Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-11116J-93-819 12/7/93 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, "SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS", TO AMEND THE HEIGHT OF CERTAIN BUILDINGS IN THE R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in order to preserve an historic structure at the ground level and to preserve environmental features along the bayfront and meet the "see -through" requirements of the Waterfront Charter Amendment, a certain height adjustment is now needed for the readily -developable sites on Brickell Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 10, 1993, Item No. 9, following an advertised hearing adopted Resolution No. PAB 42-93 by a vote of six to zero (6-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 11000 as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend Ordinance No. 11000 as hereinafter set forth: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by amending the text of said Ordinance as follows: .1/ 14 * * ARTICLE 4. ZONING DISTRICTS * * R-4 Multifamily High -Density Residential. * * * * * Intensity: Minimum lot size: Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. Setbacks: Front - twenty (20) feet, side - ten (10) feet, rear - ten (10) feet except when abutting R-1 or R-2 districts, in which case it will be twenty (20) feet. Height: For buildings which abut a right-of-way of less than one hundred (100) feet in width, the maximum height of a building at the base building line is equal to the sum of the right-of-way plus the two (2) front setbacks on either side of the right-of-way or one hundred twenty (120) feet, whichever is greater. Portions of buildings above that height point (the maximum height of a building at the base building line) shall setback not exceed a height as delineated by an forty-five (45) degree inward sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) addtbto- foot horizontal pereach and one foot vertical except in lots with multiple street frontages, where this additional setback applies to frontage on arterials and collectors only. Words and/or figures stricken through sball be deleted. Underscored words and./or figures sba11 be added.. The rem&inimg provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Ellipsis i psis and asterisks indicate omitted and Used material. -2- sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) foot horizontal and two (2) feet vertical measured from said point. Minimum lot width: One hundred (100) feet. Floor area ratio: Maximum of one and seventy -two - hundredths (1.72) times the gross lot area. Building footprint: Maximum of four -tenths (0.40) times the gross lot area. Green space: Minimum of fifteen -hundredths (0.15) times the gross lot area. Permitted Principal Uses: Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, part of this section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after final reading and adoption thereof. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 16th day of December , 1993. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 27th day of ATTEST: 6w JP4!05� MATTY HIRAI City Clerk STEP EN P. CLAAK, MAYOR -3- 11116 PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: LINDA KELLY KEA SO Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: elclv��4 - 4zmz� A. QTt±wx OOS, III City Att ey LKK/pb/bss/M1064 -4- E PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of Miami Department of Planning, Building and Zoning APPLICATION DATE October 13, 1993 PZ=10 REQUEST/LOCATION A text amendment to Ordinance 11000 to amend R-4 Multiple Family Residential zoning district regulations to amend height regulations for buildings abutting a right-of-way of one hundred (100) feet or more in width. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PETITION Consideration of amending the text of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami by amending Article 4, Zoning Districts, R-4 Multiple Family High -Density Residential District, Intensity, to provide that for setbacks of proposed buildings abutting a right-of-way of one hundred (100) or more feet in width, maximum height shall not exceed two hundred forty (240) feet at the base building line; heights above that point are governed by a sixty (60) degree inward -sloping plane; clarifying setbacks for proposed buildings abutting a right-of-way of less than one hundred (100) feet in width. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval BACKGROUND AND In order to preserve an historic structure at the ground level, to preserve ANALYSIS environmental features along the bayfront and to meet the "see -through" requirements of the Waterfront Charter Amendment, this height adjustment is proposed for the last readily -developable R-4 High -Density Multiple Family Residential site on Brickell Avenue. Presently, the maximum height in R-4 is unlimited; the maximum height of a building at the base building line is equal to the sum of the right-of-way plus the two front setbacks on either side of the right-of-way or 120 feet, whichever is greater. Portions of buildings above that height are required to be set back one additional foot per each foot in height (except in lots with multiple street frontages, where this additional setback applies to frontage on arterials and collectors only.) This amendment provides that, for buildings abutting a right-of-way of 100 feet or more, such as Brickell Avenue, the ratio for setback above 240 feet of building height shall be doubled (one foot horizontal to two feet vertical) resulting in an approximate 60 degree inward -sloping plane. This would emphasize the tapering effect of the building. Given the unlimited height of buildings in R-4, such a proportional setback is intended to soften the juxtaposition of a potentially monolithic structure to the surrounding avenue and neighborhood and to preserve an existing historic structure, the Santa Maria from additions which could destroy its character. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval CITY COMMISSION PASSED ON FIRST READING CC 12/16/93. APPLICATION NUMBER 93- 85 November 10, 1993 12/19/93 11116 RESOLUTION PAB - 42-93 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT OF THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BY AMENDING ARTICLE 4, ZONING DISTRICTS, R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, INTENSITY, TO PROVIDE THAT FOR SETBACKS OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS ABUTTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ONE HUNDRED (100) OR MORE FEET IN WIDTH, MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FORTY (240) FEET AT THE BASE BUILDING LINE; HEIGHTS ABOVE THAT POINT ARE GOVERNED BY A SIXTY (60) DEGREE INWARD - SLOPING PLANE; CLARIFYING SETBACKS FOR PROPOSED BUILDINGS ABUTTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET IN WIDTH. HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 1993 VOTE: SIX (6) TO ZERO (0) ATTEST: ERGIO RODRIGUEZ, DIRECTOR PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING MIAMI BROWARD PALM BEACH WY BLsrc&s R"lv. Bmward (305) 46&2600 / (305) N"577 SOLiH EIORIDA S NCNSE'AV(HS , ENiE Rf•RISE RE 0.l ESTATE AND EAW 82 • 0 Affiliates of Time Wanver Inc. _ T F - -' LL_ f SALES CODE AMER NUMBER _tlSTOMER NO. DESCRIPTION • 1 ._ _ - E _ 1' - 'I , - t, ' 3 • -A CODE DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW P.O. BOX 010589 MIAMI, FL 33U-1-0589 - J=.. :.-1� �_:T. TERMS: NET DUE ON RECEIPT OF INVOICE VIEPARTMENT DATE INVOICE W ?/';/- I v_ ti7 UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 52 �Q rri J I 1 ORIGINAL- PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE SUBTOTAL .: = • ' SALES TAX - - x. AF 'y ' Y - .-1.. ..� � aF'...`C• _ �_ '1 �-._ - �p'r �' i ' ry.:�' '2 _ __ tom' L MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookle wUliams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Daily Business Review fikfa Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 11116 X X X Inthe ......................................... Court, was published In sold newspaper In the Issues of February 7, 1994 Affianl further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review Is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mall matter at the post office In Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy ertisement; and affient further says that she has neith d nor promised any person, firm or corporation any sc nt, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of s u g this advertisement for publication in the said Sworn to and subscribed before me this h day of ........ Fe.brUAr ..., A.D. 19.. 94, .'............. to me. OWK7AL NOTARY %UXL CHj,jtYL H ,4AxMER C'-01A 11.SSK)'4 NC'. CC191612 Kr COMMj55X)iv I;XP. AFIL 12-19% . CITY .ASAP PLO"" Ati-intbrested Rye arlii take notice that On the 27fft diy of January, jaw tha Oty Commission of Miami. F110fift sdoli*;: the folkrwin0 tilled -o>�Ni1WiCE NO, t1110 ' AS AM1671 -Q. TtdEL ZAN#4 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY pF MIAMt, ,XY, AA*N1DINQ ARITOM A. SECTION kt. x "SCHEDULE OF DIlg~"WT REGUIL ATOW.TO AMM NE . HEIGHT OF ,GERTA4VN Ot"NOS IN THE, IR-4 ¢-MULTIFAMgLY HK+ij1-0E ff REBiDENTIAL Z0 t Q v DISTRICT; C01 TAI9I1NQ A FEMLISI MOVISION AND - "`A SEVERAIMUTY CLAMC, ANID PNOAD1NG FOR AN',', )EFFECTIVE DATE. Eillti*111ANCE IM 11117 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, BY THE`ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 6, "SPECIAL DISTRICTS", SECTIONS 606 4.1-AND 806.4.3, TO MAKE GOVERNMENTAL AND PUBLIC UTILITY USES A PER- MITTED PA1WAPA). USE MOTGAD-OF PEW*ff' W W SPECIAL" EXCEPTION-OkLY.,TNERESY >ENASi." SUCH USES TO MORE AC—ADILY MEET CERTAIN PEDESTRIAN PATHWY AM URBAN PLAZA REQUIRE- MENTS, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVIS16N AND A SEVFRABILITY, CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEOTIVE DATE. Said ordinpnces may t* inspected by the public M 1he Office of the City Clerk, 3500 Pan Arnwicsn Drhra, l4W"i, Fonda, Mohr through Friday, excl-iding holidays, between the hours of 1k00 -am. and S.W pm. (N1248) MATTY HIRAI C4TY CLERK CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDrl!