HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-92-0596J-92-453(b)
9/24/92
RESOLUTION NO. 9 P.— 5 9 b
A RESOLUTION REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE
ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING THE VARIANCE FROM
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF
1.35' (20'-0" REQUIRED) FOR THE EXISTING
DETACHED OPEN TERRACE, RECREATION ROOM WITH
BATH, AND UTILITY SHED; A NORTH YARD SIDE
SETBACK OF 0.60' (5'-0" REQUIRED) FOR THE
EXISTING RECREATION ROOM WITH BATH, AND A
SOUTH YARD SIDE SETBACK OF 0.20' (5'-0"
REQUIRED) FOR THE UTILITY SHED, FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
100 NORTHWEST 56 COURT, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), ZONED R-2
TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL
USES; SAID VARIANCE BEING CONDITIONED UPON
THE FOLLOWING: (1) SUBMITTAL BY THE
APPLICANT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE
DATE OF ADOPTION OF THIS RESOLUTION, OF A
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION STATING
THAT THE BUILDING IS SAFE; AND (2) CONTINUAL
CONTAINMENT OF WATER RUNOFF WITHIN THE
APPLICANT'S PROPERTY; AND HAVING A TIME
LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A
BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of
May 18, 1992, Item No. 1, duly adopted Resolution ZB 49-92 by a
seven to one (7-1) vote, denying a variance as hereinafter set
forth; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has taken an appeal to the City,
Commission from the denial of the variance; and
CITY CONI MIISSICIN
MEETIISG OF
SEP 2 4 1992
Resolution No.
92- 59'6
Pip
WHERE1A5, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter, and notwithstanding the decision of the Zoning
Board, finds that there are peculiar circumstances affecting
this parcel of land and that practical difficulties and
unnecessary hardships exist which would impair the owner's right
to the reasonable use of the property without the grant of
variance as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The decision of the Miami Zoning Board in
this matter is reversed and the request for a variance from
Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Miami, Florida, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of
District Regulations, to allow a rear yard setback of 1.35'
(20'-0" required) for the existing detached open terrace,
recreation room with bath, and utility shed; a north yard side
setback of 0.60' (5'-0" required) for the existing recreation
room with bath, and a south yard side setback of 0.20' (5'-01,
required) for the utility shed, for a single family residence
for the property located at 100 Northwest 56 Court, Miami,
Florida, also described as Lot 33, Block 1, WEST GATE, as
recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade
County, Florida, Zoned R-2 Two -Family Residential, Permitted
-2- 92- 596
i
n
t Principal Uses, said variance being conditioned upon the
i
following: (1) submittal by the applicant within sixty (60)
days after the date of adoption of this Resolution, of a
Professional Engineer's Certification stating that the building
is safe; and (2) continual containment of water runoff within
the applicant's property; and having a time limitation of twelve
months in which a building permit must be obtained, is hereby
granted.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th
ATTE •
2
MATTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
IRMA M. ABELLA
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
—/JEWW"M
ITY
GMM:IMA:Va:bss:M3011
day of
VI
, 1992.
, MAYOR
op PZw3
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL Approximately 100 NW 56 Court
Lot 33, Block 1, WEST GATE (13-3) PROC
APPLICANT/OWNER Rafael, Zoila, 8 Perla M. Rodriguez Rafael Rodriguez, Agent
100 NW 56 Court 100 NW 56 Court
Miami, Florida 33126 Miami, Florida 33126
Home: 264-7271 Work: 358-2433
ZONING R-2 Two Family Residential
REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-2 Two -Family
Residential, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a rear yard setback of 1.35'
(20'-0" required) for the existing detached open terrace, recreation room with
bath, and utility shed; a north yard side setback of 0.60' (5'-0" required) for
the existing recreation room with bath, and a south yard side setback of 0.20'
(5'-0" required) for the utility shed, for a single family residence.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PLANNING, BLDG E ZONING Denial
PUBLIC WORKS No Comments.
PLAT AND STREET
DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No Comments.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: 92-699 Last Hearing Date: 04/08/92 Found: Guilty
Violation(s) Cited: Working without a permit, building and/or roofing, etc; illegal units; and
encroaching in required yards/open space.
Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A
Lien Recorded on: N/A Total Fines To Date: N/A
Comments: Heard on 4/8/92 - Found guilty accepting stipulations; compliance
by 6/12/92; $50 Administrative Fee; $150 per diem.
HISTORY This item was continued to May 18, 1992 from the Zoning Board Hearing of May 4, 1992.
ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the requested setback variances for the existing
additions to the single family lot. The additions were built without the benefit of
building permits. The proper rear and side setbacks should have been provided. There are
-` no special conditions and circumstances which are particular to the land, structures, or
buildings involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district. The special conditions and circumstances are a direct result
from the actions of the petitioner. Granting the variance would confer on the petitioner
a special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other properties in the same
zoning district.
92- 596
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER 92- 41
Yes No N/A
x
Special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved
and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district.
x
The special conditions and circumstances are an indirect
result from the actions of the petitioner.
x
Literal interpretation of the provisions of toning Ordinance
11000 deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by
other properties in the same zoning district under the terms
of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue
hardship on the petitioner.
x
Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment
to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands,
buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
x
The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes
possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
x
The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
MAY 18, 1992
Page 2
I t"# 1
05/14/92
92-.596
PZ-3
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL Approximately 100 NW 56 Court
Lot 33, Block 1, WEST GATE (13-3) PRDC
APPLICANT/OWNER Rafael, Zoila, 8 Perla M. Rodriguez Rafael Rodriguez, Agent
100 NW 56 Court 100 NW 56 Court
Miami, Florida 33126 Miami, Florida 33126
Home: 264-7271 Work: 358-2433
ZONING R-2 Two Family Residential
REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-2 Two -Family
Residential, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a rear yard setback of 1.35'
(20'-0" required) for the existing detached open terrace, recreation room with
bath, and utility shed; a north yard side setback of 0.60' (5'-0" required) for
the existing recreation room with bath, and a south yard side setback of 0.20,
(5'-0" required) for the utility shed, for a single family residence.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PLANNING, BLDG 6 ZONING Denial
PUBLIC WORKS No Comments.
PLAT AND STREET
DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No Comments.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: 92-699 Last Hearing Date: 04/08/92 Found: Guilty
Violation(s) Cited: Working without a permit, building and/or roofing, etc; illegal units; and
encroaching in required yards/open space.
Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A
Lien Recorded on: N/A Total Fines To Date: N/A
Comments: Heard on 4/8/92 - Found guilty accepting stipulations; compliance
by 6/12/92; $SO Administrative Fee; $150 per diem.
HISTORY This item was continued to May 18, 1992 from the Zoning Board Hearing of May 4, 1992.
ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the requested setback variances for the existing
additions to the single family lot. The additions were built without the benefit of
building permits. The proper rear and side setbacks should have been provided. There are
no special conditions and circumstances which are particular to the land, structures, or
buildings involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district. The special conditions and circumstances are a direct result
from the actions of the petitioner. Granting the variance would confer on the petitioner
a special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other properties in the same
zoning district.
92-- 596,
I
ZONING BOARD: At its meeting of May 18, 1992, the Zoning Board adopted
Resolution No. ZB 49-92, by a vote of 7-1, denying the
above.
1.
Seventy-eight replies in FAVOR and one reply AGAINST
were received by mail.
CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of July 16, 1992, the City Commission continued
the above.
Yes No N/A
x
Wr
x
x
x
x
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE
APPLICATION NUMM 92- 41
Special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved
and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the sane zoning district.
The special conditions and circumstances are an indirect
result from the actions of the petitioner.
Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance
11000 deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by
other properties in the same zoning district under the terms
of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue
hardship on the petitioner.
Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment
to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands,
buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes
possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
MAY 18, 1992 Itess# 1
Page 2 05/14/92
92-- 596
RAFAEL S. RODRIGU
100 N.W. 56 Court '.
Miami, Florida 33126
0
May 20, 1992
HEARING BOARDS DIVISION
PLANNING, BUILDING & ZONING DEBT.
275 NW 2nd. Street, Room 226
Miami, Florida 33128
Att: Teresita Fernandez
Dear sirs:
city
.92 MAY 20 All :33
RE: Lot 33, Block 1 WEST GATE(13-3)
100 N.W. 56 Court
CASE #92-699
I, RAFAEL S. RODRIGUEZ, am taking this opportunity
to let you know that I want to appeal, before the City Commission,
for the decision made by the Zoning Board to the application,for a
Variance,submitted by me and that went to the hearing of May 18,1992,
under Item #1, Case #92-699.
Thanking you in advance for your cooperation, I remain,
Yours very truly,
RAFAEL RO GUEZ
•, 0111/► i �
. 1 a
43 on
1 10 r1 to tl 10 tl ,
t i 11 l0 1•
11
O V
i/ 11: It 12 It It I•Gov,
N 17 14 IT 14 I1 i < V ' 1
is
N. 3 TL
1'N A •ti I
I all m ! to _ I wallGo
to a 11
! tf ! 20 1 to • to I to 1
• i! • •
21 • -•21 1• 1 It 2 It = 4 t a
l{ !
i! f 24 t 24 / !• 1 i N
�i • • 2I o :I • I 1T 3
t 11 2: / 14 2 , 19 22
, _ 2
10 2:I1 10 21 l0 21 � o
II 20 11 20 11 to 10 10
12 11 1 11 : •' J 14M T r WEST i
13 1• 1! 1• II If • 1� 13to 'O GATE p
\
if+ a IT 14 17 la IT : II 1 o 11 AG �
IS If II le 14 ~ '1� Ici to /• ,-; Y
N.W. 2 S T. 10It. I ,. t_ 12
PARK . c
1 'a I fo r 1 fo N.W. 2 ST. e.
21 ' a 21 • I As 1 24 1 ' It I W`
! t• ! 2• I 2•-
• 2T • I a 27 ` t _ 0
! 2a
a 21 f a 2t T1
W Go 23 23
��
+ 12 2 + 13 t + 20 +
10 21 10 tl I 10 21 T N
.11 yy y . T ltl
�' 11 20 3 1/ 20 T 1 20
•Z 1: It 2 I: 1t •Z 1 11 1i zt .;� e I 1: IZ� s ;•1. Zis z
GARDEN(
W. FLA a LER ST.
i3
v
2
f
.I.
emmmmaoQm�•
Mill
How,
In
■
�- �_ �.. � e_ �,,.� .._.. r...,...x� _.,mob... , . -. ....
j i
PETITION FOR VARIANCE
File Number V-$3-
A variance is relaxation of the terms of the ordinance where such action wiU not be
contrary to the public interest and where, owing to cautitions pecWtor to the
Property and not the result of actions of the applicant, literal enforcement of this
ordinance would result in unnecessary, and undue hardship on the property. As used in
this ordinance, a variance is autharised. only for height, area, size of structure,
dimensions of yards acid other open spaces and of fstreet paNr++ig or loading
requirements. (Section 3101)
19r46e& 14, hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning
8oaro for a variance from trio terms of the "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami,"
affecting property located at &0 A.)LOs= &-f Miami, as
specified below.
In Pport of this application, the following material is submitted with this application:
1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered
` f Land Surveyor.
= 2. Four copies of: the site plan showing (as required) property boundaries, exist
(if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc, building elevvtions
and dimensions and computations of lot area (gross cnd net), building spacing, Ltd!
ratios, and height envelope.
3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure
/ of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a83, attach to application).
...._ 4. Certified list of owners of red estate within 37S' radius from t!•.e:>side
boundaries of property covered by this application. (Form 6-83 and Cloth to
application.)
5. At least two photographs that snow thQ c-tire properly (land an.l improve:td0s).
6. Other !Specify)
7. Fee of $ram to apply toward the cost of processing, based of the following
(a) RS, RC-1 (resident! a 1 uses) $200.00
(b) For penetration of Plane ltl
by antennas and the like $500.00
(c) All other applications for
each request variance $0.07per sq.ft. of floor area of building(s)
from the ordinance minimum - $550.00
(d) Surcharge equal to applicable fee from (a)-(c) above, not to exceed $550.04
to br refunded if there is no appeal. (City Code - Section 62.61)
92— 596 7
dommiews 8. The Variance recuested is for relief from the provisions of Section of
the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows
I. In support of this application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following
evidence, on the point enumerated at Subsection 3103.1 of the City of Miami
Zoning Ordinances
Note: This appUeation cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the
Jouowing sir items are completed.
(a) Special conditions and cireuunstanees exist which are peculiar to the land,
structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to
be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.)
��'a/ a:,t�.,�s �,��� ; ,�,;s,,c, us�G shu�.•� �►-� .,lle svrv� �.,d
.:J l.� s4�! pry D o� nr& ECG
e .
L" --�
:-n
-w
i yf
T
—+w
}
i
�. (b) The special conditions and circumstan do not result fr rn the actions of
the petitioner' in that: & �Wn177� W fhda)/.e dA
Gt ��1 /i�7 f�,G i�7/� �,�,G- �>'•�,�.eil �°��e9�1'�`'s
g 92- 596
(c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning ordinance would deorive
the applicant of tights commioniy enjoyee. by other properties in the sorme
zoning district under the terens of the )ping ordinance and would work
unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that:
= �tr�de.,�d Gs� ��� C.���sf►u�-��>'7
` 7 7D -r, ek e,/v
)6/2
:r
(d) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special
privilege that is denied by the toning Ordincnce to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same zoning district in that:
40(4 f�c71' 11o1-�, AO -ree ! 0- ' ',ADc>Q ;,m. �imm� �
ze
W)� 41 /R*f It 111'hie, YOD C-6
r
rj,40�
�Jl��'m �D a,fi���
(e) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the (and, building, or stricture in that:
`rime 9.?d
'
92- 596
,� Q) The grant of the variance will be in hatinony with the general intent one
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
.jtJ,0n ;PlOke6�5 / 6 �� QLr.� ,� 0 ez)wl
Note: All documents, reports, sties; exhibits or other written or graphic matsriat to:be
spitted to the Zoning Board shalt be submitted with this pucation.
s
wner or Autncrt AgentrXN
-�
2
Address iDy CO
STATE OF FLORMA) SS:
COUNTY OF DADE )
being duly sworn, dand
SC" that he in the(Authorized Agent of of the real property desated in
answer to question 0 i, above; that he has rend the foregoing answers and that the some are
true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to ex=Ae this
petition on behalf of the owner.
SWORN TO ANO SUBSCRIBED
before me this 16 day of
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
14r,,:Dt N441..X S;ATr- OF FLORIDA
MY CCK415SI0N EXP. OCT. 17.IM
;ONDED TWW GENERAL IS. US,
/ ^
Form 1-83
DO clq&
Varna) tit v .• .� .
rLA
; ; O
Mary Public, State of Florwo at Large
92- 596
sTATE or rwRiDA)
In
coum or =a
Before ce, tho undereigned authority, this day personally
RLIfAt. I U. t?edr'sVIr
appeared Zv./a_W. Red' (gaps aw.i_ Per/'t M• gfdr ''being by as first
duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and sayss
1. That ;* is the owner, or the legal representative of
the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public
hearing as required by ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of
Miami, r"lorida, of footing the real. property located in the City
of Miami, as described and listod•on the pages attached to this
affidavit and cede a part thereof.
' 2. That all owners which he rep +eaonts, if any, have
given their full and cvsiplete percussion for his to act in their
behalf for the change or codification of a classification or
regulation of zoning as not out in the accompanying petition.
3. ?hat the pages attached hereto and made a part of
this affidavit contain the current names, sailing addresses,
phone nmbers and legal descriptions for the coal property which
he is the owner or legal representative.
1 S. The facts as represented in- the application and
doeusents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true
and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not. _
(/ N a�*�T
Sworn to and subscribed before me
this day of M Qxca 19 fz
kcj C 2 �G.�
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
92- 596 j
OWNER'SLI w
Nti l inq Address_LU el M Io. 5-6 _ CO', k1-ciu r /- i< . S. 3 / _L C-
Ttlepnont Number �C- V- 7,1 7/
Legal Ot=cription:
4.0'1
l 3 3 D/vc.k l ,/' �r �..
0uC lC i �CL je .3 - S.t b doviiteW N ,ld- 6:efe.
Owner' s NM ZO t t!a. M, f'i c ores,
Mai 11 ng Address /0 0 A 6&' . 5 6 C'e a et Ala, f F 14 3 3 L
Tt 1 ephone Number .2 6 Rl - 7)- 7 /
Legal Description: '
I- f' 3 3 r3/urk �
Plc.t Be 3 PG9t 3 - S�bdtv,�,,, U/aJf Cat.
ownerI s Nor PPrltc N1, Ro �!'/ 9c1P1.
Mai 1•i no Address_ L_� p /1 / CO. 5 4 ,� r t tie, QA., F/4 3 � / Z C.
Telephone Number 1 6 1l - 7,1 71 and- 3M -d V 3 3 (kO e rk )
L"al Description: j-o f 3 3 1310 c. 1
Plr- � 13o a 13 Pti'e 3 -
S LA bd i utit oil — w, f Cafe .
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 3711 of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
Street Address Legal DesctiiMion
Street Address Legal Description
I � 92- 596
s
i. L** dpasipti n and strut addgess of suoject real p'9gm%yt
I-er.33 f3lec.k
pl j 0,,O k 13 Paye 3 5&1bdivtvo L�fe,rfG'a% .
tu`(TE ��trr� R'it�..ft.
FL . .3 b
2.. ore+sstsl of ,s ect red, � pSr=nt&qe of a! ail ownerporties
Natoli City at Miaai Otdimwm No. S
a ing a financial interest, either dirset ar indireM. in the suojact
natter of a presentation, request of petition he to tCity Camission.
Accordin4lyr question t1 ragnires disclosure of ell shareholders of
eneparetiansr beneliciariee at trm"' aWas any ap%
toq ter with their addressee aid propoeticxwte inteseel.
/ 0
�tijrf�Qtl P.Z . .. �..+.39
39 �a
a.c�t�tfel P z (w 1 f t ..11
Per /it 14, I?edr jvez. (dacAj10r)`- 331; 7
iod street address at "Y "ap;'openy (a)
awned by ae�ry► 'PotY
3• � n an
l a in atrM-P to quescim My d {b) looted within
375 feet at the =Wjeot real pzoPerty.
4~i
3- .:
or "am') as
Q W
yet,
�dubly OOaM d�
p�CtY
raes ostthe �
dem s to gsstta% li
p� tit swimar
f fseem as trm
ey haste authority to execum dds 01110l40M at Owle ship
boas of behalf at the CWWO
Tr e
befcce Me Wr`�'=i' 9 2 -- 596
dW of
.��.
•OWSM OI A"6016tV A�Yaii tiMO iml
Power of RttDate
Vim ?A ifim jig AM ?m9als
That Zoila N. Rodriguez
ha ve mode. C"Wilwed end appointed. and by these presents do make. eam"fine and op -
POW Rafael S. Rodriguez bids aid,
lawful allorney for her end to her neat'. Ikw OW steed
to submit an application, prepare all paperwork, make all appearances and do
anything that may otherwise be neccesary in connection with applying for
zoning exception for the premises described as:
Lot 33, in Block 1, of Westgate, according to the Plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, at Page 3, of the
Public Records of Dade County, Florida.
i •
giving and granting unto Rafael S. Rodriguez mold attorney full power
and authority to do sad pe- form all and every set and thing w hateserer requisite and necessary to
! be done in and about the prenwses Y fully, to eU latents and pwpaw& as she might or coved do
c
it personally present. with full powr of subetilutt" and evoo di" Aerwiy ratifying and con%Irmml-
ing all that Rafael S. Rodriguez said attorney or
dn"Mae stroll Ulwally do or taw" to be dove by Virlue hereof.
�fl I how hereunto set MY hands and
$cols the 12 day et May . in do vow one thousand wine
hundred and ninety-two
sled and defive mn tAei rV"noe of
�"�_�. /lam �cYC•
Zoila N. Rodriguez
SWI of Florida
�o 0� Dade
Tha oa the 12th d" of f ay LU. E c as
thousand nine hundred and . ninety-two . bMwe seas puN� $TAT E I. a
MY Co c-x 2 GL
a Notary Public . ill etnd Jon the Stale of Florid oN
_ n:::;.arn•-.a:::r.� un :•:: .. • .-. _ .•-
personaily cants and appeared Zoila N. Rodriguez to me personally
known. and known to not 16 be the same persons described in and who eseculed the within power
of attorney. and she act ed the within POWS' Of ottoMey to be her act
and deed
T..S-_ __.. ,UL . e 9 2 -- 596
,Our• M A"64014V _ �AfiM i�Mle
irower of Rttoracy
I
W ail Run By But ?meats
That Perla M. Rodriguez
ha vs rods, emwituted 4nd appointed. and 6V the" presents do make. o:onstttuie and ape
pas: Rafael S. Rodriguez Im and
lawful allorney /or her and in her now. ptoos sad stood
to submit an application, prepare all paperwork, make all appearances and do anything
that may otherwise be necessary in connection with applying for a zoning exception
for the premises described as:
Lot 33, in Block 1, of Westgate, according to the Plat
thereof, as recordsd in Plat Book 13, at Page 3, of the
Public Records of Dade County, Florida.
1
giving and granting unto Rafael S. Rodriguez said 4110mey lull power
and outhonty to do end pe, fKin oU and ewey ad sad thing miAataeesrer requisite and necessary to
be done in and 46•mt the prenwea GO 194, t• ott Uten& and purposes, of she might of COHN do
if personally present. with /wit pour N 1186sitt4004 and reroCot N& hereby ratifying and confirsia
ing oU that Rafael S. Rodriguez sold attorney or
subawide shall IamfuUy dies or Comae to be dove 6y virtue hereof.
In I
jeals the 12th d&Vot May
hundred and ninety-two
( ►��"n� ,
e
SW 0f Florida
COB* Of Dade
Be That on the 12th
thousand nine hundred and ninety-two
a Notary Public
ho•e herrunt• sot my hands and
. in am roar one thousand w I
Perla M. Rodriguez
dw a
Luis E
Notary STATE OF
before Ind,Public My Comm E:y
in sty Jsa the state of Florid'SONDE
.....•-.iiiiiiisii ='s :;;.arn. - 4sam.; :r..:: ...�-. .Ms _.:::•
personaily came and apf4ored Perla M. Rodriguez to me personally
known. and known to ttut fo be the same pefsom described in and who executed the within powst•
o/ attorney, and she Ibe ,"a imm, of
Qtttw nif to be her act
and deed
i n Trctimnnu ZMhov*^1 , T 9 2 •-- '�
Mr. George Barket offered the following Resolution
and moved its adoption.
RESOLUTION ZB 49-92
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE VARIANCE
FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE
4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD
SETBACK OF 1.35' (20'-0" REQUIRED) FOR THE
EXISTING DETACHED OPEN TERRACE, RECREATION
ROOM WITH BATH, AND UTILITY SHED; A NORTH YARD
SIDE SETBACK OF 0.60' (5'-0" REQUIRED) FOR THE
EXISTING RECREATION ROOM WITH BATH, AND A
SOUTH YARD SIDE SETBACK OF 0.20' (5'-0"
REQUIRED) FOR THE UTILITY SHED, FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
100 NW 56 COURT ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 33,
BLOCK 1, WEST GATE (13-3).
Upon being seconded by Mr. Ronald Fox the motion
was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Ms. Morales and Basila
Milian, Sands, Barket
Alonzo -Poch and Fox
NAYES: Mr. Moran-Ribeaux
ABSENT: Ms. Perez -Nodal and Mr. Luaces
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7 to 1.
May 18, 1992 It= # 1
Zoning Board
92- 596