HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10680J-89-570
6/22/89
ORDINANCE NO. V)680r
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP
OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI
COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000,
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED FOR THE THREE -BLOCK AREA
BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 15TH AND 17TH STREETS,
BETWEEN NORTHWEST 28TH AND 30TH AVENUES,
MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL TO
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; MAKING FINDINGS;
INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY
OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE AFFECTED AGENCY; AND
PROVIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of June 21, 1989, Item No. 1, following an advertised hearing
adopted Resolution No. PAB 24-89, by a vote of 8 to 0,
RECOMMENDING DENIAL of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of
Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the Planning Advisory Board's
recommendation, the City Commission after careful consideration
of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant
this Comprehensive Plan change as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No.
10544 the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as
amended, is hereby amended by changing the designation of that
certain parcel of property located at approximately the three
block area bounded by Northwest 15th and 17th Streets between
Northwest 28th and 30th Avenues, Miami, Florida, more
particularly described as Block 1, MIRACOPA PARK, Plat Book 49,
Page 14, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and Blocks 3
and 4, MAYSLAND, Plat Book 10 at Page 1, Public Records of Dade
County, Florida, from Duplex Residential to Single -Family
Residential.
106801
I
Section 2. It is hereby found that this Comprehensive
Plan designation change:
a. Is necessary due to changed or changing
conditions;
b. Involves a residential land use of 5 acres or less
and a density of 5 units per acre or less or
involves other land use categories, singularly or
in combination with residential use, of 3 acres or
less and does not, in combination with other
changes during the last year, produce a cumulative
effect of having changed more than 30 acres;
C. The property which is the subject of this
amendment has not been the specific subject of a
Comprehensive Plan change within the last year;
and
d. The herein amendment does not involve the same
owner's property within 200 feet of property
provided a Comprehensive Plan change within the
last 12 months.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit
a copy of this Ordinance immediately upon approval of first
reading to Thomas Pelham, Secretary, Florida Department of
Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-2100, for 90 day review and comment.
Section 4. All ordinances, code sections, or parts
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they
are in conflict.
Section 5. Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty-
five (45) days after final reading and adoption hereof, pursuant
to law.
-2-
106801;
i
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 22nd day
of June 1989.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY
this 14th day of December 1989.
XAVIER L. S AREZ, AYOR
E
4 .
M TTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
DRIENNE L. RI SNER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
A
r
J GE L. RNANDEZ
C TY ATTO NEY
ALF/dot/M496
- 3-
re"IN
.o-f 'ta�.'iti
SERGIO RODRIGUEZ W '
Director _
December 18, 1989
Mr. Thomas Pelham, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Dear Mr. Pelham:
CESAR H. 0010
City Manager
The City of Miami adopted four amendments to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan, on December 14, 1989. This date is the second adoption period of the 1989
calendar year consistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the 1987 Florida Statutes.
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011,
Florida Administrative Code, I am pleased to transmit:
- Four (4) copies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinances as adopted, including PZ-1, PZ-
2, PZ-4, PZ-10;
- Four (4) copies of the "Response to Department of Community Affairs'
Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to Proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendments for the City of Miami -- December 1989";
- One (1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support documents on
which recommendations are based.
As directed in Mr. Paul Bradshaw's letters of November 6, 1989 and November 17,
1989, which transmitted the Department of Community Affairs' Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments, to the subject amendments, we are forwarding one (1)
copy of these transmittal documents to the Executive Director of the South Florida
Regional Planning Council.
If, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification, you may
contact Joseph McManus at (305)579-6086.
rcerer.
Sergio odriguez, DiJrect-
Planni6g Department
1
SR/vh
vh/89:123 10680
Attachments ;1.0(;8:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/(305) 579-6086 '10GS,3
Mailing Address - P.O-Box 330705 / Miami, Florida 33233.0708
10685
4-ttR orf �t�xxrY
SERGIO RODRIGUEZ W
Director
ONa.6 oil T
December 18, 1989
Mr. B. Jack Osterholt, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Dear Mr. Osterholt:
CESAR H. ODIO
City Manager
The City of Miami adopted four amendments to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan, on December 14, 1989. This date is the second adoption period of the 1989
calendar year consistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the 1987 Florida Statutes.
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011,
Florida Administrative Code, and the direction of the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to transmit to you one copy of the transmittal documents
submitted to the DCA consisting of:
- One (1) copy of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinances as adopted, including PZ-1, PZ-
2, PZ-4, PZ-10;
One (1) copy of the "Response to Department of Community Affairs'
Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to Proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendments for the City of Miami -- December 1989";
- One (1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support documents on
which recommendations are based.
If, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification, you may
ccmiUct Joseph McManus at (305)579-6086.
Sincerely,
Sergio Podriguez, Dir'bcto
Planning Department
SR/vh
vh/89:123a
Attachments
i10GS0
101681
PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/(305) 579-6086 -10683
Mailing Address - P.O.Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708
110685
CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA
a Tt .OAF E MEMORANDUM
To Matty Hirai DATE June 28, 1989
FILE
City Clerk
FROM Sergi o zJDirecto
Plan ng Department
SUBJECT Transmittal of 1st Reading
Plan Amendments to
Department of Community
REFERENCES Affairs
ENCLOSURES.
Please be advised that, pursuant to your agreement via previous
conversations, this Department will transmit items:
PZ-11
PZ-21
PZ-22
of the City Commission agenda of June 22, 1989 to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA), in Tallahassee, so that
the numerous data and the complex analyses required by
§§163.3184(3)(a)FS and Rule 9J-24 FAC are satisfied.
The DCA will have 90 days to review and return comments following
which these items will be scheduled for 2nd reading.
Please be so kind as to enter this memorandum in your records of
these items.
SRlNm/vh
vh189:394
cc: David Whittington, Chief
Comprehensive Planning Division
Harold Ruck
PZW1
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department:
June 2, 1989
AREA BOUNDED--BYAND
BETWEEN N.W. 28TH AND 30TH AVENUES,
Block 1
MIRACOPA PARK (49-14) P.R.D.C.
Block 3 and 4
MAYSLAND (10-1) P.R.O.C.
Per City Commission 89-478; May 25, 1989,
consideration of amending Ordinance 10544, as
amended, Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
1989-2000, Future Land Use Plan Map by changing
the land use designation of the three block area
bounded by N.W. 15th and 17th Streets, between
N.W. 28th and 30th Avenues, from Duplex
Residential to Single Family Residential.
REQUEST To revert the Plan desionation of this three
block area from Duplex Residential to Single -
Family Residential.
BACKGROUND This three block area is comprised of
single-family housing in good condition. Prior
to July, 1988, during the preparation of the
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000,
the plan designation was changed from Single -
Family Residential to Duplex Residential for the
reason that this three -block area was surrounded
on three sides by Duplex Residential and on the
fourth (north) side by Office. This f-hange was
incorporated in the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Subsequently, applicants applied for a
corresponding change of zoning for property on
the south side of N.W. 17th Street, from RS-1/1
Single -Family to RG-1 Duplex zoning, which was
recommended favorably by the Planning Department
and the Zoning Board (see attachment). At the
City Commission meeting of May .25, 1989 (Agenda
PAB 6/21/89
Item #1
Page I of 2
1.OiGSU,
Item PZ-10), the Commission passed Motion_89-478
as follows:
"A MOTION CONTINUING FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION PROPOSED FIRST READING
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ATLAS FOR
PROPERTY AT 2900-2922 N.W. 17TH STREET
FROM RS-2/2 TO RG-1/3; FURTHER
INSTRUCTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO BRING
THIS ISSUE BACK AT THE MEETING PRESENTLY
SCHEDULED FOR JULY 27, 1989."
In the event that the Commission decides not to
rezone the property to RG-1 and retains the
existing zoning RS-1/1, then it is appropriate
to consider reverting the plan designation from
Duplex to Single -Family so that the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are
consistent.
ANALYSIS However, the Planning Department continues to
evaluate this three block area in terms of the
surrounding Duplex designation and sees no need
to change from the existing Duplex designation.
To revert to Single -Family would create a
district unrelated to its surroundings, and not
in harmony with the surrounding established land
use pattern.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. DENIAL.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting of June 21, 1989, the Planning Ad-
visory Board adopted Resolution PAB 24-89, by an
8 to 0 vote, recommending denial of the above.
Three opponents were present at the meeting; one
proponent was present at the meeting.
CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of June 22, 1989, the City Commission
passed the above on First Reading.
1
PAB 6/21/89
Item #1_
Page 2 of 2
AN
\4
OFFICE
GENERAL 11
COMMER tAL
5 T.
L
a
z
ST
E
i i i l t l l f l l
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000
N.W. 14 ST FROM DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PAB 7/21/89
i
106se
3
a
N.W. 16 TER.
N.W. 16 S T
N.W. 14 S T.
I.W. 18 ,
gowmmfw.mW
•
T IB 5 4 3 2 1 "Z
,� ,
i _
1 1 �' 1 M•
N-W "1dC 17
99
i"" '►" I \ \ '\ c
A ? �°
?o
RO,3/40&- r
c
t'J9 192
S T.
47 s 44 43 1
N P► to
v w 1 TTER
ae 9 !so ISt".„
I.
RL
58 59160 6 1 62 C'
1 I�
S TR,
70 T T3
2 Y N
o
N. 16 Xx
ST.
X.
T9 7 7'
rF%:�::% Y 81 T8
1 8
X.
r}
•�'•''� 82 83 r4Be 87
W�• 15 S T
To 67 M 9? 96 11s " b' sa so AIRPOR-
T a 9 DISTRI
f s 4 2 2 1 6 = 4 5 6 7 ;g HOD
3 �
tto 1 14
T s S 2 3 2 1 13 12 I! 10 9 8 5 4
.1.4
tiF. 7
3
e3 so so
N.W. 14 MAXI M I NO S Te
di 93 tip ti I t7p t 00 f 9t
w 8
1 2 3 4 S } I 2 S i> 1 2 9
0 � a
" j 5
--" 14
7*1 V��
Af
'7v
If, lv.#
Ai
'ju "94
P�7
JL
lo
It w
• N; -: i'r. .. ' ? .t: Ith M t4�, e t '. f`!' '� a s �.•. : � '. it4
�i •_; ' .lam ,� 9�.... , f • �•j,iri!/' y s %r:. • .
w� f it ��.. t, � •., •� t N�. .
love,
C to
lb
Aft
, �( 1r ._,gyp •+r ,L : .+ 't-ln , t +S. ' • i " `y�i ':a ' :.
�—A .I��� .` tfwr �. av•' i ��.w•�I,,.e+-•�•+•n,t: • •� • 'f t •:••' j {- • •7.•q I J �`r `i.. '.rl
Cj
�t s,�. ..� .•s ••� 'tip}�.Y� S '� 1•� r 'y� • . •'�� ry� �r , '!�)• r -,.
t
`.r�.,�r.,..��..
.•...►�.� ,�+ �!f•
��,. •R'^'.`�•••s� �..-•.'
'•'w
.,' ,a.
n••i �PZ ..1M ��.�t
rl
M:wl
i ram• :,.,�.I't•" •� r • ^'t` r`Jpr
n
475
• •j " ` t f ,ra,, T ` - .j ' - �::+T, ti •" -b �:. a _• r= ,aL• ,•r, t .,ram' d.3..x� :ty.
'S, �� _ ;,, .fir;• , _f
••+ � t ' r.+ ..3'�wr�• r _ �. • r"t�•�'�—''grit ,�.. � .�
APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ATLAS File Number ZA-83s,�,�
I, )os9 R. :i1 onso-Pu.iol hereby apply to the City Commis-
sion of t e �.aty or Miami for an omenamenT to the coning Atlas of the City of Miami as
more particularly described herein and, in support of that request, furnish the following
informations
I. Address of property 2900-2922 tl.U. 17 Street
2. Two surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. (Attach to
application!
3. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of
interest form (Form 4-83 and attach to applicattoW.
4. Certified list of owners of real estate within 375' radius from the outside
boundaries of property covered by this'appiication. (See Forme 6-83 and attach to
application.)
S. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements).
S. Atlas sheet(s) on which property appears 9r,
7. Preient Zoning Designation RS-2/2
_ 8. Proposed Zoning Designation ?G-1 / 3
9. Statement explaining why present zoning designation is inappropriate. (Attach to
application)
Statement as to why proposed zoning designation is appropriate. (Attach to appii-
catiorU
-i I. Other (Speciry)
12. Filing Fee of $ 1,760.00 according to following schedule:
(a) , To: RS-1, RS-1.1, RS-29 U00
per sq.ft. of net lot area, minimum
H RG-i, PD-, PD-I-iC,
(b) To: RC-2, RC-2.1, 0.10 per sq.ft. of net lot area, minimum:
RC-2.3,RO-11 .oa
RO-2.1
(c) To: RG-2.21, RC-39 144.00
0.11oer sq.ft. of net lot area, minimum
R0;3
` `1
E
(d) To: CR-1, CR-2,
CR-39 0-1, CC- I , .
CG-2, WF49 WF-R,
1-191-2;-SPI-1,2,5,7,
8,9,11,12
(e) To: CM-1,,SPI-6
$0.1 Viper sq.ft. of net lot ores, minimum
$5�7.00
$0.14 per sq.ft. of net lot ores, minimum
$690.00
class(f) For any change in a sector number only, for a particular district
ifica-tion, the fee shall be the same as for a change in its district classification, as
shown in (b) through (e) above.
(9)
Nome Jose Alonso-Puiol
Address 1710 S.:,. 27 Avenue, "Hami. Florida
Phone 446- 5774
STATE OF FLORIDA) SS:
'COUNTY 'OF DADE )
l !�-Pl, iul being duly sworn, deposes and
says that he is the t wner! (Aumormea Agent for wner) or the read property described in
answer to question #I, above; that he has read the foregoing answers hat the same are
true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has cut rit' to execute this
petition an behalf of the owner. a /7
(SEAL)
SWORN -TO AND SUBSCRIBED
befor me, this.. /% + day,,_
of %.il/��jG� 8J6/
Notary uailc„Jt'O�" F Ioroza at L.arge
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
sonceo tnru ..sant's i•4otary arcKaraae
10680
Form 2543
A
A =" D A VST
STATE CF F,rC=)
SS:
CGUMTY CF DAM )
Before r.a. t.".e urdermsigue aut!"zr_t, , t ss day =orailY
appeared Jose Alonso-Pu.iol who besr.g t~; me f -t duly sdor.:,
upon oath. deposes and says: -
1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the
owner, aisitt:.:.g t.".e acc^ 3nyiz application for a public hea tng as
required by OrdLnance No. 9500 of the Code of the u-t-
y of Miami, r or:.da.
etffecting the real p:-zperr; located i..n the Ciry of ',Sian as desc:':red and
Listed on the pages at:ac: ed to this af.161davit and grade a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, :.: any, have gi:ren t:.=1
full and c=lete cer—..d. sicn for him to act in their behai: for the c:^arge
,jr csad=:::3ticz of a e?assr:Lzaticri or regulation of zing as set rut in
the petition.
3. That the pager attac..;ed hereto and aade a peat of this
af fidavit contain the = emt names, ma's addresses, #=a r=c' e.-s and
legal descr..ptions for the real pr opm=f which ne is the owner or legal
representative.
4. The facts -as rrpre;e*nted in the appliC3%icZn and dc===s
mtad.tted in c=junct:L= with this affidavit are true and .corrrrt.
F�-wr Afi = sayeth not.
(Natre )
Sworn to and Subsc:bed before ore
this ,(/m 19
x, I Liv,
Noxa`r; fciblic. It.of Florida at Large
MyCc..-iri.~w..Smic.•
. lir••.���iril�in •...r.� �� ...... rr. •.: 1 ,
.=60 :aru A.,anvs :ra:arr drerer�ge
nm
10680
iy �
OWNER'S L: ST
yner' 5 Name '1�vc1 anri '�U+7. T�'C. ' �C ?tirjrp H. :.oria_
si l ing. Address 7 ,,, ir, l.r1�3 .3 a�i , "?^.ri 0'
elepnone Number
,ega l Descri Mti on: : s 5•, ' :'ays l 111-i _ 1 t
owner's Name
Mailing Address
Te;:phoni-. Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telepnone'Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Des.riotion
Leaal Description
Legal Description
OISCMSL'FE CF a,'NER HIP
I. . Legal description arxi street. address cf subject real property:
Lots 15-11, Mock A, ;;aysl and, P3 10/1
2900-2922 17 Street
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership.
Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties
Having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject
matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission.
Accordingly, question.p2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of
corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties,
together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
11aysland Orouo, Inc. - 100%
1710 S. 27 Avenue, "2
;,i ami , Florida 33145
P. Lopez (!Director/President) - 33 1/30m
f. Lopez (director,':'ice President) - 33 1/3
J. Alonso (Lirector/Secretary/Treasurer) - 33 1/304
Address for all the above: 1110 S.11. 27 ;;venue, A2
:.iami, Florida 33145
3. Legal description and street address of any teal property (a)
owned by any party listed in answer to question t2, and (b) located within
375 feet of the subject real property. '
Lot 1:9-22, '.lock 4 Maysl and (0-1)
1652-1532 29 Avenue
Nlani, Florida
OWNER OR l,TTOAqEY FOR GVNER
S= OF AAA ) S5:
CCMM GF DADE )
,f�l.c�sp. �u 1 , being duly sworn, deposes and
says that ne is the (Gwnerl (Attorn tar Owner) of the real prooerty
described in answer to question #l, above; that he has read the foregoing
answers and that the same are true and oplete; and (if acting as attorney
for owner) that he has authority to execute this. Disclosure of Ownership
form on behalf of the owner.
-77 • (1Ci )
(CJa'ite �
berore me this
day of i t 1 V1 IV
Notary Punlic„ itace.+or.
Florida at L*et 10680
::'try. = ..:'ic. �:i?a ;'-...�4a .�::.•' � - /
•1Y arar.:m�ss�on iExoues ... �-• .:1 (�%
:•ncea :... ; 's
.,_anci:ocarY �ruKaraKq
SS:
�UT�TY or =E )
being duly sw= deposes and
air,.%nat -he is the Duly appo=tec of .... ..,.... :.,C.
he owner of the real property descts.oeo i.n answer to question #l, acoves
-,at he has reed the foregoing answers; that the same are true and com-
;fete; and that he has the authority to execute this Disclosure of owner-
:hip ,form on behalf bf the owner.
hame�
Wrn"v TO PAID 5tJF5CfcIBED
More me this
gay of :: Ti98`I .
Notary ?uollce Slate or
Flbrida at Large,
i
MY COMMISSICA: MWIRES :
L ;, ge
faa: •
public. state of Flo""
ues J,;ne 25, 1991
r. � �...nm�sslUn =• � atoKotM�18 -
t,t � '- ants Nctacy.
3on��o taro A+
M
Note: The Florida Department of Community
Affair's Report on Objections, Recommendations and
Comments (together with other agency comments)
dated November 6 and November 17, 1989, pertaining
to Items PZ-1, 2, 4, 9, 13 and 14 is included in
Item PZ-1 for brevity.
RESPONSE
TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS'
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENTS
TO PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI
1
Prepared by
The City of Miami Planning Department
December 1989
Y
e.,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
PZ- 4 (4/27/89)"Ormond"
PZ-11 (6/22/89)"City of Miami
PZ-21 (6/22/89)"CBRF
PZ-22 (6/22/89)"DCA Def./L.U.
SECTION II
PZ- 3 (7/27/89)"Gerrits"
PZ-13 (7/27/89)"Coconut Grove"
10680
i.:1
i
SECTION I
DCA
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
TO
CITY OF MIAMI
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENTS
A. OBJECTIONS
DAU
None
IAaal.Y.sis
9J-5.006(2)(a)
Map Amendment No. PZ-4 (Ormond) is not supported by an analysis of the
availability of facilities and services, including traffic
circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste,_ drainage, and potable water,
to serve the proposed land use.
The information provided, stating facilities are available, is
incomplete. There is no analysis to establish current and forecasted
demand on existing facilities and a determination of available
capacity for each facility type.
Rec-ommendation
Include an analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility
type, including traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste,
drainage and potable water to serve the proposed land use.
City of Miami Res ons
The attached "Worksheet for Concurrency Management -- Impact Analysis of
Proposed Change to Land Use Map" for -the PZ-4 (Ormond) amendment contains an
analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility type, including
traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water
to serve the proposed land use. It matches these to the required; adopted
levels of service standards for each facility, and makes a "Concurrency
Checkoff" finding.
NORKSHEET FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHANGE TO LAND USE MAP
:.......................-....--------------.....---.....----------
---------------------------------------------------------;
AMENDMENT INFORMATION ;
CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS
:
.-----------------------------------------------------------------:
.........................................................
: Applicant: Gregg J. Ormond, Esq. (Agent)
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Address: M-899 M.M.4 St.
Population Increment (,000)
0.257
430 i 490 N.M. S.Rlver Drive
Space Requirement, acres
0.334
401-449 N.M. 9 Ave. :
Excess Capacity Before Change
53.97
Boundary Streets:
Excess Capacity After Change
55.64
North: N.M. South River Drive
Concerrency Checkoff
OK
South: N.M. 4 Street
.... --...................................................
:
East: N.M. South River Drive
POTABLE HATER TRANSMISSION
West: N.M. 9 Avenue
Population Increment, Residents
257
Transmission Requirement, gpd
37,368.
Planning District: D. (little Havana)
Excess Capacity Before Change. >2Z
above demand ;
:
Excess Capacity After Change >2Z
above demand
: Maximum lU Intensity:
Concerrency Checkoff
OK
Existing40 DU/acre
...........................................................
: Proposed 100 DU/acre
SANITARY SEVER TRANSMISSION
Population Increment, Residents
257
Net Increment With Change:
Transmission Requirement, gpd
47,545
Population 257 :
Excess Capacity Before Change >21
above demand
Dwelling Units 100
Excess Capacity After Change )2Z
above demand
: Sq.Ft. Floor Space N.A.
Concerrency Checkoff
-----------------------------------------
OK
---------------- .
.
: County Nastevater Collection zone 309
STORM SEVER CAPACITY
Drainage Subcatchment Basin J1
Exfiltration System Before Change
On -site :
Solid Waste Collection Route 18
Exfiltration System After Change
On -site
Concurrency Checkoff
OK
Transportation Corridor Name (1) Civic Center
---------------------------------------------------------�
(2) Dolphin
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
Type (1) HS
Population Increment, Residents
257
(2) HS
Solid Waste Generation, tons/year
329
.---------------------------------------------------------------- .
Excess Capacity Before Change
>600
816NIFICANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES SUPPORTING AMENDMENT:
Excess Capacity After Change
>271 s
:
Concerrency Checkoff
OK
. land Use: 1.1.1 :
---------------------------------------------------------:
i.1.3 :
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
=
1.1.6
Population Increment
257
:
Peak -Period Person -Trip Generation
283
Interpretation of Future Land Use Plan Map
LOS Before Change (1) A
(2) C
LOS After Change (1) A
(2) C
Housing: 1.1.5
Concerrency Checkoff
OK
1.2.7
---------------------------------------------------------:
1.3
ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS
: 1.3.1
Population increment is assumed to be all
new residents.
: 1.3.2
Peak -hour person -trip generation assumed
to be 1.1 per
:
resident. Potable water and wastewater transmission
;
Transportation: 1.4
capacities are in accordance with Metro -Dade
County
1.3.1
stated capacities and are assumed correct.
Service :
connections to water and sewer main% are
assumed to be of:
CIE: 1.2.3
adequate size; if not, new connections to
be installed at:
:
owner's expense. Transportation Corridor
capacities and :
:
LOS from Table PT-2, Data and Analysis.
_
........................---------......--------------------------
'
------------------------------......-x�Im......s
10
The City did not include an analysis of the need for proposed text
Amendment PZ-21, which proposes to eliminate free-standing office and
commercial buildings in the medium density multi -family residential
classification, but allow free-standing medical and dental offices in
the high density multi -family residential classification. An analysis
of the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population
relating to types and intensities of use was not provided.
Demonstrate that the proposed text amendment is consistent with the
existing (or revised) analysis of the amount of land needed to
accommodate the projected population, including the types and
intensities of use.
In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the year 2000.
This growth is only 17,000 persons in ten years or about a 4% increase above
the 1990 projection of 383,000. The City of Miami is unique in that is is
essentially built out. Only about 6.4% (from MCNP Land Use Data and Analysis)
of its total area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one
acre. In short, Miami is in a redevelopment mode; development on raw acreage
is not a viable option. No analysis has ever been prepared as part of the
MCNP relating the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected
population; to do so would be an exercise in futility.
The issue, therefore, for the City of Miami is not the amount of land or the
categories and acreage of land use needed to accommodate projected
populations, but, what is the appropriate mix of uses and scale of
redevelopment most compatible with medium and high density residential
development. At a density up to 40 dwelling units per acre in medium density
residential, the intent is to accommodate a judicious limited mix of uses
within the residential buildings at that scale. In the high density
residential areas, at densities from 40 to 100 dwelling units per acre the mix
of uses would accommodate free-standing hospitals and nursing homes; therefore
free-standing medical and dental office buildings would also appear to be
appropriate at that scale of redevelopment.
The City did not include an analysis of the need for
the proposed land use change for map amendments PZ-4
(Ormond) and PZ-11 (City of Miami). An analysis of the
amount of land needed to accommodate the projected
population, including the categories of the land use
and the proposed land use densities and intensities of
use, the estimated gross acreage by category and the
description of the methodology used.
Include an analysis of the proposed land use as it
relates to the amount of land needed to accommodate the
projected population, including the densities and
intensities of use and how they meet estimated gross
acreage needed by category.
In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the
year 2000. This growth is only 17,000 persons in ten years or
about a 4% increase above the 1990 projection of 383,000. The
City of Miami is unique in that it is essentially built out.
Only about 6.4% (MCNP Land Use Data and Analysis) of its total
area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one
acre. The issue, therefore, for the City of Miami, is not the
amount of land or the categories and acreage of land use needed
to accommodate projected populations, but, what population change
would result from proposed changes to the Plan Map. Changes in
densities resulting from changes in land use would affect the
City's population growth projections.
PZ-4 (Ormond): Because of Miami's unique situation, the land
development needs for the City must be met primarily through the
redevelopment of existing underutilized parcels and vacant
tracts. The lack of large tracts of undeveloped land,
furthermore, requires property development to focus primarily on
the revitalization of depressed or declining areas and the
stabilization and maintenance of more stable neighborhoods.. One
method to plan for growth is through increases in land
development intensities.
As the Planning Fact Sheet (Attachment 1D) indicates, future high
density development and redevelopment is anticipated and expected
in areas east of NW 8th Avenue, presently designated
"Residential -Multifamily High Density". The subject block, west
of NW 8th Avenue, if redesignated to the same "Residential -
Multifamily High Density", would serve to create a larger base
for this redevelopment area, increasing the chances of realizing
areawide revitalization. Furthermore, because of the subject
block's location diagonally opposite the Victoria Hospital, the
development, brought about by redesignation, could stimulate
lower intensity revitalization west of NW 8th Avenue as well.
This land use change would be consistent with the pattern of
similar "Residential -Multifamily High Density" areas along the
Miami River Corridor.
- 3 - IZ
The "Analysis of Proposed Plan Amendment (Attachment 1B)
indicates that the proposed land use change, if utilized to the
maximum intensity permitted under the requested zoning, would
increase the potential density by 100 families or approximately
257 persons (the 1980 Census estimated 2.57 persons per family).
Though an increase in intensity is permitted through this land
use change, the percentage distribution of residential land use
area compared to other land uses, (i.e. commercial, industrial,
institutional/ public, recreational, transportation/ utilities),
remains unchanged.
PZ-11 (City of Miami): The density, for this parcel, has been
scaled back to reflect the predominant dwelling unit type as a
response to the recognition of an existing viable single family
neighborhood. The present "Residential - Duplex" land use
designation would allow the area to increase from its current
single family density of 9du/acre to 18du/acre. At 14.5 acres,
the land use change would reduce the future population projection
by 130 families or 334 persons. Though a decrease in the
potential intensity will result through this land use change, the
percentage distribution of residential land use area compared to
other land uses, (i.e. commercial, industrial, institutional/
public, recreational, transportation/ utilities), remains
unchanged.
The overall impact on the City from both land use amendments
would be a net decrease of 30 families or 77 persons from the
total projected population of 400,000 persons through the year
2000. The acreage distribution of residential land use versus
other land use categories remains unchanged.
None
B. COMMENTS
The City should take the Metro -Dade Planning Department's
comments into consideration when addressing the objections
to Map Amendment PZ-4 (Ormond).
1
_4_ 13
HOUSING ELEMENT
A. OBJECTIONS
None.
Analysis
1. 9J-5.010(2)(f)4.
The proposed changes to the terms in the Land Use Categories for
Community Based facilities. in Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4 and
1.3.5 are not supported by description of the need for such as they
relate to the specific requirements of HB 1269. The City has not
provided definitions for new Community Based Facility terms. Also,
the language added to Housing Element Objective 1.3 and 1.3.4,
"subject to the requirements to the Zoning Ordinance, may make the
standards more restrictive for the Community Based Residential
Facilities (see the South Florida Regional Planning Council comments
dated September 6, 1989).
Recommendation
Include an analysis based on and consistent with the requirements of
HB 1269 to support those changes to the Housing Element objectives,
policies and land use categories and ensure that they are consistent
with the intent of this law. Explain and define new terms in the Land
Use Categories. Include an explanation of "subject to the
requirements and limitations to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that
this addition will not make the standards for Community Based
Facilities more restrictive.
(Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
Goals. Objectives and Policies
Proposed text amendments to Housing Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4
and 1.3.5 appear to be inconsistent with HB 1269 requirements for
Community residential homes. The City changed terms for Community
residential home types, however, they did not include the change in
terms in Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4. Also, the language in Policy
1.3.5 which states "and evaluated to determine the impact of allowing
and amended, where warranted" is unclear.
16680
l-8811W:1�.
Include an analysis of the changes in Housing Element Objective 1.3
and Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 to establish consistency with HB 1269.
If the analysis reveals that the objective and policy changes are not
consistent with HB 1269, then the City should make appropriate
revisions to these policies to ensure they are consistent with this
law. Community residential terms should be consistent between the
land use categories and Housing Objective and Policy. Include
clarification of language "and evaluated to determine the impact of
allowing and amended, where warranted".
(Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
B. COMMENTS
The City should review the South Florida Regional Planning Council
comments and take them into consideration when addressing the
responses to the above Housing Element objections. Also, the
Department encourages the City to coordinate with the South Florida
Regional Planning Council in order to ensure that their concerns are
resolved in regard to this matter.
City of Miami Response
The DCA objections, recommendations and comments are appropriate; this
proposed amendment was fashioned in May and June, 1989, and passed 1st reading
June 22, 1989, to reflect the then - policy of the City Commission and before
the Governor had allowed HB 1269 to become law. Recognizing that HB 1269
would become law, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 10646 (attached) on,
September 28, 1989, effective October 28, 1989, which is a comprehensive
amendment to Zoning Ordinance 9500 in conformity with HB 1269. The
corresponding changes have now been made in PZ-21 to bring the MCNP into
conformity with HB 1269. The following changes have been made in response to
objections, recommendations and comments:
1. The range of Community Based Residential Facilities has been defined
and brought into conformity with HB 1269.
A definition of "Community -Based Residential Facilities" has been
added to the Land Use Element under the interpretation of the Future
Land Use Plan Map, as follows:
"A community based residential facility provides room (with or without
board) resident services and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a
facility functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category
includes adult congregate living facilities; facilities for physically
disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled
persons, for non -dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent
- 6 -
iosso � 5
children, as licensed by the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services (FHRS); and residential facilities for alcohol
and drug rehabilitation and juvenile and adult residential
correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed and
approved by an authorized regulatory agency."
Specific conformity to HB 1269 is now evidenced by the revised Zoning
Ordinance (see Ordinance 10646 attached). The Zoning Ordinance has
been amended so that community -based residential facilities, as
defined, for 6 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or
correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in all
residential zoning districts and that community -based residential
facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or
correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in two family
and multi family zoning districts.
2. Objective 1.3 and Policv 1.3.4 have been clarified and Policy 1.3.5
has been eliminated so that the descriptive phase "subject to the
requirements and limitations of the Zoning Ordinance" has been
eliminated as pertains to Community Based Residential Facilities, as
follows:
"Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of
housing in non -isolated residential areas for group--Rouges-and
community -based residential facilities and foster care facilities
(including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services). adult emigrevate livimg facilitie.,
i�fl71/ 7 1■1�III AR *! i1 R � l � lw � i � t i L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ It
"Policy 1.3.4: The City will continue to assist in the development of
9.cup —lie community -based residential facilities and foster care
facilities, and ACLF's for low -and moderate -income residents through
its existing housing programs
lifflitatiems of the Vidimamee."
3. Policy 1.3.5 has been eliminated so
evaluated to determine the impact
warranted" has been also eliminated.
Policy 1.3.5 read, as follows:
that the descriptive phase."and
of allowing and amended, where
"Policy 1.3.5. The City's zoning ordinance will be reviewed and
amended, where warranted, so that family homes (group homes which
provide room and board, personal care, rehabilitation service, and
supervision in a family. setting to be occupied by not more than eight
(8) related or unrelated persons who are developmentally disabled,
mentally impaired, physically handicapped or elderly) be allowed as a
permitted use in all residential neighborhoods and that a group home
(occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use
in all residential neighborhoods and that a family group home
(occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use
in all residential neighborhoods other, than single-family (where it
shall be allowed on a special use basis),''
The Zoning Ordinance has been amended so that community -based
residential facilities, as defined, for 6 clients or less, but not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are
permitted in all residential zoning districts and that community -based
residential facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug,
alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in
two family and multi family zoning districts.
At the public hearing of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC)
on September 6, 1989, City staff orally concurred with SFRPC's comments. It
is believed that all of the SFRPC concerns have been addressed.
DRAINAGE S LE FMFNT
A. OBJECTIONS
I. 91_-5011(2)(62.d.
Proposed amended Policy 2.1.3 does not include a quality standard for
the revised level of service for drainage.
Recommendation
Revise proposed amended Policy 2.1.3 (drainage level of service) to
include performance standards for water quality and flood control.
Appropriate local and state regulations specifying stormwater quality
standards should be adopted by reference to specific regulations as
they exist on the date the plan amendment is adopted as an integral
part of the drainage LOS standard to measure performance of systems
- which are designed to remove pollutants from run-off. Appropriate
regulations specifying ambient ;,ater quality standards should be
referenced to protect and prevent further degradation of surface and
groundwaters (by run-off).
! City of Miami Response
Section 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2.d cited above under A. OBJECTIONS appliies to level
of service standards for potable water facilities, not drainage facilities.
We believe that the citation is a typographical error, and that Section
9J5.0011(2)(c)2.c was intended.
I
The provisions of Chapter 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2 regarding level of service (LOS)
standards for drainage facilities require the adoption of LOS standards for
"c. Design storm frequency for drainage facilities capacity". No mention is
made of water quality standards as a requirement of the drainage LOS.
- 8 - 19
Maintenance of water quality standards for stormwater drainage is adressed in
the City's Comprehensive Nieghborhood Plan in the following Goals, Objectives,
and Policies of the Sanitation and Storm Sewers sub -element: Goal 2;
Objective 2.2; Policies 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, and 2.2.5. In future
revisions or additions to these policies, the City will consider the DER
request that water quality standards be referenced. However, the City
declines to include them in its adopted LOS standard at this time.
B. COMMENTS
The City should take the Department of Environmental Regulation's
comments into consideration when addressing the above 9J-5.001
(2)(02.d objection.
Although there is an implication in the revised Policy 2.1.3 that the
"20% of the system brought to standard" applies to the existing
drainage system, it would be helpful for clarification purposes if the
revised Policy 1.2.3 [sic] was rewritten to include "20% of the
existing system".
The City will add the word "existing" as requested, causing the proposed
amended policy to read as follows:
Policy 2.1.3: Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance
with a drainage level of service standard of a one -in -five-year storm
event. For the entire storm drainage system as a whole, witfiim the —City,
20—percent of the existing
system will be de i gored--fer brought to a standard of a one -
in -five-year storm event by the year 2000.
TAL_MANAGEMENTT ELEMENT
A. OBJECTIONS
Data
None
Analysis
1. U-5.012(0 1.
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase density in what
appears to be within the hurricane vulnerability zone. The City did
not provide a reassessment of its hurricane evacuation plan in regard
to the impacts resulting from this increased density, specifically,
additional persons requiring evacuation, evacuation routes, and any
special needs of the elderly or handicapped relating to this land use
change.
ioseo 18
-9-
The City needs to include a reassessment of their Hurricane Evacuation
Plan, -including all items listed in the above objection as a result of
the increased density by the proposed map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond).
The reassessment should include impact on hurricane evacuation times.
The amendment should not be adopted unless hurricane evacuation times
are maintained or reduced.
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is not located within the Hurricane Vulnerability
zone (see attached Figure IV.2: "Hurricane Vulnerability Zone"); therefore,
this Objection and Recommendation is not applicable (see map attached).
Goals. ObJectives. and Policies
2. 9J_-5,012(3)(b
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase from a multi -family
medium density use, which allows 40 units per acre, to a multi -family
high density use, which allows 40-100 units per acre. The proposed
amendment is located within the vicinity of the Miami River. The map
that the City included identifying the Coastal High Hazard Area is
unclear; therefore, it is difficult to determine whether this land use
change is located within the 9J-5.003(13) definition of the Coastal
High Hazard Area, which includes the V-Zone.-
Recommendation
The City should not encouraoe increases in density within the Coastal
High Hazard Area. Include information identifying whether map
amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is, or is not, located within the FEMA V-Zone.
If this amendment is located with FEMA V-Zone, which identifies the
Coastal High Hazard Area, the City should not allow an increase in
density.
City of Miami Response
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is not located within the Coastal High Hazard Area
(FEMA V-zone -- see attached Figure IV.3: Areas Subject to Coastal Flooding
and High Hazard Flood Areas:); therefore, this Objection and Recommendation is
not applicable (see map attached).
3. 9J-5.013(3)(b)7 and (3)(67.
The proposed changes to Policy 4.1.2 to address the Coastal High
Hazard Area must include the area within the V-zone and that seaward
of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The City proposes only.[to]
include the V-zone except on Virginia Key, which would use the Coastal
Construction Control Line.
10680
-10-
1w a 4w
o A
F
•
`TAM 1 COMPREHENSIVE N E OD PLAN
. iGH�C3R�-i0
W% iii►uuiu+m�uuau�m�mi, Ilt
one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
REPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREMENS!vi
PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED SY CHAPTER 84-147LAWS (IF FLORITIA AND AOMINISTEREO Rv THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Cn1.1MUNllr. AFFAI`
2-0
RRgommendatiorb
Revise Policy 4.1.2 to include all areas of the City that are within
the FEMA V-Zone, including Virginia Key.
City of Miami Response
(See Response provided after COMMENTS below.)
B. COMMENTS
The City should take the specific comments by the Department of
Natural Resources into consideration when revising Coastal Management
Policy 4.1.2.
Cry of Miami Responsg
The only part of the City of Miami's coastline that has a designated Coastal
Construction Control Line (CCCL) is the Atlantic Ocean coast of Virginia Key;
therefore, that coastline was specifically identified in the proposed amended
Policy 4.1.2. It appears, however, that the wording as proposed by the City
is not clear to those who might be unaware of this local situational fact.
Therefore, the City will revise the proposed amended Policy 4.1.2 to make
clear that the FEMA "I" zone aplies to all the City's coastline except on
Virginia Key, where there is also a CCCL, causing the proposed amended Policy
4.1.2 to read before and after the change as follows:
Before change of wording:
Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment
conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area-
_L -_ �_r __1 -- 1' -- -.--- _�__� _r__J -- nvn k.. +-hn CnAm"ni
}
see map attached).
After change of wording:
Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment
conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area..
tJ--J.C.-A kill, nft ku +hn pericnal
a
- V
V
y A
>
ga
A.
i
ao
s
a
y
g
o
=
o
a
�
m
D
IV. 0
N
10680
MIAM I COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
one mile (CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRE•ARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIOA UNDER THE LOCAL GO:ERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 114•I67LAWS OF TI.ORIOA AND ADMINISTERED BY NIE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT or rOfAMUNIfY AFFAIRS
AT-rnnue4GA1T G.. ..
a
V V i
•.i
Z
'
> >
A y
Z
S• Q AWE
>
Z
CA
Om
N f
�SnI
v =
y
cn
= C
Q
93
� a
_
,a
> Ri
N C7
i SUIT AVL
> -4
v <
a -
i0
-n
A
O
�6 0
>
p
3 =
O SW, or AWL
cn
>>1
o
_
111
A
i
• is i
O
I
_
;.aL
-
•'_�
Y.W AT AVE
y
i I.7Q
<p
^a
M
a.
A . ~ i •fca+Aa
Z s iy°
Z > .J
z H .� f
off: = S
zz
—Q
z
10680
MIAM1 COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
// aiim�ammmia�mimm
one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GO.ERNMENT COTAPREMENSIVE
PLANNING Aq`pTANCE PgOGFIAM-AUTHORIZED BY CHAPtFq RA-+F7LAWS OF FI.OnJOA AND ADUINIStERED BY rHE FLORIDA OEPARTMENt of rommumtY AFFAIRS
I I I I III
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
A. OBJECTIONS
None
Analysis
None
Goals. Objectives. and Policies
1. 9J-5.016(3)(04.
Revised Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 does not include a quality
standard for the Drainage Level of Service.
Recommendation
Revise Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 to include a water quality
standard for the Drainage LOS. This revised policy should be
consistent with the Drainage Policy 2.1.3.
City of Miami Response
See response to "Drainage Sub -Element", preceding.
B. COMMENTS
None
CONSISTENCY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
REGIONAL POLICY PLAN AND WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A. OBJECTIONS
1. 9J-5.021
The following proposed amendments are inconsistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan (187.291, F.S.)
locao
- 1z - 23
a) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, which establishes a Coastal High Hazard
Area which is not consistent with Rule 9J-5.003(13) F.A.C., definition
and map amendment PZ-4, %-.hich possibly allows increased density in a
Coastal High Hazard Area, are inconsistent with Policy (7)(b) 24 and
25 which state "require local governments, in cooperation with
regional and state agencies, to prepare advance plans for the safe
evacuation of coastal residents" and "require local governments, in
cooperation with regional and state agencies, to adopt plans and
policies to protect public and private property and human lives for
the effects of natural disasters".
Recommendation
Revise the Coastal High Hazard designation to be consistent with the
9J-5.003(13) definition and ensure that an increase in density does
not occur within the Coastal High Hazard area.
City of Miami Response
(See response to "Coastal Management Element", preceding.)
2. Proposed text amendment PZ-22, relating to the revised Drainage LOS
does not include a quality standard and would result in additional
negative impacts on the surrounding water bodies and marine and other
natural resources. Therefore, proposed text amendment PZ-22 is
inconsistent with Policies (8) (10) and (12) which state "Protect
surface and groundwater quality and quantity in the state and
"eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated stormwater runoff
into the waters of the state" -and Policies (9)(b)5,6, and 7 which
state "Protect coastal resources, marine resources, and dune systems
from the adverse effects of development", "Encourage land and water
uses which are compatible with the protection of sensitive coastal
resources", and "protect and restore long-term productivity of marine
fisheries habitat and other aquatic resources".
Recommendation
Include a water quality standard in the City's revised level of
service standard for drainage.
City of Miami Response
(See response to Drainage Sub -Element", preceding.)
3. Proposed text amendments PZ-21, relating to the changes made to
Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4, which address adequate sites in
residential areas for group homes etc... may make the standards for
such more restrictive, therefore, possibly being inconsistent with (5)
(b)1 which states "eliminate public policies which result in housing
discrimination, and develop policies which encourage housing
opportunities for all Florida's citizens."
- Recommendation
Include an explanation of "subject to the requirements and limitations
to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that this language will not make the
standards for Community Based Facilities more restrictive.
City of Miami Response
(See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
REGIONAL POLICY PLAN
A. OBJECTIONS
I. 9J-5.0 1.
a) Proposed text amendment PZ-21, changes to Objective 1.3 and Policy
1.3.4, is inconsistent with Regional Policy 16.1.0 which states
"encourage inclusion of policies in the local government comprehensive
plans which prevent exclusion of group homes and foster care
facilities by zoning."
Recommendation
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
City of Miami Response
(See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
b) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, relating to the designation of the
Coastal High Hazard area and map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) which
possibly proposes an increased density in the Coastal High Hazard Area
are inconsistent with Regional concern relating to growth in high
hazard areas.
Recommendation
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
10680
14 2 5
'itv�, of Miami Response
(See response to "Coastal Management Element preceding).
c) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, does not include a quality standard in
the revised Drainage LOS Policies 1.2.3 and 2.1.3 which is
inconsistent with Regional Policy 37.1.4 which states "individual
drainage system should not adversely impact water quantity or quality
of the surrounding area.
Recommendation
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above -
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
City of Miami Response
(See response to "Drainage Sub -Element", preceding.)
- 15 -
106130
z(
SECTION II
Mav amendments PZ- 3 (7/27/89)"Gerrits
* PZ-13 ,(7/27/89)"Coconut Grove"
* The Department of Community Affairs had no objections,
recommendations, or comments to this map amendment.
SECTION II
DCA
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
TO
CITY OF MIAMI
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENTS
A. OBJECTIONS
None.
COMMENTS
Proposed map amendment PZ-3 proposes to allow a general
commercial land use in a residential area which is
potentially an incompatible commercial use with the
surrounding neighborhood uses. The City has stated
that this land use change is supported by Future Land.
Use Objective 1.2 which requires the City to promote
the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted,
declining, or threatened commercial and industrial
areas. However, the City should include more
information concerning why this land use amendment is
consistent or supported by Future Land Use Objective
1.2 (identifying it as a blighted area and providing a
specific explanation for how this change will promote -
revitalization and redevelopment in the area). Also,
demonstrate that this would ensure compatibility with
the surrounding uses. The Department suggests the City
include an analysis of how the amendment PZ-3 parcel
would be developed pursuant to local land development
regulations and special conditions in order to ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses.
The subject parcel, as stated in Attachment 6B of the City's
Amendment Transmittal to DCA, is located.in the Wynwood Community
Development (`CD) Target Area. The socio-economic characteristics
of the area.qualified Wynwood as a CD Target Area, providing
resources to improve the quality of its residential and economic
environment through, among others, commercial rehabilitation.
10680
28
The MCNP Data and Analysis identifies characteristics that
demonstrate the declining nature of the area and the need for
revitalization. For instance, this area of Wynwood experienced a
decrease in population during the 1970-1980 period in the range
of 500 to 1000 residents. The percent of families below the
poverty level during the same period increased as well. In 1970
it was estimated to be between 20% and 30%. By 1980 the
percentage had increased to over 30%. These percentages are well
above the City average of 16.4% in 1970 and 19.9% in 1980. This
trend parallels that of the entire Wynwood Target Area, where
figures show that the civilian labor force decreased by -4.7%
between 1970 and 1980.
One root cause for this decline is the lack of jobs in the area.
As noted in Attachment 6B, the City purchased property from the
owner/applicant to expand Roberto Clemente Park. The property
had been part of the applicant's business site. To mitigate the
impact on this established business and possible loss of jobs,
additional land was needed. The resulting business expansion
effort would serve to stimulate additional employment
opportunities in -the area.
This proposed land use amendment is compatible with the
surrounding uses. The parcels are contiguous to those presently
owned by the applicant and utilized for his business. The
additional parcels would expand an existing business within an
established commercial corridor along NW 2nd Ave. The amendment
would not detract from, nor divide, the currently established
residential neighborhood since the land use to the south is
designated as "Recreation". Any development undertaken by the
applicant to improve the subject parcels will require local land
development regulation permits that ensure compatibility with the
surrounding properties.
A. OBJECTION
None.
B. COMMENTS
Proposed map amendment PZ-3 would eliminate a maximum
of 20 units of medium density multi -family residential
units. It appears the City has limited lands available
to provide for their projected housing needs. The City
should include more analysis of the impacts on the
housing needs for the City as it relates to the
elimination of 20 units of medium density multi -family
residential units.
r ..
- 18 - 23
City of Miami Response
Though the City has limited lands available to generate new
housing units and the City as a whole desires more affordable
housing, the Wynwood Community Development Target Area
experienced an increase in the vacancy rate of existing
residential units during the 1970-1980 period. In 1980, 881
housing units were vacant compared to 525 vacant units in 1970.
This is an increase to 10.78% in 1980 compared to 6.65% in 1970
(MCNP Data & Analysis). The elimination of 20 units by this land
use amendment could be sufficiently absorbed through the existing
vacancies in the area.
Doc:[sys)<comp>dca/orc
12/01/89
=s
30
PH 2 - 32
MIAMI REVIEW
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
Sookle Williams, who on oath says that she is the Vice
President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
ORDINANCE NO. 10680
In the ..... X..X . X........................... Court,
was published In said newspaper in the Issues of
December 21, 1989
Afflant further says that the said Miami Review Is a
newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida,
and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously
published in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as
second class mall matter at the post office In Miami In said
Dade County Florida, for a period of one year next preceding
the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and
offlant f or says that she has neither paid nor promised any
person, r or corporation any discount, rebate, commission
or ref d or the purpose of securing this advertisement for
public tf In the sat .w.paper.
H t . � IQ
::;��` •O� ,6�;m �ar*d�subscribed before me this
27 . daybi ......Decei>1 ' ........ A.D. 19.. 8.9.
net Sanchez
��.•\p.. ary P Ic` tote of Florida Large
�QQ. • . �'
My C�o�rp�t}b�;r dxplfes Jr81e.,$'f�, 1991.
MR 114A"/1/rfir0 R C)1P \\``•
All Intelgeted 061001111111 Will tape 110ti0e thilt 60 thg t4th 60 61
December, 1080, the City Comftlleslon of MIAMI, ROOS, adopted
the foll0wlrrg titled ordinances.
bRGINANC6 Nb.10679
AN EMERGENCY. ORbINANCtISTABUSHINdA
ITS OPERATION IN THE AMOUNT OF, ;
STATE OF FLORIDADEPARTMENt Or;..
Ai, ne ennu A►11r- ABUtCI nbiMllt'i
}
dithWiNCIE NO. INN
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LANq.U3E,MAP LF
WEST 28TH AND 30TH AVENUES, MIAMI, FLORIDA MORE PAR•'
TICULARLY .DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGN';
NATION OF THE SUBJECT` PROPERTY 'PROM DUPLEX RESI•. "
DENTIALTO SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENTIA14 MAKING FINDINGS;';
INSTRUCTING THE .CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT, A;,OOPY,OF
THIS ORDINANCE TO THE AFFECTED'AGENCY; AND PROVID-
ING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE NO.11l
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
MAP, OP THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE.NEIGHSORHOOD PLAN
1989.2000, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY
833.899 NORTHWEST 4TH STREET, 430 AND.490 NORTHWEST
SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, AND 401-449 NORTHWEST 9TH"AVENUE,
MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN),'=
BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT'PROP-;.
ERTY FROM MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TO MULTI -FAMILY. HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; MAKING FIND-
INGS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE -DATE.
ORDINANCE NO.10682
AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO, 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE.CITY OF:.
4TH STREET ANWAPPROXIMATEL•Y 430 AND;490 NORTHWEST;
SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MOIRE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM RG•215 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
TO RG-316 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND
BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO.35
OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF:ORDINANbE NO.
9500 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SEC-
TION 300, THEREOF; .CONTAINING A AEPEALER 'PROVISION
AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO.10683
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF `
ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE_MIAM.I COMPR&-
HENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989.2M, FOR, PROPERTY:
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 146.170 N.W.-35TH.STREET,
MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN),
BY CHANGING THEDESIGNATIONOF THE SUBJECT PROP.
ERTY FROM MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; MAKING FINDINGS;INSTRUCTING
THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT' THIS ' ORDINANCE 'JO THE.,.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; AND PROS
VIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE' AND
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.10804
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING'ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF APPROXIMATELY 145.170 NORTHWEST 35TH STREET, MIAMI,
FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED .HEREIN) FROM
RG•215 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TO CG-1/7 GENERAL 2COMMER-
CIAL BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE NEO-'"
ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 21 OF SAID ZONINGATLAS
MADE APART OF ORDINANCE NO.9500 BY REFERENCE AND
DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300, THEREOF;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIUTY
CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.10865
AN ORDINANCE WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING THE FUTURE
LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED,. "
THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
1989.2000, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3490
AND 35W MAIN HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICUI-.
LARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION.
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM .RESTRICTED. COMMER-
CIAL'AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL`TO`MAJOR PUBLIC
FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES; MAKING FIND-
INGS; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY
OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE AFFECTED AGENCIES; AND
PROVIDING A REPEALER PROVISION„SEVERABILITY CLAUSE .
AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 1
ORDINANCE NO.10686
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING, ATLAS OF:ORDI• '
NANCE NO.9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING'
CLASSIFICATION OF 3490 AND 3500 MAIN HIGHWAY,MIAMI,'
FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM
SPI.2 COCONUT GROVE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND
RS-212 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL TO GU GOVERN-
MENT USE BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING' ALL THE.
NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO.46 OF SAID ZONING
ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY REFER-`
ENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300, THERE•
OF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL-
ITY CLAUSE.
Said ordinances may be Inspected by the public at,the Office of
the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive; Miami, Florida, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays, between the houis'0f 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m.
Iti ,
-
(6235)
MATTY HIRAh
a �"" " CITY CLERK
MIAMI, FLORIDA .
12121 i)8rA+122123M