Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
O-10747
a•: }v r J-90-299(a) 4/18/90 ORDINANCE NO. 10747 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE N0. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY APPLYING SECTION 1610, HC-1: GENERAL USE HERITAGE CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE VENETIAN CAUSEWAY: THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CAUSEWAY WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET WEST OF THE DADE COUNTY BULKHEAD LINE EASTWARD TO THE CITY LIMITS AND INCLUDING ALL BRIDGES AND THE RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF NORTH AND SOUTH VENETIAN WAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA; INCORPORATING THE DESIGNATION REPORT; MAKING FINDINGS; AND MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBERS 22 AND 23 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the Venetian Causeway, a County -owned right-of-way, is the oldest causeway in Dade County remaining in its original form; and WHEREAS, only the two westernmost of the Venetian islands, Biscayne Island and San Marco Island, are located within the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the proposed designation would apply only to the public rights -of -way and would require that any future alterations, demolition, or new construction be approved by the City of Miami Heritage Conservation Board; and WHEREAS, the Venetian Causeway has been included in the Future Land Use Map series of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 as a potential historic site; and WHEREAS, the Venetian Causeway has been listed in the National Register Of Historic Places, and that portion within the City of Miami Beach has been designated as a local historic site by the Miami Beach City Commission; and WHEREAS, the Miami Heritage Conservation Board, at its meeting of January 16, 1990, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. HC 90-2, by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the herein historical designation; and 10747 WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its meeting of April 4, 1990, Item No. la, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 15-90, by a 9 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the request to amend the Zoning Atlas as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend the zoning atlas as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1, The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby further amended by applying the HC-1: General Use Heritage Conservation Overlay District to the Venetian Causeway: The entire length of the Causeway within the City of Miami from a point approximately 20 feet west of the Dade County bulkhead line eastward to the City limits and including all bridges and the rights -of -way of North and South Venetian Way, Miami, Florida. Section 2. It is hereby found that this zoning classification change: (a) Is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; (b) Is not contrary to the established land use pattern; (c) Will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; (e) Will not materially alter the population density pattern or increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) Will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; -2- 10747 (g) Will not create or excessively increase traffio congestion or otherwise affect public safety; (h) Will not create a drainage problem; (i) Will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent area; (j) Will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; (k) Will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; and (1) Will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare. Section 3. It is hereby found that the subject property is eligible for this historic designation under criteria numbers 3, 7, and 9, as set forth in Section 1604.1 of Article 16 of Ordinance No. 9800, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida. Section 4. The "Designation Report," accepted by the Chairman of the Miami Heritage Conservation Board, on January 16, 1990, is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference. Section S. Page Nos. 22 and 23 of the Zoning Atlas, incorporated in said ordinance by reference and description in Article 3, Section 300 thereof, is hereby amended to reflect the herein zoning changes. Section 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 7. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 8. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after final reading and adoption thereof. -3- 10'7 4 '7 PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLYthis 24th day of May , 1990. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th day of June 'r1990. hIc XAVIER f. SETA EZ , MOOR Q OF 0��'�� MAT Y HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: CORRECTNESS: 40 L E. MAXWELL C EF ASSISTAN�/ CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JOR`GE V. F ANDEZ CITY ATTORNE JEM/db/X6D :7 -4- 10747 PZW1 APPLICANT PETITION la. REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING FACT SHEET City of Miami Planning Department: February 2, 1990 Consideration of recommendations concerning an amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas, Pages 22 and 23 of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, by applying Section 1610. HC-1: GENERAL USE HERITAGE CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT to the subject property, as described in the designation report, and retaining the underlying zoning district. To apply the NC-1 overlay to this historic site, as described in the designation report. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Approval. HISTORIC CONSERVATION BOARD Approval, 7 to 0 (Resolution HC-90-2). ANALYSIS The Venetian Causeway,, a County -owned right-of- way, is the oldest causeway in Dade County remaining in its original fora. Only the two westernmost of the Venetian islands, Biscayne Island, San Marco Island, are located within the City of Miami. The proposed designation would apply only to the public rights -of -way and would require that any future alterations, demolition, or new construction be approved- by the Heritage Conservation Board. The Venetian Causeway has been included in the Future Land Use Map series of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as a potential historic site. Additionally, the causeway has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and that portion within the City of Miami Beach hpv been designated as a local historic site by the Miami Beach City Commission. ,PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting of April 4, 1990; the Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 15-90 by a 9-0 vote, recommending approval of the above. Twenty-six _ PROPONENTS were present at the meeting. Two replies AGAINST, and five replies in FAVOR were receives by mail. CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of May 24; 1990; the City Commission passed the above on First Reading. 10747 1 I � i • i N • 1 SISCAY�IE li �''�/� • S A N r A it Co IslAp ISLAND wa••wt icwutrA. ' " �- S=•:•= t , y ` ��.= Illliltf i111/ «II! .tor At It Zoning Ordinance ' PR 9500 Atlas Amendment Ordinance 10544 KHP 1909-2000.- O '� �. •� `PR Venetian CauSeraa To apply the HC-T overlay to this historic site. PAR 4 /4 /90 '7 v tXl 43 4i r wn III �' ISLAND, SAM NAACO ISLAM Q► 10747 Ordinance 1100 Atlas Amendment Venetian Causew PAB - 44-90 Z/ s ,� ,,�,� ,�, , R•^�+ r !`' B I S C - Y N Ef B A Y i ..�.% � t / • 1.y i 4 1 It, a 1� a r i I,. Sr ,,► / A Q U A T I i itt R E S R V E 66 /t JU j! �,� 85•��0 �95� frs � • �,• : i i y� • • t �• w arrr ar x a, i J/ fANf1�lAMt ' •. Sunselr stands Venetian , taia dw i t I •� hlw Nfr -, n••Ar• {\= -16 Me no 8 IsAenco «i rn of 1 •f • U161 i • i lbimm Wand M•"1°"•1 �IIIMIIY�t r 1074 Palm 191and �• , ..� 13 VENETIAN CAUSEWAY Designation Report ,c. of �- st Clt of Miami 10797 6 - REPORT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION BOARD ON THE POTENTIAL DESIGNATION OF THE VENETIAN CAUSEWAY AS A HERITAGE CONSERVATION ZONING DISTRICT Prepared by Maria T. Temkin Consultant a Prepared by--., sstoric reservaation -'Date Planner Accepted by Chairman, Reritage Date Conservation Board Designated by the Miami City Commission Ordinance No. Date 10747 7- CONTENTS Page I. General Information 1 II. Significance 3 ITI. Architectural Information 6 IV. planning Context 11 V. NC Zoning Elements 12 VI. Bibliography 13 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Historic Name: Venetian Causeway Current Name: Venetian Causeway Location: The entire length of the Venetian Causeway right-of-way within the City of Miami from a point approximately 20 feet west of the Dade County Bulkhead Line eastward to the City Limits and including all bridges and the rights -of -way of North and South Venetian Way. Present Owner: Metropolitan Dade County Present Use: County Road Present Zoning District: RG-2/5, RS-2/2 HC Zoning Overlay District: HC-1 Boundary Description of HC Zoning District: The entire length of the Venetian Causeway right-of-way within the City of Miami from a point approximately 20 feet west of the Dade County Bulkhead Line eastward to the City Limits and including all bridges and the rights -of -way of North and South Venetian Way. HC Zoning Classification: Historic Site -1- 10747 VENETIAN CAUSEWAY site plan 1074'7 l0 - II. SIGNIFICANCE Specific Date: 1926 Builder/Architect: Harvey Stanley, Engineer Raymond Concrete Pile Company of New York, Contractor James M. Thompson, Superintendent Statement of Significance: The Venetian Causeway, the oldest causeway in its original form in Dade County, is significant in the history of community planning and development in Miami. Designed and constructed as an essential element of the planned community of the Venetian Islands, the Venetian Causeway was the final phase of the development of these island communities. The causeway, which links Miami with the island of Miami Beach, includes a series of twelve spans, two of which are located in the City of Miami. The design of its railings and its prominent location in Biscayne Bay have made the Venetian Causeway an important visual feature in northeast Miami. The Venetian Causeway came into existence as a result of the Florida Land Boom of the 19201s. During this period, a tremendous amount of building activity was taking place in the Miami area, and residential subdivisions were springing up at an unprecedented rate. The most desirable land on which to build was the waterfront. "Island building" became a popular way of increasing the amount of waterfront property. Through the dredging and filling of bay bottom, new and valuable real estate was created. The Bay Biscayne Improvement Company was responsible for the construction of the Venetian Islands and the Venetian Causeway. The company's officers were Josiah F. Chaille, President; F.C.B. Le Gro, Vice President; and Hugh M. Anderson, Secretary -Treasurer. Chaille and Anderson had previously been associated, in 1917, in the development of the Wynwood Park subdivision. Le Gro was responsible for the opening of the Highland Park subdivision in 1910. In addition, in 1916 Le Gro had been affiliated with John S. Collins in the development of Belle Isle, the easternmost island on the Venetian Causeway. Marshall Price and Colonel Frank B. Shutts, Directors of the Bay Biscayne Improvement Company, were both well-known attorneys. Shutts was also the publisher of The Miami Herald. Through the Bay Biscayne Improvement Company, these five prominent Miamians planned to create a residential development out of bay bottom. -3- 10 7 4 7 They envisioned the creation of a chain of islands across Biscayne Bay. The chosen location for their island -building venture was alongside the Collins Bridge. The company's principals chose the name "Venetian Islands" for their planned island community. Their wish was that the project be associated with the City of Venice, Italy, a community of "villas" of Italian -inspired architecture within a landscape of water. The company resolved to approach its development project in phases. Four islands were planned and were to be constructed one at a time, beginning west of the existing island of Belle Isle. Preparations for the purchase of the desired property were undertaken. John S. Collins, Miami Beach pioneer and owner of the Collins Bridge, was approached regarding the sale of the bridge. The Collins Bridge, a wooden structure thought to be the longest wooden bridge in the world, had been completed in 1913 and was an essential part of the development plans of the Bay Biscayne Improvement Company. The company realized that it would be necessary to replace the deteriorating bridge upon completion of the islands. However, access to the islands during the initial development period would be achieved via the old bridge. Plans proceeded smoothly. The Bay Biscayne Improvement Company obtained all necessary permits and completed the purchase of the Collins Bridge. Island building began immediately. The Venetian Islands, bearing Italian names, were platted as follows: Rivo Alto in February 1922; Di Lido in January 1923; and San Marino and San Marco in June 1923. Whitney C. Bliss, the engineer of record, was responsible for preparing the layout of the islands. The Venetian Islands would contain over 450 residential lots. Two sales offices were opened to market the development. One office was located in the heart of downtown Miami, while the second was placed at the Miami side of the Collins Bridge. Lots, still underwater, were sold from the plats. Sales contracts specified that a purchaser would receive a lot on an island that had been dredged, filled, and bulkheaded by a sea wall of one to three feet thickness. The contract also stipulated that the island would be equipped with roadways, sidewalks, utilities, and other amenities. Furthermore, the purchase agreement guaranteed that the Collins Bridge would be replaced. A toll would be charged for usage of the new access road; however, the toll would be waived for Venetian Island residents. The construction of the Venetian Islands and the sale of the lots progressed swiftly. In 1924, the Bay Biscayne Improvement Company began drawing up plans for the replacement of the Collins Bridge. The engineer in charge of submitting plans for a new access road was Harvey Stanley. Several designs for the roadway were presented. The one that was chosen was estimated to cost two million dollars. Work began on the construction of the Venetian Causeway, which was to be made of concrete, in February 1925. .The cpntractor was the Raymond Concrete Pile Company of New York. James M. Thompson served as superintendent. The completion of the Venetian Causeway was scheduled to take place near the end of 1925. However, an embargo on the shipment of building supplies delayed this date. On February 28, 1926', a formal dedication -4- 1074'7 took place. The islands and causeway were considered engineering feats of both beauty and practicality. Biscayne Island, the westernmost island on the Venetian Causeway, was not part of the original Venetian Islands development. Biscayne Island was platted in December 1936. The island was developed by the Biscayne Island Corporation whose president was Lucy C.T. Magraw and whose secretary was Albert R. Smith. The engineer in charge of the layout of the island was William B. Garris, a principal in the firm of Watson -and Garris Civil Engineers, Inc. Relationship to Criteria for Designation: The Venetian Causeway is eligible for designation under the following criteria: 3. Exemplifies the historical, cultural, political, economic, or social trends of the community. The Venetian Causeway came into existence as a result of the Florida Land Boom of 1920's. The causeway was an essential element in the planning and development of the community of the Venetian Islands. 7. Contains elements of design, detail, materials or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represent a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The bridges which make up the Venetian Causeway feature low, open railings in a geometric design which provide a constant and continuous view of Biscayne Bay. The bridges were considered engineering feats of both beauty and practicability. 9. Because of its prominence or spatial location, contrasts of siting, age, or scale, is an easily identifiable visual feature of a neighborhood or the city and contributes to the distinctive quality or identity of such neighborhood or the city. The Venetian Causeway's prominent location in Biscayne Bay has made it an important visual feature in northeast Miami. -5- 10747 III. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Description of Structure: The Venetian Causeway, transversing Biscayne Bay, links the cities of Miami and Miami Beach through a series of man-made islands known as the Venetian Islands. Located just north of downtown Miami at N.E. 15th Street, the two -and -one-half mile causeway consists of twelve reinforced concrete bridges, including two bascule spans, connected by a two lane road. The main entrance to the causeway is located at the western end on the Miami side and is graced by simple octagonal towers. All of the bridges along the causeway feature low, open, geometrically designed railings. The Venetian Causeway cuts across six islands, and the bridges occur intermittently between the islands. The islands, from west to east, are named Biscayne, San Marco, San Marino, Di Lido, Rivo Alto, and Belle Isle. The Venetian Causeway was completed in 1926, shortly after the four central islands were created from material dredged from the bay bottom for a residential development. The area from the eastern edge of San Marco Island to the causeway's entrance at N.E. 15th Street lies within the City of Miami. The eastern portion of the causeway beyond San Marco Island is under City of Miami Beach Jurisdiction. The following contemporary description of the Venetian Causeway is found in the Spears/Harris Papers Manuscript, c. 1927: The causeway consisted of a combination of viaducts and fill. There were eighteen viaduct units, running a total of 4,200 linear feet, which were arranged to take account of tidal flow. The longest, on the Miami side, ran 1,340 linear feet. The project featured two modern bascule -type draw bridges, one at each side of the bay, which allowed for twelve -foot clearances when closed. Fills ran an additional 4,005 linear feet, fills and viaducts totalling 8,205 linear feet. Fill for both causeway and islands came to 3,000,000 cubic yards. The roadway was eighty feet wide, curb -to -curb, with four -foot sidewalks on both sides. The road surface on the fill was laid over two feet of boulders which, in turn, lay over a mat built from planks from the old wooden bridge. 278 white way street lights illuminated the roadway. 84,000 linear feet of concrete piling were featured in the project. 25,000 barrels of cement and 30,000 pounds of steel were required for the piers and abutments. The abutments were of the arch -girder type. Perhaps the most striking feature of the bridges is the guardrail design. The pierced, ornamental design features central square units with radiating diagonals that form aln "X" pattern, thus allowing a view of the bay from all bridges. Other than the two masonry light towers -6- 1074 7 at the Miami entrance to the causeway, no original street light fixtures remain. Two of the bridges along the Venetian Causeway are located within the City of Miami. Bridge 1, which spans the Intracoastal Waterway and connects the Miami mainland with Biscayne island, is the longest bridge at approximately 0.4 miles. The western end contains a pair of tapering, octagonal entrance towers topped by lights. These concrete towers are reminiscent of miniature lighthouses. Inscribed in bas relief on the towers are the words "Short Way" on the north tower, and "Venetian Way" on the south tower. At the center of the viaduct is a steel bascule drawbridge. This bridge has a low rise, providing a clearance above the mean high water of ten to twelve feet. At the southeast end of the viaduct is a small, hipped roof, wood frame maintenance shed in a rectangular plan. Of modest, utilitarian construction, it appears to be contemporary with the bridge. To the east is a modern toll booth stretching the full width of the road. Bridge 2 connects Biscayne Island to San Marco Island. Of the same design and materials, it is a considerably shorter span than Bridge 1, less than 0.1 miles. -7- 1 61747 � rA t n .r 1 =mot L t 0 J ■ƒ » . $, {.t .\\\/-1 < ©�� � 2� \ ƒ2//��� • � : / '(§ (��. ' Ali ,» \\ 'C! �{ tfill .//�•/ f I IV. PLANNING CONTEXT Present Trends and Conditions: The Venetian Causeway is a County -owned right-of-way and is one of four causeways connecting the cities of Miami and Miami Beach. Unlike the other three, the Venetian Causeway is only two lanes in width, has a lower speed limit, and is controlled by a toll booth. The causeway is also more susceptible to bridge openings because of the low rise of the bridge, which spans the Intracoastal Waterway. The load carrying capacity of the bridges is not adequate to carry standard Metro buses. While the MacArthur and Julia Tuttle Causeways are the primary access highways to the southern half of Miami Beach, the Venetian Causeway's main function is a residential collector street serving the Venetian Islands. Conservation Objectives: Although roadway and bridge improvements are desirable for safety reasons, any changes should respect both the historic and residential character of the Venetian Causeway. Because the MacArthur and Julia Tuttle Causeways provide sufficient access and capacity to Miami Beach, it is not necessary to expand the Venetian Causeway. It should continue to perform its primary function as a distributor to the Islands, not a through road. Any proposed safety improvements to the bridges should be carefully evaluated for the effect on their historic and aesthetic character. The present design of the guardrails should be maintained. These conservation objectives can best be achieved by applying an HC-1 zoning overlay district, which would require the review of physical changes to the property. -11- 10 '7 4 '7 V, NC ZCNINC ELEMENTS Boundaries: The boundaries of the NC zoning district have been drawn to include the entire east -west right-df-way of the Venetian Causeway within the City of Miami, specifically the two bridges and the roadway (North and South Venetian Way) connecting these spans. Major Exterior Surfaces Subject to Review: All features of the causeway shall be considered major exterior surfaces subject to review. Major Landscape Features Subject to Review: The major landscape features subject to review shall include all features which are subject to requiremepts for tree removal permitsl, as set forth in Chapter 17 of the City Code. -12- 1074'7 �� Y T . 819LIOGRAPHY Ballinger, Kenneth. Miami Millions. Miami: The Franklin Press, Inc., 1936. Dade County, Florida. Recorder's Office. Plat Books. Metropolitan Dade County. From Wilderness to Metropolis. Miami, Metropolitan Dade County, 1932 Muir, Helen. Miami, U.S.A.. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1953. Peters, Thelma. Biscayne Country: 1970-1926. Miami: Banyan Books, 1976. Smiley, Nixon. Memories of Old Miami. Reprints from The Miami Herald, Sun ay agaz ne, 1982. Spears/Harris Papers, Unpublished Manuscript, Miami Shores, Florida: c. 1930. Weigall, T. H. Boom in Paradise. New York: Alfred H. King, 1932. . ,. -13- 10747 ,:!o / A. "N MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she Is the Supervisor of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI Ordinance No. 10747 In the .......... . ..2...Z.. Z ........... , ....... Court, was published In said newspaper In the Issues of JulY 16, 1990 i Affient further says that the said Miami Review is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore boon continuously published in said Dade County, Florida each day (except I Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and �been entered as second class mail matter at the goat office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a perlod of one eor next preceding the first publication of the attached cc advertisement; and afflant further says that she has In or pal nor promised any persolry1�firm or corporation an unt, r bate, commission 3r r fend for the pur ose o ng thi advertisement for I 3u c i aMp In the new � ```II1,1111111 IflIr ' �%���L) �o!q�a';d subscribed ....o. JU•J � • J p It ry f•ublh (S L) • U ®1 MYS Ission explres•A! Lr4 7�fl �� jO 1 e 10 me this .......... A.D. 19.9.0... iteryl H. Marmer State of Florida at Large 1992. IMI, FLORIDA NOTICE FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; INCORPORATING THE OFF.& IGNATION REPORT; AND MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBERS 22 AND 23 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10749 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 1990), BY AMENDING ARTICLE 6, SO SPECIAL DISTRICTS, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 010 SD-10 JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT; PRO- VIDING FOR INTENT AND EFFECT; REQUIRING A CLASS 11 SPECIAL PERMIT; PROVIDING SPECIAL RULES FOR COMPUTATION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10760 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 1990), THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY APPLYING THE 80-10 JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OVER- LAY DISTRICT TO THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 14TH AND 20TH STREETS, BETWEEN NORTHWEST 7TH AND 12TH AVENUES, PLUS AN AREA EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF NORTHWEST 16TH STREET AND EXTENDING APPROX- IMATELY 650 FEET WEST OF NORTHWEST 12TH AVENUE TO WAGNER CREEK, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICU- LARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN); BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 24 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVID- ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10751 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 1ST COURT AND 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NORTHWEST 5TH AND 6TH STREETS, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM CG-2!7 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO SPI.16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN•PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DIS- TRICT; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NEC- ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 36 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC• TIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO. 10752 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 110DO (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 19W). THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY NORTH- WEST 1ST COURT AND 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH- WEST 5TH AND 6TH STREETS, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL TO SD•16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DIS- TRICT; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NEC. ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 36 OF SAIn ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC. TIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 10753 AN nanINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 9500, AS TIIE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIOA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 20 GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS, SECTION 2008 REQUIRED OPEN SPACES; DETAILED LIMITATIONS ON OCCUPANCY, BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 2008.13 ENTITLED "NOISE AND DISTANCE LIMITATIONS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT"; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, ORDINANCE NO. 10764 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE ABATEMENT, AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 36.13, PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT; DELETING ExisrING SECTION 36.15 AND SUBSTITUTING, IN LIEU THEREOF, A NEW SECTION 36.15 ENTITLED "MECHANI- CAL AND FIRE EQUIPMENT'; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVID- ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10755 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; AMENDING SECTION 4.10 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED TO CLARIFY LANGUAGE; TO PROVIDE THEREBY THAT DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR IDENTICAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSEES BE MEASURED SEPARATELY AND DISTINCT FROM THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT FOR DISSIMILAR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSEES; FUR- THER BY MODIFYING THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPA- RATION FOR DISSIMILAR LICENSEES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERASILITY CLAUSE AN AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Said ordinances may be Inspected by the public at the Office c the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, Monde through Friday, excluding holidays, between the hours of 8:00 ax and 5:00 p.m. MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK MIAMI, FLORIDA (6921) (9 7116 9D4-071652M MIAMI RI Published Dally except SI Legal Holl Miami, Dade Cou STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned aut Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on ( Supervisor of Legal Advertising o (except Saturday, Sunday and L published at Miami In Dade Count Copy of advertisement, being a Lei In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI Ordinance No. 10 In the ............. z 2.. Z . . was published In said newspaper in. JuIY 16, 1990 Afflant further says that the I newspaper published at Miami In ar and that the said newspaper has hen published In said Dade County, FI Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) second class mail matter at the p08 Dade County, Florida, for a period of the first publication of the attached cI affiant further says that she has n peroo firm or corporaiton an or r nd for the purpose o pu ca)iQ in the sa+d new o `,T1TI11111 Illl ' ,%%`(1. Fi 11 � tq��and auk • • • Q191 � 4 ®�o1ary Publlei St (StiAL) ' myV4101asion explres•Algiri , 19G MRi '9 •'•..•• `�� "'Will ert,<p CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE All Interested persons will take notice that on the 28th day FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; INCORPORATING THE DES - of June, 1990, the City Commission of Miami, Florida, adopted IGNATION REPORT; AND MAKING ALL NECESSARY the following titled ordinances CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBERS 22 AND 23 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION ORDINANCE NO.10742 AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TIVF DATE. AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 54.5.12 AND 54.5.16 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. AS AMENDED, BY PROVIDING A METHOD TO ALLOW AN EXISTING BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR WALL TO REMAIN IN THE UNDEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY; BY PRO, VIDING A METHOD FOR ADJUSTMENT TO DESIGN STANDARDS; AND BY PROVIDING ANOTHER MECHANISM TO VACATE AND CLOSE PLATTED PRIVATE AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS AND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE No. 10743 AN ORDINANCE, WITH ATTACHMENT, ESTABLISHING A NEW SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ENTITLED: "SOLID WASTE REDUCTION: RECYCLING AND EDUCATION (FY'90)"; APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC- TION 403.706(4), FLORIDA STATUTES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $585.808, CONSISTING OF A RECYCLING PROGRAM GRANT FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GRANT RULE 17.716 AND SECTION 403,7095 FLORIDA STATUTES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.10744 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS, 7245 AND 7247 IN THEIR ENTIRETY AS APPEARING IN BASIC ORDI- NANCE FORM AND AS CODIFIED IN THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BOTH ORDINANCES HAVING BEEN ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 30, 1964 AND RELATING TO THE ORIGINAL CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF FIRE, RESCUE AND INSPECTION SERVICES RESPEC- TIVELY; FURTHER, CREATING THOSE TWO DEPARTMENTS WHOSE AFFAIRS ARE TO BE ADMINISTERED BY DIREC- TORS WHO WHILE BEING APPOINTED BY AND SERVING UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF THE CITY MANAGER SHALL ONLY BE REMOVED FROM THEIR POSI- TION BY JUDGEMENT OF THE CITY COMMISSION OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE RESPONSIBILITIES, FUNCTIONS, AND DUTIES OF THE NEWLY CREATED DEPARTMENTS REMAIN UNCHANGED FROM THOSE RESPONSIBILITIES, FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES BEING DISCHARGED PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE AND BY PROVID- ING THAT ALL FUNDS, PERSONNEL, RECORDS AND EOUIPMENT CURRENTLY APPROPRIATED AND ASSIGNED TO THE RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENTS AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE ARE TO REMAIN SO APPROPRIATED AND ASSIGNED; REPEALING CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-81, 2.82, 2-83, 42.1, 42.2, AND 42.3 IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AND ADOPTING NEW CITY CODE SECTIONS 2.81, 2.82, 2.83, 42.1, 42.2, AND 42.3; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI- SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.10745 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 1 AND 5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 10648, THE ANNUAL APPRO. PRIATIONS ORDINANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 19N ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 28, 1989, AS AMENDED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF REPLACING $200,000 OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR THE COCONUT GROVE PLAYHOUSE LOAN PROJECT AND S50,000 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MARKETING SROChURE WITH $250.000 OF REVENUE FROM GENERAL. OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE FUND — INTEREST EARNINGS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI. SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10746 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO, 10642, ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 28, 1989, AS AMENDED THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS APPROPRIA- TIONS ORDINANCE, BY INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS TO THE PROJECT ENTITLED "RELOCATION OF MUNICI• PAL SHOPS OPERATIONS;' PROJECT NO. 311018, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $500,000; APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR FROM VARIOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING SOURCES AS LISTED HEREIN; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL• ITV CLAUSE, ORDINANCE NO. 10747 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY APPLYING SECTION 1610, HC-1: GENERAL USE HERITAGE CONSER- VATION OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE VENETIAN CAUSEWAY: THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CAUSEWAY WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET WEST OF THE DADE COUNTY BULKHEAD LINE EASTWARD TO THE CITY LIMITS AND INCLUDING ALL BRIDGES AND THE RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF NORTH AND SOUTH VENETIAN WAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA; INCORPORATING THE DESIGNA. TION REPORT; MAKING FINDINGS; AND MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBERS 22 AND 23 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PRO- VISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO.10748 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO, 11000 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 1990), THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY APPLYING SECTION 710, HC•1: GENERAL USE HERITAGE CONSERVATION OVERLAY DIS- TRICT TO THE VENETIAN CAUSEWAY: THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CAUSEWAY WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET WEST OF THE DADE COUNTY BULKHEAD LINE EASTWARD TO THE CITY LIMITS AND INCLUDING ALL BRIDGES AND THE RIGHTS. OF -WAY OF NORTH AND SOUTH VENETIAN WAY, MIAMI, ORDINANCE NO.10749 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, t990), BY AMENDING ARTICLE 6, SD SPECIAL DISTRICTS, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 010 SD-10 JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT; PRO- VIDING FOR INTENT AND EFFECT; REQUIRING A CLASS 11 SPECIAL PERMIT; PROVIDING SPECIAL RULES FOR COMPUTATION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10760 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 1990). THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY APPLYING THE SD•10 JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OVER- LAY DISTRICT TO THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 14TH AND 20TH STREETS, BETWEEN NORTHWEST 7TH AND 12TH AVENUES, PLUS AN AREA EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF NORTHWEST 16TH STREET AND EXTENDING APPROX- IMATELY 650 FEET WEST OF NORTHWEST 12TH AVENUE TO WAGNER CREEK, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICU- LARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN); BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 24 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVID- ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10761 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 9600, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 1ST COURT AND 2NO AVENUE BETWEEN NORTHWEST 5TH AND 6TH STREETS, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM CG-2f7 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO SPI.16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DIS- TRICT; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NEG ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 36 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO.10%62 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 4, 1990). THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY NORTH- WEST 1ST COURT AND 2NO AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH- WEST 57H AND 6TH STREETS, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM C•1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL TO SD•16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN•PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DIS- TRICT; BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL NEC- ESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NUMBER 36 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO, 10753 AN nn-11NANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 9500, AS AM..F.U, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, DY AI.IENDING ARTICLE 20 GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS, SECTION 2008 REQUIRED OPEN SPACES; DETAILED LIMITATIONS ON OCCUPANCY, BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 2008.13 ENTITLED "NOISE AND DISTANCE LIMITATIONS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT'; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 10754 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE ABATEMENT, AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 36.13, PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT; DELETING EXISTING SECTION 36-15 AND SUBSTITUTING, IN LIEU THEREOF, A NEW SECTION 36.15 ENTITLED "MECHANI. CAL AND FIRE EQUIPMENT"; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVID• ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.10765 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; AMENDING SECTION 4.10 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED TO CLARIFY LANGUAGE; TO PROVIDE THEREBY THAT DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR IDENTICAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSEES BE MEASURED SEPARATELY AND DISTINCT FROM THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT FOR DISSIMILAR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSEES; FUR. THER BY MODIFYING THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPA- RATION FOR DISSIMILAR LICENSEES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AN AND EFFECTIVE DATE, Said ordinances may be Inspected by the public at the 011lce the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, Monc through Friday, excluding holidays, between the hours of 8:00 a and 5:00 p.m. MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK MIAMI, FLORIDA (6921) (9 7116 90.4-071652M