The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem #15 - Discussion Item.1 b 4 TELEPHONE (305) 379-2261 374.0544 FAX 381-6869 Mr. Cesar H. Odio City Manager, City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 LAW OFFICES LEONARD H. RUBIN SUITE 1125, ALFRED 1. duPONT BUILDING 169 EAST FLAGLER STREET MIAM1, FLORIDA 33131 30 March 1995 Re: Reyes v. City of Miami; Circuit Court for Dade County. Appellate Division, Case No. 93-008 AP Dear Mr. Odio: C� BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL LAW TRACTICE W CRIMINAL LAW MEMBER NEW YORK BAR On behalf of my client, Manuel Reyes, I request that the following two matters be placed upon the City of Miami Commission Agenda on May 11, 1995: 1. My motion to tax appellate costs of $1,006.00, as is more fully set forth in my letter dated 11 November 1994 to the City Clerk, a copy of which I attach for facility of your reference (Exhibit I ; 2. My motion to adopt the Mandate of the Circuit Court for Dade County, as is more fully set forth in my letter dated 21 November 1994 to the City Clerk, a copy of which I attach for facility of your reference as Composite Exhibit 2. Both Exhibits 1 and 2 were sent to the City Attorney. A letter acknowledging receipt of Exhibits 1 and 2 was sent to me by the City Clerk on November 23, 1994, and I attach a copy thereof for facility of your reference as Exhibit 3. On 28 December 19941 filed my Lobbyist Annual Financial Report, a copy of which letter and Report are attached hereto for facility of your reference as Composite Exhibit 4. Very truly yours LHR:mm Enclosures cc: Office of the City Attorney Suite 300, Dupont Plaza Center 300 Biscayne Blvd. Way Miami, FL 33131 Ms. Eivi Gallastegui Agenda Coordinator e LEONARD H. RUBIN ISGuSS ice`- _ 410.ff LAW OFFICES LEONARU H. RUBIN SUITE 1125, ALFRED I. duPONT BUILDINO _ 169 EAST FLAOLER STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE (305) 379.2261 374.0544 FAX 381.6869 11 November 1994 BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL LAW PRACTICE IN CRIMINAL LAW MEMBER NEW YORK BAR City of Miami Office of The City Clerk 3500 Pan American Drive , Miami, Florida 33133 Attn: Matty Hirai, City Clerk Res Reyes v. The City of Miami; Circuit Court for Dade County, Appellate Division. Case #93-008 AP Dear Ms. Hirai: On October 21, 1994, the Circuit Court for Dade County, Appellate Division filed its Opinion reversing the City of Miami in the above -styled matter. I enclose a copy of that Opinion. This appeal was prosecuted in the Circuit Court for Dade County, pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Under those rules, the prevailing party shall tax costs in the lower .tribunal on motion served within 30 days. after issuance of the _mandate. (See Rule 9.400). Since the Miami City Commission is the "lower tribunal" in this matter, please accept this letter as my motion to tax appellate costs, which costs consist of the followings 1. On November 10, 1992 I paid your filing fee for my client's appeal to the Miami City Commission in the amount of -- $ 400.00 (paid by check No. 1749 of Leonard H. Rubin, copy attached) 2. On November 18, 1992 I paid for copies of the tape recording of the Zoning Appeal before the City of Miami Hearing Board in the amount of -- 16.00 (receipt No. 67663 of the City of Miami is attached) OX) %- / 95- 57.5.1 .3 :rt • City of Miami November 11, 1994 Page 2 4. 5. On December 10, 1992, court reporter Friedman, Lombardi & Gendron attended the Miami City Commission Appeal hearing, for which the reporter charged $100.00 for attendance, and $130.00 for a trans- cript in the total amount of -- (copies of statements attached with copy of check #1780 of Leonard H. Rubin) On January 6, 1993 I paid the Clerk of The Circuit Court a filing fee for this appeal in the amount of -- (copy of check No. 1787 of Leonard H. Rubin is attached) On October 29, 1993 I received the statement from the City of Miami for a transcript of the zoning appeal before the City of Miami Hearing Board in the amount of -- (attached is a copy of check No. 1944 of Leonard H Rubin in a e t th f 230.00 75.00 285.00 p ym n ereo ) Total $ 1,006.00 I would appreciate it if you would inform me as to a mutually convenient date for this matter to appear on the City Commission Agenda so that I can be reimbursed for the appellate costs which I .have advanced in this matter. I have previously filed my Lobbyist Annual Financial Report Of Lobbying Expenditures And Source Of Funds for 1994, and I would appreciate it if,you would advise whether you still have that on record and whether I must file an additional form for 1995 in the event that I cannot get on an Agenda during 1994. I am sending a true copy of this letter and the exhibits to the City Attorney, Suite 300, DuPont Plaza Center, 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Miami, Florida 33131. Finally, I am having my signature and the contents of this letter, with exhibits verified, under oath. Very trul : -yours, LEO H. RDBIN 95- 5115.1 City of Miami November 11, 1994 Page 3 STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF DADE j BEFORE ME,, the undersigned authority, personally appeared LEONARD H* ,RDBIN, he being personally known to me, and after being first duly sworn, he did depose and state that he signed the above and foregoing letter, and stated that the matters contained herein, and the exhibits annexed hereto are true and correct. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me at Miami, Florida, this 11 -1 14 dale of November, 1994. oo Nota Public, St a of Florida at JLarge Printed name of Notary Public cc: Katherine S. Pecko, Esq. Assistant City Attorney u 7"V_4 t. •+ ROiL:h'v: ;, .•,;?F,JFawjaA j W11►if",S1�f1 P 0.CC CGS Se,�$ 7.� :ar �+iaSS rr e�� MAY 21. i wa i e 95- 5154 s • •• • �.•.f M N w, .w.. ww W Iq ww. �w M H wy w w. �'w.id.MNif�M�YM.glw.gr..w wwq w w., , .. 17.49 LEONARD N. RUBPN'' ALFRED I. DU PONT BLDG. MIAMI, FL 33131 pA -VA PAYPAY TO TIM ' OMEIz of $ 1 DOLLARS t United National Bank On' BUayn' ow'r Mlrmi, Fbdd' 1 1 j MEMO ��[�,, •jr� 1: i41.9 r _ m z c) _ac C-5 o 7� IX L3 Gil Y U'r tV IAMI ^- VI'T-1i+1h1S. Ir«v��7 � BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PIECE f .. AOORe Agy 11000OLLARS TYPE OF INSPECTION AMOUNT CERTIFICATE OF.00CUPANCY PEE S ACCESSORY USE FEE ORIGINAL RENEWAL____ ,i. . BOND NO. ' OTHER ' (SJ CITY OF MI MI. FLORIDA BY P � DEPT. SION� 7htt reeefot het VALID enbtt doled, Ogled ' Ih.ond eipned bV euthorlred emoloyee eO0ep6 and Oirirfon Wtfpnotoo hereon. FORM 700 • t •Ire ' kF SUITE 1020 REPOnrEA,, ClRCUlr COU17 SIBfrAYNE BUILDING ' Berl 1080 • 1080 Dell Frlorin 19 WEST PLA&ER STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 FRIEDMAN, 1= LOMBARDI & GENDRON om aelo aendron 1980 • • General Reporting TELEPHONE: 371.8877 �L EONARD H. RUB I N, ESQ. INVOICE. DATE EMPLOYEII Lf ' 59.078.5073 ALFRED I. duPONT BLDG., 12/17/92 SUITE 1125 INVOICE NUmmin MIAMI, FL 33131 '.• 99/43879 PG. i PLEASE REFERENCE THIS INVCIICE NUMBER WHEN REMIrmc 00 DATE TAKEN : REFERENCE CHARGES RE: 'REYES 45 M iC:10S2 ATTENDANCE TO 7 : 30 P.M. 100, i -ax_ .--.. � ..._ _...� ._.•.,.........: - zai_r+cv.au t.�a�.nl.l Mr_ C'r' T �Ir_1 _...__...._.._ .. _.._. _. .... � . SUITE 1020 BISCAYNE BUILDING OFFICIAI. nF.PouLt,n CIIIr:IJI7 19 WEST FLAGLER STREET flarl Fnuchimn 1,9110. 1911i MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 FRIEDMAN, LOMBARDI & GENDRON Dal1rGorMmn 1980- General Reporting TELEPHONE: 371.667 �LEONARD H. RUB I N, ESQ. ALFRED I. duPONT BLDG. , SUITE 1125 MIAMI, FL 33131 DATE TAKEN 12/10/ REFERENCE RE: IN RE: REYES 45 26 op [CITY COMMISSION MEETING] PAY TO TI IE INVOICE DAIE. I.MPLOY 12/29/92 sq•a7o•5 INVOICE NUMIJUII 99/44077 FAG: PLEASE REFERENCE" rIIIS INVC11(11• NUM111:11 WHEN RL•MIIIINO LEONARD H. RUBIN ALFRED I. DU PONT BLDG.'` MIAMI, FL 33131 United National Bank ®Isaeyne Bankln CenNr ' , One BlI�iceyne Tower ArN IsmI,7iOrlds 3131 (:I IAII(if S~ 13 17E R �* S .. •t.0'•!ti,��'« »W „ ,•W �..wN. .• •.1»••yhN�N,j1�M1��Mi,�.4'� , ,�It.' 1 °� ]7 ' } • ,E, \. V,w',..'1 �ah ,�'w.,�yV'a'� Ih"M.sr�A'�M•'�„' _`M^' T`.'��yrM�"'^'/"�.�w'�!'�.�.'P• r � � 1 13 Y F, E I •• .,' "LEO�+NAR�^4D1'' eFi^:`RUB1N;,,,;�.,,",,.;'�i'.:`+'r{'P.�h,r. •41 • .,� �. 4/' `4oMr�'I�i �.w'4i rt/`r�l. r�'w,,,/�� .-4., w1'� •� l ; w.. .•ALFRE� NV•`V#\I.BWQ• �, MIAM!.FL Q 19..-t..�.'.�e 670PAYTOTHI r. " 1 i' -. ORUER OF :; P.`e.•a;.n, :M M1yti�� .`;Q .• i. :'• ��}� �.�•M}' �yul� 4. :a^•RJ...'•, �V 4Y•�. • , x ii � i F.4✓ V�A.4ryP��{�j, y,yy . � - -��n_._t Nam' N� . W %' �.i�y '.w ��4\%� yi \.I�' • ' L '''��•y�.'ti 7'i ',1V ,`, sr�w ,"+. r'bn• p,.�^'�y:,i�y'�'hd'R«.y r^}�'. lWd Natlonal.Bapk!.^•,,,; ..,...�' +1: ., •_ »:.e<yr ».. . , .� .�'`, r :� :: a• ..;aL'�q,»h. ��.!`,",..�„`� :'.• ' .. 95- 515" 41yiA�•1�. . � o CESAR H. 0010 a 'b'Ij YS°" P. 0. sox 33070a �p MIAMI. [1OR10A 33233-0708 CITY MANAGER CC P 306-250-5400 •••+� fAX 305-285-1835 October 290 1993' BILL TO: Leonard Rubin, Attny. 169 East Flagler Street r Suite 1125 Miami,.Florida 33131 Professional Services rendered from' Monday, October 18 thru October 28, 1993• Translation and Typing for a total of nineteen (19) hours at $15• per hour. Amount due $285.00 4 If you have any questions, please free to contact me at 250-5321. Sincerely, Aerta A. Dav s LEONARD N. RUDIN 194 4 ALFhEb 1. DU PONT BLDG, MIAMI. FL 33131 — 6)-�006 PAYT(1jjIE ' /'—"Iy ,7 670 OR lIP �. � io ...i5; - !)OLLARS POW Nallonal Bank • ❑ 31601 n/ emk�lpn CvMa ..jtii�l Fio�ld.3°sioi • MUM ,� 4 4:06 9 I, 1- , • LAW OFFICES LEONAR,D H. RUBIN SUITE 1125, ALFRED 1, duPONT BUILDING 169 EAST FLAGLER STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER TELEPHONE (305) BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL LAW 379-2261 MACTICE IN CRIMINAL LAW 374.0544 21 November 1994 FAX 391.6"9 MEMBER NEW YORK BAR Via Fax #858-1610 and Mail City of Miami Office of The City Clerk 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Attn: Matty Hirai, City Clerk Re: Reyes 'v. The City of Miami; Circuit Court for Dade County, Ap"llate Division, Case 193-008 AP Dear Ms. Hirai: On November 14, 19941, the Circuit Court for Dade County, Appellate Division, in Appeal No. 93-008 AP, entered its Mandate, a copy of which I attach. Please consider this as my clients motion to adopt the Mandate, and for a Resolution from the Miami City Commission on behalf of.Manuel Reyes, pursuant to said Mandate and the Opinion filed October 21, 1994 in the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida. I am sending a copy of this letter to you by fax (858-1610) as well as by mail, and I'm sending a copy to the City Attorney by fax (579-3399) as well as by mail. Since LEONARD H. RUBIN LHR: mm cc: City Attorney (Via Fax #579-3399 and Mail) 1�uevler�+ r i _ MANDATE FROM CIRCUIT COURT APPELLATE DIVISION ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPEALS NO. 93--008AP MANUEL REYES APPELLAJVT/'PET I T I ONER vs - CITY OF MIAMI APPELLEURESPONDENT This cause having been brought to this Court by appeal, and after due consideration the Court having Issued Its opinion; YOU ARE HEREBY OCNMArDED that such further proceedings be had In said cause In accordance with the opinion of this COURT attached hereto and Inoorporated as part of this order, and with the rules of procedure and laws of the STATE OF FLORIDA. Case Number(s) 92-82O WITNESS the Honorable Murray Goldman, Administrative Judge of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida and the seal of the said Circuit Court at Miami, this 14TH day of NOVEMBER, 1994. HARVEY RUVIN, Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit In and for Dade County. -" / 4 A 0 I By: OLIX P CIA, Deputy erk c i RIOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED MANUEL REYES Appellant, v . THE CITY OF MIAMI Appellee. IN • THE ,CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION Case No. 93-008 r� - - DERD NOV 0 8 1994 - M 1/�C1.101 0UCull • t, & County Courts s OPINION FILED October 21, 1994 An appeal from Resolution 92-820 of the City of Miami, City Commission, Dade County, Florida. Leonard H. Rubin for the Appellant, XATHRYN S.- PECKO., Assistant City Attorney, for the Appellee. Before Robbie M. Barr, Jennifer Bailey, and Alan S. Gold, J.J. ALAN S. GOLD, JUDGE. Appellant, Manuel Reyes, appeals from Zoning Resolution Number I92-820 of the City of Miami, which denied Appellant's appeal from the City s Zoning Board and upheld the issuance of a Class I Special Permit for a pool hall with three tables in connection with a private club for profit, subject 'to certain additional onditions, including that (1) the hours of operation be from 10:00 Cn e, cn ,.,A.M. to 9:00 P.M., six days a week excluding Sundays, and (2) a CD 8security guard licensed, uniformed and armed at all times be on the • cs .9: premises while it is opened for business (hereinafter tCO "conditions"). Appellant contends that the conditions are in violation of Sec' -ion 1306 of the City of Miami Zoning Code and are RECORDED 1 OCT 24 1994 116555Pc07 95— 64 414y, unsupported by competent, substantial evidence of record. We find merit in Appellant's arguments and reverse. The *Appellant filed his application for Class I Special Permit to operate a three table pool room at 304 S.W. 8th Avenue, Miami, Florida. The Zoning Administrator granted the permit as -being in compliance with the City's zoning ordinances, subject to the limitations that the use include no video games, no -food preparation, no beer, wine or liquor - to be sold on the premises and no activities outside the enclosed premises. Prior to issuing the permit, the Zoning Administrator was advised by the City Attorney that he lacked discretion to deny the permit based on assumed criminal or disruptive activity by a prior tenant of the premises, with the same type operation, if the application otherwise met all applicable land use regulations. After the permit was granted, an adjacent business owner, as an aggrieved party, filed an appeal of the permit to the City's Zoning Board. By Resolution ZB 113-92, the Zoning Board, following notice and public hearing, denied the appeal, but imposed additional conditions on'the Class I Special Permit, two of which were the subject of the Appellant's appeal to the City of Miami Commission. Neither the Zoning Board nor the City Commission set forth the reasons for the conditions, although, evidently, they were imposed in response to concerns heard from objectors during 1-o the hearing before the Zoning Board. . ,g=- ICO The City's resolution under appeal is the result of a quasi- judicial process concerning the issuance of a permit. Jennings v. 2 1RF.F.1i.AE9 OKI 9 5 - 515 f f 11L P, r Dade County, 589 So.2d 1337, 1343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (Ferguson J. concurring) . As such, it is to be scrutinized on appeal by non - deferential judicial standards. Id. at n.3; Bd. of Cty Com'rs of Brevard v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469, 475 (Fla. 1993); City of Apopka v. Orange County,, 299 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). At the circuit level, the reviewing court must consider whether due process was afforded, whether the administrative body applied the correct rule of law, and whether its administrative findings and judgment are supported by competent, substantial evidence. City of Deerfield Beach v. Valiant, 419 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1982); Educ.Dev.Ctr. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 541 So. 2d 106, 108 (Fla. 1989). In so doing, the circuit court may not reweigh the evidence nor substitute its judgment for the administrative agency. Id. First, although a local government is not ordinarily required to make findings of fact in support of its decisions., see City Com'rs of Brevard v. Snyder, supra, 627 So. 2d at 476, the City, by its own zoning ordinance, required that any conditions or safeguards "...be supported by stated reasons therefor, based on such conditions and standards...." Having adopted such a requirement, the City was obligated to follow its own procedural -- requirements when the Zoning Board, and, subsequently the City .Cn � Cn Commission, imposed the conditions in question. Gulf & Eastern �Development Co r. v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 354 So. 2d 57, 61 . (Fla. 1978). Its failure to do so in its motion or resolution results in a violation of the City's own ordinance. U1 Second, the record before the Zoning Board and the City / 1 0 t 3 OFF,7 R°C so 9 5 — 51511 Commission 'fails- to contain competent, substanti�i- evidence establishing asubstantial relationship between the conditions imposed and the need to be regulated. It is fundamental, and long established, that there must be a substantial and reasonable relationship between the need for the zoning restriction and the public health, safety, morals or welfare to justify -interference by exercise of the police power, with an owner's right to enjoyment of Property. City of Miami Beach v. Lachman, 71 So. 2d'148 (F1a. 1948).'Without such a substantial relationship, the zoning action is in violation of basic substantive due process rights. This fundamental constitutional protection is also reflected in Section 1306 of the City of Miami Zoning Code where conditions or limitations are prohibited beyond that which is. reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the safeguard is Imposed. - 'It is undisputed that the Appellant established before the Zoning Administrator and the Zoning Board that the application for Class 'I Special Permit complied with all substantive and procedural requirements of the City's land development regulations. At this point, the burdenshiftedto the City to demonstrate that the ,additional conditions were reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of a legitimate governmental purpose. Cty Com'rs of Ln ~o ` - Brevard v. Synder, supra, 627 So. 2d at 476. As indicated, no such evidence sufficiently appears of record. Instead, the record 'CO establishes that the conditions are arbitrary and discriminatory. Cr) The condition that this three table poolhall be restricted in 4 (QUIwREC BKI 1 CCCCnnn-1r9 17 its hours of operation from 10:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., six days a week,. is directly contrary to the City's own ordinance which governs the operation of all other poolhalls in the City of Miami. As noted in the City's own brief, with exceptions not applicable here, Section 5-11 City of Miami Code, mandates that poolrooms be closed no later than midnight and reopen no earlier than 8:00 A.M. Answer Brief of Appellee, page 3. The record fails to establish by _competent, substantial evidence any reasonable necessity to single .out this one small business for such disproportionate treatment other than the neighbors unsubstantiated fear that Appellant will permit illegal activities on the premises as did the former tenant. As to this matter, the City's own attorney correctly advised the Zoning Administrator that the requested Class I Special Permit could not be denied based on assumed criminal or disruptive activity. Similarly, the condition requiring "an armed, uniformed and licensed security guard at all times" is likewise unsupported by competent, substantial evidence demonstrating a substantial and reasonable necessity between the condition imposed and the need the City seeks to regulate. The City conceded at oral argument that no City ordinance of general applicability imposes such an obligation I i;on other poolrooms, regardless of the number of tables involved, Nonetheless, the City argues such conditions may be imposed on a .CO O case by case basis under Section 1305.8 of the City of Miami Zoning '00 Code which pertains to the "control of adverse effects generally,." ~ Such a broad reliance on'thisgenerally worded section of the 5 LOF-F eEc.OX1 9 5 - 515.1 I [CCCornIC0 At zoning code is in direct conflict with the well established principle that all persons similarly situated should be able to obtain a permit approval upon meeting uniform standards. See City Nat'l Bank of Miami v. City of Coral Springs, 474 So. 2d 984, 634, (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); City of Lauderdale Lakes v. Corn, 427 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Park of Commerce v. City of Delray Beach, 606 So. 2d 633, 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Otherwiser the official app:roval or denial of such a permit -would depend upon the whim or caprice of the public body involved. Property owners are entitled to notice of the conditions they must meet in order to improve their property in ..accord with the existing zoning and other development regulations of government. Park of Commerce v. City of Delray Beach, supra, 606 So. 2d 633, 635. As stated in the Park of Commerce case by the Fourth District Court of. Appeal, "[t]hose conditions should be set out in clearly stated regulations. Compliance with those regulations ations should be capable of objective determination in an administrative proceeding." Id. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the City of Miami to enter the Class I permit in question,, absent the two conditions in question. ROBBIE M. BARR AND JENNIFER BAILEY, J.J., CONCUR. COPIES FURNISHED TO: I*a.% PICOUNSEL OF RECORD AND Cn' ..:TO ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED -_J R11 .CD 1C0 I t- 100 95- 51511 6 � y -7 r m - 00!�l November 23, 1994 Leonard H. Rubin, Esq. Suite 1125, Alfred I. duPont Building 169 East Fiagler Street Miami, Florida 33131 - RE: REYES V. THE CITY OF MIAMI; CIRCUIT COURT FOR DADE COUNTY, APPELLATE f DIVISION, CASE #93-008 AP f Dear Mr. Rubin: Pursuant to your request we hereby acknowledge receipt of your letters dated November 11, 1994 and November 21,1994 related to the above -captioned case. We have also, pursuant to your request, routed your letters to the members of the City Commission. Sincerely, o07: VMHirai U City Clerk 95" 515 , / Ex//iRi T 3 LAW OPSCES LEONARD H. Rum SUITE 1125. ALFRED 1. duPONT BUILDINO 169 EAST FLAMER STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 28 December 1994 BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL LAW PRACTICE IN CRIMINAL LAW MEMBER NEW YORK BAR City of Miami -City Hall j- Office of the City Clerk I 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Attn: Hayaee Regueyra Re: Lobbyist Annual Financial Report ' Dear Ms. Regueyra: Enclosed is original and one copy of my Lobbyist Annual Financial Report. I would appreciate it if you would acknowledge receipt on the copy, and return it to me in the enclosed self- addressed and stamped envelope. Thank you for your courtesy in this regard. Sin r LEONARD H. RUBIN LHR:mm LHSBPWvor&W1 i GDMPBS/7� �1'f�/&T 44 95,I CiTY OF MiAMI d Reporting period covered: i January 1,1994 through --- December 31, 1994 LOBBYIST ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF LOBBYING EXPENDITURES AND SOURCE OF FUNDS NOTE: Report trust be filed with the City Clerk by January 10, 1995. If the space provided Is Insufficient, accompanying schedules should be attached.' Please be reminded this reDort must be filed even If you had no expen ores. • M STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF DADE ) SS _ C17Y OF MIAMI ) Before me, the �� undersigned authority, personally appeared (PRINT YOUR NAME HERE) 400,W h /y .+P #AZAI who, by first being duty sworn on oath, deposes and states that the attached Information disclosed herein, or otherwise contained In any other forms attached hereto, Is true and correct: 1. The lobbyist submits to the City Clerk's Office the following list of all lobbying expenditures as well as the sources from which such expenditures have Incurred In the period commencing on the first day of January, 1994, through December 31, 1994. II. a. General Expenditures. + NOTE: The statement of expenditures in this Subsection ("General Expenditures") shall include, but not be limited to, all expenses made or incurred, of any nature whatsoever, for or on behalf of the lobbyist, and , shall also include the dollar amount for said expenses, 9 any. NATURE OR KIND OF NAME & ADDRESS EXPENDITURE FOR OR ITEM AMOUNT OF PERSON PAID ON BEHALF OF LOBBYIST �0 2. $ 3. 4. $ (NOTE: ENTER "NONE" IF THERE WERE NO EXPENDITURES.) 414 f+,Y ti f 1 b. tiospltailhl Expenditures. ' NOTE: lbe dollar amount of expenses! If any, set forth in this Subsection ('Hospitality Expenditures) shag De Itemized, hereinbelow: . LODGING MEALS, ENTERTAINMENT NAME AND ADDRESS I�ii 1 AMOUNT AND TRAVEL OF GUEST, IF ANY ®yam 2. a �. a. s Ill. Source of Funds. NOTE: this portion of the lobbyist form shall contain the sources of the cited expenditures. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON, FIRM, ! ITEM AND/OR ORGANIZATION MAKING FUNDS AVAILABLE 2. 9. Lobbyist g a urso State or Florlds On this the 2 day or 19 . berore me. the undersigned ota llc or the to or lorida, personally appeared 7t7 County or. IName(s) of Indlvidual(s) who appeared before notaryl —� NOTARY PUBLIC and whose name(s) Is/are subscribed to the within Instrument, and he/she/ SEAL OF OFFICE: they acknowledge that he/she/they executed It. WITNESS my hano and o dal seal. Rr Gs�% NOTARY PUBl.Z• S?A'(E OF FLORIDA MWTAMEDEL tOM1 0 Sfl0 NOTARY P BLIC, STATE OFF ()RID ^ti MAY �t%s '••.� ++� (Name of Notary Public; rMnt. Stamp, or Type as Commissioned.) •� 8TIpersonally known to me, or ® Produced Iderltincatlon: `f (Type or Identitics,ion Produced) {�j DID take an oath, or (] DID NOT lake an qqi r r