HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-94-0295J-94-113
4/21/94
RESOLUTION NO. 9 4 - 295
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), ACCEPTING
THE STUDY KNOWN AS "THE FLORIDA AVENUE
PROJECT (AUGUST 1993)," ATTACHED HERETO AND
MADE A PART HEREOF, PREPARED BY DOVER, KOHL
AND PARTNERS, FOR FLORIDA AVENUE NEIGHBORS
AND THE CITY OF MIAMI, FOR PROPERTIES
ABUTTING FLORIDA AVENUE FROM MATILDA STREET
TO MCDONALD STREET, EXCLUDING KIRK MUNROE
PARK, IN COCONUT GROVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA;
FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO
INITIATE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS WITH
THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNING THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAID
STUDY, AS APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the Florida Avenue Neighbors and the City of Miami
sponsored an all -day charrette at the Coconut Grove Elementary
School on July 24, 1994 to obtain suggestions as to how to design
an environment to enhance security, economic stability, social
contact and appearance of Florida Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said suggestions were compiled by Dover, Kohl and
I
Partners and included in their study known as "The Florida Avenue
Project (August, 1993)", as presented on August 24, 1993, in
Coconut Grove to the Florida Avenue Neighbors; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1994, the Planning Advisory Board,
pursuant to Resolution PAB 5-94, by a vote of five to four (5-4)
1 approved the study known as "The Florida Avenue Project (August
1993)," prepared by Dover, Kohl and Partners for Florida Avenue
1
Neighbors and the City of Miami, for properties abutting Florida
(HTA1I.C.D
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
APR 2 8 1994
Awoiudon I"
94- 295i
Avenue from Matilda Street to McDonald Street, excluding Kirk
Munroe Park, in Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida, provided that (a)
the proposed zoning for the subject property(s) is R-2 Duplex;
(b) no C-1 Restricted Commercial uses are included; (c) there is
adherence to existing parking standards; and (d) that townhouse
housing is explored; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to
accept the study and direct the City Manager to initiate further
workshops with the neighborhood regarding subject property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
aforementioned zoning study and in the Preamble to this
Resolution are hereby approved, confirmed and adopted by
reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth
in this Section.
Section 2. The study known as "The Florida Avenue Project
(August 1993)" prepared by Dover, Kohl and Partners for Florida
Avenue Neighbors and the City of Miami, for properties abutting
Florida Avenue from Matilda Street to McDonald Street, excluding
Kirk Munroe Park, in Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida, is hereby
accepted.
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby directed to initiate
additional community workshops with the neighborhood concerning
the subject property prior to the implementation of said study,
as approved.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of _ April , 1994.
STEP EN P. CLARK, MAYOR
JATTTRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
� r
LINDA KELLY KEAR ON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
94- 295
-3-
FLORIDA AVENUE P R 0 j E C T
COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA
Sponsored by:
FLORIDA AVENUE NEIGHBORS and THE CITY OF MIAMI
Submitted by:
DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
Urban Design
AUGUST 23, 1993
94- 295
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE PROJECT .................................................. 1
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ................................ 4
THE RESULTING DESIGN ......................................... S
SITE -DESIGN STANDARDS ....................................... 15
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ................................. . 15
PERMITTED USES .................................... 17
ILLUSTRATED BUILDING EXAMPLES ......................... 19
FLORIDA AVENUE LOTS ................................... 20
GATEWAY LOTS ........................................ 24
PARK FRONT LOTS ........................................ 29
GRAND AVENUE LOTS ..................................... 33
GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................... 37
ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ................................... 39
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .... 39
BUILDING WALLS ......................................... 40
GARDEN WALLS & FENCES ................................. 41
COLUMNS, ARCHES, PIERS, & PORCHES ....................... 42
ROOFS & GUTTERS ....................................... 43
WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS, STOREFRONTS, & DOORS .............. 44
STREET STANDARDS ........................................... 45
DEFINITIONS .................................................. 51
94- 295
J
The Project
THE PROJECT
PLAN OF ACTION
This project concerns the revitalization and physical improvement of a small area in the heart
of Coconut Grove. It has been brought about by citizen leaders who share a conviction that
Florida Avenue today is much less than it can be. Like most grass -roots projects, it sharply
challenges the status quo- but unlike `protest' projects it also proposes a precise alternative,
and a plan of action.
This plan of action is firmly rooted in teamwork:
• It reorganizes a patchwork of complicated properties and land uses into an organic
whole, a system— part of a real neighborhood;
• It was conceived in a citizen gathering via a group brainstorming process;
• It will take on official status only if the coalition of the City and private interests that
has emerged continues its teamwork; and
• For the overall plan to be physically implemented anytime soon, individual neighbors
must coordinate with one another and the City to achieve greater ends.
PROJECT LOCATION
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT •1• DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94-- 295
The Project
SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS
FLORIDA AVENUE NEIGHBORS is a not -for -profit organization chartered by residents and
property owners on the street and funded by them for the purpose of carrying out this
project. The philosophy of Florida Avenue Neighbors holds 1) that a properly designed
environment will enhance security, economic stability, social contact, and appearance; 2) that
such a design should be created using a citizen -driven process; and 3) that the project on
Florida Avenue can be a testing project and model, both in process and product, for other
areas of the Grove and the City.
THE CITY OF MIAMI Planning, Building and Zoning Department has provided financial
Y support, staff resources, and professional expertise for the project. Jointly, the City and
cte Florida Avenue Neighbors contrad the urban design firm of Dover, Kohl & Partners as
consultants for the project. In the setup phase, the City supplied Florida Avenue Neighbors
and the consultants with base information, maps, real estate data, and community contacts.
For the Citizens' Meeting, the City widely advertised the event and provided staff from
departments including the Coconut Grove Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET),
Planning, Parks, and Public Works.
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS have also given time, money, meeting space, data or effort; these
include invaluable contributions from the Coconut Grove Elementary School PTA and the
school itself, the Coconut Grove Chamber of Commerce, Constructa Properties, Arturo F.
Comas & Sons, and others.
THE ALL -DAY CITIZENS MEETING
As the project concept evolved over many months, several gatherings of neighbors were held
to discuss possibilities and explore public -involvement alternatives. Tasks were distributed
among members of Florida Avenue Neighbors and the consultants devised a proposed work
program. The City officially confirmed its participation in the project in May 1993.
After many weeks of preparation, Florida Avenue Neighbors and the City of Miami held an
all -day working session on July 24, 1993. The session was held at the Coconut Grove
Elementary School, immediately adjacent to the project study area. Specifically invited
participants included all those within 1000 feet of the study area. Approximately 50 people
attended the event, which was organized as a condensed version of a town planning charrette
or high-speed creative design session.
The all -day meeting began with introductory presentations about the purpose of the project
;. and a slide presentation about basic urban design, `defensible space', and key issues to be
resolved during the day. Ground rules were established (including "No speeches: argue if you
must, but argue with a pencil ). Next there was a group walking tour of the area, in which
neighbors and consultants compared their observations of the existing conditions. Then the
creative work began; participants first worked individually, after that in small groups, and
then with the full audience on identifying commonly held ideas and concerns through words
and graphics. Each of three groups worked over large-scale maps to combine visual ideas, then
presented their drawings to the other groups. During a break, the consultants and enthusiastic
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT •2. Dom, OVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
4- 295
The Project
citizens synthesized thegroups' findings into one plan and refined keysots. Alternatives
were discussed for the ost challenging parts of the plan. Following the break, participants
reconvened for an evening presentation of the rough results and a spirited debate about the
1 plan's details.
Following the all -day citizens' meeting, the consultants continued research and refinement of
j the plan concepts, prepared presentation drawings, and this document for use by Florida
Avenue Neighbors and the City.
THE BASIC CONCEPT
Florida Avenue will be transformed into a healthy, open part of the Grove by:
• Encouraging redevelopment of strategic properties with building types and uses which
will improve the visual quality and security of all public spaces, including the Park;
• Encouraging the improvement of existing structures with building features and uses to
eyes -on -the -street', including replacing fortress -fronts with front porches,
• Replacing existing zoning with a more precise set of Site -Design Standards and
Architectural Standards designed to bring about definite results, including the desired
shape to public spaces and visual harmony among buildings;
� Reorganizing circulation to control traffic, reduce crime, and encourage pedestrian use,
including reconstructing Florida Avenue for a narrower road, and introducing alleys;
Designing the anticipated redevelopment along Grand Avenue in a configuration that
provides a proper transition to the neighbors to the north; and
Correcting the physical relationship between the private buildings, the Park, and the
Coconut Grove Elementary School, the streets, and interrelating their daily uses.
I '"s' THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
•3-
DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Goals, Objectives, & Policies
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Goal 1: To encourage strategic redevelopment in the neighborhood
Objective: Enhance the developability of properties on the street, but control the scale,
intensity, and appearance of the new development.
Policies:
• Set forth new land development regulations as described in this report.
• Pro -actively promote the redevelopment by publicizing this model project.
Objective: Improve the visual character and functionality of the public rights -of -way and
the Park.
Policies:
• Establish a new architectural/urban pattern (see items under Goal 2 below).
• Reconstruct Florida Avenue (see items under Goal 3 below).
• Clean up the dumpster area at the School.
,J • Promote future addition to School offering a grander front to the Park.
• Introduce alleys to remove clutter and ugliness associated with curb cuts,
garbage collection, arage doors, and parking lots where front yards should be.
• Place monument te.g. statue, flag pole) at eastern end of street.
yObjective: Increase property values (and thereby the ad valorem tax base).
Policy:
„- • Restore developability to the properties by correcting security, image, and
zoning errors.
Objective: Maintain a stable economic vitality for the neighborhood. Encourage long
term ownership and owner -occupancy of buildings.
Policies:
1 • Permit owners to continue existing uses uninterrupted. Participation in the
«�l redevelopment project need not be compulsory.
- Owners of existing buildings shall not be forced to modify their buildings to
the new guidelines, except upon substantial renovation exceeding 50% in relative
value (or some similar `grandfather' clause.
H
THE MONIDA AVENUE PROJECT •4• Dovm, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Goals, Objectives, & Policies
Goal 2: To reduce crime in the area
Objective: Achieve natural surveillance, or "Eyes -on -the -Street" (and on -the -Park); let
would-be criminals know that this area is watched over and let strangers know this is
not their territory.
Policies:
• Require front porches.
• Require clear lines of sight from inside buildings to the public spaces.
• Position buildings close to the street with windows facing the street.
• Reorient buildings on the western edge of the Park to face the Park.
• Increase the number of houses facing the Park.
--Mix building uses to increase building occupancy at all hours.
• Set buildings forward at the ends of the block to spatially form a "gateway".
Objective: Architecturally define a clear edge between public and private spaces.
Policies:
• Use picket fences along fronts of properties .
• Position buildings close to the street with traditional `dooryards'.
Objective. Discourage visitors to the Grove from exposing themselves to risk; reduce
attractiveness to car thieves and auto break-ins.
Policies.
• Remove parallel parking in front of Park.
• Onstreet parking on Florida Avenue by permit only, for owners and guests.
Goal 3: To create safer streets for pedestrians
. Objective.- Discourage high-speed car traffic and encourage drivers to be alert.
Policies:
• Correct the lane width to eliminate temptation for higher speeds.
• Use suitable, small turning radii at corners.
• Include orderly parallel parking, as a friction element and to provide for
queuing of cars picking up and dropping off schoolchildren.
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT
.f. DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94— 295
Pedestrians. or f
g Goals, Objectives, &Policies
Objective: Establish safe crossings
Policies.
• Use suitable, small turning radii at corners.
• Provide marked crosswalks at intersections.
• Use a different paving texture for crosswalks.
Objective. Increase pedestrian activity; retain neighborhood school's pedestrian access.
Policies.
• Require proper building placement and require shading elements such as trees,
arcades, colonnades, and cantilevered balconies where appropriate.
• Promote mixed -use occupancy.
• Conserve the residential character of entire area.
*� Objective. Maintain appropriate passage for emergency vehicles and occasional large
vehicles; allow smaller curb radii but admit larger vehicles when required.
Policy.
• Establish `clear zones' at corners.
Objective. Establish safe sidewalks where pedestrians have minimum conflict with
moving cars.
r, Policies.
`' • Regulate curb cuts.
• Locate parking and trees between sidewalks and travel lanes.
Goal 4: To encourage sustainable development and energy efficiency
Objective: Promote infill develo ment, discourage sprawl, and development which
reduces dependency on automobile trips.
Policies:
• Promote incremental change into a mixed -use, compact, neighborhood.
• Demand building placement and require elements that encourage pedestrians.
• Restore developability to the area by correcting the image and zoning errors.
THE FLOWDA A VENUE PROJECT •6- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Goals, Objectives, & Policies
Objective: Encourage climate -responsive architecture and landscape architecture.
Policies:
• Establish Architectural Standards.
• Utilize traditional shading devices such as roof overhangs, porches, arcades,
colonnades, Bahama shutters, and so forth.
• Maintain shade through orderly spacing of full-size canopy trees.
• Minimize the heat buildup and limit impervious area through minimized
asphalt areas and through regular placement of canopy trees.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT .7 Dova, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
The Resulting Design
THE RESULTING DESIGN
MAP OF EXISTING CONDITIONS, 1993
�u
O'
i�
d�
o
THE FLORIDA AVENUE P R 0 1 E C T
EXISTING CONDITIONS
August 23. 1993-
•ILMM asmin Itsmomm Tug Ci• ff or NUZ P"M MM A, PANXIM
ME FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT" -8- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
THE MASTER PLAN: The Resulting Design
Projected Buildout, 3-5 Years
FWN
_�151
IUM
fit
,3;
SWO
In
it
I
IN
i
Ou
■
all
z 0
gw I gin '..wa
fr. gw G'al 0il; "irr I
it
FA
0 �
�;r�a
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -9- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
THE MASTER PLAN.-
Projected Buildout, 30 Years
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
The Resulting Design
-10 Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
is
—,rf-tljuUA A VLNUb FRUILCY
DovF-R, Kom & PAR7MRs
I SO OWN. C.
94- 295
l
,.�
THE FLORMA AVENUE PROJECT 12- Dom, KOHL f+ PARiNExs 9 4 —
The Resulting Design
View Facing Northwest into Park
r_in
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -13 DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
MIN
l
1
l
1
1
The Resulting Design
View .Facing East along Florida Avenue
THE FLOPMA AVENUE PROJECT" -14- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
7
Site -Design Standards
SITE -DESIGN STANDARDS
These Site -Design Standards are the site -specific component of the Florida Avenue Project
Master Plan. For each lot, information is designated such as: the permitted land uses, the
location and dimensions of Build -to Lines; and locations where front porches or colonnades
or balconies over the sidewalk are required.
AMENDED LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
In response to spillover effects on the homes of Florida Avenue from the adjacent commercial
area to the south, and the need for an proper transition to the residential areas north of
Florida Avenue, it is appropriate that the existing R-1 (single-family) land use designation be
reconsidered. With current traffic, noise, and crime the street can no longer function properly
as a single-family residential street; in effect (by accident or on purpose) Florida Avenue has
} been sacrificed as a buffer between the commercial uses to the south and the residential
neighborhood to the north. As a protective layer between these uses, Florida Avenue has
received many of the negative impacts from the commercial success of Center Grove but few
benefits.
One goal is to permit development of building types which more effectively `seal' the public
space than single-family homes do. Low -slung, single-family houses spaced far apart are
inappropriate for the first block off a bustling `Main Street' like Grand Avenue. More
appropriate building types are rowhouses, veranda -style two-story houses, and similar urban
types such as those found in places like St. Augustine or Key West. This change-- to a
y� traditional pattern— will improve the street image, reduce spillover effects, and provide
(through greater numbers of permissible units) an incentive to redevelopment.
Another goal is to have buildings occupied at all hours; this will reduce the occurrence of
break-ins and increase street activity to create safety for residents, pedestrians, and parked
automobiles. In high crime areas, streets (or buildings) with only a single use will be empty
for parts of the day or night offering an invitation to burglars and vandals. Presently it is
perceived that many incidents of crime occur, during the day, when adult occupants . of
residential uses are most likely to be away at work. Therefore it is necessary to promote a
true mixed -use pattern, within certain very tight restrictions, which will include both places to
dwell and places to work. By design, this new land use pattern should be of a finer grain than
conventional zoning; it is necessary to create new sub -categories within the overlay district
in response to the uniqueness of certain properties. Parking requirements within these sub-
categories should be adjusted (reduced) by the Planning Staff incorporating shared -parking
principles for the mix of uses, accounting for the pedestrian nature of the district, and
including on -street parking as part of the supply.
A third goal is to control the form and lacement of buildings so that each hel� s shape the
desired public space, and each fits agreeab y within the architectural character of tg e street and
A� the historic Grove.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -IS- DOV£R, KOHL & PAR7-A,£Rs
94- 295
Site -Design Standards
Located on the man below are labels designating which categories of standards and uses pertain
to which lots, as follows:
FA for Florida Avenue lots,
GW for Gateway lots,
PF for park front lots, and
GA for Grand Avenue lots.
Oak Avenue
F1,
Park
I
I �
N I U
1 En I I
I
�ic Florida Avenue 'd
a
�I
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
Grand Avenue
16 DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
PERMITTED USES BY CATEGORY Site -Design Standards
FA, GW & PF (Florida Ave., Gateway, and Park Front Lots):
RESIDENTIAL: permitted on all floors.
LIMITED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES': additional restrictions apply (see below,
`HOME OFFICE' USES
r Accounting & Auditing Services Notary Public
Advertising Agency Office: Cultural, Business or Professional
Architectural Services Opticians or Optical Goods, Office
Building Contractors Office Planning & Zoning Consultant
Counseling Services Public Relations Services
Credit Reporting Services Real Estate Agency
Insurance Agency Stenographic Services
Interior Designer, Office only Stock Brokerage Services
Investigative Services Telephone Answering Services
Investment & Tax Counseling Telemarketing Services
Law Office Tutorial Services
Market Research Services
`SMALL SHOP' USES
Antique or Curio Shop Museum
Art Gallery Opticians or Optical Goods, Showroom
Barber, Hairdresser, Manicurist Photographic Studio
Bookstore, Stationers, Reading Room Picture Framer
Fabric or Drapery Shop Shoe Repair Service
Florist Tailor or Seamstress
Fraternal Organization or Club Tobacconist
Int. Decorator, Showroom/Salesroom Watch and Clock Sales & Repair
Library
`LIMITED LODGING' USES
Bed -and -Breakfast Inn (6 rooms max.)
The following RESTRICTIONS apply for LIMITED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES:
1. Home Office uses and Small Shop uses may occur on the ground floor only. Residential
and Limited Lodging uses may occur on any floor.
2. Home Office uses and Small Shop uses may occupy up to 50% of the combined gross floor
area within all structures on a given lot, up to 1800 SF maximum.
"1 3. Non-residential uses shall be limited to a maximum of 3 employees present at the place of
J business at any given time, not including persons residing on the property.
4. Signage is limited to 10 SF per building, with no signs of area more than 3 SF. Signs must
be hand -painted or carved wood board -signs, frontlit only; no signs shall occur above the
first floor level; no illumination of signs shall cause spillover onto adjacent properties.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -17- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Site -Design Standards
GA (Grand Avenue Lots):
RESIDENTIAL: permitted on all floors above the first.
NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: all those uses currently permitted under SD-2 zoning as
determined by Section 602.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, City of Miami.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
The consultants' initial suggestion was for the PF (Park Front lots to be residential only. However,
at a gathering of Florida Avenue property owners and residents, held August 19, 1993, the citizen
group disagreed with the residential -only suggestion, contending that the Park Front lots should be
treated the same way (with regard to use) as the rest of the existing street. The athering included
15 people, who unanimously (through show of hands preferred the mixed -use (f exible) alternative
for the Park Front as well. This draft reflects that revision.
j
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT -18• DOVER, KOHL & PAR7NERS
4— 295
Site -Design Standards
ILLUSTRATED BUILDING EXAMPLES
In the Site -design Standards on the following pages, diagrammatic examples are used to
illustrate building locations, height, configurations, and dimensions. These diagrams are
generic in nature, and represent only a few of the many possible configurations for buildings.
A wide varietyof architectural designs can be generated within
g g thin the confines of the Site -design
Standards and the Architectural Standards; diversity should be encouraged.
Y� . T, '
r)
l
V1
J
. . •err_
� • l� //w�J/-••M111.11..1
f
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -19- DoVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
°4- 295
Site Design Standards Florida Avenue Lots
FLORIDA AVENUE LOTS (F A )
-L-JJLU I I Q L
Oak A�enua
I
,.;. Park
ii
b S I
_ Florida Avenue
.I �a
I
v —
''*„ Orand Avenue ,c
\ l�
The following standards regarding
Heights and Uses, the Relationship
of the Building to the Street,
Building Frontage, Building
Placement & Buildable Area,
Porches, and Fences, Walls &
Hedges apply to all lots within the
FA category as designated by hatch
lines in the figure to the left.
Minimum lot width = 20 ft
Minimum lot depth = 100 ft
Maximum number of lots which
can be aggregated = 3 lots
-.1----- -------------------------------------------------------------
Heights & Uses:
Slp��lgl
Ma X.
slb�rlg1
%SIb_NTI
a�l �slb�N�
• 2 story minimum height
required.
• 36 ft maximum height
For a detailed list of Limited Non-
residential Uses see: New Land Use
Designations.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -20- DovER, KOHL & PAR77VERS
_�� 99 4 — 295
Site Design Standards Florida Avenue Lots
Relationship of Building to Street:
BUILD -TO LINE --t --PROPERTY LINE
A front porch is required. Front porches may be 1, 2 or 3 stories in height and shall be
constructed forward of the Build -To Line. The minimum depth for front porches is 8 ft.
The Build -To Line is located 20 ft from and parallel to the front property line.
A fence or garden wall is required at the front property line.
Building Frontage
The Building Frontage shall be 50
to 100% of the lot frontage as
measured from side property line to
side property line at the front Build -
To line.
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT .21- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94` 295
Site Design Standards Florida Avenue Lots
Building Placement & Buildable Area:
STREET
.s-- CURB
MnEWALK
• Lot Coverage = 50% maximum
BUILD -TO LINE
• Open Yard Space = 40% min.
BUILDINGS MAY
• Front Build -to Lines are
WITHIN
EM THIS
HIS AREA
established at 20 ft from and
Farallel to the front property
line.
• Fronts of buildings shall be
oriented to the street.
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
• Outbuildings are permitted. (See
OUTBUILDINGS MAY
General Provisions for more
BE PLACED WITHIN
details regarding Outbuildings)
THIS AREA
g g
Porches
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
•22-
• Front Porches are required and
shall occur forward of the build -
to line.
• Front Porch depth: 8 ft min.
• Front Porch Length = 50 - 106%
of building frontage.
• Porches may be multi -story
porches and/or have balconies
above.
• Roofs of porches may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Site Design Standards Florida Avenue Lots
Fences, Walls & Hedges:
•---STREET —•
+- CURB
IHt+►II/I/III!//YIIIIIIJM/////%////IIIr►IYJI/I/I/J SIDEWALK
! ' PORCHES OCCUR FORWARD
! ! f ! I OF THE BUILD -TO LINE
IBUILD -TO LINE
I I III POSSIBLE BUILDING
ROOF PLAN
- ALLEY
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
FENCES, HEDGES, OR
WALLS MUST OCCUR
ALONG UNEUILT PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO
STREETS OR ALLEYS
• Fences, garden walls or hedges
must occur along unbuilt
property lines adjacent to streets
or alleys (as shown with hatch
lines in the diagram at the left).
• Fences, garden walls and hedges
are also permitted in other
locations of each lot. (see General
Provisions for more details
regarding fences, garden walls
and hedges)
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -23- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94— 295
Site -Design Standards Gateway Lots
GATEWAY LOTS (GW)
<< I 1 i L
0 Afaaa�
The following standards regarding
Heights and Uses, the Relationship
of the Building to the Street,
Building Frontage, Building
Placement & Buildable Area,
Porches, and Fences, Walls &
Hedges apply to all lots within the
GW category as designated by hatch
lines in the fieure to the left.
Minimum lot width = 20 ft
Minimum lot depth = 100 ft
Maximum number of lots which
can be aggregated = 3 lots
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Heights & Uses:
r
• 2 story minimum height
required.
• 36 ft maximum height.
For a detailed list of Limited Non-
residential Uses see: New Land Use
Designations.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -24- DovER, KOHL & PARMERS
94— 295
Site -Design Standards Gateway Lots
Relationship of Building to Street:
STREET R.Oz.
40'
PROPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE-J t-PROPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE
STREET R.O.IU.
40'
PROPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE -J -Pf?OPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE
A colonnade, arcade, or 2nd floor balcony projecting over the sidewalk is required. Verandas
or Balconies may occur on upper floors and may project over the public right-of-way. The
minimum depth for colonnades and 2nd floor balconies is 8 ft.
The Build -To Line is the front property line.
A fence or garden wall is required at any unbuilt front property line.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
-25. DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
G
Site -Design Standards Gateway Lots
Building Frontage
The Building Frontage shall be 70
to 100% of the lot frontage as
measured from side property line to
side property line at the front Build -
To line.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Building Placement & Buildable Area:
--- STREET
-- ALLEY —+-
THE FLORMA AVENUE PROJECT
CURB
SIDEWALK
•
Lot Coverage = 60% maximum
BUILD -To LINE
•
Open Yard Space — 10% min.
BWILDMGS MAY
•
Build -to Lines are established at
BE PLACED WITHIN
lines which face streets.
THIS AREA
s
property
Fronts of buildings shall be
oriented to the street.
•
Outbuildings are permitted. (See
General Provisions for more
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
details regarding Outbuildings.)
OUTBUILPNGS MAY
BE PLACED WITHIN
THIS AREA
-26- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Site -Design Standards Gateway Lots
Colonnades / Arcades:
• Colonnades - / Arcades are
required except when there is a
continuous 2nd floor
cantilevered balcony, and shall
occur forward of the build -to
line, provided approval has been
obtained by the jurisdiction or
agency controlling rigght-of-way.
• Colonnade depth: 8 ft min.
nd/or • Colonnade length = 100% of
may building frontage.
ova o Colonnades may have multi-
�e' story porches and/or balconies
above.
S Roofs of porches may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Balconies:
,ri— 'liq
THE aONDA AVENUE PROJECT
O Balconies are required on the
2nd floor only when there is no
colonnade or arcade and shall
occur forward of the build -to
For taller buildings:
line, provided approval has been
porches and/or
balconies may
obtained by the jurisdiction or
occur above
agency controlling right-of-way.
?nd floor balconies
0 2nd floor balcony depth: 8' min.
• 2nd floor balcony length =
2nd floor balcony
is required if
100% of building frontage.
• Balconies above the 2nd floor
there is no
may differ in depth and length
colonnade
from the 2nd floor balcony.
0 Roofs of balconies, if
constructed, may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
-27- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Site -Design Standards Gateway Lots
Fences, Walls & Hedges:
f— STREET
COLONNADES OR BALCONIES OCCUR
LWITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OP -WAY
luau
Fall
ALLEY —
THE FLOR DA A VENUE PROJECT
r� •
SIDEWALK
Fences, garden walls or hedges
must occur along unbuilt
BUILD -TO LINE
property lines adjacent to streets
or alleys (as shown with hatch
POSSIBLE 1BUILDINC,
lines in the diagram at the left).
ROOF PLAN
•
Fences, garden walls and hedges
are also permitted in other
PROPERT"MOT LINE
locations of each lot. (see
General Provisions for more
details regarding fences, garden
walls and hedges)
FENCES, HEDGES, OR
WALLS MUST OCCUR
ALONG UNBUILT PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO
STREETS OR ALLEYS
-28- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
t
Site -Design Standards Park Front Lots
PARK FRONT LOTS (PF)
L—L—J==L=jj L The following standards regarding
O.k 1nnu.
Heights and Uses, the Relationship
of the Building to the Street,
Building Frontage, Building
Park Placement & Buildable Area,
Porches, and Fences, Walls &
Hedges apply to all lots within the
s
PF category as designated by hatch
� norla, a..nY. 9
lines in the figure to the left.
UMinimum lot width = 25 ft
Minimum lot depth — 75 ft
Maximum number of lots which
can be aggregated s 3 lots
7`Grandd A"nw
\t) 1 I I
Heights & Uses:
• 2 story height required
• 24 ft maximum height
For a detailed list of Limited Non-
residential Uses see: Amended Land
Use Designations.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT •29• Dom, KOHL & PARTNERs
04— 295
Site -Design Standards Park Front Lots
Relationship of Building to Park:
Short -Term Build -Out:
GUILD -TO LINE -J t-PROPERTY LINE
A front porch is required. Front porches may be 1 or 2 stories in height and shall be
constructed forward of the Build -To Line. The minimum depth for front porches is 8 ft.
The Build -To Line is located 16 ft from and parallel to the front property line.
A fence or garden wall is required at the front property line.
A walkway shall be constructed 5 ft wide forward of and parallel to the front property line
in the park. Another fence or garden wall is required on the park side of this walkway.
Long -Term Build -Out:
BUILD -TO LINE -r -PROPERTY LINE
A front porch is required. Front porches may be 1 or 2 stories in height and shall be
constructed forward of the Build -To Line. The minimum depth for front porches is 8 ft.
The Build -To Line is located 16 ft from and parallel to the front property line.
A fence or garden wall is required at the front property line.
Eventually the tennis courts should be removed when a tennis center is constructed elsewhere
allowing for further expansion of the Park Front houses to Oak Avenue. A lane shall be
constructed allowing one-way vehicular access in front of the Park Front houses with one lane
of parallel parking.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -30- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
04- 295
12'
Site -Design Standards Park Front Lots
Building Frontage
The Building Frontage shall be 50
to 80% of the lot frontage as
measured from side property line to
side property line at the front Build -
To Line.
'mac
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Building Placement & Buildable Area:
- STREET --►
CURB
SIDEWALK
• Lot Coverage = 50% maximum
BUILD -To LINE
• Open Yard Space = 40% min.
• Minimum lot depth = 100 ft.
BUILDINGS MAY
• Front Build -to Lines are
THIS REAPLACED WITHIN
established at 16 ft from and
parallel to the front property
line.
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
• Outbuildings are permitted. (See
OUTBUILDINGS MAY
WITHIN
General Provisions for more
THIS READ
details regarding Outbuildings)
+ ALLEY
THE FLOPMA AVENUE PROJECT -31• DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Site -Design Standards Park Front Lots
Porches
• Front Porches are required and
shall occur forward of the build -
to line.
• Front Porch depth: 8 ft min.
• Front Porch Length = 50 - 100%
of building frontage.
• Porches may be 1 or 2 stories tall
• Roofs of porches may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
i gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fences, Walls & Hedges:
STREET --•
-ALLEY -
CURB
+- SIDEWALK
PORCHES OCCUR FORWARD
OF THE BUILD -TO LINE
BUILD -TO LINE
POSSIBLE BUILDING
ROOF PLAN
PROPERMLOT LINE
FENCES, HEDGES, OR
WALLS MUST OCCUR
ALONG INBUILT PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO
STREETS OR ALLEYS
• Fences, garden walls or hedges
must occur along unbuilt
property lines adjacent to streets,
alleys, or parks (as shown with
hatch lines in the diagram at the
left).
• Fences, garden walls and hedges
are also permitted in other
locations of each lot. (see General
Provisions for more details
regarding fences, garden walls
and hedges)
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -32- Dom, KOHL & PARMERS
24-- 295
Site -Design Standards Grand Avenue Lots
GRAND AVENUE LOTS (GA)
JL- L
The following standards regarding
Heights and Uses, the Relationship
of the Building to the Street,
Building Frontage, Building
Placement & Buildable Area,
Porches, and Fences, Walls &
Hedges apply to all lots within the
GA category as designated by hatch
lines in the figure to the left.
Minimum lot width = none
Maximum lot width = 50 ft
Minimum lot depth = 100 ft
Maximum number of lots which
can be aggregated = 4 lots
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Heights & Uses:
I
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
-33-
S 2 story minimum height
required.
0 48 t maximum height
Residential uses are permitted on all
floors above the first floor.
NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: all
those uses currently permitted under
SD-2 zoning as determined by
Section 602.4 of the Zoning
Ordinance, City of Miami are
permitted on all floors.
DovF_R, KOHL & PA)?77VERs
94— 295
Site -Design Standards Grand Avenue Lots
Relationship of Building to Street:
PROPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE) t-PROPERTY/BUILD-TO LINE
SECTION LOOKING WEST
A colonnade, arcade, or 2nd floor balcony projecting over the sidewalk is required. Verandas
or Balconies may occur on upper floors and may project over the public right-of-way. The
minimum depth for colonnades and 2nd floor balconies is 8 ft.
The Build -To Line is the front property line.
A fence or garden wall is required at any unbuilt front property line.
Building Frontage
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -34-
The Building Frontage shall be 70
to 100% of the lot frontage as
measured from side property line to
side property line at the front Build -
To Line.
Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
1
Site -Design Standards Grand Avenue Lots
Building Placement & Buildable Area:
— STREET
CURS
SIDEWALK
BUILDINGS MAY BE
• Lot Coverage = 60% maximum
• Open Yard Space — 10% min.
SUILDINGs MAY
• Build -to Lines are established at
THIS AR EEAD WITHIN
property lines which face streets.
• Fronts of buildings shall be
oriented to the street.
• Outbuildings are permitted. (See
General Provisions for more
PROMP.rY/LOT LINE
details regarding Outbuildings.)
OUTBUILDINGS MAY
BE PLACED WITHIN
THIS AREA
- ALLEY -
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Colonnades / Arcades:
• Colonnades / Arcades are
required and shall occur forward
of the build -to line, provided
approval has been obtained by
the jurisdiction or agency
controlling the right-of-way.
• Colonnade depth: 8 ft min.
• Colonnade length m 100% of
building frontage.
• Colonnades may have multi -story
"may porches and/or balconies above.
love • Roofs of porches may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof, of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
THE FLOWDA A VENUE PROJECT -35- DovER, KOHL & PAR7NaS
94- 295
..�
Site -Design Standards Grand Avenue Lots
�y
I
Balconies:
J
0
01 . I'%,
• Balconies are required on the 2nd
floor only when there is no
colonnade or arcade and shall
occur forward of the build -to
For taller buildinge:
line, provided approval has been
Pch�sa and/or
obtained by the jurisdiction or
baorlconleb may
Occur above
agency controlling the right -of -
2nd Floor batconles
way.
• 2nd floor balcony depth: 8 ft
2nd floor balcony
min.
• 2nd floor balcony length - 100%
Ie required Ir
of building frontage.
!here ie no
colonnade
• Balconies above the 2nd floor
may differ in depth and length
from the 2nd floor balcony.
• Roofs of balconies, if
constructed, may be single
sloped, double sloped with a
gable, hipped, or flat with
balustrades. A flat roof is only
permitted where the roof of the
porch serves as outdoor usable
space.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fences, Walls & Hedges:
--- STREET -----
COLONNADES OR BALCONIES OCCUR
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
�--- CURS
d-- SIDEWALK
aryl�l
]p�lllll
IW
-ALLEY -
THE aONDA A VENUE PROJECT
BUILD -TO LINE
POSSIBLE BUILDING
ROOF PLAN
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
FENCES, HEDGES, OR
WALLS MUST OCCUR
ALONG UNBUILT PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO
STREETS OR ALLEYS
• Fences, garden walls or hedges
must occur along unbuilt
property lines adjacent to streets
or alleys (as shown with hatch
lines in the diagram at the left).
• Fences, garden walls and hedges
are also permitted in other
locations of each lot. (See
General Provisions for more
details regarding fences, garden
walls and hedges.)
-36- DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
94— 295
General Provisions
GENERAL PROVISIONS
PORCHES, BALCONIES:
Porches shall occur streetward of the Build -to line. Balconies may cantilever beyond the Build -
to line. Porches and balconies may not be enclosed.
On corner lots, porches and balconies may wrap around the side of the building facing the side
street. That portion of porch length or balcony length on the side of the building shall not
j count toward the required length (percentage of frontage).
COLONNADES / ARCADES:
Depth — 8 ft minimum from build -to line to inside column face.
Height o 8 ft minimum clear, not incl. signs and other fixtures. Open porches and/or
balconies shall be permitted above the colonnade / arcade. Awnings are encouraged in the
neighborhood, but are not considered colonnades or arcades.
On corner lots, colonnades and arcades may wrap around the side of the building facing the
side street. That portion of colonnade length or arcade length on the side of the building shall
not count toward the required length (percentage of frontage).
7�
HEIGHT:
There shall be no height limit on structures or parts of structures with footprints of less than
125 square feet. Height of Outbuildings = 22 ft maximum.
OUTBUILDINGS:
Outbuildings may contain accessory apartments. Area of accessory apartments shall be not
greater than 625 square feet.
Outbuildings (if any) shall be located in at least one rear lot corner and shall be placed 0 feet
from the property line.
If only one outbuilding is located on a corner lot, it shall be located on the rear corner of the
lot closest to the side street. Additional outbuildings may be built along alleys or rear property
lines provided outbuildings occupy the two corners first.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -37 DOVER, KOHL & PARMERS
94- 295
FUTURE ADDITIONS TO BUILDINGS: General Provisions
All future additions to existing buildings shall be constructed within the buildable area
designated by this code. Outbuildings need not be constructed at the same time as the
primary structure.
FENCES, WALLS & HEDGES:
5�Fences, garden Walls, or hedges are required on all un-built property lines which abut streets
or alleys. Height shall be 30" - 36" for front and side property lines adjacent to streets.
Height for rear property lines and midblock side property lines shall be 30" - 96".
Shrubs for hedges shall be at least 2 ft tall at time of planting and spaced on center at an
I appropriate distance for the species.
I
Where building walls are situated a distance of 4 ft 6 inches or less from a property line
running parallel to the wall: fences, garden walls, or hedges are not required.
Openings for Pedestrians: 6 ft wide maximum.
`u Openings for Vehicle Access: 9 ft minimum to 24 ft wide maximum.
Fences, Garden Walls and Hedges shall be minimum 30% opaque. Fences made of chain -link
or wire (wholly or in part) are prohibited along all property lines which abut streets or alleys.
z. PARKING PROVISIONS:
Parking may occur onstreet, in garages and on parking surfaces, but shall not obstruct alleys.
Where there is no outbuilding, there shall be a landscaped area of 4 ft minimum width
between parking surfaces and property lines; exceptions may be granted for rear property lines.
Front driveways to rear parking areas are permitted only where rear or side street access is
unavailable. Lots that have both rear and side access shall use the rear access.
Circular drives are prohibited.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -38- DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS
9'4- 295
Architectural Standards
ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
These Pre -Approved Architectural Standards are intended to provide a degree of predictability
about the quality of building designs and to promote harmony among buildings without the
j need for an appearance before and approval by a review board.
Wherever these Architectural Standards may conflict with existing City of Miami codes and
ordinances, these Architectural Standards shall apply for properties within the Florida Avenue
Project Area.
The lists of permitted materials and configurations come from study of traditional buildings
found. in South Florida and have been selected for their appropriateness to the visual
environment and climate. During the All -Day Citizens' Meeting for the Florida Avenue
Project, members of the community emphasized the desire for the architecture to resemble the
Florida Vernacular, Bahamian or Caribbean character common within historic Coconut
Grove.
A primary goal of the Architectural Standards is authenticity. The Standards encourage
construction which is straightforward and functional, and which draw their ornament and
variety from the traditional assembly of genuine materials. The Standards generally discourage
`imitation' materials, such as simulated wood, to avoid a tacky image for the neighborhood.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
All construction must comply with The South Florida Building Code, the latest edition, as
amended and adopted by the Dade County Florida Board of County Commissioners and any
and all revisions made subsequent to that date.
,. The following shall be located in rear yards or sideyards not facing side streets: Window and
Wall Air Conditioners; Air Conditioning Compressors; and Irrigation and pool pumps.
The following shall be located in the rear yards only: Clotheslines, Clothes Drying Yards;
Utility Meters; Antennas; Barbecues; and Swimming Pools and Tubs.
No materials shall be used that attempt to fake the appearance of some other material. The
following are prohibited:
Inoperable Shutters or Undersized Shutters or Plastic Shutters
"Ribbon Windows" or Horizontal Stripes of Glass
Reflective and/or Bronze -tint Glass
Plastic or PVC Roof Tiles
Backlit Awnings
Glossy -finish Awnings
Styrofoam Cornices
Chain link, barbed wire, or wire mesh fences
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT •39- DovF-R, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Architectural Standards
BUILDING WALLS
FINISH MATERIALS
Wood, painted or natural (cyprus and cedar referred)
Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S-�
Reinforced Concrete with Stucco
CONFIGURATIONS
Wood:
Channel Rustic 7" to the weather
Lap Horizontal 5" to the weather
Shiplap Horizontal 4 " to the weather
Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S.)
Stucco: with smooth or light texture
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
For Masonry or Stucco finished structures:
An expression line shall delineate the division between the first story and the second story.
An expression line shall either be a cornice or molding extending a minimum of 2 inches,
or a jog in the surface plane of the building wall greater than 2 inches.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT" -40- Dova, KOHL & PAR7NERS
94- 295
Architectural Standards
GARDEN WALLS & FENCES
FINISH MATERIALS
Wood, painted white
Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S.)
Reinforced Concrete with Stucco
Wrought Iron
Coral (limestone)
Coquina
' CONFIGURATIONS
Wood:
Picket Fences: minimum 30% opaque, w/ corner posts
Other- to match building walls
1 Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S.)
Stucco: with smooth or light texture to match building walls
Wrought Iron: Vertical, 5/8" minimum dimension, 4" to 6" spacing
Coral or Coquina: vertical or battered
[t' GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Fences, Garden Walls and Hedges shall be minimum 30% opaque.
1 Height along front and side property lines: 30" minimum to 36" maximum.
Height along rear property lines: 36" minimum to 60" maximum.
7HE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT -41- Dovm, KOHL & PAR mas
94- 295
Architectural Standards
COLUMNS, ARCHES, PIERS, & PORCHES
FINISH MATERIALS
Columns:
Wood, painted or natural (cyprus and cedar preferred)
Cast Iron
Steel
Concrete with smooth finish
Arches:
Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S.)
Reinforced Concrete with Stucco
Piers:
Concrete Masonry Units with Stucco (C.B.S.)
Reinforced Concrete with Stucco
Porches (railings, balustrades):
Wood, painted or natural (cyprus and cedar preferred)
Wrought Iron
CONFIGURATIONS
Columns:
Square, 4" minimum, with or without capitals and bases
Round, 4" minimum outer diameter, with or without capitals and bases
Classical orders
Arches:
Semi -circular, carried on piers only
Piers:
16" minimum dimension
Porches:
Railings 2 3/4" minimum diameter
Balustrades 4" minimum spacing
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Colonnades & Arcades: minimum 8 ft in depth between the face of the building and the inside
face of the columns supporting the structure above.
Porches: minimum 8 ft in depth.
Column and Pier spacing: Columns shall be spaced no farther apart than they are tall.
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT
•42• DOva, KOHL & PAR wERs
94- 295
Architectural Standards
ROOFS & GUTTERS
FINISH MATERIALS
Roofs:
Metal:
Galvanized
Copper
Aluminum
Zinc -Alum
Shingles:
Asphalt or Metal
Tiles:
Clay, with white finish color
Concrete, with white finish color
Gutters:
Copper
Aluminum
Galvanized Steel
CONFIGURATIONS
Roofs:
Metal: Standing Seam, 24" maximum spacing, panel ends exposed at overhang
Shingles: Square, Rectangular, Fishscale, Shield (dimensional or architectural types)
Tiles: Barrel, Spanish, French, or Flat
Gutters:
Rectangular section
Square section
Half -round section
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Permitted Roof Types: hipped, gabled, shed, barrel vaulted & domed. Flat roofs are permitted
only where used as outdoor useable space. Applied mansard roofs are not permitted.
Exposed rafter ends (or tabs) at overhangs strongly recommended.
Downspouts are to match gutters in material and finish.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -43, Dova, KOHL & PARTNERS
04- 295
Architectural Standards
WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS, STOREFRONTS, & DOORS
FINISH MATERIALS
Windows, Skylights, & Storefronts:
Wood
Aluminum
Copper
Steel
Vinyl Clad Wood
Doors:
Wood or Metal: solid or with 50% maximum glass coverage
CONFIGURATIONS
Windows:
Rectangular
Square
Round (18" maximum outer diameter)
Window Operations:
Casement
Single- and Double -Hung
Industrial
Fixed Frame (36 square feet maximum)
Skylights:
Flat to the pitch of the roof
Door Operations:
Casement
Sliding (rear only)
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Rectangular windows shall have vertical orientation.
The following accessories are permitted:
w Operable Wood Shutters (standard or Bahama types)
Wooden Window Boxes
Real Muttons and Mullions
Fabric Awnings (no backlighting; no glossy -finish fabrics)
Storefront areas only:
The ground -floor building frontage shall have storefront windows covering no less than
25% of the ground -floor building frontage wall area. Storefronts shall remain unshuttered
at night and shall utilize transparent glazing material, and shall provide view of interior
spaces lit from within. Where Building frontages exceed 50 feet, doors or entrances with
public access shall be provided at intervals averaging no greater than 25 feet.
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT •44• Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Street Standards
STREET STANDARDS
These Standards serve as design guidelines for future street improvements within the Florida
Avenue Project area.
Street Turning Radii & Clear Zones
Tight turning radii at street intersections shorten pedestrian crossings and inhibit reckless
drivers from turnipg corners at high speeds. To allow for emergency vehicles (e.g. fire trucks)
to turn corners, a Clear Zone with a mountable curb shall be provided. The Clear Zone shall
be free of all obstructions including but not limited to telephone poles, sign poles, fire
hydrants, or newspaper boxes.
TYPICAL CORNER CONDITION
THE FLO&DA A VENUE PROJECT •45• Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Street Standards
Street Sections
The map below marks the locations for the street sections that follow on the next few pages;
ue
r5
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT -46- DOVER, Koxt PARTNERS
94- 295
Street Standards
Street Section "A" at Florida Avenue:
Overall:
Right -of -Way width — 40 ft
Curb Radius m 10 ft
Clear Zone Radius 25 ft
Street Tree Spacing 20 ft to 30 ft, spaced evenly
Travel Lane: one way, 10 ft wide
Inside the right-of-way:
Two 5 ft wide sidewalks
Two planting strips 6 ft wide between sidewalk and curb
One travel lane 10 ft wide (one-way)
One parallel parking lane 8 ft wide
Outside the right-of-way:
20 ft between the Front Property Line and Build -to Line
Fence or garden wall at front property line required.
Front porch required.
THE FLOPMA AVENUE PROJECT
-47 Dova, KOHL & PARmas
94- 295
Street Standards
Street Section "B" at Florida Avenue:
Overall:
Right -of -Way width = 40 ft
Curb Radius = 10 ft
Clear Zone Radius = 25 ft
Street Tree Spacing a 20 ft to 30 ft, spaced evenly
Travel Lane: one way, 10 ft wide
Inside the right-of-way:
Two 5 ft wide sidewalks
Two planting strips 6 ft wide between sidewalk and curb
One travel lane 10 ft wide (one-way)
One parallel parking lane 8 ft wide
Colonnades, Arcades, or 2nd Floor Balconies may
encroach into the public right-of-way.
Outside the right-of-way:
The Property Line is the Build -to Line.
Fence or garden wall at un-built property line
required.
THE FLORIDA A VENUE PROJECT
-48- Dovu, KOHL & PARTNERS
04— 295
Street Standards
Street Section "C" at future Park Front Lane:
SECTION LOOKING NORTH
Overall: Right -of -Way width — 40 ft
Curb Radius -= 10 ft
Clear Zone Radius = 25 ft
Street Tree Spacing 20 ft to 30 ft, spaced evenly
Travel Lane: one way, 10 ft wide
Inside the right-of-way: Two 5 ft wide sidewalks
Two planting strips 6 ft wide between sidewalk and curb
One travel lane 10 ft wide (one-way)
One parallel parking lane S ft wide
Outside the right-of-way: 16 ft between the Front Property Line and wild -to Line
Fence or garden wall at front property line required.
Front porch required.
THE FLORMA AVENUE PROJECT -49- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94- 295
Street Standards
Street Section "D" at Grand Avenue:
PROPERTY/Bllll-D-TO LINE t-PROPERTYAWILO-TO LINE
SECTION LOOKING WEST
Overall: Right -of -Way width — 70 ft
Curb Radius — 10 ft
Clear Zone Radius a 25 ft
Street Tree Spacing = 20 ft to 30 ft, spaced evenly
Travel Lanes: 10 ft wide
Inside the right-of-way: Two 12 ft wide sidewalks
Two 8 ft wide parking lanes between sidewalk and curb
Three 10 ft travel lanes
Colonnades, Arcades, or 2nd Floor Balconies may
encroach into the public right-of-way.
Outside the right-of-way: The Property Line is the Build -to Line.
Fence or garden wall at un-built property line required.
THE FLOWDA AVENUE PROJECT -50-
111
Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
94— 295
Definitions
DEFINITIONS
ACCESSWAY: A street or driveway which traverses a parcel providing access to an abutting
street, alley, or other vehicular use area.
ALLEY: A 20'-24' wide way providing access to the rear of lots and buildings.
A� ARCADE / COLONNADE: A covered, open-air walkway attached to front of building;
structure overhead is supported architecturally by columns or arches along the sidewalk.
Traditional for `main streets' in South Florida and the Caribbean. These standards permit
encroachment by habitable spaces on upper floors over any arcade along a City street, or
elsewhere if approved by the entity controlling the right-of-way.
BUILDING DEPTH: The absolute distance between the outer wall surface of the building
frontage and the outer wall surface of the rear wall of the building.
,..:� BUILDING FRONTAGE: The side of a building which faces the primary street.
BUILD -TO LINE: An alignment established a certain distance from the property line, along
which the building shall be built. Front porches, arcade/colonnades, and handicap ramps shall
be exempt from build -to line requirements.
CLEAR ZONE: In the corners created by the intersection of two streets, the area outside of
an established radius which shall be kept clear of obstructions to emergency vehicles. A
smaller Corner Curb Radius may occur within a Clear Zone.
CORNER CURB RADIUS: The radius , of the curved street edging at intersections. Radii
shall not exceed the appropriate maximum prescribed in the Street Standards.
EXPRESSION LINE: An exterior cornice or molding delineating the division between the
first story and the second story.
FENCE LINE: The alignment along which fences, walls, or hedges shall be located.
FRONT PORCH: An un-airconditioned roofed structure attached to the front of a building,
open except for railings and support columns.
GROUND FLOOR AREA: The area on the ground occupied by a building.
LOT COVERAGE: The percentage of the gross area of a given lot which contains
buildings. Outbuildings do not count toward Lot Coverage.
OPEN YARD SPACE: The portion(s) of a lot free of buildings or paved surfaces.
OUTBUILDING: A separate building detached from the primary building on a lot.
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT •Sl• DOM, KOHL & PAnNas
94- 295
Definitions
PARKING SURFACE: An area designated for parking constructed with either of the
following surfaces: turf block, gravel, brick, pavers, asphalt, or concrete.
STOOP: A small platform or staircase leading to the entrance of a house or building.
STORY: The horizontal division of a building between the surface of a floor and the surface
of the next floor above, or the next ceiling if there is no floor above. For the purposes of
these regulations a story shall be interpreted as each vertical unit of 14' maximum, e.g. a 1-
floor cinema 22' tall shall be considered a two-story building.
THE FLORMA AVENUE PROJECT .52- Dom, KOHL & PARTNERS
04- 295
i
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
CITIZENS, PROPERTY OWNERS, NEIGHBORS included
Richard Abel
H. L. McKenzie
Richard Arango
Joshua Medvin
Alfredo Bared
Roni Medvin
Carl Boehm
Julian Mesa
Danny Couch
Mildred K. Miller
John Daw
Ray Miller
Grady L. Dinkins
Bill Munroe
..
Angel Espinosa
Joyce Nelson
David Gell
John Purifoy
Barbara Goodman
Colette Raker
Lisa Goodman
Rita Sander
Terry Goodman
Cynthia Shelley
Elizabeth Guyton
Seth Sklarey
Susan Hall
Cindy Snyder
Gregory Han
Larry Sokol
Joe Harrison
Jean-Claude Verite
Barbara Ladyga
Andrew Wetherbee
Gilbert Marinier
CITY OF MIAMI
�J
Christina Abrams
+
Dianne Johnson
1
Jim Kay
Joseph McManus
Kristin Triff
DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS
F
Marice Chael
aJ
Victor Dover
Robert Gray
Joseph Kohl
Barbara Lamb
Dana Little
Karen Reed
1
THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT
•S3• Dova, KOHL & PARmns
94- 295
a
a
J
J
J
J
J
J
PLANNING FACT SHEET PZM8
APPLICANT City of Miami Department of Planning, Building and Zoning
REQUEST/LOCATION The Florida Avenue Planning Study.
PETITION Consideration of recommending that the City Commission approve in concept
"The Florida Avenue Project" (August 1993) prepared by Dover, Kohl and
Partners for Florida Avenue Neighbors and the City of. Miami, for properties
abutting Florida Avenue from Matilda Street to McDonald Street, in Coconut
Grove
PLANNING
RECOMMENDATION Accept report; direct staff to prepare legislation per the recommendation
of Planning, Building and Zoning.
BACKGROUND AND Florida Avenue Neighbors and the City of Miami sponsored an all -day
ANALYSIS charrette at the Coconut Grove Elementary School on July 24, 1993. Subse-
quently, the report was presented August 24th in Coconut Grove. Approxi-
mately fifty people attended both events. The principal issues and
Department of Planning, Building and Zoning response to the proposals in
the report are as follows:
REPORT PROPOSAL AND ISSUES RAISED
1. To subdivide certain lots to 20 feet wide
and 2,000 square feet in area for
townhouses.
2. To require a "build -to" line on Florida
Avenue and encouraging a "voluntary"
alley in back, for new construction.
3. To introduce a "granny flat" on the back
of the lot.
4. To allow porches, balconies, arcades and
colonnades to be built over the public
right-of-way.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. Zoning ordinance would have to be amended
to a new minimum lot size; no side yards;
required.
2. Continuous alley unlikely to be provided
voluntarily.
3. Each 2,000 square foot lot would have two
dwelling units.
R-1 Density Proposed Density
8 units/acre 42 units/acre
4. Private residence may possibly avoid tax
assessment for structure over right-of-
way.
5. To reduce onsite parking spaces. 5. Objection. Current zoning calls for 2
onsite parking spaces per dwelling unit
plus parking for C-1 uses. Increased
density with fewer onsite parking spaces
would seriously impact neighborhood.
6. To liberalize home occupations by
including such C-1 uses as antiques, art
galleries, bookstores, tailors, shoe
e repair on 100% of the ground floor, with
3 employees plus residents.
Application Number 94-86
Revised: 4/13/94
6. Expands C-1 type commercial uses into
single family (or duplex) residential
neighborhood.
94_ 295
Page 1
7. To convert public park land for
residential use (one option does not
require use of parkland.)
8. To replace the existing zoning district
pattern with seven districts (four
different types) averaging six houses
each.
9. To legislate precise site design
standards and architectural standards for
each of the four types of zoning
districts to apply to every new house
major remodeling.
7. Ob ection. Public park land should
remain open and available to the general
public.
8. Objection. This approach is unrealistic
and too complex; needs to be reduced to
one zoning district.
9. Ob ection. The administration of these
standards would be time-consuming,
cumbersome and beyond staff resources.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Public hearing of November 10 1993 continued the item until December
CITY COMMISSION
Application Number 94-86
Revised. 4/13/94
8, 1993; the public hearing of December 8, 1993 continued the item
until January 19, 1994 for lack of a quorum. At the public hearing of
January 19, 1994 the board, by a vote of five (5) to four (4),
approved a resolution recommending that the City Commission approve in
concept "The Florida Avenue Project" (August 1993) prepared by Dover,
Kohl and Partners for Florida Avenue Neighbors and the City of Miami,
for properties abutting Florida Avenue from Matilda Street to McDonald
Street, excluding Kirk Munroe Park, in Coconut Grove, provided that
(a) the proposed zoning is R-2 Duplex; (b) no C-1 Restricted
Commercial' uses be included; (c) there is adherence to existing
parking standards; and (d) that townhouse housing be explored.
Continued on 2/24/94 to 3/24/94; continued on 3/24/94 to 4/28/94.
Q_ 295
Page 2
M
RESOLUTION PAB - 5-94
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVE
IN CONCEPT "THE FLORIDA AVENUE PROJECT" (AUGUST 1993)
PREPARED BY DOVER, KOHL AND PARTNERS FOR FLORIDA AVENUE
NEIGHBORS AND THE CITY OF MIAMI, FOR PROPERTIES ABUTTING
FLORIDA AVENUE FROM MATILDA STREET TO MCDONALD STREET,
EXCLUDING KIRK MUNROE PARK, IN COCONUT GROVE, PROVIDED THAT
C(A)
THE PROPOSED
ZONING 2DUPLEX;
ADHERENCE SRESTRICTED
TO
EXISTING PARKING STANDARDS; AND (D) THAT TOWNHOUSE HOUSING
SHOULD BE EXPLORED.
HEARING DATE: JANUARY 19, 1994
VOTE: FIVE (5) TO FOUR (4)
ATTEST:
R DRIGUEZ, DIRECTOR
PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING
94- 295
SET BY: .Dw 3p-94 9 �oYu : COPUL GARI-tS-
RORIDA AVENUE NEIGHBORS
DESIGN FOR
STREET AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEjNENi
0
March �S, 1994
Sergio Rodrigues,
Miami Assistant City Manager,
Miami City Hall, Pan American Drive,
MIAMI, P1 33133
Dear Mr Rodrigues:
Thank you for meeting with us. We also met further with Lourdes Slazyk
to discuss implementation of change on Florida Avenue.
The Dever Kohl concept is based on their interpretation of public
input, and every owner signed acceptance. However, they did so in
principles recognising the need for adjustment from the start.
Florida Avenue is now a heavily impacted urban butter which needs to
be changed with that in mind. Limited mixed use will establish a
natural gradient between commercial and residential, and will reduce
our specific, excessive crime without resort to barricades.
Crime is not the only issue here, but, the location of this street and
the park afford* plausible cover for the many criminals attracted to
case houses, cars, and people with impunity. Most properties have been
robbed several times, car windows are *="hod regularly, and armed
robberies on the street have been averaging about one a month.
Twenty-four hour occupancy plus natural surveillance of the street and
perk will not stop crivwt but it will mitigate it. Barring this we
will be forced into street -closure, enclave -type changt.
As we understand it you tsel the most practical solution is R3 zoning
with an overlay to permit restricted upon by special permit only, and
to impose special design standards.
If you think that this is on balance the best approach we will support
you and we will work • with the Planning Department on implementation.
Sincerely,
John Daw
President
3158 FL.Op10A AVtffME a MIANO. Ise. 93gM3 U.S.A. 7=_ C*C ll 444-' 5q4
04- 295
4 r
51
1.j
INN",
No
r
W77
I
-.� 1 !1- V,
6.
' -7
111[[)[ ol
0
16_ Co:�a_�e •R oqi, �.—_at._oe��e` ea _ .a__ ia_ __��� . .. �,_..�[`„'
mq_p.lqw..W- KIM ME turej
tol,111,1111jICI . H! li:,!l PIA 11;1!11 TAIIii ii I
M.
=aA. I I Ic
F L 0 R I D A AVENUE PROJECT
COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA
Sponsored by:
FLORIDA AVENUE NEIGHBORS and THE CITY OF Mmm
Submitted by:
DOVEk KOHL & PARTNERS
Urban Dedgn
AUGUST 23, M