Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-90-0590a J-90-618 7/16/90 RESOLUTION NO. 9 Q- 590 A R986LOTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO PAY TO THE GLORGE HYMN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, WITHOUT THE ADMISSION Off' LIARILITYr THE --SUM OF $388000.00 114 PULL AND COMPLETE SETTLEMENT OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF MIAMI0 IN CIRCUIT COURT CASE NO. 84-18744—CA-03, UPON THE EXECUTION OF A RELEASE BY BOTH MIAMI CENTER ASSOCIATES, INC., AND GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RELEASING THE CITY OF MIAMI FROM ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS; SAID MONIES TO BE ALLOCATED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT OF THE CONVENTION CENTER AND PARKING GARAGE REVENUE BOND FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of Miami and Dade County were sued in 1984 by Dade Savings and Loan Association in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, Case No. 84-18744, alleging Sunshine Law violations by the Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals in connection with the correctness of plans relating to fire resistivity provisions of the South Florida Building Code for the Miami Convention Center Parking Garage (the "garage"); in turn, the City of Miami sued both Miami Center Associates, Inc. ("MCA") and the George Hyman Construction Company ("Hyman") for alleged building code deficiencies and costs of remedying said deficiencies; then, MCA and Hyman countersued the City of Miami for monies due and owing for construction work performed on the garage; and WHEREAS, the above lawsuit has been investigated by the City Attorney's Office and the City Manager's Office, and said offices recommend that this lawsuit be settled for the sum of $388,000.00 with the following conditions precedent: a. Hyman will perform remedial punchlist work pending since 1985 so as to satisfy the Building Official; b. Hyman will apply for, and receive, a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the garage; and c. Hyman and/or MCA will provide to the proper City officials a complete set of "as -built" "reproducible" plans for the garage; and x 3 d, Hyman and 11CA will each release the City of Milli frt r t�l�, b1�[i�ns' �►nd dl�t�an+ds� NOWt THURFOREt MB IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CM OF Fl1M F'RIAt 'Beet ion 1.,- The recitals and findings set Forth in the preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. - Section 2. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized_ to peg George Haman Construction Company, without the admission a a; of liability, the sum of $388,000.00 in full and complete 4. r_ settlement of any and all claims and demands against the City of Miami, in Circuit Court Case No. 84-18744 CA 03, upon the execution of a release by both Miami Center Associates, Inc., and the George Hyman Construction Company releasing the City of Miami from all claims and demands subject to the aforesaid conditions precedent, and enter into a settlement agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, with monies therefor hereby _ allocated from The Construction Account of the Convention Center and Parking Garage Revenue Bond Funds. 4 Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July , 1990. XAVIER L UAREZ, MAYOR :4, t� A 4J MA TY Hum ti = CITY CLERK G i M11 90 5 _ lip 2. S w4 u- 7` -. ' k 'f' r z•. � r � t} + 1 {�� -'`„fir „ ^u - a V,- p CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA ' INTM OFFICE MEMORANDUM 1°x tO Honorable Mayor and Members °A ` July 16, 1990 ��� of the City Commission SUBJECT : Dade Savings V. City . aF Ki#ui i v. George Byaan construeti46tk i F ' Miami Center a►ssoeiatos i Ines FROM : Jorge L. FernandeZ REFERENCES : Case go. 84-187t4 (.i)3) City Attorney Recomended Settlement ENCLOSURES : Resolution The subject case involves litigation concerning building code defects in the Miami Convention Center garage. (commonly referred to as the "Centrust Garage"). In 1980, pursuant to City Commission Resolution No. 80-21, a "turn -key" contract was entered into with Miami Center Associates, Inc. ("MCA") to construct a, -parking garage adjacent to the Miami Convention Center MCA hired The George Hyman Construction Company ("Hyman") to build the garage. In February of 1981, the City entered into "Change Order No. 1" wherein the City agreed to issue joint payment checks to both MCA and Hyman. The City of Miami, along with Dade County, was sued in 1984.by then - Dade`, Savings and Loan Association alleging that the Dade County Board of Rules- and Appeals, the authority which passes on - interpretations of the South Florida Building Code, violated the Sunshine Law by rendering a decision regarding alleged building Cade violations in the garage. The Courts ruled that. the decision by said Board was void. As a result of being sued by Dade Savings, the City of Miami sued MCA and Hyman for building; code defects and the costs of corrections. The City was in turn countersued by both MCA and Hyman for monies due and owing for.,. n construction work performed on the garage. The City has been : withholding $271,125.00 in retainage due MCA and Hyman pencinq . completion of remedial repair and/or punchlist work required by; _ various building inspectors. - $271,125.00 has been due Hyman under the contract. RoNevsr, h because of non --compliance with the South Florida Building Code', the City has withheld this amount pending remedial wbr)k involving, among other things, painting low overhead be yellow:` and installing warning signs throughout the garage. $yman' - agreed to accept $386,000.00 in settlement of this case and turn will perform the remedial, measures to satisfy the bui,ldi gI. official (since the above retainage has been earning i.ntexestn ri - an interest -bearing bankaccount• additional monies need nod: be: appropriated to settle this litigation). Both Hymawi un and MCA `ll _A then execute releases in favor of the City and obtain a ftnol certificate of occupancy. - r, r Honorable Mayor and Members July 16, 1990 of the City Commission Page Two` Both the City Manager's Office and this office recommend that this case be settled as outlined above to avoid the additional expense of litigation and a possible adverse verdict against the City. Therefore, it is respectfully recommended by the City Attorney and the City Manager that the requested amount of Three Hundred Eighty -Eight Thousand Dollars ($388,000.00) be approved by the City Commission for full settlement of the claims by MCA -and Hyman pursuant to the terms as outlined in the attached Resolution. JLF/C FK/n r/M4 43