The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-93-0414J-93-464 6/30/93 RESOLUTION NO. 9 3 - 414 A RESOLUTION REJECTING THE PROPOSALS SUBMITTED BY DOWNTOWN DISTRIBUTORS, INC., NOR-MUNDO CORPORATION AND PALM LIQUOR LOUNGE, INC., IN RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) ISSUED JUNE 1, 1992, BY THE CITY OF MIAMI FOR THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (UDP) CONSISTING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON CITY -OWNED RIVERFRONT PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN S.W. 2ND AND 3RD STREETS ON S.W. NORTH RIVER DRIVE, ALONG THE MIAMI RIVER, IN MIAMI, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, on March 12, 1992, the City of Miami Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-156 declaring that the most advantageous method to develop certain improvements on the City -owned riverfront property located between S.W. 2nd and 3rd Street on S.W. North River Drive, on the Miami River, Miami, Florida, is by the Unified Development Project (UDP) process, as set forth in City of Miami Charter Section 29-A(o) and City of Miami Code Section 18-52.9; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 92-156 a public hearing was held on May 14, 1992, to take testimony regarding a Request for Proposals (RFP) for this UDP; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing, the City of Miami Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-326 authorizing the issuance of a RFP on June 1, 1992, for this UDP which consisted of the development of marine activities including a restaurant CITY COMMISSION N$ETING OF JUL 0 9 1993 Aerolulion Na 93- 414 with water -dependent use on the City -owned riverfront property located on S.W. North River Drive along the Miami River, in Miami, Florida; and WHEREAS, a RFP was issued by the City of Miami on June 1, 1992, having a proposal submission deadline of September 8, 1992; and WHEREAS, due to the request of prospective respondents and Hurricane Andrew, the proposal submission deadline was delayed twice; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 1993, a total of three proposal submissions were received from Downtown Distributors, Inc., Nor-Mundo Corporation and Palm Liquor Lounge, Inc.; and WHEREAS, said proposals were reviewed by City staff for compliance to the requirements of the RFP; and WHEREAS, said proposals are severely deficient in providing the information required by the RFP and are thus determined to be non -responsive to the RFP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures set forth in the RFP, proposals that are non -responsive to the RFP shall be rejected by the City of Miami Commission prior to the UDP evaluation process; and WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Department of Development recommend rejecting all proposals received for said project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference 33- 414 -2- thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The proposals from Downtown Distributors, Inc., Nor-Mundo Corporation and Palm Liquor Lounge, Inc. in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) issued June 1, 1992, by the City of Miami for the Unified Development Project (UDP) consisting of the development of certain improvements on city -owned riverfront property located between S.W. 2nd and 3rd Streets on S.W. North River Drive, along the Miami River, in Miami, Florida, are hereby rejected as determined to be non -responsive to the requirements of the RFP for this UDP. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of July 1993. ATTEST: MATTY RIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: CARMEN L. LEON ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CLL/mis/csk/M3704 -3- XAVIER L/.)SUAREZ, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: n •� 93- 414 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayar and Members To: of the City Commission FROM : Ce dlo CiVager DATE : J U N 2 81993 FILE Resolution Rejecting SUBJECT three proposals received for the SW North River Drive Property UDP REFERENCES: For City Commissi-on Meeting of 7/08/93•. ENCLOSURES: It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Resolution rejecting the proposals submitted by Downtown Distributors, Inc., Nor-Mundo Corporation and Palm Liquor Lounge, Inc., in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) issued June 1, 1992 by the City of Miami for the Unified Development Project (UDP) consisting of the development of certain improvements on City -owned riverfront property located between S.W. 2nd and 3rd Street on S.W. North River Drive, along the Miami River, Miami, Florida. The Department of Development recommends that the attached Resolution be adopted by the City Commission on July 8, 1993 thereby rejecting the proposals received by the City of Miami in response to the RFP for the S.W. North River Drive property. On June 1, 1992, a RFP was issued for this UDP which consisted of the development of marine activities including a restaurant with water -dependent use on the City -owned riverfront property. After two postponements of the proposal submission deadline, three proposals were received by the City on February 8, 1993. The respondents were Downtown Distributors, Inc., Nor-Mundo Corporation and Palm Liquor Lounge, Inc.. 33- 414 a Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page two The three proposals were reviewed by City staff to determine compliance with the requirements of the RFP. It was determine that all three proposals were severely deficient in providing the information required by the RFP. Deficiencies for each of the respondents' proposals are noted as "No" in the attached form entitled "Checklist for February 8, 1993 Proposal Submissions Compliance to the RFP". In accordance with the regulations set forth in the RFP, proposals which are found to be deficient in providing the information required and are thus non -responsive, shall be rejected by the City of Miami Commission. Attachments: Checklists Proposed Resolution 93- 414 9 I. SW NORTH RIVER DRIVE PROPERTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CHECKLIST FOR FEBRUARY 8, 1993 PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS' COMPLIANCE TO RFP Yes No Proposal Format and Content of Submission Procedures (page 30 of the RFP) 1. Received by 2:00 p.m., February 8, 1993 at the City Clerk's Office 2. $1,500 cashier check with submission �-- 3. One (1) original and twelve (12) copies of a complete proposal submission in an 8 1/2" x 11" bound format 4. One (1) set of board -mounted illustrative drawings not to exceed 30" x 40" prepared by a registered architect. 5. Completed and signed forms included in Exhibit II entitled as follows: a. Declaration b. Organizational Structure C. Financial Disclosure and Professional Information d. Proposer's Questionnaire_ e. Partnership Statement or f. Corporation Statement g. Experience Statement of Proposer. -lef- t-- h. Financial Data of Proposer i(_A)O ItU'hl rp f`ioAti cit2�._, i. References of Proposer n:fel ev?)Jf r/-ovipr. L„ j . Proposer's Architect/Engineer Questionnaire RIOT (nmrtt.fTf k. Experience Statement of Proposer's Architect/Eng. 11 y- 1. Background Data of Proposer's Architect/Eng. m. References of Proposer's Architect/Engineer it - V n. Architect/Engineer's Subconsultants' Questionnaire" o. Experience Statement of Architect/Eng. Subs. s► p. Background Data of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants !� q. References of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants 93- 414 Initial Review Checklist :DOUYJ,7�U��O'Disu(SOVC;+Tj Page 2 Respondent Yes No r. Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager questionnaire . r-OQAI)OT C O$,( P(E.19!.tt) 1/ S. Experience of Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager rorp - #,)d't Ct1m pe-F-1 r-J) Z.�^ t. Background Data of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager U. References of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager "t�riv il•.i" C w rArirD V. Proposer's Restaurant Operator Questionnaire W. Experience Statement of Proposer's Restaurant Operator f--C At A)01 C.OM(14TI Ij At X. Financial Data of Proposer's Restaurant Operator y. References of Proposer's Restaurant Operator 6. Completed Minority Participation Documentation included in Exhibit III. K)0 �W-f (P-01111t)E Ac'lWN RA-0 yr- II. Proposal Submission Requirements (Page 18-20 of the RFP) Credentials 1. Evidence demonstrating the development team's ability to undertake and complete development of a facility for marine activities which may include a restaurant with water -dependent use. ow l.. v ryi proctl v, 6 f: t?crl= iii lije • R 1= t-r A tip -A W? 2. Evidence demonstrating the development team's expertise in the following disciplines (current active licenses required): Architecture �...• Engineering Landscape Architectural -L 3. A Financial Strategy 4. A Proposed Lease Term complementing the financing strategy and/or depreciation schedule. 5. A $42,500 minimum annual guaranteed rental payment to the City or the dollar amounts for payment to the City of a percentage of gross revenues collected, whichever is greater, in accordance with Section IV.C. of the RFP.y 93- 414 Initial Review Checklist Page 3 Respondent 6. Project development and Operating Pro Formas of anticipated project income and expenses projected for length of lease term 7. Project Implementation Schedule B. Project Management Plan 9. Development Plan: a. Description of all aspects of the plan b. Architectural character and features of the development C. Number of buildings and use, sq.ft., height d. Methods of construction e. Number of boat slips f. On -site loading and service parking requirements g. Lot No. 17 parking requirements 10. Schedule and Type of Project Amenities III. Additional Requirements 1. A response to all applicable aspects of the contract Terms and Conditions as detailed in Section VII. of this document. 2. Letters of commitment from financial institutions documenting the proposer's ability to finance all aspects of the proposed development. 3. Letters indicating the proposer's ability to obtain required bonds and insurance. 4. Documentation of minority participation pursuant to the goals set forth in City of Miam Ordinance No. 10538. ( ti'1 T ( 0t.�PL-[- 1) Yes 1_Q 100''' W/-1I 4--' v s 93- 414 I. A)nP,-MUA)tin Caeognealm) Respondent SW NORTH RIVER DRIVE PROPERTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CHECKLIST FOR FEBRUARY 8, 1993 PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS' COMPLIANCE TO RFP Proposal Format and Content of Submission Procedures (page 30 of the RFP) 1. Received by 2:00 p.m., February 8, 1993 at the City Clerk's Office 2. $1,500 cashier check with submission 3. One (1) original and twelve (12) copies of a complete proposal submission in an 8 1/2" x 11" bound format 4. One (1) set of board -mounted illustrative drawings not to exceed 30" x 40" prepared by a registered architect. 5. Completed and signed forms included in Exhibit II entitled as follows: a. Declaration b . Organizational Structure ( fo t , , •t) •i i vi ) C. Financial Disclosure and Professional Information d. Proposer's Questionnaire e. Partnership Statement or f. Corporation Statement g. Experience Statement of Proposer h. Financial Data of Proposer(Wo rA.)ji,tg111J. i. References of Proposer A)(W (r)rA PL.r'I+`, J. Proposer's Architect/Engineer Questionnaire k. Experience Statement of Proposer's Architect/Eng. 1. Background Data of Proposer's Architect/Eng. m. References of Proposer's Architect/Engineer n. Architect/Engineer's Subconsultants' Questionnaire o. Experience Statement of Architect/Eng. Subs. p. Background Data of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants q. References of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants Yes No v y 1✓• y 93- 414 Initial Review Checklist oijDo 1- ioue,4T1m) Page 2 Respondent Yes No r. Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager Questionnaire. S. Experience of Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager t. Background Data of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager U. References of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager V. Proposer's Restaurant Operator Questionnaire w. Experience Statement of Proposer's Restaurant Operator X. Financial Data of Proposer's Restaurant Operator �- y. References of Proposer's Restaurant Operator t.r 6. Completed Minority Participation Documentation included in Exhibit III. II. Proposal Submission Requirements (Page 18-20 of the RFP) Credentials 1. Evidence demonstrating the development team's ability to undertake and complete development of a facility for marine activities which may include a restaurant with water -dependent use. r�I:�t,�;" �'F ��f}JW.�rt? r`.��i�?�ff�t'��f�tJ► Lr-- 2. Evidence demonstrating the development team's expertise in the following disciplines (current active licenses required): Architecturey Engineering Landscape Architectural' 3. A Financial Strategy �- 4. A Proposed Lease Term complementing the financing strategy and/or depreciation schedule. 5. A $42,500 minimum annual guaranteed rental payment to the City or the dollar amounts for payment to the City of a percentage of gross revenues collected, whichever is greater, in accordance with Section IV.C. of the RFP. 93- 414 Initial Review Checklist Page 3 luorl—doliD6 C()1fP0ftT11(A) Respondent Yew No 6. Project development and Operating Pro Formas of anticipated project income and expenses projected y for length of lease term !i 7. Project Implementation Schedule' 8. Project Management Plan 9. Development Plan: a. Description of all aspects of the plan L b. Architectural character and features of the development C. Number of buildings and use, sq.ft., height _�- d. Methods of construction �-- e. Number of boat slips ,G- f. On -site loading and service parking requirements g. Lot No. 17 parking requirements _ 10. Schedule and Type of Project Amenities L III. Additional Requirements 1. A response to all applicable aspects of the contract Terms and Conditions as detailed in Section VII. of this document. 2. Letters of commitment from financial institutions documenting the proposer's ability to finance all aspects of the proposed development. 3. Letters indicating the proposer's ability to obtain required bonds and insurance. 4. Documentation of minority participation pursuant to the goals set forth in City of Miami Ordinance No. 10538. 93- 414 I. Q C �OO10CTE; _10C. Respondent SW NORTH RIVER DRIVE PROPERTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CHECKLIST FOR FEBRUARY 8, 1993 PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS' COMPLIANCE TO RFP Yes No Proposal Format and Content of Submission Procedures (page 30 of the RFP) 1. Received by 2:00 p.m., February 8, 1993 v at the City Clerk's Office 2. $1,500 cashier check with submissiony 3. One (1) original and twelve (12) copies of a complete proposal submission in an 8 1/2" x 11" bound format 4. One (1) set of board -mounted illustrative drawings not to exceed 30" x 40" prepared by a registered architect. 5. Completed and signed forms included in Exhibit II entitled as follows: a. Declaration y b . Organizational Structure "01 C7P P� ► 't f . L-- c. Financial Disclosure and Professional Information d. Proposer's Questionnaire e . Partnership Statement or f. Corporation Statement �--- g. Experience Statement of Proposer h. Financial Data of Proposer �n��pt'i?'jaFlll�/I�VGI l.,►I111�'.lf�J(�, ��' r�i tTtp �. i . References of Proposer B _� J. Proposer's Architect/Engineer Ques ionnaire L... k. Experience Statement of Proposer's Architect/Eng. �r 1. Background Data of Proposer's Architect/Eng. M. References of Proposer's Architect/Engineer t� n. Architect/Engineer's Subconsultants' Questionnaire �.-- o. Experience Statement of Architect/Eng. Subs. p. Background Data of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants q. References of Architect/Eng. Subconsultants /-- 93- 414 Initial Review Checklist Page 2 �ahA 0, t Res ondent Yes No r. Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager Questionnaire. S. Experience of Proposer's General Contractor or Construction Manager y t., Background Data of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager U. References of Proposer's Contractor or Construction Manager V. Proposer's Restaurant Operator Questionnaire NO'l COA�fL/' W. Experience Statement of Proposer's Restaurant OperatorX. Financial Data of Proposer's Restaurant Operator 11 f y. References of Proposer's Restaurant Operator ,1,.--- 6. Completed Minority Participation Documentation included in Exhibit III. II. Proposal Submission Requirements (Page 18-20 of the RFP) Credentials 1. Evidence demonstrating the development team's ability to undertake and complete development of a facility for marine activities which may include a restaurant with water -dependent use. D M I f OPF 011 1►00.1r, 1 7' L�- 2. Evidence demonstrating the development team's expertise in the following disciplines (current active licenses required): Architecture Engineering Landscape Architectural- 3. A Financial Strategy 4. A Proposed Lease Term complementing the financing 1_ strategy and/or depreciation schedule. 5. A $42,500 minimum annual guaranteed rental payment to the City or the dollar amounts for payment to the City of a percentage of gross revenues collected, whichever is greater, in accordance with Section W.C. of the RFP. 93- 414 Y Initial Review Checklist Page 3 q A lNN ko)('100_ 4W�;TAZ Respondent Yes No 6. Project development and Operating Pro Formas of anticipated project income and expenses projected for length of lease term 7. Project Implementation Schedule' 8. Project Management Plan 9. Development Plan: a. Description of all aspects of the plan — b. Architectural character and features of the development C. Number of buildings and use, sq. ft., height(61{.5 d. Methods of construction e. Number of boat slips�-- f. On -site loading and service parking requirements(fw- g. Lot No. 17 parking requirements _ 10. Schedule and Type of Project Amenities' III. Additional Requirements 1. A response to all applicable aspects of the contract Terms and Conditions as detailed in Section VII. of this document. I.-- 2. Letters of commitment from financial institutions documenting the proposer's ability to finance all aspects of the proposed development. 3. Letters indicating the proposer's ability to obtain required bonds and insurance. 4. Documentation of minority participation pursuant to the goals set forth in City of Miami Ordinance No. 10538. IC5 93- 414