Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-93-0065` J-93--37 (a ) 1/28/93 a 93— 65 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 10'-0" (20'-0" REQUIRED), 89% OF PAVED AREA [40% OF THE TOTAL AREA OF THE REQUIRED YARD, MAXIMUM PAVED AREA ALLOWED, ACCORDING TO SECTION 908.10.1(B)] AND TO ALLOW A PROPOSED PARKING STALL AT THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE WITHOUT THE 7'-6" REQUIRED BY SECTION 908.10, FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A DUPLEX RESIDENCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 121-123 NORTHWEST 56 COURT, MIAMI, FLORIDA, ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WESTGATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 3 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; SAID VARIANCE BEING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) APPLICANT :HALL OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE PROPERTY ON OR BEFORE MAY 28, 1993; 2) APPLICANT SHALL PAY AT LEAST FIFTEEN PERCENT (18%) OF THE SUM OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES ACCRUED TO DATE ON THE PROPERTY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR THE CITY SHALL PLACE A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY FOR SAID AMOUNT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE PROPERTY IS SOLD AND THE FINES DUE ARE PAID TO THE CITY OUT OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALE; FURTHER, HAVING A TIME LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of November 23, 1992, Item No. 2, duly adopted Resolution No. ZB-116-92 by a four to four (4-4) vote, constituting a denial of the variance as hereinafter set forth; and CITY COKOSSION IMETI G OF JAN 2 8 M3 93— 65 Ott WHEREAS, the applicant has taken an appeal to the City Commission from the denial of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter, notwithstanding the decision of the Zoning Board finds that there are peculiar circumstances affecting this parcel of land and that practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships exist which would impair the owner's right to the reasonable use of the property without the grant of variance as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The reoitals and findings oontained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Seotion 2. The decision of the Miami Zoning Board in this matter is reversed and the request for a variance from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, Article 4, Section 401, Sohedule of District Regulations, R-2 Two -Family Residential, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a rear yard setback of 10'-0" (20'-0" required), 59% of paved area [40% of the total area of the required yard, maximum paved area allowed, according to Section 908.10.1(B)l, and to allow a proposed parking stall at the front property line without the ?" 6" required by Seotion 908.10, for an existing addition to a duplex residence for the property looated at 121- 123 Northwest 56 Court, Miami, Florida, also desoribed as Lot 3, -2- 93- 65 Block 2, Westgate Subdivision, an recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, zoned R--2 Two --Family Residential, said variance being subject to the following conditions: 1) applicant shall obtain a certificate of occupancy for the property on or before May 28, 1993; and 2) applicant shall pay at least fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of the code enforcement fines accrued to date on the property prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the City shall plane a lien on the property for said amount until such time that the property is sold and the fines due are paid to the City out of the proceeds of the sale; further, having a time limitation of twelve months in which a building permit must be obtained, is hereby granted. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. �----� PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of Jar�a� 1��3• ) ATTES NATTY H RAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: IRMA M. ABELLA ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: A. ki M3387/ jr/bss/osk -3- ^' G--- RAVIER L 3 r MAYOR 93- s5 i • ZONING FACT SHEET LOCATIONAEGAL 121-123 NW 56 Court a Lot 3, Block 2, WESTGATE SUBDIVISION (13-3) PROC APPLICANT/OWNER 0igmory Rocio Diaz b Edilma Castano 121-123 NW 56 Court Miami, Florida 33126 267-8095 ZONING R-2 Two -Family Residential REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the toning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401. Schedule of District Regulations, R-2 Two -Family Residential, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a rear yard setback of 10'.0" (20'-0" required), 594 of paved area (40b of the total area of the required yard, maximum paved area allowed, according to Section 908.10.1(b)1, and to allow a proposed parking stall at the front property line without the 7'-6" required by Section 908.10, for an existing addition to a duplex residence. REC"ENOATIONS: PLANNING, SLOG & ZONING Denial. PUBLIC WORKS No Consent. PLAT AND STREET N/A DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No Comment. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: 92-198 last Hearing Date: 02/12/92 Found: GUILTY Violation(s) Cited: Working without a permit, building and/or roofing, etc.; Illegal units. Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: 03/14/92 Lion Recorded on: 06/23/92 Total Fines To Date: N/A Comments: Ordered to comply by 05/12/92 or be fined $150 per diets. HISTORY =' ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the -requested rear yard setback and paved area variances, or to allow a proposed parking stall at the front of the property line without the required distance for an existing addition to a duplex residence. The addition and use of the parking stall were done without tha benefit of appropriate permits. There are no special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land or structure involved which are not applicable.to other lands or structures in the sac zoning district. Reasonable use of the property can be achieved without the encroachment into the rear yard area; and the parking stall at the front of the property without the required distance -=-"e from the street has a negative effect on the neighborhood, particularly since there are four (4) cars parked in front of this structure. -=1 93- 65 APPLICATION NUMBER 92- 111 Novemlar 23, 1992 Item# 2 - Page 1 10/27/92 k Ms. Elba Morales offered the following Resolution. and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 116-92 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCES FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 10'-0" (20'-0" REQUIRED), 59% OF PAVED AREA (40% OF THE TOTAL AREA OF THE REQUIRED YARD, MAXIMUM PAVED AREA ALLOWED, ACCORDING TO SECTION 908.10.1(B)'J, AND TO ALLOW A PROPOSED PARKING STALL AT THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE WITHOUT THE 7'-6" REQUIRED BY SECTION 908.10, FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A DUPLEX RESIDENCE FOR, THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 121-123 NW 56 COURT ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WESTGATE SUBDIVISION (13-3) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY. Upon being seconded by Mr. Lorenzo Luaces the motion failed by the following votes AYES: No. Basila and Morales Luaces, Alonso-Poch NYES: Moran-Ribeaux, Milian, Sands and Barket ABSENT: Mr. Ronald Fox. Ms. Fernandez: Motion fails 4 to 4, constituting a denial. November 23, 1992 93- 65 4. 3 x ZONING FACT $MEET LOCATION/LEGAL 121-123 MW 56 Court Lot 3, Block 2, WESTGATE SUBDIVISION (13-3) PRDC APPLICANT/OWNER Digmoory Rocio Diaz & Edilma Castano 121-123 NW 56 Court Miami, Florida 33126 267-8095 ZONING R-2 Two -Family Residential REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-2 Two -Family Residential, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a rear yard setback of 10'-01, (20'-0" required), 59% of paved area [4001 of the total area of the required yard, maximum paved area allowed, according to Section 908.10.1(b)], and to allow a proposed parking stall at the front property line without the 7°-6" required by Section 908.10, for an existing addition to a duplex residence. RECOMMENDATIONS: PLANNING, BLOG b ZONING Denial. Pt18LIC WORKS No Comment. PLAT ANO STREET N/A DADE COUNTY TPASPORTATION No Comment. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.S. Case No: 92-198 Last Hearing Date: 02/12/92 Found: GUILTY Violation(s) Cited: Working without a permit, building and/or roofing, etc.; illegal units. Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: O5/14/92 Lien Recorded on: 06/23/92 Total Fines To pate: N/A Comments: Ordered to comply by OS/12/92 or be fined $ISO per diem. HISTORY ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the requested rear yard setback and paved area variances, =g or to allow a proposed parking stall at the front of the property line without the required distance for an existing addition to a duplex residence. The addition and use of the parking stall were done without the benefit of appropriate peruits. There are no special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land or structure involved which are not applicable.to other lands or structures in the same zoning district. Reasonable use of the property can be achieved without the encroachment into the rear yard area; and the parking stall at the front of the property without the required distance from the street has a negative effect on the neighborhood, particularly since there are four (4) cars parked in front of this structure. 93` 65 APPLICATION NUNIIER 92- 111 November 23, 1992 Itemf 2 Page 1 10/27/92 K a ZONING BOARD At its mwting of NiNwber 23, 1992, the Zoning Board adopted resolution ZS 116-92, by a motion to approve that failed 4 to 4. denying the above. -- Two replies in FAVOR were received by mail. { ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE APPLICATION NUMBER 92. 111 Yes No N/A X Special conditions and circuwstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the %am zoning district. X The special conditions and circumstances are an indirect result from the actions of the petitioner. X Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 11000 deprives the applicant of rights co=only enjoyed by other properties in the sm zoning district under the terms of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue hardship on the petitioner. X Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, - buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. X The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the lard, building, or structure. X The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otheneise detrimental to the public welfare. Novea!ber 23, 1992 Pale 2 93- 65 Item 2 10/27/n 5 Me. Elba Morales offered the following Resolution. and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 116-92 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD MADE A MOTION TO r APPROVE THE VARIANCES FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 10'-0" (20'-0" REQUIRED), 59% OF PAVED AREA (40% OF THE TOTAL AREA OF THE REQUIRED YARD, MAXIMUM PAVED AREA ALLOWED, ACCORDING TO SECTION 908.10.1(B)'y, AND TO ALLOW A PROPOSED PARKING STALL AT THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE WITHOUT THE 7'-6" REQUIRED BY SECTION 908.10, FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A DUPLEX RESIDENCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 121-123 NW 56 COURT ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WESTGATE SUBDIVISION (13-3) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY. Upon being seconded by Mr. Lorenzo Luaces the motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Ms. Basil& and Morales Luaces, Alonzo -Poch NYES: Moran-Ribeaux, Milian, Sands and Barket ABSENT: Mr. Ronald Fox. MA. Fernandez: Motion fails 4 to 4, constituting a denial. November 23. 1992 ., 93- 65 rm ,c ''' o SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP,Ito- Pts �= Director DECEMBER 2r 1992 CESAR H. 0010 City Manager . THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT TRANSLATION OF LETTER OF APPEAL RECEIVED November 25, 1992 FROM Edilma Castano & Digmony .Diaz FOR 121-123 NW 56 r COURT, MIAMI, FLORIDA. i; TERESITA L. FERNANDEZ, CHIEF OF HEARING BOARDS DIVISION AND DEPUTY CITY CLERK i Fi yl Ei 93- 65 j tt PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 275 N.W. 2nd Street/P.O. Box 330708/Miami, FL 33233-07W/(MS) 579-M Zoning and Planning Boards Dear Sir(s)i Through this letter I, Digmory Diaz. appeal to the Zoning and Planning Department in order to legaal:Lze the apartment where I reside with my little daughter. On M3nday, November 23, 1992, there was a meeting and they ruled against me. I beg that you help me in this appeal, my case number is 121 NW 56 Court, Miaami, Florida 33126. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Signed; Digmory Diaz 93- 65 c �,K►,L�.q �'SO�✓Q'.�2 %"t�l� G���.•^� r» : �-��R.�`mt�s�? cYoix�� c.�ivd .,.tc�• 23 �7/7,.iAo (Z/, .•�, . can / eic i�� rrr . / czov -fo ale CT,Ooe;p o&Z/ �G�cJ• $(v edw-w r: /y7/drr9r' , 4'/02-,O�o .v3/-tYi oQ'_v z M W µ 93- 65 i Zoning and Manning Board: Dear Sir(s): Through this letter, I, Edilma Castaro appeal to the Zoning the Planning Department, in order to legalize the apartment where my daughter Digmory Diaz lives with my little granddaughter. On Monday, November 23, 1992 there was a meeting in which they ruled against aye, this is the reason for my appeal. My case number is 12L NK 56 Court, Miami, Florida 33126. Your cooperation in appreciated. Sincerely Signed: Edilma Castano 93- 65 �.'.� I+rT�C�'J� �+.�CZnL7►�'.'" *,ter+ 5 �' o ©/ .��'�j►'r.�ei / ��V •ars �.-�7`� G ..t�c?.t/t.c,��/ �t/, rt 1e 0 0< z' /' e� y a of. I x 3 7 3 �uc7c.�,re►. ► s �.�e 9 4'.Z !n I U�9-»�t3 ,J�c►r c� � +C� d. � .» : c?�t/ct �i� � .�r� � � uirs�P� /:-.) / v✓CrJ •'ram a-e-W .�IA:y�i /�!o.-r d'GL off/ - ra 3 5G 93- 65 4, - irate two amen ■ . �� � vv arc■ �+ ' ice. �.Q,. s� sus. .,::'© •'`p':i �O���ae � • s�0 si'� s�no •�- �iads a mi *7 M lUX 716 r - ■■�� 4sn• �� a �■ � Q DO �nsm ao a � ■■was, ■s,�sts ■d.�■ �4 �01 ENV --am a■ i r-aWin � wmQ� a7 lOa 0 . aa�tarss ■� -•� � aad■.aasa MOW rj we r.- ��rl■h� ■� oaf �s ■1r11■ Emm now roam as MAN Palo ■Aim"a mm sus ■s#:� ■A■ms isi io ■ Qom+ '.. row■ �IwAr rdr►W Bor�■ sa■■s�■ ssiaa� Nita ■ic►o NEW v� o • -■-� pir @ @� omn■m ■■axis 0 �#® iir�s �r� saa,rca omC= .d �➢. ..., assrra■ Assn■ arloAaa� ss a� ::' �' � 0� �.� BOEHM .1 -Alt OIL Aim . Rio �lo■laa. oa4■ .��. Paz: EM = irk aa�oc�oaaa� 1�ic1141o1. m� Atow y+ y n > � r , < y A >. Y lei._•: of > t 'OS 1Y�'6 ♦ rl��tZ� $r > � r w: r T i UY ° E iv of e d N pcT11.ONV F CR VARPANC. 59 File Nw"bw Y— A vertance is retaaation of the eerms or the ardnartas where sach action unu not to Coma y to the pubide (merest and Where, owiV to Con itwu peculiar to the propo.15► and nog the rss g& of dCgaW of t" appitcatt, titerat Worcoment of this arc nance voWd result tat unnecessary, clad undas haa•dthli? an the pr'op&ny• As ussd Gt Ws ord umes, a vartanes is c=hortsed. arty for height, airs. side of st mmaso d imerulans of yg-,& and other open "" and of f s sheet aarWng or 100*4 regtrlrernents. fSsctian ?101� ROCIO 19 MRS . EDI LMA CASTANO & BIGHORT IDW l,Weby petitlon the City of WNW ZCCLIR9 Boarig tor a varza me rarn ins terms at the laZening Ordtnariee of the CIty of ani," ofNoing pre+pervy located at 1 21- s 23 N.W. 56 CT.- Miami• specif1*4 below. In support of this application, the following material is submitted with this appilea tars , X 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by of State of Florida R*Otered x 2. Four copies oft the site plan sharing (as requirsO p aM ly bar4arimt wdxttng Of any) and proposed stg ueture(s). parkM% laindscapkM star building ei*V tioM and dirrN W*m and core Watlais of tot area (gross cnd nstX building spocinL.Ut ratter, and height 4mviope. 3. Affidavits dlsatosing ownership of property covered by applletatton and dltclasiars of interest fcrm (Forms 443 and UA attach to appllcatlarlL x 4. Certifled Ilst of ovnws of real esiate within 377 rodiut from the outside boundaries of properTy covered by this application. Fors 6-0 and Q"Cc t to oppiicoatlonj x. x S. At least two photographs that sttow the entire propertr (lord 9%J im;wcvemenft)- 6. , x 7. Fee of 60�to apply toward the cost of procsasings based of the following (a) RS, RC -I ( rest dentle l uses) $ 200. 00 W For penetration of Plante 111 by antwvm and the like $ 300.00 W All other q*ications for each request variance $0.0 7 per sq.f t. of floor area of building(s) from the ardinance minimum - S5 50.00 (d) Surcharge equal to applicable fee from Wa(c) above, not to *xceed $550.001 to bo refunded if there is no appeal. (City Cade - Section 6241) 93- �5 la x L na V ariwc+B remested is for relief fram the mvvisiom of Sev. ion if 000900M the City of mioms swung Ordinances (a followw SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, PAGE 13 MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. 20'-0" REQUIRED REAR SETBACK - 10'-0" REQUESTED dmvmmo 9. In suoport of this c*lcotloc4 the ertrldeetem. on the point aerated ?.oe jm Ord oWIOWW is premed to offer the following at Svbsevion 310& 1 of the City' at M1ar i Notes TW appucuum ram be accept" for Zonq aoad ocdat untsss A of 1ha f oilovrft su Cum art aompieted x,... (a) Sp"cd ="Hom orml cir*Anziarsoea exit wttileh are pmdlar to the lord, xtrvrture, or buiWk g Qnvolvaed and which an not oppiieaMe to other tank- struturees? or baildings in the som andnq dtaMct In thaft Rta • ovi de ms : to be produced aced un a"dond she ak ff nmumvyj THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES EXSIST ARE PECULIAR TO THE LAND AND STRUCTURE. EXISTING EXPANSION AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY WAS CONVERTED INTO AN APARTMENT- (DUPLEX USE ADDITIONAL UNIT) THERE FOR REQUIRED ZV-Q" SET BACK. (b) The special cavOlons and circunutancee do not rastielt from the octl0m d the patitton r in thats THE PETITIONER WAS NOT INTENTIONALLY OR KNOWINGLY AWARE OR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION- SHE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY AS IS THE s>pLY THING SHE DID WAS CONVERT THE EXISTING REAR PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE INTO AN ADDITIONAL UNIT. (CONVERT TO DUPLEX) ... 93— 65 I W x ( Uww intermrs"tion of the provisions of the toning ordinw4e would _ecr"re '"""'mom shot molieant of rights =rtumnl)r enjoyed by. other procertisss in !.-e so zcn*mg disttrie:t ender that tsrrm of the zaninr; ardirmo= and waved Karx utu+eteeacry and undue hardships an the pattitioner in than THE PETITIONER IS UNABLE TO ENJOY THE COMPLETE USE OF THE PROPERTY DUE TO THE SIZE. IT IS BEING CONVERTED INTO A DUPLEX BECAUSE SHE HAS NEED FOR REVENUE. SINCE SHE IS BY HERSELF AND IS PRESENT'-(' UNEMPLOYED, AND HER DAUGHTED IS EXPECTING A CHILD AND NEEDS '"HE APARTMENT. x �di . Gtanthr+q the va lcm raid will rat cmfor an the potittoner OW -Ps" privilege that is denied by the Zwj"q Ordkmum to caller 1amW, buiidleigri ar met in that sew zoning dletrW in theft THE PETITIONER AT SACRIFICE TO HERSELF AND THE PROPERTY. WENT AHEAD AND CONVERTED THE REAR PORTION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE INTO AN APARTMENT NOT BEING AWARE OF THE NEED OF,A BUILDING PERMIT x = TM variame, It granted, Is the mininur'n vasione s ttm will mcke possible the re®orabla use of the iannd, building, or strvlwe in them RATHER THAN DEMOLISHING THE EXISTING -REAR PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE TO MEET THE 20'-0" REAR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS THE PETITIONER DECIDED TO CONVERT THE REAR PORTION INTO AN APARTMENT, AS AN ADDITIONAL UNIT- (DUPLEX) IF THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED, THIS WILL MAKE POSSIBLE FOE THE RESONABLE USE. 93_ 65 { (F) The gtcnt of th+e varit rve will be in hat n1®nv with the ?vr.: ;vans• of the Zoning Grdinancv. and will nest t* :n]ur:OtA •S neighb mood, or otherwise; detrimental to the public vvaifore. THE VARIANCE. IF GRATED WILL RESULT IN THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE PROPERTY VALUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH IT IS. LOCATED, DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE VIOLATION WOULD THEN BE IN COMPLIANCE AND THE REAR PORTION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WOULD THEN BE OF THE PROPERTY AS A WHOLE. Notes Alt doesnrtienm repasts. sts.c 96S, exhibits or other written Cr gra�ic 110sRr:rt '-z -6e vAbmttted to tho Zot'ung 9oaret MdU be =Nnittod with this GFOcatton. ea.- edar A — Stgrlezturo - weutnarises Agent Nam MRS . ED I ]RMA C� ASS ANt] -- A,*M 121-123 N.W. 56 CT. STATE OFFLORIDA i S& COUNTY OF OADE ) MRS . ED I LMA CASTANO bOv duty dlQD Crd salt t rs tner with 1zed ) of fhn roam grope t)► described ;n a www to qua tlan 019 that he hat rvoal fhef foregowq a v"n and that tho same are tnm and C=61plet" cnd (if am" ag agent for owner) that he has ovthorlt' to execute this peNtton an belwJf of the owner. _ SWORN TO AND StJ®SC.'R11310 before me this LMLday of AUG1992 MY COMMISSION WIRES& NOTARY PUSUC. S PT't of ►t0l�ll,0 419. INV %O;AM'iyioN IN.". OCt. MiuTaR� 09w06a W".40 "Wraat ww'r WIKw 6 X /., a �tz. lZRWO ]�&� ' --- w .rrc uwie, ate of 0haa at LVrgs 93- 65 /�1�7 rF (f) The grant of the variance will be in harin nY with the ;ever-, 'nrerr puraase of the Zoning CrdInwca, cmd will not be :mjvr;oug .2 µ- ne3ghbo&ocde or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, Note: A9 doesortenM sport% stud ssw mAdbits Or other ivrlt"A or 9"We ena:sriai :::e mmitted to tJte ZwAM Bow aua be submitted with Wda appliootio+% S7grtatvre `' , or to WIM +gent t`OM DIGMORY ROCIO DIAZ Ad&= 121-123 N.W. 56 CT. STATE OF FLORIDA) SSt COUNTY OF DAM ) _ DIGMORY ROCIO DIAZ Heft duly-7 sworn, dsp�oees c-.d am t is t etedAvm W Owner) of ttse reesi -property demtibed ir arver to gamttan #1, abw* Mten he fret Bread the fw*"IM wuwste-and that the samw are true a+d cat. testes and Of mtIrq as agent felt owner) then heat hGvftrity to execute thi: petition an behalf of the owner. ' SWCFtN TO AND SUESMISM before fm fft 6TH . daw of AUGUST '��` 1992 NOTARY PUettG STATE Or FLOWCA. Mr COMMISSION WjgLS.. OCT. 1. J"3. 1 60"ag TPORW ROTARY .uiYo 016"A W COMMISSION F.XPIFW..% aryate at Florica 0 '-4 4 .__...._. 93` 65 ., $!1►" o1 nAlUoA) coma or ma Mtws no to sadesatp"! as%b"Lty, ULM "7 pssisaully MRS. 01LPIA EpjA o * vAs rsisp "IT sass*. "em sssA, deposes am **"I . i. not lA is Ow WSW# on aM "0" sspssAuuvs s! Vs ssm, srmeet" tM s+nswlww* SWUSttes tss s mile mw%" sr se*ola" of 4 M" 0 am goo st as usy of r XLMi. hiss"* .tteftsm as MI. POMIT 3®sssst In 00 CAST fAtidevisNo am" apan Um to S. am du wafts to sapmem, it 4** 5 fiin+s Isaw stab tail w1 Owls" Pawlstw tss so a an Ws"ts b""t No to scow 4w arlitw aias se a sElwum"Aft s: 8"Sus"a of WGI 116M, P isLMO i. SM tit POW N 14OW W as as& s Pose of tit® altLeis swats Me ss:aws MM* sailiiW sitoasss. {IMMsa madmw ad ul" bwssique" tsv asai Pes/s:eT vats~ Ai As tw 4� M 3Vi sspessssatiw. 4. �ass�laM111� �' iii QN�i�d M1 sMsa�sass s hid s. assiisrssss visa V" at tics t "m tws sat @M! on * vwwm altiias sa"a *"* �rsss is am $elssiast beet" ms me 4" st s yea �i'i 1 seats s � Mst►rs as Lair,! asruw Neu& v +tee•• j ri +o. au+wsar. s. +s�• 0 i?An Of t'iO1 *A? ss COVN'!°Y Qp Dq� � Seim we WW wWWV9 L Mad 41¢sMISM, U44 OF psssan I LY appeaser Dt6WRV RWjo DIAZ . tAllP �eiaM � as Usft ftlt .ass. *Poo aaau, dopes ear sots 1. !'ate he to sae saws, so sate l"lu Imp* sasesivs of uw ftvwi somall l» us Masw wuq awUmsiss low a PoWe beast" sat ""U" w 110" so We caft st us CLOT sf diem* MRIde• ottos 1=! sal! M". 1004"d iR uw CUT es amoi. 40 "SMILMM o" lusad' A sae Paces assasa«1 to tus "at dowst am aara a Pon fit. as an sU WAN" vues he "o it ass♦ Bali 7:ves %A"& !mil a" ssaW1"s Paloissise ass us " an Ls ON&& bmWS Off MIS SIMP sf owlsoauft of • tumitimiss as s+rtslm's st tsaia� 4w M slay 1a sala �la+N P"iaise. ?. !O US Pages stsM►bsd baeeela alas arks a Pass 09 tad allidMiti oaaiai>• "A guy"* aalloae. UUU* amwsss, Passes, sumbon alrll 1"" dsstsiat a In saa erase ety Vuea a as, is on ass" sae I"" loplosswives _ 3 0. 1" tM" as s--- Is - on Vswites asd ie sa sois"M is ear is via ow aatl�+r!►t`�as eaers solls"s. `+ 7 PSIWW MILMs $4700 as* sum to a! sabool "d leis'e " _ t 1A. 9eatte 0: tlosiM Its Wt Caaeeie 1109 IVAZea r f ykl11M MIM S / �N�R1 4tiRpe0t11�: OAWi� Mt111r4 AMMt teltte" um "Gl lod"Otal Wool wMei+'lipties tpp ►Ail RlRi1� OM "� wo idlaloollys �RAI� v �Rtlly (or �r+tr fall. p or oI+rmly? *Isis 30 M' fee soon aim it Its" ; . 11i F4 am 65 ry 41 �o r L. t404 d"Anf 3m sari atsas+r pel prMet9►t 121-123 N.M. 36 CT. IC r. 3 6L40CR 2, 1tU^11 ATC SUWl V I l ION Vs. 13 PC. 3 s. .*~W s4 tUL ad pstl^�Was" Of s►wunhia. a of rt&M 09 tt is�I mina at au N nuns t sl ab ivasaas�• stwof asaiw �t wan", rs m lw"m qmm !e /1 pwaswummo ropml M plo""m N 1s Cis► CaMsls�M• Asuve fitly, qmtum *a mp tru dLesU n N aAi O1s>l+0u Wews of ,"�Mww� # M totou• awm W odw U M19 U%d VmLol l DIGNCt1tY MOCIO AIAB 500 own= ®UM CY'>;M M OAU �i .j J GUNd IV aW $MY UNM V BAR 0 ¢EMM 93* M 04 10=d AM" VS fta4d an awlen na pvpwq,, Notts . 1 of mwlo OIAZ 0I4M 1r tt=so otA$ n ad MiaesMM to s gmnm it. fm ai an ad we oaf ar wawa a�nr er cart rdr m no " 40610a as 11A OWN +a wowl" ow ONI � so an �sg u �rwir � rt t#areaa� M am as mom d, ift *Am& • OI IA DYAt ,- ------------ �ca 9 Am saga= 9 3 mom i tm 67W . 65 I +. i21-i23 M.W. 36 CT. = 3 BLOCZ 2 W=TGAT` SUBDIVISION !D. 13 lit. 3 3. • 0~ 41 4t R� slri peff"Is" ONwn+etsh tlp. 4 dui* imam*# mm disow a L11"Im. W tlro ww�sw as • floomseume op we " QWls" to Cl" C�31311A. L"l i�� s3 l"Wm dt+sitbeemm Of soli isessMrLd�>rs et +fir m . llr:! l Asrti it�r MM. ZDIL lA CASTAM sof await BtONPllt MCID ALs sot 0 m 3. Vp". 4=WIPJM Nd "IM Wdl l" rti GM stab IMPM tat WAN* or of pm usW in � 0 gomm ad IN lama wit" 37! tM it 10 6W)IM " pll MMo , E t W I Q _ t Hu. CDIL lA CART tfa r � ad Oat! er "" mount tap �is�st a 408" $1* an� fm s o swap" �B ad so am m mo ad � tsoda an OWN) sm he to a wwalf ff W� smaAn Oman aso JbikilhiT ` 1192 MRS ntLPA CASTAM tam ror� rWt+l�.. orr s. ini.. 93- 65 C�z1 I