HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10916J-91-471
7/8/91
ORDINANCE NO. 0
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1820-2010
SOUTHWEST 17TH AVENUE; 1700-1753 SOUTHWEST
19TH STREET (BOTH SIDES), MIAMI, FLORIDA
(MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM
R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-3 MEDIUM
DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND G/I
GOVERNMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL; BY MAKING
FINDINGS; BY MAKING ALL NECESSARY CHANGES ON
PAGE NO. 39 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING
A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of June 5, 1991, Item No. 11 following an advertised public
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 36-91, by a 6 to 0 vote,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
the Zoning Atlas as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 11000, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classification from R-2 Two
Family Residential to R-3 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential
and G/I Government and Institutional for the property located at
approximately 1820-2010 Southwest 17th Avenue; 1700-1753
Southwest 19th Street (both sides), Miami, Florida, more
particularly described as Lots 21-28 of Block 1, VENICE HEIGHTS
AMEND, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 28
at Page 69 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; all of
10916
MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB., according to the plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book B at Page 26 of the Public Records of Dade
County, Florida; and Tr. A, TELCO SUB., according to the plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 87 at Page 21 of the Public
Records of Dade County, Florida.
Section 2. It is hereby found that this zoning
classification change:
a. is in conformity with the adopted Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan;
b. is in harmony with the established land use
pattern;
C. is related to adjacent and nearby districts;
d., is not out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or the City;
e. maintains the same or similar population density
pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax
the load on public facilities such as schools,
utilities, streets, etc.;
f. will change existing district boundaries which are
illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change;
g. is necessary due to changed or changing
conditions;
-h. positively influences living conditions in the
neighborhood;
i. has the same or similar impact on traffic and does
not affect public safety to a greater extent than
the existing classification;
J. has the same or similar impact on drainage as the
existing classification;
k. has the same or similar impact on light and air to
adjacent areas as the existing classification;
1. has the same or similar impact on property values
in the adjacent areas as the existing
classification;
-2- 10916
M. will contribute to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accord with existing
regulations;
n. conveys the same treatment to the individual owner
as to owners within the same classification and
the immediate area and furthers the protection of
the public welfare; and
o. is warranted because there are substantial reasons
why the use of the property is unfairly limited
under existing zoning.
Section 3. Page No. 39 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of
Ordinance No. 11000 by reference and description in Article 3,
Section 300 thereof, is hereby amended to reflect the changes
made necessary by this amendment.
Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as
they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. If any section, part of this section, paragraph,
clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty
(30) days after final reading and adoption thereof.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 25th day of
July , 1991.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY
this 26th day of September , 1.
ATTE : v
MATTY HIRAI, CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
O `
LINDA KELL KE RSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
LKK/db/M816
FfA
Zr MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
4 0) n- 4--r- C
GE NANDEZ�
CITY ATTOR EY
10916
-3-
APPLICANT
PETITION
REQUEST
PLANNING
RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND
1.
PLANNING FACT SHEET
City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning
Department: May 15, 1991
Lots 21.28 (to R-3)
Block 1
VENICE HEIGHTS AMEND. (28-69) PROC
All of (to R-3)
MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB. (8-26) PRDC
Tr. A (to G/I)
TELCO SUB. (87-21) PRDC
Consideration of amending the zoning atlas of
Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of ss the City of Miami by changing the
zoning classification of the subject property
from R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL to R-3 MEDIUM
DENSITY MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and G/I
GOVERNMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL.
To rezone the subject property from R-2 to R-3
and GI.
Approval.
The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1976-
1986 designated the property as Low -Moderate
Density Residential; the 1985 plan continued the
same designation. Zoning Ordinance 6871
classified the property as Duplex and Medium
Density Multi Family; Zoning Ordinance 9500
classified the property as Duplex.
The land use designation in the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 for
the residential portion was changed on January
24► 1991 from Duplex to Multi Family Medium
Density Residential and Major Public Facilities
by Ordinance 10833.
10916
e
ANALYSIS
The zoning has to be changed from R-2 Two Family
Residential to R-3 Medium
Densityti
Residential and Government/Insttutionajami;n
order to comply with the Comprehensive
The property north of SW
19ttreet has a1a19
unit apartment building, 3 duplexes and 2 single
family residences,
and the property to the south
four apartment buildin
cs Occupiedng b
4
condominium buildsgsucontainng 39 nits)andnits, and La Arboleda ?4s
duplexes. units)
The tract on the south
Occupied by a Southern Bell facility.
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
At its Meeting of Jame S, 1991 the P lanniAdvisory
Board adopted resolution number PSB by
36 -91 a vote of
6 to 0 recommending approval of the above.
CITY COMMISSION
Thirty replies AGAINST and five in FAVOR were
received by maims'---
At its meeting of Jul
Commission passed the 5' 1991, the City
Reading, above on First
10916
U
ANALYSIS
YU Ha H�A
X The proposed change is in harmony -with the
adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan 1989-2000, and does not require a plan
amendment.
X The proposed change is in harmony with the
established land use pattern.
X The proposed change is related to adjacent and
nearby districts.
X The change suggested is within scale with the
needs of the neighborhood or the City.
X The proposed change maintains the same or similar
Population density pattern and thereby the load on
Public facilities such as schools, utilities,
atr"ta, etc. is the same.
X Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn
in relation to existing conditions on the property
Proposed for change.
X There are changes or changing conditions that
make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
X The proposed change g positively influences living
conditions in the neighborhood.
The proposed change has the same or similar
impact on traffic and does not affect
Public safety as the existing classification.
X The proposed change has the same or similar
impact
ct on drainage as the existing
classification.
X The proposed change has the same or similar
impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
X The proposed change has the same or similar impact
on property values in the adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
X The proposed change will contribute to the
improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
.1.0916
3
X2A S2 H�A
X The proposed change conveys the same treatment tc
the individual owner an to the owner within the
same classification and the immediate area; and
furthers the protection of the public welfare.
X There are substantial reasons why the use of the
property in unfairly limited under existing
zoning.
X It in difficult to find other adequate sites in
the surrounding area for the proposed use in
-districts already permitting such use.
���,111���/Jj21Q212J12=��11)11•I.�,{IIt12�712t�1J12• 2
c-- S.W
.v- 17 S T.
�
-�•I•�• �..i.
6 '
°,'I' �� ' tt 11 IoI•'1 � l• �J
,• I 1
t
• � • I 13 • I • OQ,•'�
• �� 3 1{
ER
�3N► ' t t 3 a a 1 tl•
2 8 ��r• •
• W M . •
-12111i10 • t ells It • �' S 16 ST.
J. ".
:1
t
1 i l
A
f
If t
I f
Joe
g
I.
1
,
11
M
•
I •
+
6
1•
1•
II
•
13 M
t
13
12
11
0
RK
AY
S T.
3 � 1`l ��_ I ♦ 1 I
}n •�,jJ • 3 • !li
� g, t 1� ,• It I 13 t r' .
S� t2113 I •
W. 19
» Irs lip
• ,. •
•p
N.6-
17
{ ! T
3 J TE RR. p ' _ I. 7 >
.., r 1 t 2
e l 1 �• o r r • Q
t — 3 7
4 g '• 1
{
• N {/f
� 10
•>K. s 0 '
T •1( 3.— l i I W I • ,
6
t • ! t F.." tr • w r
.t 21 ST. I
2.I1�1job
g3�. , eIT2 3 3i
It II• I♦ I1f It 117 11• m t • is • 10 l,j
S I I I I I•, •'� I I' I I I o'k3 1!
'RR. S.W.H R• _
f •� •3 1 ia a I'1 3 • 2 I s 1 I1l1 to
3 I `^ 3
12 I1 3 I1 Ili • I�'tf 11• I7�.I.1.1. �� M�•
�YYli��slit
17 - 1
�1(7T EER R�
I1 1:1) I••I�
1
2
)
a
f
W
C
2•
t)
t
tl
0 �
A4 I
OlJ1f tit j11� la I13 ' • 3 It
It
S.W.
S X
22
S T. (CORAL
C
r
• = 1
,��!
I
I
r
Z
t•
>
7I III
2 It
be
31
2 3 3
3•
3D
Q
PO
31f
17'
211 2.
3 0
11
j
It
2
ER.
-
I
f�
, p
0
.•
{
I t
I •
!
M
I
)
t 1
I♦
13
1t 1 1
to
•
I {
t
{ I ►
j
Ki
Ito R-3 u
I to Gil I
6
>.• i . . . . . ,•
1 e 7 • f 10 11 .: J� 0
12 13 t• 17 1s to
S.W. 211.
• ♦ I 1• v 3• 3 b+ 112 3; 1
GA ROEMSL Q
•A• C I 1 i A Ai t l
• -�I s t A 0 D ���� 11000
. Approm: 1820-2010 S-N
„ 17th Ave 170C
1753 S.W- 19t
Street
). (Both Sides)
21 It
2 at Cd II 1 From: R-2 Two Family
3 Residential
t3 4
To: A-3 Medium Den-
sity Multifamily
Residential and
0 0 16 G/I Governslent
and Institutions
PAB 6/5/91
oil I
Mill1111111 UNION
aumnm��m� �11
u�nu� m�im�munnn __
-�
■ ��� t!', �� •M 3 pit ti_TP,
y " is
� r L
rt
LL L i r
;1 S'
r
.. � r.
ORs
1y�
!400
.Cyl� k � r : r � � f.Me¢ ii • p� w
�.Y
R E. C,fi ' . _ �J
cur _9
�... CITY Cl.
MIAMI 1411 {l, F/ ,
Published Deily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Bofors the undersigned authority personally appeared
Sookie %Mlllams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice
President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
LEGAL NOTICE
RE: ORDINANCE NO. 10917
X X X
Inthe ......................................... Court,
was published in said newspaper In the Issues of
October 4, 1991
Afflant further says that the said Miami Review Is a
newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida,
ppond that the said news
ppaper has heretofore been continuously
Satulydey, S nday end Legal HolidayFlorida hasebeen ent(except
red as
sepbn'on
mall matter at the poet office In Miami In said
DaFlorida, for a period of one yoar next preceding thation of the attached copy of advertisement- end
afsays that she has neither paid nor promises any
per corporation any discount, rebate, commission
orthe (((Nose of securing this advertisement for
puthe a newspaperk// e,
- - _...._.�.....yr. vr� .. .......
vvAwep►J and subscribed before me this
4th 1 91
day of }+ fiw .......... A.D. 19...... .
f
(SEAL) *»r OR*«
,OFFICIAL
NOTARY r
M INGEU40
C
MY COW. EXP. 4/5/95