Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-96-0719J-96-1362 10/10/96 RESOLUTION NO P 6— 7 19 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF SWEETAPPLE, BROEKER & VARKAS, TO SERVE AS COUNSEL TO THE CITY OF MIAMI IN CONNECTION WITH THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT BOARD RELATED LAWSUIT, CYNTHIA JORDAN, ET AL, VS. CITY OF MIAMI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MIAMI DIVISION, CASE NO 93-1469-CIV-NESBITT; WITH FUNDS THEREFOR HEREBY ALLOCATED, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000, FROM THE SELF-INSURANCE AND INSURANCE TRUST FUND, ACCOUNT CODE NO. 62103-661. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1, The City Attorney's engagement of the law firm of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkas, to serve as counsel to the City of Miami in connection with the Nuisance Abatement Board lawsuit, Cynthia Jordan, et a/ vs. City of Miami, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 93-1469-CIV-NESBITT, is an amount not to exceed $25,000, is hereby authorized, with funds therefor hereby allocated from the Self -Insurance and Insurance Trust Fund, Account Code No. 620103-661for said services. Section 2, This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1996. OE ARO LO, MAYOR ATTEST - WAALTER F MAN, CITY CLERK CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: A.Q NN JbqYN,III CITY ATTO Y W 1772: CSK cnTCOMMMON TUgG OF OCT In, 1996 Resolution IQo. 9�- 719 �i P Mayor-Joe-Carol,lo ID:305-854-4001 OCT 02'96 14:08 No.027 P.01 LAW QFFIc Cs OFff SWEETAPPLr., ®ROCKER & VARKAS A PARTNC145H10 OF pROFCS31ONAL. A550GIATI0N6, DOUDLAS Q 9*01EKER. RA. TQNTH FLOOR CONCORO 9"OINo i1XTT-WX WLIT FL.AOLER SIRE" MIAMI, FLORIDA RIDA 33130 Tr"PHONC 130i! 3iA•5"3 Tt:LECOPIrR t3051390-1023 RODCRT A. SWCETAPPLF* DOUGLAS C. GROEKER ALEXANDEN A. PARKAS. JR. GEOFFREY C 13ENNCTT j PAUL a. FELTMAN" Toss S. TOYNe September Joe 1996 � •i4A11D CEMv,eD CIVI�7Aut �\TIMNCT ••AIiD lPNtTrtD IN Tiil•� i t vi FAcsjmilQ 30S12S5-1835 Merritt Sterhi.em City Manager City of Miami. 15oo pan American Drive Miami, FlorLda 33133 Fie: Cynthia Jordan, et. a1. V. City of Miami Dear Mr, Sterhiem: 1ROS%RT .*, SWRLTAPt Lw, RA. 465 EAST PALMETTO PARK ROAD BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 3343Z TELEPHONE 14071 "Z•1210 MIAMI LINE 13051 P44.1645 TELECOPIER 14071 304•St02 Dust ♦6Pt,Y TO MIAMI Before getting to the business of tbLts letter, let me first thank you for accepting the position as manager of our City. We axe fortunate to have your wi-adnm, experience and capability at a critical time for Miami. I perceive that you, the Mayor and Commissioners are together paddling a canoe through class IV rapids: it all rushes very fast, you fake tremendous turbulence, and huge and t.,reacherous Obstacles; but if you meet the challenge you all, together, will have brought the City a Long way in a short time. This newly reconstituted mayor/Cnmaaissioners/manager team reminds m® of a rejuvenated Mizzi Dolphin team; the enthusiasm is palpable, among all of you — the "players," as well as ua who live and work in Miami — the I f'•a.ns. " Now for the more mundane business of thin letter: It is my privilege to serve as litigation counsel for the City of Miami in a case entitled Cynthia Jordan, et. za.I. v. The City of Mi,ama. The case arose from a decision by the C.ity,s Nuisance Abatement Board. I serve a 3 legal counsel to the Board while an Assistant City Attorney prosecutes the cases. I happened to undertake this litigation representation because the case arose on an emergency basis in Federal Court in August, 1993: the .Assistant City Attorney who handled the Nuisance Abatement Board matters was not certified to appear in Federal (Court is the Southern District of Florida. Meanwhile, I was both certified and knew the facts and law. 96 - 719 1 Mayor-Joer-Car o l l o ID :305-854-4001 OCT 02, 96 1 :09 No .02? P.02 1 Merritt Stexhiem Ci t:y Ala Ager September 1.8, 1996 Vaga 2 The case ntart*�d with a temporary injunction entered against the City without notice. Within a span of eight weeks, and fallowing numearous hearings, =tions and legal, memoranda, we obta.iz d a ds am, ..&.x1 of tho case with prejudice. p1ai.uL1-):1sa took a.n appeal to the 11th Circuit. 1 did not take part is the appeal: it was handled by the Appellate Division of the City Attorney' s , ottice. The di .saal tetras reversed and the case was xemandad for further proceedings. Judge Laaare Nesbitt has scheduled trial for 14dv�.nabar 2 S . At a. status coafere nce in t.hi.s case. Judge Neabitt's comment to me in open court has been "c.au't the City settle this case?. :tu fact, the thirty-oDe (311 pl.aialtlffs are wi3ling to accept th+a amount ni; $24,800 i= full. &ettleweut UZ all of their clai= in my view, the cost of simply, defending this case will exceed $25, 000. In try view, it uau.ld be 1-=esp4asible for me try c n work and charge the City when the case cyan be %ettled for less than the amount of my aauticiPated le,9&I fees® Qa the lather hand, a. deoLai on must b�c mach prompt.1y Lv-c4 isa it would I-Ucewis a be irresponsible to allos-a the case to p,rc�gresa to the even of trial without &decpmto preparation. Tbexefore, Whiles this roqueot comes to your office halatedly, T ask that you act sui-ftly. I would 1aa La bring thin matter before the City Commission for consideration at the next Co=Lizsion meting. The political issues arc ooten ' A13enzitivn bg#caur.E an &--Si went dan be made that than® �alaizatiff� _do not deserve ��eaui�r �d that it Would-be 2oDr poll to ,pay a r-ettlement when there roan be no legal liabi atsr. on the athe.r hand,, tiie plaintiffs ' C'laaiTnei matte survived an appeal. it is possible that the Courts the second time around, win treat plaintiffs, claim rarittahly, to avoid the possibi-Xity of it second reveraai. Recognizing that the plaintiffs are impoverished re-sidents of the City of Hiazi, and that they claim to have bean put out of t-hei.r hou es Improperly, loaLng their posseasions through alleged callous conduct by employes a Of the City of Miami.,, jury sympathy c6ald result; im an award which iAs many times the amount reque-sted for settlement. The settlement amount averages lose than $1,000 per plai,ntiif. I recognaza tbAt t.hiz rpestion could be a "political hot potato." The City Attnrnesy has dLractsd me to take this mattes up with the individual. Commissioners and bring it before the Cn=; Asi.on if a majority of the Comnissioners agree. Z reviewed this wl h Mayor earoll o ' s otitice and was dixect.ed to write to you Law ovr4cEc or SW EETAPPLE, BROCKER & VARKAS A Oo A11TNER.%NIP or Ptior LSSIONAL ASDOCWPAON4- z 96-- 719 r ,