HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-0260_ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CHIEF PROCUREMENT
OFFICER'S DECISION TO REJECT THE PROTEST
RECEIVED FROM INTERAMERICAN CAR RENTAL IN
_ CONNECTION WITH BID NOS. 92-93-027 AND 92-93-
039R FOR THE FURNISHING OF CAR LEASE/RENTAL
SERVICES FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS IT HAS
BEEN DETERMINED TO BE WITHOUT MERIT.
WHEREAS, in connection with Bid Nos. 92-93-027 and 92-93-
? 039R for the furnishing of Car Lease/Rental Services for the
Police Department, a protest filed by Interamerican Car Rental
,t was received on April 8, 1993 by the Chief Procurement Officer in
her role as the arbiter of protests pursuant to Section 18-56.1
of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, said bids pursuant to Section 18-52.7 of the City
Code, were rejected by the City Commission on January 14, 1993
and March 11, 1993 respectively; and
WHEREAS, a new bid was issued with revised insurance =
requirements, and was scheduled to be opened on April 13, 1993 at
11:30 A.M.; and
WHEREAS, all soliciting vendors have been duly notified of =
the rejections and issuance of the new bid; and
WHEREAS, the protest is found to be without merit and
therefore rejected by the Chief Procurement Officer and approved
by the City Manager and the City Attorney;
C'1'rF COS
MEETING OE
APR 15 W
boom**"*
93- 2�.
NOWT THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED RY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The Chief Procurement Officer's decision to
reject the protest in connection with Bid Nos. 92-93-027 and 92
93--039R for the furnishing of Car Lease/Rental Services for the
r Police Department, filed by Interamerican Car Rental, is hereby
approved.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of
PREPARED AND APPROVED BYt
RAFAEL 0. DIA
DEPUTY CITY ATT07E
PPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESSt
• N I
CITY .ATTO Y
2
it
VIER
effective
-
1993.
MAYOR
=
-a
�F
xe=
93-- 26�_
r
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTIM- JFFIOE MEMORANDUM
-i
Honorable Mayor and Members
I TO DATE : APB c TaMW fiLE
of th City Connission
FROM Cesa H . Odio
City Manager
Resolution of Protest
sue�ECT Bid Noe. 92`93-027
and 92-93-0391t
Auto/Lease Mental
REFERENCES:
- ENCLOSURES
s
it is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt a -
- resolution approving the Chief Procurement Officer's decision to
_ reject the protest received from Interamerican Car Rental in
-� connection with the above subject City's Invitations for Bids for
the furnishing of Auto/Lease Rental Services for the Police
— Department.
A protest was received from Interamerican Car Rental and it was
-
determined by the Chief Procurement Officer in her role as the
arbiter of bid protests, pursuant to Section 18-56.1 of the City
Code, that this protest should be denied.
The City Commission, pursuant to its authority under Section 18-
52.7 of the City Code, rejected Bid No. 92-93-027 on January 14,
1993 and Bid No. 92-93-039R on March 11, 1993 for procurement.of
this commodity. A new bid was issued and scheduled to be opened
on April 13, 1993 at 11:30 A.M. All affected bidders have been
notified of the City's decision to reject all bids and the
issuance of a new bid. Further, the protesting party received
copies of the aforementioned bid invitations and has had the same-
time, as other prospective bidders, to respond to the
solicitations.
The Chief Procurement Officer investigated the matter and
determined that the protest lacked merit, as detailed in the
-
attached letter. Her decision has been approved by the City
-
Manager and the City Attorney.
93- 269
r F
-
>Clr
F
{
• bt IM tux �s1
°fflt mom
April 9r 1993
-- 9X i hick Byrds 'Vice pares idont
lnteraawrioan Car Rental
17 90 N -N . LeJoune Road
-- Itiaai, t% 33126
Dear fix. Syrdt
Rai Orotest of Bid 10os. 92-93-039R and 93-93-027 tot !Coto
Lease/Rental services
of Miavxi • I ateCiiV*d On
Rs Chief PtOcUrement Officer of the City tinent documnts,
AV] e, 1993 your foarwal protest, reviewed pet nrauant to
talked wLth the GUPlcyves # Arid researched the issues n n� � a
nd gaction 10-56.1t City of Miami Code,
awry duties u er f�Ardsl
3
The folinwing is submitted in response to Your letter .
� "tZlli
Section 19-52.7 of the City CrA#b Records the City of lrii�.emi
d*,s or offers : after receipt"
'tin ' 'all
ri ht . • • • to reject all bids , o�� right be ` lmrul sided . ,
Zwpires that the foarag right.
ana
� imitation docwaents. The City ,Ca�aorAiseion escerci�d
eoi 92-93-039A and 9�-g3-027 ofiaich1, 1993
ars ovtin Bid Nor.
and 14 1993t respectively.
January
+1rya.
tiles in
delay in
technicalC
JK�
_Due to sows th ry Kasns
ale ion
docutentstion to eenfLof
the
vtic+C'ri�o o
notifying soliciting vendors of
wit a
92-93-039R• do e • e riritten
r
aid No.
together Mith attachments providing
re je�ction • delivered and foxed to you on
ttiarnl�
R
explanatLon for see +esre
or 1993. Your receipt of thu rejection notice on9�_y8
tizi tugg in Sid.,�• .��
Ps
would not preclude your firms trora par
to bs opened unt11.11:3D a: ••
_
093R because bids are not +scheduled
1993. Your firm received the bid 1nvIL&LLvn On
Tuesday► april 13t other P�cospective
4�
r
�tareh 31, 1993 and has had the sa>ase time, as
to respond to the solicltatilon.
vendors,
With regards to Section A(2of your letterf there !.e no, .
notii es of ite+ss to be included
;equi,cemsnt that the City y part
on a Coss.ission agenda, other ths►D : ;the tact, .,that egendan area
�weting;Ads►tg snil a p►uDlic
nblfished JI% aftance of the ardspeoLi�w
lntomatlon:
i 3
_
...f
# L
1<a
t
'
r
Y
D 1. t, 1 1 1 vi m rL-V i Y u uv • i a• v l ru% ♦. 11, I .urn. UVhAAt v via � � �� .....,.....
xr. Rick 2Y&d gage -9-- Aprt 1 9, 1993
Your assertion that hid No. 53-•93-003 represents a rabid of Did
Yon. 93-93-037 and 92-93-039K in not entirely correcti as the
insurance require"nts for the procureinant of this comiaodity
changed.
Finally, I have no knowledge of any facts that will substantiate
your allegativps Lis SeuLlan d of your letter.
based upon the foregoing, I am rejecting roe
ur pprut"St. The City
Manager and City Attorney have approved my i$ion.
The matter has been scheduled on the City Commission agenda for
Thursday, April 15, 1993, beginning at 9100 a.m. The Meeting wi11
be hold in the Cit�yy Commission Chambers, City Hall, 3500 pan
=i American Drive, KLarai, Florida.
hinderely.
Judy S. Carter
Assistant Director/
Chief Procurement Officer
cc: Ron B. Williams, Assistant City Ifanager
Rafael Dias, r)a nity City Attorney
Calvin Ross, Polio Chief
4 4 A VA OA A . Uft A
AVAWNrL
#JWWT
AM i U r L
oa
AMPORT
TAwk%wn
ANSI=
OL a*" sum"
i. kVA WW"
GWU GARN
pool$"
ast
mer n
n
April Go 1"3
THE CITY OF MUNI
Services Adidnistration
Protartmat Mam easat Div.
Post Office, Box 1 $30706
Mimi* Florida 33233-0708
Atv Chief Procurewni Officer
K4- Pretext
Rat Bid 0 93-91-019 It
Bid # 92-93-027
Dear Sir:
In accordance with the above referenced Bid (e) and paragraph 14 of the
spatial conditions therein# and in accordance with Section 10.56-1 ur
the City code* protest is hereby made in emection with the not: -award of
these vequeot for Did. Our protest is based LU P&Kt VIL AIM fU1.IW1UZ
facts and circanstancas:
A) On Dscadwr 7. 1992. InterAsterican responded to Bid #92-93-027
1) InterAwrican'swas the uuty response, to said aid
and was responsive to all specifications of said Did.
2) For reasons unknom to the undersigned, the City rejected
**Ld Did, un December 10tbij 1992. The vt"arslWd was
notified of'said rejection In aletter dated J"uary
19ths, 1993. InterAxterican VILS loot notified that the
comission, would consider the Bid on December 10, 1992.
No representative Of InterAztevican wai.prasent at said
meeting.
3) On February 8, 1993, InterAwrLean responded- to Bid 092-93-039R
1) One other Did was submitted at said tine, that of
Royal Rent A Car'
2) IntevAuarican's lid was the lower of the two Bids and
-Continuod-
ik sua* wnwoucAft LwwPavwWAMCOMAIRTUP
. M N.W. LWWWII ROAD10?MML FLJ MIS$ a (%*AR M -I"
21;0
-21i
3LN1 01 •%,11 1
p11t1►U 1 s .I u►r r 1 a ` Uvn.Y16► ► .a:r �.►..1u. ..
April 6 e 1993
TIM CITY or Kim
Att: Chief Proeuremat Officer
Page 2
vms rsspoueive to all specifications of said Aid.
C) Interdmletican has received no notification of the disposition of
Bid 092-93-039R —
D) On March 31 s 1"), IaterAniarloat+ received Bid P42-93-U831 =
1) Said Biel would appear to be eat le-61d at 92-93-027 and
92-93-039R11
t) InterAmerican is s past vendor to the City of Mod With an
unblostsked reoord of perfos-wance. -
F) loyal :Lent A Car is a cut cent vendor to the City of Miami
0 It to veil documuLed thae-the using department within
the City is not eatisfied'vith the service provided by
Royal Aent O Crag.
2) It is well dac manned that the using department has -
often found Royal Rant A Car to be out of compliance ,
with hhe roquirewnts of the ezfstion contract.
C) it would asem apparent that the City has some unspoken motivation
to Re -Bid this solicitation/contrset until some differelnr rest z.
Us achieved. -
1) The Ciy should declare its objection to each of the afore- _
mentioned Bids of InterAwrican. �.
Saving Wes submitted fully coa Bent Bids to rho City for theme services,
InterAaeriean will not participate in Bid 992-93-083R pending resolution
of this protest. This protest shall further preserve our legal rigbts
to recovery of damages.
P.leasa respond directly to tha undereLped in writing.
IF
Rental, Inc.
Rick .'
Vic*._Prastds
ccl Mayor Suarez
CommUslaswer DaTurra
..-Contiausd-
is
+�u+ utuar� .a v
tjU6, 'or
JUN i u t• L 1 i I Vt m t tidy 1 � f" u w.► , a a vurf.� , v� �� ..
April 6, 11943 -
-I= Cift 01F X%AtY
Attt Chief Procurement Officer
gage 3 -
Coa�irrioasr �luimurr -
_ Commissioner Alousel `
C&m seioner tiae kim
Chief of police 26*6
_ Assistant Chief of Police warnhav
Major !Martinez
i
93- 26
flaw
4