HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-94-0851J-94-795(b)
11/17/94
RESOLUTION NO.
94- 851
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE APPEAL OF CAPITAL
BANK AND REVERSING THAT PORTION OF THE
DECISION OF THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PRESERVATION BOARD WHICH DENIED A CERTIFICATE
OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A
SIGN ON THE UPPER EAST ELEVATION OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 169 EAST FLAGLER STREET,
MIAMI, FLORIDA (THE ALFRED I. duPONT
BUILDING), SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.
WHEREAS, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board
(HEPB) at its meeting of September 20, 1994, following an
advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. HEPB 94-39,
which denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
installation of a sign on the upper east side elevation and two
banners for the property located at 169 East Flagler Street,
Miami, Florida (the Alfred I. duPont Building); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 23.1-5(b)(4)(e) of the Code of
the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, an appeal to the City
Commission has been taken by Capital Bank, prospective tenants,
on the grounds stated in its Notice of Appeal, filed
September 27, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter finds that the stated grounds for the appeal and the
facts presented in support thereof justify reversing that portion
of the decision of the Historic and Environmental Preservation
CITY COV247SSION
DIEETINNG OF
NOS► 1 7 M94
Resolution No.
9
4r- 851
1
Board as it pertains to the installation of a sign on the upper
east elevation of the Alfred I. duPont Building;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The City Commission hereby reverses that
portion of the decision of the Historic and Environmental
Preservation Board (Resolution No. HEPB 94-39, adopted September
20, 1994), which denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
installation of a sign on the upper east elevation of the
property located at 169 East Flagler Street, Miami, Florida (the
Alfred I. duPont Building), and grants the appeal, as pertains to
the installation of said sign, giving rise to this hearing
subject to the condition that the applicant complies with all
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as
amended.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November , 1994.
�?A a lam.. 2
ST HEN P. CLARK, MAYOR
ATT T ' .� _
HIRAI, CITY CLERK
- 2 -
94- 851
PREPARED AND--XPPROVED BY:
ti
fiREN BITTNER
SISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
a. Z�,- �,Zjz� a I
A. QU N CT I I I
CITY ATTO
M4647/WB/bjr/bss/csk
94- 851
- 3 -
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
e
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM PZ=5
TO : Honorable Mayor and Members DATE : FILE
of the ity Commission
SUBIECT: Appeal of Decision of the
Historic and Environmental
Preservation Board:
169 E. Flagler Street
FROM : REFERENCES:
Cesar H. Odio Agenda Item:
City Manager ENCLOSURES: City Commission Agenda
November 17, 1994
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission deny the appeal of
Capital Bank and affirm the decision of the Historic and Environmental
Preservation Board, which denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
installation of a sign on the upper east elevation and two banners on the
southeast and northeast corners of the Alfred I. duPont Building.
BACKGROUND:
Please refer to the attached memorandum from the Preservation Officer
concerning this, -appeal.
Attachment
94- 851
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO : Sergio Rodriguez DATE : October 4, 1994 FILE :
Assistant City Manager
sUI JECT : Appeal of Decision of the
Historic and Environmental
Preservation Board:
FROM : IS
� REFERENCES: 169 E. Flagler Street
Sarah E. Eaton ENCLOSURES: Agenda Item:
Preservation Officer City Commission Agenda
Gel her 2 , 1994
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission deny the appeal of
Capital Bank and affirm the decision of the Historic and Environmental
Preservation Board, which denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
installation of a sign on the upper east elevation and two banners on the
southeast and northeast corners of the Alfred I. duPont Building.
BACKGROUND:
The Alfred I. duPont Building, located at 169 E. Flagler Street, is one of
Miami's most significant architectural landmarks and is noteworthy for the
excellence of its design, materials, and detailing. The facade of the
building is stepped back above the fifteenth story, emphasizing the building's
geometric form. The parapets on the main structure and each setback are
decorated by vertical fluting and low relief ornamentation.
On September 6, 1994, Capital Bank applied for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the installation of various signs on the duPont Building.
The application submitted identified the proposed signs by number. The
Historic and Environmental (HEP) Board authorized a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the installation of seven signs on the building. These
included a sign on the upper west elevation,(Sign #1 - west), two signs on the
south and east elevations at the third floor level (Sign #2), and four signs
on the south and east elevations on both sides of the main entrances (Sign
#3). The Board denied the request for a sign on the upper east elevation
(Sign #1 - east) and two double-faced banners (Sign #4) on the southeast and
northeast corners of the building.
The proposed upper east elevation sign (Sign #1) is well -designed with respect
to lettering style and the quality of materials; however, the placement of the
sign would obscure significant architectural features on the building and is
therefore incompatible with the historic character of the building. The
proposal does not comply with the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for
Rehabilitation." The appellant cites several examples of historic buildings
with signage similar to that which is being proposed. None of these historic
signs, however, cover up architectural detailing. Instead, these signs were
designed to be located on flat, continuous surfaces, unbroken by decorative
details.
Page 1 of 2 ,9 4 �-- - g J-1
The basis for denying the sign on the upper east elevation was not
inappropriate design, only inappropriate location. It was for this reason
that a similar sign proposed for the upper west elevation was approved by the
HEP Board. The west elevation is a secondary facade of the building and may,
in fact, be considered the rear of the structure. A sign on this facade would
barely be visible and therefore would not create a negative impact on the
architectural character of the historic building. The general policy of the
HEP Board is not to review work on the rear of a building.
The banners (Sign #4) proposed for the southeast and northeast corners of the
Alfred I. duPont Building are also not in keeping with the architectural
character of the structure, primarily because of the impermanent and whimsical
nature of a banner, as well as the proposed location and size. Although the
concept of seasonal banners is encouraged in downtown Miami, the appropriate
location is on light poles within the public right-of-way, not on historic
buildings. Furthermore, although the banners may be well designed, they add
visual clutter to an architecturally significant structure.
The seven signs approved by the HEP Board for Capital Bank should certainly be
sufficient signage for any banking institution. Twelve signs for any single
tenant are excessive and should not be approved.
94- 851
Page 2 of 2
Lucia A. Dougherty
(305) 579-0603
Nis. Teresita Fernandez
Clerk, Hearing Boards
City of Miami
275 N.W. 2nd Street
Miami, Florida 33128
fiflEENBfflfi
iBflVfll6
�jI 1 f i ilirl,
194 SAP 27 AIi I I: 12
September 27, 1994
Re: Capital Bank's Appeal of a Portion of the Historic & Environmental
Preservation Board Decision Concerning 169 E. Flagler Street
Dear Teresita:
Pursuant to Section 23-1-5(b)(4)e of the City Code, on behalf of Capital Bank, we
are appealing a portion of the Historic & Environmental Preservation Board's ("Board")
decision on Item 3, at its meeting of September 20, 1994. We are only appealing the
Board's denial of Capital Bank's request to install a sign on the upper east elevation and
two banners for the property located at 169 E. Flagler Street and also known as the Alfred
I. duPont Building.
It is our belief that the proposed east elevation sign, as well as the banners, are in
keeping with the design and character of the Alfred I. duPont Building. Mr. Bernard
Zsycovich, A.I.A., was hired by Capital Bank to design the proposed signs and to make sure
that all of the signs were in keeping with the historic design and integrity of the building
which was built in 1939. Prior to designing the signs, Mr. Zsycovich studied the signage
from this era to insure that the proposed signs would be consistent with the historic building.
Mr. Zsycovich found examples of signage on other buildings from this era which have the
same type of architectural design as the Alfred I. duPont Building. In fact, the signage of
the Rockefeller Center in New York, the PSFS building in Philadelphia and the Walgreens
located on Flagler Street, are all examples of buildings with signage that is the same in
design approach as that which Capital Bank has proposed.
- It is interesting to note that City staff recommended approval and the Board
approved the upper west elevation sign, but denied the upper east elevation sign when in
fact, the upper east elevation and west elevation signs are the same, and the architectural
features of the building are the same for both upper elevations.
It is essential for all banking establishments to have adequate upper elevation
sipage, and the same is true for Capital Bank. In the event that Capital Bank obtains
GREENBERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSLN & QUENTEL, P. A.
1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33131 30S.S79.0500 FAX 30S•579.0717 v/
M1AMI FORT LAUDERDALE . WEST PALM BEACH TALLAHASSEE NEw YORK WASNINGTON. D.C. 8
Ms. Teresita Fernandez
September 27, 1994
Page 2
approval for its signage, it would like to have a branch office at the Alfred I. duPont
Building, which is in great demand for tenants. The Downtown area greatly needs
revitalization, and businesses cannot be expected to move in, unless signage is permitted.
In support of Capital Bank's signage, a letter was submitted by Nancy Sullivan Skinner,
Managing Director of the Gusman Center, and Matthew Schwartz appeared at the hearing
and spoke in support of the signs on behalf of the Downtown Development Authority.
Further, the proposed banners which are to be, located on the Southeast comer of
the building at Flagler Street and 2nd Avenue and the Northeast corner of the building at
1st Street and 2nd Avenue, should also have been granted approval. Capital Bank was
proposing to use banners which would be changed with the seasons and which could also
depict special events occurring in the area, such as the upcoming Summit. Capital Bank was
considering having a contest to design the banners by local artists or students from schools
in Dade County.
Based on the foregoing, we believe that the proposed signage for the upper east
elevation and the banners is consistent with the historic architectural features of the building
and will not adversely affect the historic, architectural or aesthetic character of the building
or the relationship or congruity between the building and the neighboring structures. Nor
will the proposed signs adversely affect the special character or special historic, architectural
or aesthetic interest or value of the overall historic site. In addition, the proposed signage
is consistent with the U.S. Secretary of Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation and
Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings."
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Please call me at 579-0683
if you need any additional information.
Very truly yours,
Lucia A. Dougherty
cc: Mr. Charles Boyce
W. Bernard Zsycovich
Ms. Sarah Eaton
Timothy Kish, Esq.
Zl ffW� LZA h6
'dNINN'VId IW w Jo'kilo
94- 851
GREENBERG TRAURIG
RESOLUTION HEPB-94-39
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING
SIGNS, ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION ON FILE IN THE
PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, AT THE
ALFRED I. DUPONT BUILDING, 169 E. FLAGLER STREET:
SIGN "1" (WEST FACADE ONLY), SIGN "2", AND SIGN "3,"
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, AFTER FINDING
THAT THESE PROPOSED SIGNS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S "STANDARDS FOR
REHABILITATION":
1. SIZE OF LETTERS ON SIGN "1" (WEST FACADE) SHALL BE
REDUCED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, AND
2. METHOD OF ATTACHMENT SHALL BE SUCH THAT MINIMAL
DAMAGE OCCURS TO THE STONE CLADDING OF THE
BUILDING;
FURTHER, DENYING THE FOLLOWING SIGNS, ACCORDING TO
SAID APPLICATION: SIGN "1" (EAST FACADE) AND SIGN
"4," AFTER FINDING THAT THESE SIGNS ARE NOT COMPATIBLE
WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER AND FEATURES OF THE
HISTORIC BUILDING, WOULD DAMAGE THE HISTORIC INTEGRITY
OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEREFORE DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S "STANDARDS FOR
REHABILITATION."
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994.
RESERVATION OFFICER
aye
CHAIRMAN
J4-- '851
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Historic Preservation District
Evaluation Sheet
Name of Property: Alfred I. duPont Building
Address: 169 E Flagler St
Project Description:
Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of signs.
Analysis:
A previous application for signage was denied by the Board at its meeting of
July 19, 1994, and the applicant was encouraged to come back with a revised,
more modest proposal that was less agressive to the building. The applicant
has since hired an architect to design a revised signage program. This
proposal takes care to minimize the amount of intrusion to the building,
specifies materials of a high quality, and selects appropriate lettering
styles. Staff continues to object to "Sign 1" on the upper east elevation,
but would not oppose the new sign proposed for the west facade. That
particular portion of the facade, unlike the east facade, has no architectural
detailing and is a secondary side of the building. The size of the letters,
however, exceeds what the Zoning Ordinance permits. "Sign 2" is proposed to
be placed on top of the existing historic sign and is recommended by the
architect instead of a trompe 1'oeil panel mimicking the cladding of the
building. "Sign-3" consists of a newly proposed pair of signs to be located
on both sides of the main entrances. The design of both "2" and "3" is
consistent with the architectural character of the building. "Sign 4" is a
banner sign on the corner of the building, replacing the clock in the previous
submittal. The impermanent and whimsical nature of a banner, as well as the
banner's location and size (which exceeds that permitted in the Ordinance) are
not in keeping with the architectural character of the building.
Staff Recommendation:
The Preservation Officer recommends that Signs 111" (west facade only), 112" and
113" as specified in the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness be
approved, subject to the following conditions, because these proposed signs
are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for
Rehabilitation." It is further recommended that Signs "1" (east facade) and
"4" be denied because they are not compatible with the architectural character
and features of the historic building, would damage the historic integrity of
the property, and therefore do not comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
"Standards."
Conditions, if any:
1. Size of letters on Sign "1" (west facade) shall be reduced to comply with
the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Method of attachment shall be such that the expansion occurs in the
concrete, not in the stone cladding, sous to minimize damage to the stone.
9A- 1851
Alfred I.•duPont Building
169 E Flagler St
.. . I - ....
0
CEP— 5--- 4 TUE 1 5: -►0 P.01
.APPLICATION FOR nit.,.CERTIFICATE .�,
GOAAD
OF APPROPRIATENESS
ALTERATIONS, NEW CONSTRUCTION
NAME OF HISTORIC SITE/HISTORIC DISTRICT
A �- FREo I. P,, t v N •-r- g L.fl 1,4
�-
ADORESS_.OF PROPERTY
I (; `I E • FL -A, C.- L. E r- l' �_ 3;13 L.
Ot1NGR S NAMH
OWN S ADDR SS '
:4 •�a 'col MIA A,% 3313i
OWN R S TELEPHONE
APPLICANT-S NAH9 (IF NOT OWNER)
GAnITA4t.. '�ANt�
-----�
RELATIONSHIP- TO OWNER
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
'NOR ALTERATIONS MAJOR ALTERATIONS SIGNS
Lj
EXHIBIT
NO.
I Q
EXHIBIT
NO.
I
L*!lbiT
NO. I
0
EXHIBIT
NO.
2 ❑
EXHIBIT
NO.
2 ❑
EXHIBIT-
NO. 2
C3
EXHIBIT
NO.
3 C]
EXHIBIT
NO.
3 Q
EXHIBIT
NO. 3
Q
EXHIBIT
NO.
4 ❑
EXIIIISIT
NO.
4 ❑
EXH101T
NO. A
(3EXHIBIT
NO,
5 []
EXHIBIT
140.
5
(]
EXHIBIT
NO.
6
[]
EXHIBIT
NO.
7
C]
EXHIBIT
NO.
S
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHAOILITATION WORIC
PROVIDE AN OVERALL OESCRIPTION OR PROJECT. OfIBCRISE THE NATURE ANO SPECIFIC LOCATION OF ALL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OR CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY. USE ADDITIONAL PAGE IF NECESSARY.
;'t..ssl+sa sea A"TrAcHeo —
94- 851 / I
REASONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMV OR CHANGES
�7r2,tnUn
:?.JLti.j�v. ; 9 �✓1:5 ��O-+AT',3�, n
in'74lJ,� /i1;��t ��o „.yi rn D 2;
�nis 1�;,� }••�a.. �G�E.r�c:ln: � U�o.. `r�v Q�s �o�1�1nN ,Jla i'�.�5
1 t
PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS
LIST THE NAME AND FIRII OF SUCH PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS AS ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
CONTRACTOR, AND PRESERVATION CONSULTANT,
NAME/FIRM ADDRESS TELEPHONE
z"(CCoJIc 4 L lwc. 160 N. %i5GA,4^It $L-J_D. $� 1400 HlAr41 FL 33t3L 3aC - 37Z• S_ZZZ
NAME/FIRM ADDRESS TELEPHONE
NAHE/FIRM ADDRESS TELEPHONE
NAME/FIRti ADDRESS TELEPHONE
NAME/PIR'I ADDRESS TELEPHONE
EXPECTEO SCHEDULE
rie�:., llJotlt. '3 v►nov.i'�+4
l
I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOtILEDGE AND BELIFF TEAT ALL IltFORMATION IN THI'� APPLICATION ANO ITS
ATTACHMENTS ISATRUE AND CORRECT.
SIGNATURE O� P Y OWNER DATE
P • M IJA&4 Gee FF r. #s1
S GNA URE 0 \A P_ (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) OA
FOR STAFF USE OIILYr
APPLICATION NO.
DATE RECa V 0
A STANDARD CA STAFF REVIEW FINAL ACTION
Ci SPECIAL CA ✓• 14CAR ING DATE FINAL ACTION
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
169 E. Flagler Street, Miami, Florida
See Exhibit "A" for legal
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami
Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a ffnantial interest,
either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or
petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested
parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
The building is owned by the Alfred I. DuPont Building Partnership.
I. DuPont Building is owned by:
Jorgar Corp. 50% (Carlos Lindefeld 100%)
Doodad, Inc. 10% (Elsa Lindefeld 100%)
Ciprox USA, Inc. 10% (Dania Lindefeld 100%)
Mar11u Corp., 10% (Martin Lindefeld 100%)
Jeffrey & Vivien Fessler (Jof e & Viv 100�)
Eileen Schechter (Ric �:1ec;]�ier��
3. Legal description and street ad ress o any real property J(a owned by any party
listed in answer to question P2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject
real property.
none
STATE OF FLORIDA } SS:
COUNTY OF DADE }
aL ' e � r �_Q_ pe: �' 4
OWNER OR AanRHFv FOR,WER
Adrienne Friesner Pardo
The Alfred
Adrienne Friesner Pardo , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
(Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #I,
above: that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete;
and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure
of Ownership farm on behalf of the owner.
C AL)
(Nam 9 4 — 851
Adrienne Friesner Pardo
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
before me this WJUNEAVISday of 19 �% A.M0 pI,pA1DA
personally Known. Public, State of F1 idaiO.GC19P%A-
Oath Taken.MY XP NOV. Z1,1995
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP
I. legal description and street address of subject real property:
169 E. Flagler Street, Miami, Florida
See Exhibit "A" for legal
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Mimi
Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest,
either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or
petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question f2 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, -and/or W other interested
parties, together with their addresses and proeortionate interest.
Capital Bank has a contract/lease space in the
Alfred I. duPont Building. The shareholders of
Capital Bank are attached in Exhibit "B".
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party
listed in answer to question f2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject
real property.
No property owned by Capital Bank.
OWNER OR ATTORW FOR OWNER
Adrienne Friesner Pardo
STATE OF FLORIDA } SS:
COUNTY OF DADE }
Adrienne Friesner Pardo , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
(Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question 11,
above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the sane are true and complete;
and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure
of Ownership form on behalf of the owner.
UrtuA�;�� R4A SEAL)
(Name
Adrienne Friesner Pardo
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
before me this '� —
day of t9ce , 19.%4
Personally Yjxm tary Public, State of Florida at large
Oath taken _
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:,
851
OFFICIAL NNE H DAMS
JUNE H DAIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORID COMMISSION Nn Cr �.?cr,^
14 COMMISSION NO. CC 163W9 . y co,
MY COMMISSION EXP. NOV. 21,1995
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA }
} SS
COUNTY OF DADE }
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared
Adrienne Friesner Pardo , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes
and says:
1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner,
submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by
Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real
property located in the City of Miami, as- described and listed on the pages
attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full
and complete permission for his to act in their behalf for the change or modifica-
tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying
petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit
contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions
for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative.
4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted
in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
OJI'l , "�q pa_42dLD
• (Nm) Adrienne Friesner Pardo
Sworn to and Subscribed before me
this 2] day of �, 19 y
tary Public, State of Florida at large
My Commission Expi7 /
94- 851
OMCIAL NOTARY SEAL
JM H DAVIS
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORiDA
COMMISSION NO. CC 1�i009
MY COMMISSION EXP. NOV. 211495
OWNER'S LIST
Owner's Name Alfred I. DuPont %Aldincr Partnerzij=
Mailing Address 169 East Flagler Street
Telephone Number
Legal Description: 169 East Flagler Street
Alfred I. duPont Building
See Exhibit "A"
Owner's Name
Mailing Address _
Telephone Number _
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation,
partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
none
Street Address
Legal Description
Street Address Legal Description 9 4- 851
I
OWNER'S LIST
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description: 169 East Flagler Street
' Alfred I. duPont Building
See Exhibit "A" for legal description.
Owner's Nave
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address —
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation,
partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description 9 4_ 8 5 1
4
CJCT-06-1994 13,18 f.40M Fropprty Management TO 913'i18428 P.01
�ult-DI►4(0 C`0
rt/G'lld'�4'a{����''�..
' 3 is72�>✓ C>AtliN�iAC6� ��►
JEGAL, DESCRIPTION
4.
Lot i 1 , 2, 3. 4. 17, 18, 19 and 20, block 117• NOaTM;
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, according to plat thereof
s.
made by A.L. Knowlton,, Civil Engineer, and recorded
In Plat Book 'IS", Paige 41, Public Records of Dade
':1 'County, Florida (saving and oxcepting therefrom the
1 following property, to -wit: West 15 feet of Lots 4.
and 17 in Block 117, Worth, City of Miami, Florida)',
$ AND ALSO EXCEP'riNo the East 10 feet of Block•117,
t North, eecord'ing to Knowlton's Map of Miami, Dade
County, Florida, as recorded in Plat Book "B", Page
41, Public Records of_Dade County, Florida; -
' OROM Wit DATK 1" M. "a $URVEY
in
01 60153 07-23-93 NMI- 69 Sound" Survey
• o2-T0806 o3"i1-9Z 02'ZIMW3 updote Survey
t 01- 72038 12-07-93 1800-69 Upd01e Survey
1
TOTAL P.01
94- 851
l8
S1d iG h b (drirS o 5 /e r-nr q_J%Lrl (UuMt r W lit{ Seth 0ITEM 12.-�VCURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFIC1"',.OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The foilowuiY table sets forth the beneficial ownership of uis Company's Common Stock by (1) all
Directors of the Company, III) the chief executive and 4 other most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company, (ill) all persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of five
percent (5%) or more of the Company's stock and (iv) all Directors and Executive Officers of the
Company as a group, as of December 31, 1993.
Name of Individual Amount and Nature
or Identity of of Beneficial Percent
Grout) Ownership of Class
Abel Holtz 11950,608 (1) 35.88%
Fana Holtz 746,146 (2) 13.72%
Nathan Esformes 79,454 (3) 1.46%
Russell W. Galbut 7,000 (4) •
Alex Halberstein 13,986 (5) •
Daniel M. Holtz 196,001 (6) 3.61 %
Timothy E. Kish 7,000 (7) •
Simon Portnoy 122,094 (8) 2.25%
Leon Simkins 353,185 (9) 6,609E
Craig L. Platt 51000 (10) •
Jeffrey H. Porter 22,791 (11) •
Thomas J. Flood 61,067 (12) 1.12%
John W. Kiefer 23,000 (13) •
All Directors and Executive
Officers as a group,
Including those listed
above (16 persons) 3,612,832 66.46%
Less than I %
(1) Includes 349,978 shares owned of record by Mr. Holtz and 503,428 shares owned of record
jointly by Mr. Holtz and his wife. Also includes an aggregate of 1,032,248 shares over which
Mr. Holtz claims voting power pursuant to various voting trust agreements, shareholder
agreements and irrevocable proxies and presently exercisable options held by Mr. Holtz to
purchase a total of 84,956 shares. Does not include an aggregate of 237,230 shares owned,
nor presently exercisable options to purchase a total of 115,000 shares, by the adult sons of
Mr. Holtz, as to which shares Mr. Holtz disclaims beneficial ownership and voting power. Also
does not include 739,146 owned, nor presently exercisable options to purchase a total of
7,000 shares, by Fana Holtz, as to which shares Mr. Holtz disclaims beneficial ownership and
voting power. The address of Mr. Holtz is 1221 Brlckell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131.
N f l • - 45
ALFRED I. DuPONT BUILDING
CAPITAL BANK
SIGNAGE PROPOSAL
Proposed signage for the exterior of the Alfred I. DuPont Biulding at N.E. 2nd Ave. Miami, Florida.
SIGN 1 Box section stainless steel letters 6'-0" and 2'-0"in height, mounted to horozontal steel
sections painted to match the adjacent finish of the building. The steel sections are attached
to the face of the building at convienent and concealed, if possible, mounting points. The
upper line of lettering is elongated to reflect the proportions of the overall body of the
building.
SIGN 2 Cast stainless steel letters 2'-0" in height mounted to (3) paralell horozontal pieces of
stainless steel bar stock approximately 3/4" x 2" deep. Concealed mounting points in the fo4eet
bar stock mount to the face of the building. The former title of the building is visible a rr
beneath the new signage. The sign is intended to literally cross out the former signage. The
lettering and the horozontal lines of the bar stock reflect the original signage indicated over
the storefront windown at the street edge.
SIGN 3 Cast stainless steel letters 6 in height mounted to (2) paralell horozontal pieces of stainless a P r ro ���
steel bar stock approximately 1/2 x 1 deep. concealed munting points in the bar stock
mount to the face of the building.
SIGN 4 Cloth or vinyl banner 2'-0" W x 30'-0" H with top and bottom stainless steel mounting
stantions mounted to the face of the building at a 45e angle to the comer.
i*gjeet0414sipo/doc1.doc
94- 851 �'
I
t4
SIGN I
94- 851 �5