HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-11116J-93-819
12/7/93
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
"SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS", TO AMEND
THE HEIGHT OF CERTAIN BUILDINGS IN THE R-4
MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING
DISTRICT; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in order to preserve an historic structure at the
ground level and to preserve environmental features along the
bayfront and meet the "see -through" requirements of the
Waterfront Charter Amendment, a certain height adjustment is now
needed for the readily -developable sites on Brickell Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of November 10, 1993, Item No. 9, following an advertised hearing
adopted Resolution No. PAB 42-93 by a vote of six to zero (6-0),
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 11000 as
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
Ordinance No. 11000 as hereinafter set forth:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by
amending the text of said Ordinance as follows: .1/
14 *
*
ARTICLE 4. ZONING DISTRICTS
*
*
R-4 Multifamily High -Density Residential.
*
*
*
*
*
Intensity:
Minimum lot size: Twenty thousand (20,000) square
feet.
Setbacks: Front - twenty (20) feet, side - ten (10)
feet, rear - ten (10) feet except when abutting R-1 or
R-2 districts, in which case it will be twenty (20)
feet.
Height: For buildings which abut a right-of-way of less
than one hundred (100) feet in width, the maximum
height of a building at the base building line is equal
to the sum of the right-of-way plus the two (2) front
setbacks on either side of the right-of-way or one
hundred twenty (120) feet, whichever is greater.
Portions of buildings above that height point (the
maximum height of a building at the base building line)
shall setback not exceed a height as delineated by an
forty-five (45) degree inward sloping plane measured by
a ratio of one (1) addtbto- foot horizontal pereach
and one foot vertical except in lots with multiple
street frontages, where this additional setback applies
to frontage on arterials and collectors only.
Words and/or figures stricken through sball be deleted. Underscored
words and./or figures sba11 be added.. The rem&inimg provisions are now
in effect and remain unchanged. Ellipsis i psis and asterisks indicate omitted
and Used material.
-2-
sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) foot
horizontal and two (2) feet vertical measured from said
point.
Minimum lot width: One hundred (100) feet.
Floor area ratio: Maximum of one and seventy -two -
hundredths (1.72) times the gross lot area.
Building footprint: Maximum of four -tenths (0.40)
times the gross lot area.
Green space: Minimum of fifteen -hundredths (0.15)
times the gross lot area.
Permitted Principal Uses:
Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar
as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of
this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 3. If any section, part of this section,
paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared
invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be
affected.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty
(30) days after final reading and adoption thereof.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 16th day of
December , 1993.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY
this 27th day of
ATTEST:
6w JP4!05�
MATTY HIRAI
City Clerk
STEP EN P. CLAAK, MAYOR
-3- 11116
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
LINDA KELLY KEA SO
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
elclv��4 -
4zmz�
A. QTt±wx OOS, III
City Att ey
LKK/pb/bss/M1064
-4-
E
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Department of Planning, Building and Zoning
APPLICATION DATE October 13, 1993
PZ=10
REQUEST/LOCATION A text amendment to Ordinance 11000 to amend R-4 Multiple Family Residential
zoning district regulations to amend height regulations for buildings
abutting a right-of-way of one hundred (100) feet or more in width.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PETITION Consideration of amending the text of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami by amending Article 4, Zoning Districts, R-4
Multiple Family High -Density Residential District, Intensity, to provide that
for setbacks of proposed buildings abutting a right-of-way of one hundred
(100) or more feet in width, maximum height shall not exceed two hundred
forty (240) feet at the base building line; heights above that point are
governed by a sixty (60) degree inward -sloping plane; clarifying setbacks for
proposed buildings abutting a right-of-way of less than one hundred (100)
feet in width.
PLANNING
RECOMMENDATION Approval
BACKGROUND AND
In order to preserve an historic structure at the ground level, to preserve
ANALYSIS
environmental features along the bayfront and to meet the "see -through"
requirements of the Waterfront Charter Amendment, this height adjustment is
proposed for the last readily -developable R-4 High -Density Multiple Family
Residential site on Brickell Avenue. Presently, the maximum height in R-4 is
unlimited; the maximum height of a building at the base building line is
equal to the sum of the right-of-way plus the two front setbacks on either
side of the right-of-way or 120 feet, whichever is greater. Portions of
buildings above that height are required to be set back one additional foot
per each foot in height (except in lots with multiple street frontages, where
this additional setback applies to frontage on arterials and collectors
only.) This amendment provides that, for buildings abutting a right-of-way of
100 feet or more, such as Brickell Avenue, the ratio for setback above 240
feet of building height shall be doubled (one foot horizontal to two feet
vertical) resulting in an approximate 60 degree inward -sloping plane. This
would emphasize the tapering effect of the building. Given the unlimited
height of buildings in R-4, such a proportional setback is intended to soften
the juxtaposition of a potentially monolithic structure to the surrounding
avenue and neighborhood and to preserve an existing historic structure, the
Santa Maria from additions which could destroy its character.
PLANNING ADVISORY
BOARD Approval
CITY COMMISSION
PASSED ON FIRST READING CC 12/16/93.
APPLICATION NUMBER
93- 85 November 10, 1993
12/19/93
11116
RESOLUTION PAB - 42-93
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT OF
THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BY
AMENDING ARTICLE 4, ZONING DISTRICTS, R-4
MULTIPLE FAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, INTENSITY, TO PROVIDE THAT FOR
SETBACKS OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS ABUTTING A
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ONE HUNDRED (100) OR MORE
FEET IN WIDTH, MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL NOT
EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FORTY (240) FEET AT THE
BASE BUILDING LINE; HEIGHTS ABOVE THAT POINT
ARE GOVERNED BY A SIXTY (60) DEGREE INWARD -
SLOPING PLANE; CLARIFYING SETBACKS FOR
PROPOSED BUILDINGS ABUTTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET IN
WIDTH.
HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 1993
VOTE: SIX (6) TO ZERO (0)
ATTEST:
ERGIO RODRIGUEZ, DIRECTOR
PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING
MIAMI BROWARD PALM BEACH
WY BLsrc&s R"lv. Bmward (305) 46&2600 / (305) N"577
SOLiH EIORIDA S NCNSE'AV(HS , ENiE Rf•RISE RE 0.l ESTATE AND EAW 82 • 0
Affiliates of Time Wanver Inc.
_ T
F - -'
LL_
f
SALES CODE AMER NUMBER _tlSTOMER NO.
DESCRIPTION
• 1 ._ _ - E _
1' - 'I , - t, ' 3 •
-A
CODE
DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
P.O. BOX 010589
MIAMI, FL 33U-1-0589
- J=.. :.-1� �_:T.
TERMS: NET DUE ON RECEIPT OF INVOICE
VIEPARTMENT DATE
INVOICE W
?/';/- I
v_ ti7
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
52 �Q
rri J
I 1
ORIGINAL- PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE
SUBTOTAL .: = • '
SALES TAX
- - x.
AF
'y ' Y - .-1.. ..� � aF'...`C• _ �_ '1 �-._ - �p'r �' i ' ry.:�' '2 _ __ tom'
L
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
Sookle wUliams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice
President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Daily Business
Review fikfa Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday
and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
ORDINANCE NO. 11116
X X X
Inthe ......................................... Court,
was published In sold newspaper In the Issues of
February 7, 1994
Affianl further says that the said Miami Daily Business
Review Is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade
County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Dade County, Florida,
each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and
has been entered as second class mall matter at the post
office In Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of
one year next preceding the first publication of the attached
copy ertisement; and affient further says that she has
neith d nor promised any person, firm or corporation
any sc nt, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose
of s u g this advertisement for publication in the said
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
h day of ........ Fe.brUAr ..., A.D. 19.. 94,
.'.............
to me.
OWK7AL NOTARY %UXL
CHj,jtYL H ,4AxMER
C'-01A 11.SSK)'4 NC'. CC191612
Kr COMMj55X)iv I;XP. AFIL 12-19%
. CITY .ASAP PLO""
Ati-intbrested Rye arlii take notice that On the 27fft diy of
January, jaw tha Oty Commission of Miami. F110fift sdoli*;:
the folkrwin0 tilled
-o>�Ni1WiCE NO, t1110 '
AS AM1671 -Q. TtdEL ZAN#4 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
pF MIAMt, ,XY, AA*N1DINQ ARITOM A. SECTION kt. x
"SCHEDULE OF DIlg~"WT REGUIL ATOW.TO AMM
NE . HEIGHT OF ,GERTA4VN Ot"NOS IN THE, IR-4
¢-MULTIFAMgLY HK+ij1-0E ff REBiDENTIAL Z0 t Q v
DISTRICT; C01 TAI9I1NQ A FEMLISI MOVISION AND -
"`A SEVERAIMUTY CLAMC, ANID PNOAD1NG FOR AN',',
)EFFECTIVE DATE.
Eillti*111ANCE IM 11117
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
AS AMENDED, BY THE`ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 6, "SPECIAL
DISTRICTS", SECTIONS 606 4.1-AND 806.4.3, TO MAKE
GOVERNMENTAL AND PUBLIC UTILITY USES A PER-
MITTED PA1WAPA). USE MOTGAD-OF PEW*ff' W W
SPECIAL" EXCEPTION-OkLY.,TNERESY >ENASi."
SUCH USES TO MORE AC—ADILY MEET CERTAIN
PEDESTRIAN PATHWY AM URBAN PLAZA REQUIRE-
MENTS, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVIS16N AND
A SEVFRABILITY, CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFEOTIVE DATE.
Said ordinpnces may t* inspected by the public M 1he Office of
the City Clerk, 3500 Pan Arnwicsn Drhra, l4W"i, Fonda, Mohr
through Friday, excl-iding holidays, between the hours of 1k00
-am. and S.W pm.
(N1248) MATTY HIRAI
C4TY CLERK
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDrl!