HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-94-0559CITY OF MIAM{, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM 13
TO: Honorable Mayor and DATE JUL 1 9 Iacf FILE
Members of. the City Commission
SUBJECT Discusson on the proposed
sales price & buyer select-
ion process for the St.
Cesa o Hugh Oaks Village Condo -
FROM City REFERENCES: minlum Project
City Commission Agenda
ENCLOSURES: Item - July 14, 1994
At the February 17, 1994 City Commission meeting, a request was
made to provide a status report on the City -sponsored St. Hugh
Oaks Village Condominium project currently under construction in
the Coconut Grove neighborhood. More specifically, the request
centered around the proposed sales price of the homes being
developed, in addition to the selection/marketing process that
will be utilized by the City.
At the April 14, 1994 City Commission meeting, a report was
presented by the Department of Development and Housing
Conservation, outlining the staff's recommendations as to the
proposed sales prices and buyer selection process for the City
sponsored St. Hugh Oaks Village Condominium project. On that
date, members of the Coconut Grove Homeowners and Tenants
Association, requested that the City Commission adopt: a
resolution prepared by their organization, which stipulated that
at least 11 units of the St. Hugh Oaks Village project be sold to
African American buyers and furthermore, that at least 6 of the
eleven units be sold to buyers with historic, cultural or civic
ties to the black community of Coconut Grove.
After the question of the legality of this request was discussed,
the City Comr.,..ssion passed a motion directing the Law Department
and City Adm:i.nistration to initiate a study, to ascertain whether
or not there has been discrimination in connection with the
assignment of housing units in the City.
A study performed by the City Administration in conjunction with
the Law Department, regarding the various housing programs
provided by the City of Miami, concluded that the City of Miami
has not discriminated against African Americans in the provision
of housing. It was further determined that areas in the City of
Miami which are of predominately African American residents have
received a greater amount of housing assistance, compared to
those areas resided predominately by members of other ethnic
groups.
558
9AI 559
94- 560
y
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
Page 2
The project's construction phase is well underway, with a
completion date estimated for mid -September. It is important
that the sales prices as well as the selection process be finally
determined. Once this has been done, staff would be able to
commence the pre -approval process of the potential buyers and
marketing of the units. The ultimate objective would be to have
already determined who would be the buyers of the units at the
time that the certificates of occupancy are issued, eliminating
the possibility of having vacant completed units, that would be
subject to vandalism.
PROPOSED SALES PRICES:
The projected total development cost for the St. Hugh Oaks
Village Condominium Project is $3,570,000. This amount includes
the following:
Land Cost $1,071,000
Construction Cost $2,374,000
Architectural Fees S 125.000
$3,570,000
Based on the City's actual cost for developing the St. Hugh Oaks
parcel, the homes would have to be marketed at $155,217/unit
($3,570,000 / 23 homes) in order for the City to recapture its
total cost of developing the St. Hugh Oaks property. Considering
the total cost incurred by'the City in the development of the St.
Hugh Oaks parcel, the City Administration is recommending that
these homes be marketed at $115,000. At the sales price of
$115,000, the City would be able to recapture its construction
cost of $2,499,000 and $6,347/unit of site acquisition cost.
Presently, the City is proposing to market these homes under the
FHA 203(b) Program. The maximum mortgage amount under the FHA
203(b) Program is $112,350 for a single family home.
Generally speaking, housing is considered affordable when the
family's monthly housing costs do not exceed approximately one-
third (1/3) of a family's monthly income. At the sales price of
$115,000, the homes would be affordable to moderate income
families and enable the City to recapture all of the City's
construction cost plus some of the land cost.
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
Page 3
Attached in Exhibit "A" is an analysis of the different sale
prices that can be established for the homes that would still
insure that the homes remain affordable to moderate income
families as well as enable the City to recapture certain levels
of its actual construction cost.
HOMEBUYER SELECTION PROCESS
Another significant concern related to the sale of these units
has been the method of selecting the buyers. A method that would
be fair as well as efficient has been a concern of the Members of
the Commission.
The City Administration is considering a lottery system as the
fairest method. In short, at the time that these homes are ready
to be marketed, the availability of these homes would be
advertised for a period of thirty (30) days. During this time
the Administration would begin to pre -qualify the applicants
based on FHA lending guidelines. All of those pre -qualified
prospective buyers would be placed in a lottery, and the first 23
selected would be the first eligible buyers. The pre -qualified
applicants that were not selected among the first 23 would be
placed on a waiting list. ThF,.;e families would be offered a
purchase contract only in the -_,vent that any of the fi.r_st 23
buyers fail to obtain financing during the full application and
qualification process.
i
EXHIBIT "A"
COST
i
Land $1,071,000
:4 Construction $2,374,000
i Architects S 125,000
Total Cost
$3,570,000
ESTIMATED SALES PRICES
Recapture all cost - $155,217
Recapture all cost less 25% of land = $143,576
Recapture all cost less 50% of land = $131,934
Recapture all cost less 75% of land = $120,293
Recapture all cost less land = $108,652
Recapture all cost less land & arch. - $103,217
Recapture original const. cost only = $ 98,173
Estimated sales price of $115,000 would recapture all cost
less 86% of land cost. This results in the return of
I $146,000 of the land cast or $6,347./Lot.
i
1
AFFORDABILITY
The units are being' marketed to target moderate income
families.
Moderate income is defined as an annual gross household
income ranging from 81% to 140% of the median income
adjusted for family size.
The following affordability analysis takes into
consideration a family of four, which would be a typical
family to purchase the 3 bedroom units.
These units will be purchased utilizing FHA financing,
therefore the following, is taking into consideration FHA
qualifying criteria.
Family Size 4
Dade County Median Income $35,700
Moderate Income - up to $49,980
4- 558
DEBT SERVICE ANALYSIS
Sales Price $115,000
Downpayment @ 3% (est.) _ $ 3,450
Mortgage Amount - $111,550
$111,550 @ 8 @ 30 year amortization = $818.51
Plus maintenance (est) = 75.00
Plus taxes ($2,000 yr) = 166.00
Total PITI = $lr059.51
FHA limits allow for total principal, interest, taxes, and
insurance (PITI) not to exceed 29% of a household expense to
gross monthly income, and 41% including other monthly
expenses such as credit cards, personal loans, etc. This
means that the above total payment would be 29% of an income
of $3,653.49/month or $43,842.00 which is within a moderate
income range. In addition a moderate income family could
also have other monthly expenses totalling $600 a month and
qualify for the FHA loan. $1,059.51 + 600 = $1,659.51 / .41
_ $4,047.58 x 12 = $48,571.02.
The following indicates the minimum income requirements to
qualify for a FHA mortgage to assist in the purchase of
these units. This would be assuming a family of 4 who has
additional expenses of $600 per month.
Minimum
Estimated Total Housing Annual % of
Sales Price Mtg. Amt. Expense (PITI) Income Median
$120,000 $116,400 $1,095.10 $49,612 139%
$115,700 $112,243 $1,064.60 $48,720 136%
$108,650 $105,390 $1,014.31 $47,248 132%
$103,220 $100,123 $ 975.67 $46,117 129%
$ 98,180 $ 95,235 $ 961.81 $45,711 128%
$ 90,000 $ 87,300 $ 881.57 $43,363 121%
$ 85,000 $ 82,450 $ 845.98 $42,321 119%
$ 80,000 $ 77,600 $ 810.40 $41,280 116%
94- 558
944 55 �� � .
5 - l