Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-0212y y f 1_t J-92-703(a) 12/31/92 3 .. 212 RESOLUTION No a A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD AND DENYING THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, 'TI4E ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 602, SD-2 COCONUT GROVE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO WAIVE FORTY- FIVE (45) OF FORTY-FIVE (45) REQUIRED: OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES FOR THE EXISTING RESTAURANT (TULA RISTORANTE) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2957 FLORIDA AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), ZONED SD-2 COCONUT GROVE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of September 14, 1992, Item No. 1, duly adopted Resolution ZB 94-92 by an eight to zero (8-0) vote, denying a variance as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the applicant has taken an appeal to the City Commission from the denial of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter finds that the grant of a variance would exacerbate the present deficiency of parking requirements in the Coconut Grove Central Business District to the injury of the neighborhood and As a detriment to the public welfare; IOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Zoning Ordinance of the City. Section 602, SD-2 Coconut Grove to 1 .n a zt� findings contained in the . r Prei%#61e to this Resolution are hereby adopted by rerenee as the request for a variance from the waive forty-five (45) of forty-five (45) required offstreet parking spaces for the { existing restaurant (Tula Ristorante) 2957 Florida Avenue, Miami, Florida, Block 3, WILLIAM A. RICE SUBDIVISION at Page 13 of the Public Records of for the property located at also described as Lot 34, as recorded in Plat Book 1 Dade County, Florida, Zoned SD-2 Coconut Grove Central Commercial District, is hereby denied. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of _March , 1993. PREPARED AND, "Pikoft) t1h, IRMA'M,,,ABELLA ASSISTANT CITY ATTORME Y FORW)WD CORRECTNESS$ APPROM AS TO At Qtlm PRES Ill CITY A M3188tlMA:ra:ebh io -3- XklSi Ito SrwB: ....... ... ti Coconut Grove, Florida 33233 441-1B1B ZONING S0-2 Coconut Grove Central''fommercial District • REQUEST Variance from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 602, 50-2 Coconut Grove _Central Commercial District, to waive forty-five (45) of forty-five (45) required offstreet parking spaces for the existing restaurant (Tula Ristorante) RECOMMENDATIONS: PLANNING, SLOG 3 ZONING DENIAL. PUBLIC FORKS No'Comment., PLAT AND STREET N/A DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No Comment. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: N/A Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A Lien Recorded on: N/A Total Fines To Date: N/A } Comments: N/A A HISTORY This item was continued to June 15, 1992 i'rarr the Zoning Board Hearing of.Nerch 16,1992' for" the r staff to preparo_e parking study to be brought before the Zoning Board. Applicant requested'& coptinuance to,September 14; 1992, that eras granted -by Res. 62.92 by a 8-0- vote ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the requested variance to waive the forty-five-(45)'`` required parking spaces for the proposed restaurant.. No.special conditions and _circumstances exist which art peculiar to the building and land involved and which are.,ct applicable to other buildings and land in the same zoning,district..,.Granting.,the:variance 4 requested will confer on the,petitioner special privileges that are denied by this zonim ': ordinance to other buildings and land in thei.ame zoning district. Literal interpretations F' of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 11000 would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly, enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning,district under the terms of thi3 zoning ordinance and would not work unnecessary and undut,hardahip on the petitioner. Tne variance, if granted, is not the minimum..variance that will -make possible the reasonable use of the building and land. The required number of parking spaces should be provided for the protection of the neighborhood. The grant of this variance would not.be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and will be injurious' to the neighborhood and detrimental to the public welfare. APPLICATION NUMBER ' 92- 17 September 14, 1992 Iteat.a Page i 09//03/92 -,,r t „ � - ii • ANALYSIS Of PROPOSED VARIANCE APPLICATION NUMAER 92• 11 s Yes No N/A► x Special conditions and circumstance. exist which.. Are peculiar to the land, Structure, or building ``:nvolved and which are not applicable to other: lands, stnic•,-jres, or buildings in the same zoning district, x The special conditions and circumstances are an indirect g result from the actions of the petitioner. x Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 1I000deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by +` other properties in`the same zoning district under. the terms of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue hardship on the petitioner. -_ x Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. x The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes. ' possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. . ,3 x The grant of thisvariance is in harmony with.the general, intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and snot, `. injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimtntal to the public welfare. ZONING BOARD At its meeting of September 14, 1992, the Zoning Hoard adopted —�1 Resolution ZB 94-92, by a vote of 8-0, recommending denial of the above. Eleven OPPONENTS and seven PROPONENTS Were present at the meeting. Four replies AGAINST and four replies in-FAVOR,xe:re received by CITY COMMSSION , At its meeting of November 12, 1992, the City Commission continued the above. At its'meeting of January 28,.1993, the City Commi.ssion'continued the abovee. Septteber 14,� 1992 ?teals 1, P89 2 2 93 212 ._ Ms. Elba Morales ofyered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. ' RESOLUTION ZB 94-92 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 110001P THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE No. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 602, SO4 COCONUT GROVE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO NAIVE FORTY-FIVE (43) OF FORTY-FIVE (45) REQUIRED OFFSTREBT PARKING SPACES FOR THE EXISTING RESTAURANT (TULA RISTORANTE) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 2957 FLORIDA AVENUE ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 34, BLOCK 30 WILLIAK A. RICE SUBDIVISION (1-13). PUBLIC RECORDS OF Djuiv COUNTY (PRDC). Upon being seconded by Mr.George Barket the motion was passed and adopted by'the following vote: AYESs Ms. Morales and Basile Moran-Ribeaux, Fox; Barket Milian, Sands and Alonso-Poch • .• ORANGE, �t s T. Sao WF4-, 4 Lft r't 40 .a DAY A v E. 101 4, t•, t" 1 4 Z 1 �• 3RC�L. t � _ 11 ti f [/y) `IWE wf V O� t! LEMON MON s! , t o . • TREE viLLAGE - .*-Los •• ••1 M •• M • K • :.. to 6-4 _ K c — S! z t• + a.�COOI I o j E Lip O • .• • �! !r ` -AL. r. � • CKVE , lAOVNT�.•. r•p�i! ttZAa~' •'i Ems �•1 Is t. to .� . •. •• ,�► ♦♦ � .• I � MAO •p• "Await SA W ! • .f I �• • "OOK GR d n •i• w • •' � ♦ ♦ 8AI�110AT � QQ► Ely � „� � • � ,, `�//'�"" CL 9 3 - 2i Pc?'iT'CN FCR VARIANCE A wrtance is relaaadan a( the tsrnss o/ the Wdnanee Owe a M aMan w0 nab be contrary co the pstda WNW arsd e►, owing to cawsatttcw pleaslsar to .the` propwny aad not the fault of aetiory of th! appllee nt, ittvial en/orcement a( fts Ordnance wadd result In Imecls wy. and UrUW ha*d&ip ors rho pro &ny. As used th this orftarwse a barmans to autPsartsld. only for hft)%t• area, site of slues —% amensione or yerds and odw opera 4mes aped orlssrelt tang or lo"v ra4�tetr SSA (Section 3101) !• her+eby petition the Oty of Miami ZaMrq ®Data or a vorsame from tniv r/rnv o t "fining 4rdlR+a m of the City of Mlaftvlw atf QW 19 . Preowry loaatod of 7 a it ? c t cs r 4 d Avntriu Mlamlq ao spls'fled below. In support of this application, the following matartal is u4n fitted with this applieaval I. Two of a VA%W of the p awiy prepared by a Slate of Rlorldo R*&tersd Sumter. L. Pixie e+epter* O the site plan *WWksg (an r wino prapertp boundaries, Ge VWT Of my) aft prop�uW � yak, � elvel" OW dlmies ieost and aam;Watim of 10-am (groat cnd 1WX &jd&v spurn% L%A ration, end height anwstope. 3. Affidavits dtsat®eir4 ownership of pvWty courted by opplleetfen and dheloard of interot ferns (Form 4 a and 4409 attach to appileatloe . M.L. b. Certified list of ownu of real estare within 371 rostive , tram the outside bovndarles of praperty wowed by this oWleatione (rar er &P and 'attach to oppiicatton.) .j.. L At lost two photographs that srs w ft o ttre property Owa an.l improvemants). L Cther f j . T. Fee of sI I n n M® aWy toward the cost of processiM based of the following (b) FogRG• _ (t idsnp at t uses) $"Lao . pars! ration of (arse Ut by astorsr+as and ft Ilk! Sm oo (a) All other appileotk" for trt vesrior�! JU? W :'p'i f now groo of buitdit i f . S6o .. ,. 5urehwga equal to "Wieable fee from (aMc) soave, not to swetd 050.00; to b�► r! if•.the�re is no appear. {City Code - Se�tton'241)g 3 11% Variance reaysstod Is for relief from the provisions of Section the City of Miami Z&YO9 Ordinance as follow= of Oaqui oments !or :es t3::r ants 3-r::v w446t : :'.:19 '..s :nor one 5�1Ce per ::y ; °t C� yr-.ss 3:?3 -aperty ow^er is !: o"::@r/C�er 3 for � ` 3:1 �;SG3:? r?5:3�:3.^:: 'CC3ted Cn this Site. The owner has previous:.y gn .e: ed ^.: 3-•cements to ;r Cvi:e t:':e reguis i to �3r�::`: ► and excess par'cizg needed !or a valet parking permit, which are -In efr2ct at 3:00 p.m. daily. He has leased a total of ,0 of!_sire parking spaces. He now seeks relief via a variance to so that he may operate during lunch period. There are no parking spaces available,either on -site or off -site -for that Period of time. f. In art of this OWICation, the epplieant Is mowed to offer the following ewldenee, an the point a+urnerated at Waeetlon 310& 1- of the City of lKl®mi . , Zoning Qrdindras Motor Thie apptication cannot be aesopted far Zaf an- omen =River of ON f otio� s� tt� are e�ompictrd. . (a) Special aanditlanr and cin rujtaneaat uld wNch as pecviiar to l theland, ee► stnor b OdIng involved and whldh are not applleabie to other a9da, stnatura g or bulldtnp In the smw =Ong d xWet in theft Me rAdence to be produced and use addItiond Oweta, W R ►,) = The subject property is located between tvo structures, making - it impossible to expand in either direction to aceoaodate-the requisite parking'Redevelopment is not economically feasible and even if.the existing structure'were demolished and s new building .. erected, at best, only very minimal partcinq. it any,-vould become available on -site. • e nW special eot+ditte" OW Cher= Ntae"I de not raeaSt r+ tfio octian'of the petitioner In thoh The structure on the Property has been a restaurant tor`over 15 Tears and is not feasible for any other -uses 1'3 212 t I,.,it 'df irltilr�bf'dtdtiort o� that prodis'an$ of the tonin4 ordinafte wbvid :.rzva that dopli t 6f rfght�s. eonr+n ,iy lr�joyeb by other pre"nies in , tre part zinhit disttiat bt under`; the "t�ttrns the toning OY�1f1rl11Cs � �►►oviQ wa(�x t rmesucry and WWW* hts 6h1*p4� C' " the pttitiOW 16 ►hilt` •ir ¢. nr�rest:;,.r i1r.0' se o% �%.a ? . �3r t::: ...dlt1E3:1. 1 .easonabil .. 1 .,. .4ay ime •"o::rs • :�`:d :�ZSC$rty Cannot tee. .teed 3s - .. .. use. permi ted dithin t".e tide aa:::re;.cR the existing` st uc:ure and ",* property i tsei!..;:t is^�t: . !eas:b:y "ted !or any other pur rose during t:he day. f *Mtbv the wicnes re*mted will net.wder an !'1st pstltloner any spW41 - PrMls" thee; is danied by the ZW*q Qrdinane to,~ to Wh buiidb 44 or J structwo In ft same atoning distrlet in ftt= _d Granting the veriance,,Will allow the property owner to utilize the.,proparty'as�,ont of the already permitted usss`within this . district. '.Other&, in..the Coconut Grove business aria, `gave "been permitted to operate 4 restaurants during'the day Without='providing the requisito parking and yet others, have bees = peftitte'd= to operate -restaurants without additional "parking due to -outside -table seating whicli is ,not counted for the parking spacerequirement fsi '1'hs irartortee, margnted, is OW rninlaw n va knin the will nna" parrsibie reatonoblt Un ihe la+d, buildings w stye in flesh The structure on , the property .is an existing upscale, restauran o . Granting this.variance will simply allow the _business to;be;open to serve lunch. The. parking-vagiance will `clearly aliox" i� r�asonabi,s use of thn propertyi • 93- 21 m .pry f {� !*no; grant of the votitznes will be in her with the E.t; .,,p • P++ b Of the Zon,tt9 Otd,nonco, and will net bqe ;nj�r:av3 �. noighbOrhodds or othorwito detrimental to the publle wblfott. he j`.jn•In �r whi • var.an:i Ai f : =::aria e 1 i ;enera;: ". ent a. ur;ose o! the ordinance. o:ien:ed ::ss 'tr sa. Ipscale Coconut Grove resta,U."a,.t ?rssentty. theb.1 4J:l� is barely �eneratin� y'�e i::co^ze @cdssaxl to suncort the tax burden and its only possible feaiible use, 33' I been the case for decades, is a restaurant.,. Note: All doewments; reports, sties, rshtbtce or other rrrfttart or graphto a v:c::3' Athmitt0d to the ZonhV Boad " be submitted with Oda appltea;tort. AUtnatlttQ Agent --- Now A:40N7ko' .L0 AN5 1 HMO COUNTY FLORIDA� SSA Air DADE � _JUX12 F n t a ne e i M V boittq duly swotns deposes ME he is tne 10~1 QM@WW tts question Olt abovel tW h® rood iho f e! the root property dax ed te'w and ev�i*let and (if ve! atoQe�nq mowers ot�d that the some os �t far ow+rw) OW he has authority!, to txaecvte t. Petition an boMf of the owner, SWORN TO AND JAY COMMISSION EPIRM MAY PWC nstt W ►LWM Mgr C MiU101 to. 1W. I'M nou amm tu. uss, f Cam.• 31etto a of Large 93_ 40 .KI A'�•'ew�� yf 0 3 W N • �,r'Ity CITY GR WAW, FLOA10A INTO.- PILE .M2MORANDUM OATI 614bruali7 269 1992 sve�scr Tula Restaurant 2951 Florida Avenue Omit* Parking WOMP41s Jdse A. 0jenuardit P.E. U Administrator Maoluts This'is th*,..in;formation you requested about the offsits parking provided by: .'Tula Restaurant, which is the subject of a parking varianeo..sehiddled before the Zoning Board as.Item P'Z•1, for March 16o- 1992 meeting. This items was continued from December. 9. 199 V ` meetings to� .'await parking study being conducted for the business,grovt;area - 4 . A restaurant. and bar 'was ' built in �916 and approved Vith = oftsits parking, with a recorded covenant and a' loasel 4'or, fifteen t 15), parking�spacss at 3043 Grand -%vanuo. 2. �A:.new owner took over the restaurant •in, tge4,' with:a new recorded covenant providing 43• offeits' parking spaces at. St,. Stephen's Churcht 2750 McFarlane Rd/3439 Naln Nighway,. y 3 On; A1ov, ibir 30 i 1 gg0 t a new "owner sub' tutdd s lease for .. 38 parkiRE :paces at thae;..Coconut -Grove Sink. Parking Lot at. 2701 S. 8ayshore Drive* •� The covenant inaiea4os . /that altirnAtia parking has t to, be obtained It the original -is no; .,1,dagor`` available. I y ,;The agreement with the Coconut Grove Bank'Ts'* ,only-°tor e�tnines after 5 peso and all day Saturday anp, Sunday when .the Bank Is Glossa.. 4. The ottstreet parking is a legal • on;w'aonforraing charfe- torlstlo of use, which does not vo a: disaontinuanc® clause. y. 5. The parking spaces are being used to' parking of passenger cars only and not comereial vehicl. The Coconut Grove Bank 'property is' zoned 0/3001. The :30-17 overlay provides .., under Bastion 617.2.2o a floor we& ratio bonus. ter providing excess parting for use by the general public {.�.. ut;Xlztng activities or'attractions to Dimmer toy. adjacent public facilities or the Coconut Grovo••illage Contort which Includes the boundary of the 30•2 zonfog district. 1. That he is the odnsr, or the legal "prssentativs of the ounsre subattting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Csdinanee 11000 of the Code of the City of Nieai, ploridao affecting the real. property located in the City of KLmL, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and sade a part thereof. 1. that all owmrs which he represents: if aay, have given theft full and caeplate peraission for his to act in their behalf' for the .. change or. modification of a classification or - regulation of soaing as set out in the MCOManylag petition. 1. That the pages attached hereto mad node a part of this _affidavit contain the current nears, aailinq addresses$, phone., numbers and. legal descriptions for the seal property vhich he is the ownr or legal reprosentativa. `. The facts as represented in the application and docnasnts subaitted is conjunction vith this affidavit are true and correct. lnrtbar Aftiant sayeth not. Sworn to and 8ribed before sir ,. this day of Cul u up ic, State offlorida, at Largo. s MQTaT Ott SXAR PI�Tp rG My Co.■ission Bspires t � � ��� . t - pW1ms _LIST otwi 3 t�Mt Carlo Fontanesi diove. Florida 13233 hitttn� ArArea= SaxC,,conuz b51 Tei"flono Nuodlf 441.1819 williaam A. Ride 5ubdiv s on. n: * of i4, Block 3 ► 6ija1 DIUMpcl0 13 cg %lbl it ` Records Mai 1 t ns Addtll! ?llllihottA Nu�Dlr - Lpal p�riRtion: ': OMMr' a Nil 'Puling Addr*ll ralaRhanl llu�lr L*l %Seript ocher real oatat* progtY �d indiv4dua11�. =oietht. or savorally ; rq(by hip or Prlratalyl rit;Aln 379• o! t h! lCt oration. par visa is 11=tM sa tollors: , Aft"$ . a 011cr'� iow s r sups OE. or am"no Tp l+ LIgal deaeaeiption ad Street address of suojom real pcapectyl i95" Florida Avenue Lot 34, gloat 3,-william A. Rice subdivision,,' Plat Book 1 at Page 13 of the Putilic Records. 2.. .*aorta) of =&Jeft real cep Saki percentage of ownership. Notes City of MUU ordlnarw No. 9419 requires diaclasurs of all ptceiar T uq a financial interest, either direct c r indirect, in the p am eof a presentation, request or petition to the City Comisaion. kcc*VdLn9lY► question"#2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of rI , banefL iasiae of trusts, aadlor any oelwr interested pm1m, tog with their and ptapoetLana" iratet+ert. Carlo Fontanesi P.O. Box 331089 Coconut Grove, Florida 33233 (100% ownership) 3. cap" deoerIP-Won ad street address of aw real property (a) owned by wT p cy flared is answer to quwtU n Up Sad (b) 3+oamed with M tam of the subject teal peapezty. none k5 r - i+.J},. ; Cyfi1I G'yt�=N LiNi ASSOC Z.Aa?XON , INC. 1029 Div Aver+w, Coecmut Grow. Florida. 33133 Cf TY OF '92 OCT if October 12, 1992 Me To: Mayor._X. Suarez Zoning and Planning Board Miami City Council Res- Request for Variance of Required *Parking by Proposed,-.. Restaurant Ata meeting held on October 8, 1992, the Board of Directors of the Leaaontree Village Condominium Association, Inc. voted unanimously to protest the waiver of over 120 parking spaces, that has been requested bi�tt the owners of the restaurant and club, currently under construction at the corner of Florida Ave. and Virginia St. in Coconut Grove. The'?Arkin-g-dilemma in Coconut Grove is well known and constantly debated in the local press. While we are happy to see this property developed after servin as a local eye -sore for several years we -can not tolerate additional developme thout a corresponding increase in parking facilities to better manage the traffic.in our neighborhood. Currently, most on -street parking in the vicinit of Lemontree Village jVirginia St. and Day Ave.) is occupied early evening by employees of the local restaurants. By10:0C on -most-, Thursday through Sunday evenings, it is close to impossible to Yet out of our,driveways as traffic is backed up on Virginia St. In addition, cadre park i�i ally (since legal, rkinQ ,.is pa sg ! inadequate), blocking the view .of ontoaing tra fie; cosoundi'ag �? an already dangerous situation. - The parkin .and traffic;probleas of "Ceatrar Grove* will'©nI worsenlif this variance 3s granted. While we try to be good nei gphbors we expect that retail and ontertainment.esta�bi ishments, F that rofit .from locating in our neighborhood do this same. ' Given ths-current lack any concrete plan by the local business. community or Cit raaoeat to a].leviste th�r parking and traffic problems, it woufd.be sresponsibls of t?ae Zonlag`aud Planning board to grant the wai r in question. We will appear la person at the October 19th hearing over this matter,'but wanted to express our views to you of time and In writing. �Sincy�►sly, ? .. X.w �e., Afid;law R. Cohan r, Secretary, Lewontree Village. Condominium Association. -Inc. �;�� ,ono .The �� mom of 09 p,`"`o u.. 'Cul BY t- bt waik to Spam c a Conv o'ciLt P ; ; .. tv, fin�f _ypealla to Vitiate, theC1xl�ef, Mcmsure+d . Wes40. P► � . _ BLS„ � .µ;me � to ,e demod d �'cyo wre�� sts .vago Sur th a of d► am tC�u the Pafi� law LO ��CL Wv Review of tht analysisand rmm mendations, however, should be viewed in the context of Coconut,' Grove as a,, unique environment The Central Business District is as compact area of lest: than half a milt across. As suclu . and due to the nature br the land uses peckstrian traffic is prevalent: 'ihertfo�e, parking in one arcs and w'aiking -,. to other area of the CB is common. For Purposes of data collection, parkin information , was gathered for each of foot subareas (' 'cts) in the CBD. Nevertheleas, each district interaess with the others and no district can be ei%ctively, ; isolated for data collection and analysis purposes. For that reason, the conclusions of this study „ Are based upon areawide totals of the aforementioned infotrrsadon: The parldng inventory ipclu ft both off-reet and on -:trees. public and private, as well as cowercial and patrons packing. Total parking supply available to the public .on web nd nights is 2,300 spaces. An additional 1= spaces are not available because fey are used as Valet paodng, are closed on, weekend nights, or belong.m vacant buildings- Pariang a==ulation was measured on. a wcd=d night to establish usage during ` the highest hour. Ile menured usage then becasne the ban to estunate. the peak demand. i oral esdzued area weekend night parldng demand is 4200 .spas., N-acant nuiidings would male 900 spins -availabie increasing the exia mg 'supply' 3Z00 spaces. !Wditionallt. 'the supple would be increased by 35 spacxs:, due to planned parking facilities, potential use of unavailable tots and 3 parking, The PWP resultant unmct demand, these w% would be M spauces. **ADDITIOM xM sY T= P'taiuR na, gIIILD=C AND Z=XP "r DEP Tt Based 'on the ligares stated aba", the cogent estjjWted daaan+d � is 4200 spaces and the existing supply is 3200 spfcas; thus,' the �1t real resultant u:msnt dOmmd 'is curremtly ' 1000 spaces;- this is s ^••••w oi` the tact that the 330 leaned s j _ p paces* mentioned above, M OWN a. Fiftllyo parwg: requimmenm based on the existing parking code, were tested. As part of that calculation, parking requirenlents for nighttime use (restau=4 retail, theater) were also reviewed. Additionally, in as much as outdoor retail and restaurant area generate patrons (and consequently parking demand), par6g requirements for these. areas were also estimated even though the parking code nov; waives parking for such are" The nighttime parking requirement for the area then, would be 4,100 Space&, This requirement is very similar to the parking demand. Therefore, it can be concluded that the current parldng code, if expanded to include outdoor uses u consistently applied, would satisfy the nighttime requirements of Coconut Grove. The present, deficiency in Coconut Grove is, therefore, a result of outside factors su(I as gmndfathered uses and the We& Rgco'mrnendadons to resolve these deSiciencies a Utfliation gf the Existing Parking Kunniy ''..4caj organizations (such as the Chambcw- of. Comme: c: or the Cocow, Grove Parldng Commir=..' interwoven. with City representation) shouid De desianated as the hridng-' Clearing House -for Coconut Grove. 7his organization would have- the, responsibility for coordinating publication S-3 ik and dimbudan of parking information for the entire area and would take the .role o( liaiaotl . tot, iticrUsing the public and privateparking supply in Coconut `Grove _ 2. Improve the Parking ;signing plan sv sated in the 1980 study. This r =, requires public, `and private c oordinatimn/implementation.` 3. Establish an organised effort to contact property owners in the area and encourage opening other parking lam to the general public. (Enforcement of ovenue of available lots.) 4. Change the wninng code to allow 24 hour operation of puking facilities with required parking, which are not in use on weekend nigher. S. Emblish 4, Satellites jddnr/Shuttle S=jce SMem :. xabiuh a satellite paring shuttle s+ewi= to pro`'id` z Can tav=_n asraflable paridpg- . outside the s,u& area anc the Cents.: Susin= JistriCL the best soiudon would be :a nave satellite parking to me •. .. north ' and west: as well. (.4 separate derailed report on p arl:in shurle g alternatives and recommendation has also been prepared as part of this '. stud), this includes routes, headwa)% personal secuhty, etc.) .. • S-4 . r (Tax incentives+ development oroers1 Implementation of the recommended p atldng shu'ttie service is re�eaed+ _ � detailed recommendations ore detai4 in a separate volumes Spe m m .n are included in thatrepo R' for thu cocmP®ment of the p , g p