HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-92-0608J-92r-657
9/22/92
11/16/92 92- 608
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION
NO. 88-111; ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1988), FOR
THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380,
FLORIDA STATUTES, BY AMENDING ITS PROJECT
DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION REGARDING
CATEGORIES OF TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT AND
BY CHANGING THE PROJECT PHASING SCHEDULE OF
INCREMENT I FOR 1988 THROUGH 1997 AND
INCREMENT II FOR 1992 THROUGH 1999; FINDING
AND CONFIRMING THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT
CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, INCORPORATING
SAID FINDINGS IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW;
DIRECTING THE TRANSMITTAL OF COPIES OF THIS
RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE
DEVELOPERS AND DESIGNATED HEREIN; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-110, adopted
February 11, 1988, the City Commission issued a Development Order
and Major Use Special Permit for the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 9500;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-111, adopted
February 11, 1988, the City Commission issued a Development Order
for Increment I of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development
of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes,
and Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 9500; and
CITY COMIESSION ,
MEETING OF
SEP 2 4-19
Resdudm
9- 608
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1992, the applicant filed a
"Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Subsection 380:06(19),
Florida Statutes" with the Florida Department of Community
Affairs, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the City
of Miami; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1992, the applicant applied for an
amendment to the previously -issued Development Order, Major Use
Special Permit; and
WHEREAS, the definition of total allowable development in
the original Master Development Order and the Increment I
Development Order provided that "(t)he City may permit
simultaneous increases and decreases between the land use
categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses
as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the
Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour
vehicle trips;" and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Project substituting
certain categories of development for previously approved
categories, the proposed total of which does not exceed total
trips generated by the original configuration, is not presumed to
constitute a substantial deviation under Section 380.06(19); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Project phasing to
schedule Increment I from 1988 through 1997 and Increment II from
1992 through 1999 is not presumed to constitute a substantial
deviation under Section 380.06(19); and
-2-
i,
92-'608
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution PAB 26-92, adopted
September 91 1992, Item No. 3, by a vote of nine to zero ( 9-0) ,
the Planning Advisory Board RECOMMENDED APPROVAL of the
application for amendment; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, the City Commission held an
advertised public hearing to consider this application for
amendment and whether it constituted a substantial deviation
under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission considers this Resolution to be
in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Miami;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution pertaining to substantial deviation
and Conclusions of Law are hereby approved, confirmed, and
adopted by reference hereto and incorporated herein as if fully
set forth in this section.
Section 2. Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. 88-111, the
Development Order for Increment I of the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Development of Regional Impact is hereby amended in the
following respects:l/
1/ Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
-3-
92- 608
"EXHIBIT "A"
INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of
development in the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Area through the Year 2007?
including the following land uses and increments:
(91-033 Mare feet)
(roonis)
Land Uses
Increment I
Increment II
Increment III Totals
(1988-1997)
(1992-1999)
(1999-2007)
Office
166,000
337,000
500,500 1,003,500
(gross square feet)
Retail/Service/
95,400
71,700
90,600 257,700
General Commercial
(gross square feet
Hotel 0 500 600 1,100
rooms
Residential 2,000 2,000 5,000 9,000
(dwelling units)
Attractions 8,000 8,000 0 16,000
seats
—4— 92- 608
DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development
Order, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New
Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be
issued under the terms and conditions of this
Development Order, together with the applicable Master
Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to
Florida Statutes, 380.06(19) (1991), and which shall be
measured by the following land uses:
Office 166,000 gross square feet
Retail/Service 95,400 66,290 gross square feet
Residential 2,000 dwelling units
Attractions 8,000 seats
The City may permit simultaneous increases and
decreases in the above described land use categories,
provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as
changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of
the land uses in Increment II of the Project as
originally approved, as measured by total peak hour
vehicle trips.
Section 3. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of
Regional Impact, as proposed to be amended by the City of Miami
Department of Development and Housing Conservation, complies with
-5-
92- 608
the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the
orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies
with local land development regulations.
Section 4. The proposed amendment to the development order
does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable
to the City of Miami.
Section 5. The proposed amendment to the development order
is generally consistent with the Report and Recommendations of
the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not
unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and
objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Section 6. Changes in the project which do not exceed
development parameters set forth in the Application for
Development Approval and Report and Recommendation of the
Regional Planning Council shall not constitute a substantial
deviation; under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, notwithstanding
City zoning approvals which may be required.
Section 7. The phasing schedule changes and textual changes
to the original Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of
Regional Impact development order set forth herein do not
constitute a substantial deviation.
Section 8. This amendment does not constitute a substantial
deviation pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Section 9. This Resolution shall be transmitted to Herbert
H. Bailey, Assistant City Manager, and Sergio Rodriguez,
Assistant City Manager, authorized agents for the Department of
IM
92- 608
Development and Housing Conservation, 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way,
i
Suite 400, Miami, Florida 33131; Carolyn Dekle, Executive
Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood
Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021, and Linda
Shelley, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740
Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.
Section 10. The effective date of this amended development
order shall be 45 days from transmittal of the development order
to the Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, and applicant; provided, however, that
if the development order is appealed, the development order will
take effect on the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or
resolved pursuant to Section 380.07(2), Florida Statutes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of Sept ► , 1992.
ATT T XAVIER L SUAREZ,, MAYOR
MATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
LINDA KELLY K R N
Assistant City Attorney
LKK/pb/bss/M3780
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
-7- 92- 608
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -ORRICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Matty Hirai DATE : November 23, 1992 FILE
City Clerk
su9JECT : Scrivener' s Errors
FROM : REFERENCES
A. Q inn es, III
City At o ey ENCLOSURES: c�a
- Q: Y.ts'
ri. K)
On September 24, 1992 the City Commission ,adopted tR
following Resolutions and an Exhibit to a Resolution *hish
contained typographical errors in their texts% Cn
1. Resolution No. 92-607
2. Resolution No. 92-608
3. Resolution No. 92-609 - Exhibit A
Enclosed herewith are the corrected Resolutions and Exhibit.
Specifically, the Resolutions were corrected in the following
particulars:
1. Resolution No. 92-607 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
2. Resolution No. 92-608 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
3. Resolution No. 92-609 (Exhibit A) - On Page 4 the
references in the definition of CADA or Consolidated
Application for Development Approval were changed from
paragraph 17 on page 23 to paragraph 9 on Page 15.
On Page 6 the reference in the definition of Project
was changed from Page 1 to Page 3. Also, on Page 6,
the reference in the definition of Project Area was
changed from Page 6 to Page 1-2.
On Page 10, the date August, 1992 was inadvertently
left out.
,Oa- 4 o �'
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
``l INTP-A-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: matty Hirai DATE : November 23, 1992 FILE
City Clerk
sUEUECT : Scrivener' s Errors
#00
FROM REFERENCES:
A. Q inn es, III
City At o ey ENCLOSURES:
+i y
On September 24, 1992 the City Commission ;'adopte6 tR
following Resolutions and an Exhibit to a Resolution �whi:ih
contained typographical errors in their texts: Cn
1. Resolution No. 92-607
2. Resolution No. 92-608
3. Resolution No. 92-609 - Exhibit A
Enclosed herewith are the corrected Resolutions and Exhibit.
Specifically, the Resolutions were corrected in the following
particulars:
1. Resolution No. 92-607 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
2. Resolution No. 92-608 - On page 4 the dates pertaining
to Increment I were changed from (1988-1994) to (1988-
1997); the dates pertaining to Increment II were
changed from (1994-1999) to (1992-1999).
3. Resolution No. 92-609 (Exhibit A) - On Page 4 the
references in the definition of CADA or Consolidated
Application for Development Approval were changed from
paragraph 17 on page 23 to paragraph 9 on Page 15.
On Page 6 the reference in the definition of Project
was changed from Page 1 to Page 3. Also, on Page 6,
the reference in the definition of Project Area was
changed from Page 6 to Page 1-2.
On Page 10, the date August, 1992 was inadvertently
left out.
Matty Hirai November 23, 1992
City Clerk Page 2
This office reviewed the changes and determined that they
were insubstantial, therefore, the Resolutions do not require
further review by the City Commission. Accordingly, x'am hereby
requesting the execution of the corrected Resolutions and the
substitution of Exhibit A (Resolution No. 92-609) as quickly as
possible so that they may be forwarded to the Florida Regional
Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
AQJ/LKK/pb/P790
Enclosures
jn
t of Ptautt
MATTY HIRAI '3 CESAR H. ODIO
City Clerk is to Ilot � City Manager
December 1, 1992
Linda Shelley, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: AMENDED DOCUMENTS FOR CITY OF MIAMI RESOLUTIONS 92-607,
92-60$9 AND 92-609
Dear Ms. Shelley:
On October 16, 1992, our office transmitted to you copies of the
above -cited City of Miami resolutions, which have now been
amended to correct scriveners errors as explained in memorandum
from A. Quinn Jones, III, City Attorney (copy enclosed).
Please substitute the attached corrected documents for the ones
previously sent to you.
If you have any questions, please call.
4'aAelpectfully submitted,
Vay Hirai
1 City Clerk
MH:sl
ENC: a/s
i
t97
3
3
'a
}
_t
i
i
3
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 33070a//Mi�mi, Florida 33273.0=/(303) 2WSW
#q of �lllittmi w
MATI'Y HIRAI
City Clerk
s�f r O F
December 1, 1992
Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, FL 33021
CESAR H. ODIO
City Manager
RE: AMENDED DOCUMENTS FOR CITY OF MIAMI RESOLUTIONS 92-607,
92-608, AND 92-609
Dear Ms. Dekle:
On October 16, 1992, our office transmitted to you copies of the
above -cited City of Miami resolutions, which have Kow been
amended to correct scrivener's errors as explained in memorandum
from A. Quinn Jones, III, City Attorney (copy enclosed).
Please substitute the attached corrected documents for the ones
previously sent to you.
If you have any questions, please call.
R ectfully submitted,
atty Hirai
City Clerk
MH:si
ENC: a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330705/Miami, Florida 33233-0708/(305) 2WS360
i
PLANNING FACT SHEET *PZWJ9
APPLICANT Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation: October 10, 1991
LOCATION Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). (Complete
legal description on file with the Nearing Boards Division).
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point at the intersection of the center line of N.E. 5th
Street and the center line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence west on the center
line of N.E. 5th Street (and N.W. 5th Street) to the east ROW line of I-95;
thence northwesterly on the east ROW line of I-95 to the south ROW line of
I-395; thence easterly on the south ROW line of 1-395 to the center line of
Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly on the center line of Biscayne Boulevard
to the point of beginning, comprising +/- 209.38 acres, more or less.
PETITION Consideration of amending the Increment I Development Order for the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact. The Phase I redevelopment
program (1988-1994) was to have included the construction of 2,000
residential dwelling units, 166,000 square feet of office space, 66,200
square feet of commercial space, 290,000 square feet of convention space.
The proposed amendment, a result of changed market conditions, would change
(1) the phasing of Increment I to 1988-1997, and (2) would alter land use
categories for Increment I to include 95,400 square feet of commercial square
feet (instead of 66,200 square feet) and 8,000 attractions seats (to replace
total convention space),
PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval
BACKGROUND AND The Master Development Order provided that "the City may permit simultaneous
ANALYSIS increases and decreases between the land use categories provided that the
regional impacts of the land uses as changed would not exceed the adverse
regional impacts of the project as originally approved, as measured by total
peak hour vehicle trips." The proposed changes do not result in additional
total peak hour vehicle trips and are reasonably related to changed market
conditions in the city.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD: Meeting scheduled for September 16, 1992.
APPLICATION NUMBER 92- 25
07/30/92
92-- 608
PAB 09/09/92 Item 1 3
Page 1
byy
► M S
o
)IERStRT J. BAILEY
Ascistant City t.lanaFc•r
August 7, 1992
Mr. J. Thomas Beck, Chief
Bureau of State Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Dear. Mr. Beck:
CESAR H. ODIO
City Manager
05i1
Enclosed is a completed "Notification of a Proposed Change to the
Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact"
pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, for your
review and comments.
Should you have any questions or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact Reginald Barker of my staff at
(305) 579-3366 .
Thank you for your cooperation.
S, ly►
1 �
H be t Bailey
sis a City Manager
HJB/r
Enclosure
cc: Jim Snyder, Bureau of State Planning
Carolyn A. Dekle, South Florida RPC
Sergio Rodriguez, City of Miami
Linda Kearson, City of Miami
0
77
J '
92- 608
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING CONSERVATION/DUPONT PLAZA CENTER
300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401/Miami, FL 33131
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (305) 579-3366 / HOUSING DIVISION (305) 579-3336
PROPERTY AND LEASE MANAGEMENT DIVISION (305) 372-4640 / Telecopier. (305) 371-9710
c
FORM RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES
Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that
submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be
made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and
the state land planning agency according to this form. -
1. I, Herbert J. Bailey, Assistant City Manager, the
undersigned owner/authorized representative of the City of
,Miami, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a
previously approved Development of Regional Impact in
accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes.
In support thereof, I submit the following information
concerning the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment _Proect Development of Regional Impact
development, which information is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under
separate cover, copies of this completed notification to
the City of Miami, to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council, and to the Bureau of State Planning, Department of
Community Affairs.
August 7, 1992
(Date) 'Qnature)
92 608
3.
M
Applicant (name, address, phone).
City of Miami, Florida
P. 0. Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
Phone: (305) 250-5400
Authorized Agent(s) (name, address, phone).
Herbert J. Bailey
Assistant City Manager
City of Miami Development &
Housing Conservation
300 Biscayne Blvd. Way, Ste. 400
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 579-3366
Reginald Barker
DRI Project Manager
City of Miami Development &
Housing Conservation
300 Biscayne Blvd. Way, Ste. 400
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 579-3366
Sergio Rodriguez
Assistant City Manager
City of Miami Planning,
Building & Zoning
275 N.W. 2nd Street, 3rd Floor
Miami, Florida 33128
Phone: (305) 579-6086
Linda Kearson
Assistant City Attorney
City of Miami Law
Department
300 Biscayne Blvd. Way, Ste. 300
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 579-6700
Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved
DRI and proposed change.
City of Miami; Dade County; T53-R41-S36, T54-R42-S6, T53-
R42-S31, and T54-R41-S1.
5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change.
Include any proposed changes to the plan of development,
phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build -out
date, development order conditions and requirements, or to
the representations contained in either the development
order or the Application for Development Approval.
The following changes are proposed to the Master
development order (Res. 88-110):
I. Change the Project Description.
The Phase I .(Increment I) redevelopment program (1988-
1994) was to have included the construction of 2,000
residential dwelling units, 166,000 square feet of
office space, 66,200 square feet of commercial space,
290,000 square feet of convention space. Phase II, or
Increment II, (1994-1999) was to have included 2,000
residential dwelling units, 205,000 square feet of
office space, 37,300 square feet of commercial space,
500 hotel rooms and 310,000 square feet of convention
space. Phase III, or Increment III,, (1999-2007) was to
have included 5,000 residential units, 632,500 square
feet of office space, 90,600 square feet of commercial
space and 600 hotel rooms.
92,- 608
d amendment to the Project Descri
The propose tion, a � P
result of changed market conditions, would change (1)
the phasing of Increment I to 1988-1997 and Increment
II to 1992-1999 and (2) would alter land use categories
as follows: Increment I - 95,400 square feet of
commercial space, 8,000 attractions seats and no
convention space; Increment II - 337,000 square feet of
office space, 71,700 square feet of commercial space,
8,000 attractions seats and no convention space; and
Increment III - 500,500 square feet of office space.
ustificat-.on/Rationale
1. The Project Description must be modified to conform
with a proposed amended Increment I development
order and a proposed new Increment II development
order. The regional impacts of the proposed
Increment I Project Description as changed would
not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the
project as originally approved, as measured by
total peak hour vehicle trips. The regional
impacts of the proposed Increment II development
program (Project Description) have been assessed by
the South Florida Regional Planning Council (see
Development of Regional Impact Assessment for
Southeast Overtown/Park West - Increment II dated
August, 1992). Measures which mitigate adverse
regional impacts of the development program will be
included in the proposed Increment II development
order.
2. According to the Master development order an
objective of the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI
designation is to provide a flexible guide to
planned development rather than a precise blueprint
for growth. Consequently, amendments to approved
development orders and/or adjustments to future
incremental development programs may be needed to
ensure that said orders and programs "serve as a
living guide recognizing the evolution of market
demand and technologies."
The following changes are proposed to the Increment I
development order (Res. 88-111):
1. Change the Project Description.
The proposed amendment to the Project Description, a
result of changed market conditions, would change (1)
the phasing of Increment I to 1988-1997 and Increment
II to 1992-1999 and (2) would alter land use categories
as follows: Increment I - 95,400 square feet of
commercial space, 8,000 attractions seats and no
convention space; Increment II•- 337,000 square feet of
office space, 71,700 square feet bf commercial space,
8,000 attractions seats and no convention space; and
Increment III - 500.500 square feet of office space.
g92- 608
1. The Project Description must be changed to conform
with the amended definition of Total Allowable
Development proposed for the Increment I
development order and to conform with the Project
Description and definition of Total Allowable
Development contained in the proposed Increment II
development order.
2. According to the approved Increment I development
order, an objective of the Southeast Overtown/Park
West DRI designation is to provide a flexible guide
to planned development rather than a precise
blueprint for growth. Consequently, amendments to
the Project Description may be needed to ensure
that said "serve[s] as a living guide recognizing
the evolution of market demand and technologies."
2. Change the definition of Total Allowable Development.
The proposed amendment to the definition of Total
Allowable Development would change (1) the quantity of
allowable commercial (retail/service) development from
66,200 gross square feet to 95,400 gross square feet,
and (2) add the attractions land use category, quantity
8,000 seats. The convention land use category,
containing 290,000 gross square feet, is proposed to be
removed from the definition.
ustification/Rationale
1. The definition of Total Allowable Development in
the original Master development order (Res. 88-110)
and the Increment I development order (Res. 88-111)
provided that "the City may permit simultaneous
increases and decreases between the land use
categories, provided that the regional impacts of
the land uses as changed will not exceed the
adverse regional impacts of the Project as
originally approved, as measured by total peak hour
vehicle trips."
2. Increasing the amount of commercial space by 29,200
square feet and adding 8,000 attractions seats
while at the same time decreasing the amount of
convention space by 290,000 square feet does not
increase the total peak hour vehicle trips approved
by the Increment I development order.
3. Substituting certain categories of development,
e.g., the attractions land use, for previously
approved categories, e.g,, the convention land use,
does not contribute to the'exceedance of total
vehicle trips generated `by the original
configuration approved with the Master and
Increment I development orders.
4 99--- 608
W
Indicate such changes on the project master site plan,
supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate.
Additional information may be requested by the Department
or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change
or the resulting impacts.
No change in maps.
6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination
Chart for all land use types approved in the development.
If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no
change.
See Substantial Deviation Determination Chart.
7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other
appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or
amendments to the originally approved DRI development order
that have been adopted by the local government, and provide
a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any
information not already addressed in the Substantial
Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in
local government jurisdiction for any portion of the
development since the last approval or development order
was issued? If so, has the annexing local government
adopted a new DRI development order for the project?
Originally approved development orders:
1. Master Development Order - Resolution 88-110
February 11, 1988
2. Increment I Development Order - Resolution 88-111
February 11, 1988
Modifications:
3. Stipulation of Settlement, Department of Community
Affairs vs. The City of Miami, State of Florida
Division of Administrative Hearings Case No. 88-12,
June 2, 1988 (This settlement clarified the meanings of
Total Allowable Development, Net New Development and
Aggregate Exclusions as applied in the development
orders.)
4. Resolution 88-456, dated May 12, 1988, agreeing to and
authorizing the City Manager to execute the
aforementioned Stipulation of Settlement.
5
10 92- 608
�. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of
the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval
or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such
land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land
uses within 1/2 mile on a project master site plan or other
map.
Not applicable.
9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40%
(cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the
criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida
Statutes.
Not applicable, change is based upon application of
simultaneous increase/decrease criteria contained in
380.06(19)(b)18., F.S. (1987), and City of Miami Commission
Resolutions 88-110 and 88-111.
Do you believe this notification of change proposes a
change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph
380.06(19)(e)2., F.S.
YES NO
Not applicable, public hearing to be held and determination
to be made.
10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the build -
out date or any phasing date of the project? If so,
indicate the proposed new build -out or phasing dates.
Yes.
Increment I
Original Phasing and Build -out: 1988-1994
Proposed Phasing and Build -out: 1988-1997
Increment II
Original Phasing and Build -out: 1994-1999
Proposed Phasing and Build -out: 1992-1999
11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local
government comprehensive plan?
No.
Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended
development order, pursuant to Subsections 3'80.06(15), F.S., and
9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code:
6 92- 608 � J
•
12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development
portraying and distributing the proposed changes to the
previously approved DRI or development order conditions.
No change in maps.
13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(f), F.S., include the
precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or
added as an amendment to the development order. This
language should address and quantify:
a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and
build -out data of the development; to development order
conditions and requirements; to commitments and
representations in the Application for Development
Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described
proposed change of land use, open space, areas for
preservation, green belts; to structures or to other
improvements including locations, square footage, number of
units; and other major characteristics or components of the
proposed change;
See Attachments I and II.
b. An updated legal description of the property, if any
project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the
previously approved plan or development;
Not applicable.
C. A proposed amended development order deadline for
commencing physical development of proposed changes, if
applicable;
See Attachments I and II.
d. A proposed amended development order termination date that
reasonably reflects the time required to complete the
development;
See Attachments I and II.
e. A proposed amended development order date until which the
local government' agrees that the changes to the DRI shall
not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or
intensity reduction, if applicable; and
See Attachments I and II.
f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the
annual report, including the date of submission, contents,
and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in
Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C.
Not applicable.
7 92- 608
Substantial
Deviation Determination Chart
TYPE OF
CHANGE
PROPOSED ORIGINAL
PREVIOUS D.O.
E, LAND JJSE
E,
CATEGORY
PLAN PLAN
CHANGE + DATE
,
Attraction/
# Parking Spaces
N/A N/A
N/A
Recreation
# Spectators
N/A N/A
N/A
# Seats
8,000 0
N/A
Site locational changes
N/A N/A
N/A
Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements. N/A N/A
N/A
# External vehicle
Trips
28 (PM Peak) 0 (PM Peak)
N/A
D.O. conditions
See discussion at end of
chart.
ADA representation
See discussion at end of
chart.
Airports
00
Hospitals
Runway (length) N o t
Runway (strength)
Terminal (gross square feet)
Site locational changes
Airport Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
# External vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
# Beds N o t
# Parking Spaces
Building (gross square feet)
Site locational changes
Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
# External vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA.representations
A p p l i c a b l e
A p p l i c a b l e
Substantial Deviation Determination Chart (cont.)
TYPE. OF CHANGE PROPOSED ORIGINAL PREVIOUS D.O.
LAND. USE CATEGORY PLAN PLAN CHANGE + DATE;
Industrial Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements. N o t A p p l i c a b l e
# Parking Spaces
Building (gross square feet)
# Employees
Chemical storage
(barrels and lbs.)
Site locational changes
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
Mining Acreage mined (year) N o t A p p l i c a b l e
Operations Water Withdrawal (Gal/day)
Size of Mine (acres), including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
Site locational changes
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
T
Office Acreage, including N is t A p p l i c a b l e
drainage, ROW, easements.
Building (gross square feet)
# Parking Spaces -
# Employees
Site locational changes
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions.
ADA representations
d?
G
40
I
Substantial Deviation Determination Chart (cont.)
TYPE OF CHANGE PROPOSED ORIGINAL PREVIOUS D•O.
LAND USE CATEGORY PLAN PLAN CHANGE + DATE
Petroleum/Chem. Storage Capacity
Storage (barrels and/or lbs.) N o t
Distance to Navigable
waters.(feet)
Site locational changes
Facility Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N o t
# boats, dry storage
0 Dredge and fill (cu. yds.)
Petroleum storage (gals.)
Site locational changes
Port Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easement, etc.
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
Residential # dwelling units _ N o t
Type of dwelling units
# lots
Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
Site locational changes
# External vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
A p p l i c a b l e
A p p l i c a b l e
A p p l i c a b l e
Substantial Deviation Determination Chart
(cont.)
TYPE OF
PROPOSED ORIGINAL
PLAN
PREVIOUS D.O.
CHANGE + DATE
CHANGE
LANDUSE
CATEGORY
PLAN
Wholesale,
Retail,
Acreage,including
drainage, ROW, easements.
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Service
Floor Space (gsf)
94,500 66,200
N/A N/A
N/A
(Commercial)
# Parking Spaces
N/A N/A
N/A
# Employees
Site locational changes
N/A N/A
58 (PM Peak) 40 (PM Peak)
N/A
N/A
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
See discussion at end
of chart.
ADA representations
See discussion at end
of chart.
Hotel/Motel
F-0
Convention
CD
b4l)
# Rental Units N o t A p p I i c a b 1
Floor Space (gross square feet)
# Parking Places
4 Employees
Site locational changes
Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements, etc.
t External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
Acreage, including
drainage, ROW, easements.
Floor Space (gSf)
# Parking Spaces
# Employees
Site locational changes
# External Vehicle Trips
D.O. conditions
ADA representations
N/A N/A N/A
0 290,000 N�A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A NIA N/A
N/A N/A N/A
0 (pm Peak) 46 (PM Peak) N/A
See discussion at end of chart.
See discussion at end of chart.
9
TYPE OF
LAND USE
CHANGE '
CATEGORY
Substan
tial Deviation Determination Chart (cant.)
ORIGINAL PREVIOUS PATE
PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE
PLAN
N o t A p P I i c a b l e
Acreage
Open Space Site locational changes
(All natural T e of open space
and vegetated Type
conditions
non -impervious D.O.
surfaces)
ADA representations N o t A P P I i c a b 1 e
Acreage
Preservation, rs osed
Buffer of Special Site foment oflsite npe P
Protection Areas Develop
D,O, conditions
ADA representations
r
N
tion of each
attach a detailed description may request
than one sentence, fan drawings'
The BureauIf a response is to be more modified site p
Note. res of the proposed .
e and cop' developer or his agent
proposed Chang .
additional information from the
c�
i
Gn
Q
EXPLANATION Or SIMULTANEOUS INCREASES AND DECREASES IN LAND USES
The Increment I development order (Res. 88-111), page 3, sets
forth the following definition for "Total Allowable Development,"
including the criteria by which the City may permit simultaneous
increases and decreases in land use categories:
"Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New
Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be
issued under the terms and conditions of the Development
Order, together with the applicable Master' Development
Order, as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)
(1987), and which shall be measured by the following land
uses:
Of f ice
Retail/Service/Commercial
Residential
Convention
166,000 gross square feet
66,200 gross square feet
2,000 dwelling units
290,000 gross square feet
The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in
the above described land use categories, provided that the
regional impacts of the land uses as changes will not exceed
the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I
of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total
peak hour vehicle trips." Additionally, substituting
certain categories of development for previously approved
categories or land uses which does not cause the exceedance
of total peak hour vehicle trips generated by the original
configuration does not contribute to additional adverse
regional impacts.
An objective of the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI designation
as expressed in the "Findings of Fact," Increment I development
order, pages 4-5, is to provide a flexible development framework
wherein future development may take place which responds to "the
evolution of market demand and technologies." (Today's market
conditions suggest that an attractions land use designation may
further the timely redevelopment of Southeast Overtown/Park West
instead of the convention land use category designation.)
Consistent with the above, the applicant proposes to increase the
commercial land use category to 95,400 square feet (net increase
of 29,200 square feet) and add 8,000 new attractions seats, and
to an to decrease the convention land use category by an
equivalent amount (290,000 square feet), as measured by peak hour
vehicle trips. It is important to note that peak hour vehicle
trips were agreed upon by all agencies participating in the
drafting of the development order to be the controlling criteria,
rather than total trips.
13
Is
92- 608
t Approved Project Description/Total Allowable Development
Units/
PM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour Vehicle
Land Use
Quantity
Vehicle Trips
Trips Per Unit Land Use
Office
166,000 gsf
116
0.000698
Commercial
66,200 gsf
40
0.000604
Residential
2,000 dus
284
0.142000
Convention
290,000 gsf
46
0.000159
Total
486
Proposed Project Description/Total Allowable Development
Units/
PM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour Vehicle
Land Use
Quantity
Vehicle Trips
Trips Per Unit Land Use
Office
166,000 gsf
116
0.000698
Commercial
95,400 gsf
58
0.000604
Residential
2,000 dus
284
0.142000
Attractions
8,000 seats
28
0.003559(1)
Total 486
(1) Extrapolated from Consolidated Application for Development
Approval (CADA) for Southeast Overtown/Park West and CADA for
Downtown Miami, as Southeast Overtown/Park West is a sub -area
of Downtown Miami.
14
92- 608
MALTY HIRAI
City Clerk
October 166 1992
Ms. Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, FL 33021
CESAR H. 0010
City Manager
RE: AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK
WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
Dear Ms. Dekle:
The City of Miami Commission, at its meeting of September 24,
1992, passed and adopted Resolution No. 92-608, and requested the
City Clerk to transmit said instrument to you.
Attached hereto, please find the above -cited resolution, which is
self-explanatory.
s ectfully submitted,
ATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
MH:vg
Enc. a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/35W Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 33t WMiami, Florida 33nWOV(30N 2W- ip
tit. 'CCYCt
MATtY HIRAI
City Clerk
October 16, 1992
CESAR H. ODIO
City Manager
Linda Shelley, Secretary
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK
WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
Dear Ms. Shelley:
The City of Miami Commission, at its meeting of September 249
1992, passed and adopted Resolution No. 92-608, and requested the
City Clerk to transmit said instrument to you.
Attached hereto, please find the above -cited resolution, which is
self-explanatory.
s ectfully submitted,
ATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
MH:vg
Enc. a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330709/Miami, Florida 33233-07W(305) 2W530
l--a
9
vr'f
92-657
9� 2/92
9 2 a 608
is
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION
0. 88-111; ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1988), FOR
E SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380,
FLO DA STATUTES, BY AMENDING ITS PROJECT
DESC PTION AND DEFINITION REGARDING
CATEG IES OF TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT AND
BY C ING THE PROJECT PHASING SCHEDULE OF
INCREMEN' I FOR 1988 THROUGH 1997 AND
INCREMENT I FOR 1992 THROUGH 1999; FINDING
AND CONFI' NG THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT
CONSTITUTE S STANTIAL DEVIATIONS PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 380, ORIDA STATUTES, INCORPORATING
SAID FINDINGS IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW;
DIRECTING THE T SMITTAL OF COPIES OF THIS
RESOLUTION TO FECTED AGENCIES AND THE
DEVELOPERS AND ESIGNATED HEREIN; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EF CTIVE DATE.
n
v
;jS..
WHEREAS, pursuant to Res ution No. 88-110, adopted
February 11, 1988, the City Commissi issued a Development Order
and Major Use Special Permit for the S theast Overtown/Park West
Development of Regional Impact, pursuant o Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and Major Use pursuant to Zonin Ordinance No. 9500;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. \en
opted
February 11, 1988, the City Commission issued a DOrder
for Increment I of the Southeast Overtown/Park pment
of Regional Impact, pursuantto Chapter 380, Futes,
and Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 95
CITY COMMSSION
MEETING OF
SEP 2 4 1992
Resolution No.
92- 608
92-657
9 2 / 9 2
RESOLUTION NO. 9 2 608
A RESOLUTION AMENDING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION
O. 88-111; ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1988), FOR
E SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380,
FLO DA STATUTES, BY AMENDING ITS PROJECT
DESC PTION AND DEFINITION REGARDING
CATEG IES OF TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT AND
BY C ING THE PROJECT PHASING SCHEDULE OF
INCREMEN I FOR 1988 THROUGH 1997 AND
INCREMENT I FOR 1992 THROUGH 1999; FINDING
AND CONFI NG THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT
CONSTITUTE S 5TANTIAL DEVIATIONS PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 380, ORIDA STATUTES, INCORPORATING
SAID FINDING IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW;
DIRECTING THE T SMITTAL OF COPIES OF THIS
RESOLUTION TO FECTED AGENCIES AND THE
DEVELOPERS AND ESIGNATED HEREIN; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EF CTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Res ution No. 88-110, adopted
February 11, 1988, the City Commissi issued a Development Order
and Major Use Special Permit for the S theast Overtown/Park West
Development of Regional Impact, pursuant o Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and Major Use pursuant to Zonin Ordinance No. 9500;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. \en
opted
February 11, 1988, the City Commission issued a DOrder
for Increment I of the Southeast Overtown/Park pment
of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380, Futes,
and Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 95
irteur� �
►i- z.44 -9Z
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
SEP 2 4 1992
Resolution No.
92- 608
4
WHEREAS? on August 7, 1992, the applicant filed a
"Not ication of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Develop ent of Regional Impact (DRI) Subsection 380.06(19),
Florida atutes" with the Florida Department of Community
Affairs, th South Florida Regional Planning Council and the City
of Miami; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1992, the applicant applied for an
amendment to the peviously-issued Development Order, Major Use
Special Permit; and
WHEREAS, the definition of total allowable development in
the original Master Dev opment Order and the Increment I
Development Order provide that "(t)he City may permit
simultaneous increases and creases between the land use
categories, provided that the re 'onal impacts of the land uses
as changed will not exceed the adv se regional impacts of the
Project as originally approved, as me sured by total peak hour
vehicle trips;" and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to th Project substituting
certain categories of development for p eviously approved
categories, the proposed total of which does exceed total
trips generated by the original configuration, is\6(19);
med to
constitute a substantial deviation under Section 3and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Projng to
schedule Increment I from 1988 through 1997 and InI from
r
54.
1992 through 1999 is not presumed to constitute a substaNial
deviation under Section 380.06(19); and
._ -2-
92- 608
WHEREASt pursuant to Resolution PAB 26-92t adopted
Septe er 9, 1992, Item No. 3, by a vote of nine to zero (9-0)
the P1 ning Advisory Board RECOMMENDED APPROVAL of the
applicatio for amendment; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, the City Commission held an
advertised pub 'c hearing to consider this application for
amendment and wh ther it constituted a substantial deviation
under Chapter 380, F orida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City ommission considers this Resolution to be
in the best interest of t e citizens Of the City of Miami;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT SOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
T:
Section 1. The recitals a findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution pertain' g to substantial deviation
and Conclusions of Law are hereby proved, confirmed, and
adopted by reference hereto and incorpor ed herein as if fully
set forth in this section.
Section 2. Exhibit "A" of Resolution 88-111, the
Development Order for Increment I of the Southeast vertown/Park
West Development of Regional Impact is hereby amen ed in the
following respects:
V
Words and/or figures stricken through shall be dele d,. e
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. e
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchangege
nt-
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
-3- 92- 608
R.
bV4,
1 0
"EXHIBIT "A"
INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER
ROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of
d elopment in the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Comm ity Redevelopment Area through the Year 2007,
includ g the following land uses and increments:
f91`oss--square —feet)
-(dwell ing—unitr)
(gross square feet)
Land Uses Increment I Increment II crement III Totals
1988-1994 1994-1999 9-2007
Office 166,000 337,000 500,5k 1,003,500
(gross square feet)
Retail Service 95,400 71,700 90,600 257 100
General Commercial
gross square feet)
=. Hotel 0 500 600 100
rooms
Residential 2,000 2,000 5,000 9,000
(dwellingunits)
Attractions 8,000 8,000 0 16,000
seats
U.
�t
:;.
• -4- 92-'
.:.....
,1:
%IIFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development
er, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
wable Develo
t: The quantity of Net New
tt for which Certificates of Occupancy may be
later the terms and conditions of this
Development 0 er, together with the applicable Master
Development Or r, as may be modified pursuant to
Florida Statutes, 0.06(19) (1991). and which shall be
measured by the foll ing land uses:
Office 66,000 gross square feet
Retail/Service 9 400 66,299 gross square feet
Residential 210 dwelling units
Attractions 8,000 seats
The City may permit simultan us increases and
decreases in the above described la use categories,
provided that the regional impacts of a land uses as
changed will not exceed the adverse regio 1 impacts of
t: the land uses. in Increment II of the roject as
originally approved, as measured by total p ak hour
vehicle trips.
Section 3. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Develop nt of
s
Regional Impact, as proposed to be amended by the City of ami
Department of Development and Housing Conservation, complies wi
T
-5" 92- 608
a Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the
or rly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies
with ocal land development regulations.
Se tion 4. The proposed amendment to the development order
does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable
to the City o Miami.
Section 5. 'The proposed amendment to the development order
is generally cons i tent with the Report and Recommendations of
the South Florida egional Planning Council and does not
unreasonably interfer with any of the considerations and
objectives set forth in C apter 380, Florida Statutes.
Section 6. Changes i the project which do not exceed
development parameters set forth in the Application for
Development Approval and Rep t and Recommendation of the
Regional Planning Council shall of constitute a substantial
deviation; under Chapter 380, Flori a Statutes, notwithstanding
City zoning approvals which may be req 'red.
Section 7. The phasing schedule cha ges and textual changes
to the original Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of
Regional Impact development order set fo th* herein do not
constitute a substantial deviation.
Section 8. This amendment does not constitut a substantial
deviation pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Section 9. This Resolution shall be transmitted to Herbert
H. Bailey, Assistant City Manager, and Sergio R riguez,
Assistant City Manager, authorized agents for the Department of
-6-
92- 608
I
velopment and Housing Conservation, 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way,
Su i a 400, Miami, Florida 33131; Carolyn Dekle, Executive
Direc r, South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood
Bouleva , Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021, and Linda
Shelley, S cretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740
Centerview D ve, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.
Section 1 The effective date of this amended development
order shall be 45 days from transmittal of the development order
to the Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida
Regional Planning Coun `l, and applicant; provided, however,. that
if the development order 's appealed, the development order will
take effect on the day aft all appeals have been withdrawn or
resolved pursuant to Section 0.07(2), Florida Statutes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day of Septemee'r -,--,, , 1992.
ATT
MAT Y HIRAI
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
tIMM KEL E S
Assistant City Attorney
-7-
L. PUAREZ,
APPROVED AS Tq FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
City Att
, II