Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-11035J-92-532 1/28/93 ORDINANCE NO. 11035 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3711 SOUTHWEST 26TH TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL TO RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL; MAKING FINDINGS; INSTRUCTING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 13, 1992, Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, pursuant to Resolution No. PAB 19-92, defeated a motion by a vote of 6 to 3 that RECOMMENDED APPROVAL of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the recommendation of denial, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this Comprehensive Plan change as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: 11035 it Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is hereby amended by changing the land use designation from Duplex Residential to Restricted Commercial for the property located at 3711 Southwest 26th Terrace, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lot 9, Block 1, GABLES MANOR, as recorded in Plat Book 47 at Page 36 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Section 2. It is hereby found that this Comprehensive Plan designation change: a. is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; b. is one which involves property that has not been the specific subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the last year; and c. is one which does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property that has been the subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the last year. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby instructed to direct the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Ordinance immediately upon approval of second reading to Linda Shelly, Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Tallahassee, Florida, for a 90 day review and comment. 11035 -2- Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. If any section, part of this section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective ninety (90) days after final reading and adoption thereof. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 1nth day of December , 1992. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th day of January--, ATT S MATT Y HIRAI, Y CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: a LINDA KELLY K SO ASSISTANT CITY ATT09NEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: h A. qdilwq S, II CITY ATrss/M927 Y LKK/pb/ 1993. XAVIER L. UARE2, MAYOR 11©35 Mf-M Zifiq af �iaral SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, AICP Director February 17, 1993 Mr. Robert Pennock, Chief Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of Local Planning 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 CESAR H. ODIO City Manager C w m T1 1 - 00 --- V o Re: Transmittal of Application No. 92-6, a proposed amendment to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Dear Mr. Pennock: The City of Miami, on January 28, 1993, adopted Ordinance 11035 amending the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP). This proposed amendment is a small scale development activity and, according to Chapter 163.3187, is submitted without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. 1987, Chapter 163.3187(4) F.S. 1992 (abbreviated review) and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code, and the direction of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), I am pleased to provide you with five (5) copies of these documents consisting of: a) A response to the checklist provided by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), through Rule 9J-11.006, F.A.C. (Attachment 92-6 A); b) Analysis of the availability of, and demand on, public facilities (Attachment 92-6 B); c) Analysis of the compatibility of the proposed land use change with the land use element goals, objectives and policies, as well as those of other affected elements (Attachment 92-6 C); d) A map illustrating the boundary of the subject property and its location in relation to surrounding streets, and thoroughfare networks; and the present land use designations of the property and abutting properties (Attachment 92-6 D); Page 1 of 2 Planning and Zoning Division / (305) 579-6086 / FAX (305) 358-1452 PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT/275 N.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida 33128 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Mr. Robert Pennock February 17, 1993 e) A copy of support documents on which recommendations are based (PZ- 4, City Commission Meeting of January 28, 1993) (Attachment 92-6 E); f) A copy of Volume I: Goals, Objectives and Policies of the MCNP, as amended through January 24, 1991. This volume contains all of the adopted MCNP elements. (Attachment 92-6 F); and g) A copy of MCNP Land Use Plan Map Amendment Ordinance 11035 as adopted, (Attachment 92-6 G). If, in the 90 day abbreviated review process, there are points that need clarification, you may contact Roberto E. Lavernia, Planner I, Planning, Building and Zoning Department, at (305) 579-6086. Sincerely, 2 -7 `v 52 ergi 6 Rodriguez, AICP Director m y - SR/rl v j Attachments cc: Matty Hirai, City Clerk Joseph W. McManus, Deputy Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Clark P. Turner, Planner II Planning, Building and Zoning Department Robert Lavernia, Planner I Planning, Building and Zoning Department Doc:[robert]<robert>transm/92-6 Page 2 of 2 (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) (letter only) PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Alexander Fernandez, Agent, 9680 SW 103 Rd. Miami Sonzo Enterprises, Inc. LOCATION APPROXIMATELY 3711 SW 26 TERRACE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, Block 1, GABLES MANOR (47-36) PRDC PETITION Consideration of amending Ordinance 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, Future Land Use Plan Map, by changing the land use designation of the subject property from DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL to RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL. PLANNING RECOMMENOATION Denial. BACKGROUND N/A ANALYSIS The request for change in land use designation for lot 9 (subject property) represents a cosssercial intrusion into a duplex residential area. The change is beingrequested to augment parking in conjunction with abutting coeasercallr-designated Lot 10. Lot 10 is a parcel of 92'x110" or approximately 10,000 square feet in area facing SW 25th Terrace, SW 27th Avenue and Coconut Grove Drive. The adequate site of Lot 10, which if designed correctly, could accomodate the existing use and its required parking, and the difficulty in traffic access and egress to Lot 10 argue against increasing the site of the site for additional parking by designating Lot 9 as cowrcial. APPLICATION NUMBER 07/06/92 92- 13 PAS 05/13/92 Item e i Page 1 4, 11035 ?I,AIZNING ADVISOR? SD At its meeting of May 13, 1992, the Pl&ming Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAS 19-92 by a notion t.,) appzovs that failed 3-6, denying the above. One reply in FAVOR wee received by mail. ::y COTMI55I0N At its mwMirg of July 16, 1992, the City Ccmni"ian oontinued the above. At its meeting of September 24, 1992, the City Camissicn after reconsideration, cm ivied the above. At its meeting of October 22, 1992 the City Commission contimsed the above. At its meeting of November 12, 1992 the City Ccxmisei�on mytirued the above. At its meeting of December 10. 1992, the City Commission passed the above on First Beading. -- 6"41 Q.� seht��- �. •o•-.....�. i1: QmR 2a1i•. ------------- de�a1B �►_� Mb. i 1199�RR J i . .. :.. i SINUL. � FAMtLY RESTRICTED COMMERC!AL `-- F RECREATION GENERAL COMMERCIAL `• l— DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL r pi PUBLIC FACILITIFS _ OFFICE ; , — MEDIUM DENSIT MULTI SINGLE -- - - FAMILY -- 11035 r __' 1 t�l� 2•2 t42 �2. 2'22 c .� • � ' 5 >N 25 ST. � U \ TS � a 1�•! 4,1 •' •�0iI11iAltl�•ifjl• • - • - 5 tll02s=•lsr2•i��i'?•1�It2.tlkdr4,1. 1, 3 N C I T Y L I~ T � q 5 w 25 ITR 12 -Rips )S ! so asi•i• Z9 Zb n e ' )t w 26 S • � I � • 4 1. 1C 1 CASE NUMBER 92-13 PAB- ITEM#1 May 13, 1992 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT No.92-6 Lot 9, in Block 1, located at approximately 3711 SW 26th Terrace DISCUSSION The subject 0.15 acre parcel is located in the block bounded by SW 26th Terrace (City of Miami) and San Sebastian. Street (Coral Gables), between SW 37th Avenue (City of Miami) and Ponce de Leon Boulevard (Coral Gables) at approximately 3711 SW 26th Terrace, exactly on the boundary line which divides the City of Miami and the City of Coral Gables, in the Coconut Grove Planning District. MCNP Land Use Policy 1.6.1., establishes future land use categories according to the Future Land Use Plan Map and the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map". The subject property is currently designated "Residential -- Duplex". The rest.of the block west and blocks south are similarly designated; to the east there is a "Restricted --Commercial" land use designation, and to the north are the City of Coral Gables limits. The Duplex Residential land use category permits residential structures up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre. Permissible uses include places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult care centers in suitable locations subject to planning director approval. Community -based residential facilities.(14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities), also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. PAS 05/13/92 11035 Item #1 Page 1 of 2 The Restricted' Commercial category accommodates commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public. Residential uses up to high density multifamily, including hotels, are also permissible within .his land use category. Commercial uses include general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. Other permissible land uses include motels and hotels, residential facilities, offices major sports, exhibition or entertainment facilities. Mixed -uses of commercial, office and/or residential are also permissible within this land use designation. The Planning, Building and Zoning Department contends that the increased densities with the possibility of more intense commercial uses intruding into the existing low density residential neighborhood created by this amendment are not consistent with the future low density land use pattern that is proposed for the area. A change such as this is also in conflict with certain c:her policies of the MCNP. Land Use Policy 1.1.3. requires that all areas of the City be protected from encroachment of incompatible land uses. Housing Policies 1.1.5. and 1.2.7. require the City to preserve and enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods. Housing Policy 1.1.1. requires that the City control large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial land development which may negatively impact residential neighborhoods. Land Use Objective 1.3. requires the City to encourage commercial, office and industrial development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas. These policies support the position that the existing land use pattern in this neighborhood should remain the same. At the present time, the commercial area east of the site has sufficient capacity to accommodate additional commercial uses. In addition, Land Use Policy 1.1.1. requires new development or redevelopment, that results in an increase in density or intensity of land use, to be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minims LOS standards adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Policy (Policy CI-1.2.3.). The attached Concurrency Management Analysis pertaining to concurrency demonstrates that no levels of service would be reduced below minimum levels. Ooc:Crobert]<robert>92-6amen PAS 05/13/92 Item a.. 1 11035 Page 2of 2 — :oN";RRENC:'-tMIAGE.%SNT AtdAL:S:S :Ty OF N:ANI PLANN:NG :EPARTMENT moose. No.: 92-6 :mp Ac— of PROpo= ANENDmtN* To :AND USE NAP _d_e: :e/'.5i92 CUTS:DE A M"S?ORTAT:ON :VkA:DOR A.%M.NDMENT :NFORMAT:ON ------------------------------------------------ :ONCJRRENCY ANALYS:S ---------------------------------------------------------------- 4ccli_ant: A_exanae: Fernandes --------------------------------------------------------------- RECREAT:ON AND OPEN SPACE Aadress: 37:: S.W. 26 Terrace ?opu.aciOh :nCrament, Rasldon:s Space Requirement, acres 3oundary S::eets: Nor:?:: Excess Capacity Before Chanqs Sour : S.W. 26 Terrace Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff :x Was.. --------------------------------------------------------------- POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION _xistinq Ooslgnstion, naxunum Land Use Intensity POpulation Increment, Residents 5g Residential 1..:5 acres 9 18 DU/acre 3 OU's Transmission Requirement, qpd Other 0 sq.ft.9 C FAR 0 sq.ft.1 Excess Capacity before Change >24 aoove demane Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation 3 1 Excess Capacity After Change >2t aoove Remand I Coneurrency Checkoff 1x Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity --------------- ------------ ------------------------------------ Residentlal 0.15 acre• 8 :50 OU/acre 23 OU's SANITARY SEWER TRAINSMISSION Otner 0 sq.ft.1 0 FAR 0 sq.ft.I Population Increment, Residents 5g 74ek Hour Person -Trip Generation 25 Transmission Requirement. qpd Excess Capacity before Change >2t aoove aeaar.c Not Increment with Proposed Change: I Excess Capacity Attar Change >2% aoove aamar.c Population 58 I Concurrency Checkoff Owellinq Units 13 -----~-------------------~--------------~------------------- Peak Hour Person -Trips 22 1 STORM SCMIER CAPACITY I Extilcracion System before Changa on -site Planninq District Coral Way I Exfiltration System Alter Change on-si-e County wastewater Collection Zone 310 Concurrency Checkoff Cx Oralnage, Subcatcnmenc Basin Ri I------------------------»------------------------------------ Solid waste Collection Route 13 1 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION I Population Increment. Residents 58 solid waste Generation, tons/year 74 ----------------------------------------------------------------I Excess Capacity Wave Change 5CO RELEVANT MCNP GOALS. 09JECTIVES, AND POLICIES f Excess Capacity After Change 426 I Concurrency CheokottOx i Land Use Polio I. .1 -- -N-------- CIE Policy 1.2.3 1 TRAIPIC CIRCULATION Peak Hour Person -Trips ZZ Peak Hour Venlcle Trips 1 LOS before Change D v/C- 0.64 (See N:7_ : LOS After Change D v/C- 0.65 at :eft1 ------------------------------------------------- ----------- Concurrency Checkoff OK NOTE 1 I------ ----------- -'-------------------------------------------- I ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMMS i If 1999 V/C is grsaeer than 1.00 (LOS E), then the maxlmum I Population 1nCCM*ftt is assumed to be all new residan.s. Peax- allowaola v/C is equal to 1.15 tLses 1909 v/C. (Transportation I period trip generation from ITt Trip Ganeracion, eth Edition. Policy I.:.3.61. 1 Potable water and wastewter transmission capacities are :n accordance with Metre -Dade County seated Capacities and are Maximum development intensities are, hypothetical *worst -case• I assu"d correct. Semis* eonneetions to water and sewer I scenario and do not reflect actual developmental potential, I mains are assumed to be of 40equate Sigel if not, new connec- t which is governed by land use and zoning regulations and would I clans to be installed at MMOV s expense. Recreation/Open be leas than the hypothetical intensity. space acreage requirements and Traffic Circulation v/C balances assume proposed change. Transportation facili::es capacities and LOS from Table PT-2(RI), Data and Analysts. 03/:3/90 --. - ----»---- ------------------- — -»--'------- ---------------------------- UN Oates 3-21-92 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT 275 N.W. 2 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 APPLICATTOM TO AMEND THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGH801H000 PLAN Section 62-17 of the Code of the City of Miaimi, Periodic review, additions and unndnnts to the adopted C*Wrehensi ve plan, pads as fo l l ors s Periodically, but not less often than once in five ($) years or more often than once in tro (2) years, adopted comprehensive plans or a portion thereeof shill be reviewed by the planning advisory board to determine whether changes in the amount, kind or direction of deve l opment and growth of the city or area thereof, or other reasons, mate it necessary or benef i ci ai to make additions or amendments to the comprehensive plans, or portion thereof. If the city commission desires am amendment or addition, it mar, on its own motion, d4reet the p l armi ng department to prepare such amirAlowt for submission to asd review by the plamieg advisory board. The planning advisory board shall mks a recamedation on the proposed plan amendment to the city commission wMin a reasonable tire as establisher by the city commission. The procedure for revising, adding to or amending comprehensive plans or portions thereof sha11 be the same as the procedure for original adoption. This petition 1s proposed bye City cammission P1 mine Oepartiment I Zoning ioard owt�tat x ; Other i Please Specify: The subject property is located at 3711 S.W. 26 TERRACE KEAMI, FICR =h 33133 ANO MW PAIMC A ANT OESCUM ASs Lot(s) 9 (NnM) 81ock(s) 1 (ONE) a: .subdivisio C GABLES-MANOR11035 O a w& he unaer 519ned �Q :ze �vmer -r *.ne �s�rese...3. ,e .f sun,iect property a ssl resooctfully rtouest the ,`roval of the city of H1&; for the f o 11 on ng #.mendaen t (s) to the Miami Ca►, atiens i •e Ne i ghoornood P 1 ate for the above-4escribed property as indicated in the Lind Use Plan: FRAM: CUPID RFSZDEIV'I'IAL TO: RESTRICTED C RC:AL Please supply a statement indicating why you think the designation is inappropriate. - existing plan DUE 70 ALTACENCY 70 THE CITY OF CORAL GABLES LOT 10, BLOCK 1 , GABLE WM S--r%rISICN ZONED C-1 (WHICH IS UNDER SAME OGfiiER.SHIP AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) .IS I1RRF7M AR AND UNDERSIZED FM ADEQUATE PARKING UNDER ANY DEVEOPIE TT SCDIARIO. THUS IN aMM TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CN-SITE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AND PARKIMt AND PROPER SITE DIMENSIONS TO ACCCMHODATE ZOMIG RE , WE ARE rum, THE RE- ZCNIIVG -- OF LOT-9, BIAC{-1 ; OF GABLES MANOR -SUBDIVi'STON FRC M R-Z (740'FAMILY - RESIDENTIAL) TO A C-1 ( RESTRICTED ClOM'IERCM%L) . Please supply a statement justifying your request to change the p'in to your requested plan designation. THE ADJACENCY TD THE CITY Or CORAL GABLES, THE 'OCRAL GABLES HOSPITAL, THE RESIDENTIAL CIM491fM AND THE CURRENT CITY OF MIAMI MiSTFR PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT Of DOUGLAS ROAD, SERVE AS MKPURAA2m1T F09R THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. AS PRLV;a=Y MMM, THE CURRENT SIZE AND STIE CONFIMRATION OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1, GABISS MANOR SUBDMSION, IS INADE> nz IN MEETING CURRENT ZONn4G REQUIREMENTS. THE REQUEST FOR THE RE-ZODI M OF LOT 9,ZU= 1,GAM MANOR SUBDIVISICN WILL IMPROVE THE DEVi3APMETT POTENTIAL FOR THE ADJACW T PROPERTY LOT 10 BLOCK 11 GABLES MANOR wmrvISION. What is the acreage of the property being requested for a change in pl designation? % 0.15 ACRE Page 2 of 3 110 5 Has the designation of this property been changed in the last year? NO Do you own any other property within 200 feet of the subject property? YES If yes-, has this other property been granted a change in plan designation within the last tweTve months? NO Have you made a companion application for a change of zoning for the subject property with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department? YES Have you filed with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department: Affidavit of ownership? st of owners of property within 375 feet of the subject property? YEES Disclosure o owne s i fo ? If not, please supply them. SIGNATURE DATE Z NAME ALESANDER ADDRESS 9680 S.W. 103 Ave. RA_ Miami Flnrida 13176 PHONE (305)598-5302 STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DATE } ALE%ANDER ra=EZ , being duly sw= depolm and says that he is t e(owner) (Authorized gent for NFer7of the real property cr ed bov t he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (i tin sag nt for owner) that he has authority to execute this petition on behalf of th owne SWORN TO AND SUBSCRI D bef e e this daY of 9 �_ IC!A L N NAN'CY RODRICUEZ EO:T:ARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLOR MIISSION NO. CCTp�p,�gNY COMMISSION EXPIMMISSION EXP. MAY 27 Ift Computation of Fee: Receipt is (SEAL) Page 3 of 3 11035 1.1 MIAMI REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Ferbsyre, who on oath says that she is the Super- visor, Legal Notices of the Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 11035 xxx In the ......................................... Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of February 10, 1993 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review is a news caper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously U. in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of on ar next preceding the first publication of the at865-:'Filil of a vertisement; and afflont further says that she aid or promised any orrson,,��fttlrm or cor orationt, re ate, commission reXiind,,ft the ouroose advertisement for Sworn to and subscribed before me this .10thfay of .... F ......' . A.D. tg.... 93 �. (SEAL),'• Octelma V. Ferbeyre. �( sok^. f V1h to me. �. . r OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL CRISTINA INCELMO COMMISSION NO. CC101031 MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 5,1995 w X M 73_ �.--. € n CITY OF MIA09 PQRit�i �, La OAL NO All Inteapmed pefom" , , talcs that on the 28Ih day, of January, IM,j thrCiiy Cofrltt 1118too Of Mliimi, Fiorlda, adopted tfra following titled ordinanCed: ORDINANCE N0.11034 AN :EMEPIGENCY OR1Etf 4AeME EWII�BLISHtNii ANEW sPEct&L REVENUE FWD ENTITLED; "jTPA TITLE III TaHMRMW'°EMIEI1lG8KN- itM PPOGRAM #q" AND U.S. Imp KKRe*), 8Y l3fflkmewe NATION OF T10 SUBJECT UPLEX, RISID£NTtAL TO RCIAL, .MEIN® FINDINGS; a TTAL OF A COPY OF TFtM 11D AGENCIM CONTANW4 A AND SEVERABIU?Y CLAUSE; CEFFECTIVE DATE. S" No.11066 AR „,R.",,,,.. ,.,,,,,,.QING THE ZONING ATLAS OF QEtDINANCE. NO. 11Q0�° AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE C*-THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLOMDA, ARTI- 0LE.4. S4Ct,tON 401 SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGUaTIO ,$YL �jNQ THE ZONING CLASSIFI- CATION FROM P4 I1A/Qf/� LY RESIDENTIAL TO. C-1 RESTRICTED COHIM�RGIAL FOR Tt1E PROPERTY LOCATEO `AT 3711 6OUTHWEST 26 TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA IMQRE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) AND BY MAKING At 1. WE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 42 OF SA10 ZONING ATLAS; ODNTAININQ A REPEALER PROVII# O -M40 A SEVERASILITY CLAUSE. Saki OMk atlbet fh+iy l% h*pected by the public of the Office of the City Clerk, 3W Pon A marl tAn Orive, MMffd, Florida, Manft thtaugh FddW.aaltc6adin4ttolidalg&, between thetlw m 01:8A0 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. MATTY FYiM1 CITY CLERIC, . MIAMI, FLORIDA 2110 93-4.0210304 �cenrrrvvoor �. PART40UL'ARLV THE LAID I" PROPERTY' I RESTRICTED INSTRUCTING" AND