Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-95-0595RESOLUTION NO. 9 5 — � 9 5 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL POINT PROJECT OF NOT MORE THAN 599 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 401 BRICKELL AVENUE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 12, 1995, the applicant, 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd. ("Applicant"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Point Project pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and in "Exhibit All, the Development Order, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, development of the Brickell Point Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on March 7, 1995 and the Urban Development Review Board met on April 18, 1995, to consider the proposed project and offer its input; and ATTA CH m E N T (S) :I CONtAlfing CITY cormwSSION MEETING OF J U L 1 3 1995 Resolution Va. 9 i WHEREAS, the applicant has modified the submittal to reflect recommendations received at said Large Scale Development Committee and Urban Development Review Board meetings; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 23, 1995, Item No. 2, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 21-95 by a vote of eight to zero (8-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble -to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved with conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Brickell Point Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd., at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 - 95- 595 rU r, Section. 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 821,858 total gross square feet; 746,892 adjusted gross square feet of habitable residential area; this number shall be reduced accordingly if the accompanying request for designation as a Planned Development Overlay District is denied (said designation permits an increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying district). Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended; and b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning District classification of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of - 3 - 95- 595 ;r. issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $80 million, and to employ approximately 273 workers during construction (FTE), and to result in the creation of approximately 72 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $2.4 million annually in ad valorem. tax revenues to local units of government (1995 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from the proposed parking for the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; - 4 - 95- 595 (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Major Use Special Permit which was submitted by the applicant on April 12, 1995, and which is on file with the Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. - 5 - 95-- 595 Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two .(2)" years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd., d/b/a Atlantis on Brickell Associates, 1455 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 200, Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G112. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Brickell Point Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 01A" and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Brickell Point Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is - determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A°), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. - 6 - 95- 595 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July 1995. STE HEN P. CLARK, MAYOR ATTEST: WALTER•J. F CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: Cr � JOR L E. MAXWELL (rpPROVED UTY CITY ATTO EY AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: - 7 - 95- 595 ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-595 DATE: July 13, 1995 BRICKELL POINT PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Point Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: - 1 - 95-- 595 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Brickell Point Project is a residential use development located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 3.62 gross acres and 2.12 net acres of land (more specifically described as "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, Jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces, all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the restaurant and retail areas. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of maximizing 'the property's unique location at the mouth of the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The two residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue Office District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. The Project consists of a wide, well integrated River and Baywalk which 2 - 95- 595 surrounds the Projects northern eastern waterfront edges. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. The Project also reflects suggestions received at the Miami Large Scale Development Committee meeting of March 7, 1994 and the Urban Development Review Board meeting of April 18, 1995 (with the exception of a condition regarding the building top design which is addressed in the conditions for development approval herein). The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners dated 3/10/95 with revisions dated 5/8/95; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a request for approval of a Class II Special Permit for the placement of a leasing trailer on the subject property during construction and a request for waiver of any applicable Waterfront Charter requirements not being met by the final plans. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permits) shall be considered sufficient for the two subordinate requests referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 821,858 total gross square feet; 746,892 adjusted gross square feet of habitable residential area; this number shall be reduced accordingly if the accompanying request for designation as a Planned Development Overlay District is denied (said designation permits an increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over that allowed by the underlying district). CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL: Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to - 4 - 95- 595 v_jJ"t, incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review ' of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. - 5 - 95- 595 7.; Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a' certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, modify the submitted plans on file to propose a more appropriate cap or terminating piece to the building, per the comments received by the Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 4/18/95; said modified building top - 6 - 95- 595 z:. plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department; said review and approval may consist of a referral to the Urban Development Review Board for comments if deemed necessary by the Director. 11. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 12. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the 30 day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell Point Project, proposed by the applicant, 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the Project will favorably affect the need for people to .find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the Project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) the Project will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) the public welfare will be served by the Project; and (9) any potentially adverse effects of the Project will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The, proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the Project i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signsand lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of - 8 - 95-- 595 issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d21<musps/95>brickell/pt/do/1 9 95- 595 :$t EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th St., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1 st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8_at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the S.E. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through central angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 minutes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an arc distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.54 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 99,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing 1637.70 95-- 595 1�1 square feet. And subject to an easement for Ingress and Egress of the Southwesterly corner of described property being all of that portion of circular sector having a radius of 35 feet and a central angle of 130 degrees and an area of 1924.2 square feet, said Easement being a portion of that certain Easement granted in Chancery Case No. 54,911 of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. l 95- 595 4 A ...•.....:.....:..:..... ._•_•-_...w.......,.....,_. .•,.._....,.L......,.,:wxwu._,:.a,:.,,.ss-�sr_.rL:ei:-.�.�'nruu --�,.�.,;:..,.,.,.,., EXHIBIT C Project Data (Property Zoned SD-5) - 1. LAND AREA SQ. • Land Area within Property Lines 92,481 • Land Area 90' - 0" into Miami River 40,755 • Land Area 90' - 0" into Biscayne Bay 5,819 • Land Area to Mid -Point of Brickeli Avenue 20,688 SUBTOTAL: 159,743 • Additional 20% Allowed Increase under P.U.D. 31,949 TOTAL GROSS LOT: 191,692 2. FLOOR AREA ALLOWED (FAR) Base F.A.R. = 4.25 191,692 X 4.25 = 814,691 3. FLOOR AREA EXPOSED (F.A.R.) (excluding parking garage and basement) TOTAL GROSS ADJUSTED GROSS A. Phase 1 (APPROX. SQ. FT.) (APPROX. SQ. FT.) • Lobby Level 8,912 8,310 • Mezzanine 11,917 8,360 • Resd. Floors: 1 - 8 74,424 68,624 (* per Floor) (*9,303 SQ, FT.) (*8,578 SQ. FT.) • Recreation Level 13,683 8,946 • Resd. Floors: 10 - 39 410,490 378,750 (" per Floor) (*13,683.SQ. FT.) (*12,625 SQ. FT.) SUBTOTAL: 519,426 SQ. FT. 472,990 SQ. FT. B. Phase 2 • Lobby Level • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 2 - 34 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SO. FOOTAGE: 6,700 6,000 8,698 4,892 287,034 263,010 (*8,698 SQ. FT.) (*7,970 SQ. FT.) 302,432 SQ. FT. 273,902 SQ. FT. 821,858 SQ. FT. 746,892 SQ. FT. 95- 595 h 4. ' TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS PROPOSED A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower: 39 Residential Floors • 6 Apts. X 39 FI's........................................... 234 s1 Apt. X 38 FI's............................ :................... 38 • 1 Apt. X 31 FI's................................................ 31 • 2 Apts. X 24 FI's............................................... 48 • 1 Apt. X16Pi's.............................................. 16 • 2 Apts. X 13 Pi's............................................... 26 • 1 Apt. X 6 Pi's............................................... 6 SUBTOTAL: 399 UNITS B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: Above Parking Garage e2 Apts. X 1 FI .................................................. 2 • 6 Apts. X 33 Pi's............................................. 198 SUBTOTAL: 200 UNITS TOTAL: 599 UNITS 5. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower: 12 Story Parking Garage • 399 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 399 • Restaurant: 5,805 sq. ft............................................ 0 • Retail: 5,603 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................... 6 B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: 11 Story Parking Garage - • 200 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 200 • Retail: 2,644 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................. 3 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 608 C. Handicapped Spaces Required ............................................... 18 Spaces Provided............................................... 18 Spaces D. Off -Street Loading Spaces Required (12' X 55' ea., w/Ht. Clear. of 15' Min.) ................... 5 Spaces Provided 0 @ 12' X 55' w/Ht. Clear. of 14' Min. and 4 @ 12' X 35' w/Ht. Clear. of 13' Min.) .................... 5 Spaces 6. OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSED • Basement .... . . ... ............................... 29 Spaces • 1 st Level .................................................... 46 Spaces • 2nd Level . ................ ............................... 76 Spaces • 3rd Level .................................................. 76 Spaces • 4th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces • 5th Level ......... ... ............ . ....................... 76 Spaces • 6th Level ......................................... 76 Spaces • 7th Level ......................................... .. ...... 76 Spaces 0 8th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces • 9th Level ................................................... 76 Spaces • 10th Level ................................................. 76 Spaces • 11 th Level ................................................... 76 Spaces ' • 12th Level ................................................... .......................... 45 Spaces TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 880 Spaces MID 6. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Front (Brickell Avenue) Required...................................................... 30' Provided...................................................... 30' Interior Side @ Garage: Required.................................................... 15' Provided...................................... .......... .. 17' Interior Side @ Tower: Required....................................... 40' Provided...................................................... 40' Waterfront: Required...................................................... 50, Provided...................................................... 50, 95- 595 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Brickell Point which is located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the "Property"), will consist of two highrise rental residential apartment towers and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel with a net lot area of 2.12 acres. The gross lot area is 3.67 acres. The property contains 159,743 square feet of gross lot area. The north property line fronts the Miami River, the east property line faces Biscayne Bay and the west property line fronts on Brickell Avenue. Brickell Point will have 599 apartment units located in two towers. Tower one will have 41 levels above its service area and Tower two will have 34 levels above the base parking structure. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue office district and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne ' Bay and Miami Beach. A retail and restaurant area, totalling approximately 11,000 square feet, will be provided within the first two floors of Tower One. In addition, the entry level of Tower Two will accommodate approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space. The retail area and restaurant will be available for the use of the public. There will also be a riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The riverwalk will provide benches, lighting and safety features. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Tower One will have 472,990 adjusted gross square feet. Tower Two will have 273,902 adjusted gross square feet for a total of 746,892 gross square feet. There will be an additional 11,000 square feet for retail, restaurant/cafe. Parking will be available on Levels One through Twelve. There will be approximately 880 parking spaces with valet parking within the service level. All higher levels will have studio, one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments. The amenities which are being provided to -the tenants include the swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club, and several multipurpose spaces all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the restaurant, and retail areas. (c) General location reap, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, ' important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; (S) The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; 95- 595 Ln A detailed analysis of site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur via the Property entrance parallel to Brickell Avenue (access to this entrance is through Northeast 6th Street). Service vehicles will turn north from the entrance road to access the service area. Residents and visitors will continue onto the Property and gain access to the parking garage. I(4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading area; Offstreet parking will be provided within the twelve level parking garage. All levels will be accessed *by ramps located on both the north and south portions of the garage. The total parking area is approximately •378,393 1 square feet. Loading areas are provided on the south side of the Property. (5) Recreational facilities locations; I Recreational facilities for the development are shown on the Eleventh Floor Level Recreation Deck Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. 95- 595 Connection points to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. See Sheet Z-P1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 159,743 square feet 3.67 gross acres (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Land Use Parking: 378,393 gross square feet 159,743 square feet = 237% Residential and Retail: 746,892 gross square feet -= 159,743 square feet = 468% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage of both the parking structure and adjoining lobbies, retail, etc. of both Towers is approximately 44,975 square feet or 23% of the total gross lot. (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Basement (Service) Level Plan, Sheet A1.2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides 5 loading bays. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential towers will consist of 599 apartment units and 3.67 gross acres. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 599 residential dwelling units _ 3.67 gross acres = 163 dwelling units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. 95- 595 Common facilities provided will include the swimming pool, outdoor recreation deck areas, tennis court, racquetball court, and health club. The common areas will be maintained by the owner. Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include two highrise residential towers with retail space at the lower levels. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on Sheets A1.4 through A1.7 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.. -,The retail areas are shown on sheets A1.1 and A1.3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. (k) (m) An illuminated project sign will be located at the southwest corner of the Property. The proposed sign will have metal back -lit letters on a metal background. The size and style will be in compliance with the required regulations. Smaller signs will be located at the entry porte cochere. Retail space and cafe will provide illuminated signs.in compliance with the required regulations. Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan located on Sheets L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owners. Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 95- 595 4011P (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I.B. & C. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I.B. &-C.- (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. .,.� The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility. Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application; a. Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. b. Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project - site. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami 95- 595 niii*�t Ordinance No. 11000, is SD5 (Special District 5). The Zoning Atlas Map on page 36 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Sheet LP-1 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This Project conforms to the SD-5 zoning for the Property. The comprehensive ' plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for execution of this Project. Further, a concurrent MUSP application will be submitted for a PUD pursuant to Zoning Code 11000, Article 5, Sect. 502. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. There are 92 existing low cost rental units on the Property, of which 73 units are rented. The monthly rental per unit ranges between $265 and $465, with an 95- 595 average of $330. Of those 92 units, 15 units are not rentable due to their dilapidated condition. The rented units are on a month -to -month tenancy. These 92 units will be replaced with 600 affordable -moderate income rental apartments. The average apartment will approximate 475 square feet for a studio, 775 square feet fora one bedroom, 1,150 square feet for a two -bedroom, and 1,600 square feet for a three -bedroom unit. Rents will range between $800 for a studio and $2,300 for a three -bedroom unit. The loss of 73 low-income housing units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income housing units in furtherance of the following sections of the Downtown Master Plan: Policy l-C: Downtown's existing neighborhoods were built decades ago under very. different market conditions than exist today. To produce moderate cost. units, higher densities allowing for more efficient land development will be required. Density increases however, should be moderate and timed to coincide with reasonable expectations of market demand and investment. As property owners present viable development applications, the City should accommodate private requests for zoning increases in the following areas: Policy 2-13: Creating bookends north and south of the CBD, the Park West and Central Brickell areas can become a concentration of highrise residential towers forming new in -town neighborhoods with urban lifestyles that resemble the upper West side in New York or the Uptown area around North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The immediate relationship of Central Brickell to the prestige Brickell Avenue office district makes Central Brickell one of the best area of downtown to accommodate the need for quality (not luxury) high-rise rental, condominium and cooperative housing. This residential use should be mixed with high intensity office use and service retail located on streets enhanced with pedestrian amenities. Brickell Promenade (SE/SW 10th Street is the proposed activity center for this neighborhood (see Enhancing Public Spaces, Policy 3-B)..... Policy 3-8: The City of Miami's Affordable Housing Trust Fund was established in 1985 to receive contributions from new private sector commercial development projects in the SPi-5 zoning district along Brickell Avenue and in the SPI-7 zoning district in Central Brickell. In both of these 95— 595 zoning districts, housing is encouraged to be provided onsite through Floor Area Ratio (FAR) incentives. As an alternative to on -site housing, the developer is given a FAR bonus in exchange for a voluntary contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The Trust Fund is required to be used to subsidize affordable housing within the zoning district from which the funds were collected. Funds collected within the SPI-5 District may alternatively be used within Southeast Overtown Park West or within a one mile radius of the SPI-5 district. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Mechanically, the cooling system will consist of water cooled heat pumps which surpass the minimum seer and cop required by the State Energy Code. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be implemented. Highly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks ' and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at all common areas. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. f. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. - g. Dade County Shoreline Development Review. On October 9, 1991, Brickell Point was unanimously approved by the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. Resolution 91-SDRC-9 recommends approval and is located under Article I(G). A determination of substantial compliance has been requested before the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 95- 555 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS This Agreement Between Adjacent Property Owners ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of July, 1995 by and between MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation ("Mass Mutual") and 97807 CANADA LTD/LTEE., a Canadian corporation, 2757214 CANADA, INC., a Canadian corporation, and 468310 ONTARIO, INC., a Canadian corporation (collectively, "Adjacent Owner"). R E C I T A L S: A. Mass Mutual is the owner of that certain parcel of real property located in Dade County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "All attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof ("Mass Mutual Parcel"). B. Adjacent Owner is the owner of that certain parcel of real property located in Dade County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made apart hereof ("Adjacent owner Parcel"). C. Adjacent Owner contemplates the construction and development on the Adjacent Owner Parcel of that certain residential apartment complex ("Project") as more particularly described in that certain "Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Pointe Project located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida" ("Permit"). D. The improvements currently located on the Mass Mutual Parcel include that certain hotel, more commonly known as the "Sheraton Brickell Pointe" ("Hotel"). E. There is a shared ingress and egress area and paved access way to and from the Mass Mutual Parcel and the Adjacent Owner Parcel ("Access Road") as more particularly described in that certain Private Road Access Agreement ("Road Agreement") dated as of May 24, 1995 and recorded in Official Records Book 16791, at Page 2561, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Capitalized terms not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Road Agreement. F. In order to support the Project, Mass Mutual is concerned with receiving assurances regarding the methods of construction of the Project and their impact on the operations of the Hotel and the Mass Mutual Parcel generally. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and in consideration of the covenants, agreements and undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth, and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10) and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Mass Mutual and Adjacent Owner hereby agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 2. Construction Hours. In order to reduce the disruption to the operation of the Hotel from the construction of the Project on the Adjacent Owner Parcel, Adjacent Property Owner agrees that throughout construction of the Project, construction on the Adjacent Owner Parcel will not commence until 7:30 a.m. and will not occur past 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. On Saturdays, construction on the Adjacent Owner Parcel will not commence prior to 8:00 a.m. and will not occur past 4:00 p.m. No construction will occur on Sundays. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the Mass Mutual Representative (as hereinafter defined), Mass Mutual will agree to later 1 cn1\UNDrs\333233, A07/ 13/ ss construction hours for particular activities (for example, concrete pouring) from time to time, provided the same will not unreasonably interfere with scheduled activities of the Hotel, and provided the same are completed by 8:00 p.m. 3. Weekly Meetings. In order to coordinate the construction activities on the Adjacent Owner Parcel with the operations of the Hotel and to thereby minimize the disruption to the Hotel from such construction activities, Adjacent Owner agrees to arrange for and hold at the Adjacent Owner Property weekly meetings with a representative from Mass Mutual (as designated from time to time, "Mass Mutual Representative") and, to have attend such meeting the Project Manager, the Project Superintendent, or any other party who maintains direct supervision over the Project. In addition, at all times the Adjacent Owner shall make available an individual for communication and consultation as problems may arise throughout construction with respect to the Hotel or the Access Road. 4. Construction Parking. In order to minimize disruption to the Hotel and the use of the Access Road during construction of the Project, Adjacent Owner shall assure that all parking related to or in connection with the Adjacent Owner Parcel and/or the construction of the Project by construction workers or otherwise, shall be on the Adjacent Owner Property, or at an off -site location away from the Mass Mutual Parcel and the Adjacent Owner Parcel. No such parking shall be permitted on the Access Road, the Chancery Parcel, the Additional Easement Parcel or the Mass Mutual Parcel. In the event off -site parking is provided by Adjacent Owner for the construction workers of the Project, Adjacent Owner will provide transport service of such workers from the off -site parking directly to the Adjacent Parcel to minimize foot traffic across the Mass Mutual Parcel or the Access Road. Adjacent Owner shall use its best efforts to insure compliance with, and enforcement of, the foregoing parking restrictions, whether violations are caused by employees of other parties or otherwise. 5. Access Road. At all times Adjacent Owner will use its best efforts to conduct the construction activities on the Adjacent Owner Parcel and related deliveries of supplies and materials to the Adjacent Owner Parcel in a manner to minimize the disruption to the free flow of ingress and egress over and across the Access Road and to minimize the disruption to the operations of the Hotel generally. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, deliveries to the Adjacent Owner Parcel shall be coordinated, scheduled and accomplished in such a manner as to minimize any waiting or stacking of vehicles in the Access Road, whether temporary, short-term or otherwise, and to prevent any entrance or exit bottleneck from occurring which would affect ingress or egress to and from the Hotel and Brickell Avenue and over and across the Access Road. All use of the Access Road shall be done in such a manner by Adjacent Owner as to minimize physical damage to the Access Road. In the event of any damage to the Access Road as a result of the use thereof for construction on the Adjacent Parcel, such damage shall be immediately repaired by Adjacent Owner at its sole cost and expense and such repair will be completed prior to any further use of the Access Road for construction vehicles by Adjacent Owner. 6. Physical -Appearance /Dust Control and Site Cleaning. Adjacent Owner agrees throughout construction on the Adjacent Owner Parcel to keep the Adjacent Owner Parcel in as clean and neat of an appearance as reasonable. In addition, Adjacent Owner agrees that the Access Road shall be cleaned daily to maintain a clean and neat appearance throughout construction on the Adjacent Owner Parcel. Adjacent Owner agrees that in connection with the demolition of the structures currently on the Adjacent Owner Parcel and in connection with construction on the Adjacent Owner Parcel generally, it will implement and maintain at its sole cost and expense, appropriate dust control and pest control and preventative procedures (in particular, procedures to assure the elimination of rodents and other pests in the existing structures prior to demolition). 7. Agreement Not to Object to Permit. Mass Mutual agrees not to object to the Permit or to the Project as described in the Permit. 8. Mass Mutual Expansion of Ballroom. In connection with Mass Mutual's planned expansion of the ballroom for the Hotel, Adjacent Owner hereby agrees to execute and deliver that certain Ingress/Egress Easement ("Easement") in the form set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mass Mutual and Adjacent Property Owner need to agree on the exact location of the easement area pursuant to the Easement, the topographical, structural, construction, detailed legal description and other relevant aspects of concluding delivery and finalization of the Easement. Mass Mutual and Adjacent Owner agree to use their best efforts in good faith to resolve all issues and details in connection with the Easement, and to finalize delivery of the Easement, within a reasonable period of time. In connection with the Easement, Mass Mutual recognizes that Adjacent Owner has certain flood criteria that must be complied with on the Adjacent Parcel. Upon the agreement of the parties, including agreement as to costs, the Easement will be executed by the then current owner of the Adjacent Parcel and joined in by all parties having a lien on the Adjacent Parcel. In connection with the expansion of the ballroom by Mass Mutual, Adjacent Owner agrees not to object to any requests by Mass Mutual of the appropriate governmental authorities for relief or variance from, or compliance with, any applicable land use laws, rules, regulations or restrictions. 9. Agreement Regarding Use of Adjacent Property as Hotel site. Notwithstanding that a hotel and an apartment hotel are permitted uses in a SD-5 Zoning District in the City of Miami, the Adjacent Owner agrees that it shall file an application for a Major Use Special Permit in the event that it seeks to operate the Adjacent Property, or any part thereof, as a hotel. Moreover, this provision shall survive any subsequent modification of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, or any other applicable regulations, which might subsequently eliminate the requirements for the filing of a Major Use Special Permit under these circumstances. 10. Miscellaneous a. Demolition Activities Included. All references herein and obligations concerning construction activities on the Adjacent Owner Parcel shall include all demolition and related activities of the existing improvements currently located on the Adjacent Owner Parcel. b. Enforcement. The provisions of this Agreement may be enforced by all appropriate actions at law and in equity by the respective owners from time to time of the Mass Mutual Parcel, with the prevailing party in any such action entitled to reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred at trial and all appellate levels. C. Counterparts/Facsimile signatures. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the separate parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when taken together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile signature and will be effective upon the attachment and delivery of such facsimile signature pages. d. Construction. The section headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect the meanings or interpretation hereof. In construing this Agreement, the singular shall be held to include the plural, the 3 OTH\LAH0Y5\353323.5\07/14/95 <i plural shall be held to include the singular, and reference to any particular gender shall be held to include every other and all genders. Nothing herein shall be deemed to amend, derogate or modify the Road Agreement. e. Notices. Any and all notices required or desired to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered by hand (including recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express) or three (3) business days after deposit in the United States mail, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows (or to such other address as either party shall hereafter specify to the other in writing): If to Mass Mutual: Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company 1295 State Street Springfield, MA 01111 Attn: Real Estate Investment Div. With copy to: Attn: If to Adjacent Owner: Attn: f. Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is determined by appropriate judicial authority to be illegal or otherwise invalid, such provision shall be given its nearest legal meaning or be construed as deleted as such authority determines, and the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed in full force and effect. g. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the owners from time to time of the Mass Mutual Parcel and the owners from time to time of the Adjacent Owner Parcel, and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 11. Amendments: Termination. Subject to the other provisions hereof and any applicable law as may be hereinafter enacted, this Agreement may not be amended, modified or terminated except by written agreement of all of the then fee owners of the Mass Mutual Parcel and the Adjacent Owner Parcel, and the holder(s) of any first mortgages of record encumbering the same. Further, no modification or amendment shall be effective unless in writing and recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 12. Remedies. Each party shall have the right to prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against any other party, or any other person, defaulting upon, violating or attempting to violate any of the provisions contained in this Agreement, in order to prevent the violating or defaulting party or any such person from violating or attempting to violate or defaulting upon the provisions of this Agreement and to recover damages for any such violation or default. The remedies available shall include, by way of illustration but not limitation, ex parte applications for temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions enjoining any such violation or attempted violation or default, and actions for specific performance of this Agreement. To the extent a condominium, homeowners or other similar 4 CTN\LAN0Y5\357217.5\07/13/95 association is established to govern all or any portion of the Adjacent Owner Parcel, such association shall become the party in interest hereunder with respect to the portion of the Adjacent Owner Parcel encumbered by such declaration and no individual unit owner within such condominium or homeowners association shall have the personal right to enforce any of the terms and conditions- of this Agreement. In connection with any amendments, modifications or consents to or under this Agreement, with respect to any portion of the Adjacent Owner Parcel for which a condominium, homeowners or other similar association(s) then exists, the instrument of amendment or consent shall be executed by such association(s) in lieu of the fee or unit owners of such portions of the Adjacent Owner Parcel and in lieu of their mortgagees. To the extent a condominium, homeowners or other similar association is established to govern all or any portion of the Adjacent Owner Parcel, any monetary liability under this Agreement can be enforced against the common area only with respect to such property and not against the individual units. 13. waivers. No waiver by either party of any default under this Agreement shall be effective or binding on such party unless made in writing by such party and no such waiver shall be implied from any omission by a party to take action in respect to such default. No express written waiver of any default shall affect any other default or cover any other period of time other than any default and/or period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of any default under any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default in the performance of the same provisions or any other term or provision contained in this Agreement. All of the remedies permitted or available to a party under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and not alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right or remedy. 5 DT11\LANDYS\353223.5\97/13/95 EXECUTED as of the date and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presences of 97807 CANADA LTD./LTEE., a these witnesses: Canadian corporation Witness: Print Name: Witness: Print Name: Witness: Print Name: Witness: Print Name: Witness: Print Name: Witness: Print Name: COUNTRY OF CANADA ) ) SS: PROVINCE OF MONTREAL ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1995 by as of 97807 CANADA LTD./LTEE., a Canadian corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/she/they personally appeared before me, is/are personally known to me or produced as identification. By: Name: Title: [CORPORATE SEAL] Address: 2757214 CANADA, INC., a Canadian corporation By: Name: Title: [CORPORATE SEAL] Address: 468310 ONTARIO, INC., Canadian corporation a By: Name• Title: [CORPORATE SEAL] Address: Notary: [NOTARIAL SEAL] Print Name: Notary Public, Country of Canada My Commission expires: My Commission No.: 91/1\LAWV6\362223.5\97/l3/95 6 COUNTRY OF CANADA SS: PROVINCE OF MONTREAL ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1995 by as of 2757214 CANADA, INC., a Canadian corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/she/they personally appeared before me, is/are personally known to me or produced as identification. i Notary: [NOTARIAL SEAL] Print Name: Notary Public, Country of Canada My Commission expires: My Commission No.: COUNTRY OF CANADA ) SS: PROVINCE OF MONTREAL ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1995 by as of 468310 ONTARIO, INC., a Canadian corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/she/they personally appeared before me, is/are personally known to me or produced as identification. [NOTARIAL SEAL] Notary: Print Name: Notary Public, Country of Canada My Commission expires: My Commission No.: 9TN\4AN0V$%353233.5%Q7/13/99 7 �a� p 1[:189A03Liy!lNal'TB �tU',Y'UAYa LilR� =N�i1DR:�a3t'3N CC��iEiAb1Y', a! Masmoehumette corporation ''Wi,tltsas �` Print da Witness 1print Nano: a. LA'. VL Na,,�' r ••`yam �xnd i .� T3'C7Lea i - 7"" [CORPORATE SZriLl Addarasul 1295 !Mate atreeat mmingrie ld, MA 01111 Attn t Real Estate invastment viv. COMMON RALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ssz COUNTY OFMfg"- The foregoing iris m®rat w as ow1*dg+9d befcarea .M9_ bL&w,,.,._. ay O may, 1995 by �./-- d� as8sn,5dMme Presldant of MA88AC=9ETTG MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 6 Ma meaahumetts corporation, " on behalf Ot the Corporation. He/who/they personally appeiaaxaed before me, is/are pdwoon ally known to me or•-rredAe*_1-- Notary : - [NOTARIAL SrAL] Print Nea=61 Notary Pub3.jC, Comma» alth 6:e Massachusetts � my C0mz 16mion aexpirees • o Mir co=imuion No.: - ___-- a All that part In Plat Book 8, at lying and being i follows: i1� n of "BRICKELL POINT", according to a Page 34 of the Public Records of thv ' City of Miami, Dade County, Plat thereof, recorded Dade County., Florida, Florida, described as COMMENCE at the intersection of the Easterly extension of the North line of Southeast 5th Street with the East rightaof-way line of Sriekell Avenue as shown on said -plat of "BRICKELL POINT", recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 34;. thence run South 760391350 East, along the North -line of the PRIVATE DRIVE as shown on said "BRICKELL 'POINr, , for a distance of 40.00 feet,- to the POINT OF BEGINNING of- the parcel of land hereinafter to be described; Thence continue South 76°39135" Fast, along the last described course, fbr a distance of 193.52.feet, to the Point of Curvature; thence run through the next 3 eaurses along North 'Line of said PRIVATE DRIVE, as follows: run Easterly and Northeasterly along a circular curve to the left concave to the Northwest, having a radius of 25 feet, a central' angle of 71a04'35% throuflh an arc distance of 31.01 feet, •.tv a Point 'of Reverse. Curvature; thence run Easterly and Southeasterly, along a -circular curve to jhe right, concave to the South, hay.i ng . a radius of 40 feet, • a central angle of UV23' 40" , through an' arc distance of 85.45.feet, to a point: thence tun South 76®39'35" East, for a distance of 295 feet, sort. or less, to the shoreline of Biscayne Bay as shown on said plat of "BRICKELL •POINT" recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 34 (dated:•. September 1921): thence meander Northwardly along said shoreline, on a general direction of North 9! East, ®ore or less, for a distance of 361 feet, more or less', to a point, said point being marked as N. L.- 36 as shown on .a Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line Bap recorded in Plat Book 74,,at Page 38, of the . Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence• seander Northwesterly along said .shoreline on a general direction of North 220 west, more or less, for a distance of 180 feet, more or. less, to a point, said point being the Easterly and point of a TENTATIVE HARBOR LINE as shown on said plat of 4RICKELL.POINT" recorded in Plat Book S. at Page'34 (dated: September 1921) and also being narked on - said Plat'Sook 74 of Page 18 as AIL 1; thence meander further Northwesterly., along said shoreline, on a general direction of North 37130' West, more or less, for a distance of 62 feet, more or less, to a point: thence run South 38007125" Test, for a distance of 240 feet, more or less, to a point; thence run South 8815071258 blest, for a distance of 337.50 .feet, to a point on, the are of a •35-foot Wfus curve, said point bearing South 88007'25" blest to the 'center of said curve; thence run Southerly. and Southwesterly along said circular curve to the right, concave to the Waste 'having a radius of 35.00 feet, a'central angle of 55°09'000, through an arc distance of 33A9 fett, to a Point of Reverse Curvature; thence run Southwesterly and Southerly along a circular curve to the left, concave to the East having a radius of 35 feet, a central angle of 55*09100" through an arc distance of 33.69 feet to a Point of Tangencyt thence run South .2•52'35" fast, for a distance of 55.33 feet to a Point of Curvature;. thence Southerly and Southwesterly, along a circular curve to the right,, concave to the West having a radius of 572.28 feet, a central angle -of 35013530" through an arc distance of 252.07 feet,• to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I; .i•. Ai jj., A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, CITY OF MIAMI, DADE COUNTY,-FLORIDA, BEING A PORTION OF'LOT 1 IN BLOCK Lg3,S OF "BRICKELL POINT". ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN' PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 93 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:. COMMENCE AT A•POINT OF INTERSECTION' OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A 16 FOOT, WIDE PRIVATE '-*DRIVE AS SHOWN 'ON SAIP' P� A►T OF "BRICKELL POINT,".; THENCE. &ORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHZ� 0F' WAY LINE diV" 139lCKF'i.I. -AVENUE • AND ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING-A RADIUS OF 532 .28 FEET AND A CElitRAL ANGLE OF 15 ° 13' 30,K,.' FOR 144.44 FEET TO THE ' POINT OF TANGENCY; ' THENCE N 01052' 3'5" W ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BRICKELL AVENUE; FOR 3.12.78"FEET; THENCE N 88-R07125" E POR 70.00 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE ARC OF.A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT BEARING S b8°07' 25" W FROM THE CENTER{ OF SAID CURVE AND' SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE. POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND;' THENCE' NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE BOUNDARY -OF TRE. EASEMENT GRINTED IN CHANCERY CASE NUMBER 54811 OF THE CIRCUIT -COURT OF' DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ;AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVS,,:HAVING A :RADIOS OF 35.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 102°36125". FOR 62.68 FEET TO A POINT OF TERMINATION ALONG THE ARC_OF SAID CURVE, SAID POINT OF'.TERMINATION BEARING N 14029100" W FROM THE CENTER OF SAID. CURVE; THENCE N 01052135" W FOR 153.10 FEET TO A'POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE OF THE MIAMI RIVER; THENCE N 86035'21" E ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE OF THE MIAMI RIVER FOR 254.70 FEET; THENCE N 72013121" E'ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE OF THE MIAMI -RIVER FOR 131.74 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE -OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE. TO'THE SOUTHWEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE OF THE MIAMI RIVER HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF'55054121" FOR 97.57 FEET -TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE S '51052118" 8 ALONG THE BULKHEAD LINE OF'BISCAYNE BAY FOR 64.24 FEET TO THE POINT .OF• TERMINATION ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINt; THENCE S 38007125" W FOR 221.00 FEET; THENCE S 88007'25" W FOR•337.50 FEET TO -THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Exhibit "B" CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Walter J. Foeman DATE : September 19, 1995 FILE To . City Clerk SUBJECT : Documents proffered into Public Record FRO e1E. xwell REFERENCES : Your memo of September 5, 1995; ty Atto Yeyy agenda item PZ-8, City Commission ENCLOSURES: Meeting of July 13, 1995 When, during a public hearing, documents are proffeered for inclusion into the record, it is the responsibility of the parties to ensure that such documents are properly tendered to the City Clerk for inclusion in your records. Attached, hereto, is a copy of a letter and a document which, presumably, is the document referred to by Stanley Price on page 310 of the City Clerk's transcript for Agenda Item PZ-8 (July 13, 1995 City Commission Meeting). Said document was "bandied about" at the July 13, 1995 City Commission meeting, but was not, to my knowledge, submitted to the City Clerk. The copy, as you can see, has a cover letter to me dated August 14, 1995, and is not fully executed. The City is not a party to this document, hence its preparation is fully the responsibility of the parties. Nevertheless, I am asking that you include the document in the public records for that meeting, without the cover letter to this office, pursuant to Mr. Price's statement on page 310 of the above mentioned City Commission Meeting transcript. I will need additional information from Ms. Vicki Leiva before I can respond to your query regarding her statement to the City Commission on May 1, 1995, Attachment ,cas m a +f 95- 595 } PLANNING FACT SHEET Pros APPLICANT A. Vicky Leiva, Esq. APPLICATION DATE April 12, 1995 REQUEST/LOCATION Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Point Project located at 401 Brickell Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office) PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit, pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, for the Brickell Point Project located at 401 Brickell Avenue (more particulary described _herein), to be comprised of not more than 599 residential units and accessory — commercial space; approving said Major Use Special Permit after considering the report and recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board, subject to the conditions of the Development Order attached hereto as "Exhibit A", and the application for development approval incorporated herein by reference; making findings of fact and conclusions of law; and providing that the Development Order shall be binding on the applicant and successors in interest. PLANNING Approval with conditionp. RECOMMENDATION _ BACKGROUND AND Please see attached. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION APPLICATION NUMBER 94-182 07/03/95 Approval with conditions N/A. VOTE: 8 - 0 May 23, 1995 95- 595 Item 6 2 Page 1 OW, ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS FOR BRICKELL POINT 401 BRICKELL AVENUE The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permits for the Brickell Point Project to be located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue with the conditions specified herein. The project as proposed, will require two Major Use Special Permits; one is for the project itself, which consists of over 200 dwelling units and over 500 parking spaces; and the other is for designation as a Planned Unit Development. See project description and accompanying applications for specific.detaiis. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Brickell Point Project is a proposed Planned Unit Development project to be located at 401 Brickell Avenue; within the SO-5 Brickell Avenue Area Office -Residential District in Downtown Miami. The project as proposed will consist of two highrise rental residential apartment towers and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel of land with a net lot area 2.12 acres and a gross lot area of 3.67 acres. Brickell Point will have 599 apartment units located in two towers. Tower one will have 41 levels above its service area and Tower two will have 34 levels above the base parking structure. A retail and restaurant area totalling approximately 11000 square feet will be provided within the first two floors of Tower one. In addition, the entry level of Tower two will accommodate approximately 2500 square feet of retail space. The retail area and restaurant will be available for the use of the public. There will also be a riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The riverwalk will provide benches, lighting and safety features. Dower one will have 472,990 adjusted gross square feet; Tower two will have 273,902 adjusted gross square feet; the total adjusted gross square footage will equal 746,892. Parking will be available on Levels one through twelve. There will be approximately 880 parking spaces with valet parking within the service level. All higher levels will have studio, one, two and three bedroom apartments. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, Jacuzzi., tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the restaurant and retail areas. 95- 595 3 ANALYSIS The Brickell Point project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's unique location at the mouth of the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue Office District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. The project consists of a wide, well integrated River and Baywalk which surrounds the projects northern eastern waterfront edges. The final .submittal has been modified slightly from its original form in response to comments received by the City's Large Scale Development Committee at its meeting of 3/7/95, and the Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 4tt9/95 (with thhe exception of the building top design which is addressed in the condiMons below). While the new Brickell Avenue Bridge will facilitate vehicular circulation within the remainder of the downtown area, it has made accessibility tQ the subject property difficult. The proposed accessways to the site are through an easement from the adjoining property, and while it is not an optimum solution, it is functional and makes the best of a difficult situation. RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS OF FACT The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the proposed development with the following conditions: 1. Meet_ all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list 0 agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 3. Prior to. issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police 'Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with' members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 95_ 595 1 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that Brickell Point has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major,Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 8. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record a certified copy of the development order within 90 days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, modify the submitted plans on file to propose a more appropriate cap or terminating piece to the building, per the comments received by the Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 4/18/95; said modified building top plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department. 11. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 12. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. The recommendation of approval of the proposed residential project is based on the following findings: 1) The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami; the project requires no variances, special exceptions, rezonings or changes in land use; the project is further compatible the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan which allows the mixture and intensity of the proposed development. 5 95- 595 ,it-4 117 M. 2) Upon compliance with the conditions outlined above, the project will be in compliance with all of the criteria as listed in Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000 and will be beneficial to the city by providing new housing opportunities within the Brickell area; also finding that, with the above specified modifications, the project.will have no adverse effects on the surrounding area. Note: The attached application for development approval also includes _requested approval of the following: 1. A Class IT Special Permit for the placement of a leasing trailer on the subject property during construction; and 2. A request for waiver of any applicable Waterfront Charter requirements not being met by the final plans. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the two subordinate requests referenced above. 95— 595 t rrso'�! ~ . _ 1_ t. 1 _J__L-1J• 7�0�1 IOd•/MOOQSM �O EL N.E. . 41 o 0 0 o4°O0 i A f t e• • t t 6, J' ! 1$ �,► 7• f• s t I z •• r••♦ t 1 p t � to le ev p, It it tt 'A1s 1 to it 11 If N IT 1• i• is Is 14 Is to oilA 1 • 1♦ 1a I • • T i N J nr �] EAST FLAGLER T. - O ao • • r • • , s t ; ►• • r • f ♦ 'f • 1 '• W CMONEEo it ' W Q 2I p•+c !U•. M as 1 R q M 1• I• It d 19 I! if N 10 N it 'is 1• 4�6't', ¢ Ta♦CT� \V"0 2 SY. r S.E. I �o ST �j 00000000000000 53M40000046<' 1 6= N o 27 cF'04 .M a I It 1! 141 it 1• I• I n '17 h 1 Ir 1• » a go S T. ° • y • M,et pJi o o ° d� N • t • f !♦ It It to • � t � 3 • W N It It II to • • 1� , 3 i M1pM 1 ! t ♦ 1 ! sONVENTM • i 'A 't• I „ g et l• • \`p4` AMENO BISCAYNE SOULE ARD WAY o I >~ rn� \ TRACT'C' J C TH�MER �'\\°o ooep vi . PROPERTY °Op oow 1 6RICKELL KEY ON N ii •s. ', % 1 I CLAUGHTON ISLAND Y s „ , Ol/v T SECT1flN 3 ,A s a ° • 0♦ ' o° J 9 TRACT G PARCEL 7' e a T1t• % 0 ,cl� "A a s a T a to S 1 • r _ a PARK FZ so is to I 12 17 14 to II i/ ,_ 0 1 to to It !t If ~ 1' 1 • It 1, = I • , lot Sr. 7a•loaci4 s• N 7i y ♦0p�noN , 11 a a ♦ ° ST �p i� SECTI + r A 4S1'r 'IK16 95- 595 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU-95- 1t is intended that mgIor use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involved matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for moor use special permits. (See Article 28). The City Commission shall refer all applications for mgjor use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the director of the Department of Planning for recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (section 2301.5.) i, Ayicky Leiva , hereby apply to the Director of Planning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. X Address of Property 401 Srickell Avenue, MiamiF'lorida 33131 X Nature of Proposed Use (Be Specific) To construct a S99-unit h prise rental apartment building consisting of two towers and i retail space Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: x 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. x 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a- 83, attach to application). x 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 6-83, attach to application). Form 16-83 Page 1 of 3 95- 595 :u i x 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the property covered by this application. x 5. General location map, showing relation of the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan X (a) site Plan and relevant information. sections a10.2.3 (a through h) and 2304.2.1 (d through h), X (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems and facilities. Section 2802.3.2(a) x (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.2(b) t j X 71, Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development I t approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). X 81 Other (Be specific) see the documents submitted with the application. x 9. Fee of $ 30, 000.00 , based on the following: (a) $.05 per sq. ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees aslisted in Section 62-61 of the City Code. (b) Fee tabulation Building(s) Advertising Fee $ 1,000.00 Form 16-83 Other (Specify) hailing Fee S s4 . o0 Page 2 of 3 Total $31,054.00 "_ 595 Final Application -� 1 attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final applications: See the documents submitted with this anulication. Signature _ Owner or. Autho ' ed Agent Name A Vicky Leiva Address 701 Brickell Avenue, suite 16so City, State, Zip Miami, Florida_33131 Phone 347-3816 _ This applicatidn is approved denied in accord wlth`City Commission Resolution No. iother Sergio: Rodriguez, Director Planning Department Date Form 16-83 Page 3 of 3 I� 95- 595 4s 1 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS .1 COUNTY OF DADE } "t Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared I A. Vicky Leiva who being by we first duly 'sworn, tupon oath, deposes } and says: 1. That she is the oW=XX=*xthWlegal representative of the owner, submitting the.. accompanying application for a public hearing as required by . Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real I property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. ;That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full ,`l and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. . 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone nuabers and legal descriptions for the the Peal property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are -true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. , '(SEAL) (Name) A.' Vic Le' a Sworn tt and Subscribed before me own o me. this1W"day of R.i 19 i __............... , Csrri��if�L [dOfARY S DIAZ Notary Public, State of Flo MIS �SLIC STATE OF FLORID COMMISSION NO. CC359211 95_ 595 I . OWNER'S LIST 1 -Owner's Name SEE ATTACHED DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP bailing nddresr Telephone Number Wit. a Legat.Oescription Owner's Name Mailing Address ,Telephone Number, - Legal Description,: Owner's Name k Hailing Address Telephone -Number .cytxt ucaa.Nrrw. Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, _or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 315 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NONE Street Address Legal Description NONE Street Address Legal Description x NONE 95- 595 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal'description and street address of subject real property 401 BRICKELL AVENUE# MIAMIt FLORIDA SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION :,2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419•requires disclosure of all parties haviW a financialinterest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any -other interested parties,.together with their addresses and proportionate interest, . 4 SEE ATTACHED 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed A answer to question•f2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. GiNNR OR ATTORNEY FO HER f STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: I COUNTY; OF DADE } A. VICKY LEIVA being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (4erJ (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question fl, above; that he has read the.foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and _(if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure. of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. SEA ) (Name) A. VICKY LEIVA SWORN TO AND SUBSCRED before,q this 77�jj�L ` day o wdd , 19 know to -me '-'"""� Notary Public, State of Florida a e MY �7is iaSMIS DIAZ NOTAR6LIC f;i'ATE OFCO'WION NO. CM9211 MYCOiSSiOIN EXP. MAR 24,1996 9 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION .114'y?M All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: J. Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th St., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1 st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the SX. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through centrag angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to' -the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2n . Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 mi utes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of , e parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an arc distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.54 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 99,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing .1637.70 15 95— 595 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP The owners of the subject property are: 97807 Canada Ltd. and 392208 Ontario Ltd., d.b.a. Atlantis on Brickell Associates 97807 Canada Ltd. - 50% ownership Sol Luger, President, 25%, 190 Eton Crescent, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3K3.-- Herman Luger, Secretary, 25%, 144 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 3201, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1 L2 Mendel Luger, Treasurer, 25%, 1421 Franklin Drive, Chomedey, Laval (Quebec) H7W 1 K7 j David Nisker, Nice President, 25%, 140 Finchley Road, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3A2 t 392208 Ontario Ltd. - 50% ownership Sam Greenberg, President, 50% 3577 Atwater, Apartment 1408, Montreal, Quebec H3H 2132 Gerald Naimer, Secretary/Treasurer, 50%, 1455 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 2301, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1 L2 UNDER SELL/PURCHASE CONTRACT TO: BCOM Properties Corp. Stan Baumann 50% Michael Baumann 40% Terry J. Franzen 5% Richard Van Buskirk 5% 95- 595 DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS FOR 401 BRICKELL AVENUE Owner/Developer: 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd. d/b/a Atlantis on Brickeli Associates 1455 Sherbrooke Street West Suite 200 Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1 L2 Telephone: (514) 939-7213 Fax: (514) 933-7208 `'- Mr. Sol Luger Mr. Sam Greenberg Project Manager: BCOM Property Corporation 540 Brickell Key Drive Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 375-0090 Fax: (305) 375-8183 Mr. Michael Baumann Architect: t Wolfberg Alvarez Group 5960 S.W. 57th Avenue � Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 666-5474 - Fax: (305) 666-4994 Mr. David Wolfberg O'Leary Design Associates, P. A. William O'Leary 8525 S.W. 92 Street Miami, Florida 33156 Telephone: (305) 596-6096 David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Telephone: (305) 447-0900 Fax: (305) 444-4986 Mr. David Plummer 95- 535 (� v Zook Moore & Associates, Inc. 901� North Point Parkway, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Telephone: (407) 583-4017 Mr. James R. Zook Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P. A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 _ Mr. Darryl Sharpton - Legal: Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1850 Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 372-9400 Stanley B. Price, Esq. i Telephone: (305) 347-3816 A. Vicky Leiva, Esq. t Telephone: (305) 347-3818 .4 54 Project D (Property Zone 1. LAND AREA • . Land Area within Property Lines • Land Area 90' - 0" into Miami River o Land Area 90' - 0" into Biscayne Bay • Land Area to Mid -Point of Brickell Avenue SUBTOTAL: +� Additional 20% Allowed Increase under P.U.D. TOTAL GROSS LOT: 2. FLOOR AREAALLOWED (FAR) • Base F.A.R. = 4.25 3. FLOOR AREA -EXPOSED (F.A.R.) (excluding parking garage and basement) A. Phased Lob, Level • Mekanine • Resd Floors: 1 - 8 (* pet Floor) • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 10 - 39 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: B. Phase 2 • Lobby Level Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 2 - 34 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE: Da d SD-5) _ SQ. FT. 92,481 40,765 5,819 20,688 159,743 31,949 191,692 191,692 X 4.25 814,691 TOTAL GROSS (APPROX. SQ. FT.) 8,912 11,917 74,424 (*9,303 SQ. FT.) 13,683 410,490 (* 13,683.SQ. FT.) 519,426 SQ. FT. 6,700 8,698 287,034 (*8,698 SQ. FT.) 302,432 SQ. FT. 821,858 SQ. FT. ADJUSTED GROSS (APPROX. SQ. FT.) 8,310 8,360 68,624 (*8,578 SQ. FT.) 8,946 378,750 (*12,625 SQ. FT.) 472,990 SQ. FT. 6,000 4,892 263,010 ("7,970 SQ. FT.) 273,902 SQ. FT. 746,892 SQ. FT. 95- 595 A 1 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS PROPOSED A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower 39 Residential Floors • 6 Apts. X 39 F1's.............................................. 234 • 1 Apt. X 38 FI's................................................. 38 • 1 Apt. X 31 Fi's................................................ 31 • 2 Apts. X 24 FI's ............................................... 48 • 1 Apt. X 16 FI's ........................... 16 • 2 Apts. X 13 FI's .......... ........ .......................... 26 • 1 Apt. X 6 FI's............................................... 6 SUBTOTAL: 399 UNITS B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: Above Parking Garage • 2 Apts. X 1 FI ................................................... 2 • 6 Apts. X 33 FI's ................. ...... ......... ......... 198 SUBTOTAL: 200 UNITS TOTAL: 599 UNITS 5. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Phase!1 -- 41 Story Tower: 12 Story Parking Garage t • 39AApartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 399 • Restaurant: 5,805 sq. ft............................................ 0 ^. • Retail: 5;603 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................... 6 B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: 11 Story Parking Garage • 200 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 200 • Retail: 2,644 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. ................ 3 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 608 C. Handicapped Spaces Required................................................ 18 Spaces Provided ..... ........................... ........... 18 Spaces D. Off -Street Loading Spaces Required (12' X 55' ea., w/Ht. Clear. of 15' Min.) ................... 5 Spaces Provided (1 @ 12' X 55' w/Ht. Clear. of 14' Min. and 4 @ 12' X 35' w/Ht. Clear. of 13' Min.) .................... 5 Spaces 95- 595 6, OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSED • Basement .................................................... 29 Spaces -� • 1 st Level .. .................................................. 46 Spaces • 2nd Level ..... ....... ..... .... ............ ...... 76 Spaces • 3rd Level ..... ........................... ..... ... 76 Spaces • 4th Level ..... ... .............................. 76 Spaces. • 5th Level .... ................. ........................ 76 Spaces i • 6th Level ............ ....... ... ....... 76 Spaces ' • 7th Level .. .............. .................. 76 Spaces • 8th Level . .... . .... .. .... .. .............. .. 76 Spaces • 9th Level .............. ...................... ... .. . 76 Spaces • 1Oth Level ......... ....... .......... ....... ..... 76 Spaces i s11th Level+ ... ..... ....................................... 76 Spaces • 12th Levels; . .......................................... ..... 45 Spaces TOTAL ARKING SPACES PROVIDED 880 Spaces 6. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Front (Brickeil Avenue): Required.................... ..................... .. ... 30' Provided....... ..... .................... ....... .. . 30' Interior Side@ Garage: Required ... .......... ........................ 15' Provided .... ......... .. .. .... ....... 17' Interior Side @ Tower: Required........ .. ..... .... .............. 40' Provided .... ... ............ ......... .... 40' Waterfront: Required.... ......... ..... ..... .... . 50' Provided ........ ......' ..................... ..... 50' SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REV BV COMMITTER RESOLUTION 91-SDRC-9 WHEREAS, Canada LTDOLTEE and 392208 Ontario Limited have Applied for approval of architectural and site plans for 401 Bridkell,Avenue located,at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami as prepared by Cohen Freedman Encinosa and dated Octobe-k 15, 1991 and the landscape plans as prepared by Bradshaw Gill Fuster and Associates and dated October 9, 1991 and as fully described in the, attached recommendations, and WHEREAS, the proposed project consists of a 39-story apartment tower with 617 units, approximately 8,000 square feet of retail sptace and a river promenade, and WHEREAij the subject application as filed with the Dade County Developmental impact Committee dated September 24, 1991 requests site plan approval, and WHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee considered whether and the extent to which the project as presented conformed to the Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan, the City of Miami Master Plan, and. the Biscayne Bay Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee of Dade ., County has as one of its primary responsibilities, the duty to determine the extent to which any plan or development action, as proposed, is in conformance with Dade County Ordinance 85-14 and the minimum standards set forth in Dade County Resolution 85-257, and ..w RESOLUTION NO. 91-SDRC-9 Page No. 2 WHEREAS, the Committee considered the recommendations of Dade County staff, and WHEREAS, a public meeting of the Shoreline Development Review Committee of Dade County, Florida, was 'advertised and held, as required by law, and all interested parties in the matter were heard, and upon due and proper consideration having been given to the matter; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that at its advertised meeting of October 24, 1991, the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Development Review Committee, as moved by Ricardo Ruiz and seconded by Les Beilinson recommended approval of the development action as presented and tenumerated in the attached staff reports with the ,\ following provisions and conditions: 1. That the size of the trees be upgraded. 2. That the applicants submit a survey showing existing vegetation, and a proposal for relocating any significant trees on or off site. 3. That the applicants submit two sets of revised plans to the Shoreline Coordinator for a determination of compliance with conditions 1 and 2 The vote on the motion was as follows: William O'Leary - Aye Ricardo Ruiz - Aye Conchita Suarez - Aye Madelin,Bunsters Aye Sergio Bakas - Aye Franklin Grau - Aye Les Beilinson - Aye Jose Feito - Aye 95-- 595 RESOLUTION NO. 91-SDRC-9 Page No. 3 Motion to approve passed - 8-0. This resolution constitutes the report of the Shoreline Development Review Committee together with all exhibits attached. hereto submitted to the Dade County, Florida pursuant to Dade County Ordinance 85-14 which shall become a part of all hearings and/or permit records on the proposed development action. Respectfully submitted, William A. O`L a , F.A. L.A Chairman, Biscayne Bay Sh eline Development Review Committee Date App. #91-11 95- 595 - .4 tl ECKm SEAMANs C=mlN & MELLOTT May 4, 1995 701 Brickell Avenue 18th Floor Lourdes Slazyk Miami, FL 33131 City of Miami Telephone 3051373-9100 planning, Building and Zoning Department Facsimile3051372-9400 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Brickell Point/MUSP Application Dear Ms. Siazyk: Please accept this letter as a formal request for the waiver of the Scenic View Corridor Charter Amendment for the above -referenced Brickell Point project. It is our believe, pursuant to my letter to you of March 8, 1995, that our property meets the requirements of said Charter Amendment, however, to avoid any confusion we would ask for a waiver of the same. This request is being,submitted as part of the MUSP application currently pending before the City, and pursuant to Section 1301 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 1100, this permit would be covered under the MUSP application permit which would be controlling. Sincerely, I AWva Miami AVL:id:22234 Harrisburg Pittsburgh Allentown Philadelphia Boston i Buffalo i Fort Lauderdale oca Raton x Tallahassee A. VICKY LEIVA 95 " 5 Washington, D.C. 305/ 347-3818 d rssadd` 'ice •�,}y,:r ECKERT SEAMANS CH RIN & MELLOT r 701 Brickell Avenue 18th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephmu3051373-9100 Ms. Lourdes Slazyck Facsimile 3051372-94W Planning Department City of Miami 275 NW 2nd Street. Miami, Florida 33128 ' ITY ®F. MIAMI PLANNING. BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. March 8, 1995 95 MAR -9 PM I: 39 Miami Harrisburg Pittsburgh Allentown Philadelphia Boston Buffalo Fort Lauderdale Boca Raton TnYW-- Re: Large Scale Development Committee (LSD) of March 7, 1995, Brickell Pointe project Dear Ms. Slazyck: 1 During the above referenced meeting issues were raised regarding the Charter of the City of Miami requirements as to the "Scenic Corridor" requirement for waterfront property. The Charter specifically mandates the preservation of the City's natural scenic beauty, to guaranty open spaces, and to protect the waterfront. In order to do so, the Charter requires at least a 50' setback from the seawall and average side yards equal in aggregate to at least 25% percent of the average lot width. It is our position that the Brickell Pointe project satisfies both of these requirements. A The Brickell Pointe project as ' evidenced by the plan reviewed during the LSD Committee meeting, clearly shows a 50' setback from the seawall along the entire waterfront frontage of the property. As to the side yards, you will be able to ascertain from the attached sketch the average width of this lot which is calculated at 197.41 feet. This figure has been obtained by measuring the property width at five different points of the property (as you indicated to the architect) and averaging the five measurements for the total average width of 197.41 feet. The Charter requires that the average side yards be equal in aggregate to at least 25 % of the average lot width. Therefore, the least required average side yards would be 49.35 feet, the aggregate side yard provided is 67 feet. It is evident, based on the calculations submitted to us by the.. architect, that this project meets the requirements of the Charter provisions. Upon review of this letter by you and your staff, we are confident that you will concur with our findings that the F 95 - 595 A \rrrvv T rnrA Sincerely,.. A:' V.icky Leiva, AVL:id:20038 cc: Stanley B. Price, Esq. Joel Maxwell, Esq. Joe McManus Juan Gonzalez Z . City of Miami, by its . authorized officer, hereby affirms and concurs to the aforementioned position. �"- 595 s� •'`C+ I LE No : 114 03i07 ' 95 �8 I D t b�.. M AL.VAREZ X %64994 • PA(� /r .A9 41 .31v3s 0� „e. S O'OCZ r CD .. D'v6 Y W S _ vi Cr +a 7C W m 9'69 3NI1 M/8 M3N ACCESS DRfVE mi Als fm 390148 3nN3AV 113>10180 M3N NOW 3nv 113MOING J0 3NI1LI31N33 Aantlns 3Nrl3Sm8 95,- 595 ECKERT SEAMANS GHBRIN & Ii/.[awn May 4, 1995 701 Brickell Avenue 18th Floor Lourdes Slazyk Miami, FL 33131 City of Miami Telephone3051373-9100 Planning, Building and Zoning Department Facsimile 3051372-9400 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 -- Re: Brickell Point/MUSP Application Dear Ms. Slazyk: Please accept this letter as a formal request for the appropriate permit for a "rental trailer" to be located on the site during construction of the above -referenced project. This request is being submitted as part of the MUSP application currently pending before the City, and pursuant to Section 1301 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance ! 1100, this permit would be covered under the MUSP application permit which would be controlling. AVL: id:22236 Miami Harrisburg Pittsburgh Allentown Philadelphia Boston Buffalo Fort Lauderdale fbx#Zaton Tallahassee Washington, D.C. cerely, A. Vicky Leiva A. VICKY LEIVA 305/ 347-3818 05- 595 1�iA�tia ECKERr SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOU May 4, 1995 761 Brickell Avenue 18th Floor Lourdes Slazyk Miami, FL 33131 Planning, Building & Zoning Department Telephone 3051373-9100 City of Miami Facsimile3051372-9400 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Rrickell Point Dear Lourdes: Pursuant to your request, attached please fold a letter from` 'the Shoreline Development Review Committee declaring the above -referenced project in substantial compliance. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 347-3818. i Sincerely, A. Vicky Leiv AVL: id:22222 Encl. Miami Harrisburg Pittsburgh Allentouin Philadelphia Boston Buffalo Fort Lauderdale Boca Raton Tallahassee. Washington, D.C. z A. VICKY LEIVA 305/ 347-3818 9 5 r- 595 4 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY; FLORIDA MMRO,DADE METRO-DADE CENTER OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT COMMITTEE SUITE 1210 11i N.W. 1ST STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128.1911 (305) 376.2657 April20, 1995 -- Stanley B. Pricer Esq. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott -- 701 Brickell Avenue, 18th Floor - Miami, FL 33131 Lie: Brickell Point BCom Properties Located at 401 Brickell Avenue (Shorelinet.Appl. 95-2) Dear Mr. Price: As you are aware "by your attendance at yesterday's Executive Council of the Developmental Impact Committee meeting, the Council rendered a "No Need to Comply" determination for the above referenced project. This determination was based on the fact that the plan was \in substantial compliance with the previously approved plan. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to call me at 375-2589. Sincerely, V� Alex A. David, Coordinator Shoreline Development Review Committee cc: Lourdes Slazyk Planning, Building & Zoning City of Miami k:\alex\sdr\lprice.sam 4411N ti r I -Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed developm=Uaf activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity: Brickell Point which is located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the "Property"), will consist of two highrise rental residential apartment towers and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel with a net lot area of 2.12 acres. The gross lot area is 3.67 acres. The property contains T 59,743 square feet of gross lot area. The north property line fronts the Miami River, the i east property line faces Biscayne Bay and the west property line fronts on Brickell Avenue. Brickell Point will have 599 apartment units located in two towers. Tower one will have 41 levels above its service area and Tower two will have 34 levels above the base parking structure. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue office district and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. A retail and restaurant area, totalling approximately 11,000 square feet, will be provided within the first two floors of Tovyer One. In addition, the entry level of Tower Two will accommodate approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space. The retail area and restaurant will be availably for the- use of the public. There will also be a riverwalk along the Miami River end Biscayne Bay. The riverwalk will provide benches, lighting and safety feltures. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Tower One will have 472,990 adjusted gross square feet. Tower Two will have 273,902 adjusted gross square feet for a total of 746,892 gross square feet. There will be an additional 11,000 square feet for retail, restaurant/cafe. Parking will be available on Levels One through Twelve. There will be approximately 880 parking spaces with valet parking within the service level. All higher levels will -have studio, one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments. 1 95- 595 The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include the swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club, and several multipurpose spaces all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the restaurant, and retail areas. (c) 'General location map, showing• relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: -, (1) Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.1 under Tab 6 of the Suporting Documents. n (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, build�g, watercourses, U easements and section lines; 3 The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5= of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; �] The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; D- • 95 - A detailed analysis of site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur via the Property entrance parallel to Brickell Avenue (access to this entrance is through Northeast 5th Street). Service vehicles will turn north from the entrance " road to access the service area. Residents and visitors will continue onto the Property and gain access to the parking garage. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading area; Offstreet parking will be provided within the twelve level parking garage. All levels will be accessed by ramps located on both the north and south ' portions of the garage. The total parking area is approximately 378,393 square feet. Loading areas are provided on the south side of the 'Property. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown o the Eleventh Floor Level Recreation Deck Plan, under Tab 6 of the Suppoging Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. nqi" Connection points to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. r� See Sheet Z-P1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 159,743 square feet 3.67 gross acres F1 [ ! 1 The various permitted uses; Land Use Land Use Parking: 378,393 gross square feet -- 159,743 square feet = 237% Residential and Retail: 746,892 gross square feet -�- 159,743 square feet = 468% (2) Ground coverage b structures. 9 Y - Ground coverage of both the parking structure and adjoining I�bbies, retail, etc. of both Towers is approximately 44,975 square feet or 23 /o of �he total gross lot. D(f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Basement (Service) Level Plan, Sheet A1.2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides 5 loading bays. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre.. D The residential towers will consist of 599 apartment units and 3.67 gross acres. The residential project density pe'r aci a will be as follows: 599 residential dwelling units 3.67 gross acres = 163 dwelling units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. D 95 595 Common facilities provided will include the swimming pool, outdoor recreation deck areas, tennis court, racquetball court, and health club. The common areas will be maintained by the owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include two highrise residential towers with retail space at the lower levels. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on Sheets A1.4 through A1.7 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.; The retail areas are shown on sheets A1.1 and A1.3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting I Documents. (j1 Plans for signs, if any. An illuminated project sign will be located at the southwest corner of the Property. The proposed sign will have metal back -lit letters on a metal background. The size and style will be in compliance with the required regulations. Smaller signs will be located at the entry porte cochere. Retail space and cafe will brovide illuminated signs in compliance with the required regulations. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan located on Sheets L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the *Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owners. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. 133creational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3°I 95— 595 r 0.11T (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2 Section 1 y®2.2.1 General Report. (1) ` Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of �the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I.B. & C. r� (2) The nature of the unified interest or control The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I.B. & C. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. iJ A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the iurvey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application; a. Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. b. Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (5) Materials to demon*strate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami 95" 5,95 Ordinance No. 11000, is SD5 (Special District 5). The Zoning Atlas Map on page 36 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are. consistent. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on —Sheet LP-1 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and (� orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. t The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab *6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This Project conforms to the SD-5 zoning for the Property. The comprehensive Ian future land use designation conforms with the land use d si nation currently P 9. 9 Y in effect for this Property. No zoning variances, or spe .ial exceptions are contemplated for execution of this Project. Further, a concurrerE MUSP application will be submitted for a PUD pursuant to Zoning Code 11000, Article 5, Sect. 502. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1 /4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. There are 92 existinglow cost rental units on the Property, of which 73 units are P Y. rented. The monthly rental per unit ranges between $265 and $465, with an 95- 595 average of $330. Of those 92 units, 15 units are not rentable due to their dilapidated condition. The rented units are on a month -to -month tenancy. These 92 units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income rental apartments. The average apartment will approximate 475 square feet for a r studio, 775 square feet for a one bedroom, 1,150 square feet for a two -bedroom, and 1,600 square feet for a three -bedroom unit. Rents will rangebetween $800 r-. for a studio and $2,300 for a three -bedroom unit. The loss of 73 low-income housing units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income housing units in furtherance of the following sections of the j Downtown Master Plan: Policy I-C: Downtown's existing neighborhoods hborhoods were built decades -ago under very different market conditions than exist today. To produce moderate cost units, higher densities allowing for more efficient land development will .; be- required. Density increases however, should be moderate and timed to coincide with reasonable expectations of market demand and R investment. As property owners present viable development applications, the City should accommodate private requests for zoning increases in the following areas: �1 Policy 2-13: � Creating bookends north and south of the CBD, the Park VVest and Central Brickell areas can become a concentration of highrise residential towers forming new in -town neighborhoods with urban lifestyles that resemble the upper West side in New York or the Uptown area around North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The immediate relationship of Central Brickell to the prestige Brickell Avenue office district makes Central Brickell one of the best area of downtown to accommodate the need for quality (not luxury) high-rise rental, condominium and cooperative housing This residential use should be mixed with high D intensity office use and service retail located on streets enhanced with pedestrian amenitibs. Brickell Promenade (SE/SW 10th Street is the proposed activity center for this neighborhood (see Enhancing Public Spaces,'PoliCy 3-13)..... Q Policy 3-6: The City of Miami's Affordable Housing Trust Fund was established in 1985 to receive contributions from new private sector commercial development' projects in the SPI-5 zoning district along Brickell Avenue and in the SPI-7 zoning district in Central Brickell. In both of these 47. 95- 595 ,twj, a: zoning districts, housing is encouraged to be provided onsite through Floor Area Ratio (FAR) incentives. As an alternative to on -site housing, the developer is given a FAR bonus in exchange for a voluntary contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The Trust Fund is required to be used to subsidize affordable housing within the zoning district from which the funds were collected. Funds collected within the SPI-5 District may alternatively be used within Southeast Overtown Park West or within a one mile radius of the SPI-5 district. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State _ Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. 1 Mechanically, the cooling system will consist of water cooled heat pumps which surpass the minimum seer and cop required by the State Energy Code. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be implemented. Highly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at all common areas. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. 1 e. Historic buildings. 1 There are no historic structures located on the Property. f. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. g. Dade County Shoreline Development Review. On October 9, 1991, Brickell Point was unanimously approved by the Dade County Shoreline Development -Review Committee. Resolution 91-SDRC-9 recommends approval and is located under Article I(G). A determination of substantial compliance has been requested before the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 43 95- 595 RESOLUTION PAB - 21-95 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING PPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE BRICKELL POINT PROJECT, LOCATED AT 401 BRICKELL AVENUE, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE T AN 599 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, APPROVING SAID MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS "EXHIBIT A", AND THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT - APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND PROVIDING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. HEARING DATE: May 23, 1995 VOTE: 8 - 0 ATTEST.- �EffGIOCRODRIGUEZ, DIRECTORVL, PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- DATE: BRICKELL POINT PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in _a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Point Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: Page 1 95" 595 m 7;V FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Brickell Point Project is a residential use development located at approximately 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Project"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 3.62 gross acres and 2.12 net acres of land (more specifically described as "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces, all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Ray, the restaurant and retail areas. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's unique location at the mouth of the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The two residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue Office District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. The Project consists of a wide, well integrated River and Baywalk which surrounds the Projects northern eastern waterfront edges. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this permit. The Project also reflects suggestions received at the Miami Large Scale. Development Committee meeting of March 7, 1994 and the Urban Development Page 29 Review Board meeting of April 18, 1995 (with the exception of a condition regarding the building top design which is addressed in the conditions for development approval herein). The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners dated 3/10/95 with revisions dated 5/8/95; said plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The application for development approval also includes a request for approval of a Class II -Special Permit for the placement of a leasing trailer on the subject property during construction and a request for waiver of any applicable Waterfront Charter requirements not being met by the final plans. Pursuant to Articles 13 and_17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the two subordinate requests referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to 821,858 total gross square feet; 746,892 adjusted gross square feet of habitable residential area; this number " shall be ,educed accordingly if the accompanying request for designation as a Planned Development Overlay District is denied (said designation permits an increase in the floor area ratio by 20 percent over That allowed by the underlying district). Page 3 65, 95- 595 u 'CONDITIONS - THE APPLICANT, ITS'SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL: I... Meet all applicable .building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Within six.(6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical; 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, -:Rescue and Inspection_ Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department; Page 4 9-N� 595 1110; 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a certified copy of the development order within ninety (90) days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, modify the submitted plans on file to propose a more appropriate cap or terminating piece to the building, per the comments received by the Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 4/18/95; said modified building top plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning, Paae 5 67 Building and Zoning Department; said review and approval may consist of a: referral to the Urban Development Review Board for comments if deemed necessary by the Director. 11. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 12. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. THE CITY SHALL:--- 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date .of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the_30 day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit; - CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell Point Project, proposed by the applicant, 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd. ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance 11,000: (1) The Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) The Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) The Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and Page 6 � - �95 A 4 (4) The Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) The Project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) The Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) The Project will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) The public welfare will be served by the Project; and (9) Any potentially adverse effects of the Project will be mitigated through conditions of -this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the specific site - plan aspects of the -Project i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and cogtrol of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. [d2]<musps/95%hrickell/pt/do/1 r -EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th 5t., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1 st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the S.E. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through central angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 minutes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an arc distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.54 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 99,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing 1637.70 F] §�- Z 9 5 ,twiv! ; Project Data (Property Zoned SD-5) 1. LAND AREA • Land Area within Property Lines • Land Area 90' - 0" into Miami River • Land Area 90' - 0" into Biscayne Bay • Land Area to Mid -Point of Brickell Avenue SUBTOTAL: • Additional 20% Allowed Increase under P.U.D. TOTAL GROSS LOT: 2. FLOOR AREA ALLOWED (FAR) • Base F.A.R. = 4.25 3. FLOOR AREA EXPOSED (F.A.R.) (excluding parking garage and basement) A. Phase 1 • Lobby Level • Mezzanine • Resd. Floors: 1 - 8 (* per Floor) • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 10 - 39 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: B. Phase 2 • Lobby Level • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 2 - 34 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE: SQ. FT. 92,481 40,755 5,819 20,688 159,743 31,949 -191,692 191,692 X 4.25 = 814,691 TOTAL GROSS - ADJUSTED GROSS (APPROX. SQ. FT.) (APPROX. SQ. FT.) 8,912 8,310 11,917 8,360 74,424 68,624 (*9,303 SQ. FT.) (*8,578 SQ. FT.) 13,683 8,946 410,490 378,750 (*13,683.SQ. FT.) (*12,625 SQ. FT.) 519,426 SQ. FT. 472,990 SQ. FT. 6,700 6,000 8,698 4,892 287,034 263,010 (*8,698 SQ. FT.) (*7,970 SQ. FT.) 302,432 SQ. FT. 273,902 SQ. FT. 821,858 SQ. FT. 746,892 SQ. FT. "� 595 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS PROPOSED A. Phase 1 — 41. Story Tower: 39 Residential Floors 0 6 Apts. X 39 FI's ........ ...................... ............. 234 • 1 Apt. X 38 FI's ................................................. 38 • 1 Apt: X 31 Fi's .. ........................................... 31 • 2 Apts. X 24 FI's............................................... 48 • 1 Apt. X 16FI's............................................. ..16 • 2 Apts. X 13 FI's ............................................... 26 s1.Apt. X 6 F1's .. ..................................... .... . 6' SUBTOTAL: 399 UNITS B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: Above Parking Garage _ • 2 Apts. X 1 Fl........................................... .... 2 _ 6 Apts. X 33 FI's ....... ....................................... 198 SUBTOTAL: 200 UNITS TOTAL: 599 UNITS 5. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower: 12 .Story Parking Garage • 399 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 399 • Restaurant: 5,805 sq. ft ............................................. 0 • Retail: 5,603 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq, ft. .................... 6 B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: 11 Story Parking Garage • 200 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 200 • Retail: 2,644 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................. 3 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 608 C. Handicapped Spaces Required............ ........................ ........ 18 Spaces' Provided............................................... 18 Spaces D. Off -Street Loading Spaces Required (12' X 55' ea., w/Ht. Clear. of 15' Min.) ................... 5 Spaces Provided (1 @ 12' X 55' w/Ht. Clear. of 14' Min. and 4 @ 12' X 35' w/Ht. Clear. of 13' Min.) .................... 5 Spaces 95- 595 6. OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSED • Basement .................................................... 29 Spaces 0 1 st Level .................................................... 46 Spaces e2nd Level ..................................................... 76 Spaces Y 3rd Level ............................ ..................... 76 Spaces 0 4th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces • 5th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 1 +� 6th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 7th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 'A 8th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces • 9th Level .................................................. .76 Spaces - • 1Oth Level ................................................... 76 Spaces 11thLevel ................................................... 76 Spaces • 12th Level ................. ......:....................... 45 Spaces TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 880 Spaces 6. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Front (Brickeli Avenue): Required.................................................... 30' Provided.......... ....... ... ........................... 30' Interior Side @ Garage: Required............ ..................................... .... 15' Provided...................................................... 17' Interior Side @ Tower.: Required.................................................. . 40' Provided...................................................... 40' Waterfront: Required.................................................... 50' Provided........................................................ 50' 95-- 595 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Brickell Point which is located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the "Property"), will consist of two highrise rental residential apartment towers and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel with a net lot area of 2.12 acres. The gross lot area is 3.67 acres. The property contains 159,743 square feet of gross lot area. The north property line fronts the Miami River, the east property line faces Biscayne Bay and the west property line fronts on Brickell Avenue. Brickell Point wili'have 599 apartment units located in two towers. Tower one will have 41 levels above its service area and Tower two will have 34 levels above the base parking structure. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue office district and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. A retail and restaurant area, totalling approximately 11,000 square feet, will be provided within the first two floors of Tower One. In addition, the entry level of Tower Two will accommodate approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space. The retail area and restaurant will be available for the use of the public. There will also be a riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The riverwalk will provide benches, lighting and safety features. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Tower One will have 472,990 adjusted gross square feet. Tower Two will have 273,902 adjusted gross square feet for a total of 746,892 gross square feet. There will be an additional 11,000 square feet for retail, restaurant/cafe. Parking will be available on Levels One through Twelve. There will be approximately 880 parking spaces with valet parking within the service level. All higher levels will have studio, one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments. 95- 595 &6 ,ti,r�:; 'i,7�iyit'j The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include the swimming pool; jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club, and several multipurpose spaces all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the restaurant, and retail areas. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; �5.. 595 A detailed analysis of -site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur via the Property entrance parallel to Brickell Avenue (access to this entrance is through Northeast 5th Street). Service vehicles will turn north from the entrance road to access the service area. Residents and visitors will continue onto the Property and gain access to the parking garage. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading area; Offstreet parking will be provided within the twelve level parking garage. All levels will be accessed *by ramps located on both the north and south portions of the garage. The total parking area is approximately •378,393 square feet. i, Loading areas are provided on the south side of the Property. (5) Recreational facilities locations;. Recreational facilities for the development are shown on the Eleventh Floor Level Recreation Deck Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. : (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. &P7 95- 595 d1diR�'+�y;i n 141 . !� Connection points to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed td be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. See Sheet Z-P1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 159,743 square feet 3.67 gross acres (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Land Use Parking: 378,393 gross square feet T 159,743 square feet = 237% Residential and Retail: 746,892 gross square feet -j- 159,743 square feet = 468% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage of both the parking structure and adjoining lobbies, retail, etc. of both Towers is approximately 44,975 square feet or 23% of the. total gross lot. df) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Basement (Service) Level Plan, Sheet A1,2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides 5 loading bays. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential towers will consist of 599 apartment units and 3.67 gross acres. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 599 residential dwelling units 3.67 gross acres = 163 dwelling units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. 95- 595 i Common facilities provided will include the swimming pool, outdoor recreation deck areas, tennis co-urt, racquetball court, and health club. The common areas will be maintained by the owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. _ The development will InoWde two highrise residential towers with retail space at ' the lower levels. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on Sheets A1.4 through A1.7 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents..Jhe retail areas are shown on sheets AM and A1.3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1D Plans for signs, if any. (k) An illuminated project sign will be located at the southwest corner of the Property. The proposed sign will have metal back -lit letters on a metal background. The size and style will be In compliance with the required regulations. Smaller signs will be located at the entry Porte cochere. Retail space and cafe will provide illuminated signs -in compliance with the required regulations. Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan located on Sheets L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owners. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 95- 595 :. 40V (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) _Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area ' proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I.B. & C. (2) The nature of the unified Interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I.B. &-C. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, Including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. ..., The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility. Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application; a. Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. b. Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami 95-- 595 Ordinance No. 11000, is SD5 (Special District 5). The Zoning Atlas Map on page 36 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation' for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent. 3. 'Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. - This Article contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Sheet LP-1 indicate -the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This Project conforms to the SD-5 zoning for the Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. No zoning. variances, or special .exceptions are contemplated for execution of this Project. Further, a concurrent MUSP application will be submitted for a PUD pursuant to Zoning Code 11000, Article 5, Sect. 502. 4.Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1 /4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. There are 92 existing low cost rental units on the Property, of which 73 units are tented. The monthly rental per unit ranges between $265 and $465, with an aK-�5 average of $330. Of those 92 units, 15 units are not rentable due to their dilapidated condition. The rented units are on a month -to -month tenancy. These 92 units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income rental . apartments: The average apartment will approximate 475 square feet for a studio, 775 square feet for a one bedroom, 1,150 square feet for a two -bedroom, and 1,600 square feet fora three -bedroom unit. Rents will range between $800 for a studio and $2,300 for a three -bedroom unit. The loss of 73 low-income housing units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income housing units in furtherance of the following sections of the Downtown Master Plan: Policy I-C: Downtown's existing neighborhoods were built decades ago under very . different market conditions than exist today. To produce moderate cost units, higher densities allowing for more efficient land development will be required. Density increases however, should be moderate and timed. to coincide with reasonable expectations of market demand and investment. As property owners present viable development applications, the City should accommodate private requests for zoning increases in the following areas: Policy 2-13: Mo Creating bookends north and south of the CBD, the Park West and Central Brickell areas can become a concentration of highrise residential towers forming new in -town neighborhoods with urban lifestyles that resemble the upper West side in New York or the Uptown area around North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The immediate relationship of Central Brickell to the prestige Brickell Avenue office district makes Central Brickell one of the best area of downtown to accommodate the need for quality (not luxury) high-rise rental, condominium and cooperative housing. This residential use should be mixed with high intensity .office use and service retail located on streets enhanced with pedestrian amenities. Brickell Promenade (SE/SW 10th Street is the proposed activity center for this neighborhood (see. Enhancing Public Spaces, Policy 3-13)..... Policy 3-8: The City of Miami's Affordable Housing Trust Fund was established in 1985 to receive contributions from new private sector commercial development projects in the SPI-5 zoning district along Brickell Avenue and in the SPI-7 zoning district in Central Brickell. In both of these 95- 595 zoning districts, housing is encouraged to be provided onsite through Floor Area Ratio {FAR) incentives. As an alternative to on-site.h+ausing, the developer is given a FAR bonus in exchange for a voluntary contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The Trust Fund is required to be used to subsidize affordable housing within the zoning district from which the funds were collected. Funds collected within the SPI-5 District may alternatively be used within Southeast Overtown Park West or within a one mile radius of the SPI-5 district. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated- walls and roof. Mechanically, the cooling system will consist of water cooled heat pumps which surpass the minimum seer and cop required by the State Energy Code. Extensive use of wall shading by means of canopies and balconies will be implemented. Highly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clock$ and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at all common areas. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. _ e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. f. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. - g. Dade County Shoreline Development Review. On October 9, 1991, Brickell Point was unanimously approved by the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. Resolution 91-SDRC-9 recommends approval and is located under Article I(G). A determination of substantial compliance has been requested before the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. C73 PRICKIAJLL POINT 401 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTED AS SPECIFIED FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Prepared by: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT WOLFBERG ALVAREZ GROUP C. G. CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY O'LEARY DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P. A. DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ZOOK MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P. A. Submitted January 1992 Revised April, 1995 Submitted into the ubt c L=Y COr�n SSION r P #IEETING OF record onnecti n i Reim on I J U L 1 3 1995 Walter oema ' ouuoa N� ►?'fix F d _ City Cle I TABLE OF CONTENTS I: Project Information January, 1992 Revised April, 1995 A. 1) Application for a Major Use Special Permit 2) Application for Planned Unit Development for Increase in Density B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 36 G. Dade County Shoring Development Review Conunittee Resolution II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted into the public record onnec . n it K 7� on `�,W_ alter oeman 9XViii�`,�'�.�_ City Clerk 1 I. PROJECT INFORMATION] PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 36 G. Date County Shoreline Development Review Committee Resolution Submitted into the public record 'n connec 10 item on I NY Walter Foeman City Clerk APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU-95- It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involved matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 28). The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the director of the Department of Planning for recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (section 2301.5.) I, A. Vicky Leiva , hereby apply to the Director of Planning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. x Address of Property 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami Florida 33131 x Nature of Proposed Use (Be Specific) To construct a 599-unit highrise rental apartment building consisting of two towers and retail space - Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: x 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. x 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a- 83, attach to application). x 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 6-83, attach to application). Form 16-83 Page 1 of 3 Submitted into the public recor 'p, connec i w Item Q on 9 5 _ Walter Foeman P, City Clerk 595 ,, x 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the property covered by this application. x 5. General location map, showing relation of the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, i Y important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan x (a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 510.2.3 (a through h) and 2304.2.1 (d through h), x (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems and facilities. Section 2802.3.2(a) x (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 28O2.3.2(b) x 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). x B. Other (Be specific) See the documents submitted with the application. x 9. Fee of $ 30, 000.00 based on the following: (a) $.05 per sq. ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code. (b) Fee tabulation Building(S) Advertising Fee s 1, 000.00 Other (Specify), Mailing Fee $ 54.00 Form 16-83 Total $31,054.00 Page 2 of 3 Submitted into the public recor conne t'o� i h item on I Water F man City Clerk 95-;- 5C5 -~1 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final applications: See the documents submitted with this application. Signature Owner or Authorized Agent Name A. Vicky Leiva Address 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1850 City, State, Zip Miami, Florida 33131 Phone 347-3816 This application is approved denied in accord with City Commission Resolution No. other Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning Department Date Form 16-83 Page 3 of 3 Submitted into the public recor conne�ni item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- �95 J �AFF10AVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } j } SS .l COUNTY OF DADE } f I Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared R. A. Vicky Leiva who being by me first duly 'sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: rr� 1. That --he is the ow=xxXcrXt W legal representative of the owner, submitting the.. accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real 1 property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for his to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. _.J 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, sailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are•true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. c—,,L--SEAL) _J (Name) A. Vicky Le' a Skwo and meSubscribed before me Submitted Into th@ pUb(iC y thislal—day of �.c C 19 recor r it'item j!�rnne on t - Walter Fo man cr MCARY S AL CityClerk Notary Public, State of Flo �.RlYa1�SLIC STATE OF n.ORIDA r _ ei1 CC359211 COMMISSION NO. Hy Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXP. MAR. 24,1998 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSNIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 401 BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having.a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. 4 SEE ATTACHED 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question- #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. 6iWR OR ATTORNEY FO NER STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } A. VICKY LEIVA , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (,9awj (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question P1, above; that he has read the.foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure. of Ownership form on behalf of. the owner. SEA ) (Name) A. VICKY LEIVA SWORN TO AND SUBSCED r this day o,+ifv day of G 119 know tJo-me: - ---�� � Notary Public, State of Florida a e MY EY 16"m.0P i-M. ' Cf ;(SBAL IvtS DI: _. —N i'IJI;L,: i ATE OF FLORID C0F�iMiSSi0N NO. CC35 211 241995 CommISSION EXP• MAIL• Submitted Into the public record��nneth item �fonWalter ean ,:'.,.. City Clerk J OWNER'S LIST SEE ATTACHED DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Owner's Name Hailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Nailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone -Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NONE Street Address NONE Street Address NONE Legal Description i • I -L al D s rip ion 'SubmRed Inca tthe public Irecor connecti 't em on fir'— 595 City Clerk J i LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th St., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1 st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8_at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the S.E. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through central angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 minutes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an arc distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.64 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 991,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing 1637.70 Submitted Into the public recor connect' n i item on Walter oe an City Clerk 95-- 595 square feet. And subject to an easement for Ingress and Egress of the Southwesterly corner of described property being all of that portion of circular sector having a radius of 35 feet and a central angle of 180 degrees and an area of 1924.2 square feet, said Easement being a portion of that certain Easement granted in Chancery Case No. 54,811 of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. ' Submitted into the public recor nnection w ILPon 't item Walter Foeman 9 5— 595 City Clerk DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP The owners of the subject property are: 97807 Canada Ltd. and 392208 Ontario Ltd., d.b.a. Atlantis on Brickell Associates 97807 Canada Ltd. - 50% ownership Sol Luger, President, 25%, 190 Eton Crescent, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3K3. Herman Luger, Secretary, 25%, 144 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 3201, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1 L2 Mendel Luger, Treasurer, 25%, 1421 Franklin Drive, Chomedey, Laval (Quebec) H7W 1 K7 David Nisker, Vice President, 25%, 140 Finchley Road, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3A2 392208 Ontario Ltd. - 50% ownership Sam Greenberg, President, 50% 3577 Atwater, Apartment 1408, Montreal, Quebec H3H 2132 Gerald Naimer, Secretary/Treasurer, 50%, 1455 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 2301, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1 L2 UNDER SELL/PURCHASE CONTRACT TO: BCOM Properties Corp. Stan Baumann 50% Michael Baumann 40% Terry J. Franzen 5% Richard Van Buskirk 5% Submitted into the public record connecti n with item on Walter Feman City Clerk 95- 5 F� APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU-95- b� It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involved matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 28). The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the director of the Department of Planning for recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (section 2301.5.) I, A Vickv Leiva , hereby apply to the Director of Planning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. x Address of Property 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami Florida 33131 x Nature of Proposed Use (Be Specific) To construct a Planned Unit Development allowing for an increase in floor area ratio of up to twenty percent (20%) over that allowed by the underlying District. Submitted into the public recoUE_ in conne on `w, ith Item on Walter Foeman 1 City Clerk 9r3- 505 z I Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: x 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. x 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a-83, attach to application). x 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 6-83, j attach to application). Submitted into the public record nnec 'z with itema!on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- 595 J x 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the property covered by this application. x 5. General location map, showing relation of the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan x (a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 510.2.3 (a through h) and 2304.2.1 (d through h), x (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems and facilities. Section 28O2.3.2(a) x (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 28O2.3.2(b) x 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). x _ 8. Other (Be specific) See the documents submitted with the application. x 9. Fee of $ , based on the following: Submitted into the public recorann nec i item '�with ".� Walter Foeman City Clerk (a) $.05 per sq. ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code. (b) Fee tabulation Building(s) Advertising Fee S Other (Specify) Mailing Fee $ Total $ Submitted into the public recor connec ' n ith item on .I�i Walter Foeman City Clerk 95'— 555 v Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final applications: See the documents submitted with this application. Signature j Owner or Authorized Agent Name A. Vicky Leiva Address 701 Brickell Avenue Suite 1850 City, State, Zip Miami, Florida 33131 Phone 347-3818 I This application is approved denied ' in accord with City Commission Resolution No. other Fa ..l y Sergio Rodriguez, Director I- Planning Department I w� Date Submitted Into the public recordn,i��connec i with item �r�� _ r on�man Walter Foe City Clerk 0 4 A F F I D A V I T STATE OF FLORIDA ) } SS .I COUNTY OF DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared A. Vicky Leiva who being by me first duly'sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That --he is the owveaxx=xtbeclegal representative of the owner, submitting the. accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are -true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. EAL) (Nose) A. Vicky Leiva Submitted into the public wornt and Subscribed before me record in connect'on with Sknown �o me. item Q.QL on -�+�--- this ay of �(-C 19� - - - Walter Foeman , 1:L csrt��nl aRY sEat. City Clerk IBIS DIA2 NOTARY PUSLIC 'TATE OF FLORIDA O.Notary Pubic, State of Florida 8 OMMISSIONEXPCC359211 COMMISSION EXP. MAR.241998 My Commission Expires: fir_ ��a5 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419-requires disclosure of all parties having.a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest.. 4 SEE ATTACHED 0 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question-#2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. 0» OR ATTORN FOR OWNER A. VICKY LEIVA STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } A. VICKY LEIVA , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question f1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure. of Ownership form on behalf of. the owner. SEAL) (Name) A. VICKY LEIVA SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before y� this, U day of (fit A,, , 19S known to me. _ No Public State of Flo at Large Submitted into the public MY ',E Y SEAL recoriWon rinej t' I ith Iris D::,7 NOTARY PUM,zC ST'. 'z OF FLORIDA item �� � COMPfIS510N NO. CC359211 Walter Faeman MY COMMISSION E'CP. MAR• 24,1998 City Clerk OWNER'S LIST I SEE ATTACHED DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Owner's Name — — Railing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: 4 Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone -Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NONE f i Street Address Legal Description NONE Street Address Legal Description Submitted into the public NONE record in Item _ on -17 Waltef City Clerk J I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th St., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1 st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8. at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the S.E. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through central angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 minutes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an are distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.54 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 99,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing 1637.70 Submitted into the public record in connec i (r "t item _ on 9 _ r Walter oeman City Clerk J ram. square feet. And subject to an easement for Ingress and Egress of the Southwesterly corner of described property being all of that portion of circular sector having a radius of 35 feet and a central angle of 180 degrees and an area of 1924.2 square feet, said Easement being a portion of that certain Easement granted in Chancery Case No. 54,611 of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. Submitted into the public record connect. I�nn�,�w�ith item on _`1.�zr> 5 Walter Foeman City Clerk 9"- 505 I r;. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP The owners of the subject property are: 97807 Canada Ltd. and 392208 Ontario Ltd., d.b.a. Atlantis on Brickell Associates r: 97807 Canada Ltd. - 50% ownership Sol Luger, President, 25%, 190 Eton Crescent, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3K3. Herman Luger, Secretary, 25%, 144 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 3201, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1 L2 Mendel Luger, Treasurer, 25%, 1421 Franklin Drive, Chomedey, Laval (Quebec) H7W 1 K7 David Nisker, Vice President, 25%, 140 Finchley Road, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3A2 392208 Ontario Ltd. - 50% ownership Sam Greenberg, President, 50% 3577 Atwater, Apartment 1408, Montreal, Quebec H3H 2R2 Gerald Naimer, Secretary/Treasurer, 50%, 1455 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 2301, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1 L2 UNDER SELL/PURCHASE CONTRACT TO: BCOM Properties Corp. Stan Baumann 50% Michael Baumann 40% Terry J. Franzen 5% Richard Van Buskirk 5% Submitted into the public recor connect'o wit item on Waite Foeman City Cleric EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of BRICKELL POINT, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, lying East of the Easterly boundary line of S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, described as follows: Commence at the intersection of the North line or its prolongation Eastward of the Northerly line of S.E. 5th St., with the Easterly boundary line of Brickell Avenue (S.E. 1st. Ave.), according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, thence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of the S.E. 2nd Ave., Bridge approach across the Miami River, according to condemnation proceeding recorded in July 16, 1928 in Circuit Court Minute Book 36, at Page 290, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and along a tangential circular curve having a radius of 532.28 feet through central angle of 15 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds for an arc distance of 141.44 feet to the end of said curve, thence continue along the East boundary line for the S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach as aforesaid and along the bearing of North 1 degree 52 minutes 35 seconds West for a distance of 112.78 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North along the aforesaid S.E. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach for a distance of 186.52 feet (186 feet by Deed) to a point on the bulk -head line along the South bank of the Miami River; thence North 86 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East to 282.07 feet (North 86 degrees 27 Minutes 45 seconds East 282.37 feet by Deed) along said bulk- head line to a point; thence continue along said bulk -head line North 72 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 131.59 feet (North 72 degrees 7 minutes 25 seconds East 131.07 feet by Deed) to a point marking the beginning of a tangential circular curve; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said bulk -head line and along a curve having radius of 100.21 feet through a central angle 55 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for an arc distance of 97.54 feet (100 feet radius, central angle 56 degrees, arc distance 97.74 feet by Deed) to the end of said curve thence continue South 51 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East along said bulk -head line along a line tangent to the aforesaid curve for a distance of 64.53 feet to a point (South 51 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds East 64.54 feet by Deed); thence South 38 degree 17 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 221.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 407.5 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 99,253.59 square feet (2.2785 Acres) More or Less. LESS: The West 10 feet thereof, dedicated for Street and sidewalk containing 1637.70 square feet. And subject to an easement for Ingress and Egress of the Southwesterly corner of described property being all of that portion of circular Submitted into the public recor connect' n with item _ on If 9 5 Walter Foeman City Clerk sector having a radius of 35 feet and a central angle of 180 degrees and an area of 1924.2 square feet, said Easement being a portion of that certain Easement granted in Chancery Case No. 54,811 of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. Submitted into the public record I connect - item -�—. on with 9 r 5 Walter Foeman City Clerk EXHIBIT "2" DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP The owners of the subject property are: 97807 Canada Ltd. and 392208 Ontario Ltd., d.b.a. Atlantis on Brickell Associates 97807 Canada Ltd. - 50% ownership Sol Luger, President, 25%, 190 Eton Crescent, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3K3. Herman Luger, Secretary, 25%, 144 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 3201, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1 L2 Mendel Luger, Treasurer, 25%, 142.1 Franklin Drive, Chomedey, Laval (Quebec) H7W 1 K7 David Nisker, Vice President, 25%, 140 Finchley Road, Hampstead, Quebec H3X 3A2 392208 Ontario Ltd. - 50% ownership Sam Greenberg, President, 50% 3577 Atwater, Apartment 1408, Montreal, Quebec 1-13H 2132 Gerald Naimer, Secretary/Treasurer, 50%, 1455 Sherbrooke Street West, Apartment 2301, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1 L2 UNDER SELL/PURCHASE CONTRACT TO: BCOM Properties Corp. Stan Baumann 50% Michael Baumann 40% Terry J. Franzen 5% Richard Van Buskirk 5% Submitted Into the public recor anrnnecti n v�ith item i�1 on Walter oemarf City Clerk ` 5 95- va� J DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS FOR 401 BRICKELL AVENUE ) Owner/Developer: 97807 Canada Ltd. & 392208 Ontario Ltd. d/b/a Atlantis on Brickell Associates 1455 Sherbrooke Street West Suite 200 Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G1 L2 Telephone: (514) 939-7213 Fax: (514) 933-7208 Mr. Sol Luger Mr. Sam Greenberg Project Manager: BCOM Property Corporation 540 Brickell Key Drive Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 375-0090 Fax: (305) 375-8183 7 Mr. Michael Baumann Architect: Wolfberg Alvarez Group 5960 S.W. 57th Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 666-5474 Fax: (305) 666-4994 Mr. David Wolfberg Landscape Architect: O'Leary Design Associates, P. A. William O'Leary 8525 S.W. 92 Street L Miami, Florida 33156 Telephone: (305) 596-6096 Traffic: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street j Coral Gables, Florida 33146 1 Telephone: (305) 447-0900 Fax: (305) 444-4986 Mr. David Plummer Submitted into the public recor connect'on 'with Item on Q I g Walter Foeman City Cleik Zook Moore & Associates, Inc. 901 North Point Parkway, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Telephone: (407) 583-4017 Mr. James R. Zook Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P. A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Mr. Darryl Sharpton Legal: Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott 701 Brickeil Avenue, Suite 1850 Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 372-9400 Stanley B. Price, Esq. Telephone: (305) 347-3816 A. Vicky Leiva, Esq. Telephone: (305) 347-3818 _1 «r1 ' Submitted into the public recor n connecti h item on 5 5 15 Walter oeman City Clerk i 11 Project Data (Property Zoned SD-5) LAND AREA • Land Area within Property Lines • Land Area 90' - 0" into Miami River • Land Area 90' - 0" into Biscayne Bay • Land Area to Mid -Point of Brickell Avenue SUBTOTAL: • Additional 20% Allowed Increase under P.U.D. TOTAL GROSS LOT: FLOOR AREA ALLOWED (FAR) • Base F.A.R. = 4.25 FLOOR AREA EXPOSED (F.A.R.) (excluding parking garage and basement) A. Phase 1 • Lobby Level • Mezzanine • Resd. Floors: 1 - 8 (* per Floor) • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 10 - 39 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: B. Phase 2 • Lobby Level • Recreation Level • Resd. Floors: 2 - 34 (* per Floor) SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE: SQ. FT. 92,481 40,755 5,819 20,688 159,743 31.949 191,692 191,692 X 4.25 = 814,691 TOTAL GROSS (APPROX. SQ. FT.) 8,912 11,917 74,424 (*9,303 SQ. FT.) 13,683 410,490 (*13,683.SQ. FT.) 519,426 SQ. FT. 6,700 8,698 287,034 *8,698 SQ. FT.) 302,432 SQ. FT. 821,858 SQ. FT. Submitted into the public record connect' 1 yvi Item on `t Walter oeman City cleric ADJUSTED GROSS (APPROX. SQ. FT.) 8,310 8,360 68,624 (*8,578 SQ. FT.) 8,946 378,750 (*12,625 SQ. FT.) 472,990 SQ. FT. 6,000 4,892 263,010 (*7,970 SQ. FT.) 273,902 SQ. FT. 746,892 SQ. FT. 95- 5�5 J 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS PROPOSED I A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower: 39 Residential Floors • 6 Apts. X 39 FI's............................234 • 1 Apt. X 38 FI's ...................38 • 1 Apt. X 31 FI's................................................ 31 • 2 Apts. X 24 FI's...............................48 • 1 Apt. X 16 FI's ................. 16 • 2 Apts. X 13 FI's............................................... 26 r • 1 Apt. X 6 F1's............................................... 6 SUBTOTAL: 399 UNITS B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: Above Parking Garage • 2 Apts.X 1FI..................................................2 ., • 6 Apts. X 33 FI's.............................................. 198 SUBTOTAL: 200 UNITS "I TOTAL: 599 UNITS 5. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Phase 1 — 41 Story Tower: 12 Story Parking Garage • 399 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit . 399 • Restaurant: 5,805 sq. ft............................................ 0 "� • Retail: 5,603 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................... 6 1 B. Phase 2 — 34 Story Tower: 11 Story Parking Garage • 200 Apartment Units @ 1 Parking Space per Unit ........................ 200 ii • Retail: 2,644 sq. ft. @ 1 Parking Space per 1,000 sq. ft. .................. 3 �LJ TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 608 1 C. Handicapped Spaces Required............................................... 18 Spaces Provided............................................... 18 Spaces D. Off -Street Loading Spaces �.. Required (12' X 55' ea., w/Ht. Clear. of 15' Min.) ................... 5 Spaces Provided (1 @ 12' X 55' w/Ht. Clear. of 14' Min. and 4 @ 12' X 35' w/Ht. Clear. of 13' Min.) .................... 5 Spaces k? Submitted into the public recor connecti n th itemon 9" - 5; a Walter oeman City Cleric 6. OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSED 0 Basement .................................................... 29 Spaces 0 1st Level .................................................... 46 Spaces 0 2nd Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 3rd Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 4th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 5th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 6th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 7th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 8th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 9th Level .................................................... 76 Spaces 0 10th Level ................................................... 76 Spaces 0 11 th Level ................................................... 76 Spaces 0 12th Level ................................................. 45 Spaces TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 880 Spaces 6. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Front (Brickell Avenue): Required..................................................... 30' Provided...................................................... 30' Interior Side @ Garage: Required...................................................... 15' Provided...................................................... 17' Interior Side @ Tower: Required...................................................... 40' Provided...................................................... 40' Waterfront: Required...................................................... 50' Provided...................................................... 50' Submitted into the public recorWe nnc iW item lon r Waite Fo9 5` 5 9 5 City Clerk "MIMITTER LIM21ted h4l/4 SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RESOLUTION 91-SDRC-9 WHEREAS, Canada LTD/LTEE and 392208 Ontario Limited have applied for approval of architectural and site plans for 401 Brickell Avenue located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami as prepared by Cohen Freedman Encinosa and dated October 15, 1991 and the landscape plans as prepared by Bradshaw Gill Fuster and Associates and dated October 9, 1991 and as fully described in the attached recommendations, and WHEREAS, the proposed project consists of a 39-story apartment tower with 617 units, approximately 8,000 square feet of retail space and a river promenade, and WHEREAS, the subject application as filed with the Dade County Developmental Impact Committee dated September 24, 1991 requests site plan approval, and WHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee considered whether and the extent to which the project as presented conformed to the Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan, the City of Miami Master Plan, and the Biscayne Bay Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee of Dade County has as one of its primary responsibilities, the duty to determine the extent to which any plan or development action, as proposed, is in conformance with Dade County Ordinance 85-14 and the minimum standards set forth in Dade County Resolution 85-257, and Submitted into the public record onnec i a� item 99 on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- 5,11,5 I RESOLUTION NO. 91-SDRC-9 Page No. 2 i WHEREAS, the Committee considered the recommendations of Dade County staff, and WHEREAS, a public meeting of the Shoreline Development Review Committee of Dade County, Florida, was advertised and held, as required by law, and all interested parties in the matter were heard, and upon due and proper consideration having been given to the matter; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that at its advertised meeting of October 24, 1991, the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Development Review Committee, as moved by Ricardo Ruiz and seconded by Les ' Beilinson recommended approval of the development action as presented and enumerated in the attached staff reports with the 1 following provisions and conditions: j1. That the size of the trees be upgraded. 2. That the applicants submit a survey showing existing =� vegetation, and a proposal for relocating any significant trees on or off site. 3. That the applicants submit two sets of revised plans to the Shoreline Coordinator for a determination of compliance with conditions 1 and 2. Ja The vote on the motion was as follows: William O'Leary - Aye Ricardo Ruiz - Aye Conchita Suarez - Aye Madelin Bunsters - Aye Sergio Bakas - Aye Franklin Grau - Aye Les Beilinson - Aye Jose Feito - Aye Submitted into the public recor2fon nne i i item Walter oeman, City Cleric 95- 595 RESOLUTION NO. 91-SDRC-9 Page No. 3 Motion to approve passed - 8-0. This resolution constitutes the report of the Shoreline Development Review Committee together with all exhibits attached hereto submitted to the Dade County, Florida pursuant to Dade County Ordinance 85-14 which shall become a part of all hearings and/or permit records on the proposed development action. Respectfully submitted, 4F,.A_L�.A. William A. O'L a , Chairman, Biscayne ine Development Review Committee App. #91-11 Date Submitted Into the public recor connet'o Wi item on 5 .- r. Walter Foeman City Clerk J BRICKELL POINT 401 BRICKELL AVENUE r , MAJOR USE OFFICIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE 11. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 ' 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report b fi� 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study 3 i I J Submitted Into the public recor connec#i . it item , on / Walter Foemar? City Clerk 95- 595 J 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials s (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article 1. c (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. p_ Brickell Point which is located at 401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the "Property"), will consist of two highrise rental residential apartment towers and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel with a net lot area of 2.12 acres. The gross lot area is 3.67 acres. The property contains 159,743 square feet of gross lot area. The north property line fronts the Miami River, the east property line faces Biscayne Bay and the west property line fronts on Brickell Avenue. ;.,..� Brickell Point will have 599 apartment units located in two towers. Tower one will have 41 levels above its service area and Tower two will have 34 levels above the base parking structure. The residential towers will compliment the Brickell Avenue office district and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. A retail and restaurant area, totalling approximately 11,000 square feet, will be provided within the first two floors of Tower One. In addition, the entry level of Tower Two will accommodate approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space. The retail area and restaurant will be available for the use of the public. There will also be a riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The riverwalk will provide benches, lighting and safety features. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Tower One will have 472,990 adjusted gross square feet. Tower Two will have J 273,902 adjusted gross square feet for a total of 746,892 gross square feet. There will be an additional 11,000 square feet for retail, restaurant/cafe. Parking will be available on Levels One through Twelve. There will be approximately 880 parking spaces with valet parking within the service level. All higher levels will have studio, one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments. Submitted into the public recor� in connection it item �•. ,� ]�� The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include the swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club, and several multipurpose spaces all located on the eleventh floor. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the riverwalk along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, the F1I restaurant, and retail areas. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. 3� The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents: � (1) Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. 1 (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; Submitted Into the public record i connec i n t item on _ Walter oeman City Clerk A detailed analysis of site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur via the Property entrance parallel to Brickell Avenue (access to this entrance is through Northeast 5th Street). Service vehicles will turn north from the entrance road to access the service area. Residents and visitors will continue onto the Property and gain access to the parking garage. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading area; Offstreet parking will be provided within the twelve level parking garage. All levels will be accessed by ramps located on both the north and south portions of the garage. The total parking area is approximately 378,393 square feet. Loading areas are provided on the south side of the Property. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown on the Eleventh Floor Level Recreation Deck Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Submitted into the public recor connects � item on 4:� Walter Foeman City Clerk 95— 595 J (e) (g) Connection points to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. See Sheet Z-P1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 159,743 square feet 3.67 gross acres (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use Land Use Parking: 378,393 gross square feet - 159,743 square feet = 237% Residential and Retail: 746,892 gross square feet -- 159,743 square feet = 468% (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage of both the parking structure and adjoining lobbies, retail, etc. of both Towers is approximately 44,975 square feet or 23% of the total gross lot. Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The offstreet loading area shown on the Basement (Service) Level Plan, Sheet A1.2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, provides 5 loading bays. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential towers will consist of 599 apartment units and 3.67 gross acres. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 599 residential dwelling units _ 3.67 gross acres = 163 dwelling units per acre. If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Submitted Into the public recor connecti n t item on Walter oeman City Clerk j Common facilities provided will include the swimming pool, outdoor recreation deck areas, tennis court, racquetball court, and health club. The common areas will be maintained by the owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include two highrise residential towers with retail space at the lower levels. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on Sheets A1.4 through A1.7 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheets A1.1 and A1.3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. An illuminated project sign will be located at the southwest corner of the Property. The proposed sign will have metal back -lit letters on a metal background. The size and style will be in compliance with the required regulations. Smaller signs will be located at the entry porte cochere. Retail space and cafe will provide illuminated signs in compliance with the required regulations. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan located on Sheets L-1 through L-4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, j indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owners. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted Into the public reconne wiitem aNion 5 eWaltroeman City Clerk (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. None. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I.B. & C. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I.B. &-C. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application; a. Sheet LP-1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. b. Sheet LP-2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Submitt^d into the public record onnect'on a,! item on 9 w15 Walter oeman City Clerk k Ordinance No. 11000, is SD5 (Special District 5). The Zoning Atlas Map on page 36 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation t"le access. Maps located on Sheet LP-1 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This Project conforms to the SD-5 zoning for the Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently ,I in effect for this Property. No zoning variances, or special exceptions are contemplated for execution of this Project. Further, a concurrent MUSP application will be submitted for a PUD pursuant to Zoning Code 11000, Article 5, Sect. 502. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1 /4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. ' The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. There are 92 existing low cost rental units on the Property, of which 73 units are rented. The monthly rental per unit ranges between $265 and $465, with an Submitted into the public record conne 'on i h item on 1 ". a Walter Foeman *r City Clerk average of $330. Of those 92 units, 15 units are not rentable due to their dilapidated condition. The rented units are on a month -to -month tenancy. These 92 units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income rental apartments. The average apartment will approximate 475 square feet for a studio, 775 square feet for a one bedroom, 1,150 square feet for a two -bedroom, and 1,600 square feet for a three -bedroom unit. Rents will range between $800 for a studio and $2,300 for a three -bedroom unit. The loss of 73 low-income housing units will be replaced with 600 affordable moderate income housing units in furtherance of the following sections of the Downtown Master Plan: Policy I-C: Downtown's existing neighborhoods were built decades ago under very different market conditions than exist today. To produce moderate cost units, higher densities allowing for more efficient land development will be required. Density increases however, should be moderate and timed to coincide with reasonable expectations of market demand and investment. As property owners present viable development applications, the City should accommodate private requests for zoning increases in the following areas: Policy 2-13: Creating bookends north and south of the CBD, the Park West and Central Brickell areas can become a concentration of highrise residential towers forming new in -town neighborhoods with urban lifestyles that resemble the upper West side in New York or the Uptown area around North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The immediate relationship of Central Brickell to the prestige Brickell Avenue office district makes Central Brickell one of the best area of downtown to accommodate the need for quality (not luxury) high-rise rental, condominium and cooperative housing. This residential use should be mixed with high intensity office use and service retail located on streets enhanced with pedestrian amenities. Brickell Promenade (SE/SW 10th Street is the proposed activity center for this neighborhood (see Enhancing Public Spaces, Policy 3-13)..... Policy 3-8: The City of Miami's Affordable Housing Trust Fund was established in 1985 to receive contributions from new private sector commercial development projects in the SPI-5 zoning district along Brickell Avenue and in the SPI-7 zoning district in Central Brickell. In both of these Submitted into the public t record ppiWonne t'o with item on Waite Foeman City Cleric zoning districts, housing is encouraged to be provided onsite through Floor Area Ratio (FAR) incentives. As an alternative to on -site housing, I the developer is given a FAR bonus in exchange for a voluntary contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The Trust Fund is required to be used to subsidize affordable housing within the zoning district from which the funds were collected. Funds collected within the SPI-5 District may alternatively be used within Southeast Overtown Park West or within a one mile radius of the SPI-5 district. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only `t those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. i Mechanically, the cooling system will consist of water cooled heat pumps which surpass the minimum seer and cop required by the State Energy Code. Extensive use of wall I shading by means of canopies and balconies will be implemented. Highly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. I Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at all common areas. All motors over one-half horsepower will be high efficiency motors. e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. f. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. - g. Dade County Shoreline Development Review. On October 9, 1991, Brickell Point was unanimously approved by the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. Resolution 91-SDRC-9 recommends approval and is located under Article I(G). A determination of substantial compliance has been requested before the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. Submitted Into the public recor Won nnec io i h item Waite Foeman 9 151 -- 5 S 5 City Clerk. J III . � m DQaNIEIVIS _ SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE Ill. Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted j lxf f fi i i t i i Submitted into the public "' f recor tonne t''RL ith ; item on z Waite Foeman City Clerk � , : %� � : ���� � � � �� . zw� , MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Prepared by: 97807 Canada Ltd. and 392208 Ontario Ltd., Owners of 401 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida Submitted Into the public recur on ' n t item m on 9 1� — Walterf oeman City Clerk. I. Construction Plan for Minority Equal Opportunity Employment A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council I!. A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will ^ be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. Submitted into the public recorM connI*' item — on Walter 9 5 -- City Clerk The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development Florida Department of Transportation The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council II. Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Equal Employment Plan. A. Goal. To promote economic opportunities for minority contractors and vendors in the City of Miami. B. Background. The applicant's intent is to pursue his successful past practices of hiring qualified minority construction contractors and subcontractors in every phase of the construction and management of the project. III. The Applicant's Policy Statement for Equal Employment Opportunity. Purpose To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are administered equally and without regard for race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. Policy 1. All employees and job applicants are guaranteed equality of employment opportunity. This means that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. t 2. All recruitment, selection, placement, training, and layoff decisions made by the Company's supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates job -related qualifications and abilities. 3." All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration. Assuming that an opening exists, the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the basis of the individual's ability and merit (as demonstrated by the applicant's performance record). 4. All other personnel policies and practices of the Company, including compensation, benefits, discipline, and safety and health programs, as well as social and recreational I_J Submitted into the public recor conne J• h item on 915-W 595 Walter Foeman �Y City Cleric activities, will be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 5. The Company will establish special programs to recruit, hire and ensure the advancement of qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans. 6. The Company will take all necessary steps to ensure that each employee's work environment is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. Submitted into the public recordconnec ' n4emn � item on Walter F City Clerk 9 951 - 5S5 Project #91120 JAN92/91120R02 January 6, 1992 Revised February 11, 1992 BRICKELL POINT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY* Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Submitted into the public reCorA%c(onnejct'o I item an Waite Fopm, oeman, In My Clerk 95- *Please note that the attached Traffic Study is in substantial compliance with the current project concept. Some numbers and details have changed; however, the original conclusion remains valid. Changes: Page 1 Apt. Dwelling Units 599 Page 4 Page 4 Page 5 Retail SF GFA 8,247 Restaurant SF GFA 5,805 C Vehicular Access Residents and visitors will continue onto the Property and again access to the parking garage via a short ramp. D Pedestrian Circulation The second level of the building provides access to the project lobby and the retail stores. Omit reference to pedestrian bridge. Total Traffic (599 D.U. and 14,052 SF commercial) Submitted Into the public record ' nnecti n i 9 5 Item on Walter oeman City Clerk -J, INTRODUCTION j Brickell Point is a mixed used residential and commercial development in Downtown Miami, J Dade County. This site, shown in Exhibit 1, is located on the southerly bank of the Miami River east of Brickell Avenue and north of S.E. 5th Street. The site is presently occupied by 92 dwelling units (D.U.'s) which will be replaced by the proposed development. The following land uses are proposed for the site: BRICKELL POINT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Land Use Apartments Retail Restaurant * Square feet of gross floor area. Intensities 600 Dwelling Units 4,000 SF GFA* 4,000 SF GFA* STUDY PURPOSE The general purpose of this study is to request approval of Brickell Point under the development order issued for Increment I of the Downtown Miami Areawide Development of Regional Impact (DRI). This traffic impact study will determine if there would be localized impacts beyond those identified in the Downtown Miami DRI. STUDY AREA Per agreement with the City of Miami Planning Department, the study area is defined as S.E. 4th Street on the north, S.E. Sth Street on the south, Brickell Avenue on the west and Biscayne Bay on the east. The study area is shown in Exhibit 2 along with the critical intersections to be analyzed. Submitted Into the public recor connecti it item on 9ra� �� 5 Walter oe an City Clerk EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing turning movements counts for the intersections under study were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Downtown Miami DRI where available. Additional turning movement counts were obtained for Brickell Avenue and S.E. 4th Street and S.E. 5th Street (Appendix 1). Level of Services (LOS) for the signalized intersections was determined using the methodology outlined in 1985 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized intersections. Intersection analysis performed for existing conditions during the afternoon PM Peak Hour have been included in Appendix 2. The analysis is consistent with the Downtown DRI methodology. Exhibit 3 represents link analysis for the existing traffic in the study area. It shows peak hour volumes, capacities, excess capacities, volume to capacity ratios and levels of service. Traffic volumes shown in this table were obtained from the turning movement counts taken for this project. The analysis indicates that all roadway links presently operate at or above Level of Service "E". This is an acceptable level of service under the adopted Special Transportation Area designation for this area as recognized in the Downtown DRI and the City's Comprehensive Plan. PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The 1992 Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was reviewed to determine if any roadways within the study area are programmed for improvements within Increment I of the Downtown Miami DRI. The document includes one roadway improvement in the area: the proposed replacement of the Brickell Avenue bridge over the Miami River Submitted into the public recorddsc onnecti n i _item . on 9 r -� Lti g r Walter -oeman f City Clerk (Exhibit 4). Exhibit 5 presents the proposed alignment for the Metro -Mover Extension (under construction) and the existing alignment and station location for Metro -Rail in the vicinity of the project. Planned improvements within the study area include the City of Miami Brickell Promenade, which will promote pedestrian movements to and from the Metro -Rail Station located at the intersection of S.E. 1 st Avenue and S.E. 10th Street. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT In order to assess the impacts of Brickell Point traffic on the street network, future traffic conditions without project must be determined. For consistency, the analysis was conducted for the Downtown DRI increment 1 (1997). All of the developments within Increment I of the Downtown DRI (both approved in allowable) were considered committed developments even though the majority are not yet under construction. Allowable development traffic allocated to the project site in the Downtown DRI Increment I study was deducted from the area. Intersection analysis worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix 3 for the PM Peak Hour. PROJECT TRAFFIC A. Traffic Trip Generation The Dade County Trip Generation formula used in the Downtown Miami DRI was used in order to project traffic generation by Brickell Point and it is shown in Appendix 4. Submittod into the public record,r,cUnr��; orip item on _ Walter Foeman City Clerk B. Traffic Assignment Traffic assignment used in the Downtown DRI for the Brickell Point Traffic Analysis Zone Brickell 2) was used in this analysis. C. Vehicular Access Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur via the project entrance parallel to Brickell Avenue (access to this entrance is through N.E. 5th Street). Service vehicles will turn north from the entrance road to access the service area on the first level of the building. Residents and visitors will continue on the entrance road and gain access to the parking garage via a ramp to the second level of the building. A drop-off area is provided along the ramp at the project's lobby entrance. D. Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian circulation in public areas is provided on two levels. The third level of the building provides access to the project lobby and the retail stores. This level is connected to Brickell Avenue via a pedestrian bridge which separates pedestrians from the vehicular traffic entering the project. Pedestrian circulation is also provided at the River Promenade level. Again, this area is completely separated from vehicular traffic. Submitted into the public recor i cu�+r�ec is vrRh item on UValtc City Clt:rk TOTAL TRAFFIC Net new project traffic was calculated as the difference between the proposed project traffic (600 D.U.'s and 8000 S.F. commercial) and the existing site (92 D.U.'s). Net new project traffic was then superimposed on the future traffic volumes without project to obtain total traffic. Intersection analysis worksheets for the critical intersections are provided in Appendix 5. The results are graphically portrayed in Exhibit 6. Brickell Point's net new project traffic is equivalent to the total allowable traffic as originally calculated for traffic analysis zone Brickell 2 of the Downtown Miami DRI. ,j I CONCLUSIONS Link analysis, consistent with the Downtown Miami DRI, was also undertaken for total traffic i on the recommended roadway network (Exhibit 7). The Downtown Miami DRI recognized that there are physical, historical and aesthetic limitations to the continued expansion of its 1 roadway system. Brickell Avenue is one of such roads considered "constrained". The peak hour level of service standards for Downtown Miami, as specified in DRI j Applications, is LOS E. However, provisions are also made to allow for a certain percentage of links and intersections to fall below LOS E. Mainly, no more than twenty percent (20%) of intersections can operate below LOS E. All intersections analyzed in this study are projected to operate at acceptable levels of l service with recommended and improvements in the DRI. The impacts of this project are therefore mitigated through the City of Miami Regional Transportation Impact Fee. The existing signal at S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue will provide access to both Brickell Point and the Sheraton Hotel. It is recommended that driveways from these two projects Submitted into the public record ' conn2cti wi item , on T, Waltar !-oor an 9 5 City Clerlt be signalized as shown in Exhibit 8 to provide a free -flow inbound movement to both Brickell Point and the Sheraton Hotel. No additional roadway improvements are recommended. .f 1 } 4f� Submittod into the, public record conne t'on �i 9 _item . on Walter Foe an City Clerk UMB-1 Submitted into the public recor connect' n .item on '# Walter oeman . City Clerk 95- 595 BRICKELL POINT N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT 1 091120 PROJECT LOCATION recor cunnect'o di item on ' Walter o r City Cierk E. FLAGLEA ST. � gnomon FS E 1 ST. SE 2 ST. Z - b J r r 0.0 Q - - - ■ SE 5 ST. `t SE 6 ST, I N.T.B. • 11' ■ ■ PROJECT SW T ST, LOCATION - � I r SW 8 ST, A > �, r J � S c�� w Yo ST. , co I ® ,� 610MAL12ED INTERSECTION co I P� BRICKELL POINT EXHIBIT 2 #91 too STUDY AREA record tonne itemth on x Walter Poeman r; " 3 �. city clerk P OS-Jan-92 File: EXSLINK.WR1 Projects BRICKELL POINT Scenarios EXISTING TRAFFIC -------------------------------------------------- Number --------- Peak -Hour ------- Direction of Volumelcapacity' V/C I -------------- -..__--------------•^------------------------------------ From To Lanes BRICKELL AVE. S.W. Sth STREET S.W. 7th STREET ---------------------------------- NB 3 1715 2780 0.62 SB 3 1347 2780 0.48 S.N. 7th STREET S.H. 5th STREET NB 3 1436 2780 0.52 sB 3 1649 2780 0.59 S.N. 5th STREET S.W. 4th STREET NE 2 1433 1830 0.78 SB 2 1524 1830 0.83 M x w Y. C„, CDn Q ^ CD 2 O '] n o N M Z7 C7 CD n LOS D D D D D D Excess Capacity 1,43'J 1,344 1,131 397 306 k,.:.'.. _:..1 � M� .: a�u�tw'j wa*w.waat �e.rr.+cat ..r•....ay m«—....a ,..a . r rvwow.v4 nac�sa�zq yy �, 01105M 07:1a PY /Y1120 PilMP.MMi1 m x x am —0 3 0 o �s' 3 CD o. c� o iu 5 :3 o M CD ff -n CD 0 B CD ^a SD •/ I err PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (1) BRICKELL POINT Project Number Roadway Description Year Cost(In $1000) 9113279 BRICKELL AVENUE REPLACE MOVABLE SPAN 1992-93 CST 14,429 BRIDGE CEI 1,440 (1)1992 Transportatlon Improvement Program COPMAe Kum im c 3AL SRICKELL POINT PROJECT LOCATION Sr � } e r, r co r® _E.XHIB1.T_ S #91120 MASS TRANSIT ubmitted into the i public recor onnec -o item S If 5 on Walter Foemarn 01l01iiQ OY:�O AM Oi1120 NlfEliWgt C n a . fin 3 h ,+ t C n `D c cc CJt 1 C,T!' EXHIBIT 6 BRICKELL POINT SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION ANALYSIS INTERSECTION TIME PERIOD EXISTING LOS FUTURE W/O PROJECT FUTURE WITH PROJECT BRICKELL AVE./S.E. 8th STREET PM PEAK B E E HOUR BRICKELL AVE./S.E. 7th STREET PM PEAK C E E HOUR BRICKELL AVE./S.E. 5th STREET PM PEAK C D D HOUR BRICKELL AVE./S.E. 4th STREET PM PEAK B C C HOUR POO 07-Jan-92 Files FUTLINKR.WRl Projects BRICKELL POINT Scenarios FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT Segment -------------------- ---------------------- ------- Number ---------Peak-Hour--------------- Excess , Direction I of V0 umelCapacityl V/C I LOS Capacit, From I To Lanee -------------------------------------- I ---- I,, ---------- -------------- -------------------------------- BRICKELL AVE. S.W. 8th STREET -------------------------- S.W. 7th STREET NB 3 908 2780 0.33 D 1,872 SB 3 2342 2780 0.84 D 438 S.W. 7th STREET S.W. 5th STREET NB 3 1643 2780 0.59 D 1,137 SB 3 1553 2780 0.56 D 1,227 S.W. 5th STREET S.W. 4th STREET NB 2 1642 1830 0.90 D ' 188 SB 2 1384 1830 0.76 D 446 m X n'oca o z a o — Mao p� t 0 (D CD ids no woa BRICKELL "E. i ir ' r I , n ( M� ui vi EXHIBIT B #0120 BRICKELL POINT ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY Submitted into the public record in connec i ith 9 item on — Walter Foeman Yy G �y,,t' 'HR,. „ 4 t� &YOi% Submitted into the public I record 'n annect'a Q item on Walter Foeman 9 5" 555 City Clerk Submitted into the public record connect'on with item on �- Walter Foeman 9 5 _-• 5 6 15 City Cleric 05-Jut92 19,38:50 BRISES.WR1 APPEND I x DAVID PLU MER & ASSOCIATES SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS +................................................................................................................ ILOCATtON: BRICKELL AVE. & S.E. 5 STREET ICOLRNTY : DADE CITY: MIAMI (OBSERVER: DPA DATE: 12/05/91 I IWEATNER : REMARKS : BRISES.WRI 1 (ROAD CONDITION: AADT BALANCED 1 +-------------------*--------......---...+-----.............._+.,_..._...------.......................... 4.......4 ITIM+E............... INORTHBOUND .......... JSOUTHBOUND .......... JEASTBOUND............ I4ESTSOUND ........... I GRAND I IBEGIN END I L T R Totatl L T R Totall L T R Totatl L T R Totall TOTAL I +...................y........................................+ ..................... ♦.................... y........ J 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 J 0 1 1 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l 0 1 07:30 AM 07:45 AN 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 107:45 AM O8: DO AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 J 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 J 0 1 1 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 108:30 AM 08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 J 108:45 AM 09:00 AM 1 I I 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 I ! 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 I ! 0 1 I I I 1 I 1 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 1 13 200 35 I I 247 1 11 1a2 13 ! I 207 ( 20 0 25 I I 45 J 18 0 35 I I 53 I I I $53 I J 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 1 14 222 36 272 1 14 226 10 250 1 8 2 7 17 1 25 0 20 45 l 584 I 104:30 PM 04:45 PM 1 18 244 41 303 1 8 226 14 249 I 13 0 17 30 1 22 0 15 37 J 619 1 104:45 PM 05:00 PM 1 16 256 34 307 1 23 280 25 328 J 19 0 12 31 J 14 0 19 33 ( 699 1 105:00 PM 05:15 PH 1 17 325 27 369 1 11 358 13 383 J 23 0 28 51 J 24 0 25 49 I 852 I J 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 1 13 331 23 368 I 19 383 14 416 ( 19 0 19 38 I 18 0 20 38 I 859 I l 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 1 11 329 13 353 I 14 295 8 317 J 9 0 20 29 1 13 0 10 23 J 722 1 1 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 1 13 330 9 352 1 22 353 13 388 1 0 0 24 24 1 11 0 16 27 1 791 J ............................................................♦................................................... 05-Jan-92 19:38:51 DAVID PLUWER & ASSOCIATES PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS .r. ............................... ILOCATION: BRICKELL AVE. & S.E. 5 STREET 1 JCOUINTY : DADE CITY: MIAMI 1 (OBSERVER: DPA DATE: 12/05/91 1 (WEATHER : REMARKS : BRISES.WR1 1 ' I (ROAD CONDITION: MDT BALANCED J �7Y.........................................}....................4..................................................� IPEAK HOUR INORTHBOl1ND---------- JSOUTHBOI---------- JEASTBOUND............ (WESTBOUND ........... I GRAND 1 1FROM TO I L T R Totall L T R Totatl L T R Totall L T R Totall TOTAL I .......................................y....----------------•-------------...................................... JAM PM I i I I I I 1 01:30 PM 06:30 PH 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 0 I 0 l ;PEAK HOUR FACTOR i NA i NA j MA i NA i NA I i I I I I PH PEA[ 105:00 PM 06:00 PH 1 54 1300 73 1427 i 61 1418 45 1524 1 52 1 99 152 1 73 1 72 146 1 3225 I ;PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 0.98 i 0.90 1 0.69 1 0.70 1 0.94 ♦.......................................+...........---------+----------..................................--..... Submitted into the public; record in conne ion it APPENDIN. I am � on Walt r Foemao 5 -. L?A; City Clerk" [P 05-Jan-92 19:50:55 BRISE4.MR1 APPENDIX DAVID PLUMMER i ASSOCIATES SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS +................................................................................................................. (LOCATION: BRICKELL AVE. i S.E. 4 STREET (COUNTY : BADE CITY: MIAMI { (OBSERVER: DPA DATE: 12/05/91 {FEATHER : REMARKS : BRISE4.61R1 {ROAD CONDITION: AADT BALA.YCED { ....................+---.................+.....------.........+.....................*..—................+.......+ (TIME ............... (NORTHBOUND .......... {SORTHBOUND .......... JEASTBOUND............ (WESTBOUND ........... { GRAND (BEGIN END { L T R Total{ L T R Total( L T R Total( L T R Total( TOTAL +...................+.........-----......+..............-----.+.....................+...---........•..... ( 07:00 AN 07:15 AM { 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 4......... 01 0 i ( 07:15 AN 07:30 AM ( 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 01 ( 07:30 AN 07:45 AM ( 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 01 ( 07:45 AM 08:00 AN ( 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 l { 08:00 AM 08:15 AM { 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 01 01 { 08:15 All 08:30 AM { 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 01 j ob:30 AM 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0{ 01 1 08.45 AM 09.00 AM l 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0( 0 { 04:00 PM 04:15 PM { 0 0 0 0{ 59 211 0 269 ( 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0 ( 04:15 PM 04:30 PM ( 0 0 0 0{ 70 234 0 303 ( 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 04:45 PM ( 0 0 0 0{ 68 241 0 308 ( 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 ( 04.45 PM 05:00 PM ( 0 0 0 0( 60 276 0 336 ( 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 { 05:00 PM 05:15 PM { 0 0 0 0( 71 331 0 401 i 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0 { 05:15 PM 05:30 PM ( 0 0 0 0( 53 336 0 388 { 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 ( 05:30 PM 05:45 PM ( 0 0 0 0 82 315 0 400 ( 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 ( 05:45 PM 06:00 PM { 0 0 0 0( 66 375 0 "1 { 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0 +...................y....................+....................+.....................+....._............_.. 05-Jan-92 19:50:56 DAVID PLUMMER 3 ASSOCIATES PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS 269 303 { 308 336 j 401 388 400 j 441 I +................................................................................................................+ (LOCATION: BRICKELL AVE. i S.E. 4 STREET (COUNTY : DADE CITY: MIAMI OBSERVER: DPA DATE: 12/05/91 {FEATHER : REMARKS : BRISE4.WR1 { {ROAD CONDITION: MDT BALANCED ...........+. ....................4....................+........ +------......•-•--•-+•----^ -. +----...--^-----••-- (PEAK HOUR IMORTNBOUND.......... {SOUT HBOUND-...••....JEASTBOUND------------(WEST8CM-----•-----{ GRAND ( (FROM TO { L T R Total) L T R Total{ L T R Total{ L T R Total{ TOTAL { +........................................ +--------.........---+-------...........---+--......••..........+.......+ {AM PEAK { ( { { 01:30 PM 06:30 PM { 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0{ 0 M0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 i 0 ,PEAK HOUR FACTOR { RNA ( NA KA NA { i { { { { jPM PEAK 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 j 271 1471 0 1741 j 0 0 0 0{ 0 0 0 0{ 1630 {PEAK HOUR FACTOR { NA { 0.92 { NA ( NA 0.92 +------------------- +.........................................+.......................................... 4........ Submitted into the public record I connect I item on APPENDIX 1 b Walter Foeman City Clerk 9- ER- END- M 2 Submitted into the public record nne t Ith item on Walter Foeman City Clerk HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 8th STREET (N-S) BRICKELI4 AVFMJE Analyst: DPA File Name: DRISEXT.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAR HOUR Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R � No. Lanes 2 1< 1 2> < 2 3< 2 3 Volumes 298 93 185 180 294 771 63 98 1240 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 60 0 0 --------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left _ `1 Thru Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 35A 16A Green 13A 33P Yellow/A-R 5 5 Yellow/A-R 3 5 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 l Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: 01 12 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/c Approach: i Mvmts Cap ----- ----------- Flow Ratio ----- Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 2951 949 0.35 0.32 22.7 C 22.4 C TR 1560 502 0.24 0.32 21.8 C 'j J R 1363 439 0.25 0.32 21.9 C WB L 2951 462 0.32 0.16 32.9 D 34.6 D LR 1437 225 0.59 0.16 37.2 D R 2406 377 0.45 0.16 34.0 D NB TR 4757 1448 0.67 0.30 27.4 D 27.4 D SB L 2951 334 0.32 0.11 35.9 D 21.0 C 0.67 9.9 Intersection Delay Intersection Delay 24.7 (sec/veh) (sec/ve ----p-44----1nterse-c--------------- Intersection LOS c Submitted into the public record connec�xxpUrnan wit��hitemW�on lWalter � City Clerk .,... js,_ E APPENDIX 2 a 9 r .- 5S 5 J 1 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In TransportatJon Streets: (E-W) S.E. 7th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVFYUE Analyst: DPA File Name: DR17EXT.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-27-91 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R -- ---- ---- - -• - ---- ---- --- ---- - No. Lanes ---- ---- - � 2 3 3 < Volumes 299 1247 1446 219 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------- Signal.Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green Green 89P 19A Yellow/A-R Yellow/A-R 4 3 Lost Time Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: 15 16 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS NB L - 2951 488 0.68 0.17 36.9 D 6.9 B T 4811 4685 0.31 0.97 0.1 A SB TR 4703 3681 0.52 0.78 3.6 A 3.6 A Intersection Delay = 5.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Submitted into the public record i connecti A Item _ on Walter oeman a v, Cir,� Clerk APPENDIX 2 b 95- 595 i i I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 5th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: BRICSE5.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---I- ---- ---- ---I- ---- ---- ---� ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 52> 1 1 1 99 73 1 1 72 1 2< 1 2< 54 1300 73 61 1418 45 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 0 0 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 31A Green 63P 9A Yellow/A-R 5 Yellow/A-R 4 3 Lost Time 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: 11 15 16 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB LT 1221 350 0.16 0.29 23.3 C 23.1 C R 1363 391 0.10 0.29 22.9 C WB LTR 1121 322 0.48 0.29 26.6 D 26.6 D NB L 1524 119 0.00 0.66 0.0 A 18.8 C TR 3184 1772 0.86 0.56 19.6 C SB L 1524 119 0.01 0.66 5.1 B 22.1 C TR 3193 1777 0.91 0.56 22.8 C Intersectign Delay = 20.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Submitted into the public record cannecti n i item on Walter oeman City Clerk APPENDIX 2 c Fm� 95- 555 HCH: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 4th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: BRICSF4.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS -PM -PEAK -HOUR Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R Ia T R No. Lanes 2 3 2 Volumes 1433 271 1471 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols ------------------------ 0 0 ` ------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds 1 WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green Green 65A 10A lop Yellow/A-R Yellow/A-R 5 5 5 Lost Time Lost Time 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 100 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- secs Phase combination order: 15 16 07 Intersection Performance Summary 1 Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap ----- ---- Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ------- NB R 2726 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 1826 0.87 0.67 13.2 B 13.2 B SB L 4571 1097 0.29 0.24 23.6 C 6.2 B T 3208 2631 0.62 0.82 2.8 A i----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Delay = 9.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Submitted into the public record! connect'on 7�ri h item on Walter oeman City Clerk PE APPENDIX 2 d 95- 505 AP'PE M X 3 Submitted into the public record connectioq wl h item on '1 C1 Walter oeman City Clerk J HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 8th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWOP8.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAR HOUR ------------------------- Eastbound --- --- Westbound - ----_--_------- Northbound Southbound L T R ---- L T I ---- ---- ---- R I ---- L T R ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- 2 2 1 I 1 > < 2 3< 1 2 3 Volumes 459 380 47 516 876 1436 140 116 1354 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 60 0 0 ----------------------------------------------------------_..----------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30A 24A Green 6A 43P Yellow/A-R 3 3 Yellow/A-R 3 3 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: 01 12 15 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersecti.on Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap ----- ----------- Flow Ratio ----- Ratio --_..- Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- --- EB L 2951 770 0.66 0.26 30.3 D 43.0 E T 3208 837 0.50 0.26 27.9 D R 1363 427 1.03 0.31 72.1 F WB L 1524 318 1.19 0.21 161.9 F 99.7 F LR 1461 305 1.10 0.21 110.3 F R 2726 711 1.01 0.26 61.9 F NB TR 4746 1775 1.03 0.37 51.4 E 51.4 E SB L 2951 154 0.83 0.05 61.4 F 31.4 D T 4811 1799 0.87 0.37 29.0 D Intersection Delay = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 55.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E APPENDIX 3a Submitted into the public record r connect! n with item on Walter oeman City Clerk 95- 595 J ECM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 7th STREET (N-S) BRICIAELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWUYR7.NC:9 Area Type: CBD 12-27-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAX HotiR Eastbound ~Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --- ---- ---_ .tee-- -a - - -- ---- No. Lanes > 2 < 1 2 3 < ] 3 < Volumes 10 257 39 978 1865 99 10 1532 319 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 --- --------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------ Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB EB Right Right g 9 ht SB Right WB Right Green 12A Green 52P 41A Yellow/A-R 3 Yellow/A-R 3 4 Lost Time 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: 11 06 05 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/c Approach: MVmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS -- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB LTR 3189 333 0.89 0.10 55.6 E 53.3 E R 1363 142 0.29 0.10 36.5 D NE L 2951 1078 1.00 0.37 49.3 E 53.5 E TR 4770 2157 1.05 0.45 55.5 E SB L 1524 557 0.00 0.84 0.0 A 42.7 E TR 4669 2111 1.02 0.45 42.9 E Intersection Delay = 49.5 (sec/Veh) Intersection LOS = E ----------------------------------------------------- ------ Submitted into the public recor connec 'on vit item on Walter Foeman City Clerk APPENDIX 3b 9 5` 595 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation pal Streets: (E-W) S.E. 5th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE I Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWOPR5.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR I Eastbound j Westbound 1 Northbound I Sorthbound I L T R{ L T R j L T R( L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- I - - I - --- ---- > 1 1 1 > 1 < 1 1 - 2--- 1--1 1--- 2< ' Volumes 1 52 1 991 73 1 721 54 1957 731 61 1604 45 Lane Width 12.0 12.01 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 601 01 01 0 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left * (NB Left Thru I Thru Right * j Right Peds * I Peds j WB Left * JSB Left f Thru * I Thru Right * ) Right Peds * I Peds NB Right JEB Right s SB Right JWB Right Green 20A lGreen 75P 9A Yellow/A-R 4 jYellow/A-R 4 3 Lost Time 3.0 (Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #6 #5 ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- EB LT ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 1205 220 0.25 0.18 30.8 D 30.5 D 1 R 1363 249 0.16 0.18 30.1 D WB LTR 1079 197 0.78 0.18 46.2 E 46.2 E NB L 1524 119 0.00 0.77 0.0 A 33.4 D T 3208 2120 1.02 0.66 35.3 D i R 1363 901 0.09 0.66 5.3 B SB L 1524 119 0.01 0.77 2.4 A 14.2 B TR 3193 2110 0.86 0.66 14.6 B 1 Intersection ------------------------------------ Delay = 25.6 (sec/veh)-----------Intersection LOS = D ---------------------- Submitted into the public record ' conne�•a ,^ h item Walter Foeman al City Clerk APPENDIX 3c 95- 595 J HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation a==e-== oco=-oo=== oa====--_sa==e��c=;a�== e====e= ====_= Streets: (E = = -W)r S.E. 4th STREET__==-== (N ==-S) BRIC=KELL= AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWOPR4.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK M Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Eastbound~~ Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 1 3 2 Volumes 2081 271 1664 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols ----------------------------------------- 0 0 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left i Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green Green 80A 12A Yellow/A-R Yellow/A-R 4 4 Lost Time Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 100 ---------------------- secs Phase combination order: 16 15 ' -------- ----------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap ----- ---- Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ------- NB R 2726 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 2208 1.04 0.81 29.6 D 29.6 D f SB L 4571 594 0.53 0.13 31.6 D 7.4 B T 3208 2598 0.71 0.81 3.3 A { Intersection Delay ------------------------------------------ = 18.9 (sec/veh) -----Intersection LOS = C ---------------------- Submitted into the public record in connecti it item on Walter oeman APPENDIX 3d City Clerk 9_ 5�'S - :1•La•q :5:71:q f!I[L(lt ?:IAt - 1t11M 11:1200A.f11 9WEIRlp:Si IAt SZIA•l()l:-:C 241A • (KA {l4lt^rrlsl INUMI J ► VIEVS isc"xtsl --- kowla 1 (---: IM • 1 t t ; Ants fly IAfLf t Il A0)re.dl 1 1 :"1 o 1 1 1 1 let (Jf list Ell real..erltri Orlctell I I Ms • S I 1 I I ] J 4 S; alICE : 60'1. WME 1 MAIL �— ^: f[illisfiAL--------: fueal Aru I pear 11fict t flow Samoa I rim I flow ldall hail fl.t;lie/ f..fn fillstal J kid lollFeal t area (111e►rl I Arai 1 arts lf(epsttelbsnll lelh Asia Later F. Odb ) s4.ft. )eft Spp. JNs SO.►l. SC.fl. J831 Jsbs C.C. bbila ? F. - t[:L:rG---: IOGIi]fIM./YK4ES41 OIIVEFCa----a IQIK— --�--- Fop. ; faeal lklrl t flow Rowts 1 Floor lral.rat Scbest I fir I.Anlr. Aslessis slits Attrltecrtl flow total I.ollea/ hu: C.~c. A.cocJ i fnhwnl: Iru Eylgrl: kts Iles l e{dl;l slut t Area EglgcafltlgW Eulqul;: ku but bite [ylcwrl[ylgrlt.dryut fc►. boot ),I% St.fl. jeh SJJI. Stellate Me SIM. jobs MS $1119 JOBS SO L tau 1.0.0 AM 4e06 lobs Esnastea ►s:tw--) /.41 • . 4.44 7.11 1.10 0.413 4.911 1.121 1.13 1.00 :7.4071 1 .l 1.47 :.r7 /.17 In.116► ►K.nSF fa.ttst far.ag 41n100 1er.10C ttr.1711 ItrJLAS I1r.1►9 Sh.1lSF )e.11SF fee.199 ►a.tltf itr.JSost pit 1 ) • 1 1 •. 1 1 • a / 1 1 — e 1 • e a • • • { { • { ^ }- 9911 1 / 1 1 1 / 1 a 0 • 0 1 / b / a e 1 1 0 0 e • e { • • / /1 -�• Cal 1 / 1 1 1 e 1 1 / 1 e i e • 1 • • • • • • / { • • a • • e • • • • Vry 1 t e 1 a 1 a 1 0 / 1 • • • • a e 0 - • 0 / a 1 1 { c • i • • i Ciro 7 a e 0 0 • 1 1 1 • 1 0 i •- 1 i 1 0 9 Q { • 1 1 0 e • 1 e • awn 7 1 1 • 1 a 1 / 0 1 � 1 / 1 • 1 • • • • 1 • { { • { { i ' • • b • cut 7 1 e 1 e • 1 a 1 e 1 • • • • 1 e e • 1 • • 1 • • • • • 0 • :a/ t ) / / a 1 1 1 • 1 1 0 1 • e • 1 1 1 a a • { 1 a • e • • • / tit 1 s a e 1 e • 1 1 i e 1 e o • / 1 • { 1 0 1 • • a / 0 1 1 • 1 a)t 1 • a 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 f • a a 1 e e e 1 • 1 • { • a { • • at 7 0 1 / a 1 1 1 / a e • 1 0 0 1 a 1 1 1 0 1 1 e 0 0 0 e 1 t1)1 7 1 0 1 1 a a ' 1 / 1 / • 0 • • 0 1 1 0 e { • • { • • • 1 Fittp[t 1 S 0 0 0 1 • 0 1/ 1 1 1 1 0 a e 1 1 / 1 • / / 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • a 0 • - Rtd4:l7 S 1 e / 1 9101 1 7t 0 Sol 111 ill 411 a 1 • 1 1 1 • 0 1 i 1 a 0 0 a 0 • / • • • • • • • Itit311. 1 S e / 1 / 1 1 • { • 1 • 1 0 I i 1 • • a VOW 0 Hs 74 14 ie IAIM1I 7 1 1 1 1 0 1 a • 1 / 0 • a a a 1 ! 4 1 a • • { • • • r71 0 e 1 e C e 0 • e • / 1 e 0 0 0 • • 0 e e • • 0 i • a 1 0 1 1 'a 1 0 0 a i • 0 • / • • 0 1 1 • 1 0 i e • • • • { • .� If 1 a 0 1 { e 1 1 • 1 1 • 1 1 • • • a • 0 0 0 / • 1 0 e / 1 1 / • 7l • i 1 . 0 • 0 • 1 t • 1 • • • e 1 / • • • / • • e 1 1 { 1 • e • a • • a • 0 / 0 1 1 • / 0 1 • / • / � m1 �• 1 Z • r 1 a ^�• • __._ / — � -- • --� � — e • i e 1 a 1 1 � 1 • � a tomlra 1 e 1 e • 1 a 1 • • • e • i 1 1 a • • 1 1 a •° e Q S: Ma • 1 a a tot / 74 { :41 214 At 474 1 • • / 1 1 0 1 1 1 a { 1 • ' • e KArCfl/ri. 0 • 1 e • 1 1 1 1 1 • e • ) 0 1 a • 1 0 a 0 t•a 1 :M 7l :s p IKl { 1 1 e / 0 a • e • e • a • • 0 1 a e f e 1 • b ! ~sw / • 1 • 0 1 0 1 { • 1 • 1 e 1 _ j1 i(lSt Aa[A { • 1 • t101 1 11 1 . tA— AI UI ~1 1 ^• 1 • / 0 • 1 1 a+ / r:J•-- • sa Oi CD C 3 C) -tea. rr. ED C coo Crt Q o fD C) [D a 3 .< 0/-lan-92 1.ii:2{:1{ ERICKEIL PG191 - 1911:0 15i12001AR1 Dukulcon NIA71 DRI KRouN TRIPS CALCULATION E?K ATTR MEK DEVELOPRENI INCLUDING PREVIOUS 111CHrEKIS1 Isho�l Scenario: 1 (----; 1992 = l [c�start Approvedt 1 1 1997 = 2 nnanrua Allc.able(l) _ 1 2005 = 3 a1.I5E2Gl a ---- -------- ----------------- —---------- —-------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- —---------------- —---------- --------------- ND1I<-BASED PP.DGCCIICNS------- — -------- ----------------------; HONc-fF.5c0 AIIRF'.TIOHS------- —------------ — ---- ---; NON-HGNE lASEO---------------1 TDTAL Farcel - Area — work ---Shop- SOc.Rec. School Nis-. ictal Kart 5-top Ser.Pec. S:Aool Hi St. Total Person Ail Truk Total 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------��— out 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 any:2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 6 Ong; 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 D1fV 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 C C J 0 0 G 0 d 0 0 7 0 Dlf:2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D OTEK 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M C32 1 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 c 0 M CID 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I m CP13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z COD 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB) 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x CDO 6 2 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 J A BRI'WLL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 cr ca FF.1CKELL 2 5 Sol ,i."7 219 1;1 2?0 15J8 28 33 92 0 iI !B7 ID l 32 614 1158 Q IFIECELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ERWILL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa61 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 o a a Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c� 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c a--------------------------------------- ------ —------------------------ --------------- —--------------- —-------------- —---------------- —--------- -------------- ------- O G"I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 `n ? DCINTOYN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 9 `= ERICI.cLL 5@l 327 2;9 UI 21J 1:09 1a 33 92 0 ;3 IB7 30 1 32 63 141,58 DVER1OMP9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 -ccG FORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cr--------------------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------^--------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --- W7 C O STUDY AREA Sol 327 2;9 Ili -?0 15.8 918 33 92 0 33 lei 30 1 32 63 1158 1 CR C 07-]an-72 ME S?LTT L05K_? TAB' E 15:24:44 BRIMELL POINT - 1911:0 Area nine Nill Do "1 100 West M Ei:t Osert/PY Brictell 191120DR.NR1 DO'ANTOUN NIAMI 21RI Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1?97 :IS 0.00 0.;;3 0.239 0.469 0.c32 0.211 (BEN DEVEL02NENT INCLUOINS FREVIGU3 IKCREmENTSI 1531 NS 0.00 0.4:2 0.24: 0.400 0.06/ 0.:83 Tear: 1 1-----: 1992 - 1 20A5 NS 0.00 :.472 0.215 0.360 0.057 0.176 Approved[ I 1997 - 2 Allowallell) t 2e05 = 3 I DAILY TRIP""a----------------------------- ------- ------- : I'M HOUR ACTC IRIFS--------- -- CHEEK------------------ ----__.____----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Person Node Aito F.sto Irtriz./ Ecternal T.o-lit Ir,b w-.d Cutbosnd Net Trip Rate Pircel Area Trips aph t P.Trips Trips lot.! Auto T. (Autc Trips per 1000 SF) ----------------------------------------------- ------------- ------ ---- - ConYerfi[n Ficter----) 1.43 c; C.186 0.:4 0.70 irrYa) InOcead Outbound [Transit) Per./Auto Oreraii Ii F4/7:I.y Intn1 I Gatbnd I -------------------f-------------------------------- ------------------ ---- 06Y1 I 1 0 0.40 0 0 SI 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.030 CIL41 2 1 0 0.40 0 0 5I 0 0 0 0 MOO 0.000 0.000 01191 3 1 0 0.40 0 0 5I 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.0-j0 OTPY 1 4 0 0.03 0 0 20; 0 0 : 0 0.00) 0.000 0.000 DIFY 2 4 0 0.09 0 0 :UI 0 0 0 0 1.000 0.00 0.000 DIFY 3 4 0 0.00 0 U 20I 0 0 0 0 0.t00 0.000 0.030 c10 1 2 0 0.29 0 0 5: 0 0 0 0 MOO 0.000 0.000 m C5D 2 3 0 0.47 0 0 5; 0 0 c 0 0.0c0 0.000 0.000 z cap 3 3 0 0.47 0 0 5; 0 0 0 0 -1.000 Moo 0.000 0 coo 4 3 0 0.47 0 0 =I 0 0 0 0 O.C:O MOO O.ODc j� CeD 5 3 0 0.47 0 0 51 G 0 D 0 0.000 0.033 0.000 CD COO 5 2 D 0.29 0 0 9 D G 0 0.00 o.oco 0.00 oh cD (D c BRICXELL 1 5 0 n 0,21 0 0 5I 0 0 c 0 0.000 0.000 O.oco Q 3 O �' IRICKELL 2 5 1758 0.21 1587 970 5I 92. 77 24 55 S.BC3 2.6a 6.162 ri- BRIC[ELL 3 0 0.21 0 0 SI 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00 0.000 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0.21 0 0 51 3 0 C 0 0 0.000 O.000 0.033 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 52 0 c 3 0 0.0co 0.000 0.0T0 0 0 MO 0 0 5: 0 0 c 0 0.000 0.000 Moo O :3 0 0 0.00 D 0 5I 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 O 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 ---------------------- ----- --------- ----- ------------------------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ CL/OtO:! 9 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0- Cl'ANTCN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p CD 0 BRIEKELL 1758 1387 770 921 i9 :4 55 9 3 6 n 3 6 DIERTGVK/PY 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 SD FORT 0 0 U o0 0 0 ----- ------ ---------------- --------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------- AREA 1753 1337 770 921 73 C1-t f ca CIP UZ J, 7-- ARRE—NDrX_S SLIbmittect into rOcord the Public Itom r Connec' n On Waller CeInar) City Cleric 7 1 HCK: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation -- Streets : (E-W) S.E. eth-STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWPRO8.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PM PEAR HOUR Eastbound ( Westbound ( Northbound Southbound L T ---- ---- R L T ---- ---- ---- R ---- ---- L T R L T R ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 1 > < 2 1 ---- ---- ---- 3< 1 2 3 Volumes 1 470 380 4771 516 8761 1439 1401 116 1361 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 12.01 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 601 601 01 0 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left * BNB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * JSB Left Thru Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds NB Right JEB Right SB Right JWB Right Green 30A 24A IGreen 6A 43P Yellow/A-R 3 3 !Yellow/A-R 3 3 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle secs Phasecombination order:#1#2#5#6 -Length: -115_ -- _ - Intersection Performance ` - - _ --`-_______ Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap ----- ----------- Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 2951 ----- 770 0.68 ----- 0.26 ----- --- ----- --- 30.6 D 43.0 E T 3208 837 0.50 0.26 27.9 D R 1363 427 1.03 0.31 72.1 F WB L 1524 318 1.19 0.21 161.9 F 99.7 F LR 1461 305 1.10 0.21 110.3 F R 2726 711 1.01 0.26 61.9 F NB TR 4746 1775 1.03 0.37 51.9 E 51.9 E SB L 2951 154 0.83 0.05 61.4 F 31.6 D T 4811 1799 0.88 0.37 29.2 D Intersection Delay = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 55.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E Submitted into the public recur connc i n Item on Walter o�,r,�an PR Citv Clerk APPENDIX 5s 95-- 595 �1 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) S.E. 7th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWPRO7.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-27-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PM PEAR HOUR i - Eastbound -) Westbound Northbound Souhbound L T R L T R( L T R( L T R --- -----------i---- --- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- i---- i--- '2<2 3<3 Volumes 1 10 257 391 978 1879 991 10 1539� 347 Lane Width 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols ( i 01 01 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 a-� EB Left JNB Left Thru ( Thru Right Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left i Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right JEB Right SB Right JWB Right Green 12A !Green 52P 41A Yellow/A-R 3 !Yellow/A-R 3 4 Lost Time 3.0 !Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #6 #5 -------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/c Approach: t Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOOS -___- --- ----- --- ----- ----------- WB LTR 3189 ----- ----- 333 0.89 0.10 55.6 E 53.3 E i R 1363 142 0.29 0.10 36.5 D NB L 2951 1078 1.00 0.37 49.3 E 55.5 E TR 4770 2157 1.06 0.45 58.3 E SB L 1524 557 0.00 0.84 0.0 A 49.0 E TR 4661 2108 1.04 0.45 49.2 E i----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Delay = 52.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E Submitted into the public recordp' onngct'oi 'th item_ on �!� Walter Focmen day city cleli< APPENDIX 5b 1 I' HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation -------------------- Streets: (E-W) (E-W) S.E. 5th STREET - - - (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWPR52.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR ------------------------ Eastbound --- - ---------------------- Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T -------- ---- R L T R L T ---- R (---- ---- No. Lanes > 1 11 > 1 < ---------------- ---- 1 1 2 1 ---- Volumes 52 5 991 108 7 881 54 1957 871 168 1604 45 Lane Width 12.0 12.01 12.0' 112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 601 01 01 0 - --------------------------------------------------------------- signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left * J NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * i Peds WB Left * JSB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds NB Right JEB Right SB . Right JWB Right Green 19A lGreen 73P 6A Yellow/A-R 10 jYellow/A-R 4 3 Lost Time 3.0 (Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: £1 £5 £6 - --------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap ----- ----------- Flow Ratio ----- Ratio Delay LOS Delay ----- LOS EB LT 1142 258 0.23 ----- --- ----- 0.23 27.7 D 27.4 --- D R 1363 308 0.13 0.23 27.0 D WB• LTR 1084 245 0.87 0.23 51.5 E 51.5 E NB L 1524 80 0.00 0.72 0.0 A 42.8 E T 3208 2064 1.05 0.64 45.5 E R 1363 877 0.10 0.64 6.0 B SB L 1524 80 0.11 0.72 3.7 A 16.1 C TR 3193 2055 0.89 0.64 16.6 C Intersection Delay = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Subn-Wt d i!ito ih�i public recorG� L'Uilrle�;(j' i} .item In on Waiter oeman_ dpa APPENDIX 50?; City Clerk I -- 595 J I 7 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation aa==ssrsszss==-z�s==---a=zas==zzcz===-zn==zz==z=aszszms=n-=zczM=======s Streets: (E-W) S.E. 4th STREET (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE Analyst: DPA File Name: FUWPR04.HC9 Area Type: CBD 12-26-91 PM PEAK Comment: FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR sasazss=e=szz_--zxzms=sx==czzzc==sz=zcz=zz=z==�.zz=ezc=zz=zzzc==o====== Eastbound i WestboundI Northbound I Southbound L LR L T R I L T R 1---- ---- ----I---- ---- ----I---- ---- ----I No. Lanes 1 ( I 2 1 3 2- Volumes I I I 20971 271 1671 Lane Width I I I 12.0112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 1 1 1 01 0 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left 1NB Left Thru R( Thru Right 9 I Right Peds Peds WB Left I TSB Left Thru Right I Right Peds 1 Peds NB Right IEB Right SB Right 1WB Right Green IGreen 80A 12A Yellow/A-R IYellow/A-R 4 4 Lost Time ILost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #6 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- NB R 2726 2208 1.05 0.81 32.0 D 32.0 D SB L 4571 594 0.53 0.13 31.6 D 7.4 B T 3208 2598 0.71 0.81 3.3 A Intersection Delay 20.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Submitted into the public recor connect' n vith item on LT — APPENDIX 3 d Walter Foeman City e!k J TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS BRICKELL POINT BRICKELL AVENUE AND S.E. STH STREET r MIAMI, FLORiDA :1 r 1 Submitted to: l Pedro G. Hernandez, P.E. 1 Chief, Highway Division Depa►tment. of Public Works i Metropolitan Dade County, Florida i ' Prepared by: ' ZOOK, MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. West PalmBeneb, Florida r- April, 1994 Revised April 27, 1994 , COPR Zook, Moore & Associates, Inc. ...144++e�++..�ss..••��! ; L 4317T.41 .'Submltted t into 'the'pc;biic i' nnectivim recorik-00n. " W41ter Foe n ' - ' City adri�. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION........................................... 1 ANALYSIS................................................ I TRAF-NETSIM Analysis .................................. 1 RoadwayGeometry ...................................... I ' TrafficVolumes ........................................ 2 SignalTiming ........................................... 2 .� QUEUING, DELAY, AND LEVEL OF SERVICE .• ..• ......• .....• .• ., .• ., ...• .' .' . 2 ...• Queuing • 2 Delay.. ............................................. 3 Level -of -Service '............... 3 ....................... JUSTIFICATION FOR SIGNAL .................................. 3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................ 4 APPENDIX.............................................. 1 15 o;..a . ;j i Submitted into the public record in onnec i item on Walter Foeman City Clerk is TABLE NO. 2 3 t 4 LIST OF TABLES TITLE PAGE PROPOSED LAND USE 5 AVERAGE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIP GENERATION 6 QUEUING, DELAY, AND LEVEL OF SERVICE 7 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 8 LIST OF FIGURES FI GURE NO, TITLE PAGE TRAF-NETSIM NETWORK 9 ROADWAY GEOMETRY 10 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES P.M. PEAK HOURS 11 SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED PHASING 12 NETSIM OUTPUT SUMMARY WITH PROPOSED SIGNAL 13 NETSIM OUTPUT SUMMARY WITHOUT PROPOSED SIGNAL 14 Submitted into the public recorYY2on-t(?,n ' nneitem 2"i 9 5 Walter Foeman City Clerk I � + INTRODUCTION As part of a right-of-way settlement with Brickell Point, the Florida Department of Transportation has agreed to improve the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street in Miami. The improvement would place the Brickell Point Frontage Road, which is just east of Brickell Avenue, under signal control in coordination with the main intersection signal. This improvement will reduce queuing and delay••for the Brickell Point Frontage Road, and will improve the level of service and safety of the intersection. The taking of right-of-way has resulted in a reduction of queuing space at the westbound approach of the intersection of S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue. Additionally a reduced turning radius from the Brickell Point Frontage Road to S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue inhibits egress movements from Brickell Point. This report will demonstrate that the overall operation of the intersection will improve by placing the Brickell Point Frontage Road under signal control. The proposed signal will eliminate queuing in front of the Brickell Point Frontage Road. ANALYSIS Because of the close proximity of the Brickell Point Frontage Road to the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street, the performance of the signal improvements could not be adequately evaluated as an isolated intersection using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual methodology for signalized intersections. It was determined that the signal would be evaluated using a widely accepted computer program called TRAF-NETSIM which was developed by the Federal Highway Administration. The analysis assumed frill buildout of the Brickell Point property. TRAF-NETSIM Analysis TRAF-NETSIMr is a traffic simulation program which evaluates every vehicle in the network every second of the simulation. This allows detailed computations of such measures of effectiveness as queuing and delay. Because the model simulates actual traffic operation, it takes into account the coordinated operation of the two closely placed signals. The analysis is ..� based on a user -created network made up of links and nodes which represent streets and intersections. The detailed input includes roadway geometry, signal phasing and timing, traffic 1 volumes, and link lengths. The network used to evaluate the Brickell Point intersection is illustrated in Figure 1. The TRAF-NETSIM output is provided as an appendix to this report both with and without the proposed intersection improvements. Roadway Geometry The roadway geometry of the intersection of S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue, and of the Brickell Point Frontage Road illustrated in Figure 2. This includes improvements to be made by the Florida Department of Transportation which are associated with the right-of-way acquisition. Submitted into the public record �'n onnec, n, nth; item or -J Walter Foeman 9 5— 5 9 5 City Clerk J 2 . Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on full buildout of the Brickell Point property, based on the land use intensities given in Table 1, and trip generation given in Table 2. Background traffic is based on a future buildout year as previously developed in a traffic study prepared by David Plummer & Associates for Brickell Point. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are illustrated in Figure 3. . Signal Timing The signal timing and phasing of the proposed signal improvements will be integrated to operate as part of the existing signal at Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street. The signal timing and phasing, as developed by David Plummer & Associates is shown in Figure 4. QUEUING,.DELAY, AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Table 3 summarizes the queuing, delay, and level -of -service for each intersection approach. The links in the table refer to the network illustrated in Figure 1. For example, link (2,1) is the link between nodes 2 and 1, which is the S.E. 5th Street between Brickell Avenue and the Brickell Point Frontage Road. By listing link 2 first, it indicates the direction of travel as node 2 to node 1. Therefore, link (2,1) is the westbound approach to the intersection of S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue. Queuing, delay, and level -of -service are illustrated graphically in Figures 5 and 6 with and without the proposed signal. Queuing Queuing is an important issue when two intersections are spaced as closely as the intersections evaluated in this study. The westbound approach to the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street has only enough storage space for one vehicle before the queue blocks the Brickell Point Frontage Road. In the conditionJ*here the proposed signal is not installed, the queuing for links (22,2) and (2,1) must be combined as there is no traffic control to keep vehicles from blocking the Brickell Point Frontage Road. Under this scenario, the combined maximum queue for links I (22,2) and (2,1) is five (5) vehicles, which indicates that the Brickell'point driveway is blocked f much of the time. In addition to making it impossible for vehicles to. exit Brickell Point while a queue exists, it also prevents vehicles from turning left into the Brickell Point Frontage Road. This results in a maximum queue for link (1,2) of three (3) vehicles. If drivers in the westbound -� queue do not provide a gap for these vehicles to turn left into Brickell Point, the queue for the eastbound, left -turning traffic could back up into the intersection of 13rickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street, When the proposed signal is installed, the westbound approach to the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street will be controlled by the signal such that queued vehicles will not block the Brickell Point Frontage Road. This reduces the maximum left -turning ingress queue to the Brickell Point Frontage Road from 3 vehicles to 1. Thus the problem of vehicles .-_ backing up into the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street is eliminated. It also r Submitted into the public record in connection wi h item on 91�_ 555 Walter Foeman Citv Clerk 3 provides a gap for vehicles leaving the Brickell Point Frontage Road to turn right onto S.E. 5th Street. Thus the proposed signal represents a major improvement to queuing at the Brickell Point Frontage Road. Queuing within the main intersection remains unchanged. Delay Average vehicle delays were computed by the TRAF-NETSIM computer program. Delay t� is important because it is used as the indicator of level -of -service in the 1985 Highway Capacity _ Manual. Delays on the main intersection approaches will change very little as a result of the proposed signal. Delays at the Brickell Point Frontage Road are vastly improved due to the availability of gaps in front of the driveway provided by the signal.. Delay to the westbound approach is increased somewhat as a result of the signal. Table 3 and Figures 5 and 6 show that the delay for Iink (2,1) is greatly decreased as a result of the signal, and that delays for link (22,2) are greatly increased as a result of the signal. This is because once the signal is installed, most of the westbound traffic will queue east of the Brickell Point Frontage Road. When these vehicles receive a green signal at the Brickell Point- Frontage Road, they will also have a green signal at Brickell Avenue. As the location of the queue is moved, the approach with the greater ! delay is also moved. Level -of -Service ,i The TRAF-NETSIM model does not include level -of -service as one of its outputs. However, level -of -service for each approach can be determined Using the stopped delays ' computed by the model, and Table 4 (Table 9-1 from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual). The level of service for each approach is given in Table 3, and illustrated in Figures 5 and 6. No approach falls below level -of -service "D" either with or without the proposed signal. Most r approaches operate at level -of -service "B" or better. The proposed signal improvement therefore meets Dade County level -of -service requirements. i JUSTIFICATION FOR SIGNAL The proposed signal improvements place the Brickell Point Frontage Road under the U'i control of the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Brickell Avenue,and S.E.•5th Street. This improvement is not a new independent traffic signal. As this improvement does not involve the installation of a new traffic signal, a complete warrant analysis is not required. Additionally the Florida Department of Transportation is incorporating the proposed signal improvements into their roadway improvement project on Brickell Avenue. The signal improvement is justified for the following reasons: • There is only enough queuing space available for one (1) vehicle at the westbound approach to the intersection. Without the proposed improvement, queues of up to five (5) vehicles could be expected. The signal improvements will keep vehicles from queuing in front of the Brickell Point Frontage Road. Submitted into the public record �i��connect' n r it item -:_ on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- 51155 4 • The signal improvement will decrease the maximum left -turning ingress queue from three (3) vehicles to one (1). The reduced queue length will prevent vehicles from backing up into the intersection of Brickell Avenue and S.E. 5th Street. • The proposed signal modification improves level -of -service and reduces delay at the Brickell Point Frontage Road. Additionally, the existing operation does not experience any adverse change in level -of -service or delay. CONCLUSIONS The proposed signal improvement at the intersection of Brickell Point and S.E. 5th Street, which involves placing the Brickell Point Frontage Road under signal control, provides an improvement to the pperation of the intersection. Queuing and delay will be reduced as a result of the improvement. The probability of vehicles backing up into the intersection of S.E. 5th Street and Brickell Avenue is greatly reduced. The intersection will meet Dade County level -of -service requirements with the proposed improvement, and will provide adequate capacity to support the full buildout development intensity of the Brickell Point property. Submitted into the public record connectiop with item on Walter Foeman 9 r� City Clerk ' 5 s TABLE 1 PROPOSED LAND -USE LAND USE SIZE 2 t HIGII-RI,SE APAR7MMNTS 600 DWI LLING UNITS 11 GENERAL MERCHANDISE 4,000 SQUARE FEET J HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANT 4,000 SQUARE FEET SOURCE: David Plummer & Associates Submitted into the public record onnect• n with I item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 4 595 'i i 1 TABLE 2 • AVERAGE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIP GENERATION E. PM PEAK HOUR (VEMCLESIHOUR) NET NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS GROSS INTERNAL TRANSIT (1) WALK ENTER EXIT APARTMENTS ENTER 122 10 13 6 (2) 93 EXIT 78 11 8 4 (2) 55 RESTAURANT ENTER 35 12 4 14 5 (3) EXIT 30 it 3 12 4 (3) RETAIL ENTER 10 1 4 1 3 2 (3) EXIT 10 4 1 3 2 (3) TOTALS 106 61 (1) ASSUMED 10.5% TRANSIT USE BASED UPON '/2 OF THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DRI USE OF 21 % TRANSIT. (2) 5 % PEDESTRIAN TRIPS BASED UPON THE URBAN LOCATION (3) EMPLOYEE AND/OR DELIVERY TRIPS SOURCE: David Plummer & Associates Submitted into the public recor nne n i item%b on , Walter oeman 9 5` 5 9 5 i City Clerk J 7 TABLE 3. QUEUING, DELAY, AND LEVEL OF SERVICE LINK WITH PROPOSED SIGNAL WITHOUT PROPOSED SIGNAL MAXIMUM QUEUE (vehicles/lant) DELAY E (seconds) LEVEL OF SERVICE MAXIMUM QUEUE (vehlcla/lane) DELAY 77ME (seconds) LEVEL OF SERVICE (12,1) 2 13.7 B 2 14.7 B (1,2) 1 0.1 A 3 10.6 B (22,2) 4 31.9 D 2 6.9 B (2,1) 2 6.8 B 3 28.5 D (11,1) 7 6.2 B 7 6.2 B (13,1) 16 9.2 B 16 9.3 B IJ (21,2) 1 2.2 1 A 1 17.8 C ,4 Submitted into the public record in oI ti n i h item ..9on I r Waiter Foeman City Clerk H TABLE 4 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTE RSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE STOPPED DELAY PER VEHICLE (seconds) A 5 5.0 B $J to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 s F > 50.0 SOURCE: Table 9-1, 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Submitted into the public record OT7t7e t'on ritli item _d on 9 5- 595 Walter Foeman City Clerk ZOOK,MOORE and Assocloles, Inc. • � E�gWEEnlll'IANNEM1t pMn,� �I 1 M� +:ua� �d SUBJECT SHEET NO, / OF DESIGN -DATE-CHECK-DATE- JOB NO. ;TRAF--NETS IM NETWORK Submitted into the public recor , n�,connc21.1419-'7- ' n with item' on Walter oeman City Cleric FIGURE 1 NOT TO SCALE .... . . . . . .... 0 CT CL o CD 0 cD / f I FIGURE 2 ROADWAY GEOMETRY - --------------------- „ ZOOK, MOofiE and Assoctntas,lua EIICWEEn9l('(�fd�Ef�t t f SUBJECT SHEET N0, (� OF DESIGN DATE CHECK DATE JOB NO. i BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FM. PEA K-- HO UR `1 .,:Submitted into the public SOURCE DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES record i connecti In� 'th ' item on }�-�—=5 i. Walter Fooman City Clerk FIGURE 3. ?. NOT 70 "S6ALt= i FIGURE 4. SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED PHASING TIMING TIMING GREEN YELLOW RED GREEN YELLOW RED 22 4 1 73 4 0 boa —i 8 3 CD x TCL �' o� - *0=o CD 0, " =r BRICKELL AVE. / S.E. 5th STREET — CD .o 0 C� 3 c Cr 0 13 4 0 73 4 .0 8 3 0 FRONTAGE ROAD / DRIVEWAY FINAL SIGNAL TIMING AND PHASING WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DADE COUNTY PUBLIC. t;5t WORKS DEPARTMENT, SIGNALS AND SIGNS DIVISION TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER. SOURCE DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES T1MIN3 GREEN YES RED 7 3 0 m �C3 c _J z m 0 0 D m 0 m 0 D m 0 w -N = m z 0--mi z 0 ii:�- 0 n ZOaK,MoonE and A4soclatas. btc pff [eM.�Hf iris lltiuemtl SUBJECT SHEET No. 13 OF DESIGN DATE CHECK DATE JOB NO. NET31M OUTPUT 3UMM,ARY" MITH PROPOSED SIGNAL 4 1 72�1 J S.E. sr,, STREET (2 C12 2 B ty <x'2.) (xzf Z) 6.0 �M steal A v NEMIM LINK DESIGNATION 2 MAX. QUEUE (VFH) ; b•S DELAY MCIVEFI? B . APPROACH LEVEL OF SERVICE f Submitted Into the publici recot cannectl ,nwitfh t FIGURE Slte"'� on wafter ; NOT To SCALE City Clerk 95— 595 r ZOOK,MOOnE alld Tssrx:i:nos, file. SUBJECT SHEET NO. I q OF— r«W«crnsrrw«Icns DESIGN DATE CHECK DATE JOB NO. NETS 1M OUTPUT SUMMARY WITROUT PROPOSED SIGNAL 04 } z O . W ti C2 r cn Z► 3 lc.Q S.E. S rw STREET 2.�...: i' •� a o Iz / 2 z Y. 1 1 y �3� (E� 1) NETSIM LINK, DESIGNATION F� k 3 MAX. QUEUE (VE14) i 28.5' DELAY (SECT VEN ) DC E) APPROACH LEVEL OF SERVICE s Submitted into the publl( FIGURE f cord,,i01- connec io ))ff�wi.tr item_ on .1 NOT TO SCALE Walter Foeman, A1� . City Clerk APPENDIX A TRAP -NE TSIM OUTPUT WYM PROPOSED SIGNAL UVIPROVEMENTS Submitted into the public recur ilf nne�ct' i nt hn Item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 15 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR hhhhhhA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR hAhhhhhAhhA PFFFFFFFFFP ITT RRR RRR hhh hhh FFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TIT RRRRRRRRRRR hhAhhAAAhhh PFFFPFF ITT RRRRRRRRRR hhAAAAAhAAA FFFFFFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA PFF ITT RRR RRR AAA Ahh PFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA PFF ITT RRR RRR 1Ah AAA PFF KICRO-COMPUTER PROTECTED-KODB VERSION„ (REQUIRES 80386 AND 80387 OR ABOVE) VERSION 4.00 RELEASE DATE APR 1993 I TRAP SIMULATION KOBEL DEVELOPED FOR w U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEM RESEARCH DIVISION Qttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Submitted into the public recor!Mon nnjagh item Walter Foeman City Clerk " START OF CASE I ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttctttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttytttttttttttttttttttt CARD PILE LIST OSEQ.1 :----+----1.... +---- 2---- +.... 3----+---- 4---- + ---- 5----+.... 6.... + .... 1.... +----8 1 :BRICRELL POINT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS pp 2 :This analysis evaluates the operation of the intersection of S.E. Sth 00 3 :Street and Brickell Avenue in Miami, Florida, It also includes a 00 4 :proposed traffic signal at the driveway to Brickell Paint, approximately 00 5 :80 feet east of Brickell Avenue. Full buildout of Brickell Paint is 00 6 :assumed. pp 7 : 00 8 :JEFFREY D. ARMSTRONG 2 14 94100A, NOORE 6 ASSOCIATES 0 01 9: 1 10 0 0 0 31700 02 + 10: 345 03 I 11 : 1150000 04 12 : 1 1 lbrpnt 05 13 :8012 12 1 1 11 ` 14 : 12 1 500 150 1 1 11 2 13 2 25 01 11 15 : 1 2 110 1 • 21 22 22 25 11 16 : 2 12 300 1 8022 25 11 ._ 11 :8022 22 1 2 _ 11 J �• 18 : 22 2 300 1 1 21 25 11 19 : 2 1 60 1 13 12 11 12 25 11 500 801i 25 11 P 21 :8011 11 3 21 : 11 1 500 100 3 1 2 13 12 13 35 I1 23 : 1 13 500 3 8013 35 24 :8013 13 3 1 11 25 : 13 1 500 100 3 1 4 11 11 2 11 35 11 26 : 1 11 500 2 8011 35 11 21 :8021 21 1 2 I1 28 : 11 2 225 1 21 1 15 I1 29 : 2 21 225 1 8021 25 11 30 :8012 12 100 12 1 52 11 99 21 31 : 1 2 100 135 2 22 100 21 32 :8022 22 100 22 2 100 21 33 : 2 1 110 8 89 1 12 100 21 "1 34 :8011 11 100 11 1 891604 45 21 35 : 1 13 100 21 36 :8013 13 100 13 1 541957 129 21 37 : 1 11 1'00 P1 i 38 :8021 11 100 21 2 100 21 ``� 39: 2 21 100 '21 40 : 12 8012 1 35 41 : 11 8011 1 35 42 : 21 8021 2 35 43 : 22 8022 2 J5 44: 13 8013 1 35 45 : 1 0 12 11 2 13 22 4 1 13 4 8 3 35 46 : 2 0 I 21 22 13 4 7 3 85 3 35 41 : 12 11 10 60 36 Submitted into the public 48 59 : 11 11 : 21 11 BO -'110 36 3 record i onnect'on with, 50 : 22 11 104 60 36.itBrrl _ on OSEQ,i :-----.__1----+----2----F----3---- +.... 4--------5----+.... 6.... +--=-1 .... + ---- 8 Walter Foernan City Clerk —� 1 CAHO PIL$ LIST (CONT,) OSBQ,1:....t....1----t----2----t----3...-t----i----t----5----+----6----+----7 .... t----8 51 : 13 11 60 10 36 52 : 1 1212 0202 2222 2121 2020 2424 2020 60 60 36 53 : 2 121 020 212 202 122 022 72 60 36 54 :8012 12 168 1 8022 22 146 1 SO 55 :8011 111738 5 8021 21 61 1 8013 132140 5 50 56 : 0 57 : 1 170 OS8Q,1:----t----1----+----2----+----3----+----i----t----5----+----6----+----7 210 ---- +----8 n� i, i Submitted Into the public record onnecti 4niitem —wonth Walter FOP, Man City Clerk 9"- 595 J 1 TRAP SIMULATION MODEL r DEVELOPED FOR ' U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEM RESEARCR DIVISION G!t!!t#lktttktktt!!!#!kltt!!t!#!!!ttlttttk#tttttlt!##ttklt!#1!!#tltt#!tt!###tiitttltttt!!t!kltttttttt#t2tt#ktt#tttttltlilt!!ttlittlt START OF CASE 1 ttittitlttittirkttktktiittititittttttttttttttittitt#titt#tttltittttittkitittttttttitttttttttttttiktitttttttttttttttitttittttittittt : 0 BRICKELL POINT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 0 This analysis evaluates the operation of the intersection of S.E. 5th lx. 0 Street and Brickell Avenue in Mani, Florida, It also includes 0 proposeL traffic signal at the drivevay to Brickell Point, appraanately 0 80 feet east of Brickell Avenue. Full buildout of Brickell Point is 0 assuned. DATE : 2/ 141 94 0 USER : JEFFREY D. ARMSTRONG 0 AGENCY : ZOOK, MOORE 6 ASSOCIATES 1 RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS Submitted into the public recor in connect: n RD.. I.-,g _item on 4w Walter Foeman ty LI.GiClerk 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ;,., 0 0 NEXT CASE CODE = (0,1) IF ANOTHER CASE (DOES NOT, DOES) FOLLOW 0 1 RON TYPE CODE = ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 NETSIN ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS 0 FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED 0 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: NOT WRITTEN 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE : (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE : (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SANE AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1700 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMM) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE -- (0,1,2,,3) IF (NO, IMMEDIATE, 2-CYCLE, 3-CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 345 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD 10, 1 ; 0 115 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIRE, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 1 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIRE INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS Of 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE : (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED'FOR NETSIN SUBNETWORK 0 1 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE : (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED 1#tit##tttttttttttt:t#t#tttzt#ikitttttt#ttt#it#!ltrtt#tltitttitittt###tttttttt#tttt:ttttttttt#ttttttttttti#ltttttttt#ttttttt:ttittt# TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA i ttt#ttttttitttttttttttttittt#kittittttititttttttittttttttttttttttttt#tttttt#ttttttittitt#tttttttttttttttttttttt#tttt#tt#tittttttttt ; 9r-'B95 1 NETSIH LINKS 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME RDWY, SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET 9j LINK FT I H L L R PCT TYPE B234567 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAL NODE SEC SEC HPH/KHPH CODE CODE -HINT NAME �(8012, 12) 0/ 0 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 0/ 0 0 0 .1-it rr: ( 12, 1) 500J 152 1 0 1 0 It 0000000 11 2 13 0 2 2.5t 2.2t 25/ 40 0 1 1-it (.. ( 1, 2) 110J 31 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 21 22 0 0 22 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-11 ( 2, 22) 3001 91 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8022 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-It _nj (8022, 22) 01 0 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 2 0 0 0 2.5' 2.2t 01 0 a 0 1-it ( 22, 2) 3001 91 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 21 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-it ' ( 2, 1) 601 18 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 13 12 11 0 12 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-it ( 1, 12) $001 152 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8012 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-1t (8011, 11) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 01 a 0 0 1-it ( 11, 1) 5001 152 3 1 0 0 It 0000000 2 13 12 0 13 2.5t 2.It 35/ 56 0 0 1-1t ( 1, 13) SOO/ 152 3 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8013 0 0 0 2.5' 2.2' 351 56 0 0 1-It ti (8013, 13) 0j ' 0 1 0 0' 0 It 0000000 0 "1 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t - 0/ 0 0 0 1-1t { . 13, 1) SOO/ 152 3 1 0 0 It 4000000 12 11 2 0 11 2.5t 2.2t 35J 56 0 0 1-it ( 1, 11) SOO/ 152 2 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8011 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 35J 56 0 0 1-it 21) 01 0 1 0 0 0 P 0000000 0 2 0 0 0 2.5t 2.2t Oj 0 0 0 1-It `8021, 21, 2) 2251 69 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 22 0 1 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 25/ 40 0 0 1-It ( 2, 21) 225/ 69 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8021 0 0 0 2.51 2.2t 25/ 40 0 0 1-it r � ) t INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES HERE SPECIFIED LINK TYPE LANE CHANNELIZATION CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY QUEUE DISCHARGE AND '2 BUSES ONLY START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSED CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES TOTAL LINKS: 17 (ALLOWED: 500) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 7 (ALLOWED: 250) `v6a1 RTOR CODES- 0 RTOR PERMITTED 1 RTOR PROHIBITED PEDESTRIAN CODES 0 NO PEDESTRIANS 1 LIGHT 2 MODERATE 3 HEAVI Submitted Into the public record n onnect�111th item WA on Walter Foeman City Clerk r ii f..r' 4.i a I " . �.J LINK (8012, 12 ( 12, 1 ( 1, 2 ( 2, 22 (8022, 22 ( 22, 1 ( 2, 1 ( 1, 12 (8011, 11 ( 11, 1 ( 1, 13 (8013, 13 ( 13, 1 ( 1, 11 (8021, 21 ( 21, 2 ( 2, 21 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT RIGHT 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 31 10, 59 0 YES YES YES NO Of 0 ISO/ 46 13 57 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 53 1 43 0 YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 j o 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO O/ 0 O/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 5 92 3 0 YES YES YES NO 1001 30 O/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 Of 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 3 91 6 0 YES YES YES NO loot 30 O/ 0 0 too 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO • NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 0 0 100 0 YES NO YES NO 01 0 0/ 0 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 SPECIFIED FIXED-TIHE SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES NODE 1 OFFSET 0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 115 SEC INTERVAL DURATION t- - - ----- - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - ---- --- - - - - -+ NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 12, 1) ( 11, 1) ( 2, 1) ( 13, 1) 1 22 19 1 2 1 2 2 4 3. 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 2 2 2 2 S 73 63 2 1 2 I f. 5 4 3 2 0 2 6 8 6 2 2 1 3 2 2 0 2 0 NODE 2 OFFSET 9 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 115 SEC, INTERVAL DURATION". +- -- ----- - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - -- NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 2) ( 21, 2) ( 21, 2) 1 13 11 1 1 I ' 2 t 3 0 2 0 3 7 6 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 0 2 5 85 73 1 2 2 6 3 2 0 2 1 NODE 11 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION t- -- ----- - - - - - - - APPROACHES - ---- -- - - - - -+ NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8011, 11) 1 0 100 1 1 NODE 12 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION t- -- ----- -- ---- - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8012, 12) ( 1, 12) 1 0 too I 1 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - NODE 13 - - - - - IS - - UNDER SIGN CONTROL - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - Submitted -int the public NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8013, 13) ( 1, 13) record in connec " wi 1 0 100 1 1 item Vt on , Walter oeman ' City Clerk ,. 95- 595 0 0 INTERVAL DURATION I - - - NODE 21 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL - - - - - - - - - - -- APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8021, 21) ( 2, 21) 1 0 100 1 1 1 0 NODE 22 IS UNDER SICK CONTROL - 0 INTERVAL DURATION t--- ------ - - - - -- APPROACHES - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -} NUMBER 1 (SEC) (PCT) 0 100 (8022, 1 22) ( 2, 22) 1 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES :. 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 1 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW f� S STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW 1 NO TURMS-GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN -GREEN THRU AND RIGHT ' J 6aumitted into the public record i orinecti Wnonitem Walter oeman City Cleric 95- 555 �t, ___J_ 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES CO = PROTECTED KOGO : NOT PERMITTED AMBR = AMBER PERM : PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED S I� PROT _ PROTECTED , .. STOP `= STOP SICK ILD = YIELD SIGN 0 CYCLE LENGTH = 115 SECONDS NODE 1 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET = SECONDS INTERVAL DURATION -------------------------•--------------- -- APPROACHES -------------------- ....... -.......... ...... ( 12, 1) ( 11, 1) ( 21 1) ( 13, 1) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRO RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRO RITE DIAL 1 22 PERM GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO PERM GO GO KOGO KOGO NOGO 2 4 AHBR AHBR AMBR KOCO NOGG KOGO AMBR AHBR AMBR NOGO NOCO NOGO 3 1 NOGO NOGG KOGO NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGG NOGO KOGO NOGO ROGO NOGO 1 73 KOGO KOGO NOGO PERM GO GO K000 KOGO KOGO PERK GO GO ` 5 4 NOCO NOGO NOGO AHBR AHBR AMBR KOGO NOGG NOGO AHBR AHBR AHBR 6 8 KOGO KOGO KOGO PROT NOGO NOGO KOGO NOGG KOGO PROT KOGO NOGO 7 3 KOGO KOGO KOGO AMBR NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGG AHBR NOGO NOGO NODE 2 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET 0 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH = 115 SECONDS 1 INTERVAL DURATION ------------------- ------------------------ APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 2) ( 21, 2) ( 22, 2) 1 LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 13 PROT GO NOOO KOGO Go GO 2 4 AHBR AHBR NOGO NOGO AHBR AMBR 3 7 KOCO KOGO PROT GO KOGO KOGO i 3 KOGO KOGO AHBR AHBR KOGO KOGO 5 85 PROT GO KOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO 6 3 GO GO r NOGO ' NOGO NOGO NOGO NODE 11 SICK CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------ APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8011, LEFT THRU RITE DIAC LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO 8 "0 NODE 12 SIGN CONTROL - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- i INTERVAL DURATION ------------------- - - - - APPROACHES , G� (8012, 12) ( 11 12) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT tHRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAC LEFT THRO RITFSDU%GmJJH�f�TF��C publla 1 0 co co recor!Mon nnect'on wi h item oeWai=man i City Clerk RODE 13 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL ,DURATION----(8013 ---1, 13) --------------------13) ---------- APPROACHES ............................................ (8013( LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO �... NODE 21 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8021, 21) ( 2, 21) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 22 SIGN CONTROL IfiTERYAL DURATIOA-----(8022, -------22) 2, 22) ------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT-THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG � 1 0 GO GO 1 1 ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS (VEHIHOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8012, 12) 168 1 0 (8022, 22) 146 1 0 Submitted into the public (8011, 11) 1738 5 0 record i (8021, 21) 61 1 0 item onnei 8013, 13) 2140 5 0 on `y� ... 1 Walter*eman VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS CitY Clerk VEHICLE LENGTH MAXIMUM ACCELERATION MAXIMUM SPEED Q DSCHG HDWY FLEET COMPONENT PERCENTAGES TYPE FEETIMETERS (HPHISEC)I(KHPfl1SEC) (HPH)1(KHPH) FACTOR (PCT) AVG.-OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS 0 pt 11.01 5.2 5.51 8.8 15.01120.7 100 1.3 100 0 0 0 0 2tt 34.01 10.4 3.01 4.8 60.01 96.6 120 1.2 0 100 0 0 i 0 3tt 11.0 5.2 5.5 8.8 15.0 120.7 100 3.5 0 0 100 0 i 1 1 1 0 1tt 47.0114.3 2.01 3.3 50.01 80.5 120 25.0 0 0 0 100 .., 0 tt INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES OHM WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 400, ROUTINE CKNCRD, PARAHETER(S) - P1 : 2, P2 = 1, P3 : 60, P4 = 120 1 INITIALISATION STATISTICS TINE INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTEXT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE i 1 NETSIM 0 32 10000 2 NETSIM 32 36 12 3 RETSIH 36 40 11 4 RETSIM 40 39 2 EQUILIBRIUM ATTAINED g ALL EXISTING SUBNETWORKS'REACHED EQUILIBRIUM >� *,•,_-*r F'' CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 1:55 ELAPSED TIRE IS 0: 1:55 ( 115 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIRE IS 115 SECONDS p � 9 VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO HINUTES/HILE ----- SEC VEHICLE - -- AVERAGE VALUES -- VEHICLE HOVE DELAY TOTAL HOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUEt TOPt STOPS VOLUME SPEED LINK HILES TRIPS TIRE TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME (1) VP8 MPH (8012, 12) 5 156 ( 12, 1) 0.57 6 1.4 2.6 4.0 0.34 6,98 4.60 39.7 26.2 10,9 10.6 83 187 8,6 ( 1, 2) 0.05 3 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.00 2.20 0.00 2.0 010 0.0 0.0 0 93 25.2 (8022, 22) 0.11 S 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.85 2.79 0.41 9.5 1.4 010 0.0 0 62 21.5 156 ( 22, 2) 0.23 4 0.5 3.1 4.0 0.14 17.45 15,07 59.5 51.4 27.0 26.9 100 125 3,4 ( 2, 1) 0.08 7 0.2 0.9 1.0 0.18 13.20 10.82 9.0 7.4 1.1 1.0 28 219 4,5 ( 1, 12) 0.56 6 1.3 0.2 1.6 0,85 2.80 0,42 15,7 1.4 0.0 0,0 0 187 21.4 (8011, 11) 56 1753 ( 11, 1) 5.21 55 9.0 11,1 20,1 0,45 3.86 2.13 21.9• 12.1 6.0 5.2 36 1721 15.5 ( 1, 13) 5.68 60 9.8 2A 12.7 0.77 2,23 0.51 12.7 2,9 0.0 010 0 1878 26.9 (8013, 13) 68 2128 ( 13, 1) 6.53 69 11.3 26.0 37.3 0.30 5.71 3.98 32.4 22.6 10,1 8,7 60 2160 10.5 (8021, 11) 6.44 68 11.1 4.2 15.3 0.72 2.38 0.66 13.5 3.7 0.0 JO�.�13 0 2128 25.2 62 ( 21, 2) 0.09 2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.68 3.52 1.14 9-0 2.9 1.5 50 62 17.0 ( 2, 21) 0.13 3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.83 2.87 0.49 7.3 1.3 0,0 0 93 20.9 SUBNETWORK-- 25.66 139 0.76 0.86 1,62 0.47 3.78 2.01 0.70 0.37 0,15 53.2 15.9 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES VEHICLE -TRIPPER TRIP CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 1:55 �I�1 b ur ELAPSED TIME IS Ot 1:55 ( 115 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TINE IS 115 SECDS VER-HINS t AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -------------- Q U E U E L E N G T H (VEIII ---------- QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE XIMUM QUEUE BY LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE), (1) FAILURE 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 1 3 4 5 6 ( 12, 1) 1,5 1.4 1.9 6.5 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 a I ( 1, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.2 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 a a a 0 0 a 0 0 ( 22, 2) 4.2 4.0 3,0 21,6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0• 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 0.1 0.1- 0.3 12,5 a 0 0 0 a 0 G 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 ( 1, 12) 0.0 0.0 0.9 4,2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ( 11, 1) 6.6 5,7 10.6 14,6 0 1 1 1 0 0 a 0 4 6 7 0 a 0 1 ( 1, 13) 0.0 0.0 6.9 10.1 0 a 0 0 0 a •0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 13, 1) 13.8 11.9 18,7 25.7 0 0 6 4 0 a •0 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 1 ( 1, 11) 0.0 0.0 814 18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 21, 2) 0,1 0,1 0.3 3.3 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 'a 0 0 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0,2 1,7 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBNETWORK: 26.2 23.1 51.6 14.1 0 t THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. it AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SINULATUbmitted into the public record i connec i, �ni item on Walter Foeman City Clerk NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN (8012, 12) I ( 12, 1) 0,7 7.8 3.4 ( 1, 2) 0,1 3,9 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0,1 2,6 0,1 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0,3 5,2 4,5 ( 2, 1) 0,1 9,1 1.1 ( 1, 12) 0,1 7,8 0.3 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 611 71,1 14,4 ( 1, 13) 7.3 77,6 3,7. (8013, 13) , ( 13, 1) 8,5 89.3 33.7 ( 1, 11) 8,3 88,0 5,5 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0,1 1,6 0.1 ( 2, 21) 0,2 3,9 0,1 I 0 LINK VEHICLE -MILE LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 12, 1) 0,19 0.00 0,38 ( 1, 2) 0.03 0.02 0,00 ( 21 22) 0,00 0,11 0100 J (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.23 9.00 =( ( 2, 1) 0,05 0,01 Im ;.. ( 1, 12) 0.00 0,56 0,00 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 0,09 5,02 0.09 ( 1, 13) 0,00 5.68 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 0.09 .6.25 0,19 1, 11) 0.00 6.44 0100 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0100 0,00 0,09 e ( 2, 21) 0,00 0,13 0,00 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I TRAVEL TIME PERSON -MIN 5.2 0,1 414 5,2 1,4 2.0 26,0 161.4 48.3 19.8 0,4 0,5 VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (MPH ) STOPS (PCT) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU. RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 5 0 2 0 4 5.1 0.0 13,1 100,0 0,0 75,0 2 1 0 27.3 27.3 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0,0 21.5 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0,0 100,0 0,0 4 1 2 3.4 20.5 6.3 25.0 0,0 50,0 0 6 0 010 21.4 0.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0 56 0 1 53 1 2217 15,4 24.4 0,0 35.8 0,0 0 60 0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0,0 010 0,0 0 68 0 1 66 2 8,1 10,4 24.4 0.0 62.1 0,0 0 68 0 0,0 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 0,0. .. 17.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0 3 0 0.0 20,9 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Submitted Into the public record �i��connect- n it item .� on Walter oeman City rfork 9 i J HETSIH MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINK MOVING TIRE DELAY TIRE TOTAL TIHE RATIO HOVEITOTAL (VEN-HINS) (VEH-HINS) (VER-HINS) (VER-HINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.45 0.00 0.90 1.78 0.00 0.83 2.23 0.00 1.73 0.20 0.00 0.52 ( 11 2) 0.10 0.05 MO -0.03 -0.02 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.11 0.03 0.05 0.61 0.01 0.16 0.80 0.03 0.22 0.14 0.00 0.25 ( 1, 12) 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.57 0.00 ' 0.00 0.86 0.00 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 0.16 8.66 0.16 0.09 10.96 0.07 0.25 19.62 0.23 0.65 0.44 0.70 ( 1, 13) 0.00 9.80 0.00 0.00 2.88 0.00 0.00 12.65 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0013, • 13) ( 13, 1) 0.16 10.79 0.33 0.54 25.33 0.14 0.70 36.12 ' 0.47 0.23 0.30 0.70 ( 1, 11) 0.00 11.11 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.00 0.00 15.33 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.68 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00 HETSIH HOVEHENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIHE DELAY TIHE QUEUE TIHEtt STOP TIHEtt (SECSIVER) (SECS/VEH) (VER-HINS) (VEH-HINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 67.0 0.0 26.0 53.5 0.0 12.5 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.6 ( 11 2) 2.0 2.0 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) ( 22, 1) 0.0 59.5 0.0 0.0 51.4 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 ( 2, 1) 12.0 2.0 r, 6.5 10.4 0.4 4.9 0.0 0.0 O.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ( 1, 12) 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) I5.0 22.2 14.0 5.2 12.4 4.2 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 ( 1, 13) 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CIO 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 42.0 . 32.8 14.0 32.2 23.0 4.2 0.4 13.4 0.0 0.4 11.5 0.0 ( 11 11) 0.6 13.5 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 01, 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ( 2, 21) 0:0 7.3 0.0 0.01• 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tt TIHE FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. Submitted into the public recor1won. nne i L item Walter Foeman City Clerk 9 5 - 51�5 owl, -� 1 CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF EMISSIONS 0 LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE EMISSION RATES (KCfHILE.HOUR) GALLONS M.P.G. RC CO NO I 0 VEHICLE TYPE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS ° ( ( 12, 1) 1, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.031 0.010 0.416 0.209 0.078 0.040 22) 0.0 0.0 0..0 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.012 0.198 0.063 U (8022, z„ ( 22, 2) 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.077 1.085 0.218 E -' U ( 21 1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0,0 0.064 1.215 01305 a ( 11 12) 010 0,0 010 10.6 0.0 0,0 0.024 0.372 0.100 N - �- (8011, 11) w U Ma: ( 11, 1) 014 0,1 0.0 11,4 3,9 0.0 0.314 6.081 1,398 0 o ( 1, 13) 0.5 0.1 0.0 10.9 4.2 0.0 0.325 6,499 1.938- •- ; (8013, 13) 13, 1) 0.7 0.1 0,0 9.1 4.6 0.0 0.531 11.965 1.928 ( 11 11) 017 0,1 010 8.1 3.2 0.0 0.486 I0.671 31316 :. (8021, 21) a a E I ( 21, 2) 0,0 0,0 0,0 24.9 0.0 0,0 0.006' 0,062 0,004. ( 2, 21) 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,1 010 0,0 0.019 0,282 0,091 0 SUBNETWORK- 2.5 013 010 9.7 3,9 0.0 0.212 4,398 1,068 0 EMISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARE NOT AVAILABLE �v Q THE MAIIHUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 7S VEHICLES, THIS MAXIMUM OCCURED AT 158 SECONDS. 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 3:50 ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 3:50 ( 230 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TINE S 230 SECO S VERICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/MILE ----- S VEHICLE -- •- AVERAGE VALUES -- ! t VEHICLE HOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUE* TOP* TOPS VOLUME SPEED LINK ---- MILES TRIPS ----------- TIME TIME TIME --------=---------- TOTAL ----- TINE ------------- TINE TIME -------- TIME ------- TIME TIME - (1) .............. VPB MPH (8012, 12) 11 112 ( 12, 1) 1,04 11 2.5 4.2 6.7 0.37 6.38 4.01 36.3 22.8 14.8 14.6 81 172 9.4 ( 1, 2) 0.14 9 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.00 1,96 0.00 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 140 25.2 ( 2, 22) 0.34 6 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.80 2.98 0.60 10.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0 93 20.1 (8022, 22) ,� 140., j ( 22, 2) 0.51 9 1.2 8.0 9.2 0.13 17.96 15.58 61.2 53,1 35.5 34.1 88 140 3.3 !' ( 2, 1) 0.14 12 0.3 1.0 1.4 ' 0.24 9.90 7.52 6.8 5.1 8.6 8.6 16 187 6.1 j " ( 1, 12) 1,10 12 2.6 0.3 3.0 0.89 2.68 0.30 14.8 1.61;: 0.1 0.0 0 187 12,4 1 (8011, 11) 111 1737 ( 11, 1) 10,42 110 18.0 22.8 40.8 0.44 3.91 2.19 22.2 12.4 7.0 6.2 34 1711 15.3 ( 1, 13) 10,98 116 18,9 5.3 24.3 0.78 2.21 0.48 12.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0 1815 27.1 (8013, 13) 137 2144 ( 13, ( 1, 1) 11) 12.88 12.59 136 133 22.2 50.1 72.3 21.7 7.7 29.4 0.31 0.74 5.61 2,34 3.89 0.61 31.9 13.3 22.1 3.5 10.9 9.5 0.0 57 2128 10.7 0.0 0 2081 25.7 (8021, 21) 4 62 ( 21, 2) 0.17 { 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.58 4.11 1.73 10,5 4,4 2.5 2.5 75 14.6 ( 2, 21) 0,21 5 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.80 2.97 0.59 7.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 0 .62 78 20.2 1 OSUBNETWORK= 50.53 272 1.49 . 1.67 3.16 0.47 3.75 1.98 0.70 0.31 0.18 0.16 S0.7 16.0 -- VERICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES f VEHICLE -TRIP --- PER ' TRIP • t U 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 3:50 ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 3:50 ( 230 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 230 SECONDS VE8-HINS R AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L E N a T 8 (VEH - QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE it MAIIMUM QUEUE BY LANE LINK TIRE TIME (VEHICLE) (1) FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ------------------------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ( 12, 1) 3.5 3.4 2.1 7,2 0 1 0 a 0 0 0 a 2 0 0 0 a 0 1 ( 1, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.3 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 0.0 0,4 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0, ( 22, 2) 7,7 7.4 2.8 20.7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 2,0 2.0 1.0 38.1 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 12) 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 11, 1) 14.1 12.4 10,7 14.8 a 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 7 7 a 0 0 1 ( 1, 13) 0.0 0.0 6.7 9.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 13, 1) 27.4 24,0 1816 2516 0 0 5 4 0 0 a-- •1, a 16 13 0 0 0..3 ( 1, 11) 0,0 0.0 8.0 17.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 21, 2) 0.2 0.2 0;3 3,3 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 C 2 2.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 OSUBNETMORK= 54,8 49.3 52.4 14.3 0 c THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. tx AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION 1 NETSIH PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS �l LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME "- MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN PERSON -MIN (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 1.4 14,3 5.4 8.6 ( 1, 2) 0.2 1117 0.0 0,4 ( 2, 224• 0.4 718 0.3 1,3 (8022, 22)' 22, 2) 0.7 11.7 10.4 11.9 ( 21 1) 0.2 15.6 1.3 1.0 ( 1, 12) 1.4 15.6 0,4 3.8 vi (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 13.5 142.4 29.5 52,8 ( 1, 13) 14.2 150.2 6.9 31.4 xJ(8013, 13) J ( 13, 1) 16.7 175.9 64.8 93.5 ( 1, 11) 16,3 172,0 10.0 38,1 _ (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.2 5.2 0,4 0.9 ( 2, 21) 0.3 615 0.2 0.8 i f Submitted into the public record i onne#ino item P on Walman City Clerk 95- 5 i 1 NETSIH HOVEHENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I 0 LINK VEHICLE-KILE VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (NPR ) STOPS (Pei) LEFT THRD RIGHT LEFT THRD RIGHT LEFT THRD RIGHT LEFT THRD RIGHT (8012, 12) 0 11 0 ( 12, 1) 0.38 0.00 0.66 4 0 7 6.6 0.0 12.4 75.0 0.0 85.7 ( 11 2) 0.06 0.08; 0.00 4 5 0 29.0 32.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 21 22) 0.00 0.34 0.00 0 6 0 0.0 20.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) 0 9 0 ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.51 0.00 0 9 a 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 88.9 0.0 ( 21 1) 0.08 0.01 0.05 7 1 4 4.9 20,5 8.2 14.3 0.0 15.0 1, 12) 0.00 1.10 0.00 0 12 0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) 0 ill 0 ( 11, 1) 0.38 9.66 0.38 4 102 4 9.9 15.4 24.4 75.0 34.3 0.0 ( 11 13) aloe 10.98 0.00 0 116 0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) 0 137 0 ( 13, 1) 0.57 11.84 0.47 6 125 5 6.5 10.8 22.4 100.0 57.6 0.0 ( 1, 11) 0.00 12.59; 0.00 0 133 0 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) 0 4 0 ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.17 0 0 4 0.0 0.0 14.6 0,0 0.0 75.0 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.21 0.00 a 5 0 0.0 20.2 •• 0.0•' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 NETSIH HOVEHENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINK KOVIKG TIRE DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME RATIO ROVE/TOTAL (VEH-NINS) (VEH-HIHS) (VEH-HINS) (VEH-HINS) LEFT THRD RICH? LEFT THRD RIGHT LEFT THRD RIGHT LEFT THRD RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.90 0.00 1.58 2.55 0.00 1.62 3.45 0.00 3.20 0.26 0.00 0.49 ( 1, 2) 0.20 0.25 0.00 -0.06 -0.10 0.00 0.13 0.15 0.00 1.49 1.65 0.00 ! J ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00; (8022, 22) f ( 22, 2) 0.00 1.24 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 0.00 9.18 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.19 0.03, 0.11 0.79 0.01 0.23 0.98 0.03 0.33 0.19 0.00 0.32 ( 1, 12) 0.00 2.70 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 2.95 •0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 (8011, 11) 11, 1) 0.65 16.67 0.65 1.65 20.85 0.28 2.30 37.52 0.93 0.28 0.44 0.70 1, 13) 0.00 18.95 0.00 0.00 5.31 0.00 0.00 24.27 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 (8013, 13) { ( 13, 1) 0.98 20.42 0.82 4.27 45.36 0.45 5.25 65.78 1.27 0.19 0.31 0.64 i' ( 1, 11) 0.00 21.73 aloe 0.00 7.70 0.00 0.00 29.43 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0,00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 "D.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.58 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 Submitted into the public record i onnect on i item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 9"- p l NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIME DELAY TIME QUEUE TIHEtk STOP TIME" (SECS/VER) (SECS/VER) (VER-MINS) (VEH-HINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT TRRU RIGHT LEFT TRRU RIGHT LEFT TRRU RICRT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 51.8 0.0 27.4 38.2 0.0 13.9 1.3 0.9 1.2 1.3 0.9 1.2 ( 1, 2) 2.0 1.8 010 -1.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 { 2, 22) 0.0 10.2 0.0 010 2.1 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) { 22, 2) 0.0 61.2 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 714 0.0 ( 21 1) 8.4 2.0 5.0 6.8 0.4 3.4 1.4 0.0 0.6 1.4 0.0 0.6. ( 1, 12) 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 34.5 22.1 14.0 24.7 12.3 4.2 1.3 12.7 0.0 1.3 11.1 0.0 '. ( 1, 13) 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 52.5 31.6 15.2 42.7 21.8 5.4 3.2 24.1 0.0 3.0 20.9 0,0 ( 1, 11) 0.0 1313 0.0 0.0 3.5 010 010 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 :.t J ! { 2, 21) 0,0 7.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x� TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED I1 THESE VALUES. CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF EMISSIONS 0 LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE EMISSION RATES (KG/XILE.HOUR) GALLONS H.P.G. HC CO NO X "j 0 VEHICLE TYPE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.1 0.0 0.0 1017 0.0 010 0.033 0.425 0.085 ( 11 2) D.C. 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.014 0.289 0.063 ( 2, 22) 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 0,020 0.329 0.101 (8022, 22) r, ( 22, 2) 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.072 1.039 0.183 ( 21 1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.109 1.671 0.349 ( 11 12) 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0,033 0.534 0,155 (8011, 11) ,Lf ( 11, 1) 0.9 0.1 0.0 11.2 3.8 0.0 0.325 6.293 1.471 { 1, 13) 0.9 0.1 0.0 11.1 4.5 0.0 0.311 6,081 1.848 (8013, 13) } { 13, 1) 1.3 0.1 0.0 9.0 4.6 0.0 0.522 11,588 1.968 } ( 1, 11) 1.3 0.2 0.0 9.2 3.7 0.0 0.429 .. , 9.123 2.349 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 0.0 0.007 0.077 0.009 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0,017 0.258 0.082 �. 0 SUBNETWORK- 4.8 0.6 0.0 9.7 4.1 0.0 0.205 4.180 1.025 0 EMISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARE NOT AVAILABLE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 76 VEHICLES. Submitted into ' the public THIS MAXIMUM OCCURED AT 161 SECONDS, recordco nnect'oh item on Waite Foeman ci clerk 1 CUHULATIVE HETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 5:45 v� ELAPSED TIME IS 0: S:4S ( 345 SECONDS), TINE PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME S 345 SECONDS YBHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTESjMILE ----- $ECOND f VBHICLE -- - -- AVERAGE VALUES -- VEHICLE HOVE DELAY TOTAL HOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DEL QUEUP STOP STOPS VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TINE TIHE TIHE TOTAL TIME TIHE TINE TIME TIHE TIHE (1) VPR MPE ----------------------•------------ ----------------------------------- -----------_------ (8011, 14 16 166 ( 12, 1), 1.61 17 3,8 6.2 10,0 0,38 6.20 3.82 35,2 21.7 16,3 n 88 177 9.7 1, 2) 0.28 17 0.7 0.1 0,1 0.90 2.64 0.26 2,6 0.3 0.2 5 171 22,7 2, 22) 0,68 12 1.6 0,5 2,1 0,71 3.10 0,73 10,6 2.5 0,0 0 125 19.3 (8022, 22) 14 146 22, 1) 0,80 14 1,9 12.1 13.9 0.14 17.54 15.16 59,8 51.7 36,2 85 146 3,4 2, 1) 0.22 19 0.5 3,1 3,6 0,14 16.75 14.37 11,4 9.8 11.0 21 198 3,6 ( 1, 12) 2.11 23 5,0 0.8 5,8 0,87 2.74 0.36 15,1 2,0 0,1 0.0 0 240 21,9 (8011, 11) 167 1742 ( 11, 1) 15,72 166 27.1 37.0 64.2 0,42 4.08 2.36 23,2 13.4 8.1 7.2 37 1732 14.1 ( 1, 13) 16.09 170 27.8 7,9 35,6 0.78 2,21 0.49 12.6 2.8 0.0 0,0 0 1773 27,1 5, (8013, 13) 205 2139 ( 13, 1) 19,41 205 33,5 72.3 105.8 0,32 5,45 3,73 3110 21,2 10.9 9.5 55 2139 11,0 ( 1, 11) 18,74 198 32.3 10,9 43.3 0,15 2.31 0.58 13,1 3.3 0.0 0,0 a 2066 26.0 (8021, 21) 6 62 ( 21, 2) 0.26 6 0,6 0,4 1.0 0,58 4.11 1.73. 10,5 4.4 2,7 2.7 83 62 14,6 J ( 2, 21) 0,26 6 0.6 0,2 0.8 0.78 3.06 0.69 7.8 1,8 0,0 0,0 0 62 19,6 OSUBNBTWORK= 76,16 409 2,26 2,52 4.78 0,47 3.77 1.99 0.70 037 0.19 0,17 51,8 15.9 i 1 -- VBHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES VEHICLE -TRIP PER I 1 CUHULATIVE HETSIH STATISTICS AT TIMB 17: 1:45 TRIP a ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 5:45 ( 345 SECONDS), •• TIHE PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIHE IS.415 SECONDS VEB-HINS t AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L I N C T H (VEBICL............ QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE ti MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LAN LINK TIHE TINE (VEHICLE) (I) FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ..;; -----------------... i--- -------------- - - - - - - - - - - ( 12, 1) 5.2 5.1 2,1 7.1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0„ 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 ( 11 2) 0.1 0.1 0.3 6,2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 { 21 22) 0.0 0.0 0,6 4.4 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IJ ( 22, 2) 10.9 10,4 2.8 20,4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0, 0 0 ( 2, 1) 3,8 3.8 1.3 47.7 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 01 ( 1, 12) 0,1 0.0 1,3 5.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s ( 111 1) 23,7 21.2 11.2 15.4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 3. ( 1, 13) 0,0 0.0 6.6 9.7 0 0 0 0 0 'a'.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- ( 13, I) 39.7 34,8 18.3 25.2 0 0 Al 4 0 0."' 0 1 1 16 13 a 0 0 3 ( 1, 11) 0,0 0.0 7.9 17,5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21, 2) 0.3 0,3 0,3 3,3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0,2 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSUBNBTWORK: 83.7 75,5 53,0 1415 0 # THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIHE FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON TA e d into the pu blic tt AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF Fi�CZ3'Ptf' item anerWiw n Walter Foeman City Clerk r � j NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN PERSON -MIN (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 2.1 22.1 8.0 13.0 ( 1, 2) 0.4 22.1 0.1 1.6 ( 21 22) 0.9 15.6 0.6 2.8 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 1.0 18.2 15.7 18.1 ( 2, 1) 0.3 24.7 4.0 4.7 ( 1, 12) 2.7 29.9 1.0 7.5 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 20.4 215.0 48.0 83.1 ( 1, 13) 20.8 220.3 10.2 46.2 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 25.1 265.2 93.6 136.9 ( 1, 11) 24.2 256.1 14.2 54.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.3 7.8 0.6 1.4 ( 2, 21) 0.3 7.8 0.2 1.0 1 *it NOTE *it TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I 0 LINK VEHICLE -MILE VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (MPH ) STOPS (PC?) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT TBRU RIGHT (8012, 12) 0 16 0 " ( 12, 1) 0.47 0.09', 1.04 5 1 11 6.6 4.9 13.9 Solo 0.0 90.9 ( 11 2) 0.10 0.18 0.00 6 11 0 22.0 23.1 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.68 0.00 0 12 0 0.0 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) 0 14 0 ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.80 0.00 0 14 0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 85.7 0.0 ( 2, 1) 0.10 0.02 0.09 9 2 8 2.5 20.5 5.2 22.2 0.0 25.0 ( 1, 12) 0.00 2.11 0.00 0 23 0 0.0 21.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . (Soil, 11) 0 167 0 ( 11, 1) 0.76 14.20 0.76 8 150 8 6.7 15.5 19.6 87.5 35.3 25.0 ( 1, 13) 0.00 16.09 0.00 0 170 0 0.0 .27.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) 0 205 0 ' ( 13, 1) 1.04 17.52 0.85 11 185 9 7.6 11.0 21.9 100.0 54.1 22.2 ( 1, 11) 0.00 18.74 0.00 0 198 0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) 0 6 0 ( 21, 2), 0.00 0.00 0.26 0 0 6 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 83.3 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.26 0.00 0 6 0 0.0 19.6 0 $O 010 0.0 �Othe ubmitted Into pub record item onnecti P e on WaIW Foem. 9 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINK MOVING TIME DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME RATIO MOVE/TOTAL (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RICH? (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 1.13 0.23 2.48 3.19 0.94 2.02 4.32 1.17 4.50 0.26 0.19 0.55 ( 11 2) 0.30 0.55 0.00 -0.03 -0.08 0.00 0.27 0.47 0.00 1.11 1.17 0.00 ( 2, 22) 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 2112 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 (0022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 12.06 0.00 0.00 13.95 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.24 0.05 0.22 2.26 0.01 0.83 2.50 0.07 1.05 0.10 0.00 0.21 ( 1, 12) o.00 5.18 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 5.78 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 1.31 24.51 1.31 5.49 30.52 1.01 6.80 55.03 2.32 0.19 0.45 0.56 ( 11 13) 0.00 27.78 0.00 0.00 7.84 0.00 0.00 35.62 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 1.80 30.23 1.47 6.42 65.05 0.86 8.22 95.28 2.33 0.22 0.32 0.63 ( 1, 11) 0.00 32.35 0.00 0.00 10.93 0.00 0.00 43.28 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 Oleo 0.44 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.58 ( 21 21) 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIME DELAY TINE QUEUE TIMEtt STOP TIME" (SECSIVER) (SECSIVEH) (VEH-HINS) (VEH-MINS) j LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT -: (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 51.8 70.0 24.5 38.3 56.5 11.0 2.8 0.9 1.4 2.8 0.9 1.4 ( 11 2) 2.7 2.5 0.0 -0.3 -0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x' (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.0 59.p 0.0 0.0 51.7 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.0 ? ( 21 1) 16.7 2.1. 7.9 15.0 0.4 6.3 2.8 0.0 1.0 2.8 0.0 1.0 ;. ( 1, 12) 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) 51.0 22.0 17.4 41.2 12.2 7.6 4.8 18.7 " 0;3 4.6 16.3 0.2 ( 11 13) 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) h ( 13, 1) 44.8 30.9 15.6 35.0 21.1 5.8 4.8 34.8 0.2 4.4 30.3 0.1 ( 1, 11) 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0. ,.. 0.0 0.3 0.0 S 0.0 0.3 ( 2, 21) 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tt TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. { Submitted into . tll(, public recur eciiiter WonWaIte Foeman X ... City Clerk 95- 51.15 I CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF EMISSIONS 0 LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE EMISSION RATES (KG/MILE.HOUR) CALLON$ M.P.G. HC CO NO I 0 VEHICLE TYPE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.036 0.513 0.113 ( 1, 2). 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.023 0.501 0.122 ( 2, 22) 0.1 CO 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.030 0.500 0.155 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.2 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.069 1.004 0.177 ( 2, 1) 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.126 1.867 0.382 ( 1, 12) 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.3 1.5 0.0 0.041 0.680 0.196 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 1.3 0.2 0.0 11.0 4.2 0.0 0.333 6.359 1.509 ( 1, 13) 1.4 0.2 0.0 11.1 4.2 0.0 0.309 6,117 1.863 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 2.0 0.2 0.0 9.0 5.0 0.0 O.S13 11.299 1.975 ( 11 11) 1.0 0.3 0.0 9.5 3.9 0.0 0.413 , 8.562 2.691 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 .0.007 0.096 0.013 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.016 0.266 0.085 0 SUBNETWORK- 7.2 0.9 0.0 9.7 4.3 O.0 0.206 4.139' 1.026 0 EMISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARE NOT AVAILABLE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 76 VEHICLES. THIS MAXIMUM OCCURED AT 161 SECONDS. 0ttttt THERE WERE 1 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA FOR CASE 1. 1 MESSAGE DESCRIPTION 400 An inconsistency exists between the length link (P1, P2) input on record type 11 and the length of this link computed fro& node coordinate data input for nodes P1 and P2. The length input ortrecord type 11 was P3 and the length computed from node coordinate data is P4. The percent difference between the length input on the type 11 record and the computed length is between 10 and 20%. This may indicate an error. TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 56.03 SECONDS OLAST CASE PROCESSED ... . Submitted into the public record in�connecti t Item .�_.__._ on Walter oeman City Clerk 95- 595 J M t- t. . • 'llt 1 t i APPENDIX B TRAP-NETsim ouTPUT TrIENTS 'WITHOUT PROPOSED SIGNAL F"RO�E a r . f Ittyy • t Submitted into the public record i onnec . n '# item on Walter oemart City Clerk 95- 595 1 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR AAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR WAWA& FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF M RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TIT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF ITT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF ITT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TIT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF Tit RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF ITT RRR RRR AAA AAA FIT TIt RRR RRR AAA AAA ?IF MICRO-COKPUTER PROTECUD-HODE VERSION (REQUIRES 80386 AND 80387 OR ABOVE) -a �F�o PoSESJ I a� i VERSION 4.00 E3 RELEASE DATE APR 1993 l 1 TRAF SIKQLATION KODEL J DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADKINISTRATION INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SISTEN RESEARCH DIVISION Gtttttttttttttttttttttttitttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttf Submitted into the public record n nee � item oon aWalter Foe City Clerk S" 5515 J v l i START OF CASE 1 ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1 CARD FILE LIST OSEQA:----+.... 1.... +.... 2.... +.... 3---- +.... 4..--+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 :BRICKELL POINT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 00 2 :This analysis evaluates the operation of the intersection of S.E. 5th 00 3 :Street and Brickell Avenue in Miaei, Florida. The driveway to Brickell 00 4 :Point is stop controlled. This is an analysis of the intersection 00 5 :as it will operate with NO signal controlling the Brickell Point 00 6 :Driveway. Full buildout of Brickell Point is assu:ted. 00 7 ; 00 8 :JEFFREY D. ARMSTRONG 2 14 94100K, MOORE 6 ASSOCIATES 0 01 9: 1 16 0 0 0 31700 02 10 : 345 03 11 : 1150000 04 12 : 1 1 lbstop 05 13 :8012 12 1 1 11 14 : 12 1 500 ISO 1 1 11 2 13 2 25 01 11. 15 : 1 2 110 1 21 22 22 25 11 16 : 2 21 300 1 8022 25 11 �P� 17 :8022 12 1 2 11 } 18 : 22 2 300 1 1 21 25 11 19 : 2 1 60 1 13 12 11 12 25 11 20 : 1 12 500 1 8012 25 11 21 :8011 11 3 1 11 22 : 11 1 500 100 3 1 2 13 12 13 35. 11 23 : 1 13 500 3 8013 35 11 24 :8013 13 3 1 11 25 : 13 1 500 100 3 1 4 12 11 1 11 35 11 26 : 1 11 500 2 8011 35 11 17 :8021 21 1 2 11 28 : 21 2 225 1 22 1 25 11 29 : 2 21 225 1 $021 25 11 30 :8012 12 100 12 1 52 17 99 21 31 : 1 2 100 135 2 22 100 21 32:8022 22 100 22 2 100 21 33: 2 1110 8 89 1 12 100 21 �1 34 :8011 11 100 11 1 $91604 45 21 35 : 1 13 100 21 36 :8013 13 100 13 1 541957 129 21 37 : 1 11 100 21 38 :8021 21 100 21 2 100 21 39 : 2 21 100 21 40 : 12 8012 1 35 41 : 11 $011 1 35 42 : 21 8021 2 .35. E 43: 22 $022 2 35 44 : 13 8013 1 35 45 : 1 0 12 11 2 13 22 4 l 73 4 8 3 35 46 : 2 0 1 21 22 35 41 12 11 10 60 36 Submitted into the public : � 48 ; 11 11 60 110 36 record ' �connecti 't 49 : 21 11 72 82 36 item on 3' 50: 2211 104 60 36y Walter oemain ? 3---- +---- 4----+----5.... +----6.... +.... 7---- + ---- 8 -. City Cleric 9 5 i ' CARD FILE LIST (COMT,) 3.... +---- 4---- +----5----+----6---•+----1 .... +----8 51 : 13 I1 .• 60 10 36 52 : 1 1Z12 0242 Z222 2121 2020 2�2� 2024 60 64 36 53 : 2 151 12 60 36 50 54:8012 12168 1 $022 22146 1 55 :8011 111738 5 8021 21 61 1 8013 132140 5 50 56 : 0 170 51 : 1 210 OSEQ.{:----+----1----+----2-...+----3----+----4----+----5----t----6----t----1 ---- t----8 =mot -1 o) J i'd Submitted into the public record onnectio i item on Walter oe art City Clerk 9 5 - 555 4 J 1 TRAP SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEM RESEARCH DIVISION Ottftittttttttttittttittttttittttttttttittttttttttttttttititttttffttittittttittttttttittittttttfttttttitttttitttttttttitittitttttt START OF CASE 1 titttttttttttt!ttitttifitttttittitittttfttittttitttttftttttltttittititittttititttttttittttittttttttttttitttittttttttttt:ttttttttt j 0 BRICKELL POINT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 0 This analysis evaluates the operation of the intersection of S.E. 5th - 0 Street and Brickell Avenue in Miani, Florida, The driveway to Brickell 0 Point is stop controlled. This is an analysis of the intersection 0 as it will operate with NO signal controlling the Brickell Paint 0 Driveway, Full buildout of Brickell Point is assuned, 0 DATE : 2/ 14/ 94 0 USER : JEFFREY D. ARMSTRONG _ Egy 0 AGENCY = ZOOR, MOORS E ASSOCIATES cM 1 RUN CONTROL DATA z U VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS b o C:� a' •g 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 0 0 NEXT CASE CODE = (0,1) IF ANOTHER CASE (DOES NOT, DOES) FOLLOW o� 0 1 RUN TYPE CODE = ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY �� v J............................ 0 NETSIK ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS 0 FUEL/EKISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED •# 0 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: NOT WRITTEN 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE : (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE : (O,1,Z,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAKE AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1700 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMH) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE o (0,1,2,3) IF (NO, IMMEDIATE, 2-CYCLE, 3-CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAK FOR NETSIK OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 345 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 115 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS �. 0 5 KAIIMUH INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 1 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS, FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODEL 0 1 NETSIM HOVENENT-SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE -- (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIK SUBNETWORK NETSIK GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE -- (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED ltittttitttititittittitttttttttttttitittitittlttttittitttttttititttittttitttitttttttttttttttitttitittttttttttttttitttttttititittitf TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIH DATA tttlttt!ltittitttttttttlttttttttltttittt!littttttkttttltlttlttitttttiiilttttttttlitttitttitltlttttttttttttltttttttttlttlitlttttttt 95` 595 hfxl t NETSIH LINKS 0 -LAKES--CHANNEL- ? C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LAKE LENGTH L PKT ORO LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP, TIRE HDRY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / H L L R PC? TYPE B234567 LEFT TNRU RGHT DIAL NODE SEC SEC MPH/KHPH CODE CODE -HENT KAHE (8012, 12) 0f 0 1 0 0 0 it 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.5t 2,2t 0f 0 0 0 1-it ( 12, 1) 5001 152 1 0 1 0 It 0000000 11 2 13 0 2 2,St 2.2t 251 40 0 1 1-1t ( 1, 2) 110/ 31 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 21 22 0 0 22 Mt 2,2t 25/ 40 0 0 1-1t '( 2, 22) 3001 91 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8022 0 `0 0 2. St 2,2t 251 40 "0 b I-1t (8022, 22) Of 0 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 2 0 0 0 2,5t 2,2t 0f 0 0 0 1-1t ( 22, 2) 300/ 91 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 21 0 0 2.5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-1t ( 2, 1) 60/ 18 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 13 12 11 0 12 2,5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-It ( 1, 12) 5001 152 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8012 0 0 0 2,5t 2.2t 251 40 0 0 1-it (8011, 11) 01 0 3 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2,St 2,2t 01 0 0 0 1-It ( 11, 1) 5001 152 3 1 0 0 It 0000000 2 13 12 0 13 2.5t 2,2t 351 56 0 0 1-it ( 1, 13) SOO/ 152 3 0 0 0 1t 0000000 0 8013 0 0 0 2,5t 2.2t 351 56 0 0 1-It (8013, 13) 01 0 3 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2,5t . 2.2t 0f 0 0 0 I -it ( 13, 1) SOO/ 152 3 1 0 0 It 4000000 12 11 2 0 11. 2,5t 2,2t 35/ 56 . 0 0 1-It ( 1, 11) 5001 152 2 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8011 0 0 0 2,5t 2,2t 351 56 0 0 1-1t (8021, 21) 01 0 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 2 0 0 0 2,5t 2,2t Of 0 0 0 1-It ( 21, 2) 2251 69 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 22 0 1 0 0 2,5t 2,2t 251 40 0 0 1-It ( 2, 21) 2251 69 1 0 0 0 It 0000000 0 8021 0 0 0 2,5t 2,2t 251 10 0 0 1-it �ET��rti�L -=7gSG(LiPT�o t INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES HERE SPECIFIED LINK TIPS LANE CHANNELIZATION RTOR PEDESTRIAN CODES CODES CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERHITTED 0 KO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT QUEUE DISCHARGE AND 2 BUSES ONLY 2 HODERATE START-UP LOST TIRE 3 CLOSED 3 HEAVY CHARACTERISTICS, 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR - POOLS 4 BUSES TOTAL.LIKKS: 17 (ALLOWED: 500) TOTAL KOK-EKTRY NODES: 7 (ALLOWED: 250) Submitted into the public record'i��,connecti n it _item on Walter oemart City Clerk 9"- 595 . 1 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEETIMETERS) LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT RIGHT (8012, 12) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO O/ 0 0/ 0 ( 12, 1) 31 10 59 0 YES YES YES NO 01 0 ISO/ 46 ( 1, 2) 43 57 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 01 0 h, ( 2, 22) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 01 0 (8022, 22) 0 100 0 0 NO IRS NO NO 0/ 0 01 0 ` ( 22, 2) 0 100 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 01 0 ( 2, 1) 53 4 43 0 YES YES YES NO 01 0 0/ 0 ( 1, 12) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 01 0 0/ 0 I (8011, 11) 0 100 0 0 ..NO YBS NO NO 0/ 0 01 Q. ( 11, 1) 5 92 3 0 IRS YES YES NO 100/ 30 O/ 0 ,•� ( 1, 13) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 01 0 0/ 0 (8013, 13) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO O1 0 0/ 0 ( 13, 1) 3 91 6 0 YES YES YES NO 1001 30 01 0 ( 1, 11) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 (8021, 21) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 01 0 0/ 0 ( 21, 2) 0 0 100 0 IES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 21) 0 100 0 0 NO IRS NO NO 0/ 0 01 0. I SPECIFIED FIIED-TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES 0 MODE 1 OFFSET 0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 115 SEC 0 INTBRVAL DURATION +--------------- APPROACHES ------......--- + j NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 12, I) ( 11, 1) ( 2, 1) ( 13, 1) 1 12 19 1 2 1 2 2 4 3 0 2 0 2 Submitted into the public i� 3 4 1 0 73 63 2 2 2 I 2 2 2 record_�onnecti n 1 item on 5 6 4 3 8 6 2 2 0 4 2 2 0- 4` - Walte Foeman 7 3 2 2 0 2 0, it -.. - . City Clerk; ` 0 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +--- -- -- --- - - - - - APPROACHES - ------- ------ -+ NUMBER (SEC) '(,PCT) ( 1, 2) ( 21, 2) ( 221 2) 100 1 5 1 0 NODE 11 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +--- ---- --- ---- - APPROACHES - - - - -- - --------+ NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8011, 11) ( 1, 11) 1 0 100 1 . 1 0 MODE 12 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +--------------- APPROACHES ----------------+ NUMBER (SRC) (PCT) (8012, 12) ( 1, 12) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 13 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - -•- - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - . + NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8013, 13) ( I, 13) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODR 21 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - ......... . NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8021, 21) ( 2, 21) 100 1 1 0 NODE 22 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +-- ----- - - - - -- - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ NUMBER (SEC) () (8022, 22) ( 2, 22) 95- 5 `: O100 5 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN ' i 2 RED t 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW i 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 4 5 STOP i 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW 4 7 NO TURNS -GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURK-GREEN THRU AND RIGHT 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES 00 : PROTECTED NOGO = NOT PERMITTED AKBR = AMBER PERM : PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT o PROTECTED STOP : STOP SION L_ I 2 YLD : IIELD SIGN �jl �� NODE 1 FIXED TINE CONTROL OFFSET = 0 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES ------------------------------ -............. ( 12, . 1) ( 11, 1) ( 21 1) ( 13, 1) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 22 PERK GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO PERM GO GO NOGO NOGG NOGO 2 4 AKBR AKBR AKBR NOGG NOGO NOGG AKBR AKBR AKBR 1000 NOGO.NOGO 3 1 NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO KOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGG 4 73 1000 NOGG KOOO PERK GO GO NOGO NOGG NOGO PERK GO GO 5 4 KOGO KOGO NOGO AKBR AHBR AKBR, KOGO NOGO EOGO AHBR AMBR AKBR 6 8 NOGG 1000 NOGG PROT NOGG NOGG NOGO NOGG KOGO .PROT NOGG NOGG 7 3 NOGG NOGG NOGO AHBR NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO AHBR NOGO KOGO NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 2) ( 21, 2) ( 22, 2) LEFT THRD RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 PERK GO STOP STOP GO GO Submitted into the public recor )! onnec ' item on t I Walter Foeman l NODE 11 SION CONTROL P INTERVAL DURATION ----(-------------------------------------- APPROACHES -----------...------------------- ----------- 8011, 11) ( 1, 11) LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAL 1 0 CO GO i NODE 12 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES --------------------- ----------------------- (toll, 12) ( i, 12) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG CO CO rNODE 13 SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ----------- ----------------------------- APPROACHES ------------------- ------------------------ (8013, 13) ( 1, 13) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 CO GO , NODE 21 SIGN CONTROL-' INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES ---- _----------------------_--------------- (8021, 21) ( 2, 21) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 4 .... 1 0 GO GO t ' gw� NODE 22 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION APPROACHES (8022, 22) ( 21 22) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 CO CO :4 1 ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS r (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (1012, 11) 168 1 0 (8022, 22) U6 1 O E> (8011, 11) 1138 S 4 j (8021, 21) 61 1 0 M (8013, 13). 2140 Submitted into -the public record i connec item on ' Walter pan 1 1 VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH MAXIMUM ACCELERATION MAXIMUM SPEED Q DSCHG HDHY FLEET COMPONENT PERCENTAGES TYPE FEET/HETERS (HPH/SEC)/(KHPH/SEC) (HPH)/(KHPH) FACTOR (PC?) AVG. OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS 0 It* 17.0/ 5.2 5.5/ 8.8 75.0/ 120.7 100 1.3 100 0 O 0 0 2tt 34.0/ 10.4 3.0/ 4.8 66.0/ 96.6 120 1.2 0 100 0 0 0 3tt 17.0/ 5.2 5.5/ 8.8 75.0/ 120.7 vo 3.5 0 0 100 0 0 4tt 47.0/ 14.3 2.0/ 3.3 50.01 80.5 120 25.0 0 0 0 100 0 tt INDICATES THAT ALL PARAHElERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES Ottttt WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 400, ROUTINE CKNCRD, PARAHETER(S) - P1 = 2, P2 = 1, P3 = 60, P4 1 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS f TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE 1 NETSIM 0 31 10000 2 NETSIM 31 35 12 3 NETSIM 35 40 14 4 NETSIM 40 40 0 EQUILIBRIUM ATTAINED ALL EXISTING SUBNETWORKS REACHED EQUILIBRIUM 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 2, 1) STARTS 1 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIH LINK ( 1, 2) STARTS 1 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 2, 1) ENDS 4 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DORATIOK OF 3 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIH LINK ( 1, 2) ENDS 6 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 5 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIH LINK ( 2, 1) STARTS 70 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION �D 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 1:55 :� .• ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 1:55 ( 115 SECONDS), .. TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS, 115 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO HINUTES/RILE ----- SECONDS / VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES -• VEHICLE HOVE DELAY TOTAL HOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUP STOPS VOLUNE SPEED LINK HILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME ----------- -------------------- TOTAL ----- TIME TIME --------- • - TIME TIME . ---------------------- TIME n!!P! (1) VPH MPH---- ------------------• ! (8012, 12) 5 156 12, 1) 0.57 6 1A 2.8 4.2 0.32 7.33 4.95 41,7 28.2 12.4 12.1 83 187 8.2 ( 1, 2) 0.11 6 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.35 6.79 4.41 7.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 50 187 U ( 2, 22) 0.11 2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.85 2.79 0.41 9.5 1.4 ., 0.0 0.0 0 62, 21.E (8022, 22) 5 156 ( 22, 2) 0.23 4 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.72 3.30 0.92 11.3 3.1 4.5 4.3 25 125 18.1 ( 2, 1) 0.07 6 0.2 3.0 3.2 0.05. 46.93 44.55 32.0 30.4 24.4 23.8 50 187 1.: ( 1, 11) 0.56 6 1.3 0.3 1.6 0.83 2.86 0.48 16.0. 2.7 0.0 0.0 0 187 21.( (8011, 11) 56 1753 11, 1) 5.21 55 9.0 11.1 20.1 0.45 3.86 2.13 21.9 12.1 6.0 5.2 36 1721 15,! ( 1, 13) 5.77 61 10,0 3.0 13.0 0.77 2.25 0.53 12.8.;; 3.0 0.0 0.0 0 1909 26., (8013, 13) 68 2128 ( 13, 1) 6.53 69 ' 11.3 26.0 37.2 0.30 5.70 3.97 32.4 22.6 10.1 8.7 59 2160 10;:' 1, 11) 6.34 67 10.9 4.1 15.0 0.73 2.37 0.64 13.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 0 2097 25.. ; (8021, 21) 2 62 ( 21, 2) 0.09 2 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.19 12.32 9.94 31.5 25.4 15.3 15.3 100 62 0 l ( 2, 21) 0.17 4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.76 3.13 0.75 8.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 • 0 125 19.: OSUBNETWORK= 25.76 140 0.76 0.87 1.63 0.47 3.71 2.02 0.70 0.37 0.15 0.14 53.6 15.1 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES / VEHICLE -TRIP --- PER Submitted into the public RIP I record�ir�'.00nnec i n vit item tt''� _ on r Walter roe'Man 9 5- 5 9 5 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 11: 1:55 ELAPSED TINE IS 0: 1:55 ( 115 SECONDS), TINE PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 115 SECONDS VEI-MINS t AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L E 1 G T I (VEII QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PRASE AVERAGE QUEUE B1 LANE tt WIXOM QUEUE BI LANE LINK TINE TIME (VEHICLE) (1) FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----------------- ---- . -- ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ( 1, 2) 0,2 0.2 0.3 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.9 0 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 22, 2) 0,4 0,4 1.0 7.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 3,7 3.6 2.5 92.4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 12) 0.0 0,0 0,9 3,8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 5.7 10.6 1(.6 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 1 ( 1, 13) 0.0 0.0 111 1015 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. ( 13, 1) 13,8 11.8 18.7 25.7 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 a 0 16 12 0 0 0 1 ( 1, 11) 0,0 0,0 8.2 18.0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' ( 21, 2) 0.8 0.8 0:9 9.3 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0. ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.3 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSUBNETNORK= 27.1 24.1 52,8 14.4 0 = THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLI ON THE LINK, AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TINE SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION 1 HETSIN PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAT TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIX PERSON -MIN (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.7 7.8 3.7 5.4 ( 1, 2). 0.1 7.8 0.6 1,0 ( 2, 221, 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.4 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0,3 5.2 0.3 1.0 ( 2, 1) 0,1 7.8 3.9 4.2 ( 1, 12) 011 7.8 0.3 2.1 (8011, 11) 6.7 71.1 14.4 26,0 ( 1, 13) 7.5 78.9 3.9 16.1 4 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 8.5 89.3 13,6 48.2 8.2 86,7 5,3 19.4 ti (S021, 21) j ( 21, 2) 0.1 2.6 1,1 1.4 t 1, 21) 012 5.2 4.2 0.7 Submitted into the public recor connect• n i item on water oeman t- — 9 � C" q, '� City Clerk r 0 LIKE VEHICLE-HILE LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.19 0.00 0.38 ( 11 2) 0.07 0.04 0.00 ( 21 22) 0.00 0.11 0.00 (8022, 22) 22, 2) 0.00 0.23 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.05 0.01 0.01 ( 1, 12) 0.00 0.56 0.00 k (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 0.09 5.02 0.09 ( 1, 13) 0.00 5.77 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 0.09 6.25 0.19 ( 1, 11) 0.00 6.34; 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.09 •.� ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.17 0.00 1 LIKE HOVIKG TINE (VER-HIKS) I , LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.45 0.00 0.90 ( 11 2) 0.20 0.10 0.00 ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.27 0.00 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.00 0 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.11 0.03 0.03 <� ( 1, 12) 0.00 1.35 0.00 (sell, 11) 1) 0.16 8.66 0.16 `11, 1, 13) 0.00 9.97 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 0.16 10.78 0.33 11 11) 0.00 10.95 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.20 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.41 0.00 KETSIH HOVEHEKT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I VERICLE-TRIPS SPEED (HPH ) STOPS (PCT) t LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 5 0 2 0• 4 5:2 0.0 11.6 100.0 0.0 75.0 4 2 0 8.9 8.6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 4 1 1 1.3 0.7 5.8 50.0 0.0 0.0 0 6 0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 56 0 1 53 1 22.7 15.4 24.4 0.0 35.8 0.0 0 61 0 0.0 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 68 0 1 66 2 8.1 10.4 24.4 0.0 60.6 0.0 0 67 0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 4 0 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 KETSIH HOVEHEKT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II DELAY TIRE (VEH-HIKS) LEFT THRU RIGHT 1.75 0.00 1.07 0.29 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 1.96 0.99 ••0.09 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.09 10.96 0.07 0.00 3.03 0.00 0.54 25.28 0.14 0.00 4.07• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.13 0.00 TOTAL TIME RATIO HOVE/TOTAL (VEH-HIKS) (VER-HIKS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 2.20 0.00 1.97 0.20 0.00 0.46 0.48 0.25 0.00 0.41 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 2.07 1.02 O.T2 0.05 0.03 0.23" 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.25 19.62 0.23 0.65 0.44 0.70 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.70 36.07 0.47 0.23 0.30 0.70 0.00 15.02 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 Submitted into the pul)lic item connect' n it item on Waiter 0eman I City Clerk J XETSIX HOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIRE DELAY TIRE QUEUE TIXEtt STOP TIXEtt (SECSIVEH) (SECSJVEH) (VEH-XIXS) (VEH-XINS) LEFT TBRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) $6.0 0.0 29.5 52.5 0.0 16.0 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.$ ( 1, 2) 7.3 7.5 0.0 4.3 4.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0,1 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0.0 9.5 ', 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 ( 2, 1) 31.0 61.0 7.0 29.4 59.4 $.4 0.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.5 1.2 ( 1, 12) 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 15.0 22.2 14.0 512 12.4 4.2 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 ( 1, 13) 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 42.0 32.8 14.0 32.2 23.0 4.2 0.4 13.4 0.0 0.4 11.4 0.0 ( 1, 11) 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 ( 2, 21) 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tt TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. 1 CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTIOX AND OF EXISSIONS 0 LIKE FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE.EXISSION RATES (KC/HILE.HOUR) GALLONS H.P.C. HC CO NO I 0 VEHICLE TIPE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,3 0.0 0,0 0.032 0,428 0.079 ( 1, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.028 0.541 0.092 ( 21 22) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0,0 0,0 0.015 0,269 0,089 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.0 �0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.024 0,343 0.082 ( 21 1) 010 010 0.0 1.2 010 0.0 0.238 3.165 0.168 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.026 0.407 0.110 (8011, 12) U ( 11, 1) 0.4 0.1 0.0 11.4 3.9 0.0 0.313 6AO "'1.383 ( 1, 13). 0.5 0.1 0.0 11.0 4.2 0.0 0.318' 6.281 1,860 a � o (8013, 13), ( 13, 1) 0.7 0.1 0.0 9.1 4.6 0.0 0.531 11.965 1.928 U ( 1, 11) 0.7 0,1 0.0 8.8 3.5 0.0 0.474 10.384 3.223 0 (8021, 21) c o o ( 21, 2) 0"0 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.015 0.154 0.013 f ( 21 21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.031 0.505 0.160 m c 0 SUBNETWORK- 2.4 0.3 0.0 9.7 4.0 0.0 0.210 4.345 1,047 0 EHISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARE NOT AVAILABLE '` t THE XAIIHUX NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 74 VEHICLES, THIS XAIIXUX OCCORED AT 44 SECONDS, k 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIX LINK ( 2, 1) ENDS - 118 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 48 SEtOXDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIX LINK ( 2, 1) STARTS -169 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION j 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 3:50 vl*� ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 3:50 { 230 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 230 S CONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO HINUTES/HILR ----- SEC04DS I VEHICLE --- -- AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE HOVE DELAY TOTAL HOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUP STOPt STOPS VOLUME SPEI LINK MILES TRIPS TIRE TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME (t) VP9 MPI ----------------------------------- ----- -------------....................... -----.................. (8012, 12) 11 172 { 12, 1) 1.04 11 2.5 4.3 6.8 0.37 6.51 4.13 37.0 23.5 15.4 15.2 81 172 9• ( 1, 2) 0.17 10 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.46 5.13 2.75 5.1 2.7 3.8 3.8 30 156 11 i ( 2, 22) 0.34 6 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.78 3,03 0.65 10.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0 93 19 (8022, 22) 9 140 ( 22, 2) 0.45 8 1.1 0.8 1.9 0.57 4.14 1.76 14.1 6.0 8.1 7.91 25 125 14 ( 2, 1) 0.14 12 0.3 6.8 7.2 0.05 52.56 50.18 35.8 34.2 30.9 30.4 50 187 1 ( 1, 12) 1.20 13 2.8 0.4 3.3 0.87 2.74 0.36 15.2 2.0 0.1 0.0 0 203 21 (8011, 11) 111 1737 ( 11, 1) 10.42 110 18,0 22.8 40.8 0.44 3.91 2.19 22.2 , 12.4 7.0 6.2 34 1721 15 ( 1, 13) 10.88 115 18.�8 5.4 24.2 0.78 2.22 0.50 12.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0 1800 27 (0013, 13) 131 2144 ( 13, 1) 12.88 136 22.2 50.0 72.3 0.31 5.61 3.88 11.9 22.1 10.9 9.5 56 2128 10 ( 1, 11) 12.59 133 21.7 1.6 29.4 0.74 2.33 0.61 13.2 3.4 0.0 0.0 a 2081 25 (8021, 21) 4 62 { 21, 2) 0.17 4 0.4 1,7 2.1 0.19 12.22 9.84 31.3 25.2 18.2 18.2 100 62 4 ( 2, 21) 0.21 5 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.76 3.13 0.75 8.0 1.9 0.0• 0.0 0 78 19 6SUBNETAORK= 50.49 272 1.45 1.68 3.17 0.47 3.77 2.00 0.70 0.37 0.18 0.16 51.1 15 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES I VEHICLE-TRII --- PER TRIP 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIK STATISTICS AT TIRE 17: 3:50 ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 3:50 ( 230 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 230 SECONDSqiA t� 1ta , VEH-KIKS t AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q 0 10 E L E K 0 T (TER ......... QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE It MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LAN; LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) (t) FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 .... ............. .►. ------- -----------.---. ( 12, 1) 3.6 3.5 2.2 7.3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 2) 0.8 0.8 0.4 7.8 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 3 0 0 O 0 0 '= ( 2, 12) 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 22, 2) 1.4 1.3 1.2 8.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 .( 21 1) 7.1 , 7.6 2.7 97.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 O { 1, 12) 0.0 0.0 1.1 4.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 a 0" ( 11, 1) 14.1 12.4 10.7 14.8 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 ( 11 13) 0.0 0.0 6.8 9.9 0 0 0 0 0. ,.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 13, 1) 27.3 23.9 18.6 25.6 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 16 13 0 0 0 ( 1, 11) 0.0 0.0 8.0 17.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 21, 2) 1.5 1.5 1.0 5.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 OSUBNETNQRK: 56.4 51.0 ' $3.3 14.5 0 t THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. It AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION Submitted into the public record �ii connecti n with item ,r on s Walter oeman ZI 1 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DE68T TRAVEL TINE MILE TRIPS PERSOX-MIX PERSON -NIX . - (8012, 12) { 12, 1) 1.4 14.3 5.6 8.8 ( 1, 2) 0.2 13,0 0,6 1.1 ( 2, 22) 0.4 7.8 0,3 1.3 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.6 10,4 1,0 2.4 { 1, 1) 0,2 15,6 8,9 9.3 ( 1, 12) 1.6 16.9 0.6 4.3 (8011, 11) { 11, 1) 13.5 142,4 29,5 $2.8 ( 1, 13) 14,1 148.9 710 3113 (8013, 13) r{ { 13, 1) 16.7 175,9 64.7 93.4 ( 1, 11) 16.3 172.0 9.9 38.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.2 512 2,2 2.7 ( 2, 21) 0.3 6.5 0.2 0.9 l 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I 0 LINK VEHICLE -MILE VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (MPH) STOPS (PCT) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RICE! ll` ' (8012, 12) 0 11 0 L�1 l ( 12, 1) 0,38 0.00 0.66 4 0 7 6,6 0,0 12,0 75.0 0.0 85.7 ;� x ( 1 2) 0.08 0108 0100 5 5 0 9.6 14.9 0.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 2, 22) 0100 0.34 0.00 0 6 0 0.0 1918 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •. (8022, 12) 0 9 0 ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.45 0.00 0 8 0 0.0 14.5 0,0 0.0 25.0 0.0 ( 21 1) 0.07 0;02 0.05 6 2 4 1.3 0.5 1.8 50.0 100.0 25.0 ( 1, 12) 0,00 1.20 0100 0 13 0 0.0 21.9 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) 0 111 0 ( 11, 1) 0,38 9.66 0,38 4 102 4 9.9 15,4 24.4 75,0 34.3 0.0 ( 1, (8013, 13) 13) 0,00 10.88 0.00 0 115 0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 010 0,0 0 137 0 I' ( 13, 1) 0.57 11.84 0.47 6 125 5 6,5 10.8 22.4 100.0 56.8 0.0 '.: ( I, 11) 0.00 12.59 0.00 0 133 0 0.0 25,7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) a 4 0 ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.17 0 0 4 0,0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 ( 11 21) 0.00 0,21 0.00 0 5 0 0,0 `' 19,2 0'0 0.0 0.0 0.0, i f i Submitted into the i record public onneC ' item —� n on Walter 9 r oeman I City Clerk I 1 NETSIR MOMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINT( ROVING TIME DELAY TINE TOTAL TINS RATIO ROV11TOTAL I (VEH-RINS) (VEH-RINS) (VEH-RINS) (VEH-RINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU 1IGHt (8012, 12) i ( 12, 1) 0.90 0.00 1.58 2.57 0.00 1.74 3.47 0.00 3.32 0.26 0.00 0.48 ( 1, 2) 0.25 0.25; 0.00 0.27 6.09 0.00 0.52 0.33 0.00 0.48 0.74 0.00 ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 (8022, 22) { 22, 2) 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 ( 2, 1) 0.16 0.05 0.11 2.50 2.53 1.41 3.07 2.58 1.52 0.05 0.02 0.07 { 1, 12) 0.00 2.93 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 (8011, 11) ( 111 1) 0.65 16.67 0.65 MS 20.85 0.28 2.30 37.52 0.93 0.28 0.44 0.70 ( 1, 13) 0.00 18.79 0.00 0.00 5.39 0.00 0.00 24.18 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 0.98 20.12 0.82 4.27 45.31 0.45 5.25 65.73 1.27 0.19 0.31 0.64 ( 1, 11) 0.00 21.73, 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.00 29.35 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 1.68 6.00 0.00 2.08, 0.00 0.00 0.19 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 NETSIR ROVERENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINE TOTAL TIRE DELAY TIRE QUEUE TIREtt STOP TIREtt (SECSIVEH) (SECS/VEH) ,(VEH-HINS) (VEH-RINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIG[ (8012, 12) il ( 12, 1) 52.0 0.0 28.4 38.5 0.0 14.9 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.3 0.9 1 ( 1, 2) 6.2 4.0 0.0 3.2 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.2 0 ( 21 22) 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 (8022, 22)E? ( 22, 2) 0.0 14.1 0.0 0.0 6.0 •0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0' 0.0 1.3 0 ( 2, 1) 30.7 74.5 22.8 29.0 75.9 21.1 3.8 1.6 2.3 3.8 1.6 2 n; ( 1, 12) 0.0 15.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ( 111 1) 34.5 22.1 14.0 24.7 12.3 4.2 1.3 12.7 0.0 1.3 11.1 0 ( 1, 13) 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 (8013, 13) ,. ( 13, 1) 52.5 31.6 15.2 42.7 21.7 5.4 3.2 ' 24.1 0.0 3.0 20.9 0 m ( 1, 11) 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 . 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1 ( 2, 21) 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0": 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 it TIRE FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY 09 THE LINE ARE INCLUDED IR THESE VALUES. Submitted into the public recordW-nnecti item °� on Walter oeman City Clerk 9 9 CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF EMISSIONS LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE EMISSION RATES (KC/MILE.HOUR) GALLONS M.P.C. HC CO NO I VEHICLE TYPE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS (8012, 12) 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.033 0.429 0.085 0,0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.028 0.509 0.092 ( 2, 22) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.020 0.340 0.108 ' (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.025 0.352 0.071 ( 2, 1) 0.1 0.0 0,0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.249 3.240 0.485 ( 1, 12) 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.037 0.607 0.175 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 0.9 0.1 0.0 11.2 3.8 0.0 0.324 6.261 1.465 ( 1, 13) 0.9 0.1 0.0 11.1 4.5 0.0 0.306. 5.915 1.800 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 1.3 0.1 0.0 9.0 4.6 0.0 0.522 11.588 1.968 ( 1, 11) 1.3 0.2 0.0 9.2 3.9 0.0 0.428 9.116 2.844 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 0,015 0.153 0.013 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0,019 0,310 0,098 SUBNETWORK- 4.8 0.6 0.0 5.7 4.2 0.0 0.205 4.152 1.016 EMISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARE NOT AVAILABLE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON TOE NETWORK WAS 16 VEHICLES. THIS MAXIMUM OCCURED AT 161 SECONDS. 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIN LINK ( 2, 1) ENDS 237 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 68 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIN LINK ( 1, 2) STARTS 239 SECONDS INTO SIMULATIOI "j 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIN LINK ( 1, 2) ENDS 246 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 7 SECONDS ra 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIN LINK ( 2, 1) STARTS 292 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION Submitted into the (public recor },1��,connecfi n w' item: on Walter oema City Clerk 95 �. - 505 I 'J I J 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 5:45 (9, ELAPSED TIME IS 0: 5:45 ( 345 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TINE IS 3 5 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/HILE ----- SECOIIDS•/ VERICLE -- AVERAGE VALUES.-- VERICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL HOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUE, STOP, STOPS VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME (1) VPH MPH (8012, 12) 16 166 ( 12, 1) 1.61 17 3.8 6.4 10.3 0.37 6.38 4.00 36.2 22.7 17.3 16.9 88 117 9.4 ( 1, 2) 0.32 19 0.8 1.8 2.6 0.30 8.04 5.66 8.1 5.7 4.6 4.5 31 198 7.5 ( 2, 22) 0.68 12 1.6 0.6 2.2 0.74 3.20 0.82 10.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 0 125 18.7 (8022, 22) 14 146 ( 22, 2) 0.74 13 1.8 2.2 3.9 0.45 5.33 2.95 18.2 10.0 8.8 8.5 30 135 11.3 ( 2, 1) 0.22 19 0.5 11.3 11.8 0.04 54-81 52.43 37.4 35.7 31.8 31.3 47 198, 1.1 ( 1, 12) 2.20 24 5.2 0.9 6.1 0.85 2.78 0.40 15.3 2.2 0.1 0.0 0 250• 21.6 (8011, 11) 167 1742 ( 11, 1) 15.72 166 27.1 37.0 64.2 0.42 4.08 2.36 23.2 13.4 8.1 7.2 37 1732 14.7 ( 1, 13) 15.99 169 27.6 8.0 35.6 0.78 2.23 0.50 12.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0 1763 27.0 (8013, 13) 205 2139 ( 13, 1) 19.41 205 33.5 72.6 106.1 0.32 5.46 3.74 31.0 21.2 10.9 9.6 54 2139 11.0 ( 1, 11) 18.74 198 32.3 10.9 43.2 0.75 2.31 0.58 13.1 3.3 0.0 0.0 0 2066 26.0 (8021, 21) 6 62 ( 21, 2) 0.26 6 0.6 2.6 3.2 0.19 12.39 10.01 31.7 25.6 19.9 T. 100 62 4.8 ( 2, 21) 0.30 7 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.15 3.18 0.81 8,1 2.1 0.4 0.0 0 13 18.8 OSUBNETHORK: 76.19 410 2.26 2.57 4.83 0.47 3.81 2.03 0.71 0.38 0.19 0.18 52.2 15.8 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES / VEHICLE -TRIP -- PER TRIP j 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIH STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 5:45 ELAPSED TINE IS 0: 5:45 ( 345 SECONDS), TINE PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TINE IS 345 SECONDS �LA� b VEH-HINS , AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- Q U E U E L E N G T R (VEH QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE „ AIIHUM QUEUE BI LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) (1) FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----------------- --- -------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - ( 12, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 2, 22) ( 22, 2) ( 2. 1) ( 1, 12) ( 1, 13) ( 13, 1) ( 1, 11) ( 21, 2) ( 2, 21) OSUBNETNORK: 5.5 5.4 I 2.2 1.6 1.6 0.5 9.8 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.6 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 2.1 1.2 9.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 11.5 2.7 99.7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.0 1.4 6.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 21.2 11.2 15.4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 6.7 9.8 0 0 0 0 0 0'.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.8 34.9 18.4 25.3 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 2 16 13 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 7.9 17.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 2.3 1.0 9.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 78.9• 54.1 14.7 0 THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. „ AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF MgMed Into the public recorUK item onnec on W"alter Foernan 95- 595 J NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DSLAT TRAVEL TINS MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN PERSON -MIN (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 2.1 22.1 8.4 13.3 ( 1, 2) 0.4 24.7 2.3 3.3 (' 21 22) 0.9 15.6 0.7 2.8 (8021, 22) ( 22, 2) 1.0 16.9 2.8 5.1 ( 2, 1) 0.3 24.7 14.7 1.5.4 ( 11 12) 2.9 31.2 1.2 8.0 (8011, 11) ( 111 1) 20.4 215.0 48.0 83.1 ( 1, 13) 20.7 219.0 10.4 46.1 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 25.1 265.2 93.9 137.2 ( 1, 11) 24.2 256.1 14.1 55.9 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.3 1.8 3.3 4.1 ( 2, 21) 0.4 9.1 0.3 1.2 ttt ROTE ttt TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TINE PERIOD 1. N6TSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I LINK VEHICLE -MILE VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (MPH ) STOPS (PCT) LEFT THRU RICHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LIFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) 0 16 0 ( 12, 1) 0.41 0.09 r, 1.64 5 1 11 6.6 4.9 13.1 80.0 0.0 90.9 ( 11 2) 0.12 0.20 0.00 7 12 0 6.0 8.6 0.0 42.9 25.0 0.0 ( 2, 22) 0.00 0.68 0.00 0 12 0 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) 0 14 0 ( 22, 2) 0.00 0.74 0.00 0 13 0 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 30.8 0.0 ( 21 1) 0.09 0.03 0.09 8 3 8 0.9 0.8 1.9 62.5 66.7 25.0 ( 11 12) 0.00 2.20 0.00 0 24 0 0.0 213 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) 0 167 0 ( 11, 1) 0.76 14.20 0.76 8 ISO 8 6.7 15.5 19.6 $7.5 35.3 25.0 ( 1, 13) 0.00 15.99 0.00 0 169 0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (6013, 13) 0 20S 0 ( 13, 1) 1.04 17.52 0.85 11 185 9 7.6 11.0 19.7 100.0 53.5 22.2 ( 11 11) 0.00 ' 18.74 COG 0 198 0 0.0 26.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) 0 6 0 ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.26 0 0 6 0.0 0.0 (.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.30 0.00 0 7 0 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Submitted into the public recorMlg2nne cti nitemon ��I 9 " - 595 Waiter oeman City Clerk NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINK MOVING TIMB DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME RATIO NOVIITOTAL (VER-MINS) (VEH-MINS) (VBH-MINS) (Via-NIKS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 1.13 0.23 2.48 3.21 0.94 2.29 4.33 1.17 4.77 0.26 0.19 0.52 ( 1, 2) 0.35 0.59 ;0.00 0.82 0.81 0.00 1.17 1.40 0.00 0.30 0.42 0.00 ( 2, 22) 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.00 1.76 0.00 0.00 2.18 -0.00 0.00 3.93 --0.001 - 0.00 0.45 0.00.. ( 2, 1) 0.22 0.08 0.22 6.03 2.57 2.72 6.25 2.65 2.93 0.03 0.03 0.07 ( 1, 12) 0.00 5.41 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 6.13 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 1.31 24.51 1.31 5.49 30.52 1.01 6.80 55.03 2.32 0.19 0.45 0.56 ( 1, 13) 0.00 27.61 0.00 0.00 7.99 0.00 0.00 35.60 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 1.80 30.23 1.47 6.42 65.02 1.13 8.22 95.25 2.60 0.22 0.32 0.51 ( 11 11) 0.00 32.35 0.00 0.00 10.86 0.00 0.00 43.22 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 2.56 0,00 0.00 3.17 0.00 0.00 0.19 ( 2, 21) 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.75 .0.00 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIMB DELAY TIMB QUEUE TIME* STOP TIMI" (SECS/VBB) (SECS/VBH) (VEH-MINS) (VIE-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIORT (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 52.0 70.0 26.0 38.5 56.5 12.5 2.8 0.9 1.7 2.8 0.9 1.7 ( 1, 2) 10.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 4.0 0.0 0.8 CIS 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 ( 21 22) 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8022, 22) ( 22, 2) 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 ( 2, 1) 46.9 53.0 �, 22.0 45.3 51.4 20.4 5.4 1.6 4.7 5.3 1.6 4.6 ( 1, 12) 0.0 15.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 51.0 22.0 17.4 41.2 12.2 7.6 4.8 18.7 0.3 4.6 16.3 0.2 ( 1, 13) 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 44.8 30.9 17.3 35.0 21'.1 7.5 4.8 34.6 0.4 4.4 30.1 0.4 ( 1, 11) 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 31.7 0.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 ( 21 21) 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 "0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 it TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. Submitted into the public recor connect'o wi h item on Walter Foeman City Clerk "` 5 4 J CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF ENISSIOES LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION VEHICLE EMISSION RATES (KG/NILE.BOUR) CALLON$ M.P.C. HC CO NO T VEHICLE TIDE- AUTO TRUCK BUS AUTO TRUCK BUS (8012, 12) ( 12, 1) 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.037 0,519 0.114 ( 1, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.044 0.925 0.114 ( 2, 22) 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.033 0.542 0.168 (8022, 22) • ( 22, 2) 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0, 0.0 0.028 0.392 0.081 ( 2, 1) 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.256 3.337 0310 ( 1, 12) 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.1 1.5 0.0 0.044 0.133 0.211 (8011, 11) ( 11, 1) 1.3 0.2 0.0 11.0 4.2 0.0 0.333 6,338 1,502 ( 1, 13) 1.4 0.2 0.0 11.0 4.2 0.0 0.307 6.040 1.145 (8013, 13) ( 13, 1) 2.0 0.2 0.0 8.9 5.0 0.0 0.519 11.538 2.020 ( 1, 11) 1.8 0.3 0.0 9.4 4.1 0.0 0.417 8.693 2.729 (8021, 21) ( 21, 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.015 0.155 0.013 ( 2, 21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.019 0.316 0.099 SUBNETWORK- 7.3 0.8 0.0 9.7 4.4 0.0 0.207 4.175 1.033 EMISSION STATISTICS FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES ARC NOT AVAILABLE THE NAIIMUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 16 VEHICLES. THIS MAYIMUM OCCURED AT 161 SECONDS. Ottttt THERE WERE 1 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA FOR CASE 1. =a MESSAGE DESCRIPTION a 400 An inconsistency exists between the length link (Pl, P2) input on record type 11 and the length of this link cosputed fros node coordinate data Input for nodes P1 and P2. The length input on record type 11 was P3 and the length cosputed fros node coordinate data is P4. The percent difference between the length input on the type 11 ` record and the cosputed length is between 10 and 201, This say indicate an error. TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RIK : 55.36 SECONDS :>OLAST CASE PROCESSED s� . Submitted Into the public recorWon nnec ' Item with Walter >=oeman (.-ity r;ln!-k 95- �95 1, 1 1 �I� I Project #91120 JAN92/91120R02 January 1992 Revised February 11, 1992 SITE UTILITY STUDY* BRICKELL POINT 401 BRICKELL AVENUE Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 tG Submitted into the public connection record�� '4 item on 95- 595 Waite Foeman City Clerk *Please note that the attached Site Utility Study is in substantial compliance with the current project concept. Some numbers and details have changed; however, the original conclusion remains valid. Changes: Page 1 Impervious Surface Open Total Surfaces Retention Spaces Areas 1.72 AC 0 .40 AC 2.12 AC Page 2 A. On -Site Drainage The drainage calculations for this 2.12 acre site are shown in Table 1. Page 3 Table 1 Impervious Area (A) = 1.72 AC Previous Area = .40 AC Average Coefficient of Runoff = .77 0.9 x 0.2 = .76 2.12 Design Storm = 5 year Time of Concentration = 10 minutes Rainfall Intensity = 6.2 in/hr. Peak Runoff (Q) = CIA = (.77)(6.2)(2.12) Q = 10.12 CFS Assume: 24" Diameter Drainage Well flows at 2500 GPM or 5.5 CFS 2 wells required. Q = CFS = 1.84 Because of the site plan configurations, Well 5.5 CFS 3 - 24" diameter wells are proposed. Detention Tanks: Providing 1'/2 min. detention time of storage in each tank. Submitted into the public recor!Mon nnec ''4h item ! Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- S95 J Vol. of Tank required to handle 2500 GPM = 2500 GPM X 1.5 min. = 3750 GAL or 501 CF Provide each tank at a size of ( 17.0' L X 7.5' W X 4.0' D) = 510 CF Proposed 3 Tanks w/510 CF Vol. Each CSF = Cubic feet per second. GPM = Gallons per minute, Page 7 11 Water Distribution Master Plan ... complex will have 5,800 sq. ft. restaurant with 100 seats. Page 9 Table 2 Apartments = 599 DU x 200 GPD/DU = 119,800 GPD Retail — 8,247 SF x 10 GPD/100 SF = 825 GPD Restaurant = 100 SEATS x 50 GPD/SEAT = 5,000 GPD 125,625 GPD Page 13 Table 3 Residential = 599 DU x 16.4 lbs. _ (3 Tons' x 2000 lbs, x 1 YR = 16.4 lbs.) YR Tons 365 Days DU Day jRetail Stores 8,247 SF x 4 lb. 100 SF/Day Restaurant = 80 Seats x 2 Meals x 2 lbs. _ ( Seat -Day Meal Total 9,824 lbs./day 330 lbs./day 320 lbs./day 10,474 lbs./day 10,474 lb. = 5.24 Tons at 3.5 cy/tone = 18.3 cy/Day 2000lb/Ton Submitted into the ptIblic record�i���connec i n t item ,�=1_ or) Walter oeman `�!� City Clerk Total Anticipated Solid Waste Generated = 18.3 cy/Day Notes: 1. Residential Dwelling Units generate 3 tons per household per year. 2. 3.5 cubic yards of garbage equals 1 Ton. It is anticipated that this complex will not generate large quantities of trash and landscape trimmings. 3. DU = Dwelling Units SF = Square Feet Source: Metro -Dade County Department of Solid Waste Submitted into tf;e Public recor j Conne on with item on Walter oeman City Clerk 95- SJS SITE UTILITY STUDY BRICKELL POINT I. DRAINAGE Drainage Area Details This site consists of one parcel located on the Miami River and Brickell Avenue. The proposed project will occupy the entire site and effectively replace the six existing apartment buildings and other vacant lands with the two proposed buildings, plazas and landscaped areas. Stormwater run-off will consist primarily of rooftop, river promenade, landscaped and plaza areas. The drainage areas are as follows for this parcel: Impervious Surface Open Total Surfaces Retention Spaces Areas 1.76 AC 0 .42 AC 2.18 AC Existing Drainage Systems There is an existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) drainage system located in Bricked Avenue. The FDOT is currently planning the construction of a new drainage system along Brickell Avenue in conjunction with the new Brickell Avenue Bridge project. Exhibit 1 shows this existing system with relationship to the site. On site, it is anticipated that the existing drainage system will be removed when the existing structures are demolished. Any existing drainage wells will be evaluated for incorporation into the proposed site plan. JAN92/9112OR01 January, 1992 -1- vubmittcd h1to thr, Public record COi7r16r item record on V'laltF�r Foernan ' City Clerk 95- 555 Proposed Drainage System A. On -Site Drainage i The Brickell Point conceptual drainage plant provides for run-off from the site being collected and routed through a stormwater system and subsequently flowing into the saline levels of the Biscayne Aquifer by means of drainage wells. The drainage calculations for this 2.18 acre site are shown in Table 1. Run-off from the previous and impervious surfaces will be collected in catch basins and routed by pipes to a detention tanks. See Exhibit 2 and 3 for water control structures and catch basin details. The run-off will then discharge through drainage wells into the saline n� aquifer. The approximate locations of the wells are shown in Exhibit 1. Mechanical >j pumps will be used in conjunction with the drainage wells if the site conditions warrant. Catch basins receiving stormwater from the parking areas inside the parking I garage and loading docks will incorporate oil and grease interceptors. This proposed project will contain all of the stormwater run-off on the site. B. Off -Site Drainage The existing drainage along Brickell Avenue will not be impacted by this project because there is no direct connection to Brickell. In fact, the proposed bridge structure is proposed to be approximately 7 to 20 feet higher than the proposed project grades. The entry drive into the project will utilize the existing drainage with modification due to the FDOT bridge project. JAN92/9112OR01 January, 1992 -2- Subrnilted into the public j recor , conne t'or V'Jjty- itern 95--'- i';�4 Walter Foernan City Clerk TABLE 1 BRICKELL POINT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Impervious Area (A) Previous Area Average Coefficient of Runoff = 1.76x0.9 + 0.42x0.2 = .76 2.18 Design Storm = Time of Concentration = Rainfall Intensity = Peak Runoff (Q) = CIA — C6� 1.76 AC .42 AC .76 5 year 10 minutes 6.2 in/hr. (.76)(6.2)(2.18) 10.27 CFS Assume: 24" Diameter Drainage Well flows at 2500 GPM or 5.5 CFS 1 2 wells required. Q = 10.27 CFS = 1.87 Because of the site plan configurations, aWell 5.5 CFS 3 - 24" diameter wells are proposed. Detention Tanks: Providing 1 %2 min. detention time of storage in each tank. Vol. of Tank required to handle 2500 GPM = 2500 GPM X 1.5 min. = 3750 GAL or 501 CF Provide each tank at a size of ( 17.0' L X 7.5' W X 4.0' D) = 510 CF Proposed 3 Tanks w/510 CF Vol. Each CSF — Cubic feet per second. GPM = Gallons per minute. JAN92/91120R01 =� January, 1992 -3- Submitted into the public record onnecti n t item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95— r t I { PROP. DRAINAGE } ON BRICKEL BY F.D.O.T. --� S.E. 5 Sr j S.E 8 ST q 14 m BISCAYNE BLVD. WAY MIAMI RIVER 2 WELL ,WELL 1 1' WELL I I 1 WELL 9 m w car O •—�. Z OF Q • �- Mr 8R/cKst ` Pq RK U �� • U) m .S.�c 8 �1 1 1 01.06.92 �J p i SCALE:1' w 900' :Y LEGEND -- EXIST. DRAINAGEPIPE PROPOSED DRAINAGE PPE v PROPOSED DRAINAGE BY OTHERS PROPOSED 24' DRAINAGE WELL WMETENTION TANK PROPOSED CATCH BASING EXHIBIT 1 #91120 BRICKELL POINT ,• MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN public r$gor connect'a wi item on 9 5 _ 5 , Walter Foeman Citv Cleric .1 f l Sa� �J e 6"BAFFLE A LSO INLET PIPE {WLT. LOCAnO INLET PIPE LOCATIONI �9 •IC• PLAN KLl CONCRETE 3000 P.S.I. 28 DAYS (TYP) WOO (5=0 MIN) FRAME B COVER /'(FOR EL. SEE PLANS) FINISHED GRADE / FOR ELEVATIGN .` FRAME A COVER SHALL SEE SITE PLAN �. .` 1 CONFORM TO METRO DACE BRICK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS �'• Iuz ANC, PAD ON I MASONRY MANUAL STAND DETAIL 12" THICK AS NEEDED I COMPACTED f k6 dD 6"C.C. E.W. rr.. I. T- • WELDED LIMEROCK i O1 ENO BASEpISCHiutGDLL-- 4(w 12" # 4 0 6" C.C. E.W. I y--_PIPE � 1 IK i HORIZ. O OISCHARGE BAFFLE WALL ° o I c PIPE STEEL CASING t 1tk 4 Le8" •' WATER TA DRAINAGE INLET I VERT. o r EL. I. WELL PIPE f n 11/2"CL 25000 GPM J CAPACITY I o J016 012" EA. WAY -/ Z" CL TOP A 8ATTOM DEPTH OF STEELe'1O-r CASING WELL TO BE SgCT1pN ►-s DETERMINED IN THE nss FIELD BY THE ENGINEER RX3 01.00.92 J a WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES EXHIBIT 2 091120 BRICKELL POINT WATER CONTROL Submi TRUCTURES recorqq;; CUrinmflf ' ftem L on' Waiter i-oeman City Ciectc 'S OI�AG,BARS t 's OIAG, BARS 1 •3 OARS. 6'C'C I(EACH WAY) 'A' `-S BARS, 6'*CC PLAN 'B' 0. PLAN A EACH WAYtMIN.I �" A'-t7' MIN. I i ALAOUNO or SQUARE) I TOP SLAB DETAILS _ I I I,. IT -'SECTION /� �=+ BARS, 6"C•C L SEE NOTE I. — I `03 BARS FOR I SOUARE ANok17' FRAME 6 GRATE CATCH BASIN PV'MT ROUNO BOTTOM '8' I • PLAN s I d LEVEUNG COURSE 3=0OIL CoW-. \•VIE n'.•( SEJ .. • .. TOP SLAB iw-s.Vwl 'U ran" SECTION BOTTOM SL68 OE TAILS OUNO �r SOUAR v'MIN. •S'CLR.IfCAST-rr-PLACE , r (SEE NOTE 41 NOTES: r ar - IS'PIPE GROUT I. CAST TOP SLAB M FIT WALL USED. TO DAMN Z. TONGUE 8 GROOVE REINFORCED CONCRETE «W I INLET PIPE A.S.T:M. OESWATION C76 CLASS Z. ' 3. BOTTOM SLAB MAY BE PRECAST OR 'S' POURED -IN -PLAN. PLAN REINFORC:'IG 3 6aaRs.R L"_ MUST BE USED WHEN ROUNO RISER IS M s ' a!I-� EA. WAY, a 6:6' POURED INTEGRAL WITH BOTTOM. i w1RE MESH) tCOvER 4 PIPES MAY EXTENO INTO CATCH BASIN 0� - A MAXIMUM OF 3 `, . .�• . • • . , • 5. USE 22000 psiOONCRETE- (MINIMUM) 6 MAXIMUM CONCRETE PIPE SIZE 24' TYPICAL SECTION 1.0•-9Z EXHIBIT 3 091120 P� BRICKELL POINT CATCH BASIN DETAILS recor '�,c�, Conn j ti n ��v. -s-item on SS 9 r Walter -aeman f:ity r`fo.i. J II. WATER DISTRIBUTION MASTER PLAN I The anticipated average and peak daily water flows have been calculated and listed i in Table 2. It is estimated that the 600 unit apartment complex will have a 4000 SF restaurant with 100 seats. The existing distribution system has been researched and shown along with possible new water lines in Exhibit 4. The comments and recommendations from the City of Miami and Miami Dade Water & Sewer Authority Department have been incorporated into the Water Distribution Master Plan. No on - site supply wells or internal water supply systems are proposed for this project. The Anticipated Average Daily Flows (Table 2) have been calculated including the joint use of the hotel complex to the south of this property. The FDOT Brickell bridge project proposes to widen the right-of-way to the east, which will impact this property site. Complex utility relocations with new construction of the water lines are anticipated due to this new bridge project. 111. WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN The average and peak daily flows anticipated for this project have been calculated based on the latest information from Miami Dade Water & Sewer Authority Department. These average and peak flows are listed in the Table 2. Comments from Miami Dade have been requested. The existing sanitary system was researched and shown along with proposed construction. As stated above, the proposed bridge will impact the existing 10" vitrified clay pipe constructed in 1981 by the adjacent hotel project. It is anticipated that a new sanitary sewer will be required due to the FDOT JAN92/91 120R01 January, 1992 —7— Submitted into the public recor ,�n�,connectio rytf�— item on `►7 Waiter-oernan 5) ' City Cleric J bridge project location. Exhibit 5 reflects the project area and the proposed improvements. JAN92/9112OR01 January, 1992 Submitted into ti-IC.N plIblic JI record connect, item on ' "0 Walter 4roe �m.,, Man City Clerk TABLE 2 BRICKELL POINT ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS WATER DISTRIBUTION Apartments = 600 DU x 200 GPD/DU = 120,000 GPD A Retail = 4,000 SF x 10 GPD/100 SF = 400 GPD Restaurant = 100 SEATS x 50 GPD/SEAT = 5,000 GPD 125,400 GPD Project Average Flow = .125 MGD Project Peak Flow = .314 MGD K Existing Adjacent Hotel = 598 Rooms x 200 GPD/Room = 119,600 GPD (Not part of project) Combined Average Flow = .250 MGD, Peak Flow = .625 MGD ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS WASTEWATER COLLECTION It is anticipated that the wastewater generated from the site will equal the portable water y usage. Average Flow = .125 MGD Peak Flow = .314 MGD Notes: 1. Square footage values are rounded higher for estimate purposes. 2. No industrial wastewater is anticipated to be generated 3. Peak Flow uses a factor of 2.5 times average flows. 4. GPD = Gallons per day MGD = Million gallons per day 5. Source: Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department JAN92/91 12OR01 January, 1992 Submitted into the public k _9_ recor conne t' n vvi�. item on Waite Foeman I City Clerk 0 - i I I LS.E. 3 ST. 1I— I 11 ( I SCALE:1• + 30 BISCAYNE BLVD. WAY MI AMI BIv ER f. 'E 8 S7; • N BRICKELL POINT EXHIBIT 4 f WATER DISTRIBUTION MASTER PLAN ` vrecor onnec i it item on ry — Waiter oeman. 5 5 City Clerk S-E 5 Sr tT r a I Ir S.E. 3 ST.�i_ [ �o i • to a SCALE:i' R 300' I� r I '0_ SISCAYNE10' ELVD'.5' WAY's� MI AMI SIV ER f ctry a0�'"`• MiAMr Bq PA rrr� 10a �. ;.•) / 1 ti 4w • I t k�i t 01.06.92 ki Y LEGEND ----- CXISTING SANITARY SEWER 0 . EXIST. MANHOLES PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF EXIST. SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXHIBIT 5 091120 BRICKELL POINT WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN Soulfft H. inlo the public e!�Vflonrin e n w Item 't. ` City Clerk i IV. SOLID WASTE GENERATION The projected daily volumes of solid waste generated by Brickell Point are summarized in Table 3. Generation rates were determined from data summarized by Metro -Dade i l County Department of Solid Waste. The solid waste generated will be placed in standardized on -site containers per City of Miami Code, Chapter 22, for regular pickup by private hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department. The solid waste will then be transported to Miami Dade County's Disposal Facilities. The architectural floor plans of the truck loading areas will incorporate the actual waste i pick-up locations. JAN92/91 120R01 January, 1992 —12— i Submitted into the public record i orine I w ' Remon Walter Foeman .0'. _ : ,, .r ,. City Clerk TABLE 3 BRICKELL GATEWAY SOLID WASTE GENERATION I Residential = 600 DU x 16.4 lbs. (3 Tons' x 2000 lbs. x 1 YR = 16.4 lbs. YR Tons 365 Days DU Day Retail Stores r.� i = 4,000 SF x 4 lb. _ 100 SF/Day Restaurant = 80 Seats x 2 Meals x 2 lbs. _ Seat -Day Meal 9,863 lbs./day 160 lbs./day 320 lbs./day Total 10,383 lbs./day 10,343 lb. = 5.17 Tons at 3.5 cy/tong = 18.1 cy/Day 2000 lb/Ton Total Anticipated Solid Waste Generated = 18.1 cy/Day nr 1 Notes: 1. Residential Dwelling Units generate 3 tons per household per year. 2. 3.5 cubic yards of garbage equals 1 Ton. It is anticipated that this complex will not 1 generate large quantities of trash and landscape trimmings. �. 3. DU = Dwelling Units SF = Square Feet I Source: Metro -Dade County Department of Solid Waste JAN92/91120R01 J January, 1992 —13— Submitted into the public record i connec ' n ith item -M on Walter ocman r ~ 5 5 City Clerk J M BRICKELL POINT REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC AND TAX BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI Prepared for Brickell Point, Inc. by SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 {305) 374-1574 Submitted into the April 17, 1995 record eon public m ite r�ecf'on wit Walter on oeman City Clerk 5- 5 a i BRICKELL POINT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY OF BENEFITS 1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction 3 Objectives 3 Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact 3 Direct and Indirect Effects 4 Measures of Economic Impact 6 Description of Results 6 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Impact Indicators g Results of Indicators g Impact of Construction 10 Impact of Store Operations 10 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 10 RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Employment 11 Wages 12 Output 13 Local Taxes 15 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost 17 Impact and Other Fees 18 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 19 MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES 21 EXHIBITS 25 Submitted into the public record ,aq onne ion wig item an Walter Foeman City Clerk BRICKELL POINT SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Resident and Visitor spending impacting to Local Businesses: • Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail 1 Subrnitted into the recorM-—C onnecti�ni ubliaItem on utter Foeman C'tY Clerk 95-- 5,95 i BRICKELL POINT SMviARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BLivEFITS) Construction Period Annual impact impact Economic Activity Stimulated: (Output) $137,126,853 $ 7,981,145 Taxes 1,844,996 2,445,611 Wages 12,470,712 1,064,940 Total 1151,442,561 �11491696 Jobs created 273 72 2 Submitted into the public record i connec ' it. item on Walter oemart City Clerk : _ j �j INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Submitted into the publIc reco n ae #c nn ?o 0 Item r`12E�ajte Fo#em&n Ciry Clerk 5,5— 595 i ^� BRICKELL POINT INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS t Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of Brickell Point Condominium (the Project). The Project is a proposed 600 unit highrise apartment complex. The Project will house 20,000 square feet of retail space which will include a restaurant. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both the development and operational phases of the Project. Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of Greater Miami. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect and induced economic benefits are added to the direct benefits. These are brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from the operations of the retail business as well as the cost of on -going management of the Project. Submitted 4 into the d i public recor .onne ion 4 3 item -- on Walter Foeman O City Clerk 0 '�; BRICKELL POINT INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy I must also be considered. Salaries to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. I Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, € entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. I Income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again respend their income for more I purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces uces further job creation, business development and savings. j Quantification of these indirect and induced benefits has been the object of considerable economic :3 study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern industrial society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the 1, local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. Submitted into the public c 4 record �irl �onnectr Wit item '. on _? 9 r_ 5 so 0 r Vkher Foeman v Clerk J BRICKELL POINT INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multi 1p ier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of " 1 " would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact was 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact was 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in Greater Miami. Submitted into the PoWic record in connect'on t item -_ on i Walter Foeman 95 City Clerk J �1 BRICKELL POINT -� INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS I Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in Local employment. -wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Emi2lo,Yment is measured iri full -time -equivalent jobs. ; • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include I non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and health benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households at their place of residence. =} Local Taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem l assessments. • Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum I of direct, indirect, and induced expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). 1 Description of Results JFor the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: j by� (1) Development (2) Operational I Submitted into the public 6 recorhl�on 'nnectio w' item record �aW Waiter Foeman City Clerk 95- 595 BRICKELL POINT INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Description of Results (Continued) ' Development expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. I ORerational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the operation of the `J i Project and include the effects of: • Management operating expenditures (maintenance, sales and marketing); and. • Retail business outlet's operating expense.. 7 Submitted into the public recor nnecti w th o item on HK_ , Walter Foeman 9 5 City Clerk DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ECONOMIC AND TAX BENEFITS ANALYSIS Submitted into the public I i record onnecti item on Walter Foeman City Clerk i -� BRICKELL POINT DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE INDICATOR Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Employment • Wages • Total output + Local taxes Results of Indicators The construction and operations of the project will provide significant benefits to Greater Miami. These benefits include new jobs, new income, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect and induced economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial site development and construction expenditures and the expenditures from the Project's operations and related residents' spending. The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator ouiput is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Submitted into the public 8 record i conn `fo i �y i item on mL - Walter Foeman CitV Clerk l� BRICKELL POINT DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE INDICATOR Results of Indicators (Continued) Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct, indirect and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development One - Time Employment Wages QUIVU Faxes Total Direct 273 $12,470,712 $66,142,288 $1,844,996 $80,457,996 Indirect 63,919,907 63,919,907 Induced _ 7,064,658 7,064,658 Total Impact 273 $12.470.712 $137.126.853 $1.844.996 $151.442.561 Operational Annual Direct 72 $1,064,940 $3,751,961 $2,445,611 $7,262,512 Indirect 3,625,895 3,625,895 Induced _ 603,289 603,289 Total Impact 72 $1.064.940 $7, 981,145 $2.445.611 $11,491, 696 Submitted into the public 9 record connect' n Item �g on 9 r Walter o ieman 5 ` 595, City Clerk J i ` BRICKELL POINT I DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF INDICATOR Impact of Construction: The approximately $80 million for site preparation and construction expenditures within Greater Miami would create approximately 273 new full time equivalent jobs with the maximum number of 375 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $12.5 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the above chart spending for site preparation and project construction would result in a total estimated impact of $151 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct site preparation and project construction expenditures and the resulting indirect benefits from the multiplied effect of the direct impact. Impact of Store Operations and Mall Management As a result of the on -going operations of the various stores and the management of the Project, Greater Miami will gain approximately 72 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $1 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations and from resident and visitors' spending will provide a new, permanent impact of $9 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the management of the center, the direct operating expenditures of the retail outlets at the Project, and resident, visitors and employee's spending. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, the local area will gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $2.4 million. During the 36 month construction period, a total of $1.8 million in taxes will be generated. Submitted into the public 10 record i conne i A Item on I — 50,5 ` Walter oeman �' City Clerk RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS By INDICATORS Submitted into the . record Public onnem ec , nit on Wall4eroemc1r, city DIVA �BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the maintenance of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to The City of Miami by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phases. r� Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for The Greater Miami residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs from the development and marketing activity, and J a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations of the management company and the retail outlets. Short-term employment is from project development and marketing. This development was completed in thirty-six months and the related employment spanned a two to four year period. Additional employment will result from the on -going operations (maintenance) of the management company and the related sales, marketing and administrative efforts as well as the on -going operations of the retail outlets. As can be seen in Exhibit 1, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 273 employees over a three year period and the total on -going employment will average 72. f Additional employment will be created by business owners' employees spending within the ar�i i Greater Miami area. II IJ Examples of such businesses include restaurants, retail sales, service stations, recreation businesses, etc. Since businesses serve residents and visitors alike, and generate only a portion w i of their income from the above type of expenditures, the portion of employment that can be attributed to the above type of expenditures can only be estimated. .d I Submitted into the public 4'� !I record connec i with item on c F=aJ Walte Foeman — City Clerk J BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS This is done by investigating the pattern of these expenditures and relating such figures to business receipts and employment in The City of Miami. From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in The City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: Eating/Drinking Grocery Auto Rental Other Transportation Service Station Recreation Retail J These expenditures are then used to compute the impact of the spending by new residents to The j Greater Miami area. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. i To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly lrelated to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These yy numbers were tested for reasonableness. JJ I. I f No wages were computed for off -site employment created by new residents' spending in the Greater Miami area of new employees, business owners and the management company as well as I visitors attracted to the area by the Project. k j 1 1 I Submitted into the public 1 record 'n connec io,l will 1 item on Walter Foeman `. City Clerk I J BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Developer cost expended in Miami • Annual operational expenditures of the Management Company • New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners • Annual operational expenditures of the retail stores and restaurant. Exhibit 5 shows a summary of the development of cost expanded in Greater Miami. Exhibit 6 shows a summary of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in Greater Miami, a multiplier was applied to total direct output created by visitor spending. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. The multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. We tested the reasonableness of the multiplier used by comparing it to recent studies done in the County by the South Florida Regional Planning Council Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consist of land acquisition and site preparation, impact fees, soft cost and hard cost which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost is expected to be spent in Greater Miami. Submitted into the public 3 record conneWw item .�_ Walter Foeman '. City Cleric J 7 r\` � BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS i To incorporate the effect of respending by employees working on the Project we applied a multiplier to the total direct output. This created the induced impact from the development phase e j of the Project. A multiplier of 1.5665 was also used for this purpose. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $66,142,288. Total indirect and induced output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $70,984,565. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of Brickell Point is $137,126,853. Another component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the management company and the indirect and induced benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the retail ,i businesses that are a part of the project and the indirect and induced benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. I r. To determine the management company's direct operating expenditures we used, as a basis, annual operating proformas for the management of the Project. An overall assumption was made that all management expenditures would be spent initially in Miami. The total operating ` expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses for the management of the Project, except for wages. The impact on wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. Such expenses include maintenance, marketing, administration, security, insurance, etc. J To determine the direct output resulting from the actual operations of the businesses at the Project, t f we computed the annual operational expenditures of the businesses expected to be spent in Miami. Submitted into the public 1A recaT&!06 nne ith i item Walter Foeman Citv Clerk 95- 595 J `-�, BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operations of the Project. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $3,751,961. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $3,625,895. Total induced output created from operating employee spending is $603,289. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit resulting from the development and operation of Brickell Point is taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project as a whole. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit VII shows a summary of the computed taxes. The total real property taxes, expected to be generated annually are $2,445,611. Submitted into the public 15 recor Conn c ion i item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95-- � 9 5 BRICKELL POINT RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS BY INDICATORS t Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain cost centers. Listed below is the allocation of projected annual tax revenue to these centers. City of Miami Operating School Operating Dade County Operating City of Miami Debt Dade County Debt South Florida Water Management District Library Operating School Debt Florida Inland Navigation District Environmental Project Total $754, 646 747,059 570,180 165,559 64,227 39,071 26,964 66,192 3,852 7.861 S2.445.611 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. 4 Submitted into the public 1 record in onnecti n ith item on =��l 9 Walter Foernan City Clerk BRICKELL POINT OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which involves increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services • Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infra structure) • Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objectives to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. 95— 5D5 Submitted into the public reco1�on nnect'item17 � Walter Foeman City Cleric J 1 BRICKELL POINT '- OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. These fees are estimated to be $385,000 for phase one of the project and an additional $128,000 for phase two. Additionally, there will be a $350,000 water and sewer connection fee. For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). r� As of the date of this report, the City of Miami Department of Planning Building and Zoning have not reviewed the plans of the Project. Therefore the above fees are estimates and could change. ,1 c-cJ I:1 b$2i Submitted into the public rzc.or i connec`'o i h j item on Waite Forman l City Clerk 18 9r �c�r J SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Submitted into the public recor con item af or "nec ia- Waft4eFoem— CltY Clerk 95- 595 r BRICKELL POINT i i SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS i Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of Brickell Point, it appears evident that such a luxury development can clearly bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on Greater Miami as a result of the development. i Employment Employment considerations include direct employment and employment created in the surrounding I community through residents and visitor's spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 273 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project and operation of retail stores is approximately 72. Wages associated with such employment can be summarized as follows: i r Development $12,470,712 Annual $1,064,940 s 1 Tax Revenue (fZ 4Y! The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this Project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the Project. Total annual tax revenues expected ' S to be created are as follows: ti Total city I i Annual $2,445,611 $920,204 i Submitted into the recor 'Won public item� on Walter oelnan t o City Clerk ' r BRICKELL POINT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Output The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost, operational expenditures and residents spending and employee spending. To determine the effect of responding within Greater Miami, we utilized a � E: multiplier to compute total direct, indirect and induced benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time 20 $137,126,853 $ 7,981,145 9 Submitted into the public record Conn i item .Q on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- 595 i MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES .Submitted into the public � record�onnec io i Item an Waite Foeman City Clerk 95- 5� BRICKELL POINT MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES i Patron expenditures in business establishments constitute the primary and most direct economic benefits. These direct expenditures represent receipts to businesses from which employment and tax payments to state and local government are derived, and from which business owners and proprietors earn a livelihood. Direct expenditures of patrons produce additional economic benefits as those businesses receiving them purchase supplies and services locally and elsewhere, creating an additional round of demand for other firms in the area. These businesses in turn purchase the supplies and services they need to operate, and through successive rounds of purchases that initial direct expenditures of visitors spread throughout the local and regional economy. Similar new demands for goods and services are generated by the expenditures of employees in those firms receiving visitor expenditures, and similarly employees in those firms which respond to successive rounds of demand. Output of goods and services generated after direct visitor expenditures is called indirect output, and direct plus indirect output is called total output. Indirect output can be seen in terms of two components: secondary output, that which relates directly to the indirect demand created as each firm purchases the good and services which it needs to operate; and induced output, which is the indirect output generated by employee purchases of good and services. The ratio of total output to direct expenditures can be represented by a multiplier, a value typically between 1.5 and 2.5. A ratio of 1.8 means that for every dollar expended in the local economy by a visitor, an additional $.80 of output (additional sales) in the local economy is ultimately created by the indirect purchases of businesses and employees. The magnitude of a multiplier relates to: (1) the extent of economic leakage that characterizes a community or region; and (2) the nature of the firms that receive the direct expenditures. The effect of leakage shows the magnitude of successive rounds of expenditures in a local economy as each firm or employee spends the funds received. Looking at the first round of expenditure, each initial dollar of visitor expenditure is attenuated by purchases for goods or services made outside the local area (called "imports"). Such purchases do not create any additional output for firms or individuals in the local economy. J 21 Subrnitted into the record n onne • Public itern ,�! n with 2k on Walter 0em C;h, r1� rk 95- 595 SRICKELL POINT MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES The figure illustrates a situation where 60 percent of such purchases are made outside the area, r leaving $.40 of the original dollar to create additional demand in the local economy. During the second round of expenditures an additional 60 percent leaks out of the area leaving $.16 to create additional local output. This process continues until no significant new output is created by the additional expenditures. Each successive round of expenditures have been called turnover, and the number of rounds before total attenuation is the number of times a dollar "turns over" in an economy. This is a very imprecise term with little substantial meaning. N The multiplier representing the economy represented here would be calculated by adding all of the output created by each successive round of expenditures and dividing that amount by $1, the initial expenditure. This multiplier amounts to 1.57. Actual multiplier values are calculated by large research studies of transactions among all sectors of an economy using complex mathematical models which account for interactions among all sectors, leakages, the effects of household demand, payments to local and other government, and changes in inventories. Each such analysis represents a particular economy at a specific point in tinge. As an economy evolves, in particular as the patterns of trade change during periods of growth, inter -industry transactions alter, and multipliers and other representations of economic structure also change. For this reason these models are periodically updated using current transactions data. r Submitted into the public record i itemonnec Win.. on Walter -o Cih, Clerk J 0 BRICKELL POINT MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES Multiplier values relate to the nature of an economy and to the particular sector under consideration. Relatively undeveloped economies which provide only limited offerings of goods and services tend to exhibit low multipliers. Examples are rural areas, communities and states with highly specialized economies. Much of the indirect demand for goods and services leaks out of these economies to large and/or more diverse areas nearby that have better selections of goods and services. Sectors of the economy with relatively low multipliers are those that import a high proportion of the supplies and services they need from surrounding areas, since the purchase of such imports constitutes a leakage out of the local economy. Examples of types of firms that often exhibit high leakage and low multipliers are gasoline stations, automobile dealers, and manufacturing firms that import a large proportion of their raw materials. Sectors with lower leakages and higher multipliers include those which are relatively labor intensive, such as food or beverage services, accommodations, farming and a variety of other small-scale activities. Sections characterized by.relatively high wages also can exhibit large multipliers due to the large induced demand that these wages create in the local economy. Submitted into the public record in connecti n �wih item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 95- 595 J BRICKELL POINT En MULTIPLIER EFFECTS OF VISITOR EXPENDITURES i { Indirect economic effects are particularly import for the visitor industry because of the relatively low wages and seasonal employment that characterize many visitor industry firms. While this direct employment may be appropriate primarily for those who are young, seeking entry-level i positions or who want only part-time and/or seasonal work, the employment created by indirect effects is higher paying, more stable, spread throughout the economy, and does not differ pq substantially from the indirect employment created by any other economic activity. 24 Submitted into the record connec publlC item ;E_ on Walter oem an City Clerk 95- 5195 J i Exhibit I Exhibit II . Exhibit III f r: Exhibit IV Exhibit V �1 Exhibit VI Exhibit VII I Exhibit VIII t Exhibit IX .I 4 f l l f BRICKELL POINT EXHIBIT LIST Summary of all Economic Benefits Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Summary of all Indirect Economic Benefits Computation of Indirect Economic Benefits Schedule of Project Development Cost Schedule of Project Operational Expenditures Computation of Ad Valorem Taxes Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Operating Assumptions ?5 Submitted into the public record onne o with item on Walter Foeman Cite Cleric 7 BRICKELL POINT ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT EXHIBIT I OUTPUT WAGES FMDT.nVMVMM M*Vl. Submitted into the public recor �iconne c i item' on Walter oeman City Clerk 95- 595 J BRICKELL POINT SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS 1 EXHIBIT II TAXES OF EMPLOYEES WAGES DIRECT COST AD VALORUM $8,000,000 $746,628 273 __$12,470,712 58,142,288 1,098,368 273 $12,470,712 $66,142,288 $1,844,996 14 $341,100 $2,771,100 58 723,840 980,861 $2,445,611 72 $1,064,940 $3,751,961 $2,445,611 345 $13,535,652 $69,894,249 S4.290.607 Submitted into the public record nne tn ji titem Wa oernan City Clerk 95-- 595 BRICKELL POINT SUMMARY OF ALL INDIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS DESCRIPTION DEVELOPMENT OPERATING PHASE PHASE EXHIBIT III TOTAL $63,919,907 $3,625,895 67 545 80 S 2 M2'Y�pX &pN17NG�INDCJCpj. 7,064,658 603,289 7,667,947 $70, 984, 565 $4, 229,184 Submitted into the public record onne n it I .Item_ on 6 Walter oeman F�.•. City Clerk i 95- 595 J BRICKELL POINT COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS 1994-2009 EXHIBIT IV INDIRECT OUTPUT INDUCED OUTPUT COMPUTED COMPUTED TOTAL APPLICABLE INDIRECT TOTAL APPLICABLE INDUCED DESCRIPTION FXPF.NDTTIIRF. M1iT.TTPT.TP.R RRMRPTT WA(:F.R M1iT.TTPT.TF.R RP.MP.PTT DEVELOPMENT PHASE $66,142,288 0.9664 $63,919,907 $12,470,712 0.5665 $7,064,658 OPERATIONAL PHASE APARTMENT UNITS: $2,771,100 0.9664 2,677,991 $341,100 0.5665 $193,233 RETAIL STORES 980,861 0.9664 947,904 723,840 0:5665 410,055 TOTAL OPERATIONAL $3,751,961 $3,625,895 $1,064,940 $603,289 TOTAL $69,894,249 $67,545,802 $13,535,652 $7,667,947 ¢� a o ^ ` , C CD O �y air/ C CD 3 C • <� cr BRICKELL POINT ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST SPENT IN DADE EXHIBIT V AMOUNT $8,000,000 LAND100% 100% 48,000,000 HARD COST, SOFT COST 100% 13,200,000 IMPACTAR`AND R"OTHEFEES 100% 863,000 CRYING.CHARGES 100% 7,750,000 MANAGEMENT FEE.' 100% 800,000 $78,613,000 TOTALS' Submitted into the Public record onne;c item on Walter oeman City Clerk 95- 595 i BRICKELL POINT ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY OPERATIONAL EXPENSES # OF DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES EXHIBIT VI EXPENSE 58 23 840 7 r 980,861 58 $1,704,701 ><` 14 341 1 $ 00 r 2,771,100 14 3r 112 200 4 816 901 $rr 72 Submitted into the, pubtio record conn Item on Walter oeman city Clerk BRICKELL POINT EXHIBIT VII COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES 1996-2012 DEVELOPMENT PHASE ANNUAL DESCRIPTION YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 RECURRIN REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPED PROJECT i.VALUE $35,306,501 $70,613,000 MILLAGE: TAX::: RATE:: 3.11% 3.11% COMPUTED -R E, TAX $1,098,368 $2,196,735 LAND ......... .. $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 MILLAGE:TAX RATE. 3.11% 3.11% 3.11% 3.11% COMPUTED A/E:: TAX: $248,876 $248,876 $248,876 $248,876 TOTAL:: $248,876 $248,876 $1,347,244 $2,445,611] Submitted into the public record onne 1pq it item on Walter oeman City Cie, -I( 9 5� - 5495 BRICKELL POINT ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES EXHIBIT VIII BASED ON MILL RATE ALLOCATION DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE OF ANNUAL BASIS MILLAGE TAXES $78, 613, 000 9.5995 $754,646 9.5030 7,059 �zs>:>`:i'ES<:::EE;.EEs:':•;::E:E:::»E:�!>>;;:?:.::E:E:>��:<< <:;l:>:::<:;:>':;::':> 7�ACii}i;r1 $78, 613 000 / 7.2530570,180 :•:;::'r'i.,.:.'::;•?.;.}ny1.+i�,:,:;Ny•:y;;`ti�:i,.;:J2:.::::isj}:}%:ii:::f::j::i'i'::1i`:::i::?j;:sr:�'i<ii::r:?^::;::. ,. ... .:: 7�A7.M..i:..:: is i:4ii:pii:;4Tr::;;?;::4: ;:v i:•: ;! i:•i,i:;J:?tt:;::::; �:;.: $78,613,000 2.1060 6 0 165,559 5 59 t��`33':'•''?E:'�`>:.<.:>'.<"<:'`;';>`i'••`•??'sE##'::>'•:''r?'?;�<�';E>`!>'?:;SEE::':: ............... $78,613,000 0.8170 64/ 2 27 ]� Eibi�'iY '','�•::)::v:ij�^:�::j:i�'E.�':;::::�}:::::vC:{i�i:{�:::iY%:::::::f[::v:::::n::�:;:<:::;:;:;: $78, 613, 000 0.4970 39,071 bq .O x? $78 6 13 00 0 0.8420 4 20 66,192 $78613 o 0 / o 0.0490 49 0 3,852 vzz�ntnr�x�tdj�0 $78, 613, 000 . 0.1000 7 861 31.1095 $2,445,611 Submitted into the public record in connecti n v Jternt2Lon Walter oeman City Clerk 0 % — �� BRICKELL POINT EXHIBIT IX ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1,285 600 36 $8,000,000 $48,000,000 $13,200,000 $58,000,000 $7,750,000 1,145,000 771,000 264 $12,317,712 1.9664 0.5665 2,080 $800,000 $17,000 9 $6.00 $1,937,160 12.00% $1,704,701 $723,840 58 400 514,000 200 257,000 $10,394,415 22.00% $3,112,200 $341,100 14 $5,187 Submitted into the public record i onnect'o itr item on Walte Foeman City Clerk 95- 5C5 t'�J •h,f 4 .rib C� SCALE is e _ _—_-,",__.-�' 'I• ,. r.::. �,+^'f �.- _ .r..!_ ' r '"i: .N- �� >✓ ex 4u- Fri ; ° -.:1. •. S } -Q :.,d •-;�=n{Q ?" `� �? AF J z, { � .•ir.� - ,ys i 0 :�� {.• 1L —_• \ C� -_ 3 �: I'�t� : "tk N QN�, J ._ _ -- i•,• - 1 _ _ •.1{ - b, - J� •: - ti k ' _ ,, uf:Ir f I w`:r f a )r u,e;. %fr. !. - -1 'G"3' - ! •:Ii- •r <. f-' Illy il�t •lli r} ) .tom �:�'' I ` ir,rrl M f„•-er +rtlil4:<• �,(:. !l•<l4 ..r1� ":�- , _ i . .� ' --lt. • I I / � erI •_ .etYn pttrw' ..iMi )r«Ml•t «rv<N l3 " ' '-+l i - - • S :: -. F� :ri v .. )fa, •C Cw w+,li r<x.rl.3.(•. ti- ?li�c - _ ..,; ..:� :?J. 'ti i? rvl..e 'w. .[•- i '•-� .,4,c -•'c _ i 11 _ ''� ; `s S t� , �..' �..i . ..c`:S i.::a. nac.. »..:..:.•:. • ).�•� e _ J.. •i. - �\'� �., a . 1 Mi..t -.�.. ..r it .. r:: �: wil-..,. - :C 1 i �. ytf�i.Wc 1^ �' :, .t.- ; _ - 1 ! �.: 1 f•. - • r!v :.. :.: a..�f a•�ru»+n.w.n .. .•n J off'�J�>� � -j1 ""••�i IS..St lwl.•I rf f«: y s.ilf • ♦ !!Ir I — [/1_4.1f � t•!si r------tl � 4 { P-. - 1 - ., t ..i_�f� a r� ufu.. •. r. i.�.i `.r.,r � le- I I � �.,a t . _ 1 ,. : '�- ' y 1 �" . rr .. , :. - •l^sr.:f .% � ..1,=• :.:• I:: :: ;.:�=•i,.r).::,`-_;i:; :i � «. �'•f - I - t 5 _ :r ) YI . - _ �" U `I-'�-'f;_i-..=-- �me.+«.. ;i - :;=t_ -�4 _s:�_` _-.-rt•t - � •j' <�: ,r.Ycx,�>2>73t k�.•r,' w,lcc at -a ! `'� .��.� .. ���. rewS.oJs '.: a,.! acf +�aa .a..aee e.l J S.S.a_ I - � ^lY ; t i _ _ C ��+[ x �..saLM[eC + t✓w ••a n 14T I,r(aa »9G'Ge �LL%.,nt ,-1 L..va),e N .. O.lur .+e. ••++J ts. uv,r.., .. ' ) ♦ t!29 nR-i„L1 N SWv V iKY Ga u!t K vy,fyY 4!»[i,,r'!Y u : _.� i -.� - •'� • _ �..,)• •H H.3 fM.t3cf<aY Yr, m foY:urt ,<}C,nG �) Hra...c. •s•lY ^T r t3:n,w: .•T=- _Q +..�. .9�. w<r � L+ _ ,2�si 7 yr.'. L".•:�' -'y7 -'�13 * EER(_. �- � ' �' t f SJ w. fc,'..- 'l,Ym::lA. Kc_... 9 T _ -- _�i _• _._ C� • m _ s O — SURVEY —" �a=30 CD Cs; , cU n� cr SHEET LP-1 LP-2 j LP-3 ZP-1 A1.1 A1.2 A1.3 AIA A1.5 `A A1.6 A1.7 A1.8 A1.9 A1.10 A2.1 A2.2 A2.3 A3.1 L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 21449 DRAWING LIST TITLE Street System and Project Area Location Map Aerial Photograph Survey Zoning Plan Lobby Level Basement Level Mezzanine Level Typical Floors loth Floor Site Plan Recreation Level Typical Floors 12-40 Unit Floor Plan Unit Floor Plan Unit Floor Plan North and North East Elevation West and South Elevation Partial North East Elevation Building Section Landscape Site Plan Baywalk Planting Plan Plant List & Details Tree Inventory and Evaluation Submitted into the public c ' record onneon i item record on 9 Waiter -oeman City Cterk 95- 595 DESIGN ASSOCIATES P A. LANDSCAPE ARCIETECTURE IWOLFBERGI ALZVVARE �- AND 'OUkRO ALVARM ARCHITEMME • ENGINEERING PI AMMG • INTERIOR DESIGN - ENGIl�F.FdtING - PI.A1�iNING INTERIOR DESIGN OAK PLAZA PROFESSIONAL CENTER 8525 S.W. 92ND STREET. SUM C 11 5960 SOUTHWEST 57TH AVENUE 9iTAMI, FLORIDA 33156 MiAMI, FLORIDA 33143 Submitted 1. record, iP A x qgig JSSUE DATE are `� varos i;rsttmitted infio the �Wbft wa mum tiff onnecti n th recoron LP'_ I — item �,a�� tter oeman i .City Clerk r 95— 5, tl� RSk P2 Ayrl '+1�, tT Frt •fit} � �S• r { r rt'. v"i, ', r * + F � t/ t` 444 mono lPb 77 n I .r. r j 111 �6�t�,.• 5'1 {t�� F 1t il�IS fi'tlr ��;� 1 r� "(• + �t�i�l i s �; ;� �ti t• r ,wry 1i 11 [ �Zs art, _ ����. �' • r t vJ x, � - • 4 J yi M LASON Systems, Inc. S-E. 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149.800-287-4799 - FAX 305-477-7526 IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES SKETCH OF SURVE-Y-- cam.:-.. _ r•..-=--•-•---- �-• - -:ram•"-'-^—: _ ��9•CALE �' Ie•� 20'. LE>'EtiD 1 ^�� '.. ••_ _ M1aaP4M�ltY9�!•a•Aftl.'!�M•IrfrMK:,'' .�. i�«••�!l++•rrtr.MM�e•!+•A!W•� '.��,. Gf ` jITV IAa•ltiety P. ' moo_. .• atrr.:: r..a:r.:..•-• -:-•n-•--=__ �'r✓ r: _...__• 2b2.o1' 2ea.31 •..�=^"'•r""� � . _.. _......� :..--�,` r I,� rp1c. 6VA.K51PA0 u G6.35'2! . sz 1, •' x.o / �,�,'Ofi !_Lf4�if/ T� • ' �i:/O �O . � �, :a �-.,,�.; :'�jj .;�.;� ..._::� �..._� ... - , r .. , . _ , s ._. _..,._... • 5 f „` ear-=` � v��e�' ..r ., :.- - ,;,;.�•.. I\ \\ ICN p +o Do ul `gym; U _n .. ;� V .�•�,C is �1' t Y , �- -_ cc ul lJi •-�� 4 a ' � � N n p � • Q i .� }' '+ µ r, _e } w t ! to LI. i,> Ira �• Wig• mr- ci N•• to !14 •. .�- _ .�•Q {��'� lie a _ • t F tlY I i- A.Y ,'G I11.+Y . 97. •.. _� _�� �?C . I J rJ3.•svrG 1 . . e f 'ari -•''A6' ' *a4r t1 A „ f`t' n.o. �~ •°'` fir• al.o qti. fl�`'y ri• .p 4i' ®sis Al Eo.o 41.0' •' �/IRfcf�i 9id a I ar' A ,o Ec �u.< ��---�_ �•�1 cr b , f� I • �s Q.2" C1 '-6D•A io` .� irw•q'w GJMma! '�97.76' WALL _ - saize'� r.' « rt:c� 7 P 'e cvo • - - � 40150' S b5, Ol 25v. • t�� ABPNAI.f ° •. �L ` L.0 .S'!//Il�,y �19SLi7M OV! .. _ - .:__ - �. ...OrJG'G-..... / roSJes'�f•r On'JeAd-.�i(Pl✓d%DI7 ^' ,. .�1 QjrAcA►rt•!c' } .� 3l ....:..... !u,:iyrwr•„',•:• `-:-�' c5•.;6 ¢"fir/-IR!/.� •1Lec�neo cf t]l. GWl io i burr[ "c' • •_n•a: caen:r RoAtm L.>6iP•QAJ I ri . Ate.!✓.r7ldi-.i? WE IERECY CERRAY: twr t>ra ArtAor»-91cETa10f SUNVEY' or no Aews °cxwam moronr r tfwa �.•� .9 ' �' S S d.: a rcu e i l a to ZFtIG y `t raft ALso CI m iM e[aT O/ vm OORma! mu rm L Aa 11Pammr WMl'm AIO RATitm TW A STP CT W .:/o/••�< �� W O to c' c caa of vat Tlao Also twT nrae All! Mo vmMa OOGIOA4MYna Yetla aMowM rMueaA ourrAtaal or iMa AelTaAGT or ' CcViu�sp�nr�'i/Jg afocrtii ld :nrvr, i� mu vat MA17» as was To Ia:nlw.At aeraeoe° wrPW°.ra. AAn. ArncTaw 1Mt Nwr( , AeCATIOM �k✓� V A+5 oq ooi' /Ot 3! 91'• i oeneuTtow or unmea a AI0011 Aonemrt m n! rwo►un wrr a Moi meawee Aa "" aeowAtwM wu 1 t t tin•: .dCr•ff'�3'?7�� Q 3.09 L�eY+G� ! rm \eaRma oemm*°r ■ m+arer m o-ww or mu. nw K[nr ar w vm rma tue wur �- �%a r i2/.f!/�hC9p co e1:. Pe the �f 3� nAPWOJ eSIT PO M n na riaoA 9TAn00u0 OF u r .-2'.• ag vEC. �7YJG'�.-r�o2 J.fSd: GY=rRrl W �- W '!se' West l0 ieec r:�� '� •.a n • .L. Ea7ENO NOT VAUD UNU3s'sEAuu wrrH AN twBOMD sURMO" SEAL � - .. Aad sableaC to nn r. gWW :IAin@ i radfus 'o • �.�t? w dlS,kC JLk/,nd•B Pd/d /%A++ i °RMJI Zusu.menC granted 11 Qtl1' �.f:/ed�a�,JBiet,4f'.�r� fXW e00R ne.2�3g-i7. .�i1d�•e .4: r;.a �dB.rEc> 7P9./.e ,:...! W .r's6C�c� �"'ivG aye/%vNS� 'I• - ' itdo' afisarAefhaas DATE i .�..-� -%°r., ` $URVEY� +NOTE:I�THE ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENT IS U fOR. t.C:G L-N.gSE _•... aaawnemwAlvttoeM. 3/T-/•..• ..RAR•w.Rapy� I At THE NORtiiLA6TERLY PiIDPEKIY Cc .,t..• i . 041 FEET ft"EACTERLY INTO THE AL ' y •Q �A^rdCadj> y fmsA) Rc2y.�/wJ � oGT!G•t% r•i S•M1�, �rrnm uwwow %L wrAm orv6A .m Ma,d(rp.4iSBy-sx aG-Xarot 1 01.4 i G27-89 6 UPOATg-_y�Ryey- 1��y AY;-ENGINEER'ING:_CO �.oROER_ _cJse__ EaNa ._� REVI5toN5 da inW. Fla91a St:mN`P-..O.Bwc 011161 - X4�L Florida �130 A00_ CERTIFICATION FR WI 'i0.0"�`!i�''r�s'._•�'�!1[rC'��• �OI•G'19- G•4ss-69' !SKETCHADD LOCATION TO URVEY -o' {IJPOA7M —_3 K E•.Te C H OF SURVEY v .+wit.+. ., �.u..L _•.rY+.�fiirH--'_T'.'rrf ,.-.,t,'..ttzri•r•.. T-_\' - _ .. _ _.-4•,., .., ••�iL�1, a•_' L'- 9 C A L E le' 20'. •i+aa'+W:-�+i* -.e-agtP' ..' „. 'M> QA� _ �yi._.7Laro,.f.P!'R•O►"9c'• MdM1itM�IOMIay!,: _ wear — -iLTo, a.:•' fr `_ ujii Ar '�tI�•..� _ t" b StP/`B.N t�•.b,•: rcna!w`_ ^` 6 . + [hu s . ....._ :� _'_-�- FIIO RC.P+BT•;.� 1 •w + OEAfYwC�Y._/ ._..._ I.. s.-: aa'+1'•t ) 4`f-_ :AwU.e. 28237ncan)..,INBt' _•', �..�.....Z. ._��.. 'J O•:i � �ti. .•�.:._"-- •:----••^s•n,.:. ._: �.s,-•=n•—•. =.201'C •_ _...._-. -_ _ Ma- .io..� ` .. _ `y M1`. ,, ray r.•-� .'9;g �i;�. =t Y fPwc. � f CR (it , jJ.' A •�.IC-�-+i'S, --- . ... o. �' ��:/O r'• e s 1. T� CV ..� a ._� .a� •�1. s�«an+a+fylo ' _ '. X e/ ` •' � �-V �r7 l R n~ 'T !.1.c-+. -•+f ,Y - �.y... ^• �w Lam. i+!••' ..7:.,L'.� ! � - ..x►�lM�lgr!•�__-� s • • •� C J e a ss • � 0 0 �. s eA f.�i+c./ a Qfj• ir AP 0 it AP +" + LE�J.1- �escr Irrr 10 s' d +-.4. �- }' At that portion of BRICE-- PCLST, according to,che plat thereof, recorded in ' ,}y 87•o y' � • ice- • - I t! sock 8, ac -awe 14, i tie ILhltc Records of UaJe County, Florida, lying - d -na.y o • r a b' 4 .e to' �• s Lo• b ?,,sr of t'te 7.astarly .oun,:1c: ine of S,E, 2nd. Ave„ Bridge approach,'•:rosa It - :•e :r lver, des:rEed as rbllovs- _ nz-'icn at the inceravccto:t cC *e ::orch lino or lcs prolongation EaseJard of d eta o r•b•:o: !.erly line of ;. E, '-eh. it., with tha Lafcerly boundary line bf B,L:kell 3r. �, 17� r:' .o ti � Avenuv ;S.F.. lst. Ave..- aL_crdiry cn ch6lar c%ereof, a recorded In Flat took al.o y ? -/ ( ut ^a{u 14, of eno unit: 8ezards of Dade County, Florida, thence 4artherly tiL 1 Kd C ry% .iln•m tic easterly 1'aundar: lute of the S.w. 2nd. Ave., Bridge approach atrosr- .+ - ! d fla.-tt Fiver_ ac„on int: co condo•!at ton proceeding recorded In July lo, 19:? n •.F .�. 4il11- 3.-,.�tc_.f�.,. _ • tl j ,•u �: =1cr!la a•ti al,tn: a cut t .I-etrcul.+r tune ha:•in; a radf us ,ef ;I:.!- :acc rota e:•cr.,l Pm;-L. Cc 15 de:-ecs I: �Iautus 30 2e_onds for'an .t-. ,.!s!•,::Le of l.t.'-- ie.t :6 c.e and of a Id :are, c`ente :oc"A ar.: iu / s, s. :'•e tic f•n,^oar^ ILtu for t:u•:.e. Ind, Ave„ nridte approa:ni as afa l rasa t.d ,n.i ,lu::.: :•r. ie Ar!a% of :::r:^ l' de :roe 52'. Lnutes 15 seconds West for a eistanze 'B7.5Gt wA6f feer co tic !'rl i• •-i •e •l wi of :he parcel of land Herein descrOcd; -- - 40750 5 0'1 25 )... emu.—.{ �0. �r ;•,.•s .•, c.tnrtaws Sor-!i aLnn, r'!e !fcresaid S,'., t,td, Ave., Brid:c prpprroacn for FUD. IL_i :.:ta'w. cf 13 .'_ :.•e,: 11: foe: h­ 11eed) cc a point an the htilk-&wad."line oVo ,�.Qyw��,r ��y ,la c •e •,:. •ank of :1 tit :.Lver; tiunru 7:orth e5 de{reel 75 st-aces v 1L ..•-o1-. .; •'..w: -.• !::.P' .,c•tc e:r:h An ue:rees 2! "(mites .5 se"n%A East a5.O/NQy �l9JEL7M atq - 0 - :,:.1 Cent a•: ]eee, al,a t.; said :Z!k-hind Lin+ ta.a pcinc; thence Hoc L'!ve-- -. ^_ -���� -==�—o�L+U� Jpd /f�%B/7 S•'- • -•^^ - •'- •'••"--• • •- AL-e ...id, na G- Feu.. Ilne :nrca•:2-decrees• L1 minutes- 21••aeconds Easrfos-s-- __. _ -•- ^- +- ��i Sa ,�_�sp•-.4fr.S. iLecance of L]l,W felt i•;orc:t :2 deaees 7 •tl crs 25•sarnnds .:.sc 111.07 feet b•'luu,!t en.a point :Arkint: the heelnninq of a'eangentcal clrcalar ~JF•' ll' 9dr/nvtd s�b+�,y c':rvu; c�,encr O.,wterly'•utE ouc'•eascerl .,Icv: 4.ILd Atli:-�e�u li w an•i -%ton:•; aurvu h.r:L!{ .t radios of 140.:1 feet through a central •nIle =BURVEY"ar n,a AeeYa otltla•m wsaratrr�saua +. .9- 'S5 deercua id iW;;tes :•L 1ewnds fur a,•d .,r. ,1..:.,n.+ of /'.S.,fua: .I_ feat.: ,,d::;, :uacr.,l .i ,to 5n decrees, nr. iistance 9),:4 feet Qced) -As MC sar ataeYO'm AM saran taeuot OW owes .!/o/�-rl jf !f/ to c'c ene of sail .,:rt.r :' ::.:!revs Conic :enc l:we kl,ch ul .1 -tit .:ov I., +a:_o^cone s s _:,sr .clail +,ulL.;. ' -_M,o,ett rMfnemt 9JtaauAn0u 01 TM Aaar^A= OF � �N/t!B�'�ifri/.09 � etc lLtc ., Lrn. a line content to the r son. MRCTW no rmftnr. LorATm YD • BO?I,6 �,�-Ifor"iid a.lrve for .t dl.c:,:ee of 14.)i f.:_c cc , p,.inc ica:t: SL :tire.•.: ;_ +: t,cas 15 se.un,N rasc •. » fedc )ved,; thence South )^ decrees :rierr w9m on sectewo As suer seomureae tru 1: •.,)a^c es 2, se_rge; ds .fr ter a L:I t..we of 2 :... ;oL:a , •c!, r dwe .nv.. 10 do:ruui U: i tnces :i me -onus 'west for a distance of 407.5 face _nwssamOFKmsrrrmnrrrr LJt1Tk'✓I!/i%f9/� to eh. Point. f FevLnnind; Contitn9irt 9X2:1,i•:.t+:arc feuc 52.2:r5,-..;esi :Are or Lase, swaKroww. .�aT• Se:G.d71x�_rlo2 JX4:;: Me! Was. 10 feet thereof, dediaaced for icrunc dm! sidew1k:onciinin: 1-3_ a a tuare icec. . - - '' And subject to nn'easexnc for Ingress and ?•ress of ehe Southue}iicerL•• :rr•ter uC descr!'ted prnl•,•ri.- `elnz all of chat portion of :lr:•aar sector : tL Ing a radius 'of 35 fact and a central tn;le of Is() decrees and -m aruu of 1924.1 ],;dre. fear., •.dt•1 :tie-ic 'et:o; a porclon of chat :cream _ Easumenc granted In d.,nser- Cate 1:c, 51,811 cC eau dlrc•.lc •' r: of ',-e t•r•ct: Icrc BJEG7 R7 A.Vi E.�Oaf E7t/E,V OG'D/CdT/O.U'•i �.EST,C/ -/o r/S L /.N/TAT/OHS u • '... i R R.E'St.'.4✓.fT/c.KS OF RECo.2O. __ •.. I SURVEYORS NOTE:I THE ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENT r-THE 1.5 FOOT SEAWALL, r) ELEVA.T1000. sUowrJ meex- AI ',a•— "^ D onJ e'i!YA�.e//A.✓/ .. .wwvarae rsa /T'/'. •'RAta-oI 'saWoa II - AT TkE NORTHG6TERLY PRDPeRiY cmmeR, Wtip IS EN.Rmv II,4 lA1,,Wop Lo.✓ .W91�i• Bdy ) pw-e'uo, -- 1 . •, 041 FEET SOL"EAGMP" WO We ADJACENT Pt7 pewf. '+) Q -u .. • , ctT�( o� MILMI ,P.LG.FQRJ,4,S wa;eltsa.rt., A - .. — - EtJ � am6mm so. srAm of-WAmaa II •f/••E Ce�rLllv L C,OF S.E.. 2^".4v6 of 2•`r '6j rLL•E1 E.L4'"V'/0.591� =1 0l-�� vzl•89 sUPPATe SURVEY __DATE__ EESNa_..a_�s. REVIGI0N5 _.-.r._.___ oasase-_ w•7 re. sle. tsto,.ls. •.f. =I1vEFAAIIVG-CO. ,.ORDER_ 011164. 01-01 OO 5-B'8 RT ADD CEIFICATION WHITE �,-7- B-¢coo�7.91 2t31-7+ , •Sr��T,o as. F a pc- L� �.- R ^. 1�si, as ii m. 33130: i ecNa.... .nts ',1pj)•$j{.'J(1'/]��y ;'r..t r: s•E'-,•,r-i•: Swi:,y .!.. 108 •G'9ti'B9' SKETCH AOD I,OGATION TO (JRVE OS-7o7is7 a-ro•at ' 21Ab-65 `T�a� :r P�'^ d - • of7r7o, -s7s /6 D P�tdlf/ao v/DArB" ¢ �J si oivgie/ 5i�, f / _..._ _.._..__._ . _._.___.__--.-_....... .. _,_.. .. rotor 'onrieeti�i�� 'item on .� It- 1 1 Walter Foeman City Clerk 1. ... (PRCPERi7 ZONED SD-3 .. a E• 1. LAND AREA VT - LAM AAEA '. '".OPLIItY "W's /2.4/1 . 4 LAW AREA MO'=0' IM10.1-1 ITV" N.723 •AREA • IMORT . • t. • LAAO Aft. 10•-0' INTO 11SGYK MAY 3.111 IL .K AK '• •fNA - • LAM AKA TO NID-POINf d SRICKE" AKMC-20.104 YWa RIVER q - "TOTAL. ISM.7.3 ' .h • AOOIftaNAL 202 Au0•[0 INCREASE uua P.U.O. SIR "P TOTAL GROSS LOTI 2. FLOOR AREA AL1DK6 (FAR) i O • /ASE r.A,K. •.23 111.102 / 4.23 - 114.d91 YN a. FLOOR AREA PROPOSES) (f.A.M.) < (nnNNNA• rNNR.c f.MAR A.1 INNOINR) TOTAL CROSS ADJUSTID CROSS N `^ tM•ENI. •0.R.3 lMlwta. nrt.). ^ . • A. POLLS[ 1 R V O ] LOBBY LEVEL 1 a b 1y j a .iT. `� 1L G / _ KISANIK It./17 /.]6a ALSO. FLOORS: 3 - 10 71..2. ./.924 t. rt•'_' t.•.faa < •r • r / SpVVV \ MCCMATItr1 L[v[L 13.16f .MN • I. SO. FLOORS: 12-42 .10..00. ]7.M.750 • lvR fm11 u.w •c.n.l 4n.m aa.R.I (t. < f - Y- 7LRx1i' .f SLISWAL: 5t/.421 SaT. 172.1/O SO.R. 3 < y 1. rNASE2 . - LOBBY LEVEL /.700 .000 A - KCMEATION LLKL a./// .1K • RESO. FLOORS: Ix - •/ .7.071 2Ma.012 • - (• Puma) (LAW in.".)7.MAO � S �t sa _� �. �- I SMTQiY.: S2.432 SO.A. .R. TOTAL SO. FOOTAGEI 121.131 Sa:R. 744.112 TO.►T. M. TOTAL )KAREN d MAKICEMT7 PMOPOMED ' I I DaSTM SHERATON HOTEL PARKNG GARAGE A. PHASE I - 41 STORY 10". 3/ RESIIIE TIM. FLOM5 1 II I ' • / APTS. K 30 FL•s . 23• .. :. fL.. ::.: : ::: 'S 31 at 2 MIS. 1 2L rl•S N I Mf- ' K 31 FL'2 .... _ - • 1 "I. R 1/ rL'S N . .. .. . . . . .... ...:. • S MIS. 1 la ft's 11 R Ex6TWG S1fERATON 110TE1 • I MT. 1 1 FL'S . ...... - . -. "TOTAL: aM UNITS z . /. f%1% x - 34STOOP IOER: AOOVE PARKINS CAAACE - O ' 2 ARTS. R 1 FL. x • / Mrs. 1 13 FL•3 : . . . .. lea E- �A • '9ATOfFI: 2fE1 N•RNTS - n �i M '•1 . • TOTAL: 309 !KITS O p ZONING PLAN /. OFF-97REXT PARKING AM LOADING RED)IME EM(S O �• 0 - A. nUSE'I - 41 STORY TONER: 72 STORf i'UK11G GARAGE ' . • 30M APAIRTWID T UNITS • 1 PARMtING FACE MA UNIT . .. .. . . 391 _ I• < • RLSTALKAKT: 3,/05 90. FT. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . a - e RETAIL: 5.403 IO.F7. • 1 P.S. PER 1.000 SOFT. .. .. . . . ..1 14 �%" 1 L t. 11 E_ G • N. PRIAS( 2 - 34 STORY TOWN: II STORY PARKING GARAGE • 200 APARTMENT UNITS • 1 PARKIN'. SPATE PER WIT - . . . 200 w W '>- ' • RETAIL: S./La SCARY. • 1 P.S. PER /.000 SOAR...... �] Y • TOTAL PARKING FACES REQUIRE) - - C.. wwICAPPM SPACES U Y . REONNEO .. ... ... . . . ... ... .... la SPACES a" . _ PPOVIdD .. .. .. .. fa FACES TrrT .n D. df-STIK[t LOADING SPACER �. REQUIRED (12•! s3• EA.. 1(MT. QEAR. OF is- MIN.) .:. S FACES U . ' roml0E0 (I R 12•.1 33: NANf. CLEAN. d it' KIM. AV - � I•'•1 ' s M•12' 6 33MA)IT. CLEAN. gF Is- Kill.) ... S FACES • /- off-CIRCET PARKING PROPOSED -• • 2ASEFRT . .. . . . . . . . . ... 21 FACES - . • • IST LEVEL. ...... . . . . .... . .... ... N FACES ' ' • 2W LEVER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 7/ FACES - • 3RO LEVEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . .. 7/ SPACES - . • .TN LCVLL, ... .. . .... ... 71 FACES ' . SIN LML.. . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. 71 FACES - - - • 1t9 LiAl...... . .. .. I .......... ... . 7/ FACES . - • - TTN LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . 71 FA= • - $IN LEVEL. .. .. . .... ..... ..... ... i/ FACES - • OTH LEVEL . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ... 7/ FAGS 5517E DATE ' • 10TH LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .... 7/ FACES 0 2-23-95 ' • IItM LEVEL .. .. .... 71 FACES RfY151011 WE 12TH LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ••Ads .. ,-33. ' - • - TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIOFD "0 SPARS 'N) . 7. • SETLtR REOi11KlXXM - Z FRONT (1RICKELL AVEAAE): - -U . REOAIRCO 30• . . .[3 - PROVIDED ....... .. .... . . ...... 30' ' cumlOI SIDE M GARAGE: • 1 • ' REOUIRtD .. is D-_4 m PROVItED : 17• iSRS ' • 1MTula SIDE ••rorM: ' • SHEET NuAcUER - Kau RED . . . . . . . . N• _ PF=DEO . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. .- .. .. . .... .. 4. - - - MATElKM011f-. - I Z P 1 ""'"° m' ZONING PLAN LOT AREA PLAN PIGYIaED .......:.:::::: ......:::::. aa• DF record onnecu n t Item � on Waiter Foeman MIAMI RIVER 15 - _ a ❑aLi ❑❑❑o�c�ac�❑❑❑❑❑❑ o o❑ ❑ o a� �C`�/o-��) ti ; pry 0 lit G1CIC1 ,�,Oe.eD�PEWR4 <- q ffppttA +$ &nllreG so- _E aEMaSfEl __r._ xonw:an"rexe 0 P30.1 HASE 1q1 afEe Z (E1.rrClEf..,rO NaYIIf : 'tow / sm tl""t 8..7va'ML0.YIl �V .. v EEr w U p a �`� �—_._ _.. `�----�-- .__y �rmcu rr",ruwacwo gr[E.._--.•_. ! W � x § H a W L. Cm a � ra L~/'y?� .e . - _ __ — — __ _,._ _ ---------------------------- rSSUE ORiE - P afiFrGrt G!E vioen i LOBBY LEVEL EXISTING. SHERATON, HOTEL PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN x SCALE iJt6'.i'_0• a T1 SfEEE WUUW_p n Submitted into the public A . l^------- -- . —-__ t se I . — I item C� Qn r O, Waite Foeman City Clerk � � `� _ R+4 RGiC tlM ` i MIAMI RIVER MAW xl"ZA trrfnxslaEVYraE - •., � + L � a ' H euxmc u.c aul.nrxa - M "iRoe+a i I i Ld�— smp"cE- 3t)' 'EN""i llO"MiE rr3 "" Lr MRA w m-1 Z e"aetz IR9, txu srmt txr w"va �" p iaEun A,7x"sY"oou EIIXiAGE I"ASN Nano i , , I Y `✓ p r � Wax ---- a a n -- �— --- - --- 0 .3 — ��•\ it �' ,-�-, O � — WE p a .i -i _ — __=E=La°"u`i 1x.uuz�xr: __ \ •_ W -'— — — — —— —— — — — — — — — —J. . - - ISSUE a"7E r BASEMENT LEVEL (SERVICE- LEVEL) EXISTING .SHERATON HOTEL PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN x I ' SCALE 1f16*.r-r } sHm walm ry _ 1.2 Su U _ r---- _-----------_ �Fnitted into t." public _ f f f retard tt((�cannecFoem'am" f►item f F oftWalteF MIAMI RIVER�� 6 l w >\ 0 MEO1Er7101t _ $ ruaarc -s-- 30' PHASE II I. a �e a �---r "'n ""*«f' f / O ✓i Y '� �} ��J EtEx taanr� 6i, - __ _ /,� / fi - R Q (� ; - 1 - I MNRKilfYB E vgxw t4 0Uvr' rd 1d = ` ay (gi 2�• 4'ItY If) �� w D OO O n ti }ts dye fl r-� 1r I - IrtwrnaErri! ..PARKING MEZZANINE LEVEL EXISTING SHERATON HOTEL PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN t SCALE: 1/16'.1'-0• . A- • Submliied into the public, . � _ _ TIMG"cidme Walter Foeman -- 9 MIAMI RIVER z 0 z 0o0 a, = o 0-- Q �4> a E- w�a �o a. 6 W o� - as I TYPICAL FLOORS y (FLOORS 3-9 ) _.� EXISTING. SNERATON , HOTEL PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1J18•,i 4= } Sjibmli#ed into the public A 1.4 recorcL in connec on i o. I Item on i L, L MIAMI RIVER 1< 4, �� cn SMARACE 30' PHASE II ��x E 2 a Z x .4Qa w,�.rn uyet a (mawaat i---t ► it r W W � O Y L L 10TH FLOOR � y` EXISTING. SHERATON HOTEL PARKING' GARAGE SITE PLAN SCALEIIIV.1'-0' �n Submitted into. the public �- — — — — — - — — — • r�culj n—i — I I L_ MA F-M In FIVEM 0 y I — .— — — — — — — --� . - - - - !SSLE DATE :Haas - RECREATION LEVEL (I ITH FMR) EXISTING SHERATON -HOTEL. PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN SCALE ins-.r.a• • SMEU rNUMR -, - umi%ted into �e' t public b!i'ictd+A 1fF .6 _ f- - _- - T.. - acI 4-n �n�c" item on. F4alter Foema'n i i } L MIAMI RIVER MH . �• - - _- _� 27 � pper+ PG d(t� �4f . • S 3 ,Lc "4F cn .-•-"' Pa LE%" f7- 1 .2 30. o a g o E; � o — _-.— _.—.._ -- .— _--- — — — — — — O _•- - - - - -- --_--__ - r TYPICAL FLOORS ; i (FLOORS 12- 40) q C EXISTING SHERATON HOTEL PARKING GARAGE SITE PLAN _ SCALE 1/16'.1'-0' I— — — — — — — — — __ — — — , �u cnitted into trle�ublic A 1.7 record in connect" n "t — —1 item I `P on 0 I N� auiS ARC z o_ E^ Z ¢„ - oao 0= U s 0 WwW R Y Y a� 0 m i {{��► iSSuE 7/fE — .� RE-.f-ot iWE a -o L� •aU 3e 'n • ow�c unc Srw NUUES Submitted' into" the public A 1.8 - record,%conn� Ngn vfit� 0 zrtWa o ReISJCM CAFE -o LWNS :T ftu :u sKU MWIBER Submitted into the �Obl a A l.,C record connec'� � .. item on 7 '3 0 . SrfEf.r�(a{tu�9Ee� �:f Public l.{ �;ll�fIfi{igU' into frig i� �u4 � Rem �� 0 . SrfEf.r�(a{tu�9Ee� �:f Public l.{ �;ll�fIfi{igU' into frig i� �u4 � Rem �� TO OCCAAA11W rn -- NORTH EAST ELEVATION ( BISCAYNE BAY VIEW) MDm: • CQTAKtl!®ORWE-0Q'EETAT.ItQ'1/QV.4 • M1ILSE I ID891&ET AT • 7174'UQVD. • PW.SE A LDEET WtAT. WffttQVD. II111111I 1111111" " I11t k (ills Milli 0I111 I: 1111 II fill " fill :::: 11 :0 " " Us IIII fill 11 11 If . " 11111 " all " fill '1 11 IIII 11 ' „ IIII " milli " fill " " fill 11 " (III " Milli " IIII " " IIII If '• IIII "" IIII 11 " ''�11=" :III" IIII 11" IIII 11 1. His .1 11 fill If •• 1 IIII " 1111 " fill 11 1. II11 If 11 " milli " fill 1. 1. 1111 if " n =ill 111 " WIN " fill n n fill 11 M 111 " milli " IIII n 11 IIII 11 '■ II 111 " milli " 111111111 II 1. fill n " dill "IIII 11 1. IIII 11 .. rl if " Rill " loll 11 " fill if 1 IIII " Bill " lift " " fill 11 '• " IIII " Bill " ills " " fill 11 '. "fill" mill " III 1.1. fill 11 ' " fill " Rill " fill 11 1. fill 11 •/ rl IIII " Rill " His 11 1. lilt 11 •• "Jill" will 1111 11'• fin 11 " 111 " i]II " IIII " " Inf 11 " nil " BI11 " Rill " " IIII It 11111 " Kill " IIII " " Ilsl It 0 ' 1111 " �IIIi " IIII " " fill 11 •• 11111 " milli " IIII " " IIII 11 Q " " Milli " fill " " IIII 11 " 1111 II III" mill " III 11 '• fill if " 1 11 " A ° Iilt " " Itlt II •' mall " fill 11 '• III I II " .WI �.IIl IIII nil 11 •...... ":IIII " 2.11 Ifll 1, 11 11I .... © "milli" IN " IIIIWllll "HIN �' nil II 1111 Iw1nn ... ... 1.1 1., ...:.1 .•.... NORTH ELEVATION ( MIAM! RIVER VIEW ) 21"ATgM RDT..I - 1 .MOOTM.111CCDram /: D.t:O11ATNR RAt11G 2. UP YOM A1LM,.UM DOORMS W1AlOW nUUYE" 4. O■EM METAL GMILLU L GR®1 TMDED GLUS K= O DOOM AND VIO DOWS T, DECORATIVE MRAL ►A11ELS L ALUM" M RARIMW VRIII VDKWAL NCRRE ■n".R 1011 aAMM . O. ■ I IO Ill .11 all 1.. ..—. ... w w w In w m w m .�. , •••• 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 ........ .....•.......•.......E'illls�! ! 1..e L � a _ TOAOOF IIEfl9 � ! TO ROOF 3 ! a .a.rr re/111aaE . ava ai M. m M m _ m m m m — Z . m Q m m m F•-i 0-' 0 0 m a�� m U m > >- E- 15: c W w� O Y _ /87FXIOI OUX Cn E..OIBL C2--rL7— SCALE: 1' Xr-W WPM =4 . .a .. o•..Ic Rot A AA Subnt itted into the pubH.- R record in conneca 3 it on _ f WEST ELEVATION ( BRICKELL AVENUE VIEW ) • EBTA■, SHMGRAOE.Qa WT AT. IJdtLO.VD. • PHASE I LOBBY WTAT-WromVA • l/ME A LOBBY SETAT. WrILQVA o ii " ll iti ii' n sill "i . fill Ili all "' "' Ila ii 'i " " oil "' "' Ila " sosill '•• '•' lift " ■11 "' "' III " " oil m nl fin 11 ■II "' "' fin " " Ell Ila " Ell Ila It ■i11.1111 Ila t. 11 all Ilt Ilt Ila 11 H I♦n 111 1f1 1I O 11 Nil 1.B t11 Ili tt ll .Il Ilt 111 Ila It 11 nil 111 IIt fin 11 O " /11 m u' Jim '1 n oil m n' Ila '1 .. If ... t11 [is t1 u fill n1 u1 nst u " nil " "' fin " 4 " nil m ul 11\ Ell list " sit to u1 Ila 11 Ell It1 IU Ili 11 11 Ell Ila " OL" - [Ell 111 III III " n full at u' III• n © ° ■11 In u' 11� ° u liliil m w 11 Q .. ■S n ■■ 1:111 .. .. .■ .■ ■I) ■. r■ ■1 O •. ! rn a :■ r :i r■ u �� •� u r �� ii ii :i i� ii is ■. ■■ �� a a■ ■t a� mui FM N ms s o a �If'f.Irl., • .. -. .- r- . .. O SOUTH• ARVATIM MOM 9-0 be— .1 • .nm. IsaR ti .lot a o rw r iTi • N 3H g al � t# �� TO DECORATIVE EITL CASE (4 E Slll AT QNBIS OnX*4 11 ::IIIII:: 11 " 111 " 11 11111111 IIIIII� It !: 111 3111!li "!111 II 1 II "IIIII "'Ills "" I Ill "IIIII 1,10111 "" l IN '• lli e@ UI "IIIII plix If "Ulf " Ill "IUII D IIIs II II ! 11 11 1 III "fill "Ill/ II II 1 f1 11 1 Il! "lllll "' 111 "" I II fi 11 III "IIIII all "" ! II It It tl " fill "p,fis "' I If If 11 11 It nlll II ILI III, I t "Ilill "fill '"' I If 11 It It " Of " Is B " I. . II ItU 11 IIV His I"' I 11 11! I II Ip 11 II I It It n " 11111 "4I11 " ' 1 • Il 1l { oil ° " I IU "ili "alll"' • It Of "1t11 "" iill • It H "Ign "nil "" I 11 11 11 III "IIJI "111p 11 11 1 11 If 111 "]fill "His "° I III "Ifill "Ills ° ° I fl i If 1 iI "flip "ills '' " I " D'nil " _ 1 11 1 1 III Im ° I III "[fill I'Ifnf "° I . 11 l 11 I It " 1111 ° 111111 II II 1 11' "IIIII "'nls "" I . 11 I 11 "Hill "'fill "" I 11 1 I6 "fill U "'ills "" I III " fill • °' Its ° ° I ■. .. . It "IIAI "'flip "" I III: "IUII "'fill II II �� • I Ill. I111!n IIIIIIs 11 II .. .. .� w I =IIE� "1t,11 'Ills""I _ iIlllilttlll slslll ii�®r MINIMUM IMMMMMI a r �� 7 SH nnoa i� sraianaa sLora cuss w.atws v17H MMN MT PARTIAL NORTH EAST ELEVATION SCALE: WT 9 9W Wm wu«ar ooau "a *vwx auua suoonc aum ram MWOMmm000ft Wff" GPONna z 0 n n O0� a- U� � a W E- 0 W wL aY r 0 Y _ V U ova cn zrz.ln C �� sir eu�Ea Oubmitted Into the publia 4,22 record {�-n�connec ion,Iw�,lt�' TD► of Roof MECFLhNICK TOP OF ROOF J __ �EL %]98—d q .aRo noon .xMo FLOOR •la noon 3m FLOOR 21M BOOR aSM FLOOR pM RDOR . ' t>rro neon • 2JrD Roan-------.-.------ — ' . ` 21a FLOW --'---'- ----- -- 1n noon 4 TTH FLOOR - ' 23M noon--------- --___-- a•1M ' 22M1I noon _T__ ----- ' ------ - 17M BOOR IOM nnoR I•M FLOOR (IlM FLooR MOT USTD)'-_-----_ _. I2M noel ' RECRFATpN DECK ib _ _ IIM FLOW PKG lw V 12_.__--__-- F.L. +90'-11' _....... _ P-12 P-II v_Io P-Y P-a - P-7 -- P-S D PKG LEVEL 2 Loser P11ASE n EL +1'-O' --- P-2 '"2 . . P.asE • 8/SENENT l£VEL PwLSE_Y! 0 EL -B•-C .. _.- . BUILDING -SECTION SCALE : 1'=20'-(r TOP or oECORATTVE STRUCIURE • EL ++x•-(t TOP OF ROOF (YECNULGI.) " J TOP Di MROOF � —T ELiS7 L W N z N z� 0° O U E- � � a • 17M FLOW f"�M' O ' M FLOOR ^�•• . - ISM FLOOR (IJ FLOOR NOT OSM) NM FLOW rm• nnoR 12TN FLOOR Q P"IM cue Otu CUM - rRN FLOOR_ - RECREATION DECK 101% ROW PM noon P-IO Y IIM xenon' P-. 7M FLOOR 7 FL11 FLOOR- P-7 ►-a SM FLOOR . P-S 11N FLOOR ]PI! FLOOR ]RD FLMR EL +32•-ir KSME r-2 2-27 ME72NMIE MEZSANNE r-a - EL +20'-T :� MEM�J01 o-lO ....... .. -r-- ..-• .,IoeeY PMATEI - LOBBY PWLSE I .. �.....:................ .....:... - y�,i} n!o EL T•� j •m (+LT-(Y N.yv�G.V$rt 17+ i � ' a BASEMEM;, - 9 Waite Foemar� Ciiy Clerk WET 14LO • 1 a. PTO'-d AM now 3M FLOOR S•M FLOOR 17R0 FLOOR ]2W FLOOR ]1ST F1LGi wM neW 211M noon 2m. neeR _ M I A M I R I V E R rs boo PHASE 2 C=)a a 0 0 ----------------- :s FUR CL: = tso z — — — — — — — — — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 In > Z�i &E gg EXISTING SHERATON HOTEL PARKING GARAGE uy ;..I o _ Wt C8, lbl:. LANDSCAPE SITE FLAN. 17 —iiC .5utgriffleu RI• M SCALE VIV =,ry oction wit ofi "i � record in connoc 40—n L'L-- -- item VEIL 11 h Waiter Foeman e,*... flfrfr E RECREATION DECK PLAN SCALE 1/16r = Y-0' COCONU, PALMS (20' HT.) TYPICAL BAYWALK SECTION . SCALP 1/8' MIAMI RIMER TYPICAL DETAIL. BAYWALK -PLANTING PLAN N.T.S. 95~ 595 Submitted into the public recordp tonne i�wit, item �j on V 'ter Foeman TOE NAIL BRACE TO 2-x 4" WOOD BATTEN RED FLAGGING TAPE - ON BRACE 27x 4- WOOD BRACE- (3 TOTAL) CUT AWAY STRING AT BASE AND FOLD BACK MATERIAL COVERING ROOTBALL.� u 2•x47x12 FOOT PAD - FOR SOFT" SOIL CONDITIONS SUCH AS SAND. SURRIED 3 FT. BELOW GRADE. 1 METAL STRAPS SECURING 2''x 4" WOOD BA mis 5 LAYERS BURLAP 3• DEEP LAYER OF APPROVED MULCH 13ACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER .2-x 4' WOOD STAKE GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL. OR EXISTING GRADE UNEXCAVATED FOR SUPPORT 1=t I J(=1 11=1 11 l I 1 1 I r PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. PLANT LIST QL au.aeszlosa t911L taAr As chzlm rxL IAAczLtORc (IAL.lOb ,i•Ka• M., S. c-T. acA t A ,•c.. , C. QLII !] CIAS1oMIA avrrzrlaA ,r1 a7rSIA) .• , )•. ,au. aJn L Cl IOiu (1,27101 r i•• S•ilA..)ait. mfs ]: Lvoatocuws I. s771TCRrt (stsvir nmoMMoco) A. K s', Rtt mrc a corns soe]rnA •ar.KAIAIu•u•-Io• rots. (Cltm taTATAr LOmI•Vz.rALti !p[c s 1110LtIc ALQSrA1'A ls• rI-, Mr.. • IrUKI(A !QD a 1'Aodix pQ6IrzL fitatl fYli IATA) i' i t•,SLl1(j. IIli� sAfA a7 YYL lASJtti10 Auq aTLICL lVII ,)0 /CASYOiA IAIX a•-ls• C.1• 7l- S. ] C. M. - (AfAOI WIA) IM]tA ]] I1D))MAx DIASA )•- .• RT. (1%ASa lALM) IOIW a OGmPmr11A r00M 1s75 IIoOmAnm LLtA CIAAAA•txf• ,i--ta•srA... c. (orAII1 IoocAlrvlu:A) eAAs iol alum AlL)ZQPI Ia-m.,) c. .ILA ,o.% lai�Nt •"r_71f."A ,a- (S Wm LILr) I3cC aI3 LIIIZ c •crLM: clA - S]-r „•, t c. IGTArr LILT Sass)1 m5c Is rKlx=oo*w SGLUP ]o•c ]fl•, ) C. (T•MILOO[roAOM) "is 171 IIDlt ,Motu Il'r :•-, ) G. (IMRY rAKTMIIM) clI SrAS ,]o srasoKAt aatar timA ]]s aRrAju,AN tV1c1 ,sj • ,a:L ]a• IiARS.RASOIii cAASLi LIGHLBOLLARD t TYPICAL UTTER CONTAINER M.Ts Ir,6 urwco oK ..r.o.to tou.y Tri NA f—trnr•a•• trivw s.-n wraa r.re r — — — •.A.e.a r w• t-.�w w r•r •t. M awq•eM,t wl.a•a N r•7 INN FIN lwde) N Inrt ./ O vol O11(b �NO. 12 3 PERIZ R GUY WIRE 0 nl�i o O 0PROTECT TREE WITH RU88ER HOSE BENCH Is -a I- LENGTnS) - ..r.s. (MIN. 3 PER TREE) 0 `9' I..c.•.c,..ou.t.•..osct o+....o.totw.t� co S DEEP LAYER OF RED FLAGGING TAPE APPROVED MULCH ON BRACE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL YA 47x 8•-0• STAKES (3 PER TREE) SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER PLANT uATERTAt. SNALL.NOr DE PRUNED PRIOR To INSTALLATION. AFTER PLANTS NAVE BEEN INSTALLED. EACH PLANT SHALL T DEEP (A,ER of BE PRUNED FOR UNtrokulT/, APPROVEO MULCH UNDCOVER SPACING _ _ AFTER INS7ALLATTON, CUT CRO vAR1ES r1 TN SPEC tES STRING AND REuOVE "LAP —.I I I' l I I lZ" 1� II � II 11�' , TROY TOP OF ROOT BALL. LSCE PLANT LIST) I —I _ GRANULAR FlILLE MATEMATERIALIER. OR BACKFAl MTN PLANTING SOIL ♦ •A -III-_- 1-ilil IIEXISTING- IIIII-I — STAKES TO BE )U' _ BELOW PIT IN EXISTING SUBGRADE - fLL "TER-. OR {�..t 1� L j ELCAVATE TO A YINLut w DEPTH WNE)LGYATED TOR SUPPORT E,K7 f/tApE OF IV AND BACK1 ILL wit" TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING SOIL r.r.S N.T.S. o% �� I; s a 40 Q x O co W Miami- River 1& 30 IS 20 REMOVE MFI • rA IEIICADENDRON/MElALILICS pCO[ IMiTSPIG UNDf90.FAKE SPECIES / FOSSIN6 17, d 10 10 REMOVE MUSA PARAOIpA[A SAMENCUF MNANA Ib 10 22 Id RELOCATE OFF3M RIRSERA SWARU6AXIIM/0 UM00 pFAp — 19. 94 75 40 REMOVE F1QIS MEKMMINA 100TIC� WEEM"GRENLSMIN FIO TOOL4 C'ETUMOVE.UNOESIRCA KEV 20. 24 ZO 25 tilQ1DOTf1`OP'P'SIP "lluVEI SYZTGIUM NMiNlfi wem AN PWM MES /MSSING WALKICANE DAMAGE 21_ is 20 23 REMOVE LOCUS MUCIMAICOCONUT OEAD TRUNK 2Z d S 20 REMOVE "nC711A ME0.R111M.DONIOIA 23. B 10 10 REMOVE RRASAIA ACTINOPIMLAISCREFF6ERA MfiSRI. UNDF9REAKEES 24. 30 30 35 44A9Kl2M a Cb2QDRA tMFEAAREAGRAPE DFSTIOTED RT HURRICANE 23, 6 12 IS REMOVE CTJQUIDdA WIFEA4/1FaC'AIAPE 26. 24 20 2S �OIFMO COCZVCORA UVIFERA/gwGRAPE oEs1ROTpsTMIARWAME 27. 24 24 IS 23 20 20 REMOVE #bBBAR9Ff51iE COOCOtOZA UVIFFRAIS:.AGRAPE CDCLOYi DBA UVIFERAISFAGRAM DES7RA DTEDRrMR1CAME OFSOlD1b lY1R1RR1C.tlIE DESTROY4D KHWRDCANE 7a 29_ 24 20 20 REMOVE BRASSAIA ACTNpryFTUw150tEFFLERA UNOFyREAWE SPECIES 30. 36 17 23 a sbeeNL�fFSRf p00001ncA uVIFERA/SEACRAPE Of.STROTEORrHGIR/GIF� 3l.i 3025 25 REMOVE NRASAIA ACIIMOry YLLAiSCNEFFLEWA UKDFSIREAKESPECIES 32 33. 24 12-' 2S REMOVE I MElAt.EUCA LDJCAD MRDN/ME1AUEUCA UNpFyRT,A!<tpEQES 6 12 REMOVE KJRSFRA S7MARIRA/LLMK7 LIMBO 'MO SMALL AND IN MD SHAPE 6 34 3 S S REMOVE OIRTSALIOOCAAPUS UlfE507yARWA PAUI . 35 3 3 10 REMOVE SCAEWIA Pt11M1ERUWKWRRY MiSfOT. - X 12 i 12 REMOVE SC'AE10IA M3IMIFRUINKOERRY A 37. 30 10 3S WAp/1MC"IUNIA RO A/WAptING'RW MLM MISmF6 vgYT/LL.L F pOHHOt10U5TO EXtFnN iKA DO4G I IRIRWAma DnMAGE