The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-10894J-91-385 5/1/91 10894 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3710-3780 NORTHWEST 22ND AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL TO C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL; BY MAKING FINDINGS; BY MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 19 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of April 17, 1991, Item No. 4, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 27-91, by a 8 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend the Zoning Atlas as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification from C-1 Restricted Commercial to C-2 Liberal Commercial for the property located at approximately 3710-3780 Northwest 22nd Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lots 1-6, Block 4, GARDEN CITY, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 73 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Section 2. It is hereby found that this zoning classification change: 10894 a. is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; b. is in harmony with the established land use pattern; C. is related to adjacent and nearby districts; d. is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; e. maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; f. will change existing district boundaries which are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change; 9. is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; h. positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood; i. has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification; J. has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification; 'k. has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification; 1. has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent areas as the existing classification; M. will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; n. conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare; and _2_ 10894 o. is warranted because there are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. Section 3. Page No. 19 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of Ordinance No. 11000 by reference and description in Article 3, Section 300 thereof, is hereby amended to reflect the changes made necessary by this amendment. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. If any section, part of this section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after final reading and adoption thereof. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 23rd day of May , 1991. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 20th day of June , 1991. XAVIER L AREZ, YOR ATTEST MATTY AIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: 50 A, GJ y</—/ JE'LE. MAXW L IEF ASSIS T CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: A /\ V-A 1 :IC. JOR E L. FIWNANDEZ CITY ATTOR EY JEM/db/M799 -3- 10894 APPLICANT PETITION REQUEST PLANNING RECOMMENDATION ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMKISSION PZ03 PLANNING FACT SHEET City of Miami Planning, Building A Zoning Department: March 26, 1991 4. APPROXIMATELY 3710-37 80 NW 22ND AVENUE Lots 1-6 Block 4 GARDEN CITY (5-73) PRDC Consideration of amending Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami by changing the zoning classification of the subject property from C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL to C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL. To rezone the subject property for C-1 to C-2. Approval. The Land Use Plan adopted in 1989 changed the land use designation for these properties to General Commercial. However, the properties were inadvertently rezoned C-1 Restricted Commercial in Zoning Ordinance 11000 adopted in 1990. Reverting the zoning classification to C-2 General Commercial will correct this scrivener's error. At its meeting of April 17, 1991, the Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution Number PAB 27-91 by a 8 to 0 vote recommending approval of the above. Two replies AGAINST and three in FAVOR were received by mail. At its meeting of May 23, 1991, the City Cosission passed the above on First Reading. J0894 111111111 LINE Tag 14 =1_:5 J 2 2819 Z 11 10 7 11 7t,2- r. iero/1 f1 T,,,.- rr 10TT ( 7 ORDINANCE 11000 APProz: 3710-3780 N.k 22nd Ave. From: C-1 Restricted Commercial To: C-2 General Comore cial PAR 4/17/01 10894 z ANALYSIS X, The proposed change is in harmony with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, and does not require a plan amendment. X The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. X The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. g The change suggested is within scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City. X The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. is the same. X Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. X There are changes or changing conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary. X The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. X- The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. 10894 .122 22 a/A . X The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner within the same classification and the immediate area; and furthers the protection of the public welfare. X There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. X It is difficult to'find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 10894 5