HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-92-0609I
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT, CONCERNING THE
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT, A/K/A THE CITY OF MIAMI'S
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT
AREA PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 82-755 (MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN); AUTHORIZING
AN INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER;
INCORPORATING THE CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL BY REFERENCE INTO
THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER; APPROVING SAID
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND MAJOR USE
SPECIAL PERMIT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF
MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS OF THE INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT
ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", THE
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, AND THE
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH
FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW;
_ PROVIDING THAT THE INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT
ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND
SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL
OF CERTIFIED COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION AND
THE INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO
AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT AS
DESIGNATED HEREIN; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER
TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE
CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INCREMENT II
DEVELOPMENT ORDER; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1991, the City of Miami submitted a
complete Application for Development Approval for Increment II of
ATTACHMENTS)
CON'TAIRED
CITY COMMISSION,
MEETING OF
S E P 2 4 1992
Resolution No.
92- 609 .
flee
a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional
i
i Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1991), for the ongoing development
through the year 2007 for the area designated in 1982 by City
Commission Resolution No. 82-755, as the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Community Redevelopment Area, as legally described in the
.. Development Order attached hereto; and
t
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on September 16, 1992, Item No. 4, following an advertised
public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 27-92 by a nine to
zero (9-0) vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Increment II
Development Order, as amended, for the Southeast Overtown/Park
d West Community Redevelopment Area as attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, the City Commission
conducted an advertised public hearing pursuant to F.S. 380.06
(1991); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Application for
Development Approval, the report and recommendations of the South
Florida Regional Planning Council, and each element required to
be considered by F.S. 380.06 (19); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all
requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the
- issuance of the proposed Increment II Development Order had been
complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the
best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to
issue an Increment II Development Order as hereinafter set forth;
■
-2- 92- 609
0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
is OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
'i
Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are
made with respect to the Project as described in the Increment II
Development Order for the Southeast Overtown/park West Community
Redevelopment Area, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
made a part hereof by reference, and applicable to an area of the
City of Miami designated in 1982 by Resolution No. 82-755, as the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area, as
more particularly described in Exhibit "A".
H; Section 2. The Increment II Development Order for the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area,
(Exhibit "A"), is hereby granted and issued.
Section 3. It is hereby directed that certified copies of
this Resolution together with Exhibit "A" and copies of all
exhibits, attachments, and written materials, including portions
of ordinances referenced in the text of the Increment II
Development Order be immediately transmitted to: The Florida
Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning
and Management, Bureau of State Planning, 2740 Centerview Drive -
Rhyne Building, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 and The South Florida
Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140,
Hollywood, Florida 33021.
Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all
actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the
terms of the Increment II Development Order for the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area (Exhibit "A").
-3-
- 92- 609
Section 5. In the event that any portion or section of this
Resolution or the Increment II Development Order for the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area
(Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or
unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of
this Resolution or the Increment II Development Order for the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area
(Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. The effective date of this amended development
order shall be 45 days from transmittal of the development order
to the Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, and applicant; provided, however, that
if the development order is appealed, the development order will
take effect on the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or
resolved pursuant to Section 380.07(2) F.S.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of SeptAber/'1 , 1992.
_
i
AWES
MATTY HIRAI
'.
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
c�I
LIN KELLY KEAR
RV
p
Assisttant City Tttorney
LKK/pd/M3143
IER L.
Z
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
rnRRFrmNFcc•
-4- 92- 609
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION NO. 9-609
SEPTEMBER 24, 1992
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-PARK WEST
INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER
AND MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
Let it be known that pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida
Statutes,' the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has
considered in a public hearing held on September 24, 1992, the
issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for Increment II of the
Southeast Overtown-Park West development, pursuant to Zoning
Ordinance 11000 to be located in the City of Miami, boundaries of
which include N.W. 5th Street on the south, I-95 on the west, I-
395 on the north, and Biscayne Boulevard on the east
Beginning at a point at the intersection of
the center line of N.B. 5th Street; thence
west on the center line on N.E. 5th Street
(and N.W. 5th Street) to the east ROW line of
I-95; thence northwesterly on the east ROW
line of I-95 to the south RON line of I-395;
thence easterly on the south RON line of I-
395 to the center line of Biscayne Boulevard
to the point of beginning, comprising +�-
209.38 acres more or less; or
Blocks 2N, 3N, 4N, 5N, 6N, 7N, 14N, 15N, 17N,
18N, 19N, 20N, 21N, 22N, 23N, 24N, 25N, 34N,
35N, 36N, 37N, 38N, 39N, 40N, 41N, 42N, 43N,
44N, 45N, 55N, 56N, 57N, 58N, 59N, 60N, 61N,
62N, 65N, 65E, 66N, a portion of 27N, and all
existing street rights -of -way between said
blocks; Section 37, Township 53 South, Range
41 East, A.L. Knowlton Nap of Miami (B-41);
and Blocks 7, 81 9, 100, 19, 20, 21, portions
of blocks 6, 11, 16, and all existing street
- 1 -
92- 609
rights -of -way between said blocks; Section
36, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Alice
Baldwin, Jenny M., and Charles E. Oxar
Subdivision A-57 Amended (B-87); and Blocks
2, 8, 9, 10, 11, a portion of block 3, and
all existing street rights -of -way between
said blocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range
41 East, Sosts Subdivision (B-27); and Blocks
1, 8, and all existing street rights -of -way
between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53,
Range 41 East, Perry Division (B-163); and
Greyhound Center (77-98); Section 37,
Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L.
Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41); and Block 46N,
Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East,
G.G. Bolles (1-16); and Blocks 16N, 26N, and
all existing street rights -of -way between
said blocks; S37, Township 53, Range 41 East,
P.W. White Re -Subdivision (B-34); and Blocks
59N, 60N, and all existing street rights -of -
way between said blocks, Section 37, Township
53, Range 41 East, Miami South Half -Blocks
(1-185); and RTY SEC CORPS 3-172, J.A. Danns
Sub 7-36 Blocks C and D, Howard Johnson Sub
79-87, Jones Resub 3-1761, Section 37,
Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L.
Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41). (Further
described in the survey submitted pursuant to
the application for Major Use Special
Permit).
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO any
dedications, limitations, restrictions,
reservations or easements of record;
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Area
NAME OF DEVELOPER: The City of Miami
AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Herbert H. Bailey, Assistant City
Manager and Sergio Rodriguez, Assistant City Manager, or their
successors.
- 2 -
92- 609
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The project consists of development in the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area through
the year 2007, including the following land uses and increments
Land uses
Increment I
Increment II
Increment III Totals
(1988-1997)
(1992-1999)
(1999-2007)
Of f ice
(98f)
166,000
337,000
500,500
1,003,500
Commercial
(gsf)
950,400
71,700
90,600
257,700
Hotel
(rooms)
0
500
600
1,100
Residential
(units)
2,000
2,000
51000
9,000
Attractions
(seats)
80,000
8,000
0
160,000
Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1991), the Project specifies the
total amount of development planned for each land use category,
but provides flexibility for such development to be located
anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land
development regulations. The Project Area includes all property
within the boundaries of the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Area, designated in 1982 by City
Commission Resolution No. 82-755, as illustrated in Exhibit 1
attached.hereto and described in the legal description above.
E
DEFINITIONS: For purposes of this Development Order, the
following terms shall be defined as follows:
ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original
Application for Development Approval for Southeast Overtown/park
West filed by the City of Miami on February 6, 1987, pursuant to
F.S. 380.06 (1987).
CADA OR
Consolidated
Application
for Development
Approval:
The
revised
ADA prepared
pursuant to
paragraph 9
on page
15 herein.
Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or
partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307
of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development"
as defined herein.
City: The City of Miami, Florida.
Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council.
DERV: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental
Resources Management.
DRI: Development of Regional Impact.
Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included
within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage
or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats.
FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation.
- 4 -
92- 609
Maior Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City
Commission pursuant to Ordinance 11000, the zoning Ordinance of
the City of Miami, as amended.
Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which
will result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of
residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in
attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for
office, government office, retail/service, convention,
wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be
removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited
against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating
the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there
was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective
date of this Development Order for the land uses to be
demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning
Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land
use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour
vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective
date. of this Development Order a valid building permit or any
currently effective development order shall not be included as
Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net
New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in
floor area, if he finds that such development would have no
regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips.
- 5 -
92-r 609
Parcel of Lands Any quantity of land capable of being described
with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be
established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as
land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or
developed as a unit.
Projects That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on
Page 3 herein.
Proiect Area: The area included within the legal description on
page 1-2. (The area bounded by I-395, I-95 , N.W. 5th Street and
Biscayne Boulevard.)
Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development
for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms
and conditions of this Development Order, together with the
applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant
to F.S. 380.06(19) (1991), and which shall be measured by the
following land uses:
Office (sq. ft.) 337,000
Retail/Service (sq. ft.) 710,700
Hotel (rooms) 500
Residential (units) 2,000
Attractions (seats) 8,000
The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the
above described land use categories, provided that the regional
- 6 -
92- 609
G
impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse
regional impacts of the land uses in Increment II of the Project
as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle
trips.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and
adopted with respect to the Projects
A. The findings and determinations of fact set forth in the
recitals of the resolution to this Development Order are
hereby confirmed.
B. The real property which is the subject of this Development
Order is legally described above.
C. The City of Miami filed the ADA with the City, the Council,
and the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
D. The CADA has been filed by, the City of Miami pursuant to
F.S. 380.06(22) (1991) authorizing the City of Miami to
apply for development approval and receive a development
order for any or all of the area within its jurisdiction.
Individual developments are not identified or required to be
identified in the CADA. The Consolidated Application for
Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and
relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory
duties under Ch. 380 F.S. and local ordinances. Substantial
compliance with the representations contained in the
Application for Development Approval is a condition for
- 7 -
92- 609
0 0
approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the
City, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the
applicant, its successors, or assigns.
S. The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess probable
regional impacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable
Development in accordance with the general guidelines set
forth in this Development Order and the CADA. The concept
is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of high
intensity development and to focus the DRI review process
primarily on the impacts the Total Allowable Development
within the area will have on land, water, transportation,
environmental, community services, energy and other
resources and systems of regional significance. The CADA
seeks a single DRI review process for overall phased
development of the Southeast Overtown/Park west Community
Redevelopment Area rather than requiring each individual DRI
scale development within the downtown area to file for
separate DRI reviews.
F. Development within the Project Area is expected to continue
to be accomplished over an extended period of time by a
variety of developers, which may include the City. These
developers may respond to market demand and technologies
that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA is
intended to serve as a flexible guide to planned development
of the Project Area rather than a precise blueprint for its
development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b)
- 8 -
92- 609
G.
(1991), the CADA seeks master development approval for three
increments of development over a period of approximately
twenty years and specific development approval for Increment
II, which is the first phase of development projected for a
period of approximately five years. Subsequent incremental
applications may need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as
a living guide recognizing the evolution of market demand
and technologies.
The project entails the redevelopment of 209 acres of prime
real estate adjacent to the Miami Central Business District
for new residential, office and commercial activity. The
CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area
for the land uses, quantities and phases defined herein as
Total Allowable Development. As originally proposed in the
Master Development Order (Resolution 88-1101, Increment II
of the project (1994-1999) consisted of the following:
Element Area
Office (gross sq. ft.) 205,000
Retail/Service (gross sq. ft.) 37,300
Hotel (rooms) 500
Residential (units) 2,000
Convention (gross sq. ft.) 310,000
Pursuant to certain changes in market conditions and to the
proposed location of a performing arts center within the
boundaries of the DRI, the Master Development Order and the
Increment I Development Order are being amended concurrently
with this development order, to reflect the following land
use categories for the revised time frame 1992 to 1999:
- 9 -
92- 609
a
J
Element Area
Office (sq. ft.) 337,000
Retail/Service (sq. ft.) 71,700
Hotel (rooms) 500
Residential (units) 2,000
Attractions (seats) 8,000
The Master Development Order made provision for "the
simultaneous increases and decreases between the land use
categories (sic), provided that the regional impacts of the
land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional
impacts of the Project as originally approved, as measured
by total peak hour vehicle trips." The substitution of
additional commercial development and attractions
development for convention development does not exceed the
total trips generated by the original configuration proposed
by the Master Development Order.
H. The Project is not located in an area of critical state
concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 380 (1991).
I. A comprehensive review of the probable impacts that will be
generated by Increment II of the Project has been conducted
_ by various City departments, as reflected in the CAD, and
the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff.
J. This Development Order is consistent with the report and
recoaendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment
for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment
Area - Increment II", dated August 1992. The South Florida
- 10 -
92-- 609
Regional Planning Council recommends approval of Increment
Ii of the Project, and all conditions to which such approval
is subject are reflected herein.
�C. Increment II of the Project is consistent with the
applicable portion of the State land development plan and
the Regional Plan for South Florida.
L. Increment II of the Project is in conformity with the
adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan.
M. Increment II of the Project is in accord with the district
zoning classifications of 11000, as amended.
N. Increment II of the Project will have a favorable impact on
the economy of the City.
P. Increment II of the Project will efficiently use public
transportation facilities.
Q. Increment II of the Project will favorably affect the need
for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to
their places of employment.
R. Increment II of the Project will efficiently use necessary
public facilities.
S. Increment II of the Project will include adequate mitigative
measures to assure that it will not adversely effect the
environment and natural resources of the City.
T. Increment II of the Project will not adversely affect living
conditions in the City.
D. Increment II of the Project will not adversely affect public
safety.
92- 609
V. There is a public need for Increment II of the Project.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAWS
That, having made the findings of fact contained above, the
City Commission hereby concludes as a matter of law, the
followings
A. The City of Miami acting as a "downtown development
authority" as defined in F.S. 380 (1991). and is authorized
by F.S. 380 (1991) to make application for development
approval and receive a development order.
B. Increment II of the Project complies with the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the
orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and
complies with local land development regulations.
C. Increment II of the Project does not unreasonably interfere
with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State
land development plan applicable to the City of Miami and
the Regional Plan for South Florida.
D. . Increment II of the Project is consistent with the report
and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the
considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380 (1991).
E. Changes in Increment II of the Project which do not exceed
the Total Allowable Development or which do not result in a
net reduction of more than five percent (5%) in total
- 12 -
92 609
i
acreage zoned and developed as City parks, shall not
constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1991).
ACTION TAKEN:
That, having made the findings of fact and reached the
conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment
II of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following
conditions:
THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY
ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL
ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS OF
THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER
DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL:
1. Incorporate the following into the project design and
operation to minimize the cumulative adverse regional impact
of the project, its traffic and associated pollutant
emissions on air quality;
a. Actively encourage and promote ridesharing by
establishing a car and van pool information program;
b. Provide local and regional mass transit route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout
the project, including office complex lobbies and within
and adjacent to retail areas;
c. Encourage transit use by provision of bus shelters,
development of turnout lanes, or provision of other
amenities to increase ridership; and
d. Provide on -site bicycle storage facilities to encourage
use of alternative modes of transportation.
2. For the purposes of water conservation, utilize low water
use plumbing fixtures, self -closing and/or metered faucets,
and other water conserving devices.
- 13 -
92- 609
3. Incorporate the use of water sensors and other low water
volume landscape irrigation techniques to reduce the project
demand on the region's potable water supply.
4. Complete the construction of N.W. lot Avenue from N.W. loth
Street to N.W. 14th Street as a new four -lane divided
facility prior to a. or b. below, whichever occurs earlier.
a. The date when all the certificates of occupancy which
have been issued for Southeast Overtown/Park West -
Increment II will generate more than a total of 818 peak
hour trip ends, as estimated based on trip rates
identified in Exhibit 2 herein;
b. December 31, 1998.
In the event that by December 31, 1997, the necessary right-
of-way for the subject improvement has not been acquired,
then within 30 days, the Applicant shall request a meeting
with Council staff to consider potential reallocation of the
Applicants proportional share in the amount of $472,852
(1992 dollars). Any reallocation must be consistent with
applicable statutes and rules.
5. Comply with the requirements of Chapter 14, Section 14-71,
Code of the City of Miami, entitled Transportation Control
Measures, which sets forth the peak hour trip reduction and
reporting requirements for this project.
6. Conduct air quality modelling of carbon monoxide impacts.
The air quality modelling shall follow Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation guidelines and shall:
a. Be based on actual 1998 traffic counts for the
intersections listed in 6.b. below;
b. Include the following intersections: N.E. lot
Avenue/N.E. 5th Street; and, N.E. 2nd Avenue/N.E. 5th
Street; and,
c. Be submitted by June 30, 1999, in a detailed analysis to
FDER and DERM for comment and review, and to SFRPC for
review and approval.
7. If the results of the air quality modelling study, as
described in Condition 6, above, exceed 85 percent but less
than 100 percent of the State standard for CO
concentrations, submit by October 30, 1999, a detailed air
quality monitoring plan to FDER and DERM for review and
comment and SFRPC for review and approval. Pending approval
- 14 -
92- 609
�1
of the monitoring plan, withhold the issuance of any
building permits for net new development Within the subarea
that show exceedences of 85 percent of the CO standard.
B. If the results of the air quality modelling study, as
described in Condition 6, above, or any monitoring results
pursuant to Condition 7, above, exceed State standards for
CO concentrations, do one of the following:
a. Provide acceptable documentation which clearly indicates
that CO exceedences will not occur, or that the net
new
development seeking approval will not contribute to
the
predicted CO violation, or that any potential
CO
additions for each net new development have been
or
will be mitigated prior to issuance of building permits
for the particular net new development. This
documentation must be submitted to FDER and DERM
for
comment and review, and to the SFRPC for review
and
approval.
b. Withhold the issuance of any building permits for
net
new development within the subarea that shows
CO
exceedences.
9. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into
a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA)
and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council and one
copy to the Department of Community Affairs within 30 days
of the effective date of the development order. The CADA
shall be prepared as follows:
a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was
prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to
issuance of the development order, whether in response
to a formal statement of information needed or
otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be
replaced with revised pages.
b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date"
notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the
original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was
revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision.
10. Submit an annual report to the Council, and the Department
of Community Affairs on each anniversary date of the
effective date of the development order. The annual report
shall include, at a minimum, a complete response to each
question in Exhibit 3 (Annual Report).
11. Identify in the development order any approved development,
including the acreage attributable to each approved land
use, open space, areas of preservation, and green belts, and
- 15 -
92- 609
d
the structures and improvements to be placed on the
property, including locations, acreages, gross square
footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or
components of the development.
12. Establish the termination date for completing development as
December 31, 1999, provided that the applicant, its
successors, and assigns, complies with Condition 15, herein.
The termination date may only be modified in accordance with
Section 380.06(19)(c) F.S.
13. Establish an expiration date for the development order.
14. Establish the effective date of the development order as 45
days from transmittal of the development order to the
Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, and applicant; provided however that if
the development order is appealed, the development order
will take effect on the day after all appeals have been
withdrawn or resolved pursuant to Section 380.07(2) F.S.
15. Record, within 30 days of the effective date of the
development order, notice of the adoption of the development
order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court
pursuant to Section 380.06(15), F.S., specifying that the
development order runs with the land and is binding on the
applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or
severally.
16. Meet the following state criteria for issuance of a DRI
development order:
a. The development order shall specify:
(1) The name of the development.
(2) The authorized agent of the developer.
(3) The name of the developer.
(4 ) A statement that:
The Application for Development Approval (ADA) is
approved, or
The ADA is approved subject to conditions,
specifying the conditions, or
The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for
denial and changes in the development proposal, if
any, that would make it eligible to receive
development approval.
- 16 -
92- 609
b. Findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing
whether and the extent to which:
(1) The development unreasonably interferes with the
achievement of the objectives of an adopted state
land development plan applicable to the area; _
(2) The development is consistent with the local land
development regulations and the adopted local
comprehensive plan;
(3) The development will be consistent with the
recommendations of the Council DRI Assessment
pursuant to Section 380.06(14) F.S.; and
(4) The development makes "adequate provision for the
public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts
of the proposed development" or the City commits in
the development order to provide these facilities
consistent with the development schedule.
c. A legal description of the property including acreage.
17. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all
conditions of the development order and specify monitoring
procedures that, at a minimum, require development order
conditions to be reviewed by City of Miami prior to issuance
of any local development permit.
18. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development
Approval by reference into the development order as follows:
"The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is
incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the
parties in discharging their statutory duties under Ch. 380
F.S. and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the
representations contained in the Application for Development
Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or
modified by agreement among the City, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, and the applicant, its
successors, or assigns."
19. Incorporate into the development order by reference the
Council DRI Assessment for Southeast Overtown/Park West -
Master and Increment II.
20. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the development
order.
- 17 -
92- 609
EXHIBIT 1
MAP OF OVERTOWN BOUNDARIES
he t V t`tt WC1/Par�o)/Ves.,
N��h,N�st 14tt1 street
�4v,Qva
t.g5
City of Miami
EXHIBIT 2
TRIP GENERATION RATES
EXTERNAL p.m. PEAK -HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES
�l3ses
tig &tes
Office
0.9W1000 SF
Commercial
4 09/1000 SF
Hotel
0.4ZIRoom
Residential
0.235/DTJ
Attraction/Recreation
11.25/1000 Seats
SOURCE: ADA
92- 609
EXHIBIT 3
ANNUAL REPORT
FORM RPM-BSP-AJ;NUA1- REPORT-1
STATE OF FI.,ORI DA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, places the
responsibility on the developer of an approved development of
regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the
local government, the regional planning agency, the Department of
Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the
date specified in the development order. The failure of a
developer to submit the report on the date specified in the
development order may result in the temporary suspension of the
development order by the local government until the annual report
is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to
all developments of regional impact which have been approved
since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this
required report, call the DRI Planner at (904) 488-4925.
Send the original completed annual report to the designated
local government official stated in the development order with
one copy to each of the following:
a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction;
b) All affected permitting agencies;
c) Division of Resource Planning and Management
Bureau of State Planning
2740 Centeiview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
92-- 609
0
0
Format your Annual Status Report after the format example
provided below.
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reporting Period: to
Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year
Development:
Name of DRI
Location:
City County
Developer: Name:
Company Name
Address:
Street Location
City, State, Zip
1. Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of
development, phasing, or in the representations contained in
the Application for Development Approval since the Develop-
ment of Regional Impact received approval. Note any actions
(substantial deviation determinations) taken by local
government to address these changes.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit A a detailed description of each change and copies
of the modified site plan drawings. 'Exhibit A should also
address the following additional items if applicable:
a) Describe changes in the plan of development or
phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent
years;
b) State any known incremental DRI applications for
development approval or requests for a substantial
deviation determination that were filed in the reporting
year and to be filed during the next year;
92- 609
4k
c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a
development order or the subsequent modification of an
adopted development order that was recorded by the
developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15)(f), P.S.
2) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for
any portion of the development since the development order
was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted
a new Development of Regional Impact development order for
the project? Provide a copy of the order adopted by the
annexing local government.
3) Provide copies of any revised master plans; incremental site
plans, etc., not previously submitted.
Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences,
attach as Exhibit B.
4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed
and actually conducted for the reporting year as well as a
cumulative total of development proposed and actually
conducted to date.
Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve-
ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed,
barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit C.
5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other
than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate
entity or developer? if so, identify tract, its size, and
the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved.
Tract
Buyer
Note: if a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit D.
6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the
original Development of Regional Impact s�te subsequent to
issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its
size, and intended use on a site plan and map.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit E.
92- 609
7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which
have been obtained, applied for, or denied during this
reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and
duty for each.
NOTE: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit F.
8) Provide a list specifying each development order condition
and each developer commitment as contained in the ADA and
state how and when each condition or commitment has been
complied with during the annual report reporting period.
NOTE: Attach as Exhibit G.
9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the
development order to be included in the annual report.
10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been
sent copies of the annual report in conformance with
Subsections 380.06.(15)•and (18), F.S.
Person completing the questionnaire:
Title:
Representing:
9-9-- 669
PLANNING FACT SHEET PZw20
APPLICANT Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation: October 10, 1991
LOCATION Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). (Complete
legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Division).
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - - Beginning at a point at the intersection of the center line of N.E. 5th
Street and the center line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence west on the center
line of N.E. 5th Street (and N.W. 5th Street) to the east ROW line of I.95;
thence northwesterly on the east ROW line of I-95 to the south ROW line of
I-395; thence easterly on the south ROW line of I-395 to the center line of
Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly on the center line of Biscayne Boulevard
to the point of beginning, comprising +/- 209.38 acres, more or less.
PETITION Consideration of approving Increment II of the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Development of Regional Impact. In its entirety, the Phase I redevelopment
program will have included the construction of 2,000 residential dwelling
units, 166,000 square feet of office space, 95,400 square feet of commercial
space, 8,000 attractions seats, and a sports arena (approved under separate
ORI). The Phase I development program is anticipated to occur between 1988
and 1997. The Phase II development program (1992-1999), under consideration
in this item, includes the provision of 2,000 additional residential dwelling
units, 337,000 square feet of office space, 71,700 square feet of commercial
space, 500 hotel rooms and 8,000 attractions seats. The attractions land use.
(in Phases I and II) may include a museum theater, cruise port -related `
activities, specialty exhibits, performing arts center, theme entertainment,
and institutional/educational uses. Phase II (1999-2007) is proposed to
include 5,000 residential dwelling units, 500,500 square feet of office
space, 90,600 square feet of commercial space and 600 hotel rooms. When all
phases have been completed the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Project is intended to transform a presently blighted,
under-utilized land area into a socially and economically integrated
community.
PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval
BACKGROUND AND Representing the culmination of a ten-year planning process by both the City
ANALYSIS of Miami and Dade County, the general redevelopment concept for the project
is directed toward the provision of a wide range of housing opportunities for
moderate income families (S15,000-550,000 annual family income) within a
downtown settino. Also, incorporated in the development plan is the
provision of support services necessary to serve the area's future
population. In conformance with the SEOPW Community Redevelopment Plan
(adopted by both the Miami City Commission Res. No. 82-755, and the Board of
County Commissioners Res. No. 1677-82), the role of the public sector will
not be to undertake specific building programs but rather to facilitate
overall development using a variety of positive investment incentives
including special zoning designations, public land acquisition, financial
subsidies and the provision of new public facilities and amenities. The City
of Miami has initiated the redevelopment effort with a Phase I development
surrounding the Overtown Metrorail Transit Station. Nine development parcels
(or city blocks) have been acquired and developers have been selected. To
date, Stage 1 of the Phase I redevelopment program has included the
construction of 857 residential dwelling units, 18,000 square feet of
commercial space, a 16,500-seat sports arena, a pedestrian mall and the
acquisition of properties for the Historic Overtown Folklife Village. 609
191-
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD: Meeting scheduled for September 16, 1992.
'40 141,;11
South 0 5 72
1=lorida :
Regional 024.
1' 2: 59
Planning
Council
August 4,1992
-'The Honorable Xavier Suarez
Mayor, City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear Mayor Suarez:
The South Florida Regional Planning Council has adopted the enclosed Southeast Overtown/Park
West Increment 11 Development of Regional Impact and forwarded copies to the Department of
Community Affairs and other reviewing entities. This report is provided for your use in reviewing
the project and preparing a development order.
While the staff of the Council is available to assist in resolving any matter regarding this report, the
Council has no legal mechanism through which it can act on this report again, except through
appeal procedures.
Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code, set criteria for
development orders. Please review these criteria, as well as the enclosed Council
recommendations, carefully -prior to issuing a development order for this project.
Copies of any development order issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the
Council and the Department of Community Affairs, which have 45 days thereafter to make an
appeal decision.
If we can be of further assistance, please call.
Sincerely,Al
Carolyn A Dekle
Executivepirector
CAD/kc
Enclosure j
cc: See attached list
609
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140, Hollywood, Florida 33021
Broward (305) 961-2999, Dade (305) 620-4266, FAX (30. ' 96i-0322
414
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMWNI i e REt3F_VeL(JM&W MACT
t
Pegs I of ,,
Linda McCarthy
Plorida. Dept of Environmental Regulation
19M S. Congress Ave., Suite A
West Palm Beach, lL 33406
Mr. Joseph W. McManus
City of Miami Planning Dept.
275 N.W. 2nd St.
Miami, FL 33128
Mr. Jim Golden
South Florida Water Management District
P. O. Box 24680
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680
David Trimble
Department of Natural Resources
3900 Commonwealth Blvd.
Mail Station 45
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Mr. Matthew Schwartz, Director
City of Miami Downtown Development Auth.
1 Biscayne Tower, Suite 1818
Miami, FL 33131
Mr. Herbert Bailey
Assistant City Manager
Overtown Park West project
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, FL 33233-0708
Mr. Reginald Waiters, Director
Dade County Planning Dept.
III N.W. Ist St., Room 1220
Miami, FL 33128
Mr. Walter Herndon, Jr.
Dade County Public Works Dept.
III N.W. Ist St., 14th floor
Miami, FL 33128
Mr. Bruce Offord
Fla. Dept. of Environmental Regulatior
1900 So.. Congress Ave., Suite A
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Mr. Rick Poley
Dade County Environmental Resources
Management
III N.W. Ist St., 13th floor
Miami, FL 33128
. 92- 609
S
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK 'WEST COMMUN 1 TY RLUty rLUt+MhN 1 h'KUJ h61 raQO 4 Ut Ot
Ms. Wynelle Wilson
Fla. Dept. of Commerce
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Tallahassee, FI 32301
Mr. George W. Percy, Director
Div.'of Historical Resources and
State Historic Preservation Officer
Florida Dept. of State
R.A. Gray Bldg.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250
Mr. Joaquin Avino, Manager
Metropolitan Dade County
111 N.W. 1st Street
Miami, FL 33128
Mr. Lee Rawlinson, Coordinator
Dade County Developmental Impact
Committee
111 N.W. Ist St.
Miami, FL 33128
i
i+
Mr. Servando Parapar
Florida Department of
Transportation
I; 602 South Miami Ave.
i€ Miami, Florida 33130
i
i
Mr. Ray Fernald
Fla. Came 8 Fresh Water Fish Commission
110 43rd Ave. S.W.
Vero Beach, FL 52962
Mr. Jim Snyder
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Robert Sechen, Esquire
Blackwell, Walker, et al.
2400 Amerifirst Bldg.
One S.E. 3rd Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
Mr. Mark Yanno.
U.S. Fish 8 Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 2676
Vero Beach, FL 32961-2676
Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department
City of Miami
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, FL 33233-0708
SOUTHEAST WgRTOWN/PARK 6$ WBB!x OOMNNNITY REDMLOPMM'T PJW9CT Mot 3 of 3
Mr. Reginald Barker, AICP
P.O. Box 1719
Alachua, VL 32615-1719
Ms. Sabrina gouie
Project Manager
Overtown Park nest Project
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, rL 33233-0708
i
South
Florida'
Regional
Planning
Council
AGENDA ITEM #5a
MEMORANDUM
Date: AUGUST3,1992
To: COUNCIL. MEMBERS
From: STAFF
Subject: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST - INCREMENT II - CITY OF MIAMI
41 Location:
010 7/ RT b
t
MW 71 ST
Nw. U ST
I
Nw 6{ tT
.ia
IV Is sT
CORAL WAY
N
I/
M
p
!
«
GIRD AVE
GRAND AVE
4
►OINCIANA AVE
GINNER KEY
MARDEC AVE
SITE
tW
.'vENCYUN �
CAUSEWAY <
u
�c H
'
tm
R . �j
a4jA4'
RICKENOACKER�,
CAUSEWAYVIRGINIA -. 1� •! II
i /
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140, Hollywood, Florida 33021 _ 609
_ Braward (305) 961-2999, Dade (305) 620-4266, FAX (305) 961-032292
k
I
11
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
FOR
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST - INCREMENT 11
Located in the City of Miami
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
August, 1992
fLIST OF FIGURES ................ ......................................................................................................................... i
LISTOF TABLES..........................................................................................................................................0
LISTOF FJCHIBITS.....................................................................................................................................ui
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................1
PARTI.
PROJECT DESCREMON............................................................................................ 2
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION.............................................................................2
B. PROJECT INFORMATION..................................................................................2
PART II.
PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES............................................................................. 6
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ........................................... 6
B. ECONOMY..............................................................................................................6
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES............................................................................................11
D. TRANSPORTATION...........................................................................................12
PART III.
COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES.....................................16
PART IV.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SOUTH
26
FLORIDA.......................................................................................................................
PART V.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................27
UST OF FIGURES
Fiore N o. Title Lage
1 Project Location ........................................................................................................ I ..... 3
2 Master Development Plan ......................................................................................... —4
3 Traffic Impact Area ....................................................................................................... 15
I
92- 609
LIST OP TABLES
'Title
ra e
Table No.
1
Proposed Development................................................................................................
3
2
Project Costs....................................................................................................................7
8
3
Permanent Employment Impacts...............................................................................
4
Direct Fiscal Impacts....................................................................................................10
5
Summary of Affordable Housing Needs.................................................................11
6
Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste.......................................................................12
—
7
Project Trip Generation...............................................................................................14
8
Recommended Transportation Improvements......................................................14
�2- 63
;i
LIST OF EXHIBITS
c 'bit No. Title Lase
1 Trip Generation Rates................................................................................................. 31
2 Annual Status Report.................................................................................................. 32
INTRODUCTION
This assessment of the proposed Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as Southeast
Overtown/Park West - Increment It has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning
Council, as required by the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act.
The assessment is based on information supplied by City of Miami staff, state, federal and regional
agencies, official plans, consultants, and field inspection. Additional research; relative to specific -
issues was conducted by Council staff where needed.
In accordance with the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the positive and negative
impacts likely to result from the proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the City
Commission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of
regional, in addition to local, impacts and issues.
Copies of any development order issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the
South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
/ 2/ 92- 609
PART I- PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Project Name: Southeast Overtown/Park West - Increment II
Applicant: City of Miami
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
Date of Acceptance of Application: June 17,1992
Date of Receipt of Local Public Hearing Notice: June 25,1992
Deadline of Council Action: August 13,1992
Date of Local Public Hearing: September 24,1992
Type of Development: Mixed Use
Location of Development: City of Miami
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
The City of Miami has undertaken a Development of Regional Impact for a portion of the
City pursuant to s. 380.06(22), F.S. The City of Miami, acting as a Downtown Development
Authority pursuant to s. 380.031(5) as the Applicant, has proposed to have the Southeast
Overtown/Park West DRI be reviewed as a Master/Incremental development pursuant to s.
380.06(21), F.S., and Rule 9J-2.028, F.A.C., which states the following:
If a proposed development is planned for development over an extended
period of time, the developer may seek to follow an alternative DRI review
procedure by filing an application for master development approval of the
project and agreeing to present subsequent increments of the development for
preconstruction review.
It is further stipulated in s. 380.06(21), F.S., that the development order for a master
application for development approval (ADA) shall specify the information which must be
submitted with an Incremental ADA and shall specify those issues which can result in the
denial of an incremental ADA.
The recommendations contained in this impact assessment report deal with those issues
which are specified for preconstruction review for incremental ADAs in the Southeast
Overtown/Park West - Master Impact Assessment Report. Those issues recommended to be
part of the Southeast Overtown/Park West - Increment IT development order will be
discussed in the body of this report. Other issues which cover the entire Southeast
Overtown/Park West development have been discussed in the Southeast Overtown/Park
West - Master Impact Assessment Report (January 4,1988).
2 92-- 609
The Southeast Overtown/Park West development is proposed for a 209-acre site bounded by
I-395 on the north, NE and NW 5th Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east, and
I-95 on the west (Figure 1).
Implementation of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Master Development Plan (Figure 2)
has been separated into three phases spanning the period 1986 - 2005. The first phase of
development, Increment I (1986 - 1992), is currently under construction. Increment 11
represents the second phase of construction proposed for implementation during the period
1992 - 1999. Increment III is the third and final phase of development proposed for
construction during the period 1999 - 2005. The amount of development proposed for
Increment II (the subject of this application) is shown in Table 1.
Office
Increment (Sq. Ft.)
R (1992 -1999) 337,000
SOURCE: ADA
TABLE I
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Commercial Hotel Residential
S . Ft.(Rooms) (D.U.)
71,700 500 21000
Attraction
Seats
E
NA�
La►�i
SOUTH
FLORIDA
REGK)NAL
PLANNING
COUNCIL
W
W
d
3
WW
N
w,
NW T9 ST
1
NW TI ST I
N W, 62
d 1
NW 54 ST' N I
NW 48
I
NW 36 ST--.r��}•�
JULtA 1
CAUSE
NORTH BAY.
CAUSEWAY
_ '4� "--•-- - _.. ..mot. �
3 =�
ty
1� J�• Q
1 m
W
a
NW T
B'
SW 16 $TV -
N
.4 on
CORAL WAY ti
3
BIRD AVE
GRAND AVE
POINCIANA AVE
HARDEE AVE-
Source: ADA
NW
i
1 t i W
VENETIAN Y
r� • CAUSEWAY IC
_
S W
i ST
`'�.
•
�••� Op
�f •
will,
rrI .,
N•
r•
A'
•
RICKEN13ACKER j` `•• iC~ i
�.
CAUSEWAY
4
!-""'' VIRGINIA KEY
d DINNER KEY i
•
i
...-...—.—...-...-...-....-.......-..
PROJECT LOCATION
92- 603
Y
_ O O 0 C
i► F
&no r n w
0 1/2 I IC
SCALE
FIGURE
1
='--)
., M.
i0
...
SOUTH
FLORIDA
REGIONAL
PLANNING
COUNCIL
RTSICC1tttAt
,.... "=Un wmr" mntRitAL
RISI pwt ALo4mIcRmoK"=
,. RODCRA"IMtOM O[tW C"EltCIAL
RCS[pOITtALdLCIGN!lORNOyO
"malTVMICA IOU"
WIoWIm C2"NITT CDMCRCIAL
t�►,►JJJJj,{ RICH WASITT RtSIUMIAL-
� NOaUJUMICM WSITT CD"ITT W4(tl
HIGH omsm
C� CLXTRAI. Rr.ISUBS OtSTRICT
Ca:aia=.•� wt%AL WM UCIAL
TRARS}ORTATIOL
►ARl1 LTO S►AM
T� INSTIWTIDMLL
Spmm =
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAT'*!
Sowce: ADA
92-- 609
FIGURE
2
L00IIII 1ALE
PART It,- PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Summary
Impacts of the proposed development on the environment and natural resources were
addressed in the Southeast Overtown/I'ark West - Master Impact Assessment Report
Qanuwy 4, 1988). The exception to this is air quality impacts which are addressed
below.
2. Air Guaft
The Applicant has submitted an air quality analysis for Increments I and II as required
by Increment I development order conditions. The Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation (FDER), Dade County Department of Environmental
Resources Management (DERIVI), and Council staff have reviewed the study.
The results of the study show that under normal conditions no exceedences of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Carbon Monoxide (CO) will
occur at Increment II buildout (1999). However, modeling of the worst case scenario
(i.e. worst case temperature, wind speed and direction, etc.) indicates that two
intersections; NE 1 Avenue/NE 5 Street and NE 2 Avenue/NE 5 Street, will potentially
exceed 85 percent of the NAAQS.
Due to the possibility that air quality exceedences might occur, it is recommended that
the Applicant perform air quality modelling in the later stage of development of
Increment II utilizing conditions existing at that time. The purpose of this modelling
will be to determine if an air quality mitigation program is needed. In the event that
mitigation program is needed, an air quality abatement program will be established.
Conditions 6 through 8 in Part V of this report address air quality modelling and
potential mitigation.
B. ECONOMY
1. Project Costs
The applicant estimates a total project cost of $1.28 billion, for residential and non-
residential development spread across three phases. Increment 11, which would begin
in 1992 and conclude in the year 1999, would cost $399.3 million, accounting for 31
percent of overall project costs. Approximately 81 percent of expenditures in
Increment II are expected to be spent in the Region, as shown in Table 2.
17
92- 609
6
0
3
M
TABLE 2
PROJECT COSTS (thousands of 1991 dollars)
Increment Il
Overall Project
Increment
Spent
% Spent
Project
Spent
% Spent
Item
Costs
In Region
In Region
Costs
In Region
In Region
Land
71,793
71,793
100
139,590
139,590
100
Labor
87,344
87,344
100
305,338
305,338
100
Materials
203,802
142,662
70
712,455
498,719
70
Interest
26,203
18,342
70
91,601
64,121
70
Prelim. Plan.
10,190
51095
50
35.623
50
TOTAL
399,332
325,236
81
1,284,607
1,025,579
80
SOURCE: ADA
The applicant projects a need for approximately 4,144 construction employee man-years
during the eight -year build -out period for Increment U. Although no estimates have been
carried out to this effect, it is reasonable to suppose that the induced effects from the jobs
created during the construction period, and the resulting increased income in the region,
would have an impact which is somewhat larger than that estimated for the direct project
cost.
2. Permanent Employment
The applicant states that a total of 2,350 new permanent jobs will have been filled as a
result of the non-residential development proposed for Increment 11, by its completion in
the year 1999. Council staff estimates that 1,650 employees (70 percent of the Increment II
total) will constitute direct new jobs in the region.
These projected new permanent jobs, organized by SIC code, were introduced into the
Regional Science Research Institute (RSRI) regional input-output model, which produces
an estimate of the overall annual impact of the project on employment, the value of
output, wages and value added for each county in the South Florida region. The totals
take into account both the direct and indirect impacts which new jobs and new income
have on the local economy (Table 3).
The results of the simulation indicate that the permanent new employment (which does
not include jobs created during the construction phases of the project) could generate a
total of up to 2,926 new jobs in the region, with 408, 2,491 and 27 in Broward, Dade and
Monroe counties, respectively. This employment is estimated to generate approximately
$38.5 million (in 1982 dollars) in total annual wages. The average wage of $13,164 (in 1982
dollars) is above average when compared to other projects evaluated by Council staff, and
reflects the applicant's proposal to attract a mix of financial, real estate, legal, medical and
other professional activities, in addition to a modest amount of hotel and commercial
development, to the site. The non-residential component of the project, by its direct and
indirect effects, could add as much as $102.9 million in value added to the regional
economy each year.
92- 609
TABLE 3
ALLOCATION OF REGIONAL EFFECTS AMONG
CONSTITUENT COUNTIES
A. EMPLOYMENT (IN JOBS; NOT NECESSARILY FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS)
SO. FLA.
PALM
BROWARD
DADE
MONROE
REGION
BEACH
AGRICULTURE
3.6
4.4
.1
8.1
3.8
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH
2.3
2.8
.2
5.2
2.4
MINING
.4
1.0
.0
1.4
.1
CONSTRUCTION
50.9
73.1
3.7
127.7
29.9
MANUFACTURING
13.5
42.4
.1
56.1
5.4
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES
6.6
62.7
.7
69.9
7.4
WHOLESALE
9.8
55.5
.9
.66.2
8.4
RETAIL TRADE
132.1
311.6
9.8
453.5
66.4
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE
48.2
887.2
2.1
937.4
26.4
SERVICES
135.5
1037.6
8.9
1182.0
75.9
GOVERNMENT
5.4
12.6
.3
18.3
3.0
ADMIN. AUXILIARY
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTAL
408.2
2490.9
26.8
2925.9
229.1
B. VALUE OF OUTPUT (IN THOUSANDS OF
1982 DOLLARS)
SO. FLA.
PALM
BROWARD
DADE
MONROE
REGION
BEACH
AGRICULTURE
103.1
141.7
2.4
247.3
114.7
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH
56.0
76.9
3.4
136.2
63.0
MINING
29.4
72.1
.0
101.6
6.2
CONSTRUCTION
1217.2
1747.7
58.8
3023.7
673.7
MANUFACTURING
931.2
2303.2
4.7
3239.2
344.6
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES
362.1
5558.0
30.8
5950.8
509.3
WHOLESALE
366.0
2074.0
15.2
2455.2
269.5
RETAIL TRADE
2614.3
6341.9
159.4
9115.5
1306.7
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE
3822.6
80572.8
112.3
84507.7
2016.9
SERVICES
3661.2
30308.4
157.6
34127.2
1917.7
GOVERNMENT
178.8
467.4
7.3
653.5
95.9
ADMIN. AUXILIARY
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTAL 13341.8 129664.1 552.0 143558.0 7318.1
C. TOTAL WAGES (IN THOUSANDS OF 1982 DOLLARS)
SO. FLA.
PALM
BROWARD
DADE
MONROE
REGION
BEACH
AGRICULTURE
26.6
36.5
.6
63.8
29.6
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH
19.3
26.5
1.2
46.9
21.7
MINING
6.3
15.4
.0
21.7
1.3
CONSTRUCTION
802.8
1152.7
38.8
1994.3
444.3
MANUFACTURING
198.3
490.5
1.0
689.8
73.4
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES
76.0
1166.4
6.5
1248.8
106.9
WHOLESALE
156.6
887.4
6.5
1050.6
115.3
RETAIL TRADE
1092.1
2616.8
66.6
3775.4
545.8
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE
662.3
14875.7
19.5
15557.4
349.4
SERVICES
1336.1
12421.4
57.5
13815.0
699.8
GOVERNMENT
69.2
180.8
2.8
252.8
37.1
ADMIN. AUXILIARY
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTAL
4445.4
33870.1
201.0
38516.6
2424.7
l�
8 92- 609
` D. VALUE ADDED (IN THOUSANDS OF 1982
DOLLARS)
SO. FLA,
PALM
BROWARD
DADE
MONROE
REGION
BEACH
AGRICULTURE
58.5
80.4
1.4
140.3
6S.1
AGRI. SERV., FORESTRY, & FISH
27.9
38.3
1.7
67.8
31.4
MINING
18.6
45.5
.0
64.0
3.9
CONSTRUCTION
943.4
1354.5
45.6
2343.5
522.1
MANUFACTURING
312.1
771.9
1.6
1085.6
115.5
TRANSPORT. & PUBLIC UTILITIES
186.4
2860.7
15.8
3042.9
262.1
WHOLESALE
258.9
1467.2
10.8
1736.9
190.7
RETAIL TRADE
1732.2
4157.8
105.6
5995.6
865.8
FINANCE, INS., & REAL ESTATE
2889.5
62648.7
84.9
65623.2
1524.6
SERVICES
2237.1
20141.7
96.3
22475.1
1171.8
GOVERNMENT
93.8
245.3
3.8
342.9
50.3
ADMIN. AUXILIARY
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTAL
8758.3
93B12.0
367.5
102937.8
4803.2
SOURCE: ADA, SFRPC
3. Fiscal Impact
The applicant estimates that the combined residential and non-residential components
of the project will have a direct fiscal impact of approximately $19.0 million
during the
construction phase, and approximately $13.2 million
yearly
thereafter.
These direct
fiscal impacts, which would result from the growth
in ad
valorem taxes, sales and
gasoline taxes and the payment
of fees and
assessments, are summarized in Table 4
below. The table does not
include the applicant's transportation fair share
contribution.
TABLE 4
DIRECT FISCAL BOAC17S (thousands of 1991 dollars)
REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY FOR INCREMENT II
Revenues
During Construction
Annual Impact
Tax Increment District Trust Fund
16,195
Impact Fees
11284
DRI Supplemental Fees
826
Building, Zoning & Miscellaneous Fees
700
Ad Valorem Tax Receipts
8,548
Sales Tax
4,027
Gasoline Taxes
665
TOTAL
19,005
13,240
SOURCE ADA
�V
92- 609
9
4. Affordable Housing
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defined the Fiscal Year
1991 median family income in Dade County to be $38,000. Therefore, households
earning less than $19,000 were considered very low income and households with
incomes between $19,000 and $30,400 were considered low income households.
Following the "Draft Housing Demand, Supply and Need Methodology" dated April
24,1991, issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the projected
permanent jobs to be generated by non-residential development have been
distributed into HUD's very low income and low income categories (see Table 5,
below). Considering the average number of wage earners per family (1.79) and the
percentage of single -worker families (37.5) in Dade County, a total of 179 very low
income residential units and 127 low income units would be required during
Increment II to accommodate very low income and low income families attracted to
the proposed development by new jobs.
Table 5 also presents the limits for the purchase price and the monthly rental cost
(including utilities) for housing to be affordable to both very low income and low
income families. These limits are based upon the purchase cost being no greater than
2.5 times the annual family income and the monthly rental cost being no more than 30
percent of the monthly family income.
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED ANALYSIS
Items Very Low Income Low Income
HUD Income Ranees (Dade,1991
Annual Family Income Up to $19,000 $19,001 to $30,400
Purchase Price of Affordable Units Up to $47,500 $47,501 to $76,000
Monthly Rental Cost of Affordable Units Up to $475 $476 to $760
Demand for Housing
Project Permanent Employees Generated 859 609
Project Demand by Single -Worker Employee Families 179 127
15 % of Families 27 19
SOURCE: ADA, SFRPC
In recognition of the need for affordable housing in downtown Miami and the
impacts of the non-residential component of this project on the demand for affordable
housing, the applicant has developed a broad strategy to promote the provision of
affordable housing in the project area. This strategy views the DRI as an opportunity
for increasing the availability of affordable housing to those who work in downtown.
Evidence of this commitment is provided by the residential development undertaken
in Increment I of the project, which currently is underway. Increment I has a smaller
amount of non-residential development than Increment II, and consequently a smaller
impact on employment generation. Goal 5.1 of the Regional Plan for South Florida
specifies to meet 15 percent of the low and moderate income housing needs by 1995.
Staff analysis indicates that the number of affordable units provided through the
residential component of Increment I development is more than the demand of 15
percent of the single -worker employee families anticipated by the non-residential
development in both Increments I and U. The following highlights indicate the efforts
to provide affordable housing to date in the project.
10 92- 609
Biscayne View Apartments - 463 rental apartment units built; 244 units
leased; 93 of the leased units occupied by families or persons with very low
incomes; 20 percent of the units reserved for low and moderate income
families (Urban Development Action Grant funds).
Arena Towers Apartments - 356 rental apartment units built, 296 units
leased, 8 of the leased units occupied by low and very low income families;
participant in the Metro -Dade County Section 8 Existing Program; 20 percent
of the units reserved for low and moderate income fainilies (Urban
Development Action Grant funds).
Poinciana Village Condominium - 40 condominium units built, 23 units
occupied by homeowners; participant in Dade County's Documentary Stamp
Second Mortgage Program.
The City of Miami Multifamily Housing Rehabilitation Program - a total of
353 multifamily housing units have been rehabilitated within the DRI, at a
cost of $4.4 million, of which $2.4 million from the city; participant in the City
of Miami Section 8 Rehabilitation Program.
St. John Community Development Corporation - 35 new multifamily
housing units to be occupied by very low income persons or families, with a
grant of $365,000 from the city, recipient of $1 million in Metro -Dade County
Documentary Surtax Funds; participant in the federal Low Income Housing
Tax Credit Program.
The city proposes to continue to promote affordable housing opportunities in the
remainder of the residential development in subsequent phases of the project.
C. PUBLIC FAC'ILMES
1. Water. Wastewater, and Solid Waste
Table 6 summarizes the project's impact on water, wastewater, and solid waste.
TABLE 6
WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SOLID WASTE
Public
Average
Peak
Available
Facie
Demand
Demand
Source
CalRacity
Potable
0.56
1.12
Metro -Dade
Yes
Water
MGD
MGD
WASAD
Wastewater
0.4519
0.9038
Metro -Dade
Yes
MGD
MGD
WASAD
Solid Waste
24.589
-
Metro -Dade
Yes
TPD
MGD = Million Gallons Per Day
TPD =Tons per Day
!�� SOURCE: ADA 11 9 2 - 609
t
2. Police, Fire, and Emer envy Medical Service
Police and fire (including emergency medical) services will be provided to Southeast
Overtown/Park West by the City of Miami Police Department and the City of Miami
Fire Department. Two police facilities (one north and one south of the project area)
and two fire facilities (both north of the project area) will serve the development. All
of these facilities are located less than one-half mile from the project area.
An additional 12 officers will be required in order to provide police services to the
project. Funds for capital expenditures needed for the supplement of personnel will
be provided from impact fees.
The Fire Department does not indicate that additional fire fighting services will be
required in order to properly serve the project. Personnel may need to be added
depending on the level of emergency medical service demand outside the project area.
Yet the Fire Department has no plans to add personnel.
3. Health Care
Residents of Southeast Overtown/Park West will require both hospital and primary
care services. The Health Council of South Florida has acknowledged that health care
providers have capacity to meet the health -related demand of the residents of the
project.
The project is located within 2 miles of Civic Center which is the medical center for the
metropolitan region. Located within Civic Center are Jackson Memorial Hospital and
Cedars Medical Center. Jackson is currently operating at 57.4 percent of licensed
capacity and Cedars is operating at 45.1 percent of licensed capacity.
Primary care will be provided for residents of the development at numerous locations
adjacent to the project. A new primary care center is planned to be located within the
project at 1600 NW 3rd Avenue (one block north of the project area). These services
will augment the many physicians practicing in the Miami central business district
adjacent to the development.
D. TRANSPORTATION
1. Existing Traffic
The traffic impact area is generally bounded by North 79th Street on the north,
Biscayne Bay on the south, Alton Road on the east, and west 42nd Avenue on the west
(Figure 3). The adopted comprehensive plan for the City of Miami generally uses
Level of Service (LOS) "E" as the standard. Of the 77 segments studied, five segments
currently operate below LOS "E" during the afternoon peak hour.
2. Future Background Traffic Impacts
a. Programmed Improvements
Nine roadway improvements are programmed within the traffic impact area.
Most improvements are currently underway.
92- � 609
u
ay-
b. Traffic Growth and Committed Developments
The future condition traffic growth analysis was completed using Florida
Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS). The Year 2000
socio-economic data for each traffic analysis zone (TAZ) within the study area of
the project was adjusted as necessary to obtain an accurate representation of
existing and committed developments. The Year 2,000 network was also
checked against the existing network and programmed ,improvements for
accuracy.
3. Project Traffic Impacts
Project traffic was generated by the FSUTMS Model for each component of the project
based on employment data. Due to the significant opportunities of the project site to
access the transit system (Metrorail, Metromover and Metrobus), an estimated 20%
transit modal split is used in the analysis. At buildout, the project will generate
approximately 1,364 external PM peak -hour trips (Table 7).
TABLE 7
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Land Use
Magnitude PM Peak Hour Tries
Office
337,000 SF
302
Commercial
71,700 SF
293
Hotel
500 Rm.
210
Residential
2,000 DU
469
Attraction/Recreation
8,000 Seats
90
TOTAL
SOURCE: ADA
1,364
4. Additional Improvements Needed to Accommodate Proiect Traffic
At project buildout, there will be six roadway segments that operate below LOS "E"
and that carry a significant amount of project trips. Table 8 identifies the
recommended improvements, improvement costs, and the applicant's proportional
share of the improvement costs.
The total proportional share assessment for the recommended improvements within
the project's traffic impact area is $472,852 (1992 dollars). Since most roadways
impacted by the project are constrained roadways which could not be expanded,
improvement to the parallel roadway facilities to relieve congestion is recommended.
This includes a new four lane construction of NW 1st Avenue from NW loth Street to
NW 14th Street with an estimated improvement cost of $1,734,011 (1992 dollars).
Condition 4 contained in Part V of this report specifies the applicant's obligation
toward roadway improvements in order to address impacts to the regional roadway
network
0
13
92-- 609
TABLE 8
RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION UVOROVEMENTS
Improvement Applicant's Proportional
Recommended Improvement Cost Share.. .
NW 5th Street $ridge from NW 7th Avenue $3,129,750
to NW Sth Avenue:
a six -lane movable span bridge
NW 2nd Avenue from NW 8th Street 2,368,735
to NW 14th Street:
Add 2lanes
US Ifrom NE 10th Street 1,373,391
to NE 11th Terrace:
Add 2lanes
US 1 from NE 11th Terrace 501,463
to NE 12th Street:
Add 3 lanes
US 1 from NE 12th Street 1,281,516
to NE 15th Street:
Add 2lanes
NE Ist Avenue/1-395 on -ramp: 16,050
Provide directional signage to more
efficiently utilize northern on -ramp
US I/NE Sth Street: 411,950
Restripe northbound flu -Wright turn lane
to northbound thru lane, add northbound
right -turn lane (including signal modification)
$82,938
2,28,346
58,094
22,716
58,053
4,778
12,029
NE 1st Avenue/NE Sth Street: 32,100 4,954
Restripe northbound thrWright turn lane
to northbound thru lane, restripe parldng lane
to northbound right -turn lane
NE 2nd Avenue/NE 5th Street: 16,050 944
Restripe eastbound thrubight-turn lane
to eastbound right -turn lane
SOUTH
FLORIDA
REGIONAL
PLANNING
COUNCIL
TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA
TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA
••••• ROADWAY UWS qq 9 0
S.E.OVERTOWN/A WA'
REDEVELOPMENT AREA
Source: ADA
WEST '
EA.
FIGURE
3
NOT TO
SCALE
PART III - COMMENTS PROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES
This section contains comments sent to the Council by other agencies reviewing Southeast
OvertownMark West - increment 11 Application for Development Approval.
92- 609
16
Li
0
South Florida ''Water Management District
3301 Gun Club Road • P.O. Box 24680 • West Palm Beach. FL 33416.4680 0 (407) 6864M a FL WATS 1.800.432.2b4:
LAN 01
July 1, 1992
Mr. Rob Curtis, DRI Coordinator
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 140
Hollywood,, FL 33021
Dear£-ttrto��-01:
r
amp-m VPCQ
JUL-0 6 1M
Subject: DRI No. 91-375, Southeast Overtown/Park West Areawide
Increment II (Dade County)
Enclosed is a copy of the District's Impact Assessment Report for the above
subject project. This report is a general technical assessment of the project
based on information provided by the applicant and does not constitute final
finding agency action.
We appreciate the opportunity to participate in the review process. If you
should have any questions regarding this assessment, please feel free to contact
me at the above -listed phone number, Extension 6862.
Sincerely,
James J. Golden
Senior Review Coordinator
Regulation Department
JJG/dj
Enclosure
c: Mr. Herbert J. Bailey, Asst. City Manager., City of Miami
92609
co►-r t,rW Boa,
Allan Mtliedge. Chairman . Miami James E. Nall . Fort Lauderdale Leah G. Schad • West Palm Bc ' h Titford C. Creel. Executive Director
Valerie Boyd, Vice Chairman • Naples Annie Betancourt • Miami Frank Williamson. Jr. • Okeeci— oce Thomas K. MacVicar,DeputyExecutive Din.
Knn Ac4j%—..\1'ee.
r
IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
Prepared by
South Florida Water Management District
I PROJECT SUMMARY
Project:
Developer:
SFWMD ID No:
Location:
Size:
Existing Land Use:
Proposed Land Use:
Residential:
Office:
Commercial:
Hotel:
Attractions:
DRI Threshold:
Issued July 1, 1992
Southeast Overtown/Park West Areawide Increment II
City of Miami
91-375 (original ID No. 87-253)
Section 36 & 37/Township 53/Range 41 East,
Dade County
+209.38 acres
Urban Development
Mixed Use Urban Redevelopment
2,000 dwelling units
337,000 square feet
71,700 square feet
500 rooms
8,000 seats
Areawide DRI (no minimum thresholds)
II GENERAL PROJECT -RELATED INFORMATION
The Southeast Overtown/Park West Areawide DRI encompasses a 210 acre area north
of downtown Miami. It is bordered by Interstate 395 on the north, Biscayne
Boulevard (U.S. Hwy. 1) on the east, Northwest 5th Street on the south, and
Interstate 95 on the west (see Exhibit 1).
The Increment II development program includes the provision of 2,000 residential
dwelling units, 337,000 square feet of office floor area, 71,700 square feet of
commercial floor area, 500 hotel rooms, and 8,000 attraction seats. Development
of this Increment is scheduled to occur between 1992 and 1999.
III POTENTIAL FOR ADVERSE REGIONAL IMPACTS SUMMARY
Category Minimal Significant Maior
Surface Water Management - Quantity X
Surface Water Management - Quality X
Water -Related Vegetation/Wildlife N/A
Water Use X
a
is
92— 609
IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In reviewing the available information, District staff has concluded that the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Areawide Increment II DRI could be developed in such
a manner that regional adverse water resource -related impacts would not be likely
to occur with regard to surface water management quantity and quality, water use,
and water -related vegetation/wildlife.
Surface Water Management
Individual developments proposed within the boundaries of the Areawide DRI must
meet the permitting requirements of the District, the Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation and/or the Dade County Department of Environmental
Resources Management. No adverse water resource -related impacts are expected to
occur from this DRI. On the contrary, it is anticipated that the quality of
stormwater runoff into Biscayne Bay will improve.
Water -related Vegetation/Wildlife
No wetlands or other environmentally sensitive lands exist within the project
boundaries. No adverse water resource -related impacts are expected to occur ag
a result of this DRI. On this basis, the Environment checklist and footnotes
have been deleted from this report.
Water Use
Potable water supply will continue to be provided by the Miami -Dade Water and .
Sewer Authority. At this time, the utility has an adequate permitted allocation
to meet the demands of the Increment II development. The utility will also
supply the project's non -potable landscape irrigation demands.
For additional details concerning the above, see the Water Supply and Development
checklist and footnotes on pages 4 and 5.
The District is recommending Development Order Conditions (see page 3) requiring
that specific conservation measures be incorporated into the project design.
Permits
This project will require the following permits prior to commencement of
construction:
1. Surface Water Management Permit - Due to the anticipated size of the
individual developments likely to be proposed, these projects will qualify
for a General Permit, pursuant to Chapter 40E-40.302 (1) and (2), F.A.C.
Although this permit is issued by the Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management (DERM), the proposed surface water
management system design must be consistent with District criteria.
Projects that qualify for a General Permit must have less than 40 acres
total land area with positive stormwater outfall or less than 320 acres
total land area and less than 160 acres of impervious area with no
positive stormwater outfall. Projects which exceed the above criteria
must obtain an Individual Permit from the District.
2. Water Use Permit - for any proposed dewatering activities associated with
the construction of project lakes and/or road or building foundations (see
Section V, Disclaimer, second paragraph, for additional information
concerning pending revisions to the District's water use permitting
criteria).
The applicant must provide verification that the proposed system designs will
meet District criteria in effect at the time of permit application.
Recommended Development Order Conditions
1. For the purpose of potable water conservation, Southeast Overtown/Park
Areawide Increment II shall utilize low water use plumbing fixtures, self -
closing and/or metered water faucets, and other water conserving devices.
2. For the purpose of non -potable water conservation, Southeast Overtown/Park
Areawide Increment II shall utilize xeriscape principles in the design of
the project's landscaping.
V DISCLAIMER
This review has been performed by South Florida Water Management District to
provide the South Florida Regional Planning Council with a general technical
assessment of the water -related impacts of this project from the District's
perspective. It is a technical review of the project based on the information
provided by the DRI applicant. It is not a permit under Chapter 373, F.S., nor
is it a commitment for said permits. This review does not constitute final
agency action and it is not binding on this agency. Permit evaluation, pursuant
to Chapter 373, F.S., will be based upon the criteria in effect and the
information available at the time of permit application. Consequently, the
applicant is advised that this could result in a change in the District's
technical assessment from that which is contained in this review.
The review of the water supply section of this ADA has been based on current
regulatory criteria regarding water use permits in the South Florida Water
Management District. Please be advised that the existing "Basis of Review for
Water Use Permit Applications in the South Florida Water Management District" is
currently being revised to incorporate recent policy changes regarding urban and
irrigation demand management elements. Certain provisions under the new
criteria, particularly with regard to reclaimed water use and water conservation,
may influence future permitting requirements for this project. Please be advised
that the water supply aspects of the project must meet the water use permitting
criteria in effect at the time of permit application.
92- 609 c5*/
20
SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT - Southeast Overtown/Park Areawide
Increment II,_ DRI No. 91-375
Proposed Potable Water Source: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority
Permit No.: 13-00037-W Expiration Date: 03/14/98
Permitted Allocation: 164.93 MGD Current Usage: 152.58 MGD
(Average day for 12 months **************************)
Projected Demand of DRI: 1.55 MGD (1)
Proposed Non -Potable Water Source: Potable water from utility (2)
Projected Demand of DRI: 1.55 MGD (1)
JACCEPTABLE I I I
RESPONSE RESOLVABLE I MAJOR I
IN AT PERMIT TIME IREGIONALI
IAPPLICATIONI MINORL_MAJOR I ISSUES I
A.
II. WATER USE IMPACTS
A.
B. OFF -SITE
1. Verification of Availability
FOOTNOTES: See following page.
WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT FOOTNOTES:
(1) The 1.55 MGD figure includes both potable and non -potable water demands.
The applicant did not separate the non -potable demand from the potable
demand because specific site plans for each increment have not yet been
developed. Due to the use of xeriscape landscaping techniques, the non -
potable water demand is expected to be minimal.
The project site is underlain by saline water. Therefore, the development
of an on -site groundwater source to meet non -potable water demands is
strongly discouraged. The use of potable water to meet non -potable
demands is considered to be reasonable -beneficial in this particular
instance.
(2) All potable water needs will be met by utilizing potable water supplied by
the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority.
Cr
r
SUBJECT: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT - Southeast Overt
` Increment II,
Drainage Basin: Coastal
Receiving Body: Biscayne Bay & Biscayne Aquifer
A. QUANTITY CONSIDERATIONS
1. Discharge method, location
Park Areawide -
Nn . 41 _17;
JACCEPTABLE I I I
RESPONSE RESOLVABLE I MAJOR I
IN AT PERMIT TIME IREGIONALI
IAPPLICATIONI MINOR I MAJOR i ISSUES I
and route to receiving water I
X I
I
I
2. Floodplain encroachment I
N/A I
I
I
3. Net basin storage I
N/A I
I
I
4. Stage/storage I
N/A I
I
I
5. Control elevations I
N/A I
I
I
6. Water management areas
I
I X(1) I
I
7. Minimum drainage
I N/A
I
I
i
8. Overdrainage
1 N/A
I
I
9. Outparcels
I N/A
I
I
10. Exfiltration
I X
I
I
I
11. Floor and road protection
I X
I
I
I
12. Passage of upstream flows
I X
I
I
I __
13. Capacity of receiving water
(pre vs. post) I X I I i
B. QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS
1.
Standard BMP's I
X I I I
2.
Special BMP's
a. Sensitive receiving waters I
X I I I I
b. On -site use of wastewater I
N/A I I I
c. Location of on -site
percolation ponds I
N/A I I I
d. Proximity of on -site perco-
lation ponds to SWM system I
N/A I I I
3.
Use of natural system I
N/A I I I
4.
Hazardous materials
FOOTNOTES: See following page.
92-- 609
23
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FOOTNOTES:
(1) Individual developments that are proposed within the boundaries of the
Areawide DRI must meet the permitting requirements of the District, the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and/or the Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management. Details regarding the
pretreatment of stormwater runoff for water quality purposes and other
design details will be addressed when the applications for such permits
are reviewed by these agencies.
(2) The District recommends that the monitoring of groundwater and/or surface
water quality be required for any industrial projects that may be proposed
within the boundaries of the Areawide DRI.
92-- 609 �J
24
,. Southeast tvertown/Park fWest DRI
No'dhWest 140 Street
t-95
�.395
NotthW est
5th gt�eet
Boo e and
EXHIBIT 1 October 1991
92- 609
25
PART IV - CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SOUTH FLORIDA
Council staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Regional Plan for South Florida.
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Regional Plan, with the following
serving as examples:
The applicant is proposing the construction of affordable housing within the boundaries of the
project. This affordable housing will be readily accessible to the Miami central business district
and be served by Metrorail and Metromover. This is consistent with Goal 5.1 and Policy 5.1.1
which call for a reduction in the need for affordable housing and the development of
affordable housing readily accessible to employment centers and public transportation
facilities.
The project is located in an area with an existing infrastructure network which has capacity.
This is consistent with Goat 16.2 and Policy 16.2.2 which emphasize the desire to direct
development and redevelopment to areas where public facilities exist.
The project redevelopment program will encourage public and private investment in
downtown Miami. This is consistent with Goal 17.1 and Policy 17.1.2 which urge investment
in downtown areas.
Staff comparison of the proposed development vis-a-vis the Regional Plan for South Florida indicates
that the proposal is generally consistent with the Regional Plan.
92- 609 3�
PART V • SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
The Development of Regional Impact Assessment for the Southeast Overtown/Park West -
Increment It development indicates that the project would have the following positive regional
impacts.
• Generate a total of approximately 2,926 new jobs in the three south Florida counties.
• Increase the regional economy's annual value-added by about $102.9 million.
Council evaluation indicates that the proposed project should not create adverse impacts on soils,
animal life, or vegetation, However, in terms of adverse regional impact, the project would:
• Produce an average potable water demand of 0.56 MGD.
• Produce an average wastewater demand of 0.4519 MGD.
Produce an average of 24.6 tons per day of solid waste.
• Produce 1,364 p.m. peak hour trips.
Recommendations
Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative impacts, it is the
recommendation of the Council to the City of Miami Commission that the Application for
Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West - Increment II DRI be APPROVED
subject to incorporation of the following conditions into the development order to increase the
probability of realizing positive regional impacts and mitigating, reducing, or eliminating adverse
regional impacts.
THE QTY SHALL:
1. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the
cumulative adverse regional impact of the project, its traffic and associated pollutant
emissions on air quality:
a. Actively encourage and promote ridesharing by establishing a car and van pool
information program;
b. Provide Dade County Transit route and schedule information in convenient locations
throughout the project; including office complex lobbies and within and adjacent to
retail areas;
c. Encourage transit use by provision of bus shelters, development of turnout Ianes, or
provision of other amenities to increase ridership; and,
d. Provide on -site bicycle storage facilities to encourage use of alternative modes of
transportation.
3(9 277
92- 609
2. For the purpose of water conservation, utilize low water use plumbing fixtures, self -
closing and/or metered faucets, and other water conserving devices.
3. Incorporate the use of water sensors and other low water volume landscape irrigation
techniques to reduce the project demand on the region's potable water supply.
4. Complete the construction of NW 1st Avenue from NW loth Street to NW 14th Street as a
new four -lane divided facility prior to a. or b. below, whichever occurs earlier:
a. the date when all the certificates of occupancy which have been issued for Southeast
Overtown/Park West - Increment H will generate more than a total of 818 peak -hour
trip ends, as estimated based on trip rates identified in Exhibit 1 herein;
b. December 31, 1998
In the event that by December 31, 1997, the necessary right-of-way for the subject
improvement has not been acquired, then within 30 days, the Applicant shall request a
meeting with Council staff to consider potential reallocation of the Applicant's
proportional share in the amount of $472,852 (1992 dollars). Any reallocation must be
consistent with applicable statutes and rules.
5. Comply with the requirements of Chapter 14, Section 14-71, Code of City of Miami,
entitled Transportation Control Measures, which sets forth the peak hour trip reduction
and reporting requirements for this project.
6. Conduct air quality modelling of carbon monoxide impacts. The air quality modelling
shall follow Florida Department of Environmental Regulation guidelines and shall:
a. Be based on actual 1998 traffic counts for the intersections listed in 6.b. below;
b. Include the following intersections: NE 1st Avenue/NE 5th Street; and, NE 2nd
Avenue/NE 5th Street; and,
c. Be submitted by June 30,1999, in a detailed analysis to FDER and DERM for comment
and review, and to the SFRPC for review and approval.
7. If the results of the air quality modelling study, as described in Condition 6, above, exceed
85 percent but less than 100 percent of the State standard for CO concentrations, submit
by October 30,1999, a detailed air quality monitoring plan to FDER and DERM for review
and comment and SFRPC for review and approval. Pending approval of the monitoring
plan, withhold the issuance of any building permits for net new development within the
subarea that show exceedences of 85 percent of the CO standard.
8. If the results of the air quality modelling study, as described in Condition 6, above, or any
monitoring results pursuant to Condition 7, above, exceed State standards for CO
concentrations, do one of the following:
a. Provide acceptable documentation which clearly indicates that CO exceedences will
not occur, or that the net new development seeking approval will not contribute to
the predicted CO violation, or that any potential CO additions for each net new
development have been or will be mitigated prior to issuance of building permits for
the particular ner new development. This documentation must be submitted to FDER
and DUM for comment and review, and to the SFRPC for review and approval.
28 99- 609 -3�
b. Withhold the issuance of any building permits for net new development within the
subarea that shows CO exceedences.
9. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application
for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council
and one copy to the Department of Community Affairs within 30 days of the effective date
of the development order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows:
a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of
the ADA but prior to issuance of the development order, whether in response to a
formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA
will be replaced with revised pages.
b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number"
being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and
"Date" stating the date of the revision.
10. Submit an annual report to the Council, and the Department of Community Affairs on
each anniversary date of the effective date of the development. The annual report shall
include, at a minimum a complete response to each question in Exhibit 2.
11. Identify in the development order any approved development, including the acreage
attributable to each approved land use, open space, areas for preservation, and green belts;
and the structures and improvements to be placed on the property, including locations,
acreages, gross square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or
components of the development
12. Establish the termination date for completing development as December 31, 1999,
provided that the applicant, its successors, and assigns, complies with Condition 15,
herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with s. 380.06(19)(c), F.S.
13. Establish an expiration date for the development order.
14. Establish the effective date of the development order as 45 days from transmittal of the
development order to the Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, and applicant; provided however that if the development order is
appealed, the development order will take effect on the day after all appeals have been
withdrawn or resolved pursuant to s. 380.07(2), F.S.
15. Record, within 30 days of the effective date of the development order, notice of the
adoption of the development order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court
pursuant to s. 380.06(15), F.S., specifying that the development order runs with the land is
binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally.
16. Meet the following state criteria for issuance of a DRI development order:
a. The development order shall specify:
The name of the development.
0 The authorized agent of the developer.
• The name of the developer.
29
• A statement that:
The Application for Development Approval (ADA) is approved, or
The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying the conditions, or
The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for denial and changes in the
development proposal, if any, that would make it eligible to receive
development approval.
b. Findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing whether and the extent to which:
• The development unreasonably interferes with the achievement of the objectives
of an adopted state land development plan applicable to the area,
• The development is consistent with the local land development regulations and
the adopted local comprehensive plan;
• The development will be consistent with the recommendations of the Council DRI
Assessment pursuant to s. 380.06(14), F.S.; and,
• The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needed to
accommodate the impacts of the proposed development" or the City commits in
the development order to provide these facilities consistent with the development
schedule.
c. A legal description of the property including acreage.
17. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of the development order
and specify monitoring procedures that, at a minimum, require development order
conditions to be reviewed by City of Miami prior to issuance of any local development
permit.
18. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development Approval by reference into the
development order as follows:
"Ibe Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by
reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under
Ch. 380, F.S., and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the representations
contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval
unless waived or modified by agreement among the City, the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, and the applicant, its successors, or assigns."
19. Incorporate into the development order by reference the Council DRI Assessment for
Southeast Overtown/Park West - Master and Increment II.
20. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the development order.
30
-� Rog - /
a
FJC1'ERNAL P.M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES
Land Uses
Trip Rates
Office
0.90/1000 SF
Commercial
4.09/1000 SF
Hotel
0.42/Room
Residential
0.235/DU
AttractionJRecreation
11.25/1000 Seats
SOURCE: ADA
31
92-- 609
EXHIBIT 2
FORM RPM-tSP-A4NUAL REPORT-1
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, places the
responsibility on the developer of an approved development of
regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the
local government, the regional planning agency, the Department of
Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the
date specified in the development order. The failure of a
developer to submit the report on the date specified in the
development order may result in the temporary suspension of the
development order by the local government until the annual report
is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to
all developments of regional impact which have been approved
since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this
required report, call the DRI Planner at (904) 488-4925.
Send the original completed annual report to the designated
local government official stated in the development order with
one copy to each of the following:
a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction;
b) All affected permitting agencies;
c) Division of Resource Planning and Management
Bureau of State Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
32 99- 669 0�s
Format your Annual Status Report after the format example
provided below.
ANNUAL 6TATUS REPORT
Reporting period: to
Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year
Development:
Name of DRI
Location:
City County
Developer: Name:
Company Name
Address:
Street Location
City, State, Zip
1. Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of
development, phasing, or in the representations contained in
the Application for Development Approval since the Develop-
ment of Regional Impact received approval. Note any actions
(substantial deviation determinations) taken by local
government to address these changes.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit A a detailed description of each change and copies
of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit A should also
address the following additional items if applicable:
a) Describe changes in the plan of development or
phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent
years;
b) State any known incremental DRI applications for
development approval or requests for a substantial
deviation determination that were filed in the reporting
year and to be filed during the next year;
92- 609
33
c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a
development order or the subsequent modification of an
adopted development order that was recorded by the
developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15)(f), F.S.
Z) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for
any portion of the development since the development order
was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted
a new Development of Regional Impact development order for
the project? Provide a copy of the order adopted by the
annexing local government.
3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site
plans, etc., not previously submitted.
Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences,
attach as Exhibit B.
4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed
and actually conducted for the reporting year as well as a
cumulative total ofdevelopment proposed and actually
conducted to date.
Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve-
ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed,
barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit C.
5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other
than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate
entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and
the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved.
Tract
Buyer
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit D.
6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the
original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to
issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its
size, and intended use on a site plan and map.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit E.
34 32- 609 , 7�
T �
7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which
have been obtained, applied for, or denied during this
reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and
duty for each.
NOTE: If a response is to be snore than one sentence, attach
as Exhibit F.
8) Provide a list specifying each development order condition
and each developer commitment as Contained in the ADA and
state how and when each condition or commitment has been
complied with during the annual report reporting period.
NOTE: Attach as Exhibit G.
9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the
development order to be included in the annual report.
10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been
sent copies of the annual report in conformance with
Subsections 380.06(15),and (18), F.S.
Person completing the questionnaire:
Title:
Representing:
92- 608
/_ 35
7-
Tt� Df ffitarat
tin
MATTY HIRAI i. 3 CESAR H. ODIO
Y g
City Clerk a • City Manager
December 1, 1992
Linda Shelley, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: AMENDED DOCUMENTS FOR CITY OF MIAMI RESOLUTIONS 92-6079
92-606, AND 92-609
Dear Ms. Shelley:
On October 16, 1992, our office transmitted to you copies of the
above -cited City of Miami resolutions, which have now been
amended to correct scrivener's errors as explained in memorandum
from A. Quinn Jones, III, City Attorney (copy enclosed).
Please substitute the attached corrected documents for the ones
previously sent to you.
If you have any questions, please call.
,Pelpectfully submitted,
Watirai
City Clerk
MH:sl
ENC: a/s
MATTY HIRAI r ; CESAR H. ODIO
City Clerk lilt" it City Manager
December 1, 1992
Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, FL 33021
RE: AMENDED DOCUMENTS FOR CITY OF MIAMI RESOLUTIONS 92-607,
92-608, AND 92-609
Dear Ms. Dekle:
On October 16, 1992, our office transmitted to you copies of the
above -cited City of Miami resolutions, which have now been
amended to correct scrivener's errors as explained in memorandum
from A. Quinn Jones, III, City Attorney (copy enclosed).
Please substitute the attached corrected documents for the ones
previously sent to you.
If you have any questions, please call.
*Rect,fullly submitted,
irai
City Clerk
MH:sl
ENC: a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/= Pan American DriveR.O. Box 3307M/Miami, Florida 33233-0708/(305) 250.5360
TO: Matty Hirai
City Clerk
FROM : "!
A. Q inn es, III
City At o ey
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE : November 23, 1992 FILE :
SUEUECT : Scrivener' s Errors
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
On September 24, 1992 the City
following Resolutions and an Exhibit
contained typographical errors in their
Commission ::adopted
tW
to a Resolution
44rhi'sh
texts:
cn
1. Resolution No. 92-607
2. Resolution No. 92-608
3. Resolution No. 92-609 - Exhibit A
Enclosed herewith are the corrected Resolutions and Exhibit.
Specifically, the Resolutions were corrected in the following
particulars:
I. Resolution No. 92-607 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
2. Resolution No. 92-608 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
3. Resolution No. 92-609 (Exhibit A) - On Page 4 the
references in the definition of CADA or Consolidated
Application for Development Approval were changed from
paragraph 17 on page 23 to paragraph 9 on Pave 15.
On Page 6 the reference in the definition of Project
was changed from Page 1 to Page 3. Also, on Page 6,
the reference in the definition of Project Area was
changed from Page 6 to Page 1-2.
On Page 10, the date August, 1992 was inadvertently
left out.
01 #�
CITY OF MIAMI, FLOAIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Natty Hirai
City Clerk
FROM
A. Ii2 inn &ey
I
City At o
On September 24,
following Resolutions
contained typographical
1. Resolution No.
2. Resolution No.
3. Resolution No.
DATE : November 23, 1992 FILE :
SUBJECT: Scrivener' s Errors
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES
r N
1992 the City Commission ridoptedm tR
,�sot and an Exhibit to a Resolution hiehi
errors in their texts: cn
92-607
92-608
92-609 - Exhibit A
Enclosed herewith are the corrected Resolutions and Exhibit.
Specifically, the Resolutions were corrected in the following
particulars:
1. Resolution No. 92-607 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
2. Resolution No. 92-608 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
3. Resolution No. 92-609 (Exhibit A) - On Page 4 the
references in the definition of CADA or Consolidated
Application for Development Approval were changed from
paragraph 17 on page 23 to paragraph 9 on Page 15.
On Page 6 the reference in the definition of Project
was changed from Page 1 to Page 3. Also, on Page 6,
the reference in the definition of Project Area was
changed from Page 6 to Page 1-2.
On Page 10, the date August, 1992 was inadvertently
left out.
Matty Hirai November 23, 1992
City Clerk Page 2
This office reviewed the changes and determined that they
were insubstantial, therefore, the Resolutions do not require
further review by the City Commission. Accordingly, I'am hereby
requesting the execution of the corrected Resolutions and the
substitution of Exhibit A (Resolution No. 92-609) as quickly as
possible so that they may be forwarded to the Florida Regional
Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
AQJ/LKK/pb/P790
Enclosures
MATI'Y HIRAI
City Clerk
October 16, 1992
Ms. Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, FL 33021
CESAR H. 0010
City Manager
RE: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT,
A/K/A THE CITY OF MIAMI'S SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST
REDEVELOPMENT
Dear Ms. Dekle:
The City of Miami Commission, at its meeting of September 24,
1992, passed and adopted Resolution No. 92-609, and requested the
City Clerk to transmit said instrument to you.
Attached hereto, please find the above -cited resolution, which is
self-explanatory.
Rptectfully submitted,
NATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
MH:vg
Enc. a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/35W Pan American Drive&.0. Box 3307WMiaml, "odds 33233470!/(305) ZW$M
I� titu of t�tmt
MATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
A
Gntli lim t''
'GE rn FLOP
October 16, 1992
Linda Shelley, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
CESAR H. CIDIO
City Manager
RE: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT,
A/K/A THE CITY OF MIAMI'S SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST
REDEVELOPMENT
Dear Ms. Shelley:
The City of Miami Commission, at its meeting of September 24,
1992, passed and adopted Resolution No. 92-609, and requested the
City Clerk to transmit said instrument to you.
Attached hereto, please find the above -cited resolution, which is
self-explanatory.
Rozectfully submitted,
WTY HIRAI
City C1 erk
MH:vg
Enc. a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330?WMiami, Florida 33233-0706/(305) 260 SM
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
SEPTEMBER 24, 1992
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-PARK WEST
INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER
AND MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
Let it be kn that pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida
Statutes, the Co fission of the City of Miami, Florida, has
considered in a pu is hearing held on September 24, 1992, the
issuance of a Major a Special Permit for Increment II of the
Southeast Overtown-Park West development, pursuant to Zoning
Ordinance 11000 to be loca
which include N.W. 5th
395 on the north, and Biscayne
in the City of Miami, boundaries of
on the south, I-95 on the west, I-
on the east
Beginning at a point\or
intersection of
the center line of N. Street; thence
west on the center liN.E. 5th Street
(and N.W. 5th Street) east ROW line of
I-95; thence northwesn the east ROW
line of I-95 to the soline of I-395;
thence easterly on the OW line of I-
395 to the center line yne Boulevard
to the point of begic prising +�-
209.38 acres more or l
Blocks 2N, 3N, 4N, 5N, 6N, 7N, 14N, 15N, 17N,
18N, 19N, 20N, 21N, 22N, 23N, 24N, 5N, 34N,
35N, 36N, 37N, 38N, 39N, 40N, 41N, 4 , 43N,
44N, 45N, 55N, 56N, 57N, 58N, 59N, 60 61N,
62N, 65N, 65E, 66N, a portion of 27N, a all
existing street rights -of -way between aid
blocks; Section 37, Township 53 South, R ge
41 East, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-4
and Blocks 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 20, 21, portio
of blocks 6, 11, 16, and all existing street
- 1 -
92-- 609
lip 2 -q- gz-
ights-of-way between said blocks; Section
Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Alice
Ba dwin, Jenny M., and Charles E. Oxar
Sub ivision A-57 Amended (B-87); and Blocks
2, 9, 10, 11, a portion of block 3, and
all isting street rights -of -way between
said b ocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range
41 East Sosts Subdivision (B-27); and Blocks
1, 8, a all existing street rights -of -way
between s d blocks; Section 36, Township 53,
Range 41 at, Perry Division (B-163); and
Greyhound enter (77-98); Section 37,
Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L.
Knowlton Map f Miami (B-41); and Block 46N,
Section 37, To ship 53 South, Range 41 East,
G.G. Bolles (1- ) ; and Blocks 16N, 26N, and
all existing s eet rights -of -way between
said blocks; S37, ownship 53, Range 41 East,
P.W. White Re-Subd vision (B-34); and Blocks
59N, 60N, and all a isting street rights -of -
way between said bloc s, Section 37, Township
53, Range 41 East, ami South Half -Blocks
(1-185); and RTY SEC C, S 3-172, J.A. Danns
Sub 7-36 Blocks C and Howard Johnson Sub
79-87, Jones Resub 3 176, Section 370,
Township 53 South, Ran 41 East, A.L.
Knowlton Map of Miami ( -41). (Further
described in the survey subm tted pursuant to
the application for Majo Use Special
Permit).
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJ T TO any
dedications, limitations, r trictions,
reservations or easements of recor •
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: The Southeast Overtown/Par% West Community
Redevelopment Area
NAME OF DEVELOPER: The City of Miami
AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Herbert H. Bailey, Assisthpt City
Manager and Sergio Rodriguez, Assistant City Manager, or their
successors.
4r^44.*�.
17
• - 2 - 92- 609
/riaw I
1
\EDTION: The project consists of development in the
own/Park West Community Redevelopment Area through
including the following land uses and incrementss
rement I Increment II Increment III Totals
88-1997) (1992-1999) (1999-2007)
Of f ice
(98f)
1 6,000
337,000
500,500
1,003,500
Commercial
(gsf)
95,4
71,700
90,600
257,700
Hotel
(rooms)
0
500
600
1,100
Residential
(units)
2,000
2,000
5,000
9,000
Attractions
(seats)
8,000
,000
0
16,000
Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1991), he Project specifies the
total amount of development planned for ach land use category,
but provides flexibility for such devel nt to be located
anywhere within the Project Area, subjec to local land
development regulations. The Project Area inclu s all property
within the boundaries of the Southeast Overt o /Park West
Community Redevelopment Area, designated in 198 by City
Commission Resolution No. 82-755, as illustrated in E ibit 1
attached hereto and described in the legal description above
- 3 -
92- 609
2
b INITIONSt For purposes of this Development Order, the
fol wing terms shall be defined as followst
ADA orApplication for Development Approvalt The original
Applicati for Development Approval for Southeast Overtown/Park
West filed the City of Miami on February 6, 1987, pursuant to
F.S. 380.06 (1 7).
CADA OR Consolid_abec
revised ADA prepared
-tificate of t
partial Certificate of Oc
of the South Florida Buil
as defined herein.
ation for Development Approval: The
�t to paragraph 17 on page 23 herein.
s A permanent or temporary and/or
ancy issued, pursuant to Section 307
ing Code, for any "Net New Development"
City: The City of Miami, Florida.
Council: The South Florida Regional Phnning Council.
DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Depa ent of Environmental
Resources Management.
DRI: Development of Regional Impact.
Development Credits: The individual units of land es included
within Total Allowable Development, as measured by squ a footage
or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats.
FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation.
-44
- 4 - 92-- 609
ftlor use. Special permits A special permit issued by the City
C as pursuant to Ordinance 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of
the C y of Miami, as amended.
Net New Nvelopments Any construction or reconstruction which
will result n a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of
residential welling units, hotel rooms, seats in
attractions/recre Lion facilities or gross square footage for
office, governmen office, retail/service, convention,
wholesale/industrial institutional uses. Land uses to be
removed by demolition of\Order
or structure may be credited
against the proposed nefor purposes of calculating
the net increase, if theirector determines that there
was a valid Certificatecy existing on the effective
date of this Developmfor the land uses to be
demolished. If a change of land us is proposed, the Planning
Director may credit the prior land use ainst the proposed land
use based upon equivalent impacts as asured by peak hour
vehicle trip generation. Any activity which as on the effective
date of this Development Order a valid build g permit or any
currently effective development order shall not included as
Net New Development. The Planning Director may exc de from Net
New Development any small development under 10,000 squa a feet in
floor area, if he finds that such development would ave no
regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips.
5 _
92- 609
------------------
rcel of Lands Any quantity of land capable of being described
wit such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be
estab shed, and which is designated by its owner or developer as
land to used or developed as a unit or which has been used or
developed a unit.
Projects That roject described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on
Page 1 herein.
Project Areas The a a included within the legal description on
page 6. (The area bou ed by I-395, I-95 , N.W. 5th Street and
Biscayne Boulevard.)
Total Allowable Developments \which
f Net New Development
for which Certificates of Occussued under the terms
and conditions of this Deve, together with the
applicable Master Development be modified pursuant
to F.S. 380.06(19) (1991), al be measured by the
following land uses:
Office (sq.ft. )
Retail/Service (sq. ft.)
Hotel (rooms)
` Residential (units)
Attractions (seats)
337,000
,700
00
,, 00
8,000
oil The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases
above described land use categories, provided that the 3
od
the
n
#, 92- 609
\oonal
f the land uses as changed will. not exceed the adverse
impacts of the land usesin Increment 11 of the Project
ally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle
FINDINGS OF FACT
The follo ing findings of fact are hereby confirmed and
adopted with res t to the Project:
A. The findings a d determinations of fact set forth in the
recitals of the esolution to this Development Order are
hereby confirmed.
B. The real property whi is the subject of this Development
Order is legally descri above.
C. The City of Miami filed th ADA with the City, the Council,
and the Florida Department of ommunity Affairs.
D. The CADA has been filed by the City of Miami pursuant to
F.S. 380.06(22) (1991) authorizi the City of Miami to
apply for development approval and eceive a development
order for any or all of the area with its jurisdiction.
Individual developments are not identifie or required to be
identified in the CADA. The Consolidated pplication for
Development Approval is incorporated herein by eference and
relied upon by the parties in discharging thei statutory
duties under Ch. 380 F.S. and local ordinances. S tantial
compliance with the representations contained i the
Application for Development Approval is a condition or
444
9 2- 609
F
proval unless waived or modified by agreement among the
Ci the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the
appli ant, its successors, or assigns.
S. The pu se of the CADA is to identify and assess probable
regional pacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable
Development n accordance with the general guidelines set
forth in this velopment order and the CADA. The concept
is to recognize he Project Area as a single area of high
intensity developm t and to focus the DRI review process
primarily on the 3m acts the Total Allowable Development
within the area will ve on land, water, transportation,
environmental, communit services, energy and other
resources and systems of r ional significance. The CADA
seeks a single DRI review rocess for overall phased
development of the Southeast rtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Area rather than re 'ring each individual DRI
scale development within the down t wn area to file for
separate DRI reviews.
F. Development within the Project Area is a cted to continue
to be accomplished over an extended peri of time by a
variety of developers, which may include the City. These
developers may respond to market demand and echnologi.es
that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA is
intended to serve as a flexible guide to planned dev opment
of the Project Area rather than a precise blueprint fo its
development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21) )
- 8 -
92- 609
1991), the CADA seeks master development approval for three
in ements of development over a period of approximately
twen years and specific development approval for Increment
II, wh h is the first phase of development projected for a
period o approximately five years. Subsequent incremental
application may need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as
a living gui recognizing the evolution of market demand
and technologies
G. The project entail the redevelopment of 209 acres of prime
real estate adjacent to the Miami Central Business District
for new residential, fice and commercial activity. The
CADA proposes Net New D elopment within the Project Area
for the land uses, quantit s and phases defined herein as
Total Allowable Development. s originally proposed in the
Master Development Order (Reso tion 88-110), Increment II
of the project (1994-1999) consist d of the following:
Element ea
Office (gross sq. ft.) 20 000
Retail/Service (gross sq. ft.) 37, 00
Hotel (rooms) 0
Residential (units) 2,00
Convention (gross sq. ft.) 310,000
Pursuant to certain changes in market conditi\Orde
d to the
proposed location of a performing arts centhin the
boundaries of the DRI, the Master Developmentand the
Increment I Development Order are being amended
with this development order, to reflect the following and
use categories for the revised time frame 1992 to 1999:
- 9 -
92- 609
991), the CADA seeks master development approval for three
s of development over a period of approximately
years and specific development approval for Increment
II, wh\gui
he first phase of development projected for a
periodoximately five years. Subsequent incremental
applicy need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as
a livirecognizing the evolutionof market demand
and technologies
G. The project entail the redevelopment of 209 acres of prime
real estate adjacent to the Miami Central Business District
for new residential, fice and commercial activity. The
CADA proposes Net New D elopment within the Project: Area
for the land uses, quantit es and phases defined herein as
Total Allowable Development. s originally proposed in the
Master Development Order (Resolution 88-110), Increment II
of the project (1994-1999) consist d of the following:
Element ea
Office (gross sq. ft.) 20 000
Retail/Service (gross sq. ft.) 37, 00
Hotel (rooms) 0
Residential (units) 2,0
Convention (gross sq. ft.) 310,000
Pursuant to certain changes in market conditi s and to the
proposed location of a performing arts center ithin the
boundaries of the DRI, the Master Development Orde and the
Increment I Development Order are being amended
with this development order, to reflect the following
use categories for the revised time frame 1992 to 1999: N
- 9 -
92- 609
Element Area
Off a (sq. ft.) 337,000
Reta /Service (sq. ft.) 71,700
Hotel rooms) 500
Reside ial (units) 2,000
Attracti ns (seats) 80,000
The Master velopment Order made provision for "the
simultaneous i creases and decreases between the land use
catagories (sic), rovided that the regional impacts of the
land uses as chang will not exceed the adverse regional
impacts of the Projec as originally approved, as measured
by total peak hour ve 'cle trips." The substitution of
additional commercial development and attractions
development for convention velopment does not exceed the
total trips generated by the or ginal configuration proposed
by the Master Development Order.
H. The Project is not located in an area of critical state
concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 380 (1991).
I. A comprehensive review of the probable pacts that will be
generated by Increment II of the Project h s been conducted
by various City departments, as reflected i the CAD, and
the South Florida Regional Planning Council sta
J. This Development Order is consistent with the sport and
recommendations of the South Florida Regional lanning
Council, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Asse ment
for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelo nt
Area - Increment II", dated The
^44t -- -�
- 10 -
92- 609
South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends approval
o Increment II of the Project, and all conditions to which
suc approval is subject are reflected herein.
K. Incr nt II of the Project is consistent with the
applicab portion of the State land development plan and
the Region Plan for South Florida.
L. Increment II of the Project is in conformity with the
adopted Miami C prehensive Neighborhood Plan.
M. Increment II of t Project is in accord with the district
zoning classificatio of 11000, as amended.
N. Increment II of the Pr ect will have a favorable impact on
the economy of the City.
P. Increment II of the Proje t will efficiently use public
transportation facilities.
Q. Increment II of the Project wil favorably affect the need
for people to find adequate housin reasonably accessible to
their places of employment.
R. Increment II of the Project will effic ently use necessary
public facilities.
S. Increment II of the Project will include ade ate mitigative
measures to assure that it will not adverse effect the
environment and natural resources of the City.
T. Increment II of the Project will not adversely affe living
conditions in the City.
U. Increment II of the Project will not adversely affect pu is
safety.
Vd-
92— 609
0
There is a public need for Increment It of the Project.
CONCL S IONS OF I,A1 %
T t, having made the findings of fact contained above, the
City Comm ssion hereby concludes as a matter of law, the
following%
A. The City Miami acting as a "downtown development
authority" as efined in F.S. 380 (1991) , and is authorised
by F.S. 380 (1 1) to make application for development
approval and receiv a development order.
B. Increment II of th Project complies with the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborh d Plan, is consistent with the
orderly development and g 1s of the City of Miami, and
complies with local land deve ent regulations.
C. Increment II of the Project doe not unreasonably interfere
s
with the achievement of the object es of the adopted State
land development plan applicable to he City of Miami and
the Regional Plan for South Florida.
D. Increment II of the Project is consistent with the report
e
and recommendations of the South Florida Re onal Planning
Council and does not unreasonably interfere wit any of the
considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 38 (1991).
e
x„
E. Changes in Increment II of the Project which do not xceed
the Total Allowable Development or which do not result a
net reduction of more than five percent (5%) in tot
12 - 9 2- 6 n 3
t
acreage zoned and developed as City parks, shall not
constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1991).
ACTION TX"N:
That, having made the findings of fact and reached the
conclusions o law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment
II of the Proji�qt is hereby approved, subject to the following
conditions:
THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSO , AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY
ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL
ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PUR ANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOG MR WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER
DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL:
1. Incorporate the following in the project design and
operation to minimize the cumula. ve adverse regional impact
of the project, its traffic d associated pollutant
emissions on air quality;
a. Actively encourage and pro to ridesharing by
establishing a car and van pool in rmation program;
b. Provide local and regional mass\rransit route and
schedule information in convenient ons throughout
the project, including office complies and within
and adjacent to retail areas;
c. Encourage transit use by provision of\fauc
development of turnout lanes, or provis
amenities to increase ridership; and
d. Provide on -site bicycle storage facilities
use of alternative modes of transportation
€ 2. For the purposes of water conservation, util
use plumbing fixtures, self -closing and/or met
and other water conserving devices.
f:
Al
- 13 -
� " 92-- 609
iporate the use of water sensors and other low water
e landscape irrigation techniques to reduce the project
d on the region's potable water supply.
ete the construction of N.W. 1st Avenue from N.W. loth
t to N.W. 14th Street as a new four -lane divided
ity prior to a. or b. below, whichever occurs earlier.
a date when all the certificates of occupancy which
a been issued for Southeast Overtown/Park Westnc ent II will generate more than a total of 818 peak
our trip ends, as estimated based on trip rates
denti ed in Exhibit 2 herein;
b. December`*1, 1998.
In the event th by December 31, 1997, the necessary right-
of-way for the bject improvement has not been acquired,
then within 30 da the Applicant shall request a meeting
with Council staff consider potential reallocation of the
Applicants proportio al share in the amount of $472,852
(1992 dollars). Any eallocation must be consistent with
applicable statutes and ules.
5. Comply with the requireme\eeak
Chapter 14, Section 14-71,
Code of the City of Miamtled Transportation Control
Measures, which sets forteak hour trip reduction and
reporting requirements foroject.
6. Conduct air quality modecarbon monoxide impacts.
The air quality modelling low Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation es and shall:
a. Be based on actualtra is counts for the
intersections listed below;
b. Include the following intersects s: N.E. lot
Avenue/N.E. 5th Street; and, N.E. 2n Avenue/N.E. 5th
Street; and,
c. Be submitted by June 30, 1999, in a detail analysis to
FDER and DERM for comment and review, and SFRPC for
review and approval.
7. If the results of the air quality modelling s dy, as
described in Condition 6, above, exceed 85 percent b t less
than 100 percent of the State standard fo co
concentrations, submit by October 30, 1999, a detaile air
quality monitoring plan to FDER and DERM for review d
comment and SFRPC for review and approval. Pending approv
- 14 - 92- 609
a a
of the monitoring plan, withhold the issuance of any
twuilding permits for net new development within the subarea
t show exceedences of 85 percent of the CO standard.
B. If results of the air quality modelling study, as
des�,he
bed in Condition 6, above, or any monitoring results
pursue t to Condition 7, above, exceed State standards for
CO conc trations, do one of the following:
a. Provi acceptable documentation which clearly indicates
that C exceedences will not occur, or that the net new
develo nt seeking approval will not contribute to the
predicte CO violation, or that any potential CO
additions or each net new development have been or
will be mit ated prior to issuance of building permits
for the p ticular net new development. This
documentation ust be submitted to FDER and DERM for
comment and r iew, and to the SFRPC for review and
approval.
b. Withhold the issue ce of any building permits for net
new development wXthin the subarea that shows CO
exceedences.
9. Integrate all original and pplemental ADA information into
a consolidated Application r Development Approval (CADA)
and submit two copies of th CADA to the Council and one
copy to the Department of Co nity Affairs within 30 days
of the effective date of the d velopment order. The CADA
shall be prepared as follows:
a. Where new, clarified, or r vised information was
prepared subsequent to submittal f the ADA but prior to
issuance of the development orde whether in response
to a formal statement of inflkrmation needed or
otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be
replaced with revised pages.
b. Revised pages will have a "Page N r (R) - Date"
notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the
original page, "(R)" indicating that a page was
revised, and "Date" stating the date of the evision.
10. Submit an annual report to the Council, and the epartment
of Community Affairs on each anniversary date of the
effective date of the development order. The annua report
shall include, at a minimum, a complete response t each
question in Exhibit 3 (Annual Report).
11. Identify in the development order any approved develo nt,
including the acreage attributable to each approved 1 nd
use, open space, areas of preservation, and green belts, a d
15 -
the structures and improvements to be placed on the
property, including locations, acreages, gross square
footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or
mponents of the development.
12. Est blish the termination date for completing development as
Dece r 31, 1999, provided that the applicant, its
succe ors, and assigns, complies with Condition 15, herein.
The to ination date may only be modified in accordance with
Section 0.06(19)(c) F.S.
13. Establish a expiration date for the development order.
14. Establish the ffective date of the development order as 45
days from tra mittal of the development order to the
Department of Co unity Affairs, the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, and applicant; provided however that if
the development o er is appealed, the development order
will take effect on the day after all appeals have been
withdrawn or resolved ursuant to Section 380.07(2) F.S.
15. Record, within 30 day of the effective date of the
development order, notice f the adoption of the development
order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court
pursuant to Section 380.06( ), F.S., specifying that the
development order runs with t e land and is binding on the
applicant, its successors, nd assigns, jointly or
severally.
16. Meet the following state criteria for issuance of a DRI
development order:
a. The development order shall spec
(1) The name of the development.
(2) The authorized agent of the develo
(3) The name of the developer.
(4) A statement that:
The Application for Development Approval 'I'\DA) is
approved, or
The ADA is approved subject to conditi s,
specifying the conditions, or
The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for
denial and changes in the development proposal, if
any, that would make it eligible to receive
development approval.
=4JE*4- 16 -
44
• 92� sos
a
b. Findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing
whether and the extent to whichs
(1) The development unreasonably interferes with the
achievement of the objectives of an adopted state
land development plan applicable to the area;
( The development is consistent with the local land
development regulations and the adopted local
comprehensive plan;
(3) !NR development will be consistent with the
re endations of the Council DRI Assessment
pur ant to Section 380.06(14) F.S.; and
(4) The de elopment makes "adequate provision for the
public cilities needed to accommodate the impacts
of the p sed development" or the City commits in
the devel ent order to provide these facilities
consistent 'th the development schedule.
c. A legal description\of the property including acreage.
17. Designate an official o monitor compliance with all
conditions of the develop nt order and specify monitoring
procedures that, at a min um, require development order
conditions to be reviewed by 'ty of Miami prior to issuance
of any local development permi
18. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development
Approval by reference into the dev opment order as follows:
"The Consolidated Application for velopment Approval is
incorporated herein by reference an relied upon by the
parties in discharging their statutory uties under Ch. 380
F.S. and local ordinances. Substantial ompliance with the
representations contained in the Applicati for Development
Approval is a condition for approval u ess waived or
modified by agreement among the City, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, and the a licant, its
successors, or assigns."
19. Incorporate into the development order by ref ence the
Council DRI Assessment for Southeast Overtown/Pa West -
Master and Increment II.
20. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the deve
order.
17 -
92-- 609