Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-95-0141J-95-801(b) 2/9/95 RESOLUTION NO. 9 5 — 141 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD AND GRANTING THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 5'-0" (10'-0" REQUIRED WHEN ABUTTING AN 110" OFFICE DISTRICT) FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CAR WASH ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 3400 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN); ZONED C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT APPLICANT SHALL, WITHIN 90 DAYS, APPLY FOR A PERMIT FOR AN EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT OF 20 SPACES TO BE BUILT AT 3490 BIRD ROAD, MIAMI, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, SAID PARKING LOT TO BE OPERATIONAL WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND, FURTHER, SUBJECT TO A TIME LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FOR THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING CAR WASH. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of September 12, 1994, Item No. 3, duly adopted Resolution No. ZB-78-94 by a seven to one (7-1) vote, denying the variance as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the applicant has taken an appeal to the City Commission from the denial of the variance; and TTACIALMENIT (5) CONTAINED I .MTY COMasS;o x MEETING OF FEB n 9 1995 Resolution No. 95— 141 WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter, and notwithstanding the decision of the Zoning Board, finds that there are peculiar circumstances affecting this parcel of land and that practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships do exist which would impair the owner's right to the reasonable use of the property without the grant of variance as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this i Section. Section 2. The decision of the Miami Zoning Board in this matter is reversed, and the request for a variance from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, C-1 Restricted Commercial, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a reduction of a side yard setback of 5'-0" (10'-0" required when abutting an 110" Office District) for a proposed addition to an existing car wash establishment located at 3400 South Dixie Highway, Miami, Florida, more particularly described f on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, zoned C-1 Restricted Commercial, subject to the condition that applicant shall, within 90 days, apply for a permit for an employee parking lot of 20 spaces to be built at 3490 Bird Road, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, said parking lot to be 95- 141 operational within 6 months from the date of this Resolution, and, further, subject to a time limitation of twelve months in which a building permit must be obtained for the addition to the existing car wash, is hereby granted. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February , 1995. STEPIMN P. CLARK, MAYOR ST: MA RAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: G. MIRIAM MAER CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CI TTO SM003,DOC 95- 141 -3- EXHIBIT "A" The North 22 feet of Lot 38, and all of Lots 39 through 44, inclusive, less the North 10 feet and the West 10 feet thereof, and less the South 10 feet of the North 20 feet of Lot 44, Block 1, of "Carter's Addition to Coconut Grove", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 101, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and Lot 23 of "Palmhurst in Coconut Grove", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, at Page 22, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and Lots 21 and 22, "Palmhurst in Coconut Grove", according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, at Page 22, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Street Address: 3490 Bird Road, Miami, Florida. 95- 141 ZONING FACT SHEET LOCATION/LEGAL 3400 South Dixie Highway Lot 1, HERBERT L. STEVENS (79-94) PRDC. APPLICANT/OWNER James Confalone Herminio San Roman, Esq. 3400 S. Dixie Highway Miami, Florida ZONING C-1 Restricted Commercial. REQUEST Variance from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of .the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, C-1 Restricted Commercial, Permitted Principal Uses, to allow a reduction of a side yard setback of 5'-0" (10'-0" required) when abutting an "0" (Office) district; zoned C-1 Restricted Commercial. RECOMMENDATIONS: PLANNING, BLDG & ZONING Denial. PUBLIC WORKS No comments. PLAT AND STREET N/A. DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No comments. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: N/A Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Lien Recorded On: N/A Total Fines To Date: N/A CEB Action: N/A HISTORY Continued from ZB 6/13/94 to 7/11/94 and continued from 7/11/94 to 9/12/94. Zoning Board denied this variance by Res. ZB 78-94 with a vote of 7-1. ANALYSIS There is no hardship to Justify the requested setback variance for a proposed addition to an existing commercial/carwash establishment. Reasonable use of the property is currently being achieved without the variance request. Since this is new construction, it should be designed to meet all zoning requirements. The parking and vehicular circulation on the site is also currently a problem and could get worse if not addressed as part of the proposed addition. Based on these findings, including the current adverse effects to the surrounding properties. The Planning, Building and Zoning Department is recommending denial of the application as presented. ZONING BOARD Denied. (Res. No. 78-94) 9 5 - 1 4 APPELLAMT Mr.Roman,Esq.forApplicant CITY COMMISSION Cont'd. to CC 1/26/95. " APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 264 Page 1 September 12, 1994 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 264 Yes No N/A X Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. X The special conditions and circumstances are a direct result from the actions of the petitioner. X Literal interpretation of the provisions of Zoning Ordinance 11000 deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue hardship on the petitioner. X Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. X The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes. possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. X The grant of this variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance and is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. September 12, 1994 Iteml 3 Page 2 08/30/94 95 141 r . w • �, (I S, tJ I b JI i r !t Cho 4Z ' 40)1 z,r f LC !milli! PtRGIYAL +• r ro rr rt rf •, •. .e » �.ra►Mlf• a�,e5i, o .�, .ra. ' I, t • 15 t + , V ! t ♦' is r• ♦. �', a_ '°� `_.� f N u 1141- ,� •+ ,t y K. e r o lo• S.W. „ 7 T E P 4! �• to Mr •• ♦i A . � rf1 ,rr � _ a t • t1ao �! u., ♦a• _i it w•,. 41 .• Ssf. W�!• 26,0r � 1• M ,r rtN M Al rA 111 rff rft 1* iS,�Kr r101r•• t IH A! � ,I• r,0 N Sf ••• •'. tllrnerlo ST, e 2 tt N Is le f r• I• + NOW -owl oil OCT WAN rAt a• ,NO M51 Si r uj Itm30 gggmg �NIP M _�a,. �g�� . gA�ggON ®'40Pwr--* IWN d'd �,M= 1001 o© macs �r.��toum =r=© cif W&MM 00! ®m 0© .M_1•[• O ~tom Ir �® �]l3iliri� Ilfl im= =MUM 13l5Mwows �M mME aces mom `ws �L7 " f�asiut� EMM pool" �'..... MCI W 11 ^Ifi•ir�• .C.1 t i 1 , 1 1 V a MI'... . k:. 0� LAw OmcEs Wr �ECKER&POLIAKOFF, e.A. CITY QF MIAMI PLANNING. CUILD[NG •r, ZC.jIN^a DEPT. BOCA RATON* CLE4�rN�,ATER DAYTONA BEACH* FORT MYEF�+ �� LjM RNE* MIAMI PORT CHARLOTTE* ST. PETERSBURG SARASOTA 4 S" IALLAUE? TAMPA GARY A. PouAKoFF Aun S. BACKER LE RORT J. MANNE ALAN E. TANNENLAW ANTNoNY A. KAwCNE DANIEL S. Roummw SKARoN A. Won GARY C. RosEM ALLEN M. LEVINE LEE H. BURG Rowin L. TANKEt CKARtu N. Terunc STEVEN B. LESSER RICHARD H. BRw MICHELZ 0. MILES HERaw O. Sam, JR. CHAD EN M. MCCLATHEN DAm H. Room ELLEN G, HiRscH DENras A. HAm KEMNETH S. DIPeKroit JOWN E. Al: HARao E. K MICHAEL, X. Z, - PAUL L. WEAN Kw" F. BACKER NANCY E. BARsmn Do" D. Bum AwsoN K. Benom KAnum M. BuROEm C. Jmw CHRISMSEn HowARD D. Comm TNmA J. CowNs STEVEN M. DAVIS Rom M. DE LA CAMAU JAm R. DEFum RANDALL J. DEHAYn JEnwER BALES DRAKE C"m AL1N DRAFEIL STEVEN M. FALK Smm Fenno MARTIN Kum DoRETTA M. KNDEn H. PALL KoRoMn JAN Kona+ MELom I. Kucw HELENA GUtIERREZ MALCHI)W GRACE N. MANNE JAM MARACEK+ EveLYN M. MzKKANT PETER C. MOLL EMARoen SENNETT L. RARIM DAvro H. REwen KAREN E. Rosew RoKxT Ruwww Hewow SAN Roww Jui R. SCKWARTi L. Bwxz Swwm DAwo J. Tu. MK L R. wwff LYNN Sw w W000s AHNL E. ZweT OF COUNSEL MAIM L JAFFE KAY LATv% CAROLY PFDUAM J. DAw PEM atom we"OVAN DMO C. Astmo% COP"TAMT FERFLF.R U.S. Ammmom Tm COuwrA AM DUAL OTHER OFFxXS PRAOM THE CUM RVU X M== Cm, Mooco• .NOT Aa mm IN FLawA *AYALALKZ Rm Conmram BY APPORrt1161T. WATERFORD CENTER PARK C A •t: 00 6161 BLUE LAaH DRIVE I ..-..�i !'It � rrJAMi !. CM1..1 TE PARK SUITE 250 3111 Snxm RoAo MIAM1, FL 33126 FORT LAUOERDALE. FL 33312.6525 DADE (305) 262.4433 FORT LALDERDAIe (305) 9B7.7550 BROWARD (305) 463.7920 FLORIDA TOLL FREE (ON) 432.7712 FLORIDA TOLL FREE (800) 533.4874 FACSIMILE (305) 262.4504 September 26, 1994 Teresita Fernandez, Hearing Boards City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 NAPLES ORLANDO WEST PALM BEACH Re: Appeal of Zoning Board Decision on application 094-264, which was the subject of agenda Item Number Three (3) of the September 12. 1994 Hearing --Resolution #78-94 Dear Ms. Fe:. , andez : In accordance with Section 2002 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, I am hereby requesting to appeal, on behalf of the applicant, James Confalone, the decision of the Zoning Board of the City of Miami on application 0 94-264, which was the subject of agenda item number three (3) of the September 12, 1994 hearing. Miami The bases for the appeal are: 1. Zoning Board's decision was based on issues beyond the scope of the application. 2. Evidence unrelated to the specific subject matter of the application was introduced and considered by the Zoning Board. 3. Zoning Board failed to consider the evidence pertinent to the subject matter of the application. Wherefore applicant respectfully requests that the decision of the Zoning Board be reversed by the City'Commission. Re pectfully, Hermini San Roman For the Firm HSR/mrd 95- 141 7 Mr. Gary M. Carman offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 78-94 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 - OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING _ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 5'-0" (10'-0" REQUIRED WHEN ABUTTING AN "0" OFFICE DISTRICT) FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CAR WASH ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 3400 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, HERBERT L. STEVENS SUBDUISION (79-94) PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY; ZONED',C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL. Upon being seconded by Mr. Arsenio Milian the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mses. Basila, Hernandez & Morales. Messes. Carman, Milian, Crespo and Sands. NAYES: Mr. Lorenzo Luaces. ABSENT: Mr. Barket and Mr. Moran-Ribeaux. Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-1. September 12, 1994 Zoning Board Item# 3 95- 141 ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PETITION FOR VARIANCE MOTION: I ve that the request on agenda item -3 be on (granted) in that the requirements of Sec n 1903.1 (were) (were not) satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing. a) as stated in the City's finds of fact, or as demonstrated by the petitioner, or c) on the basis of the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------- The zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrtated. CHECK ONE a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do OF EACH not exist) which are peculiar to the land, STATEI�NT structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact v 2) .as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: b) The special conditions and circumstances (do not) result from the actions of the petitioner: 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 22) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: c) Literal interpretation of the i2rovisions of the zoning ordinance (would) d no deprive the applicant of rights common y en oyed by other' properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoniflg ordinance and work -- unnecessary and undue hardships on the • petitioner: .1) as stated ih the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated bolow: 95-...14i d) Granting the variance requested (will) iividuRl ) convey the same treatment to the in owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact ✓ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below e) Granting the variance requested (will) will not convey the same treatment, any special pr vilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. f) If granted the variance will b (will not be) In harmony with the genera Gnt and purpose of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare: 7 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact •_ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner p 3) as otherwise stated below: Si aturo q�lz !9� Date 7 Item t 141 CITY OF MIAM1, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : File DATE : January 6, 1995 FILE SUBJECT: 3400 S. Dixie Hwy FROM ' Juan C. Gonzalez, c n REFERENCES: Zoning Administr t �ENCLOSURES This memorandum is for clarification of the required parking for the existing car wash and proposed addition. The current zoning designation of the property is C-1 (Restricted Commercial). The C-1 designation currently requires one (1) parking space per every three hundred (300) square feet of building area, of which four (4) parking spaces are the mandated amount of spaces to be provided on site for the new addition. The existing car wash was built under Zoning Ordinance 9500, which did not mandate parking for car washes, but only stacking spaces for the wash drive-thru which were provided and approved on the site. Therefore, since the existing car wash is considered a legal nonconforming characteristic of use under our present zoning ordinance, since no parking was required for the facility under our past ordinance, and none is provided on site, for the proposed addition, only four (4) spaces need to be provided on site to comply with current code. Furthermore, this does not imply that conditions,' such as additional park=.ng spaces for the employees, cannot be required by the City Como_ ssion, since an appeal of the denial of the application before the Zoning Board was filed by the applicant, and the matter is now before the Commission. JCG: tc Enclosure (1) cc: Teresita L. Fernandez, Chief Hearing Boards Division Zoning file Central file 95- 141 13 PETITION FOR VARIANCE File Number A variance is relaxation of the terms of the ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in this ordinance, a variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards and other open spaces and off-street parking or loading require- ments. (Section 1901) I, ✓�?rrtC.S (LE'r4f/9e_d ereby petition the City of Miani Zoning Board for a variance from the terms of the "Zoning Ordinances of the City of Miami," affecting property located at J?ZepO iaimi as specified below. support of this application, the following material is submitted: -L Four copies of: the site plan showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping etc; building elevations and dimensions 'and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Affidavits disclosing own r e ship of property covered by application and zdisclosure of interest form (attach to application). 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the I. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. Z 2. outside boundaries of property covered by the application. /5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improve- ments). Z6. Other (Specify) ✓ 7. Fee of S. Rio to apply toward the cost of processing, based on the following: CS, PR, R-11 R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) ............. $ 200.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for each variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot ........... $ 30.00 Minimum ................................... $ 600.00 All other applications for each variance from the ordinance, per square foot of gross floor area of new building(s) or additions, based upon the definition of floor area (section 1901) .............. $ 0.07 Minimum ........................ «....... too $ 550.00 95- 141_ 1 Application for variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall 'be charged apladditional fee, per variance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2 .......................... S 200.00 All other'residential districts .......... $ 350.00 All nonresidential districts ............. S 450.00 Extension of time for variance ........... S 400.00 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed six hundred and fifty dollars ($650), 4xcept from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. (City Code - Section 62-61) 8. The variance requested is for relief from the provisions of section leyo / of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: s fp w 4 B.' tkAesc ��. E' u.sa-s s ' . cu e zv, AO h.4v� et e (�,,,,-�°f ,ld .r�oiie ��.�.�e-c.� %�i�e u, .7/o,�t! �.� JP9 z 'cot Sep 6�A wOV p;ore .Y V4, /D' .ten// >4At- eo//0,y,� ke re tJ /� l N U yr 04-11" e `✓ t v / fli 7rhi .r A'e. cv .S' e � •�c • [f q ac i y'fj S Nf' �G l,vJr i•K . 9. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Subsection 1903.1 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board fiction unless all of the following six items are completed. (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) AS 4 A94)-e (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: -T/�C %C�J�i`y� eAe- . se/. d��Eu �pl�s �N J��'o ar S' Gist-. ' �/iP.-e'�-• (c) Literal interpretation of the provir,ons of the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by othac properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the- zonini rdinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: !� �O4 e° aanq joJele oxe 0/ /-;;@ -a v� the dh- �ti she vL J �' S•e 70" � S /y/ le- -A- R �r ,e f7/'G�2�-J /tom !3� p /1¢`N S ?r fJ tt N 7oe0 U 1-e .- -el %his dA-vSc►S' -1he 7U Gl i.o Av 1AP Glv!✓ Q w,t� A4, 44 GAS �v' �S eA-let- 74v,•.,. (d) Granting the varia •e requested will not confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is aenied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the sane zoning district in that: s el %?.�►--wc L//��7/ t L aQ ,�fN 7�i �•/oJ� CY -,-4Z,° OAry li' e n p� ,�C/7� f /y� / 44 S ��i'vLv�Ji/ E %h's //A'�j�rv�� ,�v�r�i v v•� 7{i�•x /0 �/3�� � � S y�i,e �,v� u.. � •ydo ,�� r �Gl �� (e) The variance, if gra ad, is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure in that: L't GiC ,Wea ,G�//�re ��� 44,/r� t✓.,U���Vyzi��►�Q e ee- Aol �vv l� �G � 7a 1 � �•�C� .� � � rvi?�2r� �.� Gu •� . 95— 141 17 (f) The grant of the varia* a will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other- wise detrimental to the public welfare. Lt � �lt%R��''GeG.�.r`" A) A4 e- , i �- Note: All documents, reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application. Signatu r or Authorized Agent Name Address .3�60 Sb. ���/ P .L/�A `a�• STATE OF FLORIDA) SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner)(Authorized Agent of Owner) of the real property described in answer to question tl a ve; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the saw are true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this petition on behalf of the owner. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED befo 00 thi,j day f My Commission Expires: OFFICIAL NOTARY SEA1 1� : i•.'i .'Xa'v 74 MyC_tyr.I+.,tt;<. ;-� i 'P. jIAN,. 6,_a13 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large 95- 141 i •AFF10AYIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS. -� COUNTY OF DADE } �I Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the.o_wner,, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by i Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real i property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages I attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. I 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in the;; behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this afft.rvit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone wbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are'trus and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. I (SEAQ Sworn to and Subscribed before! me } this iTday cif 1190 OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL TERESITA L FERNANDEZ FNOW�TARV PUBLIC STATC OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC340274 COMMISSION EXP. )AN. 6,1998 Notary Public, State of ioride at Larg 41 OISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: U iv 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 02 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. l ow 'e, e VS A 3. Legal description andAtreet address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 02, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. G Bi ,y /I~t- 63J lm /i1 a y5 f P i7'�3"L 3'� vu Se . ..7� /e rs'.gr icr� l.+�dw ra L: G•e. P.�3 2.— iO � Lt��-s �;3 �-a 1�'' 4 � o — e'�t S 7 rev ..�� •wc Q,z,� 3 OWNER OR AtTORNEY FOR OWNER STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } CJA'!Yt e5 iwNFAl��n/1° being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question /1, Vie; that ht has read the foregoing answers and that the saw are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership fore on behalf of the owner. (SEAL) (Nam SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED 00, before w this J. day of 19 L¢ A, 1 1• Notary Public, State of Florida at large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES-. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEA TF.RESITA L FERNANDEZ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORID COMMISSION NO. CC340274 ... 141 8 MY COMMISSION EXP. TAN. b,199 i EXISTING CARWASH FACILITY ...: PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION REQUIRED PARKING SPACE""'' SO R �• .ayµ _. y. �.. l � ,�,.,�'w, \. .�- /! v u i L• y. 1 y-_. ` '' F`t�.' •- 1jr:: %�,,ya++'''� VGAaM aaww, .ac... Ar •: •: j � �1 ` ' ����� � : ��� • . •• • ♦uat•r• otros :con - xA- lp IV , y q K.51• b_� fD� : bII � I � 111 I I`mw '6' h1-14 'All • a • C • •• •. J.:•h:L• ••:O •.:+ti•p. ••:tiff•:• •••0•:;•••••'.%;:%%;;%•%%'::;} :L•.•'•:;::••✓::%••::•%i::•••;::;J::S•';:ti•{.:••;:;:•:•::••:::•:ti:1•:•:•::titi;:%::•:•:•:•s%:ti%ff:%:i••::••::•••:••::•:•:••::•:•;• • :;;J.:::.:NS;% —M%.ti:t%:.S::::•::•::•:`:t:J`tiAiL•L•:••r•• ::•:iti•••::ti:••••:•r•:•J•.•,. ��:;.:ti.�:� :•:%:%:`:%%:%:%:%::%::.;.•.J ..........•... •:•:'::•:•:•: tiff•:•:•: :tiff �• :iJ••:•:;::jy:••iiii.►�S'•':':':1:tJ:tiiiJl::.K•;!;J..;�•: � t•IH6 north elevation 3/1G"=1'-0" ' <1-�Uia : hE6 hLL'(• b-i wK. ��VS�ii LLEVATiUrt t � I • I I� t�rz+o2 h Inef -�h �,y f'�IE�V 2M�FI_� �lIR•a�Y• i y��a�� �' ' a{ .LL•r .•.•J :::•:•::•:•:Jr•:•:•:•: ;•:.i :ti •:•... •:•l:•: •:ti.ti •: t:ti •:•:ti•:•:•:•:•: ------------------------------------ _ .:. S1tlsi1'+ 4UL W"q ,' hIEW 0 15( `'i7Qay` Mir south elevate n----3/16"=1'--0" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION