Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
O-10949
J-01-648 8/26/91 ORDINANCE NO. 10949 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 283 NORTHWEST 35TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; MAKING FINDINGS; INSTRUCTING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of July 10, 1991, Item No. 3, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 41-91, by a 6 to 3 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding an unfavorable recommendation of the Planning Department, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this Comprehensive Plan change as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is hereby amended by changing the land use designation from Medium Density Multi -Family Residential to General Commercial for the property located at approximately 283 Northwest 35th Street, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lot 14 of Block 1, CHEFNEUX SUB, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 34 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 10949 Section 2. It is hereby found that this Comprehensive Plan designation change: a. is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; b. involves a residential land use of 5 acres or less and a density of 5 units per acre or less or involves other land use categories, singularly or in combination with residential use, of 3 acres or less and does not, in combination with other changes during the last year, produce a cumulative effect of having changed more than 30 acres; c. is one which involves property that has not been the specific subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the last year; and d. is one which does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property that has been the subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the last year. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby instructed to direct the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Ordinance immediately upon approval on first reading to Bill Sadowski, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, for 90 day review and comment. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. If any section, part of this section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective forty-five (45) days after final reading and adoption thereof. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 26th day of September 1991. 10949 PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 18th day of February , :199 ATTE MAT HIRAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: L ND KELLY KE RSON ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS AS OF AUGUST 30, 1991: L. 'FWRNANDEZ CI LKK/pb/M830 I XAVIER L SUARE , MAYOR 10949 -3- MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she is the Super- visor of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIANI ORDINANCE NO. 10949 In the.. X. X. X ............................... Court, was published In said newspaper In the Issues of February 27, 1992 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review Is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In sold Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one ar next proceding the first publication of the attached advertisement; and afflant further says that she has r pa nor promised any peroon, or corporation c unt, ebate, commission or re nd Qr the purpose a t advertisement for .« A subscribed before me this day of: ....+.......... A.D. 1992... s a (SEAL) "OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL" CHERYL H. MARMER MY COMM. EXP. 4/12/92 CITY OF MIAMI,° FL.ORIDA L.K"L NOTICE All interested persons will take notice that .on the 18th day of February; 1992, the City Commission of Miami, Florida, adopted the following titled odinances: Of IICE; No.+ 3094L AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 105", AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXI- MATELY 283 NORTHWEST 35TH STREET, MIAMI, FLOR- IDA<(MORE PARTMLARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN). BY CHANGING,THE_LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE :SUB- JECT'PROPERTYFROM MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI- FAMIt.YAESIDEiNTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; MAKING FINOING3; INSTRUCTING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO.AFFECTED AGEN- CIES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEV- ERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE. _ ORDINANCE NO.10950 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE -CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA',- BY CHANGMiGTHE ZONING CLAWFIdATADN` F.ROM2 R-3 MULTI-FAWNLY -MEDIUMS DENSITY RESIDENTIAL VJ" A148042 SPEOWL BLUFFER OVERLAY D111111TRICTTO•C-2 LIBERAL COMMEROIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 203 NORTHWESy 05 STREET, MIAMI, FLQRifKIMORE PARTICULARLY DESCPA$p HEREIN), AND BY MAKM ALL THE NECESSARY.CHAN4ES ON PAGE NQ. 21,OF SAID. ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPtALER, PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. gADMUCE NO.10961 .AN ORDINANCE AMf14011140 THE ZONING ATLAS OR ORDWANCE NO. 1111001 AS AMENDED THE "ZONING 006INANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,. FLORIDA, BY CHANGW4j, IRE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FlA MM A<2 . TWO F1NY LY'RESIDENT'IAL TO C-1 MWIRICTE17•COM- MERCIAL, FOR THE,PROPHRtY LOCATED AT ZW." SOUTHWEST 27TH TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE PAIRTICULA'RLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), A%lD BY MAKING " ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGENO. 42 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS;CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERASILITY CLAUSE: _ Said m tnWms may be inspected by the public at the Office of the City Clerk, 3600 Pan American Drive, Miama Florida, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, between the, hours 'of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m: MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK MIAMI, FLORIDA 2127 9044 22MM' '1 t#a of �ffiiami SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP Director February 24, 1992 Ms. Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140 Hollywood, FL 33021 CESAR H. ODIO City Manager (\ 1 ^J ... rI Re: Second Transmittal of Amendment No. 91-7 (DCA No. 92-51), to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Dear Ms. Dekle: The City of Miami, on February 18, 1992, adopted Ordinance 10949 amending the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP). This proposed amendment is a small scale development activity and, according to Chapter 163.3187, was submitted without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987 and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, and the direction of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to provide you with a copy of these documents consisting of: - One (1) copy of MCNP Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinance 10949 as adopted, (Attachment 91-7-2 A); - One (1) copy (for reference purposes only) of the support documents on which recommendations are based, (PZ-1, City Commission Meeting of February 18, 1992) (Attachment 91-7-2 B) specifically including the DCA Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report of January 13, 1992 and this Department's response. Page 1 of 2 Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Mr. B. Jack Osterholt February 24, 1992 If, in the 45 clay review process, there are points that need clarification, you may contact Joseph McManus, Assistant Director, Planning, Building and Zoning Department, at (305) 579-6086. SR/rl Attachments cc: Matty Hirai, City Clerk (letter only) Guillermo E. Olmedillo, Deputy Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Elbert L. Waters, Assistant Director (letter only) Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner II (letter only) General Planning Robert Lavernia, Planner I (letter only) General Planning Doc:[robert]<robert>transm/91-7 Page 2 of 2 FLORID coovV It 3EPARTMENT OF TRAIDS?ORTATIO 5C• G. W�"S 54 C.1L' Vc` D:.st_ __ _ ?_--- -_n; and "I a.ms c Z South Miami Ave..^.ue M:.a,^,_ , Florida 23 _ �0 ;205) 377-5910 (S:) 452-5910 *lcvember 14, 1991 Mr. Robert Arredondo Bureau of Local Planning State of Florida Department of Community Affairs 1-740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Dear Mr. Arredondo: ?U;?; "-I' yr O^ RESOURCE P:.rli�iltiJ :n accordance with your request, and the provisions of Charier 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Adminis- trative Code, we have completed a review of the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan amend.,nent (ref.= 92SI) which was forwarded to cur office on Cctober 10, 1991. I have enclosed an "External Agency Review" form which documents the District's comments on this comprehensive plan amendment. 0 t.ust that this will contribute to the formulation of your fi^� response to this Durisdiction. Should you have any questions concerning our review please tce individual reviewer as noted on the form. s'-nze.ely, Servand,: M. Parapar, P.E. District Director of Planning and Programs lEnclosu're cc: Director, Office of Policy Planning ca�_ 10949 South Florida Water Management District 3a Cur) C'Jo Road • PO Box 9.46 U • ��es; Pa,m Beacr• ..3:34,5•4680 • ,4:7 686.8800 a _ ,'S - - GOV 08-06 November 15, 1991 BUREAU OF LOCAL: RESOURCE pLANNiNG Mr. Robert Arredondo Bureau of Local Planning Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399 Dear Mr. Arredondo: Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Miami - 9251. Staff has reviewed the subject document and we have no water resource related comments. Please call us if you have any questions, or require more information.. Sincerely, Larry Pearson, AICP Director Comprehensive Planning Division Planning Department LP/PK/ng c: Bob Nave, DCA City of Miami Carolyn A. Dekle, SFRPC Julio Fanjul, SFWMD 1 10949 C:�� fKwerntno &mrd s'+a ki-!:Odec ChAirmAn N?ami Jamcs E. Nall - Fort Laudcrdalc Lcah G. Schad West Palm Beach T!Iford C Creci %c D �n 77 STATE OF F L 0 R I D A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SURER:! CF LOCAL R:SCURCE PLANN1,1kG AFFAIRS 2'4 0 C E N T E R V I E W D R I V E T A L L A H A S S E E, F L O R I D A 3 1 3 9 9- 2 1 0 0 LAWTON CHILES Governor November 18, 1991 WILLIAM E. SADOWSKI iecretary M E M O R A N D U M TO: Robert Arredondo Division of R ource Planning and Management FROM: Rod Westall Division of Emergency Management SUBJECT: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review The Division of Emergency Management has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan for the City of Miami (Reference Number 92-S1). We have no objections, recommendations, or comments related to 9J-5.012: Coastal Management. If you should have any questions, please call Dan Evans at 487-4915. RW:dem 10949 1� EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 6 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Depa-r-,e : of ::=..., m^ '!: A`.a_:-s sn o: ?.es"u_:�e ?:�. .�.•r a.-�c: ;� ag�-:e� S:iould you have any c-,es-iors rega_:7-4 n; == ==Pa ts, , _saze ....��- ..a k R. Woe_^-.e_-•, Section S,=exvisor, met=polit n Planni.-�g Li isicr, �- �e 205; .-. i 5-2335. �1 RBI: �2u : yf y:as s ince-rely % n Reginald Walters, A+w � :)irec�t-or 10949 nzS METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA < METRO DADE) <E`i �caC�n� Yr. Robe_?-t Aredcndo Florida Dement of Divisicn of Resource 2740 Cente--view Drive Tallahassee, Florida 20, 1991 C.=-.-%rLity Affairs Plar=i nq and Management 32399-2100 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SU17E 220 III N.W, 1st STPE=' MIAMI, FLORIDA 33129•19'2 =5) 375-2300 Subject: City of Miami Plan Aner&*nt No. 91-7, DCA Ref. 9251 Dear Mr. Arr'edonda: "lus Department has reviewed the refereed City of Miami C= pr ehersive 'Neighborhood Plan amerrbent which you transmitted to us under cover r. er.�orandum dated October 10, 1991. We reviewed the proper amend- ern primarily to identify points of consistesxy or inconsistency. with t1te p_*rovi.sions of Dade County's 0=prehensive Development blaster Plan (=) . The following arments are offered for your ca-sideration. ,his amendment, a 0.25 acre parcel located in the block bounded by NW 36 and NW 35 Streets between NW 2 and NW 3 Avenues, requests a change of land use on the City's Future Land Use Plan Map from "Multifamily Med:- Density - Residential" to "Gene-gal-Gbr.uercial" . Permitted use wit'. n the "General ., ial" designation include aul=ctive repair services, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, heavy equipnent sales and service, wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scales of operation and land use i.'-pa= are similar to those described above. Contiguous areas to the -north of the site facing NW 36 Street are designated "General-Cormer- cial", and contiguous areas to the east, west and south are designated '%-,1ti-family Medium Density -Residential". According to the info—zra- tion submitted in the amendment application the lot is currently vacant, and is intended to be used as a parking lot to serve the corme_rcial building fronting on NW 36 Street. The Metre -Dade County C171P Land Use Land map designates the anp-*it-ent site as Business and Office which is consistent with the requested change. 'This Department concludes that this amendment is not inccns is - tent with the policies of the Cam. 10949 4116 « J V .J . r ME'TR0P 17A,N 0 A 0 E OR A PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUi'= • 220 N.W. ',5; S %` MIAMI•=_�RIDA 33128•';72 305i 3'5.29GC ssis- . ��e�or of Mr ami KanrL—q, 3uildinq and Depa----rent 2 7 5 ,,'W 2 Street .., 33-28 Dea j oe : This Deparrnent has completed its review of your City's C.^cprehe.^5ive amPxxhnent No. 91-7 [Department of C=mir i ty Affairs (CCA) m=ze— 9 2 S I ; . Enclosed for your information is a copy of our c,-=nents wi^.ic. have weer s7a= L:tted to D:A J�m ac=rd With (= apters 9J-5 and 9.7-' 1, Flcr,-a Achin Code. Should you have any questions regarding our ca=ents, please ^-w Park R. Woe_rner, AICP, Section Supervisor Metropolitan Division at 375-2835. Sin y, ' Reginald R. alters, AICP Director PI-U :'IOU : yf Enclosure y:89 10949 Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Twin Towers Of;ice Bldg. • 2600 Blau Scone Road • T Iahysxe, Florida Lawton Ch6cs, Governor 7 r. BUREAU CF L0CAL` RESOURCE F'.ANNIXG Robert Arredondo Community Program Administrator Bureau of Local Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Re: City of Miami - 9251 Dear Mr. Arredondo: Carol `1. Brow- , x, Nove-a:er 21,1991 The proposed amendments were reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. We have no comments concerning these proposed amendments. if you have any questions regarding this response please contact me at 487-2498. Sincerely, oe�-' Dan Pennig n��tn Planning Manager Office of Planning & Research 10949 The �-;oncrable Xavier L. Suarez anuary 13, 1992 Page Three If you have any questions, please contact Maria Abadal, Plan Review Administrator, Paul Noll, Community Program Ad^iristratr, or Stephen Gavigan, Planner II, at (904) 487-4545. Sincerely, Robert Pennock, Chief Bureau of Local Planning RP/ rm Enclosures: Review Agency Comments cc: Mr. Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director Planning and Zoning Department Ms. Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council 10949 te-onoratle Xavier L. Suarez anuary !3, 1992 Page TVc Upon receipt of this report, the City of Miami has 60 days in which to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes, or reject the amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s.163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code. Within five working days of the date of adoption, the City of Miami must submit the following to the Department: Five copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments; A copy of the adoption ordinance(s); A copy of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendments and documentation are required for the Department to conduct the compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. As a deviation from the requirement above, you are requested to provide one of the five copies of the adopted amendment directly to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The regional planning councils have been asked to review adopted amendments to determine local comprehensive plan compliance with the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan. Please forward these documents to the regional planning council concurrent with your transmittal to the Department. :our cooperation in this matter is appreciated. ;)_o 10949 STATE OF F L 0 R I D A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS '.4 0 C E `- T E R V I E W D R I V E TALL A H A SSE E, F L O R I D A 3: 3 9 9 -_ 1) .) LAWTON CHILES WLLIAM E. SADO�SSKI Governor �ecreiar� January 13, 1992 03S33 The Honorable Xavier L. Suarez Mayor, City of Miami Miami City Hall Post Office Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Dear Mayor Suarez: The Department has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment (DCA No. 92S1) for the City of Miami, which was submitted on October 7, 1991. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional and local agencies for their review and their comments are enclosed. The Department has reviewed the proposed amendment for consistency with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and the adopted City of Miami comprehensive plan. This letter and the enclosed agency comments constitute the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, and are being issued pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010, Florida Administrative Code. The Department objects to the proposed amendment, because the traffic circulation analysis does not include the projected impact t 11 roads affected by the ro posechance of an especially back ogged Nor wes 36th Street. (See also the aE*- commen s)) This is not consistent with the requirements of 9J-5.0055, 9J-5.007(2)(b), and (3)(c), F.A.C. Because the change of land use will allow increased traffic on at least one backlogged facility, the amendment does not address and further State Comprehensive Plan Goal 20 (Transportation) and Regional Plan for South Florida. Goal 20.2 (Transportation) and their implementing policies. The Department recommends that the analysis be revised to adequately assess the impact to all affected roadways. Revise the amendment to reflect the analysis. 10949 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Lrty of �Riami CESAR H ?anuary 22, 1992 Robert Pennock, Chief Bureau of Local Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (DCA NO. 92S1)(MIAMI NO. 91-8) 283 NW 35TH STREET Dear Mr. Pennock: In response to your letter of January 13, 1992 to Mayor Suarez and pursuant to Section 163.3184(8)(a), your agency is requested to attend public hearings on adoption of the plan amendment referenced above, before the Miami City Commission at City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, as follows: Item PZ-1 After 5:00 p.m. Thursday, January 23, 1992 (Note: Prior to the scheduled hearing, the administration will request a continuance to February 18, 1992, in order to respond to the DCA letter). Item After 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 18, 1992 Inc , �o Sergi Rodrigue , AICP Dire for SR; td tdj92:016 cc: Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council Teresita L. Fernandez, Chief Hearing Boards Office Planning, Building & Zoning Department Serrando M. Parapar, Director Planning and Programs, District Six 10 9 4 9 Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 '7:c:sa_ No. C� sR2n:ST: :__y 99' Revised ',q:T'.`:N A --i ---------------------------------------------------------------- 7�__?7: AM_7N-_M7_NT :Nr--_RM!,-:C.N' ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- :CNC,;RRENCV A.NA-YS:z Rooert mcCanna ReLlly --------------------------------------------------------------- REZREA-::N AND C27-N SPACE 3 � . W . 35 .-ca_e Rez,_,Iremenc, acres Streets: Excess Capacity Before Change 3o,,; z n N.W. 5 St. Excess -2 C&CLZY After -_range East: -Ln�:_::en=y CnecX0,f ,nest: --------------------------------------------------------------- 4A77_-R 7R.1,.;SM:SS:CN EXISC!nq Designation, Xaxl:n.:m ..an ':se ...tensity see Ndes) PcP,!_*1t!2n :ncrement, Residents Resiment-la- acres D�;/ acre ZU' s 7:ansm-3sion RecF.;Irement, gnd ,-.-.er 0 sq.ft.3 j FAR sq.ft. Excess zapacl:y Before 2,-,ange >2% azt",e Peak ic.;r Person -Trip Generation. Excess Capacity After Change Zonz,.=ency Checkoff Proposed Designation, Maximum 7and �;se :n:ens_�y �sae Notes) --------------------------------------------------------------- Reslaent-'al 0.25 acres @ C n�;/acre D'j's SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION 0.25 acres 3 ..2 FAR 4,8CC sz.ft. DD�_Iatlar- _,.,,cement, Residents Peak Hour Person -:rip Generation 126 Trans:,Iisslon Requirement, god Excess Capacity Before Change >2% accve :-.e-.anz Net :ncrement With Proposed Change: Excess Capacity After Change >2% accje ae-a.-a Pop,-lazion 0 Czncurrency Checkoff Dwellingnits I --------------------------------------------------------------- Peak dour Person -Trips -26 S=RM SEWER CAPACITY System Before Change Planning District zcwn-own 7xf'!:ra:!on System After Change County Wastewater Collection Zone 3C8 Zoncuzrency Checkoff Drainage S,.:bcatchmen: Basin --------------------------------------------------------------- Solid Waste Collection Route 12 SO:,:[) WASTE COLLECTION Transportation Corridor Name Biscayne I Population Increment, Residents I Solid Waste Generation, tons/year ---------------------------------------------------------------- Excess Capacity Before Change RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff -and '-'se Policy '.1.1 --------------------------------------------------------------- C:7- Policy 1.2.3 TRAFFICC:RCC:,AT:QN Po,,jatLon Increment, Residents I Peak -Hour person -Trip Generation :0S Before -Change CS After Change ---------------------------------------------------------------- Concurrency Checkoff NOTES --------------------------------------------------------------- ASS:_MP7:ONS AND COMMENTS Trip generation based on 10,CCsc.ft. Shopping center ;se. ?coulatlon increment is assumed -0 be all new iTr!P Generation, 5th ceriod :rlz generation from ::7 7:-10 Senera:_Icn, �:n 7a,- Potable water and wastewater transmission capacl-Les are n Revised analysis 02105192 shows maximum land use intensities accordance with Metro -Dade County stated capacities ana are zased on the following criteria: assumedcorrect. Service connections to water and sewer Existing: '-'se of property is limited to off-street parking. I mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new zcnnez- Proposed: maximum intensity of development is !_'mlzed by I Lions to oe installed at owner's exoense. Recreat4cn,-,cen required off-street parking and open space to an I Space acreage requirements and Traffic Circulation V/C effective FAR of 0.44 balances assume proposed change. Transportation CorrLcr capacities and LOS from Table ?7-2(RI), Data and Ana_,,s_s. 7X-!-:N C3/13/9C -------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- 10949 PindlIv, the probacie use of the sub�Act site needs to be discussed, tote--e- r?th the safeguards that protect the City froir future development .hat degrade LOS standards. The redesignated and rezoned property will of cou-se-, be leoaily capable of development beyond the existing parking lot use shcu',31 the cener subsequently desire to do so. 'Yihile the revised Concur---nc Management A.na1vsis (attached) shows that at full development intensity, t^a required LOS standards are forecast to be maintained, it is still based' cn assumptions as to the practical use of the parcel, and cannot anticipate eve-v possible future circumstance. However, future development of the parcel is still subject to the City's concurrency management process at application for, and review and issuance of a building permit. As a matter of state and kcal law, the City cannot issue a building permit that would result in a degradation of LOS below adopted standards, irrespective of what a preliminary concurrency analysis might forecast. I trust this response to DCA's Objection is satisfactory. If you have an; questions or require further information, please contact me or Mr. Clark P. Turner at (305) 570-6086 (SUNC`IM 921-6086). Sergi,b Rodrigu-ez, AIC11 Director / Attachment (1) cc: Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner Planning, Building and Zoning Department Page 4 of 4 C� 10949 all^wing for anv transit usage), as many as 337 autos could system in a short time period, resulting in localized, but ^ctent'a' serious, concestion. The trip generation suggested by the initial conc'urrency evaluat,cr the s'abJect site was purely theoretical, based on simple multipi�ca��� of the site size by the permitted floor area ratio (FAR) to yield t to square feet of theoretical development. An assumed trip generation r�}� for a 10,000 sq.ft. shopping center was then used for traffic aenerati^^. This produced a total trip generation figure that cannot in fact a attained, due to limitations that zoning and other regulations place on site development. In particular, off-street parking and oper -a- requirements will limit the site's use, and will be more or "es-, significant depending on site size. The City has calculated "practical" site development limits for tv�ica+ parcels of various sizes and intended use. For the subject site, a parcel size of 0.25 acres can be developed to a practical maximum intensity of about 4,800 square feet of commercial floor space addition to required parking and open space, in contrast to the 118,57, square feet of "theoretical" development. A revised Concurrent Management Analysis using this "practical" intensity is attached, ari shows a reduction in peak -period person -trips from 472 to 126, or nC peak -period vehicle -trips at 1.4 ppv, not allowing for any transit usage. While this reduction has no significant effect on the Corridor �S (except to maintain the LOS " 8 " average quality), the potential fir serious localized congestion is very significantly reduced under th s more realistic "maximum development intensity" scenario. The ,i 1 nc. uses this revised methodology to calculate the theoretical develcpmer* intensity of parcels for concurrency management purposes, and re,iues_� that the revised analysis for the subject site be substituted fcr the original. 3) The subject site has been used for more than 20 years as off-street parking for the commercial enterprise on the lot adjoining and fronting on N.W. 36 St.; traffic from and to the lot has already been included in existing traffic volumes, The parking lot existed as a matter of right under previous zoning regulations, but fails to meet one of the conditions required by the current provisions of Miami's Zoning Ordinance, namely that the entrance exit for the parking lot be from the principal street on which the commercial use fronts. in the=ubjart instance, this opportunity is blocked by the building on the commercial site, and the parking lot entrance,/exit is located on N.W. 35 St. TnP parking lot would have enjoyed the status of a legal non -conformity, had the owner not failed to obtain the required permit for parking use Under the previous regulations. To legitimize this existing non -conformity:, is necessary to amend the MCNP to permit rezoning of the sobject property. Therefore, the change in MCNP designation and the accompanying zoning change will not alter any of the existing historic condition_ to the parcel. Pace 3 of 4 10949 The MCNP uses person -trips, where FDOT uses vehicle-trio-^� Fundamental unit of transportation demand. This means t`:at the +=v= -rethodology counts all individual trips, by Whatever mode thev ;rP -made, on the demand (volume) side of the V;C = LCS equation. 'he NP uses the person -trip capacity of all modes in the "ransportation Corridor, where FDOT uses the vehicular capacit,, o` the adjacent roadway(s), as the fundamental unit of transportati^n supply. This means that the MCNP methodology counts as capacity al' of the ways that an individual trip may be made -- including nass transit and increased passenger car occupancies -- on the suppl;. (capacity) side of the V;C = LOS equation; C. The MCNP uses an average person -trip over its entire length as the unit for transportation quality (LOS) analysis, where FDOT uses an average vehicle -trip on the immediately impacted roadway segment. This means that the MCNP methodology reflects the quality of the typical trip from beginning to end -- "door to door" -- in assia_ninq a+ "service" measure, expressed in a letter grade, for the transportation corridor, as the end result of the person -trip V,'C = LOS calculation. The City has no argument with FDOT's conclusion that the potential traffic generation from the subject site could negatively impact a short segment of N.W. 36 St., as viewed within the context and inherent constraints of FDOT's methodology. But the MCNP's methodology views the 3-block segment of N.W. 36 St. between the site and N. Miami Ave. as only the 0.3 mile beginning of a typical work -to -home, peak -period trip averaging 10 miles in length, the balance of which will be made in relatively uncongested conditions in the Biscayne, Civic Center, and I-95 Corridors. The Biscayne Corridor analysis, as presented in Table PT-2(RI) on page 14 of the Transportation Corridors report, shows an average LOS "B" overall, and LOS "A" for the Miami Avenue component which is only 3 blocks distant from the subject site. At least 75'= of the work -to -home trips generated by the site would use eastbound N.W. 36 Street to access Miami Ave. and from it the Biscayne, Civic Center, and I-95 Corridors; the balance, mainly north-and-southbound trips of less than average length, would leave the site by way of lesser arterial and collector streeis such as N.W. 2 and 3 Aves., which have ample capacity for these potential trips. Local bus transit service is also available to the site in route 36 (5-20 min. peak hour headways), and route J (20 min. headways), both on N.W. 36 St.; and route 2 on N.W. 2 Ave. (15 min. headways) and routes 9 and lC on M.E. 2 Ave. (5 min. headways). All routes provide connections to Metrorail. 2) A more realistic analysis reflecting practical limits on site development again shows that this amendment will not present a problem. The points discussed above notwithstanding, there would be cause for concern i` there were any realistic probability that the subject site would dump .147 person -trips into the local street network during the peak period, a_ suggested by the City's preliminary Concurrency Management Analysis. Ls the FDOT objection points out, even at 1.4 persons per vehicle (not Page 2 of 4 10949 7 4;c= February 1, 1992 Mr. Robert Pennock, Chief Bureau of Local Planning State of Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2109 RE: City of Miami Plan Amendment 91-7 (DCA No. 92S1) Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Dear Mr. Pennock: This letter is in response to DCA's Objections, Recommendations and Comments letter dated January 13, 1992 on the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighbonccc� Plan (MCNP) Amendment 91-7, DCA No. 92S1. It appears that DCA's Objection is based solely on the lack of an appropriate traffic analysis, not on the amendment itself. The subject amendment seeks to change the MCNP designation of a 0.25 acre parcel at 283 N.W. 35 Street from Medium Density Multi Family Residential to General Commercial. DCA objects to the proposed amendment "because the traffic circulation analysis does not include the projected impact to all roads affected by the proposed change especially N.W. 36 Street, which FOOT classifies as "backlogged" and recommends that the analysis be revised to adequately assess the impact to all affected roadways. The objection references FOOT's comments, which point out that the traffic generated by the proposed change could reduce the operating level of N.W. 36 Street, which is already at LOS "E" using the methodology described in the FDOT Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual. The City's response to the DCA Objection is in three parts: 1) an exolanaticn of the differences between the MCNP and FOOT analyses of the impact c{ theoretical traffic generation from the site; 2) a comparison of the theoretical traffic generation with the practical or "likely" generation; and 3) specific discussion of the subject site and the safeguards that protect against development beyond acceptable standards. 1) The proposed amendment is consistent with the Transportation Corridors concept, as adopted in the MCNP, which differs in these significant respects from the concept and methodologies described in the FOOT Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual: Page 1 of 4 10949 PLANNING Planning and Zoning Division i3031 579-6086 / FAX !305) 358-1452 BL,ILDIN'G .AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami �.� aD Florida 33126 : (j 1�/• nQl� f'` vc w•``'S: It CITY COMMISSION February 18,1992 TEM: PZ-1 .FTER 2:00 PM .EQUEST: SECOND READING - ORDINANCE (J-91-648) Amending Ordinance No. 10544 (MCNP; Future Land Use Element ,•` from: Medium ,)ensity Multi.1Family Res ideht ' 1 to: General Commercial OCATION: 283 NW 35 Street 4NER/APPLICANT: Robert McCanna Reilly, Trustee for Robert McCanna Reilly & Mary Sabol Reilly Trust Lucia A Dougherty, Esq ECQ!MENDATIONS PLANNING BLDG & ZONING: Denial PLANNING ADVISORY BD: Approval (6/3) STATUS: Approved on 1st reading 9/26/91 Moved by Comm DeYurre Seconded by Comm Plummer Yes: Suarez, Dawkins Absent: Vice Mayor Alonso --OMMENTS: Continued on 1/23/92 The Florida Department o'f: Cdrmunit Affairs (DCA) sent an "'Objection, recommendations and comments (ORC) report dated 1/13/92. Planning Building and Zoning Department's response is attached. THIS IS A COMPANION ITEM TO PZ-2 February '992 Robert Pennock, Chief Bureau of Local Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2-140 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (DCA NO. 92SI)(MIAMI NO. 91-8) 283 *1 35TH STREET Dear Mr. Pennock: This letter reiterates the invitation previously extended to your agency, by letter of January 22, 1992, pursuant to Section 163.3184(8)(a)F.S., to attend a public hearing on the adoption of this Comprehensive Plan amendment before the Miami City Commission at City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, as follows: Agenda Item PZ-1 At or after 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 18, 1992 (Please note the change to an earlier hour) (See agenda page attached). 1 Sergio ,Rodriguez,' AICP�6/ Directgr k *� td 92:^32 Attachment rr: Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council Teresita L. Fernandez, Chief Hearing Boards Office Planning, Building & Zoning Department Serrando M. Parapar, Director Planning and Programs, District Six Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX 1305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 ) Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami. Florida 33233-0708 /0 • • �� 41101" • I. L4gal description and st.-set address of S=Ject :eal ;=P@ !: LOT 14 LESS STREET BLR 1 CHEFNEU% SUB DIVISION PLAT BOOR 15 ?AGE 34 OF ?UBLIC RECORD OF DADE COUNTY 283 N.W. 35TH STREET, MIAMI FLORIDA. 2. -Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. *tote: City of Mimi Ordinaem No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties Z iav- q a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Cotsmission. Accordingly, question 42 requires disclosure of all shareholders of mrporttions, boomficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. ROBERT MC CANNA REILLY AND MARY SABOT REILLY TRUST - / 00 7r ROBERT MC CANNA REILLY, TRUSTEE BENEFICIARIES; ROBERT MC CANNA REILLY AND MARY SAaOL REILLY GaR,� 3. Legal, description ad street address of any real property (a) owned by any pasty listed in anrrer to question 92. and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. a 8.2 N cv 3 C d-+L AZOW G- s- 91 LOTS 8,9,10, 6 11 CHEFNE M SUB. P.B 15-34 i lc'op? �4 • .. • ■• g..', a • • 40000 . being duly worn, deposes and says coat ae is tie (vmcj (Attorney low owner) of the real property described in answer t& cpestien #1, aboset that he has read the foregoing answess acd that the saes an true and completes acid -(it actin as attorney for ownerl that he has authority to e=Kuu this Disclosure of Ownership four an behalf of the owner. SWUM TO AND SCROCRMW ostors tee this 28TH day of JANuARY 01 V1. ' SUL) 10949 O'�iER' S L: ST wner's 'game aosm KC CANNA REILLY, TRUSTEE "ailing Address gin 3AR.RY STREET !�IAMI, FLORIDA 33140 -eleonor,e `+gaper ROME 531-1512 OFFICE 576-2029 _egal �escr-of-on: LOT 14 LESS STREET BLK 1 CHEFNEUR SUBDIVISION PLATBOOK 15 PAGE 34 PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY Owner's Nan* Mailing Address 7eleonone Number Legal Oescription: Owner's Name Mailing Address . Telephone Number Legal Description: 7 Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation. partnersnip or privately) within 37S' of the subject site is listed as follows:. Street Address 282 NW 36 STREET Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Legal Oescriptiin 10949 37= .i.r1J1\ � • :AIM Before me, the L=er=&= autnority, this day pe'zcrAlly appears-' ROBERT NC CANNA REILLY who Deung 7f me f!."St dully sworn. upon oat..^. depoaeS and says: I. That he is the ww, or the lapl reps creative of the adow, suberdttin< the acccmpniying application for a public hearir4 as rtquired by prdIrAace NO - 9500 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecti:4 the real proPCT7 located in the City of Miami as described and :fisted on the paps attached to this affidavit and ride a parti thereof. 2. 7= all owners which he represents, if any, have Ewen their full and complete Passion for him to act is thadr behalf for the cv.,4e or modifio=ticn of a classifieatim or rigu atian at =Cniag as 'et = :n the acCa=pgnying petiti= 3. 'not the pages attached herew and mode a pu% of this affidavit-.=maia the ct=T= asmas, zed' 4 addresses, phone :ambers and lapl descriptions for the real prvparty which he is the ocar or lepl represen ative. 4. The facts -as rep ruczed in the application and doczaaaits submitted in c=Qu=ian with this affidavit are true and correct. F=%her AfnaM sayeth lot. P.. (SEAL) ROBUT I CAMA REZ T Sworn to and Subscribed before me this 28 day of .ram 19_JL• Platary C, Stna of Florida �: t'd c-*ss• ++� IC {r,ft «••....•.. ;•.. �s. An. 10949 m" the oesignation of tois property oven cnangeo it cne last jeeri ..._A,-c Do you awn any owner property within 2001 of the .abject prow y? ' % It Tres, has this other property been granted a change in plan designat'a -vMjn the last 12 months? NN Have you lade a companion application for a change of toeing for the subject property with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department? Have you filed with the Fla" and Zoning Boards Administration Departarntz - Affidavit of ownership? - list of owners of property withiq 3761 of the s"Ject property - Disclosure of ownership fors _ If not, please supply them. SIGi1A ON AMM PHONE e"4L.,-4r OAlt STATE OF fLO IDA usCOMYOF OAK . above: that he has rod the foregoing ""ewers ad that tam semi we true and ea■plotas aid (if *ntieg as agent far' Omer) that he has autherity to- Cmute this petition an behalf of tie owner. SWO TO AilD SIM=I= before ■a this _7 day or „ if yPubj le, state of Florida a arge NOTARr aL.&tlC SrAh 0. - COMISSION Esp. qy COIMtSSI011 t>vt1U Camhmtatiew of fee: Receipt h 10949 'me The under signed bdfng tnt ovmer or tnt re0rts4ntst1ve of :ne ovmtr, of ;ne subject proge-ty "(f -espectfuily request tine - r• Of the City of Miami for the f o 11 ovi i. ate:. Ant(s) to the Mimi CoL . va Me i ghbori, P 1 an for the apovo-4*w i bed property as i nd i catad in the Lind the Plant FROM: 6,. �f TOt C-�rd'So- Ptease suiPly a statement indicating why yaw think the existing plan designation is Inappropriate. -� 16 ?�-k <T' /10 t i ,() AP., 1 -n _ „ 4 : 4-. 44--) v lA . t 6UrQ Please supply a stat~t Justifying your request to change the pf m to your requested plan designation. See What is the aOMP Of the prOM y being retested for a change in plan designation? 10949 'age 2 of 3 Application s 04.1 CITY OF MIAMI PUAIN6 OEPARTM 1IT 275 N.W. 2 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 3312E APPLICATION TO ANEW THE MIAMI COwlREiaSIVE !%IWORN000 PW�I Uction 62-17 of the Coda of the City of Mimi, Periodic review, additions and amendments to the adopted comprehensive plan, reads as follows: Periodically, bvt not less often than am 1s fi ve (S) years or more often than once i a two (2) yearsv adopted comprehensive plans or a portion th ereeof shall be reviewed by the planning Advisory board to detersiiw Mwtfor changes in the amant, kind or direction of development and vvw* of the city or ova Umwf, or other reasons, nice it aoctssary or baneficiai to make additions or arsdiarmts to the coal elm sive plans, or portion thereof. If the city commission desires as aamd■allrt or addition, it not as its own motion, dirm the planning to prepare SO* ammdmsmt for svbmissia to and review by the pl&Wmg advisory bard. Tow pla inN adirl y board shall sake a recommosdatiom om i� a■wd■an0 as t to the city commissiem ritbia a. reasonable time a: established by the city COMais:ton. The proadvre for revising, addiwg to or owdirg camprelwnsive plans or portions thereof shall by the sae as the procedure for original adoption. This petition is proposed bye City Commissi on ) PZoni � t . Other & Please Specify: o T The =Woct is located at `�Z- S� prow ., /U l�J 3� _ AND MOW PARTICIA ANT OESCRIBB ASt Lot(s) Block($) Bev(4& Sebdivisios G�EFWEuy' su (� 15-3 Page 1 of 3. 10949 5 rA; er :set„ .,H+ �A�7eNy egyr•►Mt--i,i111M1A1� 6r;i'A".'< a ���; M1KiM" le"+ 1 '.�'yd.c°�F.< ::,W ."�!is� 77�°:".6�'•D9iFd 3°'.ai�° 1�:." °a1F;' a , s" wlo "'s: °r� Ecs�iw&axsts� c, 13EF^ ' { t gg� ".-_,IRRT!•iPY,,, � M"�^ �9�SJl f", �O Y��� _ ! bA sow AMELIA Jr Y" AV �, F' ^ 1 " rl Aw e +� . � ram• - GTp�9.,.efs _ v. 2 99 f�,:<- �,�6� _ �°% :�•'R' 'F "b-,' nth t ��"• • It +•I2eU 22M = v 1• N.iK t / 2 s � � r+• If 1•+•tetl e =� 6n I moo", Jmi"dw I: �•• w • i R i t le t N i '• •• f• 3 N It y f • • t l • 1� �t + N t+ tt t • It • 39 !r ' Mill 11 uprical 'Awe �AC��idC01A� E19M � a�6BoE1B@ • t• ItA N. >lLhj I. ;Weatn: tii-eeaaa9eAMe�em .,� �....._ moo•"^"� - Am �am����� ;aalso o0aa4-%v mw" t• f • re • 1 t i + • • t • f t t • / l l �t N f i » 'f +•10 N i/ n 1• N ji a s/ 24 to :+ ,: ST. +• 2. si •s : of .. N a • • / • t i a +33 .. .. I= 1969-2000 i +• n +• +• 9 * +• i• n 1• t tii • t : N i• If • 1 Affroz: 233 N.V. 35 S T. 10 9 5ast N Vt Y r• f• t t l t+ + t !!*dual Dens i t • N s Hultifmily S I6 20 T Rasid kntiLl 1 +• 1� 1• I• t• t+ s;• O r +t • • • +t �� ♦ t ;• � I•+ N + era?o: Genl Comerc • FA h " -'_Y W RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI FAMILY 3LIC I ;ILITIES SINGLE FAMILY RESIOEN71aL m DUPLEX I!I MEDIUM w I DENSITY S T.. MU LT I FAMILY I 34 RECREATION TW DI1iA1�10E 10544 " 1989-2000 proz: 283 N.W. 35, Street i From: Radius Dena it, !!nl t if daily Residential To: General Coimmerc: PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Robert McCanna Reilly, Trustee; Owners (Trust;: Robert MCCanna Reilly and Mary Sabol Reilly Trjst June 7, 1991. PETITION 3. APPROXIMATELY 293 N.W. 35TH STREET Lot 14 Block 1 CHEFNEUX SUB (15-34) PRDC Consideration of amending Ordinance 10544, as amended, Future Land Use Plan Map, Miam, Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, oy changing the land use designation of the subject property from MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL to GENERAL COMMERCIAL. REOUEST To change the plan designation of the subject property for Medium Density Multi Family Residential to General Commercial. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Denial. ANALYSIS The boundary line between commercial and residential is logical; to change the boundary is illogical and results in an intrusion into a stable residential district. There is no justification for the proposed change; other commercial areas are available. This proposed change is not consistent with the objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan for orderly and sound developmient of conwerc i a 1 property and conservation and protection of residential neighborhoods. Although the proposed change would have little impact on City-wide levels of service; the pr000sec change, if granted, would open N.M. 35th Street to further commercial applications. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its ■cretin= of July 10. 1991, the Planaing Advisory board adopted Resolution PA3 41-91, by a vote of 6-3. reco=endini approval of the above. Six replies in FAVOR were received by mail. CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of September 26, 1991, the City Commission passed the above. At its meeting of January 23, 1992, the City Commission continued the above. 10949 The Honorable Xavier L. Suarez February 17, 1992 Page Two The Department's role with respect to approving proposed revisions will begin upon adoption and submittal of the compre- hensive plan amendment, pursuant to Chapter 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code. If I may be of further assistance in this matter, please contact Maria Abadal, Plan Review Administrator, Paul F. Noll, Community Program Administrator, or me at (904) 487-4545. RP/ rm cc: Stephen Gavigan, Planner II PPT/Blue File Sincerely, Robert Pennock, Chief Bureau of Local Planning �zd into L!.6 itern o,-' N± ut iy Hirai City Clerk 10949 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 LAWTON CHILES Governor February 17, 1992 The Honorable Xavier L. Suarez Mayor, City of Miami Miami City Hall Post Office Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Dear Mayor Suarez: WILLIAM E. SADOWSKI Secretary In response to your request of February 7, 1992, the Department of Community Affairs will send a representative to participate in the February 18, 1992 public hearing to adopt the proposed City of Miami comprehensive plan amendment. The Department's representative is authorized to restate our position as expressed in the Department's January 13, 1992 Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, and to listen to all parties. It is the Department's position that the adoption public hearing is not the proper forum for modifying the Department's position or approving proposed revisions to the comprehensive plan. The Department's representative will be without authority to modify the Department's position or approve proposals discussed at the public hearing. The Department's representative will be authorized, however, to comment on proposals to resolve objections included in the report. Final approval of any proposal may only be granted by the Secretary of the Department of Community Affairs. Submitted into the public record in connection iter2Z P1-2 on z /� , -. Nutty Hai cd City Clerk 10949 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT South -� rya ral DI .,., 9 COu7�ll R�SGUK�� r:r�w^11;�G November 8, 1991 'AUiam E. Sadowski, Secretary Florida Department of Community Affairs '740 Centeniew Drive Tallahassee, Florida 3:399 Dear Secretary Sadowski: The South Florida Regional Planning Council has completed its review of the attached proposed local government comprehensive plan amendments. Consistency was determined by ensuring I ocal plan amendments are compatible with and further the Regional Plan for South Florida. This review was undertaken pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part IL Florida Statutes. The local government comprehensive plan amendments reviewed are from the following communities: Gty of Warn 417 5 • City of Key Colony Beach Town of Hillsboro Beach This report constitutes official Council action taken at the November 4, 1991 meeting of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Staff will continue to work with the Department, local governments and other reviewing agencies through the remainder of the review process and final adoption. In some cases reviewing agencies comments were not available at the time staff reports were prepared. Staff will make every effort to assist in resolving issues of concern which remain outstanding. Thank you for your continued support during this process. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Carolyn A. kle Executive Director CADS pe Enclosures " \� 1� cc: Robert Pennock 3"0 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite #140, Hollywood, Florida 33021 Broward (305) 961-2999, Dade (305) 620-4266, FAX (305) 961-0322 J Z XT1RNA1, ..3 Z N Z Y REV _..ry OF A,37_�,:Y : �epartmen.. �f Transportatizn RESPONS:BLE Z:V'IS1ON/BUREA:,: Distri:: Six ::AXE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT. C_ty of u1am1 SATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM DCA: October 15, 1991 R_7C RED RETURN ZATE FOR COMH7-NTS: November 29, 199: EiEM�'NT: Land Use AMENDMENT NO.91-7 R:;LE DEFICIENCY - CITATION FOR OB:ECTION: 9J-5.006(2)(a) 9J-5.007(2)(b) OB:ECTIONS: The analysis of future traffic circulation levels of service and system needs based upon the proposed future land us_ does not reflect operating conditions as measured by FDO7 for nearby State roadways. The 1990 level of service for SR 25 ;Nw 36th Street), between NW 7th Ave and Biscayne Blvd, was "E" Lased upon the methodology described in the FDOT Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual, and observed roadway an tra.�:� cnaracteristics. This segment of NW 36th Street is classified as a "Backlogged Facility" because no capacity improvements are programmed over the next five years. FDOT policy requires t`:e Department and local governments to work to maintain the LOS tf backlogged facilities and improve them when possible. he :,OS analysis provided with the application includes only the "Biscay- ne" transportation corridor. The analysis does not incl.:de t. 36th Street even though it is only one block from the proposed land use plan amendment. The trip generation analysis indicates that 472 peak hour person trips will be generated by the proposed change. Conversion of person trips to vehicle trips at a rate --f 1.4 persons per vehicle results in an additional 337 vehicle trips on the roadway network during the peak hour. T1"ough not all of these trips would utilize NW 36th Street, the large number of additional vehicles would reduce the operating leve-1 service on this backlogged facility. RECOMMSNOATIONS: The proposed future land use plan amendment should not be approved, or the City should identify addit_:na_ facility or service improvements to accomodate the impacts of the development concurrent with the additional impact. REVIEWED BY: David Henderson REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller PHONE:(305) 377-5910 PHONE:(305) 377-5910 L South Florida Regional Planning Council MEMORANDUM AGMNDA I'. .Ni r#9a Date: NOVEMBER 4,1991 To: COUNCIL MEMBERS From: STAFF SubjeCt: CfIY OF M1 jJW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW On October 15, 1991, staff received the proposed comprehensive plan amendment No. 91-7 (DCA No. 92S1) for the Cty of Kano transmitted from the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review of consistency with the Regional Plan for South Florida. Staff review is undertaken pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rules 9J-5 and 91-11, Florida Administrative Code. S mmary of Staff Anah►sis Amendment No. 91-7 proposes to change an area of 0.25 aces in the fut-.:re land use map from 'Medium Density Multi -family Residentie to *General Commercial% The contents and location of the amendment are described in Attachment L Amendment No. 91.7 qualifies as proposed small scale development activities pursuant to sutnect'.on 163.3187(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Because of the scale and nature of this amendment, staff finds that amendment No. 91.7 will not generate significant adverse regional impacts. Staff will continue to work with local governments, the Department of Community Affairs, and other review agencies during the remainder of the amendment review and adoption process. Recommendation Find the proposed comprehensive' plat amendment No. 91-7 (DCA No. 9Z.S1) for the Cty of Miami generally consistent with the Regional Plan for South Fkvida. Approve this summary for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, SuRe #t 40, Hollywood, Florida 33021 / Broward (305) 961.29". Dade (305) 620-4266, FAX (305) 961-0322 Atlachn-,ent 1 CI `l Or 1v1L1jq1 PROPOSED CO;vTRE:'-'i 'NSiVi: P:AN A.NIF—NrDNT ,%"T � nendment Date Received Number by SFRPC Consents of Amendments No. 91-7 10/15/91 Amendment to the future land use map for an area of OM acres from 'Medium Density `Aulti-farnily Residential' to 'General Commercial'. The affected area is located in the block bounded by NW 35th and 36th Streets, between NW Znd and NW 3rd Avenues at approximately 283 NW 35th Street. Currently, the adopted Future I.dnd Use asap shows the area north of the property, including the north side of the %a-ne block designated'General Commercial'. 10949 3� 1 'oa Cwdnet Usame Dunw.or FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF v1ATUR.A1 RESOURCES Wvionv Stoneman Douglas Building �9W CommonwWth Boulerud .� �.. hllah&& e, Florida October 1E � Mr. Robert Arredondo Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Z740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Arredondo: Staff of the Department of Natural Resources have reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, reference number 92S1, :or the City of Miami and have no comments. DED/mpp Sincerely, l.\ Don E. Duden Assistant Executive Director 10949 33 FLORIDA D .'ART'tii-N T Or ST.-',�, jim Smith Secre;a� cr S:a;e DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES R.A. Gray Buii?!n; 500 South Bronough Taiiahassee, Flonda 31399-0Z50 Director's Office Teiecopier Nurnknr (FAX) (904) 43&1480 (904) 48&4353 Mr. Robert Arredondo Dept. of Comm. Affrs. Bureau of Local Planning 2740 Centerview Dr. Tallahassee, FL 32399 October 16, 1991 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the City of Miami's (9261) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Dear Mr. Arredondo: According to this agency's responsibilities under section 267.061, Florida Statutes, and the provisions of sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5,, Florida Administrative Code; we have reviewed this proposed amendment to the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan regarding land use changes to see if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient consideration. The proposed change in land use designation, from medium density multifamily residential to commercial, of a property at 283 NW 35th Street in the Wynwood CD target area should have no affect on Miami's historic resources. Our review of this project revealed that it lacked any pre-1945 structures and holds little promise for containing significant, undisturbed archaeological resources. In sum, it is opinion of this agency that the amended comprehensive plan meets the concerns of the Division of Historical Resources and the State of Florida's requirements as promulgated in Chapters 163.3177 and 163.3178, F.S., and Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C., regarding the identification of known historical resources within their specified area of jurisdiction, and for the establishment of policies, goals and objectives for addressing historical and potentially significant historical resources in Miami. 3y Pace w-. Mr. R:: ter _ Arr edondo Ccts-ber 16, 1391 :f ycu ha•.e any questions =evarding cur cc-_-ents, -_ease feel - free to contact Michael Wisenbak er or _aura Kammerer of the Division's Ccm-:fiance Review staff at (904) 437-2333. Sin erely, k .4 Ow � Geor W. Percy, Director Div. of historical Resources 10949 �� P vIi#g of �iamt- C4 < SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP Director October 2, 1991 Mr. Ralph Hook, Community Programs Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of Local Planning 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 CESAR H. ODIO City Manager Re: Transmittal of Application No. 91-7; a proposed amendment to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Dear Mr. Hook: The City of Miami is transmitting to the DCA the required "Checklist" of information for Application No. 91-7, a proposed amendment to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP), as required by Rule 9J- 11.006, F.A.C.. This proposed amendment is a small scale development activity and, according to Ch. 163.3187 F.S., can be submitted without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration. Application No. 91-7 proposed to change the land use designation of one lot at approximately 283 NW 35th Street in Wynwood CD Target Area, from Medium Density Multi -family Residential to General Commercial. Enclosed please find ten copies of the following information for the amendment: a) A response to the checklist provided by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), through Rule 9J-11.006, F.A.C. (Attachment 91-7 A); b) Analysis of the availability of, and demand on, public facilities (Attachment 91-7 B); c) Analysis of the compatibility of the proposed land use change with the land use element goals, objectives and policies, as well as those of other affected elements (Attachment 91-7 C); d) A map illustrating the boundary of the subject property and its location in relation to surrounding streets, and thoroughfare Page 1 of 2 Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Mr. Ralph Hook October 2, 1991 networks; and the present land use designations of the property and abutting properties (Attachment 91-7 D); e) A copy of support documents, including the proposed draft ordinances, on which recommendations are based (Attachment 91-7 E); and f) A copy of Volume I: Goals, Objectives and Policies of the MCNP,' as amended through January 24, 1991. This volume contains all of the adopted MCNP elements. (Attachment 91-7 F). If you have any questions regarding this transmittal, please contact Joseph W. McManus at (305) 579-6086. 0 Sergio nodriguez, ICP Direct , SR/rl Attachments cc: Matty Hirai, City Clerk Guillermo E. 01medillo, Deputy Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Elbert L. Waters, Assistant Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner II Planning, Building and Zoning Department Robert E. Lavernia, Planner I Planning, Building and Zoning Department Doc: [robert]<robert>transm/91-7 (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) Page 2 of 2 1604 E. Westchester Dr. Tempe, AZ 85283 (602) 839-1909 October 21, 1991 Mr. Robert M. Reilly Miami Awning 282 N.W. 36 St. Miami, FL 33127 Dear Mr. Reilly: I an writing this letter on behalf of my aunt, Hilda Mehlman, and my mother, Doris R. Tilghman. My aunt has been ill and no longer lives in Miami. I an trying to help then with their business affairs. I an sorry that I did not answer your letter re the zoning petition, but it took a while for your letter to be forwarded here and then I was away. I hope that things turned out successfully for you. If you should need to contact us, the above address is the correct one. Sincerely, go- J nice Baerst Submitted into the public record in connection with item z ' on Many Hirai City Clerk 1 9 A ?ETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 2RI N W -IS Ctraat , support the commercial rezoning of the said property. IGN NAME ADDRESS .30 ,v tv, 3k& sV- - 2\Cru�A�,vlVV\� "«n �� l ,v W -j �,- -z©ms Nw LL4/C-d� j0VT)vU(--,r A92 A1Q- Ri 9+ ip 1r,vh Z- ZG Z IV. A/ Submitted into the P s D.'_ c recOId in connection 4'J? ill item 7, / -� --- . 10949 �p P� a,ty Hirai 9 yf � GiTY C40r1. v PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 28'I N Ll. 3r; street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. Submitted into the public record in connection with item 21 on Matty H4 QI 10,949 City Clerk It PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 2RI N W IS 17,trPPt support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS IV 3 G w -.� - av �LA M F�,tuaEz ��i IV 3-� s 7- �i 5-76 14 1(f E Submitted into the public record in connection with item.? .L,►P'z on a > > e_ 5 30 Y I Matty Hirai 10 fy' 4 9 City Clerk C, PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?R3 N Lj 3; support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ���,ADDRESS LAB- W SAINT ADNREWS DRIVE LoTS ¢-5-- 6-7 .4 Submitted into the public record in connection with item r2 J P-7-2 on 8 Iq -?- Matty Hirai- 1090 City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of z 2 N L.-r 1; str-eet support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS 2 Nh/ 3 q 11, -SMITA S040 Submitted into the public record in connection with item z 1 PZn 8/q a_ 10949 Matty Hi. -jai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?R3 N Ll 3; Strpett support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS --Gabriel Volante Lots 1,2,3 Bl Wyn woo Park V.P. Properties 200 N.W. 36 Stree Miami,Fl Submitted into the pu':-)lic record in connecticl� it n item 7--) 2-2on a !109.4�9 Matty Hirai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 223 N -W - 35 Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. C SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS -"* Z 70 N, w 3 b sT LOTS- o G'/�PNC-" 4.. a 7 7B vw- 36 ST_ Submitted into the public record in connection with l item �2,�n 1094 Pi Matty Hirai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 283 N L,1 15 Ctreet support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS L/ 3 7. `7' Al 1 ri Av r,& 3 3 n '7 Submitted into the public record in connection vA 1111 item PZJ, �Z -?on a' ► g' 9 -10949 Matty I ira.l City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?R3 N.4-. 35 Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS idv ��C�C G 19201 S.W. 312TH STREET - 730 Submitted into the public record in connection with item f2�) . %2_,20n .2 $ Matty Hirai 10940 City Cleric PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 283 N l! 35 Strpet support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS 228 N.W. 34TH STREET u vs e SSGMIAMI. YLA33127 Submitted into the public record in connection with itemP�On 1 EL9a Matty Hirai 10949 City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 2AR N LI 1F Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGN�;ATURE NAME ADDRESS �y A 2 - �EY ��`ac��o J/C -279 l✓,u), Submitted into the public record in connection with item e2 - I 2-.),on 9 a Matty Hirai City Clerk 1094 PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 283 N W 'I5 1;tr-e_et support the commercial rezoning of the said property. , SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS �( `F N !v r am k; Submitted into the public record in connection with itemPZ-1 .. a- t 8jq 2- Matty riircd 9 J City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 2R2 N I_l 35 Street _, support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public record in connection with item ��- I {'2-�n � / / v1q Matty Hirai city Clerk 10949 PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of N LI 35 Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public record in connection with itemf'Z - 1, e --�6n 18i' L Matty Hirai City Clerk 1094 PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 28� N L; 35 StrPPt support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submit�ed into the public xecord in co-nnecriOn with 2 itemQZ -'1°n 2- a i• 9 - `J Dicaty KiYra City C Berk I'M PETITION 551 -ire- the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?R1 N �-j 35 Strpet support the commercial rezoning of the said property. ,t•, SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS z Submitted into the public record in connection with item eZ n c2) S 2 2- Nutty Hirai City Clerk 10949 ri, PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 2P'3 N Lf 35 Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. ,'V,I SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public 3�:3a record in connection with item2 - z ion .2/ `7'a . 1 0 9 4 9 Matty Hirai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 9R3 N 14 'V; Rtreet , support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public ` record in connection with itemt 1 -) on -Eli 10 9 4 9 Matty Hirai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?Rq N Lf '�C; support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z z � -,D on 1 0a 10949 Matty H"Ta.. City Cer% PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of ?R3 N W 3`support the commercial rezoning of the said property. "Y.-* SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS 11 7 Submitted into the public record in connection with item -1. N --"Ion 10949 Matty Hircii City Clerk PETITrON We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 283 N 35 street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS cue � Submitted into the PUBiic record in connec"Fr,r..,.r item ?sari a- I�� 10.9 49 Ma.tty 'Hirai City Clerk PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of .]-1 3�; street , support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS U `► ! w Submitted into the public record in connection with item f 1-1-7 on ..Z 1.0949 Matt City Clerk PETITION we the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of 28* N iJ 3; Street support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS Submitted into the public record in connection Zvi?'-: item ?2-112- Mc,tty Hilci City Clerk 10949 V), PETITION We the undersigned owners of property within 375 feet of �R N ll �� Street , support the commercial rezoning of the said property. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS 0 4,p - lerm- Submitted into the public record in connection with item eZ� on j g R Matty:i City clerk 10949