Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-0608J-93-644 10/5/93 RESOLUTION N0.93— 608 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AUTHORIZING THE MERCY HOSPITAL NURSING HOME AND PARKING GARAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3663 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROPOSED BY MERCY HOSPITAL; APPROVING SAID MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. WHEREAS, on June 14, 1993, Mercy Hospital submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for an additional 120-bed nursing home and 650-car parking garage pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at 3663 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on September 8, 1993, Item No.-2, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 30-93 by a vote of seven to two (7-2), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and C7TY C07 or SET' ��Irll Resolution No. 93- 608 WHEREAS, on September 27, 1993, the City Commission conducted an advertised public hearing to consider the Application for Major Use Special Permit determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Major Use Special Permit Development Order had been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 2. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage, (Exhibit "A"), is hereby granted and issued. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the Development Order (Exhibit "A"). Section 4. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner -2- 93- 608 1 affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. The effective date of this development order shall be thirty (30) days from date of adoption hereof; provided, however, that if the development order is appealed, the development order will take effect on the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this27th day of September , 1993. XAVIER L. SIJAREZ YOR ATT MA TY HIRAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: LINDA K. KEA`RSON ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: At QW INN J , I CITY ATTOR LKK:bss:M3 24 -3- EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 93- SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 MERCY HOSPITAL NURSING HOME AND PARKING GARAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing held on September 27, 1993, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage, to be located at 3663 South Miami Avenue being THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4, OF "VIZCAYA - JAMES DEERING ESTATES", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 46 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4, THENCE RUN N52047'45"E, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S37012'15"E, ALONG A LINE 40 FEET NORTHEAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 962.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N52047'45"E, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 324.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N37012'15"W, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 297.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N52047'45"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 3.11 FEET; THENCE RUN N37012'15"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N52047'45"E, ALONG A LINE 450.00 FEET SOUTHEAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 397.77 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A CIRCULAR CURVE, FROM SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION THE CENTER OF THE NEXT DESCRIBED CURVE BEARS S43038'43"W; THENCE -1- 93- 608 RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST AND HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4034'08", A RADIUS OF 1351.97 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 107.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13043'10", A RADIUS OF 1451.97 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 347.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE RUN N52047'45"E, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 470.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S37012'15"E, AT RIGHT ANGLES, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1020.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S82012'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 431.34 FEET; THENCE RUN S3701.2'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 502.09 FEET; THENCE RUN S54003'23"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1173.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N71007'14"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 545.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N37012'15"W, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1348.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 40.742 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO ANY DEDICATIONS, LIMITATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FINDINGS OF FACT NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: The Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage NAME OF DEVELOPER: Mercy Hospital AUTHORIZED AGENT Ed Rosasco, Jr., CEO OF DEVELOPER: Mercy Hospital PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage development consists of expanding Mercy Hospital to -2- 93- 608 accommodate a 120-bed nursing home and a 650-car parking garage. The project conforms to the requirements of Zoning District G/I Government Institutional District as contained in Zoning Ordinance No. 11000. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation for the parcel is Major Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities which allows the proposed parking and nursing home as integral components of the surrounding medical complex. The project also reflects recommendations received at the Miami Large Scale Development committee meeting of June 30, 1993. The project will be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., dated August 1993. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Prior to any Building Permit being issued, provide a letter assuring that the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage development has addressed all concerns of Dade County Water and Sewer Authority. 3. Prior to any Building Permit being issued, provide a letter assuring that the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage development has addressed all concerns of Metro Dade's Department of Environmental Resources Management. 4. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a letter indicating coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section to discuss the scope of the project, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. -3 93- 608 5. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a letter assuring that the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage development has addressed all concerns of the Solid Waste Department. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and make recommendations concerning security measures and systems. Submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the project security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director how such recommendations are impractical. i 7. Within six (6) months, provide evidence of reimbursement in j the amount of $2,500 to the City of Miami Department of Off - Street Parking (DOSP) for the amount advanced by the (DOSP) for the parking feasibility study prepared pursuant to the request for proposals for leased operation of the parking garage. B. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide letters from the Metro -Dade Public Works Department Traffic Division and the City's Public Works Department assuring that Mercy Hospital has addressed all traffic concerns of the respective departments. 9. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the cumulative adverse regional impact of the project, its traffic and associated pollutant emissions on air quality: a. Actively encourage and promote ridesharing by establishing a car and van pool information program; b. Provide local and regional mass transit route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project, including office complex lobbies and within and adjacent to retail areas; C. Encourage transit use by provision of bus shelters, development of turnout lanes, or provision of other amenities to increase ridership; and d. Provide on -site bicycle storage facilities to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation. 10. For the purposes of water conservation, utilize low water use plumbing fixtures, self -closing and/or metered faucets, and other water conserving devices. -4- 93- 608 11. Incorporate the use of water sensors and other low water volume landscape irrigation techniques to reduce the project demand on the region's potable water supply. 12. If, in the future, daycare is to be included in the project and is located in space above the second floor, prior to commencement of construction of the project, submit a letter of approval from the State of Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services for the location of a day care facility and submit detailed plans. If located elsewhere on the subject property, then submit detailed plans for the proposed day care center to the City of Miami. Section 936.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 requires outdoor play area of a minimum size of 400 square feet or 45 square feet per child, whichever .is greater and the National Fire Protection Association (N.F.P.A.) 101 Life Safety Code requires a minimum of thirty-five (35) square feet per child of indoor floor area; design plans for the day care facility shall be revised to accommodate these minimum requirements. Within twenty-four (24) months from approval of a certificate of occupancy or when the building is 50% occupied, whichever comes first, ensure that a day care center is open during normal work week hours and continuously operating with a minimum capacity for one hundred (100) children, unless the Planning Advisory Board relieves the Applicant of all or part of such requirements upon a showing that there is insufficient demand to justify the operation of such day care facility. 13. Record, within 30 days of the effective date of the development order, notice of the adoption of the development order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court pursuant to Section 380.06(15), F.S., specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit replat the property, if determined by the City's Department of Public Works to be necessary puruuant to the applicable provisions of the City Code. 15. Pursuant to a zoning determination by the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department dated September 1, 1993, relocation of required offsite parking during construction shall be permitted with the following conditions: (1) applicant shall provide to the City a copy of the lease or the parking agreement which will fulfill the parking requirement during construction; (2) if offsite parking is to be provided across an adjoining street or alley, parking for the project shall only be provided in a similarly zoned district; (3) the relocation shall be limited to the duration of construction up to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; and (4) the distance between -5- 93- 608 the principal entrances of the temporary parking facility and the use being served shall be limited to six hundred (600) feet. 16. Participate in the financing of widening South Bayshore Drive should such widening occur. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Establish the effective date of the Major Use Special Permit as the date the thirty (30) day appeal period for such permit ends. 2. Initiate the street closure process and schedule public hearing for the following purposes: a. To make permanent the one-way direction of Alatka Street from Ti.gertail Avenue to South Bayshore Drive. b. To make permanent the one-way direction of Halisee Street from Micanopy Avenue to South Bayshore Drive. C. To make permanent the closure of Halisee Street at U.S. 1 from both ingress and egress to and from Natoma Manors. d. To place a planter across half of Halisee Street and Atlatka Street at South Bayshore Drive, so as to assist with traffic control., thereby keeping a portion of the street egressing Natoma Manors to South Bayshore open and preventing ingress to Natoma Manors. 3. Periodically request status reports from Mercy Hospital, Inc., Bay Heights Improvement Associates and Natoma Manors Homeowners Association as the parties to that certain Agreement dated September 27, 1993 to report to the City Commission the progress of the terms and provisions set forth in said Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Applicant, to the extent feasible, shall prepare a Minority Participation Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit; it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10062, as amended, is a guide. -6- 93- 608 with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) The project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) The project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) The project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) The project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) The project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) The project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) The project will not adversely affect public safety; and I&M 93- 608 (9) Any potentially adverse effects of the project will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and Pursuant to Section 1705, Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the project i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and certificate of occupancy. TO: Matty Hirai City Clerk FROM : Linda Kel Kearson Assistant City Attorney :46 DATE : November 1, 1993 FILE SUBJECT : Mercy Hospital MUSP REFERENCES ENCLOSURES: t Pursuant to our conversation, enclosed herewith is a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Mercy Hospital, Inc. in favor of the City of Miami. Said covenant specifically restricts the size of the proposed medical office building to a maximum of 85,000 usable tenant square feet in accordance with the City Commission's directive as stated at the September 27, 1993 City Commission meeting. If additional information is needed, please advise. LKK/pb/P869 Enclosure t0 1 93- 608 rA. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the "Declaration") made this 29th day of October , 1993, by Mercy Hospital, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Mercy Hospital") is in favor of the City of Miami, Florida, a municipality of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "City"). W I T N E S E T H• WHEREAS, Mercy Hospital holds fee -simple title to certain property in the City of Miami, State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") , located at 3663 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida and legally described as: That portion of Tract 4, "VIZCAYA - JAMES DEERING ESTATES", according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 34 at Page 46 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the most westerly corner of said Tract 4, thence run N52047'45"E, along the northwesterly line of said Tract 4, also being the south-easterly right-of-way line of South Miami Avenue, for a distance of 1,172.50 feet; thence run S37012'15"E, at right angles, for a distance of 870.00 feet; thence run S5204714511W, at right angles, for a distance of 75.50 feet to the point of beginning of hereinafter described parcel of land: From said point of beginning, thence run S37012115"E for a distance of 197.00 feet; thence run S52047'45"W for a distance of 117.00 feet; thence Run N3701211511W for a distance of 66.50 feet; thence Run S5204714511W for a distance of 39.00 feet; thence Run N37012115"W for a distance of 64.00 feet; thence Run N52047'4511E for a distance of 39.00 feet; thence Run N3701211511W for a distance of 66.50 feet; thence Run N52047'45"E for a distance of 117.00 feet to the point of beginning. A Catholic hospital sponsored by The Sisters of St. Joseph of St. Augustine, Florida 3663 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33133, (305) 854.4400 9 3 - 608 WHEREAS, Mercy Hospital proposes to construct a medical office building (MOB) on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 1993, Mercy Hospital submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit (hereinafter the "MUSP") to construct a 650-car parking garage and a 120-bed nursing home on property within the Mercy Hospital campus; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, at its meeting of September 27, 1993 approved Mercy Hospital's request for the MUSP thereby granting and issuing the MUSP Development order (hereinafter the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, as a condition to said approval of the MUSP, the City Commission required that Mercy Hospital limit the size of the MOB to 85,000 usable tenant square feet, but under no circumstances shall the building exceed 90,000 gross square feet; and WHEREAS, Mercy Hospital is desirous of making a binding commitment to assure that the Subject Property shall be subject to the provisions of this Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, Mercy Hospital voluntarily covenants and agrees that the Subject Property shall be subject to the following restrictions that are intended and shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and binding upon Mercy Hospital, its heirs, successors and assigns as follows: Section 1. The recitals and findings set forth in the preamble to this Declaration are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this section. 2 93- 608 Section 2. Mercy Hospital agrees that the size of the proposed MOB shall be limited to a maximum of 85,000 usable tenant square feet, but under no circumstances shall the building exceed 90,000 gross square feet; Section 3. Effective Date. This Declaration shall become effective upon its recordation in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and shall constitute a covenant running with the title to the Subject Property and be binding upon Mercy Hospital, its heirs, successors and assigns. These restrictions shall be for the benefit of and limitation upon all present and future owners of the Subject Property and for the public welfare. Section 4. Amendment and Modification. This Declaration may be modified, amended or released as to any portion of the Subject Property by a written instrument executed by the then owner of the fee -simple title to the Subject Property affected by such modification, amendment or release, provided that the same has been approved by the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City (hereinafter referred to as the "Director"), in his or her sole discretion. Should this instrument be so modified, amended or released, the Director or his or her successor shall execute a written instrument in recordable form effectuating and acknowledging such modification, amendment or release. Section 5. Declaration. The term of this voluntary Declaration on the part of Mercy Hospital, its heirs, successors and assigns shall commence on the date this instrument is executed and shall become null and void and the Director shall execute a I 3 y3- 608 recordable release of this Covenant if Mercy elects not to construct the MOB on the Subject Property. Section 6. Inspection and Enforcement. It is understood and agreed that any official inspector of the City of Miami may have the right any time during normal working hours to inspect the Subject Property to determine whether the conditions of this I j Declaration are being complied with. An enforcement action may be brought by the City by action in law or in equity against any party i or persons violating or attempting to violate any provisions of this Declaration, either to restrain violations or recover damages. The prevailing party in an action or suit on this covenant shall be �I entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees. This enforcement provision shall be in addition to any other remedies available under the law. Section 7. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these provisions by judgment of Court shall not affect any of the other provisions of this Declaration which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 8. Recording. This Declaration shall be filed of record among the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, at the sole cost of Mercy Hospital. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands and seals this C29 �/ day of © , 1993. 4 93- 608 WITNESS: MERCY HOSPITAL, INC. Gk �. By: (P n, Edward J. Rosasco, J . i President (Print name of witness) STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1993 by Edward J . Rosasco, Jr., President of Mercy Hospital, Inc., on behalf of the corporation, and he is personally known to me. f` Not�ry Public State of Florida 1i Commission No. ti pv a,•`, 3oAN, DL.ACK .,t vvSt;te of Florida ; Ccma:is,+or: +�+ "c , t'r. '• �';',� ��Jfil`ril ;P i ��y.�It.5 �, ! %; 97 5 My Commission Expires: � //.;'l1111/r�111N/I+'lrlllll/Il/INll1!!,'!l!/lll�l! a F� JOAN BLACK ;< � e nt;.ryP::b!ic. Sta-o of FjoTidA u: r !dy G'mmiiak)it Y'zptruti SIl3;ri7 l/ � EIooEM ltta� Fk Navy �ry uc k �@ � '' 93- 608 CITY O' P.'�Ar.;l. FLOR!bi, P Z INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor and DATE SEP 171993 1ILE City Commissioners SUBJECT Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage Major Use Special Permit FROM : REFERENCES Agenda Item PZ-8 Cesloer dio City Commission Meeting Ci ENCLOSURES of September 27, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Public Hearing Item 4.0, City Commission meeting of September 7, 1993, in which traffic in Bay Heights, Natoma Manor and South Bayshore Drive was discussed, and to clarify replatting, the following underlined language is recommended for inclusion and has been incorporated into the Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage Major Use Special Permit development order attached: 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit replat the property, if determined by the City's Department of Public Works to be necessary pursuant to the applicable provisions of the City Code. 16. Upon the effective date of this development order, provide evidence to the City Manager or his designee that off -duty police officers have been hired to patrol the Bay Heights and Natoma Manor communities as well as direct traffic at the intersections of Alatka, Halissee and 17th Avenue; the committment for funding for thin; project shall not exceed $1,400 per week for the durati�n of the traffic study, described in paragraph 17 below, not to extend beyond the first City Commission meeting in January, 1994. Assignment and supervision of the police ofI_cers shall be conducted by the City Manager or his desi_aTee, pursuant to community needs. Page 1 of 2 93- 608 f i 17. Upon notification by the City's Public works Department that a consultant;has been selected, make arrangements with that consultant to finance completely a new traffic study of the Bay Heights Natoma Manor and Mercy Hospital areas to be completed by January, 1994. The objective of the study is to ( determine what options are available to reduce the commuter traffic flow through Bay Heights and Natoma Manor without adversely impacting the traffic flow on South Bayshore Drive. 18. Participate in the financing of-idening of South Bayshore Drive should such widening occur." Please note the concurring letter from Mercy Hospital which follows. CHO/ Page 2 of 2 IZ 93- 608 .t 1 Qmin MeJL:.C�' Se � �er�f�n�993 Cesar Odio City of Miami Manager 3500 Pan American Drive. Miami, F:. 33,33 Dear Mr. Odio: Post•It' oranC 'ax srnllal ^lerno7"'' 1 • of 0494M ' ,.a1 IF r Cc I1c-o. IDec, -I- QL, 114 rn 4: 25 This letter is to confirm conversations that both myself and Mr. Edward J. Rosasco, Jr. had with Mr. Waldemar Lee and with Mr. James Kay on Monday, September 13th. Mercy Hospital nas agreed to fund a traffic study of the Bay Heights/Natoma Manor and Mercy Hospital areas as soon as the Public Works Department can make the arrangements. We would like to see recommendations from the study indicating what options are available to reduce the commuter traffic flow through Bay Heights and Natoma Manor without adversely impacting the traffic flow on S. Bayshore Drive. Mercy also has agreed to fund off duty Police Officers to patrol the Bay Heights/Natoma Manor communities as well as direct traffic at the intersectk:ins of Alatka, Halissee and 17th Avenue. Our commitment for funding for this project will be $1,400 per week during the duration of ,he traffic study not to exceed the first Commission meeting in January. 1994. We will leave the organization of the Police Officers as well as their specific assignments to the Uy Manager or his designee in conjunction with community needs. We wouid like to see as much direct traffic control as possible. I would like to have the invoice for their services sent to my attention on a monthly basis. If you nave any questions regarding the commitments from Mercy Hospnal please do not hesitate to contact me at 285-2970. Sincece!y. - 1 Timotny F . FiawK iirm Vice President, Support Services dmp cc: Waldemar Lee, Assistant C!ty Manager/ Ms. Tyra Simpson Mr. George Fisher 93- 608 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Ed Rosasco, Jr., CEO, for Mercy -iosoitai Samual Poole, June 14, 1993 REQUEST/LOCATION A Major Use Special Permit for a 120-bed nursing home and 650-car parking garage for Mercy Hospital located at 3663 South Miami Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Tract 4, of Vizcaya -James Deering Estates according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 34 at page 46 of the public records of Dade County, Fl. (complete legal description on file with Hearing Boards.) PETITION Consideration of authorizing a 120-bed nursing home and a 650-car parking garage Major Use Special Permit for Mercy Hospital located at 3663 South Miami Avenue pursuant to an application for Major Use Special Permit proposed by Mercy Hospital; approving said Major Use Special Permit after considering the report and recommendations of the City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, subject to the conditions of development order for the project. BACKGROUND Two proponents and twenty-four opponents were present at the Planning Advisory Board Hearing. ANALYSIS The Mercy Hospital Nursing Hoes and Parking Garage development consists of expanding the Mercy Hospital complex to accommodate nursing home and parking needs. The project, a 120-bed nursing home and 650-tar parking garage, conforms to the requirements of Zoning District G/I Government Institutional District as contained in Zoning Ordinance 11000. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation for the project is Major Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities which allows the proposed parking and nursing home as integral components of the surrounding medical complex. Required parking for the project is 2,055, parking proposed is 2,335, leaving a surplus of 280 spaces. The project also reflects recommendations received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of June 30, 1993. Pursuant to the request of the Historic Preservation Officer, the nursing home has been relocated outside of the Environmental Preservation District along South Miami Avenue and no trees will be removed for the project. Development Order conditions for the project are typical of those for Major Use Special Permits such as the proposed parking garage and nursing home facility. Conditions specific to this project include (1) the replatting of the tract prior to obtaining a building permit as required by the City Code of the City of Miami, and (2) the satisfaction of all traffic concerns of the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval. APPLICATION NUMBER 92- 71 " PAS 09/08/93 09/10/93 Page 1 K 40a 33- 608 SYSTEMS, INC. - SOUTHEAST 6954 N.W. 12 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 (305) 477-9149 FAX(305) 477-7526 (800) 287-4799 condition FC 017 tiia[e t R a•�a '�su'wP �' ;.. s Y•. - 'rrY �yr r y i J �'F Kjj• i ,r "•ri f � �� 1 ,� v ,y •. kY•'� r y�r'.4 � r'; a�,ta'a �f� 9" �•x:•R ,}i 3 � t Al Eel Pi att �t t�`' •� � ..} . � - .dWtA tt1' a �+."}y _ , 'w Js J3 -. � L of J � A Y� i�f '•t°'�1� s ... !k'�. � J � 3�' . • � ^M Psi z .o � s _ 5f r WiibhT vr> 3 y yr < 4s !mJ tY IVA A 3 } b k t < Y 34 u�'S;;-! F2 2���333''' � � f Y���{+f+ �+'•i+ b � 'y, � Y �, y'� tvtt t r v N` $ I x£ �,yy �r4!a�z<ti f tY} �y�s%5���s3 }?T uts•,?},� :�v-..3. � vh.... � .c i � .:..:. r 3 '�,�r... .. ..,- +' APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies-- involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to thg Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I,Edward J. Rosasco hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 3663 S. Miami Ave.,Miami, Fl., 33133 Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): Nursing Home, Parking Structure Additions at Mercy Hospital Preliminary Application - I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-63 and 4a-63 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adcoted comprehensive plan desiona- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. S. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity :o major streets, schools, existino utilities, snoppine areas, imoortant physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 130:.1-.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) Now concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any "required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1.702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may.substitute). 08 Page 1 of 2 cl APPLICATION IFOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT .(Continued) '. 8. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of $13,750.60 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in' Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: MVSP APPLICATION Building(s): 650 Car Parking Garage @ 200,000 s.f. @ :05/s.f. _ $10,000.00 Other (Specify): 120 Bed Nursing Home @ 43,000 s.f. @ .05/s.f. = 21150.00 HEARING COMMISSION Advertisement - Fixed Rate = 1,000.00 Mailing (2) - $3 per x 100 Addresses 600.00 Total: $13,750.00 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature owner Ir Authorized Agent Name: Edward J. Rosasco Address: 3663 S. Miami Ave. City, State, Zip:Miami,F1. 33133 Phone: 305-285-2121 This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF TR11CT 4, OF "VIZCAYA - 7;V!ES DEERING ESTATES", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 46 OF THE PUBLIC ,RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BEING MORE PART- ICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGIN AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4, THENCE RUN N52047'45"E, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, FOR A DIST- ANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S37°12'15"E, ALONG A LINE 40 FEET NORTHEAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 962.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N52°47'45"E, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 324.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N37°12'15"W, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DIS- TANCE OF 297.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N52°47'45"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 3.11 FEET; THENCE RUN N37°12'15"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N52°47'45"E, ALONG A LINE 450.00 FEET SOUTHEAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DIS- TANCE OF 397.77 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A CIRCULAR CURVE, FROM SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION THE CENTER OF THE NEXT DESCRIBED CURVE BEARS S43° 38'43"W; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST AND HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4°34'08", A RADIUS OF 1351.97 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 107.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF RE- VERSE CURVATURE; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CEN- TRAL ANGLE OF 13043'10 A RADIUS OF 1451.97 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 347.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE RUN N52°47'45"E, ALONG THE NORTHWEST- ERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 470.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S37°12'15"E, AT RIGHT ANGLES, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1020.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S82°12'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 431.34 FEET) THENCE RUN S37°12'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 502.09 FEET; THENCE RUN S54°03'23"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1173.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N71°07'14"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 545.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N37°12'15"W, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1348.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 40.742 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED BY A. R. TOUSSAINT & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS 620 N.E. 126th ST. NORTH MIAMI, FL. 33161 PH. (305) 891-7340 ORDER NO. 10498 (1) DATE: JUNE 9, 1993 APPROVED BY : 1 C PRES. HOWARD C. GAMBLE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NO. 1683 STATE OF FLORIDA Qj SHEET I OF 2 11 > .. rr I I I i X ul m� DI �• Q st AVE. N52°47'45'E 470.00' lx' —MIIAMI {+ 334.9e 100 I 3T0.00 P.O. a J a' a 111772.50 zOE N Al '_ s Ri0`i� 39 9 S Ri0110L N O ua'a 4 32T. Sx' fl' iT9NS.StT.� i00 230.00' .at N _ 60 324.♦i' 3.11 2 tp J (../ro N e Y 0' U g 324.41 - Ibb J. p I u 1 O o � i� O w Jgs I Q : I• I� M �. o � '� uz.4a'� ras.u• r7s.si �4o.as 1173.19' NW 03' 23 W 9ISCAYNE 8 A Y DATE: JUNE 9, 1993 ORDER NO,10498 (1) 0' 1000' SCALE IN FEET SHEET 2 OF 2 12 93— 608 AFFIDAVIT 3TATE OF CLOPIDA SS -OUNTY OF DADE Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Edward J. Rosasco, Jr. , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for his to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current nam, wiling addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. (SEAL) (MGM) Sworn to and Subscr," before a this � day o 19 93- 608 po e JOAN19LACK Public, State of Florida At Large h�k ZONFNG AND LAND_ tALCULATION MERCY HOSPITAL MUSP MIAMI, FLORIDA 1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Tract 4, of "Vizcaya - James Deering Esrates", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 34 at Page 46 of the Public Rccords of Dade County, Florida; being more part.icularly described as follows: Begin at the most westerly corner of said Tract 4, thence run N 52' 47' 45" E, along the northwesterly line of said Tract 4, also being the southeasterly righr-of-way line of South Miami Avenue, for a distance of 40.00 feet; thence run S 37' 12' 15" E, along a line 40 feet northeast of and parallel with the southwest line of said Tract 4, for a distance of 962.22 feet; thence run N 520 47' 45" E, parallel with the northwest line of said Traa 4, for a distance of 324.41 feet; thence run N 37' 12' 45" W, parallel with the southwest line of said Tracr 4, for a distance of 297.22 feet, thence run N 52' 47' 45" E for a distance of 3.11 feet; thence run N 37' 12' 15" W for a disrance of 215.00 feet; Thence run N 52° 47' 45" E, along a line 450.00 feet southcast of and parallel with the northwest _ line of said Traa 4, for a disrance of 397.77 feet to a poinr of intersection with a circular curve, from said point of intersection the center of the next described curve bears S 43' 38' 43" W; thence run northwesterly along the arc of a circular curve to the left, being concave to the southwest and having for its elements a central angle of 4' 34' 08", a radius of 1351.97 feet, for an arc distance of 107.81 fret to the point of reverse curvature; thence run northWescedy along the arc of a circular curve to the right, being concave to the northeast and having for its elements a central angie of 13' 43' 10", a radius of oO 1451.97 feet, for an arc distance of 347.67 c feet to the point of intersection with the northwesterly line of said Tract 4; thence run N 52° 47' 45" E. along the northwesterly line r� -r,- r x r - - j:,..--' -- - c l-+n nn f. .. W"� Zoning & Land Cjalculataons Merry Hospitaf MUSP Page Two 2) ZONING: 3) SETBACKS: 4) ; MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 5) LOT AREA. NET; (Inside Property Lines) 6) LOT ABLA. CROSS: (To Centerline of Road & 70' Into Bay) 7) FLOOR AREA RATIO: 8) BUILDING FOOTPRINT: thence run S 37" 12' 15" E, at right angles, for a distance of 1020.00 feet; thence run S 820 12' 15" E for a distance of 431.34 feet; thcrice run S 37° 12' 15" E for a distance of 502.09 feet; thence run S 54° 03' 23" W for a distance of 1173.19 feet; thence run N 71° 07' 14" W for a distance of 545.86 Peer, thence run N 37° 12' 15" W, along the southwesterly line of said Tract 4, for a distance of 1348.30 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 40.742 acres of land, more or less. G/I Governmental and Institutional (Formerly SPl-10) Front = 10 Feet Side = 10 Feet Rear = 10 Fcet .At Setback 120 Feet 1,774,678 S.F. 40.74 Acres 1,941,736 S.F. 44.58 Acres 3,339,785 S.F. Allowable (1.72 x GLA) 933,300 S.F. Existing 245.000 5.F, Proposed 1,178,300 S.F. Total (.60 x GLA) 776,650 S.F. Allowable (.40 x GLA) 201,550 S.F. Existing 43,000 S.F.'Nop2sed 244,550 S.F. Total 03 x GLA) 9) GREEN SPACE: 291,300 S.F. Required 9 3 ! C 0 8 (.15 x GLA) I N j i Zoning & Land Calculations Mercy Hospital MUSP Page Three cC File 93-061-122-H2.d 1 A 636,700 S.F. Existing (-6.400)S.F. Proposed 630,300 S.F. Tocal (.32 x GLA) Existing Provided = 2016 Pre-1990 (SPI-10) 821,700 S.F. -t- 500 - 1644 Post-1990 (G/I) Medical Office Building 114,300 S.F. + 300 = +381 Nursing Home 120 Beds + 5 24 10 Doctors x 1 = 10 23 Employees + 3 $ +42 Proposed Required - 2067 Proposed Provided = 2105 Surplus Spaces = +38 Standard Spaces = 1994 Accessible Spaces 61 Proposed Provided 13 12x35- 3 12 x 55 - 10 Proposed Required = 7 12x55= 7 19 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CONtMUNITY AFFAIRS 0 C E ,N T E R V l E W D R I V E T A L L A H A S S E E f l O R I D A 3 2 J 9 9 t (1 tl LAWTON CHILES LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY Governor Sccretuti July 12, 1993 Mr. Charles B. Short Hellmuth, Obata, Kassabaum, Inc. 2502 Rocky Point Road, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33607 Re: Binding Letter of Interpretation of vested Rights Status File No. BLIVR-1193-001; and Binding Letter of Development of Regional Impact Status File No. BLID-1193-002 Mercy Hospital -- FINAL ORDER NO: DCA93-165-FOF-BL Dear Mr. Short: We have evaluated your combined application for Binding Letters dated August 20, 1992 and received September 10, 1992, with supplemental information supplied on February 3, April 1, April 23, June 23, and June 28, 1993. Based on the information contained in the application and other information obtained dur- ing the review of the development proposal, we enter the fol- lowing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is Charles B. Short, authorized represent- ative of Mercy Hospital, Inc., which retains title of the hospital buildings. The applicant proposes to expand the hospital facili- ties with the addition of floors five and six to Huntley Tower, a medical office building, parking garage and a nursing home. 2. The Mercy Hospital development is located in Sections 14, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Dade County. The 40.74- acre project site is situated east of South Miami Avenue at the intersection of South Miami Avenue ,and Alatka Street (Exhibit A). The boundary of the nearest county, Broward County, is approxi- mately 25 miles north. Mr. Charles B. short 'July 12, 1993 Page Two 3. The existing Mercy Hospital is a multi -use development which consists of 401 licensed beds presently in use, 220,069 gross square feet (gsf) of medical office space, 102,339 gsf of ancillary hospital services and administrative office space, and 925 gsf of retail/service space with a total of approximately 2,300 parking spaces, on 40.74 acres. The main components of Mercy Hospital are the main building (bldg. #3, containing the East Wing, West Wing, North Wing and South Tower), the Huntley Tower (bldg. #2), and the Carroll Tower (bldg. #1). The main hospital building was originally built to accommodate and was licensed for 569 beds. However, due to revi- sions in the plan of development for the hospital, 57 beds were delicensed. Therefore, Mercy Hospital presently is licensed for 512 beds. In addition, the following development is found on the 40.74 acres (Exhibit B): a. The professional office building (bldg. #4) consists of 128,345 gsf of medical office and 925 gsf of retail/service use (pharmacy) open to members of the public. b. The Radiation/Oncology center (bldg. #10) consists of 10,000 gsf of medical office space open to members of the public. c. The outpatient center (bldg. #11) consists of 75,831 gsf of medical office space open to members of the public. d. The MRI building (bldg. #13) consists of 5,893 gsf of medical office space open to members of the public. e. The four story addition to the West Wing (bldg. #14) with 24 relocated beds. The existing buildings 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 15 on Exhibit B are approximately 102,339 gsf of hospital services and adminis- trative office space that function primarily to serve patients admitted to the hospital. Therefore, the Department will consi- der these facilities as ancillary to the hospital development. The existing professional office building (bldg. #4), the existing outpatient center (bldg. #11), the existing MRI building (bldg. #13), and the Radiation/Oncology centers (bldg. #10) are designed primarily to provide outpatient services to the general public. Therefore, the Department will recognize these facili- ties as separate medical office development. In addition, the 925 gsf of retail/service space located in the existing profes- sional office building (bldg. #4) is designed primarily to serve the general public and, therefore, will not be considered as 1�t J- G O 8 1 Mr.' Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Three ancillary to the inpatient hospital services. 4. The applicant is now proposing to add an additional 100,000 gsf medical office building (bldg. #20) to serve the general public, a 120-bed nursing home (bldg. # 19), a fifth and sixth floor addition to Huntley Tower which will contain 32 re- located licensed beds (bldg. #18), a corridor and elevator with approximately 15,000 gsf of ancillary space to connect the Carroll Tower and the East Wing (bldg. #16), and a parking garage containing 500 parking spaces (bldg. #21). A proposed rehabili- tation center, described in Exhibit B as building #17, was can- celed prior to this binding letter application. Thus, after the expansion, Mercy Hospital will.consist of a total of 512 licensed beds, 320,069 gsf medical office, 117,339 gsf of ancillary hospi- tal services and administrative office space, a 120-bed nursing home, 925 gsf of retail/service area, and 2,800 parking spaces on 40.74 acres. 5. The applicant is seeking a vested rights determination pursuant to Subsection 380.06(20), Florida Statutes (F.S.) to establish whether the existing hospital and its related office and commercial facilities are vested. In addition, the applicant is seeking a determination as to whether any portions of the existing hospital and related facilities which are not vested along with the proposed development cited above would be required to undergo development of regional impact (DRI) review. Vested Rights 6. According to the applicant, the following existing fac- ilities were authorized for development prior to July 1, 1973: Carroll Tower (bldg. #1); Huntley Tower (bldg. #2); the main building (bldg. #3), containing the West Wing (floors 1-5), East Wing (floors 1-6), North Wing (floors 1-5) and the South Tower (floors 1-5); the 129,270 gsf professional office building (bldg. #4), which includes 128,345 gsf of medical office space and 925 gsf of retail/service space; a two-story East Wing addition (bldg. #5); and a four-story North Wing addition (bldg. #6) and a one-story North Wing addition (bldg. #7). According to the applicant, the hospital authorized for development prior to July 1, 1973 was originally approved to accommodate and licensed for 569 hospital beds. 7. The applicant provided information for the vested rights determination which included, in part, the following: a. Aerial photograph of Mercy Hospital dated February, 1973 showing existing hospital. 9`� COu Mr.' Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Three ancillary to the inpatient hospital services. 4. The applicant is now proposing to add an additional 100,000 gsf medical office building (bldg. #20) to serve the general public, a 120-bed nursing home (bldg. # 19), a fifth and sixth floor addition to Huntley Tower which will contain 32 re- located licensed beds (bldg. #18), a corridor and elevator with approximately 15,000 gsf of ancillary space to connect the Carroll Tower and the East Wing (bldg. #16), and a parking garage containing 500 parking spaces (bldg. #21). A proposed rehabili- tation center, described in Exhibit B as building #17, was can- celed prior to this binding letter application. Thus, after the expansion, Mercy Hospital will.consist of a total of 512 licensed beds, 320,069 gsf medical office, 117,339 gsf of ancillary hospi- tal services and administrative office space, a 120-bed nursing home, 925 gsf of retail/service area, and 2,800 parking spaces on 40.74 acres. 5. The applicant is seeking a vested rights determination pursuant to Subsection 380.06(20), Florida Statutes (F.S.) to establish whether the existing hospital and its related office and commercial facilities are vested. In addition, the applicant is seeking a determination as to whether any portions of the existing hospital and related facilities which are not vested along with the proposed development cited above would be required to undergo development of regional impact (DRI) review. Vested Rights 6. According to the applicant, the following existing fac- ilities were authorized for development prior to July 1, 1973: Carroll Tower (bldg. #1); Huntley Tower (bldg. #2); the main building (bldg. #3), containing the West Wing (floors 1-5), East Wing (floors 1-6), North Wing (floors 1-5) and the South Tower (floors 1-5); the 129,270 gsf professional office building (bldg. #4), which includes 128,345 gsf of medical office space and 925 gsf of retail/service space; a two-story East Wing addition (bldg. #5); and a four-story North Wing addition (bldg. #6) and a one-story North Wing addition (bldg. #7). According to the applicant, the hospital authorized for development prior to July 1, 1973 was originally approved to accommodate and licensed for 569 hospital beds. 7. The applicant provided information for the vested rights determination which included, in part, the following: a. Aerial photograph of Mercy Hospital dated February, 1973 showing existing hospital. 9`� COu m Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Four b. As built blueprints, dated June 21, 1947, showing the East Wing (6 floors) and West Wing (5 floors) of the main build- ing, with 184 beds. The architect was Stewart and Skinner (Job 237). c. As built blueprints, dated December 23, 1954, of the North Wing (5 floors) of the main building, which show 43 beds. The architect was Stewart and Skinner (Job # 57-93). d. As built blueprints, dated January 24, 1964, of the South Tower (4 floors) of the main building, which show 128,345 gsf of medical office space and 68 beds. The architect was Stewart and Skinner (Job # 63-255). e. As built blueprints, dated September 1, 1970, of the Huntley Tower (4 floors), which show 32 beds. The architect was Madden (Job #1132). f. As built blueprints, dated September 1, 1970, of the South Tower (5th floor) of the main building, which show 42 beds. The architect was Madden (Job #1132). g. As built blueprints, dated October 8, 1970, of the Carroll Tower (8 floors), which show 200 beds. The architect was Madden (Job #237). h. As built blueprints, dated May 21, 1971, of the 129,270 qsf professional office building, which includes 128,345 gsf of medical office space and a 925 gsf retail facility. The archi- tect was Madden (Job #1132-F). i. As built blueprints, dated January 24, 1964, of the two story East Wing addition, which includes a pharmacy for inpatient use only and a waiting room totaling 6,688 gsf. j. As built blueprints, dated January 24, 1964, of the four story North Wing addition , which includes hospital administra- tive office space totaling 9,596 gsf. 8. Section 380.06(20), F.S., provides: Nothing in this section shall limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development that has been authorized by registration of a subdivision pursuant to chapter 498 by recordation pursuant to local subdivision plat law, or by a building permit or other authorization to commence development on which there has boen reliance and change of position and which registration'or recordation 3- G0$ Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Five was accomplished, or which permits or authorization was issued prior to July 1, 1973. If the developer has, by his actions in reliance on prior regulation, obtained vested or other legal rights that in law would have prevented a local government from changing those regulations in a way adverse to his interests, nothing in this chapter authorizes any governmental agency to abridge those rights. 9. The applicant has not provided evidence of vested rights based upon an approval of an overall plan of development for the hospital or upon any authorization to commence development. Instead, the applicant has submitted as built blueprints of the floors, which show the rooms and beds of the existing hospital structures, as evidence that the hospital was in existence and operating prior to July 1, 1973 (see finding of fact #6). According to the applicant, the existing additions to the main hospital. built after July 1, 1973, include: the surgery suite (bldg. #8), Catheter Lab/Hyperbaric Chamber (bldg. #9), Radiation/Oncology Center (bldg. #10), a corridor to connect the Carroll Building to the medical office building (bldg. #12), MRI Building (bldg. #13), an outpatient center (bldg. #11), a four- story West Wing Addition on infill space (bldg. #14 containing 24 relocated beds), and a two-story West Wing Addition on infill space (bldg. #15 containing a pharmacy and waiting room). 10. Any project which was constructed or which received authorization to commence development on which there was reliance and change of position prior to July-1, 1973, is vested for pur- poses of 1DRI review pursuant to Section 380.06, F.S. The appli- cant has provided evidence that -portions of Mercy Hospital in- cluding: Carroll Tower (bldg. #1 floors 1-6); Huntley Tower (bldg. #2 floors 1-4); the main building (bldg. #3) containing the West Wing (floors 1-5), the East Wing (floors 1-6), the North Wing (floors 1-5), and the South Tower (floors 1-5) initially built to accommodate 569 beds; the 129,270 gsf professional of- fice building (bldg. #4); a two story East Wing addition (bldg. #5); and a four story North Wing addition (bldg. #6) were con- structed or under construction prior to July 1, 1973. The appli- cant did not provide any evidence to show that the one story North Wing addition ( bldg. #7) was constructed4 or under con- struction prior to July 1, 1973. Portions of the existing hospital development which are not vested include: a one story North Wing addition (bldg. #7), the surgery suite (bldg. #8), the Catheter Lab/Hyperbaric Chamber (bldg. #9), the Radiation/Oncology Center (bldg. #10), the outpatient center (bldg. #11), the Carroll -medical office ��•. QQ -I-' trvO 2] Mr. Charles B. July 12, 1993 Page Six Short tw building corridor (bldg. #12), the MRI building (bldg. #13), and the two West Wing additions (bldgs. #14 and #15). Additionally, the applicant's information shows that 56 beds have or will be relocated to buildings built after July 1, 1973 (the four story West Wing addition (bldg. #14) and the proposed two story Huntley Tower addition (bldg. #18)]; thus, the number of beds remaining in the structures built prior to July 1, 1973 is reduced to 513. DRI Status 11. No documentation or claim was presented by the appli- cant that the existing one story North Wing addition (bldg. #7), the surgery suites and central supply (bldg. #8), the catheter Lab/Hyperbaric Chamber (bldg. #9), the 10,000 gsf of medical office space (Radiation/oncology building bldg. #10), 75,831 gsf of medical office space (outpatient facility bldg. #11), the bridge from the Carroll building to the professional office building (bldg. # 12), the 5,893 gsf of medical office space (MRI building bldg. #13), the four story West Wing addition with 24 relocated beds (bldg. #14), and the two story West Wing addition (bldg. #15) were authorized or built prior to July 1, 1973. The following facilities have not received authorization to commence development: the elevator/bridge between the East Wing and Carroll Tower (bldg. #16), the addition of the fifth and sixth floor to Huntley Tower with 32 relocated beds (bldg. #18), the 120 bed nursing home (bldg. #19), the proposed 100,000 gsf medi- cal office building (bldg. #20), and the 500 space parking garage (bldg. #21). The existing buildings # 7, 8, 9, 12, and 15; and the pro- posed building # 16 function as -administrative office space or services for patients admitted to the hospital. Therefore, the Department will consider these facilities as ancillary to the hospital development. 12. Paragraph 380.06(2)(c), F.S., provides that the Depart- ment shall apply the guidelines and standards which were in ef- fect when the developer received authorization to commence de- velopment from the local government. It is the Department's policy that if a portion of a project has received authorization to commence development prior to July 7, 1989,.but a substantial addition, expansion or revision to the project has been author- ized after July 7, 1989, then the entire project will be con- sidered, for the purposes of DRI review, as having received authorization after July 1, 1989. -Any such addition, expansion, or revision is considered substantial if it exceeds the substan- tial deviation criteria specified in Subsection 380.06(19), F.S. �1 Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Seven The currently proposed 100,000 gsf medical office (bldg. #20) which has not received approval from the local government, exceeds the substantial deviation criterion specified in Section 380.06(19)(b)6., F.S. Therefore, the applicable DRI guidelines for the project are Rules 28-24.017, 28-24.020, 28-24.023, and 28-24.03.1', Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). 13. Section 380.06(2)(d), F.S., provides that development which is at or below 80 percent of all numerical thresholds shall not be required to undergo DRI review; a development that is between 80 and 100 percent of a numerical threshold shall be presumed to not require DRI review; a development at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 percent of a numerical threshold shall be presumed to require DRI review; and a development that is at or above 120 percent of any numerical threshold shall be required to undergo DRI review. Rule 28-24.017, F.A.C., provides, in part, that any proposed hospital development which has a design capacity of more than 600 beds shall be a DRI. Mercy hospital with 56 relocated non -vested beds and 101,055 gsf of non -vested ancillary service and adminis- trative space is 9.3 percent of the hospital bed threshold. Therefore, the project is not required to undergo DRI review, based solely on the hospital bed threshold. Rule 28-24.020, F.A.C., provides, in part, that the DRI threshold for any proposed office building or park operated under common ownership, development plan, or management is 300,000 square feet of gross floor area or 30 acres. The proposed pro- ject, with a combined total of 191,724 gsf of nonvested existing and proposed medical office building on approximately 5 acres is 63.9 percent of the office square footage threshold and 16.7 percent of the office acreage threshold. Therefore, the proposed project is not required to undergo DRI review, based solely on the office development threshold. Rule 28-24.023, F.A.C., also provides, in part, that any proposed residential development in a county with a population in excess of 500,000 is 3,000 dwelling units. The population of Dade County is 1,982,901 . Therefore the DRI threshold for Dade County is 3,000. The Department has determined that a nursing home shall be considered residential development. The proposed 120 bed nursing home is 4.0 percent of the residential threshold, therefore, the project is not required to undergo DRI review, based solely on the residential threshold. Rule 28-24.032, F.A.C.,, Multi -use development, provides, in part, that the DRI threshold for any proposed development with � - U; 8 23 Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Eight two or more land uses is reached when the sum of the percentages of the appropriate thresholds identified in Chapter 28-24, F.A.C., and Section 380.0651, F.S., for each land use in the development is equal to or exceeds 145 percent. For each land use, the Department will analyze the highest percentage of the appropriate numerical thresholds for that use. The sum of the percentages of the appropriate thresholds for each of the above named land uses in the proposed development equals 77.2 percent, which is 53.2 percent of the multi -use threshold. Therefore, the proposed development is not required to undergo DRI review based solely on the multi -use threshold. 14. All commitments made by the applicant, all materials submitted by the applicant in the application, and all other relevant written materials are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. 15. On September 25, 1992, notice of this request for a Binding Letter of Interpretation was published in the Florida Administrative Weekly. In addition the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the City of Miami were notified. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Department concludes that the following development is vested from compliance with Chapter 380, F.S., pursuant to Section 380.06(20), F.S.: Carroll Tower (bldg. #1), Huntley Tower (bldg. #2), and the main building (bldg. #3) containing the West Wing (floors 1-5), East Wing (floors 1-6), North Wing (floors 1- 5) and the South Tower (floors 1-5) which can accommodate 513 beds; the 129,270 gsf professional office building (bldg. #4), which includes 128,345 gsf of medical office space and 925 gsf of retail/service space; a two-story East Wing addition (bldg. #5); and a four-story North Wing addition (bldg. #6). However, the Department concludes that the following devel- opment is not vested: a one-story North Wing addition (bldg. #7), the surgery suite (bldg. #8), the Catheter Lab/Hyperbaric Chamber (bldg. #9), the 10,000 gsf of medical office space (Radiation/On- cology Center bldg. #10), the 75,831 gsf of medical office space (outpatient center bldg. #11), the Carroll -medical office build- ing corridor (bldg. #12), the 5,893 gsf of medical office space (MRI building bldg. #13), the four story West Wing addition con- taining 24 relocated beds,(bldg. #14) and the two story West Wing addition (bldg. 15), the proposed 100,000 gsf medical office building (bldg. #20), the addition of the fifth and sixth floor to Huntley Tower with 32 relocated beds (bldg. #18), the 120 bed 45 v Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Nine nursing home (bldg. #19), the elevator/bridge between the East Wing and Carroll Tower (bldg. #16), and the 500 space parking garage (bldg. #21). 2. Based on Finding of Fact No. 13, the nonvested develop- ment in Mercy Hospital is less than 80 percent of all applicable DRI thresholds. Therefore, pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(2)(d), Florida Statutes, the Department concludes that the nonvested development is not required to undergo DRI review. ORDER 1. The existing and proposed Mercy Hospital development, as described above, shall not be required to comply with the review requirements of Section 380.06, F.S. 2. Any proposed changes to the vested portion of the pro- ject may require further review pursuant to Sections 380.06(4)(e) and (f), Florida Statutes. 3. The nonvested development as described in Conclusion of Law No. 1 shall be considered cumulatively with any future addi- tional development in terms of the guidelines and standards con- tained in Chapter 28-24, Florida Administrative Code, and Section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, and its associated regional impacts. Should any of the above representations made by the applicant be substantially changed, including those regarding the abandonment of building # 17, further review of the project may be required. 4. The determination in this binding letter specifically regarding the development of regional impact status of the non - vested development shall expire and become void on July 12, 1996, unless the plan of development has been substantially commenced by that date. This date may be extended by mutual agreement of the Department, the local government of jurisdiction, and the de- veloper. This binding letter of interpretation has been issued pur- suant to the procedural requirements of Subsection 120.57(2), F.S., and constitutes final agency action appealable within 30 days to a District Court of Appeal pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes. If you wish to present oral or written evi- dence, or written statement in opposition to this agency action, you must file with the Department a written request for an.oppor- tunity to do so within 30 days from this date. Such a request for a reconsideration shall be made in accordance with Rule 9J- 2.016, Florida Administrative Code, and will be responded to by the Department pursuant to Paragraph 120.57(2)(a), F.S. m i i i Mr. Charles B. Short July 12, 1993 Page Ten This determination does not obviate the need to comply with other applicable state or local permitting procedures. Any questions regarding this determination may be directed to Jim Snyder in the Bureau of State Planning at (904) 488-4925. Sincerely, Q' J.`'Thomas Beck, Chief Bureau of State Planning ! JTB/jts Attachments cc: Mr. Rob Curtis (SFRPC) {� Mr. Sergio Rodriguez (City of Miami) i FILING ANO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FILED, on !�i's ;ia;2, r;',iz t''c Departnierzt. of wt iich 4rtnient Date Clerk j • 93- 608 26 _a • a r. iLil ,II a'1 4 i ,Off / � P� • •. �" � �5/� X W i LOCATIOti 1%1:1P 93- 60827 + Z" tntnn t r fna-Mini S 1 II l:::i5TI4G r_��: MERCY HQSf ITA_. � ��� `i -- 1G63 SCUTtl M{AMI AVE �, iIOQlNIHfl!!I!IlIIUIIpINI �IIiIIiNIII y r.�l.�+ 111 1++.. 1AI APA1- rt UA11)A 33133 i 113 / �1IIIIIUlFUIIIIIIJiUlUI111i1 FIIIB11 .1 13 I1411 11 � M \1.% $It ro'l l + (ittittrUT►tlnmirut"I1N11� iillllllltllll 4 Frlt/i +•il 6.1• 182 m1 fi tK."� '1 1tIlIlAiilttAitil- Imo., IfI11ii18i1 fltii{ttlil 11 11 t Lit SALLE NIGH SCHOOL scaic 1"•itt't///f! 4t' II 26 S At. ! { �1 a lIIIIIIlIl1 O4IIIIIIIIt 11 N t S'IY N lti+. ' -..�- x a I y i :^ent:•tttmtv.l,.+1...._._�_ �__._ V > /�- `� __�'l �..... .,,,��\` t —pllllf11111191111iFilll' ......... �i1111ii1 �•t' � - � x ,+ t:,.t t+, ., ,. 1 1171iti1 � t ��3►isY31f1t1�� It v tA1ttl�l+/ 1 +,1ut11 _` ! f ''°"'•"' oil IiIII QIIIIIIIIIII10: 2' 10 tlAl -St t'I+. }i1 GnNaG1 I rn lft/SltTiltj ,tl II Ui nI Ai It' - I t aIIIIIII IIIIIIII III IIIU 1 ! 02 Eitt/t ^Ild+q I t _ I tIIIIII u // c m 2ecm ��!ttt:'illlllll WAY _ - �+� _ IM�aGY"1 ( iiriltLJttlfl UT/ll7l!/ I �,--1 MERCY II 1,, l�/uunnUltilllil!! (}r�'t�+s�� r HC}SFTRAL 3 (+ .-r -- !r 1 l i"Ht}I'. LONG ' ouil-WfiiHT �i.,r.:Y� l J 43.'_`t t 1D 4j t yQpgt�! tQ1T 8 11 �' ik i i i vil:k S o l` 't- 1 �iINIIIINl41 S . ...Mimi--•.�.._> 'I 14 I:U III i, t.l nt I 3 20 aa1 1> 111 r 1111 . Oil FP / f �1 i::XHiBrr 11 (Adapted by DCA from applicant's exhibit) Mercy Hospital Nursing Home and Parking Garage Major Use Special Permit Large Scale Development Committee ~ Summary of Minutes June 30, 1993 Scheduling of required public hearings for the project was discussed and it was concluded that because of: (1) the time necessary for revision of plans to relocate the nursing home facility outside of the Environmental Preservation District (and thus avoid the need to have the project go before the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board); and (2) in order to meet the deadline of November 1, 1993 for start of construction pursuant to a State of Florida Nursing Home Certificate of Need the following dates would be tentatively scheduled, subject to approval by the City Attorney of scheduling both PAB and City Commission meetings in the same month: Planning Advisory Board - September 8, 1993 City Commission - September 23, 1993 (editor's note: subsequently moved to September 21, 1993 and, subsequent to that, September 27, 1993). Effective date of Major Use Special Permit - October 23, 1993 (editor's note: subsequently moved to October 21, 1993 and, subsequent to that, October 27, 1993). The applicant next provided an overview and history of the project as well as a discussion of the phasing of the project in relation to the recently permitted medical office building; the parking garage is necessary to meet the required parking for the office building. He indicated that the Department of Community Affairs would be issuing a binding letter that the cumulative amount of construction at the Mercy Complex since 1973 does not constitute a Development of Regional impact requiring state review. No substantive future phases are presently planned. Traffic impacts on South Bayshore Drive and the Bay Heights and Natoma Manor neighborhoods were next discussed in light of recent discussion of barricading entrances to the areas. The applicant indicated that the nursing home with off-peak visitors and off- peak nursing staff shift changes is not expected to generate additional peak hour traffic. Sewage treatment and WASA easement encroachments were next discussed. The applicant indicated that discussions with Miami - Dade WASA were ongoing as to the location and capacity of an onsite of sewage treatment facility in light of the recent moratorium on new sewer hookups; no problems with the location of -�� 29 such a facility were anticipated. WASA indicated that the previously proposed location of the nursing home would entail encroachments onto their easements; the nursing home's relocation outside of the EPD would also resolve this problem. Solid Waste Department concerns as to the location and enclosure { of a solid waste service area were noted and the applicant will submit revised plans showing the location of the enclosed service area. Zoning concerns, primarily including location and dimension of parking and loading spaces, were next addressed. (A list of detailed changes to design plans was reviewed with the applicant and all have been reflected in the subsequent resubmittal.) The applicant expressed concerns about being able to start construction, as evidenced by pulling a building permit, by the November 1st deadline. Discussion turned to whether the City would issue a building permit prior to the completion of all inspections if the applicant offered the City a "hold -harmless" letter and assumed any responsibility if inspections resulted in the withdrawal of a permit. It was concluded that this would not be appropriate. Instead, the applicant would submit revised building plans for a "dry -run" in mid -August; this would allow ample time for the applicant to satisfy any concerns of the Building and Zoning Division and obtain the necessary foundation permit during the one -week window between the effective date of the MUSP resolution and the November 1st deadline. A question was next raised as to the platting of the project and whether the plat submitted reflects a recent conveyance to the Archdiocese. The applicant indicated he would research the survey and provide all submittals necessary to establish an acceptable plat. Fire access and water flow were next addressed and it was concluded that proper access for emergency service is available. The applicant had received comments from the Fire Plans Review section as to extension of a 12-inch water main and they were involved in ongoing discussions as to the exact location of the water main. It was concluded that the project would receive an exemption from review by the Dade County Shoreline Review Committee. The transportation planner suggested that the applicant should contact Peter Hernandez, Chief of the Dade County Traffic Division, for review of intersection signalization and any concerns which would have to be addressed. The transportation planner next asked about shuttle and bus connections, transit ridership and ride -sharing incentives offered by the hospital as a means of alleviating the traffic impacts; the applicant 30. 93- 608 explained current and proposed public transit incentives being offered. The Florida Pow -or and Light representative next asked about electric access easements and it was determined that there would be no impact on existing easements. Impacts on the Environmental Preservation District were next discussed and it was agreed that the nursing home should be relocated outside of the EPD; if so, no historic and Environmental Preservation Board review would be required. The preservation officer requested a landscaping plan and tree survey overlaid on the relocated footprint and discussed appropriate landscaping standards. The meeting was then adjourned. 93- 608 31 MIAMI-DAD_ WATER ANC SEWER AUTHOH17Y 7_?AR7M_ti7 D O Box 330316 ma- C�^,Ce aC MIAAAI, FL.ORIOA 33233-0316 �.41 $ .N�u ` "4", T���o�o�e 6fi. <'' June 29, 1993 City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Att: Mr. Joseph W. McManus Deputy Director Re: Larae Scale Develc nen_ Comni--ee , Mercy N ors _-1c Home and Fart:ing Sarace Major '-'se Special Per::._": App__ca__- Cn. Dear Mr. McManus: *:iani-Dade Wa-er and Sewer Authority Depar ment` s co.;-Wents c7 _.._ above referenced anclication are as fOl_ow: h = T. :+ere are existing 24, _Z , and c _nc*- water mans sere _. - _..e srocerty. _ :ease nc_e tzat _.._s Depar=:,len-_--- ==-_-=t_es __n==W-s` c'--- _n_-pede= a==ess _- *!-DN=S=-= s =a==-==-es--=a-ec _' ease:-.=_-:__ -car, ' ----�. _-'�'__25 �--• _- _ = -•-----. __' ._....',;.. _= _••= � =-= -=- = 93- 608 City of Miami June 29, 1993 Page Two 1 Connections to the existing sewer system may be performed provided that this system has enough capacity to accept the additional :low. However, please be aware that Metro-Dade's Department of Environmental Resources Management (D.E.R.M.) has sanitary sewer connection restrictions in place fcr new connections.• that would increase flow to the presently overburdened sewer system. As such, please contact D.E.R.M. for additional information regarding this matter. Sincerely, of el 'B2 Wiles ter os , P.E. head Plans Review Engineer RB/JFS/ogp cc: Pick Herrera, P.E., Chief, Utilities Development Division Tomas Goicouria, New Business Manager Jose Soto, Utilities Unit Supervisor file 33 tf+ i k- HeUmuth, Obata &Kassabaum, Inc. 25 02 Rocky Point Road. Suite !OU ,Architecture, Interiors. Planning, Graphics, Engineering Telephone 813 281 0533 F.AX ; 813 Z 8 1 3n-; April 23, 1993 Mr. Jim Snyder Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: Mercy Hospital BLIVR - 1193-001 BLID - 1193-001 Dcar J im: Please find atache:d the information that you requested for the Mercy Hospital DRI j binding letter application. This information has been obtained through hospital ` personnel research of existing documents. I hope this information will complete the requirements for the application. Please let me know if you have any questions. f i y' i- es Sham, Vice Presi e Hcalth Care Fasilitie3 CBS:nm Enclose Ofaces in: St. Louis. Mlsaauri San Francisco, California Dallas. Texas New'&rk, New York London 3 4Kaasas city, m1muri Los Angela. Califomis Tampa, Florida Washington. D.C. Hong Ko: C�0;b MAIN HOSPITAL "BUILDING BUILT 1947 ARCHITECT: STEWART & SKINNER JOB #237 3rd Floor Fast 36 Beds 1993 Beds 0 4th Floor East 35 Beds 1993 Beds 0 5th Floor East 21 Beds 1993 Beds 0 6th Floor East 35 Beds 1993 Beds 0 3rd Floor West 19 Beds 1993 Beds 28 4th Floor West 19 Beds _ 1993 Beds 28 5th Floor West 19 Beds 1993 Beds 8 Subtotal 184 Beds 1993 Beds 64 NORTH TOWER BUILT 1957 ARCHITECT: STEWART & sKINNER JOB #57-93 2nd Floor North 8 Beds 3rd Floor North 8 Beds 3rd Floor Norm 27 Beds Subtotal 43 Bc& SOUTH TOWER BUILT 19" ARCHITECT: STEWART & SINNER JOB #63-255 3rd Floor South 26 Beds 4th Floor Southeast 20 Beds 4th Floor Southwest 21 Beds Subtotal 67 Beds See Noce 1 See Noce 2 See Noce 2 See Note 2 See Noce 12 See Note 12 See Noce 12 1993 Beds 0 See Noce 4 1993 Beds 0 See Note 4 1993 Beds 0 See Note 3 1993 Beds 0 1993 Beds 15 1993 Beds 15 1993 Beds 15 1993 Beds 45 See Noce 5 See Note 6 See Note 6 93- 608 35 101 HUNTLEY TOWER BUILT 1970 ARCHITECT: MADDEN JOB #1132 3rd Floor 16 Beds 1993 Beds 16 See Noce 7 4ch Floor 16 Beds 1993 Beds 16 See Noce 7 Subtotal 32 Beds 1993 Bedr 32 SOUTH TOWER _ BUILT 1970 ARCHITECT: MADDEN JOB #1132 5ch Floor 42 Beds 1993 Beds 37 See Noie 8 Subtotal 42 Beds 1993 Beds 37 - J CARROLL TOWER BUILT 1970 ARCHITECT: MADDEN JOB #237 4ch Floor 40 Beds 1993 Beds 43 See Notes 9 & I 5th Floor 40 Beds 1993 Beds 45 See Noce 9 6th Floor 40 Beds 1993 Beds 45 See Note 9 7th Floor 40 Beds 1993 Beds 45 See Note 9 8th Floor 40 Beds 1993 Beds 45 See Note 9 Subtotal 200 Beds 1993 Beds 223 TOTAL J68 Bedi 1993 Beds 401 n + s V nA:- NOTES 1 1982 Renovation into Respiratory Therapy Unit Architect - Seckinger Job No. 8114 2 1977 Renovation to Hospital Support Services Refinishes to walls , floor, painting By Hospital 3 1974 Renovation to Renal Dialysis and Echo Architect - Seckinger , Job No. 7337 4 1970 transferred 16 bed intensive care unit to the 3rd & 4th floors of Huntley Tower 5 1985 Renovation to 3 & 4 West Architect - Hansen, Lind, Meyer Job No. 8239.14 6 1985 Renovation from 41-bed medical surgical unit to 30 bed psychiatric unit Architect - Hansen, Lind, Meyer Job No. 8239.14 7 See Note No. 4 8 Converted 6 beds to NICU and converted all semi -privates to private rooms to 31 beds O t NOTES - CONTINUED r 9 1981 Added 4 beds CON No. 1635 Architect - Seckinger Job No. 81-08 10 1981 Added 5 bed CON No. 1635 Architect - Seckinger Job No. 81-0$ - 11 1992 one bed deleted 20 beds Converted to Rehab beds Architect - Rosser Fabrap International Job No. 00'883.00 i 12 1985 Renovation Added 18 Beds Deleted 11 Beds for net add of 7 beds Architect - Hansen, Lind, Meyer r Job No. 8239.14 38 i f l j i I <v METROPOLITAN DADE (...,LINTY, FLORIDA ,e�IO►� MMO D De e���! ® METRO -DADS CENTER OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT COMMITTEE SUITE '210 111 N.W. 1s1 STREET WAMI. FLORIOA 33128.1973 1305) 375.2557 April 17, 1991 Mr. Charles B. Short, A.I.A. Rosser Fabrap International 1715 North Westshore Boulevard Suite 720 Tampa, Florida 33607 Re: Mercy Hospital -Parking Structure and Office Building Addition (Shoreline Appl. 91-3) Dear Mr. Short: As you are aware by your attendance at today's meeting of the Executive Council of the Developmental Impact Committee, it voted to approve your request for a "No Need to Comply" determination. The Council reviewed plans prepared by your firm and determined that the proposed addition will not alter the immediate bay shoreline or alter the physical or visual character of the shoreline setback area. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to call me at 375-2559. AAD:mg Sincerely, &L,q— A , ". Alex A. David, Coordinator Shoreline Development Review Committee y, 0' , ;)C i t� t 39