HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10700t? +
eT~89-809 8
12/7/89
ORDINANCE N0. ~~~~~~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 10644, AS
AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD
PLAN 1989-2000, BY AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF
THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO REFINE THE
DEFINITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE, AND
INDUSTRIAL; AND AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 1.3 AND POLICY 1.3.4 AND DELETING
POLICY 1.3.6 IT PERTAINS TO COMMUNITY BASED
RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES, ADULT CONGREGATE
LIVING FACILITIES, FAMILY HOMES AND FAMILY
GROUP AND GROUP HOMES; AND CORRECTING
SCRIVENER'S ERROR; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK
TO TRANSMIT THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
r
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
1
of June 21, 1989, Item No. 6b, following an advertised hearing
adopted Resolution No. PAH 29-89 by a vote of 8 to 0,
RECOMMENDING Approval, of amending Ordinance No. 10544 as
;.
hereinafter set forth; and
i'
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
i
this. matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
Ordinance No. 10644 as hereinafter set forth:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is hereby amended by
amending the text of said ordinance as follows :`/
LAND USE
Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map
I
_.. ,
~`/ Words and/or figures stricken through sha,].1. be deleted. Underscored. words
and/or figures sha11 be ad~i.ed. The remaln3s~g provisions are now in effect
arx]. remain tulchanged. Asterisks ir~.cate omitted and unchanged material.
Residential -- Single Family: ...
Other p~rmt~•stbi~ permitted~~ land uses within single family
residential areas are supporting services such as ,
publio parks and fami:Lv day Dare faci-~.-ti-es homes for
oh~'-dren and oommunit~-based residential faCi1ities~ (6 clients
~r l,~Q~ no.# including drug alcohol or correctional
,~erab~i~tation facilities) that serve the immediately surrounding
neighborhood or whose scale of activity is one equivalent to a
facility serving the surrounding neighborhood.
1' cvv.a..a..+. V.a. GA7 , ur. V ~. j./ as v.,,vv ~ a vN ..va v.wrr v +r ve.. v.,.. , ...•...... _. ...- w-.-O ----...~.~ _...~. y
- ~ StL'I~ 1.~, d day
na.ra? nP„+Ar~ A.nd a.dttlt da.v Qare centers are permissible in
suitable locations within single family residential areas. Future
publio community parks and recreation facilities serving areas
beyond the immediate neighborhood may also be psrm~ittEtt
permissible in single family residential areas provided that the
capacity of the transportation facility or facilities serving
such areas is sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands
generated by suoh facilities without degrading the level of
service below those LOS standards adopted in the CIE.
Residential -- Duplex: ...
~~ "~~,~mi tt~ " uses are allowed by r~g'~_"~rmi ssible" uses are cax~idates
for inclusion,_~,iect to an interaretation of consisteneg~y t~P Planni„a
~i rP~tor and a grant of sx~ecial exc~tion by the Zonir~ Boas~d .
~~ "A_communi~ based residential faoili pro es room (wit_r or without
- 2 -
~~~~~~
~~var,i i P ~, adult residential correctional. facilities i_nc~ ~i-~ a•~ fwav
c° a..~.icenseti or auaroved ~~+ As~thnri ~Prl rP~~latnry~ Gam,
Other permtss~b3-e permitted land uses within duplex residential
areas are supporting services suoh as ,
public parks , and ,~~ day care favt3.~~s ho a for ehi1~_
and oommuni.ty-based res~,~ r-+:i a. ~~~~1 i ti.F?r~ ( i4 clients ~r .~.ess
not ine~ ~y-1..~ g drug,,, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation
facilities) that serve the immediately surrounding neighborhood
or whose scale of activity is one equivalent to a facility
serving the surrounding neighborhood.
3n~-~germi-t,-tet~ ~IIhi~ Dare
centers and adult day care centers are ~ermi,~ ble in suitable
locations within duplex residential. Future public community
parks and recreation facilities serving areas beyond the
immediate neighborhood may also be permi-t-~ permissible in
duplex residential areas provided that the capacity of the
transportation facility or facilities serving such areas is
sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands generated by
such facilities without degrading the level of service below
those LOS standards adopted in the CZE.
Residential -- Medium Density Multifamily:
Community-based residential facilities C14 clients or less, not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation faQilities
are p-e-~-~~.~- Permissible uses within medium
density multifamily areas include accessory rrei-g'hl~orho~v~r~
eammercial and office activities .~,n the. same building that are
intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of
the immediately surrounding neighborhood. Examples of suoh
commercial activities would include the neighborhood
laundry, and dry cleaning shop,
neighborhood restaurants,
and other small scale personal or professional. service
- 3 -
~~~~~~
~ l
businesses. ,
, Community-
based rest-dert~ai facilities C~,..$-50 clients) child day Dare
centers and adult day ogre centers are pe,~missible in suitable
locations within medium density multifamily residential areas
provided that suoh facilities meet or exceed the rules and
regulations prescribed by state licensing requirements. Future
public community parks and recreation facilities serving areas
beyond the immediate neighborhood may also be p~rrmitte~Y
permissible in medium density residential areas provided that the
capacity of the transportation facility or facilities serving
suoh areas is sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands
generated by such £acilities without degrading the level of
service below those LOS standards adopted in the CIE.
Residential -- High Density Multifamily: ...
Community-based residential facilities (14 clients or less. not
ineludin~ drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation
facilities) are permitted. pErmttt~erY
Permissible uses within high density multifamily areas include
Cvmm~uni-ty accessorv commercial and office activities in the same
bui~ that are intended to serve the retailing and personal
services needs of the nP ghborhood: medical and
dental offices are ,permissible as .principal uses. Cega~t-o
, Community-based
residential facilities C15 + clients). child day care centers..
adult day care centers. hospitals, and i~ursing i~homes may also
be permissible in suitable locations within high density
multifamily residential areas provided that suoh facilities meet
or exceed the rules and regulations prescribed by state licensing
requirements. Future public community parks and recreation
facilities serving areas beyond the immediate neighborhood may
also be pE-c~ permissible in high density residential areas
- 4 -
o~.Q~Q~
provided that the capacity of the transportation facility or
facilities serving such areas is sufficient to handle the
additional traffic demands generated by such facilities without
degrading the level of service below those LOS standards adopted
in the CZE.
Commercial -- Restricted: ...
* * ,~
Other permissible land uses within the restricted commercial
category. include motels and hotels,
residential facilities, offices, medical facilities. major
sports, exhibition or entertainment facilities. Mixed-uses of
oommeroial, office and/or residential are also permissible within
this land use designation.
Office: This land use category accommodates general office uses
related to health services, professional services, and real
estate, banking and other financial services. Residential uses,
up to high density multifamily, including hotels, are also
permissible within this land use category, and limited retail
uses are allowed within these office/residential structures in
designated areas. However, the overall intensity of use in this
category will be significantly less than the CBD category.
---0- -O ~' ~° ~° • wr+~ . .wv-rr yr v.v , .w .w va..r ra vsVVN i i VA VG1 VWi G JL Vlll G f7
adult day care centers, and ifinursing i~homes may also be
permissible in suitable locations within office areas provided
that such facilities meet or exceed the rules and regulations
prescribed by state licensing requirements, and the capacity of
the facility does not exceed 140 persons pex net acre.
Auditoriums, libraries and convention facilities may be
permissible within office areas. Parks and public open spaces,
are also permissible within office areas.
- 5 -
(~14~QQ
,.~,
Industrial: This land use designation applies to both light and
heavy industry as further delineated in the City of Miami's
zoning Dods. Both designations generally permit a w~.de variety
of manufacturing, assembly, repair and storage activities. The
Tight Industry category generally limits uses to industries that
do not generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes,
illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual
impact . ~oekyards rendering forks . smelting and r~£i.ni nos
* * * ii
"HOUSING
Goal 1
Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector
provision of housing in non-isolated residential areas for
gommuni~.y-based residential facilities grnnP-~ro~mes and foster
care facilities (including those funded by the Florida Department
of Health and Rehabilitative Services ).
iWV.L J..L VW V47, WiiK iiV 4~-. Wats iVi ViiV VW~aV+W= Wawa vaav aaw a~w.rvw~/r v~r,
V i ~i--
Policy 1.3.4.: The City will continue to assist in the
development of 9ommunj tom--based residential facilitj es grv~zg
lremes, foster Dare facilities, and ACLF's for low and moderate
income residents through its existing housing programs-strb~~rt
~~
- 6 -
4~LU'74~
'
'
""
t7
IeT
U
t -
* * * ~~
Section 2. In order to correct a scrivener's error, the
west side frontage of LeJeune Road (S.W. 42nd Avenue) from S.W.
2nd Terrace to S.W. 7th Street is designated as Office on the
Future Land Use Plan Map in order to conform with Ordinance
10544.
Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to transmit this
ordinance within 45 days of first reading, and befoxe second
reading, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740
Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, FL., 32399 for 90 day review-and-
oomment.
Seotion 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as
they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. If any part of section, paragraph, clause,
phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected.
Seotion 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty (45)
days after adoption thereof.
PASSED ON FIRST READING HY TITLE ONLY this ~~nra day
of June 1989.
- 7 -
a~~"~~~
a
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING E~ TTfiLE ONLY
~hi~ 11th DAY OF January , 1990.
l
r ~ //
VIER L. SUAREZ, A R
AT S
M Y HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
~~~ ~~
L E. MAXWEL
C IEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
.. ... ~
JO~RGE L :` FERN DEZ
CITY ATTORNEY
JEM/db/M491
- 8 -
01.0'7(J~
r
-\
cFivee
r~~
.
~
SERGIO RODRIGUEZ r`'` y4~ I~~il ,~r,~ 3 ~ FFi ~' 16
Director ~
January 24, 1990 F F ~~ CITY C!_t:f~K
"iT { fir. ~,~!A~r11, FLA.
Mr. Thomas Pelham, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Dear Mr. Pelham:
CESAR H. ODIO
City Manager
The .City of Miami adopted wo amendments to the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan, on Janua y 11, 990. This date is the first adoption
period of the 1990 calendar onsistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the
1987 .Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184(7)
F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011(3), Florida Administrative Code, I am pleased to
transmit:
- Four (4) copies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
1989-2000 Text Amendment Ordinances as adopted, specifically
Ordinance No. 010700 (Attachment 50A) and Ordinance No. 010.701
(Attachment 51A);
- Four (4) copies of the Element(s) amended (Attachment 506 and
516);
- Four (4) copies of the statement indicating the relationship of
the additional changes made by the City not previously reviewed
by- the DCA, to the DCA comments, objections and
recommendations.(Attachment 50C);
- Four (4) copies of the additional changes made in the
amendments not previously reviewed by the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) (Attachment 50D);
- Four (4) copies of the City's "Response to Department of
Community Affairs' Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - December 1989"
(Attachment 50E and 51E);
- One {1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support
documents on which recommendations are. based (Attachment 50F
and 51F);
~V`
PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/1305) 579-6086
Mailing Address - P.O.Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708
r
Mr. Thomas Pelham, Secretary
- Four (4) copies of map, showing correction of "scrivener's
error" in Future Land Use Plan Map (along LeJeune Road between
5W 2nd Terrace and SW 7th Street) (Attachment 50G).
As directed by the DCA in their letter of November 6,,1989, we are forwarding
one (1) copy of these transmittal documents to the Executive Director of the
South Florida Regional Planning Council.
If, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification,
you may contact Joseph McManus at (305)579-6086.
S ncerely,
~~J
Sergio R driguez, Di recto
Plannin Department
SR/HR-RL
Attachments
cc: Guillermo E. Olmedillo, Deputy Director
Planning Department
Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director
Planning Department
Elbert L. Waters, Assistant Director
Planning Department
David Whittington, Chief
Comprehensive Planning Division
Harold Ruck
Comprehensive Planning Division
Robert Lavernia
Comprehensive Planning Division
.~
_ _
~tY 0p~' i ` ~ ~ ~ I V 1.._ I~
SERGIO RODRIGUEZ rw ~_ {~~~ j~~ 3 I pI,S ~: I ~
Director ~
{~ ~.ce~s o~'ro Q
January 24, 1990 ~;~z~ ~~~F'!~ 11P~1<.~F~La'?.
Mr. B. Jack Osterholtr Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Ho llywood Boulevardr Suite #140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
CESAR N. OblO
City Manager
Re: Amendments to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000
Dear Mr. Osterholt:
The .City of Miami adopted two amendments to the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan, on January 11, 1990. This date is the first adoption
period of the 1990 calendar year consistent with Chapter 163.3187(1) of the
1987 Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184
(7)F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011(3), Florida Administrative Code, and the
direction of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to
transmit to you one copy of the transmittal documents submitted to the OCA
.consisting of:
- One (1) copy of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-
2000 Text Amendment Ordinances as adopted, specifically
Ordinance No. 010700 (Attachment 50A) and Ordinance No. 010701
(Attachment 51A);
- One (1) copy of the Element(s) amended (Attachment 506 and
516);
- One (1) copy of the statement indicating the relationship of
additional changes made by the City not previously reviewed by
the DCA, to the DCA comments, objections and recommendations
(Attachment 50C);
- One (1) copy of the additional changes made in the amendments
not reviously reviewed by the Department of Community Affairs
~ (DCA~ (Attachment 50D);
- One (1) copy of the City's "Response to Department of Community
Affairs' Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to Proposed
Comprehensive Plan Amendments - December 1989" (Attachment 50E
and 51E);
PLANNING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/f305) 579-6086
Mailing Address - P.0.8ox 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708
~1`i
r^w~
..
One (i) copy .(for reference purposes only) of the support
documents on which recommendations are based (Attachment 50F
and 51F);
- One (1) copy of map, showing correction of "scrivener's error"
in Future Land Use Plan Map (along LeJeune Road between SW 2nd
Terrace and SW 7th Street) (Attachment 50G).
if, in the 45 day review process, there are points that need clarification,
you may contact Joseph McManus at (305)5796086.
Sincere y,
....__ ._,L...~
Sergio Rodrig ez, Director
Planning Depa tment
'SR/HR-RL
Attachments
- cc: Guillermo E. Olmedillo, Deputy Director
Planning Department
-Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director
Planning Department
Elbert l:. Waters, Assistant Director
Planning Department
David Whittington, Chief
Comprehensive Planning Division
Harold-Ruck
Comprehensive Planning Division
Robert Lavernia
Comprehensive Planning Division
.~-.~ f'~. - ~....~
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
~-, a TER-t3F, F E MEMORANDUM
r~~-.~,....~ . __41
To Matty Hirai ~ ~ - ~~ ~~ , DATE June 2$, 1989 F'LE
Cit Clerk ~, ;
sua,ECr : Transmittal of 1st Reading
- ~~= ~ Plan Amendments to
Department of Community
FROM REFERENCES A f f a i r s
Sergi o z Directo ~/
Plan ng Department ENCLOSURES
Please be advised that, pursuant to your agreement via previous
conversations, this Department will transmit items:
PZ-11
PZ-21
PZ-22
of the City Commission agenda of June 22, 1989 to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA), in Tallahassee, so that
the numerous data and the complex analyses required by
§§1.63.31$4{3)(a)FS and Rule 9J-24 FAC are satisfied.
The DCA will have 90 days to review and return comments following
which these items will be scheduled for 2nd reading.
Please be so kind as to enter this memorandum in your records of
these items.
t'-:; .,
SRI~WMIvh
vh/ 9:;94
ec: David Whittington, Chief
Comprehensive Planning Division
Harold Ruek
50
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ro . Honorable Mayor and Members oarE . ~ `, ~ ~ ~,LE
of the City Commission ~i
sue.rECr Land Use and Housing Amendments
--~ ~ Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
,'~ ;~~~- Plan 1989-2000
FAOM ~` ~',,` rj i /~
~;,; REFERENCES
Cesar H. Odio Item PZ-1? City Commission
a City Manager ENCLOSUAES Agenda of December 14, 1989
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that thA commission adopt the attached ordinance -
Exhibit "B" - amending the lan~l ~~,e and housing elements and land use
classifications of Ordinance I(1~a4, a, amended, the Miami. Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, which lra~ bQpn farther amended on second reacliny with
the concurrence of the Law Department to respond to objectives, recommendations
and comments of the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA).
BACKGR ND:
This proposed amendment was initially fashioned in May and ,June I98~J, and passed
first reading on June 22, 1989, to reflect the then - poiic~y of the- City
Commission on Community Based Residential Facilities and before the Governor had
allowed HB 1269 (Group Homes) to become law. Recognizing that HB 1Z69 would
become law, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 10646 on September ~8, I989,
effective October 28, 1989, which is a comprehensive amendment to Zoning_
Ordinance 9500 in conformity with HB 12G9. The corresponding changes are now
being made to bring the MCNP into conformity with HB 1269.
Attachment
cc: Law Department
Planning Department
o~,o~oo
50-I
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department:
May 19, 1989
PETITION 5b. Consideration of amending Ordinance 10544 Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 by
amending the Housing Element as it pertains to
Community Based Residential Facilities, Adult
Congregate Living Facilities, Family Homes and
Family Group Homes and Group Homes; and the
definition of the land Use Element to refine the
definitions of Residential, Office, and
Industrial, and correcting scrivener's errors.
REQUEST To amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
plan 1989-2000 as it pertains to Community Based
Residential Facilities and the clarify the Land
Use definitions.
BACKGROUND CS/CS/HB 1269 - Community Residential Homes -
has passed both Florida House and Senate and is
expected to be signed by the Governor to become
effective October 1, 1989. If so, Family Care
Homes and Community Residential Haines would be
allowed in residential zoned districts (See.
Attachment).
ANALYSIS These amendments would:
1. Pertaining to Community -Based Residential
Facilities, tie their development to the
r~auirements apci,limitations of the oninq
Ordinance.
2. Refine the residential land use definition
to reflect that immunity Based Residential
Facilities are permissible in the Zoning
Ordinance.
3. Eliminate free-standing office and
commercial buildings in the Medium Density
dultifamily Residential classification but
make free-standing medical and dental
offices permissible in High Density
Multifamily Residential.
4. Clarify that stockyards, and smeltino and
renderi na o 1,~t,~ are exc 1 uded.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. Approval.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting of June 21, 1989, the Planning Advisory
Board adopted Resolution PAB 29-89 by an 8-0 vote, re-
commendinq approval as presented by the Planning De-
partment.
PAB 6/Z1/89
Item ~Sb
~~.0"~0~
a
tment of Community
. Recommendations and
er agency comments)
17, 1989, pertaining
nd 14 is included in
o~~~oa
3
...1
RESPONSE
TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS'
OAJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENTS
TO PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE P?SAN AMENDMENTS
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI
Prepared by
The City of Miami Planning Department
December 1989
U1a'7(~4
4
,~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
PZ- 4 (4/27/89)."Ormond"
PZ-1I (6/22/.89)"City of Miami"
PZ-2I (6/22/89)"CBRF"
PZ-22 (6/2Z/89)"DCA Def.; L.U."
SECTION II
PZ- 3 (7/27/89)"Gerrits"
PZ-13 (7/27/89)'`Coconut Grove"
~~Oi7®~
1
SECTION I
Map Amendments PZ- 4 (4/27/89)"Orntond"
PZ-il (6/22/89)"City of Miami"
Text Amendments PZ-21 (6/22/89)"CBRF"
PZ-22 (6/22/89)"DCA Def.,'L.U."
~~Q~~~
6
SECTION I
DCA
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
TO
CITY OF MIAMI
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
F~ZL13F,~r~Q USE A2dENDMENTS
A. OBJECTIONS
~~
None
A i
I. ,~J-5.006(2.} (a}
Map Amendment No. PZ-4 (Ormond) is not supported by an analysis of the
availability of facilities and services, including traffic
circulation, sanitary sewer, salid waste, drainage, and potable water,
to serve the proposed land use:
The information provided, stating facilities are available, is
incomplete. There is no analysis to establish current and forecasted
demand on existing facilities and a determination of available
capacity for each facility type.
Recommenda~i on
Include an analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility
type, including traffic circulation, sanitary sewer, solid waste,
drainage and potable water to serve the proposed land use.
The attached "Worksheet far Concurrency Management -- Impact Analysis of
Proposed Change to 'Land Use Map" for the PZ-4 (Ormond) amendment contains an
analysis of current and forecasted demand for each facility type, including
traffic~circuiation, sanitary sewer, solid waste., drainage and potable water
to serve the proposed land use. It matches these to the required adopted
levels of service standards for each facility, and makes a "Concurrency
Checkoff" finding.
~1,q'7®~
-1-
YOAKSHEET FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
CITY OF MIAMI PIANNIN9 OEPARTMENi
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHANGE TD lANO U5E MAP
AMENOMENT INFORMATION CONCURREHCY ANALYSIS :
. -----------------------•----•---------.._............-----•------s --•---...-•----.._....------•------------ ---.........--- .
Applicant: 6-egq J. Dreond, Esq. (Agent) RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE :
Address: 933.899 N. N.4 St. Popalation increeent (,000) O.ZS7 .
430 A 490 N.N. S.Rirer Drive : Space Requireunt, tires 0.334 .
: 401.449 N.N. 9 Are. Excess Capacity Before C>tange SS.91
Bounaarv Streets: Extass Capacity After Change 55.b4
Nort1: N. Y. SoutA Rarer Drive Concarrency CAeckoff OK .
5oetb: N.il. 4 Street ----------------------------•------------ ----------_...- .
. East: N. M. Soatk River Drive POTABLE NATEA iAAMSMISSION
Nest: N.N. 9 Arenue Popalation Increaent, Residents 1ST
Transeission Regeireeent, gpd SZ,568
Planning District: 0. (little Hava na) Excess Capacity Before Change >ZS shore deeand
. Excess Capacity After Change >21 abort deeand
Maxieue ~U Intensity: Concarrency Checkoff 01( .
Existing 40 DU/acre ---- --•-----------------•----•------- --------------- .
. Proposes 100 DU/acre SANITARY SEliEA TAANSMISSIDN
. Popalation Increaent, Residents 151
Net Increaent kith Changes Transussion Regeireeertt, gpd 47,545
Population 157 Excess Capacity Before Change >Zi above deeand
. Duelling Units 100 Excess Capacity After Change >1i abort deund
Sq.Ft. Floor Space N. A. Concarrency CAeckoff OX
County Yastevater Collection Iona 309 : STORM SEMEA CAPACITY
Drainage SubtatcAaent Basin J1 : E:filtration Systee Before Change On-site
Solid Maske Collection Rote !8 Exfiltration Systee Attar Change On-site .
• Concarrency CAeckoff OK '
transportation Corridor Mau (1) Ciric Center •-----••----• ............................. ................
. (Z) Dolphin SDLID HASTE COLLECTION
Type (1) HS Popalation Increaent, Residents 2Sl .
. (1) HS Solid Yaste 6enerauon, tons/year 329
........................ .......................: Excess Capacity Before %Aange >600
SI6HIFICANT MCNP GOALS. OBJECTIVES, POl1CI ES SUPPORTING AMENDMENT: Excess Capacity After Change >ZT1
• : Concarrency Chectotf OK
. land Use: 1.1.1 -------------------------•---------------- -------------- .
1.1.3 ; TRAFFIC CIRCUTAitOM
i. I.6 Popalation Increaent 151 .
. Peak•Period Person trip Generation 283
Interpretation of Futere land Use Plan Map l05 Before CAange (1) A (Z) C
• lOS After CAange (1) A (Z) C
Housing: 1.1.5 Concarrency Checkoff 0[ .
1.1.7 ---------------------------•--•----------- -•--•------....;
. 1.3 ASS1!lIPTIONS AND COMMENTS
I.3.t Popalation increeent is assneed to be all ner residents.
1.3.2 Peak-Ioer person-trip generation assaeed t o be 1.1 per :
• : resident. Potable rater and rasterater tr inseission :
Transportation: 1.4 capacities are in accordance ritb Matro-Da da County :
• l.S.t stated capacities and are assaeed correct. Serrate .
: COeeeCtl0n4 t0 Yiter and Slyer ea1nS are a 5faeed t0 b$ Of:
: CIE: 1.1.3 : adegeate sits; if not, ner connections to ba iestalled at:
: : owner's expenses. Transportation Corridor capacities and s
1.OS froe table PT-1, Oates and Anaj~so,~~~
v ..ii.. ;
~~
7
s
i
Z. 9J-5.OO6tS12.
The City did not include an analysis of the need for proposed text
Amendment PZ-21, which proposes to eliminate free-standing office and
commercial buildings in the medium density multi-family residential
. classification, but allow free-standing medical and dental offices. in
the high density multi-family residential classification. An analysis
of the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population
.relating to types and intensities of use was not provided.
Recommgndation
Demonstrate that the proposed text amendment is consistent with .the
existing (or revised) analysis of the amount of land needed to
accommodate the projected population, including the types and
intensities of use.
In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the year 2000.
This growth is only 11,000 persons in ten years or about a. 4% increase above
the 1990 projection of 383,000. The City of Miami is unique in that is is
essentially built out. Only about 6.4~ (from MCNP Land Use Oata and. Analysis).
of its total area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one
acre. In short, Miami is in a redevelopment mode; development on raw acreage
is not a viable option. No analysis has ever been prepared as part of the
MCNP relating the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected
population; to do so would be an exercise in futility.
The .issue, therefore, for the City of Miami is not the amount of land or the
categories and acreage of land use needed to accommodate projected
populations, but, what is the appropriate mix of uses and scale of
redevelopment most compatible with medium and high density residential.
development. At a density up to 40 dwelling units per acre in medium density
residential, the intent is to accommodate ~a judicious limited mix of uses
within the residential buildings at that scale. In the high density
residential areas, at densities from 40 to 100 dwelling units per acre the mix
of uses would accommodate free-standing hospitals and nursing homes; therefore
free-standing medical and dental office buildings would also appear to be
appropriate at that scale of redevelopment.
3. 9J-5.006(211c1
The City did not include an analysis of the need for
the proposed land use change for map amendments PZ-4
(Ormond) and PZ-11 (City of Miami). An analysis of the
amount of land needed to accommodate the projected
population, including the categories of the land use
and the proposed .land use densities and intensities of
use, the estimated gross acreage by category and the
description of the methodology used.
~10'74~
-2- ~ ~1
Include an analysis of the proposed land use as it
relates to the amount of land needed to accommodate the
projected population, including the densities and
intensities of use and how they meet estimated gross
acreage needed by category.
In terms of population, Miami is expected to reach 400,000 by the
year 2000. This growth is only 17,000 persons in ten years or
about a 4$ increase above the 1990 projection of 383,000. The
City of Miami is unique in that it is essentially built out.
Oniy about 6.4~ (MCNP Land Use Data and Analysis) of its total
area is vacant, consisting primarily of parcels smaller than one
acre. The issue, therefore, for the City of Miami, is nvt the
amount of land or the categories and acreage of land use needed
to accommodate projected populations, but, what population change
would result from proposed changes to the Plan Map. Changes in
densities resulting from changes in land use would offset the
City's population growth projections.
PZ-4 (Ormond) : Because of Miami ' s unique s ituation, the land
development needs for the City must be met primarily through the
redevelopment of existing underutilized parcels and vacant
tracts. The lack of large tracts of undeveloped land,
furthermore, requires property development to focus primarily on
the revitalization of depressed or declining areas and the
stabilization and maintenance of more stable neighborhoods. One
method to plan for growth is through increases in land
development intensities.
As the Planning Fact Sheet (Attachment 1D) indicates, future high
density development and redevelopment is anticipated and expected
in areas cast cf NW 8th Avenue, presently designated
"Residential-Multifam.~ly High Density". The subject block, west
of NW 8th Avenue, if redesignated to the same "Residential-
Multifamily High Density", would serve to create a larger base
for this redevelopment area, increasing the chances of realizing
areawide revitalization. Furthermore, because of the subject
block's location diagonally opposite the Victoria Hospital, the
development, brought about by redesignation, could stimulate
lower intensity revitalization west of NW 8th Avenue as w®11.
This land use change would be consistent with the pattern of
similar "Residential-Multifamily High Density" areas along the
Miami River Corridor.
~ ~®"~o ~
- 3 - ~~
The "Analysis of Proposed Plan Amendment" (Attachment 1B)
indicates that the proposed land use change, if utilized to the
maximum intensity permitted under the requested zoning, would
increase the .potential density by 100 families or approximately
257 persons (the 1980 Census estimated 2.57 persons per family).
Though an increase in intensity is permitted through this land
use change, the percentage distribution of residential land use
area compared to other land uses, {i.e, commercial, industrial,
institutional/ public, recreational, transportation/ utilitiesf,
remains unchanged.
PZ-11 fCity off' Miamil: The density, for this parcel, has been
scaled back to reflect the predominant dwelling unit type as a
response to the recognition of an existing viable single family
neighborhood. The present "Residential - Duplex" land use
designation would allow the area to increase from its current
single family density of °du/acre to 18du/acre. At .14.5 acres,
the land use change would reduce the future population projection
by I30 families or 334 persons. Though a decrease in the
potential intensity will result through this land use change, the
percentage distribution of residential land use area compared to
other land uses, {i.e. commercial, industrial, institutional/
public, recreational, transportation/ utilities, remains
unchanged.
The overall impact on the City from both land use amendments
would be a net decrease of 30 families or 77 persons from the
total projected population of 400,000 persons through the year
2000. The acreage distribution of residential land use versus
other land use categories remains unchanged.
Goals. Obj~ct~~:es and Policies
None
B. COMMENTS
The City should take the Metro-Dade Planning Department's
comments into consideration when addressing the objections
to Map Amendment PZ-4 (Ormond).
!11 (-"JLll1
...,.~
HOUSING ELEMENT
A. OBJECTIONS
None.
Analysis
1. 9J-5,010(21(f)4,
The proposed changes to the terms in the Land Use Categories for
Community Based facilities in Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4 -and
1.3.5 are not supported by description of the need for such as they
relate to the specific requirements of HB 1269. The City has not
provided definitions far new Community Based Facility terms. Also,
the language added to Housing Element Objective 1.3 and 1.3.4,
"subject to the requirements to the Zoning Ordinance," may make the
standards more restrictive for the Community Based Residential
Facilities (see the South Florida Regional planning Council comments
dated September 6, 1989).
Recommendation
Ineiude an analysis based on and consistent with the requirements of
H8 1269 to support those changes to the Housing Element objectives,
policies and land use categories and ensure that they are consistent
with the intent of this law. Explain and define new terms in the Land
Use Categories. Include an explanation of "subject to the
requirements and limitations to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that
this addition will not make the standards for Community Based.
Facilities more restrictive.
City of Miami Response
(Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.}
GQa1s. Ob_iectiv~s and Policies
2. 9J-5,OI0(3)(b)4, and 9J-5.010(3)(c)6.
Proposed text amendments to Housing Objective 1.3 and Policies 1.3.4
and 1.3.5 appear to be inconsistent with HB I269 requirements for
Community residential homes. The City changed terms for Community
residential home types, however, they did not include the change in
terms in Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4. Also, the language in Policy
1.3.5 whith states "and evacuated to determine the impact of allowing
and amended, where warranted" is unclear.
oa~o~~o
-5-
~~
~,_ „~
Include an analysis of the changes in Housing Element Objective 1.3
and Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 to establish consistency with HB 1259.
If the analysis reveals that the objective and policy changes are not
consistent with HB 1269, then the City should make appropriate
revisions to these policies to ensure they are consistent with this
law. Community residential terms should be consistent between the
land use categories and Housing Objective and Policy. Include
clarification of language "and evaluated to determine the impact" of
allowing and amended, where warranted".
(Response provided at the end of this HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
B. COMMENTS
The City should review t1
comments and take them
responses to the above
Department encourages the
Regional Planning Council
resolved in regard to this
ie South
i nt0 Ci
Housing
City to
i n order
matter.
Florida Regional Planning Council
msideration when addressing the
Element objections. Also, the
coordinate with the South Florida
to ensure that their concerns are
The OCA objections, recommendations and comments are appropriate; this
proposed amendment was fashioned in May and June, 1989, and passed 1st reading
June 22, 1989, to reflect the then - policy of the City Commission and before
the Governor had allowed HB 1269 to become law. Recognizing that HB 1269
would become law, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 10646 (attached) on,
September 28, 1989, effective Octobe^ 28, 1y87, which is a comprehensive
amendment to Zoning Ordinance 9500 in conformity with HB 1269. The
corresponding changes have now been made in PZ-21 to bring the MCNP into
conformity with HB 1269. The following changes have been made in response to
objections, recommendations and comments:
1.' The range of Community Based Residential Facilities has been defined
and brought into conformity with HB 1269.
A definition of "Community-Based Residential Facilities" has been
added to the Land Use Element under the interpretation of the Future
Land Use Plan Map, as follows:
"A community based residential facility provides room (with or without
board) resident services and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a
facility functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category
includes adult congregate living facilities; facilities for physically
disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled
persons, for non-dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent
~~~~~~
/~
~~.
;~~~
children, as licensed by the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services (ERRS); and residential facilities for alcohol
and drug rehabilitation and juvenile and adult residential
correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed and
approved by an authorized regulatory agency."
Specific conformity to HB 1269 is now evidenced by the revised Zoning
Ordinance (see Ordinance 10646 attached). The Zoning Ordinance has
been amended so that community-based residential facilities, as
defined, for 6 clients or Less, but not including drug, alcohol or
correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in all
residential zoning districts and that community-based residential
facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug, alcohol or
correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in two family
and multi family zoning districts.
2. Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4 have been clarified and Policy 1.3.5
has been eliminated so that the descriptive phase "subject to the
requirements and limitations of the Zoning Ordinance" has been
eliminated as pertains to Community Based Residential Facilities, as
follows:
"Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of
housing in non-isolated residential areas for g~rotrg-herrter-end
~ommuni~y-based rpsidentia] facilities and foster care facilities
(including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services). ,
"Policy 1.3.4: The City will continue to assist in the development of
grotty-~ome~ community-based residential facili,~ies and foster care
facilities, and ACLF's for low-and moderate-income residents through.
its existing housing programs ..
~~
3. Policy 1.3.5 has been eliminated so
evaluated to determine the impact
warranted" has been .also eliminated.
that the descriptive phase "and
of allowing and amended, where
Policy 1.3.5 read, as follows:
"Policy 1.3.5. The City's zoning ordinance will be reviewed and
amended, where warranted, so that family homes (group homes which
provide room and board, personal care, rehabilitation service, and
su envision in a family setting to be occupied by not more than eight
(8~ related or unrelated persons who are developmentally disabled,
mentally impaired, physically handicapped or elderly) be allowed as a
permitted use in all residential neighborhoods and that a group home
(occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use
in all residential neighborhoods and that a family group home
(occupancy by nine to sixteen persons) be allowed as a permitted use
in ail residential neighborhoods other than single-family (where it
shall be allowed on a special use basis)."
+C3 2 ~~nn
~.' ,,.~
The Zoning Ordinance has been amended so that community-based
residential facilities, as defined, for .6 clients or less, but not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are
permitted in all residential zoning districts and that community-based
residential facilities for 14 clients or less, but not including drug,
alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities, are permitted in
two family and multi family zoning districts.
At the public hearing of the South Florida Regional Planning Couneil (SFRPC}
on September b, 1989, City staff orally concurred with SFRPC's comments. It
is believed that all of the SFRPC concerns have been addressed.
ORAIy,AGE SU8-ELEMENT
A. OBJECTIONS
1. ~-5911(2)(c)Z.d.
Proposed amended Policy Z.1.3 does not include a quality standard for
the revised level of service for drainaoe.
Recommendation
Revise proposed amended Policy 2.1.3 (drainage level of service} to
include performance standards for water quality and flood control.
Appropriate local and state regulations specifying stormwater quality
standards should be adopted by reference to specific regulations as
they exist on the date the plan amendment is adopted as an integral
part of the drainage LOS standard to measure performance of systems
which are designed to remove pollutants from run-off. Appropriate
regulations specifying ambient water quality standards should be
referenced to protect and prevent further degradation of surface and
groundwaters (by run-off).
Section 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2.d cited above under A. OBJECTIONS appliies to level
of service standards for potable water facilities, not drainage facilities.
We believe that the citation is a typographical error, and that Section
9J5.0011(2)(c)2.~ was intended.
The provisions of Chapter 9J-5.0011(2)(c)2 regarding level of service (LOSj
standards for drainage facilities require the adoption of LOS standards for
"c. Design storm frequency for drainage facilities capacity". No mention is
made of water quality standards as a requirement of the drainage LOS.
Q ~~"~~~
- 8 - /5
s
Maintenance of water quality standards for stormwater drainage is adressed in
the City's Comprehensive Nieghborhood Plan in the following Goals, Objectives,
and Policies of the Sanitation and Storm Sewers sub-element: Goal 2;
Objective 2.2; Policies 2.2.2, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, and 2.2.5. In future
revisions or additions to these policies, the City will consider the DER
request that water quality standards be referenced. However, the City
declines to include them in its adopted lOS standard at this time.
8. COMMENTS
The City should take the Department of Environmental Regulation's
comments into consideration when addressing the above 9J-5.001
(2)(c)2.d objection.
Although there is an implication in the revised Policy 2.1.3 that the
"200 of the system brought to standard" applies to the existing
drainage system, it would be helpful for clarification purposes if~the
revised Policy 1.2.3 [sic) was rewritten to include "20a of the
i in system",
The City will add the word "existing" as requested, causing the proposed
amended policy to read as follows:
Policy 2.1.3:
event, For the ent-i-re storm drainage system as a whole. -thp;
20~a-~grcen„~ of the ~xistj,g~
system ~orrrr-srners w' 1 broua1t~, to a standard of a one-
in-five-year storm event by the yeah 2QQQ,.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEM,~,NT
A. OBJECTIONS
to
None
Anaivsis
1. 9J-5i012(e)l.
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase density in what
appears to be within the hurricane vulnerability zone. The City did
not provide a reassessment of its hurricane evacuation plan in regard
to the impacts resulting from this increased density, specifically,
additional persons requiring evacuation, evacuation routes, and any
special needs of the elderly or handicapped relating to this land use
change.
oao~oo ~ ~
Recommendation
The City needs to include a reassessment of their Hurricane Evacuation
Plan, including all items listed in the above objection as a result of
the increased density by the proposed map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond).
The reassessment should include impact on hurricane evacuation times.
The amendment should not be adapted unless hurricane evacuation times
are maintained or reduced.
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond} is not located within the Hurricane Vulnerability
zone (see attached Figure~IV.2: "Hurricane Vulnerability Zone"); therefore,
this Objection and Recommendation is not applicable (see map attached).
Goals. ~Jbiectives. and Policies
2. 9J-5.012(3)(b)6.
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) proposes to increase from a multi-family
medium density use, •;~hich allows a0 units per acre, to a multi-family
high density use, ~.~hich allows 40-100 units per acre. The proposed
amendment is located within the vicinity of the Miami River. The map
that the City included identifying the Coastal High Hazard Area is
unclear; therefore, it is difficult to determine whether this land use
change is located within the 9J-5.003(13) definition of the Coastal
High Hazard Area, which includes the V-Zone.
Recommendation
The City should not encourage
High Hazard Area. Include
amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is, or
If this amendment is located
Coastal High Hazard Area, the
density.
increases in density within the Coastal
information identifying whether map
is not, located within the FEMA V-Zone.
with FEMA V-Zone, which identifies the
City should not allow an increase in
i t}~ of Miami Resoon~,e
Map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) is not located within the Coastal High Hazard Area
(FEMA V-zone -- see attached Figure IV.3: Areas Subject to Coastal Flooding
and High Hazard Flood Areas:); therefore, this Objection and Recommendation is
not applicable (see map attached).
3. 4J-5.013(3)(b~7 and (3)(c)7.
The proposed changes to Policy 4.1.2 to address the Coastal High
Hazard Area must include the area within the V-zone and that seaward
of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The City proposes only [to]
include the V-zone except on Virginia Key, which would use the Coastal
Construction Control Line.
01t~'70U
-lo-
/7
0
Y
e
a
_~
C
m
t\1
r
er !/ eK
z
n
s
7
~r• ILK
•
1
^ ~~
I
~~~
ii
~~ ~~;
ZI ~,
i
•~;
.~.
IO~IA11~1 CO~IP~EHENSIVE NE~G~iB®I~t-!O®® PLAT
%% mumnum~imaiiimimr ~~~`~~}~
one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PgEPAgAT1pN Of TNIl1 4AP WAE AID[D TNg000N fINANCIAI. ASSISTANCE RECEiYEO fgQY THE STATE Of fIORIDA UNOEq THE LOLL 60VEgNMENT COMPgEMEN:
PLANNING A5813TANC! -gOOgAM AUTNOg12E0 0V CNA-TEr eA•td7lAW4 Tli FIOgIfTA ANO AOMINtsTE11E0 q~ TNt i~OpIDA OEPAIITMENT 0~ (•(TMMtINIt~ AlfAll
~ J
1~ 1~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
i
I~ - IM
r. h fl -
~ ~ ~r
-
~
: ~, u" + .
lir
' s •
I _
wr n 11 i ~ i _
~
.~
-~
j
~ -
1RRICANE VULNERABILITY ZONE
.
:
~ ~ ~ (~~ ~ g
~... fl . ~ I 1 .
(J
~ 1 '~
~
t
~ I I I
Mr H fl
- - - _
_ -
.'iawxll IYIAI
a+r
::
~
.i
:
. I;
_~
... 1
!I
Nr
70 SI II I II _
r1
1 ~I
'r=
1-
~
I ~i V y. ~ - ~ I Nl~ IRYO
f
~ ~)~ ? .- - - ~
~
) -
~
j
~
~~ .
~1 1 't I
I ~
~
I 1
~
I Q
I ql - ~ Ne
Nr i fl _
~ _ f - - IO~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ _~ - I - t
_ I1
~ ~ I I
p p ~ ~ 1 1 1 _
M ~ ~ ~ 'r - -
j - ~
J
fr ft 11 _ _ _ _ - q' e
~
_ - - ~ S11[ a1N4Ca1A
_
`'~ IIURRICANE EVACIIAl10N AREAS
• ~~: -
~
..
~
j '
f
I y
~
_
. _ . =
.IIIU AD ~ i - ;
~ - ( ,
~ ..,
~: :,~ ~
~~
_--
t a«NfN •1~
1.1~
~ ~
~
IOINCIaMa aYl
`-~ ~
6~-
~
~ o
~
-eosrln
oa (11 ~ l
lnl l~
Figure IV.?
L... ~~ -
z:
W v
= Y
O-
~z
~~
z
W
= U
WO
~ ~;
d.. W
® w ~}
9~
S n°
O
iA ~ W W
f
fT O
Q p0
® = r
t
o.
~ Z ~~
Z
Z ~W
W 1-
F
~ 8. „C
W ~
O
~ 2
O+
a+
"e
W Q
~ ~O
W
W '~
aG
~~ ~ W r.
u;
U „~
VI
N +
L e
•. [ W
~ ~~ ~.
:z
~~
x ~o
S O
a ~ N
~o
~~
g t
~ ~~ ~:
~~
.o
V `°
.~
ft~Y ~ i
r
O~
VI
~ ~
ft~ z
i i
'/r. W ~
t •
Recommendation
Revise Policy 4.1.2 to include all areas of the City that are within
the FEMA V-Zone, including Virginia. Key.
C?3Jf of Mi ~,mi Response
(See Response provided after COMMENTS below.)
B. COMMENTS
The City should take the specifie comments by the Department of
Natural Resources into consideration when revising Coastal Management
Policv 4.1.2.
City of Miami P.espcdnse
The .only part of the City of Miami's coastline that has a designated Coastal
Construction Control Line (CCCL) is the Atlantic Ocean coast of Virginia Key;
therefore, that coastline was specifically identified in the proposed amended
Policy 4.1.2. It appears, however, that the wording as proposed by the City-
is not clear to those who might be unaware of this local situational fact.
Therefore, the City will revise the proposed amended Policy 4.1.2 to make
clear that the FEMA "'J" zone aplies to a1T the City's coastline except on
Virginia Key, where there is also a CCCL, causing the proposed amended Policy
4.I.2 to read before and after the change as follows:
Before change of wording:
Policy 4.1.2; Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment
conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area
which ie rlefinari ne *i.n~• ~..~~ :.a....b:~:wd ., .. ~ nvn -.._., ~.., iL_ r_.~___i
see map attached).
After change of wording:
Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that al] development and redevelopment
conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area-
which 1C rloflneri ~e +{. ~~F ~wc.~ :.I ..w ~.: ~C: w~l ..r ~ Il 11 11 ~..__ L.. aL_ r_J _.__7
nVn
see map attached).
~}~~'~~~
-11- /9
a
~< n
.w '+ V 4
w
~~
a
~~
!w
~a
Cn
~~
~~
~g
V1
~9
< A
VN
a~
p
_:
N
A
^I
y
z
~
E
;c :~
o
as
"~ ~
T .O
,:~ 4
~~
~ ~
v
y f t
as
~ .-0
a
r~ ~.~
?
a
p
o ~ ~ •
•
I ~
f ~
9
•
M
f • A AY(
7.f. ~( ~~
r
I~l1AM1 ~OIIAPREHENSiVE ~lEiG3-iBI~RFi~JO® PLAN
. \\ ~muiuaarmiiiuuuiimu~ ~O ~U'7{~U
// one mile CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Pf1 L;PAq AYION OF rMI~ MAr wAS AIDED TNAOULiN FINANCIAL. ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FNOAA fME STATE OF F~OI7IOA UNDER THE LOCAL GOIERNMENt GOMF7IENEMSfvE
PIANNINO A5518TAHCE PROOIIA41 AU fNONIZEO BY QNAV TEA eb•~61 t.AW9 OF FlOf110A ANO AOMINIS(EREO BY fHE flOpLOA OE PAgTMENI 17f QpMAMlNI(~ AiFA/IN^SJ /
V
i
C r1
•
N• II 11 — —
AREAS SUBJECT 10 COASTAL FLOODING
AND HIGH HAZARD FLOOD AREAS
D
its is 01 •84.)A IUllrc
1 1 [
Z.It / S• r
•s '+1 III
•r t0 By
a,: •: ' ' is '� ' i , f /' ` ; �i I.i �`. M --- 1111cAI11c fa AVIIK
30
Nr ► fl f•: r.
1•Wla ^ .
Is a if
on
� i t
\ .
a
= A IONI S ARfAS INt)NDAIFO RI tnt) 1FAR lUIDO
V•?ONES-AREAS INUNOAIEO SY 100 YF.AP FIDOP
M III VFI,FICNY IIAIAnD l la IumGl 11A?Ann FLOOD AncAS1 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION
CONTROL LINE.
/OINtIAW AYI �
gtwnCF FEOGRAI. EMEPGENCY M4NAGFMFNI
ARFNLY, NOVFMPI R,mn? 0
' rrp4riC1 01 Clq UTu•
'�firr
L
�q
w
W
Wis r
j Y
W a
0 u
;i
W
Z�
WoC
z
o
w
J a
F
O W
Wp
Z O
u
Z
W
o-
om
Z
aW.
0W
a�
�
�
W �
I•
LJJ
_
W.9
•
p
3 Z
O
a
10
C
j
e��
fir
o
W
W O
W r
f
I
powO
Q
W ;
ua
zw
I
V
a e
Ir
a W
ifiai
'
_
-= O
O W
QN
'j
0 Q
0
•�C
W r
O i
to
`
V
;na
�'o
A.
t
�fl
W
Z
W N
O jA
N
�f
� C
r I
a r
a
a a
n
,~
..
r~ `~,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
A. OBJECTIONS
None
gp~,] y s i s
None
.Goals. Ob.iectives. and Policies
1. 9J-5.016f3)fc)4.
Revised Capital Improvements Policy I.2.3 does not include a quality
standard for the Drainage Level of Service.
Recommendation
Revise Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 to include a water quality
standard for the Drainage LOS. This revised policy should be
consistent with the Drainage Policy 2.I.3.
Cj,~y of Miami Resoonse
See response to "Drainage Sub-Element", preceding.
8. COMMENTS
None
CONSISTENCY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT r_OMPREH~~NSIVE PLAN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
REGIONAL POLIC'f PLAN AND WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A. OBJECTIONS
I. 9J-5.021
The following proposed amendments are inconsistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan (187.291, F.S.)
~10'7~D~
- 12 - ~/
a) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, which establishes a Coastal High Hazard
Area which is not consistent with Rule 9J-5.003(13) F.A.C., definition
and map amendment PZ-4, which possibly allows increased density in a
Coastal High .Hazard Area, are inconsistent with Policy (1) (b) 24 and
25 which state "require local governments, in cooperation with
regional and state agencies, to prepare advance plans far the safe
evacuation of coastal residents" and "require local governments, in .
cooperation with regional and state agencies, to adopt plans and
policies to protect public and private property and human lives for
the effects of natural disasters".
Recommendation
Revise the Coastal High Hazard designation to be consistent with the
9J-5.003(13) definition and ensure that an increase in density does
not occur within the Coastal High Hazard area.
(See response to "Coastal Management Element", preceding.)
2. Proposed text amendment PZ-22, relating to the revised Drainage LOS
does not include a quality standard and would result in additional
negative impacts on the surrounding water bodies and marine and other
natural resources. Therefore, proposed .text amendment PZ-22 is
inconsistent with Policies (8) (10) and (12) which state "Protect
surface and groundwater quality and quantity in the state" and
"eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated stormwater runoff
into the waters of the state" and Policies (9)(b)5,6, and 7 which
state "Protect coastal resources, marine resources, and dune systems
from the adverse effects of development", "Encourage land and water
uses which are compatible with the protection of sensitive coastal
resources", and "protect and restore sang-term productivity of marine
fisheries habitat and other aquatic resources".
B~ommendation
Include a water quality standard in the City's revised level of
service standard for drainage.
(See response to Drainage Sub-Element", preceding.}
-13- ~~
3. Proposed text amendments PZ-21, relating to the changes made to
Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4, which address adequate sites in
residential areas for group homes etc... may make the standards for
such more restrictive, therefore, possibly being inconsistent with (5)
(b)1 which states "eliminate public policies which result in housing
discrimination, and develop policies which encourage housing
opportunities for all Florida's citizens."
Recommendation
Include an explanation of "subject to the requirements and limitations
to the Zoning Ordinance" ensuring that this language will not make the
standards for Community Based Facilities mare restrictive.
City of Miami Response
{See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
REGIONAL POLICY PLAN
A. OBJECTIONS
I . ,~,) _ ~ 021
a) Proposed text amendment PZ-21, changes to Objective 1.3 and. Policy
1.3.4, is inconsistent with Regional Policy 16.1.0 which states
"encourage inclusion of policies in the local government comprehensive
plans which prevent exclusion of group homes and foster care
facilities by zoning."
Recommendation
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above-
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
(See response provided for HOUSING ELEMENT section.)
bj Proposed text amendment PZ-ZZ, relating to the designation of the
Coastal High Hazard area and map amendment PZ-4 (Ormond) which
possibly proposes an increased density in the Coastal High Hazard Area
are inconsistent with Regional concern relating to growth in high
hazard areas.
Recommendation
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above-
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
01000
-14- ~3
~~
~,i w of Miami Response
{See response to "Coastal Management Element", preceding).
c) Proposed text amendment PZ-22, does not include a quality standard in
the revised Drainage lOS Policies 1.2.3 and 2.1.3 which is
inconsistent with Regional Policy 37.1.4 which states "individual
drainage system should not adversely impact water. quantity or quality
of the surrounding area.
Recommendai~,i on
Revise amendments to be compatible with and further the above-
referenced concerns and policies of South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
~,jty-of Miami Response
(See response to "Drainage Sub-Element", preceding.)
SECTION II
Ldp amendments PZ- 3 (7/27/89j"Gerrits"
• * PZ-13 (7/27/89)"Coconut Grove"
i
* The Department of Community Affairs had no objections,
recommendations, or comments to this map amendment.
'~~~~~~
-16- ~~
SECTION II
DCA
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
TO
CITY OF MIAMI
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
A. OBJECTIONS
None .
B. COMMENTS
Froposed map amendment PZ-3 proposes to allow a general
commercial land use in a residential area which is
potentially an incompatible commercial use with the
surrounding, neighborhood uses. The City has stated
that this land use change is supported by Future Land
Use Objective I.2 which requires the City to promote
the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted,
declining, or threatened commercial and industrial
areas. However, the City should include more
information concerning why this land use amendment is
consistent or supported by Future Land Use Objective
1.2 (identifying it as a blighted area and providing a
specific explanation for how this change will promote
revitalization and redevelopment in the area).. Also,
demonstrate that this would ensure compatibility with
the surrounding uses. The Department suggests the City
include an analysis of how the amendment PZ-3 parcel
would be developed pursuant to local land development
regulations and special conditions in order to e,isure
compatibility with surrounding uses.
~y of Miami Resgonse
The subject parcel, as stated in Attachment 6B of the City's
Amendment Transmittal to DCA, is located in the Wynwood Community
Development (CDj Target Area. The socio-economic characteristics
of the area qualified Wynwood as a CD Target Area, providing
resources to improve the quality of its residential and economic
envirorunent through, among others, commercial rehabilitation.
~~o~oo
-~~- ~ ~~
The MCNP Data and Analysis identifies characteristics that
demonstrate the declining nature of the area and the need for
revitalization. For instance, this area of Wynwood experienced a
decrease in population during the 1970-1980 period in the range
of 500 to 1000 residents. The percent of families below the
poverfiy level during the same period increased as well. In 1970
it was estimated to be between 20~ and 30~. By 1980 the
percentage had increased~to over 30$. These percentages are w®11
above the City average of 16.4 in 1970 and 19.9$ in 1980. This
trend parallels that of the sntire Wynwood Target Area, where
figures show that the civilian labor force decreased by -4.7~
between 1970 and 1980.
One root cause for this decline is the lack of jobs in the area.
As noted in Attachment 6B, the City purchased property from the
owner/applicant to expand Roberto Clemente Park. The property
had been part of the applicant's business site. To mitigate the
impact on this established business and possible .loss of jobs,
additional land was needed. The resulting business expansion
effort would serve to stimulate additional employment
opportunities in the area.
This proposed land use amendment is comgatible with the
surrounding uses. The parcels are contiguous to those presently
owned by the applicant and utilized for his business. The
additional parcels would expand an existing business within an
established commercial corridor along NW Znd Ave. The amendffient
would not detract from, nor divide, the currently established
residential neighborhood since the land use to the south is
designated as "Recreation". Any development undertaken by the
applicant to improve the subject parcels will require local land
development regulation permits that ensure compatibility with the
surrounding properties.
A. OBJECTION
None.
8. COMMENTS
Proposed map amendment PZ-3 would eliminate a maximum
of 20 units of medium density multi-family residential
units. It appears the City has limited lands available
to provide for their projected housing needs. The City
should include more analysis of the impacts on the
housing needs for the City as it relates to the
elimination of 20 units of medium density multi-family
residential units.
4~L070~1
- i~ - ~7
Though the City has limited lands available to generate new
housing units and the City as a whole desires more affordable
housing, the Wynwood Community Dev®lopment Target Area
experienced an increase in the vacancy rate of existing
residential units during the I970~1980 period, In 1980, 881
housing units were vacant compared to S2S vacant units in 1970.
This is an increase to 10.78 in 1980 compared to 6.65$ in 1970
(MCNP Data & Analysis). The elimination of 20 units by this land
use amendment could be sufficiently absorbed through the existing
vacancies in the area.
Doc:[sysj<comp>dca/orc
12/01/89
Q~.~'J~~
= 19 - ~O
1
J-89-612
9/28/89
oRDI8A8c8 ao. lUfi46
Ax ORDIgANCB Affi814'DING ORDINANCE 9300. A6
A1L8NDSD. TaE Z08I8G ORDINANCE OP TrE CITY OP
YIA2tI. FLORIDA. 8Y A1[SADING SECTION 8054
•CO20i[TltITY BASED RESIDENTIAL PACL'.:TIES' :'0
ASFINB T°..8 DEFINITION: TO REQIIIRE A 6P8CTAt•
SSCEPTIDN 1/I'='8 CITY COl~TiISSION APPROVAL: TO
LOYBR T~..B CEBSIIS TRACT CAP 08 CLIEBTS, TO
IBCR8AS8 Tab DZSTAbiCE 68PARATION 88TylEE.'J
FACI:.I:=ES. TO ESTABLISH ISTERIOR 6PACE
6TAHDARDS AND TO R8gIIIRE A 6PSCIAL SZCEPTIC:t
•TTa CS:Y CO~QLISSION APPROVAL OP A C8ANG8 OP
OOHBRSHIP : BY A1l8RDIHG A]i'I'ICLB 38 .
DSPIAITIDNS Tfl R8PffiiffiQCS Tab PIARIDA
D8PARTlSBNT OF BEAx.TH AND RSSA8ILITATZVE
S88VICES ASD AILEHDIBG Tab 6C8EDIIL8 OP
DISTRICT ABGIIIJITZONS. PAGES 1 TaR0IIG8 4. BY
A1[88DI8G C0LII2~iS 88TZZZBa 'PRISCIPAL IISSS AHD
STRIICTIIRBS', RS-1. RS-Z 088-PA2lSLY D8TAC8ED
RSSID88TIAL: RG-1 GE~tSttAL RESIDENTIAL TO
PSR2iIT CERTAIN C02ihVNI:^.: BASED RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES TO DELETE A 6PBCIAL E7LCEPTION
RBQIIIRL'YE.YT I8 TEESE AND OTBER RESIDE:TIAL
DISTRICTS; RG-2 GBl~vtL'*- RESZaEBTIAL: R,G-2.1
GENERAL A86xDENTIAL; RG-3 G'R7~A4ST.
RESIDENTIAL; 0-I OFFICE IBSTITOTIDNAL: CR-1
C020iERCIAL RESIDENTIAL CxEIG'B80R800D). TO
RSQIIIRE CIT: C0aNISSI08 APPROVAL OP A 6PECTAT.
BZCEPTIOR POR COaNO'SITY Bl1SF.D RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES (~IT3 BZCEPTIONS); POR
CONVALBSCEHT H0]LE5 . HIIRSIHG 802SES .
INSTI:'IITIORS FOR T88 AGED OR IHPIRZi AHD
ORPBAHAGHS: 6IIBJECT TO TS8 R,EQIIIRE'L~ERTS AHD
LIMITATIONS OP 6ECTION 2034: CONTAIbTING A
REPEALER PRAVISIDN. 68V'ffi~ASILI:Y C~.AIISE. AND
AA EPPEC:IVB DATE.
1t8EREAS, the liiami Planning Advisory Hoard. at Sts meetlrg
of June 21. 1989, Stem xo. 6a, following as advertised hearing
adopted Resolution Ho. PA8 28-89 by a vote of 8 to 0.
RECOMlSENDZHG APPROVAL. of aaending Ordinance No. 9300 as
hereinafter set forth: and
f3EREAS. the City Commission after oareful consideration of
this matter deems it advisable and in the beat Interest of the
general veltare of the City of Miami a,ad Sts inhabitants to amend
Ordinance xo. 9300 e~s hereinafter set forth:
xOp, T88REFORE. BE IT ORDAINED 8Y T38 COMMISSION OF THE CI'.'Y
OP MIAMI, PIARTDA:
~~~~~
~~
soe4s
}
Btotion 1. Ordiaaaoe No. 9300. the Zoniag Ordiaaaae of the
City of l4iami. Fiorids. as amended. is hereby amended by amendLtg
the test of aasd ordinaace as iol3.ows:1
•ABTICZB 20. G8bi8RAL AbtA BIIPPL~TARY RBCZT.rATIC1TS
• e •
Geo. 2034. Co+~^^~t'Y based resideatial taoilitSes.
• • r
2034.1 Community based residential taoil:.~y det:.ned.
A oommtuasty based residential taoillty prova.des
room Lvlth or yith4tit board2. resident sertrioes.
and twenty-tour hour snpervisioa. 8noh a
taoslity tnaotioas as single honsalseeptag uaZty~
This category includes adult
ooagre$ate living taoilSties+
.Y..r V W b~ Y
and !aei? ! t1 9 fer .~,h4+e~ ~S1 t3 d! ~3ah1 ..~ Red
ids +~ ~~ ~~.~r
haadiea~e,~o_,~~rsen~s, for developmentslly
disabled persons. for nen-~angrens~;b~„~_
psrsons .. and for
dapeadeat Ohildrea. as ~ naer.d be t*c P~nr+aa
~4arts+e~t et f! rit f.h nei R hw h31 ~ testy v ~ -rv~ n.v
~: and r~'wi~'~l~ Q~~ :'~„'°- °=+r al cnhet
an~d~dr_~ w•~ah~ 2! ±a ie'+ and ,ttveaile and 6dtilt
ressdeatsal oorreotional tsaSlities. iaoluding
haltvag houses- ad 1~ nacd er a~yre~ed_~,i,~ ~n
oath ,.,..~ S~!Ater+3~n.~~...
203!.2. Prooedtsras.
203!.2.1. Registration required. All esistiag
and proposed oomsaaaity based residential
taailities shall register with the depastmeat
of building and zoning Requared
tatormatioa for registration lacludes:
• f •
2034.2.2. Special ezoeptian required. ~;s
nth-- '"'~ ~ln~.-~s1 3 L'l•r~~ «.p,~ ~ n
I71st2~ ^t R~p~Q et t~ nne } a~ 1 1 n ai.d 7 t'~S
yitr! n s , ~• • " i~~
~r - - ~aaa - ~4 rr~]. proposed
o~*„~r'.t~ :+ased residential taoitities are
parmsssible only by special esoeption V~ ~
o_~y ea Tisx~ en~~rre~ v~l _ glib~ept t0 th8
tollawing regniremeats and limitations:
2034.2.2.1. Looatloa etaadards. All
groposed community based residential
isoilitiee shall bs stsb~eot to the
tolloviag looatioa standards:
1. A proposed oommtsaity based
residential facility shall not be
boated in nay oenaus tract where
residents of dsistiag community
1 tlords and/or figures striolrea through shall be deleted.
IIadersoored words and/or figures shall be added. The
resainiag provisions are not in eiteat sad remain uaehaaged.
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
-2- 02470QI ~ ~
~OG46
....~
_~
based residential taailities
OOmpr28e ~ tvc ~2)
peroeat or more at' that oaasns
traot~s ousrent fatal population
dt estimated by the City of 2[iams
glaan».ag departmeat .
2. A proposed oommvsity based
residential taoi3.ity eha11. sot bo
boated within a radius of
+ti.Nw s~ •~ ~ wr1T A
{~? '~3is:i 4Sl~ZL`..~33~
L?.TipB,1 feet uyot as esistisg
vommuaity based residential
taoility. Measurement shall be
made from the nearest point of
the site of the e:satiag taoility
to the nearest point of tha sate
of the proposed taoiltty.
2034.2.2.'~"~... Ottstreet par]ciag . Otte C 1 ?
ottstreet par~csag space for eaoh staff
camber sad one C 1) ottstreet parlv.rag spaoe
for sash tour C4> reeideats shall be
provided. A rednotioa in requs.red. ooanpsat
ottstreet parl~iag shall be permissible
provided tlad.ings are made that clearly
show suoh reduction is reasonable based oa
such taotars as taaility prosimity to mass
transit. looatioa of oaoupant employment
area. oooupaat auto oeaarahip. taailtty
visitatsoa policy. sad tha ].SYe.
2034.2.2.Q"fSa Lsmitatioas oa algae. Signs
shall be limited to a asmeplate sot
ezceediag two CZ) square teat for each
street troatage.
2034.3 Certitiaate o! use sot traasterable: aev
ovaership by r ^'
e=n ~,; ± on w4 th et ty (~~n~tnt sat Qn dipre,~a~
The approved oertiticate of use shall not be
traasterable it the facility changes use or
oYnership. Nee oeaership shall be approved only
~t+14 ~~~.~rt_nn wits
^~'+~. fie ,s°~oii Riiitro4a~ _ --
AAT7CLE 36. DEFIN2TIONS.
Seotioa 3802. 6peoitic.
~_ 010700 OG45
t +0'nRl ~ ~ ~ ~. 1
(P~T9C) 01,.,w~.liy ~p~d=.ww~ ~'~ ~~~wd O l~glr ~+ ? .
R N~r~:
• •
•
Seotiaa 2. The 6ohedule of DS.striot Regvlatioas. page 1, is
hereby ameaded is the folloWiiig reirpeots:
'4885 AHD BTRIIC:4RES
PAIRCIPAL IISSS AHD 6TItII ... S
RS-1; R6-2. ORE-TAifZI.Y D8TAC8ffi] A&SZDEHTZAL
n
Permissible Oaly by 6peoial Permit
• •
SC -
~ rr ~
r 6 Y`. YI .
Yrap,~1-dnlt day ogre oeaters shall be permiss3.ble
by Class C permit ii for 4 adults or less.
~peoial esoeptioa it for s adults or more
aub~eot to the regniremeats aad limitations
o! 6eotion 2~OS 'Adult clhy care oeaters.'
o
RG-i. G88BRAL ABSIDEBTIAL (Oae-aad-Tdo Family)
As for RS-2. and la additioa:
Permitted Generally
~ ~ r ~ y~ ~ residpntiai faeiiiti~ _
t ~ c.nr~~ti vo ttie vwstc vi th frem 7 to a
a.~„~,~~ et 14 i eats (± aelttdinQ BSa.tt . vat
~-
...,. ~ ..~~ nd~ n~~,~re~ . gicohel nr cerr~etie~~±1_
*~1~Rh111 at~on faeilitipa) when lee8tpr~ Kt
]~~aet 1 2~^ filet froD env F milar paistit~
y_ ,3~.
010700 1OG46
Peraittsd Geaorslly
f ~
Seotlon S. Page 2 of the Sob,edule at District
Regulatloas 1s hereby amended is the iollowiag respeots:
•IIS$S A~tD 6T8IICTIIRSS
PAL~tCZPAL IISBS AaTD 6TSIIC:'ff1t8S
• m
RG-3. GR~AL BRSI~S$tTZAL
Permissible Daly by 6peoial Permit
~. Community based resident2al taoilitles vith
-fit mere! t~+Rn 1 ~ Est npt more than 50
rasideata iaolttdlag staff is RG-2/' sad 2/8
shall be permissible only by speoial
eaoeptioa_ v~th eit~ cemmiRSie~ d~r~e~ra1_
sab~eot to the regnsremeats and " ~~*a-~~~s
of seotlon 203.
RG-2.1. GffiPEItJLL RESID~TIAL
RG-3.G~P.RAL RESmERTIAL
Permissible Daly by 6peoial Permit
3. Convalesoeat homes, nursing homes,
lastltutions for the aged or Infirm sad
orphanages shall be permissible only by
speosal ezoeptioa- with amity ~~ •~•_sszer
a,3_ a_nhleet to the r~rn_~r;~ nty. ~s_nd
~~m a~tena ei seer±en 20'4_
In addition:
r
-6- oio~oo 33
iosas
o ••
;~
~1. Commvaity based reeldeat~.al tsoilitlea Y,~„'~
~Zt. t l-tf 14 ti d nL-~4~+a ~+r u 9 rO~fiZe~t~ bre
germusable Daly by speasal ezoeption.,~,~
e+ t~ ~;+s~ia9i en dasrevRi _ ~yb~®ot t0 the
ragsuremsatis sad limitations of •eorioa $03e. "
• • s•
Seotioa t. Page 3 of the 6ohedule of niatriat Regulatioaa
la hereby ameaded in the tolloviag aspeots:
'IISBS AHD STRIICZ'35~ES
PRIFCIPAI. IISBS AHD STR'CC"'~RES
s
O-I. Olt2CB-IHSTITQ?ZQBAL
•
Permissible Oaly by 6peoial Pssml.t
7. Commnaity based reaideatial taolls.ties are
permissible only by speoial esoeption.,.~;
eit~ eamm~ ~ssien Aatireva,'L,~ anb~eOt t0 the
regs~.iremeats aad lim3.tatioaa of eaotioa 2034.
• p ~
11. Coa4alesoeat homes. nnssing hamea. sad
Sastitntions !or the egad or latirm sad
orphaaagea shall be permissible Daly by
speoial esoaptiaa with P.:.~g ^e.~ + g~g~y
s~revd_ 1 _ h~ et to ~~,_„~!*?+~ r •w .+*a rd
? ir+i tEt~ e~ a of s -, a .4 ~~•
Seotion 5. Psge ~ of the 6ohedstle of Diatr~.at Regulations
is hereby emaaded la the tolloving aapeots: '
'IISBS AHD STRIIC:'4RES
P~CIPAL IISES AHD 51'RIIC:CRES
e ~ ~
C8-1 C02Qt8RL•IAL RBSIDP~'dTIJ1I. CA$IGSSO1tE00D)
• e •
Permissible Only by 6peoial Permit
• . ,
T. C~*~^*++ty based residential taoillties are
permssaible only by special exoeptioa_ wits
eit~ e~i ggi e~~~~•py~t _ aUb~eoL t0 the
requirements sad itmitatioas of seotioa 2034.
~.
Seotion 6. All o~+r~++~+ea or pasts of ordiaaaces iasotar as
they are inoonsiateat or is ooatlict vith the provislona of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
~' Q107001 ca
6sotioa 9. It aay part of eeotioa. paragraph. olanse.
phraas or word of this Ordiaanoe is deolared ta~vs].i.B. the
r~..~:~*+g pro~rtaioas of this Ordlaaaoe shall sot bs atteoted.
Seotica b. This Ordi*~~*~~e shall beoome etteoti4e thirty
(30) days after adoptiaa.
FASSBa ON FIRST R8ADS8G E'1 TZTI.B ONLY Lhis ?lst day of
~y~v 1989.
PASSED AND ADOPTER OR S8C07QD AND FISAL READIRC 8Y T:.S.B ONLY
this ~t~ day of Seoc~m~e~ 1.9
~If42E8 L. 6TJARP.E. ~2SAYOR
ATTES^ ~/
..
!SA BIRAY ~
CITY CLE,RL
PREPARED AND APPROVED 8Y:
ADRIENNE L. FRIESBER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FOR2S AND COaREC:BESS
JORRE L° FERAANDEZ
CITY ATTORNEY
ALP/dot/gl92
~~
-V' ®~o~o~
i~~
J-89-809
6/22/89
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 10544, A
AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORH
PLAN 1989-2000, BY AMENDING THE DEFINITION ~F
THE LAND IISE ELEMENT TO REFINE ~E
DEFINITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL. OFFICE, 'AND
INDIISTRIAL; AND AMENDING THE HOIISING EL~SENT
OHeTECTIVB 1.3 AND POLICY 1.3.4 AND DELETING
FOLICY 1.3.8 AS IT PERTAINS TO CO ~ ITY
BASED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES,_ ADIILT
CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITIES, ~FAMI HOMES
AND FAMILY GROIIP AND GROIIP HOES; AND
CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERROR; INSTRIICTTNG THE
CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS ORDIN~TCE TO THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMIINI~ AFFAIRS;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION,.~SEVERABILITY
CLAIISE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ,a~
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Ad~'isory Hoard. at its meeting
of June 21, 1989, Item No. 5b, fllowing an advertised hearing
adopted Resolution No. PAB
RECOMMENDING
89 by a vote
ling Ordinance
of 8 to 0,
No. 9500 as
APPROVAL, of
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter deems it adv able and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the C.~y of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
ordinance No. 9500 as l~reinafter set forth:
NOW THEREFORE, ~ IT ORDAINED HY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. rdiaance No. 10544, the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Pl n 1989-2000, is hereby amended by amending the
text of said dinance as follows:l
1 Wo s and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
II ersoored words and/or figures shall be added. The
r maiaiag provisions are not in effect and remain
changed. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchaaged
aterial.
oso7oo 3~
"LAND U5E
ti s f
Yaterpretation of the Future Land Use Plaa Map
Residential -- Single Family: ... ~~
s ~ ~ 's
~~
Other perm~i~'stbbe permitted land uses withia~siagle
family residential areas are supporting services such
as schools , houses of worship , public parks and fa. mil~v.
day care ~at~3'ttt~es homes for children that ;serve the
immediately surrounding neighborhood or whose scale of
activity ie one equivalent to a facility ,serving the
surrounding neighborhood. u _ ._ ,
centers ar~`Permissible in suitable locations within
single family residential areas. '~ Future public
community parks and recreation facilities serving areas
beyond the immediate neighborhood mad%also be permitted
is single family residential areas: provided that the
capacity of the transportation fac,~lity or facilities
serving such areas is sufficient to handle the
additional traffic demands generated by such £acilities
without degrading the level of service-below those LOS
standards adopted in the CTE. f
Residential -- Duplex: ... /"
// : s
r.
Other .permissible land uses within duplex residential
areas are supporting services such as schools, houses
of worship, public Barks, and ~amilg day care
. homes . for" ~;hilclren that serve the
immediately surrounding neighborhood or whose scale of
activity is one equivalent to a facility serving the
surrounding neighborhood.
.
~,ommLnit~ based residential
centers are „Permissible in suitable locations within
duplex residential. Future public community parks and
recreation facilities serving areas beyond the
immediate neig~iborhood may also be permitted in duplex
residential areas provided that the capacity of the
transportation facility or facilities serving such
areas is su ~fic.i.ent to handle the additional traffic
demands Ben rated by such facilities without degrading
the level~f service below those LOS standards adopted
in the CT
Residential -- Medium Density Multifamily: ...
0th permitted uses within medium density multifamily
ar s include accessory commercial and
o ice activities ~n the same building that are
i tended to serve the retailing aad personal services
-2-
oio7oo 3 7
1
needs of the immediately, surrouadiag neighborhood.
Examples of suoh commercial aotivities would inalud
the neighborhood laundr~q
and dry aleanin$- neighborhood
restaurants, dad
other small scale perscaal or professional sergioe
bueinesse's . ,
p~rmttt~t ~om~unit~ b ap residential faoilities . ~ child
day care oeater~ and adult day care centers are
~~,ssible is suitable locations within medium.~deasity
multifamily residential areas provided that such
facilities meet or eaceeed the rules and regulations
prescribed by state lioeaeing requirements.:' Future
public community parks and recreation ,:faoilities
serving areas beyond the immediate aeighborhood may
also be permitted in medium density residential areas
provided that the capacity of the t~ansportatioa
facility or faoilities "serving suoh areasj~is sufficient
to handle the additional traffic demands generated bg
suoh facilities without degrading the level of service
below those LOS standards adapted in th® CIE.
,;
..v
.;
Residential -- Righ Density Multifamily: ...
+ s ~' s
Other pre~rmtssf`bi-e F,~rmitted usesti` within high density
multifamily areas include ~ ~v'm~~ratty aec,g,~ orv
commercial and office aotivities i n„ thg ,yeme buj_ldiSg
that are iateaded to serve th~:~'retailiag and personal
services needs of the neighborhood:
1,~ • ,
Comm~nit~ bee ~, r _eid .ntia _
facilities. child day care centers. adult day care
centers . hod i~ ta~ y, and id'l~ursing ffhomes may also be
permissible in suitable lbcatioas within high density
multifamily residential i areas provided that such
faoilities meet or exceed the rules and regulations
prescribed by state lideasing requirements. Future
public community pants and recreation facilities
serving areas beyond .: the immediate neighborhood may
also be permitted lit' high density residential areas
provided that the . capacity of the transportation
facility or facilities serving such areas is sufficient
to handle the additional traffic demands generated by
such facilities witithout degrading the level of service
below those LOS s~'andards adopted in the CIE.
Commercial -- Restricted: ...
Other permissible land uses within the restricted
commercial category include motels and hotels. a~Y
residential facilities. offices,
medical ~~facilities, mayor sports, exhibition or
entertai~ient faoilities. Mined-uses of commercial,
office ~ad/or residential are also permissible within
this lad use designation.
Comme ial -- General: This land use designation
aooo odates commercial aotivities that generally serve
the eeds of other businesses, do not typically serve
th daily retailing and service seeds of the general
p ic, require on and off loading faoilities. sad
o en beaefit from close proximity to industrial areas.
-3-
®1O~Q~ 3 ~
~.
These commercial land uses include retailing of se~foad
hand items, automotive repair services, new and sed
vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, envy
equipment sales and service. building materialrsales
and storage- wholesaling, wt=arehousing, distribution
and transport related servioes, light manufaotu~l.ag and
assembly and other activities whose scale of a~eratioa
and load use impacts are similar to tY~bse uses
described above. ,~'
Other permissible lead uses within tYCe general
commercial category include public healthT~ and social
service facilities, mayor sports, re~Dreation or
entertainment facilities. Mixed uses off wfxarehousiag
and office. or warehouse and retail showrooms are also
permissible within this lead use category.
s
Office: This land use oategory acaoommodates general
office uses related to health servc~oes. professional
servioes, and real estate, bankiagad other financial
servioes. Residential uses, u to high density
multifamily, including hotels, a also permissible
within this laad.use oategory, a limited retail uses
are allowed within these office/ esidential structures
in'designated areas. However, t e overall intensity of
use in this category will be ignificantly less than
the CBD category. ,
, Community based residential
centers, and ifihursing Mh,omes ~ay also be permissible in
suitable locations within ~ffice areas provided that
such facilities meet o exceed the rules and
regulations prescribed by State licensing requirements,
and the capacity of the ,facility does not exceed 140
persons. per net acre. `1' Auditoriums, libraries and
convention facilities mag be permissible within office
areas. Parks cad aublic open spaces are also
permissible within offi~.t;e areas.
a
Industrial: This land use designation applies to both
light and heavy industry as further delineated in the
City of Miami's zoning code. Both designations
generally permit a wide variety of manufacturing,
assembly, repair nd storage activities. The Light
Industry categor general limits uses to industries
that da not gene to excessive amounts of noise. smoke,
fumes, illumin ion, traffic, hazardous wastes, or
negative visua impact. S~,ockyards. rendering, wor s.
HOIISING
Goal l:
Ob~eet a i.3: Facilitate the private aad public
recto provision of housing in noa-isolated residential
area for group homes and foster care facilities
(inc ding those funded by the Florida Department of
Hea hand Rehabilitative Services); adult congregate
li ng facilities; cad housing for the elderly and the
dicapped. sub_ieet to the requirements and
• -4-
®l0'700
39
i
Policy 1.3.4: The City will oontinue to assist
development of group homes, foster care faoiliti
ACLF's for low- and moderate-inoome resideate
its existing housing programs, 1_~~.h.,1
. __
Section 2. In order to correct a scriveaer's error, the
~'
west side frontage of LeJeune Road'(S.W. 42nd Aveaue) from S.W.
,~
2nd Terrace to S.W. 7th Street: is designated as Office on the
,~
Future Land IIse Plan Map in.order to conform with Ordinance
F.
10544. f
Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to transmit this
Ordinance immediately upon" approval of first reading, to Thomas
.<
Pelham, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740
r~
Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 for 90 day review
~•
and comment. ,;
J'
Section 4. All.'ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as
:~'.
they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are here y repealed.
s!~'
Section 5.E~ If any part of section, paragraph, clause,
phrase ox w~d of this Ordinance is declared invalid. the
remaining pr visions of this Ordinance shall not be affected.
Secti 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty-five
(45) days after adoption pursuant to Law.
ASSED ON FIRST READING HY TITLE ONLY this 22nd day Of
1989.
-5-
oso~oo ~
,f-,,i.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AN FINAL READING BY T E ONLY
1989 :1
~~.
this ,,.~~.-- day °f
XAV_.,,. ~ crrn~r~ MAYOR
ATTEST.
MATTY gIRAI
CITY CLERK
:'
=r'
r
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: ,~'
~.¢i
ADRIENNE L.r$RIESNER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM
G 6JS1Li L ~+ . ...
CITY ATTOFtN~
ALF/dot/M4$
CORRECTNESS:
r
W~~
J-89509 B
6/8/89
12/1/89
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 10544, AS AMENDED, THE
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000, BY
AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF THE LANG USE ELEMENT TO
REFINE THE DEFINITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE, AND
INDUSTRIAL; AND AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 1.3 AND POLICY 1.3.4 AND DELETING POLICY
I.3.5~5IT PERTAINS TO COMMUNITY BASED RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES, ADULT CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITIES, FAMILY
HOMES AND FAMILY GROUP AND GROUP HOMES; AND CORRECTING
SCRIVENER'S ERROR; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO
TRANSMIT THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
~Xrll~~~ ~~/
.WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 21,
1989, Item No. 5b, following an advertised hearing adopted Resolution No. PAB
29-89 by a vote of 8 to 0, RECOMMENDING Approval, of amending Ordinance No.
10544 as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this .matter
deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City
of Miami and its inhabitants to amend Ordinance No. 10544 as hereinafter set
forth:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 105x4, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is fierQby amended by amending the text of said
ordinance as follows:?/
LAND USE
Interpretation ofi the Future Land Use Plan Map
Residential -- Single Family: ...
~/ Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words
and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect
and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
0 Z'Q~®~r,
7~
Other i-sr~-b}e ~rmittg~~~ land uses within single family residential areas
are supporting services such as public parks and
Emily day care `--~ homes for children and community-based residential.
facilities (b clients or less not including drug, alcohol or correctional
rehabilitation facilities) that serve the immediately surrounding neighborhood
or whose scale of activity is one equivalent to a facility serving the
surrounding neighborhood.
#$_:'.~riT-~ ~ehild day care centers and adult day care centers are dermissible
in suitable locations within single family residential areas. Future public
community parks and recreation facilities serving areas beyond the immediate
neighborhood may also be pew permissible in single family residential
areas provided that the capacity of t'ie transportation facility or facilities
serving such areas is sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands
generated by such facilities without degrading the level of service below
those LOS standards adopted in the CIE.
Residential -- Duplex: ...
Other ~l~ germitted land uses within duplex residential areas are
supporting services such as _, public parks, and
family day care ~a~e-i-}-i~-i-e~ homes for children and community-based residential
facilities (14 clients or less not' including drug. alcohol or correctional
? ~ "permitted" uses are allowed by right: "permissible" uses are candidates
for inclusion. subiect to an interpretation of consistenc.v bathe P~.annin
.~ /
- 2 -
~~~~~
~F3
houses as licensed or approved bean authorized regulator~gency.
,Eeha 'litation faciiiti s) that serve the immediately surrounding neighborhood
or whose scale of activity is one equivalent to a facility serving the
surrounding neighborhood. - ,
-i~-i-es-; ~ehild care centers and adult day care cen ters ar e permissible in
suitable locations within duplex residential. Future public community parks
and recreation facilities serving areas beyond the immediate neighborhood may
also be ~errtrt-~d g~r•mis~sible in duplex residential areas provided that the
capacity of the transportation facility or facilities serving such areas is
sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands generated by such
facilities without degrading the level of service below those LOS standards
adopted in the CIE.
Residential -- Medium Density Multifamily:
~mmuni~,v-based residential facilities f14 clients or less. not including
drug alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities are permitted. 9~tte1°
pt~°rwi-t-t~d Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas include
accessory commercial and office activities in the same building
that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the
immediately surrounding neighborhood. Examples of such commercial activities
would include the neighborhood _ .. , laundry, and dry
cleaning shop, neighborhood restaurants, r.~" --~'- ~..~_:,
and other small scale personal or professional service
businesses. , ,
.. Community-based residential facilities
j15-50 clients). child dad care centers and adult day care centers are
p,~ rrrissible in suitable location= within medium density multifamily
residential areas provided that such facilities meet or exceed the rules and
regulations prescribed by state licensing requirements. Future public
community parks and recreation facilities serving areas beyond the immediate
neighborhood may also be pe~°nri~~ permissible in medium density residential
areas provided that the capacity of the transportation facility or facilities
serving such areas is sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands
- 3 -
010'704
~~(
generated by such facilities without degrading the level of service below
those LOS standards adopted in the CIE.
Residential -- High Density Multifamily: ...
* ~
community based residential facilities (14 clients or less not including
,~.g alcohol ~ r correctional rehabilitation facilities) are bermitted. 8t#er
-~-b}~; ~#~ Permissible uses within high density multifamily areas
include eammctrt#~p accessory commercial and office activities in the,.~ame
ildina that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs
of the r~ghborhood• medical and dental offices are
~gimisSi6le as g_rinci~al uses.
fommunity-based residential facilities (15 + clients). child
~~,~~ ~~rp centers adult day care centers. hosoitals, and f~nursing +ihomes may
also be permissible in suitable locations within high density multifamily
residential areas provided that such facilities meet or exceed the rules and
regulations prescribed by state licensing requirements. Future public
community parks and recreation facilities serving areas beyond the immediate
neighborhood may also be per~ri-t-ted permissible in high density residential
areas provided that the capacity of the transportation facility or facilities
serving such areas is sufficient to handle the additional traffic demands
generated by such facilities without degrading the level of service below
those LOS standards adopted in the CIE.
Commercial -- Restricted: ...
Other permissible land uses within the restricted commercial category include
motels and hotels, _ residential facilities, offices,
medical facilities, major sports, exhibition or entertainment facilities.
Mixed-uses of commercial, office and/or residential are also. permissible
within this land use designation.
Office: This land use category accommodates general office uses related to
health services, professional services, and real estate, banking and other
- 4 -
~~
~~
financial services. Residential uses, up to high density multifamily,.
.including hotels, are also permissible within this land use category, and
limited retail uses are allowed within these office/residential structures in
designated areas. However, the overall intensity of use in this category will
be .significantly less than the C60 category. ,
community-based re~id~ntia) facilities child
~,~y carp rgnters adult d,~,v care centers, and ~i-~ursing fihomes may also be
permissible in suitable locations within office areas provided that such
facilities meet or exceed the rules and regulations prescribed by state
licensing requirements, and the capacity of the facility does not exceed 140
persons per net acre. Auditoriums, libraries and convention facilities may be
permissible within office areas. Parks and public open spaces, are also
permissible within office areas.
Industrial: This land use designation applies to both light and heavy
industry as further delineated in the City of Miami's zoning code. Both
designations generally permit a wide variety of manufacturing, assembly,
repair and storage activities. The Light Industry category generally limits
uses to industries that do not generate excessive amounts of noise,. smoke,
fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual impact.
,~toc~vards rendering works smelting and refinino plants and similar
activities are excluded. "
"HOUSING
Goal 1
Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of
housing in non-isolated residential areas for com unity-based residential
facilities gi°ec~r-frames and foster rare facilities (including those funded by
the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services);:-
- 5 -
010700
yb
'"~
Policy 1.3.4.: The City will continue to assist in the development of
rommy~,l~,y~-based re~,~dential faciliti,gs ~°at~-~ameg, foster care facilities,
and ACLF's for low and moderate income residents through its existing housing
program, .
81'dr+~attee-
•
( J
Section 2. In order to COrr?~t a scrivener's error, the west side
frontage of LeJeune Road (5.41. 42nd Avenue) from S.41. 2nd Terrace to S.HI. 7th
Street is designated as Office on the Future Land Use Plan Map in order to
conform with Ordinance 10544.
Section 3. The City Clerk i; instructed to transmit this ordinance
within 45 days of first reading, and before second reading, to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, FL.,
32399 for 90 day review-and-comment.
Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are
inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
- 6
01000
~~
Section 5. If any part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of
this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance.
shall not be affected.
Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective forty (45} days after
adoption pursuant to Law.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of
1989.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this
1989.
XAVIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MATTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
JOEL E. MAXWELL
CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
JORGE L. FERNANDEZ
CITY ATTORNEY
- 7 -
{~ ~.®740
PU+' ~ J
f~~.C~ I~'L~D
I~J~ J(~N 25 A.1 9~ 4 ~-
i'"1 '4
~'`I~~ { 1 ~~ iili~.~{
MIAMI REVIEW
Published Dally except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the underetgned authority personally appeared
Sookle 1VIIIlama, who on oath says that she Is the Vice
President of Legei Advertising of the Mlaml Review, a daily
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legei Holidays) newspaper,
published et Mlaml In Dade County, Florlde; that the attached
copy of advertlaement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the metier of
CITY OF MIAMI
ORDINANCE N0. 10700
Inihe ......X ..X..,X .......................... Court,
was published In said newspaper In the Issues of
January 23, 1990
Alflant lurther says that the said Miami Review Is a
newspaper published at Miami In Bald Dade County, Florida,
and that the said newspaper hea heretofore been continuously
published In sold Dade County, Florida each day (except
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and des bean entered ea
second class mall matter al the post olfice In Mlemi {n Bald
Dade County, Florida, for a pe-lod of one year next preceding
the firs ublicatlon of the attached copy of advertlaement; and
allian rther says that she hoe neither paid nor promised any
pars irm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission
or r f d for the purpose of securing this advertisement for
pub lion in Ih aid newspaper.
V•Sw. a u ibed belore me this
...1.,..,a.D.19.9
t ~-••-JJo ary ~I~cl~Slate of F19f(de al Large
My
~'~
FlORID~ ~~
CITY OR MIAMI, l~LORI®A
LEAAL NOTICE '
All Interested persona will take notice that ,on the 11th day of
January, 1990, the City Commission of Mlaml, Florida, adopted they
Ioliowing titled ordinances:
ORDINANCE NO.10887
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE, WITH ATTACHMENT,
ESTABLISHING A NEW SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ~NTI•
tLEO: "MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD
PLAN/LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Fy'89.90,"
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR IT3 OPERATION IN THE
AMOUNT OF 5218,417 COMPOSED OF 5218,417 FROM
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE
GRANT AWARD FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS TO ASSIST THE CITY IN
PREPARING OR MODIFYING LOCAL LAND DEVELOP•
MENT REGULATIONS AND AUTHORItING THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE THE
NECESSARY AGREEMENT(S), IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE
ATTACHED FORM, FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID
GRANT; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
ORDINANCE N0.1088a
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38 OF THE CODE
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY
AUTHORIZING THE BAYFRONT PARK MANAGEMENT
TRUST OR ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO PERMIT, WITH
CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, THE GALE OR DISPENSING OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, INCLUDING BEER AND WINE,
IN SOFT CONTAINERS IN THE CLAUDE AND MILORED
PEPPER BAYFRONT PARK, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE
WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL
REGULATIONS; MORE PARTICULARLY, BY CREATING A
NEW CODE SECTION 3849.2; CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.10889
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A NEW SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: "DADE COUNTY EMS GRANT
AWARD (FY'89)", APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE
OPERATION OF SAME IN THE AMOUNT OF 5283,997,
CON5ISTING OF A 5283,997 GRANT APPORTIONED BY
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY FROM THE STATE OF
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITA•
TIVE SERVICES UNDER THE "FLORIDA EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES GRANT PROGRAM FOR COUNTIES"
AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
ACCEPT THE AFOREMENTIONED GRANT AWARD AND
ENTER INTO THE NECESSARY CONTRACT ANDIOR
AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH ANO REHABILITATIVE SERVICES ANDIOR
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION ANO A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE N0.10890
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 10642, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT APPROPRIA-
TIONS ORDINANCE BY INCREASING THE TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT ENTITLED .
"SOLID WASTE COLLECTION EQUIPMENT-FY'90•FY'91",
PROJECT NO 353010 BY 5750,000.00, SAID AMOUNT
BEING AVAILABLE FROM THE CERTIFICATE OF
PARTICIPATION (C.O.P.); CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 10691
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE GOAL OF THE
MIAMI CITY COMMISSION OF MAINTAINING THE SEP•
TEMBER 30, 1989 FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL
FUND IN AN AMOUNT WHICH COULD NOT BE LESS
THAN 56,000,000 BUT COULD BE MORE DEPENDING ON
THE FINAL ACCOUNTING STATEMENT FOR FISCAL
YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 AND REQUIRING
THAT A SEPARATE ACCOUNT BE ESTABLISHED IN
WHICH SAID FUND BALANCE IS TO BE DEPOSITED
ALONG WITH ANY INTEREST EARNED BY THE FUNDS
IN THE ACCOUNT; FURTHER INCREASING FUTURE
YEAR ENDING FUND BALANCES IN THE ACCOUNT BY
A MINIMUM OF 51,000,000 PER FISCAL YEAR FOR THE
NEXT FOUR YEARS, WITH THE MINIMUM BALANCE IN
THE ACCOUNT INCREASING TO A MINIMUM OF
gt0,000,000 BY THE ENO OF SUCH TERM; FURTHER
INSTRUCTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE THE
NECESSARY ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE SAID GOAL; FUR•
THER PROVIDING THAT THE SAID MONIES IN SAID
ACCOUNT SHALL NOT BE THE SUBJC-CT OF APPRO•
PRIATIONS UNLESS THERE IS A FAVORABLE VOTE OF
AI5TH OF THE CITY COMMISSION; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
1 OF 2
ORDINANCE NO. 10692
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A NEW 5PECIAL
REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: "DHRS NEW REFUGEE
EMPLOYMENT ANO TRAINING PROGRAM (FY'90)" FUR•
THER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT
A GRANT AWARD FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 1N THE AMOUNT OF
556,550 AND ENTER INTO THE NECESSARY CONTRACT
ANDIOR AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVER•
ABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO. 108@3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 54. ARTICLE Vi.
ENTITLED "SIDEWALK CAFES", OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY MAKING
tHE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: EXPANDING THE
BRIGKELL AREA CAFE ZONE; FURTHER, IN REGARD
TO SUCH 2ONE5 GENERALLY BY REVISING THE PERMIT
FEE; MAKING CORRECTION TO THE STANDARDS AND
CRITERIA; ADDING A RESTRICTION AGAINST THE GEN•
ERATION OF LOUD NOISE AS A FORM AND CONDITION
OF THE PERMIT; PROVIDING FOR A TEMPORARY SUS•
PENSION OF A PERMIT FOR CAUSE; REINSTATEMENT
OF A SUSPENDED OR REVOKED PERMIT BY THE DIREC•
TOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UNDER SPECIFIC CONDITIONS;
AND ESTABLISHING A MINIMUM TIME PERIOD FOR
REAPPLICATION AFTER REVOCATION; MORE
PARTICULARLY BY AMENDING SECTIONS 54.109, 54.111,
54.114, 54.116, 54.117 AND 54.118; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO. 10894
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 38.8 OF THE CODE
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY
INCREASING EXISTING RATES FOR THE USE OF DES•
IGNATED AREAS AT THE MANUEL ARTIME COMMUNITY
CENTER; ESTABLISHING RATES FOR THE USE OF THE
M)NI•PLA2A AND MINI•PARK AND AUTHORIZING
APPROVAL OF SPECIAL RATES AND FEE WAIVERS BY
THE CITY COMMISSION AT SAID CENTER FACILITIES;
REVISING THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS;
RENAMING THE LARGE AUDITORIUM OF BUILDING "A"
AS THE MANUEL ARTIME PERFORMING ARTS CENTER;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVER•
ABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE N0. 10695
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 53.151 OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED,
WHICH PERTAINS TO PROCEDURES AND USER FEES
AT THE COCONUT GROVE EXHIBITION CENTER BY
CHANGING FEES WHICH ARE DETERMINED BY THE
TYPE OF EVENT BEING HELD; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 10898
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 37.71 OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED,
ENTITLED "OPEN AND VACANT STRUCTURES," BY
PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTABLE METHODS OF SECUR-
ING AND SEALING VACANT STRUCTURES; CONTAINING
A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE N0. 10897
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE
10619, ADOPTED JULY 27, 1989, BY INCREASING THE
APPROPRIATION TO THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
ENTITLED "JTPA TITLE IIOLDER WORKER (FY'90)" BY
58,300, THEREBY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION
FOR SAID SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TO 518,675; ALSO
INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION TO THE SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND ENTITLED "JTPA TITLE IIAINEIGHBOR•
HOODS JOBS PROGRAM (FY'90)" BY $42,321, THEREBY
INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION FOR SAID SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND TO 5366,834 FOR THE OPERATION OF
THE NEIGHBORHOODS JOBS PROGRAM.
ORDINANCE N0.10098
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 1, 3, 4 AND 5 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 10848, THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS
ORDINANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER
30, 1990, ADOPTED SEPTEMDER 28, 1989, BY CREATING
A NEW SECTION 2, 1, DEBT SERVICE FUND, FOR THE
PURPOSE OF FORMALIZING CITY COMMISSION
ACTIONS AND IMPLEMENTING OTHER AMENDATORY
CHANGES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE N0. 10699
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1
OF ORDINANCE NO. 10842, AS AMENDED, THE CAPI•
TAL IMPROVEMENT APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE 8Y
ESTABLISHING A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT ENTITLED "CITY•WIDE TELEPHONE SYSTEM",
PROJECT NUMBER 311021 IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
S1,339,900.00; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION
AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE N0.10700
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 10544, AS
AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBQR•
HOOD PLAN 1989.2000, BY AMENDING THE DEFINITION
OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO REFINE THE DEFINI•
TIONS OF RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE, AND INDUSTRIAL; ANO
AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.3
AND POLICY 1.3.4 AND DELETING POLICY 1.3.5 IT
PERTAINS TO COMMUNITY BASED RESIDENTIAL FACIL-
(TIES, AOULt CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITIES, FAM•.
ILY HOMES AND FAMILY GROUP AND GROUP HOMES;
AND CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERROR; INSTRUCTING
THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS ORDINANCE TO
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE NO.10701
AN ORDINANCE WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING
ORDINANCE 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPRE•
HEN5IVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989.2000, DRAINAGE
SUB•ELEMENT, POLICY NO. 2.1.3, BY SPECIFYING
WHICH STORM SEWERS IN THE CITY WILL 8E
DESIGNED FOR A ONE•1N•FIVE•YEAR EVENT ANO
ESTABLISHING A SPECIFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
STANDARD FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STORM SEW
ERS; COASTAL MANAGEMENT SUB•ELEMENT, POLICY
4.1.2, DEFINING AND DESIGNATING THE COASTAL HIGH•
HAZARD AREA WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI; AND
ADOPTING CONSISTENT LEVEL OF SERVICE STAND-
ARDS IN BOTH THE DRAINAGE SUB•ELEMENT AND
POLICY NO. 1.2.3(4) OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ELEMENT; DIRECTING TRANSMISSION TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS; CONTAINING
A REPEALER PROVISION SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
EFFECTIVE GATE.
Said ordinances may be Inspected by the public at the Office of
the Gity Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drlve, Mfami, Florida, Monday
through Friday, exciuding holidays, between the hou-s of 8:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
(6251) .
' MAT1Y HiRAI
_..• CITY CLERK
MIAMI, FLORIDA
1123 .. ~ 90.4.012391 M
2 OF 2