED;" THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989.2000. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 349D' AND 3500 MAIN HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICU- LARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM RESTRICTED, COMMER- CIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MAJOR PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES; MAKING FIND- INGS; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE AFFECTED AGENCIES; AND PROVIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10688 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI. NANCE NO. 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 3490 AND 3500 MAIN HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM SPI.2 COCONUT GROVE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND RS•212 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL_TO GU GOVERN- MENT USE BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO, 46 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY REFER- ENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300, THERE- OF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL- ITY CLAUSE. Said ordinances may be Inspected by the public at the Office of the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, between the�hours of 8i00 an, and 5:00 p.m. (6235) . MATTY HIRAl a ""t •. CITY CLERK MIAMI, FLORIDA 12/21 89.4.122123M