Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-96-0245ZONING FACT SHEET PZ LOCATION/LEGAL 4101 N.W. llth Street and 1135-1145 N.W. 41st Avenue. (Complete legal description in the Hearing Boards Division's file). APPLICANT/OWNER Ronald Pellitero for Adelaida Fernandez-Fraga, Esq. Pell/Cruz Investments, Inc. 6061 Collins Avenue, #23C 3191 Coral Way, Suite 1005 Miami Beach, FL 33140 Miami, FL 33145 461-4440 ZONING R-3 Multifamily -Medium Density Residential. REQUEST Change of Zoning as listed in the Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, from R-3 Multifamily Medium -Density Residential to C-2 Liberal Commercial. RECOMMENDATIONS: PLANNING, BLDG & ZONING Approval with condition. PUBLIC WORKS No comments. PLAT AND STREET N/A. DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION No comments. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY, IF ANY C.E.B. Case No: N/A. Last Hearing Date: N/A. Found: N/A. Violation(s) Cited: N/A. Ticketing Action: N/A. Affidavit of Non -Compliance issued on: N/A. Daily Fine: $0.00 Lien Recorded On: N/A. Total Fines To Date: N/A. CEB Action: N/A. HISTORY Recommended for denial on 10/19/94 by Res. PAB 60-94 with a vote of 8-0. The Zoning Board on 11/21/94 recommended approval by Res. ZB 128-94 with a vote of 8-0. Item is being returned to Zoning Board for inadvertent omission of a secondary street address which is part of request. ANALYSIS The petition for this change of zoning is in order to move the zoning designation boundary line of the adjacent property east and extend the C-2 Liberal Commercial designation to include the subject property. The Planning, Building and Zoning Department contends that the increased densities created by this change will not have additional impact on the existing conditions in the area and is recommending approval of the application with the condition that a one foot (1'-0") strip around the portions of the property which abut a less intense district remain R-3; this is in order to prevent the requested change from beginning a domino effect of changes within the area. ZONING BOARD Recommended for approval to City Commission. (Res. No. 017-95) APPELLANT N/A. CITY COMMISSION Passed on First Reading. - APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 312 Page 1 February 6, 1995 9 5 - 245 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 312 Yes No N/A X The proposed change is in harmony with the adopted Miami Compre- hensive Neighborhood Plan, 1989-2000, and does not require a plan amendment. X The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. X The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. X The change suggested is within scale with the needs of the neigh- borhood or the City. X The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. is the same. X Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. X There are changes or changing conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary. X The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety as the existing classification. X The proposed change has ,the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or deve- lopment of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. X The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner within the same classification and the immediate area; and furthers the protection of the public welfare. X There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. X It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 95- 245 November 21, 1994 11g., M VO �/ T 1 • TRACT 'A•�ry�Tf 44 a.. R Kw. G/I A GLADYS* DIXON IS TRACT TMCT ."PUMA . N• ♦1 _ oonm� mill oil A*,'�' �imam a Rom SUB. 111DY KOM - ®:a■ l�sv ®s ®v �`�t� �■s ®� aa�s ®cam �o�: ���©� KOMwrlo®M anvoaooada� an mamma, ra a�o�e�� SU9{W��J I - N. VL = _ _ 6 - - - --- - n. �T mood Y��mm����mmm© ao�o�I aad� �l®lwo� e .4d� eeee��eu�d ; ■o ae�em�ame® i Mr. Lorenzo Luaces and moved its adoption. offered the following Resolution RESOLUTION ZB 017-95 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ATLAS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, PAGE 27, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4101 N.W. 11TH STREET AND 1135-45 N.W. 41st AVENUE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" HEREOF ATTACHED; ZONED R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THIS CHANGE OF ZONING WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO EXCLUDING FROM THIS APPLICATION A ONE FOOT (1') STRIP AT THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE AS A CONDITION OF THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux the motion was passed -and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mses. Basila, Acosta & Morales. Messers. Luaces, Moran-Ribeaux, Barket, Carman, Crespo & Milian. NAYES: None. ABSENT: Mr. George Sands. Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0. February 6, 1995 Item# 3 Zoning Board 95- 245 q W=W 2210. Ham Am awman Of' ammC if w wpm To cnT apemi m When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under section 2202.1(e), the report and recommendations of the Toning Board shall show that the Toning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: (a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan - and does not require a plan aondunnt; (b) The proposed dump is in harmonry with the establishad land use pattern; (c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) The durge suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city; (e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for dheoge; (g) Qhagad or d-ging conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary; - �-(h) The proposed chimage positively influiences living conditions in the neighborhood; (i) The proposed die has the same or similar impact an traffic and does not affect public safety to a graatar extent than the existing clesaificatiar; (j) The proposed change has the ease or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification; W The proposed dhange has the acme or similar intact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification; (1) The proposed charge has the same or sixdlnr impact on property values in the adjaoent area as the existing c-I ifiration; (m) The proposed dump will contribute to the imnprovaamaxt or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; (n) The proposed change conveys the am treatment to the individual weer as to aams within the sane classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare; (o) There are substantial reasons athy the we of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning; , (p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the eurroading area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. (MMUN) After considering the factors a% forth in Section 2210 of OnUna ce 11000, 1 move that ft—request (agenda item ) be recorded to the City Cants cn for - (a jvwalJ(deniaL). Item Date 95- 245 9 Mr. Lorenzo Luaces and moved its adoption. offered the following Resolution RESOLUTION ZB 128-94 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ATLAS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, PAGE 27, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4101 N.W. 11TH STREET MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" HEREOF ATTACHED; ZONED R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THIS CHANGE OF ZONING WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE PLANNING, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mses. Basila and Morales. Messers. Luaces, Moran-Ribeaux, Barket, Carman, Cr,espo and Sands. NAYES: Nine. ABSENT: Mrs. Hernandez and Mr. Milian. Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 8-0. November 21, 1994 Zoning Board Item# 8 95- 245 / `" 0 0 lot V. �.ii:_� y: 1: •1 f MY ==. N 2210. ['imz Am mmusen cF amc mad;D Rum m a= amassm When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under section 2202.1(e), the report and recommendations of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: (a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment; (b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern; (c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) The d=ge suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighbortaoi or the city; (e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) Bdsting district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change; (g) Qvwpd or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary; (h) The proposed chmW positively 1nfLmices living conditions in the neighborhood; (i) The proposed dugp has the same or similar impact on traffic a nd does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification; (j) The proposed dome has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification; W The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification; (1) The proposed change has the same or sirdlar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification; (m) The proposed d>r4p will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; (a) The proposed dump rnaveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immdlare area and furthers the protection of the public welfare; (o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning; (p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the stiaroimding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. (DDrICN) After otmsidering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance 11000, I move that the request (agenda item ) be reo=mmded to t CL ion for (appraval)(denial). o Aglature Item �UOL Z4l Date i s,a:t AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION Pursuant to the representations made before the Zoning Board at the public hearing scheduled on February 6, 1995 and in accordance with the terms of the recommended approval of the Zoning Board at that hearing, the application is hereby amended to exclude from the property being re -zoned in this application the East one (1) foot of the parcel as a whole, Dated: February 10, 1995 245 17 0&, APPLICATION FOR AMEHMENT TO ZONING ATLAS File Number 42- I, Ronald PellitPro. as Prestd nt of Pell C(Olz TntmcrmPnt'g, rnr , hereby apply to the City Commission of the City of Miami for an amendment to the toning Atlas of the City of Miami as more particularly described herein and, in support of that request, furnish the following information: 1. Address of property: 4101 N,W. llth S r Pr and 1135 cud 1145 N t Lost- A is 2. Two surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 3. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest. (See attached force.) 4. Certified list of owner of real estate within a 315-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by -this application. (See attached form.) 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements.) 6. Atlas sheet(s) on which property appears: 1. Present zoning designation(s): R-3 8. Proposed zoning designation(s): C-2 9. Statement explaining why present zoning designation is inappropriate. (See attached form,) 10. Statement as to why proposed zoning designation is appropriate. (See attached form.) 11. Other (Specify) 12. Filing fee of j according to following schedule: Change of zoning classification to: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, per square foot of net lot area ............. $ 0.12 Minimum....................................................... 5550.00 R-3, R-4, 0, G/1, per square foot of net lot area ............. $ 0.16 Minimum ..................................................... $650.00 C-1,/C-2 , I, per square foot of net lot area .................. $ 0.20 Minimum'....................................................... $750.00 CBD and all SO's, per square foot of net lot area ............. f 0.22 Minimum....................................................... Signature: Name: pirl PV.11i tem President of Pp11 M „7. Ines Mients , Inc. Address: 6061 Collins Avenue. #23Q 1Iiami Beach, FL 33140 Phone: • 868-3733 STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } President of Pell/Cruz Investmen s,In Ronald Pelli ter_c as being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is tie (Owner)(Authorized Agent for Owner) of the real property -described in answer to question 1 above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) thgt a has 4.Lthority to execute this petition on behalf of the owner. � ,11�1 (SEAL) SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this �/,'day of 191 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Not y Public, Cat of Florfda at Large 95- 245 019., LAW OFFICES PADIERNE, FERNANDEZ-FRAGA & PADRON, PA. 3191 CORAL INAY c,Ui1E 1 Cx]S i hMArRI, FLORIDA 33145 PAFAEL E PAULPNE .ADELAW, FE;;NANDE--FRAGA cAatos e, PanFUN t i. I December 21, 1994 j city of Miami t t Planning, Building &;Zoning Dept. P.O. Sox 330708 Miami, FA 33233-0708� Attention: TeresitaFernande4 Ree Ronald Pelliterd zoning our File No. 94325 Dear Ms. Fernandez: i`.'Li=r^NOVaE )303) 451- -140 FAt:WA1LE 13i, dol J5�5 Please be advised that the property is currently zoned medium density residential although the maps show this designation is the result of an arbitrary drawing of zoning lines where, instead of the commercial z aing line being drawn straight to the, south, the line "zig zags" around this property. The property is tordered by commercially zoned & utilized Property to the northeast, north, northwest, west and southwest. The proposed zonint change on this property would result in a more uniform zoningjlins. The proposed Chang would not add measurably to the traffic an N.W. 11th street, nd would permit a substantial investment in improving the property, which would raise the city's general tax revenues. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. sincerely, PADIERNE, FXRNANDEZx -FRAGA & PADRON, P.A. By AF 95- 245 U 40r, •AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA.} } SS I COUNTY OF DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared BQUalSj.Pallitero aG , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes President of Pell/Cruz Investments, Inc.. and says; 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. -That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are -true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. (SEAL} (Name Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of,, 19. Natary Public, to of 1 1dn at Large My Commission Expires; tlnta�' ^'.:,ta sf Flarlda hiy'oin r. 36on i:44res N4c A 1996 95- 245 U OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name 13e11/Cnt-,. Trnm�tman n, �. Mailing Address 60 1 Sn11inc 4.7o„A 1ia 41?' ,4 eae14 P Telephone Number Legal Description: " SEE ATTACHED Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description N/A Street Address 9;L Street Address Legal Description Legal Description 95- 245 tIS-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION1 Tract A of " HANDELSMAN SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 56 at Page 60 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and, Commence at the SW corner of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of section 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Dade county, thence due North along the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32 for a distance of 25 ft.; thence North 88 degrees 511300 East, parallel with the South line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 0£ said section 32, for a distance of 340 ft. to a point; thence due North parallel with the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32, for a distance of 80.54 ft. to the Point of Beginning; thence continue due North for a distance of 69.46 ft to a point; thence North 88 degrees 51130" East, parallel with the south line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 32 for a distance of 60 ft. to a point; thence due South, parallel with the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 32, for a distance of 70.58 ft. to a point; thence South 89 degrees 53'30" West for a distance of 59.99 ft. to the of t J of eginning, lying and being in Dade County, F1a�:��C, and, Commence at the southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the section 32, Township 53 south, Range 41 East, thence due North along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 32, for 25 feet; thence North 88 degrees, 51'30" East, parallel with the south line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 32 for 340.6 feet to the Point of B®ginning; thence due North parallel with the west line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 32 for 80.54 feet; thence North 89 degrees, 53130" East for 59.39 feet; thence due south parallel to and 400.00 feet East of the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 32 for 79.42 feet; thence South 88 degrees, 511300 west parallel with the south line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 32 for 59.40 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in Dade County, Florida IEcve, -6 EXHIBIT "A". 95- 245 a 3 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP I. legal description and street address of subject real property: Tract A of HAN DELSMAN SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 56 at Page 60 of the Public Records of Dade Count.°, Florida AND SEE ATTACHED 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question !2 requires disclosure Qf shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Pell/Cruz Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation— 100% Ownership Ronald Pellitero — 50% shareholder Maria Pellitero — 50% shareholder 3. legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 12, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A r� / WNER OR ATTORNEY FOR OWNER //�•`.GC•Gf. Cam'%/ STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: MARIA PELL TERO COUNTY OF DADE } Ronald Pellitero and the shareholders of Pell/Cruz Investments, Pala ri a pet J i t-prQ ag a l l of being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question fl, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. r x (SEAL) 19d a/Ala c1(e I-y ` i / SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED Al before moo this 9 "" day 19a. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:. Notary Public, State of Florida at large ,iw"' t• aARBARA GARCIA * E4:�MY °°"" 9 5- 245 E o,ided by HA! Na a Sw-422- t aaa Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONt Tract A of N HANDELSMAN SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 56 at Page 60 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and, Commence at the SW corner of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Dade County, thence due North along the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32 for a distance of 25 ft.; thence North 88 degrees 51130" East, parallel with the South line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32, for a distance of 340 ft. to a point; thence due North parallel with the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 32, for a distance of 80.54 ft. to the Point of Beginning; thence continue due North for a distance of 69.46 ft to a point; thence North 88 degrees 51130" East, parallel with the south line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32 for a distance of 60 ft. to a point; thence due south, parallel with the West line of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section 32, for a distance of 70.58 ft. to a point; thence south 89 degrees 53'30" West for a distance of 59.99 ft. the p9int J of ,s�eginn� lying and being in Dade County, Fla �T- and, TLi/ f Commence at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of the section 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, thence due North along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 32, for 25 feet; thence North 88 degrees, 51130" East, parallel with the south line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 32 for 340.6 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence due North parallel with the west line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 32 for 80.54 feet; thence North 89 degrees, 53130" East for 59.39 feet; thence due South parallel to and 400.00 feet East of the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 32 for 79.42 feet; thence south 88 degrees, 51130" West parallel with the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said section 32 for 59.40 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in Dade County, Florida, 6AIPT 6A)E Fev'T / 7f SD( . EXHIBIT "A". 95- 245 49-1 A(AIV i MAJOR PUBLIC FACILITY IN . GENERAL COMMERCIAL RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL f 7- _,. I.. _ • T - .A MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI FAMILY N. W GENERAL COMMERC L MEDIUM ;}-----i DENSITY MULTI DUPLEX --1 1 ' ' RESIDENTIAL W W uj . 1 14 4 cc w pi.1- 9 a� SINGLE . FAMILY RESIDENTIAL F 73 30 76 5 4 J74 S r a" 4 DY SUB. 'SUB. 11N- 25 he GLADYS DIXON uj LEWIS TRACT (\j TRACT A 2 C OMMER FIAL CENTER TRACT"K,�!o 1,045 AC f4d P, 10�� T-q,"A" as W .9 0 2!o $1 2 i2 4 ACRjS 9 122 0 60 60 64 t• 20 1 1 33 0 19 t- 20 1 145 146 10 2 o 19 20 14e 2 - 17 184 17 16 P. 5 rn 17 16 6 6 10 1.6 14 7 1 s fi 14 i. J3 13 14 cc 13 12 13 9 a 1 10 12 12 11 10 9 9 73 10 N. W. 21 61 2 20 19 73 73 7? 3 20 2 1 o 20 1 3 •1,9 v v L4 LAJ 18 3 0 �t % 17 4 4 a , 17%%61 1 1= Regional Plan for South Florida Goal 16: Land Use Measure: 1. Amount of development autlioriied where public facilities and services do not already exist or are not programmed Regional Goal: 16.3 By 1995, reduce the amount of incompatible land use in the Region by 10 percent compared to 1990. Regional Policies: 16.3.1 All land use plans and development regulations shall provide for the compatibility of adjacent land uses and assess the impacts of land uses on the surrounding environment. 16.3.2 Land uses surrounding natural recreational areas and public lands held for conservation and preservation shall be planned so as not to disrupt the ecological systems within those areas. 16.3.3 Future development should be directed first to areas served by existing infrastructure areas and to other locations that are suitable for development, as identified in local comprehensive plans. 16.3.4 Direct development away from environmentally sensitive lands. 16.3.5 Removal of native vegetation from areas of a site other than where the structure and supporting facilities are to be located will be discouraged. 16.3.6 Promote the recovery of natural beach systems and protect those which still exist. 16.3.7 Existing natural wetlands which are pristine or of high quality will be incorporated into the site plans of developments in the Region, or preserved in such a way that they are not adversely impacted. 16.3.8 Encourage the compatibility of adjacent land uses. 16.3.9 Promote public awareness of the sensitivity, uniqueness and importance of South Florida's natural environment. 16.3.10 Encourage curriculum at all levels of education within the school systems that emphasizes the relationship of South Florida's natural environment to urban systems. Measure: 1. The amount of land in the Region which has land uses that are incompatible with neighboring land uses 206 95- 245 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 312 Yes No X The proposed change is in harmony with the adopted Miami Compre- hensive Neighborhood Plan, 1989-2000, and does not require a plan amendment. X The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. X The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. X The change suggested is within scale with the needs of the neigh- borhood or the City. X The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. is the same. XExisting district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. X There are changes or changing conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary. X` The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. X " The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. �( The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or deve- lopment of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. X The proposed change conve s the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner within the same classification and the immediate area; and furthers the protection of the public welfare. X There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. X It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 1 February 6, 1995 Item1� 3 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION NUMBER 94- 312 Yes No N/A X The proposed change is in harmony with the adopted Miami Compre- hensive Neighborhood Plan, 1989-2000, and does not require a plan amendment. X The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. X The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. X The change suggested is within scale with the needs of the neigh- borhood or the City. X The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. is the same. ::X Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. There are changes or changing conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary. X The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety as the existing classification. X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification, X The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent areas as the existing classification. X The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or deve- lopment of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. X The proposed change conve s the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner within the same classification and the immediate area; and furthers the protection of the public welfare. X There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. X It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 1 February 6, 1995 Item! 3 i 95— 245