HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-033793- 3
N m
MOLUTION NO.
RBSD i TION, WITH ATTACHMENT (S) , AUTHORIZING
THR GIB MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN INTER AL
AGPERMENT, IN SUBSTANTIALLY HE ATTACHED
'MUNICIPALITIES
FORMWITR METROPOLITAN DADR COUNTY AND
REPRESENTING A MAJORITY OF THE
lOPULATION <OP THE INCORPORATED AREA OF DATER
t ix w
ailV ' y PROVIDE_ .POR THE DISTRIBUTION OF A
,1
PbRTION . CIF' `ARE DADS GORY OPTIOXAL GAS TAX
TO
-
}
i;,
DISTRIBUTED TO N TIGI�A ITIR FURTHER
AUTTi41RZ 1CNG THE CITY MANAGER
_—
b
TO IMX' EDIATBbY
COMMERCE NEGOTIATIONS WITH METROPOLITAN DADE
T -
COUNTY TO OPTIMI ZZ THE FINANCIAL RETURN TO
GMt
THE GITY FROM THE CURRENT LEVY AND ANY
ADDITIONAL LEVIES 'To BE IMPOSED BY THE COUNTY
a
R
FAR PUT URB PROCEEDS TO BE PROVIDEl3 TO THE
�
CITE �
F� _
m
�
>;
U ] 4
WHEREAS, , Seation 336.028, Florida Statutes (1992)
i --
t
,
t
t
authorizes counties to impose up to a six cent local option gas
i -
-
5
-�*
'j �q/� +� y�..
} may. yry fuel
�Iax upon motes` fuel, and. special fuel; e,nd -
—
r
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Bade County proposed to impose and
s
levy said tax under the procedures of Subsection t) Cad C 1 of
4
Section 336.025, Florida Statutes and
f�-
4
WHEREAS, Stag law rewires that the county share the
ate.
h
ai
4
proceeds of such a tax with municipalities- and
�.
WHEREAS , said State law requires that an Interl.ocal.
�--
Agreement shall be negotiated by cities representing a Majority
-
of the papulatlon within all municipalities; and
£Y�
{
WHEREAS, Dads �aur�t y has agreed to share % of the proceeds
of said tax with eligible municipalities within Dade County -and
4
_
COXMSXM
AITTACHMINWI)
METMG Cr,
CONTAINED
� MlkMllrAl�M
i
t
S
PASSED AND ADOPTED thle
A
stopsMIMI
CL
MPA � i ` i� ' : APPROVED AS TO F09Mt AND
, CORRECTNESS. 1.
i'Y♦1, � � � ��f(1j �Y{�c. p��j, M.wkt♦'M:W1+i+i+yw
[}�' A[:'y' Mir- y' • (+� jlot
!f iwi r 'l l
CIT
OIRREY
TT EY
MIN
4 r
1 of 0150
COMMON!
w
M�t'� ��yr
;
i
a:
a
Y
y
a zt UN
,
i
jAll
k t'�
iy { L. lop
i
s
� y
TV
R aid
010
l.f a�i
tl S'�
A 1 1 dy}y
AWAS M
�
t
r,:-� a
'A,+., ,rAr..,.�.•. �,
-77
s_
t.nT a3
1 PM
. - CAL AGREEMENT
hip aigrojkMant antarod into this day o
► the StAtt 'of Floridan and municipalities
a rik it of the Pula tion o f � n �� �►a�a
yj t i 1 ted
OU
;i
,r
`M XREM section 336.025 j. Florida St^tutes (1992) authscn,. eaa�
catiaa+AM ?P3J� rs► tc c��.cca�i3t�i7►jl�l$ax
i91it f. YE, an 4M1kFA.i■
tt�unty Proposes impose send v fa t tees
336 ���5a (3) i of Section
et a
z.
z
tww MORE .in aOnti��s�W-01% of t�eP srt�v�s��t� �����i�e�
1� x+ Opt �'tE' a s h of which are re1k�► a�ckt� deed
Py a 31+�tl+�t reatc it greed ollc+t
k
stall CE' MO yet lctiii s u n Its a
t
� 6' t n Va.
..
yr Of the irte
efW Qr! the
* 4
g
-
�! lead er $+t eRl opt: io s 144 0
f ;
ts�' opto � � s
S
f k
r
03% the bas is bt 74r
j0
rcei�t Lae lclt'
ion:) �� .� �L�:��tiP � �
c port.
�R
r rMW
r x
yT�ry9 � k
v
f
portion) to all aligib.10 Incorporated municipalitleg in Dade
county, noride pu,rausnt to Section 336.025
��
A 1992) Net procaeda shall mean the local option gag tar
-
Col lOctOd OY t hO.:`10r1da 09partment of Revenue (Do ) 1,080 the
€ amount retAl od her - the'DOR fur administration at provided its
section 215.20j, rlotida -Statutes (1992).
3 The ,Municipal portion of the local option gaig t&x aha
distributed amonq the eligiblo: Incorporated municipalities in
;tom
DadeC:our!tty oFlorida, baaed , tin a formula as follows: ;
Seen �-f iv percent based upon the ratio of the '
population of each _ eligible Incorporated
municipalitycompared to the total
P population —.Of'
1111 OlLgLble, incorporated mun.ic pa.11t ea in Dadra
t
County; and,
b : Twenty-five percent based u n -thy! 'r±ttfo of total,
�
centerl ino miles of roadway mai ntal nod by each
AW7
+eligii+e incarratOd unifcipaslitlronrad.
total centeslina miles maintain" by, *11, it +
incorporated municipalities :in Dade bounty.
i
PO ul tlon., f i.gurei6 used shall be, the f igures used '. ta►
R
deteriiai.ne tho artnu4l distribution of the hat dent . local
}
9QV'*rnft*ftt 9411011_ tax. Plar:uant to Section 418. 00I Plorida
�—
'StatUten (1992),Centerl,ine mile figures. .Bh Al. be based U
yeariy figures submitted py each .0tunicipality to the Department
of an k44 and rinance in their Annual, ri nAncial Aevort.. :,and -
=
ra drd d the !'l osida impartment of Transport ct,i on
r
i
{
t
s
j�L
-
,
by Section f a and ), FloridaLutes (1992), The
, n . s end centerline i.�e figures shall b+ updated annually
witda current of Juno 1 of each year*
�-
5►, Cad's County will use its hest efforts to !��l 1iMd c
thirds of thy► Count rtion on trans crtatit�t� expenses �it�i�
the in=rporated MAMici ali.t.iee.
6. The O ,centages for distribution shall be Calcuiatad by
jul 1 of each year,, the County shall
the Cent antall '`
n t f all ral.ci a1 ti a and the rog�riat StOtte agOnC OS Of
�—
the a `cents s fear distribution Of the local ���$s� gas talc
�=
r aada cn the Municipatlities for the upcoming annual. rind
ccmraeatdi.hg September 1 * The percentage for distribution of local
des. tax proceeds to anycity "+whose current populatioft or
e er in milt figures a not available shall be deter 9.hedby
tht.' County baffied on the, mostrecOn.t atva�il,�bie population anti/ter
canter,l.i no mile figures reported tc .the States
.
?, rguant to Sections 336.025(5) (b), Florida Statute$
�.
(.1992 ) diaputes regarding the percentage of distribution to any
--
-
municipality hereunder shall be resolved through an appeal to the
Ad .n �c re+ti at� Co issi,*n in accordance with procedures developed
by the COATAissf+t n. Pending final �dispositio Of such
proceedings.. thetax shall be coilect,ed and such . funds shall be
b�
meld in escrow by the Clark of th* Circuit Court of the County
until final diaposi.tLiOn is made
fd . i h accordance with Section 336.025, Florida 5tat�af`et�
IN
{
as Amended by the 1993 the not
z
fi
Y� _
33
d
-
uTi 3
f
� -
WE
proce#dolof
the local option gas tax shall only
be u for
Vie
10110joing
transportation; expenses
L
A)
public transportation o - 4a tjons andmaintenance;
}
roadway 1 -of A maintenance and *qui +gin
and
txk r+ primarily , or
the storage
and
maintenatee bf such equipment
roadway way and right�����r��► �r�i�a� � �
pavement markings;
nain n + and operation)
� --
debt service and current
expenditures
' for
'.
c
► Ionital rojectin
�
the a ve programs
-
.' ..
:.; .'areasNolko—
y i lu�di€ Q sruction or
r+econstructio n
vl
road**
ru
t
j
+
r
r
{
F
r
v
,
t
r
N�wnt�f!lrraa+...4+F'a�r++s ,,.r.�.....-,.,. c.......1..... ._..._.N F-e _ _ � _. ._
�_
y. f..�.. �_..
.. .
.e< ..
;,
Y677-
i
M#�OWIM
r p
Iry
i .
i'
y3t y
C�
� t- M�2F41aabrw.4rralrwwwiw E�
i
U4, �
j
t�.
P•tt
yi- t , u -s x 2- B
�7
� 4 _
.1y
t
�ygy
OWN 1*14ii,
2
J 3 5:
a+, .
' �
t id OfiYFfib7�.y��wy Qnd- 7.6S�i+]PAa•M�
- Y § k irwt #�At--'dYF�'i'�•'-.>�}}'9h'a� .�'
�' � �4�L}Y`�'�y �e''g�,"&c'����a`- .;
.-'r
P
l
R 'rH±1'#i'ry .da((�Y t-t
M T{4�3'!�fi '.:
qhN� xyY,�sr +�s n,i •s. ,a�i .
v
5
r
I
CITY
-OFr- ME MEMORANDUM
INTER