Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-93-0350FLOOP GEIGER, P.A. AW -iitU OAOE (305) 37e ` IN IG Pry:,, page „. the `rto t_- ".�.. April 20, 1993 BUT, Plizai-- City Clerk Operating without a certificate of use. It was explained to our client that we could present our case to the Code Enforcement Board —_ at a hearing thatt ;had been scheduled on the violation. While the - City,; acknowledged that an , employment office is a permitted use at xe aub ect location, they advised our client that because of the type',of employment our client's business sea~vic+ed, that this type of employment office must be conducted in a industrially zoned tea,* ,After the City presented its case before the Cade- Enforcement board and provided testimony as to the nature of our client r s t� i nt ns we attempted tea present our case. We were advised k . ortly Intoour, presentation that the only issue which the Code Shforcemefssnt Board had jurisdiction over is whether our client was ` dperati with or without a certificate of uce* Since our client �- - _.... , admitted that it dial not have a certificate of use, the beard would = - cyt hear :any further evidence car testimony and issued an order requiring our elen'sa business to close immediately. 'While we have appealed this decision, the general effect of this process was to completely deny our client ADI due process or an opportunity to -- n be heard, ,Our client was simply railroAded e . Given the failure ;.of the City of Miami to follow its own t2rd�. i�l3>cgsr our firm ,tes required to initiate an action 'n Dade Circuit i.t Court to compel ' the Zoning Administrator to act an the 1` app.14cati.ion so our client would have its right to appeal to the s ciii"%' Soard and the City. of Miami Commission. I am enclosing h hote i,th a copy . of the Order the Circuit Count Fudge entered requiring.' the ,.City to follow its own ordinances and requiring the , ” Z nii.nCj, .ni.ss�strator to act cam . the application eo our client would i ., have a right of . appeal to , the Zoning' Board and City of Hi — C.ssasi.on ... - .. L= We - appeased before the Zoning Hoard who apparently had ii.ttle. concernif any, for the legal issue, that we,presanted* The legal issssae isthat the cods �? and d .>gcri. nate between f . - +diffo rent types of employment agenc�.es o The City arts that if x our employment agency employed secretaries and white collar g ,xorlkerss that this would be a rmiated; us e. They argue, however _ t that becatus*e we generally employ laborersand blue collar workers, that we cannot operate our busi.nesss. -Since our 'clients are gen+sesally uns killed l roresrs�, pcaor and memb►ersa of mi ' ori.$- ess�, they j area r+entl r �undes isable" and the -City i.s att t.i.ng to force ��ent to operate Its business in anIndustrial. area which. is �- outside, .de the reach of Its clientele* o our client'e clientele do not have cars and live �- within walking distances of our cli.entrs palace of business. Our >ci heattrov.de these, peopl.a with theyvo�aldthery ,lee 3+ �tc } ,a+rhich A •fix Y e x Afth Gyclock- P.A. paqe April 2or 1993 _ n .+ lawful. business, withholds taxes, has nd otherwise provides t- ' `honest o a ". or � whet generally are the most disadvantaged = ., nalting The .' action mutli9 in discriminating eh therr�r and nr d.ient is not only immoral but t Therentanc in the Ga.ty code that per.t� should —this d2.ecrimination. p_ ! City,, ' b .ssa.oners should be rovidi d, prior G► fltXr { " " h ` : {r a 1 ., c� Winn as to whethe the code distinguishes j payment . egen les that hire blue collar workers as C eOd - to `'19�ih' caller workers and whether the action by the }B on g Adz n strator and the. Zoning . Board was legal. hii Verb trt l ours, St i" IGER, P.A. LEVI , 1 BY:, 91 Rob t J. Levine, Each. 5 , i it V �as i��F yam.., Mayor: {{►�'' . a+.�� � Suarez ':+rc t i.1i Fi�dlr Si ysl��nR�Jb 7 ♦� +}. Inc., �y! County.. pindets do - ix r Ma or V .: 0.6nmaj6fs !ti'ne KiY.+14rL.iim .Al'Vni7V', .. .Y.A• , xAL ioner...filler Davkins , '.. ' f h ri9si�►1a�u�Yrrlt� F Submitted into the public aft r� record m connection •nth - n i Idat "j�,lrk...i, A 'j nor le fir , r t f' 0, " ioo s.Oc : IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH a -u "JUDICIAL 'CIRCUIT IN AND FOR f ADE COUN" FLORIDA CASE NO. 92-23731 CA (11) ► 0? D COUNTY war• y■ pyQ;y ff+' ORDER GRANTXNG C 11 -or MAN- k, public EW , i �,l�yYSyOyl+i,.. .111�WIN Min connection with, item jtse City Clerk =; THIS : -CAUSE came before the Court on November 9921 " n- CrPlB tf r f ell Xotit�n or Emergency Writ cf V�andamus, ri sad ' Pro ibit on and/or for andatory njunct on raf ter 11 { i�.r of: "+�orral,+a'i►1f heard from Plea —.Mitt 9 r re.0entative and: received evidence, ihavfn r^ 4 :rep owed th lie n #� r�q *the ,ri + fully* advised r ises 0-1-8 the .`following findings, r „ f ' r . r wx C r r t ... .°`e' 1 ++, r k rn. �BOA FXN0M �Or 141 , � xffi f�`q�jj, a ey� ;yxy C Pa 10, t 7 _ v �+ CAAN 00i 91 ott fits h a the Defendant CITY OF MIAMI 26 of Use or formally reject same. ht x_ 30 Thy` Court finds that. Defendazit CITY OF MIAMI Agbtfc la on upon J the r n b the snub roperty { Ur t fins a t at a hearing was hold before F �+ 'li r� crc m��t hoard of the City of Hiami on October 28l ' ?� t iich +� +��rtain Sanctions � 12r� were ���asad for 'failure "to' IprEi With a ertifia+a aa. The- 'oLtr .a�d� that the Plaintiff sl`ioi��:d be 2tive y*�'. YM y�`py, jj�{}�� yy `i1A� ` or ur fty Y! V•rY. - 1I .� a k its it i ra, .. ,.' 4�t � itM Tom! '- ,..y(� _.. (yY� �yy{� {y gy■ (qy �;y��y{V[�a. a�wt¢ Y• s 'TP iiI Nos on '�. j�` �)y the fines W-i P V 9 tl� forded ,' any M1 J a a n la tit fi � � bu ne�� ; ti,y z n; �+ t?ug't: $ nr s t , at N i enct sit i F s .a .. 3r uc, , , = yew - � .� , ba counS��I hay ` $ epresented that t Pendant 'CZ ' OF - - m m CASS #to? !$ denied its request f,or an Emergency a Writ of Mandazui%* SOP, DADE COUUTYr INC. a//a . Lhwlt �C I, INC., is hereby permitted to reopen its }1Al atft a �c ated at 1279 West Flagler Street, Miami o Florida ti ` 2 days cc� acing on November Its, 1992, the day after. T A hihearing, to permit Plaintiff toexhaust its admin istrative . S r#3 " w Duringthattine, Defendants, CITE OF I�7Cl�+it, a t { t1#2 #a corpor- -ionj THE PLANNIt�i , Bt t i� i ZONING .. ._ * 3 PARTHEml, Off` THE CITY OF mI � I , JOSEP GENUARDI ' AS ZONING I i Ia'1' .� , �'#iZd THE J BOARD OF THE CITY OF CEDE ENFORCEMENT -� { c r`+ t zy ► f i.�n* imposed! by the Order fl►f the CODE, FORCOMNT BOMW,, the fi.ne i i osed by the Order of the CODE �er 2, '�11�F 4`92 BO of N��veeg ag���� ��Y� �« ��� x' Yst and ac ei.ans the subject property located at 127 w+��►t - - - - 'y�L . i � >✓} C 3It^'SkY{ Y�y■ gyp` y+�;. �y�yy, te y}yy� ��,y+ :ll�:�ub= i��F�tA✓ ed b 1,y� �M 'aMl� with, 1-4 M. Y Or OT F 3. a .4t iry g L2ii Order o f � s Court F , WNW,": -ARD ORMAW Chambers at Miami-: Dade County,, dad ,of November,, 1992.at/LA otcloc .. HAROLD LOMON F4 CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Submitked into the ubij xcord in connection vu-ith t '! T i` 0 � "' - wow EE & GF-10CRI,o. At 1 L lit€ (?-Vito 7• ,. ,� r � . , of r '-.'���g'S.G°^nv!^=«Y, a'FitF.k'A'.ti�� .a P✓,'K'!:'...cT�^t r,. ss...; ., S�'�yP 9 4P' 4 J U _ � 07^ Jill Is I IN THV ClgCUIT COURT,' Op THE 11 JU AN `a # ID COUNCAS } F O Di COINDERS UNTYf ' k/ a 7 Plaintiff t 0RDXR GRANTING t $ ' "'' i " Y�I I e s municipal Betted into the public NT . JOSEPW }•��� �•y�y'(/��) rewrd in connection With Z ap'�.yi�-uyT AS, ZON T BOARD 4)z -4 /9 item wwm.on or a 14 AMIcif Hirai D f endants . City Clerk "•���""�" yir �/�y ► .1 c befor the Court on NovexbOr 9 k WyR i es �ergencTTTyAAA la,Difffe L _ 3­1iy $ 4. n in unlit �n after Ali fsa Mandatory � "y�� ."�� and/ �A/,# Vhitrn {�gyeaR m+.rY�'' .... with + „ �y+� plyof -%M Lowy�yw yq�� im ing 4 St nY hav i hosx'd Sgunent of counsel.. 7 sentative aind received iepreceived --- S. 1 ► jut f S ■���s y�Ipj i ise fuily ad�' , eth4 bainO w e e the file ent� makes lloving findings: it , r Lind$ � the Pie ntiff f � „e + rt -0�t r.INC a , _ n. DACOMMDS, rr OF $' f + i � Ant �` ' ���� •� k -� i L _ 3 2� •L - i t ilk 00, =' street, iamii ir is hereby t unm further Of, this C00rt* ow AND MOM - chambers at Miami,, Dade County, H y _ jjf 1992 at : AHRDQQanna�� O :. a �• C lltteUXT COURT FUDGE w 4 a5 , Submitted into the' pubfi a record 1n nne .ion. it } ,... �� - �� � f '� Epq item on gg l rto 3 e ntLndez,, att Hiram rE,w iacel: 01 Cty'Clerk Y 'v � a s � NO S yt ��n1 htr �i • u f t � � S• 7A� .. ttt W , 11 + t •i ft .. 1[ { i F � L 4 .. �" �'�"+j� q {'yyy pq y'y Y C /'.q( conditions. 'j(�j all iw �i l�W�IL �.d+.A his %o- :4�� ��k�4 Ae/'ti.F.��S'v3��.T�. 4s114�37 S� Q�j�'�$ +�( comply with terms 1 he parties $m�,k +walsM _ 3 i s T ... the order OrAM i n j u Dade Florida DONE AND WdiJ€S�r3+i.0 .i�76a 5t M i.fRArm of �r�ec�'Sr r+s. �- 91 '. J .his R of 7 f' V Y CIRCUIT JUDGE ; Sub y w *� C.Sq 'AE�_ + &.g�r E raknc� ��xi with J jqyoj11PO Orf i\ �^" item ` Mcaty Hirai R Q+Y Clare aw i 1 V 1` i 4 : x : t �R r h k L Y � 3 i f < i : y pq ZONTINO fl 4,2 1.4. f: xi,zz, �,.,. ,v..� . � , hion vvh ,gip 4 24 .�.D� INTS �9� k M T RAI' •75 eft -at the time a PWticlilar occupancy or City Clerk Exceeding 5Q0 sq. fi• a u vas est�tWished � ill be applicable. but le than 2,600 (4) The invoice f� the fshuant of the annual sq, fta cif floor a a. 50.{�0 reinspe'. i0h: eertiticatevil.l be billed during E�teeec�xt�g 2,50{� scl, tle year fps herein fixed ft. but less than 5 ,q0.sgs fts of floor - (a) Apartment bilddt�yy�j�[� S:Jri .. /�y}, area ��y+�_xceed�s}� � �q{f�y+��yy � • • i.JIT Ls�'LW idl•{w},VM V'.7s' f k - 3- 12 dwelling units 50.00 ft. but less than 1 •--50 dwelling uniti . + . 70.00 15,000 sq. ft. of y ,t u t offer 2.00 floor area... ; 70.00 Moper otel, roomin 9 ,..... Exceeding 15,000 sq. h use4 ft - but less than - rental sleeping 25,000 sq. ff.. of w - LiTllt$... • ♦ t ♦ . 4 .... ♦ . ♦-.. I3-50 rental sleep En 50,00 floor area,..... 4 . 80.00 �` S ... y/y C� f�(�%� C EXc i n j 25, 000 q. — units♦».•.Uix•.•.{i•.w,♦ ub, per unit'over f C} 70.00 2.00 ft, but less than i (c) E:'OmrraOvial and ndits• so 006. sq. ft. of ftocar trials rimedQr: area, . • 4 , ... 94,00 lxce(ding 52100 sq• sit es -- at ftof floor axea. 100,00 t0 invence storms.. 76.00 ft. of flcwr area. • :. 40.00 C0nv' ni t'nt�e x Exc ix� t#.0 sq, #' . but I ifhan 2,500 stor '• as used .i - -- tiai s$atiau}zyr�s sq. fi.6t tjour area. 50.00 any ,- J�- �a u 21500 ,sq• itath ft hut` less thanret al g a /� [!�► the ... rwM1.dgato Mabd M1Fe}. 15,t)t3tf, sq ft• of eel, that is regu- scar pe -Od o�'b ti- ; k floor •'� .. , �e.g 15t0 70 .00 nest` at; gay . tit xn er i betwee t lief bit less an 0.00 la.�pi �;r {)0; 26,0004 ft, of aa: �rt 80.00 M •. d outs 1) On- but .i,sss than , � �y ft, yw+ i� ployee• i h�5J it Mi ' < id {�y�,�q AIvei:fiance a '+ao4• Y R 3. �• i a i 4 1 0-00t jnip�� A to -arm t i M -:100.00 I '. Prw " , (n) '�bal+ssale in,d p1 rW' • • t - Y ; } ..".'I" it._� ,1 'pea y�+}U� to ap iv� €slAv LHUG Orbvs. a.r w. on a the► tfaxaa an_'-; Ord. 1067, z, 7-i3-i3, Ord< IvTo. � su �� � no s�axa�r than l,{�737, � 1, 5-2�.49t) Ord, No. 1t}7ffi, § 1,"�-28d9t3t d& y l3 , � %id in i A, ex Ord, No. logg, �, � 1, �•�fl-9�; Card, ��s.1�?��I, �r 1, ♦��. pu dad in esection -(3. 10.4. 1} fY t wpt iAL7 r r s� city code crow r efer�euce .'3ch�iui+� �a� Wining and ��srs+- N t `l What therd reb +,estab shed schedule „ing fee, 6 62-$1. on new construction f } o'vr �+ n performed by the a rand ng now 6tatr�act � pe Sec. 2.76. ee for inspections and examina* u� taori races Departments Lions of PIann for COMPHance with s the pravisions of the Citof Miami y xt tas�r ogle Famfly and zeletats: r _ 0MUMMeeZoe ���yj i imcxcc e following(A) There.is hereby established a cr:t dirty ► additions: fee per square foot ct£ total land ax"er� aaxcaa�►pa�ed in the project it the time the elrp%xaticrn is made } ,Each lilQ 9%. ft..6r fractional of 0,95 for the construction of a new building, c�aangs a ' iiocar aarea• . .. use of build ng or an addition {pr rtional gart t 3 +c n rrr ta�sra crt}ter than ascaf land area),for the l 'p of 'lien Of the plans toad site development and sub uent b y�g i +� of the buildi side grit►r tlae isau- l'Water towers} pYl©ns, uli the r#r%66 of Win¢" sub- 'z an t+ s►ge-ton found tivns, cla�r~xxt them to snare origi t ,rind continued searalls� huheas, un- Of the city zoning Usual 'limit' -use buildings} a�a x Rance with.the g < � ordinance,, Ordiushte No. c no}�ies, a rga3cees dnd sun a r con- te- family aruf , to s ..... i3.t 7 atxruati+an}: �"7iraee (.�) staand rr�s r l ac x ,ti #7k C►f estimated cost All Moot 11inglie-f A ri.95 0.d , duple�@s ♦ . 1 v ♦ .. +h • v .. wq f f s F _.or ta6ns . and repairs to In exce&? of tires f3i stxl�8: /�*i�y�t��. _ tz Q: All u e_rpt "e-f * and k ted �t y+y/�� . MrYV+ drutplexes. •• • f t•! w Y. 1 q 1 r. 1 `oxr F "t .. <.... 7 . 4 This fee she 3l be in addition to the btrtildi a per. s h , A addltti ►n $LON of " mat fee• ; ti atEst 'or fractional (B� Fees for review b► the zoning, section ref the 4.95 ' building and zonngieartmer�t of p4 for a d . �►a+d/ar for a.,public hearag. special ge'rnit Incre4we Taw 040) h ty 'Safte �to 1_r'ea ... Y i ♦ a • clam +� !��+■}�� �JI��/�y5 LT W.iFV ♦ - Whenever '+ n ihty]en elm D, vsr.�,� (2) Special, a tiax , .�.■ {t�'i 4t y �f �►f t e wh c�/h tal angle•i'a xly duplex . ,■p.*s ./y l pgrt� p�M FF F .� ?� 1��5�Xgy�..: for74 Idaaltapitc �+�ieliiAi• v �F�♦' M :. _ 40 *44h 1��,fT .1 .F:�• 'ii _net lot area 9 . Y 4 ♦ • ♦ Y . ♦ ♦�t�u� " }J�(/{���.,j10 ' .� -�♦ .'�Nf' 1R � • 1! i 1` 4 • ♦ i . 1 r. x i'�1 �[lFTfi3O t 409 !a #r, No 100 Via: 1 i0-7-0 f�4 Na. 0 F,� vk