Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-95-0597
J-95-607 7/12/95 9 I RESOLUTION N0. 597 i A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT, OF NOT MORE THAN 508 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 325 RESIDENCE HOTEL UNITS, 652 PARKING SPACES AND ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL SPACE, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 27 SOUTHEAST 5TH STREET; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 19, 1995, the applicant, Pacific International Equities, Inc., submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell on the River Project pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at approximately 27 Southeast 5th Street, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B11, attached hereto and in "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, development of the Brickell on the River Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on March 28, 1995 and the Urban Development• Review Board met on June 13, 1995, input; and to consider the proposed project and offer its --------------- ATTACHMENT(5 ` CONTAIHEn, CITY CQMnsslox MEETING OF JUL 1 3 M95 9 Resolu n�M„ o ``�J WHEREAS, the applicant has modified the submittal to reflect recommendations received at said Large Scale Development Committee and Urban Development Review Board meetings; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on June 21, 1995, Item No. 4, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 31-95 by a vote of six to zero (6-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "Al' and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Brickell on the River Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Pacific International Equities, - 2 - 95- 597 Inca ("Applicant"), at approximately 27 Southeast 5th Street, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 905,027 square feet of habitable residential area; 288,736 square feet of hotel units; 17,426 square feet of office space; and 30,729 square feet of lobby, restaurant, recreation and meeting room space. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-7 District Zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, - 3 - 05= 597 have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $87 million, and to employ approximately 352 workers during construction (FTE), and to result in the creation of approximately 300 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $4.9 million annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1995 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; - 4 - 95- 59 me°µ, (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT. will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. - 5 = 95 597 Planning,, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Pacific International Equities, Inc., 11098 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402, Miami, F1. 33161. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Brickell on the River Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A° and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Brickell on the River Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner, affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A°) which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th ATTEST: WALTER J.j OEMAN, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: 16/JEM/mis - 7 - day of July 1995 "a, p STE EN P. CLARK, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: 9 - 597 EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-597 DATE: July 13, 1995 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell on the River Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 27 Southeast 5th Street, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: 1 95-- 597 FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Brickell on the River Project is a residential and hotel use development located at approximately 27 Southeast 5th Street, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 4.129 gross acres and 2.373 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached. hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. Among the amenities which are being provided, there is a cafe/restaurant of approximately 4,430 square feet (seating approximately 120 people). Tower One will include a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscaped outdoor area, a health spa and two racquetball courts. Tower Two will include a swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. The Project will also include an improved riverwalk along the Miami River with benches and security lighting. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas.and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's unique location on the Miami River overlooking Page 2 95-- 597 Downtown Miami. The two residential towers will compliment the Central Brickell District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami and Biscayne Bay. The Project consists of a wide, well integrated Riverwalk which surrounds the Project's northern waterfront edge. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. The Project also reflects suggestions received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of March 28, 1994, and the Urban Development Review Board meeting of June 13, 1995. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with _plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bermello, Ajamil & Partner Inc., dated 5/6/95 and 5/8/95, with revisions dated 5/15/95 and signed and sealed on 5/25/95; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-7 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a required approval of a Class I Special Permit for the proposed swimming pools. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance Page 3 95` 597 No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate request referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 905,027 square feet of habitable residential area; 288,736 square feet of hotel units; 17,426 square feet of office space; and 30,729 square feet of lobby, restaurant, recreation and meeting room space. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. An interim landscape and facade plan for the Southeast 5th Street (south) facade shall be prepared and submitted for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan shall specifically address interim plans for the south facade to be implemented between phases of the Project, or in the event that Phase II is never constructed or delayed. 2. The Project's final landscape plan shall be modified, per the recommendation of the Urban Development Review Board, by providing Coconut Palm trees along the riverwalk, where Royal Palms are now specified, and by providing Royal Palms Page 4 9 5_ 597 i along the east side of the property, where Washingtonian Palms are now specified. 3. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 4. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members Page 5 - 9 5_ 597 of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit,,provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 8. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 9. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Page 6 95- 597 Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 10. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 11. Record a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 12. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 13. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. Page 7 9 5` 597 _ L AILS 4 J. 1 1 JLAr%J.AJ 1: Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell on the River Project, proposed by the applicant, Pacific International Equities, Inc. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and Page 8 9 5- 597 (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (9) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d2]<musps/95>brickell/RIVER/do Page 9 .I-tit,�Al EXHIBIT B M: LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET, AS PER PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES :�0' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POINT IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID HARBOR LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80 DEGREES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 124.22 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 DEGREE 5 F 11" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. 5TH STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUi`ITO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIMES DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH; BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 299.78 FEET AT NORTH END; TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. 95 597 =4Mrr r.... v.... �.uwAmfllY%...a?=+Y� � � .w iY...y..w.... ... w.. .. ....r�.......�........rrwu.s.wr.�..............u.t............................ ... u. .... .... w1.... rYfYi .... ...ru.. EXHIBIT C BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT DATA SHFFT 1. Legal Description: See Exhibit "A" 2. Address: 27 S.E. 5th Street Miami, Florida 3. Zoning. Classification: City of Miami Zoning Overlay SD-7 4. Lot Area Net Area: 103,406 sq. ft. Gross Area: 179,860 sq. ft. 5. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Maximum Allowed: Residential FAR Non -Residential FAR plus Bonus for Non Residential Floor Area Ratio(FAR): Provided 6.Loading Berths: 7. Height: 8. Building Footprint: 9. No. of Parking Spaces Required No. of Parking Spaces Provided 8.0 6.0 2.25 633 3 loading berths 12ft. x55ft.. No height limitations 650 provided (60 stories) 55,017 gross sq.ft. 541 spaces 652 spaces 9 - 597 ate=: S.E. 5th Street Upper Level S.E. 5th Street Ground Level Upper Level Interior Sides: East Side Visual Corridor West Side Visual Corridor River 25 ft. ' 15 ft up to 48 ft in height 25 ft. after 48 ft. in height. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50 ft. Provided 15 ft. 25 ft. 15ft 25 ft. 25 ft. 6 in. 30 ft. 50 ft. 95- 597 APPLICANT L.A. Dougherty, for Pacific Intl. Equities, Inc. APPLICATION DATE REQUEST/LOCATION Major Use. Special Permit for the Brickeil on the River Project, located at 27 S.E. 5th Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office) PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit, pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, for the Brickell on the River Project located at 27 S.E. 5th Street (more particularly described herein), to be comprised of not more than 508 residential units, 325 residence hotel units, office space and accessory commercial space; approving said Major Use Special Permit after considering the report and recommenitations of the Planning Advisory Board, and subject to the conditions of the Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A", and the application for development approval, incorporated herein by reference; making findings of fact and conclusions of law; and providing that the Development Order shall be binding on the applicant and successors in interest. PLANNING Approval with conditions. - RECOMMENDATION ` BACKGROUND AND SEE ATTACHED ANALYSIS PLANNING AOVISORY BOARD Approval VOTE: 6 - 0 CITY COMMISSION N/A. APPLICATION NUMBER 94-195 June 21, 1995 06/29/95 9 5 597 ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS FOR BRICKELL ON THE RIVER 27 S.E. 5TH STREET The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell on the River Project to be located at approximately 27 S.E. 5th Street with the conditions specified herein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Brickell on the River Project is -a proposed residential, hotel and office use project to be located at 27 S.E. 5th Street; within the SD-7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District in Downtown Miami. The development consists of a single parcel with a net lot area of 2.373 acres and a gross lot area of 4.129 acres. The property fronts the Miami River on the north, S.E. 5th Street on the south, the U.S. Customs Building on the east and the Fifth Street Metromover Station on the west. Brickell on the River will have 508 residential units and 325 hotel residence units located in two towers joined by a 10 level parking garage containing 652 parking spaces. Tower One, at the northernmost portion of the site, will have 60 levels of residential units; Tower Two, at the southernmost part of the site, fronting 5th Street, will have 52 levels which will include 96 residential units, 325 hotel units and two levels of penthouse office space. Among the amenities which are being provided, there is a cafe/restaurant of approximately 4,430 square feet (seating approximately 120 people). Tower One will include a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscaped outdoor area, a health spa and two racquetball courts. Tower Two will include a swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. The project will also include an improved riverwalk along the Miami River with benches and security lighting. Access to the site will occur off of S.E. 5th Street; the project proposes a driveway to Tower One and a driveway to the easternmost side of the site to TowerTwo. The internal circulation ramps are located in the center of the structure. A service entrance is located to the west, adjacent to the Fifth Street Metromover Station site. All vehicular access points to the site will be from S.E. 5th Street. ANALYSIS The Brickell on the -River project has been designed with the goal of maximizing- the property's unique location on the Miami, River overlooking Downtown Miami. The design of the proposed towers will compliment the Brickell area while offering optimal views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach to its residents and guests. The proposed restaurant will be available for the use*of the public and due to the projects easy access to the Metromover system, will encourage pedestrian activity along S.E. 5th Street. 95- 597 d The proposed Riverwalk will also -greatly enhance the project as well as the - City s waterfront; it has been designed for the use of the public as a passive park and is envisioned to be connected to the walkway and green area at the Fifth Street Metromover Station. With regards to vehicular access, the project is proposing for all vehicular access to _occur off of S.E. 5th Street with separate driveways breaking off internally within the site. This proposal works well in that it offers controlled access to the site and therefore a more efficient and safe situation for the project users. A primary concern related to this project, which has not been adequately addressed.in the submitted application, deals with the project's phasing. When a project of this magnitude involves more than one phase, there is always a concern about the impact of the project on the x-ity in the event that future phases are not constructed. The "Brickell on the River" Project is proposed to be `constructed in two phases. An interim landscape and facade plan, to be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department, should be designed with the same importance as was given to the final build -out scheme; the interim plan should also specifically address the project's impact along S.E. 5th Street and its view from the Metromover in the event that Phase II is not constructed or delayed. RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS OF FACT The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommendiing approval of the proposed development with the following conditions: 1. An interim landscape and facade plan for the S.E. 5th Street (south) facade shall be prepared and submitted for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan shall specifically address interim plans for the south facade to be implemented between phases of the project, or in the event that Phase II is never constructed or delayed. 2. The project's final landscape plan shall be modified, per the recommendation of the Urban Development Review Board,by providing Coconut Palm trees along the riverwalk, where Royal palms are now specified, and by providing Royal Palms along the east side of the property, where Washingtonian palms are now specified; 3. The project shall meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 4. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 5, Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to -conduct a security survey, at the option of the 95- 597 ,4ti'd!xti; Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; 'further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police ,Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the project has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 8. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood, that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 9. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 10. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 11. Record a certified copy of the development order within 90 days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 12. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 13. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. The recommendation of approval of the proposed residential project is based on the following findings: .5 95— 597 -- 1) The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the SD-7 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of he City of Miami; the project requires no variances, special exceptions, rezonings or _changes in land use; the project is further compatible the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan which allows the mixture and intensity of the proposed development. 2) Upon compliance with the conditions outlined above, the project will be in compliance with all of the criteria as listed in Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000 and will.be beneficial to the city by providing new housing opportune ies within the Brickell area; also finding that, with the above _ specified modifications, the project will have no adverse effects on the surrounding area. Note: The attached application for development approval also includes the following required approvals.� I.a Class I Special Permit .for the proposed swimming pools; 2. a Class I Special Permit for the proposed valet parking; 3. a Class II Special Permit for a reduction in height of the required loading berths; and 4. a waiver of Section 3(mm)(ii) of the Charter of the City of Miami which requires that there be a 251. aggregate side yard for waterfront properties;_ the required amount is 60 feet and the project will provide 55.6 feet (therefore requesting a reduction of only 4'-4"). - Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special-Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate requests referenced above. 95- 597 K � f dF N. E . ��+otroAomoea; r n I� 1, W o 0 0 og000 DADE C O U T Y r' a,+"• r •!s a s i t e y. r, a, a t o slr ZCOURT !♦ 1 a s• t r tNTOWN GOVERNME N N I N 114N ' HOYSE 1 116 LIT IER-FIRSTAODITION 1't 'r '3Ia e� t ,x laIsi,a{n t1 I• r t,a sIA'r an• t�„ •a a , , It � �• R EAST FLAGLER ST. ' W voo aawJ�` • aT 6:a lli I a • x �x 1 I+Rl s�+ via. 3 r itr • a t1 + a,3 t t r•� J W CQ aac•a t< ST Ge S.W I ST S E. I ST_ _ o a„ a00000000aoorw• .J CO s oN !., I0 • • v , > r • • t aN s tj s!v e�aN •I-si, a �aw......,,,.v �.,�-...`.�+".�-----._.�._ a Is lay ,, �,+ o• (x I s4 S. 70 o oogo S T ia! t atl 4 • a 1' yL��Po tv • o o a so uo �.s ,r ;o 1< __ I`vU 1+,` t�r lrR:».s'`0 � r x . -�t 3 • 3'a r.., Sri TR 0• f •._ , a i-•—•" g a t• ! W .4WDW*A _ PA0PERTY OF 3' st a MtAMI CONVENTIONA MI STEAM !„.a,� •a �S• TER,a'AME BISCAYNE 80UL ECTRIC STATION•• no a�, � TRA 'C � `� I i o °LORiDA OWER TN►iE,NE � _`�,°000aoo � � I AND LIGHT CO. E4TERPRISES oe0000000oaooar PROPERTY 00 G / I t SR/ �j o 16 •NaY;� t Q I y° ( 3� �raa Spa �,�• `r' s,�' ° P It �� n id9't I StI .�• VrI s'". (/t Jr �� o°Q.. PA •s SE. ' _ a •jrt•Iv t•:-.-.- , ' �i`(e aiy, t ST •,,/ jt ',t s ! 52 A�'- N Sr I � , •a r . t!i 3 "—'I • I •,•• Ircy•. ,s o r .ii.•� i!-� `"_, aC g �G�3 s� • ., e: ° a a • 1 T S.E. R-.. � Tg4cT SU8' 4 soo _�� u r a .•. ..� a 70 597 M . . . . . . . . . . M h. SEEM- 1P .0 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupanciesinvolve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The.City Commission shalt be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or, officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) .1, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning'of the City of Miami far approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions'of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 27 S.E. 5th Street, Miami, Florida Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): ;approval for 2 residential towers (508 units) with a residence 4hotel (325 units), offices and a restaurant. R�reliminary Application Ikattach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- ti.on: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida 'Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) Now concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of.zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3..2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). Page 1 of 2 F 95- 597 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT •(Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): See attached supplemental document 9. Fee of $ 30,000 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes.of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Buildin (s): Other g(Specify):. Total: $ 30,000 Final Application L I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature r orized Agent Lucia A. Dougherty Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: ' Other:. Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 95- 597 Leonard J. Adler C. Daryl Couch Fernando C. Alonso Miguel A. De Grandy Caw L. Alvarez Alan T. Dimond Liliana Armas 'mini L. Donato Daniel It. Aronson Lucia A. Dougherty David C. Ashburn Candace R. Duff Charles M. Auslander William B. Eck Fred W. BagKett Kenneth Edelman Kern L. Barsh Arthur J. England, Jr. Mlarie Bass Gary M. Epstein V. Down Beighey Elvira A. Esetibano Norman J. Benford Henry H. (Ducky) Fox Dale S. Bergman Jorge L. Freeland Paul Berkowitz Jeffrey R. Fried Bridget Berry Robin R Frydrnan :dark F. Bideau Rnhert C. Gang Lorenee Jon Bialby Richard G. Garrett Mark D. Bloom Brian K. Garr Reginald L. Bouthillier, Jr. • David J. George Howard Bregman Jeffrey Gilbert Blake D. Bringgold Lauric L. Gildan Francis B. Brogan, Jr. Bruce H. Giles -Klein Hurt Bruton Richard 1. Ciusto Bernardo Burstein Lawrence Godofsky Joseph A. Carballo Joel K. Goldman Dianu Wagner Carr Steven E. 4goldman David R. Chase Glenn E. Goldstein Michael J. Cherniga Joseph G. toldstein Ary Choueke Steven S. Goodman Suit M. Cobb Matthew B-iGorson '.t Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 GR N E Y S A T L NfENBEfl6 ...iBflVfllfi .. Dianne Greenberg Melvin N. Greenberg Robert L. Grossman Barbara A. Hall Paige A. Harper Fred F. Harris. Jr Steven M. Hellman Alberto M. Hernandez Jeffrey A. Hirsch Kenneth C. Hoffman Larry J. Hoffman Kenneth A. Horky John Harrison Hough Gerald J. Houlihan Andrew Hulsh John B. Hutton Keith A. James Martin Kalb Steven M. Katzman David S. Kenin Holly W. Kimmel Steven J. Kravitz J. D. Boone Kuersteiner Christopher L. Kurzner Ronald C. LaFacc Gustavo J. Lamclas Steven A. Landy Steven B. Lapidus Nancy B. Lash Moshe MI. Lehrfield James E S. Leshaw Marc S. Levin Oscar Levin Michael P. Levinson Norman H. Llpoff Carlos E. Loumict Juan P. Loumiet Bruce E. Maedonough Robert P. Maclna Alfred J. Malefatto Samantha D. Malloy Fernando Margarit Ines Marrero-Priegues Enrique J. Martin Roberto Martinez Pedro J. Martine:-Fraga Joel D. Maser Juan J. Mayol, Jr. Craig T. McClung Robert R. McDonald Maury R. Olicker Rebecca R. Orand Debbie M. Orshefaky Aileen Ortega A. Friesner Pardo Stevan J. Pardo Rose Parish -Ramon Michael C. Park Marshall R. Pasternack Sylvia S. Penneys Apri121, 1995 Sheldon S. Polish Roberto R. Pupo Albert D. Quentel Vivian Poxes Quiroga C. Ryan Recta Mark J. Reisman Barry Scott Richard Douglas J. Rillstone Andrea Rivera A. Jeffry Robinson Kenneth B. Robinson Raquel A. Rodrigues Alan H. Boinick Marvin S. Rosen Richard A. Rosenbaum Ronald bI. Rosengarten David L. Ross Stephen D. Sanford Gary A. Saul Elliot H. Scherker Mark P. Schnapp— Clifford A. Schulman Randy J. Shaw Paul A. Shelowitz Brian J. Sherr Marlene K. Silverman Holly R. Skolnick Charles E. Stive , Jr. Joel L. Stocker Douglas R. Thornburg Robert 11. Traurig Peter L. Tunis Brian J. Wolsh Keith Wasserstrom Jeffrey Weithorn David E. Wells Bradford D. West Howard W. Whitaker Jerrold A. Wish Timothy D. Wolfe Linda G. Worton Julie A. Zahniser T. Wayne Davis, of Counze: Arnold J. Hoffman, of Cou Patrick T. O'Brien, of Cow Allan Sslovin, of Counsel Paul E. Shapiro, of Counse H. Allan Shore, of Counsel Craig E. Stein, of Counsel Marc M. Watson, of Courts - Julie A.S. Williamson, of Cot Zachary H. Wolff, Retired Re: Brickell on the River 27 S.E. 5th Avenue Waiver of Charter Waterfront Setback Provision Dear Teresita:: On behalf of Pacific International Equities, Inc., we are requesting a waiver of Section 3(mm)(ii) of the Charter of the City of Miami, Florida, which requires that there be a 25010 aggregate side yard for waterfront properties. The waiver is required due to the unusual pie shape of the subject property. The 25% aggregate setback required is 60 feet. The proposed setback is a total of 55.6 feet which is only 4'4" less than that which is required. The west side has a 30 foot side yard setback and the east side has a 25'5" side yard setback. snt\reroos\azass.t\w/u/ss GREENBERG TRAURIC HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P. A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI. FLoRIDA 33131 305.579.0500 FAX 305-579.0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH TALLAHASSEE F 9 5 - ;97 eI . Gfl��NBEG A T T O R N E Y S A T L A.R' j flII G Lucia A. Dougherty _. (305)_579-0603 April 21, 1995 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Br ckell on the River Dear Teresita: i Pursuant to 'Section'1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, this letter serves to request Class II Permit approval for the reduction in height of the required loading berths and for Class I Permit approval for use of valet parking service. Section 1301 provides that when more than one special permit is required to address the same issue, the highest ranking permit shall be considered sufficient. The Zoning Ordinance requires three (3) loading berths for the subject property, each being 12' x 55' x 15'. The proposed plans request approval for three (3) loading berths which are each 12' x 55' x 12', therefore the reduction in height is required. In addition, we are also requesting Class I Permit approval for valet parking use. Thank you very much for your attention. Very trYy yours, Lucia A. Dougherty cm�rwusnuu�uaro.i�w/u/n s GREENBERC TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P.A. 3 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305.579-0500 FAx 305-579.0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WESTPALm BEACH TALLAHASSEE 9 5 — 597 Q Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared :� who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal reare entative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance No. 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he.represents, if any, have given their :full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit gontain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscribed before me ` this IA day of .� , 191R- �.. Notary Pu lic, State of Florida at Large City Commission Expires: ) ( me) Lucia A. Daugherty OFFICIAL. ADRiEV, NOTARY PUHLIC S'TA MY C041N1t_:J... 'SIC=-2 ' 5EAL PARDO\O'1<�d} i'L'OF FLORIDACc' �tiiC428765\SY �t:,.,6C.21,1998 95- 597 OWNER'S LIST Owner'-s Name Brickell On The River, Inc. Mailing Address 11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 402, Miaml, Florida 331.61 Telephone Number 891-7987 Legal Description:. See attached Ekhifait "A " Owner's`Name Mailing_ Address Telephone Number Legal Description Owner's Name t. Mailing Address Telephone Number t Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 95— 597 4qi DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 27, S.E. Sth Street, Miami, Florida See attached Exhibit "A`' for legal description 2..,_ Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a 'financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject ratter of a presentation, request or petition to the City CDmmission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with -their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "B". 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None. ,i ,. OWNER 0 TTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY:OF DADE ) Lucia A. Dougherty being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #I, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and.(if acting as attorney for owner) that he.has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on aif of the owner. (SEAL) (Name Lu -a A. Dougherty SWORN TO AND- SUB, C IBED before me this day �af• t1 n 1 199 , Notary Public, State of Florida at Large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Personally known, oath taken CTW\PAFM"\3263561\04/ 14/" OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORUTA COMMISSION NO CC:28' 3 MYCOMMISSION EXP. DEC.21.1Y.•, 95- 597 µ� EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM A CONCRETEMONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET, AS PER PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 3935 " WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES 20' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POINT D4 THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A' . DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID H.A11BOR LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80 DEGREES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OFF 24.22 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; , THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 DEGREE 51' 17" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. 5TH STREET AT THE'SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT.HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 "EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIMES DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH, BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 299.78 FEET AT NORTH END, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. 95- 597 I 1 DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS FOR BRICKELL ON THE RIVER Owner/Developer: Pacific International. Equities, Inc. 11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 402 Miami, FL 33161 Telephone: (305) 891-7987 Fax: (305) 891-6854 t Toll.Free: (800) 342-1222 Mr. Howard. Shapiro, Senior Vice President Architect: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshorebrive, Suite 10000 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Mr. Willy Bermello Ms. Teresita Castellanos Garcia (beeper 952-9848) (car 301-3393) Mr. Rai Fernandez (beeper 952-9848) Landscape Bermello, Ajamil.& Partners, Inc. Architect: j 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 10000 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 i Ms. Nancy L. Siemion Civil & Traff is : Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 10000 Miami, Florida '33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Mr. Vish Chowdhary Mr. Fernando Alonso Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A*. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Mr. Darryl Sharpton Mr. Tom Schlosser Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0683 95- 59 7 BRICIELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT DATA SHEET 1. Legal Description: See Exhibit "A" 2. Address: 27 S.E. 5th Street Miarn , Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Maori Zoning Overlay SD-7 4. Lot Area, Net Area: 103,406 sq. ft. Gross Area: 179,860 sq. ft. 5. Allowable Area: Floor Atea Ratio(FAR) Maximum Allowed: 8.0 Residential FAR 6.0 Non -Residential FAR 2.25 plus Bonus for Non Residential Floor Area Ratio(FAR): 6.73 Provided 6. Loading Berths: 3 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft.. 7. Height No height limitations 650 provided (60 stories) 8. Building Footprint: 55,017 gross sq.ft. 9. No.. of Parking Spaces Required 541 spaces No. of Parking Spaces Provided 652 spaces 95- 597 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER' PROJECT ]DATA ,S., EFT' 'Handicapped Spaces Required 11 spaces Handicapped Spaces Provided 18 provided ' 10. Open Space: Required: 5,123 sq. ft. 'rovided: 7,155 sq. ft. ` 11 Setbacks: Required Provided S.E. 50i Street 15 ft. required 15 ft. S.E. 5th#Street Upper Level 25 ft. 25 ft. S.E. 5th Street Ground Level 15 ft up to 48 ft 15 ft Z in height Upper Level 25 ft. after 48 ft. 25 ft. in height. dvit EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET, AS PER PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 11 WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1 THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES 20' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POINT -IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIANS RIVER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID HARBOR LINE; THENCE RUN. -SOUTH 80 DEGREES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF;124.22 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF.THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; d THENCE RUN `SOUTH 1 DEGREE 51' 17" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. STH STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIIvLES DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH, BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 299.78 FEET AT NORTH END, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. F 95- 597 kSH1 :KLLL AaK� /�5�t�l:IE-1 1 IUtV 600 griakell Avenue, Suitt.Ny �0 Miami, rlorida 33131 (305) 375-0080 Omeert: President Me;an xelly pats HetsElts Vit=e Presidenc " Phiitp.f. Btumbetr. Ed��ef vrtArrsryTie�ien . Loreto Cocknui, Pas President . October 14, 1994 Richard E. Friend EtECUtiYE Coordinator '. Brcadi Hiirston Bosrd ar Dtretccrat Mr. Howard Shapiro }{ere aaiiey riekctl Homeowners Asw Senior Vice president Shirt ti. Berry pacific Interpiational Equities San ti.A. "BanYr?v�=�•at. Philip,F. BlutnDcrr 11098 Biscayne Bouievard Atncrtean Ventures Corporation Suite 402 )!in Bridtry jleidkellF4wdet,eom -Miami, Florida'3316I " Charter Carlisle ,Taylor&' Mathis Loren Coekrurn 'Forun Group. Inc. An d Ferrer Dear Howard: horthelleTrust Bank , A- nd S r�u ie ard F— Firas et. 31. Thanks very much for participating in the recent Brickell Building Blocks Barry Hcfsh BOO ScldmAA, CPA's presentation. I am confident that your organization can make the first large , Anthony Jackson scale residential project on the river work. We are ready to help whenever we Sharpton. Brunson & Company t Ctyyde Judson can. )udson & Partner S. tawrenec Kahn, III Lowell Hamm Best regards, ). Mcgs�a Kcuy Swire Properties Inc _ Edr�l�riuer B {�LL ASS ON Carmen Bcta won Lcwis Misrni 7odsy ' LynnB Lcwis Lynn 8 Lcwis,: Tom Pennek J: Megan lly , •' r =• Pcnnekamp oto Presidentrn .....� Law Offices of Max D. Puyatie } d li iJ S 1 ry tQ� ►i, . Dc=s L: •Tarr _. Fire Presbyterian Church IJ H ' i eland Tay�cr The'Allea Moms Company JMI�lfn: Susan Thomas _ . Terranova Corporation i Edward Mct) ur CapiW Bury )eat Wbipple The Whipple Group Chy wiison BamurBmnf of South Florida " cWvin Bnekell Key one Condo Aar=. Board Emeritus: ... ,. . Sack L.awcll Summa Properties =Allen Morris e Allen Morris Companies r Wmir1 ' nrsJ laresanents 95� 597 BRICKELL ON TIME RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Zoning Ordinance No. 110000 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Brickell;on the River is a luxury residential apartment development including residence hotel units located at 27 S.E. 5th Street, Miami, Florida. The development consists of a single parcel with a net areatof 103,406 square feet or 2.373 acres. The gross lot area is 179,860 square feet or 4.129 acres. The property fronts the Miami River on the north, S.E. Sth Street on the south, the U.S. Cuktoms Building on the east and the Metromover Fifth Street Station on the west. Brickell on the River will have approximately 508 apartment units and 325 residence hotel units. The project will encompass two towers, joined by a 10 level parking garage. Tower 1 at the northernmost portion of the site will have 60 levels of residential units. Tower 2 at the southernmost part of the site and fronting 5th Street will,have 52 levels. This tower will include 96 residential units,325 hotel residence units and two levels of penthouse office space. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell luxury condominium corridor and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. Among the amenities provided there is a cafe/restaurant of approximately 4,430 square feet, with seating for approximately 120 people. The restaurant/cafe will be available for the use of the public. This type of use will encourage pedestrian activity at Fifth Street coming from the Fifth Street Metromover Station. Tower 1 will include a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscape outdoor area, a health spa and two racquetball courts. Tower 2 will include a swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. The project will include a river walk along the Miami River with benches and lighting, ensuring the safety and security of its users. The riverwalk is intended for the use of the public as a passive park. It is envisioned that this riverwalk can be connected to the walk and green area at the Fifth Street Metromover Station. Drawings that show the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 7 95- 597 The approximate gross square footage allocation for the building is as follows: _ ]Parking Garage Tower 1 Tower 2 Total Residential units 765,619 139,408 905,027 Parking units 652 spaces (290,265) Residence hotel units 288,736 288,736 Lobby 6,272 2,530 8,802 Restaurant 4,430 4,430 Recreational Spa 9,983 9,983 Spa and meeting rooms 7,514 7,514- Office 17,426 17,426 t The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/exits, drives, internal circulation ramps, coverkd entry courts, tenant service area and emergency vehicle access, three loading bays. The ground level includes also utilities such as FPL transformer vault, emergency generator, main electrilial and telephone room, a domestic pump.room and a main mechanical room. In addition the gro"d level includes the restaurant, health spa and lobbies. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Area Context Map: Map of the project area and its surrounding sites indicating existing buildings and their functions. (2) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, the date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The title sheet contains all the information on the developer and architect. One site plan, Sheet A-1.01 is provided with the Major Use special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: -2- ,ivjj (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing Streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the -Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures. There are no existing buildings on the site. The location of the buildings to be constructed is shown on the Site Plan, Sheet A-1.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic wiif be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. A detailed analysis of4h& site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All of the circulation to the site will originate from 5th Street. There will be a driveway ;to Tower 2 and a driveway at the easternmost side of the site to Tower 2. The internal ;circulation ramps are located in the center of the structure away from all setbacks and will provide an efficient and secure access for the tenants. A service entrance is located to the j vest adjacent to the Sth Street Metromover Station site. All vehicular access points to the site will be from 5th Street. - (4) Off street parking and off street loading areas. k Off street parking will be located on levels 1 through 10 and will contain approximately 290,265 square feet, with 29,026 square feet per level. Loading and delivery parking will be located on the west side of the residential structures. (5) Recreational facilities' locations Recreational amenities included in Tower 1 will be located on the north side on the ground level, on the second level and on the level I Ith at the roof top of the garage. This will include a health spa, with an exercise or aerobics room; two racquetball courts, lockers and showers. The facilities on the I I th level will encompass a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscape areas. Recreational facilities are shown on the Ground Level Site Plan, Sheet A-3.01 and Level I Plan on Sheet A-3.06 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Recreational facilities located in Tower 2 at the 10th level will include a health spa, swimming pool,•sun deck and meeting rooms. These facilities are shown on Level 10 Plan, Sheet A-2.05 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. -3- 95- 597 (6) Screens and buffers. Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Site Plan, Sheet L1.0 and on the Landscaping Plan, Sheet U.I under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided for by a containerized compactor system located for Tower, I within the structure on the north side, and within the parking garage for Tower 2. (8) Access'to.utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access. and points of connection to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to 1 (1) The various permitted uses. nd Use ti ]Aarldng Garage: 290,265 gross s.f. + 1,916,303 = 15.2 % t Tc wer 1: 1,011794 gross s.f. _ 1,916,303 = 52.8 % (inlcudes residential) Tower 2: 614,244 gross s.f. 1,916,393 = 32 % ( includes residential, commercial and office) (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage is 31 % of dze total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The minimum number of off street parking spaces required is 541 parking spaces. The total number of spaces provided is 652 spaces. This creates excess parking in the amount of 111 spaces. The parking ratios provided in the project respond to market conditions. It is also anticipated that residents will also be using the transit facilities adjacent to the site. -4- F 95 597 dlti�9�;it"p The off street loading area shown on the Ground Level Site plan, Sheet A-3.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three loading bays within the parking structure with maximum clearance of approximately 12 feet at beam location as opposed to the required 15 feet. The three loading bays are 12 feet x 55 feet. (2) , Total projec# density in dwelling units per acre. The residential towers will consist of 508 apartment units. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 508 residential dwelling units T 2,373 net acres = 214 dwelling units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to.be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities provided will include the recreational areas. The common areas corresponding to the residence hotel units will be maintained by the Owner. The common faculnes corresponding to the residential units will be maintained by the Owner and eventually by a condominium association. (h) Storni drainage and sanitary sewerage plan. _i Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include a complex of two high rise towers joined by,a 10 level parking garage. The towers will include luxury residential units as well as residence hotels and limited office space with a restaurant that will compliment the project and the existing neighborhood facilities. The exact number of dwelling units and residence hotels with their, sizes and types is included in the Project Summary for Brickell on the River under BUILDING AREA COMPUTATIONS, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents Typical floor plans for residential units are included in Sheets A-3.01 through A-3.10 under Tab 6,of the Supporting. Documents. -5- 95- 597 1i, G) Plans for signs, if any. Building identification signs will be located at the south side of the property at Sth Street within the landscaped area at the entrance to the project. The design wilt be compatible with the area and type of luxury development proposed. Proposed signage will be in compliance with the required regulations. Smaller directional signs will be located at the entrance driveways and service entrance. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showingprovisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan, Sheet L-1.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner. The Boundary Survey indicates any existing trees on the site. The disposition of such trees is indicated in the Landscaping Plan, Sheet L-1.1 under Tab 6. (1) Plan ,for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for suxh use. L Recrotional facilities included in Tower 1 will be located on the north side on the ground level, on the second level and on the level 11 th on the roof top of the garage. This will include a health tpa, exercise or aerobics room, with racquetball courts, lockers and shower. The facilities on the I1th level will encompass a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscaping areas. 1keereational facilities are shown on the Ground Level Site Plan, Sheet A-' .01 and Level 2 Plan, Sheet A-3.02 and Level 11 Plan on Sheet A-3.07. (m) Such additional data, snaps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the Applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site an,d, development plan. The Drawings depicting Floor Area Ratios, Sheet FAR- 100 through- Sheet FAR- 207 are found under Tab 6. Elevation and Sections depicting the architectural character of the buildings, Sheet A-6.01 through Sheet A-6.04 and Sheet A-7.01 through A-7.02 are found under Tab 6. Renderings and vignettes showing the architectural character of the buildings and how it will blend with he surrounding s areas are found under Tab 6. IM. W.;_ 597 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statements of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article L (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article ,li. (3) The survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the BoundarySurvey of Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting _ Documents. _ (4) :Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use, general topography and physical features. The e4sting site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of Property locatedjunder Tab 5 and described in the Site Utility Study, located under_Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. In addition; the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-7. The of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is restricted commercial. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. -7- 95- 597 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps submitted indicate the land uses of the property and the project's functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are included in the Drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-7 zoning for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this property. The following permits and approvals are also required for the execution of this project: 1. 4A request for waiver'of the Charter Waterfront Amendment setback. 2. A Class II Permit approval to reduce the required height a the loading bays. 3. AtClass I Permit approval to permit valet parking use. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the -city, The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. -8- T- 95- 597 c. A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 508 apartment units. A copy of the Goodkin Report on the Downtown Miami Housing Market Analysis addresses the housing impact and the need for additional housing within this area.. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. The building envelope will comprised of insulated walls and roofs. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. e. Historic Buildings There art no existing historic structures located on the property. f. EnvironAiental Zone The propetty is not located within the environmental preservation district, t RESOLUTION PAB - 31-95 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 17.OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, FOR THE BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT, LOCATED AT 27 S.E. STH STREET (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 508 RESIDENTAIL UNITS, 325 RESIDENCE HOTEL UNITS, OFFICE SPACE, AND ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL SPACE; APPROVING SAID MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, ATTACHED HERETO AS "EXHIBIT A", AND THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND PROVIDING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. 36- 95- 597 EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- DATE: BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be -known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City. of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell on the River Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 27 Southeast 5th. Street; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board -and after due. consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the.PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use.Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Brickell on the River Project is a residential and hotel use development located at approximately 27 Southeast.5th Street, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 4.129 gross acres and 2373 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder -of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. Among the amenities which are being provided, there is a cafe/restaurant of approximately 4,430 square feet (seating approximately 120 people). Tower One will include a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscaped outdoor area, a health spa and two racquetball courts. Tower Two will include a swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. The Project will also include an improved riverwalk along the Miami River with benches and security lighting. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's unique location on the Miami River overlooking Downtown Miami. The two residential towers will compliment the Central Brickell District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami and Biscayne Bay. The Project consists of a wide, well integrated Riverwalk which surrounds the Project's northern waterfront edge. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. 95_ 597 The Project also reflects suggestions received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of March 28, 1994, and the -Urban Development Review Board meeting of June 13,1 1995. The Project shall be constructed substantially in`accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bermel1o, Ajamil & Partner Inc., dated 5/6/95 and 5/8/95, with revisions dated 5/15/95 and signed and sealed on 5/25/95; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-7 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a required approval of a Class I Special Permit for the proposed swimming pools. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be`considered sufficient for the subordinate request referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 905,027 square feet of habitable residential area; 288,736 square feet of hotel units; 17,426 square feet of`office space; and 30,729 square feet of lobby, restaurant, recreation and meeting room space. CONDITIONS Page 3 9V�— �� THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. An interim landscape and facade plan for the Southeast. 5th Street (south) facade shall be prepared and submitted for the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; said plan shall- specifically address interim plans for the south facade to be implemented between phases of the Project, or in the event that Phase II is never constructed or4elayed. 2. The Project's final landscape plan shall be modified, per the recommendation of the Urban Development Review. Board, by providing Coconut Palm trees along the riverwalk, where Royal palms are now specified, and by providing Royal Palms along the east side of the. property, where Washingtonian palms are now specified 3. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, _ ordinances and other laws. 4. Within six (S) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or,approval required of each; 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police. Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; Page 4 95- 597 It Offfjk 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue . and Inspection Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the FirePlanReview Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter, of assurance from- the Solid. Waste Department that the PROJECT- has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 8. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 9. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within :ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special.Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 10. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. Page.5 11 95- 597 4 �thr��tht 11. Record a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the 'Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 12.. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 13. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell on the River Project, proposed by the applicant, Pacific International Equities, Inc.("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and ;goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance 11,000: (1) The PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) - The PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and Page 6 95- 597 (3) The PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) 117he'Pa0JECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) The PROJECT will not negatively impact theenvironmentand natural resources of the City; and (6) The PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) The PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) The public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (9) Any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the specific site plan asPects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and .. ,control of potentially adverse effects generally have beenconsideredand will be. ,further' considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d2]<musps/95>brickell/RIVER/do Page 7 ae��' EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTT3 STREET, AS PER PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 "WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES 2`0' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POINT IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIANII RIVER AT THE NORTHEA$T CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; TH&CE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID HARBOR LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80 DEGREES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 124.22 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 DEGREE 5 F 17" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. 51H STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 51H STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 51H STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 51H STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIMES DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH, BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 290.78 FEET AT NORTH END, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. 9-'- �97 F;� �s2 BRCKELL ON THE RIVER RO . 1 s.. s . ..l 1. Legal Description: See Exhibit °A" 2. Address: 27 S.E. 5th Street Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning Overlay SD-7 s 4. Lot Area Net Area: 103,406 sq. & Gross Area: 179,860 sq. ft. S. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Maximum Allowed: 1 Residential FAR Non -Residential FAR plus Bonus for Non Residential Floor Area Ratio(FAR): Provided 8.0 6.0 2.25 6.73 6. Loading Berths: 3 loading berths 12ft. x55ft.. 7. Height: No height limitations 650 provided (60 stories) 8. Building Footprint: 55,017 gross sq.ft. 9. No. of Parking Spaces Required 541 spaces No. of Parking Spaces Provided 652 spaces ,!,ypa ii EXHIBIT C BRCKELL ON THE RIVER RO . 1 s.. s . ..l 1. Legal Description: See Exhibit °A" 2. Address: 27 S.E. 5th Street Miami, Florida 3. Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning Overlay SD-7 s 4. Lot Area Net Area: 103,406 sq. & Gross Area: 179,860 sq. ft. S. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Maximum Allowed: 1 Residential FAR Non -Residential FAR plus Bonus for Non Residential Floor Area Ratio(FAR): Provided 8.0 6.0 2.25 6.73 6. Loading Berths: 3 loading berths 12ft. x55ft.. 7. Height: No height limitations 650 provided (60 stories) 8. Building Footprint: 55,017 gross sq.ft. 9. No. of Parking Spaces Required 541 spaces No. of Parking Spaces Provided 652 spaces ,!,ypa ii EXHIBIT C I = ® I m v�W-7 c , y`q t+t �rj-h ^? tl k' it,t zk{�'Xie rj8 � rq t' MAJOR `SE ` }� PPL1CAT10 F pp PREPARED 13 U.R "° ` , HOFFMAN, t UENTEL, P.A. irr Mr � L®, AJAMIL & 'RTNERS, INC. t �R '!, 13RUNSON & OMPANl( P 9 • •A. :. r • 74"+� .. rr s Ij r :7 Q- N Ott w IL 7 901Fmalm- 7 vrr IP 4r Submitted into the pudic record �in connecti t Item Xz= on t Walter Foeman City Cleric LOCATION SITE Submitted into the public record nonnecti n,10,wath item on ir Waiter Forman City Clerk �. ,L; . _ 7 Now Now WON Now WON bow how and know TABLE OF CONTENTS �. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Request for Waiver of Waterfront Charter Provision C. Request for Class II Permit Approval for Reduction in Height of Loading Berths and Class I Permit for Valet Parking Service D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principals G. Project Data Sheet H. Zoning Atlas Page I. Letter of Support from Brickell Area Association It. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Development Impact Study III. Supporting Documents Tab I Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted Into the public recorM-0000n nriec ' i item Walter -ocman " City Clerk Oman BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I 4 Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Request for Waiver of Waterfront Charter Provision C. Request for Class II Permit Approval for Reduction in Height of Loading Berths and Class I Permit for Valet Parking Service D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principals G. Project Data Sheet H. Zoning Atlas Page I. Letter of Support from Brickell Area Association Submitted into the public recor �nt�Connect• 13 ith item on Walter Foeman 9 r �. City Clerk APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MU- File Number - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals .w to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) v: I, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building . and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. „. Address of Property: 27 S.E. 5th Street, Miami, Florida Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): Approval for 2 residential towers (508 units) with a residence hotel (325 units), offices and a restaurant. Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3..2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). Page 1 of 2 Submitted Into the public record ,�c�onnecti n ,rith item on - P� Walter Foeman City Clerk J APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): see attached supplemental docuwnent 9. Fee of $ 30,000 , based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Buildin (s): Other Specify): Total: $ 30,000 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature r orized Agent Lucia A. Dougherty Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 'submitted into the public r;cor in conne t' ith 9 � ftem Mo on . Walter Poeman City Clerk onard J. Adler rnando C. Alonso Cesar L. Alvarez Liliana Armas 111aniel H. Aronson avid C. Ashburn larlcs M. Auslandcr Fred W. Haggett Kerri L. Barsh "'lilarie Bass LDawn Beighey rman J. Benford Dale S. Bergman Paul Berkowitz "Jill Berry urf: 1; Bidcau nrence Jon Bielby Mark D. Bloom Reginald L. Bouthillier, Jr. ",(,,word Bregman IInke D. Bringgold tancis B. Brognn, Jr. Burl Bruton Bernardo Burstein unph A. Carballo dune Wagner Carr .,'avid R. Chase Michael J. Chcrniga Ary Choucke ite M. Cobb C. Deryl Couch Miguel A. De Grandy Alan T. Dimond Trini L. Donato Lucia A. Dougherty Candace R. Duff William B. Eck Kenneth Edelman Arthur J. England, Jr. Gary M. Epstein Elvira A. Escriban,, Henry H. (Bucky) Fox Jorge L. Freeland Jeffrey R. Fried Robin F. Frydman Robert C. Gang Richard G. Garrett Brian K. Gart David J. George Jeffrey Gilbert Laurie L. Gildan Bruce 11. Gilcs-Klein Richard J. Giusto Lawrence Godofsky Joel K. Goldman Slevcn E. Goldman Glenn E, Goldstein Joseph G, Goldstein Steven S. Goodman Matthew B. Corson Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 6BEENBEBG . 0IBBVBIG Dianne Greenberg [Melvin N. Greenberg Robert L. Grossman Barbara A. Half Paige A. Harper Fred F. Harris, Jr. Steven M. Helfman Alberto M. Hernandez Jeffrey A. Hirsch Kenneth C. Hoffman Larry J. Hoffman Kenneth A. Horky John Harrison Hough Gerald J. Houlihan Andrew Hulsh John B. Hutton Keith A. James Martin Kalb Steven M. Katzman David S. Kenin Holly W. Kimmel Steven J. Kravitz J. D. Boone Koersn iner Christopher L. Kurzner Ronald C. LaFace Gustavo J. Lamelas Steven A. L.andy Steven B. Lapidus Nancy B. Lash Moshe M, Lelrrfield James P S. Leshaw Marc S. Levin Oscar Levin Michael P. Levinson Norman If. Lipoff Carlos E. Loumict Juan P. Loumiet Bruce E. Macdonough Robert P. Macina Alfred J. Malefatto Samantha D. Malloy Fernando Mnrgarit Ines Marrero-Priegues Enrique J. Martin Roberto Martinez Pedro J. Martinez-Fraga Joel D. Maser Juan J. Mayol, Jr. Craig T. McClung Robert R. McDonald Maury R. Olicker Rebecca R. Orand Debbie DL. Orshufsky Aileen Ortega A. Friesner Pardo Stevan J. Pardo Rose Parish -Ramon Michael G. Park Marshall R. Pasternack Sylvia S. Penneys April 21, 1995 Re: Brickell on the River 27 S.E. 5th Avenue Waiver of Charter Waterfront Setback Provision Dear Teresita:: Sheldon S. Polish Roberto R. Pape Albert D. Quentel Vivian Pazos Quiroga C. Ryan Reetz Mark J. Reisman Barry Scott Richard Douglas J. Rillstonc Andres Rivera A. Jeffry Robinson Kenneth B. Robinson Raquel A. Rodriguez Alan H. Rolnick Marvin S. Rosen Richard A. Rosenbaum Ronald iM. Rosengarten David L. Ross Stephen D. Sanfurd Cary A. Saud Elliot H. Scherker Mark P. Schnapp Clifford A. Schulman Randy J. Shaw Paul A. Shelowitz Brian J. Sherr Marlene K. Silverman (lolly R. Skolnick Charles E. Stiver, Jr. Joel L. Stocker Douglas R. Thornburg Robert H. Traurig Peter L. Tunis Brian J. Walsh Keith Wasserstrom Jeffrey Weithorn David E. Wells Bradford D. West Howard W. Whitaker Jerrold A. Wish Timothy D. Wolfe Linda G. Worton Julie A. Z.ahniser T. Wayne Davis, of Counsel Arnold J. Hoffman, of Counsel Patrick T. O'Brien, of Counsel Allan Snlovin, of Counsel Paul E. Shapiro, of Counscl H. Allan Shore, of Counsel , Craig E. Stein, of Counsel Marc M. Watson, of Counsel Julie A.S. Willinmson, of Counsel Zachary 11. Wolff, Retired 1 On behalf of Pacific International Equities, Inc., we are requesting a waiver of Section 3(mm)(ii) of the Charter of the City of Miami, Florida, which requires that there be a 25% aggregate side yard for waterfront properties. t,�� The waiver is required due to the unusual pie shape of the subject property. The 25% aggregate setback required is 60 feet. The proposed setback is a total of 55.6 feet which is only 4'4tt less than that which is required. The west side has a.•§gtW&6Wggtgrql1e public setback and the east side has a 25'511 side yard setback. reror(n conne#in,&'t1hGTWAAD"%326765.11a/17/95 -item on Waloeman GREEN➢ERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P.A. ._. City Clerk 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579-0500 FAX 305-5�9-0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH TALLAHASSEE 9 55 .-- J a) 7 NEW YORK WASHINCTON, D.C. r Ms. Teresita Fernandez April 21, 1995 Page 2 r. Thank you very much for your attention. Very trul yours, 1 %, VAA. ougherty lad/wp %w%Pµ DOAN32W65.1\041%7%9i Submitted into the public record in connectilon with item on -. Walter Foeman City Clerk+ GIIEENBERG TRAURIG �� GflEGNBEBG A T T O It N F Y S A T I. ,5 W I B fl U B I G Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 April 21, 1995 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Brickell on the River Dear Teresita: Pursuant to Section 1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, this letter serves to request Class II Permit approval for the reduction in height of the required loading berths and for Class I Permit approval for use of valet parking service. Section 1301 provides that when more than one special permit is required to address the same issue, the highest ranking permit shall be considered sufficient. The Zoning Ordinance requires three (3) loading berths for the subject property, each being 12' x 55' x 15'. The proposed plans request approval for three (3) loading berths which are each 12' x 55' x IT, therefore the reduction in height is required. In addition, we are also requesting Class I Permif approval for valet parking use. Thank you very much for your attention. Very t y yours, Lucia A. Dougherty eTH%FRI MEMN326770.i\a/��lss Submitted into fie public recor n conneVilon with item on GREENDERC Waite Fo - man TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ROSEN & QUENTEL, P.A. City Clerk 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579-0717 MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH TALLAHASSEE Py NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. 9 5 7 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 27 S.E. 5th Street, Miami, Florida See attached Exhibit "A" for legal description 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "B" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None. OWNER 0 TTORNEY FOR OWNER Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY' OF DADE ) Lucia A. Dougherty/ , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on alf of the owner. % (SEAL) (Namej—'LLicra A. Dougherty SWORN TO AND SUB, C� JtIBED before me this I`'1 day 199= . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Personally known, oath taken GTH%PAW0A\32e354.1\w/ a /99 r Notary Public, Sta% of Florida at Large OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDC7 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIP.A COMMISSION NO CC;' .: MY COMMISSION EXP. Di. 21.Iw.. Submitted into the publ, recor n conneV-X— wi` item ��Io can WaiemC CityCie, 95- �9 7 t OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Brickell On The River, Inc. Mailing Address 11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 402, Miami, Florida 33161 Telephone Number 891-7987 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "A". Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description N/A Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Submitted into the public recor6 Ln onnect' n i iitem on 4m Walter Fo;;man City Clerk J "� AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) i Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared i Lucia A. Dougherty who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete. permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. (SEAL) (Name) Lu a A. D6ugherty Sworn to and Subscribo befo.re me this _ day of 1916. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL C ADRIENNE FRIESNER PARDO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA Notary ubl i c, State Fl or'i da at Large COMMISSION NO CC428765 My Commission Expires: S►.IbmSffnrl � to the pubs MY COMMISSION EXP. DEC, 21,1998 Personally known, oath taken record ; r' pert' Irk wit item �_ z. . EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE J OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET, AS PER ,,;41 PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO _,::, THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES 20' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POIN'r IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID HARBOR LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80 DEC . ,EES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 124.22 FEET TG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN j DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 DEGREE 51' 17" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. STH STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; -A THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE j OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIMES DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH, BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 299.78 FEET AT NORTH END, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. Submitted into the public record connecti n i item on Walter oeman 9 r - 5 ,5, 7 City Clerk EXHIBIT "B" Brickell on the River, Inc. is owned 100% by Southeastern Florida Properties, Inc. Southeastern Florida Properties, Inc. is owned 100% by Pacific International Equities, Inc. Pacific International Equities, Inc. is owned 100% by FME Investments, LTD. FME Investments, LTD is owned 100% by Charles Bedzow. Submitted into the public record i connecti n with itern p to on -7 Walter otman City Clerk AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA) SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Ll_t.C.iA who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance No. 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. -rl *- - (SEAL ( me) ) Lucia A. Dougherty Sworn to and Subscribed before me this 1, day of ry � 191R5 Notary Pu lic, State of Florida at Large OFFICIAL, Ni."" ADW\\E. FK..r. NOTARY PUBLIC STA MYCONI'Mi..-:.... ^ City Commission Expires: 'PI`. '�`-)TARYSEAL �hiEti\ER PARDO \01 A,. ) �2L•,cl.ic' iTATE OF FLORIDA Cc tf-tilC)\ :\'n CCa28765 11Y i:.. tyS12\ E.tiP:'DEC.21,]998 Submitted into the public r recor conne t'on ith Item p on I Waite Foeman ` City Cleric DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS FOR BRICKELL ON THE RIVER Owner/Developer: Pacific International Equities, Inc. 11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 402 Miami, FL 33161 Telephone: (305) 891-7987 Fax: (305) 891-6854 Toll Free: (800) 342-1222 y Mr. Howard Shapiro, Senior Vice President Architect: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 10000 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Mr. Willy Bermello Ms. Teresita Castellanos Garcia (beeper 952-9848) (car 301-3393) Mr. Rai Fernandez j (beeper 952-9848) Landscape Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. "} Architect: 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 10000 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Ms. Nancy L. Siemion Civil & Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. { i Traffic: 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 10000 1 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Mr. Vish Chowdhary Mr. Fernando Alonso Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. u 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 ' Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Mr. Darryl Sharpton Mr. Tom Schlosser !` Attorneys: Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. .. Telephone: (305) 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. GTH\FRIESHERA\145396.1 Telephone: (305) 579-0683 VJ Submitted into the public ( nneci �� withitem recorMfion s 5 µ 557 Walter Fo,_,r-. � 1. 2. 4� 3. 4. P=� 1 5. �r i 6. 7. 8. 9. BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT DATA SHEET Legal Description: See Exhibit "A" Address: 27 S.E. 5th Street Miami, Florida Zoning Classification: City of Miami Zoning Overlay SD-7 Lot Area Net Area: 103,406 sq. ft. Gross Area: 179,860 sq. ft. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Maximum Allowed: Residential FAR Non -Residential FAR plus Bonus for Non Residential Floor Area Ratio(FAR): Provided Loading Berths: 3 Height: Building Footprint: No. of Parking Spaces Required No. of Parking Spaces Provided 8.0 6.0 2.25 6.73 loading berths 2ft. x55ft.. 'o height limitations 50 provided (60 stories) 5,017 gross sq.ft. 41 spaces 52 spaces Submitted into the public record n connec i i h item record on Walter Fo man City Clerk 95" 5:�rd BRICIKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT DATA SHEET Handicapped Spaces Required 11 spaces Handicapped Spaces Provided 18 provided Open Space: Required: 5,123 sq. ft. Provided: 7,155 sq. ft. Setbacks: Required S.E. 5th Street 15 ft. required S.E. 5th Street Upper Level 25 ft. S.E. 5th Street Ground Level 15 ft up to 48 ft Provided 15 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft in height Upper Level 25 ft. after 48 ft. 25 ft. in height. Interior Sides: East Side Visual Corridor 30 ft. 25 ft. 6 in. West Side Visual Corridor 30 ft. 30 ft. River 50 ft. 50 ft. Submitted into the public � recor n connecti n with } item UP on Walter Fo6man City Clerk ` 95- 697 i r EXHIBIT ►'A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET, AS PER PLAT RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOK 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 13 DEGREES 20' 55" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A POINT IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 74 DEGREES 08' 01" WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN SAID HARBOR LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80 DEGREES 42' 26 " WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 124 22 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 DEGREE 5 P 17" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 413.75 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID S.E. 5TH STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; 1 THENCE RUN NORTH 88 DEGREES 13' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTI-IERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.97 FEET TO A CONCRETE 1 MONUMENT MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE 1 OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET; ...J THENCE RUN SOUTH 76 DEGREES 39' 35 " EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID S.E. 5TH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS J THEREUNTO BELONGING OR IN ANY WISE APPERTAINING WHETHER OF COMMON LAW, STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, AND SOMETIMES DESCRIBED AS .,.�J THE WESTERLY PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 103, MIAMI SOUTH, BEING 182.45 FEET AT SOUTH END AND 299.78 FEET AT NORTH END, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS. ,ubrnitted into the public rrcaj' n connect' if 'tern on r -w Walter Foeman 0 7 City Clerk y Mere: president McYam Kt (1 President Elect Barry Hersh Vice President Philip F. Blumbert Treasurer Edward Tictjcn Barclay Loretta ocknm Put President Richard E. Friend Excoutive Coordinator Brend;L Hairston Board of Directors-. Herb Bailey Brickell HomeOwneq Assn, Stuart A. Berry San Ba-W.V±_-ni. K.A. Phitip•F. Blumborc Amenean Ventures Corporation Jim arickcy Brickell Equities Corp. Chirles Carlisle Taylor At Mathis Lot= Cocksum s Forum Group, Inc. Ari�eI Ferrer Northern Trust Bank Richud E. Friend Sara, Uckctcin u. al. Barry Hersh BOO 56dman, CPAs Mthony Jackson Sharpton. Brun & Company Clyde Judson Judson & Partners .l S. L %vtence Kahn, Al Lowell Homes 1. Me Kelly Swine Properues inc Edit Carmei11177Betutcourt LcwiS Miami Today Lynn B. Lcwis Lynn B. Lewis, Tom Pcnack �` Patmekamp oto Law Offices of Max D. Puyanie Dennis L: Tarr, -• First Presbytcnan Church H. Leland Taylor The Alien Moms Company Susan Thomas . Tcrtanova Corporation _ i. Edward Tict'en• Capiw Bank lam Whipple The Whipple Group clay Wilson 4` Bumeit Bank of South Florida Calvin lextttk7 Briekell x�y ne Condo Assn, Board Emeaitw: lici( Lowell Summa Properties W. Allen Morris The AUea Morris Companiu Th Peter weaxel WenrrJ Investments �. 600 Srickeli Avenue, Suite 60( Miami, Rorlda 33131 (305) 375-0080 October 14, 1994 Mr. Howard Shapiro Senior Vice President Pacific International Equities 11098 Biscayne Bouievard Suite 402 Miami, Florida 33161 Dear Howard: Thanks very much for participating in the recent Brickell Building Blocks presentation. I am confident that your organization can make the rust large scale residential project. on the river work. We are ready to help whenever' we can, Best regards, B LL AS J. Megan sly President JMKJfn �t t LZ "+a�iJt►iiAir, ) a xxas),sAlDtilNt► Submitted into the public recordiJ�nnecti ith itcti7 on 95-'"� Walter oeman City Clerkq i 80 in 56-i i-Ndd IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION BRICICELL ON THE RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION RTICLE H roject Description Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702.2.3 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study Submitted into the public record onnect'on ith item �� on �� Walter Foeman City Clerk J BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Zoning Ordinance No. 110000 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Brickell on the River is a luxury residential apartment development including residence hotel units located at 27 S.E. 5th Street, Miami, Florida. The development consists of a single parcel with a net area of 103,406 square feet or 2.373 acres. The gross lot area is 179,860 square feet or 4.129 acres. The property fronts the Miami River on the north, S.E. 5th Street on the south, the U.S. Customs Building on the east and the Metromover Fifth Street Station on the west. I Brickell on the River will have approximately 508 apartment units and 325 residence hotel units. i The project will encompass two towers, joined by a 10 level parking garage. Tower 1 at the northernmost portion of the site will have 60 levels of residential units. Tower 2 at the southernmost part of the site and fronting 5th Street will have 52 levels. This tower will include 96 residential units, 325 hotel residence units and two levels of penthouse office space. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell luxury condominium corridor and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. 1 Among the amenities provided there is a cafe/restaurant of approximately 4,430 square feet, 1 with seating for approximately 120 people. The restaurant/cafe will be available for the use of the public. This type of use will encourage pedestrian activity at Fifth Street coming from the Fifth Street Metromover Station. Tower 1 will include a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscape outdoor area, a health spa and two racquetball courts. Tower 2 will include a swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. The project will include a river walk along the Miami River with benches and lighting, ensuring the safety and security of its users. The riverwalk is intended for the use of the public as a passive park, It is envisioned that this riverwalk can be connected to the walk and green area at the Fifth Street Metromover Station. Drawings that show the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted into the public recor in connect'o with - 1 - item on Waite Foeman City Cleric 95- b57 The approximate gross square footage allocation for the building is as follows: Parking Garage Tower 1 Tower 2 Total Residential units 765,619 139,408 905,027 Parking units 652 spaces (290,265) Residence hotel units 288,736 288,736 Lobby 6,272 2,530 8,802 Restaurant 4,430 4,430 Recreational Spa 9,983 9,983 Spa and meeting rooms 7,514 7,514 Office 17,426 17,426 The ground level includes landscaped areas, entrance/exits, drives, internal circulation ramps, covered entry courts, tenant service area and emergency vehicle access, three loading bays. The ground level includes also utilities such as FPL transformer vault, emergency generator, main electrical and telephone room, a domestic pump room and a main mechanical room. In addition the ground level includes the restaurant, health spa and lobbies. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Area Context Map: Map of the project area and its surrounding sites indicating existing buildings and their functions. (2) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, the date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The title sheet contains all the information on the developer and architect. One site plan, Sheet A-1.01 is provided with the Major Use special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: -2' Submitted into the public' record connec o I t item Q 4 on Walter oeman City Clerk i i � - lily 7 (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) , Exact location of all buildings and structures. There are no existing buildings on the site. The location of the buildings to be constructed is shown on the Site Plan, Sheet A-1.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. All of the circulation to the site will originate from 5th Street. There will be a driveway "} to Tower 2 and a driveway at the easternmost side of the site to Tower 2. The internal j circulation ramps are located in the center of the structure away from all setbacks and will provide an efficient and secure access for the tenants. A service entrance is located to the west adjacent to the 5th Street Metromover Station site. All vehicular access points to the j site will be from 5th Street. (4) Off street parking and off street loading areas. Off street parking will be located on levels I through 10 and will contain approximately 290,265 square feet, with 29,026 square feet per level. Loading and delivery parking will be located on the west side of the residential structures. (5) Recreational facilities' locations. Recreational amenities included in Tower 1 will be located on the north side on the ground level, on the second level and on the level 11th at the roof top of the garage. This will include a health spa, with an.exercise or aerobics room, two racquetball courts, lockers and showers. The facilities on the l lth level will encompass a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscape areas. Recreational facilities are shown on the Ground Level Site Plan, Sheet A-3.01 and Level 11 Plan on Sheet A-3.06 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Recreational facilities located in Tower 2 at the 10th level will include a health spa, swimming pool, sun deck and meeting rooms. These facilities are shown on Level 10 Plan, Sheet A-2.05 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. - 3 - Submitted into the public recur n� connec ion with item Y�lD on Walter Foamarf 9 5 — 5 i� City Clerk (6) Screens and buffers. Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Site Plan, Sheet L1.0 and on the Landscaping Plan, Sheet L1.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided for by a containerized compactor system located for Tower 1 within the structure on the north side, and within the parking garage for Tower 2. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and points of connection to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to (1) The various permitted uses. Land Use Parking Garage: 290,265 gross s.f. _ 1,916,303 = 15.2 % Tower 1: 1,011794 gross s.f. -: 1,916,303 = 52.8 % (inccudes residential) Tower 2: 614,244 gross s.f. 1,916,393 = 32 % ( includes residential, commercial and office) (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage is 31 % of the total gross lot area. M Tabulation showing (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The minimum number of off street parking spaces required is 541 parking spaces. The total number of spaces provided is 652 spaces. This creates excess parking in the amount of 111 spaces. The parking ratios provided in the project respond to market conditions. It is also anticipated that residents will also be using the transit facilities adjacent to the site. 4 Submitted into the (public record ^n conned n 4item on Waiter oet��an City Clerk 95- 4` 7 The off street loading area shown on the Ground Level Site Plan, Sheet A-3.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides three loading bays within the parking structure with maximum clearance of approximately 12 feet at beam location as opposed to the required 15 feet. The three loading bays are 12 feet x 55 feet. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential towers will consist of 508 apartment units. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 508 residential dwelling units T 2.373 net acres = 214 dwelling units per acre. i (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities provided will include the recreational areas. The common areas corresponding to the residence hotel units will be maintained by the Owner. The common facilities corresponding to the residential units wW be maintained by the Owner and eventually by a condominium association. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plan. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include a complex of two high rise towers joined by a 10 level parking r ` garage. The towers will include luxury residential units as well as residence hotels and limited office space with a restaurant that will compliment the project and the existing neighborhood facilities. The exact number of dwelling units and residence hotels with their sizes and types is included in the Project Summary for Brickell on the River under BUILDING AREA COMPUTATIONS, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents Typical floor plans for residential units are included in Sheets A-3.01 through A-3.10 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. - 5 - Submitted into the public record in corm io�n4�w,i�th item P- on — Walter Foernart- City Clerk i 1 IJ ®) Plans for signs, if any. Building identification signs will be located at the south side of the property at 5th Street within the landscaped area at the entrance to the project. The design will be compatible with the area and type of luxury development proposed. Proposed signage will be in compliance with the required regulations. Smaller directional signs will be located at the entrance driveways and service entrance. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan, Sheet L-1.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner. The Boundary Survey indicates any existing trees on the site. The disposition of such trees is indicated in the Landscaping Plan, Sheet L-1.1 under Tab 6. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for such use. Recreational facilities included in Tower 1 will be located on the north side on the ground level, on the second level and on the level llth on the roof top of the garage. This will include a health spa, exercise or aerobics room, with racquetball courts, lockers and shower. The facilities on the 11th level will encompass a swimming pool, sun deck and extensive landscaping areas. Recreational facilities are shown on the Ground Level Site Plan, Sheet A-3.01 and Level 2 Plan, Sheet A-3.02 and Level 11 Plan on Sheet A-3.07. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the Applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. The Drawings depicting Floor Area Ratios, Sheet FAR- 100 through- Sheet FAR- 207 are found under Tab 6. Elevation and Sections depicting the architectural character of the buildings, Sheet A-6.01 through Sheet A-6.04 and Sheet A-7.01 through A-7.02 are found under Tab 6. Renderings and vignettes showing the architectural character of the buildings and how it will blend with he surroundings areas are found under Tab 6. -6- Submitted into the public record in connection ,with item -N-IQ0 on - Waller Foernan City Cleric 9�` "�a 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statements of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (3) The survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey of Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use, general topography and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of Property located tinder Tab 5 and described in the Site Utility:Study, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-7. The of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article 1, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is restricted commercial. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. - 7 - Submitted into the public record in con necti n ,with item IL4 on k Walter oeman City Clerk "� 6 " J J 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps submitted indicate the land uses of the property and the project's functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are included in the Drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-7 zoning for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this property. The following permits and approvals are also required for the execution of thhis project: 1. A request for waiver of the Charter Waterfront Amendment setback. 2. A Class II Permit approval to reduce the required height a the loading bays. 3. A Class I Permit approval to permit valet parking use. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. -8- Submitted into the public record onnec ion wi h item_ an Walter oeman City Clerk 9�'— � 37 J c. A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 508 apartment units. A copy of the Goodkin Report on the Downtown Miami Housing Market Analysis addresses the housing impact and the need for additional housing within this area.. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. The building envelope will comprised of insulated walls and roofs. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be accomplished. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. e. Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. f. Environmental Zone The property is not located within the environmental preservation district. - 9 Submitted into the public rec►ar n connecf'a tiT�►th Re (d on I� Walt r oemart City Clerk lll. SUYYOR,i.IV(,1)OCU�Ii;�'1'S x 9 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENT s i ARTICLE i[I. ` Supporting Documents Tab I Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study ,.I Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property j Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted into the public recur ,fin cannectio with item — on!1 r Walter Foarnan City Clerk 0 woo BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN May, 1995 Submitted into the public reoor n conne4`i�� 'vith item on Waiter -o man City Clerk 9' MICKEL,]L on the RIVER, INC. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT CORPORATE STATEMENT: Brickell on the River, Inc. is committed to ensure that our organization and the organizations with which we contract, reflecdt the cultural and ethnic diversity of the areas within which we operate. To this end, we warrant to administer ourselves in such a manner as to guarantee equal and fair employment practices. We shall not discriminate with regard to race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. POLICY: Recruitment, selection, placement and layoff decisions will be based solely on a candidate's or contractor's job related qualifications and abilities, consistent with job requirements. All employees, job applicants and/or contractors a re guaranteed equal employment , L opportunity without regard for race, color, religion, sex, age or national orgin. Personnel policies and practices including compensation, benefits, safety and health programs will be so governed. Furthermore, all necessary steps will be taken to ensure that each employee's work environment, regardless of corporate origin, is free from unlawful discrimination 1 or harassment of any kind related to race, color, religion, sec, age or national origin. jubmItted Into thp, public recor�in� �cor�r�ect�on with item i�l0 on � Waiter -ceman ``�,'a._r s` City Clerk. naca��c OR S 11098 BISCAYNE BLVD. • SUITE 402 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33161 • (305) 891-7987 • FAX (305) 891-6854 95- 597 j ) Architecture B�(A Engineering Pldnrung Interior Design Landscape Arch; loc.ure Bermello, Ajamil 3 Partners, Inc, 2601 South Bayshore Drive, 101h Floor, Miami, Florida 33133 Tel, (305) 859.2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 August 1, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees w� FROM: Willy A. Bermello RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base employment on merit, qualifications andcompetency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and 7 promotion of employees. i _J 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual despite the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. has assigned Mr. Nelson C. Martinez, Sr. Associate for the Firm in charge of Personnel, as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. I Willy A. Bermello AIA AICPLuis qr�: AD t 2 J NelsonC.IMarrtinezAIA Submitted into the pUbl't Atch:At�000ssoe Agustin J. Barrera recor n connec ion with f Bernard N. Horovitz, AIA Item 597 Bonnie S. Muxo, ASID N . on -�- 9 r �' �' Vtlalter For Man Affirmative Action Plan Page Two T Bermello, Ajamil & Partners' Affirmative Action Plan, as approved by Metropolitan Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the firm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the plan goals and objectives. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially Black minorities. In addition, the partners of the firm "practice what they preach" by participating in community activities which are designed to promote the above stated objectives. Mr. Bermello has recently been Chairman of the Florida Commission on Human Relations, State of Florida, where in 1992 he received the Civil Rights Leadership Award for his participation in the Florida Civil Rights Act, while Mr. Ajamil has been elected to Black Economic Development Team Miami of the Beacon Council. The firm continues to support functions such as recently the Miami Negro College Fund. One of the most important things that the firm has been doing is actively seeking Black 1 professionals in the fields of expertise that the firm is practicing. The firm has made positive } strides in this endeavor. W Willy A. Bermello, AIA, AICP President Submitted into the public record irl connect'o wUl item Waiter Foeman 9 5 City Cled< i BRICKELL ON THE RIVER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,1 i a ^, J ..f I Prepared for Brickell on the River, Inc. by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 i May, 1995 Submitted into the PLIWIC rEC01' � CUrInECti(ri item Or) �{ , Walter I+oeman '.�,�. City Clerk SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY 1 3.0 STUDY AREA 1 4.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 4 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING 4 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT 5 4.4 MASS TRANSIT 5 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 5 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10 6.0 TRIP GENERATION 10 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 13 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 13 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 13 APPENDIX A INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES APPENDIX B ROADWAY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE APPENDIX C INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUMES APPENDIX D FUTURE ROADWAY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE APPENDIX E INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT VOLUMES APPENDIX F FUTURE ROADWAY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE (WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC) APPENDIX G MODAL SPLIT AND VEHICLE OCCUPANCY APPLICATION APPENDIX H INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY LINK OPTIMIZATION FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Submitted into the public rPcor onne i �,; h item on Wa95 lter-cienian — City Clerk V LIST OF TABLES Table # Description Paae Table 1.A 1995 Existing Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour 6 Table 1.13 Future Background Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour 6 Table 1.0 Future Background and Project Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour 6 Table 2 Link Analysis 9 Table 3 Trip Generation 12 Table 4 Roadway Improvements 1b Table 5 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Summary 20 ipubmitted into the public record n conne�' ion �}�'ht Item �- °n�1�:1�' Walter Foeman 95 a 0`7 i City Clerk ti LIST OF FIGURES �au,�re ## Fjgur�.Name �� Figure 1 Site Location z Figure 2 Signalized Intersection Lane Configuration 3 Figure 3 1995 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7 , Figure 4 Intersection Level of Service for 1995 Existing Traffic Volumes 8 } Figure 5 Trip Distribution 11 I Figure 6 Project Trip Generation Distribution for PM Peak Hour 14 Figure 7 Future Background Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour 16 Figure 8 Intersection Level of Service for Future Background Volumes 17 Figure 9 Future Background Traffic and Project Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour 18 Figure 10 Intersection Level of Service for Future Background Traffic 19 and Project Traffic Volumes It t l i Sjlfbmiticu into the public record conne, l o 1' h item_ on ' - Walter Foeman r City Clerk 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Brickell on the River is a 60-story, two tower, development consisting of apartments, hotel rooms, and parking. The site is located on SE 5th Street between Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The proposed land uses for the facility are as follows: TOWER 1 Residential 412 units 1 bedroom 30 units 2 bedroom 202 units 3 bedroom 180 units TOWER 2 Residential 96 units 1 bedroom 32 units 2 bedroom 48 units 3 bedroom 16 units Hotel 325 rooms PARKING 652 spaces 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study is to determine the vehicular traffic impacts on the signalized intersections and roadways within the study area. This is accomplished by performing signalized intersection and roadway link analysis. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries include: the Miami River as the northern boundary, SW Sth Street as the southern boundary, Brickell Avenue as the eastern boundary, and Miami Avenue as the western boundary. The study area of impacts including the roadways and signalized intersections was determined in consultation with the City of Miami. Figure 2 shows the signalized y: intersection and roadway links. These include the intersections of • SE 8th Street and Miami Avenue o SE 7th Street and Miami Avenue ® SE 8th Street and Brickell Avenue 1 BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Z7 mitted into the publiC Brickell on the Rive; record connectf#nwApril 14, 1995 item Alt onPia1 Vvalter 95 5117 Citv Clerk s t t v a '4 1, i. ' , x > I. E Flap or St .21 . !S xwv S y r c,l ,, ti t 7 1 1 .y 'h 1 I f.; _ l r ` t � )T i t Q i try S t 1 1 i{i ' �.- y r ti SE 1 st St Ql ` r ' : ', c41 a , >c C 7: 11r 1 r� t r h, I 1 �t {: 1 s 1_ t it �� ie , ' r �t I 1 l { ;i �,1FY r i7 r i ,ti r.._ a d r i\ -1 \ v4 !�!� .J 1 7 a t I t iT 1 >. t ti. c 9 ' +tr tlrl;Gl Ic rF t f� a 11 , I 9:'1. SJ •Siy.JL. ,' ) t-. A kt .11 } , t �. , I l i .� I- -I I r lly�rF vt \ if v f .( r t ! .; I y j r /�: }t, Y, 4 T 1, n, I+ '�t ,,+L1 * >> r t. .S l v y r t r 1 I ,rat �rJ y C 1 (1 A 1r•� �h.p 1 i`t it �l-�,rf 77 t ,{V1i , 1 i. i Jr14t11`�il I " 1Y..-i ,1 'L is t,, j. ,'lf 1'E1 .!14.i 7 �t c.� t .:�'1. +' �� 1. 7^r t . r r tiii a r t I "�'"" �'! SITE r € �i `t 5E a LCA�ON' t= ,: t; a- 7 r' 11.1.11s.; S { ti l- z I T _c rJ 7t S� 6f �' 1 6,1 I s �VI� �tf� Sf E. r r` S T 1' t it( } 1 f S'' r� t ` v7.'w 8th• St .. .. r i.. .. �. v 4, y�, t :,Y Sy :.. BISCAYN� SW. 1 A St BAY l rS ski �` s s x �, ,.. SW 13th St sF�2 f t �� f�T� t SF� ,t 3fh sf i i L SF ti , J �� 4�k ��' # sal1. t s�� �e� e, , jE \ 4 r ( t 1_�YJ ;' r� it ifi X4a — r l („L.ti/ y t zl ,I t � �� ��y+Q, ' 4' r s S fi 4�\f yw i,i5 i __JJ '� I r C #c fi :t yak [c4 .�11�'r" >��..` •{\ r H +f t. li r t� T t. k '. ' ��~`' 'js1 t r 11 �ti , tfr� r . . f - .11 i i-�, .r f/-i \r., r: �PJ t t c� r� f r j,, z.�f�11F 3 1. j ( 1> , r .�'' �r'I7�>r Y�-tr%1 ? r.4 r' 1a ? U� r,�t �t y ry i r 7 7s r t `, i:'1. Y kV,, f ,.` r �,? f 3F t x '��, ZC a. J ; U s, ,, 1N� - S I '� > S: % ?"i'I ]t vfrt c tr rl +' Ja n F. ,c t yrjtY'�c'tr�-1'�j°�f �G `r��t - t 4 ' S� "k,1 i i'(a, �S Sit +•�\ St y./ ,4 rrca t�,t r ^�S i}} n s 3 ri r G EIr ~F v. ,� .�cr ? 0 a+Z`G �,. t .c11 r tt tr -7y'Iy �,,&, yp-fti -I �,. 1 f> .� E - r >J� c •E w T'"t r .Y ^�"rvi. P. +r.?±r' �i'S't, `t' +. �. }fir - cry F -'f Its 4�a t i S7 jrr, 1 r i �j� �) till�!iww •..?,'_./ r1 ,'t '"�i -' nit a t'tl ns ri t1+ 1, cs i�t ry �'v;T',4,i j 3{ ak''v .} " 1, t - /ryr ems' i a .t �� r ++Y , S. ! '*, i 'lt "r r. rK, S-.i ?t.fit..y i~�t��1X>�t Sr'�"i '? r 7 F'r"-5- 1f r t T t 47�.tc.,�ci 1at'.sFfrc7 lti -- p ti 7.iyi`rt�r%Y�Sar�a7? p rL.� ;4f�14r4 ns��'l nib i'araz��4agtatt;3 T 2 r5 nk l'7- ) .^rt•; 4 S. 4/t i r - 7SRL +ur tt rt ct +sir ,J �•; • ?Y..c Si�S�{Sa°rtikttil'l%v f, rr.,nti. i+Y` 4f.,u y11 }? �>:sti i5( ki%h1+a' t r�1Mr�n,wv ..n :",i.""" 4"7ixw°'� F" ',, wMetrorail Station FIGURE 1 j = Metromover Staflon Submitted into the !: SITE LOCATION BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC, fecor � �oonne tjo t' Brickell on the River item on i I April 14, 1995 Walter altB Foeman Page 2 City C194, 5— 5 I w I LEGEND Metered Street Parking BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. FIGURE 2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATION Submitted into the public recor onne mFoernan Ith item L anWaste City Clerk Mckell on the River April 14, 1995 Page 3 O SE 7th Street and Brickell Ave The roadway links include SE 8th Street from Miami Avenue to Brickell Avenue, SE 7th Street from Miami Avenue to Brickell Avenue, Miami Avenue from SE 7th Street to SE 8th Street, and Brickell Avenue from SE 7th Street to SE 8th Street. V'`� 4.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic counts locations, and to collect the traffic counts. y 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue is a four lane divided roadway orientated in the north and south i direction. It contains a large number of signalized intersections. Within the study area, Miami Avenue is a one-way northbound roadway. Miami Avenue becomes one-way near SE 10th Street and remains one-way until the avenue crosses the Miami River. A second one-way roadway within the study area is SE 7th Street. This is a two lane westbound roadway. The last one-way roadway within the study area is SE 8th Street which is in the eastbound direction. This is shown in Figure 2. A major arterial roadway located to the west of the study area is Interstate 95. The roadway SE 7th Street provides direct access to 1-95 from the study area, while SE 8th Street provides direct access from 1-95 to the study area. This is shown in Figure 1. The lane configurations for each of the four intersections to be analyzed are shown in Figure 2. At the time of this study, Brickell Avenue was under reconstruction. This resulted in restriping the roadway, maintenance of traffic and rerouting of traffic. This could have affected the traffic conditions. 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing plans for the signalized intersections were obtained from the Dade County Traffic Control Center. These plans were used in the intersection capacity ' analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS). u BERMELLO, AJAMIL &PARTNERS, INC, r1t0 tj10 public Brickell on the River recor]�Lconne i�1t'p April 14, 1995 wlt i Page 4 lieM I U�a(tcr f=a�rr�,�r1 9 5 {!Y 9 b t 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS Traffic count data collection was coordinated with the City of Miami. It was decided to use existing data available as much as possible. Additional locations where existing data was missing or riot available were identified. The PM peak period was identified as the critical time period to analyze the traffic impacts as per the City of Miami guidelines. Based on the Downtown Miami DRI, previous traffic studies performed in the study area and historical traffic growth data from FDOT, a growth rate of 2% was determined to be appropriate for the study area. At the intersection of SW 7th Avenue and Brickell Avenue, observed PM peak hour counts were used for the southbound traffic and for traffic exiting the parking garage. The counts were collected on Thursday, April 6, 1995 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM. For the intersections SW 7th Street and Miami Avenue and SW 8th Street and Miami Avenue traffic counts were collected on April 4, 1995 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM. These traffic counts are summarized in Table 1.A and depicted on Figure 3. 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The study area is served by an extensive mass transit network. There are several bus routes serving the study area including routes 6, 8, 24, 48, 95, and B. The Metromover also serves the study area with a station next to the project site at SE 5th Street and SE 1st Avenue. There is also a station located at SE 8th Street and SE 1st Avenue. Each Metromover car has a sitting capacity of 12 people with the cars operating in pairs. Metromover vehicles operate at a 150 second headway. A Metrorail station is located near the study area at SW 1st Avenue and SW 9th Street. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the four intersections were analyzed to determine the level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 1992 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS, Cinema 2.03 was used. The results are shown in Figure 4. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. Link analysis was also performed on four roadway within the study area using the FDOT LOS software Roadway Link Analyses. These roadways are SE 7th Street, SE 8th Street, Brickell Avenue, and Miami Avenue. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 2. The FDOT LOS link analyses are included in Appendix B. 1 BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. 6ubmitted Into tho public Brickell on the River recor cannecti )r il '''i April 14, 1995 item on � � a e 5 9 �- 7 '-Vaiter Foeman �' Citv Clerk NOTES: NA' - Movement f of Available CD CD Q Q i C � O tom'=CD ci) 0 ��: � c cc C.0 E TABLE 1.A 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PM PEAK HOUR TABLE 13 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PM PEAK HOUR TABLE 1.0 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PM PEAK HOUR Page 6 ' I I (i,)* Shared left turn lane (R)** Shared right turn lane M*** Shared through lane B . ERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. ( 14A-IN FIGURE 3 1995 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Submitted into the public record nnect . o 'th item on Walter Foeman City clerk BrIckell on the River April 14, 1995 Page 7 '5 1) 7 a , •�i�;# 1 j. IF W f •�� PW r SE STN ST r r LEGEND ' V Level of Service A as _ 40 Level of Service B Level of Service C ® Level of Service D ® Level of Service E . Level of Service F BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. FIGURE 4 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR 1995. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Submitted into the public Brickell on the River record i rLConne�Yo� April 14, Page 8 item on Page s Walter Foeman 9 City Clerk co Table 2 Link Analysis ........... --- ........................ ............ ........................... ................... ........ .... ......................... .............. ............. ....... ..... .................... ......... . ................ .... .... ........ ....... ............ FUTURE,,'. .. ....... .. . ................. ...... - ...... .......... ........ ............ ... ...... .... .......... ....... .. ........... .... , -, * " * , " ..... . . . .. . RE ...... . .... .......... . ............. .. . :: .... .... .. ........ . ................... ............. ......... ... ...... L .... . .... ..... ......... ..-..x.: ........ .......... BACKGROUND ... BACKGROUND:` .... ..... ..... .................. OPTIMIZATION: OPTIMIZATION ........ .. .. ........ ...... . . ......... . .................... . . .. .. ........ . .............. .. ............ ................ . .................... . .............................. .... .............. ... .......... ........ ...... .......... - . ..... .... ... ... . ............ ................ ............. - X.- x .. . .. ....... ............................. ... ...... ................ . . .. ... ............ .... -AND.RROJECT... .............. . . ............. I ....... ................ .... ................ .. ... ................ .. .......... ...... .......... ...... ............... ............. ..... ........ . ....... . -1 ...... .... .. .................... :. .. .... .. ....... .......... . . ....... ... * : .......... .. ... ............. ....... .. ................ ... '' ........ .............. * * . ..... . ......... ..... LOS: ........ - ......... . .. ......... .......... . .-. ........... ... ........... ...... ..... . ..... - ... ................ .. ..... SW 7th Street Miami Ave Brickell Avenue C C c NOT NECESSARY SW 8th Street Miami Ave Brickelf Avenue D D D NOT NECESSARY Miami Ave SW 7th Street SW 8th Street C C C NOT NECESSARY Brickell Avenue (Northbound SW 7th Street SW 8th Street C C C Avenue LBrickell (Southbound I SW 7th Street SW 8th Street E E E EI I Page 9 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 675. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 675 was obtained from the Concurrency Department of the Metro -Dade. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 15.29% East -Northeast 6.22% East -Southeast 1.50% South -Southeast 4.09% South -Southwest 8.39% West -Southwest 22.59% West -Northwest 18.08% North -Northwest 23.83% The trip distribution throughout the study area is shown on Figure 5. A modal spilt of 15% and vehicle occupancy of 1.4 was used. These factors were determined after discussions with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Metro -Dade Transit Agency (MDTA), and review of the 1986 Downtown Miami i Development Regional Impact Study. 6.0 TRIP GENERATION The number of vehicular trips generated by the land uses, apartments and hotel units, Ij was determined for the PM peak hour using the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the apartments was based on the total number of apartments, Chapter 220. The number of trips generated by the hotel units was based on the total number of units occupied at 100 %, Chapter 310. This was done in order to determine the worst case scenario. The results 1 are shown in Table 3. v' These trips are the total number of vehicular trips generated by the project. Within the study area, 15% of person trips will use mass transit. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic conditions, therefore, will not be included in the trips i distribution throughout the study area. The remaining 85% of the person trips generated by the project will be distributed throughout the study area. In order to determine the actual number of trips that will impact the study area, a trip conversion analysis was done. This conversion is accomplished by multiplying the trips I by the vehicle occupancy rate which is 1.4 for the study area. This converts the vehicle trips to person trips. The modal split of 85% is then applied to determine the person trips using vehicular mode of transportation. The vehicle occupancy rate (1.4) is then .... dd ',ntn_the public BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. nnecYo h Bnckell on the River record April 14, 1995 item on Page 10 Walter Fo man 9 r, W City Clerk 1 M u <° E E—Q .��► PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS LEAVING THE SITE .�.� PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS RETURNING THE SITE BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. bb, t , y� t � , � Y •}1' 4 f ubmitted into the public record i connect' wi h item on Walter Foeman City Cleric FIGURE 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Brickell on the River April 14, 1995 Page 11 95- 597 TABLE 3 Trip Generation Land Use Da ...; Timequatoon Total Trips In Spb total Trips Out 'Sub; partment (220) Weekday 4:00 - 6:00 PM Ln(T) = 0.9281n(X) - 0.118 288 68% 196 32% 9 Hotel (310) Weekday 4:00 - 6:00 PM Ln(T) = .9571n(X) - 0.07 236 54% 127 46% V FO divided into this number to determine the number of vehicle trips generated by the project. Therefore, the actual number of trips entering the project site during the PM peak is 275. The actual number of trips leaving the project site during the PM peak is 171. Using the trip distribution (Figure 5) for the study area, the project trip generation distribution for the PM peak was determined. This is shown in Figure 6. the mode split and vehicle occupancy rate application to trip generation is included in Appendix G. 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Using the Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 1995, the programmed and planned improvements in the study area were determined. These improvements are detailed in Table 4. During this traffic study, Brickell Avenue was in the process of being repaved. However, this improvement was not listed in the TIP. 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 1997. A growth rate of 2% per year was applied to the 1995 traffic volumes in order to achieve 1997 traffic volumes. Table 1.6 details the future background volumes and Figure 7 shows these volumes with the associated movement. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and link level of service by using the same software programs as used for previous analysis. j The intersection level of service for the future background traffic volumes are shown on ! Figure 8. Each intersection's level of service ranged from B to D. These values are the ! same as those for year 1995. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future traffic conditions was performed on the roadway links identified previously. These results are summarized in Table 2. The link level of service analyses for future traffic conditions are included in Appendix D. 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic and project traffic conditions were analyzed for year 1997. This was t accomplished by using the 1997 traffic volumes and adding the traffic generated by the project site (as shown in Figure 6). Table 1.0 details the future background and project volumes for the PM peak hour and these values are shown in Figure 9. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection and link levels of service using the same software as previously stated. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. I « Brickell on the River record coni1E;cti °Ji April 14, 1995 Item TfId on Page 13 trllalter oemart �. t n� City Clerk g f S t, , It t t , k -t + y t c � ra i' tt , r 1 �, , ,► IQ '99' bb �, { 3 I S Vry 72 1 a.. 31 31 61� 7 3-iJ t '.� ��' 27.. AR r• 5ti�}) f? i'�Ii �, r7t{e. tilt+ t +C-.� 1 S c� 7. i ��t> (r � + � � '+ � r✓.r'`•• k 1 -� X+"i! � �s � n t..�+a�t � 1-t r x a' c ., t o t t a'- t, A Zt tr ry �. [e- 'rr ry Sy` t y3. i s 1 ` tL r. c � tt , t t� 1 t •t Ei}. �5;. )4� i]. {11..1 ']h''•ifC�y. i ,!J'r „(- �t�f , u!r G ) S xrsty �iL s. •3: t; L.: t L l'� 4.;r` 1{�T'rT't i.t'7.. f��`� 44ti4' A fix{ C 7P �i7:.�t �.�•%C_.j if tt+=J �,Y'.0 C - 5,.1 J .. f t - + N •� �. - J� b`� i:"'-:�•+?, ,�•[;./+:t, .PA, r: tr+l�i •Z.. r` ,, in t� •ti l t 3 v� �' l l l �,°S t,,.,ir#?fy� �L—ti'A�1' L=+�i 5.t .t�rpFa'+... �%�` �jn7iC..'w. ���'+( a�� �! :1 t �l�'�, !yi .tr ;'y?�����S=� t+'+c�i�!%�.'Y;;. i � r_r.3• �, 1 `i:�4Fi'C: �J' .�.c ` lLri ,r z. �.. �5:-,rt�.'a=' y a,y ��s n�5tnc^�„_«�,i't�::.':, r'L+'�»•:>��:'.:^w'�.b�fS}.,...:.'l•»�f:':..^.L«.tt.-......_"«�.—:.s.:.�..;F.._.I.S.�.,.0 '� u 4 h, 1. r7 r1 t'1 � it �j'`•'a s L�J `;�. L Cy /s• �� 1. t� ,ccr% � �13 �� ,y��)�la !�. .,.� ;e. . t� ,..<h i" '✓ lc.� '. ,; . • ,; .s:. �«7r..:-�a-ri?.+r4r.._::rt.r���t..�'_;=bli',���tr,.,...+�v 4.—....--�`-rs--� LEGEND 171 TRIPS LEAVING THE SITE DURING THE PM PEAK HOUR NUMBER OF TRIPS LEAVING THE SITE FIGURE b 275 TRIPS RETURNING TO SITE DURING PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ,r .•••�► NUMBER OF TRIPS RETURNING THE SITE DISTRIBUTION FOR PM PEAK HOUR `!x CzIiemitt�^� 'tg tia " Brickell on the River BERMELLO, AJAMIL &PARTNERS, INC, record ' 1 �onnect' n ��� April 14, 1995 item on +. Page 14 I-oernan f Walter , City Clerk TABLE 4 Roadway Improvements Roadway .. T 0 ype;. of OW - a SW 1st Street At the Miami River I Replace movable span bridge (preliminary engineering) 98-99 Submitted into the public record L'n n n e item Page 15 Waiter City Clerk 95- 597 � " � -1 ..11 1 r 1 - ,, t ( ,. t c 1 t. , ♦ ♦ 1c ,w t t 1, ., } 1` F t ♦ , j) 14�� 5t.:i 5�J\j t..tii t,4'li(:�t s14 f) 11 _+ C t. t 1 - ,u {� r! �. t �f r n5�f r$, A4 ( 3 it r`. 'S c 1"ts� rLr 1 Y♦ . b t( 1. J ..c'. t' r.ua1 1 )y t It ♦ f ...Lit 1 tl �` st^rj ♦ta 1 r 4dYi t5 ) rc r �} t. n ,,) 1 tt 1 t s y 1, ♦ i p� c f A s.'9". ''iL F', VC. ♦ / at. ) r I J r t ♦l 1 „-t Ca f.Z. tj h 0 A�`t{ l i 1 '1 + ) /l,.. r -~ i t t a Z f f c+ `a'r y i+ 'l t !'' i {t{''.t ZSJ1L S' / ``:t Yr ♦ t yt - tt it�.� N�'�+{5 i'(` �b. \'t < `. i �,t;AO r r r '} c is Y r ,r r Y i 1 is ti tip✓ vt 1. -nlJt �Q 3 �i; •- t" tt�' t ti, u�t. I..t r �t - t,.� f �� ! }.. M ;,ti ctr f 1 ♦ S QN� t 1 5 "`,r r I � t t p { at ar ti 11 ar $1 }5 i" d. a z'r �i f t"! c, t. , ♦ - �i t ( (�.... 5 t t i t ♦ , ( -t. b a r '}>t '7. lt�X :t 11 l t. 1' / S +1 t r t !+S rt4 t �,.. N '- 1� t 5. } J „ r +r a s Itr .1 k i 1 t j ', ! st , '' t ♦:.7.1kK i} r 1 ♦ { h r C r t✓ I }} i 1 ��•yFT �2tfw'i��t��t CtY. +�1jr it tai tit r :5. 1. t {rt ) t Y-! 1 I-:, t f yy t) tfls ..', '�'� (?t�,�` tS �F„ (.+ ♦ 5 t .i ! Cj Y-. t t , f . 4 , i r t ♦ ( + t Cp + r♦'i '�.. ♦jt 'f Jt t �r } y t )t t '!! - 4 t.' { i,i r� i -. r t,,v l A: (, } ti h f:yC ;7 is ' �Zt i . 5 z r >, r , tt t ' tl .c , � T ' aK' , 2C t cs aft t! a j rtt t w ti t ♦ ,�� t .}t, .� t + c r t 5 tV, ' T♦t 7 1r t `4fF `iz f S VI}•f pr .r t it 5,4 r t ,t t 1 t,{r Yy,I e}♦Jc j:7 Y. F 4 r ,k } r 4. i t 55 x f 5. c; } I! r- 5 t t, t: -tl �5 f f 5 r t t ` 3 1 t 1 Z, r 1 5( t j, J 1 M'+ ..\ i--,! L j �� r{r tr 4 a t t I t - tt 1 L♦ 1 f t c 5, ,,v `. L1' tr y 3 } 1 ` i t„Q. 1 ""I 1 iLti t ¢ ,�S 1 1 Y 1 S r ,t J $ LI.1 . r s� d r ry t.IT t f 1 5 1 — t rfi S 1_.'.. ._�i 1S,(0Q4 ]$.7. [dry l _ t \ • lam••.*Q U /may _ i s .,�_. & �R), `1� 9 /� ''r� t yFq`�ii ( tsr \ i ,� ,1 .0 L 1.:� , zN x r - r 4 ♦ R.. c. ✓1.5 rJ 1 1 r c r_ ,. a __ ,, _ i r s r r t r r t r_ C t lac R - f G . v: :� "c 3r � J 1 1 I c I_ ti t t t" �QQ p- r i t , 1 2 i( �- s:c T s f , t5 tr. t. o ^'d %ttpp f !. 1 + I ( 1 ZtL a 5 .r, 1 ! j h l Y 11 j 1 57 a' 117 L t ; S< �'a y a7D.t141.•, ci }:- 1t !4 y SCJ.$5 �. r 1 �,.. tt 1 1xlt}+c �. .. r»I t ("c r._ A 4Vc„U lea/!Z ' r """a!, t < 2 r t r } t Fy tr.< ♦ r. �.* t t r 1 is �•17 5r t '< {a"_ "'.a't fr t i {- .+ L! -�.t :�1, Y t �•. ) i a i JI +� h'It _� tj'. 4! , 5 t♦ ", t JJJ??? ..w �r%YU 1 t ., 5 h A L i t St. } i$t J 1�t Wf . 41.% a i Jj,!, . . '31 1 ki`ry [�, C 7 h ' S� 8TH ST a f 84(a 1 , . r , Ri ,/ i. r �, r ? 4 rJ' i i 1 .r5\ ,c l ✓ /� }� t l' r t r r ty 5 i - °I p�J�/� ti } ( S . 11tc P }i.. il,. + ♦' ,'vS.. c;' y. '''Lilt Z .: j- -> >. 9 yz'. .f 11 t.7 i7V� +)•,.... wi ):: r _.j '�' ? 5 j. `[. t! S ItSr `A c } t t r r •}QtJ S +-•t - f z f ��. / +r t _.'. r...it.. l r4 r t F h'tli.' { 1� r1f t'1�I (-s d �; ,t 1f i +S- rt•y t s s_ ""fit` Ji C t �r P Rr r:}t,1 (.. i , '{� �F# },, ! 4 rt a t ,ns.i.d ti. > < µ'�5 t-7- ,afc5. lr7yj R,�r. ..--',,�,�--'�.� -,.,,.,''-. -,,,.'�.',,.. ,,,,_-.��,�.��:,,.,. .����:', �-.��. ,�1I :���I.g. ,;,-,1---�.'��1.�--��"-i .�./t. -��,,�,I .-,,-�",.,�,�":.-, t� ,,. �.:",. :., I,..,,-�.��::2.��;," !�" '�.:M,,-`�-.,.�,"'�,-- ..',":..� �-'.'-�'�;.-,-;', .-,1,,.:!.-�-:� -- ',. -:`-. .::.;.-�'",, *;-: . .�--,':..��..-..�-..:.:'.'-�"-.-, -�,---�-�.. .,.�.�-,:4.,'�--..-1,�,�.--,., .% -- , .-,..�I ..'.,0:-�.�-_7-I-,-,-.-:--.,:tM, �..,,:.: ,�I-I .:-g;-,-�� .---.-,,.,,.. ��-�':;,- -�.(�., .i-.�:�-'*..,.�'-�.--,,".��--,: - .�':." ,.,-.. .�..,.. .�.-.q�-'-.I1 �.,,-"��- �,: .. !:�,�,,�� "�� 1-".-..:4..- .- .,1...-'-,,..1, -,',-"--.,.���,. ,--.��:1.,�.� .,"�.�,,�:t,i,-�-� �.�.�,-.�-.:�.—,�..,--,- ,.. 4.... -7�-.",.,� :�-..- �z. --.",�',.'- ��.;.I: ---..,-.,,,-;.1 - , ,':,,-,�.-,-.�-.'-'_,:,�'"..'..�-'-,-:�...- -%,'�.: ,,'., 4. r :a fl s-, rj , `c1 �. SS /y� d +r i p t c "` - , > � . 3 t ., - ✓ .f - ^'�N'.r i 1 }1 t.t J'v ;5bs..+i Ir c P1 ,/,.r �sk`t� ?...� .• r \iti 'f r S ! L- t i tp* 'S\ 1 .� ti is cF c.l'1 s 1.+'-'-} y Snk h r. a.ir.S y�y�( S�iti {r.7 I:+C 4r2r lr i.� '�7C1 si 1 5'c 4 ,, J1 L S5 ! 5�}>}({a",tt rf-.*a! �'�k.,`7 ;��.;,t +.tlJlt,i'in'i d:� -i'.!) .1 .tc f•,.'rl;,`a, ., 71rA' ...+,.:..I,a-ct�:+`,:Clt:t`;:7K _"r_i.7 ��tt;.=4.�.6jS F11 "i 4 `•t'C' ♦♦)z. { S:s{�'_Y'c..• xnn (i4r 3ck tir<yy ft;{ 5,5154t r" r.�; r,Gv +v. {. • y �,..•3.4� ,Y. ,�''t . a,.. , y, t?.,• t..'C U - u ;�:r.'. eys7:'•rs.,it r •c+,,kt.t;;aa{•f„�. ,s''-a @'s'` l 4?z.i •.sa;3^`i-nny 1r ry �1f tn!�'%.� •e "+� .ems Lt •t Jt-'_ti+.+ yJ s ( tr.`r*r,4 .✓' s u{<�i t't't ,,•:�f'i•f'„4' �u1 trt t °' . *,3 tt �7 t5 r �tv t ( 'ti. t :j t I , ct S,{ r'?Z t q :'i) .if r. ,�.x. c.....n.f r"'t. ft' ,¢ •�Ly "7�...� 0 AYTlj+. r', +. +� �, r 71 ' r -'t4i •4+L-r 'f �:!" S w. ,�S, r•. if { e' ;5 '- J �' y- �Y 'r � r' 6f "f`r f 'r r}->3 A r, �' + tt.F rr %i+C°ls r (. t n CeJ S•3' i �>, S a u .:. j}.(iu Z1),, •id' s'`'`i:.. a yw "t .�•. �, P �,s.pi .A-`c �'c i' 9 t ., c'• y F -< C' 7+vu 7 j �i Its 75 ryr-c�:�`�.�7'j-�Yt7'i- 'y+ �•t! .• MY�i4.1...bA�y'.31.j`.t.G..v.�.3a"..i....a.3�''5.1.9i:od�su±J:a:J.{S:Cs+i:t.:i7W.i �'sa.=�::• 'u.l ✓i��y,j;.sjKly}ram y\ i 7: yf i �t`�,yI it •; : �•:1:> ?..JLu:R"r�+:l♦Jt:•.•�a'"4:l'.I.y:�y.4:'.>S+SS:S�:�,t.'$�.t" l�. ?�':r�• T•+�.•....r.•-r LEGEND ' . (Q* Shared left turn lane (F)** Shared right turn lane FIGURE 7 cry*#* Shared through lane FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PM PEAK HOUR Sl�hmitt_Tari tntr, a�� _an�Hf, t • BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. record in connec 'o riti Mckell on the River item �� Url t Aprll 14, 1995 j .• Waiter oemarl Page 16 9 L; - City Clergy, I .. I 1. I ., - I �-1 I I nu {{ii p • .4f . �y 1 . i 4 U " I a.sr) f yJ 1 I I SE 77k sr I �. ) r f , t _ t \ \ } 1 � \ \ } l l)t f't7 Jl, � \ 1{i' f%�t •' 1 .� .h f LEQE-NI2 .Y Level of Ser4lce A ® Level of Service B Level of Service C ® Level of Service D • Level of Service E Level of SeMce F BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC FIGURE 8 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES Submitted into the public recur in conne t item - on Walter oeman ritN (tilnr Brickell on the River April 14, 1995 Page 17 905- 5-7 3,3a T 4 iG-- 8TH\ST X� t LEGEND (Ly Shared left turn lane (R)** Shared right turn lane FIGURE 9 ��*** Shared through lane FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PM PEAK HOUR ml ted into the public Brickell on the River BERMELLO, AJAMIL &PARTNERS, INC. eor nc_onApril 98�r 'lo age an Waiter Foeman 9 5 -~ 15' 9 7 City Clerk 1 The intersection level of service for the future background and project volumes remained the same as the 1995 intersection level of service. This is shown is Figure 10. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix E. The link level of service analysis for future traffic and project traffic conditions was performed on previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 2. The link level of service analyses for future traffic and project traffic conditions are included in Appendix F. 10.0 CONCLUSION After reviewing all of the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, the intersection's levels of service remain the same from 1995 existing traffic volumes to the future with background and project traffic. The same may be said about the roadway link level of service. For the intersection of SW 8th Street and Brickell Avenue, the westbound approach, as it exists today, has a level of service of F. Due to this LOS, an optimization of this intersection was performed using the future background and project traffic volumes. There was a change in the approach and intersection's level of service. For the intersection of SW 7th Street and Brickell, the southbound approach, as it exists today, has a level of service of E. An optimization of this intersection was also performed using the future background and project traffic volumes. There was a change in the intersection's approach level of service. The results of all of these analyses are shown in Table 5 and the analyses are in Appendix H. Since optimization was performed on both of these intersections, a roadway link analysis was also performed using the optimized signal timings. These results are shown in Table 2 and the analyses are in Appendix 6. The traffic generated by the project development will not have a negative impact on the surrounding roadways. The two intersections which have approaches with a LOS of F and E can be optimized to provide a level of service C by altering the signal timing. BERMELLO, AJADIIL & PARTNERS, INC. )e P5511C Brickell on the River recut in corinecti n ith April 14, 1995 item or) Page 19 Walter 'oe an J " City Clerk I J, LEGEND �it Level of Service A Level of Service B Level of Service c FIGURE 10 ® Level of Service D INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR Level of Service E FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ® Level of Service F AND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Submitted into thO PubileBrickell on the River BERMELLO, AJAMIL &PARTNERS, INC. i ecor � connoc ion with April ,ge 20 UVfo Fooman 95 597 City Clerk Table 5 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SUMMARY SL,DHIiW?d inir) t1-10 PLIbtic recor ra cor►nc,ct'0 v� i 7 itert� � Walter Foeman City Cterk Page 21 BUM Intersection Level of Service for 1995 Existing Traffic Volumes Submitted into the public reel nconnep I III itemt Walter Foernan City cleric 95- ; 97 I HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8th ST NORTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1995 BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SWBMIAMI INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) P1 ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- EB 3 3 600 0 0 0 ------ 0 WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 3 3 600 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV..WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 WB NB T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS ------------------------------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 258 800 0 0 1.00 1.00 WB 0 0 0 0 i NB 0 607 21 4 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS ---------------------- ----------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT j ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- i EB 258 800 0 0 .91 .91 i WB 0 0 0 0 NB 0 607 21 4Stl'�rniti0cl ii?f0 the P0()jf0.81 .81 SB o 0 0 �eeor! ' i conr�Or;`i it item D on w Itor-oemart 95 9 7 C�tl+ tJryrt� , HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-2 ic************************•lck�F,kit*•le***************************•!c•lc�c***�c•k********* 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED i -------- APP . ------------------------------------------------------ -------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LT WB NB TP SB L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 t 7 8 --- Green --- 44 --- --- --- --- 28 0 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 5 2 0 0 EAST WEST NORTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 CURB PARKING Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS SiAAW@ted into the pulA6 • 0 repo tn car�nec i n t item lA on Walter oeman City Clerk, SOUTH 95- 597 i i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ! Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 258 1.00 258 .91 284 LT 1163 3 1.00* 1163 .24 .00 T 800 1.00 800 .91 879 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 r NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 TR 770 3 1.00* 770 .00 .03 T 607 1.00 607 .81 749 <-� R 21 1.00 21 .81 21+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal 5== .: a. Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. r.- App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg w--- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB LT 1800 3 1.000 .985 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 .963 4287 EY NB TR 1850* 3 1.000 1.00 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 .996 1.00 4627 i i s 1 f y * Value NM- -bvdu nibr the, public record r connecOipn v't item on1155 951 9 7 Walter -oeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v s C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App.-Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * LT 1163 4287 .27 .57 2465 .47 ` NB * TR 770 4627 .17 .38 1735 .44 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .44 Xc = .46 Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 -- Delay 2 By Lane Group Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec {< App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LT .47 .57 7.5 2465 .1 1.00 LT 7.6 B 7.6 B tl � NB TR .44 .38 14.2 1735 .1 1.00 TR 14.4 B 14.4 B !' a r Intersection Cycle ;= 80 :illilrCliti Ci into the pt1Jlic 10.3 B ' recor in conned � ► i item Q_. are Walter oon an t City Clerk HCH Summary Results for Case: SUSttIAMI SW Sth ST /MIAHI AVE 1995 BACHGROUNU VOL. Version 2.63 X Delay it I 1 Lane vts v/c (sec/ I i �p Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS II *LT .27 .47 7.6 B I I All 7.6 R I I II II II ----------_— ------- ------------ -------_ II 258 BOB {B *TR .17 .44 14.4 B All 14.4 B I I 121 I I 607 1� 2 4 4 28 I Intersect .44 .46 10.3 B Submitted into the public record in connectio with ;t r m. on Waiter ooman 95— 597 0 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1995 BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SW8BRICK INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 SB 5 2 600 2 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0CaL cM L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH n L` C7 LT - LEFT TURN' f THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TUkT3,Q o LR - LEFT TURN j RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TU@gg a LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN - � O Q� J TRAFFIC VOLUMES E ' CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES-(VPH) GROWTH FACTORS ----------------------- -------------- �r APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- EB 316 99 196 9 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 191 0 312 62 1.00 1.00 NB 0 618 67 13 1.00 1.00 SB 50 668 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS ---------------------- ----------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- EB 316 99 196 9 .90 .95 .90 WB 191 0 312 62 .90 .90 NB 0 818 67 13 .95 .90 SB 50 668 0 0 .90 .95 95- S97 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right'w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) Green 6 29 50 12 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 .- -� `J 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 CC C -j U LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 O C C7 cY.f TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Q AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES co ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH " LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 7 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- t EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 50 ---- 50 ----- 50 ----- u; PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR Y 20 Y 20 Y 20 Y 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 26.0 26.0 20.0 20.0 95"` �jo 7 J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 --VOLUME -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET-------- ---------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp_ _ (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT_ _RT_ EB L 316 1.00 316 .90 351 L 351 2 1.00* 351 1.00 .00 T 99 1.00 99 .95 104 TR 312 2 1.00* 312 .00 .67 R 196 1.00 196 .90 208+ WE L 191 1.00 191 .90 212 L 180 1 1.00 180 1.00 .00 T 0 1.00 0 .90 0 LR 171 1 1.00 171 .10 .81 R 312 1.00 312 .90 278+ R 139 1 1.00 139 .00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 861 2 1.00* 861 .00 .00 T 818 1.00 818 .95 861 R 60 1 1.00 60 .00 1.00 R 67 1.00 67 .90 60+ SB L 50 1:00 50 .90 56 L 56 2 1.00* 56 1.00 .00 4, T 668 1.00 668. .95 703 T 703 3 1.00* 703 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET -------- -Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg s EB L r 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 .900 1.00 2641 WE L. 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1524 LR 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .878 .995 1401 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 NB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 .1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 SB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 T 1900* 3 1.000 .990 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 4723 s * Value set by MMitted into the publ'', recur tonne Witd item , on�1. 7 t Walter 0i;nl�iil City Clerk i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * L 351 2951 .12 .46 1360 .26 TR 312 2641 .12 ..46 1217 .26 WB L 180 1524 .12 .13 199 .90 * LR 171 1401 .12 .13 183 .93 R 139 1181 .12 .13 154 .90 NB * T 861 3386 .25 .28 942 .91 R 60 1181 .05 .28 329 .18 SB * L 56 2951 .02 .o6 180 .31 T 703 4723 .15 .36 1684 .42 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit - .51 Xc = .55 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group ---Approac - X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec j App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- EB L .26 .46 14.4 1360 .0 1.00 L 14.4 B 14.4 B TR .26 .46 14.4 1217 .0 1.00 TR 14.4 B WB L .90 .13 37.5 199 27.0 1.00 L 64.4 F 68.4 F LR .93 .13 37.6 183 34.4 1.00 LR 72.0 F R .90 .13 37.5 154 31.6 1.00 R 69.0 F _ NB T .91 .28 30.5 942 9.5 1.00 T 40.0 D 38.9 D R .18 .28 24.0 329 .0 1.00 R 24.0 C SB L .31 .06 39.3 180 .3 1.00 L 39.6 D 22.7 C T .42 .36 21.3 1684 .1 1.00 T 21.4 C Intersection Cycle = I'1 )MIttE:d Into th0 (�ut�IPc; 33.9 D recorc n connect are i item D orl WaJEor oLrnan City C1EAK HCM Summary Results for Case: SUBBR ICX Sty BTH ST /BR ICKEI.L AVE 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUHES 1995 BACKGROUND VOL. Version 2.03 66B I I I X Delay 50 I I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 1 I I Apg Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I { { { 312 EB *L .12 .26 14.4 B I`III(�I I TR .12 .26 14.4 B 1191 L= All 14.4 B UB L .12 .90 64.4 F --f' *LR .12 .93 72.0 F R .12 .90 69.0 F I { All 68.4 F 316 I tI IIII NB *T .25 .91 40.0 D 99 R .e5 .18 24.8 C 19G I I 4 All 33.9 D { { 67 I I 92 SB *L .02 .31 39.6 D i IL 2 I 3� 4 L { t T .15 .42 21.4 C IN All 22.7 C 6 3 29 1 50 4 1 12 4 1 Intersect .51 .55 3:3.9 D ubmittod into the public re�or n tonne 'ion wi item 0 on Waite Fo man City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. /Miami Ave Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: Miami Ave WEST APPROACH: SW 7th St SOUTH APPROACH: Miami Ave ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1995 BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SW7MIAMI INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 NB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ---- 0 ---- ---- ----- WB 0 911 292 58 1.00 1.00 NB 495 362 0 0 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 WB 0 911 292 58 NB 495 362 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT submittc Into tfi�ut�fia recortonnec�' it iten) on Walter oe an City Clerk 9 .93 95- 5D7 i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. /Miami Ave Page-2 SIGNAL _SETTINGS -`_OPERATIONAL -ANALYSIS _== CONTROL TYPE . PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED f*-' ----------------------------------------------------- ' APP . 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- WB TP rN� NB LT SB _A L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) -----------------------------------------------------------------.---- -1-- --- --- --- --- --- _7_ -$- Green 35 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS t AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 4 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- f: EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH -___ ____ ----- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 j CURB PARKING Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS vtJ;ni Qr„; t;-l4 Q reccr� ��,or7rEoc,'<� rt itl Rom .y1� ao 95— 597 Walter oe nan T'.F.•.. City chork HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. /Miami Ave Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U=====v=-=--_-_--_-_- Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT WB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 980 2 1.00* 980 .00 .00 T 911 1.00 911 .93 980 R 252 1 1.00 252 .00 1.00 R 292 1.00 292 .93 252+ NB L 495 1.00 495 .92 538 L 538 1 1.00 538 1.00 .00 T 362 1.00 362 .92 393 T 393 2 1.00* 393 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 1 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user 3i SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET _ -v ldeal_5== Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- k WB T 1800 2 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3224:_;. R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 NB L 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .850 1370 T 1900* 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 2983 I I * Value sS�br Ylte&'I& the public record n connect) n U it item ,�.(� . on Waiter oeman y, ,; City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. i /Miami Ave Page-4 i CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ti v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. ---- Group (vph) ----- ----- (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) ------ ----- ----- ----- Ratio --__- WB * T 980 3224 .30 .46 1491 .66 i R 252 1181 .21 .46 546 .46 4 a. NB * L 538 1370 .39 .49 668 .81 , T 393 2983 .13 .49 1454 .27 * Critical Lane Group sum(v/s)crit = .70 Xc = .73 Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 _ -- Delay 2 -- By -Lane Group A roach- hr X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec't F` App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS t - t,a WB T .66 .46 12.6 1491 .8 1.00 T 13.4 B 13.0 B R .46 .46 11.2 546 .5 1.00 R 11.6 B t NB L .81 .49 13.1 668 5.0 1.00 L 18.1 C 14.4 B T .27 .49 9.2 1454 .0 1.00 T 9.2 B t hiiC Cyj�i�;($Oil t[t t,:4 pii.... Intersection 13.6 B j y recor(� yricoim Ite on --�� City cletrIx NCH Summary Results for Case: SU7HIAMI SU 7th St /Miami Ave 1995 BACKGROUND VOL. Version 2.03 X Delay l l Lane v/s v/c (sec/ I AE Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I �. 292 1 911 UB *T .30 .GG 13.4 B ------------ t IIII ------ jam= R .21 .46 11.6 B I I All 13.0 B I II NB *L .39 .81 18.1 C II I I T .13 .27 9.2 B All 14.4 B I I 495 362 Intersect .70 .73 13.6 B i 2 .-- f 35 4 36 �! 4 1 Submitted into the public recor in tonne io ith Item __ on 9 5 W b 0 7 — ,Waite Foeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES CASE: SW7BRICK INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) WB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 NB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB LT 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN f RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN j THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- EB ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ---- 0 WB 68 375 22 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 317 1323 42 42 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 0 600 175 70 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 WB 68 375 22 15 NB 317 1323 42 42 SB 0 600 175 70 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT SubmittP Into the9kublic .90 recor Fnne t' wi o item on 95_ 597 Walter Foemani City r;lork J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. I 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ----------------------- CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WB LTR NB LTR TR SB TR L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 59 21 22 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red - 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ----------------•------ '� EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT-THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- ---- ----- 50 50 ----- 50 61 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON 6i MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS Submitted int028hP- pulp) �4.5 N N record connec >r I 14.5 item nn y • Walter Poeman � � City Clerk R9 Z/ :fMMW8 ' :y HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION; B and.A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME^ ADJUSTMENT_ WORKSHEET_rr________ Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- URIWB L 68 1.00 68 .90 76 LT 471 2 1.00* 471 .16 .00 T 375 1.00 375 .95 395 R 7 1 1.00 7 .00 1.00 R 22 1.00 22 .90 7+ NB L 317 1.00 317 .90 352 L 352 2 1.00* 352 1.00 .00 T 1323 1.00 1323 .95 1393 TR 1393 2 1.00* 1393 .00 .00 R 42 1.00 42 .90 0+ SB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 632 2 1.00* 632 .00 .00 T 600 1.00 600 .95 632 R 116 1 1.00 116 .00 1.00 �I R 175 1.00 175 .90 116+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user ,l -� '-----------------rrSATURATION ^FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET____^--__-________-- Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. �> App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- WB LT 1800 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1'.00 .900 1.00 .992 3214 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1492 ' NB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3297 SB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1477 * Value setSbtJrM- into the pt.Vic recor��,��n,��,connecflo w;-h item 1 0 on r� f Walter oeman 9 5 " Ell �' 7 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 i CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- f WB * LT 471 3214 .15 .22 699 .67 R 7 1492 .00 .22 324 .02 NB L 352 2951 .12 .52 1540 .23 * TR 1393 3297 .42 .75 2466 .56 SIB T 632 3386 .19 .21 707 .89 R 116 1477 .08 .21 308 .38 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .57 Xc = .59 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 -- Delay 2 -- By Lane Group -Approach- ,< r X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- f WB LT .67 .22 31.4 699 1.8 1.00 LT 33.2 D 33.1 D ° R .02 .22 26.9 324 .0 1.00 R 26.9 D t NB L .23 .52 11.3 1540 .0 1.00 L 11.4 B 6. 3 B � TR .56 .75 4.8 2466 .2 1.00 TR 5.0 B SB T .89 .21 33.6 707 9.9 1.00 T 43.5 E 41.4 E s R .38 .21 29.7 308 .4 1.00 R 30.1 D Intersection Cycle = r1�'-Btabmitted into the: public 19.5 C reCOr I tonne o i eterit �� on i W- �.ItUalte Foeman ''��{`,,, City Clerk i I HCM SL=ary 1,...-iults £or Case: SV7BRICX SU 7TH ST MICHELL AVE 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMESUersion 2.03 600 1 1 X Delay I I i 1 PSLane v/s v/c (sec/ 1 I I A.� Crou Ratia Ratio veh) LOS 22 i i I «— 322 II1I I r-- 68 I}t} I UB *LT .15 .67 33.2 D I R .00 .02 26.9 D I II1�1 All 33.1 D I I I I I fl NB L .12 .23 11.4 B 1 {I *TR .42 .56 5.0 B I I I t All 6.3 B I I f I { I 317 42 1323 SB T .19 .89 43.5 E 1 2 J) 3 08 .38 . II1r t Ir t-- 4 1 All 4401.4 E 59 3 21 4 1 22 Intersect .57 .59 19.5 C Submitted into the public rec:c�rd i conncrx'o with t#� on Waiter r=oeman City Clerk 95— �997 C-.0"s .. X A FM jfij� Roadway Link Level of Service `s Submitted into the public recor connect'a v'th Item `o on k Walter oeman b� City Clerk 915w 597 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 =================================================== Florida Department of Transportation ==11 II Arterial Level of Service Tables (1 Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ART —TAB Version 1.1 II Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II DESCRIPTION II ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE II PEAK DIRECTION: SB II Study ime Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 2 II AADT: 8500 (I User Notes: II I TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range— II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) II PHF: 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) 11 ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) (I % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 7 (0 - 100) II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 (I Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.633 II MEDIANS (Y/N)- Y II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 11 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II Submitted into the public TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3 (1, 2, or 3) 3=Semiactuated) kil CA II'record„ip_ tonnVrFoernan , item On�_�-- SYSTEM SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) 11- — Wa WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.34 (0.20 - 0.80) Cite Clerk 95- j37 I REPORT FOR 4/14/95 it PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME II (( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) (( (( 6,319115 Intersections per mile (( (( Level of Service II Il A B C D E II ii LANES I) (( 1 N/A NIA N/A NIA 470 (( (( 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,000 Il (( 3 N/A N/A N/A NIA 1,560 II Il 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,110 (( II it PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) —II (( II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II Ii 6.319115 Intersections per mile (( II Level of Service (( II A B C D E I( II LANES II Il 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 850 (( Il 4 N/A N/A NIA N/A 1,820 (l ii 6 NIA N/A N/A N/A 2,840 (( II 8 II N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,840 (i II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) —II II ii (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) (( II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II (( Level of Service (( II A B C D E II it LANES II Il 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 (( ll 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,500 (( II 6 N/A N/A N/A NIA 33,500 (l ii a II N/A N/A N/A NIA 45,200 ll it N/A means II the level of service is not achievable —II (( 14 II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll 11 Level of Service II I) LANES A • B C D E II II 1 NIA N/A N/A NIA 0.67 (( 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.72 (( (( 3 N/A NIA N/A N/A 0.75 II II 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.76 (l ubmitted into. the public recor n connects n ifib item on 1 Walter oe REPORT FOR 4/14/95 {) Florida Department of Transportation II jj Arterial Level of Service Tables II Ij Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II I{ ART TAB Version 1.1 II {{ Date: 12-14-91 II (( Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown {{ (( DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE II II '>'» PEAK DIRECTION: N13 II (( Study Time Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II (( Number of Lanes: 4 ({ (( AADT: 19800 User Notes: II ({ II ({ TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS {j (( —Range— II (( K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II II D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 -1.00) {{ j( PHF: 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) jj ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) II j( % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 21 (0 - 100) II II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II II II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II II II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U {{ II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) {{ FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II II II I{ For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II j( Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 jj Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 {{ i II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 ({ II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 (( (j Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 it f II {I TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.633 II j( MEDIANS (Y/N): Y {{ TURN BAYS Y/N . Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS {{ I II (i NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 II {{ ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II SubMitted into the public II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II recorW nilec ion(1=Actuated, th II )temor on jj SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) {{� Walter Foernan II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.73 (0.20 - 0.60) ( City Clerk 9� lf" F- FRI�- REPORT FOR 4/14/95 it PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II ll A B C D E it LANES II II 1 N/A N/A 1,200 1,500 1,650 11 II 2 N/A N/A 2,540 3,100 3,370 11 A� II 3 N/A N/A 3,900 4,750 5,100 II II 4 N/A N/A 5,270 6,400 6,810 it -II II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) II it (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II Level of Service II II A B C D E II II LANES II II 2 N/A N/A 2,180 2,730 3,000 II II 4 N/A N/A 4,610 5,640 6,130 Il II 6 N/A N/A 7,100 8,640 9,280 II II 8 N/A N/A 9,580 11,650 12,370 II II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) ll ii 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II I I LANES II j Il 2 N/A N/A 25,700 32,100 35,300 Ii II 4 N/A N/A 54,200 66,400 72,100 II Il 6 N/A N/A 83,500 101,700 109,200 ll II 8 N/A N/A 112,700 137,000 145,600 1I -II II ii N/A means the level of service is not achievable II ll Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full houril t II Level of Service II it LANES A B C D E II 1 N/A N/A 0.68 0.86 0.94 11 2 N/A N/A 0.72 0.88 0.96 II it 3 N/A N/A 0.74 0.90 0.97 II 4 N/A N/A 0.75 0.91 0.97 II Submitted into the public recordf�� �onnec i n°; i• item .Y..�l� on Waller =oeman -- 557 City Cleric I _.� •.ram_.. REPORT FOR 4/14/95 (( Florida Department of Transportation (( Ji Arterial Level of Service Tables (( II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II J( ART TAB Version 1.1 !( Ji Date: 12-14-91 JI (J Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown I) JJ DESCRIPTION (( II ROAD NAME: SE 8TH STREET (( JI »»> PEAK DIRECTION: EB (( II Study Time Period: PM PEAK II (( Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 !I J( Number of Lanes: 3 JJ IJ AADT: 7200 JJ User Notes: II II II (I TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS (( II —Range-- II (( K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) JI II D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) JJ J! PHF: 0.925 (0.70 -1.00) (( JJ ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) (( JJ % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 - 100) II (( ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (( II JJ (j URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR !( II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/'1"/R): U JJ !! ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) J( JJ FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II i( II J( For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: (( II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 JJ II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 !I JJ Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 JI JJ Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II II II II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.17424 (( (( MEDIANS (Y/N): N (( (( TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II --- -------- ------- II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS (( II II JJ NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 (( II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II Submitted into the U II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (( p bliC (I reCar (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) (( ))�n'���Caripe a Uvfth (( SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) (I itefil_._ an (( WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (0.20 - 0.80)( Walte F eman City Clerk 95- 597 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 ----- II -------- ----------------------------- PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ---- II ll (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II it 5.739131 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II li A B C D E ll II LANES it it 1 N/A N/A N/A 530 970 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,100 2,030 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 II II 4 N/A N/A N/A 2,240 4,180 I) II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) -II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 5.739131 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II ll A B C D E II II LANES II II 1 N/A N/A N/A 530 970 II 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,100 2,030 I II 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 II ll 4 II N/A N/A N/A 2,240 4,180 II ll AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 5.739131 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II ll LANES II II 1 N/A NIA N/A 6,200 11,400 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 12,900 23,800 II II 3 N/A N/A NIA 19,400 36,500 II II 4 II N/A N/A N/A 26,400 49,200 II it N/A means II the level of service is not achievable -II II II II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll II Level of Service II I) LANES A B C D E it II 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.45 0.83 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.47 0.87 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A 0.47 0.89 II it 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.48 0.90 II Submitted into the public record ' connection Nith item _ on Waller -oa r.an City Clerk 95- 1 Op ,1 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation II Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual J( ART —TAB Version 1.1 II Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown ----- JJ DESCRIPTION — it (( ROAD NAME: MIAMI »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB (( Study Time Period: PM PEAK JI Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 3 JJ AADT: 10100 JJ User Notes: II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS (( —Range— (( K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) JJ PHF. 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) JJ ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) JI % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 58 (0 -100) IJ ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS JI URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR I! JJ RURAL ARTERIAL (UMR): U JJ ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) J( FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) JJ For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 IJ Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 JJ TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.34 II II MEDIANS (Y/N): N JI TURN BAYS (YIN): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 2 it JJ ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) (( TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II 0=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) I) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 -180) JJ WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.49 (0.20 �00$%itted into tAle publiC record r connect! n 1 item on 7 Walter Foeman City Cleric 9 5 - �,97 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME {) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II {( 5.882353 Intersections per mile II {( Level of Service II II A B C D E 11 it LANES ({ () 1 NIA N/A 460 1,660 2,020 {{ {{ 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 (( (I 3 NIA N/A 1,390 5,560 6,380 (( I{ 4 N/A NIA 1,850 7,500 8,510 {) �" ({ PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II {{ 5.882353 Intersections per mile II Level of Service II !I A B C D E I! (( LANES II :, {{ 1 N/A N/A 460 1,660 2,020 {) {{ 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 {{ (( 3 N/A N/A 1,390 5,560 6,380 (I {{ 4 II NIA N/A 1,850 7,500 8,510 II {( AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II II (( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) !{ it 5.882353 Intersections per mile II 1 ({ Level of Service {) II A B C D E II (( LANES II {{ 1 N/A N/A 5,500 19,600 23,800 II 2 N/A N/A 10,900 42,100 49,100 { { (( 3 N/A NIA 16,400 65,400 75,100 {{ ( (( 4 If N/A N/A 21,800 88,200 100,100 11 {{ N/A means the level of service is not achievable -il II II Peak hour peak direction thru/right VIC ratios for full hour(( {{ Level of Service r„ (( LANES" A B C D E II {{ 1 NIA N/A 0.21 0.75 0.91 (I {{ 2 N/A NIA 0.21 0.81 0.94 {( 3 N/A N/A 0.21 0.84 0.96 {{ (( 4 N/A N/A 0.21 0.85 0.96 {I Submitted into the public recort &jconne4co itemonFoern,�n City CIOIR 95- 59'7 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation II jj Arterial Level of Service Tables II jj Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II {) ART TAB Version 1.1 II II Date:12-14-91 II II Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown — II ' Il DESCRIPTION II II ROAD NAME: SW 7th ST II »»> PEAK DIRECTION: WB jj Study Time Period: PM PEAK II jj Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II ji Number of Lanes: 2 II AADT: 14200 User Notes: II II II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II jj —Range— it {j K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II "" II D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) II PHF: 0.925 (0.70 -1.00) ij ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) Ij % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 - 100) II II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II ` II jl URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II { ji RURAL ARTERIAL (UMR): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II `l II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) jl jj For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: ij Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 jj s II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Ij Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 jj Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II � II II jj TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.17 jj MEDIANS (Y/N): N TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS jj NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 Ii { II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) jl to jj TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) jl jj SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 -180) jtlj f II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (0.20-SOti�nitted into Ae public record „i conned n with g item I---- an 3I Walter oeman City Clerk 9 APPENDIX C Intersection Level of Service for Future. Background Volume Submitted into the public recorkin conn no 'c io 1 0 item on Wal4teFoeman City Clerk 95- 597 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE BACKGOUND VOL CASE: SW8BRK-B INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP_ LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 {{ SB 5 2 600 2 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. -------- LEFT --------------------- THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 330 ---- 103 ----- 204 ---- 50 ---- ---- ----- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 199 0 325 70 1.00 1.00 NB 0 851 70 15 1.00 1.00 SB 52 695 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 330 103 204 50 WB 199 0 325 70 NB 0 851 70 15 SB 52 695 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .90 .95 .90 Subrfl4ted into the public. go record in Conn@d(ion wit .9 item 9 0 Zors 9 5 Walter Foeman 9 5 — 9 17 City Clerk J I� a HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. y y y y SW 8TH ST /BRIICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED - ----------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB_ LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) - ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 6 - -29 50 12 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES a-� EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gsi EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH i. CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 !I CURB PARKING Y Y Y 1' NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 20 20 20 20 ti NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 6.,0 26.0 0.0 20.0 CAmitted into the public recur in cennec i n yvit ` - Walter Foeman City Clerk i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME -ADJUSTMENT ^WORKSHEET-------- -------+-------------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) -LT- -RT- EB L 330 1.00 330 .90 367 L 367 2 1.00* 367 1.00 .00 T 103 1.00 103 .95 108 TR 279 2 1.00* 279 .00 .61 R 204 1.00 204 .90 171+ WB L 199 1.00 199 .90 221 L 188 1 1.00 188 1.00 .00 T 0 1.00 0 .90 0 LR 175 1 1.00 175 .10 .81 R 325 1.00 325 .90 283+ R 141 1 1.00 141 .00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 896 2 1.00* 896 .00 .00 T 851 1.00 851 .95 896 R 61 1 1.00 61 .00 1.00 R 70 1.00 70 .90 61+ SB L 52 1.00 52 .90 58 L 58 2 1.00* 58 1.00 .00 T 695 1.00 695 .95 732 T 732 3 1.00* 732 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg ---- --- L] EB ----- L ---- 1800 --- 2 ----- 1.000 ---- .990 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- .900 ---- 1.00 ---- .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 .908 1.00 2664 WB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1524 LR 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .878 .995 1401 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 NB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 rb R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 SB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 T 1900* 3 1.000 .990 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 4723 * Value set by 3t. itted into the public record in �connectipn �tli item on Q- waiter Foernan g r, _ �, 9 7 City C leric f HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 i CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * L 367 2951 .12 .46 1360 .27 TR 279 2664 .10 .46 1228 .23 WB L 188 1524 .12 .13 199 .94 * LR 175 1401 .12 .13 183 .96 R 141 1181 .12 .13 154 .92 NB * T 896 3386 .26 .28 942 .95 J R 61 1181 .05 .28 329 .19 SB * L 58 2951 .02 .06 180 .32 T 732 4723 .15 .36 1684 .43 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .53 Xc = .57 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec I LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1- -- Delay 2 -- By Lane Group -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sect App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS J w EB L .27 .46 14.5 1360 .0 1.00 L 14.5 B 14.4 B �- TR .23 .46 14.2 1228 .0 1.00 TR 14.2 B WB L .94 .13 37.7 199 34.9 1.00 L 72.6 F 73.9 F LR .96 .13 37.8 183 39.3 1.00 LR 77.1 F R .92 .13 37.5 154 34.1 1.00 R 71.7 F NB T .95 .28 31.0 942 13.7 1.00 T 44.6 E 43.3 E R .19 .28 24.0 329 .0 1.00 R 24.0 C [ I. kro SB L .32 .06 39.3 180 .4 1.00 L 39.7 D 22.9 C T .43 .36 21.4 1684 .1 1.00 T 21.5 C Intersection Cycle = 115 36.6 D x S-ubmitted into the public record conneW101 E item on Walter Foeman 9 r ""` t'i ' 7 City Glek HCH &mmary Results For Case: SUBBRK-B SU GTH ST /BRICKELL AVE FUTURE BACKGOUND VOL Version 2.03 Il I X Delay 69I552 I 1 I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ + � AM GroupRatio Ratio Leh) LOS I I 1 I 325 EB *L .12 .27 14.5 B I I I ((�, I i TR .10 .23 14.2 B �- 199 All 14.4 B VB L .12 .94 72.6 F SLR .12 .96 77.1 F R .12 .92 71.7 F All 73.9 F KE *T .26 .95 44.6 E R .05 .19 24.0 C All 43.3 E SB *L .02 .32 39.7 D T .15 .43 21.5 C All 22.9 C Intersect .53 .57 36.6 D -�------ I till 330 III 103 PI I I 204 - l l I ! f 70 I l I I 951 i IL Z f I 3� 0 4 1 4 L 6 3 29 +I4 1 12 4 1 Submitted into the public record in conre t'o With item on. Waiter Fireman CitV Clerk 95 - 507 i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8th ST NORTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SW8MIA-B INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 3 ----- 3 ------ 600 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 3 3 600 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 WB NB T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN f THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT ----------------------------- TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 268 ---- 832 ----- 0 ---- 0 ---- ---- ----- 1.00 1.00 WB 0 0 0 0 NB 0 632 22 15 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 268 832 0 0 WB 0 0 0 0 NB 0 632 22 15 SB 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .91 .91 Submitted into t$i public .81 record connect+ n With item on Walter f-ocman 9 5 — 597 City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 EB LT WB NB TP SB L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 44 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- -- -- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 5 2 - 0 0 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- ----- ----- 3 3 0 0 E Y Y E' 20 20 0 0 N N :Rb4hitted into the p;6HS recor i connec i n ith item on .� Walter Foeman City Cleric t HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 4 SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-3 i VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ---- -- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 268 1.00 268 .91 295 LT 1209 3 1.00* 1209 .24 .00 T 832 1.00 832 .91 914 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 TR 788 3 1.00* 786 .00 .01 T 632 1.00 632 .81 780 R 22 1.00 22 .81 8+ r..j + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg - --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB LT 1800 3 1.000 .985 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 .963 4287 W-� Y NB TR 1850* 3 1.000 1.00 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 4636 i I * Value set by ii7ffiitted into the public record�,,,, ii�� corm ct' i � i h item U-10 on � Walter Foeman5 — 5ky 7 City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8th ST /MIAMI AVE Page-4 I **************************************************************************** l CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET E v s v s C c X t Lane Adj. Flow Adj. -Sat. Flow- Green Capacity -v/c- App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- ----- EB * LT 1209 4287 .28 .57 2465 .49 f NB * TR 788 4636 .17 .38 1739 .45 f„I r_j * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .45 Xc = .48 Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group ---Approach- X g/C d1 c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec ' App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- EB LT .49 .57 7.6 2465 .1 1.00 LT 7.8 B 7.8 B t;! kr NB TR .45 .38 14.3 1739 .1 1.00 TR 14.4 B 14.4 B Intersection Cycle = 80 10.4 B Submitted into the p«Q1ic record in conno n 'tl tern on 1 Walter roc,man 0 '- r5 '9 7 HCH Summary Rebalts for Case: SWBMIA-B SW Bth ST /MIAMI AVE FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. Version 2.03 X Delay 11 l I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ i I Amp croup Ratio Ratio vela) LOS I l Ell *LT .28 .49 7.6 B l 1 All 7.0 B i I I! II II ------------ - - -- ------------ - - - - -- 26B III 632 MB *TR .17 .45 14.4 B I 1 All 14.4 B I 1 I I 22 632 Intersect .45 .49 10.4 B 1 2 44 4 28 11'14 Submitted into the p,.1h1fr, record t connent'on Vdit'i� itettt .4—ran MDAl Waftk :rlFoeman City Clecit k HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SW78RK-B INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) µ ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - Jj EB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 NB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB LT 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 .'� SB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH ,.,. LT - .LEFT TURN f THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN ' LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT ------------------=---------- TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 0 0 0 p ---- ---- ----- WB 71 390 23 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 330 1377 44 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 0 624 182 93 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 WB 71 390 23 17 NB 330 1377 44 30 SB 0 624 182 93 PEAK ----------------- HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 4 Sbdtd I ir'rt59gopublid record j caring io .I VJt"l 90 stem an' 5 5, Waiter Foeman City Clerk !r 1 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WB LTR NB LTR TR SIB TR L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green --- 59 --- --- --- --- 21 22 0 0 --- 0 --- --- 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- ----- ----- 50 50 50 3 3 3 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N SUbmitted int30t,`-§-) pubP6. 5 14.5 reooWO onnect'o � i �itemon VfaltGr -oe,man 9 5 -- 597 Ci,y Clerk J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** t VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ------------ -------------------------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) -LT- -RT- --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---_ ___- - i 3 WB L 71 1.00 71 .90 79 LT 490 2 1.00* 490 .16 .00 T 390 1.00 390 .95 411 R 7 1 1.00 7 .00 1.00 R 23 1.00 23 .90 7+ NB L 330 1.00 330 .90 367 L 367 2 1.00* 367 1.00 .00 T 1377 1.00 1377 .95 1449 TR 1465 2 1.00* 1465 .00 .01 t«. R 44 1.00 44 .90 16+ SE L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 657 2 1.00* 657 .00 .00 T 624 1.00 624 .95 657 R 99 1 1.00 99 .00 1.00 R 182 1.00 182 .90 99+ ,9 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. a: Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- WB LT 1800 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .992 3214 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1492 NB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 . . . . . TR 1850* 2 1000 990 1000 100 100 .900 .998 1.00 3290 4� � 't SB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1477 * Value set by►M$Ae%t into the public ee c L7rCl M connec ion f ;tern nn VVuite s•-n. m�-,,n C; 5 17 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v s C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. ---- Group - -- (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) ------ --- ----- ----- Ratio ----- F9 WB * LT 490 3214 .15 .22 699 .70 R 7 1492 .00 .22 324 .02 NB L 367 2951 .12 .52 1540 .24 * TR 1465 3290 .45 .75 2460 .60 SB T 657 3386 .19 .21 707 .93 R 99 1477 .07 .21 308 .32 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .60 Xc = .62 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec 7, LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach-+-; X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay M15 Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec w App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- =:` i; WB LT .70 .22 31.6 699 2.2 1.00 LT 33.8 D 33.7 D E R .02 .22 26.9 324 .0 1.00 R 26.9 D f ` NB L .24 4 .52 11.4 1540 .0 1.00 L 11.4 B 6.5 B l j TR .60 .75 5.0 2460 .3 1.00 TR 5.3 B SB T .93 .21 33.9 707 13.5 1.00 T 47.5 E 45.1 E r, R .32 .21 29.3 308 .2 1.00 R 29.5 D Intersection Cycle = 115 Submitted into the public 20.4 C recordlpnne Mi item =oncar, Walter Foeman _ r 9 � City Clerk HCM Sum►aary Results for Case: SU7BRK-B SU 7TH ST /BRICHELL AVE 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. Version 2.03 X Delay 624 1 1 1 I I I I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 1B2 + I I I AER Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I I I 23 390 71 WB *LT .15 .70 33.9 D R .00 .02 26.9 D All 33.7 D NB L .12 .24 11.4 B *TR .45 .60 5.3 B All 6.5 B SB T .19 .93 47.5 E R .07 .32 29.5 D All 45.1 E Intersect .60 .62 20.4 C I I r 330 44 1377 1 2 J1 3 L *--- 59 111 rr 3 IN 21 1 22 4 1 Submitted into the public record 'n conne t'on with item on .� 3 S Walte Foeman City Clerk �' `� w HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. CASE: SW7MIA-B INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ---- 0 ---- ---- ----- WB 0 948 304 61 1.00 1.00 NB 515 377 0 0 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 WB 0 948 304 61 NB 515 377 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ; S;y ittecl ink thn pUbji reor c�nnt itGrli�. c�;l _1�_� t. ,r F City Clerk- HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-2 **************************************************************************** SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WB TP NB LT SB L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 35 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- j EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 2 1 4 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- ---- 0 ----- ----- PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 CURB PARKING Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 j PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS SubmittE..4 Ao theloiJAC recor ^ connect'ongill item._____ QJ v r. '' '° Y_u s Walter Foeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** y _--_-_VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ----------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj . } Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Uti1 Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- WB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 1019 2 1.00* 1019 .00 .00 T 948 1.00 948 .93 1019 R 261 1 1.00 261 .00 1.00 R 304 1.00 304 .93 261+ NB L 515 1.00 515 .92 560 L 560 1 1.00 560 1.00 .00 T 377 1.00 377 .92 410 T 410 2 1.00* 410 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET :.:�----------Ideal_____________________________________________________________ s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg WB T 1800 2 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3224 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 w,. NB L 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .850 1370 T 1900* 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 2983 * Value set )'abWftrd into the public record in connectiont with item l) on JiNq5- Walter For elan City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION:�B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-4 CAPACITY -ANALYSIS -WORKSHEET_- _-----_---___ v a v/s g/C c X Lane Adj'. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App.- Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio �. WE * T 1019 3224 .32 .46 1491 .68 R 261 1181 .22 .46 546 .48 NB * L 560 1370 .41 .49 668 .84 2983 .14 .49 1454' .28 T 410 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .72 Xc = .76 Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 -- Delay 2 -- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C dl c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec sfi App, Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- WB T .68 .46 12.8 1491 .9 1.00 T 13.8 B 13.4 B R .48 .46 11.3 546 .5 1.00 R 11.8 B l NB L .84 .49 13.5 668 6.5 1.00 L 20.0 C 15.5 C T .28 .49 9.3 1454 .0 1.00 T 9.3 B i Intersection Cycle = Oubmitted into Pie public 14.3 B record in canne^ io nh item on Walter Faeman 9 5 597 City Clerk HCH Summary Results For Case: SW H IA-B SW ?TH ST /MIAMI AVE FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUt= FUTURE BACKGROUND VOL. Version 2.83 I X Delay l Lane v/s v/c (sec/ I App. Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 1384 948 --- t t--------- WB *T .32 .68 13.B B iIII R .22 .48 11.8 B l l All 13.4 B l l I HB *L .41 .84 20.8 C I T .14 .28 9.3 B All 15.5 C l 515 l 377 1 2 35 4 36 �� 4 1 Intersect .72 .76 14.3 B Submitted into the public record in runner 'an, tivi h item Ate. on q Walter Foeman (amity Cleat Future Roadway Link Level of Service Submitted into the public recar t Connecti n rit item on Walter oeman City Cleric ss— � �r REPORT FOR 4/14/95 II Florida Department of Transportation II P II Arterial Level of Service Tables II II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II II ART_TAB Version 1.1 II II Date:12-14-91 II II Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II II DESCRIPTION II II ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE II II PEAK DIRECTION: SB II it Study ime Period: PM PEAK II II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II II Number of Lanes: 2 II II AADT: 8800 II f� � s II User Notes: FUTUREBACKGROUND II II II r;;c� --------------------------------------------------- II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II II —Range-- II II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) II 11 PHF: 0.950 (0.70 - 1.00) II II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) II II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 7 (0 - 100) II a II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II II II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR it it j II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II e> II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II II For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of. II II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II II Urban or Transitioning', Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II z.� it II II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.633 II II MEDIANS (Y/N): Y II 4•; II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y I) II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS li G � II II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 II II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) II II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.34 (0.20Stted into thP public record ,�,nconnec I n i item` on Walter City Clerk J REPORT FOR 4/14/95 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) jj 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II A B C D E II II LANES II jj 1 NIA N/A N/A N/A 470 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,000 II jj 3 NIA N/A N/A N/A 1,560 II 4 N/A N/A NIA NIA 2,110 II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) —II Ij (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II jj 6.319115 Intersections per mile II ij Level of Service II II A B C D E it LANES II jj 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 850 jj 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,820 II II 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,840 II 8 NIA N/A N/A N/A 3,840 II _ rll jj AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) j( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II Level of Service II A B C D E II LANES II 1 jj 2 NIA NIA N/A N/A 10,000 jj 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,500 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 33,500 II jj 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 45,200 jl II N/A means the level of service is not achievable 11 -------- -------- -------- -------- II ---- ij Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourjj jj Level of Service ij LANES A B C D E jj 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.67 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.72 II jj 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.75 4 N/A NIA N/A N/A 0.76 II Submitted Into tho public recort Uonnr,-Acton j�with � City Clerk I REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation (( Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (j ART TAB Version 1.1 (( Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE (( »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 4 AADT: 20600 j User Notes: BACKGROUND TRAFFIC jl TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS --Range--- j( K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) it ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 21 (0 -100) (( ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II (j RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) (( For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: j) Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 j( Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (ml): it 0.633 MEDIANS (YIN): Y Ij TURN BAYS (YIN): Y_ II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS (( NO, SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: II 4 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) j( TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) ({ SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g1C: 0.73 (0.20 - O.Rhmitted intoll the public recor wi h Wriconnection itemon Walter -oeman City Clerk 95- 597 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 II -------------------------------- PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ------ II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) (I {) 6.319115 Intersections per mile (l {) Level of Service II {{ A B C D E II LANES I I {{ 1 N/A N/A 1,200 1,500 1,650 II Il 2 N/A N/A 2,540 3,100 3,370 {1 II 3 N/A N/A 3,900 4,750 5,100 {I II 4 N/A N/A 5,270 6,400 6,810 II I1 II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) -II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II 11 LANES II {) 2 N/A N/A 2,180 2,730 3,000 II II 4 N/A N/A 4,610 5,640 6,130 II II 6 N/A N/A 7,100 8,640 9,280 11 11 8 II N/A N/A 9,580 11,650 12,370 II II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II {I 6.319115 Intersections per mile II it Level of Service II 1{ A B C D E II (( LANES II II 2 N/A N/A 25,700 32,100 35,300 {{ II 4 N/A N/A 54,200 66,400 72,100 II II 6 N/A N/A 83,500 101,700 109,200 {{ {I 8 N/A N/A 112,700 137,000 145,600 II I{ N/A means the level of service is not achievable 11 -II it II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hour{I II Level of Service II {i LANES A B C D E II {{ 1 N/A N/A 0.68 0.86 0.94 II II 2 N/A N/A 0.72 0.88 0.96 11 11 3 N/A N/A 0.74 0.90 0.97 II it 4 11_______ N/A N/A 0.75 0.91 _______= -------- -------- -------- 0.97 11 Submitted into the public SecaWinonnec - �n+aer1�on _ 1� Walter -oeman City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation II Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (( ART —TAB Version 1.1 II Date., 12-14-91 I Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown j( DESCRIPTION -- II (( ROAD NAME: SE 8TH STREET j( »»> PEAK DIRECTION: EB (( Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 (( Number of Lanes: 3 j( AADT: 7500 (( User Notes: FUTURE BACKGROUND II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS (( ---Range-- II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) (( D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.925 (0.70 -1.00) II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) (( % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 -100) j( ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS j( URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II (( RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) (( FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: it Use Free Flow speed of: (( Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 (j Transitioning, Class 1 55, 60, 45, 40 or 35 (( Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 (( Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 (( TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): II 0.17424 (( MEDIANS (Y/N): N TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS j( NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: it 1 (( ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) (j TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (0.20 - 0 Amitted into Ithe public recur in connecti n v�i` item M4--- on Walter - oernan City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 II PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME II ? II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II jj 5.739131 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II jj A B C D E II {j LANES II j{ 1 N/A N/A NIA 530 970 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,100 2,030 II 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 {I II 4 N/A N/A N/A 2,240 4,180 II I{ PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) III II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 5.739131 Intersections per mile II u' Ij Level of Service II i II A B C D E II II LANES II Ij 1 NIA N/A N/A 530 970 II 2 N/A NIA N/A 1,100 2,030 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 II II 4 II N/A N/A NIA 2,240 4,180 Ij jj AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II j) II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 5.739131 Intersections per mile I( II Level of Service II ij A B C D E II II LANES II II 1 N/A N/A NIA 6,200 11,400 II Ij 2 N/A N/A N/A 12,900 23,800 Ij Ij 3 N/A N/A N/A 19,400 36,500 {{ Ij 4 II N/A N/A N/A 26,400 49,200 11 {{ N/A means the level of service is not achievable Il —II II II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourij II Level of Service {{ LANES A B C D E II II 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.45 0,83 II I{ 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.47 0.87 II Ij 3 N/A NIA N/A 0.47 0.89 II x� II 4 N/A N/A NIA 0.48 0.90 II Submitted into the PUblic recorIM, onnec for wire item onW5 Waiter Ferman City Clork 95` EE 7 a J J 91, REPORT FOR 4/14195 Florida Department of Transportation II Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ART TAB Version 1.1 II Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown I) —II DESCRIPTION it ROAD NAME: MIAMI II »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB II Study Time Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 3 II AADT: 10500 User Notes: FUTURE BACKGROUND II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range— II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 - 1.00) II PHF: 0.950 (0.70 - 1.00) II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 58 (0 -100) II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II • TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.34 II (I MEDIANS (Y/N): N II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 2 II II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 - 180) II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.49 (0.20 - 0.80bibmitted if -Ito the public recor in connecPiitem on Waite eman City Cleric 9 5 - 157 J REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Ii------- II ---------------------------------------- PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ------ -III II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II jj 5.882353 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II (I A B C D E {{ 11 LANES II II 1 N/A N/A 460 1,660 2,020 {{ it 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 II II 3 N/A N/A 1,390 5,560. 6,380 II ij 4 N/A NIA 1,850 7,500 8,510 II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) {{ jj (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) {{ II 5.882353 Intersections per mile Il Ij Level of Service II j( A B C D E {{ ji LANES II II 1 N/A N/A 460 1,660 2,020 {{ II 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 II (j 3 N/A NIA 1,390 5,560 6,380 {{ II 4 N/A N/A 1,850 7,500 8,510 II II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) II j( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II (j 5.882353 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E I{ II LANES !I jj 1 N/A N/A 5,500 19,600 23,800 11 (j 2 N/A N/A 10,900 42,100 49,100 {I jj 3 N/A N/A 16,400 65,400 75,100 II I( 4 N/A N/A 21,800 88,200 100,100 {{ -II II (( N/A means the level of service is not achievable II I{ II II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll - j1 Level of Service II jj LANES A B C D E II (( 1 N/A N/A 0.21 0.75 0.91 ){ (( 2 NIA N/A 0.21 0.81 0.94 II jj 3 N/A N/A 0.21 0.84 0.96 {{ II 4 ----- N/A N/A 0.21 0.85 ------------------------------------- 0.96 {{ ------ -- Submitted into the publir, recur n �co111iec.6 ,n rith item on Walter ro:eman 4 Iv CityClPIrk. IV 0 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAB Version 1 A Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown �I DESCRIPTION I ROAD NAME: »»> PEAK DIRECTION: Study Time Period: Analysis Date: Number of Lanes: AADT: User Notes: TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS SW 7th ST WB PM PEAK APRIL 13, 1995 2 14700 FUTURE BACKGROUND —Range-- K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) PHF: 0.925 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) I % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 -100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS j URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): ARTERIAL CLASS: FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): For Arterial Type and Class: Rural Transitioning, Class 1 Urban, Class 1 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 Urban, Class 3 U 2 (1, 2, or 3) 35 (40,35,30,25) Use Free Flow speed of: 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 45, 40 or 35 40, 35, 30 or 25 35, 30 or 25 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.17 MEDIANS (Y/N): N i TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS I NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 - 180) II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (0.20 - 0.80) II Qubmitted into the public recorW'nn -�c i vaititemon P Walter Foeman REPORT FOR 4/14/95 (( PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) iJ II 5,882353 Intersections per mile II J( Level of Service JJ II A B C D E II JJ LANES II (( 1 N/A N/A 1,170 820 1,020 JJ JI 2 N/A N/A 2,330 1,750 2,110 (( II 3 N/A N/A 3,500 2,720 3,230 JJ II 4 N/A N/A 4,660 3,710 4,350 JJ II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) JJ JJ (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II JJ 5.882353 Intersections per mile JJ (J Level of Service II II A B C D E JJ II LANES II J( 1 N/A N/A 1,170 820 1,020 JJ J( 2 NIA N/A 2,330 1,750 2,110 II II 3 N/A N/A 3,500 2,720 3,230 JJ J( 4 N/A N/A 4,660 3,710 4,350 II II II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II Ji II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) JJ II 5.882353 Intersections per mile JJ JJ Level of Service II II A B C D E IJ JJ LANES II JJ 1 N/A N/A 13,700 9,600 12,000 (( JI 2 N/A N/A 27,400 20,500 24,900 II II 3 N/A N/A 41,100 32,000 38,000 II (( 4 N/A N/A 54,800 43,600 51,200 JJ IJ II NIA means i! the level of service is not achievable -II II II J( Peak hour peak direction thrulright V/C ratios for full hourll II Level of Service II (( LANES A B C D E II II 1 N/A N/A 1.00 0.70 0.88 JJ (J 2 N/A N/A 1.00 0.75 0.91 (( JJ 3 N/A N/A 1.00 0.78 0.93 JJ JJ 4 N/A N/A 1.00 0.80 0.93 II Submitted into the public record connecti n ti jt item on � �1 Walter -Delman City Cierk 05- 5.131 I APPENDIX E Intersection Level of Service for Future Background and Project Volumes :�ubrnittedl into the, public re c o rddconne' ctip PR , item Oil Walter Forman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION j EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 tar ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SW7BRK-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY - LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 NB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 ! SB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- ---- EB ---------- -------------------- ---------- WB LT 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------- - - - CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS t----------------------------- -------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT -- EB --- 0 ------- 0 0 --- 0 ---- ---- ----- WB 71 390 23 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 330 1476 44 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 0 653 215 97 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. ---------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 0 0 0 0 ' Ctit�fi�ted into 9` ptiblic-90 NB SB 330 0 1476 44 653 215 30 97 , 90 vecord in conri t on vdih W'0 [N- .90 item on� �" Walter hoernan City Clerk 1 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS -- CONTROL TYPE . PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WB LTR NB LTR TR Sg TR Rty�TIMING L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict BY PHASE (SECONDS) -----------------------•----------------------------------------------- 4 --- - --- -- -1- -2- -3- -- Green 59 21 22 0 --- 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 "j CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES EAST WEST - NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---2- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- --2- ---2- ---- ---- ------ --0- --0- ---0- --2- --2- EAST WEST ---- NORTH SOUTH ----- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- 50 50 50 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 s PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS0.5. 4.5 14.5 Submi ed into the public record n connecti n �'t item on -- Walter cerman ` City Clerk 15,"ki HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION; B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT n --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- WB L 71 1.00 71 .90 79 LT 490 2 1.00* 490 .16 .00 T 390 1.00 390 .95 411 R 7 1 1.00 7 .00 1.00 c= R 23 1.00 23 .90 7+ NB L 330 1.00 330 .90 367 L 367 2 1.00* 367 1.00 .00 T 1476 1.00 1476 .95 1554 TR 1570 2 1.00* 1570 .00 .01 R 44 1.00 44 .90 16+ SB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 687 2 1.00* 687 .00 .00 T 653 1.00 653 .95 687 R 131 1 1.00 131 .00 1.00 R 215 1.00 215 .90 131+ i + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user -1 SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s I .� Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- WB LT 1800 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .992 3214 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1492 rtiv NB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3290 •SB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1477 * Value set by use:�ubmltted into the Public record in connec io item b on Waite F~o�:man95- ;� City Cleric HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. i i 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ------------------- v s v/s C c X C Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App.- Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio WB * LT 490 3214 .15 .22 699 .70 R 7 1492 .00 .22 324 .02 NB L 367 2951 .12 .52 1540 .24 * TR 1570 3290 .48 .75 2460 .64 SB T 687 3386 .20 .21 707 .97 R 131 1477 .09 .21 308 .43 * Critical Lane Group Sum (v/s)crit = .63 Xc = .65 I Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Delay1 --- -- Delay 2- --- Y B Lane Group Y p -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay '_`� Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec k App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio /veh) ----- ----- (vph) /veh) Fact ----- ----- ---- Grp. /veh) LOS ---- ----- --- /veh) LOS ----- --- I WB LT .70 .22 31.6 699 2.2 1.00 LT 33.8 D 33.7 D t.J R .02 .22 26.9 324 .0 1.00 R 26.9 D fs: NB L .24 .52 11.4 1540 .0 1.00 L 11.4 B 6.8 B TR .64 .75 5.3 2460 .4 1.00 TR 5.7 B SB T .97 .21 34.3 707 20.0 1.00 T 54.4 E 50.6 E � R .43 .21 30.0 308 .6 1.00 R 30.6 D Intersection Cycle = 115 S+.abmitted into tfle p0�1ia21.9 C recor in�ConnectWnw item 1 anWateir oeman 9 S597 HCH SwvAary Results for Case: SW7BRX-C SW 7TH ST sBRICHELL AUE 1995 BACHGROUND VOLUHES FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECTVersion 2.83 653 I I I X Delay 1 1 1 Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 215 I t I Apj Grou23 p Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I ( ! � 390 I�It I r— 71 VB *LT .15 .70 33.0 D { ItI R .00 .02 26.9 D ( III{I All 33.7 D I I I I I II NB L .12 .24 11.4 B I I! I I I *TR .40 .64 5.7 B I 1 1 t All 6.0 B I I I I I 330 44 1 1476 SB T .20 .97 54.4 E 1 2 JI 3 t L 09 43 IN a-- All 50.6 E 59 ]Ir3 21 1 22 4 1 Intersect .63 .65 21.9 C Submitted into the public record' y' o0[1 with th item en --' Walter F em n City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND & PROJECT VOLUMES /MIAMI'AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SW7MIA-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- EB ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ---- 0 WB 0 979 304 61 1.00 1.00 NB 515 377 0 0 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 WB 0 979 304 61 NB 515 377 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT Nritted i43 the PUblig3 recor ri connecti n w th item on - Walter Foernan City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND & PROJECT VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-2 SIGNAL _SETTINGS _- OPERATIONALANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED - ----------------------------------------------- ----------------^----- APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 r - '-- --- --- --- --- ^-- --- --- EB WB TP NB LT SB L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 --- 7 --- 8 --- --- --- --- --- Green 35 36 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD --------------- C,V PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH L,� l LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT. LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ----- LEFT THRU ---- ---- RIGHT ----- 1 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- ---- 0 ----- ----- PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR Y 20 Y 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR r 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS SG!"jt`nRfe-(,P+-it4 record �t�� cu�nncciic n wI i itt;m �'`r� are ._ Waltar yaaman 9 5-; 5 7 Citv Cleric HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND & PROJECT VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET - --------------------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT IAA,{ WB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 1053 2 1.00* 1053 .00 .00 T 979 1.00 979 .93 1053 R 261 1 1.00 261 .00 1.00 R 304 1.00 304 .93 261+ ff?��NB L 515 1.00 515 .92 560 L 560 1 1.00 560 1.00 .00 T 377 1.00 377 .92 410 T 410 2 1.00* 410 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 i + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. is Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg ;F --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- WB T 1800 2 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3224 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 6 NB L 1800 1 1.000 .995 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .850 1370 T 1900* 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 2983 4 * Value set by usill�mitterd into tho public record fnnec i n wi la item on Walter Fo man 9 5- 597 City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. FUTURE BACKGROUND & PROJECT VOLUMES /MIAMI AVE Page-4 WORKSHEET ---------CAPACITY v -ANALYSIS - ---------------------------- s v/s g/C c X App. Lane Adj. Flow Group (vph) Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) v/c Ratio ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- WB * T 1053 3224 .33 .46 1491 .71 R 261 1181 .22 .46 546 .48 -°� NB * L 560 1370 .41 .49 668 .84 T 410 2983 .14 .49 1454 .28 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .74 Xc = .77 Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec "� SERVICE ------------------------LEVEL -- Delay 1 --- -OF- -WORKSHEET -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio Ratio /veh) ----- ----- ----- (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- /veh) LOS ----- --- �? WB T .71 .46 13.0 1491 1.1 1.00 T 14.1 B 13.7 B R .48 .46 11.3 546 .5 1.00 R 11.8 B NB L .84 .49 13.5 668 6.5 1.00 L 20.0 C 15.5 C T .28 .49 9.3 1454 .0 1.00 T 9.3 B Intersection Cycle = 80Submitted into the public 14.4 B record f i connect' n U item on Waiter oeman - 597 City Clerk HCM Summary Results for Case: SW7MIA-C SU 7TH ST /MIAMI AVE FUTURE BACKGROUND a PROJECT VOLUMES FUTURE B.G. LAND PROJECTVersion 2,83 X Delay Lane v/s v/c (sec/ ! Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS ! 304 979 ! WB *T .33 .71 14.1 B �-__ ------ R ,22 .40 11.8 B III I II All 13.7 B ! I NB *L ,41 .84 28,8 C ! I T ,14 ,28 9,3 B I All 15,5 C ! 515 377 Intersect 1,74 .77 14.4 B i 2 t 35 4 36 �! 4 1 Submitt-ed into the public record i G,;nnec:'ionAniitem cn 1r r Wain; Foe:man '� `� City Clerk li HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. t SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SWBBRK-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET- -POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 SB 5 2 600 2 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT - RTO R LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 380 103 ----- 204 ---- 50 ---- --=- ----- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 199 0 330 116 1.00 1.00 NB 0 895 70 15 1.00 1.00 SB 54 722 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ---------------------- (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT - ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- EB 380 103 204 50 ---- ---- ----- .90 .95 .90 WB 199 0 330 116 ,90 w NB 0 895 70 15 IN90 LSuhrnitted ir'bt_p the pu%% SB 54 722 0 0 rojZjrda9B�ec iow +vi h it rn G an 9 ri-- " Walte Faeman City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- FIB --- --- --- --- --- LTR --- --- --- WB L R NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green --- 6 --- --- --- --- 29 50 12 0 --- 0 --- --- 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ysLEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ..,� EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING Y Y Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 20 20 20 20 to NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 26.0 26.0 20.0 20.0 Submitted Into the public record ui connfect'a item ,h on ��-® j w, 5 9 7 Waite Fuf:'Tilra City cleric i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ---------------------- Peak Lane U v awl Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp_ (vph) Lns Fact (vph) _LTr rRT_ EB L 380 1.00 380 .90 422 L 422 2 1.00* 422 1.00 .00 T 103 1.00 103 .95 108 TR 279 2 1.00* 279 .00 .61 R 204 1.00 204 .90 171+ Q1 jI WB L 199 1.00 199 .90 221 L 194 1 1.00 194 1.00 .00 T 0 1.00 0 .90 0 LR 146 1 1.00 146 .10 .82 R 330 1.00 330 .90 238+ R 119 1 1.00 119 .00 1.00 .,x NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 942 2 1.00* 942 .00 .00 T 895 1.00 895 .95 942 R 61 1 1.00 61 A0 1.00 R 70 1.00 70 .90 61+ SIB L 54 1.00 54 .90 60 L 60 2 1.00* 60 1.00 .00 T 722' 1.00 722 .95 760 T 760 3 1.00* 760 .00 .00 R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user i SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. '= App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flowdd w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 .908 1.00 2664 WB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1524 1 LR 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .878 .995 1401 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 NB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 u- R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 j i SB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 g T .1900* 3 1.000 .990 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 4723 1 * Value set by ti` -Otecl into the p0lic recerY10coo l�Jiter FoamAn 1-9 7 item City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. ` SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 CAPACITY -ANALYSIS v s -WORKSHEET---r___________ v/s C c X , Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App.-Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * L 422 2951 .14 .46 1360 .31 TR 279 2664 .10 .46 1228 .23 WB * L 194 LR 146 R 119 NB * T 942 R 61 �.,,,....... SB * L 60 ............. T 760 Sum(v/s)crit = .57 Cycle Length, C = 115 1524 .13 .13 199 .97 1401 .10 .13 183 .80 1181 .10 .13 154 .77 3386 .28 .28 942 1.00 1181 .05 .28 329 .19 2951 . .02 .06 180 .33 4723 .16 .36 1684 .45 * Critical Lane Group Xc = .61 c Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec .� App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- (vph) ----- /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L .31 .46 14.8 1360 ----- .0 ---- 1.00 ---- L ----- --- 14.9 B ----- --- 14.6 B i TR .23 .46 14.2 1228 .0 1.00 TR 14.2 B WB L .97 .13 37.9 199 42.1 1.00 L LR .80 .13 36.9 183 14.4 1.00 LR R .77 .13 36.7 154 14.0 1.00 R NB T 1.00 .28 31.5 942 22.5 1.00 T R .19 _.28 24.0 . 329 .0 1.00 R n= SB L .33 .06 39.3 180 T .45 .36 21.6 1684 79.9 F 63.3 F 51.2 E 50.8 E 54.1 E 52.3 E 24.0 C I . .4 1.00 L 39.8 D 23.0 C .1 1.00 T 21.7 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Submitted into the public 37.1 D recur n ronne i 2 with item on +� Waite Fo man r " 9 7 City Clerk HCH Summary Results For Case: SWBBRK-C SW 8TH ST MICHELL AVE FUTURE B.G. AND PRWECTVersion 2.03 II I X Delay 722 I I I Lane v/s vac (sec/ I 54 I I I A2E Group Ratio Ratio veh) LQS 4 I I I 1330 EB *L .14 M 14.9 B IIIIIfyI I TR .10 .23 14.2 B 199 A11 14.6 B WB *L .13 .97 79.9 F LR .10 .80 51.2 E R .10 .77 50.9 E All 63.3 F HD *T .28 1,00 54.1 E R .05 .19 24.0 C All 52.3 E SB *L .02 .33 39.8 D T .iG .45 21.7 C All 23.0 C Intersect .57 ,Gi 37 A D -- - - -—--- - - - - - - I tIf f995 10320470 i IL 2 1 3� 4 L 6 3 29 IN 1 8 4 1 12 4 1 Submitted into the public rc;cord An conned' n d' iiern on walte Foeman City Clerk J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /MIAMI AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION t EAST APPROACH: SW 8TH ST NORTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: MIAMI AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SW8MIA-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY r j J LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- ll APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 3 600 0 0 0 0 WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..w� NB 3 3 600 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ----------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 WB NB T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 268 ---- 882 ----- 0 ---- 0 ---- ---- ----- 1.00 1.00 WB 0 0 0 0 NB 0 632 22 15 1.00 1.00 SB 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 268 882 0 0 WB 0 0 0 0 NB 0 632 22 15 SB 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT .91 .91 Submitted into the pultc .81 record urulc�cti n vit item ME, �I�, _ VVai er -'c,,-man 9 5_ r 9 7 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /MIAMI AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ----- --- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LT WB NB TP SB L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Green 44 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 80 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 5 2 0 0 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH i ---- ---- ----0 -----. 3 3 0 0 k Y Y 20 20 0 0 N N 14 . OSuhmitted into W Qublic recorc , ri cos�nnc`'CDR ��- 'h item �n-� 9 --'7 - ,. Wulte i-ou�riarl City Clerk J 1 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /MIAMI AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET --------------------------- Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT ----- RT ' --- --- ----- ------ EB L 268 1.00 ----- 268 --- ----- ---- --- ---- ----- ---- .91 295 LT 1264 3 1.00* 1264 .23 ---- .00 T 882 1.00 882 .91 969 t� R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 e NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 TR 788 3 1.00* 788 .00 .01 , T 632 1.00 632 .81 780 R 22 1.00 22 .81 8+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET L; ----------Ideal5 Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj . hti' Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow Ytrr w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg �` --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 6. EB LT 1800 -3 1.000 '.985 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 .965 4296'' u I , MNB TR 1850* 3 1.000 1.00 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 4636 * Value set by user Submitted into the p(A)1ic record �,n-1,`conne ion i item �uy � on* 9" — 5 9 7 - Walter Foeman HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. y SW 8TH ST /MIAMI AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET r v s v/s g/C c Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v%c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio { ---- EB * ----- --- LT 1264 4296 .29 .57 2470 .51 NB * TR 788 4636 .17 .38 1739 .45 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .46 Xc = .49- `'' Cycle Length, C = 80 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET -- Delay 1 -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group - -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec r� App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- --- ---- EB LT ----- .51 .57 7.8 2470 .2 1.00 LT 7.9 B 7.9 B s } NB TR .45 .38 14.3 1739 .1 1.00 TR 14.4 B 14.4 B f i .5 Intersection Cycle = 80,F3offirnitted into the public 10.4 B ser;orconne �r wwitb 9 '— Waiter Foeman — City Crr=.tc HCM Sunmary Results for Case: SU8MIA-C SW 8TH ST /MIAMI AVE FUTURE B.G.-AND PBWECTVersion 2.03 X Delay I{ I I Lane v/s v/c (Sec/ I I AEp Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS ( 1 I I EB *LT .29 .51 7.9 B II All 7.9 B I l II II II -- ---------- --------- _-_______---------- -- rII 26B ___r I 1 1 —* 882 I I NB *TR .17 .45 14.4 B All 14.4 B l l I I 122 632 I Intersect .46 .49 10.4 B J 2 44 4 28 u millet d Into the public rocorr , n o r,noAN ryilea Ulruit�oorttan V Oil City clerk �I FA _a JL] A ss Future Roadway Link Level of Service Includes Project Traffic Volumes taarrtatteci i lei) f;7etahliG record cort:Iert'ctj mirth itern Waite Foernan City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation )j I II Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ART TAB Version 1.1 ){ I I I Date: 12-14-91 jj Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II j{ DESCRIPTION )j jj ROAD NAME: SW 7th ST {) II ">>> PEAK DIRECTION: WB II �� II Study Time Period: PM PEAK II ij Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 jj Number of Lanes: 2 II ? j j AADT: 15100 ) j {i User Notes: II BACKGROUND & PROJECT TRAFF II II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS {{ II ---Range— II jj K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II jj D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 - 1.00) II jj PHF: 0.925 (0.70 - 1.00) II jl ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) )j II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 -100) II II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS jl jj URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II j{ RURAL ARTERIAL (Urr/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) )) jj FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II it jj For Arterial Type and Class: II Use Free Flow speed of: {{ jj Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II jj Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 it II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II {I Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II �" II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): II 0.17 MEDIANS (Y/N): N II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II j{ SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II II jj NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: II 1 II II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) {{ jj TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II jj (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) j{ I) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 - 180) II II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (01DAOTO nd into the Ihublic recorMr(_M'* neu)n vitemon 111_5 h r roeman City Clerk 9 5 - 1597 REPORT FOR 4114/95 Florida Department of Transportation II Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ART TAB Version 1.1 II Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II - - -- it DESCRIPTION II ROAD NAME: MIAMI II »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB II Study Time Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 3 II AADT: 10500 II User Notes: BACKGROUND & PROJECT TRAFF II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range— II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) II PHF: 0.950 (0.70 - 1.00) II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 58 (0 - 100) II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) II For Arterial Type and Class: I I Use Free Flow speed of: II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): II 0.34 II MEDIANS (Y/N): N II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y I) SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: II 2 II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 80 (60 - 1806 int I the�I ( Ublic WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.49 (0.20 - 0.$6ybrriitterJ retard._ 1JI i n h item �)_ on �v Walter --o.hnan City Clork 9"- 537 REPORT FOR 4/14/95 (( PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (( (( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) Il (( 5.882353 Intersections per mile II (( Level of Service II (( A B C D E II (( LANES II (( 1 N/A N/A 460 1,660 2,020 (( (( 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 (( (( 3 N/A N/A 1,390 5,560 6,380 Il (( 4 N/A N/A 1,850 7,500 8,510 (( II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) II I( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 5.882353 Intersections per mile (I (I Level of Service I( (( A B C D E II (( LANES II (( 1 N/A N/A 460 1,660 2,020 (( II 2 N/A N/A 930 3,580 4,170 (( (( 3 N/A N/A 1,390 5,560 6,380 (( II 4 II N/A NIA 1,850 7,500 8,510 ({ (( AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) -II (( (( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II (( 5.882353 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E (( II LANES {{ (( 1 N/A N/A 5,500 19,600 23,800 {( (( 2 N/A N/A 10,900 42,100 49,100 (( (( 3 N/A NIA 16,400 65,400 75,100 II (( 4 N/A N/A 21,800 88,200 100,100 it II N/A means I the level of service is not achievable -Il II II l( Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll - - Il Level of Service II II LANES A B C D E ll (( 1 N/A N/A 0.21 0.75 0.91 (( (I 2 N/A N/A 0.21 0.61 0.94 I) (( 3 N/A N/A 0.21 0.84 0.96 (( II 4 N/A N/A 0.21 0.85 0.96 (l vi1b,Ilitted int0 tid(? �Ul)iiC racord 'n connec,don '�,,i$h 4 item onl'z�� r Waller Foeman � 7City Clerk v i REPORT FOR 4/14/95 jj Florida Department of Transportation )( II Arterial Level of Service Tables (( ij Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ij ART TAB Version 1.1 II 11 Date: 12-14-91 II j( Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown () ji DESCRIPTION (( j) ROAD NAME: SE 8TH STREET II ij »»> PEAK DIRECTION: EB (( II Study Time Period: PM PEAK )) ii Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 (( II Number of Lanes: 3 II )j AADT: 8200 (( I( User Notes: II BACKGROUND & PROJECT TRAFF {( )) Ij TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range--- Ii II K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) () jj D FACTOR: 1.000 (0.50 -1.00) II II PHF: 0.925 (0.70 -1.00) (( { II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) {( II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 25 (0 -100) )) II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS --- -------- -------- Y 11 (( URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II RURAL ARTERIAL (UMR): U () ij ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) (( jj FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): it 35 (40,35,30,25) )( jj For Arterial Type and Class: (( Use Free Flow speed of. II jj Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 () jj Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 (( )j Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II jj Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 jj Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 )( II (( TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): II 0.17424 i( ji MEDIANS (Y/N): N (( Ij TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II jj SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS ----------------- - II II jj NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: (( 1 it jj ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) II jl TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (( II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) )) Ij SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): I► WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 115 (60 - 1 0.46 (0.20 - �Wltted Into ��e public recor in connec)ion w'th item on 5 g 95 � � Walter Foeman City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 it=====-- jj -------- -------------------------------- PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ------ --II II ji (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) lj jl 5.739131 Intersections per mile jl ({ Level of Service II it A B C D E it II LANES II jj 1 N/A N/A N/A 530 970 (( 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,100 2,030 Ii lj 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 II i( 4 N/A N/A N/A 2,240 4,180 (( it j( PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) —II II j( (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) (j jl 5.739131 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service {{ II A B C D E (i LANES II ll 1 N/A N/A N/A 530 970 II (j 2 N/A N/A NIA 1,100 2,030 II it 3 N/A N/A N/A 1,650 3,100 {{ Il 4 N/A N/A N/A 2,240 4,180 jj AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) lj (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) ij 5.739131 Intersections per mile jl lj Level of Service II jl A B C D E II jj LANES {( jl 1 N/A N/A N/A 6,200 11,400 (j 2 N/A N/A N/A 12,900 23,800 II it 3 N/A N/A N/A 19,400 36,500 jj 4 N/A N/A N/A 26,400 49,200 II N/A means the level of service is not achievable II jj j( Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll ji Level of Service {l (j LANES A B C D E ji 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.45 0.83 I{ Ij 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.47 0.87 jl 3 N/A N/A N/A 0.47 0.89 (( II 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.48 0.90 (j Submitted into the pul)liC seGorc; r7 car.ne,,fi r� i�ttt item Walter Fveman City Clerk 9r- 557 REPORT FOR 4114/95 =====--===---===============--===================== == II Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables II Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (( ART TAB Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 () Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown (( DESCRIPTION Study ime Period: ROAD NAME: PEAK DIRECTION: Analysis Date: Number of Lanes: AADT: User Notes: TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS K FACTOR: D FACTOR: PHF: ADJ, SATURATION FLOW RATE: % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): ARTERIAL CLASS: FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): For Arterial Type and Class: Rural Transitioning, Class 1 Urban, Class 1 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 Urban, Class 3 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): MEDIANS (Y/N): TURN BAYS (Y/N): SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II BRICKELL AVE {( SB (( PM PEAK APRIL 13, 1995 II 2 II 9100 (j BACKGROUND & PROJECT TRAFF II -� II —Range---- 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) II 1,900 (1400 - 2000) 7 (0 -100) U II II II 2 (1, 2, or 3) II 35 (40,35,30,25) II Use Free Flow speed of. 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 45, 40 or 35 (( 40, 35, 30 or 25 II 35, 30 or 25 (( II 0.633 Y II Y II II I{ NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 (j ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) Subrnittec i into the public WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.34 (0.20 - 0.80) recur n conne'cl 0n 4, �`th item on Walte Foemort -- City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 II ------------------------------- PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ------ Il II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service Il II A B C D E it II LANES II II 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 470 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,000 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,560 II (I 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,110 II II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) —II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II Il LANES II II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 850 Il II 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,820 II Il 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,840 (l II 8 II N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,840 II II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) —II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II II LANES II II 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 Il II 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,500 II II 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 33,500 II ll 8 II N/A N/A N/A N/A 45,200 II II N/A means the level of service is not achievable II —II Il II II Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll II Level of Service Il ll LANES A B C D E II II 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.67 II ll 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.72 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.75 it II 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.76 II Submitted into the public recur n Cc�rn1�'[; 'on with hen � or) 1-1 .l�.0 Walte; Fokri:an 9 r_ 507 City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 Florida Department of Transportation I( Arterial Level of Service Tables {I Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (( ART TAB Version 1.1 (( Date: 12-14-91 () Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown ({ —II DESCRIPTION II ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE II »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB {( Study Time Period: PM PEAK (( Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 j( Number of Lanes: 4 II AADT: 22000 { User Notes: BACKGROUND & PROJECT (( II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range— (( K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) II D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) II PHF: 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) ({ ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) (( % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 21 (0 - 100) II ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (( URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR !l ({ RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U H ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) (( For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of. II {I Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 (( Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 (( Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 {{ Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 II TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.633 II II MEDIANS (Y/N): Y II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 II ({ ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) (( TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.73 (0.20 - 0.8oyjbrni!1N-d i ij- i''� record iii c��,3 tic%i item a on Waite Fae�ari City Cleric F 95_ �' REPORT FOR 4/14195 ll PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME I( jj (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6,319115 Intersections per mile ll II Level of Service 11 r II A B C D E II II LANES II j jj 1 N/A N/A 1,200 1,500 1,650 (( jj 2 N/A N/A 2,540 3,100 3,370 (( I jj 3 N/A N/A 3,900 4,750 5,100 II Ij 4 N/A N/A 5,270 6,400 6,810 II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) I) II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) (( jj 6.319115 Intersections per mile II jj Level of Service (( II A B C D E (( ij LANES II jI 2 N/A NIA 2,180 2,730 3,000 Ii II 4 N/A NIA 4,610 5,640 6,130 II jj 6 N/A N/A 7,100 8,640 9,280 II jj 8 N/A N/A 9,580 11,650 12,370 (j -II II II ---- AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (( II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) I( jj 6.319115 Intersections per mile I( ji Level of Service II II A B C D E ll I I LANES I jj 2 NIA N/A 25,700 32,100 35,300 II jj 4 NIA NIA 54,200 66,400 72,100 I( j( 6 NIA N/A 83,500 101,700 109,200 (( j( 8 N/A NIA 112,700 137,000 145,600 (I -II II II N/A means the level of service is not achievable II (( II jl Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll II Level of Service (( it LANES A B C D E II II 1 N/A N/A 0.68 0.86 0.94 II 2 N/A NIA 0.72 0.88 0.96 II II 3 N/A N/A 0.74 0.90 0.97 II II 4 N/A N/A 0.75 0.91 0.97 (I Submitted into ts:e public recor n connectic n dith item �' _ on Walter =oeman �\yy/yJ r+ E, 91 City Cleric Modal Split and Vehicle Occupancy Application Submitted into fhe public record in connecti item .�. 10 on Walter -ocman 5 City Clerk Vehicle trips returning to the development (From ITE Trip Generation Manual) = 323 Person Trips from the development = 323 x 1.4 = 452 ( 1.4 is the Vehicle Occupancy Rate) Assumed Mode Split = 15% Transit Person Trips = 452 x .15 = 68 Highway Person Trips = 452 x .85 = 384 Highway Vehcile Trips = 384 /1.4 = 275 So 275 vehicle trips are returning to the project site ts(3mitteti into the public rncor n connec':',n lrfh item on �� � r " Walter Y V alter Rieman Ci1,'.E'tr�rk APPENDIX H Intersection and Roadway Link optimization for Future Background and Project Traffic Volumes Submitted intro the public record 7 onnertion With item on WallelrC)eman Cji.y Clerk 7 7 REPORT FOR 4114/95 ===== ==--==== ======== ========--=============--===== ==11 Florida Department of Transportation {( Arterial Level of Service Tables {) Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (} ART TAB Version 1.1 (( Date: 12-14-91 II Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown j( --- II DESCRIPTION II ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE (i PEAK DIRECTION: SB j( Study ime Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 (( Number of Lanes: 2 II AADT: 8800 { { User Notes: OPTIMIZATION }} II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS j} ---Range— K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) (( D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) j( PHF: 0,950 (0.70 -1.00) II ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) {} % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 7 (0 - 100) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS j( URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II }{ RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) () FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) 11 For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 {( Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 {( Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 i( Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 }} TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): it 0.633 (( MEDIANS (Y/N): Y (j TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: II 4 {{ ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) {( SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) II WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.46 (0.2grjgMted into the,11 public recar rar�nerti� n i item on Walter oerian _ 5 � 7 City Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 II PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME I) II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II �� II A B C D E II 1 II LANES II II 1 N/A N/A N/A 290 770 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 570 1,620 II II 3 N/A N/A N/A 860 2,490 II II 4 N/A N/A N/A 1,180 3,390 II II �� II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) —II II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II II LANES II "� II 2 N/A N/A N/A 520 1,400 II. II 4 N/A N/A N/A 1,040 2,950 II II 6 N/A NIA N/A 1,560 4,530 II i I I 8 NIA N/A N/A 2,140 6,170 II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II II 6.319115 Intersections per mile II II Level of Service II II A B C D E II it LANES II 1 II 2 N/A N/A N/A 6,100 16,400 II II 4 N/A N/A N/A 12,200 34,800 it II 6 N/A N/A N/A 18,300 53,300 I) II 8 N/A N/A N/A 25,200 72,600 II it II N/A means the level of service is not achievable II -II II it ----- II Peak hour --------------- --------------------- peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourII ------ Level of Service II II LANES A B C D E II II 1 N/A N/A N/A 0.30 0.82 II II 2 N/A N/A N/A 0.30 0.86 II r,r II 3 N/A N/A N/A 0.30 0.88 II II 4 N/A N/A N/A 0.31 0.90 II N UJii"liftE'C1 o tite (.)LjbIi i record i oi'r,"("Cil0ri vvi h iieri�In on Wait er Fo -man r City Clerk .l Id REPORT FOR 4/14/95 _____________ ______________=-_-____ _-____-_-_______ Florida Department of Transportation ==11 it Arterial Level of Service Tables I1 Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II ART TAB Version 1.1 II Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.McLeod, W.McShane, and G.Brown II DESCRIPTION —II 11 ROAD NAME: BRICKELL AVE 11 »»> PEAK DIRECTION: NB II Study Time Period: PM PEAK II Analysis Date: APRIL 13, 1995 II Number of Lanes: 4 II AADT: 22000 I I User Notes: OPTIMIZATION II II TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS II —Range— it K FACTOR: 0.085 (0.06 - 0.20) 11 D FACTOR: 0.550 (0.50 - 1.00) II PHF: 0.950 (0.70 -1.00) 11 ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 (1400 - 2000) II % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 21 (0 -100) 11 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS II URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR II II RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U II ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) II FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) ll For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: II 11 Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 II Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 II Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 II Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 11 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.633 II II MEDIANS (Y/N): Y II TURN BAYS (Y/N): Y II SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS II NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 II II ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) II TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) II (1=Actuated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Semiactuated) II SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) it WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.70 (0.20 - 0.Mbmiftod into" the public recar n conncet'o nrr >7 item _14... on Walter Foernan CitV Clerk REPORT FOR 4/14/95 11 j( PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME {j II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II ({ 6.319115 Intersections per mile (( II Level of Service it II A B C D E II II LANES II ll 1 N/A N/A 1,040 1,390 1,570 (( (( 2 N/A N/A 2,180 2,940 3,200 (( 3 N/A N/A 3,360 4,460 4,850 l( 4 NIA N/A 4,480 6,080 6,530 II II II PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) -II ll (j (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II ({ 6.319115 Intersections per mile (( 11 Level of Service j( (( A B C D E ({ (j LANES II II 2 N/A N/A 1,890 2,530 2,850 (( (( 4 NIA N/A 3,950 5,350 5,820 II 6 NIA NIA 6,110 8,110 8,810 () II 8 NIA N/A 8,140 11,050 11,860 {j II AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) II II (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) II jj 6.319115 Intersections per mile {j II Level of Service II (( A B C D E II II LANES II (( 2 NIA NIA 22,200 29,800 33,500 j{ II 4 N/A NIA 46,500 62,900 68,400 j( (( 6 N/A N/A 71,800 95,400 103,700 (i jj 8 NIA N/A 95,800 130,000 139,600 ll it (( NIA means 11 the level of service is not achievable --II II II ({ Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full hourll (( Level of Service i( (( LANES A B C D E II li 1 NIA N/A 0.62 0.83 0.93 j{ II 2 N/A N/A 0.65 0.87 0.95 II j( 3 NIA N/A 0.67 0.88 0.96 (( (( 4 N/A N/A 0.67 0.90 0.97 II Submitted ic7tc} 11'ic' C�c..shlic rBCOr n Ct7nl� c:j.on with item on �� Water Foeman 9 5 _ 50 City Clerk 9 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SW 8TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SW8BRK-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ---- POCKET--- ,j APP_ LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) 1{ EB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 100 SB 5 2 600 2 100 0 0 j MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN % THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 380 103 204 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 199 0 330 150 1.00 1.00 NB 0 895 70 15 1.00 1.00 SB 54 722 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 380 103 204 50 WB 199 0 330 150 NB 0 895 70 15 SB 54 722 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT .90 .95 .90 .90 .90 Submitted into 96e public. 90 record . 'n canna On k th item on !L �.' Walter i-oeman 1';f%1 Oinrle HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR WB L R NB TR SE LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 6 39 32 20 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT -HEAVY -VEHICLES J{ EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- ----- ----- LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- -- ---- ----- 2 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING J NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 3 3 3 3. 0 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y s 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 N N N N 28rj@mittecp§nt8 the �@bl% 20.0 recor� �n nnecti n � t item ►ry�0 on _ �, 9 7 -oeman Walter y City Clerk J HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW STH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT -- EB~ ^L- -380 1.00 380 .90 422 L 422 2 1.00* 422 1.00 .00 T 103 1.00 103 .95 108 TR 279 2 1.00* 279 .00 .61 R 204 1.00 204 .90 171+ WB L 199 1.00 199 .90 221 L 194 1 1.00 194 1.00 .00 T 0 1.00 0 .90 0 LR 127 1 1.00 127 .12 .79 R 330 1.00 330 .90 200+ R 100 1 1.00 100 .00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 942 2 1.00* 942 .00 .00 T 895 1.00 895 .95 942 R 61 1 1.00 61 .00 1.00 R 70 1.00 70 .90 61+ SB L 54 1.00 54 .90 60 L 60 2 1.00* 60 1.00 .00 T 722 1.00 722 .95 760 T 760 3 1.00* 760 .00 .00 i R 0 1.00 0 .90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user -----SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET---- Ideal s °i Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. j Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow -- aLTvphg - - - - --- ----- ------- ---- ---- --- ---- ------ "'� EB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 .890 1.00 .900 .908 1.00 2664 WB L 1800 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1524 LR 1800 l 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .882 .994 1406 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 NB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 .800 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1181 SB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 T 1900* 3 1.000 .990 1.000 .930 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 4723 * Value set by uV&e [)Mitt03d into the puhiit; record Ill Conne'G' iU - l� 5 r� item Q_._ ex�� �� � � - � :Y Waite r c nn 1; � t:ity C(eer;; 1 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SW 8TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ---------------------------- v s --- v/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio ----- ----- (vph) ----- Ratio ----- ---- EB * ----- L ----- 422 2951 .14 .30 898 .47 TR 279 2664 .10 .30 811 .34 WB * L 194 1524 .13 .20 305 .64 LR 127 1406 .09 .20 281 .45 R 100 1181 .08 .20 236 .42 NB * T 942 3386 .28 .37 1237 .76 R 61 1181 .05 .37 431 .14 SE* L 60 2951 .02 .06 180 .33 T 760 4723 .16 .44 2095 .36 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit - .57 Xc = .61 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec ' LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) - /veh) Fact Grp. ---- /veh) LOS -- /veh) LOS - --- EBL.47 - .30 - 24.7 898.3 1.00 L 25.0 C 24.5 C TR .34 .30 23.6 811 .1 1.00 TR 23.7 C WB -L .64 .20 32.0 305 3.0 1.00 L 35.1 D 33.1 D LR .45 .20 30.7 281 .8 1.00 LR 31.6 D R .42 .20 30.6 236 .8 1.00 R 31.3 D NB T .76 .37 24.4 1237 2.0 1.00 T 26.4 D 25.9 D R .14 .37 18.6 431 .0 1.00 R 18.6 C SB L .33 .06 39.3 180 .4 1.00 L 39.8 D 17.9 C KT .36 .44 16.1 2095 .0 1.00 T 16.2 C Cycle=1;§n119:tCl (rota tht, public Intersection 24.4 C record i' I C(Wlnlec item onitb ion wr f) ,. v 0,ite - Foeman , City Clerk HCH Summary Results for Case: SUHHH-C SU 8TH ST /BRICHELL AVE FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECTVersion 2.83 II I X Delay 722 I I I Lane v/s vrc (Sec/ 54 i 1 I App Grou Ratio Ratio Leh) LOS I I I 1330 EB *L .14 .47 25.0 C III IIII(�I I TR .10 .34 23.7 C �Itlil 'I 1199 All 24.5 C UB *L .13 .64 35.1 D LR .09 .45 31.6 D R .08 .42 31.3 D All 33.1 D MD *T .28 .76 26.4 D R .05 .14 18.6 C All 25.9 D SD *L .02 .33 39.8 D T .16 .36 16.2 C All M 9 C Intersect .57 .61 24.4 C I II 38e--� I 1`111 204 I I I I 70 I I 895 1 IL 2 i 3 4 6 3 39 iIl 4 1 3322 4 1 28 4 1 Submitted into the public record �I fC�onn t'on tivi item YEN. on�� Walter Foeman 5 City Cleric HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SW 7TH ST SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: ANALYSIS DATE: 04-07-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECT CASE: SW7BRK-C INTERSECTION GEOMETRY i LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- EB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 i NB 4 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB LT 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 I�I SB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS ------------------------------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 0 0 0 0 j `A WB 71 390 23 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 330 1476 44 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 i SB 0 653 215 97 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS ---------------------- ----------------- ,,j APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 1 EB 0 0 0 0 WB 71 390 23 17 Submitt gPPnto the. P5bliC .90 NB 330 1476 44 30 record ' 9uvnnect or?�vi t • 90 i SB 0 653 215 97 item on�95� 90 r� Walter Foeman 9 City Clerk HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ---------------- CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WB LTR NB LTR TR SB TR L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 39 37 26 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 All Red 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES ---------------------- " EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ---- ---- 50 ----- 50 ----- 50 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS St.bmiuczb is5to thel f)LIBliC 14.5 record in connecti n i item �_ on 9 � Walter oeman City Clerk 545 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** ------------------===-=VOLUME ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- WB L 71 1.00 71 .90 79 LT 490 2 1.00* 490 .16 .00 T 390 1.00 390 .95 411 R 7 1 1.00 7 .00 1.00 R 23 1.00 23 .90 7+ NB L 330 1.00 330 .90 367 L 367 2 1.00* 367 1.00 .00 T 1476 1.00 1476 .95 1554 TR 1570 2 1.00* 1570 .00 .01 R 44 1.00 44 .90 16+ SB L 0 1.00 0 .90 0 T 687 2 1.00* 687 .00 .00 T 653 1.00 653 .95 687 R 131 1 1.00 131 .00 1.00 R 215 1.00 215 .90 131+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal s Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. APP P Grou S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- --g-- ---- ---- --a- ---- ---- ---- F WB LT 1800 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .992 3214 R 1950* 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1492 NB L 1800 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .920 2951 TR 1850* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3290 i, SB T 1900* 2 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3386 R 1950* 1 1.000 .990 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1477 �+ * Value set by,;u;,q,�:r:�r into the publiC in (;onne ' IOil� ivet±7 21UL on a, %falter FOCY an City Clerk. 1 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. 1995 BACKGROUND VOLUMES /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s V/s g/C c X Lane Adj. Flow Adj. Sat. Flow Green Capacity v/c App. ---- Group ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) ------ ----- ----- ----- Ratio ----- _ry WB * LT 490 3214 .15 .25 810 .60 R 7 1492 .00 .25 376 .02 ~� NB L 367 2951 .12 .35 1026 .36 * TR 1570 3290 .48 .71 2346 .67 SB T 687 3386 .20 .35 1178 .58 R 131 1477 .09 .35 514 .25 i * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = .63 Xc = .65 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec i LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET f ` --- Delay 1 --- -- Delay 2- --- By Lane Group -- -Approach- X g/C di c d2 PF Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp. /veh) LOS /veh) LOS WB LT .60 .25 28.8 810 .9 1.00 LT 29.8 D 29.7 D R .02 .25 24.6 376 .0 1.00 R 24.6 C 4ru1 NB L .36 .35 21.2 1026 .1 1.00 L 21.3 C 10.0 B TR .67 .71 6.9 2346 .5 1.00 TR 7.4 B ( I SB T .58 .35 23.3 1178 .6 1.00 T 23.9 C 23.3 C R .25 .35 20.4 514 .1 1.00 R 20.5 C i i Intersection Cycle = 115 Submitted into fhe public 16.4 C record 'n connect'ongi I 1 item l0 on � q J Walter t-oeman Citv C 1prk J HCH Sumary Results for Case: SV7BRX-C SU 7TH ST MICHELL AVE 1995 BACHGROUND VOLUMES FUTURE B.G. AND PROJECTUersion 2.03 653 1 1 1 X Delay I I I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 215 I I I App Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I I I � 23 390 71 WE *LT .15 .60 29.0 D R .00 .02 24.6 C All 29.7 D NB L .12 .36 21.3 C *TR .48 .67 7.4 B All 10.8 B SB T .20 .58 23.9 C R .09 .25 20.5 C All 23.3 C Intersect .63 .65 16.4 C I II I I 1 I I III { II I II l I I 330 44 I I l 1476 1 2 3 t_ 39 11f 3 37 f1 r 4 1 26 4 1 Suomi ed Into the public' r-.:corU iri cornea ion with steam � on � Walter Foeman City Clerk `^ ' -TAB 3 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER SITE UTILITY STUDY Prepared for Brickell on the River, Inc. by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 May, 1995 Submitted into the public recurW-o4oN2 Sitem City Clerk 9 J — 5?1 9 7 7 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER SITE UTILITY STUDY I. Drainage A. Drainage Area The site which is located on S.E. 5th Street West of Brickell Avenue has approximately 180 feet of frontage on 5th Street and it consists of a total of 3.46 Acres. After development, approximately 95% of the site will be impervious areas and i approximately 5% of the site will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas rim - off. The coefficient of run-off is arrived at as follows: 0.95 (impervious) x 0.90 = 0.855 +0.05 (pervious) x 0.30 = 0.015 overall coefficient 0.87 B. Existina Drainage System The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system in S.E. 5th Street. However because this site is undeveloped, it does not contribute any significant amount of stormwater run-off to the street. The existing roadway system is of sufficient capacity to handle the present conditions. C. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system of this building will consist of drainage wells which will allow the stromwater runoff to be fully contained on -site. No off -site runoff is anticipated from this building. It is anticipated that five drainage wells will be sufficient to handle the run-off (See Table 1 for drainage calculations). The stromwater will be collected thru a system of catch basin inlets and transported by pipes to the well locations. The wells will allow the stormwater to flow into the Biscayne Aquifer. The wells will be designed to handle the stromwater runoff and tested for capacity as they are installed. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas will be diverted thru detention structures which will capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the wells. j Submitted into the d record F�ull!!G cor?ne i w, th item oil ry lle ► or�man �r . City Cleric Runoff Generations 1. Total Gross Area a. Impervious b. Pervious 2. Average Runoff Coefficient 3. Design Storm 4. Time of Concentration Table 1 Drainage Calculations 3.46 Acres 95% or 3.29 Acres 5% or 0.17 Acres (.95) (.9) + (.05) (.3) = 0.87 5 years 10.00 min 5. Rainfall Intensity 6.10 in/hr 6. Peak Runoff (Q) = CiA (.87) (6.10) (3.46) = 18.36 CFS Assume each 24" diameter drainage well flows at 650 gpm per foot of head - using 3 feet of head 3 x 650 gpm = 1,950 gpm per well 1,950 gpm = 4.31 CFS (Peak runoff) 18.36 CFS = 4.25 Wells (Flow per well) 4.31 CFS Provide 5 - 24" diameter wells Detention Tank: Providing 1 1/2 minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,950 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,950 gpm x 1.5 min = 2,925 gal/tank or 391 Ft'each. Provide 5 tanks each with the following interior dimensions: 6' (width) x 7' (height) x 10' (length) = 420 Ft3 Provide 5 tanks w/420 FT volume each Submitted Into tho public recorA1-1600n nnU "i' n h item Walter --oeman City Clerk 95— , �+ v � i . 7 II. Water Distribution The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operations a 12 inch water main located in S.E. 5th Street. The developers of this project will continue this 12-inch water main along S.E. 5th Street, from its present end to the East boundary of their property. The water connections to serve the building will be done from the new 12-inch main on 5th E Street. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic water and irrigation water. No on -site wells are planned for this project. ��..� The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes ,.' Residential Apartments 508 Apts. @ 200 G.P.D/Apt. 101,600 gal. l Office 17426 Ft2 @ 10 G.P.D./100 Ft2 1742 gal. Restaurant 4430 Ft' @ 1 Seat/ 50 Ft' @ 50 gpd/seat 221,500 gal Hotel 325 Units @ 100 GPD/Unit 32,500 aal 140,272 gal Total flow demand 140,000 G.P.D. III. Sanitary Sewer The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 15 inch gravity sewer line along S.E. 5th Street. It is anticipated that a single gravity connection to the 15 inch line will be sufficient to serve this project. No pump station will be built on -site to serve the project. Table 3, below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Submitted into the public record i onne;cL on U�ith item _� - on -�j3� 1 Vvalto r I-c:- tan City Clork 915- 597 i Table 3 Sewage Flows Average Flow (from Table 2) Average Flow Peak Flow 97 x 3.5 IV. Solid Waste Generation 140,000 G.P.D. 97 G.P.M. 340 G.P.M. Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standardized on -site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided by either private hauling companies and/or The City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's Disposal or Recycling facilities. The projected volumes of solid waste generation are shown in Table 4, below. Table 4 Solid Waste Generation Residential Apartments (508 Apts @ 1.42 tons/units x 2000 lbs. #/ton)/365 days = Office (17,426 Ft2 @ 2.58 lbs./Ft--)/365 days Restaurant (4,430 Ft2 @ 14.12 lbs./Ft2)/365 days Hotel (288,736 Fe @ 2.25)/365 days MocABrickell.Riv Total 3,952 lbs. 123 lbs. 171 lbs 1.780 tbs. 6.0 66 tbs Submitted into the public record corn E� OO. E�� th r _ 1 r item on� Walter Foeman City Ciork WNW mow omw kvtw wmw WNW omw 6" ww BRICKELL ON THE RIVER REPORT ON THE ECONIMIC AND TAX BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI Prepared for Brickell on the River, Inc. by Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A.. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 May, 1995 SL'brn;tted into tijn. public, recora,conniccie-ion with on1 3, Walter Foeman City Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS r TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY OF BENEFITS 1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction 3 Objectives 3 Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact 3 Direct and Indirect Effects 4 Measures of Economic Impact 5 ' Description of Results 6 j THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 7 E DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE INDICATOR l Impact Indicators 8 Results of Indicators 8 Impact of Construction 9 Impact of Operations 9 Y� Impact on Local Tax Revenues 9 RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Employment 10 Wages 11 Output 12 Taxes 13 1. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost 15 Impact Fees 15 i SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 16 i y� t MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES 17 EXHIBITS 20 � Sui)iiliv..!;(l i''i[va i't^r.:)ilFil i c recorditern ���C:U;"i�ler;'�;})�,il Walter Fo � t, eman :. S 91 ., City Clem{ BRICKELL ON THE RIVER SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Resident and Visitor spending impacting to Local Businesses: • Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail Submitted into the public recor�n�� �come Finn w' h item `Ids_ on' U' a!te Fj. eman C,st p Clerk The following table summarizes the economic impact of the4 4 Brickell on the River development: 1 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS) Construction Period Imp -act Annual Impact Economic Activity Stimulated: (Output) $146,023,554 $15,029,195 Taxes 8,231,206 4,879,785 Wages 31,572,000 5,076,540 Total $185, 826, 760 $24, 985, 520 Jobs created 352 300 Submitted into the pubiiC recur' j�rconnec Iozn vi1h ~\ : \ � INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS } � . a � \ � � \ � � � � \ ( t . [ { � � ( ( SUtmƒ@g A ( ® pu0l� moor, ! 0 ( « m A }. _k \— / a�rclr \ ? Qy erg BRICKELL ON THE RIVER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of Brickell on the River Condominium (the Project). The Project is on a 3.46 gross acre site on the southern bank of the Miami River next to the Metromover station. It incorporates luxury residential and condominium hotel components. The Project will be composed of two buildings in varied heights containing a total of five hundred and eight residential units and three hundred and twenty-five hotel units. Amenities include a swimming pool, lap pool, club room and exercise room. The project will also incorporate a retail area which will house retail shops as well as a restaurant. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both the development and operational phases of the project. Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of The City of Miami. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 1 The construction and subsequent operation of the project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new Vieconomic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct 1 benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from maintenance of �1 the apartment units and from the operation of the retail area. ` 0brlitted into the public in c:onn itt �r pp 'lh � w t _ on . G 3 UValter t=oe nan ChY Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Salaries to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again respend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect and induced benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern industrial society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. Submitted in,o thn (>>.ibiic record �i-1cc�rznc�r:��r w'th itetri Walter F()emari 4 CiT Clerk J BRICKELL ON THE RIVER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator, as a multiple of the initial, direct e fect. For instance, a multiplier of " 1 " would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact was 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact was 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in The City of Miami. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in Local emp]gyment. wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and health benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households at their place of residence. • Direct Expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project. • Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described above. 5 oOubmitted lnf.) fl'in t'lLliil(C i,)n wI h Item. orl "'alter F oeman City Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Des cription tion of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: I (1) Development e (2) Operational 'x Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the operation of the Project. d into il,e public Pe:;OfCiC'Cti;"•— , ( )rl "titll Cily Clerk 6 95- 59i 4 t' r-� 1 i BRICK -ELL ON THE RI'FR TBE PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 jjj 1 t: �f 7 Submitted into the public record i m ^o i(In with "on�- — �t� i BRICKELL ON THE RIVER PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The proposed Project is a luxury residential and condominium hotel complex located on a 2.37 net acre parcel at Southeast Fifth Street and the Miami River. Construction is expected to commence in March of 1996. The construction period is expected to be 36 months. 7 80ubmitted into the, public record i connecti' itern 1rJ on �13,2 — — p Walter FO man Cibl Clerk J C � , �j i RRICKELL ON TIRE RIVER DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE INDICATOR k rw! t I rec()rct ttF?rif aY.j��tj7l�"1 h { -Jam`{jj�jG Jtiyf �j+Jdlterr I POeMan Cliy Ch rk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE INDICATOR Impact Indicators We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator uo tput is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development One - Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 352 $31,572,000 $86,724,284 59,299,270 $8,231,206 $126,527,490 59,299,270 Total Development Impact 352 $31,572,000 $146,023,554 $8,231,206 $185,826,760 Operational Annual i -- I Direct Indirect 300 $5,076,540 $7,643,000 7,386,195 $4,879,785 $17,599,325 7,386,195 Total Operational Impact 300 $5,076,540 $15,029,195 $4,879,785 1 $24,985,520 Total Economic Impact 652 $36,648,540 $161,052,749 $13,110,991 $210,812,280 Submitted into the ptih!ie recur&.ieponnr:,K;'1-n viit-ernon Walior, Fo. rnan 8 City Clerk (j+1 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF INDICATOR Impact of Construction: The approximately $87 million for site preparation and construction expenditures within Greater Miami would create approximately 352 new full time equivalent jobs with the maximum number of 552 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $31.6 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the above chart spending for site preparation and project construction would result in a total estimated impact of $177.5 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct site preparation and project construction expenditures and the multiplied effects of resulting indirect benefits and induced benefits. Impact of Store Operations and Mall Management As a result of the on -going operations of the various retail area business and management of the Project, Greater Miami will gain approximately 300 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $5 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations and from residents' spending will provide a new, permanent impact of $20 million annually to the County's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance of residential units and residents' spending as well as the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, Dade County would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of $8.2 million and an estimated annual tax benefit of $4.9 million. The specific entities receiving these revenues are shown on page 14. Submitted into the public reco d in conneci; i item 7 on tWiller Foeman 9 City %IfTr•!r €95® V5 97 I BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Submitted into thr- P'U1-'l e record n c:onnc for #"Ath item on 'qP Walter Foeman City Cleric, BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the maintenance of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to The City of Miami by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for The City of Miami residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the condo owners in area businesses. Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going operations (maintenance) of the management company and the related sales, marketing and administrative efforts as well as the on -going operations of the retail and entertainment outlets. As can be seen in Exhibit 1, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 352 employees over a two year period and the total on -going employment will average 300. The total on going positions can be summarized as follows: • Retail Stores • Leasing/Marketing/Administration • Management • Security/Police • Parking • Maintenance and Clean -Up Additional employment will be created by business nez 'employees spending within the Stu mi ted into the public Greater Miami area. rector ��}}'��,��connec;t of ' h itemr,_, i on �: J Walter P-oel: an 10 Cify Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Examples of such businesses include restaurants, retail sales, service stations, recreation businesses, etc. Since businesses serve residents and visitors alike, and generate only a portion of their income from the above type of expenditures, the portion of employment that can be attributed to the above type of expenditures can only be estimated. This is done by investigating the pattern of these expenditures and relating such figures to business receipts and employment in The City of Miami. From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in The City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: Eating/Drinking Grocery Auto Rental Other Transportation Service Station ,t Recreation Retail These expenditures are then used to compute the impact of the spending by new residents to The City of Miami area. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such w� as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. J Submitted into tl:e public record in co-ne ion (weigh itemLJ_ 1' alter Foeman 11 City Clerk y5= 97 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Developer cost expended in Miami (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of Management Company • New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners • Annual operational expenditures of the retail stores. Exhibit 2 shows a summary of the development of cost expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in The City of Miami, a multiplier was applied to total direct output created by visitor spending. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. The multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. We tested the reasonableness of the multiplier used by comparing it to both economist and the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consists of land acquisition and site preparation, soft cost and hard cost which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. To incorporate the effect of res endin and reinvesting in Greater Miami we applied P g g pp ed a multiplier sto the total direct output. This created total output created from the development phase of the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami another $96.64 will `j be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. 12 Submitted into ti'i+�-) public record 4,1 conr7E-ctnia i �• itf itern Vdal'lclr Rieman City Clerk 95— 597 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $86,724,284. Total indirect and induced output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $59,299,270. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of Brickell on the River is $146,023,554. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the retail businesses that are a part of the project and the indirect and induced benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. To determine direct operating expenditures we used as a basis, annual operating proformas for the maintenance of the condo units. An overall assumption was made that all maintenance expenditures would be spent initially in The City of Miami. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operations for the condominium units except for wages. The impact on wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $7,643,000. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $7,386,195. Total indirect output created from ongoing operations $15,029,195. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and non -ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Specific non -ad valorem taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. .pub mittt�rl into the ;Jublic recor !r! c�,lirleG c item one 9 _ 9 ;� Walter Forman 13 City Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The total real property taxes, expected to be generated annually are $4,879,785. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. Annual One -Time City Operating $1,505,762 $2,539,914 Schools 1,490,625 2,514,381 County Operating 1,137,694 1,919,058 Debt Service - City 330,344 557,223 Debt Service - County 128,153 216,169 South Florida Water 77,959 131,500 Library Operating 53,802 90,754 School Debt Service 132,075 222,783 Florida Inland Navigation 7,686 12,965 Environmental Projects 15,685 26,459 Total $4,879,785 $8,231,206 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. Subrnitte7d irim the public record in conne(,ii�rh � °i.�.th item-- on c UVaIcer-oamarl 14 {_ s ,.. City Clerk 9 5 S 0 7 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Submitted into tfie public McOrAconnecl Ion.. vj r.- r item tKe BRICKELL ON THE RIVER "'mot OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which involves increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and I the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek +' to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services • Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infra structure) • Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objectives to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did believe it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. Impact Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being measured (Miami) specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. These fees are detailed in Exhibit VIII. art, f, �he direct For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees aFoax4G1l-1 IM�a tp o��u �c development cost (output). Impact fees total $1,377,729 Z&ar Te&k-mic ' �s t t�„srt on r `17 VJalter Foeman t" 15 Ciiy Ctork i 1 i i t i i r BRICIO L ON THE RIVER 5UIVDVIARY AND CONCLUSIONS y 9iq 3 ' �J f ' 2 `s Submitted into tfte pubtiC record in confsecii tII ith item � can "�.W { i�J�Tiwr i C);1I71;In 9 — j �� �� BRICKELL ON THE RIVER SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of Brickell on the River, it appears evident that such a luxury development can clearly bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on Greater Miami as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the Project direct employment and employment created in the surrounding community through new residents spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 352 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the t Project and operation of retail stores will be approximately 300. Tax Revenue The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other Jrevenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: City $8,231,206 Annual $4,879,785 Output The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost, operational expenditures and residents spending and employee spending. To determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $146,023,554 Annual $15,A r}P��od fwo tflo pUblic rocord i1rr corfrier. fo 1 vv�h item _1' ! ( or, 16 lllla1Wr Fwa )pan City , BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES Patron expenditures in business establishments constitute the primary and most direct economic benefits. These direct expenditures represent receipts to businesses from which employment and tax payments to state and local government are derived, and from which business owners and proprietors earn a livelihood. Direct expenditures of patrons produce additional economic benefits as those businesses receiving them purchase supplies and services locally and elsewhere, creating an additional round of demand for other firms in the area. These businesses in turn purchase the supplies and services they need to operate, and through successive rounds of purchases that initial direct expenditures of visitors spread throughout the local and regional economy. Similar new demands for goods and services are generated by the expenditures of employees in those firms receiving visitor expenditures, and similarly employees in those firms which respond to successive rounds of demand. Output of goods and services generated after direct visitor expenditures is called indirect output, and direct plus indirect output is called total output. Indirect output can be seem in terms of two components: secondary output, that which relates directly to the indirect demand created as each i Finn purchases the good and services which it needs to operate; and induced output, which is the indirect output generated by employee purchases of good and services. The ratio of total output to direct expenditures can be represented by a multiplier, a value typically between 1.5 and 2.5. A ratio of 1.8 means that for every dollar expended in the local economy by a visitor, an additional $.80 of output (additional sales) in the local economy is ultimately created by the indirect purchases of businesses and employees. ' The magnitude of a multiplier relates to: (1) the extent of economic leakage that characterizes a community or region; and (2) the nature of the firms that receive the direct expenditures. The effect of leakage shows the magnitude of successive rounds of expenditures in a local economy a� as each firm or employee spends the funds received. Looking at the first round of expenditure, ✓L each initial dollar of visitor expenditure is attenuated by purchases for goods or services made outside the local area (called "imports"). Such purchases do not create any additional output for firms or individuals in the local economy. The figure illustrates a situation where 60 percent of l such purchases are made outside the area, leaving $.40 of the original dollar to create additional demand in the local economy. During the second round of expenditures an additional 60 percent leaks out of the area leaving $.16 to create additional Wcal o Bc'into the public recor to conneelipn Witt) #ens �0 on _ 17 Walter Fooman Cif v Clerk r _ r r; 1.7 I -J BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES This process continues until no significant new output is created by the additional expenditures. Each successive round of expenditures have been called turnover, and the number of rounds before. total attenuation is the number of times a dollar "turns over" in an economy. This is a very imprecise term with little substantial meaning. The multiplier representing the economy represented here would be calculated by adding all of the output created by each successive round of expenditures and dividing that amount by $1, the initial expenditure. This multiplier for the City of Miami amounts to 1.9664. Actual multiplier values are calculated by large research studies of transactions among all sectors of an economy using complex mathematical models which account for interactions among all sectors, leakages, the effects of household demand, payments to local and other government, and changes in inventories. Each such analysis represents a particular economy at a specific point in time. As an economy evolves, in particular as the patterns of trade change during periods of growth, inter -industry transactions alter, and multipliers and other representations of economic structure also change. For this reason these models are periodically updated using current transactions data. Multiplier values relate to the nature of an economy and to the particular sector under consideration. Relatively undeveloped economies which provide only limited offerings of goods and services tend to exhibit low multipliers. Examples are rural areas, communities and states with highly specialized economies. Much of the indirect demand for goods and services leaks out of these economies to large and/or more diverse areas nearby that have better selections of goods and services. Sectors of the economy with relatively low multipliers are those that import a high proportion of the supplies and services they need from surrounding areas, since the purchase of such imports constitutes a leakage out of the local economy. Examples of types of firms that often exhibit high leakage and low multipliers are gasoline stations, automobile dealers, and manufacturing firms that import a large proportion of their raw materials. Submitted into ti3n pi.iblic record in connect'on it stem 'lq on 18 Walter Foeman 5; 9 7 City Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES Sectors with lower leakages and higher multipliers include those which are relatively labor intensive, such as food or beverage services, accommodations, farming and a variety of other small-scale activities. Sections characterized by relatively high wages also can exhibit large multipliers due to the large induced demand that these wages create in the local economy. Indirect economic effects are particularly important for the visitor industry because of the relatively low wages and seasonal employment that characterize many visitor industry firms. While this direct employment may be appropriate primarily for those who are young, seeking entry-level positions or who want only part-time and/or seasonal work, the employment created by indirect effects is higher paying, more stable, spread throughout the economy, and does not differ substantially from the indirect employment created by any other economic activity. Submitted into the public record in connec on with item '��1V on-3 1_ 19 Walter Foeman City CI?rk 9 55 Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 F<< Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 i .t Exh bi 6 a Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Ca BRICKELL ON THE RIVER EXHIBIT LIST Summary of all Economic Benefits Summary of Direct Economic Benefits Computation of Indirect Economic Benefits Schedule of project Development Cost Computation of Ad Valorem Taxes Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Operating Assumptions Impact and Other Fees Submitted into the p1ji11iC recor� �n,,,�conr�erti item L!� on VJul,�r, ^fin � � �, 20 City Gi;, rk i BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT EXHIBIT I OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES $86,724,284 $31,572,000 352 $8,231,206 7,643,000 5,076,540 300 4,879,785 $94,367,284 $36,648,540 652 $13,110,991 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS t� �q jj TAXES PHASE # OF EMPLOYEE WAGES DIRECT COST AD VALORUM # DEVELOPMENT PHASE LAND;: $4,000,000 $497,752 Jj PROJECT COST -MARKETING 340 12 $30,876,000 57,361,000 696,000 11,304,000 7,733,454 FINANCING ;COSTS; 14,059,284 i 5UH TOTAL: 352 $31,572,000 $86,724,284 $8,231,206 OPERATIONS PHASE 300 5,076,540 7,643,000 4 879,785 TOTAL :DIRECT BENEFITS 652 $36 648 540 $94 367 284 $13t110,99 i J �5 4 44F i 9J Submitted ir,o tijo p1j)lic C. i f record � �in�,5co ,rick"( n vitt� item on Walter aernan . '` City Clerk BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS EXHIBIT III TOTAL APPLICABLE COMPUTED INDIRECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIER BENEFIT Submitted into ti,)ec record i curineciiu i�wit item Waller FoUllizan c1tlj cleric BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST EXHIBIT IV % SPENT IN TYPE OF COST DADE AMnrr*rm SUbmitteld into fhe public recorlWon nnElCkn vvit i item t q Walter Foeman City Clerk J .emu i.a.5`1i�,j 3tE.v�.i�� t�:sw� n.h!:acc€:0 p'ca�w te�.cruas.� ensmi r'�.:a.;q ricnw.�f.*v+V R+Y? + mom 1 � BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DEVELOPMENT PHASE TOTAL DESCRIPTION 1996 1997 1998 1999 ONE TIME $24,371,389 $53,617,056 $82,862,722 $87,737,000 NET CONDO BASIS $24,371,389 $53,617,056 MILLAGE•TAX RATE:. 3.11% 3.11% COMPUTED R/E TAX.,. $758,182 $1,668,000 LAND' VALUE $4,000,000 $4,000,000 MILLAGE.TAX RATE. 3.11% 3.11% COMPUTED R/E TAX; $124,438 $124,438 TOTAL $882,620 $1,792,438 CO W G 3 o cr co Ca. c:n f 0 o Q =a j""Ct f�, ,� 0 $82,862,722 $87,737,000 3.11% 3.11% $2,577,818 $2,729,454 $7,733,454 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 3.11% 3.11% $124,438 $124,438 $497,752 $2,702,256 $2,853,892 $8,231,206 EXHIBIT V ANNUAL RECURRING $169,558,370 12,700,000 $156,858,370 I 3.11% $4,879,785 � 7 a� f .;l p BRICKELL ON THE RIVER EXHIBIT VI ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES ALLOCATION ALLOCATION OF APPLICABLE OF ANNUAL ONE TIME DESCRIPTION BASIS MILLAGE TAXES RATIO TAXES Ga }� of �i�am Operat9ng $156,858,370 9.5995 $1,505,762 30.86% $2,539,914 5�h0 1 Op ra � 8 8 156 5 370 $ r , 0 0 9 5 3 4 0 6 5 1 9 2 $ , , 30 5$ 5 2 514 38 S r r 1 Dry.,,�..;CpUn�y:::.;<;:.1?;;;:•;>:.;;�'.;;:;.;::��:::<z:::;::>:::.•:.;::s>s:»>:;a;:::;:.;;:>;;:.:::�s:<;:.;»::»; 1 6 858 370 5 $ , r 7. 530 2 6 1 137 94 $ , r 2 3.31 0 8 $1,919, 5 $156, 858, 370 2.1060 $330, 344 6. 77% $557, 223 .:�..:�;.::..:..:::u11•�Y:�::.::;:.<:�,:;::::•::.:�::::.::::::::.:::::::::::::::..::..:::.:::::::::.�::::::::: 6 858 370 1512 S ,$ 0.8170 8 3 , 15 6 � 2. 3 $216,169 South Floz�c�a. �a� x M n..,gement„.�zstrx..t 8 0 15 6 5 8 3 7 $ , , 0.4 9 7 0 $77, 9 5 9 6� 1. 0 $131,500 �. r. x'. �C..3<r"'''>>'`':`>':'s<<:'`'<''>><>':'<`'•''�':'•`•''•.''`''>>':>'�<:'>':>`:?> 1 6 858 370 5 0. 430 3 8 53 02 1.1 0� 90 754 nz'';?»>»>?<%'is?>z'3>>':'zs<sr?>>'s.`•.`•?»>?>z>> Scl aa.l.:;.:.::ebt.::::::.:.::::::•.:�:::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::.�.�::::::::.::::::.:::.�:::::::•:::::: 6 $15 ,858 ,370 84 0 0.2 0 5 $132, 7 2*.71% $222, 783 ;; o>,.<<>::'>::;:< ::;> <>':? #':':':{>';< ;`'?.`' '`•.!s'i>>'.:'`?`s>»>`:>'.<> P`l. r da �.nT.and Nav3.ga ion ��,str�ct Sl 5 6 8 5 8 3 7 0 0.0 4 9 0 $7, 6 8 6 0 .16% $12, 965 .,:�,:><>:>:;>:;�:::::<:::»z'?'•>`'`?''`:'>`<`?:'•??E3>��''<�'#>s##:`•;<3.>'•!?;>` 8 0 15 6 5 8 3 7 $ , 0 0 O 1 0 S1 5 6 8 5 0 3� 2 2 6 4 9 S 5 O'1'saE><`:>`:i?<;>>>'z'E>'"'><<>><.'>''<<;? >`<° ......:: ,_1L:::..:::::...::::,,.: ,.::.:::,...:..,:.::: ,,;::::.::::,,.:::::.::.......::..::: 6 8 70 S 15 , 5 8, 3 31.1095 $ 4, 8 7 9, 7 8 5 100 % $ 8, 2 31, 2 0 6 CD c O O' Ro a. _ = w n =) 0 W7rz cU :D zy ci , BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT VII AMOUNT 1,211,199 905,027 301,742 4,430 1,053,504 827,114 508 1,628 $205 34 15 226,390 325 697 17,426 4,430 300,000 150,871 103,406 58,370 Mar-96 36 $4,000,000 $257,000 $73,000,000 $730,000 $500,000 $11,887,767 $12,000,000 $696,000 $20,847,400 $83,389,600 $1,550,844 $12,508,440 12 300 500 $15.00 $30,000,000 30 10 12 $3,650,000 $2,190,000 $876,000 300 e $12,719,540 tB $5,076,540 $25,000 1.9664 Ibmitted into the publi card,inyconnuc,•�,( IT) r .► i'"' 9 � a.y F �"7 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES EXHIBIT VIII Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department cuL7mitted into thO PUblir .:s�� or : (rlr: 'rf%an " City Clerk 0 7 TAB 5 BOUNDARY SURV.- SCALE 1"• 30' - �• �'- :.P .2/CEP ���/� _Btq,-KIEgD —..._ 1-rErJiV 7Q• .78'i Oq! 000' 'rm Mrta'- '1 TA• a HI,..AryC. *f••1 DEC. AY %V/w•AA•^ POA'! �3 � 5.6f•Sri I kEGAL DESCRIPTION% �� R SPR[A RtW Gne o! LIST Goccnm.! _ --� H bo'•L�n�/P.ge FROM A LTLHCRETE DOCUMENT AT SHE INTERSECTION OF P6E.9:I EASTEI:LT LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE f THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S.E. FIFTH STREET. AS PER PLAT y/[JP RECORDED AT PAGE 93, OF PLAT BOOT. 8, OF THE PUBLIC O.p. RF:COItDS C. DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. RUN NORTH 1 I `� 76.39'35' AEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID - --" S.E FIFTH STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 552.5 FEET TO TIE POINT OF BEGINNING; •T T/IENC6 RUN NORTH 13.20'55' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF t 432.68 FEET TD A POINT IN THE U.S. HARBOR LINE I H ..>� f '•' ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT THE I I 'ILj' ' - PALM TREES NO%HEAST •VRNgR OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; T l ICE RUN HORT ,7a•00'01• WEST ALONG SAID HARBOR I LIME TORR A DISTMICE OF 175.56 FEET TO AN ANGLE IN I� SA HAA00't LINE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 80•a2.26' WEST ALONG SOLD WIRBOR 1 I •- - LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 224.22 FEET TO THE •) � ( NORTHWEST .W. HER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; L THENCE RUN SOUTH 1.51'17' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF CW3'T-(R 1 113.75 FF.T TO A CONCRETE HONUHFM IN THE OF LY rR ,•.'( - ` - NORllIERLY SINE OF THE SAID SE STH STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST •VRNER OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; _ ' •- THENCE RTYI NORTH 88•13'13• EAST -ALONG SAID _ [ NORTHERLY LIKE OF SAID SE STH STREET TOR A - - DISTANCE CF 26. 97 FEET TO. A CONCRETE MONUMENT• MARKING THE LOCATION OF AN ANGLE IN SAID NORTHERLY O.jONRfi' LINE OF SA-0 SE STI STREET. THENCE PU[ SOUTH 76.39'35' EAST A{OtLG� SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SE STH STREET FOR A = ;, •[ • DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGLIVE.R W:T{ ALL AND SINGULAR THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS pp�t TIMAKUNTO SELOtK;[NG OR IK ANY WISE APPERTAINING •' WIIETIER OF COMMON LAW STATUTE LAW, OR OTHERWISE, '• ` \lll AHD SOMMAFS DFSCRIHCD AS T:E WESTERLY PART OF R TOT 1. BLO _K 101• MIAMI SOUTH. BEING 102.45 FEET Al SOUTH ENO AND 299.78 FELT AT NORTH END. •:II TOCCIIIER W RIPARIAN RIGHTS. U ARIHG' F Vd4 HERFOB ARE BASSO ON AN ASSUMED 13.13"EIc,.i13FCIzw/..,AwhJ�c F — 6.97' — j- -� CLFEtiEep_ ..O a h'q� •}�_� b n�eQn ?., ' •ERa' T85 WALL G • :E ^: kN . If CE PO V ' p F,P.L - ARBREVIA 6CINS;- RM RUIWT-0F..VIAT �� tt• p Ts arr. JAT3XT :.a.IL CCMCRETE BLOCK R A•,�wA aTtUCrURI P „M�.,,,•,,, CONC. COvCRET2 ... •T„•.Tan. f.R_r_ fE%.ANENT REFXREMCC 'C ••,v •[,n "ARC MU.C.7 -� •0•C•,a.A wave.. P.C.P. "LAMENT COMTItOL 4 AK•�A P.OAL ro'MT OF "o-MIMO A avr •�•[ f.O.0 - �F}}— " W C •C n .n ro•Nr OF Cor[MD.CE1HlE A ( CE YT'IR UME Rao RESAR a CAP T••r.s s.A••a,Rl DU RECOROm n �"'� A�,L eA•,r (w) .,:A*u. O -� v,[rvn (Cx.f') (RL GLCULATm ,.UNU.prr LINK • �. Yon 11 p c.+ewr[ ovine is 0 •` .A KOD P T �- I33: 6 76'39' JS"E a� AlSxiA.£.0 OTC •✓/aFss/.ir • v_ Llnt 6: L ` ter+ in '� N 76' -39' �S'N� 1V7! R/vtineJ e_ °'Li �a''MAN S.E FIFTH _ STREET <a d3fL4r.V% - • '^I LW lTE4 VAL • CA` l+➢ NI LE rc w. ' �� 'ol . NWOIi•: (•/zl/ J �MM MANHOLE 9� ^+ '} V0Ur WtRE DOWER F0.E w W.NARE �p.A.ri-ibb �-y'%y jj/W (inG l B A•r f`tiuy1 II I8' SO'— W I I Z i W / I Q Ci}v } I z .J o. }� IL W l 4 �o I t10• 3?' —1B' —5� n o-l--- 3; LOCATION -_SKFs7-H SCALE: f•301;: Su/'rcYors I>'OfC:' penotcJ EL•-r�t�en bmscd &17 the 6�� /Yatio�7aL Eell o'ee-'a l�erfiCeL L?atum �cnch il�lai:C ,Pe%crcnc_� _ yle>framo✓er 6- y = ys 8 G bscL: Siodc uiaL.= of cSour/i S.cc S. e. 7,:7 a�e>/ 4B "' Feed Fast` From ca�cfa ba3%. c� c%E. Pro�ocr�y Cor/ser T�F B �'freel; f 6�tii in s Saors�n terC � �baseda/, an I m Bssv ed ,uei':d.I�i, as sor�i �L/onu/r�i1L L.�s/•rn�p'S.ESS> r/T�9�5 u/ ii Ld/�d5ho� fie/e� � were /�c� 6Lls/ ci2d �'ar Edseme��ts Bi�i/oi- .ei�h���u/o71, WE HEREBY CERTIFY; THAT THE ARAO 10-SKETCH OF SURVEY- o• M"n'l o"C""FRO•ansrRul ARO COAI.[R to M l[[T O' OUR AFP•L.OPI TIP FlLdF A[ R[CIMRr IURY[T[0 ARP w.AT,rD iwD[R OUR PR[4 W n rI . ALSO TWAT MR[ ARl ..O Y E lw BOAC —tin ~53IP'OnM MRlpA "ARwATEM o• PR AF3TRACT a T , Y,lt—,t TO,/ RAoa t. glT1Ar.2 RIC:oRP[o w[i1 .l.'a. i ARY.. Cerra M FRO•[RTY. LOCATP• AMD 2 F 7 D[R,fK.AT OF UMMES CI ARDOR A ACIW TO M pnMM W[K ROr [[CO140 AS SUCH 1i10R..AnoR WA/ FOr leouE[rta, ow"A*H0 is [uWK, 1L o—ow 0.' RILL P•t "C" . OF [IAn" "I"Iy'M" TIOwCK HH-6 Mid. < O. � STAWARPA MY FORM lT OIC M)ftU lTA'l 9W" OF LAID W r"TORl In CbAP, ~ Adminlltrativa Cada,p ramt t: Section 472.027, Florlda Scuat,l. NOT VAUD UNLESS SEALED WITH %N FL le( pp {Lf• ..iC Elu ; -. -I t t 4, i' 7t BiALllr, v a F record injcDrulec i n ^,ii!I o n r� ooze :.o s� s3 item �' a4ter Fceman Wit`Lug] /� Clerk. City Cle► c 11=YNE S CItiMM CgWR,. ING �^ �� o•OCR t BY: 9.ram •f_.�.p/y 01 - 71947 is v'.S�rvt=yor.:ej/9-¢ V P'`o�.sis �s TAB G l �M HEE FAR-100 FAR-101 rfj FAR-102 FAR-103 Q FAR-104 v,V FAR-105 FAR-106 FAR-107 FAR-108 FAR-109 FAR-201 FAR-202 FAR-203 ' FAR-204 FAR-205 FAR-206 FAR-207 BRICKELL ON THE RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWING LIST TITLE Zoning Plan FAR Tower I Level I FAR Tower I Level 2 FAR Tower I Level 3 FAR Tower I Level 4-10 FAR Tower I Level 11 FAR Tower I Level 12 FAR Tower I Level 13-44 FAR Tower I Level 45 FAR Tower I Level 46-60 FAR Tower II Level 1 FAR Tower II Level 2 FAR Tower II Level 3-9 FAR Tower II Level 10-11 FAR Tower II Level 12-34 FAR Tower II Level 35-50 FAR Tower II Level 51-52 ubrtt'stiec; info �tifl hll�; recor ire cc?;1rlr�olt n .s itiy .item on UV4ttGr j3 � _ ceman City,Clerk . 0 DRAWING LIST CONTMUED SKEET TITLE L-1.0 Landscape Plan L-1.1 Landscape Planting Plan A-1.01 Roof Site Plan A-3.01 Ground Level Plan A-3.02 Level 2 Plan A-3.03 Level 3 Plan A-3.04 Level 4-8 Plan A-3.05 Level Plan A-3.06 Level 10 Plan A-3.07 Level 11 Plan A-3.08 Level 12 Plan A-3.09 Levels 13-34 Plan A-3.10 Levels 35-44 Plan A-3.11 Levels 45-60 Plan A-6.01 South Elevation A-6.02 West Elevation A-6.03 North Elevation A-6.04 East Elevation A-7.01 Building Section AA A-7.02 Building Section BB SUbmitted info Ih,,rijblba record i connec i n ;ui` item on— 91'— ��7 = = �. Walter i-oemary r City Clerk PROJECT SUMMARY FOR BRICKELL ON THE RIVER B&A Project No: 9318.002 May 1995 The following data summarizes the maximum development allowed at the Brickell on the River project pursuant to SD-7 Zoning Guidelines: A. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Street Frontage: S.E. 5th Street 181.66 L.F. 2. Net Lot Area ............................... 103,406.00 S.F. 3. Gross Lot Area .............................. 179,860.00 S.F. 4. F.A.R. Allowed ..................................... 8.0 Residential F.A.R. (6) ....................... 1,079,160 S.F. Non -Residential F.A.R. (2.25) .................... 404,685 S.F. Bonus F.A.R. allowed toward Non -Residential F.A.R....... 4,430 S.F. 5. Maximum Development Area Allowed ................ 1,443,310 S.F. (179,860 S.F. x 8.0 F.A.R.) includes Bonus F.A.R. 6. F.A.R Provided ..................................... 6.73 7. Maximum Development Area Provided ................ 1,211,199 S.F. Residential F.A.R ............................ 905,027 S.F. Non -Residential F.A.R. ........................ 301,742 S.F. Bonus F.A.R. allowed toward Non -Residential F.A.R ...... 4,430 S.F. S.E. 5th Street S.E. 5th Street Upper Level Interior Sides East Side visual corridor West Side visual corridor River Building Height Required Provided 15' 15' 25' 25' 30' 30' 50' Max. Allowed No Limit 25' —6 " 30' Submitted into the puWla 50' recor in conned o i -h n ,. ltern can Provided V4aa' r f ,;0� yen C. a� t 650'-0" (60 Stories) Tower 1 J --. Brickell on the River Project Summary Page Two 9. Open Space Open Space required ............................. J,1L.3 J.r. Open Space provided ............................. 7,155 S.F. 1. Total Residential F.A.R. provided (including Lobbies, Corridors, Units) . S.F. Tower 1................................ 765,619 S.F. Tower 2................................ 141,938 S.F. Total Residential F.A.R. provided ............... 905,027 S.F. 2. Total Non -Residential F.A.R Tower..................................... None Tower 2................................... 306,162 Total Non -Residential F.A.R...................... 306,162 3. Residential Units Tower 1.................................. 412 Units Tower 2................................... 96 Units Total Units Tower 1 & 2 ....................... 508 Units 4. Residential Unit Mix Tower 1 One Bedroom Units Levels 3 through 12 1074 S.F.............................. 10 Units 953 S.F. ............................. 10 Units 810 S.F. ............................. 10 Units Submitted into the: public record in connection it it .item.- on c� Walter Foernan 9 5 � �r City Clerk BrickeIl on the River Project Summary Page Three Two Bedroom Units Levels 3 through 12 1092 S.F.............................. 10 Units Two Bedroom Units Levels 13 through 44 1428 S.F.............................. 64 Units 1472 S.F.............................. 32 Units 1649 S.F.............................. 32 Units Two Bedroom Units Levels 45 through 60 n- 1472 S.F.............................. 16 Units 1649 S.F.............................. 16 Units 1761 S.F.............................. 32 Units Three Bedroom Units Levels 3 through 12 2016 S.F.............................. 20 Units Three Bedroom Units Levels 13 through 44 2061 S.F.............................. 64 Units 2075 S.F.............................. 64 Units Three Bedroom Units Levels 45 through 60 2061 S.F.............................. 32 Units Total Residential Units Tower 1 ................. 412 Units Tower 2 One Bedroom Units Level 35 through 50 899 S.F ............................... 16 Units 938 S.F.......... ....... ... 16 Units Submitted into the pul�':ic record, cconnec�tio�� wK /'r item on ---�-1 =3� 4 Walter Foeman City clerk r� I Brickell on the River Project Summary Page Four Two Bedroom Units Levels 35 through 50 1312 S.F. 16 Units 1419 S.F. ............................. 16 Units 1432 S.F. ............................. 16 Units Three Bedroom Units Levels 35 through 50 a ;K 1456 S.F.............................. 16 Units Total Residential Units Tower 2 .................. 96 Units 5. Hotel Units Tower 2 Hotel Units Levels 3 through 9 598 S.F. (F1)................................ 7 Units 582 S.F. (F2)................................ 7 Units 583 S.F. (F3)................................ 7 Units 643 S.F. (F4)................................ 7 Units 836 S.F. (135)................................ 7 Units 844 S.F. (F6)................................ 7 Units 823 S.F. (F7) ................................ 7 Units Hotel Units Levels 12 through 34 fT 606 S.F. (Fl) ............................... 23 Units 590 S.F. (F2) ............................... 591 S.F. (F4) 23 Units ro ............................... 23 Units c01, { 595 S.F. (F4) ............................... 23 Units L 865 S.F. (175) ................................ 23 Units . �, U+ 891 S.F. (176) ............................... 23 Units 1' r' 891 S.F. (177) ............................... 23 Units 686 S.F. (178) .............................. 689 S.F. (179) ............................... 23 Units 23 Units 704 S.F. (F10) .............................. 23 Units IE .E 557 S.F. (F11) .............................. 23 Units 684 S.F. (1712) ............................. . 23 Units Total Hotel Units ................................ 325 Units 95- 597 Brickell on the River Project Summary Page Five 022493.BRC 6. Total Number of Parking Spaces Required (Min) ...... 541 Parking Spaces 7. Total Number of Parking Spaces Provided ........... 652 Parking Spaces 8. Excess Parking ................................. 111 Spaces Submitted in,c) t;;e pisl+iio record i conncc' item ' on � 9-5— 557 Walter Feernan City Clerk li ,lf ? W�'Z`s.'rl 1 .t!,.e�'�l4 ..�.,,y f �+}. 7 �0.. tq' r 9} \ � � 1(. ,•. 4f \ a•y,pV ikv �'. �.�`Jt'� p' � �"rt `¢� ��t. :Mc t � N �' Q11 7, � �y^l t, rf�l4�: M.o r ��i ��r �J �-• � � \�\ t I{ ~ �.�1w �.� /�t1\4� :`1 +n1 r W t Y? l� F1l •if.,.y �1SJ NL� �i \ w J i;:•$r42i.CIt �'i /� ' � �� i`i f - '.r ul � 2,.{ •{a• � gg � " r r4}+ryr�,6A+ i j am r LI �V .:"S Yd, }':.�.. ^►1� � . " � 6� (- \ 1. Wt�. �V �`. S�'rt��' 4 .'i,• :�� ., � 1 � d n ti 1y�ait'fa 3 ?t Eh� ��Y �8i► •!Ty tit�a�rinaa �i 6(I ''\f�r�pp�'11 '�!i`�'� 'l�a� i;� r': ' `�tC j�`�ld�l�'A � �?',.w`3T•,;• � t f ` ("f V ,9"�.D diSb 1f "�•4�`` ���+� R�75I. �f�� �.' Lgo /K°� , r(.}`J�i��11 •fir. t } �I {►tp�� f�j; 1,� ��1J � C � �•' IF'.ltsr�i--+��r' �`f �' - _ ��t��: tr .,a�9",� � i! , �I � .. -ats�1� f,I' 6i\ .ry rg n.v2.a6"'1 l I ^yt�ai� ^f,Z'ts�' �t'�"�% "!�. .y// , lf.Ft`.;f�/ F.d.7i .tS'SCi1•Yz 5��r''�ba� r ..r►,' i 4 r i �r: .���� • "' ��J yS,t1}SG �. • � t ,�'z''�1 4�J � f � . Pn'•�ri. � �f �p .,'� '� �� Vr�� �� c� ply �Q tY �j• , i _ "J 07MMUM IRS" rf �` �•. � , r �r, I ; �' } %1 rho —r c Nil "rt r ,�, �t "� '� f i 1rt!a1j.t AH` r tR',�$ �.•aP�f.,�.1 � �,'}`� 4 t �l �• �•. � � +� '{t��Ytitt{�.i',�! ,1';zt t �.A�.y1r i13 .i �va� i +r [ r w 'Ate >, �{� ,• '`•��.�Y �"" L,.� -.t...r Yob �.f ��y i �r� !•. .i !�_, �,.. �s T�� .� 6 ''y.��r.a -''• $ �`N'_i7D_,1 M,i7+�� �frT,,. o-i.{ �lo' � �. S'•+ � s �' ♦� v'0�y�.--- !i t V ; `T�h r C,. G.�i �C �'*rr s ft3rti��f�s 1 � ���`:w � � ;� frrl �1'f' 1!'"/�"�uaa`�:� v� 1� t �x . �'�I �"�-- _� ti�R rat z► r~, � 10 ni"� s.:. '�«r :=+,a- ,4 i �?v`.7 __�"'-ay. -.,A .r � d��,'",J+ M„ti}','►i�;�'tu� y&�•..��, � i J F� � �\+i Q,�''fi..•i _ YY (1) l� 1111j11f11(1i 4 � '�i� •` +, u�,' , ,i w �x rjlt $,r,1.t �,ayi/ ie%�'�► � w ilili • 1�� �Q + t Q�yr'. rt�}ra .>a ,rl �.� d+ '` k.' j a,!< fi � 4� �•�, �v w' �l" i 1�'YS!' 1-fi �V • ! ,�y r1RmfIM1R�. �: '9{t �I Mill ����,� l���b���`.;ai�'•.—C 1 �"Il rt > With.- 1"Im I I M( qz b� !u•. � �f ts. ,',, HIM any �s % i. tw }� fp�'',t�� 4j�Fi• �`�A,� �, t } C i�,.I , . R �':4 FAii�. r I +' 1, itii+�.tL.�.::- {� _ �• i D •rrt 7.czuere^�� t>_% f;; �i2���'ir`.:� ..,��, .... ---27-SE.-5TH-STREET-.-MIALI,--FLORI)A-- MWMM FOR BRICKELL ON THE RIVER INC. 1109 BISCAYNE BLVD. SUITE # 402 MIAMI, FLORIDA PIWMM BY: BERMEIJLC, AJAML & PARTNERS MCHnWTUFE*ENGINEEFUNG*PLANNING*NrMOR DESIGN- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Submitted fin,o recor ,e nn e C 09 "i' item on 4W' 95-- 5�7 Walter Foeman Gitv Cl'-rt' 'f LASON Systems, Inc. S.i 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149.800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 THE FOLLOWING IS AN IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES J 10]. >♦ 1 ►♦♦►100♦♦1111♦♦1♦1.11..♦.t•1.11.1111.111.1.1111.1111.♦11.1.1�11�.w111♦ ♦1.11111.t•.111111111/ �1111.111t•11�f11.11111.111•t1111•t•111.1t•1.1.11111111111t•111111�.•t•111/4.1.1/1.•1.11.V. .11111.111.i �11�1111.11111.1t •.• .`t. •.�11111111 i1f1111.111•.111.1.•1111.•.1111.11111❖! - - -WSR'.04��.��1�1�1�f�1�1�1�f�f�1�f�1�1���4. �a1�1���1�1�1�1�•�1�1�1�1�1�� - ��+ �� 1i1i1a1i �1ila�ila�a �1a1a1a�a1i1i�i1a1.►1i�i�i1+1a1a �1i�,�1i1i.-.a�a�ali�i�alil.A1i1a1i1a1i1i1f1a<.. + + +•a•+•+ a a�a•a•+•au•a•� +•+•+ +•�u•� •: )XMXW� 1�1�.�t•1i1i�i1� a ...•ti..........'.................1..........................-..•--...-...�...v.......i....T. ►1r�alrl661a�rlr�a�r1*11�a���.1•�a1•1r�a�•1r�r1r1a�i1i1i�ilili�i�ili�i�ili�ilfl.�rlali�i+ilifililf a�ifiilrlj��1j1j1j�.11111.111��j1111�j�11��•1.11 �.•.1111f.�111�11111111.11�.! ■ m:f?.• >+ .:t:�:� .:t•:1:.:1:f•-,� 1�f:1:♦:� .:� . �:♦:i:.:� .-,� 1:1:f ��1:. �:f:� 1:1:t: .:� �:ii ��.:{'-��VJ...�1�1�.�1�1�1�1�.�1+1�.�1�.�1�.�1�t f•�f�.�.�.�.�1�1�1�.�.�1�.�1� .. ••t i / �111•11.••�.1.•11111�.•1•1f1111.1.•1�.1.1f�11.•111�.1.1�•1i�•�1�•�t•�1�.�.�.�.�1�.�.�1�.�.�.�1�.�1�! ��•���i•�1�•�1�•�t•�1�1�i�•�•�1�•�1,�1�.�.�.�1�.�t� ���.� �.j1�1.1•�:1:1:K..�• ■ W,:,.1i1�/ �1�1�1i�i�a1i1i1i1��i1i�a1il+�il��ifilii1��i1i��1i1i1m1�1ii�i�a�i1+•i1a�i1a1+�a1aa�a1i1�1a1i1i1a�i1a�a1+•+�a�a1i ��al+fafi�+lil+fala.+lili �1+1a1+•a1+�+1a1a1a1a1a�a•+fat+lal+! ��.•j�.-.-j-j-.-1-j•1�fQ•1-.•1•jj•1-j❖j•1-i-j-.❖.-1-.•1-1-1•.-1-.•1.1-.•1•1-1.1.1-1.1�1.1+1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1.1.1.1-1.1.1•1-1-1-1-1-1-1v1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1•1-1-.•1-1-1•1-1-1•.-f•1! ♦�111..♦1•♦♦♦1..•1111.1.♦♦1.♦♦11..♦♦.11.•♦1....♦111♦•1/1♦1..11.1.11111111..11...11.11.. 11.1 �.�..1.♦...♦♦..1111.�.♦♦♦.♦♦11♦1111...ii..11..1..1...11.1.11111..11.♦....1.11.1.1.f1..11..111 ♦ . 1 ♦ ♦ . 1•.111.11111.1.1.111.111.1.•111111.1.11111.1.1111111.��1.�.1t•11�.1.•11t•1111111.11111.1.•11.11111.111.11.�•1111.1.1i11111111111.111t•1.1111.01.�.111f•.1.f.1.11111.1.1f1.1.1t; 1.1 ►11i11tfif � . ff.111.11f.�.11f.�1f111f11.f.�1f1�1f11.1.w1ffi11fr1•.1f�f1.�11...111f.1111f11111f11�f�f�.111f..11111f+.+f jt'1+1111fa1afaflli.+�11+t:.i.1f11�f�1 ff1.111f11111f111� ►1./ ....... ....111.1.�11111------�.11111.�11f1111•.�111111.<, ... 1 1t • �Y 1 / 1' �1 + t''• .1111.111111111.111111111.1! .t.y�1,..1.1.►:�.r.�.........1,.1.1r��..1.....1.1.•.•��,f.�l.•.+•r.f•��1.1....1i.1...�,1.1.•.•.1.1...f.1....., w... ..�..r ...1.:•..r . � v...O:..1...•...f,.;wl..•.f.•.♦ �Er&� ..OAF .t4.7 +A ',~``•(! ®® i� ff ff�f ff0 ffiifiififiifififififiififififi! , f•f`� ifififffififififififfiy •...-.���-� �• ..•��..•� � ..•�•.•.•.�. • + �±. , �ffQ.ifif�f�fj,} f^f�f f^• ff�f�f f f f�f � i��•r.....�...r...��.•....♦.......•►... v............ ffi•f•f •iffiifiiffff•ff• ♦filffffiffiffffffffffl: i • • . �.•lffflffff*fffffffffffffif••f1ffffffff�, �f�ff��ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff� �•.••.��1.fff.�lh�fff l�f �fffff�� i.1 1. f.� i.•.1.f.� f.� ff.� fff �.f.Aff. . 1 ��f�•�i f�f�i�1�f��I,i�,f�f�f�f�f�fjf�.�fj•�•�f�f�• 1�f�f,: .f:ff:Afff:•:w•C•'.':r -, f. f. f. f.1� ' f� f�•� f�a�i�i� fifi•�•�fif;��f�iififif���l�fifif�.ififif�f�.�f�fif�}�•�..fi.fAf►fffff,►ffi�i�. ►•ffffffffff•1*fffifffffffffi�.ifffff•ffflffffff•ffffff�fffffffffffffffifffffffffffffffffffff• ►fffffffffff�ffffffffflfffffffifffffifflffffififffi�fifffffffffffffffffffffffffilfifffiffiifffff� ►♦i1♦♦♦♦•fffff111fi•f••lffffffffi•fff♦♦ffiifflfii♦ ►tiff*. fiiifiiii*^f+f•.}-fit+f�f�*� f* f*ffyfittaf fi f� ff f�i�ffifii ffifif ffff ff ff ff ff f� � }fi�ffi� ffiffflf(1• 1• �fifffffffffiffff♦ ..• • ►fffffif♦ ��iiti • -, "•.'frffffffffffffffff ... .•• ��'f'f•1�fff • Y'f�•••♦••fffliff♦fff� �.iffff♦ y �f�f�f�1�f�•�f�•���f���•�1�•�•���}`fififi �• /ifffl i .ff� lfff• ►< y.•}+1•.fffiff�ff• >f•ffffr•}Ifffff• ��f�.�f�•�f�f�c�f�f�� \r�f�• f�f&f�f�f�f�f�, f�. sir r►f.� i•Oi•�•i XII s MOMMS AN TOWER 1 FLOOR AREA LEVEL 1 FAR I EGEND FLOOR kREA�X1 LEVELS ( � S"PP0W 0 II 3444 SF I) 3W aF �HON .f1Y1L 11 NONE NONE OPe+s3PacE {E tow I) Sab �,� TBiALf1i�D@iiV1 -FARG.7W 8F 8!F TOTAL fi0*i*M1XN %. - FAR NONE TOTAL ALL OTHMSPACES 11 'PIsm'!!PI= 4 1IN 4�I'm IWod. Raffia 3sL18 Do N"M OL om SWUM Re on TM f& s3laow somic vsfr - ,--T Dow 02-27-N f...w F.Q.R. Wil 3 To"36 FLOOR AREA LEVEL 2 FAR. LEGEND FLOOR AREA xi LEVELS ,W,Nn,A.L GM S.F. am Sp. SUPPORT E:= tm SA tm OF. .-P j:t SPECIAL PURPOSEW7 OF. W7 O.F. .0 L9 NONE NONE OPEN SPACE NONE NONE ra TOTAL FEWENTLAL FAA 0266 OP. 3206 OF. TOTAL WON-MOCCOn - PAR NONE NONE (1) (U TarAL ALL 07HA SPACES 44G2 OF. 4492 OF. TOTAL 7778 UF-. 7778 Of. =Y Ka c4aum 806141 D" Dmwot CAW ra I DrmVg TlUc FAA TOWN I lboa Ro FAR-102 TOWS; I FLOOR AREA LEVEL 46-60 F,A.R. LEGEND (PeI•�MI r.i.m SI>PPoT C= SPECIAL PURPOSE PEEHq (FMRCF ®m CM SPACE 19 TOTAL DIAL - PM TOTAL NON-fCWC nkL - PM TOTAL ALL Mel SPACER TORAL FLOOR AREA lw 8F. uw 8F. NONE NONE 2 m er-, LEVELS M976 SF. 4750 SF - NONE NOW OZ415 eF. IblMw WAP WAUM 11s7Kiwi not so. /ayWmr Ddw 3uu 1000 30/09 (s" m Cal M9-" Cemm Ne 031L000 geaMt t/it - 02-27-" Drawat LPG FAA � TOW=t I MUS 46-60 CID � _. ftog Ka. FAR-109 .................................... .........7........j................... - •.... .. .■+�cr■■a+�uwincaq�wwaur::aWnaAawYu . ■rrw■■■w■■■■rrwrwrw■Ffrwrwwww■; in Eno: r■■■■■■■■■LL r4L71 ►' !!30t- Lr■■■■■■. w lommommommn am aniiM.soriiiiiiii� i■ r■■=■■■/rwuurwrr■■■■:l■■r■OU �■ /wr ■■/A■TIY!�■■■■/w■w■■■■■rwrH■■■mv,R ■1■■■■■■www■r■rrrw■■■■■111 :■■a r■■rrw■/■r■■rr■rww■/w■rnlgrF■■!� ■■aar■aAamaaaasar■AawdaailJ al than ■wlurr■.-■oor■oo■r' ow rtf,c� raa . fw■ww■rwr■w■■■■r■a■y■■■• a rouow■HUM.Ma■arsr reminememrrmer_emammamn�: Io■r rwor■orwuur.Yli.r. u■u■urwrr4llur�/w[ rf ■■■■uouuFuupapaawr tw■■or■w■tlwrra■U■rr, ■■/■■r■■ca■■■ar■r■r r0■■■w■F9■■■■r■r■r, ■r�ruu■ro■a■y;us;:�I •mmm..nw.r.-n.nu.-...• �. �-.;tr•r.rnTrm•,I�Pw■■,p 11 aar'rr r■rrrrrror+i■ru uorrrrs •ur■w■wr/rw■■■awwrFrrwrrrw■■rr■ wfr■r■w■■wrrrdr■aw■f■wf■■rr■w■ ■■■■w■r■■wrwwa■■rvwwwww■■wr■w■ u■r■ww■�wwr■/■awwnwww■wwwmrw■rt o�y _ ■fw, t' 7rn �1L': � q ;� : ■wwwo: :i c ■rnrw.i 1Y�'•I.+..r■.�■[:liurrK. ■■r■rYldmLrr/rrrww■■■■r■; r■■r■YaYW■/rrrrrLtt�lttltlLlC:...............cc samaaaann ,V. -.-, r • T:96 ll■/p■■pQ 1: I■/■r■wwwr'1P.!I.Ir I►C .,.,•'TLLarrwrrM uoulrl.:nrr..:. �.lr -a : auruwrr/uut rrwrwrwww!.��a�C1[prrrrFrrrwwurF Iwra I■■/wwroom■■,R.rhwwwp■rfwrw■wF■■mmom ■! wrwpww■rrrrwFr■wrrrr■F r■■rr■■■r■■rr■000rrwr wrruuw[: r wrw■r■rwK ■wuurrur wr������s: :YYWYYYYWI� w■rwwrr�• TCMMBII FLOOR AREA LEVEL 1 FAR., LEGEND FLOOR AREA TOTAL i ,REA X9 LEVEL ) � NONE N09 C� 9400 SF. 24M SF. NONE NOTE a ®� sm 8F ww.9F. OMN VAC@ lam NONE NOR' TOTAL 1l8DEWLAL - PAR NONE NOR TOTAL WON-REeMiL - PAR d4iB0 8F. a0 SIR TOTAL, 07HO SPACM 2400 OF 2400 SF. TOTAL L.. aLL �M ) -- oar_ c a o -0 U a, c ,` x) lianz-01" pmjod Ilwtw BricKELL ON THE RIVER Comm. w 1311.000 to[MI 1/1i' - DAM 07-27-H DHrr1 , C6�aY[d; CAW Ali Fc\ \1319\FAPZi DnWt T11L: F.A.R. TOVM N LKW L 1 _ lh*A wo. FAR-201 Towl FLOOR AREA LEI/EL 2 F.A.R. LEGEND FLOOR AREA xi LEVELS OFAIRN&V a -ME NONE NW. awrm 1= 953 SA 1753 aF. SMOOL NONE NONE rw"r VPU14L M SA m W. OM SPAM NONE NONE TOTAL FESVeM& - PAR - NONE NONE TOTAL MWOMMAL - PAR. gm sr - TOTAL ALL 01HM SPACIM SF --va5wF- 7WAL 4m er-, 4WOR 2 Q) C) m ttY C 0 -c3m Cl 0 Avjw No"": BIMICKIRILL ON THE Pd= satin I/it - I,-*, D" 01-27-45 P.A.R. TOWIN III sh"t Ira. FAR-202 TOWMI FLOOR AREA LEVELS 3 THRU 9 F.A.R. LEGEND FLOOR AREA LEVELS NONE NOW own" [ 8v 8A 0,209 8F SreaAL Merom ® NONE NONE $A" SR 48,= SF - OM SPACE "a 8F. 10,20 SA TOTAL FE8DEMIAL - PAR NONE SF. TOTAL No*+CsD&M*L - PAR. 814" 8A 108 8P. TOTAL ALL CM*R 9PACM z= 8A_ TOTAL AM SF- 01M SA f'- c�. r ;-- C) _. f r3 . _.1 Yenmdl . AAMU Y Putnam. toe B&A Yle,let 91"W1- La11Ue1�N 9tLLtti Idooftylhe~ odes (7D1► rl1�0�00 PARzl(�Oet a9-," J . CMAM. Ma 93184M foals: 1/1! a 11-0 DAW 02-27-" Deoros Chednd: CARD lost FN \9718\FMM Ell. DrwWS Ttlls: %,)I FJUL Town M Lwa 3 TM 9 /but Kai FAR 203 11111i Mill 1!191 uIll I 111I4 ....... .............. ................. .. . ....... ..... .................................. ........... ........................... . ... .......... . ................. .. ............ .... . ....... twol :I-OOR AREA LEVEL 10 (INCLUDES LEVEL 11 -2 STORY SPACE) "A . .'R. LEGEND L FLOOR AREA LEVEL NONE NONE In or-. 10 or-. PE GAL PIJfIP088 �� am op. sm op. NOW NOW M SPACE 9.7fl OP. Z7fl or-. OTALFEwevAL-FAFt NONE NONE OTALNM-Fa90%%AL - FAR NOW H WE OTAL ALL oim spAcm lzw OP. I Im or-. OTAL 125M op, 1.2-M ap, 0 _r-Q A al cy "D U. " L) cl) n - -j u E, ly) vu ,Cj"yabam Dot" 33196) MGMrAx 014-9636 C60= AL 031"W ftaw: I/it - 11-0 D", 02-27-95 Draws cmwkdd; CAJ)D r*i F.,\ \1316\FARW4 Dmw'f TUW: R.A.R. TOVMR N Lam 10 Am 11 Shea W4. FAR-204 TOM% FLOOR AREA LEVELS 12-34 F.A.R. LEGEND FLOOR AREA LEVELS NONE NOW ou"Off IAM S.F. 344M Sr-. rec" MAVOCE NONE NM OEM Am er_. 2U,20 SA OPEN SPACE 44n SF. aw SP. TOTAL PMSCeMAl -PAR TOTAL NON40905MAL - W. Am OFN. TOTAL ALL 07HEFI SPACES TOTAL Atflap- Not B& "youls Wye Suud to-M, R1000OMA 2310 (MG) 196410M M (XIQ 00-MM 0 Pmioct Noniet BMCKBLL ON THE fum can= Y.& 931LOW ftawl I/If - 1,0 Dam 02-27-M Dm.n: Chookod: CADD nks FN \1318\ Dmw'S TIU4: R.A.R. Tovm a QY1.) LEM U THM 34 sh*A bra, FAR 205 I TOWER FLOOR AREA LEVELS 35 THRU 50 F.A.R. LEGEND FLOOR AREA I LEVELS PPENT F R) ® 8,713 Sr-- M,408 SF. (PRAT eurroff �� 833 S.F. 13,326 SF. ePecw. rurPOee NOM NOW ARTONE OP PAA l NOtC N OPEN SPACE 1,678 9F. 26" TOTAL FIESEENT1AL - PAR 8 i13 `� F , M SP. WE TOTAL NOWRIESDENTW. - P.AA. TOTAL FALL SPACES NVE z s1i B.P. it 40,176 BF' TOTAL fl 224 SP. !I V96" SF. Not ICOO�M De1re sufts kV Fletide 06t00 (306) 16i4M TAX (005) 8"-UU O Comm. No. 931E-000 5"161 1/16' - I,-0' D" 02-27-96 Dram C6004ed: CeDD M, F.\ \*315\FAR206 Dmw'g TIU4: L — P.AJL Tom u LEVEL 86 THRUM 50 Eped Ifo. FAR 2��a 0 TOWER I FLOOR AREA LEVELS 51 AND 52 FAR. LEGEND —T FLOOR AREA X16 LEVELS FIIMIDT�r NONE NONE Burro" sm 8F. too sf. Me" Ml NONE 14ONE VV% i POMP A9 � L Emu 8'm SF-. f7,428 8F. cPIN SPACE mm WS UA 3, sp. TOTAL FESDENTL46L - PAR 8,70 S.F. 17,420 af. TOTAL NON-Feemm&L - rAft NONE now TOTAL ALL OTMA SPACES 2.M 13A 5 Q22 SF. TOTAL 11 1,224 SA 11 22A43 SF. r. LL MCI So suits War&are Driva 1 W)UP-214r,"35133 ... .) M."m 0 Project Narns: BRICKNU ON THE RIVER Comm. W4. 03184M saawl 1/it - V-0, D" 02-27-95 Dram Chook": CADD M: F,\ \1316\FAR207 Dmiez Till": R.A.R. TOWER N LEM 51 AND 52 8b"t Ifa FAR 207 B A6-1 'MOS 3e. $ate Dfi fof4 tOW F.w:�Fcnc Fromm �`r, BRi 'KELL Oi THE RIVER } =wr C w i IE may..3%1^ E itya% 9 ou NORTd C. G LL COD Too: � O 1 O, �c1 `tW' i1 L`IMs1 8rm P c � �- a � 17- LASON Systems, Inc. S.E. 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149.800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 ll: Fill till IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES askJ �wd .4 will au.a rrr u4a I V 4V CCi 11 tiau ,vu anAOK InE F nlmi- y -- 'Ira �• r ! , qq i � Imo'►='�►��;11►��� '�I � 9 l rl +R"m'ah, ►�N ►mot ►�� i o � 1 LOBBY I i ` i •. I ••Y' ' •'!• • 137 �•.� ` � ,,�f ` � I l _, i � LOBBY r PLANT U-GBVD , PHAS 7W0 PHASE ON ! I TRB AND PAUU13 �, •• SYNBOL KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QTY. HIGT. I SPRD.I ROOT I REMARI O BLRSERA SIMARLBA GUW180 LIMBO 36 10'-17 1 51-6 1 B+B�- �i CASSIA SLRATTENSIS GLAUCOUS CASSIA 7 10'-17 6-6 B+B P COCCOLOBA DIVERSIFOLIA PIGEON PLLYdJi 6 10.12 5-6B+B 134 RYP) , CONOCARPUS ERECTLIS GREEN BUTTONWOOD 12 10'-17 5.6 B+B SI-RIFCS AND GROIIND COVERS NE ILIM OLEANDER 'CALYPSOOLE"ER STANDARD 4 6'•9' 4'-5' B+B SYMBOL KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME OTT. T. CG. CAR13SA MA PA EMERALD BLANCET 1557 PTYCHOSPERMA E�GANS SOLITAIRE PALM 10 12-30' O.AA - VARY HEIGHTS G.G. GALPHIMA GRACIL15 TH2YALLIS 156 24' L � ACILIS �r~,� M,C. MYRICA CERIFERA WAX MYRTLE 213 6 ROYSTCNEA E.ATA ROYAL PALM 15 20' OAK Cor i N.E. W-NOLEPIS EXALTATA BOSTON FERN 357 I8' t ° SWEITENIA MAHAGONI MAHOGANY 7 ICHz 5.6 B+B PA PSYCHOTRIA NERVOSA WILD COFFEE 205 24' TABESUTA HETERPHYLLA PIN< TABEBUTA 9 10'-12' 5'-6' B+B g�M P.L. PENTAS LANCEOLATA DWARF LAVENDER PENTAS 933 I7 IP, IXORA PETITE' RED TAIWAN DWARF 170 IB' WASHINGTONIA ROBUS-A WASHINGTONIA PALM 19 SIZES AS SHOWN MATCH HIEGH TS BY ROW AS SHOWN F. SEASONAL FLOWERS 1127 L,,, SOD•STENOTAPHRLIM SECUNDATUM - ST. ALIGUSTINE 'FLCRATAM' NOTE- al ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED Mg TO PROPOSED BUILDING CON u2 PLANT OUANTITIES IN PLANT LEGEND ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. IF DISCREPENCI IN LEGC-NO AND OUA':TITIES SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. CUANTITIES ON PLAN SH ,mra•+�:�i M��.40ti�.1vD!15C OfiQ4F >7V��Y.:aufiaOQ.DOR�ro��+:�a�7�omounod+0.LoQ, 3x:>a.o'u_Rip67m:1mc�pt. �Wnaoe;�eollaa[1v�41144� 1• •1� _' ;•I �� '-1""' a{"" ' _� — _ �I.I �T' '7j�'►l► �I �11`PlI71i,9' t; it .i �tj }*'�'� "�yd `� � i n„tiwp �/,r 'IIIIIIII�'. I�. � �'. 1�� �/��`♦ -iW— O O © O •er � o'er=-� ��.: .°�'�^�:��\\' • r • •• • • ••ram - • K01 9o, Ha)ehore Drive Du1te 1200 lttxrnl Florida 33333 (305) 09950 nx (305) 959-9839 Revimorn: Project Nome: ®RICKLLL ON THE RIVER AD)RES51 AD)RM2 Comm. No. MUM Hoale: 1'-20'-0' late: 05/15/95 Dr—: F.D. Checked: N.L5. CADD Ale: 5:\1LANDDS\9311Q\ Dm.'j 71Ue: LANDSCAPING PLAN Hheet No, Wxy I ."DOW =14 Opp • gm LOW .............................. S.F LOW ...................... 0 191 LW AEA .................................................... 113.40 S.F. 0 FAR (rLQQR AEA WJIQ) Aumm JIMMI KPONTIAL LO 1.079.1114 6.1. M.Gv S.F. WMINUX 2.25 400.1113 6.f. M.142 115. em POHM FAR (R3TRAW 4,W X 1) "31 44M S.F. W. FAR WKVT0W Lor to 1.4X.M S.'L ( bri empsw 5 f23 3 r f— 1 7 133 •MrSwartAt spa"Imse ",W S.F. (1NL) 0 gin" INAWS.F. Imun .14 :mw 134. 9m Start)10 UL IV 1110. 191-r SIN: (AGO ma :wm (1111101) "M UWL (WK Q*-Q`) is W WWI PM (I- EL 1HL EL 0111311111111111. 508 lots 000 (I OMANI WL) = Imin :NMAVM a a 20 MOM . 2141 *WFKE is 33 11 MOD III. W ME W, Will.) 16.9m IF / 5" - m fm mmwm 341 Im ou W-C Q'-w rw r4 1 v comm rw no. W4 rya am dC om Mm --Vftkftk LLJ l30. 81700" Do" low wm-1 Flaft, Mt33 Na) wl,-a nx M W-*= obwAs, ow ssmoca scow, 1* - 2W-W D&W. 05/08/" pro�. Cbmbwd: CAW row D,N..s TILW. GROUND LML PLM EIw1 Mo. A-3.01 U� "NUB" !!L-- MIL - TOWER 11 .., ...... .... I I. Cif!ig 0�1 i :, i ... ....... .... ......... ......... . .. ................. Opol TO MAW am ......... . .... . ....... . ............ Tr. TOWER I ........... .......... ........ .. ....... . . . ............. ........... I ..... ... .............. .... ........ . ..... ... .......... ... ... . .... .. ......... .... ........ ..... ... ... . .. ........... ... .......... ............ I t IN .............. ........... .......... .. . .. .... ... .... ............. .. . .... ... ... ... .... .... ........... SL I TOWER 11 a 1w a. TOWER I NOL u ft"W" NO M" low Am " at M 5-4 C) Z, u seeks 2W-e Mw nw) 054\13MM Y3 DmWg TMk: LEM 2 PLAN A-3.02 7 ....................... LLJ c E DWOMUO. AP" k F=tW bf,dw IWO =1 30. goydws SUIT. OW Dt"m MM-0 "'l=xpQft Cmm YAL 2318= somm V - 201-c Dam Doomm SAM moo Aw. 1316INS31" orwg Twc Lam 8 PLAN ab"L Ka ffC &%m BULUM Pmw ~ Lwa on== numn TOWER I TOWER I l to 0 0 o cj o o L G. CD 2re C. Q 2PT I ca CH ......... j= LLJ I— 0 LLJ (n < a E Z, 0 25 0 IWONWAC AJMW & Fmtm kUlbF Soft befiUM AMU =1 SIL foydmm DMw SUU& loo ,a — "I me.ima c Pm*t Nam BRHwjLL ON TM Mmm C40ML N& 93lum soda V - 27-C Due 5/s/M om� CbscimmL MW Fdw 9316"319 vmwg TMIC LIVILS 4 THRU a PLAN sh" Va. -3 A.0 U"m un swim w"T LEM LM orromm off"Um GX. M TOWER 11 -) 0Ir-r 2 LLI TOWER I G) (D 0 'Zi E t5 0 Cl) 0 ft.immo: TM Mu comm yA6 93ILM SWIM t, - 2v-e cam S/GAS Drat Caw ra.,. W184\93103 prow's Twc 2 is LEM 9 PLAN A-3.01 vAn same mcnvxa mw IRM TOWER II TOWER BrACKELL ON I TM rAvu god= I-2W-e Data 5/s/95 DMWW cbedaw: CAW raw S31SA\9310-- tirswg rum Ulm N" w A-3.04 TOWER 11 TOWER I V-w :r-w 2r-r X-jr Ml u slyaws DOM 1.) See- projed Piz wc ll HOKILL ON Irm rAv= a— X& 2318= ftge T*-V-e Data 5/8/" onmw cbmabo& CAM Fft 2310\93190 L".. Dross Twc Lam PLAN Shea Va. A-3.07 �_ M TOWER aLwam ,aa. offrola � I lO DD C 0 TOWER I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .�! r-0' ar C air-7 374 2r-w 2T'-r g a- EII ll� t we poet �u-oa. Raasana ProJaC< Nat BMCKM an TM rmm rA— xa as,ama foafa: V _ 1D•-d Data Wsa DMWW eeaaee, CADD MW %u,a�u,agnsu Dmwd Twc LVAL u LID PLAN lbaat Ka A-3a08 G>_ 91 C, .1 ti "M KMAUM PRMT unm TOWER I 0 Cl! I r-e L IT-7* 2f-C TOWER I up & (�) 0UH (9 2rr W-e SW 2f-w V-r . .......... LLJ iLu CL M (f) CL ML U o"ohme Mft saw im pmjoa mm BMCKM ON ma rmm t' - 2&-T -9/s/N am ift Mejj two Ali Mb" Va. A-3.09 0 0 a TOWER I TOWER I _M�ms _ UM r ►0 0 —'nr arr ,ro� +o r xa' m c �c�r x•,r x-W 2r-*e Rio INIWL ``N dia RBI ter.,ler Mt s wp+e=a Oem Suva �ow 10"'ie�►v a q t Pmjdd Now BRICKILL ON TM Rdim Qead{ TAW. PLAN /b"L Ka. AQ3.1 LOA= TOWER If wm LW VAUM rooff LEM offmam SgTa= ir-r 2r-C @am 7T B4 TOWER I maw TRRJ w (rip.) c l�- (D 37'•G � X 14' O ----------------- I I wwadw Abma 6 r lb Mt SIL saner. Dift surd low wad,upwrMalaw (21 -M 3m on-= pr*d meow BNKWJELLL ON TM rdvn Dmwc Cbsobwb CAM rds.- $31 &%\S314%31 1. am.'s Tww LDILS 45-ft 'LAN LID Sh" Ira. A-3.11 Submitted into the public rc:cor n ccnnectio item v✓i f o Walter Foemdn City Clerk ` HIM t F r A ® 95- 597 SOUTH ELEVATION IIIIIIIII dill 11 T ""4.47M EBM MU M C, Iq ahl, I it, I I MIL, C. Submitted into the iJu�iiir; record in corin-ocflorl v ivh item car:�1_.�5 a95- 59'7 SECTION AA sit L + Wmf-(F ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- th, rn Cl* r!", SECTION 08 a ; 1111111 1. ap! 111111111 a IIIIIIII0