Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-95-0599tt J-95-602 7/13/95 RESOLUTION NO. 9 5 W 5 9 9 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE OCEAN GROVE TOWER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OF NOT MORE THAN 103 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3202 SOUTHWEST 27TH AVENUE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 19, 1995, the applicant, Lucia A. Dougherty, for Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for designation of the Ocean Grove Tower Project as a Planned Unit Development, pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and in "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Lucia A. Dougherty, for Cornelia Enterprises, Inc has applied for the Planned Unit Development Overlay District designation, in order to utilize the increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying Office district with an SD-17 Overlay district; and WHEREAS, development of the Ocean Grove Tower Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and ATiACHAAENT (5) I -' CONTAINED CITY COMMISSI0II1 P,IUEE'TING OF, JUL 1 3 1995 � No. j 9 - 599 i , I J-95-602 7/13/95 RESOLUTION NO. 9 5 W 5 9 9 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE OCEAN GROVE TOWER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OF NOT MORE THAN 103 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3202 SOUTHWEST 27TH AVENUE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 19, 1995, the applicant, Lucia A. Dougherty, for Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for designation of the Ocean Grove Tower Project as a Planned Unit Development, pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and in "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Lucia A. Dougherty, for Cornelia Enterprises, Inc has applied for the Planned Unit Development Overlay District designation, in order to utilize the increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying Office district with an SD-17 Overlay district; and WHEREAS, development of the Ocean Grove Tower Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and ATiACHAAENT (5) I -' CONTAINED CITY COMMISSI0II1 P,IUEE'TING OF, JUL 1 3 1995 � No. j 9 - 599 i , I WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on April 3, 1995 and the Urban Development Review Board met on May 16, 1995, to consider the proposed project and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board met on June 20, 1995, and adopted Resolution No. HEPB-95-36, approving the proposed tree removal and relocation, subject to conditions (incorporated into the attached Development Order); and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on June 21, 1995, Item No. 2, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 29-95 by a vote of six to two (6-2), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. - 2 - 95- 599 Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved with conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Ocean Grove Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby designated as a Planned Unit Development Overlay District, per Article 5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 169,042.40 total gross square feet; this is permitted by designation as a Planned Development Overlay District which allows an increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying district. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the 110" Office and SD- 17 Overlay district zoning classifications of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. 95- 599 I c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered 1 ' administratively during the process of issuing a i building permit and a certificate of occupancy. l d The PROJECT is t d ION a to cost approximately $3l million, and to employ approximately 53 workers during construction (FTE), and to result in the creation of approximately 12 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $0.9 million annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1995 dollars) . e. The PROJECT fulfills the requirements of a Planned Unit Development Overlay District because it meets the following criteria: (1) greater flexibility in the pattern of development; (2) improved level of amenities; - 4 - 95 " 599 (3) appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development; (4) creative design; and (5) improved environment. f. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently transportation facilities; use public (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from the proposed parking for the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10)any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Major Use Special Permit which was submitted by the applicant on April 19, 1995, and which is on file with the . Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for - 6 - 95- 599 administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is 30 days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., c/o Freeman, Newman and Butterman; 520 Brickell Key Drive, Suite 0-305, Miami, Florida 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Ocean Grove Tower Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Ocean Grove Tower Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this, Resolution or the. Development Order (Exhibit "All) is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or 7_ 9;- 599 Development Order (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th da f July , 1995. e STEVEN P. CLERK, MAYOR ATTES L WALTER J. O CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: w L E. MAXWZ UTY CITY A 93/JEM/mis APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: j A j 41� CITM -8- 95- 599 ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-599 DATE: July 13, 1995 OCEAN GROVE TOWER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Artiales '&,, 13 • and ' 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the designation of the Ocean Grove Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") as a Planned Unit Development Overlay District to be located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the designation of the PROJECT as a Planned Unit Development Overlay District and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: -1- 95- 599 FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Ocean Grove Tower Project is a residential use development located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 1.88 gross acres and 1.49 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, cabanas, a tennis court and a recreational facility which includes a sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room. The Project also includes an extensively landscaped outdoor area. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of preserving as many of the trees on the site as possible and therefore enhancing the property's unique environmental attributes. The design also optimizes the site's views of Biscayne Bay and Downtown Miami. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. 2 9 - �99 The Project also reflects recommendations received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of April 3, 1995 and the Urban Development Review Board meeting of May 16, 1995. The proposed tree removal and relocation plan has been approved, with conditions (incorporated into this Development Order), by the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board at its meeting of June 20, 1995 pursuant to Resolution No. HEPB 95-36. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Gail Byron Baldwin, architect and Bradshaw Gill & Associates, landscape architects, dated 4/17/95 and 4/19/95 respectively; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the 110" Office and SD-17 Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a request for approval of a Class I Special Permit for the proposed swimming pool and a Class II Special Permit for the placement of a sales/leasing trailer on the site during construction. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the - 3 - 95~ 599 requested Major Use Special Permits) shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate requests referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 169,042.4 square feet; this is permitted by the Planned Development Overlay District designation which permits an increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying district. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL: 1. Provide a complete tree mitigation plan for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan should address canopy replacement plans as well as mitigation of any trees lost during the construction of the Project. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans should be modified to a) Eliminate the ingress and egress point to the existing office building and provide an internal connection between the sites. b) Enhance the landscaping of the existing office site to match the quality of the proposed tower site, this should include new landscaping of the front swale area - 4 - 95- 599 and posting of "NO PARKING" signs within that area; the landscape plan should be designed to discourage parking within all "NO PARKING" ZONES. *Note: Any landscape to be provided beyond the base building line shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and if approved, will be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain (by duly recorded covenant). c) Reconfigure the curb cuts at the depicted service access so that egress will be "Left turn only" toward Southwest 27th Avenue. d) Reconfigure the main access aisles off of Southwest 27th Avenue in order to provide two lanes of egress (one for left turns only and one for right turns only) . e) Reconfigure the depicted "Cornelia Drive" tenant access for "egress" from the property only, and left turn (toward Southwest 27th Avenue) only. The Applicant shall provide new curbs and gutters along Southwest 27th Avenue, and sidewalks wherever possible; all street improvements along Southwest 27th Avenue shall be subject to the review of the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. ,21'i'l►��> 4. Pursuant to Resolution No. Historic and Environmental June 20, 1995, the following required: HEPB 95-36, adopted by the Preservation Board on conditions shall also be a. Change the symbol of tree #44 on sheet L-2 to indicate relocation; b. Clarify the impact on trees #73, 80 and 123, and adjust the location of the loading area and sales office if necessary; c. Revise sheen L-4 to include all trees to remain, and those to be relocated, and incorporate these trees into the new landscape plan; d. Under the supervision of the Dade County Archeologist, conduct a Phase I archeological survey prior to any ground clearing or tree removal and notify him prior to any ground disturbing activity; e. Plant the trees to be located off -site within the boundaries of Coconut Grove in locations to be determined by the Coconut Grove NET Offices; these trees shall be maintained alive and healthy by the applicant, for a period of six months; the applicant shall further be responsible for replacing any of such trees which die within the six month period; and a f. The Certificate of Approval is subject to final approval of the Major Use Special Permit by the City Commission. 5. The applicant shall not convert the proposed residential units to hotel use without amending this Development Order, including all the hearings required for such an amendment. 6. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 7 8. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at - 7 - the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 11. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 12. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 13. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing -8- 95- 599 z� that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 14. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that. the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 15. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title or Covenant for the subject property providing that for development and Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) purposes the property shall not be separated, although said property may be under separate ownership. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Ocean Grove Tower Project, proposed by the applicant, Cornelia Enterprises, Inc. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami - 9 - 95- 599 that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 14. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that. the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 15. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title or Covenant for the subject property providing that for development and Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) purposes the property shall not be separated, although said property may be under separate ownership. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Ocean Grove Tower Project, proposed by the applicant, Cornelia Enterprises, Inc. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami - 9 - 95- 599 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the Project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and the Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and the Project will not adversely affect public safety; and the public welfare will be served by the Project; and -10- 95- 599 WN (9) any potentially adverse effects of the Project will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the Project i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d2]<musps/95>OCEAN/gr/TOWER/do/1 95- 599 Exhibit NIB"(I) EXHIBIT E(a) .4GL O.F r.2dCr 10d 0 Of' 1GQOYC A/OUlv7.41,V •PEF�Gdr "'J fI CCO,e01&6 TO' r1l oz.4r , lleeeev ,Qs ,Q�-Cp eoEo /N .04.4r QOO& /2g dT go ,s OF 7iYE �t/BG/C .eeeme s OF o.�4OE e'OUv. x., �GO.e/OA � LE6�' THr4.'j �O•�T/ON /�D.Q� .oAQi.�Cl�G.4QCY BEGIN AT CONCRETE'.MONO E 7 AK•NG THE COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 46.. 1,1, 12 of s.AI$ �0A,'DROVE ERRACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF `SAID GROVE CIO. , TARN REPULAI,; THE FOLLOWING THREE (3 COURSES ARE ALONG' TH 'MO�JUME TED BOUNDARY OF GROVE MOUNTAIN REPLAT. QLAT BOOK ' 1' . P.JtGE . 9 OF THE- PUPL I C" RECORDS OF DADEE COUNTY, tLORIDA. (11�THEWC�E SOUTH 14 48 -36 •AST FOR 51.2 FEFT TO CONCRETE MONO ENT SET BY RLS #241 �25 THENCE FORTH :87 -4p4 -14 Ej�ST F.Or�'25 ..6.1: FEE.j TO -CON RETE MONUMENT ET BY RLS tf2408; 0) THENC.E. SO —'H 14 -48 -3U EAST FOR •bb.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE''104THERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GREE doo ROAD. WHOSE RADIUS BEARS OU.VH '20!-15'-47" EAST FOR 22a.27 FEET: THENCE VESTERLY ALONG' THE ARC 0 SAID CURVE HAVING FOR ITS ELEMEUTS A CENTRA ANGLE OF 06--31'-32" AND A RADIUS OF 224.J/ FEET FOR 2.U6 F ET. TO A POINT WHOSE R1�DIUS BEARS SOU�r H RST7'-19" EAST FOR 4.27 FEET: THENCE NORTH 130-51'-31 FOR 66 .99 FEET ALONG A LINE 25 .00 FEET EAS�T OF AND gARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 45'OF §AID'UAX"G�OVE TERRACE.`. PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE,160. THENCE SOUTH -87 -51 -2 EST FOR 2S .')3 FEET ALONG THE COMMON 'BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID LOT 45 AND 46 OF DAY GROVE TERRACE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 46: THENCE NORTH 1.3*-51 -31" WEST FOR 50.99 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY 9F SAID LOT 46 To THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit "A" 95— 599 GAIL BYRON EXHIBIT C B A L D W I N ARCHITECT OCEAN GROVE TONER PROJECT DATA APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ART7CLE S CITY OF MIA.MI ZONING ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF 20% IN FAR) Legal Description: Parcel "A" All of Tract. "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel "B" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereof, Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-1-7 , Lot Area: Parcel "K: Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Parcel "B": Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 1 5815 S.W. 68th STREET 95 - 599 SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 3 0 5/ 6 6 6 -7 0 5 0 OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 units allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) -1.72 allowed Parcel "A" 67,400.39 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B''= 140,868.67 Pursuant to Article 5,,City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an increase of 2090 in F.A.R. 140,868.67 x .20 = 28,173.73 Total Allowed 140,868.67 + 28,173.73 = 169,042.40 sq. feet. Proposed. Building — 165,000. sq. feet. Existing Office Buildine 5,228 sq. feet. 1,185.60 sq. feet. See request for additional square footage under Article 914. 7. Loading Berths: 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. 8. Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. ' Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshore Drive or 22 Stories. Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Permitted: Parcel "A": 67,400.39 x .40 = 26,960.15 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x .40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 32,760.15 Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,846 Parcel "B": 3.879 Total Footprint Provided 25,725 2 95- 599 A OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 10. Parldng Spaces Required: I space for each I bedroom unit I x 40 = 40 spaces, 2 spacbs for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2 x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors - I space for each 10 units 103 + 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Handicaped Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Required: Parcel "A7: .15 of 'gross lot area required =..15 x '67,400.39 10,110 sq. feet required.(min) Parcel "B": .15 of gross lot area required = .15 x 14,500 2,175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Minimum Greenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided: Parcel "A7: 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel "B": 2,963 sq. feet provided. Total:- 25,244 sq. feet provided. 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided. Side: 10-0' required; 10-0' provided. Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided. Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows I additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided. 3 95- 599 Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2e1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Ocean Grove is ,a luxury residential condominium development which will be located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida. The property consists of 1.49 net acres./ The gross lot area is 1.88 acres. The property fronts S.W. 27th Avenue on the east and Cornelia Drive on the west. Ocean Grove will have 103 residential units and 22 stories. The building will offer magnificent views of Coconut Grove, Downtown Miami and Biscayne Bay. A swim- ming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room will be provided, as well as an extensively landscaped outdoor area. Drawings showing the architectural char- acter and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/ exit drives. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. CMPA 0"%n5n:.1%"/s4/n The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indi- cating the project site. - 2 - 9 599 (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting .rn\�woo�\ntt�a.�\a/��Iss Documents. J (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffics will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of. site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All traffic circulation to the site, will originate from S.W. •27th Avenue and Cornelia Drive. The entry driveway will be at Southwest 27th Avenue. The garage can be entered from ramps on the east and west sides. The service access to the development will enter and exit from Cornelia Drive. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located within the building podium. Tpading and delivery parking will be located on site. - 3 - 95- 599 44. L (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include a swimming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room. (e) emp"CwN22591:.I%WI4/ a (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape.. Plan, under Tab- 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a container- ized compactor system located within; the building. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Building footprint: proposed building 21,846 s.f. 67,400.39 s.f.= 32% existing building 3,756 s.f. 14,500.00 s.f.= 26* Total: 81,900.30 s.f.= 31% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by above ground parking structure is 31% of the total gross lot area. 4 - 95- 099 x t (g) _. anArwno��usu:.t�a/u/n Tabulation showing: (1.) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Site Plan and the Ground Floor Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three (3) loading berths. Each berth is 121 x 351. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential building will consist of 103 residential -Units. The density per acre will be as follows: 103 Presidential dwelling units s 1.88 gross acres = 54.79 dwelling units per acre. if common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities to be provided will include the swimming pool, cabanas, lobby area, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. The common areas will be maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Architectural definitions for buildings in the develop- ment; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use which consists of `a luxury highrise building. Typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. =&INC 95- 599 (j) (k) Plans for signs, if any. Signs will be provided at ground level at the entrance to the property. Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and . decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and loca- tions,, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location agd general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, cabanas, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. `� � 9 9 .1A ,V (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application. (5) Materials tr'o demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteris- tics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use special Permit. Pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, the exist- ing zoning designation for the property is 0 (Office) and SD-17 (South Bayshore Drive Overlay District). Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian move- ments, and transportation access. Maps submitted indi- cate the project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are in- cluded in the drawings submitted with this Application. erMrwiow\us/e.�\a/p/n — / — 95- 599 , VOPYi The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the zoning designation zoning of the property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently existing for this property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for execution of this project. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2_of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employ- ment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the city. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. c. A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 103 residential units. The City of Miami, and in particular Coconut Grove, has a demand for additional housing. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in state Energy code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and shaded glass. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell 95-- 599 1 PLANNING FACT SHEET PZw 12 APPLICANT Lucia A. Dougherty, Esq., for Cornelia Enterprises, Inc. APPLICATION DATE REQUEST/LOCATION Major Use Special Permit to designate the Ocean Grove Tower Project, located at 3202 S.W. 27 Avenue and 3350 S.W. 27 Avenue, as a Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Division) PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit, pursuant to Articles 5 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, for the Ocean Grove Tower Project, located at 3202 S.W. 27 Avenue and 3350 S.W. 27 Avenue (more particularly described herein), in order to designate said project as a Planned Unit Development, and to be comprised of not more than 103 residential units and accessory office space; approving said Major Use Special Permit after considering the report and recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board, subject to the conditions of the Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A", and the application for development approval, incorporated herein by reference; making findings of fact and conclusions of law; and providing that the Development Order shall be binding on the applicant and successors in interest. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND SEE ATTACHED. ANALYSIS VOTE: 6 - 2 June 21, 1995 95- 599 llwillit ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS FOR OCEAN GROVE TOWER 3202 S.W. 27TH AVENUE The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permits for the Ocean Grove Tower Project, to be located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, with the conditions specified herein. The project, as proposed, requires two Major Use Special Permits; one is for the designation of the project as a "Planned Unit Development (PUD), pursuant to Article 5 of Zoning Ordinance 11000; and the other is for an increased development bonus of 0.84 percent, F.A.R., pursuant to Section 914 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, which allows such an increase upon payment _of $6.67 per square foot of increased floor area, into the City of Miami Affordable Housing Trust Fund. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Ocean Grove Tower project is a proposed Planned Unit Development project to be located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, within the Coconut Grove Area. The subject property consists of two tracts of land with a net lot area of 1.49 acres and a gross lot area of 1.88 acres; the property is zoned "0" office with an SD-17 Overlay District. The development consists of a new 22 story, 103 residential unit, tower and an existing office building to remain. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, cabanas, a tennis court and a recreational facility which includes a sauna, steamroom, clubroom ad exercise room. The project also includes an extensively landscaped outdoor area. The primary access to the project will be off of S.W. 27th Avenue, however, the project is also proposing a secondary means of access for tenants off of Cornelia Drive and a separate service access also off of Cornelia Drive. The existing office also proposes to continue using its current access off of S.W. 27th Avenue. ANALYSIS The Ocean Grove Tower Project has been designed with the goal of preserving as many of the trees on the site as possible and therefore enhancing the property's unique environmental attributes. The design also optimizes the site's views of Biscayne Bay and Downtown Miami. The overall replacement of canopy which will be lost by the development has, however, not been adequately addressed by the applicant. A complete mitigation plan for the lost canopy area, as well as for any tree which may inadvertently be lost during construction, should be provided as part of this proposal. 95- 599 e With regards to the project's proposed vehicular access ways, four separate points of access is excessive. The project site plan should be reconfigured to limit the amount of access points onto the site to one off of S.W. 27th Avenue and one off of Cornelia Drive; this reconfiguration, if designed well, could even result in a few additional parking spaces or green area, either of which would benefit the project. The -existing office building has been included in this application for development approval for the purpose of allowing additional F.A.R. to the new residential tower; however the applicant is not proposing any improvements to the office building itself or the site. The existing office building should, at a minimum, be re -landscaped to the same lush quality as proposed for the residential tower site. The quality of the S.W. 27 Avenue streetscape will be greatly affected by this project and therefore requires these improvements in order to mitigate its effects. The existing; office site is also legally grandfathered for less parking than is required under today's code; a connection between the office site and the new building will allow the vehicular overflow from the office, which is now illegally parking in the swale area along S.W. 27th Avenue, to utilize the excess residential parking during peak office hours. The entrance on to the office site, due to its grading , is also currently not in compliance with FDOT site distance visibility standards and should be closed off for safety reasons. Finally, the project as proposed, appears to have been designed with a fairly attractive "front" toward Biscayne Bay, without considering what the neighbors to the "rear" off of Cornelia Drive had to look, at. The Cornelia Drive facade should be enhanced so that the project provides appropriate facades on all sides of the new tower. RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS OF FACT The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the proposed Ocean Grove Tower Development with the following conditions: 1. Provide a complete tree mitigation plan for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan should address canopy replacement plans as well as mitigation of any trees lost during the construction of the project. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans should be modified. to 1j Eliminate the ingress and egress point to the existing office building and provide an internal connection between the sites. 3. 2) Enhance the landscaping of the existing office site to match the quality of the proposed tower site; this should include new landscaping of the front swale area and posting of "NO PARKING" signs within that area; the landscape plan should be designed to discourage parking within all "NO PARKING" ZONES. *Note: Any landscape to be provided beyond the base building line _shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and if approved, will be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain (by covenant). 3) Eliminate the ingress and egress point to the new residential tower site and add either- additional parking or green space within the residual areas. 4) Reconfigure the curb cuts at the depicted service access so that egress will be "Left turn only" toward S.W. 27th Avenue. 5) Reconfigure the main access aisles off of S.W. 27th Avenue in order to two lanes of egress (one for left turns only and one for right turns only). Per the public works department, the applicant shall provide new curbs and gutters along S.W. 27th Avenue, and sidewalks wherever possible; all street improvements along S.W. 27th Avenue shall be subject to the review of the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. 4. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 5. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department,prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 95-- 599 5 e 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a lette of assurance - from the Solid Waste Department that the project has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 9. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow 10. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review -and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 11. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 12. Record a certified copy of the development order within 90 days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and -is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 13. Record, within 6 months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title or covenant in lieu of unity of title for the subject property. All modifications of plans required by the conditions specified herein shall be subject to the review and approval by the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department. The recommendation of approval of the proposed Ocean Grove Tower Project is based on the following findings: 1) The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the 10" office and SD-17 Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami; the project requires no variances, special exceptions, rezonings or changes in land use; the project is further compatible with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan which allows the mixture of uses and intensity of the proposed development. 95— 599 sc 1 2) Upon compliance with the conditions outlined above, the project will be in compliance with all of the criteria as listed in Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000 and will be beneficial to the city by providing new housing opportunities within the Coconut Grove area; also finding that, with the above specified modifications, the project will have no adverse effects on the surrounding area. Note: The attached application for development approval also includes requested approval of the following: 1. A Class I Special Permit for the proposed Swimming Pool; and 2. A Class II Special Permit for the placement of a sales/leasing trailer on the subject property during construction. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the two subordinate requests referenced above. I TR •A• ¢ s• » .DA COOK I* r f t� :E 4 + • a Y N Lot I to 8 tI s M LOT t own UKM ��f.WU, S �SiYrY- `AA d4w � MISS= 111550, 0 0 O No 310 ]] s{ )t >o {T S1 SUQ !9 •P t '�,, ' 7R A U t .♦ ti ^� SDolT R{.qn/ n IN .. .. .. a f• .. Tfl '.' ti♦ :' .�.1��. � f 9 _9 3 0 4 `� O i• n `ii• 1` � O I ZI �� ' 9 xxt{s � I: 7 P R F Il. TRAGt'A r' • `•9'c y� GO Pp� 114 Is • Tr is : MAYFAIR SUB tI J 9 a II a. t►w'Y ♦ s t• i3t9�N G '`lt /� pop,A, Sp �, , ✓ ♦ o9t .y �ATdM°RE ' FA v TAW ° �• ♦ t sAIL.BOAT a JAI Etta *�`A�m�°` s®" • �'� %/ t F 00 Q ` \ 'N ♦ `\. _ "�S� !vVpV'C *owl � �� f � � •� �' �P �/ �, c JAY 95- 599 .. �_-� 0 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters to be of citywfde or area -wide importance. The 'City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to '.4e Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5).,. I, Lucia A. Dougherty hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under'the provisions of Article 17 of the city of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): To obtain a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to obtain an additional 20% of FAR for a 103 unit residential building i 1 t Prey \iminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6- 83 to application). 4.Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for areas on and around the property covered by this letter. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to'major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c), How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Development Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT— (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific):- 9. Fee of 8,250.00 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Building(s): Other (specify): Total: SBAQ,00 — Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: - Signature Owner or hoylized Agent Lucia A. Dougherty i Name: Address: Cijy, State, Zip: Phone: Th s application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in+accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: k - ergo KOdriguez, Director Planning; Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 13 95-- 599 Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 April 20, 1995 Ms. Teresita Femandez Clerk, Hearing Vgards City of Miami ` 275 N.W. 2nd Stroet Miami, Florida 3�128 Re: Ocean Grove Tower - 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue 1 Dear Teresita: Pursuant to Section 1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, this letter serves to request Class II Permit approval for a sales trailer. Section 1301 provides that when more than one special permit is required to address the same issue, the highest ranking permit shall be considered sufficient. Thank you very much for your attention. Very tru� yours, Lucia A. Dougherty GREENBERG TRAURIC HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P. A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579.0500 FAX 305-579.0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WESTPALM BEACH TALLAHASSEE 9 5 d 599 NEW YORK WASHINGTON. D.C. ti4�`�'dfit AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A Dougheft who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the. accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000.of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to thi.§ affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full 4 and complete pq'rmission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification ofia classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he is the owner, or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. (SEAL) (Name) Lucia A. Dougherty OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL Sworn to and Subscri4o before me ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA this 'Ij� day of i9 COMMISSION NO CC428765 MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC.21.1998 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Personally known My Commission Expires: oath taken 95— 5S9 i OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Cornelia Enterpriges. Inc.. a Florida Coro. Mailing Address c/o Freeman; Noy, 4 Sutierman. 520 Brtckell Key Drive. Suite 0-305 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone,Number 374.3soo Legal Description: See Exhibit A Owner'sName . Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name ; Mailing Address% Telephone Number Legal Description Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description 95- 599 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name -Peacgek Properties. Inc,, a Figrida Cor Mailing Address ,3360 SX 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida 331•33 Telephone Number asa-Zoos Legal Description: See Exhibit B- Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number I Legal'Descripttpn: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Ci•rnat eiirlrcec Legal Description Legal Description 40 t OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Najiar Associates, LLI!, a New Jersey Limited Partnership Mailing Address 500 So: Ocean Boueivard, Suite 2109, Boca'Raton. FL 33432 Telephone. Number 407-393-0061 Legal Description: Has a contract to purchase the property identified on attached Exhibits A&B Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: l Owner's Name Mailing Address i Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Legal Description Legal Description. 95- 599 'm.qy! DISCLOSURE OF -OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See Exhibit A 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of sharehold6rs of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation owned by: Keeler Enterprises LimltWa British Virgin Islands Corp. - 100% No shareholders of Keeler own greater than a 5% Interest 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subjebt real property. Nont C OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA SS: COUNTY OF DADE Lucia A. Dougherty being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to, question4l, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. (SEAL) (Namel Lucia A. Dougherty OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA before me this day of COMMISSION NO CC428765 199a. MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC. 21,1998 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Personally known, oath taken I q 95- 599 vdk- DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Legal description and street address of subject real property: See Exhibit B 3350 S.W. 27th Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject flatter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Peacock Properties, Inc., a Florida Corporation Is owned by: 1. Scott Silver, Individually 50% 2. Frederick K Garrett, individually 50% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by -any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. L Non i OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Lucia A. Dougherty , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he i ,the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question:#l, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the,Disciosure of Ownership form on behAlf of the owner. (SEAL) ( ame) Lucia A. Dougherty SWORN•TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this day of 19s_s MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES:. DrAL ADRIENNE FRIFSNER PARDO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORI �,jC�A{MISSION NO CC428765 k /'- el /' . f L L Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Personally known, oath taken 95- 599 Iute!'' 3. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibits A & S Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of.Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. .•. Najjar Associates LLP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership Ellsha Najjar 25°6 Jessie Najjar - 25°.G Jordan. Najjar - 25% Joshua Najjar 25% Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None i �. OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Lucia A. Dougherty being duly sworn, deposes and says that he isthe(Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behal of the owner. x (SEAL) -(Nalnef Lucia A. Dougherty SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this iCA day of r.p 199 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Notary Public, State of Florida at Large OFFICIAL i h taken ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO CC428765 MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC.21,1998 95— 599 40P 46941- CeZoO710.41-* Xel_ tov= ne,.4er 1;d Of &ev Pe 1V0e1Ao,*X41& ed-,01-dr tvAeollflis r IAI 0ZAr le 6 47- ei- .60, tov--'we _4VlAee _4 BEG IN AT CONCRETE' M0iNUjE-MT MAKYNG THE COMMON CORNER 'OF -LOTS ERRACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY 46. 11, 12 OF 'SAI CORNER OF SAIDREPLATf' THE FOLLOWING THA'EE (3) �GROVE'-MOU p G" tHl" 040NOM , ENTED BOUNDARY OF COURSES ARE ALONG' GROVE MOUNTAIN REPLAT. p LAT BOOK .1.) pAdt 39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BADE COUNTY. LOR DA: ENCE SOUTH 14%48'-36�ZEAST FOR 51.20 FECT � TO CONCRETE MONUIENT . SET BY RLS #2408: THENCE NORTH .-87%44'-14* S)�'T 1 5`41 'FEET TO -CONCRETE MONUME-14T ET BY RLS #2408: THENCE SOUTH 14%48'-36" EAST FOR -bb.5; FEET TO A POINT ON THE, -'NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GREENWOOD ROArj WHOSE RADIUS BARS SOUTH 20%15'47" EAST FOR 224.27 FEET. THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC 06, SAID CURVE HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CENT RAL ANGLE, OF - —3l'-32" AND A RADIUS OF 221-27 FEET ro 2 F$ET-TO A POINT WHOSE RDIUS BEARS SOUTH I AR .06 20 -47 s R 24.27 FEET:. THENCE NORTH 13*-5l'-31- WEST FO-1119;6 JV, FEET ALONG A LINE -25 .00 FEET EA'ST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY* BOUNDARY OF LOT 45- or §AID DAY GROVE ERRACE,. PEAT BOOK 9, PAGt, 180: ' THENCE SOUTH 87 -51'-26" WEST FOR 25-53 FEET ALONG THE COMMON :BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID LOT 45 AND 46 OF DAY GROVE TERRACE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 46; THENCE NORTH .13"T51'-31w WEST FOR 50.49 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 46 TO THE POINT OF -BEGINNING. V -7w 95- 599 "i w1w LEGAL DESCRIPTION This property described as: Lots 41 and'42, less the East 15.01 thereof, DAY GROVE TERRACE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 1 i Exhibit "BRI . - AECTORX OF PROJECT PRINCII. FOR OCEAN GROVE TOWER - 3202 B.W. 27 AVENUE Owner/Developer: Najjar Associates LLP 500 South Ocean Boulevard Suite 2109 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: (407) 393-0061 - Fax: (305) 393-0061 Elisha Najjar Architect: Gail Byron Baldwin Architect 5815 S.W. 68th Street Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 666-7050 Fax: (305) 667-2971 , Gail Baldwin Alfredo Pou Telephone: (305) 665-5783 Landscape Bradshaw, Gill & Associates Architect: 4337 Seagrape Drive Lauderdale -By -The -Sea, Florida Telephone: (305) 944-7245 Fax: (305) 772-8417 Walter Taft Bradshaw Joe Gordon 4 Traffic: Civil: 33308 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive t Suite loth Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Vish Chowdhary - Traffic Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. 16201 S.W. 95th Avenue Miami, Florida Telephone: (305) 652-7010 Fax: (305) 652-8284 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton/Tom Schlosser Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, L, poff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0683 95-- 599 GAIL BYRON,, BALDWIN ARCHITECT OCEAN GROYNE TOWER PROJECT DATA APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 CITY OF MIAMI ZONING ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF 20% IN FAR) 1. Legal Description: Parcel ."A" All of Tract "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel AB" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereof, Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. t 2. Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-17 4. Lot Area: Parcel "A": Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Parcel "B": Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 1 5815 S.W. 68th STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 3 0 5/ 6 6 6 .7 0 5 0 F A X/ 6 6 7 .2 9 7 1 599 6 u OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 twits allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Arm - Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .1.12 allowed Parcel "A" 67,400.39 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B" 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 _ Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B" = 140,868.67 Pursuant to Article 5, City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an increase of 20% in F.A.R. 140,868.67 x .20 = 28,173.73 - Total Allowed 140,868.67 + 28,173.73 = 169,042.40 sq. feet. Proposed Building - 165,000. sq. feet. Existing Office Building _5,228 sq. feet. - 1,185.60 sq. feet. See request for additional square footage under Article 914. 'i 7. LoadingPerths: 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. E:1 Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshore Drive or 22 Stories. Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum. Permitted: Parcel "A": 67,400.39 x .40 = 26,960.15 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x .40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 32,760.15 Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,946 Parcel "B": 3.879 Total Footprint Provided 25,725 0j 95- 599 1 ' OCEAN GROVE TOWER I April 19, 1995 _ 10. Parking Spaces Required: 1 space for each 1 bedroom unit 1 x 40 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2 x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors 1 space for each 10 units 103 = 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Handicaped Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Reoired: Parcel "A": .15 of 'gross lot area required = ..15 x 67,400.39 = 10,110 sq. feet required.(min) Parce%"B": .1.5 of gross lot area required =..15 x 14,500 -- 2.175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Vinimum Creenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided: Parcel W: 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel "B": 2.963 sq. feet provided. Total: `' 25,244 sq. feet provided 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided. Side: 10-0' required; 10-0' provided. Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided. Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows 1 additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided. 3 "- 599 ta April 19, 1995 OCE,4N GROVE TOWER PROTECT .DATA APPROVAL FOR 14 AWOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO SEC77ON 914 CITE' OF 1iLW16II' ZO117NG ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF ALLOWABLE F.A.R.) 1. Legal Description: Parcel "A" All of Tract "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat'thereo& as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel "B" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereof; Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florid- ;1� 2. Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-17 Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 IHY:1 5815 S.W. 68th STREET SOUTH MIAMI, I'L 33143 3 0 5/ 6 6 6 .7 0 5 0 95- 599 -,A OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 units allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio. (FAR) -1.72 allowed Parcel "A" 67,400.39 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B" 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B" = 140,868.67 Pursuant to Section 914, City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an additional increase of 59oo in F.A.R. -is allowed (total increase of 25%). r-A 140,868.67 x .05 = 7,043.43 140,868.67 x .20 173.73 Total Allowed 140,868.61 -+• 35,217.16 = 176,085.83 sq, feet. Proposed Building = 165,000. sq. feet. ExistinOffice Building 5,228 sq.. feet. Total ?.A.R. Proposed 170.228. sq. feet. Actual of increase required = .84% (Less than 1%) . 1 Loading Berths: 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. 8. Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshorc Drive or 22 Stories. Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Permitted: Parcel "A": 61,400.39 x .40 = 24,560.16 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x .40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 30,360.16 Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,846 Parcel "B 3 m Total Footprint Provided 25,725 2-A 0) 01.1 9r- 599 .r , OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, .1995 10. Parking Spaces Required: 1 space for each 1 bedroom unit 1 x 40 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2'x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors - 1 space for each 10 units 103 + 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Elandicaped Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Required: Parcel:"A": .15 of gross lot area required .15 x 67,400.39 = 10,110 sq. feet required.(min) Parcel `."B": .15 of gross lot area required .15 x 14,500 — 2,175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Minimum Greenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided• Parcel "A7: 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel t": 2.963 sq. feet provided - Totah 25,244 sq. feet provided- 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided. Side: 10-0' required; 10-0' provided. Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided. Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows 1 additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided. 3-A ID 95— 599 I �����) IIIII I�I I� ��I �) �I) I) I�) II'!� �I ��) I� �I� �) �{� If �I�(� II� II �I� �I Il�ll ��l �I ��f �� (f� � t�'I �• 1995u40614245032 IE Issued Date • 5-APR--1995 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Expiration Date: 4-JUL-1995 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 33 S.W. 2nd AVENUE SUITE 500 MS GAIL B BALDWIN MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130.1540 MIS) 372.6500 BALDWIN ARCHITECTS 5815 SW ,68 ST MIAMI, FL 33143 .Fax- Tel'- 666-7.050 RE:_ -Sewer System Treatment and Transmission Capacity Certification Dear MS ,BALDWIN: The Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) .has received your application for approval of a sewer service 'connection to serve the following project which is more specifically described in the attached project summary. -Project Name: CORNELIA APARTMENTS Project Location: 3355 CORNELIA DR MIAMI Proposed Use: 1Q3 UNIT APARTMENT Previous Flow: 0 GPD Calculated Sewage Flow: 20600 GPD Sewer Utility: M�AMI DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT _ Receiving Pump Station: 30-0009 t DERM has evaluated your request in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Paragraph 16 C of the First Partial Consent Decree (CASE NO. 93-1109 CIV-MORENO) between the United States of America and Metropolitan Dade "County. DERM hereby certifies that adequate treatment and transmission capacity, as herein defined, is available for the above described project. Please be aware that this certification is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Sewer Service Connection Affidavit filed by the applicant, a copy of which is hereby attached: By copy of this certification we are advising the appropiate building official. of our Department's determination. Sincerely, John W. Renfrow, P.E. Director Department Environmental Resources Management B - Y � to E. Arrebola, P.E. Chief, Water & Sewer Division tachements (2) } cc: Building Official (w/Attachments) 95599 TTt * l i t-,r (1F4:i 1 /­ /n- k`bate: 04-06-1995 Page: Applicant's Name: MR GAIL B BALDWIN Applicant's Address: 5815 SW 68 ST DERM Number: 1995-0406-14241-5032 Project CORNELIA APARTMENTS 3355 CORNELIA DR Proposed Use: 103 UNIT APARTMENT Pump Station: 30 -0009 Allocated flow--: 20600 (GPD) -Projected NAPOT: 17.80 (HR) # Folio Lot Block Flow (GPD) 1 01-4121-127-0010 20600 t d t s 95- 599 PAUM Station Monthly Information <Plan Review> .,station. 30 -0009 1 `as Pg..H16 '-'` Moratorium..AC 441AM I`DARE WATER & SEWER Lr:PARTN M APPROVED AL. CORRECTED Addr..2202 SW 26 LN Moratorium effective since Sec -Towns 1p-Range............15-54-41 Genr. ET clock.Y Telm.Y Pumps. 3 Pump Type.B Stn Class.L Speea.l Hrspwr.+ Yearly NAPOT (hrs)..._.... 17_51 Res flow(gpd) Proj Napot Cap Plans 90,110 17.80 hrs 177.40 Plats:. 0 17.51 hrs 175.10 Extens. 0 17.51 hrs 175.10 Date Mo.NAPOT Avg Daily Flows Comments 72/16/1995 8.95 17.90 0.00 AC - 3/8/95; see ps comments or file. 01/17/1995 10.44` 20.68 0.00 - 12715 1994 13.31 26.61 6.00 cH - 1 26/94; see PS COMVENrS OR FILE - DG 11 17/1994 23.02 46.04 0.00 J. 10/20 1994 21.26 42.51 0.00 09/15 1994 12.48 24.96` 0.00 g8/22/1994 15.84 31.68 0.00 - Signature...GRANDAL_p Sign Date..03/16/1995 10:54:06.59 GOLD/M Station I<m>provement GOLD/S <S>tation Inform. GOLD/U <U>pstream Station GOLD/D'<D>ownstream Station GOLD/P <P>ump Information GOLD/G Codes & Cata<g>ories GOLD/T Sewer Cer<t>ification 95- 599 I Zoning ordinance No. 11000 1. section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. ocean Grove is a luxury residential condominium development which will be located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida. The property consists of 1.49 net acres. The gross lot area is 1.88 acres. The property fronts S.W. 27th Avenue on the east and Cornelia Drive on the west. ocean Grove will have 103 residential units and 22 stories. The building will offer magnificent views of Coconut Grove, Downtown Miami and.Biscayne Bay. A swim- ming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room will be provided, as well as an extensively landscaped oAtdoor area. Drawings showing the architectural char- aAer and location of the. intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 1' The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/ exit drives. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indi- cating the project site. 4&MPAW"%U5V&.Ikap4/s — 2 _ 95- 599 �� cnnaum A%3259ra.lkw/u/.a A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact surrey of the _ property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project...and-the location of existing streets and easements are shown -on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic t will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; } A detailed analysis of site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All traffic circulation to the site, will originate from S.W. 27th Avenue and Cornelia Drive. The entry driveway will be at Southwest 27th Avenue. The garage can be entered from ramps on the east and west sides. The service access to the development will enter and exit from Cornelia Drive. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located with ' th � n e building podium. Loading and delivery parking will be located on site. - 3 - 95- 599 n .-LOJA (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include a swimming pool,, cabanas, tennis court,, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom,, clubroom and exercise room. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan,, under Tab 6­ of the'. Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a container- ized compactor system located within the building. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities. hookups. 4 Access and connections *to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility -Study located under Tab 3 of -the Supporting Documents. (a) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) -The various permitted uses; Land Use Building footprint: proposed building 21,846 s.f. 67,400.39 s.f.= 32% existing building 3,756 s.f. + 14,500.00 s.f.= 26% Total: 81,,900.30 s.f.= 31% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by above ground parking structure is 31% of the total gross lot area. 4 95- 599 Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown.in (d) above; The offstreet loading area 'shown on the Site Plan and the Ground Floor Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three (3) loading berths. Each berth is 121 x 351. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential building will consist of 103 residential units. The density per acre will be as follows: 103 residential dwelling units + 1.88 gross acres = 54.79 dwelling units per acre. if common facilities (such as recreation areas of Structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities to be provided will include the shimming pool, cabanas, lobby area, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. The common areas will be maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. (h) storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) architectural definitions for buildings in the develop- ment; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use which consists of a'luxury highrise building. Typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. - 5 - 95- 599 'tl'ti? r) (j) Plans for signs, if any. Signs will be provided at ground level at the entrance to the property. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and , decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and loca- tions, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, cabanas, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. (m) quch additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. I Tke Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. 95- 59931 (5) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included . under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab'3 of'the-Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteris- tics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting -Documents. (6) xisting zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for the area on and.around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Mrsuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, the exist - zoning designation for the property is 0 (Office) and SD-17 (South Bayshore Drive Overlay District). Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 31.. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project"s relationship to traffic, pedestrian move- ments, and transportation access. Maps submitted indi- cate the project°s relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are in- cluded in the drawings submitted with this Application. cmlrum.►�sassrt.Nw/uiss - 7 4o 95- 599. aM *61 The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the zoning designation zoning of the' property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently existing for this property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for °execution of this project. 4. section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within -approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employ- _Mont, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that t2e proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the city. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. c. A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 103 residential units. The City of Miami, and in particular Coconut Grove, has a demand for additional housing. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and shaded glass. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell GW%P#O.►%=H?2. 1�04/14/K r 8 _ 95- 599 l switches. Energy, saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. e: Historic' Buildings There are, no existing structures located on the property. f. Environmental Zone The Property is located within the City of Miami Historic Environmental Preservation District. The project will be reviewed by the City of Miami Historic Environmental Preservation Hoard. rn�.w+oaWs.ra. galan� t l "W= 95- 599 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 22 STORY CONDOMINIUM APARTMENT COMPLEX AT 3202 S.W. 27TH AVENUE, .REQUIRING TREE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. CHANGE THE SYMBOL OF TREE #44 ON SHEET L-2 TO INDICATE RELOCATION. 2. CLARIFY THE IMPACT ON TREES #73, 80, AND 123 AND ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND SALES OFFICE, IF NECESSARY. 3. REVISE SHEET L-4 TO INCLUDE ALL TREES TO REMAIN, AND THOSE TO BE RELOCATED, AND INCORPORATE THESE TREES INTO THE NEW LANDSCAPE PLAN. 4. UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE DADE COUNTY ARCHEOLOGIST, CONDUCT A PHASE I ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRIOR TO ANY GROUND CLEARING OR TREE REMOVAL AND NOTIFY HIM PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. 5. PLANT THE TREES TO BE LOCATED OFF -SITE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF COCONUT GROVE IN LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COCONUT GROVE NET OFFICES. MAINTAIN THESE TREES ALIVE AND HEALTHY FOR SIX MONTHS AND REPLACE ANY OF SUCH TREES WHICH DIE WITHIN THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD. 6. APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT BY THE CITY COMMISSION. AND FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED WORK, AS MODIFIED, COMPLIES WITH CHAPTER 17 OF THE MIAMI CITY CODE. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JUNE, 1995. PRESERVATION 0 FICER CHAIRMAN 95- 599 �'1kFa APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Environmental Preservation District Evaluation Sheet Name: Ocean Grove Tower Address: 3202 SW 27th Avenue Project Description: Application for a Certificate of Approval for construction of a condominium apartment complex, requiring tree removal and relocation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: 22 story Given the' small size of the subject site, the large number of trees currently existing, and the type of building permitted, the applicant has done a good job of preserving as many significant trees as possible. The majority of specimen trees (18" or more in diameter) are proposed to be either preserved in place or relocated. The specimen oaks proposed for removal are in the center of the site and/or are in poor condition. Although not a native, the most promi.nent tree on the property is 12' diameter banyan tree (#126). The applicant has carefully designed his project to preserve this tree. Since the submittal of his application, the applicant has prepared a mitigation plan for the loss of canopy due to the removal of 50 trees. Although some replacement trees are proposed on site, many of the new trees must be located off site. These trees must be planted in Coconut Grove, and their locations must be coordinated with the NET offices. Staff has only minor concerns with the.plans as presented. The new landscape plan (Sheet L-4) must clearly show the trees to remain and integrate these trees into the.new plant material. There also appears to be a possible conflict between tree #73 and the loading area on the northern corner of the site. The loading area may need to be shifted in location. Trees #80 and 123 also appear to.be affected by the location of the temporary sales office. The location of the office may also need to be.adjusted. The Preservation Officer recommends that the application for Certificate of Approval be granted, subject to conditions, because the proposal complies with Chapter 17 of the Miami City Code. WPB Action: Approval of a Certificate of Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Change the symbol of tree #44 on sheet L-2 to indicate relocation. �- 599 2. Clarify the impact on trees-#73, 80, and 123 and adjust the location of the loading area and sales office, if necessary. 3. Revise sheet L-4 to include all trees to remain, and those to be relocated, and incorporate these trees into the new landscape plan. 4. Under the supervision of the Dade County Archeologist, conduct a Phase I archeological survey prior to any ground clearing or tree removal and notify him prior to any ground disturbing activity. 5. Plant the -trees to be located off -site within the boundaries of Coconut Grove in locations to be determined by the Coconut Grove NET offices. Maintain these trees 'alive and healthy for six months and replace any of such trees which die within the six-month period. 6. Approval is subject to final approval of the Major Use Special Permit by the City Commission. i R AD sHA o W. GILL%.,x s s o c i A,r li., -- June I.4. I'90 Ms. Sarah Eaton Prescrvatuon Officer Planning and Zoning Division City of Nlianii 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miitmi. FL 31128 RC: Ocean Gruvc Tower Tree Mitigation List Dear Sarah: As per ottr cunversation on .tune 12, 1995. I ani providing you with a list of oxistingftees on the Ocean Orove Tower site that are to he relocated on site or rcmovtd die to difficulty of transplanting, or poor quality of the: tree. The: list also mclude4 the approximate caanupy squurc lbotage of cacti listed tree with the corresponding mplaccinent quantity and size for mitigation purposes. In referwicc to dic " Fxisting frees To Be Relocated" list, it is our intent to relocate hest trees on site ,where possible. Iluwcver, if this is not possible due to tight site Wndilons, the trees than are not relocated will be replaced with the equivalent quantity and ea. hupy on site. The proposed planting plan plant list provides a list of fret spcc:tcs autd quWAittc:i that would cover this contingency. In xeferonce to the ,Existing rrees To Be Removed" list, we have determined that these trees are not relocamble due to the AIC umditiurt5 or Eurur qutility ui'the u'cc. We Would like to recommend that tlii� list ul UCGs to he mitigated tier equivalent tree canopy and. quantity as indicated for each individLial tree. 'These trees would) be planted in quantity and species type as directed by the'City of Nliatni at a location off kite to he established. The following is an example of how we vsLa Misled the tree canopy replaceintut value as indicated on the tree lists for mitigation purposes. Using Schwebke-Shiskiln & .;\ssociates' Tree Survey list (File No. U-773), a Live taak with a 20' spread has a 314 sq,ft. canopy. 'Ihe rcplact;ment value for equivalent canopy would he (3) 12' spread live Oaks (nursery grown) •%ith a I c' minlnlum height. 95-- 599 Ocean ( rove T•oikycr - June 14, 1995 Page 2 i If you have ally questions or mcd additional. inlormation, please caill, Sincercly. BRADSHAW. GILL & ASSOCIATES Joseph Gordon ,ICiiniew• Attach. 0077 i i 95- .599 T s C;ro`•c Tower ng Trees To Be Relocated Sy.Ft. -- RotanLcs11•'S.1?t1111 m— -- _-- 4311..__—fit._....... Ficus benghalem.s 0.6D 22' 15' Good Condition Relecaie 176 2fd:12' spr. Banyan Tree Quercus virginiana III, 6C' 40' Good Condit.on Relocate 1.256 1112' spr. - Livc Oak ` Roystortea clata 1.30 45' 15' Good Condition Relocate 176 Royal Palm Quercus virginiana 1.50 35' 20' Good Condition Relocate 14 3,6 11 spr. . Live Oak Moms rubra 0.80 26' 15' Good Condition Relocate 176 2ra.12' spr. � Red Mulberry Quercus virginiana 1.50 26' 20' Good Condition Relocate 314 a 12' spr. Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1.00 26' 20' Good Condition Relocate 314 3-a) 2' spr. Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1.90 50' 20' Good Condition Relocate 314 3;a I?' spr. Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1.30 50' 20' Good Condition Relocate 314 3..1'.'' spr. Live Oak Quercus virginiana I.CM) 26, 20' Good Condition Relocate 3:4 3Of, 12' sp-r. Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.00 45' 40' Good Condition Relocate 1256 1 l(a 12' spr. Live Oak Roystonea data 1.30 35' 20' Goof Condition Relocate 314 1:a 10. C .1'. Royal Palm Cocos nucifera 1.00 32' 20' Gook Condition Relocate 314 1 @ 10'C.T. - Coconut Pal m Quercus virginiana I.'20 35' 10' Good Can ttthn Relocate 79 1:��1'' spr. Live Oak Qt�virgiirrients 2.00 4W cm)oci-Co+ldit4eo- Relocate 1.256 114121 .Live Oak Rovst'oneb etam L" 215' t5' Good €u ditirnr ftloeata 176 10, fe' C.T. Royal Palm Tamarindus indica 1.50 26' 25' Good Condition Relocate 49D 5Ca! 12' spr. Plume'ria rubm 1.00 28' 25' Good Condition Relocate 49D 5@12' spr. Frangipani Quercus virginiana 1.70 40' 40' Good Condition Relocate 1,256 1 1@12' spr. Live Oak Cordia sebestena 1.50 40' 20' Good Condition Relocate 314 3Cal 1_' spr. Geiger Tree Q� ian C rove Tower stink Trees To Be Removed _.....I-41ziti4a CZmtu9li—__..L.til.�1iL...� ��'r•.._ -_.S•sulslitios Ramark "_.--UiiPc!sikQ&—..--Cajnp �-----_ D1a5enigt►t(ij Bambusa multiplex cut lC Not '�Vo-th Seeing Remove 78 1@)1 ), spr. Bamboo Cluster 4-Quercus virginiana 1.30 35' 20' Poor Condition Remove 314 1a 1?' spy. Live Qwrcus 4 ireiriiana 1.60 3'T ?0' Poor Condition Remove 314 Y 1 �' spy. Live Oak V Archotophoenix 0.80 3C' 13' PoorCorditicn Remove 116 14b10' C.T. alexandrae Alexander Palm Persea americana {2) 1.20 50' 20' Poor Cend:tion Remove 14 ? a'12' spr. Twin Avocado Trees Mangifera indica 1.30 40' 20' Poor Condititl:•t Removc 314 Mango ' Wonix regia 1.00 30' 20' Poor Condit:un Remove 314 _ i' spy. Royal Poinciana Unknown Fruit Tree 0.50 20' 1 V Poor Condition Remove 176 Persea americans 0.80 20' 10' Poor Ccndi k)n Rrmove 78 1 l2' spy. Avocado Tree Quercus virginiana 2.60 SO' 30' Poor Condition Remove 706 6;a 12' spy. I.ive Oak Quercus virginiana 1.60 26' 20' Poor Condition Remove 314 3@12' spy. Live Oak I Quercus virginiana 1.40 32' 20' Poor Condition Remove 314 3@12' spy. Live Oak Quercus virginiana 0.60 ?0' Is, Impossible To 1Vlo�e Remove T76 ra�T:" sPr. Live Oak - Qttett:trs on gvtiatra - - t {} 95' -XV lmpes4W Te blew- - -Remew -.. --314 Live Oak uercus yr inTaria Q^ � M. _... 3r--- . �, . ... � ..._ .. -3t4- 3@+21yPr• Live Oak Delonix regia 1.40 55' 25' Dead Remove 490 Mayo! rolor.119UHS Quercus virginiana 0.80 10' 10' Impossible To Move Remove 78 1@ 12' spr. Live Oak Delonix regia 1.40 55' 25' Impossible To Move Rmwve 49G 5@12' spy. Royal Poinciana cean Grove Tower Kissing Trees To Be Removed Sq. Ft. �, __._ _,l}otani:al•:��nnton _:__Cal. _•- _i�,----- bT,r,.---...—,�!lis'tt�$s�mitt�. ___ _U..l5jt.4iisis?.lL.-._..C3IIU01• .._.._�(��tlacementtsl ___;. _._ ArcholOphuenix 0.-Z0 14' Is' linpossible'Co %love Remove 176 Ira;12' sp:. ` alexandrae Alexander Palm Quercus virginiana 0.80 N Poor Cund:tion Remove 31.1 3:a!12' spr. Live Oak Sabal palmetto 1.00 15' 15, Impractical To Move Remove 176 :ra lea' C.T. ✓ Cabbage Palm A 'ScheMera actinophy!ia ).00 25' 15' Impracriew To Move Re-nove 1.6 !d 12' spr. Umbrella Tree V Bauhinia blakeana 0.50 26' I5' Poor Condition Remove 176 : at?' spr. Hong, Kong Orchid Plumeria nibra 1.40 2C 25' Poor Condition Remove 491) 3i&.12' spr. Frangipani Mangifera indica 1.50 26' 35' Poor C onditiai Remove 961 9Q92' spr. Mango Tree i Quercus virginiana 0.90 3:' 20' Poor CondidOn Remove 1.3 3.'u.111' spr. Live Oak Tenninalia eatappa 0 ?(1 261 10' Poor Condition Remove '8 I to 12' spr. Tropical .Almond Sabal palmetto 0.90 15' to' Poor Condition Remove 78 Ira;10' C.T. Cabbage Palm Bauhinia blakeana 0.80 22' 20' Poor Condition Remove 314 3 2112' spr. Hong Kong Orchid Bauhinia blakeana 0.6C 22' 10, Poor Condition Remove 79 t G IV spr. :Haug Kau g Orchid . . Mangifera indica 1.6C 22' 20 Dead Remove 314 Mango Tree [v�langifera indiaca .._. _. .. _ Q BC _.... _. 141aLip Tree, T Delonix Royal Poinciana Quercus virginiaea 1.50 32' 20' Poor Con"on Remove 314 3 a@12' spr. — —Cive Oak o Mangifera indica 0.50 23' 15, Impossible To Move Remove 176 12@12' spr. Mango Tree , Quercus virginisna 1.20 30' 20' Impossible To Move Remove 314 3@12' spr. Live Oak Ocean (:rove Tower Uistieg Trees To Be RernovFd Sq Y[ ,BStla�"sn►►1—___1.__�iL—+�r.... �ndltiyn;Ke��ark Disrositi�tl�.. Sd114R1 V,O Quercus virginiana 1.40 40' 25' Impossible To Move Remove 4qo 56j:2' spr. Live Oak G I Ficus benahalensis 2.20 30' 0' Impossible To Mole Remove ;4 3 a�, 13' spr. Banyan Tree 4? Mangifera indica, 1.00 3fi' 15' Impossiblt TO'.vlovt Remove 17ti 2 a l2' spr. Mango Tree 93 DtIonix regia 1.30 45' .0• Poor Condition Remove 31.1 3tni 12' spr. Koval; Poinciana 93 Ouercus s irginiana I M 31' 10, Nor ( o-tdition Remove 78 1 `a 12' spr. Live Oak 100 Quercu� virginiana 100 35' '0' Poor Condition Remove 314 3;a 12' spr. Live Oak iC�d 63auhiniahlakcana 11.R0 »' '_ii' P:)orCondi:ion Remove 314 3 1?' spr. Hong Kong Orchid , ' � I i I Bauhinia blakeana 1.00 Ir" 3G.' Nor Cott di tion.."Dead Remove 71)7 6ia.12' spr. Hong i onC4 Orchid ! I7 i;nknow-ti Species 0.80 - Raor Condition Remove 1 18 Delonix regia 1A) — Ram Condition Remove Koval Poinciana 12C tpuercus virginiana 1.20 ' 3C�' :5' Poor Condition Remove 175 2!d,-12` spr. Live Uak 127 Quercus virginiane- 1.00 25' .5' Poet Condition Remove 175 2{fu12' spr. Live Oak 128 Bursera simaruba 0.90 20' 10' Poor•Cundition Remove 78 I C 10 spr. Gumbo Limbo UN— Mw fiinia tiia eA a 1.2.1T Ar W twrt'Mdltft luma e V spr. Hong Kong Orchid 1 .3p dkt.;Fjf,�t"A� RESOLUTION PAB - 29-95 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, IN ORDER TO DESIGNATE THE OCEAN GROVE TOWER PROJECT, LOCATED AT 3202 S.W. 27TH AVENUE (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND NOT TO BE COMPRISED OF MORE THAN 103 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH ACCESSORY OFFICE SPACE; APPROVING SAID MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, ATTACHED HERETO AS "EXHIBIT A", AND THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND PROVIDING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. HEARING DATE: June 21, 1995 VOTE: 6 - 2 ATTEST: .7�m4j,//o LSERGIO RDRI , R PLANNING, BUILDING AN NING 95- 599 53 EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- DATE: OCEAN GROVE TOWER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the designation of the Ocean Grove Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") as a Planned Unit Development Overlay District to be located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; After -due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the designation of the PROJECT as a Planned Unit Development Overlay District and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: I'm 95- 599 FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: j The proposed Ocean Grove Tower Project is a residential use development located at approximately 3202 Southwest 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 1.88 gross acres and 1.49 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, cabanas, a tennis court and a recreational facility which includes a sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room. The Project also includes an extensively landscaped outdoor area. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities I f will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of preserving as many of the trees on the site as possible and therefore enhancing the property's unique environmental attributes. The design also optimizes the site's views of Biscayne Bay and Downtown Miami. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. The Project also reflects recommendations received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of April 3, 1995 and the Urban Development Review Board meeting of May 16, 1995. The proposed tree removal and relocation plan has been approved, with conditions (incorporated into this Development Order), by the Historic and Environmenta Preservation Board at its 95— 599 snw$ArAt meeting of June 20, 1995 pursuant to Resolution No. HEPB 95-36. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Gail Byron Baldwin, architect and Bradshaw Gill & Associates, landscape architects, dated 4/17/95 and 4/19/95 respectively; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the "0" Office and SD-17 Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a request for approval of a Class I Special Permit for the proposed swimming pool and a Class II Special Permit for the placement of a sales/leasing trailer on the site during construction. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 11 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate requests referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 169,042.4 square feet; this is permitted by the Planned Development Overlay District designation which permits an.increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying district. 63 Page 3 95- 599 u CONDITIONS -�-- THE APPLICANT, ITS'SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL: 1. Provide a complete tree mitigation plan for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan should address canopy replacement plans as well as mitigation of any trees lost during the construction of the Project. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans should be modified to a) Eliminate the ingress and egress point to the existing office building and provide an internal connection between the sites. t) Enhance the landscaping of the existing office site to match the quality of the proposed tower site; this should include new landscaping of the front swale area and posting of "NO PARKING" signs within that area; the landscape plan should be designed to discourage parking within all "NO PARKING" ZONES. *Note: Any landscape to be provided beyond the base building line shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and if approved, will be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain (by duly recorded covenant). Page 4 t95_ 599 1111 , c) Reconfigure the curb cuts at the depicted service access so that egress will be "Left turn only" toward Southwest 27th Avenue. d) Reconfigure the main access aisles off of Southwest 27th Avenue in order to two lanes of egress (one for left turns only and one for right turns only). 3. Per the public works department, the Applicant shall provide new curbs and gutters along Southwest 27th Avenue, and sidewalks wherever possible; all street improvements along Southwest 27th Avenue shall be subject to the review of the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. 4. Pursuant to Resolution No. HEPB 95-36, adopted by the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board on June 20, 1995, the following conditions shall also be required: a. Change the symbol of tree #44 on sheet L-2 to indicate relocation; b. Clarify the impact on trees #73, 80 and 123, and adjust the location of the loading area and sales office if necessary; C. Revise sheet L-4 to include all trees to remain, and those to be relocated, and incorporate these trees into the new landscape plan; d. Under the supervision of the Dade County Archeologist, conduct a Phase I archeological survey prior to any ground clearing or -tree removal and notify him prior to any.ground disturbing activity; e. Plant the trees to be located off -site within the boundaries of Coconut Grove in locations to be determined by the Coconut Grive NET Offices; these trees shall be maintained alive and healthy by the Page 5 66 95- 5J9 applicant, for a period of six months; the applicant shall further be responsible for replacing any of such trees which die within the six month period; and f. The Certificate of Approval is subject to final approval of the Major Use Special Permit by the City Commission. 5< "Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 6. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; 8. Prior to issuance ofa building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with membersofthe Fire PlanReviewSection at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, buiiding development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; Page 6 95- 599 9.Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 10. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted. within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and 7comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 11. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 12. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 13 Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that, the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 14. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title or Covenant for the subject property providing Page 7 �- M ri �1J4gh�jpfi that for development and Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) purposes the property shall not be separated, although said property may be under separate ownership. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this. Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Ocean Grove Tower Project, proposed by the applicant, Cornelia Enterprises, Inc. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive. Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) The Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) The Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) The 'Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) The Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) The Project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and Page 8 9-- 599 (6) The Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) The Project will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) The public welfare will be served by the Project; and (9) Any potentially adverse effects of the Project will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development_ Plan applicable to the City of Miami—, and - Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the Project i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and - will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing _ individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d2]<musps/95>OCEAN/gr/TOWER/do/1 Page 9 95- 599 CS 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION l This property described as: Lots 41 and 42, less the i East 15-.0e thereof, DAY GROVE TERRACE, according to the ! Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of J.7... ri..L1 4 .. r�.�........A- �42 MmAn P+ru�n�v Wi �r� Am Exhibit "Ber(1) 95- 599 4114pl EXHIBIT B Ca- ALL a= T,QdCT ",Q Of �G•�0l�G�' iy0l/sVTQ/iV �.�G.4T ", •,�CClQO/.t/G 7*0 1,V OL.4r 600.e le6 .4T s4ae- go , OF OF ®woe cooly rx., BEGIN AT CONCRETE.MONU E PJE&RTA, THE COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 46. 1,1. 12 OF S.AIO ,DA ' CE ANO THE NORTHEA'STERLCORNER OF sAID GROV AiTHE FO 01dING E ENO TFOLLOWING TNEi CORRS S . ARE ALONG' T MO•NvM TED BOUNDARY OF GROVE UNDA N REPLA LAT B60K ' �'. PAGE 39 OF THE PURL I Cw R CORDS OF DAD COUNTY M OR DA H q -4 - THENCE SOUT 1 8 36 AST FOR 1.2 FEAT TO CONCRETE MONOj?..6 T 'SET BY RLS #24O8s (2 THENCE hORTN - 87 -1240 4 -14 ST FOR .1: FE T TO CO CRETE MONUM T ET BY - RLS 8: i51 THeN E� Soul H 1 ~-48' -360 EAST OR �.5 EET TO A POINT ON THE ' ORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF UREE(VWt�00 OAG WHOSE RADIUS BEARS OUVH 'ZO'-15�-47� EAST FOR 2Z4.2T FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG .THE ARC 0 SAID VRVE HALING FQR ITS MELJTS A CENTRA ANGLE- OF 01 -31'-3 AND A RADI•U OF 7tFEET FOR 2.Ufi FEET;. A POINT WHOSE Rl�DIUS B ARS �OgJU 6EST 0- 7-19EASTFOR 224.27 FEET: THENCE NORTH 1. -51 -31 FOIL G6 .99 FEET ALONG A LINE 25 .00 FEET EA T OF AND PPARALLEL TO THE FOR BOUNDARY OF LOT 45' OF SAID �AX 4OVE iERRACE.• PLAT BOOK 9. PANE, 18O;' THENCE SOUTH '9T -51'-2 " EST • FOR 25-°)3 FEET ALONG THE COMMON 'BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID LOT 45 AND 46 OF DAY GROVE TEf CE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 46: THENCE NORTH '3`;51 - 1� W ST FOR 50.99 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF 5AID OT 41 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit "A" OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 OCEAN GROVE TOWER PROJECT DATA APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AWOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT; PURSUANT TO AR77CLE S CITY OF AILIA1I ZONING ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF 20% IN F.A.R) 1. Legal Description: 'Parcel "A" All of Tract "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel "B" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereon Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereon as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 2, Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-1-7 4. Lot Area: Parcel "A": Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Parcel "B"c Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 1 5815 S.W. 68th STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 l n f r ell n .. OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 units allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) -1.72 allowed Parcel "A" 67,40039 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 — Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B'"= 140,868.67 Pursuant to Article 5Xity of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an increase of 20%b in F.A.R. 140,868.67 x .20 = 28,173.73 Total Allowed 140,868.67 + 28,173.73 = 169,042.40 sq. feet. Proposed. Building — 165,000. sq. feet. Existing Office Building 5,228 19. feet. . 1,185.60 sq. feet. See request for additional square footage under Article 914. 7. Loading Berths- 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. 8. Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshore Drive or 22 Stories. Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Permitted: Parcel "A": 67,400.39 x .40 = 26,960.15 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x :40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 32,760.15 Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,946 Parcel "B": 3.879 Total Footprint Provided 25,725 2 95- 509 73 ttk'P�eP��A�� OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 10. Parking Spaces Required: 1 space for each 1 bedroom unit 1 x 40 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2 x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors - i space for each 10 units 103 + 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Handicaped, Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Required: Parcel "A": .15 of gross lot area required = ..15 x '67,400.39 = 10,11.0 sq. feet required.(min) Parcel "B": .15 of gross lot area required _ .15 x 14,500 — 2,175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Minimum Greenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided: Parcel "A": 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel "B": 2.963 sq. feet provided. Total. 25,244 sq. feet provided. 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided Side: 10-0' required;10-0' provided Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows 1 additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided 3 95- 599 y Zoning ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in.Article 1. (b) statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. ocean Grove is ,a luxury residential condominium development which will be located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida. The property consists of 1.49 net acres.,/ The gross lot area is 1.88 acres. The property fronts S.W. 27th Avenue on the east and Cornelia Drive on the west. Ocean Grove will have 103 residential units and 22 stories. The building will offer magnificent views of Coconut Grove, Downtown Miami and Biscayne Bay. A swim- ming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room will be provided, as well as an extensively landscaped outdoor area. Drawings showing the architectural char- acter and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/ exit drives. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the dike. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documentsc (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indi- cating the project site. - 2 0it!� p 75 () G` 5 9 9 p;: z (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings,, watercourses, easements and section lines; -Me boundaries of the project and the location of existing stfeets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. s (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of. site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All traffic circulation to the site, will originate from S.W. 27th Avenue and Cornelia Drive. The entry'driveway will be at Southwest 27th Avenue. The garage can be entered from ramps on the east and west sides. The service access to the development will enter and exit from Cornelia Drive. Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located within the building podium. I4oading and delivery parking will be located on site. - 3 - 95- 599 (5) Recreational facilities locationst Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include a swimming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape. Plan, under TO 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areasT s Waste collection will be provided by a container- ized compactor system located within•,. the building. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities. hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (®) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed -to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Building footprint: proposed building 21,846 s.f. + 67,400.39 s.f.= 32% existing building 3,756 s.f. + 14,500.00 s.f.= 26% - Total: 81,900.30 s.f.= 31% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by above ground parking structure is 31% of the total gross lot area. - 4 - 9 5 - 5 77 Tabulation showings (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Site Plan and the Ground Floor Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three (3) loading berths. Each berth is 12' x 35F. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential building will consist of 103 residential -Units. The density per acre wi3-1 be as follows: 103 /residential dwelling units + 1.88 gross acres = 54.79 dwelling units per acre. If common facilities (such as recreation ar®as of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to howl such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities to be provided will include the swimming pool, cabanas, lobby area, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. The common areas will be maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution', waste water and solid waste generation provisions are'discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the develop - ment;'ezact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with.typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use which consists of a luxury highrise building. Typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. - 5 - 95- 599 Signs will be provided at ground level at the entrance to the property. (icy Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and . decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and loca- tions, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, -including - location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, cabanas, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. _ (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may- be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Beation 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article S. 95- 599 (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features,, including streets, alloys,, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use special Permit Application. (S) Materials to demonstrate. the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteris- tics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Pursuant to City of Miami ordinance No. 11000,, the exist- ing zoning designation for the property is 0 (Office) and SD-17 (South Bayshore Drive overlay District). Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article 1, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2*2 Major Use special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed use,, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian move- ments, and transportation access. Maps submitted indi- cate the project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are in- cluded in the drawings submitted with this Application. 599 The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the zoning designation zoning of the property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently existing for this property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for execution of this project. Section 1.702.2.3 Developmental impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area Within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, pr an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2-of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employ- ment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the city. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab*4 of the Supporting Documents. . . c. A housing impact assessment. d. aw\rro..\auera. t\.+It�M The property will be residential with 103 residential units. The City of Miami, and in particular Coconut Grove, has a demand for additional housing. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and shaded glass. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell 95-- 599 '11VA"11 I ai NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND PARTICULARLY TO OWNERS OF REAL ESTATE WITHIN 375 FEET OF 3202 S.W. 27 Avenue. i A PUBLIC HEARING will be Held by the City of Miami City Commission on Thursday, July 13, 1995 at 2:30 PM , in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, to consider the following: Major Use Special Permit for an increased development bonus of 0.84 percent. F.A.R. for t.ho 0#79an Grove Tat-:c_ Projcat loca ad at 3202 S.W. 27 Avenue. Major Use Special Permit to designate the Ocean Grove Tower Project, located at 3202 S.W. 27 Avenue, as a Planned Unit Development. -1 •> lJ1 rV �nr M i a .� ' M The PETITIONER or the PETITIONER'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ,must bed < present at this Hearing. All interested real estate owners are-0 M invited to express their views. w 0 The request and supporting papers for this Public Hearing are on file at the Planning, Building and Zoning Depmrtment; 275 N.W. 2nd Street, 2nd Floor, Miami, Florida, and are available for public review during working hours. Phone: 579-6800. Should any person desire to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect tc any matter to be considered at this meeting, that person shall insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made*includi 9 all testimony and evidence upon• which any appeal may be based (F/S 286.0105). CITY ORDINANCE NUMBER 10087 ADOPTED MARCH 18, 1986, AS AMENDED, GB`NFRALLY REQUIRES ALL PERSONS WHO ARE APPEARING IN A PAID OR REMUNERATED CAPACITY BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION TO REGISTER WITH THE CITY CLERK BEFORE ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES. A COPY OF SAID AMENDED ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, CITY HALL. 07/03/95 ; � �t�—' iE.499 Apr 4 0 0 U. Is 10 I* 9TH%PAW"%326156. 1%0S/OS/95 I® OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT (INCREASE OF 20 PERCENT F.A.R.) AND AN INCREASED DEVELOPMENT BONUS OF .84 PERCENT F.A.R. Prepared by: GREENBERG, TRAURIG, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, ROSEN & QUENTEL, P.A. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. BRADSHAW, GILL & ASSOCIATES GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. April 1995 Submitted into tho public recur to con�icct"on iic;rn can —11 Walter Foernan 9 5" O g 9 city c!er►ec sue, • r -.� ! .i+ If k.ta�a'!��t; 'tr zi Arx 4 r ..r }. ■tly; t t- � ? 01, %af�/1•� `-.- .. t` "�14. .t � ,fir f � �- Si;bmitttd into the puhii4 rncort, innec i n vvl th iter� `gin .��� Walter f-o�.;niun City Clerk znc;t.r OF CON'rr.N'rS y iA TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit for an increase of 20% FAR .. B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit for an Additional .84 Percent F in FAR C. Request for Approval for a Class II Permit for a Sales Trailer D. Disclosure of Ownership `R E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principals G. Project Data Sheet H. Zoning Atlas Page I. Sewer System Treatment and Transmission Capacity Certification II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary r Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted •""•."°°.�•" °,°,n Submitted into tho pt.i:,iiC recor cc� Sri - �! 07-1 V.'li item cn�� Walter Foeman Gity CLr1( I. PROJECT INFORMATION OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit for a 20% Increase in FAR ==j B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit for an Additional .84 Percent in FAR C. Request for Approval for a Class II Permit for a Sales Trailer D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principals G. Project Data Sheet H. Zoning Atlas Page I. Sewer System Treatment and Transmission Capacity Certification �7 E= SYMP NDOAN=sl".1\a/os/" Submitted into the public record in connc*%ooe tiv° ,h item on Waltman CityClerk gr.-, I APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERlMIT File Number MU- - -�; It is intended that major use special ppermits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, ~�+ Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5). 1, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the city of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): To obtain a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to obtain an additional 20% of FAR for a 103 unit residential building Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6- 83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for areas on and around the property covered by this letter. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to'major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a) (c) Now concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Development Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). Submitted into t1i4 public recur &connr140 � •r'��itenon 1 ,. 9 r �- City Clerk APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT- (Continued) B. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of 8.250.00 , based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: • Building(s): Other (specify): Total: SQ.250.00 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: 1 Signature wner or °+ Lucia A. Dougherty Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: i i 4,j Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Submitted into tti; Page 2 of 2 record in ce),11,1 1r i era v;ia Item �f on _ Wale i UE-nia 1 City Clerk � �- 599 M] APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5). I, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the city of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): To obtain a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Section 914 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to obtain an additional .84% of FAR Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6- 83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for areas on and around the property covered by this letter. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Development Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). Page 1 of 2 Submitted into the record or n(')ct'on th Item onjI_' Waltc Foes1 an '— City Clerk APPLICATION FOR A IUWOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT - (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of total fee on other application, based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. *w Fee tabulation: Building(s): Other (specify): H M Total: Total fee on other application Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature Owner or Auth6rized Agent Lucia A. Dougherty Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Submitted into the ptihlic i recoWin onnectorwi Page 2 of 2 itemon - Walrct Foemrin City Clerk Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 April 20, 1995 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Ocean Grove Tower - 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Dear Teresita: Pursuant to Section 1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, this letter serves to request Class H Permit approval for a sales trailer. Section 1301 provides that when more than one special permit is required to address the same issue, the highest ranking permit shall be considered sufficient. Thank you very much for your attention. i7M►AW"N326919.1 \a/ 17/9S Very true yours, Lucia A�Dougherty Submitted into t:i^f-) publiv record in onnl,Ctlof item on .(P- — Waltc' Fo. e man GREEN BERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN LII'OFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P.A. City Giorgi, 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MlAmi, FLORIDA 33131 305.579-0500 FAX 305.579-0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WF.STPALM BEACm TALLAHASSEE NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. V 1 F 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See Exhibit A 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Cornelia Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation owned by: Keeler Enterprises Limited, a British Virgin islands Corp. - 100% No shareholders of Keeler own greater than a 5% interest 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None t OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA SS: COUNTY OF DADE Lucia A. Dougherty , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on be of the owner. i (SEAL) (Name Lucia A. Dougherty OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA before me this day of COMMISSION NO CC428765 199. � MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC. 21 1998 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Personally known, oath taken Submitted into tile; public recur � �1 ��r�ir�o -"I�n It1Z items on Walter -oeman 9 5 599 City Clarft r'1 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Cornelia Enterprises Inc a Florida Corp Mailing Address cfo Freeman Newman & Butterman 520 Brickell Key Drive, Suite 0-305 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone Number 374-3800 Legal Description: See Exhibit A Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: 1' Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Nong M Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description (^. .,., it ti ' , r•,, recor Walter Foy --.man C4Y Cleat Im AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) R ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. 02-) (SEAL) (Name) Lucia A. Dougherty OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL Sworn t0 and Subscribe before me ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO th i s day of 1 n, NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA y , 19 COMMISSION NO CC428765 MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC. 21,1998 n ubmlt, d roll th,,%p u hiic ''���.,-� recarc,n. lr1f :. t�r'r Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Personally kn--.,. �._ can t My Commission Expires: oath taken 1rJ alto r r+JarncJ.11 Cite Cleric 55- 599 �1 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See Exhibit B 3350 S.W. 27th Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Peacock Properties, Inc., a Florida Corporation Is owned by: 1. Scott Silver, individually 50% 2. Frederick M. Garrett, individually 50% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None STATE OF FLORIDA SS: COUNTY OF DADE l OWNE VOR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty Lucia A. Dougherty , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on beh-alf of the owner. (SEAL) ( ame) Lucia A. Dougherty SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED AURIENNELFRO ARYNER SEAL before me this I��_ day of NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO CC428765 J MY OMMISSION EXP. DEC. 21,1998 Notary Public, State of F1gMA1A&,,L�>jp 1l1; s_>>5l:!ir� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Personally known, oath taken recor r ctirlr;; ,.,.' item � Oil J ,,. - b� E , F01-rncafI City Clerk 951 o 99 J OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Peacock Properties. Inc.. a Florida Corp. Mailing Address 3350 S.W. 27th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone Number 85s-7008 Legal Description: See Exhlbft B Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None E Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description .... .... utt�i�i7is:�'�r ' CGCQf jj ll.�j, {�Qi:!) •raj. ��hp! ([A item fill Zi r� rf,`7-1-1. "( �: AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) i ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Doughedy who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the ,a l accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal'.` descriptions for the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. f Further Affiant sayeth not.rA i (SEAL) i (Name) Lucia A. Dougherty Sworn to and Subscribed before me OFFI=NOTAKYSEAT.ADRIEPARDOthis day Of .(Z �1 19 NOTARY PF FLORIDACOMM428765MY COMMC.21,1998 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Personally known My Commission Expires: Submit tiaken tf�n �,�I�JIt; recar �, t igo,, r,,,s� �ryitem N�-� iTl �_ I 9 5— ot?, 9 9 Walter ocrn�ln �, City Clerk Q DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibits A & B 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Najjar Associates LLP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership (IT Eiisha Najjar - 25% Jessie Najjar - 25% Jordan Najjar - 25% Joshua Najjar - 25% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None STATE OF FLORIDA SS: COUNTY OF DADE ,X �IA OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty Lucia A. Dougherty , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behal of the owner. x (SEAL) (Na Lucia A. Dougherty SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 101 day of 199 1-5 . Notaa"y Public, State of3FIonda at Large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: h takenLK'Ud OFFICIAL, i011 U, u � ADRIENNE FR[ESNER PARDO l i-Z �� 1 ••lI NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA ,IM Lltilj�BUtat? !il 'J001 CoNiMISSION NO CC428765 MY COM'MISS10N EXP. DEC.21,1999 D11gnd E)ql O}ui POrJ!tuGIIS t " 599 J OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Nallar Associates LLP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership Mailing Address goo S- Ocean Bouelvard Suite 2109 Boca Raton FL 33432 Telephone Number 407 393 0061 - Legal Description: Has a contract to purchase the property identified on attached Exhibits A&B Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Non Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description item ors 9 r- S 9 9 Walter Foc,;- I fm Gily n"or`,r i IN AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. X A (SEAL) (Name) Lucia A. Dougherty OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL Sworn to and Subscrib d before me ,/�- ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO thisr-J day Of ! , 19r(� NOTCRY`PiBLiC� r°4287O651DA MY C.C?`:1\11�S1U�. F.\P. DEC.21,1998 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Personally known My Commission Expires: u t t t7 mi tic cbalt i�k�m 1.I, q; �; record ki COnn," ; �1 item F Walter 1=oonnar, City Clerk Z460-41. D6XV RIo407! V 4I dGC. OF T.2.4CT W '', IV0UAIr-41AI Aee,aGgT", 4CCOAe,01, /G TO Tf�/N .0G,4r 6001,-- /28 d7- p,QGE' .39 � OF Tf/E �U,BG/C .pE'CO,P�S' O.�' 0,40E' G'OUNTy� �G 0.2io•4 � L E55` TH.4r .�o.2TioN /i?BQ� �,4,QTICUGq.�G y d ESC' P/8 E� dS FOGLD!%YS� BEGIN AT CONCRETE MONU ENT MAKING THE COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 46, 11, 12 OF SAID DA `.GROVE TERRACE AND THE NORTHEASTERL�j CORNER OF SAID GROVE`MO. TAIN REPLAT.; THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES ARE ALONG' TN tiON.UMENTED BOUNDARY OF GROVE MOUNTAIN REPLAT, PLAT B60K 128. PAGE 39 OF TH€ PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA: (1) THENCE SOUTH 14-48�-36" EAST FOR 51.20 FEET TO CONCRETE MONUjtNT'SET BY RLS #2408: (2) THENCE NORTH 87'-44'-14" EAST FOR 15.61 FEET TO CONCRETE MONUM T SSET BY RLS #2408; ( 3 ) THENCE S�oUTH 14'-48' -36" EAST FOR 9 .5y FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GREENWOOD ROAG WHOSE RADIUS BEARS SOUTH 20%15'47" EAST FOR 224.27 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING FOR ITS ELEMENTS A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00*-31'-32" AND A RADIUS OF 224. / FEET FOR 2.06. F ET TO A POINT WHOSE RADIUS BEARS SOUTH 20"-17'-19~ EAST FOR 24.27 FEET: THENCE NORTH 13"-51'-31" WEST FOR 66 .99 FEET ALONG A LINE 25 .00 FEET EAST OF AND �ARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 45- OF §AID DAY GROVE ERRACE,PLAT HOOK 9, PAGE,180;THENCE SOUTH 87-51'-26" WEST FOR 25.53 FEET ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID LOT 45 AND 46 OF DAY GROVE TERRACE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 46; THE14CE NORTH 13"-51 -31" WEST FOR 50.99 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 46 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit "A" Submitt, r1 ipr .. tho i,at: cif IeCOrtiitem iN' t r_ ai.� r FoennarD City Cleric LEGAL DESCRIPTION This property described as: Lots 41 and 42, less the East 15.01 thereof, DAY GROVE TERRACE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Exhibit IIBII Submitted into tha Public recorj� Uni, I Ite crjnn�� on Wa City clerk M DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS FOR OCEAN GROVE TOWER - 3202 S.W. 27 AVENUE Owner/Developer: Najjar Associates LLP 500 South Ocean Boulevard Suite 2109 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: (407) 393-0061 Fax: (305) 393-0061 Elisha Najjar Architect: Gail Byron Baldwin Architect 5815 S.W. 68th Street Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 666-7050 Fax: (305) 667-2971 Gail Baldwin Alfredo Pou Telephone: (305) 665-5783 Landscape Bradshaw, Gill & Associates Architect: 4337 Seagrape Drive Lauderdale -By -The -Sea, Florida 33308 Telephone: (305) 944-7245 Fax: (305) 772-8417 Walter Taft Bradshaw Joe Gordon Traffic: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Vish Chowdhary - Traffic Civil: Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. 16201 S.W. 95th Avenue Miami, Florida Telephone: (305) 652-7010 Fax: (305) 652-8284 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton/Tom Schlosser Attorneys: Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. Submi;tecl Telephone: (305) 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esgrecordp� ��c.�ri��c;t; Telephone: (305) 579-0683 item -t-� �1"01r) . Waiter .7NWM00�\nIg7. 1\a/19/fs City Clerk 95- r�qq GAIL BYRON B A L D W I N ARCHITECT OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 OCF,4N GROVE TOWER PROJECT DATA APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE S CITY OF MIAMI ZONING ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF 20% IN FAR) 1. Legal Description: Parcel "A" All of Tract "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel "B" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereof, Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 2. Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-17 4. Lot Area: Parcel "A": Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Parcel "B": Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 1 5815 S.W. 68th STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 3 0 5/ 6 6 6 .7 0 5 0 F A X/ 6 6 7 .2 9 7 1 19 Submitted into the publia recorcj,,�rzCc r,neri 71th stern V° .Fier or;oa1an (- t'!ell( 951- 599 OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 units allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) -1.72 allowed Parcel "A" 67,400.39 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B" 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B" = 140,868.67 Pursuant to Article 5, City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an increase of 20% in F.A.R. ` 140,868.67 x .20 = 28,173.73 Total Allowed 140,868.67 + 28,173.73 = 169,042.40 sq. feet. Proposed Building = 165,000. sq. feet. Existing Office Building 5,228 sq. feet. - 1,185.60 sq. feet. See request for additional square footage under Article 914. 7. Loading Berths: 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. 8. Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshore Drive or 22 Stories. a Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Permitted: Parcel "A": 67,400.39 x .40 = 26,960.15 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x .40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 32,760.15 Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,946 Parcel "B": 3.879 Total Footprint Provided 25,725 Submitted f irst(} recor�L ;I,�u :, , item r7;, � ► 6 2 tAiai1'e i�tii'?i1Jri I ','i OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 �} 10. Parking Spaces Required: 1 space for each 1 bedroom unit 1 x 40 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2 x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors - 1 space for each 10 units 103 :- 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Handicaped Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Required: Parcel "A": .15 of gross lot area required = .15 x 67,400.39 = 10,110 sq. feet required.(min) Parcel "B": .15 of gross lot area required = .15 x 14,500 = 2,175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Minimum Greenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided: Parcel "A". 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel "B": 2,963 sq. feet provided. Total: 25,244 sq. feet provided 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided. Side: 10-0' required; 10-0' provided. Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided. Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows 1 additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided. Submitted into Elie public recorK.1�1110'n '"iecti jith 3 Item n Waite. Foen a City Clerk b J ,( 4 .. 9 % — a3 GAIL BYRON B A L D W I N ARCHITECT OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 OCEAN GROVE TOWER PROJECT DATA APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 914 CITY OF MIAMI ZONING ORDINANCE (INCREASE OF ALLOWABLE FAR) 1. Legal Description: Parcel "A" All of Tract "A", of "Grove Mountain Replat", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 128 at Page 39, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less that portion more particulary described. (Please see attached copy of survey.) Parcel "B" Lots 41 and 42, less the east 15.0 thereof, Day Grove Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 180, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 2. Address: 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning District O (office) SD-17 4. Lot Area: Parcel "A": Net: 54,188.6 sq. feet or 1.24 acre Gross: 67,400.39 sq. feet or 1.55 acre Parcel "B": Net: 10,700 sq. feet or .25 acre Gross: 14,500 sq. feet or .33 acre Lot Area Parcels "A" & "B": Net: 64,888.60 or 1.49 Gross: 81,900.39 or 1.88 1-A 5815 S.W. 68th STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 3 0 5/ 6 6 6 .7 0 5 0 F A X/ 6 6 7 .2 9 7 1 Submitted into tilt,' public recor � f}fltlet; I �litl� Item ail Walter o .man City Clerk 95— 599 OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 5. Density. Units/Acres 150 units/acre allowed = 223.5 units allowed, 103 units provided. 6. Allowable Area - Floor Area Ratio (FAR) -1.72 allowed Parcel "A" 67,400.39 x 1.72 = 115,928.67 Parcel "B" 14,500 x 1.72 = 24.940 Total Allowable Parcel "A" & "B" = 140,968.67 Pursuant to Section 914, City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, an additional increase of 5% in F.A.R. is allowed (total increase of 25%). 140,868.67 x .05 = 7,043.43 140,868.67 x .20 = 28,173.73 Total Allowed 140,868.61 + 35,217.16 = 176,085.83 sq. feet. Proposed Building = 165,000. sq. feet. Existing Office Building 5,228 sq. feet. Total F.A-R. Proposed 170,228. sq. feet. Actual % of increase required = , 84 0 (Less than 1%) . 7. Loading Berths: 3 @ 12' x 35' x 15' H. 8. Height: Unlimited in Zoning District O. f Special District -17, 250 feet above South Bayshore Drive or 22 Stories. Ocean Grove Tower is 249.5 feet above S. Bayshore Drive. (South Bayshore Drive elevation is 5.41' at intersection of 27th Ave. and South Bayshore Dr.) 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Permitted: i Parcel "A": 61,400.39 x .40 = 24,560.16 sq. feet. Parcel "B": 14,500 x .40 = 5,800 sq. feet. Max footprint permitted Parcel "A" & "B": 30,360.16 } Provided Footprint: Parcel "A": 21,84b Parcel "B". 3,879 Total Footprint Provided 25,725 Submitted into tho public 2-A recorn 1c�M10 :'iol^`W1 itemoi}l-1-� VlfaI et r F(.),oman City Clerk 9 J OCEAN GROVE TOWER April 19, 1995 10. Parking Spaces Required: 1 space for each 1 bedroom unit 1 x 40 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 2 bedroom unit 2 x 20 = 40 spaces 2 spaces for each 3 bedroom unit 2 x 43 = 86 spaces Visitors - 1 space for each 10 units 103 _ 10 = 10.3 (10 provided) 197 Total Parking Spaces Provided. 11. Handicaped Spaces: 6 required and provided (part of the 197 provided). 12. Green Spaces: Required: Parcel "A": .15 of gross lot area required = .15 x 67,400.39 = 10,110 sq. feet required.(min) Parcel "B": .15 of gross lot area required = .15 x 14,500 = _ 2,175 sq. feet required.(min) Total Minimum Greenspace Required: 12,285 sq. feet. Provided: Parcel "A": 22,281 sq. feet provided. Parcel "B": -22Q sq. feet provided. Total: 25,244 sq. feet provided 13. Setbacks: Front: (27th Avenue) 99.9' required; 107' average provided. Side: 10-0' required; 10-0' provided. Rear: (Cornelia) 20-0' required; 20-0' provided. Front setback requires a height limit of 140' at the base building line, then allows 1 additional foot in height of building for each additional foot of setback provided. l a�wrt�it`ted into iflo public { )MCOrd�or7no ''i � i !1t@111or)- � 3-A 's� Walter Foeman City Clerk Im ,qage . 1 of 1 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA METRODADE 1995040614245032 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Issued Date: 5-APR-1995 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION Expiration Date: 4-JUL-1995 33 S.W. 2nd AVENUE SUITE 500 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130.1540 MS GAIL B BALDWIN (305) 372.6500 BALDWIN ARCHITECTS 5815 SW 68 ST , MIAMI, FL 33143 Fax- Tel- 666-7050 RE: Sewer System Treatment and Transmission Capacity Certification Dear MS BALDWIN: The Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) has received your application for approval of a sewer service connection to serve the following project which is more specifically described in the attached project summary. Project Name: CORNELIA APARTMENTS Project Location: 3355 CORNELIA DR MIAMI Proposed Use: 103 UNIT APARTMENT Previous Flow: 0 GPD Calculated Sewage Flow: 20600 GPD Sewer Utility: MIAMI DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT Receiving Pump Station: 30-0009 DERM has evaluated your request in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Paragraph 16 C of the First Partial Consent Decree (CASE NO. 93-1109 CIV-MORENO) between the United States of America and Metropolitan Dade County. DERM hereby certifies that adequate treatment and transmission capacity, as herein defined, is available for the above described project. Please be aware that this certification is subject to the 'berms and conditions set forth in the Sewer Service Connection Affidavit filed by the applicant, a copy of which is hereby attached. By copy of this certification we are advising the appropiate building official of our Department's determination. Sincerely, John W. Renfrow, P.E. <,J Director Department Environmental Resources Management B - '� SL'D : into Vie i y � record PublicDui to E . Arrebola, P.E. � �jCOnn:,ct•�p �t Chief, Water & Sewer Division item Attachements (2 ) =f alter Moe an F,d r..:.. CrhY Cleric cc: Building Official (w/Attachments) — � Utility Official (w/Project Summary Attachment) 9 5 �° 'Date: 04-06-1995 Applicant's Name: MR GAIL B BALDWIN Applicant's Address: 5815 SW 68 ST DERM Number: 1995-0406-1424-5032 Project: CORNELIA APARTMENTS 3355 CORNELIA DR Proposed Use: 103 UNIT APARTMENT Pump Station: 30 -0009 Allocated flows: Projected NAPOT: 17.80 (HR) # Folio Lot Block Flow (GPD) 1 01-4121-127-0010 20600 Page: 20600 (GPD) L`48bmitted into flip r!h,fl0 cordin �connor�;n m �Y.lvor� l ,�, P- Walt r r car an Y"city Clerk ,,Xjej.i. gr_ 599 1 Pump Station Monthly Information ctation..30 -0009 Atlas Pg..H16 OK�DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT Addr..2202 SW 26 LN Sec -Township -Range...... ..... 15-54-41 Genr. ET clock.Y Telm.Y #Pumps. 3 Pump Type.B Stn C1ass.L Speed.l Hrspwr.+ Res flow(gpd) Proj Napot % Cap Plans.. 90,110 17.80 hrs 177.40 Plats:. 0 17.51 hrs 175.10 Extens. 0 17.51 hrs 175.10 Date Mo.NAPOT Avg Dail #12/16/1995 8.95 17.90 01/17/1995 10.44 20.88 12/15/1994 13.31 26.61 11/17/1994 23.02 46.04 10/20/1994 21.26 42.51 09/15/1994 12.48 24.96 08/22/1994 15.84 31.68 Signature.. GOLD/M Station I<m>provement GOLD/D <D>ownstream Station GOLD/G Codes & Cata<g>ories y Flows 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 <Plan Review> Moratorium..AC APPROVED AND CORRECTED Moratorium effective since Yearly NAPOT (hrs)............ 17.51 Stn Gross Capacity(gpd).. 8,640,000 Station Reduction Factor....... 0.85 Stn Net Cap Certif(gpd).. 0 Stn Net Capacity(gpd).... 7,344,000 Indicated Flows(gpd)..... 5,358,060 Comments AC - 3/8/95; see ps comments or file CH - 1/26/94; see PS COMMENTS OR FILE - DG Sign Date..03/16/1995 10:54:06.59 GOLD S <S>tation Inform. GOLD/ U <U>pstream Station GOLD/P <P>ump Information GOLD/T Sewer Cer<t>ification 0 Submltt-Od into tfjoher m"FnEIr) r City Clark V r 11e39 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplemen- tary materials g 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study 0 .n„v.ro0Al3259u.1\04/ uns record i fi co-,::;. Item ors Waite Foema City Clerk 95- 599 Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are + provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Ocean Grove is a luxury residential condominium development which will be located at 3202 S.W. 27th �.i Avenue, Miami, Florida. The property consists of 1.49 4 net acres. The gross lot area is 1.88 acres. The property fronts S.W. 27th Avenue on the east and i Cornelia Drive on the west. Ocean Grove will have 103 residential units and 22 .� stories. The building will offer magnificent views of Coconut Grove, Downtown Miami and Biscayne Bay. A swim- ming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room will be provided, as well as an extensively landscaped outdoor area. Drawings showing the architectural char- acter and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/ exit drives. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indi- cating the project site. Submitted into t110 public Wo Item rd YY� iGonnor,ect'on v ii CM\PMm.\u5972.1\w/N/9S - 2 - CM%'� Walter Foeman QtY Clerk 95- 599 (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: 00 Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All traffic circulation to the site, will originate from S.W. 27th Avenue and Cornelia Drive. The entry driveway will be at Southwest 27th Avenue. The garage can be entered from ramps on the east and west sides. The service access to the development will enter and exit from Cornelia Drive. uJ (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located within the building podium. Loading and delivery parking will be located on site. am%aMno.\22%91:.1%04/1 Vss - 3 - J Submitted into the; pisblic PccrWon onnect on wah p' item Wa(teFoeman City Clerk 95- 599 J ILO E0 (a) mMvemoA%axssn. 1\a/J4/ss (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include a swimming pool, cabanas, tennis court, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, clubroom and exercise room. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a container- ized compactor system located within the building. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Building footprint: proposed building 21,846 s.f. 67,400.39 s.f.= 32% existing building 3,756 s.f. _ 14,500.00 s.f.= 26% Total: 81,900.30 s.f.= 31% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by above ground parking structure is 31% of the total gross lot area. - 4 - St1!mittecl into the r.►.�k�ts.; &&onne )n it ..von Walter oeman ea City Clerk. !0� (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Site Plan and the Ground Floor Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three (3) loading berths. Each berth is 121 x 351. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential building will consist of 103 residential units. The density per acre will be as follows: 103 residential dwelling units - 1.88 gross acres = 54.79 dwelling units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are +>1 to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities to be provided will include the swimming pool, cabanas, lobby area, recreational facility ri including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. The common areas will be maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the develop- ment; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use which consists of a luxury highrise building. Typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted i,"Ito the' p1lblic record0 Ica �, �r.,�i V"I'in item �- cn -7 i?s V-1a tier Fooman T, City Clerk .TH%PAW .%us.va.11w/ups — 5 95- 599 71 ----- -- --- 12 (j) Plans for signs, if any. Signs will be provided at ground level at the entrance to 0% the property. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and • decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. I0*) The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and loca- tions, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. k1 (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, cabanas, recreational facility including sauna, steamroom, exercise room, clubroom and tennis court. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. Submitted into, tho {public i.4 item record Aly on; y6_ _ .ni�vai.a�sxs9n.1a/u/.s �� Y Walter i=oeman, City Clerk U (3) survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteris- tics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, the exist- ing zoning designation for the property is O (Office) and SD-17 (South Bayshore Drive Overlay District). Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. A The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. 'red a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian move- ments, and transportation access. Maps submitted indi- cate the project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are in- cluded in the drawings submitted with t1aW)rA�W1Jii d ti!bfi.pi.jb1i(: r}e]car nnejf�(/.i nv-/{�11i/fh` .7N�.M00�\5:5.7t. INW 14/95 - 7 - item crin ca) -•+, Walter Foeman City Cferk 95- 599 J W The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. "7y b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the zoning designation zoning of the property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently existing for this property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for execution of this project. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employ -- went, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the city. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. c. A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 103 residential units. The City of Miami, and in particular Coconut Grove, has a demand for additional housing. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and shaded glass. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocksSuland-tecp}apcttoL+eli:ablic 44 recar in corinec Mori &n"ARO %n52?2.1,a,1.,95 - s - Item n Walter Foeman City Clerk to g' i switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. A e. Historic Buildings i There are no existing structures located on the property. f. Environmental Zone The Property is located within the City of Miami Historic Environmental Preservation District. The project will be reviewed by the City of Miami Historic Environmental Preservation Board. atw\vwmw\nss�x. �\w/��/s ctN\Puaow\axsst:.f\aha/s — 9 — Submitted into Rie I)ublic record in connection �Ji item on Walte Foeman City Clerk 9_ b a s -�i SUVpoRTING oocuMryrs j SUVpoRTING oocuMryrs j Q OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE Ili. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted 1 °:) I r: +a► 0 II= �\a►poo.\axN s6.1\ W /17/9S Submitted into r, IrecOrd�} the Public Item Onnec ' n �M O� n1 tNalter oOman City Clark Vic;_ aGg TAB 1 OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORPCONSTRUCTION EM OYMENT PLAN C7MVNi�2\7t615E. I\MI (20(93 Submitted into the publio record �i!�� �onneflon with ' item Waiter Foeman wvi City Clerk 95— 599 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT CORPORATE STATEMENT: To ensure that the distribution of work to subcontractors reflect the cultural and ethnic diversity of the areas in which we operate. To this end, we warrant to administer itself in such manner as is appropriate to guarantee equal and fair employment without 01 regard for race, color, religion, age, or national origin. POLICY Recruitment, selection, placement, and layoff decisions will be based solely on candidates' or subcontractors job related qualifications and abilities, as well as reflecting the natural progression of the job. All employees, job applicants, and subcontractors are guaranteed equality of employment without regard for race, color, religion, age, or national origin. Personnel policies and practices including compensation, benefits, safety and health programs will be conducted and applied without regard to race, color, religion, age, or national origin. Furthermore, all the necessary steps will be taken to ensure that each employees work environment, regardless of corporate origin is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, age, or national origin. CT11\oAV)GA\]26166.1\04/11/95 Submitted into the public recur ainconnect'item on VU 1 alter o\=man City Clerk W 95— 599 TAB 2 1w9 Ord dok of M OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC STUDY Submitted to The City of (Miami Prepared by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. R Submitted into the i Ttec bj onner 1 Public ` em- on vitl k� falter 1=peman i City Clef* ��� 599 t °1 MFG Tableof Contents.........................................................................................I Listof Tables................................................................................................ii List of Figures .............................................. III 7 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................1 2.0 Purpose of Study..............................................................................1 3.0 Study Area........................................................................................1 4.0 Existing Traffic Conditions.................................................................1 _� ? 4.1 Existing Roadway Conditions............................................................1 4.2 Existing Signal Timing.......................................................................4 4.3 Existing Traffic Counts......................................................................4 4.4 Mass Transit.....................................................................................4 4.5 Existing Level of Service...................................................................4 714 5.0 Trip Distribution.................................................................................4 6.0 Trip Generation................................................................................10 7.0 Programmed and Planned Roadway Improvements, ....................... 10 8.0 Future Traffic Conditions..................................................................10 9.0 Future Traffic and Project Traffic Conditions....................................18 10.0 Optimized Level of Service Analysis................................................18 11.0 Conclusion.......................................................................................27 Appendix A 1995 Existing Traffic Intersection Level of Service Analysis Appendix B 1995 Existing Traffic Arterial Level of Service Analysis Appendix C 1999 Future Background PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Analysis Appendix D 1999 Future Background PM Peak Hour Arterial Level of Service Analysis Appendix E 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Intersection Level of Service Analysis Appendix F 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour s Traffic Arterial Level of Service Analysis Appendix G 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour Optimized Traffic Intersection Level of Service Analysis Appendix H 1999 Future Background and Project PM Pea{ H&Vbmitted Into the public Optimized Traffic Arterial Level of Service AnalyskPcor in cconn t on it4, - } 1 on_��-�,' .item Walter Foeman i City Cleric 10 95- 599 ilk 1 k1 t: M .1ibe 1 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.........................................6 2 Intersection Level of Service...................................................................7 3.A Arterial Level of Service for Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour .......... 9 (1995 Existing Traffic) 3.B Arterial Level of Service for Off Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour .... 9 (1995 Existing Traffic) 4 Trip Generation......................................................................................13 5.A 1999 Future Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......................16 5.8 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes..................................................................................................16 6 Intersection Level of Service...................................................................20 (1999 Background Traffic and 1999 Background and Project Traffic) 7.A Arterial Level of Service for Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour .......... 21 (1999 Background Traffic and 1999 Background and Project Traffic) 7.B Arterial Level of Service for Off Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour .... 21 (1999 Background Traffic and 1999 Background and Project Traffic) 8 Intersection Level of Service Optimization for Future Background and ProjectTraffic Volumes..........................................................................22 Submitted into the public recor �ii onnect! nwittlItem on Walter 'oeman ii City Clerk 95— 599 List of Figures Ficure Description Paae 1 Base Map.............................................................................2 y 2 Lane Configuration...............................................................3 3 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes......................5 i 4 Intersection Level of Service for 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.............................................8 5 Directional Trip Distribution for Trips Leaving theSite.................................................................................11 6 Direction Trip Distribution for Trips Returning tothe Site.............................................................................12 7 Project Trip Distribution for Trips Leaving the Site During the PM Peak Hour..............................................14 8 Project Trip Distribution for Trips Returning to the Site During the PM Peak Hour........................................15 i l 9 1999 Future Background PM Peak Hour TrafficVolumes.....................................................................17 10 Intersection Level of Service for 1999 Future Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .........................19 11 1999 Future Background Traffic and Project j Traffic Volumes .......................................... 12 Intersection Level of Service for 1999 Future I Background and Project Traffic Volumes..............................23 f 13 Optimized Intersection Level of Service for Future Background and Project Traffic Volumes...................24 i i I Subr,littec+ i recor onnec p'lblic I itemmh on 1 �- kt Walte. Fo3 :r.. erpan City Clerk 95- 599 I 1.0 INTRODUCTION Ocean Grove Apartments is a 22 story apartment complex consisting of 103 units and 197 parking spaces. The site is located on SW 27th Avenue between Tigertail and Bayshore Drive as shown in Figure 1. 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY 17 The purpose of this study is to determine the vehicular traffic impacts on the signalized intersections and roadways within the study area. This is accomplished by performing signalized intersection and roadway link analysis. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries include: Bayshore Drive as the southern boundary, Tigertail as the northern boundary, SW 27th Avenue as the eastern boundary, and Cornelia Drive as the western boundary. The study area of impacts including the roadways and signalized intersections was determined in consultation with the City of Miami. Figure 2 shows the signalized intersections and roadway links. These included the intersections of • Bayshore Drive and SW 27th Avenue • Tigertail and SW 27th Avenue The roadways which were analyzed are SW 27th Avenue, Bayshore Drive, and Tigertail. 4.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic count locations, and collect traffic counts. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Bayshore Drive is a four lane divided roadway located in an east -west direction. This roadway provides left and right turning bays. Tigertail is a two lane roadway located in an east -west direction. Tigertail also provides right turn bays. SW 27th Avenue is a two lane roadway with left turn bays. Figure 2 shows roadway configurations along with intersection lane configurations. Bermello, Ajamil and Partners. Inc. Submitted into the pLDEfl rove Apartments Page 1 recor Unne 1 I April27, 1995 item on . Walte Foeman City Clerk J fIrIVF'. SW '27(h Ave cD ro E3 O 0 C �• 0 O OCD =9 3 ZZ A.Jl, clurrCn& .orenuI Pbomn�I OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS lal•nw D,a4.4"4.#;e ArcWl.lun Sull• 11100 ME N SASE MAR FIC F:\ENG\IRANS\YRAN5\ACADFILE\0CI (D n v 0 (n T 0 m Ili a �. Q. a a C�► � �I su CDO fI J Y o CD .0 �9 Cr_ C� LEGEND Parallel Metered Street Parking Cornelia Drive E- SW ?Ith Ave =j > M`�il"r�r`_�'����N' Pl.un" I OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS Inl•riw Dwl,e•I�oCr&p Irthst.,wr ,9�ulle �Q00 0 a� N LANE CONFIGURATION Fit _- S�ur_l ro�ue� •nu.e�.r.nr.. r �... IMF 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing plans for the signalized intersections were obtained from the Dade County Traffic Control Center. These plans were used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS). 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS Traffic count data collection was coordinated with the City of Miami. Traffic counts were collected at the intersections of SW 27th Avenue and Tigertail and SW 27th Avenue and Bayshore Drive on Tuesday, April 18, 1995 from 4:30 - 6:30 PM. The PM peak hour was identified as the critical time period for analysis and analyzed as per the City of Miami guidelines. The traffic counts are shown in Figure 3 and summarized in Table 1. 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The study area is served by several bus routes including routes 22, 27, 42, 48. The Metrorail located north of the study area has Coconut Grove Station on U.S. 1 west of SW 27th Avenue. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each intersection was analyzed to determine the level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 1992 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS, Cinema 2.03 was used to analyze the intersection. The intersections levels of service ranged from A to F. The results of this analyses are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Figure 4. The detailed intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. Roadway link analysis was also performed on three roadways within the study area using the FDOT LOS software Roadway Link Analysis. The arterial' levels of service ranged from B to F. The results of these analyses are summarized in Tables 3.A and 3.B. The detailed arterial level of service analyses are included in Appendix B. 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone 704. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 704 was obtained from the Concurrency Department of the Metro -Dade. The distribution is as follows: Submitted into the public Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. itern n� 17_ on Y �� Walter oeman City Clerk Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 Page 4 95- 599 i E-- 81 (R)' (L):..t8 38 (T).. (T)�• 70 Lj 191 12� ro 0 o (D NnN N a ryk m M, Co 0 ro - a ro ruc—�--c"P2 D (R)' SHARED RIGHT TURN LANE (T)" SHARED THROUGH LANE (L)"' SHARED LEFT TURN LANE ------�—� p r i ve Cornelia Site LocGooll F — SW 27th rove 37 —� 356 I r �0 F— 147 E — 230 45 l.elurn jfrm� Il.nun, ®LEAN GROVE APARTMENTS �995 EXISTING PM PEAK F 3WI.Wte. aay.•Laae.ye ArAllrolurr HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9a11. 1000 Wig: 33133 icu ra sas eso-rws r:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACAOFA.El TABLE 1 1995 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES East West North South Intersection L T R L T R L T R L T R Tigertail and 107 148 48 14 355 170 37 356 11 45 230 147 SW 27th Ave Bayshore Dr. and 62 560 31 21 1171 247 18 20 12 191 38 81 SW 27th Ave f: ZR cn m 0 3 a, a 15: �i iD � Cti c7 i C7 W C I Cie �p Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 Page 6 TABLE 2 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 1995 EXISTING BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Intersection INTERSECTION Tigertail and SW 27th Ave F F A A F Bayshore Dr. and SW 27th Ave B B D D B Submitted Into the pubffc Ocean Gorve Apartments recor 1inJ�conne tion I April27, 1995 Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. jtor,l On /� _ Page 7 Waiter r= gg��I Oefi1c'1n c7 599 City Clerk i a) 0 N t O O LOS B �—� LOS D LOS D --+ LOS B ,-. CA 3 0 g LOS B �• cry .•+ C-) .� ! ca = I.I.rW Delp Suit* 1000 ^JIDI So B' o1, IOod (MS) aw-2D C n llu 01Ive 00 SW 2-/th Ave LOS A --* M LOS F 1 +— LOS A LOS F f LOS F N F: \ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACAOFILE \GCE AN\FIGURE 4 a III } TABLE 3.A Arterial Level of Service for Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour Arterial Direction 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Bayshore Drive WB B NW 27th Avenue NB C Tigertail WB F TABLE 3.B Arterial Level of Service for Off Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour Arterial Direction 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Bayshore Drive EB B NW 27th Avenue SIB C Tigertail EB E Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Submitted into the public recor VY nnecti n iitt- item on Walter Foernan City Cleric 195- 599 Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 Page 9 North -Northeast 23.1 % East -Northeast 12.0% East -Southeast 2.65% South -Southeast 0 South -Southwest 6.35% West -Southwest 18.53% West -Northwest 14.51 % North -Northwest 22,86% The trip distribution for trips leaving the site is shown in Figure 5. The trip distribution for trips returning to the site is shown in Figure 6. 6.0 TRIP GENERATION The number of vehicular trips generated by the apartments was determined for the PM peak hour using the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the apartments was based on the total number of apartments, Chapter 222. This is shown in Table 4. Figure 7 shows the project trip distribution for trips leaving the site during the PM peak hour. Figure 8 shows the project trip distribution for trips returning to the site during the PM peak hour. 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Using the Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 1995 and after discussion with the City of Miami, it was determined that there are no programmed and/or planned roadway improvements in and or near the study area. 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 1999. A growth rate of 2% per year was applied to the 1995 volumes in order to derive 1999 volumes. Table 5.A details the 1999 future background PM peak hour traffic volumes. These volumes are shown in Figure 9. The 1999 volumes were then used to determine the intersections and arterial level of service for year 1999 using the software previously stated. The only change that occurred in the intersection levels of service for year 1999 was at an approach. The intersection of Bayshore Drive and SW 27th Avenue in the eastbound direction changed from level of service B to level of service C. There was no change for the arterial levels of service for year 1999, Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Submitted into tilee p,.li?I161 cean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 recurWinonnec" 11Page10itemon�95-- 599 Walter Foei-nan City Clerk eiM d"'i 0 0 In m -_-`___.- — D. r i v e /� Cornelio Site tLoeoti01-1 20• 11 i 36% 26% S 46% 167 i/ r n C 1 O Cr C g t7z E s CD ea, C ec to 0. N O�rmrlln, Aj.—. VPtlrtoen. Inc. MA Arrb,t.cttlrtntin er1n� Pleonin� OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE Intmm Drlyn•I•nAKtlPf Ar[hltee4tlre 9" 01 '°°° FOR TRIPS LEAVING THE SITE 2,.OI 1 0tlf+hnre Drlre Yt•mt. rloril• 7°t°] l,i l3'A eeu-7t35 FIENOITRMtl\TRAHS%ACADFLEIOCEANW "E a) 7 n a� 0 C V) T C) m a--► 26% '1 • .., F"i Y ) hr,°1 26% )-8% — - -�IO�ICl �I�IVC LOCH loj l f- 46 23% o L aD 1 5% 6°/ �c 5%I boa 16% cz c m z O CD c� CD -0 ry' �: CD 1 nm V'� �, G_ N A flermello, Alemd��A,,� PiR.". Inc. 4<bflarlp4.-LvineerloAPleoninA ®LEAN GROVE APARTMENTS DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE R.K. Deriio•landwspe Lc6ileclen 2401 . FOR TRIPS RETURNING TO THE SITE A01 So Oeye6o31 3 6 mi.m(306) i l7orlde FAX (.V JDS S6Y-2650 IAI J00) 8]Y-1AW _ P%EM%YRA S%TPANBVACADFLE%OCE WfKKM TABLE 4 Trip Generation Land Use Day Time Equation Total % Trips In Sub -Total % Trips Out Sub -Total Apartment Weekday 4:00-6:00 PM Ln(T) = 0.937Ln(X) - 0.693 38 61 % 23 30% 15 O Cr .n a ro cz a 5 o l l CDt �,%2 !=: 71 `� o E 0 �d Z Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Ocean Grove Apartment April 27, 199 Page 1 -- -- 10 'Ornelia��'ve .. Site Location 5 4 7 � 2 `�_�-e co 0 , � l � 3 �� cL a o0 F u ry ncr a n BrrmeUa, �paul Y Pertaere. In, g A PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE Arehileclure•Eadlneenad {'lenainE ,CICEAN C�R��/lE APARiiVIENiS slerlor 0e.y.•l�adreepr 4chilrctue FOR TRIPS LEAVING THE 8glls I000 2601wi.m;,�A . , SITE DURING THE PM PEAK HOUR % E60-m00 ►u ]b! N 0 C- a m a 5 IC � ' _ 6 or��eli� 0~ ,- ive `„�.. C Site 1� Location I — " rn t � fD C 4 3 cc')' Er Q .o n ro o -o CD G CA B;FvW , Apml kV.rta•n. Inc. Bfi'iA Erepil•rlure•EoElne•rinE Pl�oninE 1000 OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS Iu4Nw Dedp-L� W.W 4,b - ..if — f- f— N PROJECT TRIP DISTIBUTION FIGURE FOR TRIPS RETURNING TO THE SITE DURING THE PM PEAK HOUR 8 F1EN0\TRANS\7R461AG1�fi.E10CEA/Ai701,: TABLE 5.A 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES East West North South Intersection L T R L T R L T R L T R Tigertail and 116 163 56 16 384 184 40 385 12 49 249 15i SW 27th Ave Bayshore Dr. and 67 606 34 23 1268 267 19 22 13 207 41 8E SW 27th Ave TABLE 5.B 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES East West North South Intersection L T R L T R L T R L T R Tigertail and 123 164 56 16 385 184 40 385 12 49 260 159 SW 27th Ave Bayshore Dr. and 69 60 6 34 23 1268 271 19 22 13 209 41 91 SW 27th Ave CDc B o Cr C. 0. a _ E ~ `V I � C� Bermello, Ajami, and Partners, Inc. Ocean Grove Apartment! April 27, 199! Page 11 n Q) L O c- U) m TT � 0 Or I L (D V�yy E— (L)...19 8T)6/}22 Lj 013 _ 1 ro ITT a O O N .r � � -Oj O C7 "� (D YD O O Z3 n CD CD LEGEND ' (R)' SHARED RIGHT TURN LANE tTC (1)" SHARED THROUGH LANE (L)*** SHARED LEFT TURN LANE .Q Gi 1Ve � COffle�l4 F— Site LocOtion In 88 (R)* F- 20;1''* sw 27tn Ave 40 385 �,, > brhdomn{I OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS I.ItrW Delg.•Wle.p. ut611rrlurr 9ulle loon F-- 159 F— 249 49 1 Y ;0— 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND PM FIGURE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9 F: \ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\DCEAN\FIGURE The intersections level of service are summarized in Figure 10 and Table 6. Tables 7.A and 7.6 summarize the arterial level of service. Appendix D contains the 1999 future background PM peak hour intersection level of service analyses in detail. Appendix E contains the 1999 future background PM peak hour arterial level of service analyses in detail. +- 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future background traffic and project traffic conditions were analyzed for year 1999. This was done by using the 1999 traffic volumes and adding the traffic generated by the project site (as shown in Figures 7 and 8). Table 1.0 details the 1999 future background and project PM peak hour traffic volumes and these values are shown in Figure 11. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection and link levels of service using the previously stated software. There were no changes in the intersection or arterial level of service for the future background traffic and project traffic conditions (with the 1995 signal timing plans). The intersections level of service are summarized in Table 6 and Figure 12. The arterial level of service are summarized in Table 7.A and 7.13. Appendix F contains the detailed 1999 future background and project PM peak hour traffic intersection level of service analyses, Appendix G contains the 1999 future background and project PM peak hour traffic arterial level of service analyses in detail. 10.0 OPTIMIZED LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Intersection optimization analysis was done for the intersections in order to improve level of service of the entire intersection and the intersection's approaches. The LOS for the overall intersection of Tigertail and SW 27th Avenue as it exists today is F. This LOS remains the same for the year 1999 under existing signal timing plans. After optimizing the intersection timings, the intersection operates at LOS C. For the intersection of Bayshore Drive and SW 27th Avenue, the optimization of the intersection timings improved the level of service of the approaches. The intersection LOS remained the same. These results are shown in Figure 13 and summarized in Table 8. The detailed analyses are contained in Appendix H. A roadway link analysis optimization was also performed using the optimized signal timings. These results are summarized in Table 9.A and 9.B. The detailed analyses are contained in Appendix I. Bermcllo, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. EAJ Submitted into the PLI )6an Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 recort�Wn qj on wit Page 18 itemon City cle4c 599 J Q 4� O N U) >11 o Cornelia Drive te LOS C Location LOS F l 1 �— LOS D LOS A LOS D LOS B SW 27th Ave LOS A LOS F Q LOS B LOS F A) J O st Gp CD m _ Nrmrll°, FJ+mil i P•rin•rt, Ine '—�-- -� B&A INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE �• �hle0l.u.r FOR 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND It. IooO OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS AUl s°. ria."°" U PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 10 305) 8 FI°A . FAX (W m) esu-tnso ru Iws) 851-7a35 F:\ENO\1RANS\TRANS\ACADFIIE\OCEAN\FIGURE TABLE 6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT TRAFFIC East- West- North- South- Overall East- West- North- South- Overall INTERSECTION bound bound bound bound Intersection bound bound bound bound Intersection Bayshore Dr. and SW 27th C B D D B C B D D C Tigertail and SW 27th Ave F F 7 A A F F F A A F CD Boo C' 1 CD C. Q !y -� O rw (p 0 I Y M Ste,^ 17 tR = Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc, Ocean Grove Apartme April27, 1! Page TABLE 7.A A94arlal t_pvel of Service for Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour 1999 Future 1999 Future Background and Arterial Direction Background PM Peak Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Hour Traffic Bayshore Drive WB B B NW 27th Avenue NB C C Tigertail WB F F TABLE 7.B Arterial Level of Service for Off Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour 1999 Future 1999 Future Background and Arterial Direction Background PM Peak Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Hour Traffic Sayshore Drive EB B B NW 27th Avenue SB C C Tigertail EB E E Submitted into the public recoriiEon nnac ,,n �v th item Walter Foemian City Clerk Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. r.599 Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 Page 21 O _ t 0 W 1� T � �� -- p (l e l I c) Drive QT a orn /•// � catiOr� ar, rT pII ID K / L Ln Ip <— (R)' 91 (L)" 19 41 (T)" �` �) 40—=a L 260 (T)" 23 209 — S)W % (fl Ave (t)"385 49 13_— ---- ------ -- --R)• 127�- � n � CL CD CLN j I to0003 CTf CD 0 �y- cD CD (—D cr w t.O LEGEND (R)* SHARED RIGHT TURN LANE (T)" SHARED THROUGH LANE (L)... SHARED LEFT TURN LANE I tl il.rmello, A�)•md� kA P.A.... Inc --- UTURE UND Sul,, •clur•UI. �ifne�rfnt)PI•nnlnA OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS1AND F RO ECTATRAFFIOC VO UI49ESIC FIGURE ArrAilrclar• Inl•rla D•dl�•IAa1sAp• SullJw Ib 21ID1 Se R�/lA6 • brNe 1' Nirrml, Ilorld� �DISJ SOS BSY-t050 IAI 7D5 ESY-TG'IS F• \FNC\TRANS\TRANS\AF.Anrll F\orFAN\riCIIDr 11 LOS D ..o v N O U) a 0 m LOS C l �— LOS D LOS C (D fDcr a, n O �n LOS B rn .� ^ CR en`J Cornelio_DriVe mite Llot on SW 2 7I. -i Ave LOS A ---o. LOS F ;l +— LOS A LOS F t LOS F Bm INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ,111,4000 I:,,in.erinA Pl�onioA OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS FOR 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND FIGURE 1ulrrMr p'f1�0•Iwnd�c�pe AmW1K1— Niol 1000 "'m' "°" a""' AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 12 (305 8W-3050 FAX 30! 65i.7E75 F; \ENG\TRANS\TRANS\AC ADFILE \OCEAN\FIGURE 1 T O N O O cn 0 Drive ~ m /�___ Cornelia Site LOS B �_ocotion LOS C *-- LOS D +— LOS B LOS C LOS S SW 271h Ave LOS B LOS C m r� a a LOS B LOS C oµ D �,z cc)l7 � CDCr At— C7 w IMrmrll°, Aj—d i PEA—. I - MIA OPTIMIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF FIGURE lot. .el,4m-L&Amrrr�°A Plr°m°A OCEAN GROVE APARTMENTS SERVICE FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND IMrrla TMy1�•Wdcrpe AnNlnt°rr BuLLr ow 7110' S° aig Sl AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 13 ]°S 11511-1°5° rAi W5 KY-M5 f:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACApE4E\nCEAN\flcuRfl] �*• TABLE 8 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE OPTIMIZATION FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 01 I yId INTERSECTION Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Intersection Tigertail and C C B B C SW 27th Ave Bayshore Dr. and B B C D B SW 27th Ave Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. rSubrrritled into iiZt� (ltt(;lic record .OnnF;c'ii item On Walter i-oerrtun ... City Cleric 599 Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1994 Page 25 J 0 I t",1 TABLE 9.A Arterial Level of Service for Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour Arterial Direction Optimized 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Bayshore Drive WB C NW 27th Avenue NB D Tigertail WB D TABLE 9.B Arterial Level of Service for Off Peak Direction for the PM Peak Hour Arterial Direction Optimized 1999 Future Background and Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Bayshore Drive EB B NW 27th Avenue SB D Tigertail EB D 4 4' ,6ubmlttod into reca• c ' the Public 3 r� or;ne� wr' for ,.. � item _ 95- 599 Ocean Grove Apartments April 14, 1995 Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Page 26 to 11.0 CONCLUSION The signalized intersection and arterial analyses show that with the project in place in 1999, the intersections and roadways within the project vicinity will operate at acceptable levels of service. The additional trips generated by the project are minimal and do not adversely impact the roadways. y 17) 1 z) p1 iSubmitted into ti)�-, public Y record In on-nec.`' n- =itli Itern Of', ° Walicr Foornan City Clerk Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. Ocean Grove Apartments April 27, 1995 Page 27 95- 599 i ") I') i =) APPENDIX A ,j 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted into the public record n conncc`i ritl item on Walter oenan City Clerk tug 95- 599 r HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 04 EAST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: BAYSR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 4 2 600 1 150 1 100 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 NB LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 62 ---- 560 ----- 31 ---- 5 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 21 1171 0 0 1.00 1.00 NB 18 20 12 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 191 38 81 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 62 560 31 5 WB 21 1171 0 0 NB 18 20 12 5 SB 191 38 81 22 t4 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .83 .83 .83 .92 .92 .66 .66 .66 Submitted' NO the p$glic • 87 recor conne �' c��i 1` item on - 95 Walter F=oeman City Clerk � 9 9 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LT NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 82 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ------ - --------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT k: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 0 0 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 too PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 11.5 11.5 20.5 20.5 Submitted into the public recol�� n� connecti n � < < item 1� on _ , 9r, v .— 599 Walter eernan City Clerk J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App --- Mvt (vph) --- ----- Factor ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) ----- Lns --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- EB L 62 1.00 62 .83 75 L 75 1 1.00 75 1.00 .00 T 560 1.00 560 .83 675 T 675 2 1.00* 675 .00 .00 R 31 1.00 31 .83 31+ R 31 1 1.00 31 .00 1.00 WB L 21 1.00 21 .92 23 L 23 1 1.00 23 1.00 .00 T 1171 1,00 1171 .92 1273 T 1273 2 1.00* 1273 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 NB L 18 1.00 18 .66 27 LT 57 1 1.00 57 .47 .00 T 20 1.00 20 .66 30 R 10 1 1.00 10 .00 1.00 R 12 1.00 12 .66 10+ SB L 191 1.00 191 .87 220 L 220 1 1.00 220 1.00 .00 T 38 1.00 38 .87 44 TR 112 1 1.00 112 .00 .61 R 81 1.00 81 .87 68+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- EB L ---- 1800 --- 1 ----- 1.000 ---- .995 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- .102 ---- 183 T 1900* 2 1.000 .985 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3743 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .394 709 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 NB LT 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .837 1507 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 SB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .774 1393 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .909 1.00 1682 * Value set by user Submitted into the public recOr Urcoll neitern ' on Walter Fovman 91 599 City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-4 04 104 J SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto Sop=(1800*No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop gu= (g-C*Yo) / (1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=P1t(1+(((N-1)*g)/(fs*gu+4.5))) 9q=9-gu Pt=1-P1 gf=2*Pt (1- (Pt**0.5gq)) /Pl E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (1/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 120 120 120 120 85.000 85.000 31.000 31.000 1 1 1 1 781 1296 67 332 706 1273 67 112 75 23 27 220 1.000 1.000 .474 1.000 2 2 1 1 1273 706 112 67 .000 .000 .000 .403 3600 3600 1800 1551 .354 .196 .062 .043 65.853 76.462 25.095 26.983 .079 .434 .805 .833 1.000 1.000 .474 1.000 19.147 8.538 5.905 4.017 .532 .532 .526 .526 .000 .000 1.888 .000 14.173 2.594 1.398 1.350 .102 .394 .837 .774 .102 .394 .837 _774 Submitted into the l)ublic recor n crane' n with item I }L-on ' b'alte (=oemar� City Clerk 95- 599 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) Ratio EB * L 75 183 .41 .71 ----- 130 ----- .58 T 675 3743 .18 .71 2651 .25 R 31 1658 .02 .71 1174 .03 WB L 23 709 .03 .71 502 .05 T 1273 3800 .34 .71 2692 .47 NB LT 57 1507 .04 .26 389 .15 R 10 1658 .01 .26 428 .02 SB * L 220 1393 .16 .26 360 .61 TR 112 1682 .07 .26 435 .26 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = ,57 Xc = .59 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec --------LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -A roach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L .58 ----- .71 ----- 6.6 ----- 130 ----- 4.4 ---- 1.00 ---- L ----- 11.0 --- B ----- --- 5.3 B T .25 .71 4.7 2651 .0 1.00 T 4.7 A R .03 .71 4.0 1174 ,0 1.00 R 4.0 A WB L .05 .71 4.0 502 .0 1.00 L 4.0 A 5.9 B T .47 .71 5.8 2692 .1 1.00 T 5.9 B i �d Ito NB LT .15 .26 26.1 389 .0 1.00 LT 26.1 D R .02 .26 25.2 428 .0 1.00 R 25.2 D SB L .61 .26 29.8 360 2.2 1.00 L 31.9 D TR .26 .26 26.9 435 .1 1.00 TR 26.9 D Cycle = 120 Submittod bnt,) t+= := ()Ublic recor ,ff 11e s tin with item ., on - I - J I Walter Foeman City Clerk 26.0 D 30.3 D Intersection 9.5 B 95- 599 01N "-I I :' i ';' HCH Sumeaary Results for Case: BAYSR BAYSHORE DR /NU 27 AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING CONDNS P.N. PEAK Version 2.03 38 X Delay B1 1191 Lane V/s V/c (Sec/ � I 1 � App Groin► Ratio Ratio Veh) LOS a i ER *L .41 .50 11.0 B 1171 T .19 .25 4.7 A I I i- 21 R .02 .03 4.0 A "�-------- All 5.3 B '--- WB L .03 .05 4.8 A _ All 5.9 B I 62 I HB LT .04 .15 26.1 D 560 -' I R .01 .02 25.2 D 31� I t All 26.0 D I 18 12 I 28 SB *L .16 .61 31.9 D 1 2 it TR .07 .26 26.9 D All 30,3 D 82 4 1 27 ili 4 2 Intersect .57 .59 9.5 B Submii:ted in'M th^ r�rr�i e3 riirecor item tileUUemar City Clerk 95-- 5.99 4, HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: TIGER INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 2 ----- 1 ------ 600 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 1 ------ 50 WB 3 1 600 1 125 1 100 NB 2 1 600 1 150 0 0 SB 3 1 600 1 150 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 TR 12.0 I SB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 + L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES r'< CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) ----------------------------- GROWTH FACTORS -------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 107 148 48 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 14 355 170 135 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,a NB 37 356 11 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 45 230 147 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. ---------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- EB 107 148 48 23 .74 .74 .74 WB 14 355 170 135 .86 .86 .86 NB 37 356 11 0 94 .94 .94 SB 45 230 147 25 Submrj�.d l;!t0 Jl-9 PI-ViC .79 item�^ itil Walter i-oonian Chy Clerk 04 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 14 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU ---- RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2 0 0 0 1 1 ---- ---- 0 0 ----- 0 ---- 2 0 ----- 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 Submitl-­-' recor n Wi'h item ail4 Walter Foeman CRY Clerk 95- 599 9 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) ----- Lns --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- �� EB --- L ----- 107 1.00 107 .74 145 LT 345 1 1.00 345 .42 .00 T 148 1.00 148 .74 200 R 34 1 1.00 34 .00 1.00 R 48 1.00 48 .74 34+ WB L 14 1.00 14 .86 16 L 16 1 1.00 16 1.00 .00 T 355 1.00 355 .86 413 T 413 1 1.00 413 .00 .00 R 170 1.00 170 .86 41+ R 41 1 1.00 41 .00 1.00 NB L 37 1.00 37 .94 39 L 39 1' 1.00 3911.00 .00 T 356 1.00 356 .94 379 TR 391 1 1.00 391 .00 .03 R 11 1.00 11 .94 12 <� SB L 45 1.00 45 .79 57 L 57 1 1.00 57 1.00 .00 T 230 1.00 230 .79 291 T 291 1 1.00 291 .00 .00 R 147 1.00 147 .79 154+ R 154 1 1.00 154 .00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w ----- HV ---- g ----- p ---- bb a RT ---- ---- ---- LT ---- vphg ---- EB LT 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .348 623 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .250 450 T 1900* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1891 R 1950* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1649 NB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .536 r 965 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .995 1.00 1841 SE L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .569 1014 T 1900* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1641 * Value set by user Submitted into the Public recoditemr nnic.., �ri,%AOfh -- 599 Walter Foeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR V n rnn *Tn e n Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto Sop= (1800*No) / (1+Plto ((400+Vm) / (1400-Vm)) ) Yo=Vo/Sop gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=Plt(1+(((N-1)*g)/(fs*gu+4.5))) 9q=9-9u Pt=1-P1 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/P1 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+(gu/g) (l/ (1+P1 (E1-1)))+(2/g) (1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 120 120 120 120 16.000 16.000 100.000 100.000 1 1 1 1 379 470 430 502 379 454 391 445 145 16 39 57 .420 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 1 1 454 379 445 391 .000 .383 .000 .000 1800 1338 1800 1800 .252 .283 .247 .217 .000 .000 93.432 94.450 .591 .638 .597 .631 .420 1.000 1.000 1.000 16.000 16.000 6.568 5.550 .580 .580 .580 .580 2.723 .000 .000 .000 1.903 1.763 1.885 1.784 .348 .250 .536 .569 .348 .250 .536 .569 Submitted ln'-o recor conne:c i r► VJf' 1 item on Walter l oeman city Clerk 95- 599 04 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ------------------------ "`' v s v/ s C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB - * LT- 345 623 .55 .13 83 4.16 ,LIN R 34 1658 .02 .13 221 .15 WB L 16 450 .04 .13 60 .27 T 413 1891 .22 .13 252 1.64 R 41 1649 .02 .13 220 .19 NB L 39 965 .04 .83 804 .05 * TR 391 1841 .21 .83 1534 .25 SB L 57 1014 .06 .83 845 .07 T 291 1900 .15 .83 1583 .18 R 154 1641 .09 .83 1367 .11 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .77 Xc = .79 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec ' App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) ----- ----- Fact ---- Grp. ---- /veh) LOS ----- --- /veh) LOS ----- --- --- ---- EB LT ----- 4.16 ----- .13 ----- - 83 - 1.00 LT - F - F R .15 .13 35.0 221 .0 1.00 R 35.0 D WB L .27 .13 35.5 60 .6 1.00 L 36.1 D T 1.64 .13 - 252 - 1.00 T - F R .19 .13 35.1 220 .0 1.00 R 35.2 D. NB L .05 .83 1.3 804 .0 1.00 L 1.3 A TR .25 .83 1.6 1534 .0 1.00 TR 1.6 A SB L .07 .83 1.3 845 T .18 .83 1.5 1583 R .11 .83 1.4 1367 - Delay invalid when X>1.2 140 .0 1.00 L 1.3 A .0 1.00 T 1.5 A .0 1.00 R 1.4 A Cycle = 120 Submitted into the: public record onnec on wish item ' � on I I Walter Foeman City Clerk F 1.6 A I 1.5 A 1 Intersection F i 95- 599 I j1j 4;: 1;4 HCN Sumary Results for Case: TIGER TIGERTAIL iNW 2? AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1995 EXISTING P.N. PEAR Version 2.03 X Delay 230 Lane v1s v/c (sect 147 45 f E Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS L 1?0 EB *LT .55 4.16 - F 355 R .02 .15 35.9 D I I ! I I s-- 14 All - F WB L .04 .27 36.1 D T .22 1.64 - F R .02 .19 35.2 D 18? I I All - F i4B -* I NB L .04 .05 1.3 A 48--1 h *TR .21 .25 1.6 A I t All 1.6 A 3? 11 356 SB L .06 .07 1.3 A 1 2 T .15 .19 i .5 A R .09 .11 1.4 A 14 4 97 4 1 All 1.5 A Intersect .77 .79 - F Submitter9 recorJ2 1 1, item on _ Waiter Forman � City CIC)Ik APPENDIX B 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted record � item 9 s, — 599 a 00, tr F'. a� �a Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 10100 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.740 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 51 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R1: U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mill: 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) ` 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 (0.20 - 0.80) i PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 410 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 890 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,410 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,920 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 830 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,790 (� 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,810 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,840 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,500 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 33,900 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 46,200 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.56 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.61 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.64 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.65 Submitted into the puollc recorug— connec ion w' h itemon 9 Waite Foeman Y�{{ - City Clerk �Y 011N I ``a A'sr ,:c) Im Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 10100 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ----Range---- K FACTOR: 0,083 10.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.640 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.860 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 34 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 360 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 770 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,210 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,660 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 560 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,210 it 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11900 ll 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,590 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B c D E II LANES l i 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6,700 it 4 NIA NIA N/A N/A 14,500 Ii 6 N/A N/A NIA N/A 22,800 II 8 N/A N/A N/A NIA 31,200 N/A means the level of service is not achievable I I Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hours I Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.65 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.71 3 N/A NIA N/A N/A 0.74 4 N/A N/A NIA NIA 0.76 v Submitted into the public recor I onnect' 1' it. item on 9 a— 599 Walter Foeman City Clod< 10 1 ee >1NA Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 i Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: SB ` Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 9950 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.510 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.790 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 45 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mil: 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0,80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A 1,810 2,050 2,210 2 N/A N/A 3,800 4,240 4,500 3 N/A N/A 5,830 6,420 6,750 4 N/A N/A 7,860 8,650 9,080 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES i I 2 N/A N/A 3,550 4,020 4,320 4 N/A N/A 7,450 8,300 8,820 6 N/A N/A 11,430 12,590 13,230 8 N/A N/A 15,410 16,950 17,810 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E i LANES 2 N/A N/A 42,800 46,500 52,100 ii 4 N/A N/A 89,700 100,100 106,200 6 N/A N/A 137,700 151,600 159,400 j I 8 N/A N/A 185,700 204,200 214,600 i N/A means the level of service is not achievable ii Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hours i Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.66 0.74 0.80 2 N/A N/A 0.69 0.77 0.81 3 N/A N/A 0.70 0.77 0.81 4 N/A N/A 0.71 0.78 0.82 Submitted into the p1.1011C j record 11 conI' - :"�i m vit11 ' item on r Walter -oE Tlan 599 ._ City Clerk h 1d (OP I r{ 1 0," V i M Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 9950 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1,00) PHF: 0.940 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 9 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sect: 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0,20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 NIA NIA 1,300 1,480 1,590 2 N/A NIA 2,730 3,050 3,230 3 N/A N/A 4,190 4,620 4,850 4 N/A N/A 5,650 6,220 6,530 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A N/A 2,610 2,950 3,170 II 4 N/A N/A 5,460 6,090 6,470 II 5 N/A N/A 8,380 9,230 9,700 II 8 N/A N/A 11,300 12,440 13,060 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E II LANES I 2 N/A N/A 31,400 35,600 38,200 II 4 N/A N/A 65,800 73,400 77,900 I 6 N/A N/A 101,000 111,200 116,900 8 N/A N/A 136,200 149,800 157,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable 11 Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) I Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.78 0.88 0.95 2 N/A N/A 0.82 0.91 0.97 3 N/A N/A 0.84 0.92 0.97 4 N/A N/A 0.85 0.93 0.98 Submitted into the public record connecti n wi h item on r Walter oemart City Cleric - 599 U I AN 1 f 1'1 (' J) si. «wl _0 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 25200 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ----Range---- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.830 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 96 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 14 (0- 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 950 1,220 1,310 1,410 2 N/A 2,000 2,530 2,680 2,840 3 N/A 3,050 3,870 4,060 4,260 4 N/A 4,110 5,160 5,420 5,680 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 1,900 2,450 2,630 2,810 4 NIA 4,010 5,050 5,360 5,680 6 N/A 6,090 7,730 8,120 8,510 8 N/A 8,230 10,310 10,830 11,350 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 22,900 29,500 31,700 33,900 4 N/A 48,300 60,900 64,600 68,400 i 6 N/A 73,400 93,200 97,900 102,600 8 NIA 99,100 124,200 130,500 136,800 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hours Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.61 0.78 0.84 0.90 2 N/A 0.64 0.81 0.85 0.90 3 N/A 0.65 0.82 0.86 0.90 4 N/A 0.66 0.82 0.86 0.90 Submitted into the public recur in item 1f�l�.lte� i�ac:,n n City cloli P 04 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIREC&N: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK el Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 25200 User Notes: Existing Traffic for 1995 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.688 (0,50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.920 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 2 (0- 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS 01 URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) I For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0.80) 0 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 920 1,190 1,280 1,370 2 N/A 1,950 2,460 2,610 2,750 3 N/A 2,960 3,760 3,950 4,130 4 N/A 4,000 5,010 5,270 5,510 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 1,340 1,730 1,860 1,990 4 N/A 2,830 3,570 3,790 4,000 6 N/A 4,310 5,470 5,740 6,000 8 N/A 5,820 7,290 7,660 8,000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 16,200 20,800 22,400 24,000 4 N/A 34,200 43,000 45,700 48,200 6 N/A 51,900 65,900 69,200 72,300 8 N/A 70,100 87,800 92,300 96,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) l Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.67 0.86 0.93 0.99 2 N/A 0.71 0.89 0.95 .1.00 3 N/A 0.72 0.91 0.96 1.00 4 N/A 0.73 0.91 0.96 1.00 �`J11Or5ilt(t'i.i ) :"'.1 �ll.l%'111G recor t, c i�sr with item on--� jiz p� �t Walter FoeMan9 - 599 City Clerk A e1, i:� 4;'l r APPENDIX C 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted into the public recor n tonne o v�.;q item IZon� _ Waiter Foonian City Clork 95- 599 La HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: TIGERFB INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES ----- (FEET) LANES (FEET) ------ ----- ------ ---- EB ----- 2 ----- 1 ------ 600 0 0 1 50 WB 3 1 600 1 125 1 100 NB 2 1 600 1 150 0 0 SB 3 1 600 1 150 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------- MOV. ---------- WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- ---- EB ---------- LT 12.0 ---------- R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT ---- -------------- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- ---- EB ---- 116 ---- 163 ----- 56 ---- 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 16 384 184 147 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 40 385 12 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 49 249 159 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 116 163 56 27 WB 16 384 184 147 NB 40 385 12 0 SB 49 249 159 27 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .74 .74 .74 .86 .86 .86 .94 .94 .94 Submitt6® into th,57$)ublic .79 record jn tonn%,pl,gh item_ on 9 5 - 599 Walter Foeman City Clerk MU HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict el TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- Green 14 --- --- --- 97 0 0 --- --- 0 0 --- --- 0 0 `t Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS -------------------------------- AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT F.• ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 �g PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 Submitted into the piji,,1ie recur Jt.c nnecipi gel' Item on �I �� Waiter Foeman City Clerk 95- 599 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) --- Factor (vph) PHF (vph) ----- Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- EB L ----- 116 ------ 1.00 ----- 116 --- .74 157 ---- LT ----- 377 --- 1 ---- 1.00 ----- 377 ---- .42 ---- .00 ` T 163 1.00 163 .74 220 R 40 1 1.00 40 .00 1.00 R 56 1.00 56 .74 40+ WB L 16 1.00 16 .86 19 L 19 1 1.00 19 1.00 .00 T 384 1.00 384 .86 447 T 447 1 1.00 447 .00 .00 R 184 1.00 184 .86 43+ R 43 1 1.00 43 .00 1.00 NB L 40 1.00 40 .94 43 L 43 1 1.00 43 1.00 .00 T 385 1.00 385 .94 410 TR 423 1 1.00 423 .00 .03 R 12 1.00 12 .94 13 SB L 49 1.00 49 .79 62 L 62 1 1.00 62 1.00 .00 T 249 1.00 249 .79 315 T 315 1 1.00 315 .00 .00 R 159 1.00 159 .79 167+ R 167 1 1.00 167 .00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included a SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal 8 Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w HV g p ----- ---- ----- ---- bb a RT LT ---- ---- ---- ---- vphg ---- EB LT 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .350 627 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .250 450 l T 1900* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1891 ! R 1950* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1649 ` NB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .513 923 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .995 1.00 1841 l SB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .549 978 T 1900* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1641 * Value set by user Submitted i dsc record, 11 conned l )n r �. item 1 Z. ►d-- on �1 9 r 599 Walter Faeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR L^T] TOT] ATM on Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto Sop=(1800*No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=Plt (1+(((N-1) *g) / (fs*gu+4.5)) ) gq=g-gu Pt=1-P1 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/P1 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (l/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 120 120 120 120 16.000 16.000 100.000 100.000 1 1 1 1 417 509 466 544 417 490 423 482 157 19 43 62 .416 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 1 1 490 417 482 423 .000 .376 .000 .000 1800 1316 1800 1800 .272 .317 .268 .235 .000 .000 92.686 93.856 .569 .614 .574 .611 .416 1.000 1.000 1.000 16.000 16.000 7.314 6.144 .584 .584 .584 .584 2.765 .000 .000 .000 1.978 1.831 1.961 1.842 .350 .250 .513 .549 .350 .250 .513 .549 Submitted into t0(, t�t.t�liC recor n connect' .n C th item �6 on.1�5 Walter Foeman Cite Clerk 95- 599 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. ---- Group ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio ------ ----- Ratio ----- (vph) Ratio EB * LT 377 627 .60 .13 ----- 84 ----- 4.49 R 40 1658 .02 .13 221 .18 fly WB L 19 450 .04 .13 60 .32 T 447 1891 .24 .13 252 1.77 R 43 1649 .03 .13 220 .20 P NB L 43 923 .05 .83 769 .06 * TR 423 1841 .23 .83 1534 .28 SB L 62 978 .06 .83 815 .08 T 315 1900 .17 .83 1583 .20 f R 167 1641 .10 .83 1367 .12 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .83 Xc = .86 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- - g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec -5 App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact ----- Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LT 4.49 .13 ----- ----- ----- ---- - 84 - 1.00 ---- LT ----- --- - F ----- --- - F R .18 .13 35.1 221 .0 1.00 R 35.1 D WB L .32 .13 35.8 60 1.0 1.00 L 36.8 D - F T 1.77 .13 - 252 - 1.00 T - F R .20 .13 35.2 220 .1 1.00 R 35.2 D NB L .06 .83 1.3 769 .0 1.00 L 1.3 A 1.6 A TR .28 .83 1.6 1534 .0 1.00 TR 1.7 A SB L .08 .83 1.4 815 .0 1.00 L 1.4 A 1.5 A T .20 .83 1.5 1583 .0 1.00 T 1.5 A R .12 .83 1.4 1367 .0 1.00 R 1.4 A Intersection - Delay invalid when X>1.2 Cycle = 120 - F V Submitted into the public recur connc::ci t; � item on113-Re 9-- 5 Walter Foeman 99 City Clerk G7 107 o WCM &tm. ary Results for Case: TIGERFB TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACK GROUND P.M. PEAK Version 2.03 249 X Delay 159 49 Lane v/s v/c (sec/ AZE Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 4 L 184 EB ELT .60 4.49 - F I I `- 384 R .02 .18 35.1 D !II I I � 16 All - F r VB L .04 .32 36.0 D s-s T .24 1.77 - F --- R .03 .20 35.2 D 116 1 i All - F 163 NB L .05 .06 1.3 A 56 «� *TR .23 .28 1.7 A I All 1.6 A 40 12 385 SB ' L .OG .08 1.4 A 1 2 T .17 .28 1.5 A R .18 .12 1.4 A 14 4 97 ili 4 1 All 1.5 A Intersect .63 .86 - F Submitted Into tfjo ptal)lic record i connec�' ,n � r;t item on UVGItel Fcenian City Cleric "- Snn HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: BAYSRB INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) ------ LANES (FEET) ----- ------ LANES ----- (FEET) ------ ---- EB ----- 4 ----- 2 600 1 150 1 100 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- MOV. WIDTH ---------- ---- EB ---------- L 12.0 ---------- T 12.0 ---------- T 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 NB LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT -------------- THRU RIGHT EB 67 606 34 7 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 23 1268 0 0 1.00 1.00 NB 19 22 13 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 207 41 88 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. ---------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT aH EB 67 606 — — 34 ---- 7 .83 .83 .83 WB 23 1268 0 0 .92 .92 NB 19 22 13 5 $u6fnittw •66 s ,66 SB 207 41 88 24 87. 7 rG3d in V;�(ity.nti� item1 On — 5 9 ' Walter Forman City Clerk a HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ------------ CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LT NB LTP SB LTP �j L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 82 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- ----- ----- LEFT.THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- 0 ---- ----- 0 0 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 11.5 11.5 20.5 20.5 Submitted into the public record item ,onne ( on • i r N h 5_ 5 9 9 1l a to Foeman City Clerk i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) ----- Lns --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- "I EB --- L ----- 67 ------ 1.00 67 .83 81 L 81 1 1.00 81 1.00 .00 T 606 1.00 606 .83 730 T 730 2 1.00* 730 .00 .00 R 34 1.00 34 .83 33+ R 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 WB L 23 1.00 23 .92 25 L 25 1 1.00 25 1.00 .00 T 1268 1.00 1268 .92 1378 T 1378 2 1.00* 1378 .00 .00 ^� R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 NB L 19 1.00 19 .66 29 LT 62 1 1.00 62 .47 .00 T 22 1.00 22 .66 33 R 12 1 1.00 12 .00 1.00 R 13 1.00 13 .66 12+ SB L 207 1.00 207 .87 238 L 238 1 1.00 238 1.00 .00 T 41 1.00 41 .87 47 TR 120 1 1.00 120 .00 .61 R 88 1.00 88 .87 73+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w ----- HV ---- g ----- p ---- bb ---- a ---- RT ---- LT ---- vphg ---- EB L 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .056 100 T 1900* 2 1.000 .985 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3743 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .362 652 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 NB LT 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .826 1487 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 SB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .760 1368 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .909 1.00 1682 * Value set by rZ5ubnlitted qzer into fl-) pul)lic recor n corine ;ors vvi h item on �-� 9 5_ 599 Wa{te Foeman City Clerk r., HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR "MI EB WB NB SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 120 120 120 120 Effective Green, g (sec) 85.000 65.000 31.000 31.000 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 844 1403 74 358 f. Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 763 1378 74 120 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 81 25 29 238 Proportion of LT, Plt 1.000 1.000 .468 1.000 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 1378 763 120 74 Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto .000 .000 .000 .392 Sop=(1800*No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) 3600 3600 1800 1553 Yo=Vo/Sop .383 .212 .067 .048 gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) 63.294 75.587 24.643 26.546 fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 .014 .398 .800 .829 P1=Plt (1+ (((N-1) *g) / (fs*gu+4 .5)) ) 1.000 1.000 .468 1.000 gq=g-gu 21.706 9.413 6.357 4.454 Pt=1-P1 .532 .532 .532 .532 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/P1 .000 .000 1.969 .000 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) 81.818 2.826 1.406 1.357 fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (1/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) .056 .362 .826 .760 flt=(fm+N-1)/N .056 .362 .826 .760 Submitted into 'qC recor n conn , , ,i i') item on Waite (=oeman City Clerk 95- 599 J2 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) ----- Ratio ----- ---- ----- EB * L ----- 81 100 .81 .71 71 1.14 T 730 3743 .20 .71 2651 .28 R 33 1658 .02 .71 1174 .03 WB L 25 652 .04 .71 462 .05 T 1378 3800 .36 .71 2692 .51 NB LT 62 1487 .04 .26 384 .16 R 12 1658 .01 .26 428 .03 SB * L 238 1368 .17 .26 353 .67 7 TR 120 1682 .07 .26 435 .28 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .98 Xc = 1.02 Cycle Length, C 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 -- Delay 2 -- By Lane Group -Approach- - g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay y Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- (vph) ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- Grp. ---- /veh) ----- LOS --- /veh) LOS ----- --- --- EB L 1.14 .71 13.3 71 150.2 1.00 L 163.5 F 20.0 C T .28 .71 4.8 2651 .0 1.00 T 4.8 A R .03 .71 4.0 1174 .0 1.00 R 4.0 A L WB L .05 .71 4.0 462 .0 1.00 L 4.0 A 6.2 B T .51 .71 6.1 2692 .1 1.00 T 6.2 B NB LT .16 .26 26.2 384 R .03 .26 25.3 428 SB L .67 .26 30.4 353 TR .28 .26 27.0 435 C .0 1.00 LT 26.2 D 26.0 D .0 1.00 R 25.3 D 3.5 1.00 L 33.8 D 31.6 D .1 1.00 TR 27.1 D Intersection Cycle = 120 Submi' 14.5 C. B record in;..... item �v on 95- 599 Walter Foeman r?. City Clerk M- a 110 HCH Summary Results For Case: BAYSRB BAYSHORE DR /NU 2? AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BACKGROUND P.M. PEAK Version 2.03 41 X Delay 88 �07 I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ I !,pR Groin Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 1 EB *L .81 1.14 163.5 F 1268 T .28 .2B 4.B A r' 23 R .02 .03 4.0 A ---------- •-- ---------- All 29.8 C UB L .04 .05 4.0 A - - - T .36 .51 6.2 B ---------- --------- All 6.2 B 1 67 rr I NB LT .04 .16 26.2 D 606 r" R .01 .03 25.3 D 34 -1, I I t All 26.0 D 1 19 13 I 22 SB *L .17 .67 33.9 D 1 2 it TR .07 .28 27.1 D All 31.6 D 82 4 1 27 ' I' 4 2 Intersect .99 1.02 14.5 B Submitted into the public recor onnecti n it item ��� on `� Walter oeman _ 9 City cleric r'1 I "`) I ".) 1 ") I kJ APPENDIX D 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted into the public CecOr connecti n vit�, item on 9 " - 5 9 Wal;er -oernan City Cleric 9 #0% 101 (cl Im ko Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11100 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ----Range---- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.740 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 51 (0- 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(YIN) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec)-. 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 10.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME •(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A 8 C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 410 2 N/A N/A NIA N/A 890 3 N/A N/A NIA N/A 1,410 4 N/A N/A N/A NIA 1,920 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4,405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES {{ 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 830 {( 4 N/A N/A N/A NIA 1,790 (( 6 NIA N/A N/A N/A 2,810 (( 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,840 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C 0 E (( LANES (( 2 NIA N/A N/A N/A 10,000 (( 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,500 {( 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 33,900 (( 8 N/A NIA NIA N/A 46,200 (( N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour( I Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA N/A N/A N/A 0.56 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.61 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.64 4 N/A N/A N/A NIA 0.65 Submitted ir'ko ptai'.iic recor Irl t;c�rrr•<<�c°; t- �vlth item IZ on a��. 9 9 Ul aIl",e Fooman City Clerk IM WE �—s Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12.14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11100 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0,20) D FACTOR: 0.640 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.860 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 34 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 60, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 360 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 770 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,210 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,660 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES {� 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 660 (� 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,210 ij 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,900 I� 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,690 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E i ( LANES ii 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6,700 I� 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 14,500 {I 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 22,800 �I 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 31,200 N/A means the level of service is not achievable I� Peak hour peak direction thruhight V/C ratios for full hours i Level of Service LANES A 8 C D E 1 N/A NIA N/A N/A 0.65 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.71 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.74 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.76 Submitted into tree 1)I110lic recor item on L2� 9 599 Wa{ie �oamnn City Clerk IA 101 N El Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 10800 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0,20) D FACTOR: 0.510 (0.50 - 1,00) PHF: 0.790 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 46 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (ml): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(YIN) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A 1,850 2,090 2,250 2 N/A N/A 3,870 4,310 4,580 3 N/A N/A 5,940 6,540 6,870 4 N/A N/A 8,010 8,810 9,250 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A N/A 3,620 4,100 4,400 II 4 N/A N/A 7,590 8,460 8,980 II 6 N/A N/A 11,640 12,820 13,470 �I 8 N/A N/A 15,700 17,270 18,140 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E II LANES II 2 N/A N/A 43,600 49,400 53,100 II 4 N/A N/A 91,400 101,900 108,200 II 6 N/A N/A 140,300 154,400 162,300 II 8 N/A N/A 189,100 208,000 218,500 I N/A means the level of service is not achievable I I Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) I Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.66 0.74 0.80 2 N/A N/A 0.69 0.77 0.81 3 N/A N/A 0.70 0.77 0.81 4 N/A N/A 0.71 0.78 0.82 Submitted into ti �? r i:i?;ic recor j corine*()I, +• item on g r- 5 g g V%Iter Foeman City Cfed( 014 0-i fit Ic i 4j 10 lw:7 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: NS Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 10800 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.940 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 96 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 9 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U(T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (YIN): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A NIA 1,300 1,480 1,590 2 N/A NIA 2,730 3,050 3,230 3 N/A N/A 4,190 4,620 4,850 4 N/A NIA 5,650 6,220 6,530 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES j1 2 N/A N/A 2,610 2,950 3,170 4 N/A N/A 5,460 6,090 6,470 6 N/A N/A 8,380 9,230 9,700 8 NIA N/A 11,300 12,440 13,060 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E I j LANES I j 2 N/A N/A 31,400 35,600 38,200 11 4 N/A N/A 65,800 73,400 77,900 6 N/A N/A 101,000 111,200 116,900 j I B N/A NIA 136,200 149,800 157,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable it Peak hour peak direction thru/right VIC ratios for full hour] I Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.78 0.88 0.95 2 N/A N/A 0.82 0.91 0.97 3 N/A N/A 0.84 0.92 0.97 4 N/A N/A 0.85 0.93 0.98 ou"Iftlu ] HIM Irlrzo' puf: jIC recort &jconn,-',-,f w*tf^item anl.� 599 Walter 1=oonian City Clerk EN 011 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27300 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0,20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.830 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400- 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 14 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 950 1,220 1,310 1,410 2 N/A 2,000 2,530 2,680 2.840 3 N/A 3,050 3,870 4,060 4,260 4 N/A 4,110 5,160 5,420 5,680 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 1,900 2,450 2,630 2,810 (� 4 N/A 4,010 5,050 5,360 5,680 6 N/A 6,090 7,730 8,120 8,510 8 N/A 8,230 10,310 10,830 11,350 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 22,900 29,500 31,700 33,900 4 N/A 48,300 60,900 64,600 68,400 6 N/A 73,400 93,200 97,900 102,600 8 N/A 99,100 124,200 130,500 136,800 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.61 0.78 0.84 0.90 2 N/A 0.64 0.81 0.85 0.90 3 NIA 0.65 0.82 0.86 0.90 4 N/A 0.66 0.82 0.86 0.90 record��i'� 599 Item Wal r cry Crean 1094 01 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27300 User Notes: Future Background Traffic for 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ----Range---- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.688 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0,920 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 2 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) NEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0.80) I PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 920 1,190 1,280 1,370 2 N/A 1,950 2,460 2,610 2,750 3 N/A 2,960 3,760 3,950 4,130 4 N/A 4,000 5,010 5,270 5,510 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A 1,340 1,730 1,860 1,990 l 4 N/A 2,830 3,570 3,790 4,000 II 6 N/A 4,310 5,470 5,740 6,000 II 8 N/A 5,820 7,290 7,660 8,000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A 16,200 20,800 22,400 24,000 II 4 N/A 34,200 43,000 45,700 48,200 II 6 N/A 51,900 65,900 69,200 72,300 II 8 N/A 70,100 87,800 92,300 96,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourl l Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.67 0.86 0.93 0.99 2 N/A 0.71 0.89 0.95 1.00 3 N/A 0.72 0.91 0.96 1.00 4 N/A 0.73 0.91 0.96 1.00 0U1.7mlttBfI IWO tine l)UblIC recor �yfl, , ni-E'QtI tN'th item ___ On 4 Walter roeman 9 3 a City Cferit J G21IIIIIIIIII 1 APPENDIX E 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS E' Submitted into the public recor nconnect n w �h item- on .� WaiteI Fo, mars City Cledc 95- 599 R HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAY S.DRIVE /NW 27 AVE Page-1 014 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------- -------- - EAST APPROACH: BAY S DRIVE NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: BAY S. DRIVE SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: BAYSRFP INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 4 2 600 1 150 1 100 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 WE L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 NB LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS -------------- APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU ---- RIGHT ----- ---- EB ---- 69 ---- 606 ----- 34 ---- 7 ---- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 23 1268 0 0 1.00 1.00 NB 19 22 13 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 207 43 90 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 69 606 34 7 WB 23 1268 0 0 NB 19 22 13 5 SB 207 43 90 24 G'] PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .83 .83 .83 .92 .92 66 .66 .66 Submgtpd into Wpl.!blic .87 recor , iy� ccr,��F� �? on vv item 12 c�I . r _ r �,. Walter Fopman 9 " `� `g City Clerk Ito W HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAY S.DRIVE /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LT NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 82 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- ----- ----- LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING.PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 0 0 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON �, N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS $Omitted IrR@5thp. rj(a91j05 20.5 r recor conncCNo item onL'12L95 Walter Fool -flan ` City rinrl, HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAY S.DRIVE /NW 27 AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) ----- Lns --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- EB --- L ----- 69 ------ 1.00 69 .83 83 L 83 1 1.00 83 1.00 .00 T 606 1.00 606 .83 730 T 730 2 1.00* 730 .00 .00 R 34 1.00 34 .83 33+ R 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 WB L 23 1.00 23 .92 25 L 25 1 1.00 25 1.00 .00 T 1268 1.00 1268 .92 1378 T 1378 2 1.00* 1378 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 NB L 19 1.00 19 .66 29 LT 62 1 1.00 62 .47 .00 T 22 1.00 22 .66 33 R 12 1 1.00 12 .00 1.00 R 13 1.00 13 .66 12+ SB L 207 1.00 207 .87 238 L 238 1 1.00 238 1.00 .00 T 43 1.00 43 .87 49 TR 124 1 1.00 124 .00 .60 R 90 1.00 90 .87 75+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1600 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .056 100 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .362 652 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 NB LT 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .820 Y 1476 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 SB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .760 E 1368 F TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .909 1.00 1682 E * Value set by user ^r 'Submitted into the public recor connect on )M item on 9 !- _ 59 9 o�► Waller Foaman City Clerk 110 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAY S.DRIVE /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR Fn wn MM en Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., P1to Sop= (1800*No) / (1+Plto ((400+Vm) / (1400-Vm)) ) Yo=Vo/Sop gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=Plt (l+ (((N-1) *g) / (fs*gu+4 .5)) ) gq=g-gu Pt=1-Pl gf=2*Pt (1- (Pt**0. 5gq)) /Pl E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+(gu/g)(1/(l+Pl(E1-1)))+(2/g)(1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 0 120 120 120 120 85.000 85.000 31.000 31.000 1 1 1 1 846 1403 74 362 763 1378 74 124 83 25 29 238 1.000 1.000 .468 1.000 2 2 1 1 1378 763 124 74 .000 .000 .000 .392 3600 3600 1800 1550 .383 .212 .069 .048 63.294 75.587 24.415 26.539 .014 .398 .798 .829 1.000 1.000 .468 1.000 21.706 9.413 6.585 4.461 .580 .580 .532 .532 .000 .000 1.990 .000 81.818 2.826 1.411 1.357 .056 .362 .820 .760 .056 .362 .820 .760 Submitted into ttae pijt:,'iC Decor conn ' C c;rr Ji l Yen l`- onil 9 "� Waiter For rnan City Cleric 599 ,.-.. 6wk, HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAY S.DRIVE /NW 27 AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio ------ ----- Ratio ----- (vph) ----- Ratio ----- ---- EB * ----- L 83 100 .83 .71 71 1.17 T 730 3800 .19 .71 2692 .27 R 33 1658 .02 .71 1174 .03 WB L 25 652 .04 .71 462 .05 T 1378 3800 .36 .71 2692 .51 NB LT 62 1476 .04 .26 381 .16 R 12 1658 .01 .26 428 .03 SB * L 238 1368 .17 .26 353 .67 y TR 124 1682 .07 .26 435 .29 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 1.00 Xc = 1.04 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -------------------------- --- Delay 1 -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- - g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- (vph) /veh) Fact ----- ----- ---- Grp. ---- /veh) ----- LOS --- /veh) LOS ----- --- EB L 1.17 .71 13.3 71 167.7 1.00 L 181.0 F 22.1 C T .27 .71 4.8 2692 .0 1.00 T 4.8 A R .03 .71 4.0 1174 .0 1.00 R 4.0 A WB L .05 .71 4.0 462 .0 1.00 L 4.0 A 6.2 B T .51 .71 6.1 2692 .1 1.00 T 6.2 B NB LT .16 .26 26.2 381 .0 1.00 LT 26.2 D 26.1 D R .03 .26 25.3 428 .0 1.00 R 25.3 D SB L .67 .26 30.4 353 3.5 1.00 L 33.8 D 31.6 D TR .29 .26 27.1 435 .1 1.00 TR 27.2 D Intersection Cycle = f%ubmitted 15.2 C into �� recor rn conne0 i' item or' 9-99 Waite Foeman , City Clerk L] LM µ 0 I HCM Sunnary Results for Case: BAYSRFP BAY S.DRIVE /NU 27 AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P COHNS P.M. PEAK Version 2.83 I 43 Lane v/s X v/c Delay (sec/ I 90 �07 I ApP Groin Ratio Ratio veh) LOS EB *L .83 1.17 181.8 F I ~ 1268 T .19 .27 4.9 A 23 R .02 .03 4.0 A - .-- ------ All 22.1 C '-- WB L .04 .05 4.0 A ' -�. T .36 .51 6.2 B -------- -+ --------- All 6.2 B I 69 -J I NB LT .04 .16 26.2 D 686 -, R .01 .03 25.3 D 34 I t I All 26.1 D I 19 13 I 22 SB *L .17 .67 33.9 D 1 2 it TR .07 .29 Z7.2 D All 31.6 D 82 4 1 27 iIi 4 2 Intersect 1.08 1.04 15.2 C v Submitted into the public recor onnecl!'On Atb. Item i c�n 9 S - �-9� HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: MITCHELLE. P ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK CASE: TIGERFP INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 2 1 600 0 0 1 50 WB 3 1 600 1 125 1 100 NB 2 1 600 1 150 0 0 SB 3 1 600 1 150 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- ES LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT ----------------------------- TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT -------------- THRU RIGHT EB 123 164 56 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 16 385 184 147 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 40 385 12 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 49 260 159 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 123 164 56 27 WB 16 385 184 147 NB 40 385 .12 0 SB 49 260 159 27 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .74 .74 .74 .86 .86 .86 .94 .94 .94 'rr Subrn-Md into. tl-ft, pubtic .79 recur i onnerti i Item an J11 9 5- 599 Wai(cr Feernan GRV Cleric J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS - CONTROL TYPE TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ------------------------------------------------------------------ APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 14 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ----- 2 0 0 0 1 1 ---- ---- 0 0 ----- 0 ---- ---- ----- 2 0 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- ----- 0 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 j PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 Submitted !,-)to p*)e r�ublin record n ort�ec''iJJ��'ZZn Ur` " item �on Walter Foeman City Clerk !^ HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) ----- Lns --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- EB --- L ----- 123 1.00 123 .74 166 LT 388 1 1.00 388 .43 .00 T 164 1.00 164 .74 222 R 40 1 1.00 40 .00 1.00 R 56 1.00 56 .74 40+ WB L 16 1.00 16 .86 19 L 19 1 1.00 19 1.00 .00 T 385 1.00 385 .86 448 T 448 1 1.00 448 .00 .00 R 184 1.00 184 .86 43+ R 43 1 1.00 43 .00 1.00 NB L 40 1.00 40 .94 43 L 43 1 1.00 43 1.00 .00 T 385 1.00 385 .94 410 TR 423 1 1.00 423 .00 .03 R 12 1.00 12 .94 13 SB L 49 1.00 49 .79 62 .L 62 1 1.00 62 1.00 .00 T 260 1.00 260 .79 329 T 329 1 1.00 329 .00 .00 R 159 1.00 159 .79 167+ R 167 1 1.00 167 .00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB LT 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .344 616 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .250 450 T 1900* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1891 R 1950* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1649 tJ NB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .504 907 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .995 1.00 1841 SB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .549 978 T 1900* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1641 * Value set by user Dibmittec iritci fl-' c��,g�SiC reco rc rr: n item Onl-�.r'`1�`" x,� Ct ra O +r� P UUalte, Fc-i'nan V v City Clerk J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-4 SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ------------- P..R WA MR Cia Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto Sap= (1800*No) / (1+Plto ((400+Vm) / (1400-Vm)) ) Yo=Vo/Sop gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=Plt(l+(((N-1)*g)/(fs*gu+4.5))) gq=g-gu Pt=1-P1 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/Pl E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (l/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 120 120 120 120 16.000 16.000 100.000 100.000 1 1 1 1 428 510 466 558 428 491 423 496 166 19 43 62 .428 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 1 1 491 428 496 423 .000 .388 .000 .000 1800 1304 1800 1800 .273 .326 .276 .235 .000 .000 92.393 93.856 .568 .608 .565 .611 .428 1.000 1.000 1.000 16.000 16.000 7.607 6.144 .572 .572 .572 .572 2.644 .000 .000 .000 1.980 1.852 1.991 1.842 .344 .250 .504 .549 .344 .250 .504 .549 Subrritte,d info Via pu,)HO recor ii'i co im Os) vith item..-7% «N i i P.. Waite Foer tan City Clerk 9r- 599 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App.- Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * LT 388 616 .63 .13 82 4.73 9 R 40 1658 .02 .13 221 .18 WB L 19 450 .04 .13 60 .32 T 448 1891 .24 .13 252 1.78 R 43 1649 .03 .13 220 .20 f' NB L 43 907 .05 .83 756 .06 * TR 423 1841 .23 .83 1534 .28 SB L 62 978 .06 .83 815 .08 T 329 1900 .17 .83 1583 .21 R 167 1641 .10 .83 1367 .12 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit - .86 Xc = .89 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS ---- ---- ----- --- /veh) LOS ----- --- --- ---- EB LT ----- ----- 4.73 .13 ----- ----- - 82 ----- - 1.00 LT - F - F R .18 .13 35.1 221 .0 1.00 R 35.1 D WB L .32 .13 35.8 60 1.0 1.00 L 36.8 D - F T 1.78 .13 - 252 - 1.00 T - F R .20 .13 35.2 220 .1 1.00 R 35.2 D NB L .06 .83 1.3 756 .0 1.00 L 1.3 A 1.6 A TR .28 .83 1.6 1534 .0 1.00 TR 1.7 'A SB L .08 .83 1.4 815 .0 1.00 L 1.4 A 1.5 A T .21 .83 1.5 1583 .0 1.00 T 1.5 A R .12 .83 1.4 1367 .0 1.00 R 1.4 A Intersection - Delay invalid when X>1.2 Cycle = 120 - F recori;n 1724r -- 9 5 - 9 9 Walt �r Foarrian ,5 City Clerk 0) ON 00 11M 40 HCM Stimary Results for Case: TIGEAFP TIGERTAIL /NUJ 27 AVE OCEAN DRIUE, 1999 F + P CONDHS P.M. PEAK Version 2.03 260 X Delay 159 49 Lane vas v/c (sec/ GroupRatio Ratio veh) LOS 4 � 184 EB *LT .63 4.73 - F 385 R .82 .19 35.1 D ill I I r 16 All - F WB L .04 .32 36.8 D T .24 1.78 - F R .03 .20 35.2 D 123 ,r I I All - F 164-` NB L .05 .06 1.3 A 56 -� y �+ *TR .23 .28 1.7 A I I All 1.6 A 40 12 2 385 SB L .06 .00 1.4 A 1 2 T .17 .21 1.5 A R .10 .12 1.4 A 14 4 97 ili 4 1 All 1.5 A Intersect .86 .89 - F er 'Submitted into the public A$�o nnon vrecor 44 item on� Walter Foeman 599 City Clerk APPENDIX F 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 1 �4 Submitted into thee pubic recor Ln onnec i � v �'titem on _ Walter Focernari City Clerk 95- 599 M Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: ES Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11200 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS .... Range---- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0,50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.740 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ, SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 52 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U(r/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(YIN) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 31 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A NIA N/A N/A 420 2 N/A N/A NIA N/A 910 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,440 4 NIA N/A N/A N/A 1,960 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES ii 2 N/A NIA NIA N/A 850 4 N/A N/A NIA N/A 1,830 ii 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,870 ii 8 N/A N/A N/A NIA 3,920 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E i ( LANES ji 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,200 ii 4 N/A N/A NIA N/A 22,000 ii 6 NIA N/A N/A N/A 34,600 ii 8 N/A N/A N/A NIA 47,200 N/A means the level of service is not achievable ii Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) i Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA N/A NIA N/A 0.56 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.61 3 NIA N/A N/A N/A 0.64 4 N/A N/A NIA N/A 0.65 Submitted into t110, public recor caruieA4. +. i ; 9 5 _ item;a-�- or)l Vgaiter F Cln?ar r:f., El 01� w34 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: WS Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11200 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS -.--Range---- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.630 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.860 (0.70 - 1,00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 34 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 =Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.20 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A NIA N/A 360 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 770 3 N/A N/A N/A NIA 1,210 4 N/A N/A NIA NIA 1,660 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 570 J) 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,220 II 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,930 I� 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,630 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E II LANES II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6,800 II 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 14,800 II 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 23,200 II 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 31,700 (I N/A means the level of service is not achievable I I Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A NIA 0.65 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.71 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.74 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.76 submifi;ed into reco in coi lilt item oo___.i.'�'.- c;r41_._?7 1," baiter Foornan 0 f` i z �<3 i4 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12.14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 10900 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0,520 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.790 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 45 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 =Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A NIA 1,810 2,050 2,210 2 N/A N/A 3,800 4,240 4,500 3 N/A N/A 5,830 6,420 6,750 4 N/A N/A 7,860 8,650 9,080 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A 3,480 3,950 4,240 4 N/A N/A 7,310 8,150 8,650 6 N/A NIA 11,210 12,340 12,970 8 N/A N/A 15,110 16,630 17,470 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A 8 C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A 42,000 47,600 51,100 4 N/A N/A 88,000 98,100 104,200 6 NIA N/A 135,100 148,700 156,300 8 N/A NIA 182,100 200,300 210,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hours i Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A NIA 0.66 0.74 0.80 2 N/A N/A 0.69 0.77 0.81 3 N/A N/A 0.70 0.77 0.81 4 N/A N/A 0.71 0.78 0.82 f I, record �! � ���r �.. 1 item �5 9 N _ c• - 1l�lalt:: t f� ,ilan 099 I }( city cleft J 4 0 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 10900 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.940 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 9 (0 • 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(YIN) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3)' (1 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A 8 C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A 1,300 1,480 1,590 2 N/A N/A 2,730 3,050 3,230 3 N/A N/A 4,190 4,620 4,850 4 N/A NIA 5,650 6,220 6,530 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A 2,610 2,950 3,170 4 N/A N/A 6,460 6,090 6,470 6 N/A N/A 8,380 9,230 9,700 8 N/A N/A 11,300 12,440 13,060 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES J 2 N/A NIA 31,400 35,600 38,200 4 NIA N/A 65,800 73,400 77,900 6 N/A NIA 101,000 111,200 116,900 j 8 N/A N/A 136,200 149,800 157,400 NIA means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour! Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.78 0.88 0.95 2 N/A N/A 0.82 0.91 0,97 3 N/A N/A 0.84 0.92 0.97 4 N/A N/A 0.85 0.93 0.98 AUUIIIItLCU IM0 Me P0011C recur �jforznegjton v�it+ item on e 9 r; " wh Waloorr � e clan U wJ P� IN I t, i0 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27360 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS .--.Range---- K FACTOR: 0,083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.830 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 15 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 960 1,240 1,330 1,420 2 N/A 2,030 2,660 2,710 2,870 3 N/A 3,080 3,910 4,110 4,310 4 N/A 4,160 5,220 5,480 5,740 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 NIA 1,920 2,480 2,660 2,850 4 N/A 4,060 5,110 5,430 5,740 6 N/A 6,160 7,820 8,220 8,610 8 N/A 8,330 10,430 10,960 11,490 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 23,200 29,800 32,100 34,300 4 N/A 48,900 61,600 65,400 69,200 6 N/A 74,300 94,300 99,000 103,800 8 N/A 100,300 125,700 132,000 138,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.61 0.78 0.84 0.90 2 N/A 0.64 0.81 0.85 0.90 3 N/A 0.65 0.82 0.86 0.90 4 N/A 0.66 0.82 0.86 0.90 recor in connec i()n wig item UL orlj G ti albrar Foornarl r Ci;y CI(A is f% I OM I� I tzo n Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShano, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 25, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27360 User Notes: Future Background and Project Traffic for Year 1999 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.688 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.920 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 96 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 2 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.71 (0.20 - 0,80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 920 1,190 1,280 1,370 2 N/A 1,950 2,460 2,610 2,750 3 N/A 2,960 3,760 3,950 4,130 4 N/A 4,000 5,010 5,270 5,510 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES i 2 N/A 1,340 1,730 1,860 1,990 4 N/A 2,830 3,570 3,790 4,000 6 N/A 4,310 5,470 5,740 6,000 i 8 N/A 5,820 7,290 7,660 81000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 16,200 20,800 22,400 24,000 4 N/A 34,200 43,000 45,700 48,200 i 6 N/A 51,900 65,900 69,200 72,300 8 N/A 70,100 87,800 92,300 96,400 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hours Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.67 ' 0.86 0.93 0.99 2 N/A 0.71 0.89 0.95 1.00 3 N/A 0.72 0.91 0.96 1.00 4 N/A 0.73 0.91 0.96 1.00 ziuumiueci In,o the pumic recor in cortnL f n i item (7i on �lra{ie Foc rran City Clerk WIE-1- �4) APPENDIX G 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR OPTIMIZED TRAFFIC INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted into the O rec public .4Gnl in conn!jj& - I orl Wi 10 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-1 04 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR NORTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE WEST APPROACH: BAYSHORE DR SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK OPTIMIZATION CASE: BAYSRFP INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 4 2 600 1 150 1 100 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 NB LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- ----------------------------- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 69 606 ----- 34 ---- 7 ---- 1.00 ---- --_-- 1.00 1.00 WB 23 1268 .0 0 1.00 1.00 r NB 19 22 13 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 207 43 90 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ---------------------- (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT t---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- EB 69 606 34 7 .83 .83 .83 WB 23 1268 0 0 .92 .92 NB 19 22 13 5 6 .66 SB 207 43 90 24 �i,(j . g4tted int.66 8�in �abli ' 87 reccr 'n cool fill toll. +w item '- . — ��� � � 599 �"'Rer Fonnian C1!v c1c,"!R €1L] El HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page - SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ------------------ CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR LTP WB LT NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 10 63 34 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ----- 1 0 0 0 0 ---- ---- ----- 0 0 0 ---- ---- 0 0 ----- 0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 0 ---- ----- 0 ----- 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 11.5&!bm�.i�.d5. 20.5 20.5 into the F7tibtiD reco item it, co. i0rr vili �7►� ,_ r — Walte F 0017)an pity Clerk 2 i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App --- Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB --- L ----- 69 ------ 1.00 ----- 69 --- .83 ----- 83 ---- L ----- 83 --- 1 ---- 1.00 ----- 83 ---- 1.00 ---- .00 T 606 1.00 606 .83 730 T 730 2 1.00* 730 .00 .00 R 34 1.00 34 .83 33+ R 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 WB L 23 1.00 23 .92 25 L 25 1 1.00 25 1.00 .00 T 1268 1.00 1268 .92 1378 T 1378 2 1.00* 1378 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 NB L 19 1.00 19 .66 29 LT 62 1 1.00 62 .47 .00 T 22 1.00 22 .66 33 R 12 1 1.00 12 .00 1.00 R 13 1.00 13 .66 12+ SB L 207 1.00 207 .87 238 L 238 1 1.00 238 1.00 .00 T 43 1.00 43 .87 49 TR 124 1 1.00 124 .00 .60 R 90 1.00 90 .87 75+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1800 --- 1 ----- 1.000 ---- .995 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- .950 ---- 1701 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .337 607 T 1900* 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3800 NB LT 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .833 1499 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 SB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .762 1372 TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .909 1.00 1682 * Value set by user Sfibmitted into ;he p�jhlio tem r � nn'9'40 WaitGr City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR -- - rn wa TITR en Cycle Length C, (sec) Effective Green, g (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto Sop=(1800*No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 P1=Plt (1+ (((N-1) *g) / (fs*gu+4 .5)) ) 9q=g-gu Pt=1-P1 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/Pl E1=1800/(1400-Vo) fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (l/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) flt= (fm+N-1) /N 0 120 120 120 .000 66.000 38.000 38.000 0 1 1 1 0 1403 74 362 0 1378 74 124 0 25 29 238 .000 1.000 .468 1.000 0 2 1 1 0 763 124 74 .000 .000 .000 .392 0 3600 1800 1550 .000 .212 .069 .048 .000 51.477 31.933 33.890 .000 .398 .798 .829 .000 1.000 .468 1.000 .000 14.523 6.067 4.110 .000 .532 .532 .532 .000 .000 1.940 .000 .000 2.826 1.411 1.357 .000 .337 .833 .762 .000 .337 .833 .762 "�,'ubmltted into aw t)IsUllc? recoWkwoiinec ics5� �v�rhite Waite Foernan City Clerk 9r.�- 41 i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CONDNS BAYSHORE DR /N14 27 AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) ----- Ratio ----- ---- EB ----- Lper ----- 23 .56 60 .38 * Lpro 60 1701 .04 .09 156 .38 T 730 3800 .19 .65 2470 .30 R 33 1658 .02 .63 1050 .03 WB L 25 607 .04 .55 334 .07 * T 1378 3800 .36 .55 2090 .66 NB LT 62 1499 .04 .32 475 .13 R 12 1658 .01 .32 525 .02 SB * L 238 1372 .17 .32 434 .55 }� TR 124 1682 .07 .32 533 .23 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .57 Xc = .59 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- - g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact ---- Grp. ---- /veh) ----- LOS --- /veh) ----- LOS --- --- EB ---- Lper ----- .38 ----- .56 ----- 11.3 ----- 60 ----- 2.0 1.00 9.4 B Lpro .38 .09 39.0 156 .8 1.00 L* 32.5 D T .30 .65 6.9 2470 .0 1.00 T 6.9 B ` R .03 .63 6.3 1050 .0 1.00 R 6.3 B WB L .07 .55 9.6 334 .0 1.00 L 9.6 B 14.9 B T .66 .55 14.5 2090 .6 1.00 T 15.0 C NB LT .13 .32 22.2 475 .0 1.00 LT 22.2 C 22.1 C R .02 .32 21.4 525 .0 1.00 R 21.4 C SB L .55 .32 25.8 434 1.1 1.00 L 26.9 D 25.6 D TR .23 .32 23.0 533 .0 1.00 TR 23.0 C Intersection Cycle = 120 * Weighted Avg 14.8 B SUbmittod info t{iE. p«hliC recor ri cc1iint.c, icri v, item Ccin" L�_t.599 Cil„ r'i! ri. J rm OR A OPI AP) HCM Sun.maary Results for Case: BAYSIIFP BAYSHORE DR /NW 27 AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 BG + P CGHDNS P.M. PEAK OPTIMIZATION Version 2.83 I 43 Lane v/s X vic Delay (sec/ 90 �07 1 I Apn Group Ratio Ratio vW LOS EB *L .04 .3B 32.5 D I '-' 1268 T .19 .30 6.9 B I s- 23 I R .02 .03 6.3 B All 9.4 B -- WB L .04 .07 9.6 B - --; *T .36 .66 15.8 C - ------ --------- All 14.9 B 69 1 NB LT .04 .13 22.2 C 606 R .01 .02 21.4 C 34 --1 I f All 22.1 C 1 19 13 1 22 SB *L .17 .55 26.9 D 1 2 3 TR .07 .23 23.0 C�:-- All 25.6 D 10 2 63 4 1 34 ;; 4 2 Intersect .57 .59 14.0 B Submitted into 1+i public recor in connor.;i on' vvi"JI item 17Qn '� Valle Fo pan City Clem 95- 599 ( s HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL NORTH APPROACH: NW 27-AVE WEST APPROACH: TIGERTAIL SOUTH APPROACH: NW 27 AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-19-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: P.M. PEAK OPTIMIZATION CASE: TIGERFP3 oft INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE - - ---------- LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) ----- LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 2 ------ 1 600 ----- ------ ----- ------ 0 0 0 0 WB 3 1 600 1 125 1 100 NB 2 1 600 1 150 0 0 SB 3 1 600 1 150 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. ---- MOV. WIDTH ---------- MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ES LT 12.0 R 12.0 ------------------------------ WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) -------------------------------- GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- ----------------------------- LEFT ---- THRU RIGHT RTOR ---- ----- -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 123 ---- 164 56 27 ---- ---- ----- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 16 385 184 147 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 40 385 12 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 49 260 159 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT �1 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- EB 123 164 56 27 .74 .74 .74 WB 16 385 184 147 :86 .86 .86 NB 40 385 12 0 .94 Sub 4t�nd SB 49 260 159 27 I�f.94�� P7Y'10 Publ1079 recar jZ�ni*(c-T,,Gjj vI item Waiter Foenlan City Clerk dq! r HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS --------------------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 --- 7 8 --- --- Green --- 5 --- --- 48 56 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 120 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - NON-CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU ----- ---- ---- RIGHT ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2 0 0 0 1 1 ---- ---- 0 0 0 2 0 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 Il1t0 ti ;,!',;4iC SubmittedrecoW On item _ watt I Fc�Oman city cleek J 00 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- °' EB --- L ----- 123 ------ 1.00 ----- 123 --- .74 ----- 166 ---- LT ----- 388 --- 1 ---- 1.00 ----- 388 ---- .43 ---- .00 T 164 1.00 164 .74 222 R 40 1 1.00 40 .00 1.00 R 56 1.00 56 .74 40+ WB L 16 1.00 16 .86 19 L 19 1 1.00 19 1.00 .00 T 385 1.00 385 .86 448 T 448 1 1.00 448 .00 .00 R 184 1.00 184 .86 43+ R 43 1 1.00 43 .00 1.00 NB L 40 1.00 40 .94 43 L 43 1 1.00 43 1.00 .00 T 385 1.00 385 .94 410 TR 423 1 1.00 423 .00 .03 R 12 1.00 12 .94 13 F SB L 49 1.00 49 .79 62 L 62 1 1.00 62 1.00 .00 T 260 1.00 260 .79 329 T 329 1 1.00 329 .00 .00 R 159 1.00 159 .79 167+ R 167 1 1.00 167 .00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB LT 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .826 1479 ' I R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1658 WB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .251 452 T 1900* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1891 R 1950* 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1649 NB L 1800 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .367 661 I TR 1850* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .995 1.00 1841 I SB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .434 773 I ! T 1900* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 '! R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1641 * Value set by us r Submit C)" Iitemta on ® �i Vailer i--_ULff fan 9 5 9n City Cleric V �j �u L2 Ij HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT -TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR EB WB NB SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 0 120 120 120 Effective Green, g (sec) .000 50.000 58.000 58.000 Number of Lanes, N 0 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 0 510 466 558 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 0 491 423 496 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 0 19 43 62 Proportion of LT, Plt .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Opposing Lanes, No 0 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 0 428 496 423 Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto .000 .388 .000 .000 Sop=(1800*No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) 0 1304 1800 1800 Yo=Vo/Sap .000 .328 .276 .235 gu=(g-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) .000 15.806 34.417 38.954 fs=(875-0.625*Vo)/1000 .000 .608 .565 .611 P1=Plt(1+(((N-1)*g)/(fs*gu+4.5))) .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 gq=g-gu .000 34.194 23.583 19.046 Pt=1-P1 .000 .572 .572 .572 gf=2*Pt(1-(Pt**0.5gq))/Pl .000 .000 .000 .000 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) .000 1.852 1.991 1.842 fm=gf/g+ (gu/g) (1/ (1+P1 (E1-1))) + (2/g) (1+P1) .000 .251 .367 .434 flt=(fm+N-1)/N .000 .251 .367 .434 Submitted into tNG PO' lrecord in connc';ctip ii2m J� en AN 40 Walter Foeman City Gic-rk J i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDNS TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ----- ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) ----- Ratio ---- EB LT 388 1479 .26 .48 715 ----- .54 R 40 1658 .02 .47 774 .05 WB L 19 452 .04 .42 188 .10 * T 448 1891 .24 .42 788 .57 R 43 1649 .03 .42 687 .06 NB L 43 661 .07 .48 319 .13 * TR 423 1841 .23 .48 890 .48 SB L 62 773 .08 .48 374 .17 T 329 1900 .17 .48 918 .36 R 167 1641 .10 .48 793 .21 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .54 Xc = .56 Cycle Length, C = 120 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay •► Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App --- Grp. ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LT .54 .48 16.5 ----- 715 ----- .7 ---- 1.00 ---- LT ----- 17.2 --- C ----- 16.8 --- C R .05 .47 13.3 774 .0 1.00 R 13.3 B to WB L .10 .42 16.2 188 .0 1.00 L 16.2 C 20.5 C T .57 .42 20.3 788 .7 1.00 T 21.1 C R .06 .42 15.9 687 .0 1.00 R 15.9 C NB L .13 .48 13.0 319 .0 1.00 L 13.0 B 15.8 C TR .48 .48 15.8 890 .3 1.00 TR 16.1 C SB L .17 .48 13.2 374 .0 1.00 L 13.3 B 14.3 B T .36 .48 14.7 918 .1 1.00 T 14.8 B R .21 .48 13.6 793 .0 1.00 R 13.6 B Intersection Cycle = uuornitterj into ti�0 ia's.�IiC 16.8 C F'P,nO� nil8 7il d ltECt1 � on , � Walter Fceman City Cier/c Y '7 I z t �yt HCM Sumieary Results For Case: TIGERFP3 TIGERTAIL /NW 27 AVE OCEAN DRIVE, 1999 F + P CONDHS P.M. PEAR OPTIMIZATION Version 2.83 268 Lane v/s x v/c Delay (sec/ 159141I9 Amp Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 4 � 104 EB LT .26 .54 17.2 C 385 R .02 .05 13.3 B ill I I � 16 All 16.8 C t=- WB L .84 .10 16.2 C *T .24 .57 21.1 C --- - - - - -- R .03 .06 15.9 C 123 I i All 20.5 C 164 -' I NB L .07 .13 13.8 B 56 *TR .23 .48 16.1 C All 15.8 C 40 12 385 SB L .08 .17 13.3 B 1 J 2 3 T .17 .36 14.8 B R .10 .21 13.6 B 5 3 48 3 1 56 +� i 4 All 14.3 B Intersect .54 .56 16.8 C Submitted into thn pl-"Olir, i'ecor n or1nf,"l-i r Viii�/� item WaI er Foein City Clerk 9 5 -. 599 ,rt) 4 I APPENDIX H 1999 FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR OPTIMIZED TRAFFIC ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Submitted into the public re V n c o n n (-,,, c, 1, 1 r i CO -lu itell or Walter Fc5errian f City C(c-,fk F grl-- 59q Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: EB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11200 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0,20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.740 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 52 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS "1 URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 r �t Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.47 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A 980 1,270 2 N/A N/A N/A 2,070 2,620 3 N/A N/A N/A 3,180 3,960 4 N/A N/A N/A 4,340 5,340 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,960 2,540 4 N/A N/A N/A 4,130 5,230 6 N/A N/A N/A 6,360 7,930 8 N/A N/A N/A 8,680 10,670 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A 23,600 30,600 4 N/A N/A N/A 49,800 63,000 6 N/A N/A N/A 76,600 95,500 8 N/A N/A N/A 104,600 128,600 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.56 0.72 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.58 0.74 3 N/A N/A N/A 0.60 0.75 4 Nite �;N�)qi N/A 0.61 0.75 fitted into,�;fii't „�•� �(1 recorc, i nn City 9r- 599 40 i" irm I p" j f, in In Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14.91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Tigertail PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 11200 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.630 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.860 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 34 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.227 MEDIANS (YIN): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALiZAT10N CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.41 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A 590 910 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,230 1,890 3 N/A N/A NIA 1,880 2,860 4 N/A N/A N/A 2,550 3,860 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 NIA N/A N/A 930 1,440 4 N/A N/A N/A 1,960 3,000 6 N/A NIA N/A 2,980 4,550 8 N/A N/A N/A 4,040 6,120 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4.405 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E (� LANES 2 N/A N/A NIA 11,200 17,300 4 NIA N/A N/A 23,600 36,100 6 NIA N/A N/A 36,000 54,800 8 N/A N/A N/A 48,700 73,800 NIA means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right VIC ratios for full hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.52 0.81 2 N/A N/A NIA 0.55 0.84 3 N/A N/A N/A 0,56 0.85 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.57 0.86 Submitted In J l.. it recor i connecti � r item of Walleff aema-fl City CIO( 9 Via- 0Q 4 :-4 r) Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 10900 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS .... Range-•-- K FACTOR: 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.570 (0.50 - 1,00) PHF: 0,940 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 9 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED )mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuatedl SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.48 (0.20 - 0,80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A 640 830 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,310 1,720 3 N/A N/A NIA 1,990 2,630 4 N/A NIA NIA 2,680 3,540 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,110 1,460 4 NIA N/A N/A 2,290 3,010 6 NIA N/A N/A 3,490 4,620 8 NIA N/A N/A 4,710 6,220 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 NIA N/A N/A 13,400 17,600 4 N/A N/A N/A 27,600 36,300 6 N/A N/A N/A 42,000 55,600 8 N/A N/A N/A 56,800 74,900 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C 0 E 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.67 0.87 2 N/A N/A NIA 0.69 0.90 3 NIA NIA N/A 0.70 0.92 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.71 0.93 ,.. 1' t Submitted h n nonne i n recor�-�-of, V- 9��- item 1Nai�cr "a:man City Clerk 64 11 it Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12.14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME SW 27th Avenue PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 2 AADT: 10900 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.520 (0.50 - 1,00) PHF: 0.790 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 45 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS 1 URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 30 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.172 MEDIANS (Y/N): N LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 0 = Actuated, 2 = Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.47 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A N/A N/A 840 1,130 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,750 2,340 3 N/A N/A N/A 2,670 3,580 4 N/A N/A N/A 3,560 4,830 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,620 2,180 4 N/A N/A N/A 3,370 4,500 6 N/A N/A N/A 5,130 6,890 8 N/A N/A N/A 6,840 9,280 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 5.814 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A N/A N/A 19,500 26,300 (� 4 N/A N/A N/A 40,700 54,200 6 N/A N/A N/A 61,800 83,000 8 N/A N/A N/A 82,400 111,800 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.55 0.73 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.57 0.76 3 N/A N/A N/A 0.58 0.77 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.58 0.78 recar�Mn,nnect �n v"i`hitem ,�rl :. �5 9 - — 5- q Walter =osr art City Cleo( 0 0 P-4 ,.4 I tto Ito Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART -TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: ES Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27360 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 -. 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.500 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.830 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 96 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 15 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0,65 (0.20 - 0.80), PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 690 1,100 1,210 1,290 2 N/A 1,420 2,290 2,460 2,600 3 N/A 2,170 31510 3,730 3,940 4 NIA 2,940 4,680 4,970 5,260 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 1,370 2,190 2,410 2,580 4 N/A 2,850 4,580 4,920 5,210 J 6 N/A 4,340 7,020 7,450 7,890 8 N/A 5,880 9,360 9,940 10,520 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E 11 LANES (� 2 N/A 16,600 26,400 29,100 31,100 4 N/A 34,300 55,200 59,300 62,800 6 NIA 52,300 84,600 89,800 95,000 8 N/A 70,900 112,700 119,700 126,700 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.47 0.76 0.83 0.89 2 N/A 0.49 0.79 0.85 0.90 3 N/A 0.50 0.81 0.85 0.90 4 N/A 0.51 0.81 0.85 0.90 our3m)tted into tho public rccor 1 c.0rinccfi I .�r�'tf item on Wa'c' F�,rari r� 9 City Cic�rt: 1c L )ON :100 I1W its Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME Bayshore Drive PEAK DIRECTION: WB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: April 26, 1995 Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 27360 User Notes: Optimized Conditions for Future Background and Project Traffic TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: ----Range---- 0.083 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.688 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.920 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 96 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 2 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.309 MEDIANS (Y/N): Y LEFT TURN BAYS(Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYP PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1 =Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 = Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 120 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.55 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 1 N/A 30 810 950 1,040 2 N/A 60 1,730 1,960 2,100 3 N/A 90 2,650 2,970 3,180 4 N/A 120 3,570 3,960 4,240 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 40 1,180 1,380 1,510 4 N/A 90 2,510 2,850 3,050 6 N/A 130 31850 4,320 4,620 8 N/A 170 5,190 5,760 6,160 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.236 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E LANES 2 N/A 500 14,300 16,700 18,200 4 N/A 1,000 30,200 34,400 36,800 6 N/A 1,500 46,400 52,100 55,700 8 N/A 2,100 62,500 69,400 74,200 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour) Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.03 0.76 0.89 0.98 2 N/A 0.03 0.81 0.92 0.98 3 N/A 0.03 0.83 0.93 0.99 4 N/A 0.03 0.84 0.93 0.99 recorl (fell, �2 c,91 Walter Foeman _ City Clerk TAB 3 .f 101 6TMPAADQA%32615d.j%04/j0/" OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SITE UTILITY STUDY Prepared by: Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. SubmittPrI 17---, public, record jin ltern aly Clerk 95- 599 1C c5�zur�C�ZE-�y�tis,�Zin � � �.--�_�.oetaE�s, !•Ji2r. .1imas P. Shiskin, P.E., P.L.S. Theodore P. Shiskin, Arct Donald E. Burns, P.L.S. LANO SURVEYORS • ENGINEERS - LAND PLANNER$ Pierre S. Calvet. P.t.5. Robert F. Jackson, P.L.S. Eduardo P. lbarra, P.L.S. Alfonso C. ?silo, P.E., P.L.S, ARCHITEC SS • SOILS ENGINEERS Aaul E. Barreto, P.L.S. Alonzo T. Raynor, P.L,S. Garland L. Harman. Jr., P 0. Daryl Prlddle, RLS. 3240 CORPORATE WAY - MIRAMAR, FLORIDA 33025 Txomin M, ibarluzea, P,L,. Ronald A. Fritz, P,L,S. Brett V. De Falco, P.L.S. Robert C, Mulder, P.LS. DADE PHONE: (305) 552-77010 Vladimir Chomivk, P.L.S. Ken W. Gro4v. P.E. BROWARD PHONE; (306) 435.7010 A,p lg� 1995 BROWARD FAX: (305) d38-3288' DADE FAX: (305) 652.82U Ms. Gail Baldwin 5815 S.W. 68 Street South Mami, Florida 33143 RE OCEAN GROVE TONER ,Dear Ms. 73aldwin: Pursuant to your request, attached is a copy of the site utility study for the subject p opey-ty. Don't hesitate to call should you have any questions concerning this report or require a6dhioaal information. Should theyroject proceed, we would be pleased to provide you or your client a formal proposal for engineering and surveying services. 'Thank you for the opportunity to provide you this information and look forward to working with you on this project. Respectively, Sehwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. Ke . Groce, P.E. V ce President KWG:reg Submitted into the put-,lic � recur &ironnt itemon � Waller f oein-an City Del,( DADE OFFICE • t 194'. S,W, i 44TH STREET. MIAMI. FL 33186 • PHONE: (305) 223.9210 Cj — 599 0 APR 19 'SS I3:24 FROM SCHWEBKE PAGE.002 SITE UTILITY STUDY OCEAN GROVE TOWER APARTM9NTS 1. WATER DISTRiSUTION SYSTEM The property is bounded by S..W. 27 Avenue, which has a 30" and 6" water main, and Cornelia Drive, which has a 2" water main. As " the proposed use would generate an average demand of 200600 gallons per day (GPD) and a peak demand of 51,500 GPD based on 103 units), the existing..2" water main along Cornelia Drive would have to be upgraded to a 12" water main. This new water main would then serve both the domestic and fire needs of the proposed apartment highrise. The construction cost of this new main would be approximately $ 60,000. This cost includes 700± of 12" D.I.P. ' connections to the existing 30" main in S.W. 27.Ave. and the existing 10" main in Tiger Tail, 3 fire hydrants, a 4" domestic water service, an 8" fire line service backflow•preventor and _ pavement restoration. The current water connection fees are $ 1.18 per gallon which equates to a water connection fee of approximately'$ 25,000. -This fee is based on a'n apartment being ' rated at 200 GPD. The cost to prepare construction drawings for the proposed water main and process them through the various' agencies for approval would be between $ 4,000 and $ 6,000 which _.' includes the cost of a route survey. 2. _ SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM The existing sewer mains located in Cornelia Drive and S.W. 27 Avenue are more than adequate to serve the site. The existing sewer main located in areenwood Road could be abandoned or converted into a sewer lateral. Therefore, this site could be . served by one 6" or 8" sewer service being connected to the existing mains located in Cornelia Drive. The construction cost of this service would be approximately $ 3,500. The current sewer connection charges are $ 4.26 per gallon which equates to - a sewer connection fee of approximately $ 88,Q00, which is based on"200 GPD per apartment The cost to prepare construction drawings for the proposed sewer service and process them through the various agencies for approval would be between $ 1,500 and $ 3,000. Currently, there are no sewer restrictions that would inhibit the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed building. The pump station that serves.the site is operating under 10 hours �+! per day which is within EPA guidelines. The only possible restriction would be the.downstream pump station which is currently operating in excess of 10 hours per day, which requires DERM to piece it on a moratorium status. A moratorium status restricts additional sewer connections and issuances of Certificates of Occupancy until such time that the required WI upgrades have•been completed and certified by the EPA. Based on the Sewer Allocation letter dated April 5, 1995, DERM will permit the proposed building to connect to WASA's system without any restrictions. This allocation rec&i"4,..:that building; plans be submitted within 90 days of issuar-@0 h.�s�_Ia ter,-_ �Co'n item F VValler i oer:iun 9 5— 599 City Clerk U U. APR 19 " 95 1 3: c5 FROM SCHWEBKE PAGE.003 building permits be obtained within 30 days of building plan approval and construction commence within 180 days of obtaining a building permit or the allocation will be voided. Should the Allocation Letter become void, DERM could impose a restriction due to the downstream pump station being placed on a -moratorium status. This could delay the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy until .January, 1996, which is the projected completion FOR for upgragind the station, with all cost of the upgrade being borne by WASA (Miami Dade Water & Sewer bept .) . 3. DRAINAGE FACILITIES " Due to the site ground strata and the close proximity to the bay, the site drainage will be via a well, as apposed to a french drain pystem. . Each well will cost approximately $ 25,000, which includes the cost -of a collection box. In addition to the well, the site will require area catch basins, which will be piped to the well box. The cost of this system will be dependent on the .final site plan. The cost of each catch basin would be Aipproximately $ 1,300 and the 15" solid drainage pipe would cost approximately $ 20/ft. The cost to prepare paving and drainage Glans and submit them through the various agencies for approval would be between $ 3,000 and $ 5,000, which does not include the cost of off -site improvements which may be required by the City _ of Miami. t into tt�e ���blsc submitted . onnec+, recoc�,���c» itern�`` f:,ii;! r,iEFiY; 95~ 599 J TAB 4 9 ,IOF4 OCEAN GROVE REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC AND TAX BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI "I I F�a Prepared for Najjar Associates, LLP by SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami Florida 33131 ' Submitted inio (305) 374-1574 recor Ln1fonm-.-?c-Nun April 17, 1995 f "` tNaite;r J y q r + City Glen( f Ce 9 i OCEAN GROVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY OF BENEFITS 1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction 3 Objectives 3 Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact 4 Measures of Economic Impact 5 !► Description of Results 6 THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 7 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators g Results of Indicators g Impact of Construction 9 Impact of Ongoing Operations 9 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 9 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR r Employment 10 Wages 11 Output 12 Local Taxes 13 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost 15 Impact Fees 15 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 16 EXHIBITS 17 Submitted into the jai l? )lic recol, i Unnect'on V. item On Waiter ��oa w'-,1n � -- 5 599 City Cierf: 0 OCEAN GROVE SUMMARY OF BENEFITS i dl� Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes o • Economic Activity 04 Resident and Visitor spending impacting to Local Businesses: • Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail f 1#4 140 Submitted into recor �'no rifle Ner rix1 item �::�..�-'L V�°n al��risa�rl 1 City Cier'►c 95- 599 0 Lim I el i 'v> WC OCEAN GROVE SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS) The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Ocean Grove development: Construction Period Im...pact Annual Repur= Economic Activity Stimulated: Output $30,986,482 $707,904 Taxes 783,218 883,665 Wages 4,225,000 240,000 Total $35,994,700 $1,831,569 Jobs created 53 12 Submitted into the public recort&V nnc item z,n 1PialtFr n 95- 09 U7 I OCEAN GROVE INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS l Submitted into the public { recor n conn ;ion wi° item t2 onl� Walter Fee rnan City Cleric 915-- 599 r +� OCEAN GROVE INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS GO Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a luxury condominium project located at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida (the Project). The Project is 103 luxury condominiums in a 22 story building. There will be the typical amenities usually associated with a luxury condominium project such as a Fitness Center, a Pool, a tennis court and its surrounding amenities. The Ground Floor of the building P *� will contain a parking garage with 176 spaces. The site contains 1.88 gross acres. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both the development and operational phases of the project. Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of The City of Miami. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within E i Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new i economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. Submitted into the public recor ?..'n cconnec ' w'° item-'�-- on � Walter Fo> l' inn C;>, ,{ 3 �— 599 0 OCEAN GROVE INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with °�'► the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Salaries to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. Submitted into the publicrecoC 'n connect' n wi`) item Ton waiter {-oornan City Ck: tk 4 9r_ 599 �► OCEAN GROVE INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of " 1 " would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact was 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact was 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in The City of Miami. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. :- • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage- earner resides. D • Local Taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Submitted into ir`lo record in cornnoc;' Item Q .1Z on ...� 5 95- 599 OCEAN GROVE INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact(Continued) • Direct Expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project. • Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described above. • Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures #.J have been broken into two categories: (1) Development (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the condominium complex. Submitted into the public record in connocti-m Zpith !tern on 1?, . 9 f 0 I" r' VLIJ W= OCEAN GROVE THE PROJECT OVERVIEW Submitted into the public item no�jvn vit rocol"n Walter oeman City Clerk 5.99 OCEAN GROVE 44 Oq 100 k'J� t4 ke PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The proposed Project is a 103 unit luxury condominium project located on a 1.49 net acre parcel at 3202 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove. The site contains 1.88 gross acres. Construction is expected to commence in June of 1996. The construction period is expected to be 18 months. Occupancy of the constructed units is expected to begin no later than May 31, 1999. 7 Submitted into the public recor n onnec 'on �v' � , item on Walte Foeman City Clerk 95- 599 C� E® f 0 OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Submitted into the public recor in onne( ti-n wiifl item on �- K Waite Foeman City Clerk 95- 599 0 i� C� 94 i e';14 1 fJ i *A OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 53 $4,225,000 $15,807,121 15,179,361 $783,218 $20,815,339 15,179,361 Total Development Impact 53 $4,225,000 $30,986,482 $783,218 $35,994,700 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 12 $240,000 $360,000 347,904 $883,665 $1,483,665 347,904 Total Operational Impact--F 12 $240,000 $707,904 $883,665 $1,831,569 Submitted into the plablic recurnncct �, item �Mron Walter -or�m in City Clerk OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Impact of Construction: The approximately $16 million for site preparation and construction expenditures within Greater Miami would create approximately 53 new full time equivalent jobs with the maximum number of 73 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $4.2 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the above chart, spending for site preparation and project construction would result in a ,total estimated impact of $35.2 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct site preparation and project construction expenditures, including wages, and the multiplied effects of resulting indirect benefits. Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on -going operation of the 103 unit condominium complex, Greater Miami will gain approximately 12 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $240 thousand annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of nearly $1 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of residential units as well as the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of $.8 million and an estimated annual tax benefit of $.9 million. The specific entities receiving these tax rgY rft-8EP into ;l,o publi shown on page 14. record in cony; (' )11 M item &Ei can Wuli�ir F� � s't'i8 9 ir- 599 KOM 9 tft► OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR ti Submitted into the, Virus ll:t.; record corfrl(WI. ,l *1 �•.rs,, i item-�on !. Waller Foernan City Ciek 95- 599 OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to The City of Miami by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for The City of Miami residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the tenants in area businesses. Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going management of the condominium complex. As can be seen in Exhibit 1, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 53 employees over a two year period and the total on -going employment will average 12. The total on going positions can be summarized as follows: • Management • Security/Police • Parking • Maintenance and Clean -Up Submitted into the public fecor �n �anneiWaller iI item I I on 10 95- 599 J OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in The City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: • Eating/Drinking • Grocery • Auto Rental • Other Transportation • Service Station • Recreation • Retail Although it is known that these expenditures will be made, in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be difficult to contend that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from out of town rather that other parts of the city or county. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. 11 Submitted into the public recor , n onnec ion item on Walla F r3r i n City clef st 95- J59 �l OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Developer cost expended in Miami (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of Management Company • New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners Exhibit 2 shows a summary of the development cost expanded in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in The City of Miami, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. The multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. We tested the reasonableness of the multiplier used by comparing it to both economist and the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consist of land acquisition and site preparation, soft cost and hard cost which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. To incorporate the effect of respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami we applied a multiplier to the total direct output. This created total output created from the development phase of the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami another $96.64 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $15,807,121. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $15,179,361. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $30,986,482. Submitted into the public reco in�onne sort tn�� item 12 Fr] 10 OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the apartment units and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the condominium complex. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in The City of Miami. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operation of the condominium complex except for wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $360,000. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $347,904. Total output created from ongoing operations is $707,904. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is to taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. Submitted into the Public recor n connectio with / 4+ item on on 5 ' i Walter F e;;nao City Clerk 13 95- 599 �p OCEAN GROVE DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR 11 New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The total development phase real property taxes, are expected to be $782,218 and the real property taxes expected to be generated annually are $883,665. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. Annual One -Time City Operating $272,674 $241,679 Schools 269,933 239,249 County Operating 206,021 182,603 Debt Service - City 59,821 53,021 Debt Service - County 23,207 20,569 South Florida Water 14,117 12,513 Library Operating 9,743 8,635 School Debt Service 23,917 21,198 Florida Inland Navigation 1,392 1,234 Environmental Projects 2,840 2,517 Total $883,665 $783,218 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. Submitted into the prubHc record In connect .on wan item i2 on 14 Waiter Foeman 9 5 " � 9 9 City Clerk I= OCEAN GROVE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 44 oot, Submitted into the i,.:w5)AC, record 'n conneg ion Item ME on 4i5f-L Walter Foeman City C I (':' d 9 5, OCEAN GROVE i OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which could involve increases 014 in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial =e, effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services • Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infra structure) • Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objective to i compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. Impact Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are -r impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below: • City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee • Administrative Fee • City of Miami Developmental Impact • Building Permit Fee • Dade County Roadway Impact Fee • Other Fees • Installation Energy Fee For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $205,844 and other fees total approximately $76,277. These fees are shown in detail inJEiN* ffgj into i"t, p!!J,-)II�, recor r corer ��,�,r�i.,.h 15 item I� on ? 9 5 — r 9 `'�'" dValter Focorriam City Clerlt J i OCEAN GROVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS r r at�r��r :g Y F�F L l } Submitted into the r.)Ublic { recor �inconn aitemnWa eleFoem�-'atnh i �ffarJr. city Cleric 95-- 59 0 OCEAN GROVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the Ocean Grove Project, it appears evident that such a development can clearly bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on Greater Miami as a result of the development. Employment EAR Employment considerations include the Project direct employment and employment created in the surrounding community through new residents spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 111 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project will be approximately 18. Tax Revenue The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: One Time Annual Output $783,218 $883,665 The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost and outgoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of responding within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $30,986,482 Annual $ 707,904 16 Submitted into the publie recor�I,,�n, ann item item on ~h Waiter -oeman City Cleric 95- �99 ¢14 OCEAN GROVE F,XHIBIT LIST Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Summary of Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII Operating Assumptions Exhibit VIII Impact and Other Fees 17 he public Submitted into t recor onnecti n L on item � lter poc:i�►en Wa city Clerk OCEAN GROVE EXHIBIT I ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT i i OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES 1 E i 9(00 A $15,807,121 $4,225,000 360,000 240,000 $16,167,121 $4,465,000 $15,179,361 347,904 $15,527,265 $31,694,386 $4,465,000 53 $783,218 12 883,665 65 $1,666,883 65 $1 n. Submitted into the public recor ,in k nne_c�t'on item or) 7-m M i� 7 OCEAN GROVE EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS TAXES PHASE 0 OF EMPLOYEES WAGES DIRECT COST AD VALORUM SUbmitted into t{ie public recor onnc,c�'r.;r� it )� can 7 Walter Farman ci y clerk 95-- 599 J 10 f 1 F'j 1 4 j i ra OCEAN GROVE ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS EXHIBIT III TOTAL APPLICABLE COMPUTED INDIRECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIER BENEFIT r' Submitted into the public record 'n connec i r t + Item Waiter -c,!A Kan i;ity r � - S99 lu tic F-= OCEAN GROVE EXHIBIT IV ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST % SPENT IN TYPE OF COST DADE 71MATnTM ,,Ubmitted into the put;lic; recor onnc",ciic n''ZZvggj item) on ._ 1 Welter-oc,Tn, ,n City Clork 95- r-gq J 04 OCEAN GROVE EXHIBIT V ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES 04 DEVELOPMENT PHASE TOTAL ANNUAL DESCRIPTION 1996 1997 ONE TIME RECURRING i" 1 I F- 4 I" w 0 $4,919,040 $14,757,121 $30,980,000 $2,575,000 $4,919,040 $14,757,121 $28,405,000 3.11% 3.11% 3.11% $153,029 $459,087 $612,116 $883,665 $2,750,000 $2,750,000 3.11% 3.11% $85,551 $85,551 $171,102 $238,580 $544,638 $783,218 Submitted irlto the pljhliC recarc + �Z rinc;;ri ;r► vvfif item ,_ �-._ on Walter City Clerk 95- 5"99 OCEAN GROVE ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT VI ALLOCATION ALLOCATION OF APPLICABLE OF ANNUAL ONE TIME BASIS MILLAGE TAXES RATIO TAXES s._:::::;.:::}%:...::.:.::.::;:.;:::.:.%:..:.....::s:}::;:s:;:s::::::s::::s;::s.<,»s:::::: %:s::ss::s:::s<::: s: ;'`t?f:•:ITi:tt):wa ..iCaa::#� :>«::>s:?axe;:'ss3:::::»::a:::»::>:<>z::>:i>}.:Es>::: $28, 405, 000 86$ 241 679 9.5995 $272, 674 30. $ , ?{;�. }:{•.:i3'`;:4.; k;:k':k';`••R•; i*}: n,•;?:.;::}••,•:�i:i::...: { •.:: ::i:(::::k%:;>:::�� � :ti•i::::::: v.. \; . ;}.•i\'.4.::vWnhi:�?•.v: }'8: }'•.S:•}:: }i!•:: }: '%�C�: � '�?:}•::4•:f:,+.}�jii}l?;::• ..n: }:> :v •.{w;.?;.}:}.{?{d;L,>Jr{i: i:r �:t4 :;:;:;:;i��: ... }.. :.,,:...,....:.:.?::.{.......;:.:.}:.}:.}:.:i:•:,i}:•:>::;:>:<.:•}:.}:.}}:%.}:•}:?.}}.k?.}:.:;.}}>i:<k:.>,::....,. 'tiii'>::: 405 000 23955$ 30249 9.5030 $269,933 $ :� :<:::.>•�<>:''s>E'::;>#e:};;:«��:#..>•aa>:>:<:�> 28 . I %Y�<.::,::..t;.k.;.;ti•:•}:.i}•:+r.;:%•::r;k•}}}:?a`.?o:•:;:{.:}:•:<;.}r•:::;::5:�:;:ti;i •}:•}:•}}:•i}}:;•:;?'•. ::::z:>::.,}::ss:::;?:::::::::{:ss:}:}:k:»::.:}s::•s>::s::::s ?; `4 s' }W...:'`' '?` 7 x 3:}.:i;:;.}:};?s.:.;:{.;}}}}#}}:•:<?.:;:;k•;}}:;.}i}}}:•}}}}:<•}}: $ 2 8, 4 0 5, 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 6 021 2 3.31$ $182 , 603 7.2 5 $ i;'•s:'••<+`%;rr?:;+%%;�:5::•.;�::•`:k%;i••�%:.'::;}:::'%':;:::;::%�}?�;:�;:`•:�:��:�i •:;kk:;•::�k::ti:;;ti%:SStiS:::::: •;: •}:•}}:?+.:}::i:; ::::b:,•}:�:G:•r•}:.{.::••::i:k}•>:•ii:•'•':��:.;:�:5:�?S`<%%�i::}%ky;y:ti�%:�S;r.`•f:$;:!: :sf 2 8405000 2.1 $I 060 59 821 6.77% $53,021 , +Y,.::Y?•:.� :?::: •!;:: y,: ;.: :nrn;.,.:...:. v: n?•/r}r:%:S;i::�i:�ii'i'i?ii'v:•ii % .......... . .4.. �..{+•:•.5::}:::::::}.:+w::::?,:•.w}:•.CE'•:ti{:?Si:;>:;:;i:�:y};}: }::•:v �:YS' :.�R::i}:•kk''•;{;}Y.:<:i•:S;isi?':�%:;;:?•:?{??•'.??bi:i:;.:ii••}?}i:;'??.}}�%ti %•�: Si`•ki::: �iik�'iii:{� ri: {.:K...?;.,.:<;::,{.<•.;}?...;.{k.:::,?•?{.:r.?:.:::::::;..:.:::::::::. c•: 28 405 000 2.63$ 20 569 0.8170 $23,207 $ I y 'yA:v:;T,j�f;t:±�$n;%i.!v.�.,.��.•:::;,.iir'l,.l;r{:??•+:h::!{}?ir.:??:{i}:i:.}}v:: ^; v:: •:: •.:,.::: v ........................... }i/.?•::}nr,:'isy.}i:ir:?•:4}:•:ti;�i�;v:::;}:::¢ii:%ti:ii�:Gi:'�i'i:�i?iii:•I}::i::;;};: {`�i::n:...nnn .:. :.::. {r?•::..A ... s.{.:.d,},;r;:•:,.:.:,,:>•....:....:::•.,•:.k.:;s::{}.,•::;::.;:..:..{ vTJi"' }},,.::<sti S4uh2r F{w'r W�L�41i1�'# # 28 405 000 $ I r 0.4970 $14,117 1. 60% $12, 513 }:;Y}yY:$•}:,Q v :iSf, M::,4 y�•i� •; },•.,.� }l : iv:•}:;{v+:� vn^.,r.}^,t••Yti } •}iY:'•:: { }•{.{?4:G:;}:4:: {:.r..;: •.,5,.+.;'>.{ :t,+.::...?......•:::?:•:<.,9•}{5..;.ti+;;•.;:•::.?•{%L}:r �;.>:•,•',•,'}':'•}• • ::::S:k: '•ti?}};•'.: }i5> ^ ::<kr i}::i't4:.'•: T•I'•�� p y x:,:.;.::•.;v:.;>:<{::;:?,f::;:::;s;::::s:::::::;::sr::}<i<:::%;:s;<ss::> :+.3..:::�M''+A'rr,••;.r..',.�%',i::>::•r:+,t'•,:n';:v::: t.:;j:i;:4 } :ifri.'•: .. .. .:o$;::%:;, $ 28 405 000 0.3430 $9, 743 1.10$ $8, 5 k?;:};T4},?}•}iii:?{:;Y;i L;}:;?:%ri:::... .; ..: ... �:. }:';•+4ti•?':i�ti'.h,',k?}^:3k0'::}v:?;kYi:i � �:ik�r'iti �:; '�\'•M{•,v+6,�.:: r?{tn•.,?{.%}}}:•v, ^.i:{•:,`Y. ::,•:?%qf,•}i}' }'?%•i: i�^'?;n•;.!.6: i�: }:4}?;?•Y4r $yji{':::,:::•,:: r..2>.>,:}••:e?: :%:;:;%%:;;^> �•;i i kr}:.:;:•:;ki:•}}'?.}:•;yj;:;`.!::<;.'•}:•:k;:.}>:k:ti:;::.,<.:.::: }:?•{}}}r k •{'{.}:,;{Tk} },..,+.??v: }J.+ •^,:i<::}?%ii •\:}ib';�:••,}}•};.: i}.'i':•::r,•}••$:%%:'r:}:iR::}}.}'•\:;:?;5:;:i:;:%;i:j%}:r%:•i :}:jb}:•SS{.' } :<: r>:K:: A'....•:}:;:t.:{?y?.f.; �.?,: SiO ::::}.sk?;;>s.}:.<:,.:;:%::ss?k;.s•{.i:{s•::• <:s:;:<?:;•?hx?..::•: :::;«:> 28 405 000 0.8420 $23, 917 2.71$ $21,198 ::.:i.:: ;}:vv;:,r{i:,,,}•x .; ; .,,,.} :..' { :r•Y%":\:\;:>.:,+.Y::}}}r `.'.'{i:•>:::r4:: },::},'{n'>ikF`•'i+'::> {:,ra;:`::?'i}'•:{}i'rn>:i::?,;`;;iS.'•ti''•:?i':2} " •.'• } £ ' nti.: ;3 `: y::'•:;::}i i""':.'S':u�£�,?r..3?}4;?+{miry}{>,%:v;'ritii:':'i};}:};:};•y•{:?^k•::n{�v^,�Y�'<%%•'.:.,,; y!i?:•;.:?•: G>,.?r{;isy}•::}•;:.•r.•i:}.••.'2%:S>':•:?+,:+r>:;y'.,';:�tii}::S{;::kk�xf:`v3;:;:%k:::•S:i';}.r•:55:<0:.}:?«•}:,}:•} 0.0490 1,392 0.16% $1,234 k41:4:•::it#:t#4�;:,.Na:��Jj.t>,A3C:<F: •�Y $28,405,000 nv {•\4^{{;,}v{:;�{v,}ti;:??::::K•:k�`�'�L.}%'\:jyi{Y$�Y:ry'}ki.'•i:;'},.}'+?r:;:?yK?•}{YQ},^•,•}n•:%•:%�:}k::}::!::jiii:l:f::ti>}:;:;:?;:;:;:;: ;��j;S',..?yi•;yF{T. ..:?i4{,a}}y.,%ri•}:i{>•:i^`v:::{,;•'r,}:;{}::,'fi.:?ryk?}ii;$::;:;,•Si:;:::;if,.}%�r•::}:!;:%%:::;::;?,?;;,;;{r.,,: :.i�'�{j,,�•?i}ar}i•y:}f.:;;;:•r;;ry?;Tiit>•;:i?}vi{:•i:{;i::Q:;j�:,h,:i^,isisUs:}}%i':.%::�:k�{:kf:•r}:i�:•T'i'.•>:k•?i:?>.::i::::•iu•:;.`,•:; :,`kr••,•r:}`{�:•:'•k}•d�.A:j�k{;:;:v+J{�:::?F: •kiry {}}};y{�;; $::.:C+:r:^�;{:;n.�::;:Q:4$4•.1,','%:},#}:�::$�i:• :�>:?::•:k%{: %<L%s: i:�:%i:•Sil� #E : q:!}tA4 1 # 's• XC►•::Er?4•"fi s t•;'^# <;r:`, > <,':� :sns:•r:':<•:: �{.};;S$ $28, 405, 000 0.1000 $2 840 0.32% $2 517 • •s Via;', , a. �;i;Y{;:'t•.:%}%;; �:r,.;:s:%,Yv:: or,•fXr�sri##�`''�.�"#tr'k•``.;?'S;��.y??'i%v:`•�•.'{.���•;:?;••.>,?; •�.�,}••'��'r';R<;:y�:f:?G';3yy;,.;.r•:;>•„N.,:i.`i!h'u�ii{;Oyu+•v``•:5i:%;/%:�•`,•'••`S•.':},•,ryaS7$?k`5:#`kt:�::$>{y.ii%`•4:,>.%y.^,;{;S�:'••,•':•>�::: � �:%'�niY+k• �+'+}hify{??�i�K�i^^:£•$+y''i'v Ytir{Q:,�f�'v��?j i+�.%�ii �k��fis0:•}.�'f.;•'k+,?i?:?�}:}:iti:%%i{?::: Sry7��C',,..,. sw}i/k;.�:h: f°:n:5v>"::•'.<k::s>::::r;;:#:{w>':z;<#<:>:' S�;n3:..: 8 405 000 $2/ 31.1095 883 665 100% $783,218 $ ..y,N.,,�{c;..z^.?....'A��y;.y..,.,. ...> r.; :.:: :.: :. ::..:.,:,..�:::. ?:?,•:::n. a:<::•. I co CD O C< r-•f� ��. Ap� r1• -t• CO S cz) �j �•'' w G fu OCEAN GROVE ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS Im 10 DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT VII AMOUNT 180,000 165,900 154,900 103 1,504 $200.00 20 6 65,000 1,000 4,800 42,000 1,200 2,000 81,900 64,888 21,846 Jun-96 18 $2,750,000 $100,000 $100,000 $11,500,000 $575,000 $75,000 $1,950,000 $2,300,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 $14,500,000 $3,450,000 $350,000 $750,000 $375,000 $400,000 10 40 60 3 4 6 $20.00 $600,000 $240,000 12 $25,000 1.9664 J �- Ca r C v w. .o U) Im Fm EM irl OCEAN GROVE ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES EXHIBIT VIII Square Footage 180,000 165,900 154,900 65,000 Amount $112,148 90,331 3.364 $205,844 32,035 23,090 8,295 5,750 2,309 2,078 1,000 437 649 584 50 35 $76,277 $282,121 Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department .Submitted into the Public irteec; nor�--- 11 io + ' on Wa R m^- !nl 0 9"- 559 ow ow do LASON Systems, Inc. S.L. 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149.800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES r..., 11") 1 I ) I �I fi / s/e lw Tw q.'. •ve.Y P.N •� �V(b // �dfI !sal a 1. . r, w Z � � ✓ p�•f S54�oI +° G° P he� Q/M et• is4o yA Inv e4. Ie•Plfi En57Frc67d / G ;MIRY• 700 10 ,�Krow,ww.c wf•/t, \•M� �r\� rlr�. 00 L. OC-4 T/OTC! MA ,0 ^r' / �'�a � Op 00 yrq, •�.,�. 4 OOar/oa/ OF SCCr1a V�p/.r!•✓/ RIM fl ° 14, Q3 �� y • � /� r'l 97wp/t ~7. 7 1Wa 4 SW7Tl co) Z nry ,rr!•vr k�• J L` ,r7` '•4 iT , 8 'i` e w<,...•n.•r olv-rw•2•f ....,w� r iJ °s✓✓ c�'r'•f S. r fJ' •,L•T,t GOvcF ,7In LL • It73 lir brrVr � h o . u�,• r _ - lur.rou �\b ('1• •lv'l�'i� �yyry�y r • l v' r _ f e r ou,c �y nm ce rc.v eeslr� .pv+�c. le-V 1•/ ry � , p �,s err Las. •mvucrulf s \ IUV E,L✓ 4r N ,rc• N./ seer ct APC"`"`r'� .• ELE✓wrioN Jr rrB C iurE•asecr:oN 13 C+,s,+.w ru.• Teu pF JtJ!/rN tl. ✓Sl/OQf OP/✓E J!O \ � It � n° \rj </ELAMO aO fi✓AQO f1sw e7.. r.rJ Zy o; • w f 'r�'��nqqs shown hertfa✓, /e/o,6 fn on veeumcd `��aiin�t Tek 30'WJ 4 ti yfG 27,, 4wngA- P/at Bops a,, /2Ba,, Pogo 39. � �a�, Fj,.� � 2. Tins ste%h �P/r9�n/s o %aid/toP y �v/+•' / «..y. "woo A, 3. E/eves/ions shown hrL-+yr rC.�r- /o C.Mr off' •Mipon; L7.rlv.. �C.N.O% $= \ ;2 �• r a 'Py 4 Th,s sLr,ry /e aub�ec/ /o eoscmm/s, /••y/h/s •of- pod P/hrr rTtorf'ers whch mryhf fx rrFl�c �d d' fi/•E fo fhe sub�cf /ond.9. � f�ic° '�;' S q !s� 5 TJtrr L7►C rb v,�/b/e a/,crvochmcn/s o//x/ /lrvn +!rasa la �nchrrra-k rA /c}o c�curb o/ .che sou/haoB><• cn//rr- oL' o . Tiger-/oN A.r �Crr,e%o Gi•- E.Ex • /S. /9B CMD .ertr eL• iG/9 \ H,rrwr�' V,. ,'� h5,1 � � `q� � lb b 7. ra. o rs orco of po/ca/ fo adfocrn/ CU, r /,/ass of s//rr, 4S �u •w UOPfu ` '� AC Is /.Sd73 Aorea r.sr� or /ass. B. Net oreo of ck r / ;a /?4d 4c/es mo/a or /ass. ° era•' 41 o _ Of,.rtrr,wcad Ipood Kx•o&-& 6yiv/o-f: � ��•p ,p d.n+,frr ,see .(ae/„v,r. rsaL-,!*.id /d I - fjpe, ,s,r„ t ta„r,tr. ,s y,sf,o+/ y.m✓1 If Uw/ur v!!x .0 co xfcaf, fh s Ir— /'!roll fe /xo% —// p /o .r o.da. Fardo>',orar.t� \ off' 4E �• • V . I AffRe_BY CERT/FY M.,AL-d '•sk�.�h � s c>< S/✓r,ry Is l ww and ccr-rrcf fo fhe hesf --y Frww/ed/e O " and tr/.e�'os rtc�/r//y surr,ryed ondro% •d /r7o6/- -y TJYi s VUZYd y /reels AT 1t&nii7Ju av Z7eO5n, co•/ S/ondor ds os �i o° ` a�- t>' Fcr,S/i by ff,C F,br-raf� 9lao Gbai-o/oF Lond 9u/-�yo/s ` '` +r ,ow•ave•✓i sS� Cneo/rr C1G/%•G . F/o/n/O ,44inin,:rf afri�r �'oa/n RIM. 3G1. e4 I 00 SG,/K/Edt�E- S//isrCi V.v /uv. e•ase 90• .x+ ! 9 /it/C SS'00/rllES, , By: /� S('ETC/,/ TO -gg4oW THEE LOCATIONS �o.o. rp IrtZy eve. +41:lMI n..v 2, logy ,vorE: WS/sil w,wCA/a�s aw u/J.II !J r w,v ,wDFa,✓ .,<e tKflO Mbr /,ft0 rrecleupsw r.1• .w0/ // % J IIll1,. ,p,eIICWNIY ,r,•q/N/lql, A•`/wn✓.w1 % /4NT , C0.rOu,/t, CA6[!S,• !lC ,vis Ilc.✓ N,rrgf0 ar rn•! rn i/✓ errlP /M . -e /M,uYP�r �••+:• P /ro ,s rwlAl,Yyr jI awr✓ei m ..,r l�,ryley a ww ,r/rt wr..,✓ C e¢•nan•ta "t r, i1 .v/✓✓/e /ry escon�rcc. arP ram'(e a\ \ ys A y\ \a •"IYdT'/G3eE ASOW NVISIM SAetL T Cl l CIF SURVEY T ®GO G, .I,00A AIOcZedCT "d "', "O,?O(iEMOUNTd/.V QEPLsl, deeaea/.NG TO Me p147'T.4iEQEOF, dS teeeavDEO 1W i6s R!41900A,00, /Z8 d7P4CE 99, o c )W4, "Wezle .9.-e 7 601 040E COUNTY F ue :.:r .�,es,o txr SEC7/GLt/ ?/, lOif/NS.f//P S4 SOU!// ,Q,QNGE 4/ EAST, P.D.B. LEG4G HE'S /P / =�.� .4awrelBlwrrw CP T ON� / .n+S ' (t(sr our.'vxrt/ ••..w nrirrv•.r:n.e-.+a....wv Pi.•cir •. � / Cd9• A�r/ne! ro rr<w.r rwr.✓. .<s.r.r�e.re .w .r..r ew,e rin lr .vs! ee , ••! r � �< s•Ruror e, m!<esw r, I t • l} .� � fbr�''^9 .r.vwo eo« �ee...,...la. rroan�N,�+�r +.onesweer ��'':f,d � L 8 v 0 rrreFrrretttuttt,:n Filllt•: It��i�°i":avtl.:0 flat t°fgttQ `r'.,tlt rZ. _ f r'Me."iZ.t� rctt �O �` •,et[ . 'a arty }i`�('.S t�J� I•tt a fi1`�i'.t�tt'+ `7 • \h f, 1 �V •:.Vf \� � 1 i —� � �iiuw' ..i i a �•.}}l� 1�'K..Yu•r .• �.'e' rnrl v V • ' 1 � i" r � I[ µpy 1 si�On.i�K wlr, tt .Si'. Z• - I '� 1 � N. D7�ISt2/'E. (AB fiB♦/e.M/ u+ .f•Y 01tf � I(Y����� .� nuw�•r ut.fl�f� � `al � _ zs.Or 1 1: ret br. J'.t ••1 )I ft tv tp I t(t K y — ltttfht tWa••t > I•It LC• N tl trR 1OIY�Q �IIIMl11C. a D•rr-Zw,t�� Q `+ qn♦ 1 "�� b� � Q uyt• b bV V 1 A �• C �o G � � 7!4 tW.tE VIM & <47_!9 I rQ a i v 'air aa,..s rrawee ' sau sr�uav M/a, q� s "� m .•>n ram. rwy 14w rhtcr' dar/ 1� 114 E/ }r391Mdv/ 9GtdA �• d /N/S'L007X•SG7 tu11e-401 wall .0 RFE1 ,.� .��`M..�..1.: R/S'aa2u• . I watt ENWo�� _.r' .re'ree rovty an u •�!3 �%'''Gr'�'� N � G R £ '� '�'�7 r i w•� M O .• Ot•t I �—d ��7� �— i � � �&• ? " 1 � n to o u /� Llie<�) 'pr25„ , .�I �rfv Oe9/!/ •QrtlfL. fe3/ u � � /' `P' `Ti M tiJ' ' f;` —_' ELL✓. = 0 st w /,. J ` h �% f f�J ` i , ( �alun:,ac rw,<A• Ft'. f�t1° � � s n° \�0 .a`i d � `y` h 1 • P.+... Tt� fees ew 4a9 so > yr 1 Q• G P new w - Saf15�/vER MlNNBc / sYwo T J /NIEl.•.7J41/OPJ't/ k:/ate " � n•�c ••e'••'a ��t � � I — �,roo w•awA.�r•i-i `ltr � � '`�t+°� P g/�' .I � �� ,B,N - , w e � so• �• sr G�,- JV, V4ubmitted Into tile\ public PCX record i oec o^ v it item nnon Vlalte Foeman nt \ rxr rrv/.rir<..r e✓ri..�• .i ..w.e..rc «<w o..1w..Ns✓wrr ro al..s/w iry }/r> 1� V lA MIX: GaE sl.L0w 1 w y\ \Qt \r1/!J'/G:i1 E .wwrno.• areFa.frr..o r..•.sr.Is aw:f i.ry..owc .wr.. s..<.ue arvr...•t �Nr svavErNir etm �gl<nfr<:o • oe rw s<ccurvr vrs a✓ nvr errs✓ <.wr. Nt/ NI,y✓O �tlf w++t alt. w r w.wi .w tar r wrr iBiJ''AI N/r®N. MSCIr/t!•�//pr AMNN rI�fLW eplrwW fYrlre rD 4'Y (i+w/�r/fe NirY W � t• tart.{ tY.aNrl W Yrrlr Y �t<�.•r+4 '- -. -a b..r,weY e. �u1 JlR t•ti KYa+Y ..ar Re�ol> r.o Mw.-aao ..+eln �-y �'•• �'E 7"CA,I OX' SUI�V46Y T 000 Cai4 <4 AyY �`�=�•°� '� ••--%SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND M.MNM EWNEERS ARCHITECTS LAND SURYE W 4PORTIONOFMWer-,d", "6QOVE,NOlbNT,d1WRC.A lr MAN I194t s'W. 1ae+`sr fIpayDA as113f: .dCC4�P0/.NG TO T!/E PLsI T T.4�EQE0�', ,4S ,PECO.PDED /.{/ �, a�... �,.�..�r�n�,� 2 �_� a.�+ �• � • R'4TBOOf�I /2d ATP,dGE 99, OF lX/E PLlEUC QEC0�2DS .OV'H�!?T F ✓d CltSal.J 9 GW D.QDE COUNTY, FLO,e10,d . a+. r�. exai r�so ' sd. /�• - i' N& 2•ea5 Sr r diJtivfd. SECT/GW ?/, /OIy.VS'.4�/.o d4 -51046 r, AU-,VGE 4/ E,OST, &@WwGd EMOMW Ift a-•- .e RWMd Me Nd � -773 s1.e H. M s z 0 .o Cn (A �CDXa) np=;M> ,M > m r o 0) C 13 m .Q 3 C M Q 33 U ZJ v CD 59 This survey shows platted easements and rights -of -way. There Underground features, if any, not identified nor located except as Elevations shown hereon are with reference to the National noted. may exist additional restrictions and/or encumbrances which maybe indicated hereon. Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) unless otherwise affect this property. F.I.P. = Found Iron Pipe CL. = Clear P.C. = Point of Curvature CLF = Chain Link Fence CONC. = Concrete D.E. = Drainage Easement S.I.P. = Set Iron Pipe & Cap ENCR. = Encroaching P.T. = Point of Tangency WF = Wood Fence U.E. =Utility Easement D.M.E. RES =Residence R/W Right -Of -Way O F.N.& D = Found Nail & Disc t = Center Line P.C.P. = Permanent Control Point CBS = Concrete Block Stucco = Drainage & Maintenance Easement = rr i p= Angle of Deflection A = Arc Length T = Tangent F.N. = Found Nail R = Radius F.R. Found Rebar C = Chord P.R.M. = Permanent Reference mmument I�.tc. Coe .=e�actL coet� �- t ,F 1, 1J' � N J 6.. C m e n4/ in 6enG. nlonum�n�' a � o C Nrn <l A NZ � 1> 03 <� D o R no P mr 1 S -`L 0 w Q Fes. U b irr, tuna. monument` Pik© c pejjpS t Lo=04 of TRH AW17 MUM$Ee ('gam StjaFT Z op a) _... Ica 0 EF %\ pr>30 0" CI- (D rr w (D a) (D Z' w ct n rt Q, 0 (o N- 00Xrr (DOM rA 0z M � nM 0 7r tD (D O (D rn tt ' C il- (D tr i2, O N ¢, : Ar O �S 'a q rr (n �4- Z .• ro w(Dt%J,< o°rto(D m (D N ri < N O G S2, O r! NWT M 0 q :3mEn a N (D � aEQ o ' a) O M C r"t n O� n t'N Q' rr rt-Q. a' O m r- N >r ID ts' f✓ Nro (D 0 SD fr ►ZI r'r n�(D N vN Orl- to Ul 0 e �vasror rp 1 NOTES !REVISIONS r.,Ne OF 1Z D BASIS OF BEARING LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION FLOOD ZONE X COMM.PANELNO. ?4.I.SYj = S-Z�I--IA. /SG IiMrv-� M (2.la!�N % / 1 2C-v Is,oN cc-7tMCArwNS: &- Za- G4 �s LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE — BASE FLOOD ELEV. — DATEOFF.LR.M. 3la 2 O�ncnnt TD SKE't k;6-so-�i4 �. ..1.. �,- ll� �111 �1 4VG � f )( 11= � — �D c� M M C � r-Z pm O =tom _m M r- r- o F vr v n(1)wsamQmsna— cwm=00 m=. .93 mm0)mo-��=m CD ow — 3 mic 61==r= a zm=R3am3 o o c3=0�==a°1O9t nl �w�.�=�m�aCD m m �3 —w o �? N o-mmaloamy°: A T �! y .+ -t 'CCD �0 M-.3WS 0 w�m � � 0,< — N_ o MinKIDmmam- +� m 0 ��m3-'oyo°.s +=00 ?t°'3g=ors,°m 0,-iQ' = m C tr S 'm V'MAS `3Ca,m 3. -ris 05®m="*< Q1aw6wm=oM>a0. 30rn,=Rams E Z. U Cn eC M rr- D M � 31 - M K O -31 rd -n _C m UI CO r to Va D z r D 33 40 C_'�caQm0 WZ �14 �0C � I Q fi] m < s 0 { 0 31 .6j N J r� This survey shows platted easements and rights -of -way. There may exist additional restrictions and/or encumbrances which affect this property. F.I.P. = Found Iron Pipe CL = Clear S.I.P. = Set Iron Pipe & Cap ENCR. = Encroaching F.N.& D = Found Nail & Disc t = Center Line p= Angle of Deflection A = Arc Length F►. 2-� � �oT 44 n a TIE 3.20 _ a � la s f � R Q :OFFSCr �� Oti ` Underground features, if any, not identified nor located except as I Elevations shown hereon are maybe indicated hereon. Geodetic Vertical Datum (NI P.C. = Point of Curvature P.T. = Point of Tangency P.C.P. = Permanent Control Point T = Tangent F.N. = Found Nail \07- 00 x_\ X o_ P. 92.7' - —Z, ifiOry f•QO� L 5T"�RY--lZ1=5TD�t�i-Gt=- - A AI G CLF = Chain Link Fence WF = Wood Fence CBS = Concrete Block Stucco R = Radius F.R. Found Rebar 33.0' J.A N��- #� d.n4,9 ii, 107_00' CS A.LL fC1W S BouMDha1 C.oaN+�R' l—N (� Iona. ManurnenirITOFF4Er — _ EALL Cll&t4v rMAICCEZISLA 1- Q r -- 13 a- [TXErc Rc»ts) ' T �✓aTOn)S O4TJD NOTES / REVISIONCZ UA3E op D BASIS OF BEARING TA.KsFj , S_ Z¢-�'!d. R:-:Vj&onr CC7ZT1PcortoNs:&-Zo-G4 �_E=U►r,Eo MErzcor.—M: eevIstoftj TO S tcrcH; 4-30-114/� Tt} .-... _ . /Q cvd,-,,,-,� enr,c�. �rnoF of •2/u `� �� Z-1 •4v1r . = r_>j c Na CONC. = Concrete U.E. = Utility Easement D.M.E. = Drainage & Maintenance Easement C = Chord Fd. iT,o 11 � e Q �- U � N �¢ < P NZ C)d Z t A01 o- N� �? In n � 1 n loll N /F. n4d rn 6ona. rnonumcnF � � J J C � 6- M 0 w C Fa. Ll d p In N 4orrb. rrroAurnen� C3/8i s OP z �D t� N�e LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION — LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE — FLOOD ZONE X BASE FLOOD ELEV. I N CO DA 16roN 50 s4eT'cm . 2-22 ,I . , I NOTES wo LWJ awL aw I�1 0 c E 2 c m my m E L cfcAq LTO CD CD LL F m3 d CM yR m c 13 t m we �mrna t^ p0p� O ui U) 3� 0a: mZ o io •V m O m r m to , N tD m W "gW. W O '= C W ' O O m m 11 :D II a W0 U IILdV 0ui:� it U=)OC-) oW c5' a m LL m X U Y C m @ o 0 L.L fm.1 m W c0 C C m a: p ) m LL C U C L p O II II Q CI) U�UQ v 0 g aZ m� z _ a)m �OLL 0 co U II e� =iamz m a `o o c 6 m c E aQo°i rn II aaa:►- Cm U_ O1 3 t i y (%I 3 � 2 j L5 .- c 4 .n m ui m c E m II J �= UQ m E •c � II UUQ m _I Z II II O m c to a N m rn 0 oil a7 c rom am.Eo NC CaZ� 3 .0 m O 0 O ¢ n C = p U) 'gyp E G O .... CDy O m ul m LL rn 0 '?C II II 0 N CD Li Q: IE E LC L» LL: Q PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3350 S, W. 2'7v u E MIAM I , -LOP1 UA CERTIFICATE BOUNDARY SURVEY TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER TYPE DIAMETER IN FEET 1 PALM 1.8 2 PALM 1.8 3 FICUS 3.0 4 FICUS 5.0 5 TYPE OF OAK 1.0 6 PALM 1.2 7 PALM 1.7 8 OAK 1.8 9 OAK 0.6 10 OAK 1.0 11 'OAK 0.8 12 PALM 2.5 3 PALM 2.5 4 PALM 1.8 5 OAK 3.5 6 W TYPE OF OAK 0.8 7 TYPE OF FICUS 2.0 8 PALM 1.5 9 TYPE OF FICUS 1.2 20 PALM 1.3 21 OAK 1.8 22 OAK 3.0 0 U— ID Z V, Cr fn O z NOT VALID I hereby certify that this sketch of survey of the hereon SUPERIOR SURVEYING, I N C. UNLESS SEALcD described property is a true and correct representation of PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS e a survey made under my direction and that said sury is WITH THE accurate and correct to the best of my knowledge aynd 9495 SUNSET DRIVE EMBOSSED SEAL belief, and unless otherwise shown, there are no visible SUITE A - 205 encroachments. I further certify that the survey repro OF sented hereon meets the Minimum Technical Standards MIAMI, FLORIDA 23173 as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land (305) 274-5339 CERTIFYING Surveyors In Chapter 61G17-6,Fio Ida Adm istrative SURVEYOR Code, pursuant to ,Section 47 f ( Statues. Date: l0 Z4 93 SCALE: JOB NO. FL. Reg, o: Z? 3 golwlJ /!l, C/1zmo 0 L Q A. 93-10- CXo A TAB G 4% OCEAN GROVE TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWING LIST SHEET TITLE L-1 Landscape Site Plan L-2 Tree Disposition Plan L-3 Tree Disposition Plant List L-4 Overall Site Permit Planting Plan L-5 Pool Terrace Permit Planting Plan A-1 Ground Floor Lobby Plan A-2 Temporary Sales Office Plan A-3 First Level Parking A-4 Lower Level One Parking A-5 Lower Level Two Parking A-6 Pool Terrace Level Plan A-7 Typical Unit Level Plan A-8 Penthouse Level Plan A-9 Rooftop Terrace Level Plan A-10 North and East Elevations A-11 Floor Level Diagram and Sections A-12 Unit Floor Plan A-13 Unit Floor Plan r A-14 Unit Floor Plan 4Ttl%iMU"%326 A".1%N/tt/f3 9599 N LOADING AREA L-NTRA1-(1 I I mt Ri WASHINGIUNIAS GARAGE V4. DECORATIVE WATER WA o TOWER APARTMENTS I)ECORAI 1F I yp PFRIMI I I R %%At 1 SFRVI(--)&\DRIVF LOADING 0 (WEST PARKING (InMITY AV GARAG. ENTRANCE LISTING 1114"RUlki PIR1,01-URVAI-I ."NYA :7 LEGEND L-1 Site Plan/ Cover Sheet L-2 Tree Disposition Plan FN ANCE FEATURE L-3 Tree Disposition Plant List z L-4 Overall Site Permit Planting Plan TREES L-5 P001 Terrace Permit Planting Plan C() Z) L-6. Plant List and Details 69 Scale: BRADSHA GIU- Sheet L-1 Of EE)dsft A O. Lf lo 7 Graphic DescrOLegend:wlEXDWlafiW: ==TC*'="= Ares RW'"d &==jArQr Pbodwev 26 Ives 35 Treft End o Be Rwwvd-50 TO" T bftw Mm=�!ftK Von TO asmy .-20 Trees - Mbfizwlim-11WMIM *&am ToW 131 Tress -\ I- \, - 1\ 0 M --q 0 O a \` W Aclacent vacant Land 4 A"' �C) — PmPorty Existim PaskisnW Base hfornlation Thkon Rom `Tree Locabon &YvW - Sketch of &r4ey OW TOP Dated 217/85 By and Ammism.= " FmW &Fy" BV Braddlgw, Go and AssodaSW Taken 4112/95. Scale- 1/16-=I'-O" SUM Nov FWd woe COL 14L $x. Carman Opp-76-- FiOsauaaa) 190 as ilatF.nldorwa.. Gone NF 1A awahanaa♦4U Cut 10 swWo7mSo" Remove ♦ wibaa CMleler O 2 Batmae prisOr 0.4D 37' 2a Ol4ud4 RoprglGootl Rrrwn 3 Yana a Dw 36 2a Not Fred Onilta Gar NF RW O 4 Bsttiobbkmm 030 16 117 OWibROpNgRs000 PMFAn 5 Ye CtmAuWWMnPiw 0.W 35' - mdI NovFouroua 1 Gar NF �� 6 Fide fwrVhW erase 0.W 27 15' Good Common Rnne er 1Q Tm O 7 Quros vipiirns 2.00 w 4a Oubeft PnvwtAGoodRemain 8 Rgetrre alste 2i30 w 56 Not Found On•SYe Gar N F 9 Queroa vipinmrme 1.30 W 2a Pour CarMaon Rraas ♦ Lave Oek 10 ofro..mvirr 1310 20 PowCWdftm Rarinova O 1, Quros wrowna(3) Inn 4a W Ooade PmprtArow Reenin O 12 69 Peen0.50 Chm 22' 1S O Cede Pr prtoGood Renrn 13 Quens wpnrr 0.90 2a - No Fans On -Saw Gone NF 14 srrr 0, = z 1.80 55' 4a Good Condom Remon a 15 Qurns vipeve a 210 6a 4a Good Cddoon Reocale Lave Oak Q 16 Royskx- 1.30 45' 15' Good Condom RMocaee 17 Duren 1.50 3S' 2a Good Condition Relocate ® 700ne o� is Arcmmoopharon 0.80 W 15 Poo Condow Remove AYsrde Paem ♦ 19 Penn emenowu (2) 120 5a 2a Poor Condom Remove 20 Menmpaee rote 130 4a 20 Poor Condom Remove - - 21 Dobnw reps 1.00 30 2a Poor Crxdmwl Remove At 22 Urannrmn Fruit Toe 0.50 29 1 15 Poo Cmdtnn Remove O 23 dears r P., 1.00 3a 20' Good Condom Return fl 24 Mann enure Red 0.00 26 15' Good Coditm Rsbote 25 Mormrlpa dletara 0.80 26 15' Not Found OnSile Gone N F O 26 RoVUMW W 140 45' la Goad Condom Raman r R nor eve 110 45 la Not Found on -Me Gone N F Pain O 28 Rayeame' 130 As la Good Condom Reml n 29 Ray oil 1.30 45' 1a Good Condom Ramon C 3D C000e rrsslwa 0.8o 15 16 Not Found 01•Sde Game N F 31 Tamsrke cappe 0.W 35' 6a Nat Food On -Ste Gone N F TMPN* Almond 32 Do% 0.00 25' 2a Nov Found OnSr Gas N F -raps Pointy ♦ 33 Pie wrmvwa Avocado True 0.80 2a to Poor Condit", Remove - 34 Qm.ro. repivrr 2.60 sv 3a Poor can0l"n Remove 35 Qures am¢lirr 1.60 26 2a Poor Condom Remove - Liw Cok Q 36 Ch roe wpnrrs 1.50 26 2a Good Cordit"n Peocaa a 37 Ouse "Wo n e 1.00 26 2a Good Condoon Rabcate O 38 Ouror wpitirr 1.W Sa ZQ Good Cordon, Rdorse Lin 0ek N F Efastr3 Trees L a �lix1 26 Trees Falmjlaee VAMP i`rOniVia "Not ollrt Q To Remain 35 Trees w Pa aso so pospowd stme9e D wwQ E) ftkWes To Be Removed 50 Trees 1W r1s. Ile llrmaa alfm�almits�a Ton as UNpfowdof gy elCiCteWy m`) ' y \ �eOS TO Be 20 Trees �e 11 (�yetrryraoraryP �__� 3"MtAs Prtr b IYx�aULow sym r w PYnt Name C 8L �t. spr. Cantu+ oq-wb-1 39 Qmires vi9Ners Live 00k 120 Sa 2a Good aaIC16" Rskxar 40 m Coe moodier 0.50 17 5' Found M4. N F 41 Coomut F'ekn QU=W Wg wr 0.50 16 17 Foul Gans N F Live Ock 42 Quecs vrpirarr 1.00 26 2a God Camdieon Rebnee 43 "cart. vipiarr 1.00 W 2a Not Ford OnSme Gone iw Oek45 4SL rNFnos9w'200 Royrase Wa 1.30 35 2a Goodpar 1.00 37 2a Coaanf PYn 47 QuWas veyi ens 1.40 37 2a Pea ed did, Remove - 48 Quras wprna 120 3S 10 Good Camdao, raole RLim 0 0ek -Tr W 0 . 2a 55' yrpoeeO�e o Move ♦ Love 5o Ourcus 0.90 2S 1a Not Ford Oo-See Gans N F Lim Owk S1 Qmsras "Goner 1.30 3S 2a brposetr To Move Remove - 52 Que a w r 1.30 3a 2a hmpoee�e Td M ove Remove - U.0 Oak - 53 Deana Pfewoenaamr 1.40 55 25 Dead Remove 54 0 0.W la to Immpoerie ro Mae Remove A Live ON, 1.40 55 25 Nnposome To Move Remove - s 56 ttl0noropin0errn 0.50 14' 15 Mmporau4 To Nov* Remove ♦ Ahmnsmdr P.Ym 57 amrmpry9a 0.40 27' 17 NM Fond Or1•Sile Came N F lhrun9a Tree - vioivema Low 0.W 35' 2a Poor Condom o Remove 59 Quaes vegrirr 2.00 55' 4a Good Conddon Raocar Live Oak 60 Royawrra Men Palm 1.50 23 15 Good Cadion RmekxMc 61 S" pelnsao 1.00 15 15' onpn000m To Move Remove ♦ PMm 61A ScheMara earophy la 1.00 25' 15' rpaodcat To Move Remove ♦ llrtmbr*U Tree 62 Br, blekae a S.VOrdW 0.50 26 15' Poor Carndmon Remove a 63 Teme,an rota Tensmd 1.50 26 25 Good Condbon Rekxme 64 Pkmen nun 0.70 14' 15' Nov Found OrtSr Gone N F F cow O 65 Burlsra xlmrrue 1.70 26 3a Good Com Condom Remain cxsmuo Lobo 66 Sasftlea u 1.30 3a 2a Nov Fend On-Smr Gone N F Uff&@M Tree - 67 Pknsrs ruts Frn, 1.40 26 2F Poor Condom Remove 68 Mrnplra W4" 1.50 26 36 Poo Condom Remove - Me Tree Delano, regus vow 4.00 45 1 4a Nov Found On -Sae Gave N F - 70 Queer vmgelrsr 0.90 35' 20r Poor Condom Remove Live Oak O Tt Bo trine braes Hong Kong OrcNd 3.00 13' is, Good Cardom Ramonn 72 Pere rmsnnrars --- 120 27 ,5 Nat Food O+Sr Gas N F AvoosW Trot O 73 Anovµsetitilu Bn..dllif 200 5a 2a Good Cmdbm Ramon - 74 TemrwM mateme 0.70 26 10 Poo Condom Renee T - 75 Sabel PeNneda 0.90 15' ,a Poor Codbam Remove Pro - 76 Batmke Mnkeerr ong Orrtad 0.00 27 2a Poor Cadoon Remove 77 Batman b1Yaa's 0.60 27 la Poo Condom Remove - OM. a 78 Pkenens mum 1.00 2e 25' Good Condom PAkxme F ' - 79 Mrn9era n0ca 1.50 27 2a dead Remove Tres O W Mongers indca 7.60 26 ss Gaon Cord eon Rerw O 81 Qnres Vogro ms 240 4a 4S Good Condom Reman Lin Oak O 82 Delano, tegie Poieer 1.60 36 4a Good Condom Return - 83 Mraf. Nrlta 0.80 27 1s' Poe Condom Rrrove Toe sytn N0m Ptira Kale COL HL Spa. coxft o O 84 Mrmdkoa ZWan sepofte zoo 4a 4v Cma CdlOean Return 85 DMamr P�betetrr 0.00 3a to Poor CdlOoon Rannve w Ownswpnrr Lin00 1.50 37 2a Poo,CamOom Remus � M�a ndo 0.40 2a 9 Nat Fraud Oo-See Gone N f Tor ee Menpir a i3Oae 5.50 23 15 Nmpaaeeta To Mae Remove ♦ Tor - e9 Quresvwpmene 120 W 20 Wgowd*To Move Remove - gp Qmeras(;2' 1.40 4a 25 lmtpaeeule To Move Remdw ♦ 91 Fos brehrlnsir 220 3a 2a kmpcaeule To Move Remove Toe 92 Mrpsra n hca 1.00 30' 15 knooemble To Move Remove ♦ Tow 1 - 93 Delala n 1.30 46 2D Pear Cat000n Remove O 94 Uramnan Spear 0.90 W ,0' Good Condroon Roman an 95 RoyMones eat 0.60 16 15 Not Found On.Sne Game N F RMW Poem O 96 RoyMowPel 0.60 14 15 Good Condom Re aw O 97 QwWna Wwormrn 1.20 5a 217 Good condom Return 96 Quens wgnime Live Oek 1.00 3a to Poor Condom Remove O 99 Querns vagnne zoo 5a 25 Good Condom Return 100 Ovsras wpiwi a 200 36 2a Poor Cavdbon Rrrave live Orc O 10, Omsres vi9iarr Lem 99 2.00 45 4a Goad Condom Return O l02 aremn 041a O e cww chid OA0 26 ,0 Good Condom Ramon 103 Brtmr blamer 0.40 16 1a W Found Or■Sae Crane j N F HOV Kong Orr2W f - 104 Bamtro bhmkees Cvdad coo Zr 20' Poo Condom Remove 105 Quaea vrgwe ns 1.70 4a 4a Good Condom RMoc me ® Live Oak O 106 Co � Mm 0.80 14' 15' Outside Propemy/ :ooa Roman O 107 C.Imrman arnraNs O eo 27' w Good Condom Re men 108 Bourne e bleken 1.00 26 2C Not Fprd OnSee Gone N F 109 Berne blr� 1.00 26 2a Not Found On-Sm Cone N F Ordwd OP.N. 110 Sewl pekepake 1.00 IS 15' Good Condom n Remen - bhkew Orcred 1.00 30' W Poor Condtor Dew Remove O 112 Butsae EmelaQ I'M 3a 3a Good Condom Return 113 Royebrreei 140 4Q 2a Good ndRon W Ramon O 114 Coma nrPam 1.00 l7 la Not Fond Om$me Gone N F Pen 115 sebM pers6o 1.00 6 la W Fond On -Sae Gore N F Pam Q 116 Cords eebM e" 1.50 40 2C Good Conftm Raoute Toe - 117 Untaow n Spar 0.80 - - Poor condom Remove - I la Debrmr nW Ponoem 1.00 _ - Poor Condom Remove O ,79 ArUlo0ap110emm Ahesrdr Palm . 050 3Q 15' Good Carddo, Rmrrmn 120 Q,mraue amrpiirs 120 30' 15' Poor Cmoom Remove - Live Oak 121 Mrn9era imndCe 0.60 217 -fa-- Good Cmdroon Raman O Toe 122 seal p 120 Za , s• Good Carduan Return O CabbXp Palm O 123 lhaumoen Spaoir 0.80 2a 15 Good Carddmon Ramon O 124 Uraemamn Spear 0.80 20 16 Good Caddo, Raman O 125 Unknown Spades 031D 20 75' Good Cadw 126 Ficsbw#*wans 12-M w w Good Caditia, I Rerom O 12T Quens vagarale 1.w 2S 16 Poo Codiow Remove ♦ LSO k ® 1211 Bueea armrube Gumoo L. 0.00 2a la Can poor daonn Remove - 129 Batman bnlw "My 01cl 120 2O' 1a Poe Cam06am Remove Base Intonnaft Taken Fran 'Tree Location Slrvey - Sketch of Survey and Dated: 2/7/85 By 'Sdwbke-St>ielm Gate& ` and Field Slr.W By Bradshaw, ()I and /lssocrates' Taken 4/12/95. GEM e ASSOCIATES Pmaferred AreaOm AS2.A 1ffivae Arrarmre Id Ph -eft 4337 Sstye D- 5- Foade 33304 Dede 30-'AW7245 FAX 30i77244)7 14 An495 1f.4r�.rn..e�e.v =�.rrrrrr.rr r� ra.r.r.rr•.w� �7i1� I7 L .3 'r..l 441 'D- . ..Socl.yfs = r- L-5 5y_ B(>U�&W_ ft Sp. ct RwMds es R—R 41$ MIT 45' MMq+ CA =og OwkR -It tall 4S Uva>P/v cs C== 12-1+' ..10 45 Ursapy CE 12-H' 6_10 45' YaulKap CN C—'caasan vnaI:iR"R mw­ _ _ ss. rnayls.m nn dtw0a Cocmn r+rn - - aatc i1p®"OMa dR.r�d CR 7E' S' 3 MtIRpY F8 Oe B"'syl'"'"""'"k b"ow'a 1416 ao-ar a5' Ya�rpY Otroa Rd Haan ts.rr t416' 10.t2 Fs Ym+vpy HR fltl �i 6.6 4S 7 Yaa.pvrrduv LL Lo v ratr M1Z a3 a.11wta,wYmyrP LL' t9dYrm.aAna t2 t2 45' a1a1n1.duumoP PO fiber.. a v.rda� DOaiNvxbe 1.a rood ro Ni SMae Parr_ - - Pu P lo-az tatz - a R%,RY PW �� t2-t+' taYz - rm sYt�as PINS_Tr b1 I— I6lt 12-tr - 11 uYw1s OE Onxoua e,p1Ka Mppsr 1-1 63 RR RvaRRmI rod V.,_ SC SYYYW11 nPtua sat8' 1R14' S-S UORaIv Slatl P/rettolMdE' Pa n _ _ &t8' ..go—rls.d auaroN WR r �aY - - At6' su{A'Mea anuarooa WR' VA,1a'Pa'mtt�id� - - 30' mR#Idea M,. d I>♦d,ma General TdDttes — Ail PI+d mnmWs taW I cdrldm taro. aadaras fa Florid. No. l a Hato u pirm m 'Dradd w Buad.res rd wr wars-. Part I, ts63, am P.n z sr.a d Pmn, Dyttrtmmr d waricanam TRIIa a rhado. — wn I„dpaws.m.+m er vavldad wan.,, It18%Rurdnuic ittprim srnmy�rra„ a.1.dr1 All Irdayin aM ittquim YWI !r imRliM is a f¢aad WRY a Pitt Bunn¢ an .ova +m t+¢Pd p.di,j dacadnm wan am Anuav d w,d —lr adcrrm. nnp¢ Ada a d�mii ne�xim�m mP a�re:lia miyorc a arrmr run's �rvr�n. oar Thin Iec�j - lmiorn ncvur®du emn mP d roll m firer Er,aliot R. d Nbod - i,ncno.ls-..tanmrm mplan Tram wp d e.n m mp d .de ra.,r¢ ednrc mn d rrdvr. — An trod I Ia .amd .a ayeY_Rm ErmR wu no P1Wu1Y �.lm ,w nrm a tad rl.: d p.R`* b ® prapu en.Nnnm�l. —'I,ta mot rar w d.ru.ro+awl a d,ay�ad d a weir.nn d 3M.,s1 a trdri_ aentlr icdgrrek y��C.awd:r Tbr m,mrm'av«I aepm a.I1 x t.r indnr br ��t�,�� rdrr drd br aem arad.l>,t Rtl rw iard tr mrA ar.�.tis Fitlliti 1alr�. dl wn rd MM i.11 roc p.rea .an . niniriem d ca rslu d Iop.dl adnn of aderF rc rad¢.11. A mmi,ann d no�ivdo �d Yr�rd�mrddRd�e�Ppra Wool /d rr�l roll be irwYiW aw�r .d, RRIRd Tre+ran tl rd tF leer., �nn ud tra.Ucwv dl� M nn'a.at'M am.st r.,. — The fv ar awn 9�aY m.u. An dacrepnry dawR1 arRwap,�°�`i. am Pem tia ani�`.woamad emr.acs a. s ar..arps Rod m a1¢ •8nrirw 6i14 F1nr Band Aa b4 Spedtvri¢n Borlel' b t rrer e+p.enimt, apdifmr'mn pWai.p ddRih and Oia6iq . — taMuylc wur.cro to fidd vutty.11 s 9 — prgnasd wnaa Pd¢r m i.nMYiw. —.cmAi�nmM'm#cuwilm sdal�amallYc WePcPiu'any xadj..mtlb A dRp .moot adadiRR du,Pc+, dnc m.vsiYnital•.dn 6c+garwad by -AR- a�iiieu prior m imralMridn. — Al slim ors4l' rbc b�rrrr a0 and dmrva�'�'tlid W to awn a E—A, l .uacmlt.an.tlY vac r1JUY l � Y+I sym Bw nca llclxtnlpl Num m sm spa. s C!N Gu U¢r,aFl¢rmR MaxV . 46' - IIRlannrl N drlp tlndxtr� 7S ta2P taro. NbObe CPR ,CawaRn � _.�n TV 2a2r 202<' 24'dc M COC �`�oOe "�pRt,nb"''O 2o-2+' 2azr z+vc N FIC t:cusG F 55' s1axM m w¢ FBH Fig]e t62p' 1tYuc Mnme FBH fr'Juu a.n+an".a� 7r 243P 2+bc M m 11a1e H6 t � rtsia�nn 3S 18-20' 161tc N b rode IXN �Wn d �a 2A2/• 2 Yl 24'ac N HEL tl,hcd.a reslrAla odsmr aaw 33112' �u¢ a1a11(1 JAS � 2a2r 2a2r 2-1 N - UG E' 30' Nmoroe 30'a.c UR i2.14' 12-11 trac. ILL nan311Ps LMV 1a 12-1+• 1211 t2bt. u rm 3 d9s NEP F 16.18' w" 18bc N MOD Ner.D ¢ 2a2+- 29.2+• 24bt M PIS Iflbfb#an 42J8" 42 +6' ypnl NOsrn PHO PYOrN Due tY ouw - 68 - N eeaas. 23 d ..dda PHX p 2-W 2a30' yq cli Ndsne PIT Poipaa4dda 2a2+• 20-Zr R+Uc. N PTV vu'm1RaI— 20.2+' 2D2+• Nnc N RIiP. Pa.n 56 46' - N aaru $(wq�d�a 263+' 2024' 2+'oe id SEA g neRdYo°'nt.o ey aawnduea - - - $7R Sar>e r+� Nine 9N a Pups. SS' S6 - ,n J t1Yn.IJ TRI um..ctln aadYb'a,s -P.wnla,.a e;.Aaa 3 3' tu. ..aria WED Nb0YT1� Bbc redle0 culdlgs HYlA HYR ! W111— 2' R 11 a.rm LW ch ,f, pgft 6' rar .om PEN Taraltam '!.— 1 z 12 u a+ � ; irJ.L 1 uNPd.IGiPI �elaui U,� J, �. ItzvotE %Ya'+IwR>zPeaW, `� MT Clow � Eel— I the PYal R rWou 114P3C,Aad,t�IA) ltrodta47 J+aiae) Grp . W mwlto.9krlm w—Pc¢L. 6 } \ F SNGS)B6j1llL' :GLtLLliO u/AE@L � sltd��- zan+ Ci02Gs D f2 tIaIIRD � Tb YL7faNSr WTWJl:. >ra>J F w'.IIttTY amYa PA �t6nai P ee a 4urlrweaFl •airs < Ij (a�N'ID 6�aatact t� ABIEp 70 ¢E{eW'agla. fNGE¢ W CC f?JW.LD 4 dOD GEWnGec 4akex db6iblaJSEO) a+Iel 6 - TaP.lbneD. 3I110IA-i W P1 PIe1� W seJp- +..•_ T aanntli v�IN Md( �'C S I'a16.1 GbddaO NSWI(. TYPICAL PALM PLANTING DETAIL _ ao[ cur 1— 11tw1 EYaGILaRs 01' 11R aetbel NnNCAI Y'YslteFlrtpA. 11ogyAirl4 .A¢LL KOa6 nm¢ W ,Fsp7dAldsi. "T ILL wmS W-1taaMells2 wqu bA lox -*T s-TPTaWINg. zD>.ada+'r"L rKT W T'�• t� Ild:e watt aavre lnaa n7tPofuaAs tz�u®r lr[UPlaaptO/VIIGI \ 2.v—..n ....... W d WM ryas. ARA— W ft roan;. a:,.rocrsiecev lwle-n LJaee- MAJ1Ap} r4gl ny{a¢Lryrm 'm' ':i6Ks-OFaIIrAitarta¢6 'dtpKiN'O"-fAaitRE �E TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL BRADSEM A isEi3TE A ASSOCIATES dr.n.iAmc ASi..1. sap AMR. Rod Plammg 43375egrapelkile Iavdvd.35 ar So Flmida33368 lode 30.s3M-T215 ,NaFD 14 A &111995 shirt 6 Of: 6 a.ls al —.ova 0 Z ZIP % I % V 0 GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT I -- —to —37 5W5 S.W 6Mh STREET SOUTH &I" FL 33141 305/666:705 1 FAXf667 297, eel a 5 E A L : I COMM NO: 0 A T E 4-17-95 cd 75HEETNO: I m A-1 no 0 0 0 0 > Cu 0 40 Office o C-z ',t7 "Yr- 1z: co C,) ; 4D Temporary- Sales Office Plan V16' GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT 1 r- SMS SW bah STREET SOUTH MAK FL 33743 305/666:705 0 FAX/667•2971 S E A L Comm NO: 0 A T E 4-17-95 REVISIONS- tiJ A-2 .41 #I.V. M11'. D PAFJQM my- 0,"eLEO PISft" ONLY W " AWAY AND ZONE F 1 INE UP M- 2W `- L ?71 2e 5 Axt, Ni� tic. parking signag n.ts. 1/16' parking space d I'LI.S. BALDWL ARCHITEC SM sw 681h Sm SOUTH .WARN. FL 33 303/666-70! FAX/667-29: S E A L 4. — tsi, C! I:= Q) COM. NO: :t:f 0 A T E cQi 4-17-95 Co ID REVISIONS! L A-3 ♦ o ♦ , �a Qc. i M1y � � %y zF ♦♦` ,♦ `9y 4 .;♦ .,�c � /'/'yam/ a Parking 1 2 1 j2 t Lower Level One Parking GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT etG •as51 5815 SLY 68fi STRM SOUTH WW4 FL 33i43 30Sl666-T050 FAX l66 J-2471 }I I \ { I S E A i . COMM NO: A T E coD v� I 4-17-95 ' -0 0 = 5 E REVISIONS: I 1/16' SHEET NO: I A—T g�u-iIT�?Ec.i� GAIL BYRON BALDWIN 1,111 llV* 611h SOUTH MV'ML _ 3051666: FAX/6672977 Co.. "0: E D A T E I -j 4-17-95 -Ig 1/16 �S-EET-o A-5 on GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT I r- , -fo --z SMS -%W. 6&h STREET SOUTH VMK FL 33143 305/666:7050 FAX 1 667 2971 5 E A L COMM NO: L D A T F 4-17-95 REVISIONS - SHEET NO: A-6 Typical Unit on Q— Co 'o GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT SKIS S%U 6&h Sntg'r SOUTH MWK FL 33143 30 S / 6 6 6 - 7 0 !; 0 FAX/667-297 I I . . . 1 5 E A L - COMM NO: 0 A T E 4-17-95 1-0 ReVISIONStr - 1 7 —SHEET NO: A-7 1/1(3" GAIN BYRON BALDWIN 'ARCHITECT 'MS S%V 6Bth STREET SOUTH IUAM. FL 33T43 3 0 S f 6 6 6 : 7 0 0 F A X / 6 6 7 2 9 1 L I M 10 E I i I S E A L 0 -", ::I1() 0 E-Z CL Comm NO: LOE r 0 A T E a .Z� 4-17-95 EF SHEET NO- A-8 GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT SM5 SW Mh STREET SOL7H NtAK FL 33U3 3051666.7050 FAX/667 2971 I... - f Ul I 0 ZI 1 1 5 E �AL C) C, 0 E 0 A T E 4-17-95 REVISIONS: I - 7 SHEET 10. A-9 MEN East Elevation 1/I6" North Elevation 1/16" GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT I R [EG •u5= SMS SW. 68th STREET SOUTH NZANt FL 33543 305/666.705a FAX/667-2971 I �v c a v c u Lol i COMM NO: I 0 A T E 4-17-95 REVISIONS: I� SHEET NO: A-10 PaFr RdoF r.. +36s..G! 8 y P��TLbIXt 1AVU 5-uNIT LL. bK.o4 41. LfSi 'YMAL S* uNiT I.L`rE�- '1• -1Y.az 7n. �. +7;X..0 q. I p.. + 14T.ce` le• + IDt9G I'1. i IG. a +16? G 15. �> � u l A r ? 1*1 Y I C. El. +pA•.� G• 1 1 1 i ts. T �•I rwAj. S UNIT 1.NiL I _/J' Z,`►—A 7i- _ �_�•. .I..+�nl oo� l;37uND fiWpt yotsaY {}.td IT!45 iL _r J LG 'M -h'C- ,O "eNq 7 Floor Level Diagram n.t.s. 701N Iq 1N. Ib T�1. I l . Tw- 1& iH. IS ?:+- l•J Ta. 12 `n- I1-ir1.—_•__ bTr. 9T-4 _ D T✓J. ] Ta. G Tom• -rw. — 3 R� �!sc-Arlr TeRR�F Ox ry rang �.yAz;..s..-i3 L063T ?ryewjaN ra¢KIAL 1 _Q 1 1 Section E CJ i s laol.='it?rcz nt.s. GAIL BYR BALDIA ARCHITI I Ft .fG •..S SM SW 6Mh SOUM NVANL A 305/666-7 FAX/667-7 I 5 E A I -� domm { REV151C SHEET A GAIL BYRON BALDWIN ARCHITECT I F% EEa .sass SM SW 68t11 srR>£r SOUTH &UM 4 FL 33143 305/666.7050 FAX/667-2471 L 3 C Floor Plan 114 A., 9Ms.No.s G a Of ;4k-A ! ?SPZG , - 2 2. - -i5 SG2. Floor Plan 114' 5M5 SVV. 68th STREE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 331a 305/666.705 FAX/667-297 \/ Ti •O LLI S E A L p � �. if) I .- COMM NO: C; J G A T E cry = 4-17-95 REVISIONS: SHEET NO: A-13 GAIL BYRON BALQWIN ARCHITECT !I �f C: •.sfi �rrr 5815 56 68th STREET SOUTH 411AhU.%n3uQ 305/bbb FAXt667.2971 r(~+ Q C C: S E A L J L�C� . _ I ------------- j raj E COMM ,4 (f} i CS 4-17-95 L--_---- REV151O�5 L--- SHEET µC t- IVv► 1 11,.0 .1. __� 96!• OR