HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-0782J-93-907
12/16/93
9 3 - 7082
. .• •1 •• E+• ■' r PRI11CIPLE, THE■Dr' D
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR
■ . . ■ r PREPARED BY KENNETH LEVENTHAL AM
COMPANY; •NY; AUTHORIZnG THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBJECT
TO AND OCUTIMENT UPON1 IDENTIFICATIOWAVAILABILITY
OF NECESSARY FUNDnG FOR SAM REDEVELOPMENT AND 'U"
COMPIMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CHARTER AND CODE
PROVISIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.0 92-551, the City engaged the
services of a multi -disciplined consulting te6n, headed by Kenneth Izventhal &
Company, to conduct a feasibility study for the City -owned Mizmarinai at-
Bayside for its redevelopment and future operation; and
W EREAS , said consultants have made a presentation of their findings and
recommendations to the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, the -implementation of the proposed development plan will
require funds for capital improvements in the total estimated amount of
$4,750,000; and
WI RERS, anticipated fmxxU g for said improvements is as follows:
$1,500,000 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") restoration
reimbursements, as much as $2,600,000 from FEMA hazard mitigation funds,
$400,000 from litigation settlement funds, with the balance of needed funds to
be made available from such sources as Florida League of Cities Bond Pool,
acid/or Florida Inland Navigation District grant funds;
CITY COMKISSION
MEETING OF
DEC 1 6 1993
Heedu*m Na
93- 782
• 1�1• �1 •' �• �11 1. ••� I I •I • 1 • I
Section 1. The recitals and findings contaJned in the Preamble to
this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. The findings and recommendations of the feasibility
study for M mnarina-at-Bayside prepared by Kenneth Leventhal and Company axe
hereby accepted, in principle.
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to proceed with
the implementation of the redevelopment plan subject to and contingent upon
the identifioation/availability of necessary funding for said redeveloprcnent
and compliance with all applicable City Charter and. Code provisions.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective inmediately
upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December 1993.
P. CLAtE, MAYOR
ATI'E
MAM B IRAI , CITY MEM
ME WIN
ME
• •j
. ••.,• �Ir • ••� a ••••�
A% QUIM JOIW III
CITY ATTORNEY
I
BSS:M4056
°3- '782
-2-
CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
34
TO;
Honorable Mayor and Members
DATE: � � � - 61�93 FILE:
of the City Commission
SUBJECT: Discussion Item: Miamarina
Feasibility Study
P'
FROM: REFERENCES:
Cesa o
City I g ENCLOSURES:
As indicated to you in previous correspondence, the
Administration has engaged the services of a multi -disciplined
consulting team to perform a comprehensive feasibility study for
Miamarina at Hayside, its imminent reconstruction and future
operation. It is now appropriate for the firm of Kenneth
Leventhal and Company, along with its subconsultants, to present
you with their findings.
i
3q-
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
FROM : r
Cesar] io
City r
DATE : DEC _ 61993 FILE :
SUBJECT:
Presentation of Feasibil-
ity Study for Miamarina
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
After Hurricane Andrew and upon notification to the City
Commission, the Administration engaged the services of a multi -
disciplined consulting team to perform a comprehensive
feasibility study for Miamarina at Bayside, its reconstruction
and future operation. The consulting team, headed by Kenneth
Leventhal and Company, is now prepared to present its findings
and recommendations for your consideration. At the conclusion,
it is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt a
resolution accepting, in principle, the results of this study.
The City's Miamarina at Bayside suffered considerable damage as a
result of Hurricane Andrew. Given the prior problems with the
marina's revenue generation and functionality, and with input
from the Waterfront Advisory Board and users, it was determined
that rather than rebuild this facility to pre -storm condition,
the City needed to reconstruct the marina with a new
configuration to better accommodate commercial and recreational
boaters, and to do so in a manner that would optimize revenue to
sufficiently cover operating costs, debt service and provide a
return to the City. A feasibility study was required to determine
the most advantageous configuration and program.
Through a competitive negotiations process, a consulting team was
hired to conduct the study, and consisted of several firms of
differing specialties to analyze the pertinent issues: design
(physical plant, layout and connections), legal relationships,
marketability, environmental constraints and requirements,
financial viability, operational needs, and construction
scheduling and budget. Kenneth Leventhal and Company, a
specialist in real estate planning, has served as the prime
consultant with these sub -consultants: Coastal Technology
Corporation (permitting, hydrographic engineering), Wallace
Roberts and Todd (architects, waterfront planning), International
Marina Resources (market feasibility, design and operation), and
Cummings -Grayson and Company (auditing, accounting).
93- 782
Honorable Mayor an :Members
of the city Commission
page 2
The study itself wa-s a three-phase process, beginning with an
assessment of constraints and opportunities, subsequent
conceptualization of potential alternative plans, and finally,
the development of a comprehensive program for reconstruction and
operation of the marina. In addition to a series of interviews
conducted with both public and private sector parties, a
technical committee comprised of staff from Public Works,
Finance/Capital Projects, Marinas, the City Manager's Office,
Law, and representatives from Bayside Marketplace and the
Waterfront Advisory Board has participated throughout the
process.
Attached are
which will be
session.
V
highlights of the study and the recommended program,
presented in greater detail during the Commission's
93- 782
-93 THU 10.55 KENNETH LEVENTHAL & CO, FAX NO, 3054478651 P,02
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
0 SIGNIFICANT MARKET OPPORTUNITIES EXIST
Day Boaters
Transients
6 FACTORS CRITICAL TO ACHIEVING MARKET PENETRATION INCLUDE:
Resolution of wave agitation and debris collection problems
Facilities propertly designed for market
Strong promotional effort
- Provision of quality service
• POTENTIAL TO GENERATE POSITIVE CASH FLOW AFTER DEBT SERVICE
• UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUILD A FIRST CLASS MARINA AT
SIGNIFICANT REDUCED COST TO CITY
FEMA disaster funds and potential hazard mitigation reimbursement
Submitted into the pudic
record in connection vrrith
item 3 4 on 12 - 16 -q 3
Ma I:ty kli.rc.i
City Clerk
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
KENNETH LEVENTHAL & COMPANY
WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD
COASTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
INTERNATIONAL MARINA RESOURCES, INC.
CUMMINGS-GRAYSON & COMPANY, P.A.
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item 3 4 on 19 16 `9 3
Matt 2r Hirai.
City Clerk
93- 782
PHASE I
l,pjrentory & Evaluation
1 6 weeks --- _
-11
00
2�
STUDY PROCESS
• Legal
• Operational H r1.4
W �•
ALTERNATIVE:
o
�•
• Marketing Concepts
o a
o
• Layouts/Linkages
ro
�•
m
• Operation Concepts
--
• Engineering Solutions
• Slip Mixes
—
L'
��
CD,.+
�'
n
PHASE II
w
Alternative Concepts
e
Report/Review 1
Finance Plan
Concept Plan
Operations/
Leasing Concept
Permitting Strategy
Project Development
Schedule
PHASE III
Plan Development
4 weeks _ 4 weeks
Report/Review Z
MW
Final
Report
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
GOAL: MAXIMIZE OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item '� on IA ` 1"S
Matty Hirai
OBJECTIVES: City Clerk
• OPTIMIZE AVAILABLE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
• IMPROVE LINKAGES WITH UPLAND USES
• MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
• EFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS QUICKLY
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES DEFINING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
• Agreement with Bayside obligating City of Miami to provide first-class marina
at location.
• Existing level of wave agitation has negatively affected facility's marketability.
• Pier 5 Boatmens Association agreement establishes specific parameters for
commercial activity at Miamarina in terms of number of slips and rental rate
structure.
•
•
Synergy between Miamarina and Bayside Marketplace.
No live aboards.
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item on I ;L `/ & "q
3.
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS IN TRANSIENT MARKET
• MARKETING AND COMMITMENT
Promote existence as a first-class boating destination
Target local, regional and national boating community
Commitment to making slips available to transient boaters
• SERVICE
• SLIPS
To attract transient boaters, a marina must provide first-class service to
achieve and maintain a competitive position
Provide first-class slips with amenities that meet the needs of today's
boating market
Availability and flexibility resulting from a wide range of slip sizes and
configurations to meet the demand of the current boating market and to
accommodate the future of the industry (trend towards larger, wider,
more powerful vessels).
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item 3 14 on IA -19 -9 3
Nutty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
Market
Segment
Permanent
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMMISSION PRESENTATION
DECEMBER 16, 1993
PLEASURE BOAT MARKET CHARACTERISTICS
Pros
• Long term lease
Transient • Proximate to urban area
with tourist attractions
• Yield higher rental rate
• Parking is not priority
• Proven market regionally
Day Boater • Largest demand generator
• Lack of similar facilities in
Dade County
• High turnover of boater
"parking space"
• Enhances upland uses
Cons
• Limited Parking
• Limited on —premises facilities
& services
• Distant from residential areas
• Occupancy is more volatile
• Requires significant services
& amenities
• Untested market locally
• Changes management strategy
• Requires different docking
facilities
• Increased boat traffic
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item �'�' on 142 -/ 6 -q 3
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
PARKING GARAGE
zlz
Pon DOULLWARD
fTlTI1RO IJNK TD OK.VXIVlINUL MNKtllt C
4
j DODGII ISI•AND IIHID011.
Ilulvlus
K I'SI'AUNANT
OUIIl71NO3
PARKING I ��
COHTAOL fOIN ' •r—• . UAT w,,LK '
/
1 rAov EN LINTS TO 10 A1lK
IN ew coNCK Llie R A /
1.41
p
lk/
aZ
111SCAYNII. Y.
p. W
StMEi•WAL DOCK DArA
.LPL L!2rK
M .N 11 /
♦ h..Ll 1■Y.
►1 .wM 1
►I I.1wy Ia+.
.• 1
f hMll m
►►I. 1
rlr.n
•I .w ►w •
rlN.n
M 1
YI■I lh
►. 1
rlulll
MI■ 1
rlrl •h
M MVN •
.1Nm
►wIM 1
.IM►h
M 1
fhrllm
M 1
Y I•IYl Ya
MI 1
f IMII •ev
I.M .w Ir ■
.1vin
►w IW M ■
. 1 ■I .h
M 1
.I.1yA .m
M.w►q 1
.►•.IAm '
1 • b MI ..1 .MIA I.M • AAlhl .
1 • r YI rill I.... UI .ma • ltrlN
. • M Mall h.Mlf1 ►Cil1 Mr
• IIfMIIr
OAf WARTt
IIr I.Il.11l AtrlM tllO
Ilrlr IMI
KDIMMI LCVMMtkL A O"ANY
CORN. WM FL
m.A.\ flo•aC■1 t'OIIaY1111
rw R
Meo.t 1 ■mis
Y
MJ.A n7 1011.71 1tm
A T
lm4 ►+rA rl K
!MARINA DOCKAGE DAM
267 fr LI,A ALf,p
.I UP 1•IrblwI .Ir V
rlvvy•I. bl wl YIr
ItYV •Ir alwl •.►1I• A
.�flV 1•IYblwl qlr •
.IN.► r•Irbl..41 _._ r.
.IMV 1 .Irblwl rt� r •
.mil I•IYblwl rIr b/ . 1"...IA 1•Ir alwl VIr
r I•..LL 1•Irblwl rIr
. wM1A I.Irblwl rll. NI
r twat• I.I. blwl _I� I.
ti Ir.t ....s•1 bn r 1 � a
REDEVELOPMENT STUDY FOR
M", FLORMA
D�AiT�(E:\�
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
BREAKDOWN OF SLIP MIX
Maximum
Boat
Slip Configuration
Size
_
Number
Percent
Slip Orientation Slip
Configuration
in feet
of Slips
of Total
Transient (1)
Fixed Slips
Dock B
45' X 22.7'
40
1
1%
Dock B
50' X 22.7'
45
1
1 %
Docks B & D
55' X 22.5'
50
44
44%
Dock C
65' X 22.7'
60
2
2%
Docks B & C
65' X 23.5'
60
24
24%
Docks B & C
65' X 24.0'
60
4
4%
Total Fixed Slips
76
76%
Parallel Dockage
Dock C
65
60
3
3%
Dock D
70
65
8
8%
Dock C
80
75
2
2%
Dock A
119
112
6
6%
Dock B
120
112
5
5%
Total Parallel Dockage Slips (2)
24
24%
Total Linear Feet of Parallel Dockage
2,229
Total transient slips
100
100%
Excursion/Charter Fishing slips 35 (3)
Floating Docks (Docks E, F & G)
Day Boaters — linear feet of parallel dockage (4) 1,780
(1) Unoccupied transient slips expected to be utilized by day boaters.
(2) Based on estimated demand.
(3) Represents existing Pier 5 Association slips.
(4) Day boat capacity Is estimated to range from 50 to 57 vessels.
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company Submitted into the public
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Wallace Roberts & Todd record in connection wi.th�
Coastal Technology Corporation item 3 4 on /2 — / 4 t/ 3
i
City Clerk
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
YEAR 1 THROUGH YEAR 5
(in constant 1993 dollars)
Estimated Advertising Cash Flow
& Promotion Expense Estimated Payroll Expenses Availablefor Debt Service
Estimated Percentof City Wage Private City Wage Private
Year 1 Revenues Amount Total Revenue Scale Management(2) Scale Management
1 $1,157,549
$138,906
12.0%
$465,422
2 1,462,603
146,260
10.0%
493,928
3 1,778,324
160,049
9.0%
493,928
4 1,961,842
176,566
9.0%
522,434
5 1,986,023
178,742
9.0%
522,434
(1) Includes management fee.
(2) First year of full operations is estimated to be 1996.
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
9-6�
$426,320
$115,191
$154,292
462,924
305,552
336,555
485,025
522,614
531,517
513,121
620,389
629,702
514,814
637,533
645,154
oa
o
�
a
p
a
�
o
0
o
0
CD
o
m
I�
it'.
C�
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
YEAR 1 THROUGH YEAR 5
(in constant 1993 dollars)
Estimated Advertising Cash Flow
& Promotion Expense Estimated Payroll Expenses Availablefor Debt Service
Estimated Percent of City Wage Private City Wage Private
Year 1 Revenues Amount Total Revenue Scale Management(2) Scale Management
1 $1,157,549
$138,906
12.0%
$465,422
2 1,462,603
146,260
10.0%
493,928
3 1,778,324
160,049
9.0%
493,928
4 1,961,842
176,566
9.0%
522,434
5 1,986,023
178,742
9.0%
522,434
(1) Includes management fee.
(2) First year of full operations is estimated to be 1996.
Source: Kenneth Leventhal& Company
w
Go
i
CD r
r • t-4
$426,320
$115,191
$154,292
462,924
305,552
336,555
485,025
522,614
531,517
513,121
620,389
629,702
514,814
637,533
645,154
m
�
n
0
�
a.
m
o
~'
�
o
1
k
W
cn
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED STAFFING SCHEDULE
YEAR 1 THROUGH YEAR 5
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
City
Private
City Private
City
Private
City
Private
City
Private
Job Position
Operated
Management
Operated Management
Operated
Management
Operated
Management
Operated
Management
Division Head
1
NAP
1
NAP
1
NAP
1
NAP
1
NAP
Manager — Exempt
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Secretary/Bookkeeper
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Front Desk Supervisor
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cashier/Clerk
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cashier/Clerk — Relief
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lead Dock Attendant
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Dock Attendant
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
Relief Dock Attendants
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ticket Collector
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Relief Ticket Collector
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Maintenance Person
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total
18
17
19
18
19
18
20
19
20
19
N
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
n
0
W
p'
'-r
O
O
o
0
o
C�
cu
:71
I�
Fes•
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED STAFFING SCHEDULE
YEAR 1 THROUGH YEAR 5
Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Year 1 Year 2 Private
City Private City Private City Private City Private City
Job Position Operated Management Operated Management Operated Management Operated Management Operated Manage n
NAP 1NAP
Division Head
Manager — Exempt
Secretary/Bookkeeper
Front Desk Supervisor
Cashier/Clerk
Cashier/Clerk — Relief
Lead Dock Attendant
Dock Attendant
Relief Dock Attendants
Ticket Collector
Relief Ticket Collector
Maintenance Person
Total
GC
G.9
1
00
1
NAP
1
1
�
1
1
1
j
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
17
19
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
NAP
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
2
2
1
1
(D
5
W
-Z1
1
NAP
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
7
7
7
7
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
1
20
19
20
19
19
EQ
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
(in constant 1993 dollars)
Hard Costs
Dock and Piling Construction $1,682,165
Hydrological and Utility Costs 1,959,900
Other Construction & Redevelopment 364,650
4,006,715
Plus: Hard Cost Contingency Factor
(10% of Hard costs) 400,672
Estimated Total Redevelopment Hard Costs 4,407,387
Total Soft Costs 312,033
Estimated Total Cost $4,719,420
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item _ on 1.2 - / 6 _ q 3
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
DOCK AND PILING CONSTRUCTION
Transient Docks
A Dock (6 slips)
$24,680
B Dock (22 slips)
366,075
C Dock (41 slips)
415,630
D Dock (31 slips)
337,510
Total Transient Dock Construction Costs
1,143,895
Floating/Excursion Docks
Floating Docks 486,270
Excursion Docks
Finger Piers 42,000
Deck and Walkway Improvements 10,000
Total Floating/Excursion Dock Costs 538,270
Total Dock and Piling Construction Costs $1,682,165
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item 3 Q on 1.. - 16-5 3 .
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
HYDROLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND UTILITIES
Fire Protection System
$157,100
Domestic Water
136,200
Electrical (Docks Only)
576,200
Retrofit of Upland Electric Systems
96,975
Phone/Cable
83,800
Jet System/Debris Control (Bubbler)
22,125
Dodge Island Wave Baffle
497,500
B Dock Wave Baffle
390,000
Total Hydrological & Utility Costs
$1,959,900
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item _ 34____ on 1 I -16 -g 3 .
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND REDEVELOPMENT COSTS
(UPLAND)
General Signage
$15,000
Pier 5 Retrofit
22,650
Service Buildings
141,000
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
25,000
Pier Park Edge
186,000
Total Other Construction Costs
$389,650
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item 14 -- on la ` 16 -9 3 .
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
POTENTIAL FEMA HAZARD
MITIGATION COMPONENTS
Estimated
Construction Component Cost
Floating Docks $486,270
Dodge Island Wave Baffle 497,500
B Dock Wave Baffle 390,000
Retrofit of Upland Electric Systems 96,975
Transient Docks (Concrete) 1,143,895
Total $2,614,640
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
Submitted into the public
record in connection with
item 3 �._ on I a - I ( - 91
Matty Hirai
City Clerk
93- 782
TABLE .l
MIAMARINA - DESIGN PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - ENTIRE PROJECT
o.
Descirlpflon
--- --_
1 2 3 4 6 8
7
8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 6 8 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
TESTING AND FIELD SURVEYS
-
2
Topographic Survey
To
_
�__.
Rua
hic
P___.
ury
____
_Y __
.....
3
Bathymetric Survey
}:� }`::
Ba
m
Y
tric
__...
ury
Y
4
Soil Borings
polings
5
PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
6
Pre -Application Meetings
<.<:1
1 •<'
:.....
Pr
A
icati
n
eeti
s
7
Prepare and Submit Applications
\,
::•}:;<'
Pr
are
and
Su.-
m t_
pp i
atior
s
8
Meet with Agencies
x c.
Met
with
A
enc
es
-
—
' fi:>{
�
, :>
Fie
d In
est_i
atio
s i
0_
re
.9_
fired
9
Field Investigations Of required)
10
Permit Response 1
>r
;�;;��
Pe
mit
es
�
nse
_.._
1
_
_—
�_.
_
_-
--
_
_--
_
-------
-
_
Permit
esp
nse
2
f rec
11
Pemtit Response 2 Of req.)
'`
....,
Pe
mit
es
^p.
nse
_--
--3 -5
f re .—
.)_
12
Permit Response 3 Of req.)
_
_
_..__
_—
-_
.
•••••
_ Issue
- P
rmit
-
--
--
-
—
-
13
Issue Permits
14
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS-
,t .............
Pre
limin
ry
—
lans
—
—
_
--
15
Preliminary Plans
16
Coord. Plan w/Agencies & Contractor
�
�::�:};fi;��:
'""
Co
rd.
Ian/
A
nci
s &
ont
_
actq
„�.
"'' '
Co
_
mi
_
a
evie
PI
n &
esu
-_
-
- --
-
--
—
-
-
17
Committee Review Plan &Results
_
—
.....
Fin
I PI
ns P
epa
ed
18
Final Plans Prepared
_
v.,.
.
Co
a
evie
s F
al
Ian
19
Committee Reviews Final Plans
_
�•
�-
-
E
Pr
_mi
are
Ge
eral
Specs
20
Prepare General Specs
21
Committee Reviews Specs
m
n
x<
Committee
Reviews
pec
_
--
-
--
--
-,
•_--
Pr
pare
Te
hnic
I Srecs
22
Prepare Technical Specs
I
Lis
of
uali
__
ed
_..-
ont
_
acto
____..___
____..
__
-
___
23
List of Qualified Contractors
24
Committee Approves Bid & List
0
CD
_p,
Co
mi
a Approves
ro
es
_.._-
id &
List
25
BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION SUPER.
i
''
Pr
-Bid
Mee
ing
26
Pre -Bid Meeting
_
_
_-
Co
trac
-Qu
stio
s
27
Contract Questions
28
Review Bids & Award.
>: `<:
Re
iew
Bids
& Award
29
City Commission Approvals
Ci
Co
mi
sion
Approval;.
-
30
Pre -Construction Meeting
T]
--_
_
.....
Pr
-Co
stru
ion
Mee
ing
�,.:•.:
�,,,~
"`
.•,
Ell
31
Project Construction
H
_
--
--..._
_ _
32
Construction Observations & Admin.
r..
%
.
{{
_
_
<,
331
Final Approval
MiAmARINA DESIGN PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - ENTIRE PROJECT
No.
Desorption Y F A
YEA R 2
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
6e
7
a
9
io
11
12
1 2 3 4 6 6
I
TESTING AND FIELD SURVEYS
TolographicSurvay
2
Topographic Survey
. .
.
Baymc$uV3
Bathymetrc Survey
:tom
Soi
Boijingsl
I
4
Soil Borings
5
PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
Pre�Appli
cation
Neetr
s
6
7
8
. . . . . . . . . . .
Pre -Application Meetings
Prepare and Submit Applications
Meet with Agencies
1111,11
Pr
are
and
Sutmit
fications
Me
w4h
A
enc
es
Fie
d In
iesti
atiots
(it
re
wired
9
Field Investigations (if required)
w==
Pei
rnit
es
k P
nsel
I
10
11
12
13
Permit Response I
Permit Response 2 (if req.)
Permit: Response 3 (if req.)
Issue PPermitsIss
Pei
mift I
Z es p
� 2 (f
re(L.1
'
-
Pei
-rise
mites
nsel
3 Of
re
I
_.1
e P3rmit3
14
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
15
Preliminary Plans
Pre
limin
3ry Filans,
Co
)rd.
NIA
nciqs
&
'acintracto
16
Coord. Plan w/Agencies & Contractor
Co
nm*
Revi
PIE
n & I
tesu
ts
17
18
Committee Review Plan & Results
Final Plans Prepared
Fin
I PIE
ins P
-epa
-ed
Co
mill
ee F
evie
Ns Fi
nal I
fans
19
20
21
Committee Reviews Final Plans
Prepare General Specs
Committee Reviews Specs
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PrOpare
Gereral
Speos
CD
0
Conmiflee
Reviews
111pecs
. . . . . .
pare
Technic
31 Specs
22
Prepare Technical Specs
law—
Us
of
Oualffied
',oriffactors
23
List of Qualified Contractors
_V
bw-
0
(D
Conrnillee
pproiesBid&List
24
Committee Approves Bid & List
25
26
27
BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION SUPER.
Pre -Bid Meeting
Contract Questions
0
.. ..
Pre
- Bid
Mee
Jn 9
.
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contrac.
Questoilis
J
.
.
Re,
riew
Bids
l&ftand
28
29
Review Bids& Award
City Commission Approvals LL4
Cit
Co
mi
ion
App
-ova
L I
Pre
-Co
ru
. . . . . . .
ition
Mee ee
ng
30
31
32
Pre -Construction Meeting I
Project Construcfion
Construction Observations & Admin.
331
Final Approval
CA:
1
041
00
MIAMARINA - DESIGN PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
WITH EARLYACTION TO INSTALL FLOATING DOCKS
No.
Uescription
Y k A H 1
-1
Y E A R 2
T i-1-4-1
1 2 3 4 9 10 11 12
1
1 2 3 4 s a 7 a e to I 1 12
I
TESTING AND FIELD SURVEYS
2
Topographic Survey
. . . . . .
TologrephicSurvay
.. . ....... .._ . ........ ...
.... ...... . . . . .......... . .
.. . . .....
... . .........
. .. . . ...
.. ......
. .......
.. ..
. .... .....
3
Bathymetric Survey
Ba
ymetdc
ury
. ... .....
........... .
...........
4
Soil Borings
.
.... ......
.. . ....
. .......
. .....
.. . .. .. .... .... ..
6
PERMITTING - INITIAL MEETINGS
. .. .. ....
....
.. . . ...
....... . ..
.....
.. ..........
6
Pro -Application Meetings
P re
-App
Icati
)n
. ..
sell gs
... ....
...........
........ .
...
7
8
0
Prepare and Submit Applications
Most with Agencies
EARLY ACTION - FLOATING DOCKS
71,001
Pre
pare ...
_end . -
wl
� .. Sut
th A
. It . ...Pp I
pp!
n 0 es
. . . .....
.
. ..... . .....
. ......
.
.......
. ... .
.....
10
Separate Floating Docks Component
BM4
Flolting
DOC
npor
ant
1i
Permit Response I
rinse
.
... ... ...
. ...
...
.
.....
12
13
Issue Permits
Preliminary Plans (Floating Docks)
Preliminy
S60 P
ansFlo
In
i
ock
......
. . . .. ..
........
14
16
Committee Reviews Plans
Final Plans
Co
M
PglI
wie
ns
i
l.... ...
..... ....
116
17
Advertise Bids
Bidding and Award of Contract
. .......
......
Ad ertis Bid
y...... .....
Bidding
nd
Award
of C
ontract
18
City Commission Approval
C
Commission
pprqval
.. ..........
118
Install Floating Docks
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Install
F
Win
Do
ks
ia
PERMIT APPROVALS -FIXED DOCK
.. .. ...... .
. . ........
20
Field Investigations (if required)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fie
d In
estl atlo
q
Ired,
21
rmft Response I
P:rmIt
...........
...... . . ..
Pe
mit
esp6�
22
P Response 2 (If req.)
Res_
a
....... .
...
.. .. ..
.. .... . ..
23
PenTift Response 3 if req.)
.
24
Issue Permits
.... ....
Iss
e P
rmit
. ..... .
. . ......
.... . ....
... .. -
25
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
1
.
.........
. .. . ..........
26
Preliminary Plans (Fixed Docks)
Preliml
n6ry
glans
..........
27
Coord. Plan w/Agencles Contractor
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
..
....... .
.... ... ..
.... . .....
28
29
Committee Review Plan & Results
Final Plans Prepared
Co
mitiee Rev1eNPlen&
FJP4I.Rm.j.
esu
p
is
-ad
..
f.AeNsFnal
30
311
Committee Reviews Final PlansCotee
Prepare General Specs
. ..........
.......
. .
CPI
..... I
Plan-
.
..... . ...
..... .. ....
.. .......
......... ..
.... .... .
.. .. . ..... ..
32
Committee Reviews Specs
.........
.... ..
Co
m
RevieNs
Erpeci
33
Prepare Technical Specs
...
Prepare
T
. . ..
...... . ..... .....
34
List of Qualified Contractors
..........
..
Lis,
of
uallned
Cont cto
35
Committee Approves Bid & List
..
CommIll
pp�qyes
Bid &
List
......
........ -
....... . ..
.....
- -------
36
37
BIDDING A CONSTRUCTION SUPER
Pre -Bid Meeting
.... .......
..
.. . . . ..
...... . ...
. .. ... ..
.........
.
i
.1, . ..
.......
. ......
O'r"E
-Bid
Meeting
.
..
. .
...........
� ...... ...
.... ...
... ... ..
........... .
-
.... ..
.. ...
38
Contract Questions
. .
.... .... .
Contrac
Questio
... i
s
. ........
..
39
Review Bids & Award
.—I-1 ..
..... ... .
. ......
Re
Bid
&Award
..... . . .
.....
40
City Commission Approvals
1. 111.111
sion
Aqp
'o Vl�n
41
Pre -Construction Meeting
........ ..
P_
M.W:
i3
tion
42
Project Construction
.... .. .
.....
43
Construction Observations & Admin.
......
. . . . . . . . . . . .
T)I
1441
Final Approval
CD
H
CD
rn
(D
rL
0
q
10
0
CD
0.1
tr
(D
0
P.
-.1
00
Z...n
MIAMARINA - DESIGN PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
WITH EARLYACTION TO INSTALL FLOATING DOCKS
No,
Y EAR I
YVA11 2
1
2
3
1 4 1 5 6
—
7
8
1 9
10
11
12
1 2 3
4 6
8
1 7
8
9
10 It
12
1
TESTING AND FIELD SURVEYS
I
I
2
3
4
Topographic Survey
Bathymellic survey
Soft Borings
i T 0 1 2NR Ic Suryy
Ba ric urvJv
ol S'
Sol. Go.ings
5
6
PERMITTING -INITIAL MEETINGS
Pre -App(Ication Meetings
caflt7n Meetirigs
1 —4-
7
Prepare and Submit Applications
Proppare an sugmit P I;auo
S
8
9
Meet with Agencies
EARLYACTION -FLOATING DOCKS
_jA
. ...... . as
art Mekit with nci
10
Separate Floating Docks Component
Sel. aratilt Flo ting Docks Coinpor
ent
11
'12
13
Permit Response I
Issue Permits
Preliminary Plans Q%afing Docks)
Tt s&se
if I
;u; e Pe
Prelimfinbry Plans (Roakin
Docks)
f
14
15
Committee Reviews Plans
Final Plans
Commi --9R-. VvAh_t__
FiniilPlins
_4
16
Advertise Bids
Ac _rfis �B_id
sH_—H,
17
Bidding and Award of Contract
Bidding
nd
of
o
18
18
City Commission Approval
lnsbfl Floating Docks
Comte
In
misiton
If
oil
provai
Do6k
3
19
20
PERMIT APPROVALS - FUED DOCK
Field Investigations (if required)
F
Field Investclued
21
22
Permit Response I
Permit Response 2 (d req.)
Permit Respbnsel I
1 Pei nit Res
rise
V
23
24
25
Permit Response 3 (f req.)
Issue Permits
PLANS AND SPECIFICA77ONS
Permit
es SW5a
rmitih
L
26
27
28
Preliminary Plans (Fixed Docks)
Coord. Plan w/Agencies; & Contractor
Committee Review Plan Results
Its
,Preliminary
14nciis
Committee Fie
Plan
&
n & I
Cont
lesu
-actors
IS
29
30
M
Final Plans Prepared
Committee Reviews Final Plans
Prepare General Specs
—A
:iXM1 Rin
... ...
0
P
I PlAn
m
are.-
s F
repo
__S
-ad
an!
7-
f
32
Committee Reviews Spam
dCo
- - - - - - -
C
nml
F
evieWs Specs
33
34
Prepare Technical Specs
List of Qualified contractors
Preps
Lil
of
1
calified
31 S,
Con dots
i
35
Committee Approves Bid& L
m*
List
36
37
38
39
40
BIDDING A CONSTRUCTION SUPE
Pre Bid Meeting
Contract Questions
Review Bids &Award
City Commission Approvals
PrIF
K*
_B id M
Co
0
CitCofnmi
I
Ou istio
18 Wd
& Akard
Sion
4--
41
42
43
Pre -Construction Meeting
Project Construction
Construction Observations & Adman.
Pr o
iru
on
ae
g'
S
44
Final Approval
(D
0
0
CD
0
0
0
CD
F-)
0
tr
0
Lo
PHASE III
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Final Concept Plan
II. Estimated Future Cash Flow Available for Debt Service -
Average City Wage Scale: Constant 1993 Dollars
III. Estimated Future Cash Flow Available for Debt Service -
Average City Wage Scale: Inflated Dollars
IV. Absorption and Revenue Analysis
V. Payroll Expense Analysis
V1. Estimated Construction Costs
V11. Design, Permitting and Construction Schedule
f
93- 782
FMRR►JNK10ER] nINN1ALINRKMC
Parr novu mw j DODGI! ISIAND DIUDGI,
S RAMP:
PUIURI!
KIWAUKANT
"URDINM
;KING
/
111/ /
PPOVEMENI3 TO Myt PA
•o NEW CONCRETE KAMt
BISCAYNE nnY
ttvmxAMrAL Dom DATA
i .am
.tea
M MIN /
w M•Il \•••
N M1M 1
wr.rll we.
.• 1
•wrllm
M 1
w\■►aw
•r I
w\Yalt
M\r 1
f\•I •w
MMM •
w\YaA
N/r 1
wlrlw
N I
wrMlllm
N 1
rw.ulm
N 1
. rrll m
H MIt� ■
w1Yaw
•r •w •. •
wt■•aw d ,
•. I
w I.wlw m 1
w•w.r \
ww.lwm
t •.{ W a1.1 w.•Iw slre • wrlN •
1 • rW •nl MI\N farW • wrlM
a • /r M t•r wwylR ••Ol.w • wW N
M1•pATi�
ur rwua wrnl m
Irw . r wr
KEOM LVtlW IAL A C"ANY OORAL a = FL i
amm lla•al•1 te■a\la on" It
Nw• VOL rr•■ UMM." a•ua FLaluo ml a •aw a■l wn w
AWK4 DOCXACE DA rA
mmp
L P. lk
IL L P. a
wJYV 1•Ir al =
w\w
7
r\YV 1•Iw/rl rll
r\w
.
wtYV r.lrr\1 \nll
/w\w
w�YV ••Iwrl rrl
wlw
wtYV •/t•r\I wll
wllw
w•I.V C•Irw11/Y/
r\rr
. w..Il .•1rMI r1
...
ti
w rwlll /•twe11 \.11
r\w
r
r /•Iwla 1 •1 w r11 ra l
M\ r
a•
wrgll /•Iwwlrwl
\r
rs
w.•1\u' 1•Iwra rLl
r•\w
r
•ry
r ww �..wl rw
r . w
REDEVE[APMENT 9MY FOR
NMNWMAC AT ]AYSME
MtAMI, FLORmA
DATE
Tr Iw Irw
MIAMARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
HISTORIC PLEASURE SLIP DEMAND
MAY 1991 THROUGH MAY 1992
Purpose of Visit/ Percent
Size Number of Total
Day Boaters
50 ft. or less 11,391 70. 5 %
Over 50 ft. 727 4.5
Transient
50 ft. of less 3,676 22.8
Over 50 ft. 364 2.2
Total 1 1 1 %
.source. Cft of AII&
J,
93- 782
HISTORICAL MARKET MIX AT MIAMARINA
May 1991 through April 1992
< 50 feet
11391
< 50 feet
3676 50+ feet
50+ feet 364
727
Transient Boaters
Day
Boaters
co
iF,
Source: City of Miami
MIAMARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
HISTORIC
PLEASURE SLIP DEMAND
MAY
1991 THROUGH MAY
1992
Boat Length
Percent
(in feet)
Number
of Total
Less than 20
1,464
9.1 %
20 to .30
7,979
49.4
31 to 40
2,970
18.4'
41 to 50
2,297
14.2
51 to 60
814
5.0
61 to 70
302
1.9
71 to 80
119
0.6
81 to 100
166
1.0
Over 100
_47
_0.2
Total
1§.158
100.0 6
Source: City
of Miami
93- 782
BOAT LENGTHS AT MIAMARINA
w
-11
00
16,168 slips rented
Less than 30 feet
58%
31 to 40 feet
18%
•''" .�", 'rya, ..,..�' .
51+ feet
9%
41 to 50 feet
14%
Tour Boat Passenger Activity
Passenger Mix
Tour Boats
Pau Hana
Fiesta I
Heritage of Miami
Island Queen
Island Lady
Pink Lady
0%
20% 40% 60% 80%
Percentage of Passengers
® Tour Groups ® Walk-ins
100%
oa
V
Miamarina Tour Boat Activity
Daily Passengers
Week
601
Season
Source: Individual Tour Boats
)ekday
2415
Weeken
3083
Neekday
839
Off -Season
Tour Boat
Pau Hans
Fiesta
Hedtap of Miami
Island Ousen
Island Lady
Pink Lady
Total
MIAMARINA
MIAMI, FLOF40A
TOUR BOAT PASSENGER ACTIVITY
SELECTED TOUR BOAT OPERATIONS
Estimated Passengers per D
Passenger
Number of Tours/Day
Season
—season
Passer
er Mix
Ca city
ee a�
ee nd
ee ay ee a
eekday
wee nd
our roup
c In
49
5
7
65 105
35
83
30%
70%
98
8
8
160 160
60
160
80%
20%
49
3
7
30 350
24
140
20%
80%
150
8
15
723 1,800
240
900
83%
1796.
150
8
15
72D 1,800
240
900
83%
17%
150
8
15
720 1,800
240
900
83%
17%
40
67
2,415 6,015
839
3,083
Source: Indv &W Tour Boats
SELECTED STATISTICS
REGISTERED PLEASURE BOATS
DADE AND BROWARD COUNTIES
FISCAL YEAR 1991 - 1992
Dade
Broward
Percent of Percent of
Dade and
Broward Total
Percent of Dade and
Pleasure Boat Size Number
Dade Total Number Broward Total
Number
Broward Total
26 to 39 ft. 4,889
85.2% 5,326 78.4%
10,215
81.5%
40 to 64 ft. 801
14.0 1,352 19.9
2,153
17.2
Greater than 65 ft. 48
0.8 119 1.7
167
1.3
Total o,5,738
100.0 % 10.0%
i�,535
, 100.0% �
Source: States of Morlds, Department of Natural Resources
e
�■
SELECTED STATISTICS
REGISTERED BOATS
DADE AND BROWARD COUNTIES AND THE
STATE OF FLORIDA
1987-1992
Dade and Broward Counties
Pleasure (1)
Commercial
Total
Fiscal
Percem or
Percent of
Percent of
State of Florida
Year
Number
State Total
Number
State Total
Number
State Total
Pleasure (1)
Commercial
Total
1966-1987
84,683
13.6%
Z419
7.9%
87,102
13.5%
614,189
30,624
644,813
1987-19"
67,731
13.6%
Z579
8.4%
90,310
13.4%
644,807
30,667
675,474
1988-1909
91,493
13.5%
Z863
9.2%
94,356
13.3%
679.710
31,121
710,831
1989-1990
90,656
13.2%
Z790
9.0%
93,446
13.0%
687,132
30,922
718,054
1990-1m
88,626
12.9%
3,151
10.1%
91,779
12.8%
685,075
31,126
716,201
1991-1992
86,672
127%
3,424
10.8%
90,096
126%
683780
31,792
715,572
Compound Annual
Growth Rate
(198a-1 M)
l
m
Mm
am
Q 8'
(1) Includes dealer boats and canoes
Source: State of Florida, Department of Natural Resources
SELECTED STATISTICS
REGISTERED PLEASURE BOATS
DADE AND BROWARD COUNTIES
FISCAL'YEAR 1991--1992
Dade and Broward Total
Dade County
Broward County
Percent of Dade
Percent of
Percent of
and Broward
Pleasure Boat Size
Number
Dade Total
Number
Broward Total
Number
Total
Less than 12 ft.
5,675
12.4%
6,019
15.3%
11,694
13.7%
12 to 16 ft.
7,456
16.3%
7,572
19.2%
15,028
17.6%
16 to 25 ft.
26,925
58.8%
18,985
48.2%
45,910
53.9%
26 to 39 ft.
4,889
10.7%
5,326
13.5%
10,215
12.0%
40 to 64 ft.
801
1.7%
1,352
3.4%
2,153
2.5%
Greater than 65 ft.
48
0.1 %
119
0.3%
167
0.2%
Total
45,794
100.0%
39,373
100.0%
85,167
100.0%
Source: State of Florida, Department of Natural Resources
SELECTED STATISTICS
REGISTERED POWER CRAFT BY LENGTH (1)
FLORIDA
1987-1991
Under 16 ft.
16-25 ft
26-39 ft
40-65 ft.
,
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Year Number of Total
Number
of Total
Number
of Total
Number
of Total
Total
1987 314.385 50.8%
280,049
42.1%
32,632
5.3%
10,980
1.8%
618.046
1988 318,904 49.7%
281,741
43.9%
35,540
5.5%
6,053
0.9%
642,236
1989 325,106 48.3%
302,985
45.0%
37,965
5.6%
7,561
1.1%
673,617
1990 314,323 48.2%
296,903
45.6%
34,256
5.3%
6,086
0.9%
651,568
1"1 310,934 47.9%
284,936
43.9%
47,547
7.3%
6,091
0.9%
649,508
Compound Annual Growth Rate
(1987-1991) _ 21
211
,9.9%
- 3.7
Z�L
(1) Does not Include non- powered sail boats, auxiliary
powered
sail boats and
non- powered
canoes, rowboats and miscellaneous craft
Source: National Marine Manufacturers Association
yfe„
REGISTERED PLEASURE BOATS BY SIZE
< 25 f t 32571
Fiscal Year 1991-1992
^r)-4 ft 1471
?6 to 39 f t 5326
Broward County
O° Source: State of FLA; DNR
< 25 feet 400F
An+ feet 849
3 to 39 f t 488
Dade County
MIAMARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMPARABLE NA71ONAL MARINAS
Breakdown of 80pe by Size
Estimated f of Day Boats
TOtal
slip 8fte
81" by Percentage of
Peak
Off —Peek
Mafintll}l�ocatlon
Snp! —
Description
size Total
Weekday
Weekend
Weekday Weekend
Anrtepoft Chy MUrIne
ee
Up to 40 lest
82 03%
a
a
e e
Atatap^ Maryland
40 to e0 feet
a �%
BrazillenfiNKmIen/Aumllan
?3
Up to 40 fast
0 0%
1
3
1 2
West Palm 8e8cft Fbrlda
40 to e0 lest
25 34%
> so teat
48 06%
DOCItB
1 s00 lenear Net
NAP 100%
20
200
NAV NAV
Belihm , Maryland
Hwbw Iebnd
30
(1)
NAV
4
35
3 2e
TbmM FWkb
Inr f HwbOf Marine
158
Up 10 24 fast
40 25%
3
3
0 0
Balls mm , Maryland
25 to 35 fast
e2 56%
30 to as feet
28 17%
Pk kednq VVFtairf ea Up t0 40 feet
41
e4% 0 12 0 0
Selefil, MaaaadtttIm"m 40 to W feet
12
1 e%
> e0 rest
12
1 e%
MW 39 328 UP to 30 test
184
W% 12 40 a 40
S8n Fmncl cq C&UkMIe 3710 40 Net
as
20%
41 t0 45 feet
23
7%
48 to W lest
e4
20%
tit to e0 feet
10
3% ,
l
YWterslde 38 tip toss Net
30
100% 12 s0 NAV NAV
Novi* Vkglnla (Also 1.000 W of bulkhead)
00
NZ
(1) Slip design allows various alzes; no set etp size and largest dp accomodedon Is 420 feet.
Source: individual Marines, Kenneth Leventhal A Company
MWAARINA AT BAYSIOE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
DOMPARABLE NATIONAL MARINAS
1M9 FMrrMI Rah
Estimated
EM2Rab.d
/M2 ftMbt
8saaonlOR—aeawn
Alappllaop►)
YMr
"mother
19112
F%rmranenV
F hingl
I\rktrrg
1drMaAlresSsn
BsIR
of slla
Ooewenal
SMamrl
Tnm"mt Tow Baat
Other Annrl A) Monfhty 151 TrramYnt (Di
_on NY see to
ftoos AmenllMta
ArapdSo 0Bj Marina
"as
M
00%
e0%
40% 0%
0% 6023
NAP
41.25(1)
00 be per hour
0
A1apok Maryland
lad ftf brwbn/Asetrslbn
im
12
62%
f00%
0% 0%
0% WAD
NAP
01.2".70
Free
1 % A S,C,D
Nett RMm bosoh, Florid
(rafurbhbe 4
C"Doels
1070
1800 bet P)
NAV
NAV
NAV NAV
NAV NAP
NAP
01.00
0S for 4hm.
0 A,B4O,F,O
SsMdlee, MMarybnd
ldfbw bond
108B
20
20%
0%
100% 0%
r ` 0% NAP
NAP
01.00
fee
0
t►Ista, Florid
M11a►IwMfMtartra
1078
tBi 14)
00%
SO%
BD% 0%
0% 00.2v
NAY
$1.08
08 for 2hm.
210 A,0,C,O,E,F,O,H,I,K
fsMmrsw, Mlerybnd
00.18
FM11e1UMYKrF
w"
85
f00%
88%
11% 4%
0% 10,20/
NAV
01.W
$0.20
20 AB,C,E,F,O
Sebot, hbeaahvaMSe
00.00
mmm
1M4
226
40%
80%
20% (t)
0% 00.24
4.08
01.00
$tofor4hrs.
NAP A,B,D,E,F,O,H,1
ten FhsnaMee, O.illb"
tlabfslds
too Is vko*
1080
20
NAV
0%
02% •%
0% NAP
NAP
$1.00
08flat lee
o A,B,C,F,O,1
Amenities
A - 11b"Ity O - Shorerskoobn (1) Electric Is charged rparablyst a Not be of *Nor 03 of 00 chpendkq on vessel sin per might
S — Yaw H — Idrtre Supply Shop R) Tour boats se not coneldewd in ft edp mbc
0 - C" Tebvblom I — Pump Out P) Thereare no ellps but)uK bulkhead which batch 0a 1lubor Place on Its Southern
0-Ilmi-Ity J - Pool and essbm en cad parlmetars. The nrAnaabo hot TO paddlebosts for rental and to neater taxis
1-Iaw *vFiefllty K — Fuel arrd,eeaees..e,er. bmrwlbw.
F — H 0r1 Aoens Ill) Them am abo 0 T—beach which angs from 78 feet to 102 bat
P) Renal ale per foot per chy.
Source: kwM wl madme
1lemelb Low"t al A Company
�.O
00 1•C
Comparable National Downtown Marinas
Estimated 1992 Slip Mix
National Marinas
Annapolis City, MD
Brazilian/Peruvian
Waterside, VA
Harbor Island, FL
Inner Harbor, MD
Pickering Wharf, MA
Pier 39, CA
40% 60% 60%
1992 Slip Mix
100% 120%
Perm/Seasonal
®
Transient
J
Tour Boat
®
Fishing/Other
Day Boats included in Transient Percents
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMPETt11VE SUPPLY
Breakdown of Slips by Ctrs
Total gap Stm Nuaberof Pwowraego d
Madna/I.ocation Slips on Sips TOW
Dade County
Biscayne Say Marriott Marina 190 Up to 36 feet a5 47%
Miami, Florida 42 to 52 test so 44%
62 to 72 fed
10
5%
> 60fed
5
3%
Crandon Marina
222 (1) lip to 30 foot
90
4t%
Miami, Florida
31 to 35 Md
tie
28%
86 to 40 Md
25
11%
41 to 45 feet
25
11%
48to50Met
24
1f%
Dinner Key Marina
5s2 Up to 00 feet
190
32%
Miami, Florida
31 to 35 h*
121
21%
as to 40 feet
117
20%
41to45fed
st
14%
'
46 to 50 Mot
95
6!L
51 to 55 feet
11
2%
56 to e0 Met
12
2%
61 to 70 Met
10
2%
> 70 Met
5
1%
Sunset Harbor Marina
125 Up to35fest
19
19%
Miaml Beach, Florida
50 to 65 Met
71
sm
> 75Met
35
29%
Miami Beach Marina
400 Up to45bet
12D
sD%
Miami Beach, Florida
64 to 00 Met
100
25%
so to 65 Met
100
29%
> 65 fed
so
2D%
Bmward County
Bahia Mar Resort & Yatc hinp Canter WO Up to 45 fat
105
W%
Fort Laudeedaie,Florida
48tosoteet
Be
30%
80 to 200 feet
ss
20%
Pier 66 Merirra
76 Up to 45 Met
is
21%
Fort Laudetdals,Florida
469050Met
21
20%
51 to 55 feet
a
7%
a6bs0ket
25
W%
4190701001
a
7%
71 to so feet
2
!!�
si to fl5fort
1
1!c
as to so feat
1
t%
The nrnwKw ar the slp4 rwA tom
pwww d9' 14 arts vary
amu my 10 sue.
M Does not IrWAW 17 comma" slps.
soarer: IrtdMldtatl Markes, Kntuftt Lwttnds! ik Company
3- 782
Yy
i
�A.
MIAMAR INA AT lAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
COMPETITIVE MARINA
•IIPPIY
kbp
Yaaf lum or
EMlmaed
Btlnraled 1652 •ll
Mbt
ion Rental Rab
(per toot per day)
QleaNi111
Mal Recent
Number
1eo2
rnrnan
n
•aeon/D4-aneon
F!►Nlnp
14mober
MukaaA4Slon
Irhebishment
of fl e _
Oawrsney
Seasonal
Tmnslent Tow Not
OIMr
Annual
seasonal
Monthly Trenslent
0paces Amenities
ass awdy
I
llemyfrlryMarflev" M4Marka
/164
no (1)
63%
04%
le%
2%
t6%
WO-0.50/
6040-0.751
NAV 8125A125
NAV A,I,CA,E,F,%H,
MkWA Fbflds
81035-0.50
1040-0.75
I,J/C
It
OandmMarkra
"SO
23S p)
100%
63%
0%
0%
7%
$23/123
NAP
NAP •20
300 A11A,H,19
MYm4 Floods
•
0bfarltltyIll
fm
6112
94%
62%
4% 1'
0%
4%P)1027-41.35
627-8.35
NAV S1o0A1.60
330 A,I,CD,E,O,I
WK Fbfldt
4
•hnallbl4ewtuft
on
In
00%
63%
0%
1%
0%
6037A0.37
11043MAS
•06040.W 4113SA1.30
00 A,•,CA,E,D,H,I,J
Mbnd le010011 "
•
Mbml leash aft (t)
N•4
400
05%
70%
2%
0%
20%
$040,10.30
t0d10.46
90850.50.125A1.00
1,100 A,•,CA,E,GAIK
Miml •etch, FlOrlds
?Oki ands County
Ion
90%
•e%
6%
0%
•%
lrenard Ownrr
•
�hlaMarMeeftf�Nehpnpdfdar
1176
3W
00%
60%
40%
1%
6%
10065A0.05
SCAB-0.05/
1120A1.20 SIX01.35
100 A,®,CA,E,F
lft tatrbrdkb, FIo fta
SOS5-0.95
O,KJ,K
7
PWO Marks
1166
U2
63%
75%
25%
0%
0%
S1o0-S1.75/
HAV
NAV NAV
A,6,C,D,E,F
Ft (aud rAls, Fbft
S 1.75-62.70
O,H,I,J,K
TebllrasrardOewlq
472
67%
00%
34%
1%
6%
Mafbt Ana TobkDenrpeslls
--W-
8%
03%
--S%, �QY
O,W,
W
W
00
zl�:
Afaerdtbe
A - 0e0kleal m - • w"WI,alots
! - VNsW H - Merle» supply shop
O - Obbb lbbrlebn I - Pump Out
D - fltewIII r J - Pool
a - tatnrrdy R\e" K - Fuel
F - ~ AaeN
(1)40 Dwb alsombbb
362-olp 01 a%* bellye*Wbd is tpin oparalk>na In Sre 61 of 1004.
AdAbnal1011es kmhxb a owlmming pool, retland two restaurants.
ll) Figures Omm are pre-HurrlanoAndrew; cutmnfly orerka toaabout 136 operatlng sops with remalndsr belng repalredandexpected
e Imaval`ble In eight meft s.
(1) Dan not Include 126 dry serape Aallrr spolsand 30 moortnge IbralWats.
saw": trrdMdual Marbnse
Kenneth tasentlrl & Company
Competitive Marinas in South Florida
Estimated 1992 Slip Mix
Permaneni
86%
Dade County
Perrnanen
59%
Fish/Other
ransie%nt
5%
O° Seasonal Included in Permanent Category
Tour Boat
1%
Brows '
ish/Other
6%
ransient
34%
• DADE COUNTY'S COMPETITIVE MARINA SLIP MIX DIFFERS
SIGNIFICANTLY FROM BROWARD COUNTY - PERMANENT USE
DOMINATES DADE COUNTY AT 86%; ONLY 59% IN BROWARD
• BROWARD HAS CAPTURED THE TRANSIENT MARKET WITH 34%;
ONLY 5% IN DADE COUNTY - THIS REPRESENTS A POTENTIAL
LATENT DEMAND FOR SUCH FACILITIES TO CAPTURE THE DAY
BOAT AND TRANSIENT MARKET
o COMPARABLE NATIONAL MARINAS EITHER CATER EXCLUSIVELY
TO PERMANENT OR TRANSIENT MARKETS; ONLY INNER HARBOR
•
�6
SUCCESSFULLY COMBINES THE TWO
ONYL WATERSIDE AND PICKERING WHARF PROVIDE TOUR BOAT
OPERATIONS; NONE LISTED FISHING OPERATIONS IN ITS MIX
93- 782
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MARKET SEGMENT AND MARKET MIX
e VESSELS 25 FEET AND UNDER REPRESENT OVER 90% OF
FLORIDA REGISTERED POWER CRAFT MARKET
i OVER 88% OF DADE COUNTY REGISTERED PLEASURE BOATS
ARE UNDER 25 FEET; 83% IN BROWARD COUNTY
e DADE AND BROWARD COUNTIES REPRESENT ALMOST 13% OF
ENTIRE FLORIDA PLEASURE BOATING MARKET
e 58% OF PLEASURE BOATS THAT VISITED MIAMARINA BETWEEN
MAY 91 AND APRIL 92 WERE UNDER 30 FEET; 32% WERE
BETWEEN 31 AND 50 FEET; THIS REPRESENTS A WIDE MIX OF
VESSELS
A DAY BOATERS REPRESENTED 75% OF PLEASURE BOATERS THAT
VISITED MIAMARINA IN 91-92; APPROX 11,400 OF TOTAL
12,100 WERE UNDER 50 FEET. THE REMAINING 25% WERE
TRANSIENT BOATERS �.
Y�
93- 782
00
11:'
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
OPTIMIZATION OF OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
OPPORTUNITIES
CONSTRAINTS
•
Potential to be a premier marina In the U.S.
o
Wave/surge situation has adverse impact on boating
operations in the basin.
•
Limited destinations in Dade County.
•
Floating debris detracts from appearance of marina.
•
Hard Rock Cafe to stimulate increase in day boat
demand.
•
Noise levels deter certain groups and segments of
boating population.
•
Consideration of linear dockage in addition to
conventional slips.
•
Utility expenses not billed back to overnight users
represents lost revenue.
•
Capture a portion of transient boater market with
Improved service and facilities.
0
Expenses are proportionately high due to low revenue
base.
•
Permanent use can be met with commercial
operations such as the tour boats.
•
Lack of adequate and proximate parking deters
permanent and seasonal users.
•
'Aggressive and strategic marketing will promote
Mlamarina as an Ideal location for a variety of events
and attractions, increasing use.
•
Existing revenue of approximately $2,200 per slip
can be greatly Improved with efficient operations and
effective marketing to major demand segments: day
boaters and transient.
•
Creation of additional revenue sources such as billing
of utility usage for overnight stays.
OPPORTUNFI-Mb A1vIu
CONSTRAINTS
L
EGEND
JECENTER OF ACnVM
PDEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
I
DQCK LEVEL CIRCULATION
BLOCKED VIEWS
ram/ NOISE
VIEW CORRIDOR
DOCK ACCESS POU"
po ENTIAL RESTAURANT SITE
a OMWff 030AL auto R
am
e�,o�ruew�anraa am a
�w�Or•��a® OIL Ka0.
tun ■O � �
REDEVEWPMWf MDY FM
, A A AT 1BAYSME
MAK FWMA
nk" `y'j
Vi/ � •R
f
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT / FEASIBILITY STUDY
r..4y LINKAGES WITH UPLAND USES
OPPORTUNITIES CONSTRAINTS
• Expanded activity from transient boaters, day
Blockage of views by: -Shade structures
boaters and excursion boaters
-Pier Parts service buildings
•Parking garage
• Opportunity for enhanced user friendliness for
excursion and day boaters
e
• Accessibility constraints:
• Inadequate dockage/ sodbsslblilty for small boats
•Excursion boat boarding,
• Link with ad l scent activities:
• ADA compllanoe
• Outdoor safe's • Hard Rock Cafe'
• Narrow dock level pedblitfifin corridors
• Klee Park • Future restaurants
• Cru9de terminal • Bayfront Park
• Underutilized areas: • Ntlfth docks
• plot 5 dCl M/ fiehing fleet
• Opportwo4ty for Miamarina/ Bayside to link waterfront
• plot Pfiek
from D000nt Park to Bicentennial Park/ cruise terminal
• Parking supply and conVHftINHO
• Expand" aooesaibUlty to Brickell, Omni and
PrefarMMq Arts Center with Metrorall extension
• Security and safety: • Eit Mbldh 064t boarding
• GMWd bdtfti't l
• Potential. for linkages beyond downtown with water taxi
• MOW
• AMM-161Mwd problems
(10 6"WiR nil conflicts
• Opportunity fdr new activity ivi4 at North DOOM•
• Llhkftb gatoway to cruise terminal
FI i41Ng ulllkye Hletarlb 9111p
I
lieftWhi dudkolde dining Othdr tlitrlNdtlons
• Opg6rttjhIti6+b fdi• eapanded dockage oh'dtit§idb
cld b of �I�r Pbtk
MIAMARINA
4 REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MARKET SEGMENTS AND MARKET MIX
OPPORTUNITIES
CONSTRAINTS
• Major U.S. boating market.
• Lack of adequate and proximate parking for typical
space requirements.
• 85% of registered boats are less than 25 feet in
length, hence, do not require wet slip storage.
• High -noise, high-energy atmosphere deters
permanent and seasonal users.
• Proximity to areas of sightseeing Interest creates
demand for tour boat operations.
• Presence of homeless and easy public access
presents security concern for permanent/seasonal
• Day boat market Is significant due to size of small
users; a lesser extent for day boaters and tour
vessel population in Dade and Broward Counties.
operators.
• Tourist and entertainment facilities at Bayside creates
• Too far to fishing grounds for optimal charter fishing
high-energy, high -traffic atmosphere conducive to
operations.
day boater activities.
• Charter fishing not typically an impulsive purchase
• Day boaters are not well served by related
like most Bayside transactions.
waterfront restaurants/entertainment complexes In
Dade County. Broward County is a major attraction.
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
MAJOR ISSUES
• TRANSIENT ORIENTATION
• DAY VISITOR MANAGEMENT/IMPROVEMENTS
• OPTIMAL LOCATION FOR:
• DAY BOATS
• FISHING BOATS
• LARGE-SMALL/SHORT-TERM/LONG-TERM TRANSIENT
• IMPLICATIONS/LINKAGE WITH HARD ROCK CAFE AND FUTURE
DEVELOPMENTS
•. UPLAND LINKAGES
• EXCURSION BOAT ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
• BAYSIDE WATERVIEWS
• CROWD CONTROL/CIRCULATION/SECURITY
• SMALL BOAT ACCESSIBILITY
• WAVE AGITATIONMATER DEBRIS COLLECTION SOLUTIONS
• PERMITTING STRATEGIES
• CRITICAL PATH TO CONSTRUCTION/FACILITY OPENING
qd
93- 782
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
PHASE I - SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
• INTERVIEWS WITH VARIOUS CITY OF MIAMI OFFICIALS AND
REPRESENTATIVES.
• INTERVIEWS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF NATIONAL MARINE
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION.
• EVALUATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOATING MARKET.
• SUBJECT PROPERTY AND UPLAND USE INSPECTION.
• VISITATION AND INSPECTION OF SELECTED SOUTH FLORIDA
MARINAS.
•. EVALUATION OF COMPETITIVE LOCAL MARINAS.
• INTERVIEWS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF SELECTED DOWNTOWN\
URBAN MARINAS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES.
• EVALUATION OF MIAMARINA'S OPERATIONS AND HISTORICAL
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.
• ASSESSMENT OF THE HYDROGRAPHIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ELEMENTS OF MIAMARINA.
• ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY AND FLUSHING STUDIES.
• EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AS RELATED TO
PERMITTING.
3 `I
782
Ma ket
Operations
Early
Actions
Opportunities
Economics
Engineering/
Technical
d
—`�
Environmental/
&
Constraints
77
Review
National
I Prototypes
Urban Design
Unkages
to PHASE 1
1�ventory & Evaluation
.� b weeks
00
A
STUDY PROCESS
Evaluatioo. and Concept
Concept Selection Plan
• Financial
• Legal
Operational
C
ALTERNATIVE:
• Marketing Concepts
• Layouts/Linkages
• Operation Concepts
• Engineering Solutions
• Slip Mixes
Report/Review 1
PHASE II
Alternative Concepts
d weeks
Finance Plan
Concept Plan
Operations/
Leasing Concept
Permitting Strategy
Project Development
Schedule
PHASE III
Plan Development
4 weeks
Report/Review 2
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
GOAL: MAXIMIZE OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES:
• OPTIMIZE AVAILABLE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
• IMPROVE LINKAGES WITH UPLAND USES
• EVALUATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
• EFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS QUICKLY
• IDENTIFY SHORT-TERM ACTIONS
37
93- 782
93` � 82
3�0
PHASE I
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Goal and Objectives
II. Study Process
III. Scope and Methodology
IV. Major Issues
V. Opportunities and Constraints
V1. Market Segment & Market Mix Issues
VII. Competitive Marinas in South Florida
Vill. Comparable National Downtown Marinas
IX. Selected Statistics: National, Regional and Local Registered
Pleasure and Commercial Boats
X. Miamarina: Tour Boat Passenger Activity
XI. Miamarina: Historic Pleasure Boat Demand
93- 782
3y
PHASE 1
OF
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRESENTATION
ice
CITY OF MIAMI
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
JUNE 21, 1993
PRESENTED BY:
KENNETH LEVENTHAL & COMPANY
WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD
COASTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
INTERNATIONAL MARINA RESOURCES, INC.
33
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ALTERNATIVE C
e
• Provides for the greatest amount of day boat
floating dockage.
• Three floating dock fingers allow for increased
parallel transient dockage.
• Character boat enhances scenic quality of marina
and serves to balance pedestrian traffic.
• Creates activity center on northern pier.
• Excursion boat dockage redesigned to enhance
views.
• Security gate controls pedestrian traffic to
day boat and transient dockage areas.
• Turnstile and ticket office provides for effective
day boat cash control.
• Sight lines are kept open at amphitheater.
3d
Disadvantage
• No provision for ferry boat dockage.
• Eliminates charter fishing slips and reduces
number of excursion boat slips.
93- 782
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ALTERNATIVE B
j Advantage
• Three floating dock fingers allow for increased
parallel transient dockage.
• Increased excursion slips and reduced charter
fishing slips.
t • Provides for some permanent dockage.
i
• Security gate controls pedestrian traffic to
day boat and transient dockage areas.
i
i • Turnstile and ticket office provides for effective
day boat cash control.
i
• Sight lines are kept open at amphitheater.
Disadvantage
• Least amount of transient dockage,
• No provision for ferry boat dockage.
-31
93- 782
FMRR UNK in KKYlffl41N1Al. MKKA'W
PORT OWLUWIRD ♦ DODGU ISLAND URIDGU
1-7
rn
WWAUKANT
flulUNIK
$ KQWVTAL WM DArA
-&%a2 ��
If—" • 'a Ig41t Ma
►1 1 41•.u4 •tom
►• w H • w /•\.Ia to
►• w Nr1a a
►••1\ 1 'aIr4.
►.wN s w•v•w
NwN • -rvan
►11•N 1 .wlw
►••/MN / 41vaN
N 1 4•war
N•� 1 'awWt•4
NMN 'a 'a•aa.N
NMN a 'a•11►w
N 1 4 /�.LL •s
NMN • 'aII.1►1t an
1 • •r M •wl 1••\1t •q\i\ • MM
/.•'a1•. /M ..1.1►•41••1 •a'aIIt ..
• • •'I •M •M 1'aYt tO1.• • a'atM
w/r.1
r•N 1•w1'aN r.Iaw
NwN aa.1�• r111I •w
9A. "-O M
A wl.la awlN •t'a 1•r . w •�►
IlAfil fAAI
w.wilw Iu:1.� � w 1 w r
CKLKNI01/
• as: • w lin wr w 1�. wll \.0
2LIAIT MI
1•arrl 1 Itwa1
y/—
asvra /ww11aa/ cow."" •wa m
•IIIAf.ltO.\ a111t "W"m Nnt R
'alum •mml a v= m4 MII R
WNWA DMA GE DATA
r•�t/ I.�r\n ral Iv.w w
o./v t►w•I4e1 rr1 wIw �
w.w\/ •.I4'aIl rrl Ir1'a M I
.rl a. 1.1
wrl ral w1'a 11
4 /•MIa 1•I4 wr .••al 41w ti
I. MI. 1.1 "11 rK1 Ir.w
4'aMIt I• I w •YI w.l I w '�
4l.rul 1.1 wIM IIIaI 4/ w
w••Ia /•1rAI r1 In
w r.•1•t 1• I o 01 wl l a1/ . •. w
-41.Wa 1.1w V►l rill• .. w1 w, :� �.
'atw4 .raw •�I/ �. w " 41!
REDEVELOPMENT STUDY FOR
NUANAMIA AT PAYSBYS,
M1AMl, FLORIDA
DATE
PM BOULEVARD 4
_ 1
�j�j'7
1 ►-r' I IIAMr1 i �~ M1AN�NY' `
Oo
IN'd
nrMe UNK TO SIWMINNIAI. rARK/11W.
DODGE l5l AND OItID01:
KrrUKn
RMA PLA T
IUILDINM
01%CAYNI{ RAY
SCHEME B
tT1•F1'iDAWAL V= DA rA
Am era
•P Km—m""_
NMN 1
rw1y�!•
M 1
r tiY\1l \Y
NMM .
w'1'r\IR rn
•. 1
r wwlw a
•►wM •
r\YRw
MMM •
�\Yry\
w\M ;
r■r•w
wMw
r\Y •I\
w r
r\rvv
wl•. /
rw+u�
w w•s w
r\v►w
►.ww •
r\v•w
w 1
rw111ar
w M N .
r wwyA I
1 • Y 0\r rl Ry1A •1•►r • y1r\►
t • r FI 1\11 rri\lA •01r • R�1M
••••w1 r•r
VAM r"
r Iwua R•1r\• a
r . � r
it M.1.1r �w••..N1••1.+1+1.11�r
K! m UW!lA1 L l O"ANY OOl'At. Go=
%KLM\ow"Av ��
rlua.aro. � � •"'-_
Al MA DOCKAGE DATA
Mom► L/:R ALA.=
r■o•v ■.Irr1\Y1 wr\r
r\YI•r•Iwrrrw\1
r \,v •. 1•Irrr YM1 r\w.
O w\1\l 1•I r0
111-1
r IW\IR 1.1rr1 YR1 A.� NI
w 1'•YN 1•Irrr ral •r\i w
r 1w\u 1•IrarrRl 1�\r
_— —•IMR wMur aw••••�rrr rN.
pD/1�iVllREDEMA)PMENT STUDY F
11r9A1[iJLL 7I1` AT BAYSI
KM, FLORIDA
DAM
T
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ALTERNATIVE A
Advantage
• Parallel dockage of ferry boat, water taxi and
excursion boat provides access to Bayside's
south building and Hard Rock Cafe.
• Provides for some permanent dockage.
• Security gate controls pedestrian traffic to
day boat dockage areas only.
• Turnstile and ticket office provides for effective
day boat cash control.
• Sight lines are kept open at amphitheater.
36
11
Disadvantage
• Least amount of floating dockage.
• Multiple access points to/from transient
dockage.
93- 782
IWIM uu1uvt t%§ u1%11,1uL-
MIAMI. FLORIDA
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
BREAKDOWN OF SLIP MIX
Maximum Alternative Orwelo went Concept
Boat Previous/Exlsting (2) A
Sits Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Slip Orlsrthtton Slip Configuration Qn feet) of Slips of Total of Slips of Total of Slips of Total of Slips of Total
Transient
Fixed Sips 45' X 227' 40 18 13% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0%
eo' X 227'
55' X 225'
Bo' X 272
6V X 320'
6d x 227'
65' X 23,5'
Wx24.0'
70' X 37,0'
Total Fixed Slips
45 47
50 0
55 0
55 0
60 47
60 0
60 0
65 13
77 1
80 6
90 5
155 2
139
Parallel Dodcage 65 60
70 65
80 75
119 112
120 112
Total Parallel Dockage (based on esUmated demand)
Total Linear Fed of Parallel Dockage
Total ko nelent skips 139
Permanent s11ps
Floating Docks
Day Boaters — linear feet of parallel dockage
Farry Boat — linear feet of parallel dockage
Excurabn Boats
Parallel Dockage
C.�
Slips
I
Charter Fishing slips
Water TOM — parallel dockage
(1) Represents existing Pier 5 Association sips
(2) Reflects number of slips according to maximum boat size
(3) Reflects number of slips
`
8curor: Kenneth Leventhal i Company
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Waktace Roberts tk Todd
91—anal Tachnnbov Corporation
38 (3)
34% 1
0% 44
0% 0
0% 0
34% 2
0% 24
0% 4
9% 0
1% 0
4% 0
4% 0
1% 0
100%
3
8
2
6
5
24
2229
100% 100
7 (1)
1490'
65'
1%
0
44%
40
0%
0
0%
0
2%
0
24%
24
4%
4
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
68
3%
3
8%
7
2%
2
6%
6
5%
5
24%
23
2159
100% 91
7 (1)
1770'
0
0% 0
0%
44% 40
39%
0% 5
5%
0% 4
4%
0% 0
0%
26% 24
24%
4% 4
4%
0% 2
2%
0% 0
0%
0% 0
0%
0% 0
0%
�
%
3% 3
3%
8% 7
7%
2% 2
2%'
7% 6
6%
5% 5
5%
25% 23
23%
2159
100% 102 100%
0
1770'
0
180'
9 8 (1) 20 (1) 12
26 21 (1) 9 (1) 0
70' 70' 70'
R.s
IUft1KK UNK TO KK7h !HIA1. KtKKIFIC
PORT ooulkvnan a WIxiIS ISLAND ululxlL '-
PARKING GARAGE
FAMRIt
RMAUKAw
KUII1Kwt%
1AHOinurrvnewrio /
/ 1 /
/ - NAY WX ,
/
/
BISCAYNE RAY
SCHEME A
SUVEEWWrAt DOCK DATA
\I wr1 1
•r
•• f
�ra.lw
1lrlll rA
►r1r f
a waw
•\wN \
r1M•w
N ;
�IwFaw
N
1•J lw
NIw /
wfr.r\w
NwM \
wlfr aw
NIM 1
wrwaw
M 1
wMarwY
N 1
r ra.w Y
M 1
w Mllw Y
MwN •
w\Maw
•■wIr •
w1lJ aw
N 1
f I+alw M•
M wry 1
rlwYaY
1 • 1!. w r1 Irww •ulll\ •
wMM
1 . ri w rrl rwlu •r
af.r�•
r •11rr AIIMIr lr•1•r
••IOIIrI�w
1. !•�w.r
l�r �nws
r l..Iw ww1l lr11
wJf lr r
w ornla a Vll• Iar
r 1 J1 v
gQnanwft A n
w rriw w�.11w
•u r
IA/•f /A!0
r awiw ila:nile
• I n w
ii\iaMiu�� w\�rww w+.w wr Ir11r
KFTO1 m U1vvm" a o0wo Y Oom Gma FL
tuna 110 PON" mrua\w IMa It
wl•.wll•w Ilne! Ila\IY r114 ft
wun awree \ >® ••a W w
MARWA DOCKAGE DAM
nufsrrr
Tf Vrr 1•Irrlrrl Tlr r
It•!\I 1•IT MI r.I .�w T
w1•\ar �•Irrlrrtl MIw A
wlvu /•/wrl Mal w•w
r let ar ••Irrl Mal wfw
wlMar II .IIrIMaI rrr
w Va1Y \•for�frci ela ..
.Iwll 1•Iwrl Mwl w\w w
r lwu r•ITrI MaI ••
r r•IIaM 1•Irrl Mal fw w i
w wrlu \•Irrl Meal wow w
REDEVELOPMENT STUDY FOR
WW(A WA AT BAYME
M]AMI, FLORIDA
DATO _ •• .n
T
PHASE 11
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Alternative Design Concept Drawings
Il. Alternative Development Concepts: Breakdown of Slip Mix
III. Alternative Development Concepts: Advantages &
Disadvantages
I
1 93- 782
PHASE II
OF
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRESENTATION
TO
CITY OF MIAMI
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
FRIDAY, JULY 23, 1993
PRESENTED BY:
KENNETH LEVENTHAL & COMPANY
WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD
COASTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
INTERNATIONAL MARINA RESOURCES, INC.
33
93- 782
PHASE III
OF
MIAMARINA
REDEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRESENTATION
CITY OF MIAMI
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
PRESENTED BY:
KENNETH LEVENTHAL & COMPANY
WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD
COASTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
INTERNATIONAL MARINA RESOURCES, INC.
S
93- 782
Revel us$
Transient Slip
Transient SHP - Day Boat Use
Day Borate - Floating Docks
Excutalon SHP
Permanent SHP
Telephone
Other Income
Total Revenues
Cod of Saks
Telephone
Other Income
Total Cost of Sates
Gross Operating Income
Operd" Expenses
Payroll a Related
Legal a Professlonal
General a Administrative
Utilities (1)
Advertising a Promotion
Security
Maintenance a Repairs
Total Operating Expenses
Gross Operating Profit
Fixed Expenses
Insurance
Reserve for Replacement
Total Fixed Expenses
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA - AVERAGE CITY WAGE SCALE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED FUTURE CASH FLOW AVAILABLE FOR
DEBT SERVICE
(in constant 1993 dollars)
1996
1997
1991
19"
2000
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Rdto
Amount
Ratio
$657,000
56.8%
$845,961
59.1%
$1,047,696
60.8%
$1,184,881
62.4%
$1,209,063
62.8%
93,093
8.0
109.064
7.6
130,385
7.6
145,204
7.6
145,204
7.5
96,841
8.4
146,823
10.3
200,534
11.6
220,951
11.6
220.951
11.5
97,090
8.4
97,090
6.8
97,090
5.6
97,090
5.1
97,090
5.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
82,125
7.1
89,425
6.2
94,900
5.5
98,725
5.1
96,725
5.0
131,400
11.4
143,060
10.0
151,840
8.8
154,760
8.1
154,760
8.0
1,157.549
100.0
1,431.442
100.0
1,722,445
100.0
1,899.611
100.0
1,923,792
100.0
78,019
95.0
82.271
92.0
85,410
90.0
87,053
90.0
87,053
90.6
98,550
75.0
107,310
75.0
113,880
75.0
116,070
75.0
116,070
75.0
176,569
15.3
189,581
13.2
199,290
11.6
203,122
10.7
203,122
10.6
980,950
84.7
1,241,861
86.8
1,523,155
88.4
1,6%,489
89.3
1,720,670
89.4
512,021
44.2
544,570
38.0
544,570
31.6
577,119
30.4
577,119
30.0
17,363
1.5
21,472
1.5
25,837
1.5
28,494
1.5
28,857
1.5
69,453
6.0
78,729
5.5
86,122
5.0
94,981
5.0
96,190
5.0
34,726
3.0
40,080
2.8
44,784
2.6
49,390
2.6
50,019
2.6
138,908
12.0
143,144
10.0
155,020
9.0
170,965
9.0
173,141
9.0
46,302
4.0
57,258
4.0
68,898
4.0
75,984
4.0
76,952
4.0
25,466
2.2
42,943
3.0
68,898
4.0
75,984
4.0
76,952
4.0
844,237
72.9
928,196
_
64.8
994,128
57.7
1,072,918
56.5
1,079,229
56.1
136,743
11.8
313,665
21.9
529,027
30.7
623,571
32.8
641,441
33.3
45,000
3.9
45,000
3.1
45,000
2.6
45,000
2.4
45,000
2.3
23,151
2.0
35,786
2.5
51,673
3.0
56,968
3.0
57,714.
3.0
68,151
5.9
80,786
5.6
96,873
5.6
101,988
5.4
102,714
5.3
Cash Flaw Available for Debt
Service 68,592 r 5.9 232,879 16.3 432.354 25.1 521,583 27.5 538,72728.0
(1) Assume* utilities for transient slips are billed to users.
Notes: Cost of sales ratio Is to departmental revenues. All other percentages are to total revenue. Th fl Its a
In constant 1993 dollars and, therefore, do not reflect the Interim effects of Inflation.
The comments and assumptions contained In this report are an Integral part of these prospective a I a
Estimates of payroll and related expenses do not reflect contractual step Increases. The Impact at nc
may have a material Impact and result In a higher payroll & related expense, therefore reducing ca fl able
for debt service.
Source: Kenneth Leventhal a Company
-mow
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA - AVERAGE CITY WAGE SCALE
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED FUTURE CASH FLOW AVAILABLE FOR
DEBT SERVICE
(in Inflated dollars)
198e 1997 1998 1999 2000
Revenasse
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount o
Transient Slip $739,036 56.8% $989.654 59.1 % $1,274,682 60.8% $1,499.253 62.4% $1,591,044 62.8%
Transient Slip - Day Boat Use 104,717 8.0 127,589 7.6 158,633 7.6 183,730 7.6 191,079 7.5
Day Bonds - Floating Docks 108.933 8.4 171,762 10.3 243,981 11.6 279,573 11.6 290,756 11.5
Excursion Sop 109,213 8.4 113.582 6.8 118,125 5.6 122,850 5.1 127,764 5.0
Permanent Slip 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Telephone 92,379 7A 104,615 6.2 115,460 5.5 122,388 5.1 127,284 5.0
Other Income 147,807 11.4 167,363 10.0 154,737 8.6 195.821 8.1 203.654 6.0
Total Revenues 1,302,085 100.0 1,674,565 100.0 2,095,618 100.0 2,403.614 100.0 2,531,590 100.0
Cost of Sales
Telephone 87,760 95.0 96,245 92.0 103,g14 90.0 110.149 90.0 114,555 90.0
Other Income 110,855 75.0 125,538 75.0 138,552 75.0 146,866 75.0 152,740 75.0
Total Cost of Saba 198,616 15.3 221,783 13.2 242,467 11.6 257,015 10.7 267,295 10.6
Gross OperatingIncome 1,103,469 84.7 1,452,802 86.8 1,853,151 88.4 2,146,599 89.3 2,264,284 89.4
Operating Expenses
Payroll & Related 575,953 44.2 637,070 38.0 662,553 31.6 730.240 30.4 759.450 30.0
Legal a Professional 19,531 1.5 25.119 1.5 31,434 1.5 36,054 1.5 37,974 1.5
General & Administrative 78,125 6.0 92,102 5.5 104,781 5.0 120,181 5.0 126,579 5.0
Utilities (1) 39,063 3.0 46,8W 2.8 54,486 2.6 62.494 2.6 65.821 2.6
Advertising & Promotion 156,250 12.0 167,459 10.0 188,606 9.0 216,325 9.0 227,842 9.0
Security 52,083 4.0 66,983 4.0 63,825 4.0 96,145 4.0 101.263 4.0
Maintenance & Repairs 28,646 2.2 50,238 3.0 83,825 4.0 96,145 4.0 101,263 4.0
Total Operating Expenses 949,652 72.9 1,085,859 64.8 1,209,509 57.7 1,357,583 56.5 1,420,192 56.1
Gross Operating Profit 153,817 11.8 366,943 21.9 643,642 30.7 789,016 32.8 844,092 33.3
Fixed Expenses
Insurance 50,619 3.9 52,644 3.1 54,749 2.6 56,939 2.4 59.217 2.3
Reserve for Replacement 26,042 2.0 41,865 2.5 62,869 3.0 72,108 3.0 75,947 3.0
Total Fixed Expenses 76,661 5.9 94,508 5.6 117,618 5.6 129,048 5.4 135,164 5.3
Cash Floor Available for Debt
Service 77,157 5.9 272,435 16.3 526,024 25.1 859,968 27.5 706,928 28.0
CO (1) Assumes Willies for transient slips are billed to users.
C.�
Notes: Cost of sales raft Is to departmental revenues. All other percentages are to total revenue. These ive financial analyses are expressed
In inflated dollars and, therefore, do reflect the Interim effects of inflation.
The comments and assumptions contained in this report are an integral part of these prospective M ci a ® e
Estimates of payroll and related expenses do not reflect contractual step Increases. The impact of ep ea
00 may have a material Impact and result In a higher payroll & related expense, therefore reducing cash lia
j`• for debt service. 9
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company if
Revenues
Transtalt Slip
Transient Slip - Day Boat Use
Day Bosts - Flos" Docks
Excursion Slip
Pei., Slip
Telephone
Other Incans
Total Revenues
Cost of Saks
Telophone
Other Income
Total Cost of Saks
Gross Operating lnconrne
Operating Expenses
Payroll a Related
Legal a Profewlonel
Manegennmrt Fee
General & Administrative
Utilities (1)
Advertising & Promotion
Security
Maintenance & Repairs
Total Operating Expenses
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA - MANAGEMENT COMPANY OPERATED
MIAMI, FLORIDA
ESTIMATED FUTURE CASH FLOW AVAILABLE FOR
DEBT SERVICE
(in constant 1993 dollars)
1998
1997
1998
1999
2000
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Raft
$657,000
56.8%
$845,961
57.8%
$1,047,696
58.9%
$1,154,881
60.4%
$1,209,063
60.9%
93,093
8.0
140,225
9.6
186,264
10.5
207,435
10.6
207.435
10.4
98,841
8.4
146,823
10.0
200,534
11.3
220,951
11.3
220,951
11.1
97,090
8.4
97,090
6.6
97,090
5.5
97,090
4.9
97,090
4.9
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
82,125
7.1
89,425
6.1
94,900
5.3
96,725
4.9
96,725
4.9
131,400
11.4
143,080
9.8
151,840
8.5
154.760
7.9
154.760
7.6
1,157,549
100.0
11462,603
100.0
1,778,324
100.0
1,961,842
100.0
1.986,023
100.0
78,019
95.0
82,271
92.0
85,410
90.0
87,053
90.0
87,053
90.0
98,550
75.0
107,310
75.0
113,8W
75.0
116,070
75.0
116,070
75.0
176,569
15.3
189,581
13.0
199,290
11.2
203,122
10.4
203,122
10.2
990,990
84.7
1,273,022
87.0
1,579,034
88.8
1,758,719
89.6
1,782,900
89.8
303,292
26.2
318,542
21.8
318,542
17.9
333,792
17.0
333,792
17,363
1.5
21,939
1.5
26,675
1.5
29.428
1.5
29,790
123,028
10.6
144,382
9.9
166,483
9.4
179,329
9.1
181,022
69,453
6.0
80,443
5.5
88,916
5.0
98,092
5.0
99.301
34,726
3.0
40,953
2.8
46,236
2.6
51,008
2.6
51,637
138,906
12.0
146,260
10.0
160,049
9.0
176,566
9.0
178,742
46,302
4.0
58,504
4.0
71,133
4.0
78,474
4.0
79,441
25,466
2.2
43,878
3.0
711133
4.0
781474
4.0
79441
758,537
65.5
854,902
58.5
_ 949,167
53.4
1,025,162
52.3
1.033:166
10.8
1.5
9A
5.0
2.6
9.0
4.0
4.0
52.0
Gross Operating Profit
222,443
19.2
418,120
28.6
629,867
35.4
733,558
37.4
749,735
37.8
Fixed Expanses
Insurance
45,000
3.9
45,000
3.1
45,000
2.5
45.000
2.3
45,000
2.3
Reserve for Replacement
23,151
2.0
36,565
2.5
' 53,350
3.0
58,855
3.0
59,581
3.0
Total Fixed Expenses
68,151
5.9
81,565
5.6
98,350
5.5
103,855
5.3
104,581
5.3
Cash Flow Available for Debt
Service
154,292
13.3
336,555
23.0
531,517
29.9
629.702
32.1
645,154
32.5
W
I
(1) Assumes utilities for transient slips are billed to
users.
Notes: Cost of sales ratio la to departmental revenues. All other percentages are to total revenue. These anti are expr
In constant 1993 dollars and, therfore, do not reflect the Interim effects of inflation.Cff
The comments and assumptions contained In this report are an Integral part of these prospective fin a w
A
Source: Kenneth Leventhal A Company
-.4
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA - MANAGEMENT COMPANY OPERATED
MIAMI, FLORIDA
r ESTIMATED FUTURE CASH FLOW AVAILABLE FOR
DEBT SERVICE AND INCOME TAXES
(In Inflated dollars)
t;p
C.�
I
Revarnus
Transient SNP
Tranalent Slip - Day Boat Use
Dry Boat - Floating Docks
Emsolon Slip
Permanent Sup
Telephone
Other knwo
Total Revenues
Cod of !Nabs
Telephm
Otter Income
Total Cost of Salsa
Groat Ope dit Income
dam Eqmses
PWW & Raleted
Legal 3 Pmksekx*
Management Fee
Gerwel b Administrative
Umes (1)
AdvertWng 3 Promotion
Maintenance & Repairs
Total Operating Eximmses
Gros Opers" Prom
Fixed Expenses
Ireurarrce
Reserve for Replacement
Total Fbed Expenses
Cash Flow Awllabk for Debt
Swvks
It"
lttt
lttt
1t000
Mount
Ratio
Ratio
NnwuM
Ratio
Arnount
Rated
Amount
Ratio
Anwint
Rath
$739,036
50.8%
$989,654
57.8%
$1,274.682
58.9%
$1,499,253
00.4%
S1,591,044
00.9%
104,TIT
8.0
164,043
9.8
228,619
10.5
262,471
10.6
272,970
10.4
108,933
8.4
171,762
Wo
243,981
11.3
279,573
11.3
290,756
11.1
109,213
8.4
113,582
6.6
118,125
5.5
122,850
4.9
127,TS4
4.9
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
92,379
7.1
104,615
6.1
115,460
5.3
122,388
4.9
127,284
'4.9
147,807
11.4
187,383
9.8
184,737
8.5
195,821
7.9
203,654
7.8
1,302,065
100.0
1,711,039
100.0
2,163,603
100.0
2,482,355
100.0
2,613,471
100.0
87,700
95.0
96,245
92.0
103.914
90.0
110,149
90.0
114.555
90.0
110.6%
75.0
125,538
75.0
138,552
75.0
148,888
75.0
152.740
75.0
198,618
134.4
221,783
132.5
242,467
131.3
257,015
131.3
267,295
131.3
1,103,489
84.7
1,489,256
87.0
1,921,137
88.8
2,225,341
89.6
2,346,175
89.8
341,162
20.2
372,649
21.8
387,555
17.9
422.353
17.0
439,248
16.8
19,531
1.5
25,668
1.5
32,454
1.5
37,235
1.5
39,202
1.5
138,390
10.6
168,907
9.9
202.552
9.4
226,908
9.1
238.212
9.1
78,125
6.0
94,107
5.5
108,160
5.0
124,118
5.0
130,674
5.0
39,063
3.0
47,909
2.8
56,254
2.6
64,541
2.6
67,950
2.5
156,250
12.0
171,104
10.0
194,724
9.0
223.412
9.0
235.212
9.0
52,083
4.0
68,442
4.0
86.544
4.0
99,294
4.0
104,539
4.0
28,60
2.2
51,331
3.0
86,544
4.0
99,294
4.0
124,539
4.0
853,251
65.5
1,000,114
58.5
1,154,607
53.4
1,297,156
52.3
1,359,575
52.0
250,218
19.2
489,142
28.6
766,329
35.4
928,184
37.4
9861600
37.8
50,619
3.9
52,644
3.1
54,749
2.5
56,939
2.3
59.217
2.3
26,042
2.0
42,776
2.5
64,908
3.0
74,471
3.0
78,404
3.0
76,661
5.9
95,420
5.6
119,657
5.5
131,410
5.3
137, 1
5.3
173,558
13.3
393,722
23.0
60 672
29.9
798,774
32.1
8o WN
32.5
(1) Assumes utilities for transient slips am bided to users. cff
Notes: Cost of sales ratio Is to departmental revenues. All other percentages are to total revenue. Ive na cal a n I
dollars and therfore, do Include the Interim effects of Inflation.
The comments aril assumptions contained In this report are an Integral part of these pros 1 one
Source: Kenneth Leventhal a Company
MAAAARINA AT SAYS=
REDtVELOM AAARINA
M M, FLORIDA
A111111111101tIPTION AND REVENUE ANALYSIS
(In constant 1003 dollars)
19M 1M7 It"
Tt1Mn1�Mt Rassnua Anslysla
Rental RatdLknaer FoctfDay
Represses aft Bat length
R.oay
Number of Sklps
Edl naked Oooupled ft Nights
Estkneted Trenelent Sop Revenues
TMVMWA S11p - Zky most Use
Average 9" AvsNeblsiay
CYdealay (Mandey-Fric!")
C?'clas0ey (Saturday - may)
Occupancy (Mandsy - F►b+y)
Oompency (Saturday -may)
EdkndW Day BablWeak (Mon - Fri)
Esanntad Day B eftlWeek (Sat - Sun)
Estknetad Annual ay Bosh
Rental Rd&Vsy Boat
Wh wats9 TrieWent slipOsy Boat Revenues
19" 2000
$1.00
$1.10
$1.20
$1.25
$1.25
40
43
46
49
50
$0.00
$47.30
$55.20
$61.25
$62.50
100
100
100
100
100
45%
49%
52%
53%
53%
16,425
171885
18,980
19.345
19,345
$557,000
5845,961
51,047,6%
51,184,881
$1.209,063
55
51
48
47
47
1
1
1.25
1.25
1.25
2
2.5
3
3.5
3.5
25.0%
30.0%
33.0%
35.0%
35.0%
85.0%
87.5%
90.0%
90.0%
90 0%
89
77
99
103
103
187
223.125
259.2
296.1
296.1
13,299
15.581
18,626
20,743
20,743
$7.00
$9.00
510.00
$10.00
510.00
$03,093
5140,225
$186.264
$207,435
$207,435
Day mat Remus Anaysh
Linear Fast Avell"
I A02
Representative Bat length
28
Day Boat CepacRy
57
Cyctesfay (Mm* - Fey)
1
Cycleday (Saturday - Sunday)
2
Occupancy (►day - Friday)
25.0%
0ocy (fin aY - Sunday)
85.0%
Estknoted Day BostsWeek (Mon - Fri)
72
Estmated ay BostsWeek (Set - Sun)
195
Esth. Annual ay Hosts
13,834
Rental RalefDay Bat
57.00
Esil., Day Bost Revenues
W6,841
broom► Flshlrrg moat Remus AnaWs
Rental Rateflkrear Foot/Day
$0.19
Slip length
40
Revenuel811p/Yesr
$2,774
Number of Sips
35
Estknaled Exnxxalon Slip Revenues
$97,090
Kwwrslon IPantief DockW Remus
Rental RateOLInser Fool/Day
SO. oo
Paralm Dockage (pnser Ibat)
162
Eatkneted 9curslon Slip Revenues
SQ
Ferry most ftralla) Dockage Remus
Rental Rate/Lineer FoolfDey
$0.00
PeraN Dockage Mieer fed)
58.5
Estmated Ferry foal SHA Revenues
SO
.�
Wder Text Dockage Remnue
00
Rental RsteA.hw Foot/Day
$0.00
Pang" Dockage (linear fed)
63
Estimated Water Taxl Slip Revenues
So
s
Source: Kenboventhel & Compeny
1,002
1,e02
1,602
1,602
30
31
32
32
53
52
50
50
1
1.25
1.25
1.25
2.5
3
35
3.5
30.0%
33.0%
35.0%
35 0%
87.5%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
80
107
110
110
234
279
315
315
18,314
20,053
22.095
22.095
$9.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$146,823
$200,534
$220.951
$220,951
$0.19
$0.19
50.19
$0.19
40
40
40
40
52,774
$2,774
$2,774
$2.774
35
35
35
35
597,090
$97,090
$97,090
597,090
$0,00
$0.00
$0.00
$000
162
162
162
162
so
SO
$0
$0
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
S0,00
58.5
58.5
58.5
58.5
SO
$0
$0
SO
$0.00
$0 00
$0.00
$0.00
63
63
63
63
SO
SO
$0
so
to
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA
MIAMI, FLORIDA
PAYROLL EXPENSE ANALYSIS - AVERAGE CITY WAGE SCALE
(in constant 1993 dollars)
`
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Selary/Person Number Total Salary
Number
Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Division Head (1)
14,500
1
$14,500
1
$14,500
1
$14,500
1
$14,500
1
$14,500
Manager - Exempt
$38.750
1
$38,750
1
$38,750
1
$38,750
1
$38,750
1
$38,750
3ecretaWftokkeeper
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
Front Desk Supervisor
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
1
24,900
CashlerICMrk
22,600
1
22,600
1
22,600
1
22,600
1
22,600
1
22,600
Cashier/Clerk - Relief
18,080
1
18,080
1
18,060
1
18,080
1
18,080
1
18,080
Lead Dock Attendant
27,550
1
27,550
1
27,550
1
27,550
1
27,550
1
21,550
Dock Attendants
23,750
5
118,750
6
142,500
6
142,500
7
166,250
7
166,250
Relief Dock Attendants
9,500
2
19,000
2
19,000
2
19,000
2
19,000
2
19,000
Ticket Collector
22,600
2
45,200
2
45,200
2
45,200
2
45,200
2
45,200
Rellef Ticket Collector
9,040
1
9,040
1
9,040
1
9,040
1
9,040
1
9,040
Maintenance Person
19,350
1
19,350
1
19,350
1
19,350
1
19,350
1
19,350
Subtotal
18
$382,620
19
$406,370
19
$406,370
20
$430,120
20
$430,120
Payroll Taxes & Benefits -Part time $4,727 $4,727 $4,727 $4,727 $4,727
(10.25%)
Payroll Taxes & Benefits -Full Time 124,673 133,473 133,473 142,272 142,272
(37.05%)`
Total Estimated Payroll Expenses $512,021 $544,570 $544,570 $577,119 $577,119
(1) Reflects 1/3 of salary
Hourly
DaysNYeek Hours Rate Salary
Relief Schedule
Dock Attendant 2 8 $11.42 $9,500
Cashier 4 8 $10.87 $18,080co I
co Ticket Collector 2 8 $10.87 $9,040
l o D
Marioer - Exempt
Secretary/Bookkeeper
Front Desk Supervisor
Cashier/Clerk
Cashier/Clerk - Relief
Lead Dock Attendant
Dock Attendants
Relief Dock Attendants
Ticket Collector
Relief Ticket Collector
Maintenance Person
Subtotal
Payroll Taxes & Benefits
(22%)
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
REDEVELOPED MARINA - MANAGEMENT COMPANY OPERATED
MIAMI, FLORIDA
PAYROLL EXPENSE ANALYSIS
(in constant 1993 dollars)
19"
1997
1998
19"
2000
Salary/Person
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
Number Total Salary
$35,000
1
$35,000
1
$35,000
1
$35,000
1
$35,000
1
$35,000
25,000
1
25,000
1
25,000
1
25,000
1
25,000
1
25,000
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
13,300
1
13,300
1
13,300
1
13,300
1
13,300
1
13,300
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
1
15,600
12,500
5
62,500
6
75,000
6
75,000
7
87,500
7
'87,500,:.
5,000
2
10,000
2
10,000
2
10,000
2
10,000
2
10,00d
12,500
2
25,000
2
25,000
2
25,000
2
25,000
2
25,000
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,800
1
20,600
181,100
17
$248,600
18
$261,100
18
261, 100
19
$273,600
19
273,600
Total Estimated Payroll Expenses
54,692
57,442
57,442
60,192
60,192
$303,292
$318,542
$318,542
$333,792
$333,792
AFT
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
Hard Costs
Dock and Piling Construction
Hydrological and Utility Costs
Other Construction & Redevelopment
Total Hard Costs
Plus: Hard Cost Contingency Factor
(10% of total hard cost)
Total Estimated Redevelopment Hard Costs
Total Soft Costs
Total Estimated Costs
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
16
$1,682,165
1,959,900
389,650
4,031,715
403,172
4,434,887
313,908
$4, 748, 795
1 DRAFT
93- 782
1
CITY .oF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
DOCK AND PILING CONSTRUCTION
Transient Docks
A Dock (6 slips)
B Dock (22 slips)
C Dock (41 slips)
D Dock (31 slips)
Total Transient Dock Construction Costs
Floating/Excursion Docks
Floating Docks
Excursion Docks
Finger Piers
Deck and Walkway Improvements
Total Floating/Excursion Dock Costs
Total Dock and Piling Construction Costs
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
$24,680
366,075
415,630
337,510
1,143, 895
486,270
42,000
10,000
538,270
$1,682,165
DRAFT
s
93— 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
HYDROLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND UTILITIES
Fire Protection System
$157,100
Domestic Water
136,200
Electrical (Docks Only)
576,200
Retrofit of Upland Electric Systems
96,975
Phone/Cable
83,800
Jet System/Debris Control (Bubbler)
22,125
Dodge Island Wave Baffle
497,500
B Dock Wave Baffle
390,000
Total Hydrological & Utility Costs
$1,95%900
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
/Y
DRAFT
93- 782
MIAMARINA - DESIGN PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
0.
bescriplion
Y E A R 1
_Y F A R
2
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
341
TESTING AND FIELD SURVEYS
Topographic Survey
BathymetrIc; Survey
Soil Borings
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Preliminary Plans
Coord. Plan w/Agencles & Contractor
Committee Review Plan & Results
Final Plans Prepared
Committee Reviews Final Plans
Prepare General Specs
Committee Reviews Specs
Prepare Technical Specs
List of Qualified Contractors
Committee Approves Bid & List
City Commission Approval
PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
Pre -Application Meetings
Prepare and Submit Applications
Meet with Agencies
Field Investigations (if required)
Permit Response I
Permit Response 2 (if req.)
Permit Response 3 (if req.)
Issue Permits
BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION SUPER.
Pre -Bid Meeting
Contract Questions
Review Bids & Award
City Commission Approvals
Pre Construction Meeting
Project Contstruction
Construction Observations & Admin.
Fl* A2eroval
To
Be
So
20
phic
Sury
By
hymetricSiurvey
I Bo
ins
ractc
rs
Pr
liminary
Flansi
Co
Co
)rd. Tian
iAG
enci
s &
Con,
nmit
ee
evie
w PI
n &
Res
Its.
Final
Co
Prepare
Pl-,
ins F
repp
-ed
mil
ee $evle
Ns F
inal
3Ian .,
General
Spe-,s
Co
nmit
ee
evi
ws Spe
Pr
pare
Technical
Specs
Lis
Co
of
:Iualffied
on
actors
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
irimit
ee iTpr
yes I
W &
List
MR.
cit,
f Col
rimls
flon,
%ppr
val
Pr
Pr
Application
N
eetIrIgs
are
and
Sutmit
\ppll,.atiols
Met
w
th A
genc
as
3
Pei
Id In
iesti
latioi
is (I
req
ifired
if rel.)
mit
les
lRes
rise
ns
Pe
E Pe
M"
It
Re
Pe
ons
t
mit
2
2--lif
esponse
e
rel:)__..__.
3
s
e Permis
Pr E
-Bid
Me E
ling
wg�ii
Coitrac
Review
citif
Qu3stions
Comis
P r e
Bids
- : Cor
&
sion
strudtion
and
Approva
ls
Mee
Ing
5!
!Inl
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
SOFT COSTS
Topographic Survey
Bathymetric Survey
Permitting Costs
Soil Borings
Permitting Fees
Architectural & Engineering (1)
Total Soft Costs
$8,000
5,000
25,000
10,000
25,000
7.5% 240,908
$313,908
(1) Full service fee through construction excluding floating dock
costs. Does not include city allocation for management.
Amount is net of $25,000 allocated to Permitting Fees.
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
U.-
'DRAFT
93- 782
CITY OF MIAMI
MIAMARINA AT BAYSIDE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND REDEVELOPMENT COSTS
(UPLAND)
General Signage
Pier 5 Retrofit
Service Buildings
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
Pier Park Edge
Total Other Construction Costs
Source: Kenneth Leventhal & Company
Wallace Roberts & Todd
International Marina Resources, Inc.
Coastal Technology Corporation
$15,000
22,650
141,000
25,000
186,000
$389,650
DRAFT'
93- 782
I Of