Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-94-0170,z MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: March 24, 1994 the City Commission ` FROM: Stephen P. Clark RE: Local Zoning Boards Mayor and a Restructured Planning Adv. Board During my election campaign and since my election as Mayor, I have heard concerns from many City residents, especially in Coconut Grove and the Northeast, regarding a lack of "self determination" in the current planning and zoning process. The consensus from concerned residents is that the decision making process at the planning and zoning board level should be brought closer to the residents affected by planning and zoning decisions made for their area. As I indicated at the last Commission meeting, as well as during my campaign, I believe the proper response to these concerns is to create local zoning boards, similar to a proposal offered by Commissioner DeYurre once before, and to restructure the planning advisory board, all in an effort to decentralize the planning and zoning process. The concept is very simple. Advisory or quasi-judicial decisions related to planning and zoning matters should be made by residents in the area affected by a particular proposal or application. Accordingly, I have attached for your consideration a resolution asking the City Manager and City Attorney to draft an ordinance creating three (3) local zoning boards, each consisting of nine (9) members and one (1) alternate member, all of which are required to reside within their respective zoning district. Each commissioner shall have two (2) Appointments to each zoning board. My intent is to have the alternate appointment rotate amongst commission members. I have also attached for your review a map delineating the geographic boundaries of each zoning board, which was created by grouping NET service areas across the city. I.believed this to be proper, since the purpose of creating NET boundaries was, in part, to identify areas of common interest. Also, the public will more easily understand the boundaries of these local zoning boards, since they are already familiar with the NET system. Also created in this proposal is a restructured Planning Advisory Board. Please be advised that I did consider a proposal of multiple planning advisory boards to correspond with the proposal of local zoning boards. However, planning is truly a city-wide function and implemented through a city-wide comprehensive development masterplan. After being advised by the law department that multiple planning boards would provide various- legal complications with regard to their interface with the comprehensive 94- 170 70 S NEIGHBORHGi7US IMM 8 mw�w_ 11 10 ZZ VP FT < 7 G, to