Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-95-059495- RESOLUTION NO. 51) 4 A RESOLUTION REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING THE VARIANCE FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, INTENSITY, TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 3.22' (5.0' REQUIRED) AND A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 1.0' (20.0' REQUIRED) FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 575 NORTHWEST 59TH AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SUBJECT TO A TIME LIMITATION OF 30 DAYS IN WHICH TO REMOVE THE ROOF OVERHANG ENCROACHING ON AN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND TO A TIME LIMITATION OF 12 MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of June 5, 1995, Item No. 2, duly adopted Resolution ZB 61-95 by a five to four (5-4) vote, denying the variance, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, an appeal has been taken to the City Commission by the applicant from the denial of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter, and notwithstanding the recommendation of the Zoning Board, finds that there are peculiar circumstances affecting this parcel of land and that practical difficulties and unnecessary i hardships do exist which would impair the owner's right to the CITY CobMSSION MEETING OF J U L 13 1995 Revolution No. 95-- 594 Section 2. The decision of the Zoning Board in this matter is reversed and the request for a variance from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-1 Single -Family Residential, Intensity, to permit a side yard setback of 3.221 (5.0' required) and a rear yard setback of 1.0' (20.0' required) for an existing addition to a single family residence located at 575 Northwest 59th Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lot 8, Block 8, WEST FLAGLER PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 96 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, zoned R-1 Single -Family Residential, per plans on file, subject to a time limitation of thirty (30) days in which to remove the roof overhang encroaching on an adjacent property, and to a time limitation of twelve (12) months in which a building permit must be obtained, is hereby granted. 2 - 5- 564 shall become PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th da of July 1995. i STEP EN P. CLAR MAYOR ATTEST: TER J. F CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: G. IRIAM MAER CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: I J NES, II CI A Y amk/GMM/W214.DOC - 3 - 95- 594 LOCATION/LEGAL 575 N.W. 59th Avenue (Complete legal description with the Hearing Boards Division). APPLICANT/OWNER William & Maria Scharf 575 N.W. 59th Avenue Miami, Florida 33126 266-2702 ZONING R-1 Single -Family Residential. REQUEST Variances from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, R-1 Single -Family Residential, Conditional Principal Uses, to permit a side yard setback of 3.22' (5.0' required) and a -.rear yard setback of 1.0' (20.0' required) for an existing addition to a single family residence; zoned R-1 Single -Family Residential. RECOMMENDATIONS: PLANNING, BLDG & ZONING Denial. PUBLIC WORKS No comments. PLAT AND STREET N/A. DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No comments. - ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: N/A Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Lien Recorded On: N/A Total Fines To Date: N/A - CEB Action: N/A HISTORY ANALYSIS The Planning Building and Zoning Department is recommending denial of the requested setback variances for an addition built to an existing single family residence based on the following findings: 1) the subject property is of standard configuration and has a net lot area of over 5800 sq.ft. (larger than the ave age lot size of 5000 sq.ft. within the city), and a literal interpretation of the requiremen s of the zoning ordinance would therefore not deprive the applicant of the rights enjoyed y others within the same zoning district; there is no hardship to justify the setback variance `equests; and 2) the subject addition is.designed to easily function as an illegal unit, which in conjunction with the overcrowding of this property already, would further add to the detrimental effect this variance has on the neighborhood; it has further been determined that the subject addition contains a roof overhang which actually encroaches on the neighboring property. ZONING BOARDDenied. (Res. No. 61-95) APPELLANT William and Maria Scharf. 9 5 - 594 CITY COMMISSION N/A. APPLICATION NUMBER 95- 382 Page 1 June 5, 1995 Item# 2 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE JJ APPLICATION NUMBER 95- 382 Yes No N/A I X Special conditions and circumstances exist which are 1 peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings ii the same zoning district. X The special conditions and circumstances are a direct result from the actions of the petitioner. X Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 11000 deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue hardship on the petitioner. X Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. X The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes i possible t e reasonable use of the land, building, or i structure. X The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. June 5, 1995 Item# 2 Page 2 05/30/95 Peter W.P. groulp architect and planner t9ate. � 15 l3 -50 Catatonia Avenue ' . Suite #502 me: i coral nobles, florida 33134 tel. 305/448-3311 project fax no: 305-442-1713 City of Miami Building and Zoning Dept. 275 NW 2nd Street Room 226 P.O. Box 33078 Miami, FL 33128 Attn: Mrs.'Terisita Fernandez Chief of Hearing Board Dear Mrs.Fernandez: � Re: 575 NW 59th Avenue, Miami, FL A/k/a/ Lot 8 Blk Flagler Park PB 8-96 in the Public Records of Dade. County, FL William M & Maria SCHARF City Commission Hearing June 5, 1995 Board of Appeal (Appl. No: 95-382) (Letter of Appeal) The above homeowners attended a City Commission Hearing on June 5, 1995 #95-382 at which time the matter of the setbacks on the rear of the property was addressed. To their shock and surprise Ms. Lourdes SLEZKY made mention of an 6" overhang encroaching on the neighbor's property. This item was not shown on the Agenda for June 5, 1995 hearing and therefore was not included in the variance. However, the corrections were made on the construction documents on April 12, 1995 as per Mr. Marco Fernandez. The problem for the Scharfs, Mr. William and his 72 year old wife, Maria started when they hired Mr. Alfredo Saltos who at the time was dating their niece. Mr. Saltos represented to the Scharfs that he is a General Contractor, Architect and Engineer and has been active in the City of Miami Building and Zoning Department on the Planning and Zoning Board for 12 years. The Scharfs felt perfectly safe and assured that Mr. Saltos could perform in a professional -like manner as he had promised. In September of 1993 the construction began and of course, I believe you know the rest of the story. To her horror Mrs. Scharf found out that there were no permits, no licenses and that Mr. Saltos was a fraud. She then turned to the City of Miami Building and Zoning Department for help and advise. The City told her to get an architect. I was then retained by Mrs. Scharf in July of 1994. At this time we started the `as built' documents and the engineering necessary to bring the illegal 95- 594 E City of Maimi Building & Zoning Dept. Miami, FL June 19, 1995 Page: 2 Re: Hearing June 5, 1995 Appl.No. 95-382 Letter of Appeal structure up to code. We would also like to state in this letter that the 6" will be cut out of the overhang so that it does not encroach on the neighbor's property. This will be accomplished prior to the meeting withthe City Commission. Mr. Scharf is 72 years old with a heart condition and Mrs. Scharf is his 74 year old wife. They are both senior citizens with fixed income and hardly have the ability to increase their income greatly to overcome such additional expenses. As the architect working with them, I view this as a hardship case and ask your understanding in their plight. My experience with them have been law-abiding and good citizens just trying to live the rest of their lives out in peace and they at this time can ill -afford any added expense. I request on their behalf to the Hearing Board that the request for the setback be granted. Mr. Scharf has wanted this room which was added for his hobby which is electric trains and which he has worked many hard years for. He has told me that if he cannot have this space for his trains his dreams would be shattered. Thanking you for your kind consideration in this matter. Yours very truly 95- 594 Mr. Henry Crespo offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 61-95 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE VARIANCES FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, R-1-SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, INTENSITY, TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 3.22- (51.0° REQUIRED) AND A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 1.0' (20'-O': REQUIRED) FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 575 N.W. 59TH AVENUE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 8, WEST FLAGLER PARK SUBDIVISION (8-96) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY; ZONED R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. led by Mr. Humberto Hernandez issed and adopted by the following vote: Mses. Hernandez and Morales. Messrs. Crespo, Hernandez and Barket. Ms. Basila. Messrs. Carman, Luaces and M ran—Ribeaux. Mr. Arsenio Milian. Motion carries 5-4. June 5, 1995 Zoning Board Item# 2 5"'. 95- 594 ,tr , ZONING BOARD ACTION 0. ,•ETITION FOR VARIANCE 2` MOTION: I v that the request on agenda item be denied (granted) in that the requirements of on 1903.1 (were) (were not) satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing.'�.i a) as stated in the City's findof fact, or b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or c) on the basis of the following: The zoning Board shall make findings that all oof�hm..requirema s and standards of Section 1903.1 (havebeen fhave not been) demonstrtated. CHECK ONE a) Special conditions and circumstances (exiat)_Lgja— or E]►l.H not exist) which are peculiar to the land, STATEI�PT'P a ruc re --or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. Zi) in the findings fact as stated City's of 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) .as otherwise stated below: b) The special conditions and`C-ircumstances( do (do not) result from the actions of the petit over: �1) as stated in the-City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: c) Literal interpretation of .t,h";nptoye ons of the zoning ordinance (woul (would eprive the applicant of rights co d by othez' properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner: 1) as stated ih the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: 95- 594 7 d) Granting the varia. requested (will) will;no?convey the same treatment to the in owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, for structures in the same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _,. 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. f) If granted the variance (will be) ill not b in harmony with the general intent and a of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare: 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: SignAture G Date Item _ e 95- 594 TO AIRPARK PLAZA TRACT W .,n�, /rir�++a .an��¢:s .o+�►,�s. .�+�. .n nnn�; ��1i�`�� Mils lax �.-bmft am 003PFUM113 mv Lu�m Em m � t"WaE3. MWOM OrTw L� Obi mm � E�Mmw UUMME m KIM, F Ism moffrm a: . ®Ifs®03X I�awvj �Uum JEW mm� �mm �Iml " � = as� aom am do aMcm ism osaumi am mm WOW= -mm .1.4 EMM-REW MAM -31W-I-qujlu 4m Mm MMOLM ENU Mal LIJL Imm;aamm Eto AM IW�= INS 3m3lluj sun ME= E-JIMM M-MMM UMMM Elm aJFM EM 9 —'Ins Nm am mkl� � s0 Ism Elm um, Immw NEW, "A= -mom ®Wml mum= wmw, �W= �ww MMIIMOW ENLUMEW ON= Strip m MM NIM tEW-NEW 1=9 my., Im 'Im .two ORMidEMMI 01M MM Ism wo amm �Ilm EMI MIN mom w mam■E077% EL M mom mom we "AlIM O.&K,,mm 9F. . Mmm mffms mqp"m q! s . i ♦rK� �Y. i>t <k 1 ,i\ Y < . < \VAC �'�;Gy\yt\�\•f,,�}\? �\� YAS.�S v2� `�,yy a 'R� ve L I, z ?< PETITION FOR VARIANCE' File Number A variance is relaxation of the terms of the ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the appliltant, a literal enforcement of this ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in this ordinance, a variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards and other open spaces and off-street parking or loading require. ments. (Section 1901) IMaria L.Scharf ,.hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a variance from the ter�gs�of N� ''I,Qr,�ihng Qrdinances of the City of Miami,,, affecting property located at 7 N �7�y Avenue Miami as specified below. In support of this application, the following material is submitted: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by i State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. ✓� 2. Four copies of: the site plan showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping etc; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. i 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach to application). �' ) Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. S. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improve- ments). 6. Other (Specify) I> 7. Fee of to apply toward the cost of processing, based on the following: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) ............. $ 20000 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for'each variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot ........... $ 30.00 Minimum ................................... $ 600.00 All other applications for each variance from the ordinance, per square foot of gross floor area of new building(s) or additions, based upon the definition of floor area (section 1901) ............. $ 0.07 Minimum ................................... $ 550.00 95- 594 41414 Application for variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per variance: CS, PR, R-1, R-21......................... $ 200.00 All other residential districts .......... $ 350.00 All nonresidential districts ............. $ 450.00 Extension of time for variance ........... $ 400.00 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed six hundred and fifty dollars ($650), except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and - seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. (City Code Section 62-61) 8. The variance requested is for relief from the provisions of section of the City of Miami. Zoning Ordinance as follows: /J.•/ 00 9. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Subsection 1903.1 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) 9217 ` L�7L %i7�,vfrxr moo ✓�. �'���' 6'" ' 13 95-'594 (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner -in that: ;.Tnk-iowingly hired an ualicesed co-itractor wno held hinself out to be an architect, engineer, and licensed contractor and was to complote work up to turned key. See Attched. ?hases I, II, and III-. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by -other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: In that would prevent petitioner from completingrwor'f oa structure that was started on 9/28/93. (d) Granting the variance requested will not confer o1: the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: In nb way grainting of this variance will help to correetthe special condition and circunstan_ ces that did not result from the action of the petitioner. (e) The variance, if granted, is the MiniwA variance that will make possible the • reasonable use of the land, building, or structure in that: This variance if granted, is the minim,un variance that will rake possible the reaunnable use of the land., or structure. 95-"594 s� (f) The grant of the variance O ll be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other - Nisi detrimental to the public melfare. i /III � -� n�/ �I /u �-/ l� n. �; t�•�1,-� Note: All documents reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application. Signature _ Owner or Authorized Agent ._... Name LL r/���1 Address J 7 5" /1 %ZL J % A I /////V STATE OF FLORIDA) SS: J /= _ -/ COUNTY OF DADS .! is H - (_�: being duly sworn, deposes and sayi that he is. the (Owner)(Authorized Agent of Owner) of the real property described in answer to Question 01 above; that he has read the"fortgoing answers and that the sue are true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this petition on behalf of the owner. (Name) SWORN TO AND SU C� be re me this day / 199 ,r Notary Public, SIVate of Florida at LargO My Commission Expires: OFFI=NOTARATEREDEZNOTARY PF FLORIDACOMM340274MY COMN. 6,1998 101 95-'594 - 1� (f) The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other• Nise detrimental to the public Neifare. - C,Q, U//�7 vi✓-lel!'!7 %� ���r dal �— �G 7 Note: All documents, reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application. Signature/,0/111",�,�-" Z lit 9 Qwne Authors ed Agent Naawe Address 6`7S— ii.GU STATE OF FLORIDA) /�!/� 7Z4 3 /26 SS: ,r�,g-/�/,�,� sa�� v yac /3 COUNTY OF DADE _4l 706 Rt lo 2_421 being duly sworn, deposes and sayi that he is the (owner Authorized Agent of Owner) of the real property described in answer to question /1 above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the tan are true and co+apidte; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this PQtitionr on behalf of the owner. ) SWORN TO AND SUB=CRIB bere methisay QL�- 199 _ Notary public, StaAdIFlaridli4t —Large My Comission Expires: OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL TERESITA L FFR' NANDFZ MITARY PUBLIC STATE COF FLORIDA OMMISSJON NO, CC-44 MY COM-,�iSStov 0274 Exr, JAN. 6, 79.98 95- 594 ,fkti .14l+kk AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared �fl to who being by as first duly sworn, upon oath, .deposes and says: 1. That he is thq owner, or the 1e941 representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11006 of the. Code of the City of Misai. Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he repMents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to a;t_in their behalf for the chan9s.or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of toning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That, the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the: the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and doeuamts submitted in cunJunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affient sayeth not. , JSEAQ (Name) 1 Sworn to and Subscribed before ma thi834y of , 1g No SE NOT. TARY PUBLIC ERNANDEZ r AL EMS95— ATE OF FLORIDA o C 74 r P. AN. 6,14 Notary Public, State of Florida at dagN'6,I�s 9 5 _ 5 94 �'I yti,4-%v2• U c�1 5` " , who being by me first duly sworn. upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the caner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the. Code -of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for his to ags„in their behalf for the change, or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, malting addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real prop" of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts a represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiarnt saypth not. ' (SEAL) Sworn to and Subscribed before N OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL TERESITA L FERNANDEZ �,,��� NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA thist:�Y 'ay 4f COMMISSION NO. CC340274 MY COMMISSION EXP. )AN.6,1998 i Notary Public, State of Florida at La 95- 594 r _ OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name _ �I�,li�?,�/ �i'r s/Afro Mailing Address �'"'�S .�tJ ��/ •'r/ Telephone Number Legal Description: T g ��,��✓:Ct�c. Owner's Name Mailing Address s'lc% d9 Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Nailing. Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 95- 594 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Notet City of Mitsui Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question /2-requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any otiror interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. — M +4 K / A Sc 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question'112, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. Pl tic OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } %' .('',J being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the" (Please Print) (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question /1 above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same ,are true and complete and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. SWORN TO AND SU® RI9E before s+e this day of 19 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: / V" %/ r 2,''/ (SEAL Signature of Owner or Attorney forOwner 17) Notary Public, State of Florida at L OFFICIAL NOTARY SE L TERESITA L FERNANDIZ NO ARY PUaLIC STATE OF aORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC340274 MY COMMISSION EXP. AN. 61998 9 5 - 5Z`J4 1400: :DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Idr 9 r7 D �oszip,� 3 /zL< 2.Owner(s),of subject real property and percentage of ownership, Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, end/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. �ylJ- / yi5�?�i�• �G z..�c•f�gr�,X ,✓�� ©Gu ,ram G•x J'i�/.�' _ 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question-P2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. /10AI&— ���� 'a4 OWNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: - COUNTY OF DADE } being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Please Print) (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question !1 above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same •are.true and complete and (if acting, as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the disclosure of Ownership form on behalff of the owner. (SEAL) Signature of Owner or Attorney for Owner SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me -this day of 196.� i h T' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Notary Pub1 S ate`of Florida at arge OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL TERESITA L FERNANDEZ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC340274 MY COMMISSION EXP, JAN. 6,1998 �I 95— 594