Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
O-10832
J-90-445 1/24/91 ORDINANCE NO. 10832 AN ORDINANCE, WITH ATTACHMENT, RELATING TO LAND USE, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10544, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989- 2000, BY AMENDING THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THOSE ELEMENTS PERTAINING TO: FUTURE LAND USE; INTERPRETATION OF FUTURE LAND USE MAPS; HOUSING; SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS; NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE; POTABLE WATER; SOLID WASTE COLLECTION; TRANSPORTATION; PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES; PARKS, RECREATION; AND OPEN SPACE; COASTAL MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION; AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, SAID AMENDMENT MAKING SUBSTANTIVE ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS; ALSO MAKING TECHNICAL CHANGES; FURTHER UPDATING DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND TIME FRAMES; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; AND PROVIDING A REPEALER PROVISION, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 20, 1990, Item No. 4(a), following an advertised hearing ' adopted Resolution No. 49-90 by a vote of 5 to 0, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 10544, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, during a duly held public hearing January 24, 1991, the density cap of the Pequena Habana target area which is reflected in said Attachment "A" was reviewed and is hereby increased from 150 units per acre to 200 units per acre; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend Ordinance No. 10544 as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Ordinance are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. ATTIC Fi E N TS C T� I NEB 10832 Section 2. Ordinance No. 10544, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended, is hereby amended as shown on the attached pages which appear as Attachment "A", hereto. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. If any section, part of this section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of this Ordinance immediately upon approval of first reading to Bill Sadowski, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, for 90 day review and comment. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty-five (45) days after final reading and adoption thereof. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th day of June 1990. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 24th day of January , 1991. XAVIER L. SU REZ, YOR ATTEST':11 MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: e/ i '1 1!.� YIL E. MAXWELLEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JORGE L t F DEZ CITY ATT RNEY JEM/db/M642 -2- 10832 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS x 7 4 0 C E N T E R V I E W DRIVE • T A L L A H A S S E E, F L O R I D A 3 2 3 9 9 BOB MARTINEZ THOMAS G. PELHAM Grm"Xw Secretary December 15, 1990 The Honorable Xavier L. Suarez Mayor of Miami Post Office Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33128 Dear Mayor Suarez: The Department has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment (Amendment 90-2) for the City of Miami' which was submitted on August 31, 1990. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional and local agencies for their review and their comments are. enclosed. I am enclosing the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, issued pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010, Florida Administrative Code. Upon receipt of this report, the City of Miami has 60 days in which to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes, or reject the amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s.163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Admini- strative Code. Within five working days of the date of adoption, the City of Miami must submit the following to the Department: Five copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A copy of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 0 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT The Honorable Xavier L. Suarez December 15, 1990 page Two changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendments and documentation are required for the Department to conduct the compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. As a deviation from the requirement above, you are requested to provide one of the five copies of the adopted amendments directly to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The regional planning councils have been asked to review adopted amendments to determine local comprehensive plan compliance with the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan. Please forward these documents to the regional planning council concurrent with your transmittal to the Department. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Robert Pennock, Bureau Chief, or Maria Abadal, Plan Review Administrator at (904) 487-4545. Sincerely, Rost qI. ,viak'rd- Robert G. Nave, Director Division of Resource Planning and Management RGN/tmp , ,.I Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments cc: Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director, Planning, Building and Zoning Department .' SERGIO RODRIGUEZ Director January 9, 1990 Cr' it�r xrf Aiami' 10 ti ct ueta O q�FGb FLp�\ Mr. Bill Sadowski, Secretary Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive - Tallahassee, Florida 32399 CESAR H. ODIO City Manager RE: Amendment 90-2 (City of Miami Amendments Nos. 90�-5, 90-9, 90-11 and 90-12) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Dear Mr. Sadowski: This letter is a formal invitation for your Department to participate in the public hearing on the adoption, .by ordinance, of the plan amendments referenced above, pursuant to Chapter 163.3184(8)(a) F.S. These items are scheduled as Items PZ-1 and PZ-4 (90-5 and 90-9) after 9:00 a.m. and PZ-22 and PZ-23 (90-11 and 90-12) after 5:00 p.m. Thursday, January 24, 1991 at the Miami City Hall, 3500 Pan-American Drive, Dinner Key. Because the agenda for the January 24th meeting is expected to be lengthy and contain several controversial items, your local arrangements should include a block of time from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. at City Hall. The Commission customarily will not take up a new item after 9:00 p.m., and will adjourn shortly thereafter. The agenda packet to be supplied to the City Commission pertaining to this item includes: a. Planning Fact Sheet, maps, analyses, concurrency, and ordinance. b. City of Miami transmittal letter and materials to DCA dated July 27, 1990. C. Transmittal letter from DCA with Objections, Recommendations and Comments, including outside agency letters, dated December 15, 1990, and the City of Miami responses thereto. Page Iof2 10832 �V PLANNING DEPARTMENT/2.75 N.W. 2nd Street/Miami, Florida 33128/(305) 579-6086 1j Mailing Address - P.O.Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 te�-� Mr. Bill Sadowski, Secretary Florida Department of Community Affairs January 9, 1991 As this letter is being written, I believe that the objections raised in your Objections, Recommendations and Comments report can be resolved to our mutual satisfaction; but I would not want to entirely foreclose the possibility of a technical assistance meeting with your staff prior to January 24th. Please contact Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director, at Suncom 921-6086 if there are further questions. SR/vh vh/91/084 cc' Robert G. Nave, Director Division of Resource Planning and Management Jack Osterholt, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney Law Department Att: Joel E. Maxwell, Chief Assistant City Attorney Clark Turner, planning and Zoning Division Planning, Building and Zoning Dept. Gloria Fox, Division Chief Hearing Boards Office Planning, Building and Zoning Dept. Page 2 of 2 10832 a� RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS CITY OF MIAMI Amendment 90-2 (City of Miami Amendment Nos. 90-5, 90-9, 90-11 and 90-12) DATA AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS A. OBJECTIONS 1. 9J-5.005 (2) (a) and (5) ; and S.163.3177 (6) (a) and (8) , F.S. Proposed Amendment 90-11, which revises the goals, objectives and policies in all elements of the City's adopted plan by "making substantive additions and deletions; technical and perfecting changes and updating dollar amounts and time frames" (page 11 Attachment 90- 11-B), does not include relevant and appropriate data and analysis to support these changes. Recommendation Revise proposed Amendment'90-11 to include relevant and appropriate data and analysis to support the revised goals, objectives and policies in all elements of the plan. Revise the proposed amendment consistent with the required data and analysis. B. COMMENTS 1. See objections to specific proposed revised objectives and policies in the Future Land Use, Portable Water, and Natural Resource Conservation Elements. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. See responses to the Objections to specific proposed revised objectives and policies in the Future Land Use, Potable Water, and Natural Resource Conservation Elements. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS Data 1. 9J-5.006 (1) (a) ; 9J-5.005 (1) (e) ; and 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 2. 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 1 ho The map series submitted with Amendment 90-12, which is intended to depict the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments, does not include a legend that indicates a north arrow, map scale, date, and a key to the land use categories. Recommendation Revise the map series to include a legend that indicates a north arrow, map scale, date, and a key to the land use categories. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The map series has been revised to include a legend that includes a north arrow, map scale, date, and a key to the land use categories. 2. 9J-5.006 (1) (g) and (4) ; and 9J-5.005 (2) (e) An analysis of the effect of the 348 proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 upon the population projections is not included. For example, a number of proposed map amendments propose changing parcels of land designated as "Multi -Family High Density" to "Restricted Commercial" or "Duplex" to "Industrial." Recommendation Include an analysis of the effect of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments upon the population projections. City of Miami Response to Objection 2. The City of Miami is a mature central city, almost completely developed in urban uses. Population increases are accommodated by a) overcrowding -- which is not affected by land use acreage -- or b) redevelopment -- by which low -density residential areas are gradually succeeded by higher density residential uses. Population forecasts over the period covered by the comprehensive plan are approximately 10-15%. Therefore, population projections for the City of Miami are not based upon the future land use plan map designations, but rather on a model that includes such variables as past growth rates for the city, metropolitan area, region and state; economic forecasts translated into likelihood of net in -migration, as well as statistical measures such as birth and death rates and net natural increase. In evaluating proposed changes to the future land use plan map, it is necessary to assess the quantities of land in each land use category affected by the proposed changes, to ensure that sufficient land is designated in each category to accommodate the 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 2 N projected future population, as well as for the facilities, services, and activities needed to meet the population's physical, social, economic, and cultural needs, and that adequate acreage continues to be available for future use. As will be seen in the City's responses following, the net effect of modest population forecasts on these proposed changes in the available acreages is negligible, and the future land use plan map continues to designate ample land in each category to accommodate the forecasted population. Analysis 3. 9J-5.006 (2) (b) and (e) and (4) ; and 9J-5.012 (2) (a) - (d) The 348 proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 are not supported by an analysis of the suitability of use for the proposed uses, including consideration of natural and historic resources, topography, compatibility of adjacent land uses, soils and flood prone areas. For example, a number of proposed map amendments proposed changing parcels of land designated as "Major Public Facility" to "Single -Family" or "Duplex" to "Industrial." Recommendation Include an analysis of the suitability of use for the proposed uses, including consideration of natural and historic resources, topography, compatibility of adjacent land uses, soils and flood prone areas. Revise the Future Land Use Map Series to be consistent with the analysis. City of Miami Response to Objection 3. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendments total 348 parcels, or 0.4% of the City's approximately 85,000 parcels; and together comprise 474.51 acres of land, or slightly over 2% of the City's 22,144 acre area, exclusive of water. The proposed amendments include 134 parcels comprising 116.08 acres that are proposed to correct errors made when the land use map was created; another 135 parcels totalling 265.58 acres are changes necessary to bring the City's new zoning ordinance into consistency with the comprehensive plan (see the response to Objection 5, below, for further explanation of this group of changes). These "scrivener's errors" and "necessary changes" are corrective in nature, and do not alter the substance of the Future Land Use Plan; they merely strive to depict the -Plan as accurately as possible. The balance of 79 parcels, or less than 0.1% of the total parcels in the city, comprising 92.85 acres, or 0.04% of the total city January 14, 1991 10832 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 3 l area, are changes proposed by the City Commission following public hearing on the proposed plan amendments. These changes are the result of public input and staff evaluation and are typically minor in effect, both individually and cumulatively. Because the previous land use plan map designations of February, 1989 had already been evaluated for suitability of use, including consideration of natural and historic resources, topography, soils and flood prone areas, it was determined that only the compatibility of adjacent land uses was relevant in the present evaluation. Analysis reveals that in all cases, the proposed changes are compatible with the adjacent land uses; in fact, the majority of changes increase compatibility by eliminating one -or - two parcel land -use "islands" within a larger group (see the response to Objection 41 below, for further discussion of the evaluation process). 4. 9J-5.006 (2) (c) and (4) ; 9J-5.012 (2) (a) - (d) ; and 9J- Numerous proposed amendments to Future Land Use Map found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 propose to increase the density or intensity of use; however, the amendments are not supported by an analysis of the need to increase densities and intensities of use. Table II of Amendment 90-12 also does not include the acreage amounts for all of the proposed land use changes. In addition, the amendments are not supported by an analysis of the affects of these amendments on the estimated gross acreage needed for each land use category. Recommendation Include an analysis of the need to increase the density or intensity of use for the proposed map amendments. Revise Table II of Amendment 90-12 to include acreage amounts for all of the proposed map changes. Include an analysis of the effects of these amendments on the estimated gross acreage needed for each land use category. City of Miami Response to Objection 4. The 348 parcels of land are proposed for change in order to satisfy other planning requirements than density or intensity of land use. To repeat, 134 parcels are proposed for change to correct errors; another 135 parcels are proposed for consistency; only 79 parcels are being changed as a result of substantive policy decisions. Consequently, an analysis of the need to increase density is not relevant; any resultant changes in permitted densities are a consequence of, not a cause for, the proposed changes. January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 10832 - Page 4 C:�j Acreages for all the proposed changes are shown in the last column of Table II of Amendment 90-12, totalled by Item number. That is, where there are two or more parcels included in a single Item, the acreage is shown for the total Item. The net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreage needed for each land use category is negligible (see the response to Objection 3, preceding). The City has performed a concurrency management analysis of the potential impact of the proposed changes on the required facilities and services. The analysis is shown on Table II of Amendment 90-12 for each parcel proposed for a land use change either as a "necessary change" or by City Commission initiative, but excluding scrivener's errors. The analysis indicates whether the proposed change would result in an increase (+), no change (=), or a decrease (-) in potential impact on each of the six required facilities and services. Further analysis of these figures reveals that 49 parcels totalling 106.1 acres would increase in potential intensity; 73 parcels totalling 112.02 acres would decrease in potential intensity; and 92 parcels totalling 140.31 acres would remain at the same potential intensity. Therefore, potential intensity increases on 106.1 acres would be offset by decreases on 112.02 acres; while the remaining acreage would neither increase nor decrease in potential intensity. In summary, then, the total potential demand on facilities and services would be reduced as a result of these changes; but it should be pointed out that the total effect of the changes is nonetheless slight. Goals, Objectives and Policies 5. 9-5.006 (3) (b) 1. and 4. and (3) (c) 1., 2., 6., and 7.; 9J- 11.006 (1) (b) 5, and S.163.3202 (1) and .3194, F.S. Proposed Amendment 90-12 is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Objectives 1.1, 1.31 1.5 and 1.6 and Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.3, 1.5.1, 1.6.11 1.6.9. and 1.6.11 because an analysis of the population projections, the suitability of use for the proposed uses and the need to increase the density or intensity of use is not included. See also the objections raised for 9J- 5.006 (1) (g) and (2) (b) , 2 (c) and 2 (e) . In addition, the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D as "Necessary Changes" are not consistent with S.163.3202(1), F.S., and Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6.2 because Attachment '90-12-E states that these changes are necessary to be consistent with the City's Zoning Atlas. However, S.163.3202(1) and .3194, F.S., and Policy 1.6.2 require that the 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 5 City's zoning ordinance be consistent with and implement the Future Land Use Map Series. Recommendation Include an analysis of the population projections, the suitability of use for the proposed uses and the need to increase the density or intensity of use for the proposed Future Land Use Map Series to resolve the objections cited for 9J-5.006 (1) (g) and (2) (b) , (c) and (e). [See response (2) below]. Include in the analysis how the proposed amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Objectives 1.1, 1.31 1.5 and 1.6 and Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.3, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 1.6.9, and 1.6.11. Revise the City's Zoning Atlas to be consistent with and implement the Future Land Use Map Series. [See response (1) below]. In addition, revise the proposed Future Land Use Map Series amendments to be consistent with the required analysis, the cited objectives and policies, and S.163.3202(1) and .3194, F.S. [See response (3) below] . City of Miami Response to Objection 5. (1) The characterization of "Necessary Changes" in Attachment 90- 12E as "necessary in order to be consistent with the Zoning Atlas" is an unfortunate choice of words resulting from a complex set of relationships between the Future Land Use Plan and the City's newly -adopted zoning ordinance, as explained in the following paragraph. A more accurate statement would probably have been "necessary in order to achieve consistency between zoning regulations and the Future Land Use Plan", as indeed these amendments are intended, pursuant to the requirements of 162.3202(1)'and 163.3194 F.S., and the City's land use policies. Within one year following the comprehensive plan's adoption, the City was required to adopt Land Development Regulations consistent with the plan, and these were submitted in the form of a draft of a new zoning ordinance in January, 1990. The required public hearings on the new zoning ordinance were lengthy -- covering a period of more than four months -- which essentially continued the land use planning process and stimulated interest among the public and leading elected officials to look again at the plan. The result of this process was both the new zoning ordinance and a set of proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan. Guiding the entire process was the set of Goals, Objectives and Policies and the Future Land Use Plan Map adopted by the City in 1989; but the process leading to the modifications that were necessary to eliminate errors and achieve consistency between them and the zoning map resulted in simultaneous consideration of t-he land use plan and the zoning map. Because the City's Land Use Plan Map is very detailed, it has a unusually high degree of correspondence with the zoning map; so much so that an amendment to one almost invariably requires a corresponding amendment to the other. This 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 6 � L situation can lead to confusion, especially when many changes are being made almost simultaneously, as in the present instance. Therefore, in order to clarify its intent, the City requests that the characterization of "Necessary Changes" in Attachment 90-12E as "necessary in order to be consistent with the Zoning Atlas" be modified to read as "necessary in order to achieve consistency between zoning regulations and the Future Land Use Plan" pursuant to the requirements of 162.3202(1) and 163.3194 F.S., and the City's land use policies. (2) Population projections for the City of Miami are not based upon the future land use plan map designations, but rather on a model that includes such variables as past growth rates for the city, metropolitan area, region and state; economic forecasts translated into likelihood of net in -migration, as well as statistical measures such as birth and death rates and net natural increase. It is essential to ensure that sufficient land is designated in each category to accommodate the projected future population, as well as for the facilities, services, and activities needed to meet the population's physical, social, economic, and cultural needs. (3) In evaluating proposed changes to the future land use plan map, it is necessary to assess the quantities of land in each land use category affected by the proposed changes, to ensure that sufficient acreage continues to be available for future use. As will be seen in the City's responses following, the net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreages is negligible, and the future land use plan map continues to designate ample land in each category to accommodate the forecasted population. The 348 parcels of land are proposed for change in order to satisfy other planning requirements than density or intensity of land use. To repeat, 134 parcels are proposed for change to correct errors; another 135 parcels are proposed for consistency; only 79 parcels are being changed as a result of substantive policy decisions. Consequently, an analysis of the need to increase density is not relevant; any resultant changes in permitted densities are a consequence of, not a cause for, the proposed changes. Acreages for all the proposed changes are shown in the last column of Table II of Amendment 90-12, totalled by Item number. That is, where there are two or more parcels included in a single Item, the acreage is shown for the total Item. The net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreage needed for each land use category is negligible. The City has performed a concurrency management analysis of the potential impact of the proposed changes on the required facilities and services. The analysis is shown on Table II of Amendment 90-12 for each parcel proposed for a land use change either as a "necessary change" or by City Commission initiative, 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 7 4 iyv but excluding scrivener's errors. The analysis indicates whether the proposed change would result in an increase (+), no change (_), or a decrease (-) in potential impact on each of the six required facilities and services. Further analysis of these 'figures reveals that 49 parcels totalling 106.1 acres would increase in potential intensity; 73 parcels totalling 112.02 acres would decrease in potential intensity; and 92 parcels totalling 140.31 acres would remain at the same potential intensity. Therefore, potential intensity increases on 106.1 acres would be offset by decreases on 112.02 acres; while the remaining acreage would neither increase nor decrease in potential intensity. In summary, then, the total potential demand on facilities and services would be reduced as a result of these changes; but it should be pointed out that the total effect of the change is nonetheless slight. 6. 9J-5.006 (3) (c) 7. and (4) ; and 5.163.3202 (1) and .3194, F.S. Proposed Amendment 90-11, proposes the change the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map" section of the Future Land Use Element (pages 22 and 23 of Attachment 90-11-C) for Residential --Medium Density Multi -Family and Residential --High Density Multi -Family land use categories by deleting maximum density requirements and allowing development "up to the intensity defined in the zoning ordinance for each of the zoning districts classified under this land use designation" is not consistent with Rule 9J- 5.006 (3) (c) 7., F.A.C., and 5.163.3202 (1) and .3194, F.S. Rule 9J-5.006(3)(c)7., F.A.C., requires that a policy be adopted to establish densities or intensities of use for each future land use category and S.163.3202(1) and .3194, F.S., require that the City's zoning ordinance be consistent with and implement the policies of the City's plan. In addition, proposed revisions to the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map" section do not specify the suitable locations for the community -based residential facilities that will be allowed to be located in the Residential --Medium Density Multi -Family and Residential --High Density Multi -Family land use categories. Recommendation Revise proposed Amendment 90-11 to not delete the maximum density allowed in the Residential --Medium Density Multi -Family and Residential --High Density Multi -Family land use categories and to maintain the density in the City's adopted plan. Revise the proposed amendment to specify the suitable locations for the 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 8 ar. community -based residential facilities that will be allowed to be located in the Residential --Medium Density Multi -Family and Residential --High Density Multi -Family land use categories. City of Miami Response to Objection 6. The section entitled "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map" of the Future Land Use Element has been revised to restore standards for maximum potential densities for each of the various future land use designations as required by 163.3177(6)(a) F.S. and Rule 9J-5.006 (3) (c) 7. F.A.C. References to community -based residential facilities (CBRFs) in the section "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map" of the Future Land Use Element have been revised to make clear the intent of the City that CBRFs of six clients or less are permitted, pursuant to applicable state law, as a matter of right in the single and multi -family residential land use classifications; that CBRFs of 14 clients or less are permitted in the Duplex, Medium Density, and High Density Residential classifications pursuant to applicable state law, and that CBRFs of 15 clients or more, which are not subject to the requirements of state law, may be allowed in the Medium Density and High Density Residential classifications in suitable locations. Detailed siting considerations are contained in the city's Land Development Regulations. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS Analysis 1. 9J-5.007 (2) (b) and (3) (b) and (c) ; and 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 4. and 5. An analysis of the projected traffic circulation levels of service and system needs based upon the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90- 12-D of Amendment 90-12 for the initial and remaining increments of the planning period is not included. In addition, an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Traffic Circulation Element objectives and policies is not included. See also the attached comments from the Florida Department of Transportation. Recommendation Include an analysis of the projected traffic circulation levels of service and system needs based upon the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments for the initial and remaining increments of the planning period. 08 3 2 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 9 Include an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Traffic Circulation Element objectives and policies. Revise the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments consistent with the required analysis and the objectives and policies. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The City has performed a concurrency management analysis of the potential impact of the proposed future land use map amendments on the projected traffic circulation levels of service and system needs. The analysis is shown under the general heading "Facilities and Services", subheading "Traffic Circulation:, in two columns labeled "Chg."(Change) and "LOS"(Level of Service), on Table II of Amendment 90-12 for each parcel proposed for a land use change either as a "necessary change" or by City Commission initiative, but excluding scrivener's errors. The analysis indicates whether the proposed change would result in an increase (+), no change (=), or a decrease (-) in potential traffic generation, and evaluates each of these as "OK" or "NO" in terms of impact on the required LOS as adopted by the City in its Transportation Policies. Analysis of these proposed future land use map amendments reveals that changes involving 49 parcels totalling 106.1 acres would increase in potential traffic generation; 73 parcels totalling 112.02 acres would decrease in potential traffic generation; and 92 parcels totalling 140.31 acres would remain at the same potential traffic generation. Therefore, potential traffic generation increases on 106.1 acres would be offset by decreases on 112.02 acres; while the remaining acreage would neither increase nor decrease in potential traffic generation. In summary, then, the total potential traffic generation would be reduced as a result of these changes; but it should be pointed out that the total effect of the proposed changes is nonetheless statistically insignificant. The changes are fully consistent with the MCNP Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies. With respect to the comments made by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), it should be pointed out that the City's adopted Transportation Policies are based on a methodology that differs from the FDOT "Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual" and the 1985 "Highway Capacity Manual", consequently, the City's Level of Service standards will not be compatible with those used by FDOT. The City's methodology, as adopted by the City and approved by DCA in accordance with the provisions of Rule 9J5.0055(1)(d) is explained and justified in the booklet "Transportation Corridors", a copy of which is enclosed, excerpted from the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan's Transportation Element. HOUSING ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 10 Q P Analysis 1. 9J-5.010 (2) and (3) (b) and (c) ; and 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 5. An analysis of the effect of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 upon housing needs of the anticipated populations, including the ability of the City to provide adequate and affordable housing, with particular emphasis on low and moderate income households, is not included. In addition, an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Housing Element objectives and policies is not included. Recommendation Include an analysis of the effect of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments upon housing needs of the anticipated populations, including the ability of the City to provide adequate and affordable housing, with particular emphasis on low and moderate income households. Include an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Housing Elements objectives and policies. Revise the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments consistent with the required analysis and the objectives and policies. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendments total 348 parcels, or 0.4% of the City's approximately 85,000 parcels; and together comprise 474.51 acres of land, or slightly over 2% of the City's 22,144 acre area, exclusive of water. The proposed amendments include 134 parcels comprising 116.08 acres that are proposed to correct errors made when the land use map was created; another 135 parcels totalling 265.58 acres are changes necessary to bring the City's new zoning ordinance into consistency with the comprehensive plan. These "scrivener's errors" and "necessary changes" are corrective in nature, and do not alter the substance of the Future Land Use Plan; they merely cause the map to be accurate in its depiction of the Plan. The balance of 79 parcels, or less than 0.1% of the total parcels in the city, comprising 92.85 acres, or 0.4% of the total city area, are changes proposed by the City Commission following public hearing on the proposed plan amendments. These changes are the result of public input and staff evaluation and are typically minor in effect, both individually and cumulatively. The net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreage for each land use category is negligible. The impact of the changes on residential densities and on low -and - moderate income housing opportunities and availability is 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 11 2) effectively neutral, although a marginal increase in availability and opportunity might occur where higher potential densities are a consequence of the change. In any event, the effect is statistically insignificant. The changes are fully consistent with the MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies, in particular Housing Policies 1.1.5, 1.1.9, 1.1.3, 1.3.2, 2.1.1, and 2.1.4. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER, AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS Data and Analysis 1. 9J-5.011 (1) (f) and (2) (b) and (c) ; and 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 4. and 5. An analysis of the projected sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water levels of service and system needs based upon the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90- 12 for the initial and remaining increments of the planning period is not included. In addition, an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage and Potable Water Element objectives and policies is not included. Recommendation Include an analysis of the projected sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage potable water levels of service and system needs based upon the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments the initial and remaining increments of the planning period. Include an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map increments are consistent with the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage and Potable Water Element objectives and policies. Revise the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments consistent with the required analysis and the objectives and policies. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The City has performed a concurrency management analysis of the potential impact of the proposed future land use map amendments on the projected sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water levels of service and system needs. The analysis is shown under the general heading "Facilities and Services", subheadings "Sanitary Sewer", Solid Waste", Storm Drainage", and "Potable Water", in two columns beneath each subheading labeled "Chg."(Change) and "LOS"(Level of Service), on Table II of Amendment 90-12 for each parcel proposed for a land use change either as a "necessary change" or by City Commission initiative, 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 -- Page 12 - ic• but excluding scrivener's errors. The analysis indicates whether the proposed change would result in an increase (+), no change (=), or a decrease (-) in potential demand for each of these services, and evaluates each of them as "OK" or "NO" in terms of impact on the respective LOS as adopted by the City in its comprehensive plan. Analysis of these proposed future land use map amendments reveals that, excepting storm drainage, (see below) changes involving 49 parcels totalling 106.1 acres would increase potential demand; 73 parcels totalling 112.02 acres would decrease potential demand; and 92 parcels totalling 140.31 acres would remain at the same potential demand. Therefore, potential demand increases on 106.1 acres would be offset by decreases on 112.02 acres; while the remaining acreage would neither increase nor decrease in potential demand for sanitary sewer, solid waste collection, and potable water services. (Storm drainage remains neutral to these proposed changes, as the City's standard requires all drainage to be retained and disposed on site, irrespective of development type or characteristics. In summary, then, the total potential demand for these services would be marginally reduced as a result of these changes; but it should be pointed out that the total effect of the proposed changes is nonetheless statistically insignificant. The changes are fully consistent with the MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goals, Objectives and Policies 2. 9J-5.011 (2) (c) 3. Proposed Amendment 90-11, proposed to delete Potable Water Policy 1.2.4 and Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.6 (pages 41 and 80 of Attachment 90-11-D), which establish the potable water conservation strategies and techniques for the City. However, this is not consistent with 9J-5.01l(2((c)3. which requires that the City establish and utilize potable water conservation strategies and techniques. See also the attached comments from the South Florida Water Management District. Recommendation Revise proposed amendment 90-11 to not delete Potable Water Policy 1.2.4 and Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.6 and to maintain the existing potable water conservation strategies and techniques. City of Miami Response to Objection 2. The City proposed to delete Potable Water Policy 1.2.4 and its identical counterpart, Natural Resource Conservation P-olicy 2.1.6 because the City believes that the requirements imposed by them are a essentially a duplication of requirements of Metropolitan Dade County, which is the local government responsible for providing the potable water supply and for enforcing water 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 13 conservation measures. Nonetheless, the City has no objection to retaining these Policies, and will not delete them at this time, it being understood that the City is not the agency responsible. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT A. OBJECTIONS Data and Analysis 1. 9J-5.012 (2) , (2) (e) , and (3) (b) and (c) ; and 9J- .vvv%i1 w,a. An analysis of the effect of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 upon hurricane evacuation planning, including evacuation routes and times and shelter space, is not included. In addition, an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Amendment 90-12 are consistent with the Coastal Management Element objectives and policies is not included. Recommendation Include an analysis of the effect of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments upon hurricane evacuation planning, including evacuation routes and times and shelter space. Include an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Coastal Management Element objectives and policies. Revise the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments consistent with the required analysis and the objectives and policies. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendments total 348 parcels, or 0.4% of the City's approximately 85,000 parcels; and together comprise 474.51 acres of land, or slightly over 2% of the City's 22,144 acre area, exclusive of water. The proposed amendments include 134 parcels comprising 116.08 acres that are proposed to correct errors made when the land use map was created; another 135 parcels totalling 265.58 acres are changes necessary to bring the City's new zoning ordinance into consistency with the comprehensive plan. These "scrivener's errors" and "necessary changes" are corrective in nature, and do not alter the substance of the Future Land Use Plan; they merely cause the map to be accurate in its depiction of the Plan. The balance of 79 parcels, or less than 0.1% of the total parcels in the city, comprising 92.85 acres, or 0.4% of the total city area, are changes proposed by the City Commission following public 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 14 hearing on the proposed plan amendments. These changes are the result of public input and staff evaluation and are typically minor in effect, both individually and cumulatively. The net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreage of each land use category is negligible. No significant population redistribution is anticipated to occur as a result of the amendments. Therefore, the impact of the changes on residential densities and on hurricane evacuation needs is effectively neutral. These changes are fully consistent with the MCNP Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies, CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data and Analysis 1. 9J-5.013 (1) , (1) (c) , and (2) (b) and (c) ; and 9J- 11 .006 (1) (b) 4. and 5. An analysis of projected water needs based on the demands for industrial and potable water uses for the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments found in Attachment 90-12-D of Amendment 90-12 is not included. In addition, an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with the Conservation Element objectives and policies is not included. Recommendation Include an analysis of the projected water needs based on the demands for industrial and potable water uses for the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments. Include an analysis of how the proposed Future Land Use map amendments are consistent with the Conservation Element objectives and policies. Revise the proposed Future Land Use map amendments consistent with the required analysis and the objectives and policies. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. The City has performed a concurrency management analysis of the potential impact of the proposed future land use map amendments on the projected industrial and potable water levels of service and system needs. The analysis is shown under the general heading "Facilities and Services", subheading "Potable Water", in two columns beneath the subheading labeled "Chg."(Change) and "LOS"(Level of Service), on Table II of Amendment 90-12 for each parcel proposed for a land use change either as a "necessary change" or by City Commission initiative, but excluding scrivener's errors. The analysis indicates whether the proposed change would result in an increase (+), no change (=), or a decrease (-) in potential demand for water, and evaluates it as "OK" or "NO" in terms of impact on the potable water LOS as adopted by the City in its comprehensive plan. Analysis of these January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 15 10832 IA. a� proposed future land use map amendments reveals that changes involving 49 parcels totalling 106.1 acres would increase potential demand for water; 73 parcels totalling 112.02 acres would decrease potential demand; and 92 parcels totalling 140.31 acres would remain at the same potential demand. Therefore, potential water demand increases on 106.1 acres would be offset by decreases on 112.02 acres; while the remaining acreage would neither increase nor decrease in potential demand for water. In summary, then, the total potential demand for water would be marginally reduced as a result of these changes; but it should be pointed out that the total effect of the proposed changes is nonetheless statistically insignificant. The changes are fully consistent with the MCNP Natural Resource Conservation Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goals, Objectives and Policies 2. 9J-5.013 (2) (c) 4. Proposed Amendment 90-11 proposes to delete natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.8 and to revise Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.1 and Potable Water Conservation Policy 1.2.3 (pages 48, 79 and 80 of Attachment 90-11-C); Policies 1.2.3. and 2.1.8 required the City to adopt an emergency water conservation ordinance by 1990 that is consistent with existing Dade County and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) ordinances and policies and Policy 2.1.1 required the City to support SFWMD policies and regulations in periods of regional water shortages. However, proposed revised policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 only require the City to "adhere to existing Dade County emergency water conservation guidelines and the emergency Water Shortage Plan of the SFWMDt1 and do not specify the implementation programs or activities the City will undertake "adhere to" these guidelines and plans. See also the attached comments from the South Florida Water Management District. Recommendation Revise proposed Amendment 90-11 to maintain without revision Natural Resource Conservation Policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.81 Potable Water Conservation Policy 1.2.3 and the existing policies for the emergency conservation of water sources. City of Miami Response to Objection 2. The City proposed to delete Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.8 and to amend Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.1 and its counterpart, Potable Water Policy 1.2.3 because the City believes that the requirements imposed by them are a essentially a duplication of requirements of Metropolitan Dade County, which is 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 16 42 V the local government responsible for providing the potable water supply and for enforcing water conservation -measures. Nonetheless, the City has no objection to retaining these Policies, and will not delete or amend them at this time, it being understood that the City is not the agency responsible. STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY A. OBJECTIONS 1. 9J-5.021 (1) Proposed Amendments 90-11 and 90-12 do not adequately address and further the following State Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: (a) Goal 5 (Housing), Policy 3; (b) Goal 7 (Public Safety), Policies 24 and 25; (c) Goal 8 (Water Resources), Policies 4, 5, 10 and 11; (d) Goal 10 (Natural Systems) , Policies 1, .3, and 7; (e) Goal 16 (Land Use), Policies 1, 3 and 6; (f) Goal 18 (Public Facilities), Policies 3, 8 and 9; (g) Goal 20 (Transportation), Policies 3 and 9; and (h) Goal 26 (Plan Implementation), Policy 7. Recommendation Revise proposed Amendments 90-11 and 90-12 to be compatible with and further the above -referenced State Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Citv of Miami Response to Objection 1. With respect to proposed amendment 90-11 (Goals, Objectives and Policies), see the individual responses to Objections previously made. The remaining changes proposed in the Goals, Objectives and Policies are believed to be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. With respect to proposed amendment 90-12, the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments total 348 parcels, or 0.4% of the City's approximately 85,000 parcels; and together comprise 474.51 acres of land, or slightly over 2% of the City's 22,144 acre area, exclusive of water. The proposed amendments include 134 parcels comprising 116.08 acres that are proposed to correct errors made when the land use map was created; another 135 parcels totalling 265.58 acres are changes necessary to bring the City's new zoning ordinance into consistency with the comprehensive plan. These "scrivener's errors" and "necessary changes" are corrective in nature, and do not alter the substance of the Future Land Use Plan; they merely cause the map to be accurate in its depiction of the Plan. 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 17 The balance of 79 parcels, or less than 0.1% of the total parcels in the city, comprising 92.85 acres, or 0.4% of the total city area, are changes proposed by the City Commission following public hearing on the proposed plan amendments. These changes are the result of public input and staff evaluation and are typically minor in effect, both individually and cumulatively. The net effect of these proposed changes on the available acreage for each land use category is negligible, and are believed to be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. REGIONAL POLICY PLAN CONSISTENCY A. OBJECTIONS 1 . 9J-5. 021 (1) Proposed Amendments 90-11 and 90-12 do not adequately address and further the following Regional Plan for South Florida goals and policies: (a) Goal 19.1 (Housing), Policy 19.1.2; (b) Goal 35.1 (Emergency Preparedness), Policy 35.1.16; (c) Goal 37.1 (Water Resources), Policy 37.1.6; (d) Goal 58.1 (Land Use), Policies 58.1.3 and 58.1.7; and (e) Goal 63.1 (Transportation), 63.1.1. Recommendation Revise proposed Amendments 90-11 and 90-12 to be compatible with and further the above -referenced goals and policies of the Regional Plan for South Florida. City of Miami Response to Objection 1. In its "Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review" of October, 1990, the South Florida Regional Planning Council commented upon proposed amendment 90-11 as follows: Within the residential use categories, the amendment proposes the language that community -based residential facilities may be allowed. Conversation with the city planning staff indicated that it is the intent of the city that community - based residential facilities will be allowed pursuant to applicable state laws. Prior to the final adoption of this amendment, the city should revise the language accordingly to more clearly reflect its intent. [See the City's response to Future Land Use Element Objection 6, page 8, in which this is fulfilled) . 10832 January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 18 h d Comment Staff analysis finds that proposed amendment No. 90-11 will strengthen all the elements of the City of Miami comprehensive plan." The comment on proposed amendment 90-12 was as follows: Amendment No. 90-12 proposes changes to the future land use map. The proposed changes are intended to facilitate the process to bring the city's zoning atlas and zoning ordinances into conformity with the future land use map. The adjustments proposed will better facilitate one-to-one comparisons with the Zoning Ordinance. Comment Staff analysis finds that proposed amendment No. 90-12 will strengthen the future land use element of the City of Miami comprehensive plan. The SFRPC staff review was subsequently endorsed by the Council, without further comment. Hence, the City concludes that the proposed amendments 90-11 and 90-12 are consistent with, and further, the Regional Plan for South Florida. January 14, 1991 ORC Response 90-2 - Page 19 Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map The Future Land Use Plan Map is a planning instrument designed to guide the future development of —and distribution of land uses within the City in a manner that is consistent with the goals, obje t ves and policies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) 1989-2000. to be e75,nsistent with the Ftitttre band Use Ell -an Mape The Lend Use P-lan Map does not dep+et areas ef less tha acres. q1ransitional uses, as permitted within the 2ening WIN Th e Future Land Use Plan Map is a generalized map that does not depict areas of less than 2 acres. The Planning Director is res onsible for making all determinations of concurrency as defined in state statutes, and will also interpret the map based on -all applicable state laws and administrative regulations and on the consistency between the proposed change or changes and the goals, objectives and policies expressed in the MCNP. The Planning Director will also determine whether or not proposed zoning chances reau re an amendment to the comprehensive plan. Land development regulations and policies are to be consistent with the Future Land Use Plan Map. The land development regulations further define and describe all requirements applicable to zoning categories contained under each land use designation, permitting the treatment of new development according to the particular conditions existing in different areas, and always consistent with the goals, objectives and policie'es of the MCNP, and specifically with the Land Use Element and its Future_ Land Use Plan Map. The land use designations are general designations which may include more than one zoning category. All activities and uses within each designation are compatible with each other by virtue of their scale, intensity and character, or by additional conditions required by the land development regulations, more specifically by the City Zoning Ordinance, which describes special districts in order to achieve more definite_ goals and objectives. IThe Vial land use eategeries7designations which appear in the Future Land Use Plan Map are arranged following the "pyramid 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 1 -�Z.. conceit" of cumulative inclusion are inclusive of those listed previously except noted. These dessgnat ons, and the uses allowed be 7interprebed7defined as follows: ent categories s otnerwise in them, are to Conservation: This land uses designation is restricted to environmentally sensitive areas which are to be left in an essentially natural state. anel no other nly-eses-activities which reinforce this character are permitted allowed. Public access to these areas, inclilding off-street parkingT , may be limited when unregulated access may present a threat to wildlife and plant life within such areas. Recreation: This land use designation ved to only allows public parks and recreation i'a=___t_== uses. and ne other eses may be r .. isable within so designated ..... as food serviee and small seele retailing may be permissible within seeh are.. -.. . -led that they are direetly related to the spae`.' . Within regional -parks, such recreation uses permit educational and cultural facilities such as museums, art galleries and exhibition space, and marine and marina facilities. Supporting social and entertainment services (restaurants, cafes, retailing), publi health (clinics and day care centers) and public safety (police facilities) and entertainment facilities may also be permissible provided that such uses -activities and facilit a -are an integral part of the parks design arA-or of the recreational function. 81�6n speee/reereatien land uses bhe shore!-'- ...-.y rest-, i` water dependent er related recreation uses te area— net on the -waterfront. Single Family Residential: Areas designated as single family residential allow single family structures with a density of u2 to one unit per inimum size lot as established in the Zoning Ordinance. The typieell let size is that whieh J Ll- — r This designation allows a maximum net density of about 9 units per acre. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Single Family Residential: Areas designated as "Single Family Residential" allow single family structures of one dwelling unit each to a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed_ 1nAllowed" or "permitted" uses are allowed by right; "permissible" or "limited uses are candidates for inclusion, subject to an interpretation of consistency by the Planning Director and a grant of special exception by the Zoning Board. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 2 provisions of the applicable Land Development Regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. are—Ssupporting services such as publie parks and7foster homes an family day care homes for children and/or adults; and community based residential facilities (6 clients or less not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities theserve neighberheed also me will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, C-child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within single family residential areas. Future Duplex Residential: Areas designated as duplex residential allow the construction of up to two -unit residential structures, per minimum lot size as established in the Zoning Ordinance. or the frontage by 190 feet ef depth. This deseriptien imp! designation allows a maximum net density of about 18 units per acre. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Duplex Residential: Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable Land Development Regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. 2 A "Community based residential facility" provides room (with or without board), resident services, and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category includes adult congregate living facilities, facilities for physically disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled persons, for non dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent children, as licensed by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (FHRS), and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed or approved by an authorized regulatory agency. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 3 ,' and-eCommunity based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) also mep will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, Echilr d day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas. eenters are permissible T -residential. Future publie eemmenity parks and reereati n suitable leeatiens within duP -a-Ise be permissible in duplex residential areas previded that the I - seffieient to handle ..n l e L h - d da1Q1 L- Qf f ie demands Medium Density Multifamily Residential: This residential land use eategery designation medet- allows single family, duplex and multifamily structures up to the intensity defined in the zoning ordinance for each of the zoning districts classified under permitted this land use designation. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Medium Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable Land Development Regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Supporting services such as Ecommunity-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) ill be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; community -based residential facilities (15-50 clients) and day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations. Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also include commercial and =`r___ activities in the same building -that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building or building complex immediat=_ neighborhood,eurreunding places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory post -secondary educational facilities. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 4 O?cc . feeiiihies serving areas beyond the lmme_#�te reighberheed may High Density Multifamily Residential: This residential land use designation allows single family, duplex and multifamily structures -ondemin units the intensity defined in the zon zoning districts classified unde designation.!and use up to ordinance for each of the r this Lana use aesignation. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): High Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "High Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 150 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable Land Development Regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Higher densities may be allowed as shown for these specially -designated areas: Latin Quarter 200 units per acre Southeast Overtown/ Park West 300 units per acre Brickell, Omni, and River Quadrant 500 units per acre Supporting services such as offices and commercial services and other accessory activities that are clearly incidental to principal uses are permitted; Ecommunity-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) are permibbed will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; Community -based residential facilities (15+ clients), places of worship, primar and secondary schools, and day care centers for chilaren a adults may be permissible in suitable locations. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 5 Office: This land use eel designation allows structures used as permanent and transitory residential facilities, such as hotels and motels, eneral office uses and for limited commercial activities incidental to principal activities in nated areas. multifamily,Residential uses, ep to high density ineludi hotels, are also permissible within this land use eategery, limited retail uses are allewed within these off -,-i. use in this eategery will be signifieently less than the GB9 nursing hemes may also be permissible in suitable leeatiens withirr rules and regulatiens prescribed by state lieensing requirements, Bret —ate- Supporting facilities such as auditoriums, libraries and conventions facilities may be allowed within the office areas designation. , — also (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Office: Areas designated as "Office" allow residential uses to a maximum density equivalent to "Residential -- High Density Multifamily" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels; general office use; clinics and laboratories; and limited commercial activities incidental to principal activities in designated areas. Supporting facilities such as auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools may be allowed with the "Office" designation. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 6 07e.ea Restricted Commercial: This land use designation allows structures used as any type of residential facility, except for rescue missions; (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (excepting rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Residential -- High Density Multifamily" subject to the same limiting conditions; any activity included in the "Office" designation as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requireing easy access by personal auto, and are often located along arterial or collector roadways, which These —eemmerei l--dam include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. 3Rs lfnA ++se 44 areas .4-ireetly served by arterial er eelleeter roadways, d e 1 e_s.b1 via Me a' This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. permissible inelude land uses within the restrieted eemmereie! motelsOther and--heteis,--reswfaPFlt a! f& ii-1itie nment feeilities. .residential Se8 ef eemmereial, _ f fie and/or are else permissible within this !and use designatien.- General Commercial: This land use designation aeeemmedates allows all restricted commercial and office activities and residents. —`al facilities (with the exception of permanent living facilities, (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): General Commercial: Areas designated as "General Commercial" allow all activities included in the "Office" and the "Restricted Commercial" designations (with the exception of permanent living facilities but including rescue missions), as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; de --eb h,r4ealivserve the �•�•��j ����-��—..7 _•..r vvr ..r vv .. vim.. a. VaaV v, ra.yiYi r/Ma/1iV, ili\i generally require on and off loading facilities; and even benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial land uses activities include retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, building material 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 7 027FF sales and storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transport related services, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses described above. This category also allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients. 'Wlillii' ftifi �tiir��n oY i�lory�swwa��-���: IF�wai�ir�rr!F�ni���F�insoc��swar�,i�aswiswtisrr+�oru Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilit es: This land use designation is intended to aeee „edatr �r V allows the development of facilities for r nal federal, state and local government activities, as well fte major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational f___-_0,-4 activities; Governmen&!, a-ebivitie- may be reserved te areas designated under the publie . and major transportation facilities and public utilities. __ _ -4 —1-ded within this land es ♦ V ,.d \r also indieated within this land use eategery. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and utilities: Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed to a maximum density equivalent to "Residential -- High Density Multifamily" subject to the same limiting conditions. (See appendices A, B, and C for churches, schools and parks less than 2 acres). eomercial----Central Business District (CBD): This land use designation is intended to apply to the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan region, and allewss permits activities listed under residential (except for rescue missions) office, institutiona designations. ana restricted commerc (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Central Business District (CBD): The area designated as "Central Business District (CBD) is intended to apply to 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 8 q ��.f the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan region, and allows all activities included in the "Office", "Restricted Commercial", and "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" designations. Residential facilities (except for rescue missions) alone or in combination with other uses are allowable to a maximum density of 1,000 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable Land Development Regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Also permitted is a mix of uses ranging from high density multifamily residential to high intensity office uses with retail uses on the lower floors of structures. Intensity of uses within the CBD land use designation are generally higher than those allowed in other areas of the City. institutional uses, sueh as jor government and edueatien eenters, hotels, sports and entertainment feeilities and eenventien eenters, and parkin! lots 1 garages, represent permissible uses within the eBB designated i 1 ea within the eB9 Industrial: This land use designation applies to 1XIC" A4 t U&ly, I-....r+K....+. .. --- v.. -...off... --- - manufacturing, assembly and storage activities. The hight In ustryial designation eategery generally limits uses activities to industries that do not generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual impact. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting and refining plants,and similar activities are excluded. (Modify the preceding paragraph to read): Industrial: The areas designated as "Industrial" allow manufacturing, assembly and storage activities. The "Industrial" designation generally includes activities that wold otherwise generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual impact unless properly controlled. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting and refining plants and similar activities are excluded. Residential uses are not permitted in the "Industrial" designation, except for rescue missions, and liveaboards in commercial marinas. 10832 January 14, 1991 Interpretation of Future Land Use Map - Page 9 2/� � MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1909-2000 VOLUME I OOALS,OBJECTIVESs POLICIES DRAFT TEXT AMENDMENTS -- MAY 1990 (revised) COASTAL MANAGEMENT 9J-5.012(3) Goal 1: A&intain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of Adam's coastal zone including the preservation of natural resources as well as the enhancement of the built envi romwnt . C (a) ] Objective 1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its tributaries, and the Little River. C(b)1,4] 1,2 Policy 1.1.1: By 1990 the City will assess environmental hazards that are the result of past disposal activities at the Virginia Key landfill. Such assessment will be made in cooperation with appropriate County, State and Federal environmental agencies, and an action plan to reduce or eliminate any hazards will be formulated by +99+ ,1= (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 1.1.1). [(c)2] 1,2 Policy 1.1.2: By 1990 the City will begin to retrofit the yiu ber-ef storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bays end-e811 such storm water outfalls will bere been retrofitted by +9% IM. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. c 2 Policy 1.1.3: Beginning in 1990 the City will take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. These actions will include, but not be limited to: modification and improved maintenance of storm and sanitary sewer systems; increased frequency and extent of street sweeping; and encouraging the appropriate federal, state, and county agencies to dredge contaminated sediments from river bottoms (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 1.1.3). [(c)2] 1 Policy 1.1.4: The City will seek cooperative agreements and funding support from Metro Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay. By +9e IM, the City will establish plans, including a schedule of projects and completion dates, and identify funding sources required to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution within the City's boundaries. C(c)31 ns/10/90 Coastal Management - Page 1 10832 W 0 R A F T AMENDMENTS May 1990 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIMMORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Table of Contents i Future Land Use Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map Housing Sanitary and Storm Sewers Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Potable water Solid Waste Collection Transportation Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities - Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Coastal Management Natural Resource Conservation Capital Improvements Intergovernmental Coordination 10832 a EXPLANATION OF ANNOTATIONS The numerals 1,2, or 3 appear at the beginning of paragraphs that are proposed to be amended. These numbers have the following meaning: 1 means the change is limited to inconsequential wording such as: (a) substituting "land development regulations" in place of "zoning" or similar regulatory devices; and/or (b) changing a date (e.g. 19 9$ 13.9.].) , or ( c ) renumbering a paragraph. These changes are insubstantial , and could be deferred until the 1994 MCNP update, if desired. 2 means the change involves minor additions or deletions to text that updates, revises or eliminates a possibly obsolete goal, objective or policy. These changes are not critical, and could be deferred until the 1994 update. 3 means the change could be substantial and/or significant, in that it may be needed to keep the plan in compliance. These changes are critical, and should not be deferred. A ( 7 ) following a number indicates some uncertainty as to the actual numerical classification (i.e. (37) ) means that the change may not actually be of a critical nature). A notation in square brackets, e.g. [(b)21 at the end of a paragraph indicates that the goal, objective or policy is required by, or supports, the referenced section of Rule 9J-5 F.A.C. Referenced 9J-5 sections are also provided below the titles at the top of the first page of each element. 10832 FUTURE LAND USE 9J-5.006(3) Goal 1: Abintain a land use pattern that protects and enhances the quality of life in the City's residential neighborhoods; fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining areas; prcrnvtes and facilitates eeonanic development and the growth of job opportunities in the City; fosters the growth and development of >:damtcun as a regional center of domestic and international conrnerce, culture and entertainment; pranote the efficient use of land and minimize land use conflicts; and protects and conserves the City's significant natural and coastal resources. [(a)] 1 Objective 1.1: Ensure that land a" regulatiera ttrtd development regulations pei eies are consistent with fostering a high quality of life in all areas, including the timely provision of public facilities that meet or exceed the minimum level of service LOS) standards adopted in the Capital Improvements Element CIE) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. [(b)1;3;7;8] Policy 1.1.1: Development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use st. ll be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the CIE. [(c)31 Policy 1.1.2: The City's Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies, shall be responsible for monitoring the current and projected LOS provided by public facilities. The Planning Department shall also for submittal to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA�repare , as required by Florida statutes and administrative rules, the annual update of the Capital Improvements Element, the Semiannual Report on Small Scale Developments and the periodic Evaluation and Appraisal Report. [(c)3] 1 Policy 1.1.3: The City's zoning ordinance shall Rrovides for the protectio ,.gf all areas of the City from the encroachment of incompatible land uses; from the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or natural or man-made amenities; and from transportation policies that divide or fragment established neighborhoods. [(c)2] Policy 1.1.4: The City will increase its code enforcement efforts and continue the use of performance standards with the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood environmental conditions. [(b)4] 1 Policy 1.1.5: The City's zoning ordinance will require the landscaping of public open spaces amerce. Policy 1.1.6 The City's street and storm sewer improvement projects will provide curb and gutter, and street landscaping, unless deemed to be not physically or economically feasible. [(c)1] Policy 1e1.7: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of adequate neighborhood shopping, recreation, day care, entertainment, and other neighborhood oriented support activities. [(c)5] 2 , _Ld__tl.._ _t .____i.____ _ i • , Policy 1.1.9 8: The City's Planning Department will be responsible for coordinating the City's land development regulations and policies with those of Metro Dade County and adjacent municipalities. [(02] Objective 1.2: Promote the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted, declinin or threatened residential, commercial and industrial areas. �j(b)2] Policy 1.2.1: The City defines blighted neighborhoods as areas characterized by the prevalence of older structures with major deficiencies and deterioration, high residential vacancies, widespread abandonment of property, litter and poor maintenance of real property. Declining neighborhoods are defined as areas characterized by the prevalence of structures having minor deficiencies, a general need for improvements in real 10832 property, significant declines in real property values, high vacancy rates in commercial structures and increasing difficulty in obtaining insurance. Neighborhoods threatened with decline are defined as areas characterized by significant but infrequent property maintenance neglect, an aging housing stock, declining property values, general exodus of traditional residents and influx of lower income households. [(b)2] 3 Policy 1.2.2: The City's land development policies will be consistent with affordable housing objectives and policies adopted in the Housing component of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. 2 Policy 1.2.4 3: The City's residential, commercial and industrial revitalization programs will place highest priority on protecting neighborhoods threatened with declining conditions, second priority to reversing trends in declining areas, and third priority to removing blighted conditions. The City will, however, complete its current projects to improve conditions in the most economically depressed areas, and will increase its efforts to secure federal and state aid in developing comprehensive redevelopment programs. [(b)2] 1 Policy 1.2.5 4: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding Community Redevelopment Districts and will desigmete areas eF continue to im2lCment_plans for the Omni and Southeast Overtown/Park West as Community Redevelopment Districts. [(b)2] Policy 1.2.6 5: By 1994, the City will develop information pro rams on the availability of redevelopment opportunities within the City. [(b?2] 2 Objective 1.3: The City will encourage commercial, office and industrial development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas; increase the utilization and enhance the physical character and appearance of existing buildings; and concentrate new commercial and industrial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can serve development without meet or exceed degradirg Levei of Servi - '' ` Below the minimum standards for Level of Service (LOSlLevel of Service (LOS) adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE). [(b)1;2;3] 10832 ti 2 Policy 1.3.1: Continue to provide incentives for commercial redevelopment and new construction in the Edison Center, Latin Quarter, Little Haiti, Little River Industrial District, River Corridor, Design District, Grand Avenue, Flagler Street, the River Quadrant, the Omni Area Redevelopment District, and Southeast Overtown/Park West (N.W. 3 Avenue) which contribute to the improvement in the built environment. Such incentives may be offered through the building facade treatment program, interior renovation program (under consideration) and the maximum utilization of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. [(b)2] Policy 1.3.2: Encourage the expansion of existing buildings and new construction through the private sector by assisting in making available commercial loan funds for rehabilitation and small business loans and seed monies, particularly to local minority businesses and encouraging the maximum participation, especially through public/private partnerships, of financial institutions, chambers of commerce, the Beacon Council, other business organizations, property owners and residents of the areas. Priority areas include Edison Center, Southeast Overtown/Park West, the Garment District, Little River Industrial District, Little Haiti, and the Omni Area Redevelopment District. [(b)2] Policy 1.3.3: By 1994, the City will prepare a report on disposition alternatives for city -owned property in the southernmost section of the Garment District. [(b)2] Policy 1.3.4: Work with the Dade County School Board to ensure the expansion of educational facilities in areas that are easily accessible by public transit and facilitate the expansion of job training/job placement programs offered to youths (full time and summer terms) and low income persons. [(b)7] 1 Policy 1.3.5: Promote through land devglo mg ent u" regulations, Ltd the creation deveiepmerrE of high intensity activity centers which may be characterized by mixed -use and specialty center development, particularly in the Edison Center, Grove Center, Latin Quarter, Little Haiti, River Corridor, Design District and the Civic Center. The extension of commercial land uses along the entire length of significantly traveled roadways will be discouraged. [(b)7;(c)5] Policy 1.3.6: Encourage a diversification in the mix of industrial and commercial activities and tenants through strategic and comprehensive marketing and promotion efforts so that the local economy is buffered from national and international cycles. Particular emphasis is on Southeast Overtown/Park West, Latin Quarter, Little Haiti, Little River Industrial District, River Corridor, the Garment District and the Omni area. [(b)2] 1 Policy 1.3.7: Continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone and Tax Increment Financing district strategies to stimulate economic revitalization, MW encourage employment opportunities. [(b)2] io-32 /O t+.. �... ...... T nni7 TTpp .� DA nf� Q Policy 1.3.8: Work with appropriate State and County agencies to direct training programs and other technical assistance, to support minority and semiskilled residents of the City. [(b)2] Policy 1.3.9: Concentrate CD efforts in small geographic areas which have special opportunities and/or potential for redevelopment such as the Little Haiti commercial district, Latin Quarter, Little River Industrial District, Southeast Overtown/Park West, the Garment District, Allapattah Industrial District and Downtown Flagler Street. [(b)2] 2 Policy 1.3.10: Increase code enforcement efforts and consider the adoption of performance standards appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical condition and appearance of commercial and industrial areas in th SAY ,Little River - 2 Haiti.West and Httie [(b) 2 Policy 1.3.+2 11: The City's land use regulations incentiYes for_the inclusion of permit the I . near major employment centers will provide day care facilities Policy 1.3.+3 12: The City's land use regulations will permit neighborhood - based health care facilities. [(b)9] 2 Policy 1.3.+4 U: The City will aggjy for the Florida Safe Neighborhoods Program will be impiemented im the eity. [(b)2] 37 Policy 1.3.+5 14: Adopt urban design guidelines for public and private 1-edeveiepmeft projects in order to reinforce, for example, Edison Center's black cultural heritage, the Latin heritage of the Latin Quarter, Grove Center's village atmosphere and the Creole character of Little Haiti. [(b)9] Objective 1.4: Continue the growth of Downtown Miami, expand its role as a center of domestic and international commerce, further its development as a regional center for the performing arts and other cultural and entertainment activities and develop a urban residential base. [(b)2;1;9] 10832 Plan.designated im the Bewntown Master [(b)3] Policy 1.4.-2 1: Identify special use districts and direct public sector regulatory, financial and promotional efforts toward reinforcing the identity and cohesiveness of each district. [(c)2] 2 Policy 1.4.3 2: Create management districts, funded by special assessments to provide targeted extra services and special events needed to attract visitors and residents to the Flagler Street retail core, the Bmm+t ...., .."V r q-.Y Ala. WW" l... HI Y 1AMA—LIIC _WI _i'_N `i rT-'-TTII • anu V finer special retail shooing areas in downtown [(b)2;(c)5] 2 Policy 1.4.4 3: rM ► the emmi area Promote 2 • [(b)2] 3? Policy 1.4.8 4: 7,..Tl.T•..•.. r'rpw . • II • • 1 • 1 • - • • 1 . • - • 1111 1 • '1 ••�11 •�1 • Policy 1.4.9 5: Assess the benefit and economic feasibility of developing a major exhibition hall in the vicinity of the City of Miami/James L. Knight International Center. [(b)2]Policy 1.4.10: Stimulate the growth of seaport - related services in the area west of Omni and seek to limit the development of non -water dependent land uses within the Port of Miami through the formulation of future land development policies and regulations. [(c)2] Policy 1.4.40 fi: Stimulate the growth of seaport -related services in the area west of Omni and seek to limit the development of non -water dependent land uses within the Port of Miami through the formulation of future land development policies and regulations. [(c)2] 1 Policy 1.4.* Z: Modify regulations within ftowntown to ensure that retail signage is of high quality and consistent with the design and development objectives for Blowntown. [(01] 10832 1 Policy 1.4.E $: Modify land development regulations as necessary in order to encourage the adapt4ye--and rehabilitation and sensitive. adaptive reuse of historic properties and older structures in sdowntown. Exempt rehabilitation projects from Development of Regional Impact (DRI) "4 mitigation fees. [(c)8] 2 Policy 1.4.+3 2: Promote rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of vacant and underutilized spaces and provide incentives for rehabilitation of older buildings in Downtown threugh lavi imterestr iaensl. [(b)2] 2 Policy 1.4.+4 1Q: Develop modifications to existing regulations with the intent of providing greater flexibility in the design and. development of mixed -use developments within the general Downtown area and particularly along the Miami River. [(b)9] 2 Policy 1.4.i5 11: Continue to streamline the application procedures for Major Use Special Permits to simplify and standardize the process, while ensuring that the regulatory intent of the permits is maintained. 1 Policy 1.4.16 12: Implement the Downtown DRI development orders for ,D&wntown and Southeast Overtown/Park West, and seek approval for future increments of development in a timely manner. [(c)3] Objective 1.5: Land development regulations will protect the City's unique natural and coastal resources, and its historic and cultural heritage. [(b)4] Policy 1.5.1: Development orders in the City will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies contained in the Natural Resource Conservation and Coastal Management elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. [(b)5] 1 Policy 1.5.2: Land use regulations and development policies a AM be consistent with the intent and purpose of Metro Dade County's Waterfront Charter Amendment, Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, and the rules of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Management Area. [(b)3] Objective 1.6: Regulate the development or redevelopment of real property within the City to insure consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and to reduce the number of land uses that are inconsistent with the City's Future Land Use Plan Map. [(b)2,3] 10832 - , - - - -7 -,- - - - __ " /3 W Policy 1.6.1: The "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map", which follows these goals, objectives and policies, will establish the activities and facilities allowed perms within each deemed land use designation eategerr appearing on the Future Land Use Plan Map, and the City's land development regulations shall be consistent with this section of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. [(c)7] Policy 1.6.2: The City's zoning ordinance will be amended by 1990 to insure consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Map. [(c)1;7] 2 Policy 1.6.3: The City's Planning Department shall review all proposals to amend the City's zoning ordinance and any other land development regulations, and shall report as to the consistency between any proposed amendment and the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, a-mey c Policy 1.6.4: Any proposal to amend the City's zoning ordinance that has been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the Planning Department, shall require a finding from the Planning Department indicating whether or not said proposed amendment will result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards, or if said amendment would be in conflict with any element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989- 2000. Based on its evaluation, the Planning Department will forward a recommended action on said amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its recommendation to the City Commission. [(c)1;3;7] 3 Policy 1.6.5: The City will continue to use +SP+- special district designations as a land development regulation instrument for the purpose of accomplishing specific development objectives in particular areas of the City. , or . A,,,.Mdie,b to the comprehensive F!• [ (c)1; 7] Policy 1.6.6: The City will continue to use the signage ordinance as a land development regulation instrument to ensure the quality of life in the City's neighborhoods. [(c)1] Policy 1.6.7: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan as the long range policy guideline for improving seasonal flooding. By 1989, the City will rank the projects specified in that plan, with priority given to addressing the most critical problem areas within the City, and by 1990 develop a financing plan to im lement these projects. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy 2.1.1) [(c)1;3;47 10832 �, /^. In.. n..+-...-n t ="A TTon pynn 0 /Z� Policy 1.6.8: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of open space in development projects in both residential and commercial areas. [(c)4] 3 Poli 1.6.9: The City's land development regulation These reguietiens wi11 estabiisn mecnanisms, ine!U01MV, • to mitigate m. the potentially. adverse impacts of sttch future development. [(c)2;3] Policy 1.6.10: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking. [(c)4] Policy 1.6.11: The City's land development regulations and policies will insure that areas designated conservation are protected from development other than that which promotes its passive appreciation. [(b)4] 2 Objective 1.7: Encourage recreational development within designated recreation use areas, concentrating activities where the capacity of existing public facilities can serve development [(b)1] Goal 2: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Aficmi through the identification, evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of lldiwd 's historic, architectural and archeological resources. [a] Objective 2.1: Maintain, update and amplify the City of Miami portion of the Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the City's historic, architectural and archeological resources. [(b)4] 10832 / 5' Policy 2.1.1: By 1991, the City will identify potential historic districts and conduct further surveys of contributing and noncontributing buildings. [(c)8] Policy 2.1.2: By 1994, the City will develop and implement a computerized database of all relevant information for all 3,358 sites in the Dade County Historic Survey. This listing will show, in three categories, all properties of historic, architectural or archeological significance; together with their priority ranking for presentation. [(c)8] 1 Objective 2.2: Protect archeological resources within the City from destruction and loss. [(b)4] 1 Policy 2.2.1: The City will pursue the designation of significant archeological zones under the Heritage Conservation Article of the City Code. [(b)4] 1 Policy 2.2.2: By 1990, the City will establish a procedure in cooperation with the Dade County Archeologist for monitoring building activity near sites known to be, or having a significant likelihood of being, areas of archeological significance. . [(b)4] 2 Policy 2.2.3: The City will require, as part of the building permit application, pursuant to State law, that the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources be notified of construction schedules in significant archeological zones, and where potentially significant historical or archeological artifacts are uncovered during construction, permit State and local archeological officials the opportunity of surveying and excavating the site. liheM by iew, cem3tpuet+eft up te three [(b)4] Policy 2.2.4: The City will consider the need for adopting an ordinance levying civil penalties for failure to report the discovery of an archeological site during construction. [(b)4] Objective 2.3: Encourage the -preservation of all historic and architectural resources that have major significance to the City by increasing the number of nationally and locally designated sites by 30 percent by 1994 and by 50 percent by the year 1999. [(b)4] 10832 o P,nnA rTacs .. pArto 1 fl 16 Policy 2.3.1: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. [(c)8] 1 Policy 2.3.2: The City has designated 50 historic sites and three historic districts pursuant to the Heritage Conservation Article of the Zoning Ordinance. An additional 26 sites (or groups of multiple sites) and six districts have been identified as potentially worthy of designation (see Future Land Use P10 Map entitled "Historic District Boundaries and Historically Significant Properties Meriting Protection"). Of these, the City will designate 25 individual sites and four districts by 1994. [(c)8] Objective 2.4: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved, rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. [(b)4] Policy 2.4.1: The City will encourage the conservation, rehabilitation, restoration and adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally significant housing resources through low interest housing rehabilitation loans that may. be offered by City agencies. [(c)8] 1 Policy 2.4.2: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for preservation of historic properties. To receive public financial support from the City, designated privately -owned structures must meet these standards. [(c)8] Policy 2.4.3: The City currently owns nine historic sites and other potential archeological sites. If it is deemed in the public interest for the City to transfer title of City properties of historic, architectural or archeological significance, such transfers will include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such properties. [(c)8] Policy 2.4.4: By 1994, the City will enter into interlocal agreements with other local governments which have title to properties of major historic or architectural significance that will ensure the conservation, preservation and adaptive and sensitive reuse of such properties. [(c)8] Objective 2.5: Increase public awareness of the historical, architectural, archeological resources and cultural heritage of the City, and public policy and programs to protect and preserve this heritage, through public information and education programs. [(b)4] 10832 n..a..... - 'r - . 4 Ty -et Csno 1 1 17 Policy 2.5.1: The City will continue to develop a series of publications relating to historic preservation in general and the City's historic resources in particular. [(c)8] Policy 2.5.2: The City will implement a" historic marker program for designated properties and other key areas. [(c)8] 3 Policy 2.5.3: Beginning in 1990, the City will prepare a biannual report on the status of historic properties in the City This repart will inelude, but not be limited ► - epprepriate to strengthen the City's historic preservation efforts. [(c)8] Policy 2.5.4: By 1994 the City will include information on the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. [(c)8] 10832 05 /29 /90 Future Land Use Page 12 The Future Land Use Plan Map (F� is a planning instrument designed to guide the future m € ;is+ribution of tan uses with L the City in a manner that is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) The dtri�+rerbect ti ons which appear i n the fa 'e land use eetegeI4" deli ana FL� are arranged following -th "oYra id conceQ " ___�___..__+ +e.,.,.�,oe arra inclusive of those +iiteirreted defined as follows: 10832 0 5/ 2 9/ 9 0 Future Land Use - Page 13 / Conservation: This land uses designation is restricted to environmentally sensitive areas Wich are to be left in an essentially natural state, and ethew Only uses activities which reinforce this character are pe„mzted al owed. Public access to these areas may be limited when unregulated access may present a threat to wildlife and plant life within such areas. Recreation: This land use designation 1- be only allows public parks and recreationaj, facilities,, Within reviemei parks, museums, art galleries and exhibition space, supuor, tina sgrvicgs such as restaurants, cafes, retailing,;social and cultural facilities police and entertainment facilities may be allowed perme provided that such uses activities and facilities are an integral part of the parks design and recreational function. Residential -- Single Family: Areas designated as residential single family allow single family structures with a density of up to one unit per tyR minimum 4,et size lot as established in the Zonina Ordinance. 190 feet ef depth. This deseriptien impiies designation allows a maximum net density of about 9 units per acre. t5upporting services such as ks and family day care homes for 10832 1- - 1- ^ T...F..wr. T m"A Tlnr� - DAnQ 14 0 V children an ,(or adults and community -based residential facilities (6 clients or less, not -including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) that gen-e the immed4ate gurreukinq _,,,.erhe_d _ ,e4-a Residential -- Duplex: Areas designated as duplex residential allow the construction of gp to two -unit residential structures, per -minimum lot s - - - - ----- -- -• --- _.._.,thei, --- - -jr. ..jvZvi terra feet-eF dept*r: This de3eriptie,M. imviiesl designation allows a maximum net density of about 18 units per acre. 10832 05/29/90 Future Land Use - Page 15 C� / Other permOted land uses w4th4m duplex res4dential areas .supporting services such as day care homes for children Aad adults and community -based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) ,also may be All owed • that serye the immediately surreundkg neighberheedT ei rrIme sea, Residential -- Medium Density Multifamily: This residential land use eetegary► designation eeeenenadetes allows singe family, duplex and multifamily structures up to low rise apartment struetures with an imFlied maximum-rtet . the intensity defined in the zoning ordinancA this land use designation. Suggorting services such as &gommunity-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities); are permitt . community -based residential facilities (15-50 {ii��'�u•�•y��►•�•�•f�•�►�•uu•r�-r�•��•i•.•e��•�•nt:�i�-i��a���••z•����•��-rs,► i•�r•r������+�•.-met 10832 05/29/90 Future Land Use — Page 16 Multifamily: This residential land use eat-egery ows sinale family, duplex and multifamily h_jj C-gommunity-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, drnn alrnhni nr correctional rehabilitation facilities): ere Residential -- Nigh Densi eeeemmeda designation structures not includin pei-mitted:4 Vh density multifamily 1 r_ •1_1_ 9-fleet Office: This land use eatevery aeeonnnedetes general office uses �Ti1 Ti lr �i .7, F/1 VI V.JJIVIIYI JVI I Iv. YrJ, YIIV I VYI VJ YYIYr•i ✓.r 111�1..� r..- ��..�. . .. �...�_.. 10832 nti /,7a /an r,v+-jrra T.Anri TTcZP — PA(TP 17 Supporting facilities such as Aauditoriums, libraries and convention facilities may be allowed within #dM officereas edesignation. Commercial -- Restricted: This land use minions: any activity included in the Office designation as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requirejj3q easy access by personal auto, and ,ire often Located along arterial or collector roadways. which -- ---_ _:_I ..___ include_ general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, m .ior ,sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This d ---b_----- -- - -- direetly - Ci T GY YJ Commercial -- General: This land use designation eeeeemnede-ea restricted commercial and office activities and residential fa ivities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; de 10832 generally require on and off loading facilities; and eften benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial land uses activities include retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, building material sales and storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transport related services, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses described above. Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities: This land use designation allows the development of facilities forfederal, state and local government activities, ets well as -.major public or private health,, recreational. cultural._ reliaious or educational activities ; eategery..and MMajor transportation facilities and public utilities. ere Eommerei-a --- Central Business District (CBD): This land use designation is intended to apply to the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan region, and allews permits activities listed under residential. Wall - long Ell EMT- 10832 05/29/90 Future Land Use - Page 19 Industrial: This land use designation applies to The tip IndustrrW designation eategery► generally limits eses activiti industries that do not generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual impact. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting and refining plants and similar activities are excluded. to 10832 05/29/90 Future Land Use - Page 20 HOUSING 9J-5.010(3) Goal 1: Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for law and moderate incamae households and the elderly by alleviating shortages of law and moderate incane housing, rehabilitating older hamea, maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods. [(3)(a)] Objective 1.1: Provide a local regulatory, investment, and neighborhood environment that will assist the private sector in increasing the stock of affordable housing within the City at least 10 percent by 1994 and 20 percent by the year 1999. [(b)1] Policy 1.1.1: The City defines affordable (moderate income) housing as residential units whose associated housing costs (mortgage principal repayment, interest and real property taxes for owner occupied housing, and gross rent for renter occupied housing) are equal to or less than 30 percent of the median household income in Dade County. The City continues to promote equal access to housing opportunities. With other governmental agencies, it enforces fair housing ordinances. [(c)5] Policy 1.1.2: Continue and expand the City's current affordable housing programs and continue its participation in federal housing programs and the county Documentary Stamp Surtax Program. [(c)7] 2 Policy 1.1.3: Develop comprehensive neighborhood redevelopment plans and programs that encourage private developers to build new, or rehabilitate old, residential structures and ensure that public investments �paeea are coordinated with private sector developments to increase the overall attractiveness of redeveloping neighborhoods. [(c)1] 2 Policy 1.1.4: lax Increment Financing districts, which are designated by Metro Dade County, as a mechanism for financing public improvements in residential areas and stimulating neighborhood revitalization, will continue to be used i m the . —r 11e=T- 1 Policy 1.1.5: Continue to enforce, and where necessary strengthen those sections of the land development regulations ranee that are intended to preserve and enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods. [(c)2,3] 05/10/90 Housing - Page 1 10832 L� 2 Policy 1.1.6: Encourage the restoration and adaptive and sensitive reuse of historic or architecturally significant housing through the appropriate and equitable use _of.zoning incentives ens—lew—imterest, 1,2 Policy 1.1.7: Control, through restrictions in the City's JADA devel ooeaent regal ati ons renim9-erd i m0mee, large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial land development which may negatively impact �y residential neighborhoods, Reads. [(c)3] 2 . ene phase areas suitable for housing. [(e)3] 1,3 Policy 1.1.10: The City's land development regulations 20nimv 0-di ionee will direct vernit high density residential development and redevej ooment in rinse nreximity to metror-aiL and Metromover stations (see Trans grtatian Policy 1.5.1�., [(c)5] 2 Policy 1.1.11: Develop policies and procedures, including the provision of zoning bonuses, that aid the private sector in assembling land for major residential projects, and develop informational programs that promote the awareness of redevelopment opportunities, vith _tb_-t____. EdIsel een . U01,2 2 Policy 1.1.12: Preserve estates im South Gr existing viable residential neighborhoods by requiring t+mt replatted lots be at least the prevailing neighborhood lot size. [(c)2,3] Objective 1.2: Conserve the present stock of low- and moderate - income housing within the City and reduce the number of substandard units through rehabilitation, reduce the number of unsafe structures through demolition, and insure the preservation of historically significant housing through identification and designation. [(b)2,5] Policy 1.2.1: The City defines low income housing as residential units whose associated housing costs are affordable to households who earn no more than 50 percent of the median income in Dade County. [(c)3,5] 05/10/90 Housing - Page 2 10832 C�?I Policy 1.2.2: Continue, and when necessary expand, low and moderate -income housing programs with the intent of preventing a net loss of low and moderate - income housing units within the City. [(c)5] 2 Policy 1.2.3: The City's housing programs will provide for low- and moderate -income, low density housing in scattered site locations as an alternative to the geographic concentration of low income housinso-l}y . [ (c) 5] 2 Policy 1.2.4: Assist non-profit, community -based organizations in the development and provision of low- and moderate -income housing projects as an alternative to the public sector provision of low -and moderate -income housing. This assistance will include, but not be limited to, technical assistance, marketing and financial planning assistance, and the provision of public improvements, such as street improvements, curbing landscaping and public open spaces, proper drainage and street lighting. �(c)1] Policy 1.2.5: The City defines substandard housing as any residential unit that lacks either complete kitchen or plumbing facilities or does not satisfy health and safety codes. [(c)3,5] 2 Policy 1.2.6: With the intent of preserving and enhancing the historic neighborhood character, the City will increase code enforcement efforts to prevent the illegal conversion of single-family residences into multifamily units, espeeiaily im Edgewater amd [(c)3] 2 Policy 1.2.7: Continue to enforce, and where necessary, to strengthen those sections of the zoning ordinance that are intended to preserve and enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods, �ith 1,2 Policy 1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts eemti tae•, in areas where significant concentrations of substandard units are likely to exist. Owners of substandard units will be required to make needed repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property will be required to be secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard. • [(c)2,3,4] Policy 1.2.9: The City will monitor conditions and if necessary formally request that Metro -Dade County maintain an acceptable quality of public housing within the City. [(c)5] Policy 1.2.10: The City will, through its building code enforcement, demolish all structures determined to be structurally unsafe. [(c)4] 1 Policy 1.2.11: Historically significant housing in the City will be identified and subjected to the Heritage Conservation Article of. the City's Code and zoning ordinance. [(c)2,3,4] 05/10/90 Housing - Page 3 10832 9 Objective 1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of housing in non -isolated residential areas for community -based residential facilities and foster care facilities (including those funded b the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. [(b)4] 2 Policy 1.3.1: The City will permit the operation of group homes, foster care facilities and Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLFs), subject to restrictions reflected in the City zoning ordinance, in all residential areas at the residential densities for which those areas are zoned. [(c)5,6] 1,2 Policy 1.3.2: The City's land develooment regulations nee will be reviewed and amended where warranted, to prevent concentrations of reighbeyheed. L(05,61 2 Policy 1.3.3: legislative support Annual Report of the The City will direct for implementing the Committee on Housing its state lobbyist to seek recommendations contained in the for the Elderly (December 1987), • [(c)5,6,7] 2 Policy 1.3.4: The City will suoggrt the development of community -based residential facilities, foster care facilities, and ACLFs for low- and moderate- income residents through its existing housing programs. [(05,6] 3 Objective 1.4: Participate in a regional effort to RIMvide adeguate shelter for assist the homeless. [0)1] Policy 1.4.1: The City, along with Metro Dade County, Broward County, the major municipalities of the region, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services will participate in the development of a coordinated plan to address the problem of homelessness in South Florida. [(c)5] Policy 1.4.2: The City will direct its state lobbyist to seek legislative support for the State to continue implementing the recommendations of the State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services's sponsored report Final. Report, Florida's Homeless: A Plan for Action (Statewide Task Force on the Homeless, June, 1985). [(c)5,7] 2 Policy 1.4.3: The City will assist in providej=, when necessary, temporary emergency shelter facilities to serve homeless families and children. [(05] 05/10/90 housing - Page 4 10832 W 1,2 Policy 1.4.4: The City's laid development regulations zeniml will permit temporary crisis intervention facilities and short-term transitional facilities (aimed at assisting the homeless to become self- supporting members of society) to be located proximate to rea4dent eeneentrations areas where social assistance and economic opportunities are available.[(c)5] Policy 1.4.5: The City will continue and expand its efforts to acquire and administer federal and state financial aid for homeless assistance. [(c)7] 1.2 Policy 1.4.6: The City will provide regulations for, and permit the siting of, homeless shelters within its land development regulations ramtRg erdimenee and take appropriate measures to prevent a net loss of shelter capacity [(c)2.5,8] Objective 1.5: Provide for assistance to displaced occupants where public redevelopment programs require relocation. [(4)6] Policy 1.5.1: The City's housing program will continue to provide for assistance to occupants displaced by public redevelopment projects so that suitable relocation housing in proximity to employment and necessary public services is available prior to the demolition or replacement of existing housing serving low -and moderate -income occupants. [(c)7,8] 3 Objective 1.6: eanserve existing city-� fellow for replacement of mobile homes an these _. ___ on a one -for -one basis. [(b)3] 1 Policy 1.6.1: The City's ]and deveignment regulations w;'i continue to allow for the replacement of mobile homes on existing sites on a one -for -one basis. [(05] 3 Goal 2: Achieve a linable city center with a variety of urban housing types for persons of all income levels. 3 Objective 2.1: Preteet emd enhe Ce existing Viehie nerghhei-heeds. Achieve a liveable downtown with a variety of urban 3 Policy 2.1.1. Protect and enhance exist ptetainj= existing residential neigfifierheedt by (c) 3, 41 10832 31 TY-... , -- - DAPM C 1,2 Policy 2.1.2: Revise residential zoning district regulations to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary housing types and mixed -use development with the application of new higher density zoning ' , [(c 2] 3 Policy 2 1 3• Assure that necessary support servi amenities are available to existing neighborhoods. 1(0 3 3 Policy 2.12.4+: Promote development of new. c 3 3 Policy 2.1M,+: !eels, aid Target available governmental housing assistance programs and funds to assist Wilh Hi the redevelopment of affordable housing in existin viable neighborhoods and publicly designated redevelopment districts. [�c)5,7] 2 Policy 2.13.Zg: Working together with private developers, the City will continue to apply for Urban Develo ment Action Grants (UDAG's), and Housing Development Action Grants (HoDAG's� in the Southeast Overtown/Park West, Lummus Park, River Quadrant and West Brickeil areas, where housing can be developed as a part of mixed -use projects. 1,2 Policy 2.13.83: Through changes in the City's land development _regulations zenimv aidimence, expand the areas in which new commercial 10832 development may receive floor area bonuses for Housing Trust Fund contributions to iiseiude the River Quedramt, [(c)2,5] 94;�_ ' ^ ^ Housing - Page 6 IMC211 3 eemere#M-arees, 1 Policy 2.1$.4k: The City's land deveioome8t regulations �enteg aidineece will allow for housing (including units for students, artists, and the elderly) within air -rights over new public facilities, such as parking garages, performing arts centers, educational buildings, public markets, intermodal terminals and Metrorail and Metromover properties. [(c)2,5] 10832 33 7 SANITARY AND STORES SZWZ RS 9J-5.011(2) Goal 1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance, timely provision and efficient operation cf a centralised wastewater treatment and ancillary sewOrige system. [(a)] 1 Objective 1.1: All residences and businesses within the City will be served by sanitary sewers by 1993 1994, and the City will continue to replace and repas ar ginq segments of the system as requited, and will coordinate with Metro Dade County on the extension of, or increase in the capacity of, treatment facilities to most future needs. [(b)1;2] Policy 1.1.1: The City will continue to implement. existing plans to extend the sewerage system to all unsewered areas of the City. ( (c)1) J 1 Policy 1.1.2: The City will complete those sanitary sewer projects described in the City's Capital Improvement Program—. 198; 993 IDy !999 1994. ( (c) 1l Policy 1.1.3: The City will monitor progress on all sanitary sewer related capital improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement implementation procedures. ((c)1 Policy 1.1.4: Although the City has no authority with respect to Metro Dade County's wastewater treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, continue to support, ana cooperate with, Metro Dade County Water and Sewer Authority (WASA) Department actions to expand the capacities of its wastewater treatment facilities as expressed in that Department's 201 Plan. [(c)1] Objective 1.2: Nnsure that the practice of wastewater management is consistent with the protection and preservation of natural resources. [(b)5] Policy 1.2.1: Although the City has no authority with respect to Metro Dade County's wastewater treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, support and encourage Metro Dade County WASA Department to continue to adhere to its current policies of: no discharge of wastewater to surface fresh waters; advanced waste treatment at 10832 05/10/90' Sanitary and Storm Sewers - Page 1 �5 � all "package" treatment plants that are granted variances from "no discharge" requirements; secondary treatment prior to discharge from ocean outfalls; secondary treatment, proven design, local operating experience and compliance with all regulatory agency requirements prior to discharge from injection wells; and secondary or higher levels of treatment, as required by regulations, prior to discharge to shallow groundwater to ensure no negative impact on the ability of the receiving waters to meet Federal Drinking Water Standards. [(c)3;4] Policy 1.2.2: In the design and construction of new sewers, and in the repair and replacement of old sewers, the City will use appropriate design and construction techniques to eliminate infiltration of storm waters into the sanitary sewer system, or the overflow of wastewater into the storm sewer system. [(c)1;31 Policy 1.2.3: The City will use its authority under local codes and ordinances to cooperate with Metro Dade County DERM to identify and eliminate any sites where there may be illegal connections of sanitary sewers to the storm sewer system. [ (c) 1; 2] Policy 1.2.4: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, negotiate with Metro Dade County WASA Department to seek cooperative agreements to ensure that the operation of the Central District wastewater treatment facility on Virginia Key does not degrade the natural environment or limit the public's access to recreational opportunities on the island. [ (c) 1; 2; 4 ] 1,2 Objective 1.3: The City's land use and development regulations will ensure that approval of development or redevelopment will not be granted UnIese an -occur until there exists adequate wastewater transmission capacity to serve that development. [(b)3] Policy 1.3.1: The level of service standard to determine adequate transmission capacity is 185 100 gallons per � capita per day (GPCD) . [ (c) 2.a] Policy 1.3.2: All improvements for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of the sanitary sewer transmission network shall be compatible with the level of service standard adopted in Policy 1.3.1. [(c)2.a] Policy 1.3.3: Since the sanitary sewer network is an interconnected, county wide system, the departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with Metro Dade County WASA Department to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity. [ (c) 1 ] 10832 05110190' Sanitary and Storm Sewers - Page 2 ,6.Y Policy 1.3.4: The City will enforce its policy that requires City permits for any development or redevelopment occurring outside of the City's boundaries which by gravity connects to the City's sewer transmission network. [(c)41 Objective 1.4: The City of Miami's sanitary sewer collection system is a valuable and costly element of the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient manner. [(b)3] 1,2 Policy 1.4.1: The City of Miami will use its Bland Use -P1e.: evelovment reculations to ensure that development and redevelopment is consistent with the capacity, f= the sanitary sewer collection system. (See Policy 2.5.1) [(c)21 Goal 2: Provide adequate sto=water drainage to reasonably protect against .flooding in areas of intenaive use and occupation, while preventing degradation of quality in receiving graters. [ (a) ] Objective 2.1: In accordance with the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, the City will address the most critical drainage problems so that by 1991 twenty-five percent of subcatchment areas within the City will most or exceed the 5-year frequency, 24 hour duration standard, and by the year 2000 40 percent of the subcatchmont areas will most or exceed this level of service. [(b)1;2] 1 Policy 2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan as the long range policy guideline for imprc.--.ng its storm drainage management system, and will periodically update the estimated cost of implementing brat plan. By 1989 1991, the City will rank the projects specified in that. plan, witH—priority given to addressing the most critical problem areas within the City, and by 199e 1991 develop a financing plan to implement those projects, supported by the provisions of Chapter 53.5 of the City Code, entitled "Storm Water Utility System" which provides the necessary legal basis for such financing plan. [(c)11 Policy 2.1.2: The City will continue to monitor progress on all storm sewer related capital improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement implementation procedures. [(c)2.c] Policy 2.1.3: Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance with a drainage level of service standard of a one -in - five -year storm event. For the storm drainage system as a whole, 10832 05/10/90 Sanitary and Storm Sewers - Page 3 5 6 20 percent of the existing system will be brought to a standard of a one -in -five-year storm event by the year 2000. [(c)2.c] Objective 2.2: The practice of stormwater management within the City will be designed to reduce pollutant loadinq rates to surface waters. [(c)4] 1,2 Policy 2.2.1: By 1990 the City will begin to retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. arai-eAll such storm water outfalls will have been retrofitted by *945 1999. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. (See related Natural Resource Conservation Policy 1.1.2 and Coastal Management Policy 1.1.2) [(c)1] Policy 2.2.2: In order to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami and Little rivers, the City will increase the frequency and extent of street sweeping. [(c)1] Policy 2.2.3: The City will continue to seek cooperative agreements and funding support from Metro Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order to protect the quality of its surface waters and reduce pollutant loadings into the Miami River, its tributaries, the Little River, and directly into Biscayne Bay. [(c)1] Policy 2.2.4: The City shall require that "best management practices" shall be used in the design and construction of stormwater management systems to minimize pollutant load eventually discharged to iiatural drainage syr.tems, as well as to regulate the volume and timing of storm water delivered to natural systems. [(c)1] Policy 2.2.5: The City will continue to enforce South Florida Building Code requirements for the on site retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. [(c)1] Objective 2.3: As the City implements the storm water management improvements specified in the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, it will ensure that stormwater management contributes to the conservation of ground water as a future potable water supply. [(b)4] Policy 2.3.1: In its stormwater management practices, the City will promote infiltration of storm water to surficial or artesian 10832 05/10/90, Sanitary and Storm Sewers - Page 4 37 W aquifers to prevent further saltwater intrusion, where such infiltration is deemed to be feasible and cost efficient, and is not likely to represent an environmental hazard. [(c)1;21 Objective 2.4: All areas of the City are now served by storm drainage facilities, and the City will continue to coordinate the replacement, repair, eftension, and capacity increases of the system consistent with development and redevelopment needs. ,E(b)1;21 Policy 2.4.1: Through enforcement of its Storrs Water Utility System as provided in Chapter 53.5 of the City Code, the City will use its authority "to construct, reconstruct, improve, and extend stormwater utility system and to issue revenue bonds and other debts if needed to finance in whole or part the cost of such system and to establish just and equitable rates, fees, and charges for the services and facilities provided by the system". [ (c) 11 Objective 2.5: The City of Miami's storm drainage system is a valuable and costly element of the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient manner to serve this fully -developed community. [ (b) 31 102 Policy 2.5.1: The City of Miami will use its gland -development regulations to ensure that development and redevelopment is consistent with the capacity, fr the storm drainage system. (See Policy 1.4.1) [(c)2] 10832 --A. ",s„ 5anitary and Storm Sewers - Pace 5 � e N NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE 9J-5.011(2) Goal is Protect the functions of the natural ground=ter aquifer recharge areas within the City. ((a)) Objective 1,1: Ensure that stormwater management practices contribute to conservation of groundwater as a future potable water supply. [(b)5] Policy 1.1.1: As the City implements the projects identified in its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, it will promote the infiltration of storm water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater intrusion, where such infiltration is deemed to be feasible, not to represent an environmental hazard, and to be cost efficient. [(c)4] Policy 1.1.2: The City will coordinate with and support local, state and federal agencies to achieve regional aquifer recharge protection objectives, including those pertaining to the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. 1,2 Objective 1.2: The City's will use its land use and development zesti-ng regulations = wili ensure that land uses for areas within the City of Miami deemed to be aquifer recharge areas by the South Florida Water Management District, __rdex ee maintain adequate recharge for the aquifer. [(b)5] 2 Policy 1.2.1: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West Flagami area of the City (as shown on Figure III.1 of the Data and Analysis) to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Land Use Pgligy 1.1.101 [(c)4] 05/10/90 Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge - Page 1 10832 -3S POTASH WAUM 9J-5.011(2) Goal is Rnsure that all residents and workera vithIn the City have adequate access to safe drinking water through the efficient operation of centsa Uzed, County operated potable water treatment facilities and ancillary potable water transmission system. i(a)I Objective 1.1: Land development regulations will ensure that approval of development or redevelopment will not be granted unions and until there exists adequate potable water transmission capacity to serve that development. ((b)3] 2. Policy 1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, county -wide system, the City departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with Metro Dade County WASA Department to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.4) ( (c) iJ 2 Objective 1.2: Ensure adequate levels of safe potable water are available to most the needs of the City. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 1.2) ( (b)1; ; 4 ] Policy 1.2.1: Ensure potable water supplies meet the tablished level of service standards for transmission dapacity 244 200 gallons er = capita er day (GP_ CD) .ate--suee it ( (c) 2.d) Policy 1.2.2: The City will cooperate and participate to e fullest extent possible with Dade County and other county nicipalities receiving potable water from WASAD in developing acceptable countywide water conservation plan. (See Natural source Conservation Policy 2.1.7) C(c)II 3 Policy 1.2.3: The City will adept an emerveney water_ Adhere existing Dade County emergency water conservation arrdri:rcn.c idelines as well as the emergency wWater ,ortage Plan of the South Florida Water Management District. ee Natural Resource Conservation Policy 2.1.1) [(c)3j 10832 1.� 0.'. Inn Re—Z woe not in vaidgites new One. i. thee ere ittaticill"rY 10832 l Water - P a • 2 / potable Wa g 05/10/90' SOL= MS= CO==XON 9J-5.011(2) Goal 1: Zesuro a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance, timely provision and efficient operation of an .integrated solid waste disposal and ancillary solid waste collection system. ((a)] Objective 1.1: The City will continue to provide solid waste collection services to City residents and businesses in a manner that ensures public health and safety, and a clean urban environment. ((b)1;21 2 Policy i.i.i: The City's solid waste collection services t.& -- &nd It&d!iLm- y ---- ' -'- areas -shall maintain a level .TiliGii it if�ii firms ' of service standard of seven (7) lbs. per person per day, which is equivalent to 1.28 tons per person per year. [(c)2.bj 2 + Policy 1.1.2: Commercial structures and high density residential areas will continue to be served by beth-either the City's Solid Waste Department or by private sector providers of solid waste collection services. The City will require levels of service to be complied with by private haulers operating within the City's boundaries, and will enforce all City regulations regarding the disposal and collection of solid waste. ((c)2.b] Policy 1.1.3: The City shall maintain solid waste collection equipment as required to serve the public needs according to the service standard adopted in Policy 1.1.1. ((c)2.b) Policy 1.1.4: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure compliance with its "Garbage and Trash Ordinance," Chapter 22 of the Municipal Code. ((c)1) _ I1 Policy 1.1.5: Land evelopment regulations will be consistent with the provision of f solid waste collection services in accordance with the level of service adopted herein. ((b)3] Policy 1.1.6: In the allocation of funds for the provision of solid waste services, first priority will be given to those improvements and programs which are necessary to protect the health, safety and the integrity of the environment, and meet federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. Second priority in the allocation of funds will be assigned to improvements which are necessary to meet existing deficiencies in capacity or service, or required to replace or repair needed equipment, while third priority will be assigned to those projects which increase the extent of services. C(c)II 10832 Policy 1.1.7: The City shall, through enforcement of its powers to regulate solid waste collection services, require promoters of major public events to reimburse the City for extraordinary trash and garbage collection services required as a result of such events. [ (c)1] Objective 1.2: Although the City has no authority goverminq solid waste transfer and disposal, it will continue to support Metro Dade County efforts intended to ensure that transfer stations and disposal sites are sufficient to most the needs of City residents sccordinq to the service standards adopted in Policy 1.1.1. 1(b)1;2] Policy 1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Planning, through the City's Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall request the Metro Dade County Public Works Department, Division of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to biannually update estimates of system demand and capacity. [(c)1;2] Policy 1.2.2: The City shall support Dade County's policy to implement the County's Solid Waste Disposal and Resources Recovery Management Plan and those County projects identified in accordance with the Solid Waste Disposal Fund Bond Series A and B. The City shall also support Metro Dade County"s policy to increase, by 1992, county wide resources recovery operations to process 67 percent of all solid waste generated, and to process 100 percent by the year 2000. [(c)1;2] Policy 1.2.3: The City will continue to explore the development of resource recovery and cogeneration activities and, subject to concurrence by Metro Dade County, consider the implementation of programs and procedures that decentralize solid waste disposal and reduce the volume of solid waste that is disposed of at County landfills. [(c)1;2] 1,2 Policy 1.2.4: The City's --e}�ta—af ° = ''a_`_ fteek Fianri" will work with, and support, the County's efforts to identify generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper collection and disposal of hazardous waste. Its departments will support the County's program to enforce all non -household producers of hazardous waste in identifying waste and disposing of it according to EPA, State, and local standards. The City will support Metro Dade County's development of a hazardous waste temporary storage and transfer facility in a non -populated area. In coordination with Dade County, the City will work to meet the Region's objective to reduce the incidence of improper hazardous materials and waste handling and disposal by 199e 1992. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 1.1. 8) [ (c) 1; 2] 10832 nR110l90 Solid Wants Collection - Page 2 _� � Policy 1.2.3: The City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage the County to utilize "amnesty days" to encourage small volume, non-commercial producers of hazardous waste to safely dispose of such waste, and to develop a permanent system for households, small business and other low volume generators to safely dispose of hazardous wastes. ((c)1;21 Objective 1.3: It shall be the City's policy that solid waste collection procedures shall be conducted in a manner that will reduce the quantity of litter, trash and abandoned personal property on City streets. Policy 1.3.1: The City will continue its "Clean Neighborhood" campaigns and support the County's "Keep Dade Beautiful" program through public awareness and information programs. Policy 1.3.2: The City shall, through enforcement of those provisions of the City code that protect and enhance the appearance of neighborhoods, ensure that streets and yards remain clean and sightly. Where the City code falls short of the provisions necessary to accomplish this, revisions shall be proposed to the City Commission. Policy 1.3.3: The City will increase street sweeping frequencies in order to reduce pollution to surface waters via storm water runoff and to reduce or eliminate litter in areas where significant problems may exist. Objective 1.4: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer and disposal, it will continue to support and cooperate with Metro Dade County efforts to encourage the recycling of solid waste materials and reduce the volume of waste not aside for collection and disposal. Policy 1.4.1: The City shall, through its publicity programs and mechanisms, encourage the use of recyclable packaging materials. Policy 1.4.2: The City shall evaluate the development of reuse and/or recycling programs for used tires, waste oils and similar recyclable materials and make recommendations for applicable additions or amendment to City procedures governing the disposal of these materials. Policy 1.4.3: The City shall, through its publicity programs and mechanisms, encourage residents to reduce the volume of yard and tree trimmings set aside for disposal by promoting the use of composting. 10832 C' WA2 TRANSPORTATION 9J-5.007-8 (3) Goal 1: Maintain an effective and cost efficient traffic circulation network within the City of Miami that provides transportation for all persons and facilitates commOraial activity, and which is consistent with, and furthers, neighborhood plans, supports economic development, conserves energy, and protects and enhances the natural environment. [ (a) ] Objective 1.1: By the year 2000 all arterial and collector roadways and supporting parking facilities that lie within the City's boundaries will operate at levels of service that most the needs of an urban center characterized by compact development and moderate -to -high residential densities and land use intensities. [(b)1] Policy 1.1.1: The City will, through its membership on the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC), continue to participate in Metro Dade County's formulation of traffic circulation policies, and will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, support the County's efforts to maintain adopted level of service standards. [(c)1] 3 Policy 1.1.2: Within designated Transportation Corridors, the total person -trip capacity of all transportation modes will be —is used in the measurement of fetere, peak period' level of service (LOS) In such Transportation. Corridors an overall minim m peak -period level of ---.e- LOS standard A9z E (98 _ereent 100% of corridor person -trip capacity)2 will be maintained. =nimum LOS standards for each mode within both the Type HS and Type LS Transportation Corridors! are as follows: [(c)1] 'Peak period means the average of the two highest consecutive hours of trip volume during a weekday. 2Level of service in Transportation Corridors is calculated usinq the "Methodology for I Calculatinq Peak Hour Person rrip Capacity_ conta nea n the Transportation Corridors section of the Transportation Element (which combines the Traffic Circulation and Mass Transit Elements) of I the Miami Comprehensive Neiqhborhood Plant also separately published • a rye ort entitled "Transportation Corridors_-- MNeinq the Challenge of Crorth 10832 Ll S �-- . or earrideff Type Hs",, th", 1.1.2.1:+: Private passenger vehicles: i V�\i ••4ix •- irVV V / ..a Lr iiLG Li r)L+i G\i adr-VVaiYti a�i• LOS Ai?A- E as measured by person -trip methodology -using 1.6 persons -per -vehicle as the vractical cavacity of a private passenger vehic]A• rr..rreh i �Z - - ' ' - - -- r 7 .•r. arr va• iiiiiiZ� race.... trip Meeltedeievyj 1.1.2.3:42: Local bus transit vehicles: on eandweyyr minimum 20-minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 150% of seated load; 1.1.2.-1--.&3: Express bus transit vehicles: on iimiteet Midway: minimum 20 minute headway,, maximum load not to exceed 125t of seated load; 1.1.2.3--64: Rapid rail transit, minimum 20 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 130% of seated load. 1 � l • , r r r Lr 1 i Z �Td7�r Tj'74� .�—"7 �.'"rrT.' Z•�Q'j'�'.��"'�� I l v •♦ //• •. ar V v. GG l u _ _ , seated • 3The designation of Types OHS* (High Speed) and "LSO (Low Speed) Transportation I Corridors is made in anticipation of future da cation of the 1985 HCM methodology for measurement of highway levels of service, wherein average spsea will replace V/C as the primary measure of quality of service, and different minimum standards of average speed ("High" and OLow4I will be applied to the person -trip measurements seenderd*-fcr each type of Corridor. l +Jnder the current 'e Vf methodology •(el-, the minimum LOS standards are the same for th types of Corridors, with the only distinction being that the HS Type includes limited -scow■ highways and/or rapid rail transit lines, as well as surface roadways, Iwhile the LS type includes only a surface roadwayl and a local bus transit lines meeting the LOS minimum standard in 1.1.2.2vi-above_. -- - 10832 44/" 3 Policy 1.1.3: Outside designated Transportation Corridors, the roadwayvehicular canacit is used in the measurement of peak period LOS. For such limited access, arteria , and collector roadways that are not within designated Transportation Corridors, the a minimum peak period *LOSS standard E (40 100% of roadway vehicular capacity) ` will be maintained, except-- --'-` c ` "-`-"-__ as follows: [(c)1 1.1.3.1: In the Downtown Special Transportation Area (STA) , 20% percent of non -State facilities, as identified in the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI), may operate below LOS Ei 1.1.3.2: Roadways may operate below the applicable minimum if projects which would raise the LOS to the applicable minimum LOS are programmed for construction within the eery first three years of Dade County's Transportation Improvement Program (which includes the orrespondina years of the FDOT Five Year Transportation Plan), *4aA&%.&-=-14 -ho- _94--at yeae-bemire o f the cap i tw 1 T rsrnv-ement! lemene; or where adequate provision is made by the developer to make improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development concurrent with the development's traffic generation. 1.1.3.3: Roadway segments may operate below the applicable minimum if they are either (1) legislatively constrained (as for scenic or historical purposes), or (2) less than one mile in length, and where adherence to the City's Land Use Plan assures that no significant deterioration to traffic levels of service will occur as the result of additional development along such roadway segments.,63 1.1.3.4: The minimur, operating level of service standard for mesa ___ ___-t shail be-fer-local bus transit vehicles: . minimum 60 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 150% of seated load. 1.1.3.5: The minimum operating level of service standard for masss+I: sec u iee-si�!� far-express bus transit vehicles.* ,... m t=arreed�rey OLevel of service for roadwa s not in a Transportation Corridor is calculated using the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) metnodo ogy (V C) with roaaway capacity based on the Urban Transportation Planning System (UTPS) Service Volumes for Level of Service "E•- through December KSuch roadway segments presently existing are: Ingraham Highway from the south I corporation line to Douglas Road (S.W. 37th Avenue): Douglas Road from Ingraham Highway to Main Highways Main Highway from Douglas Road to Grand Avenue: and Red Road (N.N. 57th Avenue) from N.N. 7th Street to the north corporation line. 10832 P 05/10/90 Transortation - Page 3 1 7 minimum 49--60 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 125% of seated load. 1.1.3.6: For the interim eriod 1989 through 1994, thi m nimum acceptable LOS for any roadway operating below LOS E on or before July if 1989 shall be 15% below sal, existin LOS. BeginninSL January 1, 1995, roadways shall operate at or above LOS E. Policy 1.1.4: Issuance of permits for development or redevelopment will be contingent upon compliance with the City's level of service standards. t(c)ll Policy 1.1.5 The City, through its membership on the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC) and its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency of the existing thoroughfare network by such methods as improved signal timing, better intersection and street --design, car pooling, and encouraging staggered work schedules. ((c)31 Policy 1.1.6: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will encourage Metro Dade County to expand its public bus transit system and attain a 1000 bus system by 1997, and will work with Metro Dade County in the formulation of, bus system policies, and encourage Metro Dade County not to adopt level of service standards or land use patterns that are incompatible with the cost effective operation of a public mass transit system. ( (c) 1) Policy 1.1.7: Formally request the County MPO to include in the adopted Transportation Plan improvements that are designed to address traffic conditions in and access to the Allapattah Industrial District, and provide a direct access into the Design District and the Civic Center from Interstate 195 (I-195) in the vicinity of Northwest 20th Street. ((c)3) 1,2 Policy 1.1.8: Through enforcement, amendment, and interpretation of its Bland Use —Plan eedineneesf and -Simiiez ee ee 7 u drr Y i- 4G--- -+evelopment fi Gi lr iJi Y �. regulations, the City shall require the provls on of adequate vehicular parking facilities with energy efficiency lighting consistent with parking demand at locations that are not disruptive to nearby residential communities. Tn.er, Gr.e YG nd tite 2 Policy 1.1.9: Require new development in downtown to implement transportation control measure.& provisions in the City's land development regulations designed to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic byincreasing auto occupancy and transit ridership. ((c)1] 05/1.0/90 10832 Traaavortatioa - Page 4 t 2 Policy 1.1.10: Improv bV aocating street s ace whereby on "Regional Links" vehicular traffic; on "Urba generallv given to pedestri within high density areas o vehicular traffic are balan an 2 tea-exeeed H three tiers. c- the efficien r y�or aowntown roaaw hierarch of fund" neral Y given to ades" priorityis nn alb other streets needs of pedestrian 2 Policy 1.1.1411: Relocate and/or extend streets that do not fit the developed street grid system of downtown, and have contributed to the disruption of circulation. by: releenting rTQG"L ii�i3.7 L. -s �.aa .+�. �.ct. 1..� ni�acaa i.a •�y u.•va r...j+r .— .� .. .. .. �..���.. .����' Fee -ride a eenter Median and Iftnese 2 Policy 1.1.1412: The City will Intergovernmental Coordination Polic its Dade ounty to *improve downtown connections to the expressway systear y: extending the I-95 spur ramp to link Biscayne Boulevard,_ providing an interehange a means of access to and from et--I-95 seek at Northwest 20th Street, _flew Immlip-5 redesigning the existing I-395 entrance and exit ramps at ortheast ist and Znd Avenues, and constructing a tour lane unreel connecting the Seaport to I-395. 7 es ever the miami River. AC III n tam i©832 _ Pace 5 �9 Transrnrtation �2 Policy 1.1."13: New development in downtown shall be required to contribute its fair share toward the mitigation of regional roadway impacts as provided for by the Development Order implementing the downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West Developments of Regional Impact. 1 policy 1.1.1414: The City will, through its membership on the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC) continue to participate in Metro Dade County's formulation of traffic circulation policies, and will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, support the County's efforts to increase reliance on remote intercept parking at outlying Metrorail stations and express bus stops. [(c)lj 2 PolicV 1.1.15: Through enforcement of minimum and maximum on -site parking limitations, the city will manage the downtown parking supoly to maintain an appropriate balance among the need to promote economic growth, to facilitatelcal traffic circulation, and to encourage public transportation use. 1,2 Policy 1.1.1416: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of its .& land development regulations regarding downtown parking requirements, together with the powers of the city's Off -Street Parking Authority Department, the City will ..promote the development of public and private peripheral parking garages near the expressway and arterial entrances to downtown in order to reduce congestion in the core area. 2 Poiiey 1.1.19: l ins.aaw �. �.w �r ' r •• s e e devele'p!� ent-' 1 Policy 1.1.2.&17: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of its land development regulations regarding downtown parking requirements, together with the powers of the City's Off -Street Parking Authority Department, the City will increase the supply of low cost, short-term parking in public facilities near retail and commercial nodes to encourage shopping trips and other business activity in downtown. objective 1.2: Rights -of -way and corridors needed for existing transportation networks will be designated and reserved. ((b)41 Policy 1.2.1: The City will maintain and enforce, and where necessary revise, the minimum right-of-way requirements 10832 S6 established in its City Code to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network. ((c)4j 2 Policy 1.2.2: Provide a comprehensive public rights--of-way improvements program for major commercial streets which have high levels of pedestrian activity. in Sdiseft eente2t Bft ift e"artery s L e r �Fark West and T t 9e Haiti. Ta1 t2 Objective 1.3: The City's transportation systm will emphasize safe and efficient management of traffic glow through maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards throughout the thoroughfare system by continuing enforcement of design standards and presentation of transportation mode options that enhance efficient person -trip and vehicular movements and reduce accident potential. [(b)1J Policy 1.3.1: The City will continue to provide an adequate, properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular traffic by adhering to adopted design standards and procedures. ( (c) 1; 2; 3l Policy 1.3.2: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will encourage and support Metro Dade County's monitoring of high accident -frequency locations on the City's streets and its identification of design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions. The City will incorporate such improvements into the City's Capital Improvement Element. ( (c) ll Objective 1.4: The traffic circulation system will protect and enhance the character of the City's residential neighborhoods and neighborhood commercial centers through coordination with the Land Use Plan and adopted Neighborhood plans and recommendations; designs and standards for mitigation of traffic intrusion in residential neighborhoods, and TOPICS (low capital - intensive traffic operations) types of traffic improvements. ( (b)1 j Policy 1.4.1: Seek cooperative agreements with Metro Dade County to ensure that the County's transportation improvements: are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on city residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined neighborhoods and do not result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic, especially in Little Havana, Little Haiti, Coral Gate 10832r/ rn.•�►nvnn.+��-� r►n � �sno 7 and the Little River Industrial District along Northeast 2 Avenue. ( (c) 2] Policy 1.4.2: The City will develop a streetscape design program that will guide landscaping, lighting and construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along City streets, and such improvements will be coordinated with major repairs and renovation of city streets. Policy 1.4.3: As streets undergo major repairs or renovation, eliminate dirt shoulders and provide curbing, gutters and sidewalks in order to improve the physical appearance and quality of the neighborhoods and districts. Particular emphasis is on the Design District, Southeast Overtown/Park West, Grove Center, Little Haiti, Little River Industrial District, River Corridor, Latin Quarter and Edison Center. 2 objective 1.5: Although mass transit can be operated within the City of Miami only under the absolute authority of Metropolitan Dade County, the City of Miami's continued development requires the provision of efficient mass transit and paratransit services that serve existing and future trip generators and attractors, the provision of safe and convenient mass transit passenger transfer terminal facilities, and the accommodation of the special needs of the City of Miami's population. Therefore, the City of Miami -he!! ill support Metropolitan Dade County in the provia oan of these essential mass transit services. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy 3.2.2) 2 Poliev 1.5.1: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coord nation Policies, encourage Metro Dade County to facilitate exchanges between modes of transit by interconnecting transit line ni termodal terminals. 1,2 Policy 1.5.12: The City's land evelo meet regulations will direct high density commercial and residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and I Metromover stations. before permitting h high denaitr 1 do:el�pr�AeiL� Athfaree ft- l-f the eit i ( (c) 2] � 1 Policy 1.5.-23: The City shall use its 9imz___ ____,_'__- ___ land development regulations to assist the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital in meeting the demands of Civic Center expansion and helping solve the consequent accessibility and parking problems, and shall encourage the Civic Center facility operators to increase Metrorail ridership and utilization of the transit station to help decrease the need for excessive surface parking demand in the Civic Center. ((c)2] 10832 nC /1 M /On 2 Policy 1.5.34: eansiste!� with tee band Use Plan-aftd __ n__+___: Flarr C_ j____-,�s, „t The City smell will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage Metro Dade County to iftelede in its 'Feenspeftatien Flan the developmeftt-ef provide a Metrorail Transit Station to serve the River Quadrant -rre area of downtown. [(b)11 2 Policy 1.5.*5: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, assist Metro Dade Count to Econstruct the Metromover extensions to Omni and Brickel . m= .. ==_e MeteemevezBayside an ripe ^----�-( (b) 1J ...d �-..w vti..rlr •r 1,2 Policy 1.5.a6: The City of Miami sLrn Will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, assist Metro Dade County in the completion of the planning and construction of Metrorail- Phase II by using the City's regulates pewe &-land development regulations to help direct development where it will support the densities required for urban rail transit systems. [(b)1J 2- Policy 1.5.67: eansistent with the saw_•;r.,ew 6bjeee±:ves, tPhe City e f Mii � shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, request that Metro Dade County include appropriate public transit systems in its Transportation Plan i inink system to connect the following_ l �1t�+r�d�t.��teermia an�1%teemayez. Sayside to Flagler Street, the Seaport to Metromover, the Miami International Airport to downtown, Southeast Bayshore Drive to Metromover, he R____ eeadrane and etrorail Phase II in the west Omni area to Metromover, and t3e p*Y posed - _ _ syseem Miami Beach to downtown. in the est-0mn-i -tee [(b)1J 1 Policy Through land esep zening develo2ment regulations and public facility improvements a stronger interface between the development or redevelopment of neighborhood activity centers and the public transportation system will be promoted. 2 Policy &5.6: The ei- re!"Ietions :: ill foci 1 . b _t � leve i Policy 1.5.9: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage Metro Dade County to approve the use of private jitneys where it is determined that there exists public need for such services and that conventional bus transit services are not satisfactory to meet that need. [(b)1J 1,2 Policy 1.5.10: Through application of the provisions of its land development regulations, the City shall encourage the development of housing near large employment centers sueh a-9-the e i vie eettee= Seet ::_& _ _ _-:_ es. -- and the River et2edraftt—in order to reduce the need for commuting. ((b)11 Policy 1.5.11: The City of Miami shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, strongly encourage the State of Florida to locate the proposed Florida High -Speed Rail southern terminus within downtown Miami. [(b)1) 2 12 - and --Flsgir- St2eee. 2 Policy 1.5.3412: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will support Metro Dade County in its implementation of individual projects described above in order to achieve the Regional objective to increase the share of transit ridership by 50 percent of total person trips during the peak hour and 30 percent during the off-peak hours. [(b)II Objective 1.5: The City shall through its Zatergovernmental Coordination Policies, coordinate its transportation plans and its mass transit planning for transportation disadvantaged people, with those of Metro Dade County, other local municipalities, and the State of Slorida. [(b)21 Policy 1.5.1: The City shall annually review subsequent Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Five -Year Transportation Plans, the FDOT Strategic Transportation Plan and the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Range Transportation Plan Update and coordinate the City's transportation planning with these plans. [ (c) 1j Objective 1.7: Although the City of Miami possesses no power to provide for the protection of existing and future mass transit rights -of -way and exclusive mass transit corridors, the City shall, through its Interovernmental Coordination Policies, cooperate with and support Metropolitan Dade County in such programs, to the and that mass transit expansion and improvement may be facilitated. [(b)3] 1 Policy 1.7.1: The City shall use its fir_ jgtilar mreiepmente land development regulations to ensure that adequate public rights -of -way are preserved for 10832 transportation purposes, which includes the need for mass transit services within designated Transportation Corridors. ((c)21 Objective 1.8: The traffic circulation system shall. be coordinated with the goals, objectives and policies of the Land Use element, includinq coordination with the land uses, densities, projected development and redevelopment, urban iufillinq, and other similar characteristics of land use that have an impact on traffic circulation systems. [(b)1] Policy 1.8.1: The City shall continue to assure provision of an adequate, properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares through adopted design standards and procedures as contained in the City Public Works Manual as adopted for use in the review process, which at a minimum address: ( (c)11 I. Adequate storage and turning bays; 2. Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts; 3. Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable; 4. Driveway access and spacing; and 5. Traffic operations. 10832 PORT OF MIAMI PARTS, AVIATZON JUM RRLAT= TJLC=TXZS 9J-5.009(3) Goal 1: znsure that the development and expansion of Metro Dade County°s Port Of Miami is compatible with and furthers the Physical development of Miami's greater downtown area. [(a)] 1 Objective 1.1: The City of Miami, through its land use plan d coning pomace development re I gulations, shall coordinate land use in areas of the _City adjacent to the Port of Miami with the transportation related activity which occurs withia the port so as to ensure compatibility and compliementarity of land uses and activities. [(b)2.;4] 1,2 Policy 1.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through its land tree pleft, were, and similar rev"Ifteery enc development regulations, encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the port development goals of Metro Dade County and the Port of Miami. [(c)1] I1 Policy 1.1.2: The City shall, through its land tise piano erdj:nanee, end similar land development regulations, ensure that an adequate amount of commercial and industrial land will be available to compliement planned expansions of port activity, and will establish a "free trade zone" within adequate proximity to the Port of Miami. [(c)5] Policy 1.1.3: Through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, the City of Miami will seek concurrence from Metro Dade County to agree that all parking, roads and ancillary transportation facilities required to accommodate new terminals will be constructed within the Port of Miami. [(c)41 Policy 1.1.4: Through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, the City of Miami will seek concurrence from Metro Dade County to agree that all non -transportation related land uses, including but not limited to retail, general office, and hotel uses, will not be permitted within the Port of Miami, but instead such uses will be made available in areas adjacent to the Port. [(b)11 10832 Policy 1.1.5: All surface transportation improvements providing access to the Port must be compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City of Miami as related to the development of the greater downtown area, and such improvements will be financed with an appropriate share of County, state and federal funds. [ (c) 41 ' Policy 1.1.6: The Port shall prepare guidelines that will serve as design criteria for the construction, renovation and landscaping of its facilities, and such guidelines must comply with all City of Miami Code requirements. [(c)2] 1 Policy 1.1.7: The City shall, through its land use p development regulations, cooperate with Metro Dade County and it Ps urrt of Miami operation to mitigate adverse structural and non-structural impacts from the Port of Miami upon adjacent natural resources and land uses. [(c)2] 1 Policy 1.1.8: The City shall, through its land __e r development regulations, cooperate with Metro Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to protect and conserve natural resources. [(c).3] MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Goal 2: Ensure that the development and expansion of Metro Dade County's Mimi International Airport is compatible with and furthers the physical development of the City of Miami. Hall 1 Objective 2.1: The City of Miami, through its. land and 20n, to development regulations, shall coordinate land use in areas of the C ty ad acent to Miami International Airport with the transportation related activity which occurs within that facility so as to ensure compatibility and comnpllementarity of land uses and activities. [ (b) 2 . ; 4 ] 1,2 Policy 2.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through its land tine c r ' -ftents lee evelopment regulations, encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the development goals of Metro Dade County and Miami International Airport. [(c)l] 10832 5 Policy 2.1.2: All surface transportation improvements providing access to Miami International Airport and impacting upon transportation within the City of Miami must be compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City and such improvements will be financed with the appropriate share of County, state and federal funds. [(c)41 1,2 Policy 2.1.3: The City shall, through its land ese fry powers, and 9+mii-_ _ ---1 =_ y =_ _ ___- development regulations, eae L metre 1 _ - "''-" -- ,-_--`-_-_- - =nsure that zoning within the City protects existing aviation flight paths. [(c)5] PORT OF MIAMI RIVER1 2 Goal 3: The Port of Xlami River, a group of privately owned and operated commercial shipping companies located at _s�peclfic sites along the lleTiami � shal encouraged to continue operation as a valued and economically viable component of the City's maritime industrial base. ((a)] Objective 3.1: The City of Miami., through its Land Uee development regulations, shall help protect e port of Miami River from encroachment by non water - dependent or water -related land uses, and shall regulate its expansion and redevelopment is coordination with the City's applicable coastal management and conservation plans and policies. [ (b) l ] 1,2 Policy 3.1.1: The City shall use its land development regulations to encourage the establishment and maintenance of water -dependent and water -related uses along the banks of the Miami River, and to discourage encroachment by ether incompatible uses. [ (c) 5] 1 Policy 3.1.2: The City shall, through its -bland : map and Supporting pelieieq mild c development regulations, encourage the development and expansion of the Port of Miami River consistent with the coastal management lThe "Part of Miami River" is simply a legal name used to identify some 14 independent. privately -owned small shipping companies located along the Miami River, and is not a "Port Facility" within the usual meaning of the term. The identification of these shipping concerns as the 'Port of Miami River" was made in 1906 for the sole purpose of satisfying a U.S. Coast Guard regulation governing bilge pumpouts. 10832 and conservation elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. [ (c)1) 1 Policy 3.1.3: The City shall, through its Bland development regulations, encourage development of compatible land uses in the vicinity of the Port of Miami River so as to mitigate potential adverse impacts arising from the Port of Miami River upon adjacent natural resources and land uses. [(c)21 Objective 3.2: The City of Miami shall coordinate the surface transportation access to the Port of Miami River with the traffic and mass transit system shown on the traffic circulation. map series. ((b)2] Policy 3.2.1: The City of Miami shall, through the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, coordinate intermodal surface and water transportation access serving the Port of Miami River. [(c)41 Objective 3.3: The City of Miami shall coordinate its Port of Miami River planning activities with those of ports facilities providers and regulators including the Q.S. Corps of Engineers, Q.S. Coast Guard, and Metropolitan Dade County's Port of Miami. ((b)3] Policy 3.3.1: The City of Miami, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall support the functions of the Port of Miami River consistent with the future goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect to the unique characteristics of the Port of Miami River's location and its economic position and functioning within the local maritime industry, and the necessity for coordination of these characteristics and needs with the maritime industry that complements, and often competes with, the Port of Miami River. [ (c) 51 10832 5i W P"M, RNCREATtON JUM OPEN SPACE 9J-5.014(3) Goal 1: Frovide adequate opportunities for active and passive recreation to all City residents. [(a)1 Objective 1.1: Increase public access to all identified recreation sites, facilities and open spaces and beaches and enhance the quality of recreational opportunities for all aqe groups and handicapped persons within the City,a neighborhoods by 1994. ((b)11 1 Policy 1.1.1: By 1989 1992, develop a detailed management plan for any neighborhoods where there is a critical shortage of access to public recreational services, with the intent of identifying measures to address current deficiencies, determining the projected cost of implementing such measures and identifying funding sources to finance their implementation. [(c)51 Policy 1.1.2: Improve the quality and diversity of recreational programs offered at community parks, increasing staff and hours of operation where deemed necessary, and will encourage recreational staff to be certified by the Florida Recreation and Parks Association. [(b)31 Policy 1.1.3: The City's land development regulation policies will consider the impact of future development that significantly increases residential densities on the quality and delivery of neighborhood parks and recreation services. These regulations will establish mechanisms, including, but not limited to, special development fees, that will be used to mitigate the adverse impacts of su: ' , development. [ (b) 3 Z Policy 1.1.4: The City will increase recreational opportunities on Virginia Key through the island's redevelopment, and as provided for in the Virginia Key Master Plan. [(b)41 2 Policy 1.1.5: The City will retain a majority of its land use as recreational land use on Watson Island as designated in the Watson Island mMaster-+erne--dDevelopment--Plan. [ (b) 41 Policy 1.1.6: All park renovation plans will contain a provision for providing a program to ensure that in the development of new and the renovation of existing parks, the special, recreation and safety needs of preschool age children and the elderly within the service radius of park facilities are addressed. [.(c) 5) 10832 Policy 1.1.7: The City will establish a program to coordinate actions with nonprofit providers of social services to the C) 05/10/90 p""`" be elderly, so as to permit such providers to utilize public park facilities for meeting the recreation needs of the elderly. [ (c) 5 Policy 1.1.8: Features that increase access for handicapped persons will be included in the designs for all renovations and developments of park facilities. [(c)1l Policy 1.1.9: The City will establish a program to coordinate actions with nonprofit social service agencies to permit the development of special recreation programs for the handicapped to be offered by such agencies at City facilities. [(b)31 Policy 1.1.10: In the transfer of ownership of City park facilities or public open spaces, or if the conversion of City owned park or public open space to non -recreational use occurs in areas of crucial shortages, a formal justification for such action will be prepared in order to assure that the City will take appropriate actions to ensure that, in these areas with deficiencies, no net loss of recreational opportunities to affected residents occurs as a result of such title transfers or conversions. [(c)4] 1,2 Policy 1.1.11: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety, future landdevelopment regulations will require non -water dependent or related development or redevelopment to maintain public access to the shoreline. These re'g'"Iet ieft''-will `•eee3tsze the .eenstS temien er f bay Walk , river waiks and ethTe'r+ riebl-1 -�f/L_ . rr-rrr v.6ft pr . rr Fe l tee-'ee-e1s- we (See Coastal Management Policy 2.1.1) . [ (b) lj Policy 1.1.12: All City owned, waterfront property will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline by 1999. [ (b) 1] 1,2 Policy 1.1.13: By 199ey 4-Incorporate provisions for t*e ublic physical and/or visual access to the shoreline in •i-s--the City° s waterfront zoning regulations. (See Coastal Management Policy 2.1.7). [(b)lj Objective 1.2: Increase public safety and security within the City's parks, reducing crime and accident rates by 20 percent by 1995 and by 33 percent by 2000. (b) 3] Policy 1.2.1: By 1992 all community parks will be equipped with adequate energy efficient night lighting. [(e6•&c)5) Policy 1.2.2: Community and neighborhood parks will increase their hours of operation and enhance their programs, whenever feasible, so as to encourage a greater public presence in the parks. [ (b) 3 j 10832 ne/Inicn .,_._, - f Policy 1.2.3: The City's Police Department will establish a program to work with neighborhood residents to create and support community crime watch groups to assist in park safety and crime prevention. [ (b) 3; (c) S3 Policy 1.2.4: The City will establish a system of regular, uniformed police patrols and presence in and around community and neighborhood parks. [(b)3;(c)53 Policy 1.2.5: In all active parks the City will maintain an adequate number of trained staff based on professionally recognized standards, and on a regular basis will conduct safety inspections of equipment and structural facilities. [(c)5] Policy 1.2.6: The City will disseminate information to the public on proper safety procedures that are to be followed while using park facilities. Objective 1.3: Increase the efficiency of park operations, while improving the quality of recreation services and strengthening the financial support of the parks and recreation service system. ((b)33 Policy 1.3.1: The City's operating budget and the Capital improvements Element (CIE) will give priority to the quality of programs in, and the physical condition of, existing park facilities and to meeting existing deficiencies, before constructing new facilities for parks and recreation. [(c)5j Policy 1.3.2: By 1994, the City will establish a "parks of excellence" program for selected community parks where staff support and operations are focused on high quality programs leading to the development of nationally competitive athletes. Policy 1.3.3: A projection and analysis of operational and maintenance costs associated with all park and recreation related capital projects which exceed $50,000, with their anticipated funding sources, will be required and made publicly available prior to the decision to appropriate public funds for capital improvements. [ (b) 3 3 Policy 1.3.4: The City will study innovative management and maintenance alternatives designed to minimize operating and maintenance costs, while not reducing the extent and quality of programs or adversely affecting the physical condition of park facilities. Recommendations from this study will be completed by 1994, and the alternatives will include, but not be limited to, privatization of operations and maintenance. [(b)31 10832 Policy 1.3.5: Continue to develop public/private partnerships with CBO's and Merchant Associations to provide for the maintenance and enhancement of public spaces. [(b)21 1 Policy 1.3.6: In order to measure and enhance the overall quality of the City's park system the City will seek authorization for a park improvement bond issue before 1994, and also will consider establishing a neighborhood park sinking fund in the FY 191 93 budget to finance major repairs and replacement needs at commuFt—and neighborhood parks. [(b)3;(c)51 Policy 1.3.7: The City will study the feasibility of user fees and charges at community parks as a mechanism to finance a reasonable share of programs and maintenance at such facilities. Recommendations from this study will be completed by 1991, and, if implemented, the City will ensure that any fees and charges will not be prohibitive, and that park facilities will be available to all income groups... [ (b) 3 Policy 1.3.8: By 1989 the City will establish a permanent parks advisory board that is representative of all City neighborhoods, for the purpose of increasing effectiveness in the delivery of recreation services. This board, together with staff support from the City's administration, will prepare a biannual report, which will include, but not be limited to: an analysis of physical conditions within the City's parks; a prioritized list of capital repairs and replacement needs, estimated costs of those capital projects; a critical evaluation of the City's recreation service delivery system; and an assessment of the progress made toward achieving Goal 1 of this element. [ (b) 3; (c) 51 2 Policy . Miami Zoning eff did wme Will he 7 r " f:evei: Of /teL_n_ adapteek Flaii Miami y Heighbeffheeek 2 Objective 1.4: Snsure that future development and redevelopment pay as equitable, proportional share of the cost of public open space and recreational facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards?-. city. [ (b) 2; 4] Policy 1.4.1: The City will continue to use developer contributions, including development impact fees, to help fund the cost of public open space and recreational facilities needed to serve new development or redevelopment. [(b)2;4) 10 8 3 2 Policy 1.4.2: The City will periodically revise all fees related to the impact of new development and redevelopment to reflect f -2 increases in the cost of providing public open space and recreational facilities. ((b)2;4] Policy 1.4.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help fund open space and recreational facilities projects whose public benefits tend to be localized to specific geographic sub areas of the City. ((b)2;4] 2 Policy 1.4.4: Upon adoption of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, the acceptable Level of Service Standards for the City of Miami with regards to Recreation and Open Space will be -- 1.3 acres of public park space per 1000 residents, with - _ - _ _ _ _ - + - _ _ ____ _ b 7S_ _V� u• �G�- L je G Ir i. G V b i ser&& per 18 &9--persens in the —long -rurr. ( (c) 4 ] 1 Gea! 2e -Objective 1.5: Develop and enhance the quality of parks and open spaces within the City's downtown in a manner which addresses the needs of City residents, workers and visitors, and strengthens the City's economic development. ((a)] 1 objective 2.11 policy 1.5.1: Complete the renovation of Bayfront Park by 1990 1992. ((b)1] 2 Policy 2.1.1: r 1,2 ebjeeei*e i.2: Policy 1.5.2: Complete the renovation of Bicentennial Park and development of the FEC Tract, in accordance with the goals and recommendations given in the City's Downtown Waterfront Master Plan, by 1995 1996. ((b)3] 2 Policy_ _ implefitelle ___ he r__=_ Farie r_,_�_-r- _ v__r_ - e,, _ - - - Y the- - , _ - W � _ainintithe o=o Ieet' s ebjeetiyes , F(b) i; +J- 2 parks and or" spaces he th-0 everyday fteede of all; 1 Policy 2..3.1 1.5.3: Restore the utility of Southside Park as a downtown neigTiborhood center and recreational resource. ( (b) 3 (c) 51 10832 I Policy 2.3.2 1.5.4: Redevelop Lummus Park to provide an activity/program center for history, riverfront activities and recreational facilities for neighborhood residents. [(b)3;(c)51 1 Policy 2.3.3 1.5.5: Create a specialty "Fishermen's Wharf" cafe district and mar ne services center along River Drive on the Miami River. [ (b) 3] 1 Policy 2.8.4 1.5.6: As depicted in the Waterfront Master Plan and programme in the CIE, the City will provide along downtown waterfront a continuous network of public parks and major attractions. [(b)31 1 Policy 2.9.5 1.5.7: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and Related Laws, and more specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment and Ordinance 9500 (Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami) all new development and redevelopment along the downtown waterfront is required -to provide a setback of either 50 feet from the seawall or 25 percent of the lot depth if it is less than 200 feet; and those developments within Feblie __`-___� Districts (§P+ SD's) that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards". ((b)1) 1 Policy 2.9.6 1.5.8: Expand the existing public mini -parks on Southeast 10 Street to create a major public plaza at the midpoint of the proposed Brickell Promenade. [(b)3;(c)51 1 Policy 2.9.4 1.5.9: Relocate Brickell Park to the "Riverpoint" property located at the mouth of the Miami River. 1 Policy 2.3.8 1.5.10: Develop urban street promenade linkages with widened sidewalks, high quality materials, landscaping, lighting, graphics and furnishings. 1 Policy 2-.9.9 1.511: Improve the landscaping and pedestrian -oriented -amenities along major boulevards, including Biscayne Boulevard, Brickell Avenue, and North 1 Avenue, to create distinctive images and unifying elements between downtown districts. 1,2 Policy 2.3-48 1.5.12: Enhance public spaces (entrances, plazas, lobbies, courtyards and atriums) and gateways into downtown through artwork. Use, whenever appropriate, the "Art in Public Places" allocation in public facility construction budgets as well as the assistance of the 6ity an -County Arts Council staff, and encourage private organizations to construct civic monuments at gateway locations. 1083,2 I Goal 32: Dove -Lop public parka and open spaces that are aesthetically appealing and enhance the character and wage of the City. [ (a) ] Objective 32.1: Improve the aesthetic qualities of parks and recreation facilities and preserve unique natural landscape features of neighborhood parks. [(c)5] 1 Policy 32.1.1: The City will preserve unique native plant communities within the City's parks, by designating public parks with significant vegetative features as Environmental Preservation Districts; and by designating them as Conservation areas on the Future Land Use Map. [(c)1I 1 Policy 32.1.2: The City will establish an official procedure whereby native plant species which do not require excessive watering or fertilizer, and are not especially sensitive to insect infestation will be utilized in the development or renovation of public parks. [(c)11 1 Policy 32.1.3: The City will designate as scenic transportation corridors those segments of roadways which have significant vegetative features, and will develop bicycle and pedestrian paths along such corridors. Future land development regulations will provide sufficient land areas for uses that are compatible with and encourage the flow of bicycle and pedestrian traffic along these corridors. [(c)II 1 Goal 43: Encourage the development of high quality cultural arts facll.itles and programs witbla the City. [(a)] 1 Objective 43.1: By 1995, the City will have a clearly defined sad functioning cultural arts district within the downtown area, and a world class cultural performing arts facility will be built within the City by the year 2000. 1 Policy 43.1.1: Land development regulations within downtown will permit and encourage the development of a cultural arts district within downtown as specified in the City's Downtown Master Plan. 10832 1 Policy 43.1.2: The City will designate, within its Downtown Master Plan, an area within the Downtown to serve as a Performing Arts District. Performing arts facilities will be located within this downtown performing arts district. Such facilities would be developed with the appropriate share of state, county and private sector funding. 1 Objective *3.2: Promote an increase in the number of small performinq arts theaters within selected residential/co:=ercial areas of the City. 11 Policy *3.2.1: The City will encourage through land development regulations the mixed use of structures to include small capacity theaters for selected areas within the City. 10832 67 COASTAL MANAGEMENT 9J-5.012(3) Goal 1: Abintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of AficmiIs coastal zone including the preservation of natural resources as uell as the enhancement of the built enuiromment. [(a)] Objective 1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its tributaries, and the Little River. [(b)1,4] 1,2 Policy 1.1.1: By 1990 the City will assess environmental hazards that are the result of past disposal activities at the Virginia Key landfill. Such assessment will be made in cooperation with appropriate County, State and Federal environmental agencies, and an action plan to reduce or eliminate any hazards will be formulated by +9% IM lope Natural Resource Conservation Pol.]Sv�?l.• [(c)2] 1,2 Policy 1.1.2: By 1990 the City will begin to retrofit the—rember-ef storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Say., eftd--eflll such storm water outfalls will irate been retrofitted by +999 IM. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. 2 Policy 1.1.3: Beginning in 1990 the City will take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. These actions will include, but not be limited to: modification and improved maintenance of storm and sanitary sewer systems; increased frequency and extent of street sweeping; and encouraging the appropriate federal, state, and county agencies to dredge contaminated sediments from river bottoms (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy.1.1-3)• [(c)2] 1 Policy 1.1.4: The City will seek cooperative agreements and funding support from Metro Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay. By +989 JM, the City will establish plans, including a schedule of projects and completion dates, and identify funding sources required to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution within the City's boundaries. [(c)3] ns/10/90 Coastal Management - Page 1 10832 3 Policy 1.1.5: Within the coastal zone, or along ,the _Miami and Little Rivers. no land uses which represent a likely and significant source of pollution to surface waters will be permitted, unless measures which substantially eliminate the threat of contamination are implemented as conditions for approval of development or redevelopment. [(c)3] 3 Policy 1.1.6: The City will adhere to Metro Dade County DERM standards and reauire DERM aoorovals in its modify ta permitting procedures to ensure that all fuel storage facilities in the coastal zone or near major canals do not pose a significant threat to water quality. [(c)3] Policy 1.1.7: - The City will regulate development on Virginia Key and the intermittent wetland areas of the coast of Coconut Grove to ensure that there will be no net loss of functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degraded or disrupted; that when non-native vegetation is removed, it will be replaced with native species; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be protected. Priority will be given to water dependent land uses, and to development that enhances the natural environment and ensures adequate physical public access to V-irginia Key. [(c)1] Policy 1.1.8: Because of its unique character and environmental significance, all development on Virginia Key will be in conformance with the Virginia Key Master Plan 1987. [(c)1] Policy 1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensure that development or redevelopment within the coastal zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the City's natural resources. [(c)1,9] Policy 1.1.10: By 1990, the City will develop a master plan for Watson Island and all development or redevelopment therein will be in conformance with such plan. Development or redevelopment of Watson Island will ensure that land uses and activities will not have an adverse impact on Biscayne Bay, and that priority will be given to water dependent and water related land uses, and to development that increases physical and visual public access to the bay and shoreline. [(c)1,8,9] Policy 1.1.11: All City owned property within the coastal zone that may be identified as areas of significant or unique natural resources will be designated as environmental preservation districts, and the City will also consider designating private properties within the coastal with significant or unique natural resources as environment preservation districts. [(c)1] 1,2 Policy 1.1.12: The City will establish by +%9 IM detaiied marina siting requirements to be administered through its development permitting procedures and that such requirements will, at a minimum, meet standards established by Metro Dade County DERM, the State of Florida DER, and all other applicable state and federal standards. Live -aboard vessels will not be permitted unless there are adequate upland facilities which result in minimum risk to the quality of the coastal environment. These siting requirements will apply.to all new and renovated marinas, . [(c)8] nr%/1n/go Coastal Management - Page 2 10832 65 3 Policy 1.1.13: The City will continue to work with cM ;z-tom the Biscayne Bay Management Plan Committee to support provisions of the committee that prevent new development and redevelopment along the shorelines from directly discharging storm water runoff into surface waters and to get support for state and county funding for any infrastructure improvements deemed necessary to support development of Virginia Key and Watson Island. [(c)1] Objective 1.2: The city will continue to follow and enforce the South Florida Building Code which establishes construction standards that minimize the impacts of man-made structures on beach and dune systems. [(b)4] Policy 1.2.1: The City will increase inspection and code enforcement efforts for coastal area construction to ensure the proper standards are met. [(03] Objective 1.3: In order to enhance the built environment of the coastal area, redevelop and revitalize, blighted, declining or threatened coastal areas. [(c)6] Policy 1.3.1: The city will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding the designation of Community Redevelopment Districts in appropriate coastal areas of the city. [(c)6] Policy 1.3.2: Through increased citywide code enforcement of coastal areas with deteriorated conditions and will report any structures in severe condition to the unsafe structures board to either force improvements or facilitate the demolition of the structure. [(c)6] 2 Objective 1.4: Ensure that land development regulations and policies for the coastal zone are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards and those needed to maintain or enhance the quality of life within the Coastal zone of the City. ,(,See Related CIE_Ob_iective 1.2). [(b)11] Policy 1.4.1: The coastal zone of the City will adhere to the level of service standards as adopted and amended in the Capital Improvements Element, and more specifically Policy Number 1.2.3 of that element. [(b)11] Goal 2: Ensure adequate public access to Biscayne Bay and the City's shoreline. [(a)] n5/io/g0 Coastal Management - Page 3 10832 Nr� Objective 2.1: Prevent the net loss of, and, where feasible, increase, physical and visual public access to Biscayne Bay and the City's shoreline. [(b)9] 1,2 Policy 2.1.1: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety, future land use and land develo„ oment tetin y regulations will require non -water dependent or related development or redevelopment to maintain public access to the shoreline. _. -- [(c)4] e- (S parks Recreation and Onen Space Policy 1.1.11.). Policy 2.1.2:• All City owned, waterfront property will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline by 1994. [(c)9] 2 Policy 2.1.3: By 1994, prepare an implementation plan for the Downtown Waterfront Master Plan, and, by 1999, identify all regetresf fundin sources, using an appropriate mix of public and private sector financing. [M 6,9] 2 Policy 2.1.4: By 1991, prepare an implementation plan for the bay walk and river walk proposed in the City's Downtown Master Plan, and, by 1994, identify all regw'rred funding sources.. By 1999, the development of the river walk along City owned property will be completed, and, the development of the bay walk along City owned property will be completed as specified in that implementation plan. [(c)9] Policy 2.1.5: By 1991, prepare design guidelines for the bay walk and river walk along privately owned property, and by 1994 these guidelines will be incorporated into the design review process governing waterfront developments. [(c)91 1 . Policy 2.1.6: By +%9 I=, consider the need for, and appropriateness of, requiring appropriate shoreline stabilization as part of development or redevelopment of waterfront properties. [(c)1] 2 Policy 2.1.7: By 1990, consider incorporattrtgg provisions for t*e public physical and visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations (See Parks. Recreation and Open Soace Policy 1.1.13). [(c)9] 2,3 Policy 2.1.8: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and Related Laws, and more specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment and Ordinance 9500 (Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami) all new development and redevelopment along the Downtown waterfront is required to provide t s e_g_cial setback it is ':__ ==8 r==:; and those developments within Special Publ'ie fitDistricts(SPI'r) that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in conformance with the established Standards'& (See Parks. Recreation and Open SpacePolicy 2.3.5). U0 9] 10832 ns / 1 n /qn Coastal Management - Page 4 11 / N Objective 2.2: Ensure increased physical public access to Virginia Key and Watson Island through their appropriate development or redevelopment. [(b)9] 2 Policy 2.2.1: By 1994, prepare a development implementation plan for Virginia Key, and by 1999, identify sources for ail --regtrFret} funding. [(c)9] 2 Policy 2.2.2: By 1994, prepare a development implementation plan for Watson Island, and by 1999, identify sources for ail—requi funding. [(c)9] Goal 3: Prouide an adequate supply of land for water dependent uses. C(a)] Objective 3.1: Allow no net loss of acreage devoted to water dependent uses in the coastal area of the City of Miami. [(b)3] 1,2 Policy 3.1.1: Future land use and development zatrimg regulations eR will encourage water dependent uses alono the shoreline tgrrate�t ere". [(c)8] Goal 4: Ehsure public safety and the protection of property within the coastal zone frcrn the threat of hurricanes. [(a)] Objective 4.1: Minimize the potential for loss of human life and the destruction of property from hurricanes. [(b)8] Policy 4.1.1: Enforce building code standards that protect against the drrtruction of structures by hurricane winds and tidal swells. [(c)3] Policy 4.1.2: Continue to ensure that all development and redevelopment conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area, which is defined as that area identified as a 'Y' zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on its Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) except that on Virginia Key, where a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) has been established, either the "V" zone or the area seaward of the CCCL, whichever is more landward, shall define the Coastal High Hazard Area (see Map 1 attached). [(c)3] 1 Policy 4.1.3: Measures which provide for the protection of City owned historic properties from destruction in the event of a major storm, and contingency plans for each site's restoration in the event of destruction or major damage will be developed by +999 IM. [(c)1O] 10832 ns/in/qn Coastal Management - Page 5 y J 7 T i 4 g F. r z c i C O V zzs =1 � ® tis pr p7AK CC N N11AMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLA W pr] one mhe CRY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRETNID PARATRW OF M MAP IN" AED ?"HOUGH PNIANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED PROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL a0VERNMENt Ctw•REM p1 ANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED tr CNApTER •p• 1eT t AWS t1F FLORInA AND ADMINISTERED By THE IMORIDA DEPARTMENT Or CnMM11N', � Ar 08R" 13 A I I.NimnuO JO 043MLI UAG VOgr01! 3ML Ai GIVALSINIMOV ONV 7UII107A AU SMV 1 4,01.68 IIi dW140 AS GAZIY0MLIIV MVVWVd 3ONVLSIBOV OMPMV 14 .j.er*UO LN3M UMAOO 1VJ01 3NL Yiamn VOIYOlA !0 31V1S 3ML M011r OSAMU 3ONVLSISSV IVI9MVMb 11DMUM► alCIV SVM dVM OWL JO NOILVYtMiw 1.N3WiHVd3G 7NINNVId IWMIW 40 AM allm aw C/ u did CIOOHII®HH013N 3AISN3H32idWO:) IWVIW 1 c a il•1 l► �► Q Q � r r a: O W ► ti = 1Mr as +I W W e 9S S U Q W m _ iN �a W W M {1 • • W a 0 ti ti � W n j Pace 6 1 Policy 4.1.4: Immediately subsequent to the event of a major storm, the adequacy of existing building standards and the appropriateness of land uses and ,davgl opment re4ui at ' ons eaming pelieiea in the Coastal High Hazard Area will be reviewed, and all modifications to standards, zoning or land use policies required to reduce future risk of loss of life and property damage will be adopted prior to the approval of long term, post disaster redevelopment plans. [(c)5] 1 Policy 4.1.5: Each proposed land use and land development regulation rtattrtg change within the Coastal High Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a hurricane.[(c)4] ...� ....�.�..��r.....-..� wmwn- ION Policy 4.1.7: The City will incorporate into its Comprehensive Plan any relevant recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports as they become available. [(c)3,5] Policy 4.1.8: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies to adopt plans and policies which protect public and private property and human lives from the effects of natural disasters. [(c)3] Policy 4.1.9: T�e City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies in the preparation of advance plans for the safe evacuation of coastal residents. [(c)4] 10832 nc /i n /qn Coastal Management - Page 7 7Z7' 3 Objective 4.2: The City will adhere to and cooperate with the County in executing evacuation procedures as well as predeetnq an annually updatg information and procedural brochure.1 for the public -y1 999; th+%= brochure.1 will contain information on evacuation procedures and routes, and 44 will be distributed to cit residents at local businesses and government agencies. [(b�7;(c)4] Policy 4.2.1: The City's fire and police departments will continue to work with Metro Dade County and regional emergency agencies to update and revise as needed coordinated peacetime emergency and evacuation plans. [(c)3] 3 Policy 4.2.2: The City will annually update preduee and distribute an informational brochure by 9% to establish public awareness and information programs that educate as to the need for evacuation, and indicate evacuation routes and procedures. [(c)4] Policy 4.2.3:- The City will follow the County in providing appropriate evacuation route markers within City boundaries as part of a Countywide coordinated program. [(c)4] 2 Objective 4.3: Ensure that public capital expenditures within the coastal zone does not encourage private development that is subject to si nificant risk of storm damage .(See CIE Objective 1.4). [(b)51 2 Policy 4.3.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See CIE Policy 1.4.1). [(b)5] 2 Policy 4.3.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal zone intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public health and safety from storm damage. (See CIE R2Ly!v 1.4.2)., [(b)5] na / i n /qn 2 Goal 5: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification, evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Marni 's historic, architectural and archeological resources. (See land Use Goal 2)• [(a)] 10832 Coastal Management - Page 8 %S 2 Objective 5.1: Maintain, update and amplify the City of Miami portion of the Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the City's historic, architectural and archeological resources..(Seg Land d Use, Objective 2,1).. [(b)10] 2 Policy 5.1.1: By 1991, the City will identify potential historic districts and conduct further surveys of contributing and noncontributing buildings. (See Land Use Policy 2.1._1)- [(c)10] 1,2 Policy 5.1.2: By 19924 , the City will develop and implement a computerized database of all relevant information for all 3,358 sites in the Dade County Historic Survey. This listing will show, in three categories, all properties of historic, architectural or archeological significance; together with their priority ranking for presentation ,(See Land Use Policy 2.1.2_. [W1Q] 1,2 Policy 5.1.3: The City has designated 50 historic sites and three historic districts pursuant to the Heritage Conservation Article of the Zoning Ordinance. An additional 26 sites (or groups of multiple sites) and six districts have been identified as potentially worthy of designation (see Future Land Use Map entitled "Historic District Boundaries and Historically Significant Properties Meriting Protection"). Of these, the City will designate 25 individual sites and four districts by 19964 (See Land Use Eolicv 2.3,21. [(c)10] 2 Policy 5.1.4: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Land Use Policy 2.3.I). [(c)10] 2 Policy 5.1.5: By 1994, the City will include information on the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage in public information, economic develo went promotion and tourism materials. (See Land d Use Policy 2.5.4). [(c)107 2 Objective 5.2: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved, rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (twee Land Use Objective 2.41. [(b)1O] 2 Policy 5.2.1: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for preservation of historic properties. To receive public financial support from the City, designated privately -owned structures must meet these standards. (See Land Use Policy,2.4.2). [(c)10] 2 Policy 5.2.2: The City currently owns nine historic sites and other potential archeological sites. If it is deemed in the public interest for the City to transfer title of City properties of historic, architectural, or archeological significance, such transfer will include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such properties. (See Land Use policy- .4.3). [(c)10] nn/in/qn 10832 Coastal Management - Page 9 76 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION 9J-5.013(2) Goal 1: Mtintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural resources within the context of the City's urban enuiromwnt. [(a)] Objective 1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems within Virginia Key, the Dinner Key Spoil Islands, and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries. [(b)2,3,4] % 2 Policy 1.1.1: By 1990, assess the extent of environmental hazards that are the result of past disposal activities at the Virginia Key landfill. Such assessment will be made in cooperation with appropriate County, State and Federal environmental agencies, and an action plan to reduce or eliminate associated hazards will be formulated by (See Coastal Management Policy I.I.1)� [(c)10] 2,3 Policy 1.1.2: By 1990, begin to reduce the member Auantity of storm water oatfaiis that discharge] into the Miami River and its tributaries, and directly into Biscayne Bay; and by 1994 have at least the first 10 stormwater outfalls retrofitted. (See related Sanitary and Storm Sewer Policy 2.2.1. and t(c)6] 2 Policy 1.1.3: Beginning in 1990, take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami and Little Rivers, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. . �eemr. P (c) 6J 2 1-'icy 1.1.4: The City will continue to participate in the State funded SWIM program for funding support in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay • [(C)6l 2 Policy 1.1.5: Regulate development on Virginia Key to ensure that there will be no net loss of functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degraded or disrupted; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be protected. [(c)6,1] 10832 nas/10/90 Natural Resource Conservation - Paige 1 Policy 1.1.6: Through land development regulations, ensure that development or redevelopment within the coastal zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the City's natural resources. Policy 1.1.7: The City will increase code enforcement to prevent illegal disposal of hazardous waste into the City's natural resources such as the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. [(c)10] 2 Policy 1.1.8: The Cit will work with, and support the County's efforts to identify generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper collection and disposal of hazardous waste. The City will support Metro Dade County's development of a hazardous waste temporary storage facility in a non - populated area (See Solid Waste Collection Policy, 1.2.0 . [(c)10] Objective 1.2: Improve the water quality of, and ensure health safety within, the Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River. [(b)2] 3 Policy 1.2.1: The City will continue to work with emsu.. that a_:_, the Biscayne Bay Management Plan Committee in order to encourage and support Metro Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management in the monitoring of contaminants within these water bodies and to ensure that the City is kept adequately informed of environmental conditions. [(c)6] Policy 1.2.2: Continue to implement the Biscayne Bay Management Plan in order to reduce the level of contaminants in these water bodies and improve the water quality within them. [(c)6] Policy 1.2.3: Participate in state and federally funded programs to remove abandoned and repair leaking underground fuel storage tanks on City owned properties. [(c)1O] Objective 1.3; Maintain and enhance the status of native species of fauna and flora. [(b)2,3,9] Policy 1.3.1: Continue and, where necessary, expand the use of scenic corridor and Environmental Preservation District designation. [(c)9] Policy 1.3.2: Identify City owned land with significant native vegetative features or wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts. [(c)3,5,6,9] Policy 1.3.3: Continue designating private properties with significant or unique resources as environmental preservation districts. [(c)9] 1083,2 nn5/in/90 Natural Resource Conservation — Page 2 MVA 2 Policy 1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any that may patent4ally haye adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts. [(c)3,5] Policy 1.3.5: Through the development review and approval process, ensure that off -site mitigation for disruption or degradation of significant natural resources occurs in an orderly and sound manner, so as to maximize benefits to the overall natural system. Policy 1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive exotic plant species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems. 3 Policy 1.3.7: Permit applications for all boating facilities located on city shorelines shall be evaluated in the context of their cummulative impact on manatees and marine resources. [(c)5] Policy 1.3.8: Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted in areas frequented by manatees and enforcement of speed zones will be improved. [(c)5] Goal 2: Abintain an adequate and safe supply of water for the City residents. 2 Objective 2.1: Ensure adequate levels of safe potable water are available to meet the needs of the City. (See Potable Water Po�X 1.2) • [(b)2] 3 Policy 2.1.1: +in periods of regional water (c) 4] 2 Policy 2.1.2: The City will continue to enforce building code requirements for the retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. Lite anitary and Storm_Sewers Policy 2.2.51. [(c)4] 2 Policy 2.1.3: Support the South Florida Water Management District efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the City to prevent against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Underground Aquifer Recharge Policy 1.1.3). [(c)1] 108R"2 nos/lo/g0 Natural Resource Conservation - Page 3 N 2 Policy 2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, countywide system, the City departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with Metro Dade County WASA Department to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Potable Water Policv_1.1.1)._ [(c)1,4] 2 Policy 2.1.5: Ensure potable water supplies meet the established level of service standards for transmission capacity of 224 gallons/resident/day as set in the Capital Improvements Element. (See Potable Water Policy 1.2.1.: CIE 1.2 E. - -at, - ��,- -- ----------�• - Tom-- -- 1,2 Policy 2.1.0: The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible with Dade County and other county municipalities receiving potable water from WASAD in developing an acceptable count ide water conservation plan. (See Potable Water Policy 1.2.2). [(c)4r 3 Goal 3: Attain and maintain a degree of air quality that is safe and to meet all attaimwnt standards set by the U.S. Fhuiromnental Protection Agency for the City as a u*ole. [(a)] 10832 005/10/90 Natural Resource Conservation - Page 4 W'O Objective 3.1: Improve the monitoring of air quality within areas perceived to have the highest potential for air quality problems. L(b)1] Policy 3.1.1: Working with County, State and Federal environmental agencies, increase the number of air quality monitoring stations by 1991 to the level needed to ensure accurate monitoring of air quality in areas most likely to have problems. [(b)1] Objective 3.2: Prevent the degradation of ambient air quality within the City. [(b)1] Policy 3.2.1: Establish vehicular transportation patterns that reduce the concentration of pollutants in areas known to have ambient air quality problems. [(b)1] 2- Policy 3.2.2: Support those elements of the Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan that encourage the use of Metrorail and Metromover by directing high density new development or redevelopment first to areas nearest Metrorail and Metromover stations, and those land use policies that do not foster the proliferation of employment centers in the suburban areas of the County. (See related Transportation Objective 1.5. and associated policies). b)1]] Policy 3.2.3: Work with the County transportation planning agencies to continue to increase the quality of mass transit services within the City. [(b)1] 2 . U010] 1,3 Policy 3.2.45: The City will work with the appropriate federal. state, reoionai. and county Agencies to ensure wee that owners of buildings and facilities with unacceptable levels of asbestos (according to EPA and State Standards) in ambient air test remove, treat and seal asbestos -- containing materials as long as this action will not cause further degradation to the air quality. [(b)1] 1 Policy 3.2.56% The City will monitor developers to ensure that they appropriately treat exposed construction areas by means such as mulching, spraying or grass coverings, to minimize air pollution. [(b)1] 005/10/90 Natural Resource Conservation - Page 5 CAPITAL IcPR0V=MTS 9J-5.016(3) Goal 1: Adhere to sound fiscal management policies that ensure the timely provision of public capital facilities required to maintain existing public infsastruature, that meet the need for public facilities resulting from future development and redevelopment, and that enable the provision of public capital facilities that enhance the quality of life within the City. E(a)3 Objective 1.1: The Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan will provide for the sound fiscal planning of capital facility needs and assess the financial capacity of the City to undertake capital improvement projects. [(b)1;5] Policy 1.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the City will be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment. [(b)1;51 Policy 1.1.2: All capital expenditures in excess of $5,000 per distinct project must appear within the CIE and CIP, with the exception of expenditures required to meet public emergencies or unforeseeable contractual obligations. [(c)31 Policy 1.1.3: The City will adopt a Capital Budget which corresponds to the first year of the CIE and CIP. [(c)71 Policy 1.1.4: As capital projects are incorporated into the CIE and CIP, consideration will be given to the elimination of public hazards, the elimination of shortfalls between the adopted level of service (LOS) standards and the existing capacity of public facilities; the impact of proposed capital projects on the capital and operating budgets of the City; the fiscal capacity of the City to meet future capital spending needs; the economic and social benefits to be generated by proposed projects; the environmental impacts of proposed projects; the public facility requirements of new development or redevelopment; consistency between proposed capital projects and the goals and objectives set forth in the various elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000; and the coordination between 10832 proposed City projects and those projects and programs of federal, state, and county agencies and the South Florida Water Management District. [(c)1] Policy 1.1.5: In the appropriation of capital funds priority will be given to the maintenance, repair and replacement of existing public capital facilities. [(c)11 Policy 1.1.6: All bond authorizations must be in conformance with the capital facilities needs, programs and expenditure requirements as expressed within the City's Capital Improvement Element. [(c)21 Policy 1.1.7:- The City will continue to seek the advice of qualified counsel to ensure the proper timing of debt issuance and efficient management of its capital financing resources.[(c)21 Policy 1.1.8: Debt issuance timing, size, and amortization schedules will be planned and executed to maintain a level repayment and minimize fluctuations in the ad valorem tax rate. [ (c) 2.c] Policy 1.1.9: Competitive sale will be utilized whenever possible to assure that the City obtains the most competitive interest rate in the municipal markets. [(c)21 Policy 1.1.10: The City will maintain its long standing policy of avoiding the issuance of short term financing in the form of Bond Anticipation Notes, and Revenue Anticipation Notes, unless there is a compelling need or extraordinary circumstance for such interim financing. [(c)21 Policy 1.1.11: The ratio of net direct general obligation debt as a percentage of the assessed valuation of taxable property will not exceed 25% of the Charter -mandated limit of 15% of the assessed valuation, or 3.75% of assessed valuation. [(c)2..c) Policy 1.1.12: Total debt service payments as a percentage of the Combined General Fund, Enterprise Fund, and Debt Service Fund expenditures shall not exceed 15%. [(c)21 Policy 1.1.13: To the greatest extent possible, capital, projects financed through the issuance of general obligation bonds shall have an expected useful life commensurate with the period of the financing. [(c)2j Policy 1.1.14: Direct net general obligation and special obligation debt shall be maintained at below $1,000 per capita. [ (c) 21 �3 Objective 1.2: Through the implementation section of the Capital Improvement Zlement of its Comprehensive Plan, the City will ensure that future land development regulations and policies, and previously issued land development orders are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards and those needed to maintain or enhance the quality of life within the City. ( (b )1 Policy 1.2.1:• The impact of proposed land development regulations and policies on LOS, public capital facilities needs, and the City's financial ability to provide required facilities will be assessed before such proposals are adopted. [(b)3] Policy 1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses will be contingent upon the ability of existing public facilities to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard. Development orders may be granted, however, if capital improvements which would eliminate any resulting service deficiency are programmed to begin within one year and are included in the current Capital Budget. [(c)4) 3 Policy 1.2.3: . Neighberheed Plan, the -& Acceptable Level of Service Standards for public facilities in the City of Miami w=+*e are: ((c)4) a) Recreation and Open Space -- 1.3 acres of public park space per 1000 residents. b) Potable Water Transmission Capacity -- 224-200 gallons/resident/day. c) Sanitary Sewer Transmission Capacity -- 18.5-100 gallons/resident/day. d) Storm Sewer Capacity -- Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance with a drainage level of service standard of a one -in -five-year storm event. For the storm drainage system as a whole, 20 percent of the existing system will be brought to a standard of a one -in -five-year storm event by the year 2000. e) Solid Waste Collection Capacity -- 1.28 tons/resident/year. f) Traffic Circulation -- The minimum level of service 10832 standard on limited access, arterial, and collector roadways that are not within designated Transportation Corridors is LOS Ai�-& E, with allowable exceptions and justifications therefor, with LOS measured by 8� conventional v/C methodology. Within designated Transportation Corridors, which include approximately 95% of the roadway mileage within the City of Miami, a minimum LOS '9JL E is also maintained, but the measurement methodology is based on peak -hour person - trips wherein the capacities of all modes, including mass transit, are uses in calculating the LOS. Specific levels of service by location and mode are set out in Policies 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 of the Transportation Policies in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. 2 objective 1.3: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an equitable, proportional share of the cost of public facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards;. end-A(n prebeeb cc enhance [(b)4] Policy 1.3.1: The City will continue to use developer contributions, including development impact fees, to help fund the cost of public facilities needed to serve new development or redevelopment. [(c)8] Policy 1.3.2: The City will periodically revise all fees related to the impact of new development and redevelopment to reflect increases in the cost of providing public capital facilities. [ (c) 81 Policy 1.3.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help fund capital projects whose public benefits tend to be localized to specific geographic sub areas of the City. [(c)8] Policy 1.3.1: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure that increased property values resulting from new development and redevelopment are accurately reflected on the County Tax Assessor's property tax rolls in a timely manner. [(c)8] objective 1.4: Ensure that public capital expenditures within the coastal zone does not -encourage private development that is subject to significant risk of storm damage. [(b)21 Policy 1.4.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. [ (b) 2; (c) l.aj 1083.2 QS t , Policy 1.4.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal zone intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public health and safety from storm damage. ( (b) 2; (c) lal 10'32 q6 ti i i i i 3 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 9J-5.015(3) Goal 1: Increase effectiveness and efficiency in the delivery of goverment services through the appropriate coordination of local govermnent actions. [(a)] Objective 1.1: To establish formal procedures for coordinating City planning and operating functions that are directly related to the City's comprehensive plan with the Dade County School Board, Metro Dade County Water and Sewer Authority Department, Metro Dade County Public Works Department, Solid Waste Division, Metro Bade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (BERM), the Seaport Department (Port of Miami), Aviation Department (Miami International Airport), the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Bade County Shoreline Development Review Committee, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, the Division of Historical Resources, Department of State, and any other state, local or federal agency whose cooperation is required to accomplish the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. [(b)1] Policy 1.1.1: An intergovernmental coordination officer, with the approval of the City Manager and the concurrence of the Planning Director, will identify contact persons either within the Planning Department or within other appropriate City departments that will serve as liaisons with those state and local agencies listed in Objective 1.1 herein. U01] Policy 1.1.2: The Planning Department and Law Department will explore, evaluate, and prepare appropriate legislation or cooperative arrangements to implement the interlocal policies recommended for sanitary sewers; solid waste; ports, aviation and related facilities; traffic circulation, and mass transit elements by 1990. [(c)3] Policy 1.1.3: The City will continue to seek membership on the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), either formally or informally, and parallel membership on the Transportation Planning Council (TPC) in order to express its policies on land use and transportation; through appropriate legislation. [(c)1] 05/10/90 Intergovernmental Coordination - Page 1 10832 Policy 1.1.4: The City will continue to seek membership on the Biscayne Bay Management Committee, the principal coordinating body for Biscayne Bay, as a means of expressing its policies pertaining to Biscayne Bay. [(c)1] Policy 1.1.5: The City encourages Metro Dade County to review, evaluate and recommend County Charter changes a) to standardize information and b) to allow the Board of County Commissioners to waive a separate affirmative vote of resident property owners, so that small enclaves lying between municipalities can be rationalized through annexation. [(c)3,4] 1 Goal 2: Promote orderly and appropriate regional land deuelopment and transportation policies through consultations with Aktro Dada County,. tIA -eat cmuntie+ thy region. and jQ6fr11v s s Objective 2.1: To establish a planning coordination mechanism to ensure that consideration is given to both the impacts of land development and transportation policies within Miami on areas outside the City's jurisdiction and the impacts of land development outside the City's boundaries on the City of Miami. [(b)2] Policy 2.1.1: The City will formally request from Metro Dade County and from adjacent municipalities that copies of submissions of comprehensive plans and plan amendments submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (OCA) be made available to the City's Planning Department at the same time that such submissions are sent to OCA, and that the City be formally notified of all public hearings related to the adoption of comprehensive plans and plan amendments. The City of Miami will remit copies of its comprehensive plan and plan amendments to the Planning Departments of Metro Dade County and affected adjacent municipalities at the same time submissions are made to DCA, and will notify such agencies of all public hearings related to the adoption of the City's comprehensive plan and plan amendments. [(c)1,7] Policy 2.1.2: The City will support Metropolitan Dade County in the establishment of a technical Advisory Committee, comprised of professional planning personnel of the County and adjacent municipalities to review, evaluate, and reconcile discrepancies and to recommend compromise solutions to appropriate governing bodies of local government, to share information and to help evaluate the local impacts of proposed land development and transportation policies. [(c)3,5] 05/10/90 Intergovernmental Coordination - Page 2 10832 Ze 2 Policy 2.1.3: The City will support the South Florida Regional Planning Council in developing informal coordination mechanisms such as regional issue study groups that coordinate land development and transportation policies among local governments; and to establish mediation mechanisms to resolve potential regional conflicts. (See related Policy 3.1.11 [(c)2] Policy 2.1.4: The City will encourage the South Florida Regional Planning Council to conduct a regional review and evaluation of the Florida Nigh Speed Rail Transportation franchise proposals by 1990. [(c)5] 3 Objective 2.2: Coordinate with state, ]MQjon. and Metropolitan Dade County in establishing levels of service standards for public facilities, infrastructure and services and reconcile differences by 1990. [(b)3] Policy 2.2.1: The City will seek to reconcile the level of service standards for county arterials and transportation corridors to meet state requirements by 1990. [(03] Goal 3: Contribute to an atmosphere of cooperation ano local goverw=nts within Dtrde County. [(afi Objective 3.1: Maximize the use of informal, cooperative agreements as mechanisms for intergovernmental conflict resolution within Dade County and minimize the use of litigation. 2 Policy 3.1.1: The City will exhaust all efforts to solve intergovernment conflicts arising from adoption and implementatioh of comprehensive plans through informal mechanisms, including but not limited to utilizing the Dade County League of Cities and the South Florida Regional Planning Council's mediation process, before seeking remedies through the judicial system, provided that efforts at informal resolution do not prevent the City from seeking legal remedies, or jeopardize the Cit 's ability to prevail in any legal action. {See related Policy 2.1.3) [(c�2] A5/10/90 Intergovernmental Coordination — Paige 3 10832r� APPENDIX A CHURCHES (LESS THAN 2 ACRES) f f 1 Church of Christ Flagler Grove 500 N.W. 53 Avenue All of Flagler Grove Church of Christ 82-14 Tract A NR 2 Church of Christ Liberty City 1295 N.W. 67 Street East Liberty City Homesite 40-32 Block 12 Lot 18, 19, W 25' of 17 3 Church of Christ Redeemer Haitian Assembly of God 4314 N.W. 2 Avenue Columbia Park Corrected 8-114 Block 6 Lot 1 4 Church of Christ Written in Heaven 6110 N.W. 12 Avenue Orchard Villa Extention 17-55 Block 2 Lot 25-28 5 Church of God and Christ International 680 N.W. 71 Street Seventh Avenue 14-13 Block 3 Lot 3,4,5,6 6 Church of God in Christ Amcoher Temple 1747 N.W. 3 Avenue Erickson Add. Sub Lots 344 8-156 Block 17 Lot 31 7 Church of God Mount of Olives 45 N.E. 54 Street 54 Street Business Center 22-13 Block 5 Lot 7-10 8 Church of God of Prophecy Miami The Number One 4528 N.W. 1 Avenue Buena Vista Heights Addition Amend 3-22 Block 4 Lot 20-24 9 Church of God and Saints of Christ 406 N.W. 53 Street Railway Shop Addition 2nd Amend 3 -183 Block 15 Lot 8 11 Church of Our Lord 4450 N.W. 17 Avenue 17 Avenue Manor 2nd Addition 21-23 Block 2 Lot 1-4 12 Church of the Brethren 2400 N. Miami Avenue Marks Subdivision 1-28 Block 1. Lot 1,2 13 Church of the Incarnation 1835 N.W. 54 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 8-5 Block 15 Lot 20-22 10832 14 Church of the Living God 6891 N.W. 13 Avenue East Liberty City Homesite 40-38 15 Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic 1500 N.W. 54 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 8-5 17 Church World Service 701 S.W. 27 Avenue Beacom Manor 8-121 18 Metodista Pentecostal 454 N.W. 22 Avenue City Line Park Amend 10-13 19 Philadelphia Church of God 125 N.E. 54 Street Tranquilla 4-55 20 Greater Bethel Amechurch and Sarah Allen House 235-245 N.W. 8 Street (Al Knowlton) Miami B-41 21 St. Barbara Anglican Catholic Church 1156 S.W. 6 Street Emory J. Carter Re -Sub 107 22 Apostolic Revival Center 6702 N.W. 15 Avenue New Liberty City 39-28 23 Apostolique Faith Church 5708 N.E. 2 Avenue Dixie Highway TR 5-24 24 House of God Miracle Temple of the Apostolic Faith 1425 N.W. 59 Street Orange Heights 14-62 Block 14 Lot 1 Block 2 Lot 1 Lots 77-81 W 210 Ft. of S 300 Ft. of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 less S 40 Ft. and W 50 Ft. and less NR Lot 25, 26 Block 3 Lot 5-7 Block 35N Lot 14-16 Block 27 Lot 7 Block 1 Lot 15-17 Block 13 Lot 1-4 Block 8 Lot 12 -2- 10832 t 11 25 United House of Prayer for All People 4600 N.W. 2 Avenue Buena Vista Height Extention Corrected 3-64 Block 31 Lot 1,24 26 Bethel Christian Church 3030 N.W. 8 Avenue De Leon Park 3-165 Block 4' Lot 5,8 28 Bethany Missionary Baptist Church 787 N.W. 54 Street Diana Park Amend 21-67 Block 3 Lot 26,27 29 Bright Morning Star Baptist Church 1455 N.W. 53 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 8-5 Block I Lot 17-18 30 Bright Star Missionary Baptist Church 4506 N.W. 2 Avenue Columbia Park Correction 8-114 Block 2 Lot 23,24 31 Central Baptist Church and Korean Mission of Central Baptist Church 500 N.E. I Avenue Miami (Al Knowlton) 13-41 Block 63N Lot 1-3, 6-20 32 Corinth Baptist Church 1435 N.W. 54 Street McCall Park 21-20 Block 1 Lot 5-7 33 Drake Memorial Baptist Church 5800 N.W. 2 Avenue College Park Addition 9-127 Block 1 Lot 1-2 34 Eglise Baptiste Haitian Emanuel 6311 N.E. 2 Avenue Emerald Court 6-64 NR Lot 7 35 Fire Baptism and Truth No. 5 6248 N.W. 15 Avenue East Liberty City Sec "A" 39-19 Block 6 Lot 14-16 36 First Tabernacle Jesus Christ 7424 N.E. 2 Avenue Little River Extension 4-138 Block 2 Lot 17-20 37 Friendship Missionary Baptist Church 740 N.W. 58 Street All of Edison Center Dade Fed. 66-7 Tract 2 NR 38 Good News Little River Baptist Church 495 N.W. 77 Street Little River Garden 7-119 Block 35 Lot 10-13 Marden Heights 7-146 Lot 7-11 39 Greater Israel Bethel Primitive Baptist Church 160 N.W. 18 Street Johnson & Waddell Add. 13-53 Block 27 Lot 2,3 40 Greater New Bethlehe Missionary Baptist Church 420 N.W. 40 Street Vista Park Block 37 Lot 10-13 41 Greater St. James Missionary Baptist Church 4875 N.W. 2 Avenue Shadowlawn Extension 5-105 Block 3 Lot 11,12 42 Iglesia Bautista Libre Ebenezer 349 S.W. 12 Street Miami 13-41 Block 83S Lot 13 43 Iglesia Bautista Nazaret and Shenandoah Baptist Church 2225 S.W. 17 Avenue Woodside 5-28 Block 2 Lot 7-12 44 Iglesia Bautista Resurreccion 2323 S.W. 27 Avenue All of Terry Art Institute Sub 51-99 Tract A NR 45 Jordan Grove Baptist Church 5946 N.W. 12 Avenue Orchard Villa Extension 17-55 Block 6 Lot 9-14 47 Mt. Calvary Baptist Church 1140 N.W. 62 Street Northwood Revision 33-72 Block 1 Lot 14,32-38 48 Mt. Olivette Baptist Church 1450 N.W. 1 Court Waddell Re Sub 1-169 Block 44 Lot 1,4 49 Mt. Sinai Baptist Church 698 N.W. 47 Terrace Bay Vista Park Amend 10-5 Block 15 Lot 9-12 50 Mount Zion Baptist Church 301 N.W. 9 Street Miami 13-41 Block 27N Lot 19,20 51 New Bethany Baptist Church 268 N.W. 48 Street Buena Vista Heights Extension 3-64 Block 30 Lots 9,10 52 New Bethany Baptist Mission 4848 N.W. 7 Avenue Bay Vista Park Amend Block 1-20 10-5 Block 11 N 75' of Lot 1 & 2 ILf 53 New Bethel Baptist Church 1665 N.W. 68 Terrace New Liberty City 39-28 Block 5 Lots 5-8 54 New Hope Baptist Church 6600 N.W. 15 Avenue East Liberty City 39-19 Block 1 Lots 10,11 56 New Life Baptist Church 1365 N.W. 54 Street Orchard Villa 7-53 Block 6 Lot 15, 16 57 New Mt. Moriah Baptist Church 6700 N.W. 14 Avenue New Liberty City 39-28 Block 2 Lot 15-17 58 New Providence Missionary Baptist Church 760 N.W. 53 Street Bowling Green 5-101 Block 2 Lot 9-11 59 St. James Baptist Church 3500 Charles Avenue From Homestead Amend 13-106 Block 35 Lot 1 61 St. Luke Baptist Church. 1790 N.W. 55 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 8-5 Block 16 Lot 11,12 62 St. Matthews Free Will Baptist Church 6700 N.W. 2 Avenue Groveland Park 6-91 Block 8 Lot 12 63 Second Canaan Missionary Baptist Church 4343 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estates 5-48 Block 24 Lot 5,6 64 Sweetfield Baptist Church 3585 Plaza Street From Homestead Amend 13-106 Block 30 Lot 10 65 Temple Baptist Church 1723 N.W. 3 Avenue Erickson Add Sub Lots 3,4 13-156 Block 17 Lot 34 66 Zion Hope Missionary Baptist Church 5129 N.W. 17 Avenue FairHaven Gardens 6-76 Block 4 Lot 13,14 67 Iglesia Bautista Libre Ebenezer II 4111 S.W. 4 Street All of LeJeune Terrace 3-17 Block 1 NR - 5 - 1083295 68 Mt. 01ivette Iree Will Baptist Church 4290 N.W. 17 Avenue Allapattah School Sub 5-99 Block 4 Lot 3,4 69 New St. Mark Missionary Baptist Church 744 N.W. 54 Street All of Bowling Green 5-101 ROA-30 NR 70 Abyssina Baptist Church 6200 N.W. Miami Court Moywood 25-6 Block 1 Lot 1,2 71 Canaan Missionary Baptist Church 7610 Biscayne Blvd. Federal Way 25-6 Block 10 Lot 23,24 72 First Spanish Baptist Church 1790 N.E. 2 Court Miramar 3rd Amend 5-4 Block 11 Lot 1,2 73 French Speaking Baptist Church 6985 N.W. 2 Avenue Dupont Square 7-4 NR Lot 6 74 Grapeland Heights Baptist Church and Iglesia Bautista Buenas Nuevas 1351 N.W. 32 Court All of Grapeland Manor 16-65 Block 1 NR 75 Highland Park Baptist Church 800 N.W. 14 Street Highland Park 2-13 Block E Lot 1,2 76 Iglesia Bautista Calvario 226 S.W. 17 Avenue Idlewild Park 2-87 Block 36 Lot 1,2 77 Iglesia Bautista De Wynwood 1K N.W. 29 Street St. James Park Amend 4-41 Block 3 Lot 21 78 Iglesia Bautista Renacer 1101 S.W. 12 Avenue Lawrence Estate Land Co. Sub 2-51 Block 10 B Lot 8-10 79 Jerusalem Spanish Baptist Church 2495 N.W. 23 Street Burkhart's Winter Garden 1st Amended Re Sub 24-68 Block 10 Lot 13-15 10832 80 Lieglise Evangeiique Baptiste Bethel 3516 N.W. 7 Avenue Eden Park 7-29 81 Northeast Baptist Church 6720 N.E. 5 Avenue Morningside Amd P1. 15-15 82 Saint Matthew Community Missionary 3616 Day Avenue Frow Homestead Amend 8-106 83 West Flagler Park Baptist Church 5911 W. Flagler West Flagler Park 8-96 West Flagler Park Sec "B" 8-112 84 Chapel of the Sacred Heart of Jesus 3126 Coral Way Miami Suburban Acres Amended 4-73 87 Gesu Catholic Church 118 N.E. 2 Street Miami B-41 92 St. John Bosco Catholic Church 1301 W. Flagler Street Lawrence Estate Land Co Sub 94 St. Lazaro Church 1778 N.W. 3 Street Orange Park 1-189 99 St. Robert Bellarmine Catholic Church 3405 N.W. 27 Avenue Melrose Heights 11-17 100 Ukrainan Catholic Church Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary 40 N.W. 57 Avenue West Flagler Park 8-96 101 Apostolic Mission of Christ and Robertson Memorial United Church of Christ 261 N.E. 23 Street Edgewater 2-31 102 St. Philomena Catholic Church 4801 W. Flagler Street Pinechrist Villa 3rd Addition 6-169 -7- Block 1 Lot 3, 29-32 Block 3 Lots 1-2-16-17,18 Block 5 Lot 2,3 Block 4 Lot 5-15 Block 24 Lot 12 Block 3 Lot 4 Block 104N Lot 2-7 N 105' of Lot 8-10 Block 62 Lot 17-20 Block 6 Lot 9-12 Block 5 Lot 1-3 Block 20 Lot 9-11,20-22 Block 11 Lot 11, 12 NR Lot 5,6, 10 83 2 9? 103 Bethel Christian Assembly 790 N.W. 54 Street Sylvan Square 16-35 104 Haitian Mission Church 101 N.W. 71 Street 71 Street Industrial Park 89-75 105 United Christian Church of Christ 3288 Charles Avenue Frow Homestead Amend B-106 Royal Gardens 70-3 106 Fifth Church of Christ Scientist 1600 N.W. 54 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 8-5 108 Fourth Church of Christ Scientist Miami 4015 W. Flagler Street Twelfth Street Manor's 3rd Sec 6-162 109 Church of Christ Southwest 1450 S.W. 24 Avenue Grapeland Re Sub 41-74 110 Coconut Grove Church of Christ 3345 Douglas Road Frow Homestead Amend B-146 111 Hungarian Church 2230 N.W. 14 Street Kossuth Park 55-21 112 Iglesia De Cristo 3665 W. Flagler Street Twelfth Street Manors 5-59 113 Miami Gables Church of Christ 3501 W. Flagler Street Twelth Street Manors 5-59 114 Overtown Church of Christ 185 N.W. 14 Street Johnson 4 Woodell Add. B-53 115 Spanish Church of God 4180 S.W. 5 Terrace Floyd's Grove Estates 47-40 116 First Deliverance Church of God in Christ 6229 N.W. 11 Avenue Seventh Avenue Park 17-17 Block 1 Lot 5,6 All of Tract A NR Block 30 Lot 20 Block 1 Lot 7,8 Block 2 Lot 9 Block 4 Lot 21,22 Block 3 Lot 1,2,6 Block 16 Lot A,B All of Tract A NR Block 10 Lot 13-17 Block 30 Lot 3-16 Block 45 Lot 5 Block 5 Lot 10 Block 3 Lot 11,12 10832 �IS 117 Gamble Memorial Church of God in Christ 1898 N.W. 43 Street Allapattah School Sub 5-99 118 Russian Orthodox St. Vladimir Church 101 N.W. 46 Avenue Twelfth Street Acres Plan No.1 5-62 119 The Church of God of Prophecy 3655 Grand Avenue Frow Homestead Amend B-106 121 Holy Cross Episcopal Church 123 N.E. 36 Street Holy Cross Episopal Ch. Inc. 123 St. Agnes' Episcopal Church 1750 N.W. 3 Avenue Townpark Sub No. 5 NE Proj. F1 R-10 91-10 124 St. Paul the Apostle Episcopal Church 6744 N. Miami Avenue Gutteridla Sub 63-10 125 St. Philips Episcopal Church 1142 Coral Way East Shenandoah 14-55 128 Comunidades De Formacion Cristiana 3271 N.W. 7 Street Comfort Garden 2nd Add. 7-41 129 Elim Full Gospel Tabernacle 1381 N.W. 27 Avenue Shady Oaks 44-20 130 Greater Grace Church of Miami 1777 Biscayne Blvd. Miramar 3rd Amend 5-4 131 Iglesia Del Nazareno 2490 N.W. 35 Street Melrose Heights 11-17 132 Gadela Hispanic Foursquare Church 5742 S.W. 7 Street Solloway Plat 89-52 133 Believers Life Ministries 901 N.W. 62 Street Seventh Avenue Park 17-17 Block 7 Lot 121-124 Block 1 Lot 4 Block 25 Lot 17 All of Block 1 All of Tract 15 NR Al of Tract A NR Block 51 Lot 7 Block 11 Lot 10-13 Block 1 Lot 1,2 Block 9 Lot 5 Block 1 Lot 1,2 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 2 Lot 18 10832 1 V 134 Victory Fellowship 3220 Virginia Street Eden Pent Homestead A-45 135 St. Sophia Greek Orthodox Cathedral 2401 S.W. 3 Avenue Brickell Hammock Unit No.l 5-113 137 Last Day Deliverance Church 1051 N.W. 62 Street Seventh Avenue Park 17-17 138 New Jerusalem Power Holiness 1452 N.W. 58 Terrace Orange Heights 14-62 139 St. Mary's House of Prayer 6321 N.W. 2 Avenue Costage Villa Tract 3-152 140 Shinning Light Holy Spirit Church 5410 N.W. 14 Avenue McCall Park 21-20 141 Trinity Faith House of God 1351 N.W. 54 Street Orchard Villa 7-53 142 Triumph the Church and Kingdom of God in Christ 1752 N.W. 1 Ct. Johnson & Wardell Add. 13-53 143 True Fellowship Holiness Church 4949 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estate Sec. 3 6-139 144 Masjid Al Ansar Inc. 5245 N.W. 7 Avenue Railway Shop Addition 2nd Amended 145 Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall 1545 S.W. 3 Street Lawrence Estates Land Co. Sub 2-46 146 Jehovah Witness 241 N.W. 54 Street Railway Shop Inter -School Tract 3-192 147 6620 N. Miami Avenue Tafereth Israel Northside Center 64-96 148 1819 N.W. 19 Avenue Bellevue Sub 3-15 Block 11 Lot 1,2 Block 32 Lot 1-5 Block 3 Lot 18-20 Block 6 Lot 20 NR Lot 15,16 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 6 Lot 20 Block 27 Lot 4 Block 3 Lot 4 Block 13 Lot 1,2 Block 84 Lot 15 Block 4 Lot 20-22 All of Tract A NR NR Lot 26,27 - 10 - 10832 /0 G 149 601 S.W. 7 Street Miami 13-41 150 Inmanuel Lutheran Church 1770 Brickell Avenue Flagler (Mary Brickell) 5-44 151 Principe De Paz 6375 W. Flagler Street Winona Park 14-64 152 St. John Lutheran Church 2175 N.W. 26 Street Parkwart Sub Amd. 6-20 154 Bay Shore Lutheran Church MO Symod 5051 Biscayne Blvd. Bay Shore Plaza No. 5 43-74 155 St. Matthew's Lutheran Church 621 S.W. 22 Avenue Bryandale 9-86 156 First Haitian Free Methodist Church 6500 N. Miami Avenue Twelth Israel Northside Center 64-96 157 Grace United Methodist Church Haitian 6501 N. Miami Avenue Grace Park Amend 66-149 158 St. Mary's Wesleyan Methodist Church 4798 N.W. 8 Avenue Bay Vista Park Blk 1-20 Amd 10-5 159 Trinity CME Church 511 N.W. 4 Street Cano Sub 2-99 160 First Haitian Free Methodist Church 245 N.E. 47 Street Brentwood 40-66 161 Mount Zion Free Methodist Church 545 N.W. 54 Street Buena Vista Gardens 5-45 162 Ebenezer United Methodist Church 2001 N.W. 35 Street Hollerman Manor 10-30 Block 44S Lot 17 Block A Lot 12,13 Block 22 Lot 9-19 Block 2 Lot 1,2,7-11 Block 7 Lot 1 Block 2 Lot 12 Al of Tract B NR All of Tract A NR Block 12 Lot 1-4 Block 72N S 100' of Lot 19,20 Block 7 Lot 5 Block 9 Lot 11 Block 5 Lot 3-8, 17-24 10832 /0 N 163 Christ United Methodist Church 2850 S.W. 27 Avenue Pine Terrace 3-51 164 First United Methodist Church of Miami 400 Biscayne Blvd. Miami B-41 165 Riverside United Methodist Church 985 N.W. 1 Street Riverview 4-45 166 Tamiami United Methodist Church 1401 S.W. 8 Street Lawrence Estate Land Co. Sub 2-46 167 Iglesia Del Nazareno del Calvario 3210 S.W. 24 Street Silver Bluff Homesites 8-101 168 Miami Peniel Church of the Nazarene 2841 N.W. 2 Avenue St. James Park Amend 4-41 169 'Alpha Omega Mision Center 3175 S.W. 25 Street The Pines 5-76 170 Calvary Tabernacle 868 N.W. 36 Street Buena Vista Park 2nd Amd. 4-170 171 Community Christian Church 311 N.E. 78 Street Little River Garden 4-130 172 House of God Miracle Revival Fellowship Church 4111 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estates 5-48 173 The House of Prayer 1129 N.W. 58 Street Gabel Sub No. 4 16-23 174 1 Am Sanctuary and Saint Germain Foundation 447 N.E. 22 Street Mill Share Amended 27-46 Block 5 Lot 1-5 Block 80 N Lot 1-4, 18, 19 Block H Lot 11-13 Block 104 Lot 1,2,19,20 Block 3 Lot 21-24 Block 6 Lot 11,12 Block 4 Lot 15-20 Block i Lot 10, N 20' of 9 Block 1 Lot 5 Block 40 Lot 4-6 Block 2 Lot 31-34 All of NR Lot 1 - 12 - 10832 I C' .,- 175 Multi Racial Family Study Deliverance Center 6400 Biscayne Blvd. North Gate Block and Re Sub 9-53 177 Rock Ministries Inc. 331 N.E. 22 Street Edgewater 2-31 178 The Theosophical Society in Miami 119 N.E. 62 Street Inglewood Garden 13-57 179 Unity on the Bay 411 N.E. 21 Street J. H. Eastwood 5-36 180 Ermita de Regla 1920 S.W. 6 Street Westwood 13-11 181 St. Peter & Paul Russian Orthodox Church 1411 S.W. 11 Street Shenandoah Amend 8-90 182 St. Peter's African Orthodox Cathedral 4841 N.W. 2 Avenue Shadowiawn Extension 5-105 183 St. Peter's Orthodox Catholic Church 1811 N.W. 4 Court Townpark Sub No. 7 120-40 184 Elim Missionary Assembly 2336 N.W. 1 Street Glenroyal Amend 5-56 185 Evangelistic Center 3001 N.W. 22 Avenue Eby Park 9-184 186 Faith Harvest Cathedral Church 4110 N.W. 17 Avenue Allapattah School Sub 5-99 187 Faith Temple 4535 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estates Re Sub 7-114 188 House of Prayer Church 151 N.W. 79 Street Minnesota Park 6-39 - 13 - Block 8 Lot 14,15 Block 7 Lot 1 Block 6 Lot 9 less S 10 Ft & less W 20 Ft of N 40 Ft Lot 9 All of Tract 1 NR Block 3 Lot 3 Block 7 Lot 2-6 Block 3 Lot 13-15 All of Tract D NR NR Lot 167 Block 2 Lot 7-9 Block 3 Lot 11, 12 Block 2 Lot 4 Block A Lot 3 10832/03 189 Iglesia Cristo Rompe Las Cadenas 752 W. Flagier Street Miami (Al Knowlton) B-41 190 Iglesia de Cristo Ministerios Elm. 35 S.W. 36 Court Kirkland Heights Amd 3-214 191 Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal 175 N.W. 31 Street Prices Addition 4-47 192 Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal I 2610 N.W. 36 Street Melrose Heights 11-17 193 Iglesia Evangelica Pentcostal 90 N.W. 27 Avenue Hibiscus Terrace 3-201 194 Iglesia Pentecostal 7201 S.W. 8 Street Tamiami Gardens 48-19 195 Iglesia Pentecostal Estrella de Jacob 2311 N.W. 20 Street Burkhart's Winter Garden 1st Amd 5-22 196 Independent Pentecostal Church of God 6500 N.W. 15 Avenue East Liberty City 39-19 197 Mount Olive Church of God B-104 5930 N.E. 2 Avenue AF Merritt 198 Out Reach Mission Church of God in Christ 7744 N.W. 4 Court Little River Garden 7-119 199 Prophetic Pentecostal Church Esmirna 3033 N.W. 7 Avenue Valentine Map B-112 200 Temple of Faith & Church of Help 7823 N.E. 2 Avenue Woodson 6-116 201 The Bible Way Prayer Mission 5789 N.W. 7 Avenue East Moreland Revised 41-18 - 14 - Block 14S Lot 7,8 Block 7 Lots 4 & 5 Block B Lot 15 Block 2 Lot 9 NR Lot 22-25 Block 9 Lot 4,5 Block 6 Lot 18 Block 2 Lot 10,11 N 38 Ft. of E 161.86 Ft. of Beg. 104.35 Ft N of X of Co Rd & Prol of NE 59 St N 104.35 Ft. W 330 Ft Block 35 Lot 3 NR Lot 10 NR NR Block 2 Lot 2 10832 joq 203 The First Church of Deliverance 6815 N.W. 7 Avenue Seventh Avenue Highland 14-13 204 Holy Ghost Assembly Church of God 7640 N.W. 7 Avenue Stephen Manor 14-18 205 Miracle Deliverance Evangelistic Church 4407 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estates 5-48 206 Mission Evangelica Pentecostal 1734 N.W. 7 Street Rogers Add. 5-49 207 New Life Miracle Revival Fellowship Center 118 N.W. 79 Street Phoenix Park 6-80 208 World Deliverance Church 4501 N.W. 17 Avenue North Miami Estates 5-48 211 First Spanish United Presbytherian Church 619 N.W. 25 Avenue Portland Race 11-48 212 Grace Presbyterian Church 6895 N.W. 14 Avenue Liberty City Homesite 40-32 213 Iglesia Presbyteriana Pan Americana 796 N.W. 29 Street De Leon Park Boulevard 7-55 214 New Covenant Presbyterian Church 4300 N.W. 12 Avenue Carty's Re Sub 24-22 216 Shenandoah Presbyterian Church 2150 S.W. 8 Street Epzly Re - Sub 16-31 Tamiami Heights 7-64 217 New Hope Primitive Baptist Church 1301 N.W. 1 Place Alice Baldwin Jenny No. 4 Chas I 8-87 218 Iglesia Cristana Reformada el Buen Samaritano 4885 W. Flagler Street Pinehurst Villa 2nd Addition 6-157 - 15 - Block 8 Lot 8,9 Block 10 Lot 6-8 Block 9 N 20' of Lot 7,8 Block 1 Lot 5 NR Lot 10 Block 8 Lot 5,6 Block 2 Lot 1-3 Block 10 Lot 1,2 Block 3 Lot 1,2 NR Lot 1-16 Lot 6-23 Inc Block 4 Lot 12-14 Inc Block 6 Lot 9 NR Lot 2,3 10832 l �' 5 219 Eden SDA Haitian Church 235 N.W. 35 Street Wyndwood Park 5-23 220 Lebanon SDA Church 1736 N.W. 35 Street 3127-000-0080 Holleman Manor 10-30 Block 3 Lot 10 W 337.15 Ft of S 1/2 of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 less N 25 Ft W 25 Ft and S 25 Ft 221 Lebanon Seventh Day Adventist Church 1491 N.W. 26 Street Evergreen Gardens 17-30 Block 3 Lot 21,22 222 Seventh Day Adventist Church 862 S.W. 4 Street Carolina Court 15-56 NR Lot 8,9 224 Seventh Day Adventist Church Reform Movement 1800 S.W. 9 Street Shenandoah Amend 8-90 Block 22 Lot 12 226 Unity de Las Americas 2120 W. Flagler Street Idlewood Park 2-87 Block 54 Lot 4 227 Scottish Rite Temple 471 N.W. 3 Street All of Scottish Rite Cathedral 8-69 Block I NR 228 Church of God & Christ Int. 680 N.W. 71 Street Seventh Avenue Highland 14-13 Block 7 Lot 4 229 Evangelical Haitian Church of Florida 8373 N.E. 2 Avenue All of Del Rio 9-33 NR Lot 9 230 First Interdenominational Haitian Church 5846 N.E. 2 Avenue Highway Tract 5-24 Block 11 Lot 4 231 Bryan Memorial Methodist Church 3713 Main Highway All of Ewanton Height B-52 NR Lot 2 232 Second Church of Christ Scientist of Miami 3840 Main Highway All of Ewanton Heights B-52 Tract B NR - 16 - 233 United House of Prayer for all People 6820 N.W. 15 Avenue New Liberty City 39-28 Block 4 Lot 21 234 Iglesia Sion Assembles of God 36 N.W. 29 Street St. James Park Amd 4-41 Block 5 Lot 6 235 Macedonia First Baptist Church 3515 Douglas Road Frow Homestead Amd. B-106 Block 33 Lot D,E 236 Valley Grove Missionary 1395 N.W. 69 Street Liberty City Homesites 40-32 Block 8 Lot 1,23,24 237 St. John the Baptist Arimenia Apostolic 120 N.E. 16 Street North Miami A-49 1/2 Block 12 Lot 1,4 239 Hosanna Church 4755 N.W. 2 Avenue Shadowlawn Extension 5-105 Block 4 Lot 15 240 Holy Conforter Episcopal Church 150 S.W. 13 Avenue Lawrence Estate Land Co Sub 2-46 Block 79 Lot 1-4,17-20 241 Glorius Holy Church of Christ 939 N.W. 3 Avenue Many B-41 Block 26N Lot 12 242 The Church of God 1351 N.W. 67 Street Liberty City Homesites 40-32 Block 11 Lot 19 243 Mount Olive Primitive Baptist Church 1622 N.W. 69 Terr. North Liberty City 39-77 Block 6 Lot 30 244 Salvation Army 905 W. Flagler Riverview 5-43 Block I Lot 1,2,19,20 245 361 N.W. 67 Street Groveland Park 6-91 Block 6 Lot 13,14,15 246 1370 S.W. 1 Street Lawrence Estate Land Co. Sub 2-46 Block 79 Lot 8-10 247 St. Paul AME 1892 N.W. 51 Terr. Floral Park 1st Amd 8-5 Block 23 Lot 10-15 �.0832 - l07 248 Beulah Baptist Church 3793 Frown Avenue McFarlane Homestead Plat 5-81 249 Mount Aaron Missionary Baptist Church 1701 N.W. 69 Street Liberty City 7-79 250 Mount Tabor Baptist Church 1701 N.W. 66 Street Liberty City 7-79 252 Concilio Internacional De Iglesias Evangelicas 918 N.W. 7 Avenue Spring Garden Sub No. 1 & 2 253 Youth Crusade Deliverance Church No. One 6819 N.W. 15 Avenue New Liberty City 39-28 254 Anshe Emes Congregation 2533 S.W. 19 Avenue Natoma Park 9-116 255 Tabernacle Seventh - Day Adventist 8017 N.E. 3 Avenue 256 Nuesta Senora de las Mercedes Catholic Church Mission 1872-1880 N.W. 18 Terr. Bellevue Sub. 3-119 257 Nuesta Senora de la Altagracia Catholic Church Mission 1735 N.W. 28 Street Allapattah Community Center 21-72 258 San Francisco and Santa Clara Catholic Church Mission 343-347-401 N.E. 26 Terr. Escottonia Pk. Amend 4-161 259 San Juan Bautista Catholic Church Mission N.W. 2nd Ave. Northern Boulevard Tract 2-29 260 National Church of God Miami 1821 N.W. 2nd Ct. Subdivision of Lots 3 and 4 Block 7 of Erickson's Amend B-156 Block 3 Block 3 Block 7 Block 4 Block 3 Block 7 not found 3 20 Lot 14 Lot 23,24 Lot 21-24 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 1-4 28,30 31 5and 6 North 40.7 feet of lots 5 and 6 17 2,3 and 21 i0832 I 261 80 S.W. 8th St. B-41 56S 9 Miami (AL Knowlton) 262 3680 Thomas Avenue Frow Homestead Amend B-106 32 A, B and C 10832 -19- JC�q APPENDIX B SCHOOLS (LESS THAN 2 ACRES) 1 ' ,7 l 1 Alexander 3950 Biscayne Boulevard VACCA SUB 85-27 3. Bertha Abess Children's Center 2600 S.W. 2 Avenue Blk 34 Amend Rev 41-96 4. Brito Miami Private School 2732 S.W. 32 Avenue Silver Bluff Gardens 8-43 5. Champagnat Catholic School 2609 N.W. 7 Street 9-124 The HUB 7. Interamerican Military Academy 3525 N.W. 7 Street Stegeman SUB 71-96 8. La Luz School 931 S.W. 1 Street Riverview 8-43 9. La Progressiva Presbyterian School 11-14 2480 N.W. 7 Street Portland Place 11. Mary Immaculate Academy 1685 S.W. 32 Avenue Lyndale 2nd ADD 8-15 12. Pan American Institute 2901 S.W. 7 Street Tract A Blk 34 Lot 104-107, 110-116 Lots 6-7-8 Less S 69 Ft Blk 2 & all Lots 9 through 13 Inc Blk 2 Blk J Lot 19, 20 Lots 1-2-3 Blk 2 & Lots 1 to 3 Blk 1 PB 19-52 & Lots 1 to 5 Blk 2 Second SEC Carolina Heights PB 12-14 Blk 7 13. Saint John Bosco School 1301 W. Flagler Street Lawrence Estate Land Co. SUB 2-46 14. Saint Matthew's Lutheran School 621 Beacon Boulevard Beacom Manor 8-121 17. Jose Marti School 2660 S.W. 17 Street Grapeland Rev 3-196 18. Florida School of Technology 904 S.W. 23 Avenue Brian Park 5-69 Page 1 S 75' of Lot 13s & 14 Lots 10-11-12 & S 5 Ft. of Lots 1& 2 Blk 62 Lots 3, 4, 16-18 Lots 3, 4, 16-18 Blk 15 Lot 11, 12 Blk 3 Lot 1-3 10832 19. Fort Lauderdale College 7630 Biscayne Boulevard Federal Way Amend 20. International Fine Arts College 1737 N. Bayshore Drive Miramar Plaza Amend 22. Ross School of Medicine 3000 Biscayne Boulevard Ranni SUB 23. American Vocational School Inc. 1430 S.W. 1 Street Blk 78 Re -SUB 24. Arey Technical Institute 2437 N.E. 7 Street Riverside Farms SUB 25. Jones College 255 S.W. 8 Street Miami 26. Business & Technology Institute 42 N.W. 27 Avenue Hibiscuss Terrace 27. Crown Business Institute 1223 S.W. 4 Street Lawrence Estate Land Co. SUB 28. DATA America Institute 1107 S.W. 27 Avenue New Silver Coast Rev 29. Garces Commercial College 1301 S.W. 1 Street Lawrence Estate Land Co. SUB 30. Martin Technical College 1901 N.W. 7 Street Nelson Park 41. Le Overtour Toussaint Elem. School 120 N.E. 59 Street Dixie Highway Tract Parcel 2 AKA 3113-065-1600 46. COPE Center North 1749 N.W. 54 Street Floral Park 1st Amend 25-6 Blk 10 Lot 2, 25 33-18 85-45 Tract A 6-92 Blk 78 Lot 4-6 2-88 Blk 3 Lot 5-8 B-41 Blk 51 S Lot 14, 15 3-201 - Lot 10-14 2-46 Blk 90 Lot 18 39-80 Tract 2A Lot 11 2-46 Blk 72 Lot 1, 2 43-42 Blk 1 Lot 12, 13 5-24 Blk 16 Lot 4 8-5 Blk 16 Lot 18 10832 Page 2 j J 2- 47. Cooper N. K. Education Center 151 N.W. 5 Street Miami 49. Interamerican Center (Formerly Miami -Dade Community College) Inter -American Center 629 S.W. 27 Avenue Beacon Manor B-41 Blk 65N Lot 7-9 8-121 Unit 1-Unit 5 Int IN Common Elements 4103-077-0010/0090 Page 3 (;j APPENDIX C Pik I= 8sreagg African Square Park (71) Neighborhood 1.15 NW 62 Street and 14 Avenue Allapattah-Comstock Park (366) Community 9.2 NW 17 Avenue and 28 Street Allapattah Mini Park (364) Mini 0.3 1500 NW 16 Avenue Bayfront Park (83) Community 39.3 ,Biscayne Boulevard SE to NE 6 Streets Belle Meade Park (8) Mini 0.4 NE 8 Avenue and 77 Street Bicentennial Park (87) Community 33.0 New World Center McArthur Causeway and NE 9 Street Biscayne Heights Park (92) Mini 0.2 NE 84 Street and Dixie Hwy. Blanche Park (225) Mini 1.5 Virginia Street and Shipping Avenue Maceo Park (322) Neighborhood 3.0 NW 7 Street and 51 Avenue Brickel' ?ark (94) Neighborhood 4.7 Brickell Avenue and SE 5 Street Brickell Plaza Mini Park (20) Mini 0.1 Brickell Plaza and SE 10 Street Broward Circle Mini Park (368) Mini 0.3 NW 8 Avenue and 15 Street Bryan Park (283) Neighborhood 2.1 SW 23 Avenue and 13 Street Buena Vista Park (12) Neighborhood 1.6 NW 2 Avenue and 52 Street 10832 1' L'( Central Miami Mini Park (20) Mini 0.18 1403 N. Miami Avenue Clemente (Roberto) (186) Neighborhood 3.0 NW 34 Street and 1 Avenue Coconut Grove Mini Park (229) Mini 0.5 Grand Avenue and Elizabeth Street Coral Gate Park (286) Neighborhood 3.7 SW 16 Street and 32 Avenue Crestwood Park (14) Mini 1.0 NW 11 Avenue and 47 Terrace Curtis Park (372) Community 29.3 NW 20 Street and 24 Avenue Dorsey Park (110) Neighborhood 2.5 NE 1 Avenue and 17 Street Douglas Park (252) Neighborhood 10.0 SW 37 Avenue and 27 Street East Bay Vista Park (21) Mini 1.0 NW 8 Avenue and 47 Terrace Eaton Park (16) Neighborhood 3.5 NE 4 Court and 60 Street Athalie Range (25) Community 11.9 NW 62 Street and 5 Avenue Fern Isle - South Fork Park (381) Community 14.7 NW 11 Street and 22 Avenue 54th Street Mini Park (30) Mini 1.5 NW 52 Street and 18 Avenue Flagami Park (328) Mini 1.0 SW 3 Street and 71 Avenue Flagler Mini Park (330) Mini 1.0 SW 3 Street and 55 Avenue Road Fort Dallas Park (123) Mini 0.75 SE 4 Street and 1 Avenue Grand Avenue Park (258) Neighborhood 9.0 236 Grand Avenue Grapeland Heights Park (335) Community 20.6 10832 11,e 1550 NW 37 Avenue Grove Mini Park (388) NW 8 Street and 15 Avenue Hadley (Charles) Park (Manor) NW 14 Avenue and 50 Street Henderson Park (296) 971 NW 2 Street Highland Circle Mini Park (127) NW 8 Avenue and 13 Street Kennedy (David T.) Park (235) S. Bayshore Drive and 22 Avenue Kinloch Park (338) 455 NW 47 Avenue Kirk Munroe Park (262) Matilda Street and Oak Avenue Legion Park (33) Biscayne Boulevard and NE 66 Street Lemon City Park (64) NE 58 Street and Miami Court Lecuona (Ernesto) Park 900 SW 1 Street Lincoln Park (264) 2950 Jackson Avenue Little River Commerce Park (43) NE 80 Terrace and 2 Avenue Lummus Park (153) NW 3 Street and N. River Dr. General Maximo Gomez Park (47) SW 8 Street and 15 Avenue Mini Community Neighborhood Mini Community Neighborhood Neighborhood Community Neighborhood Mini Mini Mini Community Mini 0.5 28.4 3.6 0.3 29.0 2.0 2.0 13.5 2.8 0.25 0.5 7.0 0.25 832 OL Al Pallot Park (45) North of 36 Street on Biscayne Bay Marti (Jose) Riverfront Park (298) Miami River at SW 4 Street Melrose Park (396) NW 30 Street and 25 Avenue Merrie Christmas Park (266) LeJeune Road and Barbarossa Street Moore Park (405) NW 7 Avenue and 36 Street Myers (Kenneth M.) Bayside Park North Bay Vista Park NW 6 Avenue and 48 Terrace Oakland Grove Mini Park NE 3 Avenue and 48 Terrace Pace (Margaret) Park (131) N. Bayshore Drive at 17 Terrace and 20 Street Paradise Point Park (412) NW 27 Avenue and 17 Street Peacock Park (269) S. Bayshore Drive and McFarlane Road Pine Heights Mini Park (416) NW 16 Street and 8 Avenue Pullman Mini Park (54) N. Miami Avenue and NW 49 Street Rainbow Village Park (173) NW 4 Court and 21 Street Reeves (Henry E.S.) Park NW 6 Avenue and 9 Street Riverside Park (311) SW 8 Avenue and 3 Street Robert E. Lee Park (77) 3100 NW 5 Avenue Neighborhood 2.9 Community 9.7 Neighborhood 1.9 Neighborhood 5;6 Community 19.0 Mini Mini 0.5 Mini 0.2 Neighborhood 12.0 Mini 0.5 Community 20.0 Mini 0.3 Mini 0.4 Mini 1.5 Neighborhood 3.75 Neighborhood 3.5 Neighborhood 3.0 10832 III 4 M Robert King Nigh Park (345) Community 17.0 W. Flagler Street and 69 Avenue Second Avenue Mini Park Mini 0.2 NW 2 Avenue and 10 Street Sewell Park Community 10.0 17 Avenue and NW S. River Dr: Shenandoah Park (315) Community 10.0 SW 22 Avenue and 18 Street Majorie Stoneman Park (275) Mini 0.5 SW 22 Avenue and 28 Street Simpson Park (188) Neighborhood 3.5 S. Miami Avenue and 15 Road Site 16 Mini Park Mini NW 21 Avenue and 19 Terrace South Bay Vista Park Mini 0.2 NW 6 Avenue and 46 Street Southside Park (204) Neighborhood 2.2 SW 11 Street and 6 Avenue Stearns Park Neighborhood 5.4 NE 38 Street and 6 Avenue Steel (Elizabeth) Park (277) Mini 0.3 S. Bayshore Drive and Hiawatha Tacolcy Park (62) Neighborhood 2.5 NW 62 Street and 9 Avenue Town Park (182) Mini 1.5 NW 3 Avenue and 836 Triangle Park (318) Mini 0.5 SW 15 Road and 11 Street Twelfth Avenue Park Mini 0.25 NW 62 Street and 12 Avenue Virrick (Elizabeth) Park (254) Neighborhood 6.0 Oak Avenue and Plaza Street Wainwright (Alice C.) Park (218) Community 23.8 2845 Brickell Avenue Walker (Paul S.) Mini Park (121) Mini 0.1 46 West Flagler Street 10832 1l? Watson Island Park and Japanese Garden (192) Community MaCarthur Causeway West End Park Community SW 3 Street and 60 Avenue West Buena Vista Park (67) Mini NW 44 Street and 11 Place Williams Park (197) Neighborhood 1717 NW 5 Avenue Miami Design Plaza (199) Mini NE 2 Avenue and 36 Street 65.0 9.3 1.0 5.5 10832 ) / c7 CITY OF MIAMI PARKS BELLE MEADE PARK SHEET 9 Plat Dedication - A portion between lots 24 and 25 in Belle Meade 1st add 21-66 a Subdivision in the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 7 Township 53 South, Range 42 East. BISCAYNE HEIGHT PARK SHEET 9 The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36 Township 53, Range 41. OAKLAND GROVE PARK SHEET 9 All of Lots 16, 17, & 18 according to the map of the subdivision of the NW 1/4 of Section 7 Township 53 South, Range 42 East as recorded in Plat Book B, page 30 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, excepting therefrom the following tracts to wit: LITTLE RIVER COMMERCE PARK SHEET 10 Begin 165 feet South of Northeast Corner of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, thence run Westerly parallel to the North line of said SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of said Section 12 for distance of 157 feet to a point; thence run Southerly parallel to the East line of NE 1/4 of said Section 12 for a distance of 61.60 feet to a point that is 15 feet North of the centerline of N.E. 80th Terrace; thence run Easterly parallel to the North line of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 12, and 15 feet North of and parallel to the centerline of N.E. 80th Terrace for distance of 157 feet to the East line of the NE 1/4 of said Section 12; thence run Northerly along the East lien of the NE 1/4 of said Section 12 for 61.60 feet to the Point of Beginning; Less the East 15 feet which have been dedicated on record for Street; and Subject to the use at Present Time of any of said property by the City of Miami, Florida, for Streets or Sidewalks. Together with improvements thereon. TACOLCY PARK SHEET 12 Lots 2,4 & 5, Block 1, Drillion Sub (18-42) Lots 1-4, Block 12, HILDAMERE RE -SUB (40-51) Lots 1-8, RE -SUB Block 11, (43-86) plus right-of-way of N.W. 9th Avenue from north right-of-way of N.W. 61st Street to south right-of-way of N.W. 62nd Street (MLK Boulevard). AFRICAN SQUARE PARK SHEET 12 Lots 5 thru 26, less N 10 ft. for R/W and Lot 29 of Block 10 of Orange Heights PB 14-62 10832 LC, 12TH AVENUE PARK SHEET 12 20' wide going up 12 Avenue. ATHALIE RANGE PARK SHEET 13 Edison Center Park, Plat Book 48, Page 50 Less North 200' all unnumbered Tract less N200 feet. . LEMON CITY PARK SHEET 13 Lots 1, 2, 11 thru 15, Block 1, of BISCAYNE AVENUE TRACT, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 195, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. LEGION PARK SHEET 14 Beginning at a point 15 feet East to the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5 in Section 18, Township 53 South of Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida; Thence run North parallel with and 15 feet East of the West boundary line of said Government Lot 5, a distance of 747.7 feet, more or less to the Southwest corner of Lot 2, of Mary Brickell's Plat, recorded in Plat Book "B", on Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; Thence run East 1155 feet, more or less, to the West shore of Biscayne Bay; Thence Northerly along and meandering said West shore of Biscayne Bay to the Southeast corner of that certain property heretofore conveyed by the Grantor herein to Walter Harris Company, a corporation, by deed recorded in Deed Book 257 at page 424 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; Thence in a Westwardly course along and following the South Boundary of the tract heretofore conveyed by the Grantor herein to said Walter Harris Company, a corporation, as described in Deed Book 257 at Page 424 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, to a point 15 feet East of the West boundary of Government Lot 1 in Section 18, Township 53 South of Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida; Thence Sour parallel to and 15 feet East of said West boundaries of Government Lots 1 and 5 in said Section 18, 690.5 feet more or less, to the place of beginning; Less, however, Tracts "K" and "L" as shown on a Plat of a Subdivision of Government Lot 5 in Section 18, Township 53 South, of Range 42 East, recorded in Plat Book "A", at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; Also less a strip of land measuring 25 feet North and South and 125 feet East and West, lying to the North of Tracts "K" and "L" as shown on the Plat above referred to and recorded in Plat Book "A" at Page 1, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and otherwise referred to, described and indicated as Tract "M" on 'a certain plat attached to a mortgage heretofore encumbering the property herein conveyed, which said mortgage is recorded in Mortgage Book 55 at Page 146, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 10832 !�I Together with the following described property conveyed to the Trustees for the Harvey W. Seeds Post No. 29 American Legion by the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida as recorded in Deed Book 1590 at Page 83 and Deed Book 2578 at Page 300 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: From the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, which is in the center of Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida, go northerly along the said West line of said Government Lot �, a distance of 1,438.1 feet; thence, right with a deflection angle of 90 20' a distance - of 667 feet; thence, right with a deflection angle of 30 36' a distance of 559 feet more or less, to a point of beginning; said point being the northeasterly corner of the land conveyed to S. McCahill, et al, as Trustees for Harvey W. Seeds Post No. 29, American Legion, Department of Florida, by deed recorded in Deed Book 1543, Page 24, Public Records of Dade County, Florida. From said point of beginning go easterly along a line 650 (Deed 600) feet, more or less, north of and parallel to the north line of N.E. 64 Street in Miami, Florida, produced easterly a distance of 2,513 (Deed 2,400) feet, more or less, to a line 250 feet westerly from the center line of the Inland Waterway Channel as constructed by the United States and parallel to said center line; thence southerly along said line a distance of 653 (Deed 600) feet, more or less to its intersection with the north line of said N. E. 64th Street produced easterly a distance of 2,500 feet, more or Tess, to the western shore of Biscayne Bay; thence, northerly along the western shore of Biscayne Bay and the property of Harvey W. Seeds Post No. 29, American Legion, Department of Florida, a distance of 653 (Deed 600) feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, all lying and being in Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida. LESS: LEGION PARK, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 39, at Page 86, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; ALSO, LESS: The Amended Plat of LEGION PARK, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 39, at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; ALSO LESS: All that part of Government Lot 5 in Section 18, Township 53, South, Range 42 East as per Plat recorded in Plat Book A, at Page 1, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, which part is particularly bounded and described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at a point the Northwest corner of Lot D of Legion Park, as per plat recorded in Book 39, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, running thence westerly and parallel to the North line of Lot 1 of Arlington, as said Lot 1 is shown on map recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 44, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a distance of 56 feet, thence south parallel to the Westerly line of said Lot D a distance 10832 ZZ W r� of 25 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 1 of said Arlington, thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said Lot 1 of Arlington 56 feet to the Westerly line of said Lot D, thence North along the Westerly line of said Lot 0, 25 feet to the Point of Beginning. ALSO LESS: All that part of Government Lot 5 in Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, as per Plat recorded in Plat Book A, at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, which part is particularly bounded and described as follows, to wit: Commencing at a point the Northeast corner of Lot 2 of Arlington, as said Lot is shown on map recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 44, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, running thence North parallel to the West line of Lot 0 of Legion Park, as per plat recorded in Book 39, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, 25 feet to a point being the Northwest corner of tract conveyed to Randolph B. Covington and Rose Covington, his wife, by Deed recorded in Deed Book 2258, at Page 173, thence West and parallel to the North line of said Lot 2 of Arlington 56 feet to a point, and then South and parallel to the Westerly line of Lot 0 as aforesaid 25 feet to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 2 of Arlington, thence East along the North line of said Lot 2, 56 feet to the Point of Beginning; ALSO LESS: Lots 1, 2 and 6 of the Mary Brickell Subdivision, as per Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said Lot 6 is also shown as Lot 6 of Legion Park, on Plat recorded in Plat Book 39, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. ALSO LESS: The following described property: Commence at the southwest corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, thence north long the west line of the NE 1/4 of aforesaid Section 727.67 feet to the point of intersection with the center line of northeast 64th Street, thence east along the center lien of Northeast 64th Street, 600 feet to a point, thence north parallel to the west line of the NE 1/4 of aforesaid Section 18 a distance of 20.0 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 26 MARK BRICKELL SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, said point being the point of beginning of the parcel of land hereinafter described as follows, thence north along the west line of said Lot 26 and the east line of Northeast 7th Avenue a shown on AMENDED PLAT OF LEGION PARK, Plat Book 39, at Page 93, of the Public Records of 10832 1z2) Dade County, Florida, a distance of 317.1 feet to a point, thence east parallel to the center line of Northeast 64th Street 500 feet to a point, thence south parallel to the east line off Northeast 7th Avenue, 317.1 feet to the north line of Northeast 64th Street (Bay Street, Plat Book B, Page 411, Public Records of Dade County, Florida) thence west along the north line of Northeast 64th Street, 500 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described property contains approximately 48 acres. EATON PARK SHEET 14 Lots 39 and 40 of Lemon City, Plat Book B, Page 32 less the N 4' of said Lots 39 and 40 as previously dedicated for street as recorded in Deed Book 3852, page 243, also excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 39 lying Northeasterly of curve having a radius of 15 feet, the northerly end of which is tangent to a line 4' south of and parallel with the north line of Lot 39 and the east end of which is tangent to the east line of Lot 39 which portion was dedicated for street and recorded in Deed Book 4308, page 211, and also, Begin 12' south of the SW corner of Lot 41 of White's Lemon City Subdivision, Plat Book B, page 32, thence east to a point 12' south of the SE corner of Lot 39 of White's Lemon City Subdivision, thence south 20' thence west to a point south of the point of beginning, thence north 20' point of beginning, and also. Lots 35 and 36, less the north 4 feet thereof, WHITE'S SUBDIVISION OF LEMON CITY according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 32 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; ALSO a parcel of land described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 36 of WHITE'S SUBDIVISION OF LEMON CITY, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 32 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run north 116 feet to a point; thence west 10 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 35 in WHITE'S SUBDIVISION OF LEMON CITY; thence run south along the east line of said Lot 35 for a distance of 66 feet to the south line of said Lot 35; thence along the south line of Lots 35 and 36 of said WHITE'S SU; DIVISION OF LEMON CITY a distance of 100 feet to the Point of Beginning, and also, Lot 37, less the north 4 feet thereof, in the plat of WHITE'S SUBDIVISION OF LEMON CITY, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book "B" at page 32 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, together with a portion of land lying south of Lot 37 and east of Northeast 4 Court more particularly described as follows: Begin at the southeast corner of Lot thirty-seven (37) aforementioned; thence run south along the east line of Lot 37 produced south a distance of 50 feet to a point; thence run west parallel to the north line of lot thirty-seven (37) a distance of 44.92 feet to the easterly right of way line of N.E. 4 Court; thence run north and west along the easterly right of way line of Northeast 4 court along a circular curve having a radius of 250 feet, a distance of 50.37 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot thirty-seven (37); thence run east along the south line of Lot thirty-seven (37) a distance of 50 feet to the Point of Beginning; according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 32 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and also, 10832 1 21A Beginning 258 feet South and 876 feet West of the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East; thence run South 200 feet; thence run West 229 feet; thence run North 200 feet; thence run East 229 feet to the point of beginning, and less street right-of-way, and also, Commencing at a point two hundred and fifty eight (258) feet South and eleven hundred and five feet (1105) feet west of the S.E. corner of N.W. 1/4 of Section 18, Township 53, S. Range 42, East and run from said point West 200 feet; thence South 200 feet; thence East 200 feet; thence North 200 feet to place of beginning and containing 92/100 acre more or less; and less street right-of-way, and also, Commencing at a point 258 feet South and 676 feet west of the Southeast corner of N.W. 1/4 of Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East; thence run South 200 feet; thence West 200 feet; thence North 200 feet; thence East 200 feet to place of beginning, and less street right-of-way, and also, Lot 31, of LEMON CITY, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B", at pa a 32, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, Less the North Four F14) feet thereof; ALSO Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 31 of Lemon City, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B" at page 32, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run South in a Southerly direction on a line parallel with the East line of Lot 31 for a distance of 50 feet; thence run North on a line parallel to the West line of Lot 31, for a distance of 50 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 31; thence run East along the South line of Lot 31, 50 feet to the Point of Beginning, and also, Lot 32 of WHITE'S LEMON CITY, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B", at page 32, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida and also the adjoining area immediately south of the south line of said Lot 32 that is bounded on the East by the southerly extension of the east line of said Lot 32 extended 50 feet and on the West line of south Lot 32, extended 50 feet in Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East; more particularly described in a survey prepared by the Biscayne Engineering Company dated December 4, 1952, as follows to with: Commencing at a point that is 26 feet North and 20 feet East of the Northeast corner of Lot 31, according to the Plat Book "B", Page 32, said point also being marked by a City Monument at the intersection of the City Monument lines of N.E. 5th Avenue and N.E. 61st Street as said Avenue and Street are known today; thence run westerly along the City Monument line of N.E. 61st Street, said Monument line being also a line 26 feet North of and Parallel to the North boundary of sail Lot 32, for a distance of 70.015 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly extension of the east boundary of said Lot 32; thence southerly along the northerly extension of said east boundary of Lot 32, for a distance of 26 feet to 10832 i 2.S the Northeast corner of said Lot 32, said N.E. corner being also the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land hereinafter to be described; thence southerly along the east boundary and its southerly production of said Lot 32 for a distance of 116 feet to a point; thence westerly along a line parallel to the South boundary of said Lot 32 for a distance of 50.015 feet to a point of intersection with the southerly production of the west boundary of said Lot 32; thence northerly along the southerly production and the west boundary of said Lot 32 for a distance of 116 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 32; thence easterly along the north boundary of said Lot 32 for a distance of 50.015 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; less the north 4 feet which has been deeded to the City of�Miami for street purposes. Lots 34 and 35 of CORRECTED SURVEY OF LEMON CITY AS recorded in Deed Book "D" at Page 509 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida (also known as Lots 33 and 34 of WHITE'S PLAT OF LEMON CITY, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 32 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida) together with the East Half of the 20 foot alley lying west of and adjacent to the west boundary of said Lot 35 as shown in said Deed Book "D" at Page 509; also a strip of land 50 feet in width lying south of and adjacent to all of the above mentioned property and lying between the southerly extensions of the east line of said Lot 34 and the west line of the East half of the said 20 foot alley. EXCEPTING that part thereof deeded to the City of Miami for side -walk and/or street purposes, by Quit Claim Deed from FRANK W. PICOT, an unmarried man, to the CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation, (see Entry II of said MIAMI TITLE Certificate No. C-6189) dated May 12th, 1952, recorded among the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, in Deed Book 3633 at Page 552 thereof and particularly described as follows: The North 4 feet of Lots 34 and 35 of HARRINGTON'S PLAT OF LEMON CITY, filed for record in Deed Book "D", Page 509 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. STEARNS PARK SHEET 15 That certain tract of land lying east of Lots 1 and 2 as shown on the plat of Buena Vista -Biscayne Badger Club Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 1 at page 115 of the public records of Dade County, Florida and more particularly described as follows: Bounded on the north by the north line of said Buena Vista -Biscayne Badger Club Company Subdivision; bounded on the west by the east line of lots 1 and 2, together with all riparian rights appertaining to the above described property, but excepting that portion of the above described property heretofore deeded to the City of Miami for street and sewer purposes. AL PALLOT PARK SHEET 15 A parcel of submerged land in Biscayne Bay in Section 19, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Commence at a point on the west line of said Section 19, that is 495 feet north of the southwest corner of said Section 19, said point 108321zu being the southwest corner of the SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 25 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run eastwardly along the southerly line of said SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK for a distance of 1587.5 feet to the Southeast corner of said SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; thence run northeastwardly along the westerly shore of Biscayne Bay as shown on said SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK for a distance of 186 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the northerly right of way lien of Ramp "B", of Florida State Road 25 (Julia Tuttle Causeway) as shown on the Right of Way Map as recorded in Plat Book 65 at Page 105, Sheet 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, said point of intersection being the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described land; thence run southeastwardiy along said northerly right of way line to Ramp "B" for a distance of 370 feet more or less to the Metropolitan Dade County, Florida Bulkhead Line, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74 at Page 3, Sheet 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run northwardly along said Bulkhead Line for a distance of 420 feet, more or less, to the easterly extension of the northerly line of N.E. 39th Street (formerly known as North Drive) as shown on said SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; thence run westwardly along said easterly extension of said northerly line of N.E. 39th Street for a distance of 325 feet, more or less, to the easterly side of said SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; thence run southwestwardly along said easterly side of SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK for a distance of 320 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.9 acres, more or less. ALSO known as Portion of PB 5 PG 25 Described Beginning 5.5' NE'ly of NE Corner of E/L Lot 22 Extended thence W'ly 9.16' NE'ly along a line 56.5'E of ang parr. to E/L of Lots B & C for 50.61' thence deflecting to the left 9 NE'ly 61.27' thence NE'ly along a line 46.5' E of & parr. to E/L of Lots B & C for 259.40' E'ly along S/L Lot A 9.5' to SE corner Lot A SW'ly along E R4W/L NE 6 Avenue as shown on said Plat 133.72' thence deflecting to left 2 SW'ly 237.17' to POB. Less part lying in Ramp B R/W. Containing .07 acres more or less. MIAMI DESIGN PLAZA PARK SHEET 15 A portion of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 19, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: PULLMAN MINI PARK SHEET 16 Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2, Pullman Park, Plat Book 3, Page 184, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 10832 W 5 NORTH BAY VISTA PARK SHEET 16 A Tract of Land of Subdivision Bay Vista Park Amd. between NW 49 Street and NW 4 8 Street, abutting on the westerly side to the expressway. SOUTH BAY VISTA PARK SHEET 16 A tract of Land of Subdivision of Bay Vista Park Amd. between NW 47 Street and NW 46 Street, abutting on the westerly side to the expressway. BUENA VISTA PARK SHEET 16 Lots 8, 9, 10, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 of Block 16 of Railway Shops Addition, according to the Second Amended Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 183 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. MOORE PARK SHEET 17 Morningside Bayfront Park, Plat Book 60, page 73 - Tract A and Rip TRS less Part in PB 69-5. CRESTWOOD PARK SHEET 17 A portion of land on eleven Avenue between 47th Street and 48 Street, located in the S.W. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 23 Township 53 Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida. EAST BAY VISTA PARK SHEET 17 Bay Vista Amended Sudivision Plat Dedication. HADLEY PARK SHEET 17 Manor Park, Plat Book 50, Page 85 Tract B WEST BUENA VISTA PARK SHEET 17 Plat Dedication - A portion of land between Portar Avenue and Harris Avenue, and between Park Street and N.W. 45th Street, in West Buena Vista Center, a Re -subdivision of Blocks 3 to 11 inclusive, of Amended Plat of Railroad Addition, as recorded on Page 205, Book B in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 54TH STREET MINI PARK SHEET 17 Lots 1 thru 12 of Block 18 of SUBDIVISION FLORAL PARK AMENDED. ALLAPATTAH COMSTOCK PARK SHEET 19 Tract A Allapattah - Comstock Park, 89-34 10832 t Zg M MELROSE PARK SHEET 19 Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 in Block 17 of MELROSE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, PB 19, PG.44. ROBERT LEE PARK SHEET 21 Lots 1 through 21 of Block 9 of SUBDIVISION NORTHERN BOULEVARD. RAINBOW VILLAGE PARK SHEET 21' TOWNPARK SUBDIVISION, 1, PB 85-31, UR Project Fla. R-10 Tact 1 and East 34.7 ft. of the north 207.2 ft. of Tract 4. ROBERTO CLEMENTE PARK SHEET 21 All of Block Eight of Wynwood Park a sub -division of the City of Miami, Florida, as per plat recorded in Plat Book 5 page 23 of the records of Dade County, Florida. WATSON ISLAND PARK SHEET 22 The legal description that covers the area of Watson Park and other lands is described in Deed Book 361, page 353 and this deed and the legal description is superseded by the legal description as recorded in Deed Book 3130, page 257. The deed for the Old State Road AIA Right-of-way through Watson Park is described in Deed Book 3970, page 173. This office is not aware of any survey that has ever been made of the actual boundaries of Watson Park. TOWN PARK SHEET 23 36-53-41, TOWN PARK SEC 2 UR Project Rla R-10 Tract 5 10832 THEODORE GIBSON PARK SHEET 23 Miami Dixie Playground, Plat Book 64, Page 149, Tract A less Expressway right-of-way. ALSO Lots 1 through 14 of PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" on Page 127, all being in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. ALSO Lots 1 through 16 in Block 2 of SOST'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B" on page 27, all being in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. MARGARET PACE PARK SHEET 23 A parcel of submerged land in Biscayne Bay in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Commence at the N.W Corner of said Section 3I; thence run South along the west line of said Section 31 for a distance of 208.7 feet, more or less, to the westerly extension of the southerly line of CORAL PARK according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 66 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run eastwardly along the southerly line of said CORAL PARK and the westerly extension thereof, the same being also the northerly line of the Third Amended Plat of MIRAMAR as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 4 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, for a distance of 1236.9 feet, more or less, to a point of intersection with the face of the Sea Wail and the easterly line of Palm Boulevard (now known as North Bayshore Drive) as shown on said THIRD Amended Plat of MIRAMAR, said point of intersection being the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described submerged land; thence continue eastwardly along an easterly prolongation of the last described course for a distance of 527 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Metropolitan Dade County, Florida Bulkhead Line as shown on Plat Book 74 at Page 3, Sheet 3 of -the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence run southwardly along said Metropolitan Dade County, Florida Bulkhead Line for a distance of 1085 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the easterly extension of the northerly line of Block "D" as shown on said Third Amended Plat of MIRAMAR; thence run westwardly along said easterly extension of the northerly line of Block "D" for a distance of 260 feet more or less to the northeasterly corner of said Block "D", and also the face of the Sea Wall as shown on said Third Amended Plat of MIRAMAR; thence run northwestwardly and northwardly along the face of said Sea Wall for a distance of 150 feet more or less to a point where the face of said Sea Wall also becomes the easterly line of North Bayshore Drive (formerly 10332 /3G known as Palm Boulevard) a shown on said Third Amended Plat of MIRAMAR: thence run northeastwardly, northwardly, and northwestwardly along the face of said Sea Wall and easterly line of North Bayshore Drive for a distance of 1040 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 7.5 acres, more or less. PARADISE POINT PARK PARK SHEET 25 Lots 3A, 4A, 5A, 6, 6A, and 7A of Twin River Island, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 40, at Page 84 of Public Records of Dade County Florida. ' HENRY REEVES PARK SHEET 23 Culmer Park Sub 1 Plat Book 98-12 Tract B SECOND AVE MINI PARK SHEET 23 Lot 21, of P.W. While Resubdivision of Block 16, North City of Miami, According to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. BICENTENNIAL PARK SHEET 23 That certain tract or parcel of land, known generally as the City of Miami Dock Properties, bounded on the north by the south line of Belcher Oil Company's property, Plat Book 34, page 29, on the west by the east line of Biscayne Boulevard, on the south by the center line of N.E. 9th Street extended easterly to the U.S. Harbor Line, on the east by the U.S. Harbor Line, including lots 19 to 44, inclusive less the north 24 feet of Villa La Plaisance, recorded in Plat Book 4, page 114, the same being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the southeasterly corner of Lot 8, Block 21N, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami as recorded in Plat Book B at page 41 of the Public Recorods of Dade County, Florida thence run southwardly along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 8, for a distance of twenty- five (25.00) feet to a point on the center line of 3rd Street (now known as N.E. 9th Street) as shown on said A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami; thence run eastwardly along the easterly prolongation of the said center line N.E. 9th Street for a distance of one hundred and three (103.00') feet to a point on the easterly line of Biscayne Boulevard, said point being the point of beginning of the hereinafter described property; thence deflecting to the left 89058'08" run northwardly along said easterl line Biscayne Boulevard, said line being one hundred and three (103.00'� feet easterly of and parallel with the easterly line of Blocks 21N, and 20N of said A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami, for a distance of six hundred and forty- eight and fifty hundredths (648.50') feet to a point; thence deflecting to the right 17 17'30" run northeastwardly for a distance of one hundred and 10832 13l forty-three and sixty-four hundredths (143.041) feet to a point; thence deflecting to the right 19°39'15" run northeastwardly for a distance of one hundred and thirty-four and seventy-two hundredths (134.721) feet to a point of curvature; thence run northeastwardly and northwardly along the arc of a tangential curve to the left having a r$dius of four hundred, and twenty (420.00') feet and a central angle of 37 05'39" for a distance of two hundred and seventy-one and ninety-five hundredths (271.95') feet to a point of tangency; thence run northwardly along a line tangent to the aforementioned curve for a distance of eighty-four and fifty-six hundredths (84.56') feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Belcher Oil Company's Property, as recorded in Plat Book 34 at Page 29 of th8 Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence deflecting to the right 90 02125" run eastwardly along the southerly line of said Belcher Oil Company's property for a distance of one thousand one hundred and forty- six and thirty-three hundredths (1146.33') feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the U.S. Harbor Line; thence deflecting to the right 89°56'55" run southwardly along said U.S. Harbor Line for a distance of seven hundred and eight -one and sixty-seven hundredths (781.67') feet to a point, said point being U.S. Harbor Line Monument No. 32; thence deflecting to the right 0 23'00" run southwardly along said U.S. Harbor Line for a distance of Four hundred and fifty-one and nineteen hundredths (415.19') feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the easterly prolongation of the center line of said N.E. 9th Street; thence deflecting to the right 89044'42" run westwardly along the easterly prolongation of the center line of said N.E. 9th Street for a distance of one thousand three hundred and fifty-four and fifty-seven hundredths (1354.57') feet, more or less to the point of beginning, containing 34.75 acres. Except however: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of Lot 8, Block 20-N, A.L. Knowlton map of Miami as recorded in Plan Book B at page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence run southwardly along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 8 for a distance of twenty- five (25.00') feet to a point on the centerline of 2nd Street (now known as N.E. loth Street) as shown on said A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami; thence run eastwardly along the easterly prolongation of the centerline of N.E. loth Street for a distance of two hundred and twenty (220.001) feet to a point, said point being on the easterly right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as proposed for widening and being the point of beginning of the hereinafter described property. From said point of beginning, as heretofore described, run northwardly along said easterly right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as proposed for widening, said right-of-way line being parallel to and two hundred and twenty (220.00') feet easterly of the easterly line of said Lot 8 prolonged, for a distance of thirty five (35.00') feet to a point; thence run eastwardly on a line parallel to and thirty five (35.00) feet northerly of said easterly prolongation of the centerline of N.E. loth Street, for a distance of one hundred and fifty (150.00') feet to a point; thence run southwardly on a line parallel to and one hundred and fifty (150.00') feet easterly of the aforesaid proposed easterly right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, for a distance of two hundred and five 10832 /3� 606 (205.00') feet to a point; thence run westwardly on a line parallel to and one hundred and seventy (170.00') feet southerly of the aforesaid easterly prolongation of the centerline of N.E. loth Street for a distance of one hundred and fifty (150.00') feet to. a point of intersection with the aforesaid proposed easterly right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence run northwardly along the aforesaid proposed easterly right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard for a distance of one hundred and seventy (170.00') feet to the point of beginning. Also excepting therefrom: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of Lot 8, Block 20-N, A.L. Knowlton map of Miami, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence run southwardly along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 8 for a distance of twenty (20.00') feet to a point of intersection with the monument line of said N.E. loth Street, said monument line being parallel to and ive (5.00') feet northerly of the centerline of said N.E. 1Oth Street; thence run eastwardly along the easterly prolongation of said monument line of N.E. 1Oth Street for a distance of three hundred and seventy (370.00') feet to the point of beginning. From said point of beginning as heretofore described run eastwardly along the easterly prolongation of the N.E. 1Oth Street monument line for a distance of eleven hundred (1100') feet, more or less to the point of intersection with the westerly U.S. Harbor line of Biscayne Bay; thence run southwardly along the said U.S. Harbor line for a distance of thirty (30.00') feet to a point; thence run westwardly on a line parallel to and thirty (30.00') feet southerly of the aforesaid easterly prolongation of the N.E. loth Street monument line, for a distance of eleven hundred (1100') feet, more or less, to a point, said point being three hundred and seventy (370.00') feet easterly of the aforesaid southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Lot 8, Block 20-N, A.L. Knowlton map of Miami; thence run northwardly, along a line parallel to and three hundred and seventy (370.00') feet easterly of the said southerly prolon ation of the easterly line of said Lot 8, for a distance of thirty (30.001? feet to the point of beginning. CENTRAL MIAMI MINI -PARK SHEET 23 The north 40 feet of Lot 7 and the south 20 feet of Lot 7, and the north 20 feet of Lot 10, Block 16 Robins-Graham-Chillingworth, Plat A, Page 49 1/2, Dade County, Florida. DORSEY PARK SHEET 23 All of Block 29, Johnson and Waddell's Plat of North Miami, Plat Book B, page 53. Beginning at the Southeast corner of Block 29 of Waddell's Addition as recorded in Plat Book B, page 53, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run East along the Easterly production of the Southerly boundary line of said Block 29 a distance of 25.00' to a point; thence run 10832 /33 W Northwesterly making a deflection angle of 440 39' 22" to the left with said last described line a distance of 35.57' to a point on the East boundary line of Yale Avenue (now known as N.W. Miami Court) as shown on said plat, said point being located 25.00" North of the Easterly production of the aforesaid South boundary line of Block 29; thence run North along the East boundary line of Yale Avenue (now known as N.W. Miami Court) as shown on said plat a distance of 216.900' to a point; thence run Northwesterly making a deflection angle of 7 09' 10" to the left with said last described line a distance of 62.00' to a point of curve; thence continue Northwesterly along the arc of a 12° curve to the left having a central angle of 140 28' 40" a distance of 120.87' more or less to a point on the Easterly production of the North boundary line of aforesaid Block 29; thence West along the said Easterly production of the North boundary line of said Block 29 a distance of 12.31' more or less to the Northeast corner of said Block 29; thence run South along the East boundary line of said Block 29 (being also the West boundary line of Yale Avenue (now known as N.W. Miami Court) a distance of 419.74' more or less to the point of beginning; subject to all existing easements for street purposes. Also known as Tract 1 Waddell's Replat, Plat Book 47, page 78. WILLIAMS PARK SHEET 23 TOWN PARK SUB. No. 5, Plat Book 91-10, Tract 18. Commence at a point that is 15 feet North, and 15 feet East of the Southwest corner of the S.W. 1/4 of said Section 19; thence run Northerly, along the East line of the West 15.00 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of said Section 19, for a distance of 139 feet; thence run Easterly for a distance of 20.00 feet to the East line of the West 35.00 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of said Section 19, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel of land; thence continue to run Easterly for a distance of 46 feet more or less to the Northwesterly Right -of -Way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; thence run Southwesterly along the said Northwesterly Right-of- way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad for a distance of 77 feet more or less to the Northeasterly side of the existing sidewalk of N.E. 2nd Avenue; thence run Northeasterly side of the existing sidewalk of N.E. 2nd Avenue; thence run Northwesterly along the Northeasterly side of the existing sidewalk of N.E. 2nd Avenue for a distance of 74 feet, more or less, to the East line of the West 35.00 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of said Section 19; thence run Northerly, along the East line of the West 35.00 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of said Section 19, for a distance of 7 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning. PINE HEIGHTS PARK SHEET 24 Plat Dedication - That certain Public Park known as Pine Heights Park together with N.W. 16 Terrace and N.W. 16th Street, lying between N.W. 8th Court and N.W. 8th Avenue, and between Block B of Highland Park Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 13 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 10832 /3L/ ALLAPATTAH MINI PARK SHEET 24 Lot 43 in Blanton Park, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, at page 58, of the Public Records of Dade.County, Florida, and Lot 1, in Block 2 of Allapattah Manor, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 16, at page 6, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. BROWARD CIRCLE MINI PARK SHEET 24 Plat Dedication - That certain Public Park known as Broward Circle Park, lying between N.W. 8th Avenue and N.W. 8th Court, and N.W. 15th Street, in Highland Park subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 13, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. GROVE MINI PARK SHEET 24 Plat Dedication - A portion between lots 6 and 7 in block 5, Grove Park Subdivision, part of the W 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 lying South of the Miami River in Section 35 Township 53 South Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida. HIGHLAND CIRCLE MINI PARK SHEET 24 Plat Dedication - That certain Public Park known as Highland Park, lying between N.W. 8 Avenue and N.W. 8th Court, and on 13th Street, in Highland Park Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 13, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. SITE 16 PARK SHEET 25 Lot 4 Block 1 of Chula Vista Center Plat Book 120-42. SEWELL PARK SHEET 25 Lots A, B, C, D, E and F, of AMENDED PLAT OF LAWRENCE PARK, PB 7 at Page 140 and Lot 2, of ROYAL POINCIANA PARK, as shown on Plat of said ROYAL POINCIANA PARK, which plat is filed for record in Plat Book 6 at Page 19; also that tract of land lying North of and adjoining said Lot 2, and extending North to the Miami River, together with the reversionary rights in the streets or highways lying South and West of said Lot 2, and extending to the Miami River, the same being a part of the SE 1/4 of Section 34, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning on the Southwest bank of the Miami River at a point 9 chains and 48 links West of the East boundary of said Section 34, and running thence South on a line parallel to said East Boundary 486 feet, more or less to the North line on Boulevard a shown on said plat, 10832 which point is the Southeast corner of said Lot 2, as hereinabove referred to; thence run West along the North line of said Boulevard a distance of 3 chains and 16 links; thence North parallel with the boundary of said Section to the Miami River; thence Easterly, meandering the waters of said River to place of beginning, including all riparian rights and privileges. All of the above described land lies south of the Miami River. SHENANDOAH PARK SHEET 25 S 1/4 OF LOTS 7 and 8, Block 1, Marcellus Dearborn's Subdivision, Plat Book B, Page 26. I N 1/2 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 T54S R41E. N 1/2 of S 1/2 of Lot 7 and N 1/2 of S 1/2 of Lot 8, Block 1 Marcellus Dearborn's Subdivision, Plat Book B, Page 26. CURTIS PARK SHEET 25 All that part of the West Half (W 1/2) of the East Half (E 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 34, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, lying north of the Miami River, except the following: (1) the fifty (50) foot right of way of Northwest North River Drive, which has been conveyed to the City of Miami for street and highway purposes, (2) the north twenty (20) feet and the west twenty-five (25) feet of the tract first above described, which have been conveyed to the City of Miami for street and highway purposes, and (3) the tract conveyed to the City of Miami for river widening purposes as per deed in Deed Book 1487 at page 213, provided however, that all reversionary rights, title and interest in and to said excepted parcels are hereby transferred and conveyed to the grantee herein. Lots 17-18 and 19 Block 1 Washburn's Subdivision Plat Book 4 page 112. Lot 1 and North 30' Lot 2 and all Lots 4-5-6 and 7 Block 2 Washburn's Subdivision Plat book 4 page 112. Lot 21 Block 1 Washburn's Subdivision Plat Book 4 Page 112 is in name of Department of Water and Sewers, however, surface rights may be used for Park purposes. Lot 3 and the South twenty (20) feet of Lot 2, Block 2, of WASHBURN'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 112 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Lot "A" of WASHBURN'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 112 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 10832 /3,, Lot 20, Block 1, of WASHBURN'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat book 4 at Page 112 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. BRYAN PARK SHEET 25 Beginning at a point of the South line of that unnumbered block marked "Reserved" on the Plat of Bryan Park as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 69 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, said point being one hundred sixty and eight tenths (160.8') feet, more or less, West of the Southeast corner of said block; Thence run West along the South line of said block a distance of fifty-three and five tenths (53.5) feet, more or less to a point; Thence run north parallel to the east line of said block a distance of forty-two and three tenths (42.3) feets, more or less, to a point; Thence east parallel to the South line of said block a distance of fifty-three and five tenths (53.5) feet, more or less, to a point; Thence south parallel to the east line of said block a distance of forty-two and three tenths (42.3) feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. FERN ISLE PARK SHEET 25 N.W. corner N.W. 11th Street and 22nd Avenue Fern Isle south Fork Park PB 103-79 Tract A also described as: The portions of the east 1/4 and the west 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4, Section 34, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, lying south of the South Fork of the Miami River, and northeasterly of the northeasterly right-of-way line of the East-West Expressway, as recorded in Plat Book 81, at Page 83, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; the portions of Lots 1, 2, 3, in Block 47, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly right-of-way line of said East-West Expressway, and all of lots 1, 2, 3, portions of Lots 4, and 5, Block 50, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly right-of-way of said East-West Expressway, together with that portion of an unnamed street now known as N.W. 11th Terrace lying between said Blocks 47 and 50, RIVERSIDE FARMS AMENDED PLAT, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 88 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; All of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and portions of Lots 7, 8, 15, 14 and 13, Block 49, lying northeasterly of said East-West Expressway, together with the unnamed street now known as N.W. 12th Street lying within said Block 49, MERRICK'S SUBDIVISION OF RIVERSIDE FARMS, as recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 189, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and also that portion of Riverway Park, now known as N.W. 23rd Avenue as shown on said plats of RIVERSIDE FARMS AMENDED AND MERRICK'S SUBDIVISION OF RIVERSIDE FARMS. 10832 /3) CORAL GATE PARK Coral Gate Park, Plat Book 64, Page 24, Tract A. GRAPELAND HEIGHTS PARK SHEET 26 SHEET 27 The East 735 feet of the S.E. 1/4, N.E. 1/4 Section 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, less the East 35 feet, the North 30 feet and the South 45 feet thereof, for street purposes; also less the West 200 feet of the East 235 feet of the North 244 feet of the South 289 feet of the S.E., 1/4, S.E. 1/4, N.E. 1/4 Section 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East. MERRIE CHRISTMAS PARK SHEET 28 The west 1/2 of South 1/2 of North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 29, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, less the West 50 feet thereof for the right of way of LeJeune Road. ALSO A strip of land 51.9 feet in width lying South of the 30 foot street known as Avenue Barbarosa as shown on the Plat of ELEDA, as recorded in Plat Book 24 at Page 42, Less the East 337.74 feet thereof in the West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of he Southeast 1/4 of Section 29, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. ALSO DESCRIBED AS: A parcel of land described as a strip of land 51.09 feet, more or less, in width, and 639.32 feet in length lying South of a 30-foot wide Street, known as Barbarosa Avenue and lying North of and adjacent to Merrie Christmas Park, in Section 29, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida. MACEO PARK SHEET 28 1.74 AC PB 50-77 Semrocsa 4th REV and Amd. PL Tr 3 less S 5 ft. for Rd. Lot size 77, 101 ft. 2 .93 AC ML PB 28-10 W 100 Ft. of E 2304 ft. M/Lot Tr 2 S. SELY of Tamiai Canal & S of Comfort Canal less S 5 ft. 40,500 ft. 2 .98 AC ML PS 28-10 W 100 ft. of E 2204 ft. M/Lot Tr 2 Lygs & SELY of Tamiami Canal & S of Comfort Canal 43,250 ft. 2. ROBERT KING HIGH PARK SHEET 29 That part of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 lying South of the canal and West of the Florida East Coast Railroad Right-of-way and East of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Right-of-way and North of Flagler Street less street dedication Section 2 T54S R40E. That part of the NE 1/4 of Section 2 T54S R40E lying between the Seaboard Air Line Right-of-way and the Florida East Coast Railway Right-of-way and North of the North Bank of Tamiami Canal less street dedications. 10832 138 1-i FLAGAMI PARK SHEET 29 Lot B, Block 3, FLAGAMI FIRST ADDITION, Plat Book 17, page 66, dedicated to the use of the Public for park purposes. WEST END PARK SHEET 30 Lot 8 less the south 302.275' of T.R. Glass Subdivision Amended.4-76. FLAGLER MINI PARK SHEET 31 Plat Dedication - A portion of land in the Amended Plat.of Flagler Terrace a subdivision of the N.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida. KINLOCH PARK SHEET 32 Tract A corrected plat of KINLOCH MUNICIPAL PARK, PLAT BOOK 58, Page 7. GLENROYAL PARK SHEET 34 Part of Glenroyal subdivision. HENDERSON PARK SHEET 35 Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, Block G, of RIVERVIEW, Plat Book 5, Page 43. ERNESTO LECUONA PARK SHEET 35 A portion of Lots 16, 17 & 18, Block K of the plat RIVERVIEW, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, in Plat Book 5, page 43, subject property otherwise known as Riverside Baptist Church of Miami, Florida and more particularly described as follows: Commerce at the southeast corner of said Block K of RIVERVIEW, thence run north along the east lben of said Block K, for a distance of 140 feet to a point, thence run S89 50' 20" W along a line 140 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Block K, for a distance of 170.4 feet to the point of beginning of the hereinafter described tract of land; From said point of beginning run S890 50120" W along a line 140 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Block K for a distance of 89.50 feet to a point; thence run south a distance of 67 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left Saving as its elements a radius of 25 feet and a central angle of 90 09' 40", thence run southerly, southeasterly and easterly along the arc of said Surve for a distance of 39.34 feet to a point of tangency, thence run N89 50'20" E along a line 48 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Block K for a distance of 39.50 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the left having as its elements a radius of 25 feet and a central angle of 10832 i�� 890 50' 20", thence run easterly, northeasterly and northerly along the arc of said curve for a distance of 39.20 feet to a point of tangency, thence run north along a line 170.4 feet west of and parallel with the east line of said Block K for a distance of 67 feet to the point of beginning of the heretofore described tract of land. Containing 0.18 acres more or less; RIVERSIDE PARK SHEET 35 Block 23, South, of the City of Miami, according to the Plat of A.L. KNOWLTON Subdivision, and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court Dade County, Florida. Lot 1 to 20 inclusive. CUBAN MEMORIAL PLAZA PARK SHEET 35 Part of Lot 16 and part of R/W of 15 Avenue of Block 1 of SUBDIVISION AVOCADO PARK AMEND. BAYFRONT PARK SHEET 36 All that strip or parcel of upland and submerged land bounded as follows: On the North by the South boundary line of that Street of the City of Miami formerly known as Eighth Street, and now known as Northeast Fourth Street, if said boundary line were extended Eastward to the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the East by the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the South by the North boundary line of that Street of the City of Miami formerly known as Twelfth Street, now known as Flagler Street, if extended Eastward to the Channel of Biscayne Bay; and on the West by the East boundary line of that Street of the City of Miami formerly known as the Boulevard, and now known as North Bay Shore Drive: Also all that strip or parcel of upland and submerged land bounded as follows: On the North by the South boundary line of that Street of the City of Miami formerly known as Twelfth Street, and now known as Flagler Street, if extended to the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the East by the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the South by the South boundary line of that Street formerly known as Fourteenth Street, now known as Southeast Second Street, if extended Eastward to the channel of Biscayne Bay; and on the West by the East boundary line of that Street of the City of Miami formerly known as the Boulevard, now known as South Bay Shore Drive: Together with all riparian rights, submerged and filled lands, docks, wharves, franchises and leases and all other rights or easements thereunto belonging or appertaining, all lying and being within the corporate limits of the City of Miami, in the County of Dade, State of Florida. AND ALSO All that strip or parcel of upland and submerged land bounded as follows: On the north by the south line of that street of the City of Miami, 10832 I L/ C" formerly known as Sixth Street, now known as Northeast Sixth Stree, if extended eastward to the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the east by the channel of Biscayne Bay; on the South by the south line of that street of the City of Miami, formerly known as Eighth Street, now known as N.E. 4th Street, if extended Eastward to the channel of Biscayne Bay; in the west by the east boundary line of that sheet of the City of Miami formerly known as Boulevard, now known as North Bayshore Drive. LUMMUS PARK SHEET 36 Lummus Park of Miami, Plat Book 81, Page 23 - Tracts A and B. Beginning on the south bank of Little River at a point where the western boundary of Lot 12 of Oakland Grove recorded in Plat Book 5, page 30, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida intersects south bank of Little River, thence south along said western boundary of Lot 12, 178 feet plus or minus to the southeast corner of said Lot 12, thence east along the southern boundary of Lots 12, 13, 258.5 feet thence northeasterly on a circular curve whose radius is 25 feet, 39.27 feet to a point, thence north parallel to western boundary of Lot 12, 75 feet plus or minus to the south bank of Little River, thence northwesterly along the south bank of Little River 292 feet plus or minus to point of beginning. Also Lot 24 and the east 34 feet of Lots 22 and 23 of Oakland Grove as recorded in Plat Book 5, page 30, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. JOSE MARTI PARK SHEET 36 The South 1/2 of Lot 2B, less the North 20 feet thereof, all of Lots 3B, 4B, 5B, and 66, and all of Lots 1M, 2M, 3M, 4M, 5M, and 6M of RIVERSIDE WATERFRONTS, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 25 at page 72 of the public records of Dade County, Florida, together with all right, title and interest in and to all dedicated and/or platted but unopened streets, alleys or easements adjacent thereto. La`- 7B, 8B, 9B, 108, and 118 of RIVERSIDE WATERFRONTS, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 25 at Page 72 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, LESS: Begin at the most Northeasterly corner of said Lot 118, being at a point on U.S. Harbor line as shown on above described plat, thence South 87 56' 55" West, 139.83 feet along the lot line of said Lot 11B to the beginning of a curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 50 feet thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly 56.85 feet along said curvg through a central angle of 65 08' 42" to end of curve, thence North 26 54' 23" West 16.63 feet, thence North 21" 13' 45" East 137.92 feet to a point on said U.S. Harbor line being thS most Northwesterly corner of parcel described herein , thence South 32 49' 05" East 5 feet along said U.S. Harbor line, thence South 41 07' 04" East 214.41 feet along said U.S. Harbor line to point of beginning. ]10832 /y/ All of that part of S.W. South River Drive north of S.W. 4th Street and southeasterly of a line projected between a point at the most northerly corner of Lot 7-B and the northwest corner of Lot 8-8 all in Dade County, Florida as shown in the attached sketch of Plat Book 25, page 72. WALKER PARK SHEET 36 The west eight inches of the east 15 feet of Lot 6 of Block 123, north, of the City of Miami, according to a Plat recorded in Plat Book ".0" at page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The west 35 feet of Lot 6, in Block 123, Miami North, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B" at page 41 of.the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. FORT DALLAS PARK SHEET 36 FORT DALLAS PARK Plat Book 4-85 Lot 17, 18 and 19 BRICKELL PARK SHEET 37 Beginning at a concrete monument at the intersection of the East Line of Brickell Avenue with the Northerly line of S.E. Fifth Street, according to plat recorded in Plat Book 8, at page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: SIMPSON PARK SHEET 37 Described as Tract A, SIMPSON PARK, PB 82, PG 70 SOUTHSIDE PARK SHEET 37 Lots 1 through 5 and Lots 17 through 20, Block 85, Miami South Plat Book "B", Page 41. No. 2: Lots 6 and 7, Block 85 MIAMI HEIGHTS, Plat Book 5, Page 28. TRIANGLE PARK SHEET 37 Lots one 91), two 92), three (3), and four (4), of Block Eighty Two (82) Miami South, a Subdivision in Dade County, Florida, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. BRICKELL PLAZA MINI PARK SHEET 37 A portion of Lots 7 and 8, Block 72 South, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; then run Northeasterly along the Southeasterly boundary of said Lots 7 and 8 a distance of 103.66 feet to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 8; thence run Westerly along the North boundary of said Lot 8 a distance of 103.51 feet to a point, said point being 109.56 feet East of the West boundary of said Block 72 South; thence run Southerly over and across said Lots 7 and 8 along a line parallel to the West boundary of said Block 72 South a distance of 100.09 feet to the point of intersection with the South boundary of said Lot 7; thence run Easterly along the South boundary of said Lot 7 a distance of 76.28 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing an area of 9,000 square feet, more or less, AND: Lot 1, Block 73, SOUTH CITY OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the South 14 feet and the West 84.14 feet thereof. Containing an area of 3,000 square feet, more or less. GEN. MAXIMO GOMEZ PARK SHEET 38 Lot 16 less south 45 feet thereof, Block 1, Amended Plat of Avocado Park, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 6 8 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. DOUGLAS PARK SHEET 42 S.W. 1/4 of N.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4 Section 16 Tract 5, R 41 East less Right- of-way. MARJORIE STONEMAN PARK SHEET 44 Lots 8 and 9, South 4' of Lot 7 W.H. Snipes Subdivision, Plat Book 3, Page 107 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. WAINWRIGHT PARK SHEET 44 Lots 85 to 91, both inclusive, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Lots 92 and 93 in Block B Flagler, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Lots 94 and 95 in Block B Flagler, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 44 of the Pubic Records of Dade County, Florida. 10832 / '-13 STEELE PARK SHEET 44 Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, of Steele Park Sub a Subdivision according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 19, Page 27, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. KENNEDY PARK SHEET 45 All of lots 10, 11, 12, and 13, Block 43, of Amended Plat of NEW BISCAYNE, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and that land which is the extension of the above lots lying between the original shore line and the Dade County Bulkhead Line. All of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 43, of Amended Plat of NEW BISCAYNE, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and that land which is the extension of the above lots, lying between the original shore line and the Dade County Bulkhead line. All of that portion of Lot "0" of the ESTATE OF JOHN T. PEACOCK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 12 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida less the Northeasterly 25 feet thereof, which lies between the Southeasterly line of South Bay Shore Drive and the West shore line of Biscayne Bay, and that land which is the extension of said Lot "0" lying between the original shoreline and the Dade County Bulkhead Line. All of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 43, of the Amended Plat of NEW BISCAYNE, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and that land which is the extension of the above lots, lying between the original shoreline and the Dade County Bulkhead Line. Lots 14 and 15, Block 43, of SAMUEL RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book B, at page 16, of the Puuiic Records of Dade County, Florida; also, that strip of land which has been bulkheaded and filled in, which is bounded on the northwesterly side by the original shore line of Biscayne Bay, said shoreline being also the southeasterly line of said Lots 14 and 15, in Block 43, as shown on the plat aforesaid; bounded on the southwesterly side by the southwesterly line of said Lot 15, of Block 43, as shown on the plat aforesaid extended to the United States Harbor Line as now established; bounded on the southeasterly side by the United States Harbor Line as now established; and bounded on the northeasterly, southeasterly of the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive in the City of Miami, Florida, and the following described land abutting said land on the Southeasterly side thereof (heretofore conveyed from the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida to Martha Boyd Siekman by Deed Number 23930 (420-13) dated March 1, 1965 and filed in said public records on March 15, 1965 under Clerk's File No. 65R-39976) to wit: A tract of submerged land in Biscayne Bay in Section 22, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida, lying Southeasterly of Lot 25 10832 M and the Northeasterly 25 feet of Lot shhN12 between the Dade County Bulkhead own on the said plat of John T. particularly described as follows: "0" of the Estate of John T. Peacock Line and the mean high water line as Peacock, Dade County, Florida, more Commence at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22; thence North 87 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds East, along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the said Section 22, for a distance of 254.06 feet; thence South forty five degrees thirty one minutes fifty seven seconds East for a distance of 26.89 feet to a point on the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive as located through a portion of the Estate of John T. Peacock, Plat Book 2, Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and a point on a circular curve whose center bears South 45 degrees 31 minutes 57 seconds East from said point; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly right of way line of the said South Bayshore Drive and along the said circular curve having a radius of 2,892.36 feet through a central angle of 4 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds for an arc distance of 245.84 feet to a point on the Northeasterly line of Lot 25 of the said Estate of John T. Peacock; thence South 28 degrees 45 minutes 47 seconds East, along the Northeasterly line of the said Lot 25 for a distance of 200.00 feet, more or less, to the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay as the same is shown on the said Plat of the Estate of John T. Peacock and to the point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; thence south 32 degrees 8 minutes 5 seconds East for a distance of 710.50 feet to a point on the Dade County Bulkhead Line; thence South 60 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds West, along the said Dade County Bulkhead Line for a distance of 95.17 feet; thence North 34 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds West for a distance of 731.99 feet to the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay as the same is shown on the said Plat of the Estate of John T. Peacock, said point being located 25 feet Southwesterly from, as measured at right angles to, the Northeasterly line of Lot "0" of the said Plat of the Estate of John T. Peacock; thence Northeasterly, meandering the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay, as the same is shown on the said plat of Estate of John T. Peacock, for a distance of 128 feet, more or less to the Point of Beginning. Boundary of the said Lot 23 with the mean high water line as shown on the said plat of Estate of John T. Peacock, thence Northeasterly, meandering the mean high water line as shown on the said plat of Estate of John T. Peacock for distance of 100 feet, more or less, to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of the said Lot 23 and a point on the Southeasterly boundary of the said plat of Rockerman Heights; thence South 28 45°47" East along the prolongation Southeasterly of the Northeasterly boundary of the said Lot 23 and along the Southwesterly boundary of the said Rockerman Heights for a distance of 688.52 feet more or less, to the Point of Beginning. All that part of Lot 24 as exhibited on the Plat of JOHN T. PEACOCK ESTATE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, which lies Southeasterly of the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive, and the following described land abutting said land on the Southeasterly side thereof (heretofore conveyed from the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida to A.B. Thomas by deed 10832 �5 dated August 26, 1963, filed September 23, 1963, and recorded in Official Records Book 3832, at Page 559, of said public records) to wit: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida; thence North 87 30'13" East, along the North line of the Northeast 9uarter of said Section 22, for a distance of 254.06 feet; thence South 45 31'57" East for a distance of 26.89 feet to a point on the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive as located through a portion of the Estate of John T. Peacock, Plat Book 2, at Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and a point on a circular curve whose center bears South 45 degrees thirty one minutes 57 seconds East From said point; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive and along said circular curve having a radius of 2,892.36 feet through a central angle of 4 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds for an arc distance of 245.84 feet to a point on the Southwesterly line of Lot 24 of the said Estate of John T. Peacock; thence South 28 degrees 45 minutes 47 seconds East, along the Southwesterly line of the said Lot 24 for a distance of 200.0 feet to the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay as shown on the said Estate of John T. Peacock and the point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; thence South 32 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds East for a distance of 710.50 feet to a point on the Dade County Bulkhead Line; thence North 60 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds East along the bade County Bulkhead Line for a distance of 57.10 feet; thence North 30 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds West for a distance of 698.58 feet to'the intersection of the Northeasterly boundary of the said Lot 24 and the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay as shown on the said Estate of John T. Peacock; thence Southeasterly, Southwesterly and Northwesterly meandering the mean high water line of Biscayne Bay as shown on the said plat of the Estate of John T. Peacock for a distance of 168 feet more or less to the point of beginning. All that part of Lot 25 and the Northeasterly 25 feet of Lot "0" of the Estate of John T. Peacock according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, which lies side by the northeasterly line of Lot 14, Block 43, as shown on the plat ..foresaid extended Southeasterly to the United States Harbor line as now established; together with any and all riparian rights and water privileges appurtenant to said lands: SUBJECT to dedication of a strip of land four feet in width off of the northwesterly side of said Lots 14 and 15, Block 43 of aforesaid subdivision, which said four feet strip is dedicated to the City of Miami, Florida, by E.C. Stansel and Mary A. Stansel his wife, by deed dated April 27, 1926, recorded in Deed Book 954 at page 327, which dedication was for the purpose of widening South Bay Shore Drive. That part of Lot 23, lying Southerly of the South Bayshore Drive in JOHN T. PEACOCK SUBDIVISION, of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, and part of Government Lot 1 in Section 22, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; together with all riparian and littoral rights, AND the following described land abutting said land on the Southeasterly side thereof (heretofore conveyed from the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of 10832 .*�j the State of Florida to Carlton A Hunt by deed dated September 4, 1963, filed September 7, 1963, and recorded in Official Records Book 3839 at Page 233 of said public records) to -wit: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22; thence North 87 30'13" East, along the North line of the Northeast Quarter $f the said Section 22 for a distance of 254.06 feet; thence South 45 31'57" East for a distance of 26.89 feet to a point on the Southeasterly right-of-way line of South Bayshore Drive as located through a portion of the Estate of John T. Peacock, Plat Book 2, at Page 12, of the Public Records of Dade County Ylorida, and a point on the circular curve whose center bears South 45 31'57" East from said point; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly right-of-way line of the said South Bayshore Drive and along said circular curve having a radius of 2,892.36 feet through a central angle of 8 23'32" for an arc distance of 423.65 feet to the interesection thereof with the Northeasterly boundary line of Lot 23 of the said Estate of John T. Peacock and the Southwesterly line of the plat of Rockerman Heights, Plat Book 53, at Page 27, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence South 28°45'47" East, along the Northeasterly boundary of the said Lot 23 and its prolongation Southeasterly and along the Southwesterly boundary of the said Rockerman Heights for a distance of 938.52 feet to a point on the Dade County Bulkhead Line and the point of beginning of the tract of submerged lands herein described; thence South 60 21'30" West along the �ade County Bulkhead Line for a distance of 76.13 feet; thence North 30 43'18" West for a distance of 698.58 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the Southwesterly PICNIC ISLANDS PARK SHEET 45, 15, 14 Six parcels of sovereignty land din Biscayne Bay in Section 17, 18, 20, 29, 30 and 31 Township 53 South, Range 42 East. BLANCHE PARK SHEET 46 Lots 4 thru 10 Blanche Park Subdivision, Edward Pent Homestead. Thence run South 76039135" East, along the said Northerly line of said S.E. Fifth Street produce Easterly, for a distance of 233.52 feet to a concrete monument; Thence Northeasterly along the arc of a curve with a radius of 25.0 feet, through an arc 71004'3511, for a distance of 31.01 feet, to a concrete monument; Thence continue Northeasterly along tge acr of a reverse curve with a radius of 40.0 feet, through an arc of 122 23'40", for a distance of 85.45 feet, to a concrete monument; 10832 / / t 171 N Thence South 7603935" East, for a distance of 321.10 feet, to a point in the U.S. Harbor line along the West side of Biscayne Bay; Thence South S037119" West, along said Harbor Line, for a distance of 171.54 feet, to the Southeast corner of the tract herein described; Thence North 7603935" West, parallel with and 141.08 feet distant from the said Northerly line of said S.E. Fifth Street produced Easterly, for a distance of 670.29 feet, to a concrete monument in the Easterly line of Brickell Avenue; Thence North 13020'55" East, along said East, along said Easterly line of said Bricked Avenue for a distance of 141.08 feet, to the point of beginning. Excepting all that certain tract of land dedicated by Mary Brickeli for a burial ground, said dedication signed August 9, 1921, and filed for record January 27, 1923 and recorded in Deed Book 323, Page 298 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the said City of Miami, the grantee herein, hereby agrees to perpetually improve and keep up the said burial ground, consisting of that certain strip of ground in Block 103 South as per plat thereof made by P.L. Watson, recorded in Plat Book 8, page 93, in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herto that the said City of Miami relieves the Estate of Mary Brickell, deceased, from the duty of caring for the said private burial ground above described and agrees to forever hold in trust said burial ground for Mary Brickell, deceased, and the members of the Brickell family. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the said City of Miami, as grantee herein, is to bear all the expense of improving and beautifying said Brickell Park and burial ground agrees that sufficient money be administered in the perpetual care and upkeep of the place, parcle or part of ground so described and so dedicated as the burial ground of the said Mary Brickell, deceased. It is further understood and agreed that the City of Miami, the grantee herein, is to pass the proper ordinance of resolution dedicating this tract, same to be known as "BRICKELL PARK". It is further understood and agreed that if any of the provision above set forth are not carried out by the said City of Miami, the grantee herein, the title to the property hereby deeded from the said Maude E. Brickell, Belle G. Brickell and Alice A. Brickell, all fema soles to the said City of Miami, is to reinvest in the said parties of the first part, their heirs or assigns, and all right, title and interest in and to said property is hereby forfeited. 1'()8s,2 COCONUT GROVE MINI PARK SHEET 46 Frow Homestead Plat Book B-106, Block 28 West 1/2 lot 21 and all of lot 22. COCONUT GROVE TENNIS COURTS SHEET 46 Part of Lots 6 and 7, Lot 10 Edward Pent Homestead 4/45. A portion of land between Block 11 and 12 between 47th and 48 'street Bay Vista Park, a Subdivision of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 23, and the S.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 24, all in Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida. GRAND AVENUE PARK SHEET 47 Tract A of GRAND AVENUE PARK, Plat Book 58, page 27, less Beginning 92.04 feet East of N.W. corner of tract, continue East 188.10 feet southeasterly AD 34.44 feet northwesterly and westerly 213.89 feet to point of beginning. KIRK MUNROE PARK SHEET 46 Lots 1 through 4 and Lots 21 through 24, BLK 1 of CHARLES H. FROW SUBDIVISION PB 13, PG 53. LINCOLN PARK SHEET 46 Plat Dedication - A portion of land in Lincoln Manor, that same being a re -subdivision of the S 1/2 of Block of the Subdivision of Edward Pent Homestead as recorded in Plat Book A, Page 45 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also described as S 1/2 of N.W. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4, Section 21-54-41, Dade County, Florida. KEN MYER: PARK SHEET 46 Bay Vista Amended Subdivision 1/2 acre and a portion of land between blocks 7 and 8 and between 48 and 49 Street in Bay Vista Park a subdivision of S.E. 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 23, and SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 24 all in Township 53 South Range 41 East. VIRRICK PARK SHEET 46 Elizabeth Virrick Park, Plat Book 84, Page 33 Tract A. 10832 q 1/ W PEACOCK PARK SHEET 46 Coconut Grove Bayfront Park, Lots 14 through 32 LA MOREAUX'S SUBDIVISION, Sec. 21-T54S-R41E, Plat Book 6, page 100, together with all riparian rights and privileges and all submerged lands appurtenant or appertaining thereto except part deeded City of Miami on May 21, 1941 by Warranty Deed recorded in Deed Book 2170 at page 482, less however, the following described portion of said Lot 14: A strip of land off of the northeasterly side of Lot 14 of LA MOREAUX'S SUBDIVISION according to the amended plat as recorded in Plat'Book 6 on page 100, and bounded as follows: On the northeasterly side by the northeasterly side of Lot 14 as shown on said plat and as said boundary of Lot 14 might hereinafter by deflected to adjust riparian rights on Biscayne Bay; on the southwesterly side by a line 5' distant from the parallel'to the said northeasterly side of Lot 14, as shown on said plat; on the northwesterly side of Lot 14 heretofore conveyed to the City of Miami for street purposes. Northeasterly 5', Lots 14 and 16 of LA MOREAUX'S SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 6, page 100, less right-of-way. Lot 51 less street right-of-way and all of Lot 68 MCDONALD'S PLAT, Plat Book A, page 16. Lots 49 and 50, less right-of-way and all of Lots 69 and 70, MCDONALD'S PLAT, Plat Book A; page 16. Lot 2, also known as Tract 2, HOUSER'S SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 28, page 50, also described as all of Lots 40 to 48, inclusive, and all of Lots 71 to 78, inclusive, MCDONALD'S PLAT at Plat Book A, page 16, and beginning 18.5' W of the SE corner of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 21-T54S-R41E, N 37 50' W 85.49' to Ingraham Highway; thence southwesterly along said Highway to a point which is 112.05' northeasterly of the NW corner of Lot 48 of MCDONALD' PLAT, Plat Book A, page 16; thence E along the South line of the NE 1/4 of said Sec. 21 to the point of beginning and all that portion what was originally known as Front Street which is situated between Lots 71 to 78, inclusive upon the SE and Lots 40 to 48, inclusive, upon the NW said strip of land being bounded upon the SW by an extension of the boundary line which separates Lot 48 from Lot 49 to the point where the same will connect with the boundary which separates Lot 70 from Lot 71, and being bounded by the east by the section line a shown on MCDONALD'S PLAT, Plat Book A, page 16. Commencing at the SE corner of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 21-T54S-R41E, thence due W along the S line of the NE 1/4 of said Sec. 21 for a distance of 15' to the point of beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence continue due W along the S line of the NE 1/4 of said Sec. 21 for a distance of 5.29' to a point; thence N 37 30' 00" W for a distance of 115.60' to a 10832 [6 D concrete monument located 15' southeasterly from the center line of Rhodes Boulevard now South Boyshore Drive for a distance of 80.84' to a concrete monument, thence S 00 22' 30" W along a line parallel with and 15' W of the E line of the NE 1/4 of said Sec. 21 for a distance of 124.84' to the point of beginning. This same parcel of land being also described as a triangular shaped portion of Block 16 of Edward Pent Homestead, Plat Book 2, page 45 and described as bounded on the E by the W line of SW 27th Avenue, bounded on the northwesterly side by South Bayshore Drive bounded on the SW side of HOUSER'S SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 28, page 50. The following information has been included for reference and covers a portion of Southwest 27th Avenue extended to the harbor line: Beginning at the NE corner of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 21-T54S-R41E said point being also the NE corner of Tract 2 of HOUSER'S SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 28, page 50, thence W along the N line of said Tract 2, HOUSER'S SUBDIVISION said line being also the N line of said SE 1/4 of Sec. 21 a distance of 19.56' more or less, to a concrete monument marking an angle in the boundary of said Tract 2, thence with a deflection angle of 52 18' 00" to the right run NW along the northeasterly boundary of said Tract 2 a distance of 0.72' more or less, to a line parallel to and 20' W of the E line of said Sec. 21, thence S parallel to and 20' W of the E line of said Sec. 21 a distance of 76.57' more or less, tot he � riginal shore lien of Biscayne Bay, thence with a deflection angle of 12 55' more or less, to the left, run southeasterly a distance of 368.5' more or less, to the U.S. pierhead and Bulkhead Line, thence easterly along said U.S Pierhead and Bulkhead Line a distance of 20.35' more or less, to its intersection with a line parallel to and 20' northeasterly from the course above described as having a length of 36.5' more or less, to an intersection with E line of said Sec. 21, thence N along the E lien of said Sec. 21 a distance of 73.87' more or less, to the point of beginning. The purpose of this legal description is to release any reversionary interest reserved by the grantors in the certain special Warranty Deed dated April 25, 1931 filed October 2, 1931 under Clerk's File No. G-19295 in Deed Boug 1459, page 42. Tract 2 less northwesterly 30' thereof heretofore deeded to the City of Miami for street purposes and Tract 3, both as shown on Plat of S.E. Carver property, Plat Book 35, page 79, together with all riparian rights, water privileges and submerged lands appertaining to said property. That part of the following described property: Lying southeasterly of South Bayshore Drive as now located: Lot 2 less northeasterly 80' thereof and also less the southwesterly 11' thereof as shown on MUNROE'S PLAT of Government Lot 1 in Sec. 21-T54S-R41E and recorded in Deed Book D, page 253, together with all riparian rights, water privileges and submerged lands appertaining to said property. 10832 /5/ W That portion of the lying southeasterly Government Lot 1 in 253, together with lands appertaining t, southwesterly 11' of of Bayshore Drive Sec. 21-T54S-R41E as all riparian rights, 3 said property. Lot 2 and that portion of Lot 3 as shown on MUNROE'S PLAT of recorded in Deed Book D, page water privileges and submerged Beginning at a point on the northwesterly line of that tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber as shown by the plat showing the property of Sophie H. Kloeber, Plat Book 4, page 142, said point being 12Q' more or less, northeasterly from the most westerly corner of the said tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber being along the northeasterly line of the George A. Bogg's property and continuing along this line produced a distance of 381.62' to a point of intersection with the U.S. Pierhead and Bulkhead Line as established along the. westerly side of Biscayne Bay: thence with a deflection angle of 990 41' and 25" to the left, run northeasterly along said U.S. Pierhead and Bulkhead line as established along the westerly side of Biscayne Bay to a Point of intersection with the southeasterly production of the northeasterly line of said tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber being along the southwesterly line of the E.M. Hyzer property to the most northerly corner of said tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber: thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of that tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber to the point of beginning. Beginning at the most westerly corner of that tract of land marked Sophie h. Kloeber on the plat showing the property of Sophie H. Kloeber, Plat Book 4, page 142, said point of beginning being also on the southeasterly production of the northeasterly line of that tract of land marked John M. Hopkins Lot, Lake Placid Schook, Plat Book 6, page 152 thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of Business Street, now called South Bayshore Drive as shown by said plat, showing the property of Sophie H. Kloeber, a distance of 120' more or less, to the most westerly corner of the Kloeber property; thence with a deflection angle of 93 48' 08" to the right, run southeasterly line of the L.E. Kloeber property a distance of 381.62' more or less, to a point of intersection with the U.S. Pierhead and Bulkhead Line as established along th8 westerly side of Biscayne Bay, thence with a deflection angle of 80 18' 35" to the right, run southwesterly along said U.S. Pierhead and Bulkhead Line as established along the westerly side of Biscayne Bay a distance of 121.46' more or less, to the southeasterly production of the said southwesterly line of that tract o� land marked Sophie H. Kloeber, thence with a deflection angle of 99 41' 25" to the right, run northwesterly along the southeasterly production of the southwesterly line of said tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber, and along said southwesterly line of that tract of land marked Sophie H. Kloeber, said line also being the southeasterly production of the northeasterly line of said tract of land marked John M. Hopkins Lot, Lake Placid School, a distance of 394.10' more or less, to point of beginning. 108,12 /5� Cat#g Ulf �r�rmt SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP Director (10 February 19, 1991 Mr. B. Jack Osterholt, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140 Hollywood, FL 33021 Re: Second Transmittal of Amendment Application No. 90-11, to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Dear Mr. Osterholt: CESAR H. ODIO City Manager The City of Miami, on January 24, 1991, adopted Ordinance 10832 amending the Miami. Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP), Goals, Objectives and Policies. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, and the direction of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to provide you with one (1) set of these documents consisting of: - One (1) copy of MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies, showing proposed changes, (Attachment 90-11-2 A); - One (1) copy of MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies, as adopted, with changes made, (Attachment 90-11-2 B); - One (1) copy of MCNP Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinance 10832, as adopted, (Attachment 90-11-2 C), and; - One (1) copy of the support documents on which recommendations are based, (PZ-23, City Conrmi.ssion Meeting of January 24, 1991) (Attachment 90-11-2 D), including; Copy of the letter dated December 15, 1990, from Robert G. Nave, Director of Division of Resource Planning and Management of DCA to Xavier L. Suarez, Mayor of the City of Miami, transmitting the DCA Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, and; Page 1 of 2 Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailine Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami. FlnridA *41733-07nR Copy of the response of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department to the DCA Objections, Recommendations and CcmTents Report. If, in the 45 days review process, there are points that need clarification, you may contact Joseph McManus at (305) �;r9-6086. ly, Sergio Rqdriguez, D Planning Department SR/rl Attachments cc: Robert G. Nave, Director Division of Resource Planning and Management Matty Hirai, City Clerk Guillermo E. Olmedillo, Deputy Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Elbert L. Waters, Assistant Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner General Planning Robert Lavernia Zoning Code Administration Doc:[robert)<robert>transm/90-11 Page 2 of 2 (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) i t SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP ,. Director �a Hurl ntn \�•,'t� February 19, 1991 CESAR H. ODIO City Manager Mr. Ralph Hook, Community Programs Administrator -•-<-I tv ;.n Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) ~=C7-'y ca _ Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of Local Planning "' M 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re: Second Transmittal of Amendment Application No. 90-11, to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Dear Mr. Hook: The City of Miami., on January 24, 1991, adopted Ordinance 10832 amending the Miami. Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP). Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, I am pleased to provide you with four (4) sets of these documents consisting of: - One (1) copy of MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies, showing proposed changes, (Attachment 90-11-2 A); - One (1) copy of MCNP Goals, Objectives and Policies, as adopted, with changes made, (Attachment 90-11-2 B); - One (1) copy of MCNP Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinance 10832, as adopted, (Attachment 90-11-2 C), and; - One (1) copy of the support documents on which recommendations are based, (PZ-23, City Commission Meeting of January 24, 1991) (Attachment 90-11-2 D), including; Page 1 of 2 (� Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Copy of the letter dated December 15, 1990, from Robert G. Nave, Director of Division of Resource Planning and Management of -DCA to Xavier L. Suarez, Mayor of the City of Miami, transmitting the DCA Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, and; Copy of the response of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department to the DCA Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. As directed in Mr. Robert G. Nave's letter of December 15, 1990, which transmitted the Department of Community Affairs Objections, Recommendations, and Comments to the subject amendment, we are forwarding one (1) copy of these documents to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. If, in the 45 days review process, there are points that need clarification, you may contact Joseph McManus at (305) 579-6086. SR/rl Attachments cc:...,Matty=Hirai, City Clerk (letter only) Guillermo E. O]medillo, Deputy Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Elbert L. Waters, Assistant Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner (letter only) General Planning Robert Lavernia (letter only) Zoning Code Administration Doc:(robert]<robert>transm/90-11 Page 2 of 2 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department: April 18, 1990 PETITION 4a. Consideration of amending Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, by amending the Goals, Objectives and Policies of those elements pertaining to Future Land Use; Interpretation of Future Land Use Maps; Housing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection; Transportation; Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities; Parks, Recreation; and Open Space; Coastal Management; Natural Resource Conservation; Capital Improvements and Intergove,it ntal Coordination; by making substantive additions and deletions; technical and perfecting changes and updating dollar amounts and time frames. (Note: This item was continued from the PAB meeting of May 16, 1990. REQUEST To amend the text of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 by makin substantive additions and deletions; technical and perfecting changes and updating dollar amounts and time frames. RECOMMENDATION Approval. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND Section 163.3187 of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes 1987, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, states that amendments to the comprehensive plan may be made not more than twice a year ( with certain exceptions not applicable to this item ). The procedure for " amendment of an adopted plan shall be as for the original adoption". Comprehensive plans shall only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan. ANALYSIS Recommended changes to the text of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the MCNP occur mostly in the Future Land Use Element, especially the section titled Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map. Changes to this section introduce the "pyramid concept" of cumulative inclusion of 10832 permitted land use activities whereby subsequent land use categories implicitly permit those activities explicitly permitted in the previous categories. Proposed changes also serve to simplify and generalize policies , better allowing for citywide implementation. Finally, one level of service (LOSS standard is changed. The minimum LOS on limited access, arterial, and collector roadways, not within designated transportation corridors, is changed WE", where previously it had been "00, providing for increased development capacity. (See enclosed spiral bound report titled DRAFT TEXT AMU MENTS ) PLANNING ADVISORY SOM At its meeting of June 20, 1990, the Planning Advisory Board adapted Hasolution PAB 49-90 by a vote of 5-to 0 reco■ mooing a"roval of the above. CITY C At its meeting of June 28, 1990. the City OMMISSION Comission passed the above on First Heading. 10832 ''t MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookle Williams, who on lath says that she is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF ML49 Ordinance No. 10832, etc. In the ........ X. X. X......................... Court, was published In said newspaper In the Issues of February 21, 1991 Atflent further says that the said Miami Review Is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newapaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Dade County, Florida each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and Iras been entered as secon mall mailer at the post office In Miami In said Dad ounty Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the rst publ cation of the attached copy of advertisement and I nt furth r says that she has neither paid nor promised any per on, fir or eorporatlon any dfacouni, rebate, commission or fun for the urpose of securing this advertisement for pub Ic- n in the �ald newapaper. »S Y subacribed before me this 21st Feb • 91 ....... day of .....•..... ....., A.D. 19. .... . (SEAL) °OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL" CHERYL H. MARMER 14Y CO'r14. EXP. 4/12/92 r 1f D NIM/1M t�l��l101� A - L90AL NO` ICE All 'Inferested pereons `Will take notice thillt',6 the 24th day of January, i01, the, City. Commission of MIWI, Florida, Afttid the following titled ordinances: ORDINANCE NO.1082t AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF,; ORDINANCE NO. 10544, THE MIAMI COMPAb4EN$IVE NEIGH BORHOOD PLAN1989.2000, FOR THE BLOCK d(jU1NDE61Y,. SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET- AND A LINE 20 FEET SOUTH 'O#. AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE O>r SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET, BETWEEN`SOUTHWESt 42ND: AVENUE AND SOUTHWEST 43AD AVENUE, MIAMI,' ;FLOAlD_'A i (MORE PARTICULARLY,, DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY:CHANGINQ THE DESIGNATIOWOF,THE SUBJECTPROPERTY FROM; SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RESTRICTEDOOMMERCIAL( TO GENERAL -COMMERCIAL; MAKING �FINOINGS;' INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT .A COP,Y:OF THIS ORDINANCE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION: AND SEVERABILiTY, CLAUSE;: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 'ORDINANCE NO. 10828 " AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF SECTION 3509 OF ORDINANCE NO: 9500, AS AMENDED; THE.ZONING"' 1 ORDINANCE 'OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,, FLORIDA, BY: CHANQ ; ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM RS 212 ONE FAMILY DETACHED' RESIDENTIAL FOR LOT 25.LESS WES! F .LESS NORTH 20% LOTS'20.33 LESS NORTH`k':7RG-214 GEN. CR-3/7. F 1-6 `AND' 117 GENE 4201.99 14, v,. ,nua. , .. v,-. In— c.v�il�aa `"{^R' VVI'q IH11'g!rm!!i REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERA1314ITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE iV0:10829 AN .ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING•: ATLAS,OF"ORDI- NANCE N0010W AS AMENDED, THE.ZONINQ bRVINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA,. BY, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FR¢,M RA WITWSD412 OVERLAY'FOR:LOT: 26 LESS WEST;5':;AND LESS NORTH 20';' LOTS 26,33• LESS NORTH 20'; R•3- WITH .SD-12.OVERLAY FOR LOT'34, LESS` NORTH 20' AND 6.1-FOR LOTS 1.23 AND,LOT'24 LESS WEST 5' AND, LOTS 35-37 AND LOT 38 LESS NORTH2O', ALSG DESCRIBED AS ALL,OF.BLOCK 3, TRA'JUNE,-PARK'AS; 1 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, AT PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC J RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALL.TO,Cr2,.:AND BY; i MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY.CHANGES ON PAGE 00.,32 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI- SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, ORDINANCE NO..10830 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE: NO. 1*4, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE; NEIGH- BORHOOD PLAN.1,98e!2000, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED'AT: APPROXIMATELY 102.170 SOUTHWEST 7TW!STREtV'AND 701.721 SOUTHWEST 2ND AVENUE, MIAMI; FLORIDA (MORE: PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE DES• IGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; MAK(NG;FIND:,, INGS; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT,A' COPY::., OF THIS ORDINANCE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING,. A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE..± _ ?age I cf 2 C-3 Pa-P 2 of 2