Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-92-0266PLANNING FACT SHEET CASE NUMBER 92- 4 APPLICANT Joseph G. Goldstein, Attorney for Owner: Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States: November 27, 1991 LOCATION APPROXIMATELY 845-999 BRICKELL AVENUE (BRICKELL SQUARE PROJECT: PHASES It b 111) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Phase 11 - That part of Lot 11 less N. 43.29 ft. and that part of lots 12 and 13 lying westerly of the westerly right-of-way line of S. Bayshore Drive, Block 104 South, BRICKELL ADD AMEND (8-113) PRDC. Phase III - That part of Lot 10 less N. 35.86 ft. and that part of the N. 43.29 ft. of Lot 11 lying westerly of the westerly right-of-wa line of South Bayshore Drive, Block 104 South, BRICKELL ADD AMEND (B-I PRDC. PETITION Consideration of amending a previously - approved Development Order (Resolution 85-1060, October 10, 1985 as amended by Resolution 89-410, April 27, 1989) for the Brickell Square Project Phases it and III, approximately 845-999 Brickell Avenue, a Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes, and a Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 9500; by amending Condition 21 by changing the commencement of Phase It to May, 1996; Phase III to December 1999; and completion of the project to December, 2001, from November, 1991, June 1995, and 1997, respectively; by revising Figure 1 Timeline accordingly; by amending Condition 28d to change the termination date of the Development Order to December 31, 2001, from December, 1996, by changing the name of the applicant to Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States; by amending and extending the Major Use Special Permit identically; further finding and confirming that said changes do not constitute a substantial deviation after reviewing appropriate rebuttal pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes; finding that said changes are not part of the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Development Orders (Resolutions 81-1148 and 1149, December 10, 1987), and incorporating said findings as conclusions of law. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval. BACKGROUND SEE ATTACHED PAGE ANALYSIS SEE ATTACHED PAGE PLANKM ADVISOR: At its meeting of March 11, 1992, the Planning Advisory BOARD Board adopted Resolution PAB 16-92, by a vote of 9-0, recommending approval of the above. PAS 03/11/92 Item f 3 date Generated: 02/19/92 Page 1 92- 266 ATTACHMENT TO ITEMi.3 BACKGROUND In 1985, the Commission approved a Development Order for a Development of Regional Impact per Florida Statutes, and a Major Use Special Permit, under the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance for Phases II and III of the Brickell Square Project (Phase I has been completed). The Phases (as approved) are: Phase II South Tower Phase III Center Tower Element 28 floors, 383.5 ft. MSL to t.p. 35 floors, 471.0 ft. MSL to t.p. Office 438,000 6SF 454,507 6SF Retail 17,000 5,285 Parking 255,000 ( ) 105,000 ( ) Loading 5,000 (9 berths) In 1989, the Commission issued an amendment extending time frames, by changing the commencement of Phase 11 to November 1991, Phase III to June 1995 and completion to 1997 from June 1987, June 1991 and 1993 respectively. Notice of this proposed change to a previously issued Development Order dated November 27, 1991, was sent by the owner to all affected agencies including the City of Miami, South Florida Regional manning Council and Florida Department of Community Affairs. 92- 266 ATTACHMENT TO ITEMi3 ANALYSIS This second request for a time extension has triggered Section 380.06 (19) (c) F.S. by which a presumption of substantial deviation is automatically created for time extensions in excess of five years. This presumpton may be overcome by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. The requested change would extend the deadlines for commencement of Phase 11 to May 1996; Phase III to December, 1999 and completion of the project to December 2001 from November .1991; June 1995 and 1997 respectively. A finding of no substantial deviation is recommended based on: 1. The project itself remains unchanged; all impacts are known identified and mitigated. 2. The inception of the Bricked Extension of Metromover and relaxed computations now used in the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual reduce the traffic impact. 3. The Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact Development Orders assume Brickell Square Phases II and III -in the base data; subsequent increments extending past the year 2000 forecast, and permit, additional development in excess of 10 million square feet. These time extensions should be granted because: 1. The local market for office space is poor; the downtown vacancy rate is over 25% and is worsening. This project along with Brickell Gateway, Gran Central and 1111 Brickell are in a "holding pattern". The only office buildings now going ahead are Riverside (to be occupied by FPL Group) Federal Law Enforcement Building and Courvoiser Center -Phase II. 2. No other proposed office development will be hindered or penalized if this project is given a time extension. Additionally, the applicant has pointed out that there have been significant delays in the provision of public infrastructure namely the aforementioned Brickell Extension to the Metromover which commenced construction in 1991 and wit be completed in 1994 and opened for revenue service in 1995. The Brickell Avenue Bridge over the Miami River will be replaced at the same time, starting in 1993 and being completed in 1995. 0 a x 0 H W. -- -- -- :j RESTRICTED- _ -- COMMERCIAL RESTRICTED �' COMMERCIALTE W "Illllfllilot HIGH sT. DENSITY a MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL sr. RECREATION I J o MAJOR �. PUBLIC a FACILITY MULTI w h� 'I OFFICE 1 IV I �i R6STRTED , ,I,t CCIAL � HIGH y d DENSITY n� e1� s , MULTI BRt�,i. SQUARE FAMILY PHASES it and ttt OFFICE RESIDENTIAL Approx. 845-999 �' e Brickell acre TER. �� 2 — 2 V 6 4 -- PlB 3111/92 f .. . r r. 1 -ry��' >, ' •,)fir � �• 3q,♦ , � f)ara -a ON" - FVz V.I t ak: NI < +• 'tY,: . r • - , � a.� � j,> . a it e 1 e H x� ,� r ,y '• Yet v' # °" as vo- r �� �aC' 9 Y*ag �'✓� )` � � �h��X� .` a,�¢.� r'.�ti � '�aYp�'ij �+`•i,�5n�, c - �. ♦ a♦ _ t+'r t' 7,,;({ i) `� q.i'>; t . _ y.z. Eti c �� S , w ' t � ♦ � Y � �,. 1 f��j . t �. ^ M •.,. .° `r �FK • '•.'.'•: •_d$ i.•1 ..$ g .,,,ate .�',,.r,• . � � eee�%%Y'' � �c : ,�`•�'�i,:� , t .'�' �t'� • � . - j �� 3t ,4•V �)iH cw .:gr�}.,,Y��y - Lo- � �S'=W.V<r„)a• ),7c�t[+� <Fr V�,, r. +t � � s _ ""�..,__ "i" :+,'F'T.� ♦ 13 S: .,ti, S•tC 4� S k •�^'} w ? tr Tow r. //V z z 0 7 t r r► S i b � A - Q !• t t 1 i tr.0 r A A p .ra PA.'? !fi S• 2} r0 r 12 t3 r• r! r! ++ r; tJ +J �� Y y 7 r! 40007o+r A ! 7 ! tl • 2 z y • 3 • 1 R ! ! s T ,.j , r! or 11 I! rt z0 1 O r0 I iY ly to rli Is ! rp 0 t „r 22 S.E gam.. a . s 6U �=y55 ts j w ,y j r t r0 is rtr 2 Yt ' a . Sol tN I Ac rt' +rAw 9 ST • S.E. -9 ST a ro S 7!! • y Y i • O a 7 ' q rf +: ;q' YO at It Y3 rs u 1 r 7 7 ! ST-0' 1 74 tt = o IQ4 0° t1111r °0000`1r Tk4cr IAT 0 ' 0� 41 t� s • >s s t � o III .a $ GSHORF °o a rt tr Y2 23 � Aft A' ST. 6 0 f ' ! 1 :. s+tq : I Foy r' 111 loo S. RRppE : V �t 09 ' f o �%� r0 5�`jE 0 0 OoOo ELEM.f :: 0 0 L ...,,� tRoF awn �? DA1 AMEND txi . to I "o'S T. S.E. 13 ST. �o ' c•,R A ug! BRICIMLL SQUARE i a° • 8©!V/S1OH ' �� r Approx. 845-999 Q '�•"�h►. TRACr,.,� sa Brickell Ave. , w IT is Yo It T riQO r A PAB 3/11/92 Ines Mamiu-Negva 305-579 OW fiflfENBffl6 4 T T 0 R 4 E T 5 4 T L % W I B fl V fl I 6 February 21, 1992 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Public Hearings Section City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33120 V Re: Brickell Square Development of Regional Impact/Public Hearing Notice Fee Check and Mailing List Dear Teresita: Pursuant to our discussions, I enclose herewith check no. 020490 from The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States payable to the order of the City of Miami in the amount of $4,378.00. This amount covers the $1,000 advertising surcharge for the above -referenced matter and the maffing fee of $3,378 (563 names at $6.00 per name). As you know, this check replaces previously issued check no. 019670 in that same amount, which has been inadvertently misplaced. The Equitable has already requested that the issuing bank stop payment on lost check no. 019670. In addition, also enclosed is a copy of the property owners list and the address labels for. the., Trudi , ' These materials were also previously submitted by this office when the application documents were filed with the Hearing Boards Division on December 9,1991. Lucca A. Dougherty Esq Jceph• G Goldstein, Esq. fiR[EPti[QG..TRAURIG. giOFFUAN. Llporr� Roecx QU[NT[6. P.A. ��{ 12".1 8ucclW,•Av[xult ;;Mawr._ r�.tb[IpA SSla; '90S-S79-OS00 . FAX 309.5T9.OT17 >�" � v't t ;• � ` r� - , MtAMt,, ;;':FAR? LAUu6ROALE WEST PALl11 BEACH` i#g of cwYamt SERGIO RODRIGUEZ. AiCP Director January 13, 1992 Carolyn A. Dekle Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite-140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 RE: Brickell Square Project: Phases iI and III Development of Regional Impact CESAR H. 00i0 City Manager - Dear Ms. Dekie: =' Pursuant to Section 380.06 (19)(f) 3 F.S., notice is hereby given of a public hearing on Thursday, March 26, 1992, at which the Miami City Commission will consider amendments to a previously -approved Development Order for the = Brickell Square Project Phases 11 and III, a Development of Regional Impact _ .(see.attached notice) 2 Nether, the Miami Planning Advisory Board will consider their recommendations in public hearing on Wednesday, March 11, 1992, at the same location. (see attached notice). .i The applicant - Equitable Life - submitted a notification of a proposed.change to a previously -approved Development of Regional Impact on November 27, 1991. ' - By your letter of January 3, 1992, you informed this department of your intention to participate in any public hearing to consider these amendments and requested that your agency be so noticed. 3 I' Ms. Carolyn A. Dekle Executive Director If you have any questions, please contact Director of this Department, at 579-6086. �er�1X, t Sergio, odriguez, h CP Di rectpr Attachment cc: Joe Goldstein Greenberg Traurig 122I Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33133 • Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Resource Planning and Management January 13, 1992 Joseph W. McManus, Assistant 3305�h G. - 79-M ein, Ew. 03402 M[WH 4 E Y T n RIBBU�NI6 November 27, 1991 Mr. Guillermo Olmedillo, Deputy Director City of N iami Planning, Building and Zoning 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 L i1 i Re: Resolution No. 89410 (the "ResoWoe)/Amendment of Deve onment of Regional Immnact (MM Dear Guillermo: Our client, Equitable We Assurance Society of the United States ("Equitable"), is the Owner of the property that is the subject of the DRI Development Order/Resolution referenced above. Condition 27 within the Resolution currently provides, in part: [for] purposes of this timeline, Phase 11 shall commence in Ncvvmber, 1991, Phase III shall commence in June, 1995 and the project shall be completed in 1997. Equitable has prepared an application and a Notification of Proposed Change to A -Previously Approved DRI for a modification of that condition for simultaneous submittal to the.City of Miauti (the "City"), the South Florida Regional Planning Council ("SFRPC"), and the Department of Community Affairs (MCK), pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes. The proposed modification would extend the established timeframes four and a half years. It is our intention to submit this Notification to the City, SF'RPC and DCA ` before., the .end of November, 1991. According to section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and as you advised,: Ahe submittal of this form would toll the timefraznes establishing that dive must commence in November, 1991. t 927 266 s s # CR6ENlRRC. TRAURIC, ROPf14AN, LIPO", ROSEN & QULNTEL. P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVXXV9 M!AW. Foam 33131 305.579-0500 FAx 305-579.0717 IMIAM FORT LAUDERDALE .WEST PALM BEACH ,U Mr. Guillermo Olmedillo November 27, 1991 Page 2 This letter submits the completed Notification of Proposed Change form prior to the end of November 1991 and simultaneously transmits copies to the SFRPC. and DCA in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. The disclosure forms and other affidavits required for the City's application will be filed during the first ten days of December, in accordance with City policy. Thank you for your attention to this cc: Mr, Rob Curtis Mr. G. Edward Mills, III matter. Very urs, i Ph , November 25, 1991 State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of Resource Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 323014UM (904) 4884925 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SITI3SEC' ION 380.06(19), FLDRIDA STATUI9ES, Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1988), requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planningunal, and the state land planning agency. The following form is recommended by the Florida Department of Community Affairs although it has not been adopted by rule to date. 1. I, LUCIA A. DOUGHERTY, as authorized attorney and representative of Equitable' Life .Assurance Society of the United States hereby give notice of a proposed cban a to a previously -approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 38q.96(19), Florida Statutes (1988). In support thereof, I submit the following iofornaation a�ucerning The Ericiceit Square Project Phan. H and .M which, information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belles I have submitted today, under separate cover,, copies of this notification to Dade County, Florida, and to the South Florida Regional Planning Counc% and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community -Affairs. E. State of Florida November 26, 1991 Page 2 . AMU= EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1400 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 372-1600 Lucia A. Dougherty as Attorney for Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States c/o Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, L1poff, Rosen &. Quentel, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 579-M 4 Approximately 845-999 Brickell Avenue, Miami; a portion of Lot 10, a portion of Lot 11 and all of Lots 12, and 13, Block 104 South, AMENDED MAP OF BRICKEWS ADDMON TO MIA1bII according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 113 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 5. Prior Chances; Descn'be and indicate on a project master site plan or other maps all individual changes previously made to the development. Please describe all rhsnges previously made in the plan of development, phasing, build -out, date or in the representations contained in the application for development approval (ADA) since the DRUfirst-received approval There have been no previous changes made in the plan of development for the Brickell Square Project Phases II and III. The effective date: of the Development Order was January Z 1986. A timeline was referemed in the Development Order (figure 1) which indicated phasing of conditions'and commencement dates. Such timeline indicated that Phase II would commence by June 1987 and Phase III would commence by 92- 266 State of Florida November 26, 1991 Page 3 January 1991 and be completed in 1993 (Resolution No. 85-1060; Exhibit 1). In 1989, pursuant to City of Miami Resolution No. 89-410 (Exhibit 2), the phasing and buildout dates were modified such that Phase II is to commence during November 1991 and Phase III is to commence during June 1995, with completion during 1997. 6. Describe and indicate on the project Master Site Plan all currently proposed changes to the development. Please describe in detail all proposed changes to the last approved plan of development, phasing, build out date, or to the representations contained in the last approved application for development approval (ADA). It is proposed that the timeline that was referenced in the Development Order for Brickell Square Phases 11 and III (figure 1 of Resolution No. 85- 1060) and Condition 27 of Resolution 89-410 be amended to provide four and one half additional years for commencement and completion of both Phases II and ffi. It should be noted that the timeline itself states "this timeline is intended to illustrate the sequence of conditions as set forth in the Development Order. not to establishment calendar dates". No other changes in the conditions or Development Plan are requested or proposed. 7. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No such changes have occurred. & Describe any naiads purchased or optioned within one mule of the original DRI site subsequent to the o ' ' approval or issuance of the DRI development. No lands have been purchased or optioned within one mile of the o ioW DRI site by this applicant :R Y 92- 266 i 45 F 1 4 4 State of Florida November 26, 1991 Page 4 9. Briefly describe whether in the extent which: (a) the proposed change may be inconsistent with any objectives of policies of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area; and (b) the proposed change may be inconsistent with any local land development regulations or the adopted local comprehensive plan. The delay in constructing Phases II and III of this project is not inconsistent with any objective or policies of the adopted state development plan or any local land development regulations or the adopted or proposed local comprehensive plan. 10. Provide an updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing a proposed changes to the previously approved DRI development order conditions. No such master site plan is required 11. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(f), Florida Statutes, include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. Ibis language should address and quantify` (a) All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build -out date of the development; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas of preservation, green belt; the structures or other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or proponents of the proposed change. :.� 92- 266 State of Florida November 26, 1991 Page 5 The following proposed specific changes to Resolution No. 85-1060 are requested:' (1) Applicant Condition 27, of the Development Order as amended by Resolution No. 89-410, is requested to be amended as follows: Incorporated into the Development Order for Brickell Square a timeline showing the project phasing, specific elements of the project plan, and conditions of the Development Order which are to be met in each phase or other dates. For purposes of this timeline, Phase II shall commence in November,-t99}, my jam, Phase III shall commence in DeggmbeL., C;-i995 and the project shall be completed in ZM ice. All other conditions shall be in accordance with the schedule provided in the timeline (figure 1). Modification to Condition 27 is required to permit Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States four and one half additional years to initiate construction and complete Phase II and III. This request is justified because: (1) There have been significant delays in the provision of public infrastructure such as the Brickell extension to the people mover system. The Brickell Metromover extension construction was initiated during 1991. (2) The construction and marketing of the project would be hampered while Brickell Bridge is being replaced. (3) The present office market does not justify commencement at this tiara. It is anticipated that within four years, the economic condition will warrant such construction. (4) The proposed change does not create a reasonable likelihood r of additional regional impacts, or any new type of impact not previously reviewed by the South Florida Reg =1 Planning Council and the City of Miami. '� Amendments are underlined; deletions are struck through. 92 266 J-85-1011 9- 30-SS RESOLUTION 40. 6S-1060 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE BRICKELL SQUARE PROJECT PHASES II AND III MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN). A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT PROPOSED BY TISHMAN-4nTER/EOUITABLE JOINT VENTURE: AUTHORIZING A OEVELOPMENT ORDER AND MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT; APPROVING SAID PROJECT WITH MODIFICATIONS AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ATTAC4EO HERETO AS EXHIBIT °A•. THE ArM.ICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEKIN BY REFERENCE. AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. ATTACHED KIM AS EXHIBIT 'B'. INCLUSIVE. AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING, FINDINGS; PROVIDING THAT THE PERMIT SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THE HHMIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS. Tishman-Speyer/Equitabie Joint Venture has submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Oevelopment of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recomeandation for a proposed development order as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS. the Miami Planning Advisory Bard, at its meeting held on Seutember a. 1985. following an advertised hearing. adopted Resolution No. F:' 4945 by a 8 to 0, recammasting approval with mOWIcations of the Development of Regional Impact; and WHiEREAS, a rRcoeendation fr= the Miami Planning Advisory Board has been forwarded as required by Ordinance 8290; and VNMEAS. the City Coassission has conducted a public hearing on October 10. 1984, having considered the Application for Major Use Special Pemit and the Application for 0eve10000t Approval and the Reoort and Recommendations of the e^ut� Irl-4da Regional Plannino Council; and WHEREAS. the City Comisfsion has determined that all legal reaireccm��ents have been cow led with; and 9 rG " 266 WHEREAS, the City Casssission deems it advisable and in the zest interest 4 the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Development Order as hereinafter let forth: and COSY CiD�Saion r r bmrrm OF / -- EXHIBIT 1 lam? WHEREAS, the City Commission has noted with approval that Tishman. Speyer/Equitable Joint Ventura has offered to contribute the sus of sl,120.808 to the City's Mousing Trust Fund, or build approximately 42,030 6SF of affordable housing, pursuant to Section 1535.2.2 of the City's Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMiISS ION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT Section 1. THe following findings of fact are made with respect to the project: I. The Commission has determined that the project is in confornity with the adopted HIM Commprehensive Neighborhood Plan. b. The Commission his determined that the project is In accord with the district zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance 9500. c. The City Commission finds that time project would not crt%to adverse impact an air quality, ground water, soils, animal life, vegetation, waste water management or solid waste disposal, and further finds that it would have a comber of positive impacts including: (It The costs pf construction of Phases II and III will total approximately $116 million and require a total of 1.730 amployets. Approximately 87% or $101,137,095 will be spent in the region. Pem went !employment may reach 2,749, with 2,049 being relocated from witlin the region, and 700 newly created jobs. An estimated-366 million would represent value added to the regional economy. (21 An annual surpius of over 2.3 million dollars to taxing jurisdictions with approximmuly 999,311 for Miami, S69,821 for Daft County, S751,713 for'the School District, and S41,745 for the South Florida Water Management 01strict and special districts combined. (3) AL-cest and circulation should be improved by the applicants fair share contribution toward a soMbound left turn lane +..3 az :T e..!!l. !0? closing of the 11e4i88 opening at lirlckell Avenue and Ambassador Drive, and the restriping of S. W. 8 Street from S. N: 2 Avanm to S. W. 3 Avenue, for a fair share . 92_ total o;`ii2Z.407. 266 i� E.;-s060 e. The City Coroissl0n also finds that: (1) The project will have a favorable iaroact on the tconaty of the City; and (2) The project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) The project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing MUMMY accessible to their places of employment: and (4) The project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (61 The prWact.will have a favorable JuWt on the environment and natural resources of the City: and (6) The project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (71 The project would not adversely affect dublic safety; and (8) That there is a public need for the project. _ Section 2. A Development Order and Major Use Spexiat Permit, attached hereto as Exhibit 'A` and ends a part thereof by reference, approving with eaodifications. the 6rickeil Square Project Phases II and II2, a Development of • Regional Impact. proposed by Tfomasn•Speyer/Equitable Joint Venture, for approximately 845-999 8rickell Avenue (legal description on file with tilt Department of Planning and Zoning boards Administration), be and the same is hereby granted and Issued. Section 3. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval As MUM purswnt to Condition 15 Exhibit 'A' is Incarporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties M discharging their statutory duties undrr Section 380.08, Florida Statastes and local_ ordinance. Substantial compliance with the representations comtained in the Application for Develops 1,11 Approval is a condition for approval unless waivtd or mmdified by Agreement among the Council, City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns, jointly and severably. Section 4. The Aeoort and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional pl&rodng Coumil„ attacMd hereto as Exhibit 090 are incorporated herein by reference. Section d. The developorder, as approved, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. 9 2 - 266 G; V .3. "ya section 6. The City Clerk is hereby autharited and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to: the Florida Departmont of veteran and Comasmity Affairs. :.tvi;irn of Local Resource Management. 2571 Eneeutiv'e Center Circle East. Tallahassee. Florida 32301; the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard. Suite 140, Hollywood. Florida 33021; and Tishman-Speyer/Equitable Joint Venture. c/o Tishman Speyer Properties. 777 Brickeii Avenue. fiiami, Florida 33131. Section 7. The recitals of fact referred to in the herein 'Whereas' clauses are true and correct and made a part thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED thi s 1! 0 t_ h day of p�gaER 1985. V �— A • APPROrEO AS M7 AND PIMPAREO AND APPROM BY: CORRECTNESS: ad�'• es AS STANT CITY A NEY CITY ATT qEY EXHIBIT '42 ATTACHMENT TO - RESOLUTION 9.; - G OCT�iA 10,'I83"—� DEVELOPMENT ORDER AiD MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT: _ BRICKELL SQUARE: . PHASES II AND III Let it be know) that the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in pablic hearing on October 10. 1985; the issuance of a Development Order for a Oevelapaent of R";'onal Iq=t pursuant to Section 390.06 Florida Statutes, said dmlopmwt to be located in the City of Miami. at approximately #45-999 Brictell Avow, being . LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIX PHASE II All that portion of jLot IL - except the North 43.29 feet thereof and LOU 12 and 13, Block 104 South, AMENDED MAP OF BRICKELL'S ADDITIOtl • TO MIAMI, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book '8' at Page 113 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. l; trig rest of the right-of-way for South Sayshore Drive conveyed to the City of Miami for street purposes, said right-of•ray being wore particularly described in that certain deed dated November 18, 1959. filed Mar 26, 1960 in Official RecorBook 2076 at Page 436 of the Public • RK0. os of Dade County, Florida, and in that certain deed, dated Oscenber 16, 1259, filed an May 16, 1960 under CT%rk's Fite No. 6OR- 94813. in Official Records Boole 2076 at Papa "I of the Public Records of Dade Cowty, Florida, containing an area of 91,299 square feet wore or less. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CAR PHASE t• All that portion of Lot 10 except the North 35.86 feet thereof and the North 43.29 fast of Lot 11, Block 104 South, AMENDED MAP OF 81ICXELL11S ADDITION TO MIMI, according to the plat thereof record" in llat Boot use at Pepe 113 of the PVu %. Records of Dade County, J r. Florioa. lying rest of the right-of-way being mare particularly '4scr'?4o Tm !net 11"taln deed Cateo Novemer is. ::59. filed MAY 266 26, 1960 in Official Records Book 2076 at Page 436 of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida. and in that certain deed, dated December IS, 1959, filed an May If, 1960 unter :it:;'s File No. SOR- 94613, in Official Records look 2076 at Page 441 Of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, containing an arts of 37,537 square feet, more or less. and after due consideration of the recommendations of the Planninq Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with pertinent regulations and the Report and Recommer+dations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council pertaining to the Development of Regional Impact takes the following action: Approval of Application for Development Approval subtect to the following modifications: FINDING OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS Development The development proposed 1,279,792 gross square feet of floor area, comprised of the following tltattttu as specified by the applicant in the Application for Development Approval, and figures submitted by applicant dated 6/15/85. for ghosts II and II1. . Phase II. south tower - 28 floors. 383.5 ft. (141. to top of paraott) • 438.000 GSF of office uses 17,000 GSF of retail uses - 255,000 69 of parking area Phases eeIII_I: center tower • 35 floors, 471' (Val to to of parapet) 454,607 GSF of office uses 5.29S GSF of retail uses • loss= W of parking area Lading Area " - 5,000 GSF for 9 berths For Three Phases Open space • 161,194 gsf PadestM an open s114cow 86,792 9sf 9 -- 266 ' Plata SS.SSO gsf soaces /•"°� area baler graft) The project is further limited by the following considerations: 'The 40plicable provisions and procedures of the City of Miami, and developennt plans subsitted by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, dated .April 17, 1985, revised May 15, 1985, July 1, 1985, July 4, 1985, -and August 13. 1985 for Tishman -Speyer Properties - Brickell Avenue Miami. The develoo=At as proposed does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of state land developant guidelines, or plans applicable the City of MiMI . The develoom t as proposed is consistent with local subdivision and platting requirments. The development as proposed is consistent with the sussary and recommendations contained in the 'Oevelopmant of Regional Impact Assessment for Brickeli Square Osvelopmt of Regional Impact' No. 63.12. dated July, 1985 prepared by the South Florida Regional Pianning Council. • The project, as defined immediately above. meets the requirements for the issuance of a Developm t Order pertaining to a Oewlop w t of Regional Impact as required under F.S. 380.06. _ Issuance of this Major use Spacial Permit meets the requirements of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miamd . THE APPLICAiR, ITS 31J~ 0 OAS, A10/M ASSIGN JOIVMY OR SEYERABLY WILL: 1. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the cumulative impact of project traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions. or air quality and energy uses: 'Designate five percent of emoloyet, parking spaces. located as close as possible to elevator ono w i wing entrances, for taciusive u., ,,,• ••npooi use. 'Acts M y encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a car pool` infomtlon progrm and offering preferred parking spaces and work shittE t0 car and van poplars, 9 2 ` 266 • - 3- e 'Provide Matrorail, Metrobus, Metromover, and shuttle service route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project. 'Promote staggered flex•tive work schedules, four day wort weeks, or other awalaWt actions and marketing strategies, that reduce peak demand for roadway capacity and thereby reduce transportation enerVY use. 2. Place to"orary screens, berms, and/or rip -rep around the project to filter or retain storwater runoff during construction. 3. Design, construct, and maintain the ators+aur management system to meet the following standards: 'Retain the runoff from a 3-year storm on -situ, and construct the project drainage system in accordance with all representations in the ADA. 'Prohibit any and all washdown of parting areas, unless wastewater is diverted to grass scales of landscaped cross with adabaate capacity to retain the total volume of runoff. a. Incorporate into the development. by restrictive covenant and/or lease or sates agrewents, as applicable. hazardous materials accident prevention. mitigation, and response standards. At a ciniara, these standards shall: 'Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, generated, or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. 'Raquire that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containmat area not connected to the project drainage or sowr systu. 'Prohibit any outside storage of hazaraus materials or hazardous waste. 'Reepirt all hazardous waste generators to Contract with a licensed pablic or private huardoat waste disposal service or processing facility and to Provide to Dade County DERR copies of one of the following fanrs of ..':i:C� �.:: :� �':�:� �:.••-':..i .�T�� gwsw!1°ML OraCt�'es: { -a hazardous waste manifest. -a shipment to • permitted .hazardous waste. mana"mont 9 — 266 facility: or .A- -a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler or a waste exchange operation. -Notify any tenant generating tastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. 'Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by the City. Dade County DERN. and Florida DER to assure compliance with this Development Order and all applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Develop Order, a hazardous waste generator shall ROLE be defined as the Applicant and any tenant that falls under a SIC code listed In Exhibit 1 (ORI Assessment, page 61) attached hereto and Incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive. toxic, or reactive wastes. including those identified in Exhibit 2 (DRI Assessaent. page 66); provided$ however, that the uses in Exhibit 1 and the wastes in Exhibit 2 shall be sisr,itaneousiy amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by modmmnt to the 'County and Regional Hazardous Waste Assessment Guidelines' incorporated by reference into Rule 17. 31.03(2). Florida Admin trati* Code. S- Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is cleared, and use only those plant species specified in Exhibit I (DRI Assessment, page 671 in future project landscaping. 6. Prior to any site clearing, consult with and follow the reconeendations of the City of MOM Parts Oepartmt on transplanting trees presently on- ` 7. Notify Oade County, one month prior to start of construction, and allow access for construction monitoring, and delay construction up to three memths in any area where potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and permit State and local archaeologists to survey and excavate the area. S. Gbtaln a yanarai drainage pewit from tr..a 5tat,% F%rides .iatsr msnagement District and necessary approvals from Dade County Water and Sewer Authority (NASA) for provision of water and wastewater service to the project, and from Dade County Public Works Oeparae«+t for solid waste disposal service, prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy. 9 q -6. 9. Collaborate with the Police DIP&, event to incorporate security avasures and systams into the design and operation of the project. Permit Miaal Police 0e;3r= t cmdsst a security survey at option of departaea++t. Developer to report to Development Order Monitoring Official, prior to issuance of building permit. how and to what extent the Police Begs. t retomagn4stions have incorporated into project security and construction plans. Provide roof space for a communications antenna and supporting structure for the City's mmergency commanication system, if required, said antenna and appurtenances together with necessary services shall be at City of Kiwi expanse. the applicant shall retain the right of arthitectural approval. 10. At the request of the City, within one year of the effective date of this Development order, enter into an agret*ent with the -Police 0"artmd+t to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns, if necessary and required by the City. the fair share contribution is to be considered an offsetting credit against any future City impact fees. • lr. Enter into an agreeegnt with the City, if required, to contribute a fair share of capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project, ter, alternatively, pay a fair sharo contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining final certificates of occupancy for eons than S00,000 square feet of office darneiop'" t, excluding) Phase 1, on -site. The fair share contribution is to be considered an offsetting credit against any future City impact fee. 12. lncorparate the following energy conservation emures into the �'. decal opmaent: 'Air conditioning energy efficiencies (E'ER) equal to or greater than 12.0 } or 1e=s than 0.65 ZV/Ton. "Measures that effectivNy yield, in the cooling sods, R•7 in walls and R- 19 in ceilings. 'Meat producing areas and equipmt (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated fries alton41ti0"*d areas. 'COWt4V4Z2d elevator; control systen in all high-rise structures. : 'Individual'olectric.sretgrinl of tenants. 92- V tar!NTI 11 'Minimal use of incandescent 1 ightinq. and use of fluorescent task i ighting and indirect sunlight where possible: 'Mot water temperatures set at or below 1050E when allowed by health Codes and equipment nwirevents. 'Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute Or less and water closets that use no gore than three and one-half gallons per flush. % ight•reflecting and/or light Colored wall and roof surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than or equal to O.SO. 'Use of airlock doors (vestibules) at major entrances on the east side of Phase 111. 'Bicycle support facilities, includes secure bike racks or storage areas, and, if feasible, lockers and shower for VMject employees. 'Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas (on a floor -by -floor basis at ■inisaw). 'Air distribution using a variable air volume system. 'Central energy management systems that provide, as applicable, start/stop optimization, time of day scheduling, electric demand limiting, night = temperature set back/startuo, programed maintenance, and building 1 ighting Control. • ` . r '114turai gas or other non -electric ansrgr sources for cooking and water i hearing in restaurants. i 'Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and ! i washing hot water in restaurants, when feasible. 'Exterior shading or tinted or refleztive glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. *TM applicant shall prepare a statavo t signed by the registered project j i architect that all &mW consmrvation condition contained in Condition i 14 hew been met in the preparation of thin detailed construction drawings. i i prior to issuance of a building Vormit. 13. Constrntt ail roadway and intersection improvements identified in Exhibit 4 i! (OKI Assessment, page M and dedicate the improvements to the City, prior 1 to issuance of final certificates of occupancy for more than 50 e= gross Square ifft. Nf daeveiUasteflG 411N&040, ♦und. bond, Or provide a letter of credit for $120,000 (1985 dollars) to the City for construction of these Improvements. 9 2— 266 14. Prior to i1fY4nce of final certificates of occupancy for more tMM 6W.000 gross s494rs feet on -sits. including Phase I developmeeet, fund, boA 4 or ' orOvlde a letter of credit for $4,358 (1985 dollars) for eonstruetion of 8�'-1flt�l other transportation improvements to be deternined by the City in the traffic impact arts (Exhibit S, CAI Assessment, Page 721. IS. Prior to issuance of final certificates of occupancy for more than 500.000 gross square feet one -site, including Phase I deveiopmot, enter into an agreemelnt with the County to fund, bond, or provide a latter of credit in ' an namt not to exceed $196,2010 (1985 dollars) to the County umually for construction of the Brickell leg of Netromover Stage It. This amount lacy ` be adjusted annually to reflect payoff of the bonds or other financial obligations incurred for Hatromover Stage II construction according to terms specified in the agreement in a manner similar to adjustments currently made Annually for the Downtown Miami Special Taxing District for the ►eople Mover. If constructior of the Brickell tag of Metromover Stage It has not begun by January 1, I"l, all funds provided to the County pursuant to this condition, plus interest, are ,to revert to the Applicant by Margin 1. 1992. Otherwise, the requirements of this condition will terminate when all bonds for the Brickell leg of Metromover Stage II - tj construction have been retired. In the event that a special taxing district for funding the Brickell leg of Metrotwor Stage It is established .y x by a local ordinance; the payment requirements of the special taxing +.! district shall supercede the requirements of this condition, and any paymlents of funds to the County shall be credited against the special j� taxing district assassa>0 U. If. Incorporate into the route and schedule information required by Condition 1 g herein promotional material for the County. operated shuttle service to an from the Brickell Avenue metrorsil sution; provided however that, if the i; Coamty discontinues this service prior to operation of the Brictall leg of Metromover Stage II, the Applicant shall provide weekday shuttle service to A" free the Brickell Avenue Mttrorail Station at no cost to riders at 10• R minute intervals form 7:00 to 10:00 a.a. and front 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.a., and at 30-minute intervals bttweml• 10:00 a.& and 3:30 p.m. until fir! Metro■over Stage It begins revenue service. Applicant provision of this throttle service jointly with other Brickell area developers shall !•: ,t COnst9tYN LOfep11a11Ce vertu tnla .,w101C10n q awng as •..! iyaCifiad intervals are maintained and ad*Mte capacity to serve prof transit c U 6 trips fs provided. Inttgrott all original and supplemental ACA information into a Consolidated Application for Otvelopaent Appft-V61 (CAOA1. and submit three copies of the CADA to the Council. ant copy to the City. and one coy to the florid& -- •B. ,rrrrs Owartmint of Community Affairs within ninety (901 days of the effective date of this Develop Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: 'Where new clarification. or revised infor—tion was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the 00, whether in response I to a formal Information Adequacy Statement or otherwise, the original pales of the ADA should be replaced with revised pages. 'Revised pages should have a 'Page Number (R) • Date" notation. with 'Page Number' being the number of the original page. '(R)° indicating that the Page was revised, and TAW stating the date the revision was submitted. 18. Prepare and submit to the Council, City. and Florida Department of Community Affairs, an anneal noaltorinl report contsining an assesmmt of compliance with all conditions of the lriciell Square Oeveiopwit Orders, Phases I. 1t and III, complete rosponsa to the questions contained in the Annual Monitoring Questionnaire (Exhibit 7 DRI Assessment, page 82) and included herein by reference, any other information required by Section 380.06(141(c)(3), Florida Statutes (1986, or State rules, and the fol l owning: 'identification of all tenants that meet the criteria established in Exhibit 1 and 2 of ft Camil ORt Assessment (pages 61-66). 'For • each such tenant, copies of one of the following types of documentation of appropriate hazardous waste disposal: •a hazardous waste Manifest •a bill of loading from a bonded hazardous waste transporter indicating Shipsant to a per A ttad hazardous waste sumagaart facility, or -a confirmation of receipt of matesdal from a racy lop. a waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazaroowrs waste facility. 'The 40) icsnt is to provide the City with a signed statement prior to the issuance of the Certifieate of Occupancy that all conditions contained in Condition Me. 1S haw bean on. • "SUCA affidavits as sue► be required by the City pursuant to Condition 26 herain. 19. Provide 2 fire hydrants on fM cte11 Avenve and 1 fire hydrant on S. E. 8 Street, restriping of parting spates, landscaping an the south side of the Pro)tet. and that a clear area? be•mointained along 8rfctoll Avoome to provide proper vision for police vehicles, pursuant to comments of the Miami Large Scale Dwe)o; 0 t Committee, at its sooting of May 29. 1985. 20. Prior to the issuance of a building parent for the dncsen n Square iro3oct for increased floor area- in excess of 3.25 F.A.R., the owners oust obtain from the City of Miami ; a certifi i t Cat on that the requirlsnaets p the s 11 E Offsite Affordable Housing bonus provisions per Section 1556.2.2. Ordinance 9500, have been mat to the wount of 1.00 F.A.R. 21. Prior to the issuancm of any construction permit in Phases 2 and 3, a Unity of Title covering all properties within Phases 1, 2 and 3 shall be submitted to the City for recordation in the public records. THE CITY WILL: U. Consult with the Applicant -to ensure incorporation of security eteasures and systems into the design and operation of the project, including provision for emergency helicopter hovering abow tide roof of the office tamers. 13. Withhold Issuance of final certificates of occupancy for store than SO0,000 gross sguers feet of development on -site, including Phase 1. until the Applicant has compiled with Conditions 10, 11, 13, 14, 25, and 16 herein. 24. Cooperate with the County in the development and, adoption of appropriate County ordinances to Ostend the gatromovsr special taxing district to the trictell area or to ispose a one time transit impact fee on all development bentfiting from INtromover. 25. Provide that the effeitivaness of the CevelopMt Order shall be stayed and no further developtoaatt permits thereunder shall be granted, until such time 1; as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended Developsott Order issued, if Condition 13 has not been met withio three (3) years of the affective date of this. Development Order or if construction of the 1lrick0l leg of Meetrom w Stage 11 has not begun by January 1, 1992. :f this eoesdition is trisgened by evens ouriids the control of the Applicant, the scope of the An"" ADA and as rtviw thereof shall be limited to air quality and transportation Information, impacts, and issues; and the applicant will be able to complete arty developwnt for which permits have bM issued, provided that such devala; 0 t dotes not exceed 9S0,000 square feet an -site. i including Phase 1 development. Air quality and transportation information t in theastmsdad ADA shall be in the format specified in Exhibit d (DAl I1 AssessmnL , page J31 Or, at LltR OpLt101t YI .+is wvr►tss ...gwi .ri/ ft be specified. Should the ORvelopmwt Drop be stayed pursuant to this ?` conaition nothi it be rue lima Condition 20 below , nothing strain snail construed to t that this OwelapliNt Order runs with the land, and its terns And !' canditions�an binding an the wilcant, its successors, and/or assigns.. k 99- 266 i R )J +•al 26. Require that the annual report be submitted to the Council. City, and Op6rtment of Community Affairs (OCA) on the anniversary of the effective date of the Development Order. The annual report shalt include, at r minimum, a complete response to each Question in Exhibit 7 (ADA Assessment, page $21 and any other information rewired by OCA in accordance with Section 380.06(14)(C)(3), Florida Statutes (1"4). The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning O"artewnt. or a project director to be named later, is hereby designated to rbceive this report and to monitor and assure compliance with this Devalopmwnt Order. Development Order conditions shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuaece of any dere)opm--t permit and for those conditions that cam at be reasonably monitored as part of local permitting and inspection processes. a notarised form from the applicant assuring compliance with such Oowiopemsnt Order conditions is to be included in the annual report. . 27. Incorporate into the Oevelopow t Order for Brickell Square a timeline sharing the project phasing, specific elamants of the project pion, and conditions of the Oavelopement Order which are to be met in each phuo or by other specified data. (Figure 1). 28. Require, within 30 dims -of the affective date of the development order, recordation of the Arickell Square-Oevelopment Order with the Clark, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(141(d), Florida Statutes (IM ). specifying that the Oevelopmont Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or %aversely, and shall include the following: a. That the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida. has issued a f: Development Order for the trickell Square Project, Phases II amid III a Development of Regional Impact touted at N6-999 Orickell Avenw. b. That the developer of the 6rickeil Square Project is Tishman- SceyQNfouitable Joint Venture, with offices at 7" ®rickell Avenue. Miami, Florida 33131. c. That the Development Order with any modifications may be examined in the City Clark's Offices, 3500 Pan American urive, ainner hry. iiaml, Floryda' 33133. 9 2— 266 d: That the 0evsleommmnt Order constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the property; that the conditions contained in this Dewelopamnt om'do shall run with the land and bind ail %uccason in '+•��+l+,� �+ a640%0 U"oerstood that "lCordino of this notice shall not .�..._.� a •.�t3�►C. , constitute a lien, Cloud or encumbrance on real property, nor actual nor constructive notice of any of the son. This deveiowet t order shftl be considered null and void by December of 1996. unless actual construction work, excluding grading or excavating, is substantially under tray an that date. • .29. Mork with the applicant to prepare a Minority Participation and EepAioyOM t Plan to be subaitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Developmo-t. — 30. wort with the applicant to develop a Minority Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Ilan to be subritted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this 0evelopm t order. COWL.USIONS OF LAW The Rrictell Square ►MJOCt, prepared by Tishmem-Spayer/Equitabit Joint Venture i coa>plies with the His" Casprthensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly dewlopnent and goals of the City of Mind, and complies with local ' land devel'F -- t regwlations. The proposed developampt does not unreasonably interfere with the achieveeaent f of the o&J" vas of tWadopted State Land Oevelopment Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and • The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida 42ionai Planning Council and does not j Uhreuonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth f! in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Changes in the profeet Which do not exceed developnant panawters set forth in a, tfe Applicstien for Do")1; a Approval and Report and Recam■m%"tions of the Ragional Planning CoursCit shall not Canatitl 0 a substantial deviation sender Chapter 3$0 Florida S Utwtes. notwithstanding City inning approvals which may 0� ryrq¢i red. Jldl III, J I 1I1 1I.Illl 111l1 14ll 11 'Id Jill l'll 1;lillII I I I I II I IIIII I1.1 AYPUCANtTjWiF» NI CD Cay Nlo= L'ERWICATE f i IOOMTM OR actupow IF" III CITY MSUE3 DEVELOPUM OROM EFFECTIVE DATE CONDITION i / t 90 Od1Y3 CONDITION 9 CONDITION T f01N' TMA' f(1 OIIY OOP TEAR FROM TNO TEARS _ EFROI�E EFFUm "EFFf CT1VE ow —30 DAYS DAIS plum0I� ITT 1 � CONDITION 29 oalNoe�loN Ys.3a CONDITION JT WNDII IaN3 1 IPT 1. 3IP T 1.,1 PTi 9.12 AND FOR + 325 FAR, tO,tl,tt to tmmIK lHW N 13 MENOED Tc COUNIEN Ill Junk 1199C ca mTlM� 3 ANDFOR+wopao 3fXmWm PHI it ANO MR amp" ff. NRIi, 13,14.0 AND Of 12,23. r 001�01T1ONs 11PT1.31PT1.•�IPTI.Id NOTE: Tw TMIELNIE N Il1U M= TO'LUIETo:At TINE KOUENC(E OF 13V III R tiONs t s sE T »yA3L�! CA!<,Emms DA1 S oER, Nov FIGURE I BRICKELL SQUARE PHASE Ji AND ff TIMELINE Cr�GL �e6 N.rG 90 DAYS CONDITION 5 CONDITION T ONE VM FROM REEYEANSFROM 30 DAYS EFFECItVF�0�1E TFFOECINE VEARDAF RM EE T EFFECT6VE DATE i t 1oM 20 III 2s,3D CONDITION .IT -lO"3 I U" T 1. 31PT1.,1PTl .10 FOR t 3.25 FAR, t0.21.2t 1 TiNIELNIE +CtINdTNafSta.26 ' CONOlTIOMS IIPTI,2, 3(PT), IIIIIIIANDFOR450OADO&F EXCLU11M PHI a "O:OR ww pw SF. IIIct1l�a PHI. 13.I4.I5 AND M 22. 23 _ FIGURE i BRICKELL SQUARE PHASE [ AND = TIMELINE .1 • FOIII' VEARSFMM EFFI CUK GATE PHASE 0 IS IMIENOEO Tc COWIEMCE Ia SIN ND MtO 9�� Yee .-AND eE f I CO1ac MM IIPT1.31PT1; UPTId6 MOTE: THIS IWWNE 13 INTENDER TO'ELUSTRATE THE 9EQUOM OF COMO1TIOMS 4?8 SEF: . FORTH UI Tip OEvEtAPMU Of DER: NOT TO ESTAKM CALENDAR DATES J-89-255 4/17/89 RESOLUTION NO. 99-410 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION 85-1060s OCTOBER 10, 1985, ATTACHED) FOR THE BRICXELL SQUARE PHASES II AND III PROJECT, APPROXIMATELY 845-999 BRICKELL AVENUE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06 FLA. STAT. (SUPP. 1988), AND MAJOR USE PURSUANT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY AMENDING CONDITION 25 TO EXTEND A DEADLINES CONDITION 27 OF SAID DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY CHANGING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PHASE II TO NOVEMBER 1991; PHASE III TO JUNE .1995, FROM JUNE 1987, JANUARY 1991 AND 1993, RESPECTIVELY; [FURTHER FINDING AND CONFIRMING THAT SAID CHANGES DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06, FLA. STAT. (SUPP. 1988), AND THAT SAID CHANGES ARE NOT PART OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (RESOLUTIONS 87-1148 AND 1149; DECEMBER 10, 1987); INCORPORATING SAID FINDINGS IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER; AND CONTAINING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, by Resolution 85-1060, October 10, 1985, the City Commission issued a Development Order and Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Square Phase II and III Project, located at 845-899 Brickell Avenue, a Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380. F.S., and Major Use pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 9500; and WHEREAS, The applicant, Tishman Speyer/Equitable Joint Venture, now desires to change the timing of the Project and consequently desires to amend the previously issued Development Order; and WHEREAS, on December 27, 19.88, the applicant filed "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes• with the Florida Department of Community Affairs, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the City Of Miami; and 9 c2 , 266 CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF W Boa 27 iaAa 0 0 WHEREAS, on February 2, 1989, the applicant applied for an amendment to the previously -issued Development Order; Major Use Special Permit and a reservation of development credits pursuant to the City of Miami Downtown DRIB and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1989, the City Commission held an advertised public hearing to consider this application for amendment and whether it constituted a substantial deviation under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes: and WHEREAS, the City Commission'considers this resolution to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Miami: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the preamble to this Resolution pertaining to substantial deviation as Conclusions of Law are hereby approved, confirmed, and adopted by reference hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this section. Section 2. Exhibit A of Resolution 85-1060; dated October 10, 1985 (attached) the Development Order and Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Square Project Phases II and III Project is hereby amended in the following respects:ll FINDINGS OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS • a • information, is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued, if Condition 15 has not been met within three (3) years of the effective date of this Amended Development order or if construction of the 8rickell leg of Metromover State II has not begun by January 1, 404-gT 1995. If this condition is triggered by events outside the control of the Applicant, the scope of the Amended ADA and the review thereof shall be limited to air quality and transportation information, impacts and issues; and the applicant will be able to complete any development for which permits have been issued, provided such development does not exceed 950.000 square feet on - site, including Phase I development. lkir quality and transportation information in the amended ADA shall be -1 i in the format specified in Exhibit 6 (DRI Assessment, page 73) or, at the option of the Council, another _ format may be specified. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant to this condition, nothing herein shall be construed to limit Condition 27 below that this Development Order runs with the land, and its terns and conditions are binding on the Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns. _- • � s 27. Incorporate into the Development Order for 9rickell Square a timeline showing the project phasing, specific'elements of the project plan, and conditions of the Development Order which are to be met in each Phase or by other dates. For auraos+es of this timeline, Phase -Ii shall continence in November,, 1991. Phase III shall commence in June. 1995 and the project aha11 be,co leted in 1997. All other conditions shall be in -. aacor&nce with- the schedule - provided" i� n the timeline (figure 1). ,# 9 - 266 - f y t CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell Square Project, eroposed by Tishman Speyer/Equitable Joint Venture, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Hiamit and The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the. South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Changes in the project which do not exceed development parameters set forth in the Application for Development Approval and Report and Recommendation of the Regional Planning Council shall not constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 Florida Statutes (Supp• • i 1988) notwithstanding City zoning approvals which may be required. The phasing schedule changes- to the original Brickell i Square Phases II and III DRI development order set forth herein do not constitute a substantial deviation under Chanter 360 Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986). Section 3. The proposed are not affected by, or have an effect on, the Downtown Miami Development of Regional .Impact Development Orders. (Resolution 87-1148 and 1149: December10, 1987). 92- 266 Section 4. This Resolution shall ba transmitted to Luria A. Dougherty; Greenberg, Traurig, Roffman, Lipoff, Rosen and Quentel, 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 33131: Jack Osterholt, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021, and Thomas Pelham, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399. Section S. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption pursuant to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of . 1989. —a XAVIER 4,. AUAREZ; MAYOR ATTEST: `Ml+ Y HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: • ) Olt f L E. MAXWELL IEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JO 'E L. PER14ANDEZ CITY ATTORN JEM/d/db/M974 92- 266 RX ea-x y-s k'ro* i b r "x t# S & -y# '.a r i - 1 s : t V vfr fi 5,q,�a r apt >. ,� (t.s z._ i �. p 9 < s t t ,t sAlgol! "Nsts HIM" jMill, r x TOR it "' t x rti Ins 1-1 t Lot r # '� .`�w .t�"k„t�. r�� it5�.,� •.c t � .b• a y c-. t 16 i I BRICKELL SQUARE DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXTENSION INTRODUCT10N The developer of Brickell Square, located in the southeast quadrant of S.E. 8th Street and Brickell Avenue (Exhibit 1), proposes to extend the buildout date (Phase III) to the year 2001. Brickell Square, a three phase project, was originally approved for Phase I in 1983, and Phases II and III were subsequently approved in 1985. To date, only Phase I, a 427,000 square foot office/retail building has been completed. Phases II and III, located immediately south of Phase I, are approved for a total of 981,000 square feet of office and retail space. The 1985 Development Order issued for Phases II and III included a buildout date of 1989 for Phase II and 1993 for Phase III. These buildout dates have subsequently been amended to 1993 and 1997 for completion of Phase II and Phase III respectively. The purpose of this study is to determine if a further extension of the buildout dates will exceed acceptable level of service standards. For purposes of this study, it is assumed that construction of Phase III will be completed by the year 2001. Therefore, the traffic analysis will be conducted for 2002, one year after Buildout. This is consistent with previous traffic studies which analyzed traffic the year after Buildout. Phase II construction would be completed by 1997. In order to determine the impacts of extending the buildout dates, all aspects of the traffic analyses have to be reviewed. This would include trip generation rates, historic growth, committed projects, future traffic volumes as well as any change in methodologies for calculating volume/service volume (V/SV) and levels of service on area roadways. EXIT. TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Twenty-four (24) hour automatic machine counts as well as AM and PM manual turning movement counts were conducted in the Brickell area to determine existing AM and PM peak period volumes and levels of service. AM and PM peak period volumes were calculated using the procedures outlined in the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Transportation Element. Existing peak period volumes and levels of service are shown on Exhibit 2. All roadway links are currently operating at acceptable levels of service. COMMITTED PROTECT ANALYSIS The 1985 ADA for Brickell Square included fifteen (15) Committed Developments in the projection of future traffic volumes. Many of these projects have been built and are now included in existing traffic volumes. A review of the 15 committed developments, previously included, shows that seven (7) of these projects have been eliminated from the market. There is, however, the Phase I of the Downtown Miami DRI that has to be included as a committed project. Although no building permits have been issued for projects in the Brickell area, several projects including Brickell Gateway and a revised 1111 Brickell 2 1 development have been approved under the Downtown Itiiami DRI. Brickell Point, a residential project, is currently seeking approvals under the Downtown Miami DRI. Peak period traffic volumes from the Downtown Miami DRI are shown on Exhibit 3. Peak period volumes are calculated from peak hour volumes utilizing data contained in NCHRP Report No. 121. This report provides a graphic representation of the hourly variations in traffic volumes for various land uses. Based on the hourly plots the A I and PM peak period relationships to AM and PM peak hour can be calculated. A plot of the 1 AM and PM peak hours is shown on Exhibit 4. TRIP GENERATION The Brickell Square ADA (1985) calculated trip generation using the pe. parking space rates as summarized below. Brickell Square 'Trip Generation Rates Per Parking Space) In Out Total I AM Peak 0.50 0.02 0.52 PM Peak 0.10 0.40 0.50 This methodology has not changed, therefore, there is no change to the project's eternal peak hour trips. As proposed Brickell Square will have a total of 750 parking spaces at the PP-_ 1 end of Phase H and 1624 parking spaces at Buildout (Phase III). Currently there are 750 e "! trips generation for all three phases is shown on Exhibit S. e P�,RQJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT As indicated, Phase I of Brickell Square is currently occupied. Driveway counts were conducted at the parking structure to determine existing Alba and I'M peak period volumes. The AM and PM inbound and outbound volumes were reviewed to determine if any modification to the traffic assignment used in the original ADA was necessary. Existing _ AM and PM peak period volumes on the major gateway roads serving the Brickell area were also analyzed to determine if the project traffic assignments needed to be modified. Based on these analyses the project traffic assignment was adjusted from that contained in the ADA. The major changes were: (1) Increased the AM and PM project volumes assigned to Coral Way. (2) Reduced the AM project volume assigned to Brickell Avenue from the north. (3) Reduced the PM project volume assigned to Brickell Avenue to the south. } Based on this revised assignment existing AM and PM peak period project traffic volumes 77 are shown on Exhibit 6. AM and PINT peak period volumes, consistent with the City's .,� Comprehensive Plan, are the average of the 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 V. p.m. volumes respectively. AM and PM peak period total project traffic (Phases I, II and III) were assigned to the 4 92- '266 S 0 0 road network using the revised assignment. Buildout project volumes are shown on Exhibit 7 for the critical links identified for this study. Project traffic on Brickell Avenue, north of the Miami River and south of S.E. 25th Road, is less than ten percent (10%) of LOS "E". 'Therefore, these links do not need to be analyzed. In order to project future traffic volumes the net project impact has to be identified. In this instance, net project traffic is the difference between existing volumes and volumes at the end of Phase III. Net AAI and PM peak period project volumes are shown on Exhibit 8. Peak period volumes were calculated from the peak hour volumes shown on Exhibit 5 based on ratios developed from existing driveway counts. FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS Total year 2002 AM and PM peak period traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 9. These volumes reflect existing volumes, committed projects volumes and net project volumes. A separate volume for historic growth is not included because the Downtown DRI traffic volumes represent traffic to/from other areas of Downtown which will travel through the Brickell Area. Exhibit 9 also shows AM and PM peak period volume/capacity (v/c) ratios and levels of service for the peak direction on the critical links. All roadway links are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. Level of service "E" is the adapted level of service r standard for Downtown Miami. In fact, with two exceptions, roadway links are projected P 92- 266 to operate at better than LOS "E". n i The City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan provides a methodology for calculating levels of service based on person trips rather than vehicle trips. The Plan also uses the concept of Transportation Corridors (TC) which provides for an analysis of person trips utilizing all available transportation modes. Although in the Downtown area it is permissible to use MetroRail, MetroMover, MetroBus and the private auto in calculating capacities and LOS this analysis will only analyze the person trip capacities and levels of service of the private auto. This is a very conservative approach which will demonstrate that adequate capacity exists. Year 2002 peak period total person trips, v/c ratios and levels of service for the peak direction are shown on Exhibit 10. All roadway links are projected to operate at LOS "D" j or better. If the Transportation Corridor, including MetroRail, MetroMover and MetroBus, was analyzed substantially better LOS conditions would be indicated. 4! INTERSECTION ANALYSES Intersection capacity analyses are provided for they i; (1) Brickell Avenue and S.E. 8th Street _ (2) Brickell Avenue and S.E. 12th Terrace/S.E. 13th Street (3) Brickell Avenue and S.E. 15th Road Project Driveway/South Bayshore Drive b 92- 266 All intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. CONCLUSION§ Extending the Buildout date of Brickell Square to 2001 will not result in a deterioration of operating conditions below standards adopted in the City of Miami Comprehensive ;at Neighborhood Plan. Therefore, this extension is not a substantial deviation and should be approved. 4 0. EXHIBITS j. -92- 266 l I #91191.01 EXHIBIT 5 DRIC ELL SQUARE DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXTENSION PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION LAND USE Phase I Office & Retail Phase H Office & Retail Phase III EXTERNAL AM PEAK HOUR TRU!S IN BUT TOTAL 262 11 273 375 15 390 3/3/92 EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOLD t TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL 52 209 261 75 300 375 - 1 Office & Retail 175 7 182 35 140 175 i ff C i ; Total Phase H & III 550 22 572 110 440 550 Grand Total: 812 33 84S 162 649 812 1 , G, Note: Phase I construction is complete. �, 92-� 266 d 1 10 I I" I qw ff qu M mmirl �.�._...___-.-.--w._ :_.__..�.,._J..-._,_,�, �. RM iw im iw I rw ME i qw- 1 9"- I � � IWN- �l IlV'I MECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES - I _ 1 1 7 e 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED.INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *�It�r�t***ilr*9k*9k*#4rilr*�Ik**3c*�k*4*�r*******iF***�Ir*********�k******•k*************kii*** ^� INTERSECTION..SE 8TH STREET/BRICKELL AVENUE AREA TYPE.....CBD ANALYST.......DPA = DATE.......... 3/02/92 TIME.......... AM PEAK PERIOD _ COMMENT.......2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC �. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB - LT 419 98 0 188 : L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 655 0 902 493 : L• 12.0 LR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 149 260 196 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 60 0 0 : TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 _- 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -----------------------------------------------------------------------_--_�_ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS -_ 1 GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( ) M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 31.8 3 �- NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 28.8 3 - SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 28.8 3 Y- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ - SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 - PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 - =Y EB LT X NB LT - TH X X TH x - RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT x y TH TH X X r RT X RT w pD PD GREEN 24.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 12.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 YEELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 �- -----------------------------------a--------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE - LANE GRP. V/C. G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L. 0.776 0.217 37.9 D 23.0 C TR 0.584 0.525 15.3 C = WB L. 0..817 0.283 62.4 F 35.0 D LR 0.252 0.283 25.4 D R- 0.583 0.283 29.7 D NB TR 1.027 0.283 59.0 E 59.0 E SB L 0.647 0.117 4.1.4 E 23.7 C T 0.299 0.425 17.3 C ---'rrw-r---r---+.-ra....--------r_---.--------_r-------r-------.ter------wr.�_rrrr - INTERSECTION:, Delay = 36.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.728 LOS = D -71 ti 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SE 8TH STREET/BRICKELL AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... CBD A*IALYST....... DPA DATE.......... 3/02/92 TIME.......... PM PEAK PERIOD COMMENT ....... 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY - -- EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 270 235 0 48 : L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 232 0 798 981 : L 12.0 LR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 209 476 117 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 90 0 0 : TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 31.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 28.8 3 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 28.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X Y. TH X RT RT X PD PD WD LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 25.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.482 0.225 31.2 D 18.6 C TR 0.318 0.558 10.9 B WB L 0.283 0.308 24.1 C 58.2 E LR 0.616 0.308 29.4 D R 1.036 0.308 76.5 F NB TR 0.902 0.267 39.0 D 39.0 D SB L 0.193 0.100 37.7 D 23.8 C T 0.646 __....---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.392 23.2 C INTERSECTION: Delay.=, 33.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.620 LOS = D i 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SE 13TH STREET/BRICKELL AVENUE AREA TYPE.....CBD -_ ANALYST.......DPA ^� DATE..........3/02/92 L TIME..........AM PEAK PERIOD -_ COMMENT.......2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY =_ EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB -_ IT 369 9 108 73 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 172 29 1113 610 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 94 29 99 178 : R 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 - RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 - --..------- �-• ADJUSTMENT FACTORS =_ GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE _ 0.) M Y/N NM Nb Y/N min T G EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 _ 3 -_ SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 - PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 -• EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X -„ PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD f GREEN 15.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -, ---------------------------------,----------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.750 0.382 29.8 D 29.4 D T 0.605 0.200 32.8 D R 0.252 0.309 21.7 C WB L 0.019 0.382 16.1 C 22.8 C T 0.102 0.200 27.3 D R 0 078 0 309 20 4 C NB L 0.280 0.564 9.7 B 57.7 E TR 1.061 0.427 61.8 F SB L 0.300 0.564 9.8 B 20.0 C TR 0.705 0.427 20.9 C . _------------------------------------------------------------------...0.1 ----- INTERSECTION: Delay _ 39.5 (sec/veh) V/C 0.795 LOS D 92- 266 r v 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SE 13TH STREET/BRICKELL AVENUE r AREA T'YPE..... CBD ANALYST ....... DPA DATE.......... 3/02/92 �= TIME..........PM PEAK PERIOD COMMENT.., .... 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC --------------------------------•----ter----------------------------r_------- 1 VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB -_ LT 195 114 98 60 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 1 TH 81 182 711 1165 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 83 64 41 294 : R 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR _- 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------•---- 12.0 12.0 3.2.0 12.0 I --• ADJUSTMENT FACTORS =- GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE -_ M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T -_ EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 -_ NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 --• EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X ' PD PD GREEN 8.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------_ - LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS -.. EB L. 0.564 0.291 28.2 D 27.6 D T 0.330 0.173 30.6 D R.' 0.244 0.282 23.2 C WB L 0.314 0.291 23.5 C 31.6 D ' T 0.741 0.173 39.8 D _..R _ 0.188 0.282 22.8 C NE'; L 0.403 0.655 7.5 B 13.1 B TR 0.540 0.518 13.8 B Q12 T. n 1 2 w n -- c C c 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT "^ INTERSECTION..SE 15TH ROAD/BRICKELL AVENUE .AREA TYPE ..... CBD ANALYST ....... DPA -� DATE .......... 3/02/92 TIME.. .... ....AM PEAK PERIOD COMMENT ....... 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 17 59 42 15 : IT 12.0 LTR 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 26 23 1437 380 : R 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 23 27 61 18 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR C 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ^" 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (o) (-%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 ! 1 rr-r--rrr r.------- ------r---rr----------------------r---------------------- -_ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 =I ., EB IT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RS X RT X PD PD •` GREEN. 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 50.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 f- YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.227 0.133 26.6 D 32.1 D R 0.027 0.711 2.9 A W8 LTR 0.704' 0.133 36.5 D 30.2 D NB LTR 0.992 0.578 28.8 D 28.8 D q SB _ LTR 0.814 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.189 32.6 D _ 29.4 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 29.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.912 LOS = D 92- 266 -�, 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SE 15TH ROAD/BRICKELL AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... CBD ANALYST ..... ..DPA DATE.......... 3/02/92 TIME.......... PM PEAK PERIOD COMMENT ....... 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC -------------------•-------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 23 73 39 20 : LT 12.0 LTR 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 45 24 643 435 : R 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 70 13 48 46 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS �. GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%,) (%) YIN Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 y, WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.5 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 - 50 N 11.5 3 -- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH-9 0.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT. X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 25.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0' LEVEL OF SERVICE - LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.138 0.356 14.9 B 28.3 D -� R 0.088 0.656 4.3 A WB LTR 0.321 0.356 16.2 C 17.8 C NB LTR 0.910 0.300 32.2 D 32.2 D SB LTR 0 769 0 244 27 4 -Ift 0 0 D 40.4 D --- �-------------------------------------------------------- `-------- INTERSECTION: Delay 27.0 (sec/veh) V/C 0.639 LOS D t t 3 0 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAKHOUR FACTOR ................................. .9 AREAPOPULATION ................................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... PROJECT DRIVEWAY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... BAYSHORE DRIVE NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. DPA 1 DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 3/2/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. AM PEAK PERIOD OTHER INFORMATION: 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC '^ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------- --------------------------------------------------------------- - WB- NB- -SB- LEFT -EB� 11 -- 185 0 THRU 0 -- 101 242 RIGHT 11 -- 0 359 NUMBER OF .------- LANES ------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB ------- LANES ------- 2 -------------- -- 2 2 92- 266 C� 0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- --- --- - NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND --- --- --- NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRT: m-ICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- t_ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP -- -- MINOR RIGHTS = -- EB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 - MAJOR LEFTS - NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 92- 266 p dim] CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ------------------------------------------------- Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY = MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c -- v LOS = p M SH R SH c MINOR STREET EB LEFT 13 242 154 154 140 D RIGHT 13 680 680 680 666 A -- MAJOR STREET = NB LEFT 226 511 511 511 285 C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. .9 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE FAST/WEST STREET ..................... PROJECT DRIVEWAY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... BAYSHORE DRIVE -- NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. DPA DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 3/2/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK PERIOD OTHER INFORMATION: 2002 TOTAL TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION ADJUSTMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE - GRADE ANGLE ------- ---------- FOR RIGHT ---------------- TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 ----------.------- _ N WESTBOUND ----- --- --- - - NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- - $ SU TRUCKS COMBINATION AND RVIS ----------- ------------- VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 ------------- 0 - WESTBOUND --- --- --- NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 CAPACITY AND --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET = EB LEFT 244 295 289 289 45 E RIGHT 297 781 781 781 484 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 22 676 676 676 654 A