HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-90-0783WHEREAS, pursuant to public notice, sealed bid were received
August 22, 1990 for the furnishing of one high speed electronic
copier duplicator on a contract basis for five (5) years for the
Department of GeneralServices Administration/Graphic
Reproduction Division; and
WHEREAS, the Eastman Kodak Company has filed a protest in
regard to this proposed acquisition; and
termined by the Chief Procurement
WHEREAS, it has been de
Officer, in his role as the arbiter of bid protests, pursuant to
Section 18-56.1, that the bid protest filed by Eastman Kodak
Company be rejected as it lacks merit; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and the City Attorney concur with
and approve the finding of the Chief Procurement Officer and
recommend rejection of the bid protest filed by Eastman Kodak'
i
i Company;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
r f�:
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
� is
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
k e.
section.
Section 2. The Chief Procurement Officer's decision to �
a
reject the protest received from by Eastman Kodak CompanYn
one -high a eed electronic copier;
connection with, furnishing r 9 P
t �
vet T.
r �
l
r } and
5
44
aimAm
ACThk{
,-
�i„
AT S
MATTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
JOR E L. FE NANDEZ
CITY ATTORN Y
BSS:gb:M1889
f 54
1
�T�'v3�
Yew
v � ��h $' }1. �, rS _.5 ... .0 .. .-. '. �..��
v..,f•:. t..,. }...:- r?t{�r_ f K.k.�
August 22, 1990 for the furnishing or one reign speeu eiecLrcn►iu
copier duplicator on a contract basis for five (5) years for the
Department of General Services Administration/Graphic
Reproduction Division; and
WHEREAS, the Eastman Kodak Company has filed a protest in
regard tothisproposed acquisition; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Chief Procurement
Officer, in his role as the arbiter of bid protests, pursuant to
Section 18-56.1, that the bid protest filed by Eastman Kodak
Company be rejected as it lacks merit; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and the City Attorney concur with
and approve the finding of the Chief Procurement Officer and
recommend rejection of the bid protest filed by Eastman Kodak
Company;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
3:
i
ILAW
i
k
„sr r
a
3
4!
3 t .
o�
General services
catb� �Clr the Department
Reproduction biviion,
did No. 89�0-1 r
t;
iriiatration/Graphic
hereby approved.
}
Resolution
shall
became effective
section 3. This
immediately upon its adoption.
1990.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this r�
day of
er
P„
XAVIER
AREZ , OR
r
AT S
/
i
MATTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM AID CORRECTNESS:
R E L. FE NANDEZ
CITY ATTORN Y
BSS:gb:M1889
rr
C
r,
7y F F ti
Mal —
d'
Ft
_
?_} .
t (1
The subject Resolution
dealing with the City Commission's
approval of a bid protest
rejection by the Chief Procurement"
Officer contains the word "COMPANY"
as the fourth word in the
fourth line of the Title.
This word is extraneous and its
appearance is an obvious scrivener's error.
Due to the absence of
any impact or effect resulting from
the inclusion or use of the word ("COMPANY"), no action is deemed
necessary or appropriate.
You may wish to keep this memorandum on file with any back-
up material you have in your
custody regarding the Item.
RFC:gb:P085
t
a
a
s
f#