HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-94-0788J-94-802(a)
11/15/94
RESOLUTION NO.
94- '788
A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE
ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO PERMIT A HEIGHT
OF 32'-10" (25'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED)
FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2238 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MIAMI,
FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN);
ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SUBJECT
TO THE FOLLOWING: (1) SUBMITTAL OF MODIFIED
PLANS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING
AND ZONING WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE
DATE OF THIS RESOLUTION TO INCLUDE ONLY THE
HEIGHT VARIANCE, (2) A TIME LIMITATION OF
TWELVE (12) MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT
MUST BE OBTAINED, (3) A BUFFER CONSISTING OF
FOUR (4) CABBAGE OR QUEEN PALM TREES EACH TO
BE OF A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 18' FEET, OR
OF OTHER PLANT MATERIAL SATISFACTORY TO THE
APPELLANTS, JACK AND SUSAN TAFFER, AT A COST
TO THE APPLICANTS NOT TO EXCEED THE PRICE OF
THE FOUR (4) PALM TREES.
WHEREAS,
the
Miami
Zoning
Board
at its
meeting of
September 12,
1994,
Item
No.
4, duly
adopted
Resolution
No. ZB-83-94 by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, granting the variance
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, a neighbor has taken an appeal to the City
Commission from the grant of the variance; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopts and incorporates the
findings of fact of the Zoning Board as set forth in Resolution
No. ZB 83-94; and
CITY COMMISSION
MEE."ING OF
OGT 7 7 1994
Resolution No.
94- 788
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter, finds that there are peculiar circumstances
affecting this parcel of land and that practical difficulties and
unnecessary hardships exist which would impair the owner's right
to the reasonable use of the property without the grant of
variance as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter finds that the requested variance meets all other
applicable requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as
amended;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings set forth in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The decision of the Zoning Board in this
matter is affirmed and the request for a variance from Ordinance
No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami,
Florida, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District
Regulations, R-1 Single Family Residential, Permitted Principal
Uses, to allow a height of 32'-10" (25'-0" maximum height
allowed) for a proposed addition to the property located at
2238 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, legally described as
Lots 13 and 14, Block 37, HOLLEMAN PARK, as recorded in Plat Book
8 at Page 23 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; zoned
R-1 Single -Family Residential, is hereby granted, subject to the
-2-
94- 788
following: (1) submittal of modified plans, within thirty (30)
days from the date of this Resolution, to the Department of
Planning, Building and Zoning, such plans to include only the
height variance, (2) a time limitation of twelve (12) months in
which a Building Permit must be obtained, (3) a Buffer,
consisting of four (4) Cabbage or Queen Palm Trees each to be of
a height of not less than 18' feet or of other plant material
satisfactory to the appellants, Jack and Susan Taffer, at a cost
to the applicants not to exceed the price of the four (4) Palm
Trees.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of October 1994.
+Gt�
ST HEN P. CL RK, MAYOR
ATTE
MA-ttY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
G. MIRIAM MAER
CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
h /Aid-)
A. OT IN NES , I I I
CITY AT EY
GMM/ms/bss/M4653 9 4-- 788
-3-
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL 2238 South Miami Avenue
Lots 13 and 1d, Block 37, HOLLEMAN PARK (8-23) PADC. PZ=7
APPLICANT/OWNER Emmanuel Nwadike and
Naomi Nwadike
2238 South Miami Avenue
Miami, Florida
856-8150
ZONING R-1 Single F}mily Residential.
REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-1 Single Family
Residential, permitted Principal Uses, to allow a side yard setback of 1'-0" (5 -0"
required) and a height of 34'-2" (25'-0" maximum height allowed) for a proposed
addition to a single family residence; zoned R-1 Single Family Residential.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PLANNING, BLDG & ZONING Denial.
PUBLIC WORKS No comments.
PLAT AND STREET N/A.
DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No comments.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: NIA Found: N/A
Violation(s) Cited: N/A.
Ticketing Action: N/A
Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Lien Recorded On: N/A
Total Fines To Date: N/A
CEB Action: NIA.
HISTORY Setback Variance denied on 9/12/94 by Res. ZB 84-94; vote of 7-0 and the height variance
granted by Res. ZB 83-94; vote 7-0. Six (6) proponents and five (5) opponents were present at
the Zoning Board Hearing.
ANALYSIS There is no hardship to justify the requested variances for side setback and height of the
proposed addition to a single family residence. Reasonable use of the property can be achieved
without these variances; the subject property is a double lot and the proposed addition can be
accommodated elsewhere on the site. However, the proposed third floor addition to the house,
again because of the size of the subject property will not necessarily represent an
overbuilding of this site nor will it have an adverse impact on the surrounding area. The
Planning Building and Zoning Department is recommending denial, finding that there is no
hardship to justify the requested variances. It should also be noted that a separate Class I
Special Permit will be required for the proposed tennis court.
ZONING BOARD Granted for twelve (12) Mos. s subj. to modification of plans. (Res. No. 83-94)
APPELLANT Jack and Susan Taffer.
CITY COMMISSION
APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 280 Page 1 September 12, 1994 9 4 - 788
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 280
'I]
Yes No N/A
X
Special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved
and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district.
X
The special conditions and circumstances are a direct result
from the actions of the petitioner.
X
Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance
11000 deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by
other properties in the same zoning district under the terms
of this. zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue
hardship on the petitioner.
X
Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment
to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands,
buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
X
The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes
possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
X
The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
September 12, 1994 Item# 4
Paige 2 08/30/94
94- 788
��� �������►'rw
ti •
�—
SOUTH DIX1 i
% s \ , %•
t
to
\G'
o.
s
oll
MAP
Cie
limi
9y
i. CiLt�Cr 1!
94- 788
FF
-SEP , Wino.
JACK AND SUSAN TAFFER
2208 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33129
September 21, 1994
City of Miami
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration Department
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, Florida
NOTICE OF APPEAL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
TELEPHONE: 576-6300
This letter will serve as written Notice of Appeal to the City of
Miami Commission from the decision of Planning and Zoning Boards in
reference to the approval of a variance for 2238 South Miami Avenue,
Miami, Florida 33129, heard by the Board on September 12, 1994. This
matter was originally listed as Item No. 4, on the July 11th, 1994
Agenda and was continued.
The Appeal is based upon the Board's determination of granting a
variance to the residence at 2238 South Miami Avenue, Miami, allowing
for a height increase to 3412" from the 2510' maximum height as set
forth the applicable Zoning Ordinance. Said approval increases the
hieght of the new structure close to 40% of it's present height.
As an adjourning property owner, the increase in height will create a
situation where the variance grants to Petitioners a height that is
higher than any home in the neighborhood. In addition, the increase
in height creates a situation where the variance grants a structure
with three stories, and takes away from our pool area any privacy
that has been used by my family for over 20 years.
We therefore appeal the action of the Board and request that the
matter be heard before the Miami City Commission.
R ectful y mitted,
&J. FER
SEUSAN E.
TAFFER
7
94- 788
Ms. Ileana Hernandez offered the following Resolution
and moved its adoption.
RESOLUTION ZB 84-94
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1
OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE
VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401. SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-1
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO
ALLOW A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 1'-O" (5'-0" REQUIRED) FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2238 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 37, HOLLEMAN PARK
(8-23) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY; ZONED R-1
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Lorenzo Luaces
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Mses. Hernandez, Basila & Morales.
Messers. Luaces, Carman, Crespo and
Sands.
NAYES: None.
ABSENT: Messers. Barket, Milian & Moran-Ribeaux.
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0.
September 12, 1994
Zoning Board
Item# 4
94- 788
ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PETITION t?OR VARIANCE
NOTION:
I�that the request on agenda item be
(_e__niedy
(granted) in that the requirements of
Section 1903.1 (were) (were not) satisfied by
relevant evidence in the record of the public
hearing.
a) as stated in the City's finds of fact, or
b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or
c) on the basis of the following:
-------------
------------- ic—z 45u= =__ l� Cam, ------------
The Zoning
Board shall make findings that all of the requirements
and standards
of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been)
demonstrtated.
CHECK ONE
a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do
OF EACH
not exist) which are peculiar to the land,
STATEMENT
structure or building involved and which are not
applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district.
�1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do
no result from the actions of the petitioner:
— 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
i
_ 3) as otherwise stated below:
c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the
zoning ordinance (would) (would not) deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other'
properties in the same zoning district under the
terms of the zoning ordinance and work
unnecessary and undue hardships on the,
2titionisrs
_, 1) as stated ih the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
94 : 788
I
a�
d) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not)
convey the same treatment to the individual
owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings,
olr structures in the same zoning district.
1) as stated in the city's findings of fact
_ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below
e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not)
convey the same treatment, any special privilege
that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other
lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning
district.
f) If granted the variance (will be) (will not be)
in harmony with the general intent and purpose of
the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious
to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare:
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
_ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
e
i I
'Signature
•J '
Date
_i
Item -
0
Ms. Ileana Hernandez offered the following Resolution
and moved its adoption.
RESOLUTION ZB 83-94
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1
OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE
VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401. SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-1
SINGLE-FAMI'_Y RESIDENTIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO
ALLOW A HEIGHT OF 34'-2" (25'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED)
FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2238
SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 13 AND 14,
BLOCK 37, HO LLEMAN PARK (8-23) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE
COUNTY; ZONED R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS
VARIANCE WAS GRANTED SUBJECT TO SUBMITTING MODIFIED PLANS
WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS TO INCLUDE ONLY THE HEIGHT
VARIANCE OF 34'-2" AND IT HAS A TIME LIMITATION OF TWELVE
(12) MONTHS 1N WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Lorenzo Luaces
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Mses. Hernandez, Basila & Morales.
Messers. Luaces, Carman, Crespo and
Sands. ,
- NAYES: None.
ABSENT: Messers. Barket, Milian & Moran-Ribeaux.
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0.
September 12, 1994 Item# 4
Zoning Board
94- 788 13
ZONING BOARD ACTION Oh PETITION FOR VARIANCE
MOTION:
i move that request on agenda item � be
(denied) rantedE in that the requirements of
Section 19 we(were not) satisfied by
relevant evidence in the record of the public
hearing.
a) as stated in the City's finds of fact, or
b),' as demonstrated by the petitioner, or
c) on the basis of the following:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Zoning
Board shall make findings that all of the requirements
and standards
of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been)
demonstrtated.
CHECK ONE
a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do
Of EACH
not exist) which are peculiar to the land,
STATEMENT
structure or building involved and which are not
applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district.
V/ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
_ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
_ 3) as otherwise stated below:
b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do
/,not) result from the actions of the petitioner:
v 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
i
_ 3) as otherwise stated below:
c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the
zoning ordinance (would) (would not) deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the sass zoning district under the
terms of the zonihq ordinance and work
unnecessary and undue hardships on the
titioner:
21") as stated ih the City's findings of fact
_ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
94- 788 15
d) Granting the variance requested (will (will not)
convey the same treatment to individual
owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings,
or structures in the same zoning district.
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
_ 3) as otherwise stated below
9) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not)
convey the same treatment, any special privilege
that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other
lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning
district.
f) if granted the variance will bey (will not be)
in harmony with the genera nt and purpose of
the toning ordinance, and will not be injurious
to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare:
_ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2j as demonstrated by the petitioner
_ 3) as otherwise stated below:
• 5 gnature
Date
Item
1
icy
PETITION FOR VARIANCE
File Number
A iariance is relaxation of the terns of the ordinance where such
action will not be contrary to the public interest and where,
^wing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result
of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this
ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the
property. As used in this ordinance, a variance is authorized
only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards
and other open spaces and off-street parking or loading require-
ments. (Section 1901)
1Emmanuel Nwadike And,.
il�ya0qTiitiAwadjt �jr of Mimi Zoning Board for a
eariance from the terms of the 'Zoning Ordinances of the City of Mimi," affecting
property located at 2238 South Miami Avenue , Mimi as specified below.
in support of this application, the following material is submitted:
X 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida
Registered Land Surveyor.
X 2. Four copies of: the site plan showing (as required) property boundaries,
existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping
etc; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area
and building spacing.
X 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by application and
disclosure of interest form (attach to application).
X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the
outside boundaries of property covered by the application.
X S. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improve-
ments).
X 5. Other (Specify) Warranty Deed
X 7. Fee of S 962.00 to apply toward the cost of processing, based on the
following:
CS, PR; 9-1, R-2, (single-family
and duplex residential uses) ............. S 200.00
Piers, docks, wharves and the
like, for each variance from
the ordinance, per lineal foot ........... S 30.00
Minimum ................................... $ 600.00
All other applications for each variance
from the ordinance, per squirt foot of
gross floor area of new buildinq(s) or
6dditions, based upon the definition
of floor area (section 1"1).............. $ 0.07
Minimum .........................:.......... S 550.00
9 & 788
17
.-%pplicati :-ii :car . trian: e as 3 result
of a cha:rr'e r 3 .-ioialwu no6i e shall
char' ed am ;additional tee, per variance
C11". PR, R-1. R-'
S 200 (11)
.all cuter residem-ail distract;
S 1; 0 CIO
-kill nc;ti residential distracts
5�n i)i)
hxtentic-ri of time fol %arisnce
$400 GC
Surchar e equal to alai?'!cable tee front items a'r•o%e
not to BXCLed sic hundred and t-iftk• dollar;
e-.eept from a� ncac� ��; the city. such surcharge -o
be retundt-d to the •inpixarit if there is no appeal
^~;.pert c,\,� ner \.'ithm thi c;e hundr-_d and
,;evenv, -five (; x' the subject propene.
( (inC. `Je SootioII h 1 1
1 6 Tile variance requested is for relief'f of . the prov;lions of section 1 1000
of the City of N[ianii Zonina, Ordinance as tollo«s ART 4 SF.0 401
A Side Setback ; - 0" _.
Proposed 13"
S. Height ,,tax - 2 -U"
Proposed 3X '"
9 In support or the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence.
on the paint enumerated at Subsection 1903 1 of the City of ;Miami Zoning Ordinance.
'got, This a^niication cannot be accepted for Zoning Board actic-n unless all of the following
six items are cotupleted.
X (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure,
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district in that (list evidence to be produced and use
additional sheects. if necessary.)
The property is unique because it is a corner lot with a large side yard setback as well
as large front and backyard setback. The lots are long and narrow The petitioner has
purchased adjacent lot #13 and combined both lots 13 and 14. However, density in
the city of Miami is such that the most efficient use of space and land is to build up to
a third floor level, This would also preserve the original look of the buildings South
Miami Avenue clevation
I � 94- 788
x Ih) The Special conditions and ^ircamstances do not result from the actions of the
oetiti0ner in that:
The petitionerihas not carried out any actions. Other
than to formally and legal build a comfortable and
secure residence in the City of Miami - Brickell Ave.%-
South Miami Ave. area. There have been no special con-
ditions resulting from the petitioner.
X (c) Literal interpretati,)n of the previsions of the zoning ordinance would deprive
the applicant of rights rommonly enjoyed by other properties in the same
zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and would work
unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that:
The petitioner is unable to enjoy the complete use of
both, adjacent, lots on the property. The existing
house is too small and granting this variance would
allow more open landscape area at ground level as op-
posed to building and paving up to all allowed setbacks.
X (d) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special
privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the sass zoning district in that:
The petitioner's property is in an area in which 1-95
Towers to the West of his block and the mid -rise Town -
homes and highrise condos across the block, east, on
Brickell Avenue. This is an up -scale luxury "mixed"
residential and commercial area with homes and buildings
that range from one story to twenty plus stories high.
X (e) The variance, if granted, is the minisus variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building, or structure in that:
The petitioner's family is already living without
adequate living and sleeping space. The petitioner
will also be able to receive international Diplomats
in a comfortable and safe environment.
94- 788 Iq
X (f) The grant of the variance „ill he in 4armony oath the general intent and ouroose
of th! Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other-
,sq 4?tr'rent3l to the :uol— �ni�ars,
The variance, if granted, will result in the enhancement of
the property values in the luxury neighbor hood of South Miami
Avenue.
Note: All documents, reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to
be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application.
Signature
Owner or Authorized Agent
Name Dr. Emmanuel 1Vwadike
Address 2238 South Miami Avenue
STATE OF FLORIDA)
SS:
COUNTY OF OAOE )
Dr. Emmanuel Nwadike , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
(Owner) (44tficrtzVd'-AV"t-of-0001119 of the real property described in answer to question 11
above: that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete;
and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this petition on
behalf of the owner.
ITN ame)
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
before me this 19 day of
April 199 94
My Comission Expirts:
Notary p'o ie, State of Florid>e at urge
11En!NE w1NJrIVE
Notanv POW, 'ir.w f Fled1a
Ile..bdCSS„I
947-08
X (f) The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent Ind purpose
of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other.
wise detr,mentat to the oubi,c Ne)fare.
The variance, if granted, will result in the enhancement of
the property values in the luxury neighborhood of South Miami
Avenue.
Note., All documents, reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to
be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application.
Signature " "'"WG'dl&
Vw�er or Authorized Agent
Naas Naomi Nwadike
Address 2238 South Miami Avenue
STATE OF FLORIDA)
SS:
COUNTY OF OADE )
Naomi Nwadike , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
Owner (1iuthor+ted✓-AgenTi0t"0mw) of the real property described in answer to question /1
above: that he has read the foregoing answers and that the save are true and complete:
and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has- authority to execute this petition on
behalf of the owner.
Naiee)
SWORN TO AND SUISCR11E0
before me this 19 day of
April 19994
fly Coasi.ission Expires:
t
Notary P4 c, State of Florida at,, arge
REGIME CHIME
Notary eubk, state of Pi 044
Mar CWW exM rMe. G&ANJIT
+/M
94- 788 �,�
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA }
} SS
COUNTY OF DADE ?
Before lee, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared
Dr. Emmanuel Nwadikewho being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes
and says:
1. That he is th% or the legal representative of the owner,
submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by
Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real
property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages
attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full
and complete permission for him to acts in their behalf for the changt or modifica-
tion of a classification or regulation of toning as set out in the accompanying
petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit
contain the current names, sailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions
for the the real property of which he is t e��Gr
rlegal representative.
d. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted
in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not. ;
(SEAL,)
(M+ffie)
Sworn to and Subscribed before me
this 19 day of Ao�ril_, 192.0.
"COryleolic. State of Flor . i ;L471N c^ F
My Cofai ss ion Expires : Motanr pu"fic, Slate of Fioriia
,MW tomvn exe,•ee Aar ie. tame
AFF10AYIT
STATE OF FtOPIDA
} SS
COUNTY OF OAOE }
B+fore sae, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared
Mrs. Naomi Nwadike , who being by at first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes
and says:
1. That he is; th <
owner, or the legal representative of the owner,
submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by
Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real
property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages
attached to this affidavit and Made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, If any, have given their full
and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or Imodifica-
Lion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying
petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit
contain the current noes, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions
for the the real property of whict5he is th owner r legal representative.
d. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted
in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct.
Further AM ant sayeth not. //
(sit)
(Mesa)
Sworn to and Subscribed before mt
this 19 day of Anril 1914
a
Notary P lic, State of Florid at large _ p�
REWNE 3wcm
Nv rm�ieeinw Notary Public, Sta•eofFlodds
r
a4
OWNER'S LIST
Owner s 4ame Dr. Emmanuel Nwadike
Mailing Address 2238 S. Miami Avenue
Telephone Number ( 305 ) 856-81 50
Legal Description:
Lot 13 and Lot 14, Block 37,Holleman Park,
Plat Book 8, Page 23, Dade County, Florida
Owner's Name Mrs. Naomi Nwadike
Mailing Address 2238 S. Miami Avenue
Telephone Number ( 305 ) 856-81 50
Legal Description: Lot 13 and 14, Block 37, Holleman Park,
Plat Book 8, Page 23, Dade County Florida
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation,
partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address
N/A
Street Address
N/A
Street Address
N/A
Legal Description
Legal Description
Legal Description
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP
I. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
Lot 13 and Lot 14, in Block 37, of Holleman Park, according
to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at page 23
of the Public Record of Dade County, Florida.
No. 2238 S. Miami Ave. Miami, Florida.
2. pwnki(s)_ of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami
Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest,
either direct or indirect, in the subject ratter of a presentation, request or
petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested
parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
Dr. Emmanuel Nwadike (50%) & Naomi Nwadike (50%)
Tenants by entireties.
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party
listed in answer to question 02, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject
real property.
N/A
OWNER WI -•f9R-41001"
STATE OF FLORIDA } SS:
COUNTY OF DADE }
Dr, Emmanuel Nwadike , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
(Owner) ) of the real property described in answer to question 01,
above that he has read the foregoing answers and that the saes are true and cmelate;
and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure
of Ownership fore on behalf of -the owner. '
SWORN TO AND SUlSfVBED
before M this
day of
NY C"ISSION EXPIRES:
(SEAL)
(Nave)
%tw4y public. State eV Florida at Large
94- 788 95
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP
1. Legal description and street address of subject rite) property:
Lot 13 and Lot 14, in Block 37, of Holleman Park, according
to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at page 23
of the Public Record of Dade County, Florida.
No. 2238 S. Miami Ave., Miami, Florida
2. Owner(s of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Niaui
Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest,
either direct or indirect, in the subject natter of a presentation, request or
petition to the City Couuission. Accordingly, question /2 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested
parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
Dr. Emmanuel Nwadike (50%) & Naomi Nwadike (50%)
Tenants by entireties.
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owed by any party
listed in answer to question 12, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject
real property.
N/A
OWNER -000
STATE OF FLORIDA } SS:
COUNTY OF OAK }
Mrs. Naomi Nwadike being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the
(owner) ( ) of the real property described in answer to question it,
above; that he has read the forogoinq answers and that the save ere true and cm*lete;
and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to exm.te the Disclosure
of Ownership fora on behalf of.the owner.
SWORN TO AND SUescRleED
before ate this 1.9
day of April , 1924
nr coNlltsstoN ExP1REs.
Pr -.!NE V100YE
N9'Iry Public., Stne )f Flagda
8.
(SEAL)
(New)
c 1, l_.rl G
Notaily Public, State of -'Florida at Large
94- 188