HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10893J-91-384
5/1/91
10893
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2001-2193
NORTHWEST 36TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM R-3
MULTI -FAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND
C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL TO C-2 LIBERAL
COMMERCIAL; BY MAKING FINDINGS; BY MAILING ALL
NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 19 OF SAID
ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION
AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of April 17, 1991, Item No. 3, following an advertised public
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 26-91, by a 8 to 0 vote,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
the Zoning Atlas as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 11000, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classifications from R-3
Multi -Family Medium -Density Residential and C-1 Restricted
Commercial to C-2 Liberal Commercial for the property located at
approximately 2001-2193 Northwest 36th Street, Miami, Florida,
more particularly described as Unplatted (198 feet x 101.9 feet),
Lots 11 and 12, WOLVERINE PARK, according to the plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 6 at Page 124 of the Public Records of Dade
County, Florida; Lots 7-11, Block 2, BECKER SUB., according to
the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 16 at Page 43 of the
10893
Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and Lots 13-18, Block 3,
GARD9N CITY, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat
Book 5 at Page 73 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida.
Section 2. It is hereby found that this zoning
classification change:
a. is in conformity with the adopted Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan;
b. is in harmony with the established land use
pattern;
C. is related to adjacent and nearby districts;
d. is not out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or the City;
e. maintains the same or similar population density
pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax
the load on public facilities such as schools,
utilities, streets, etc.;
f. will change existing district boundaries which are
illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change;
9. is necessary due to changed or changing
conditions;
h. positively influences living conditions in the
neighborhood;
i. has the same or similar impact on traffic and does
not affect public safety to a greater extent than
the existing classification;
J. has the same or similar impact on drainage as the
existing classification;
k. has the same or similar impact on light and air to
adjacent areas as the existing classification;
1. has the same or similar impact on property values
in the adjacent areas as the existing
classification;
M. will contribute to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accord with existing
regulations;
n. conveys the same treatment to the individual owner
as to owners within the same classification and
the immediate area and furthers the protection of
the public welfare; and
0. is warranted due to the difficulty in finding
other adequate sites in the surrounding area for
the proposed use in districts already permitting
such use.
Section 3. Page No. 19 of the zoning Atlas, made a part of
Ordinance No. 11000 by reference and description in Article 3,
Section 300 thereof, is hereby amended to reflect the changes
made necessary by this amendment.
Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as
they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. If any section, part of this section, paragraph,
clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty
(30) days after final reading and adoption thereof.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 23rd day of
May , 1991.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY
this 20th day of June 1.
XAVIERt—UAREZ, MAYOR
ATTE
XATTY—RIRAI, CITY' CLERK
PRTARED AND APPROVED
W: 13- '11_� .4,
JJ4L E. MAXWELY
�r C EF ASSIST T CITY ATTORNEY
(
APP OVED A OR.M ANP CORRECTNESS:
JOR E L. FERJ ANDEZ
CI C TTORNE
JEM/db/M798
10893
i"
PZn2
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT
City of Miami Planning, Building & Zoning
Department: March 26, 1991
PETITION
3. APPROXIMATELY 2001-2123 NW 36TH STREET
UNPLATTED (198'x101.9')
Lot 11 and 12
WOLVERINE PARK (6-124)
Lots 7-11
Block 2
BECKER SUB. (16-43) PRDC
Lots 13-18
Block 3
GARDEN CITY (5-73) PRDC
Consideration of amending the Zoning Atlas of
Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami by changing the
zoning classification of the subject property
from R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL to C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL.
REQUEST
To rezone the subject property from R-3 and C-1
to C-2.
PLANNING RECOMMENDATION
Approval.
ANALYSIS
The Land Use Plan adopted in 1989 inadvertently
changed the land use designation of these
properties from General Commercial to Multi -
Family Medium Density Residential and Restricted
Commercial; the zoning classification was
changed to R-3 Multi -Family Medium Density
Residential and C-1 Restricted Commercial in
Zoning Ordinance 11000 adopted in 1990. The
Land Use Plan has been changed back to General
Commercial in comprehensive changes adopted on
January 24, 1991. Reverting the zoning
classification to C-2 Liberal Commercial' will
correct this scrivener's error.
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
At its nesting of April 17, 1991 the Planning
Advisory Board adopted Resolution Number PAB
26-91 by a 8 to 0 vote recommending approval
of the above.
Two replies AGAINST and four in FAVOR were
received by mail.
CITY COMMISSION
At its muting of May 23, 1991, the City
Commission passed the above on First
Reading.
1.'
UJ
Q
OARC
IN
ORD33UNCE 11000
9 Approa: 2001-2193 M.ii
35th St.
From: R-3 Medium Den-
sity Resideutia
A and C-1 Rest. C
1 To: C-2 General Car
mercial
PAB 4117/91
10893
2
ORDINANCE 11000
APPros: 2001-2193 N.W.
36th St.
From: R-3 Medium Den-
sity Residential
and C-1 Rest, Con
i}l+�+•-�# -ice ,qt+ tr -- 3� ,.w -, .. ,r To: C-2 General Com-
mercial
PAR 4/17/91
ANALYSIS
YA. N2 WA
g The proposed change is in harmony with the
adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
plan 1989-2000, and does not require a plan
amendment.
The proposed change is in harmony with the
established land use pattern.
The proposed change is related to adjacent and
nearby districts.
The change suggested is within scale with the
needs of the neighborhood or the City.
The proposed change maintains the same or similar
population density pattern and thereby the load on
public facilities such as schools, utilities,
streets, etc. is the same.
ries are
inlrelationstolexisting ct aconditions onillogically the property
proposed for change.
There are changes or changing conditions that
make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
The proposed change positively influences living
conditions in the neighborhood.
The proposed change has the same or similar
impact on traffic and does not affect
public safety as the existing classification.
The proposed change has the same or similar
impact on drainage as the existing
classification.
The proposed change has the same or similar
impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
The proposed change
uhas
in the adjacentsimilar
asimpact
on property vales
existing classification.
The proposed change will contribute to the
improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations..
10893
Y-OA H2 WA -
X The proposed change conveys the same treatment to
the individual owner as to the owner within the
same classification and the immediate area; and
furthers the protection of the public welfare.
X There are substantial reasons why the use of the
property is unfairly limited under existing
zoning.
X it is difficult to find other adequate sites in
the surrounding area for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.