Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-96-0360
J-96-374 5/23/96 RESOLUTION NO. 9.6 3 6 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ("RFP"), IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED FORM, FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("UDP"), TO CONSIST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL WATER -DEPENDENT FACILITIES, WITH OPTIONAL FACILITIES, AND ANCILLARY RELATED USES ON APPROXIMATELY 13.5 ACRES OF CITY - OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE DINNER KEY BOAT YARD, LOCATED AT 2640 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, Section 29A(c) of the Charter of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, and Section 18-52.9 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, provide for a Unified Development Project (11UDP11) process to govern the development of certain improvements to real property owned or to be acquired by the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, City -owned property known as the Dinner Key Boat Yard (the "Property") [formerly the Merrill Stevens Boat Yard], located in Coconut Grove at 2640 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, consists of approximately 6.9 acres of upland and as much as 6.6 acres of submerged lands well suited for the development of certain commercial and recreational water - dependent facilities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 95-48, adopted January 12, 1995, the City determined that the development of a QTTACHmr-hiT vs) CONTAINED I CITY COM ESSION MEETING OF MAY 2 3 1996 Resolution No. 96- 360 I r boat yard, marina and related retail and office facilities, with the option to develop a public market and/or historic interpretive/interactive facility, on said property would best be accomplished using the UDP process to obtain an integrated package of services from the private sector including planning, design, construction, leasing and management of such improvements; and WHEREAS, as directed by said Resolution, the City Manager authorized the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization to prepare the attached Request for Proposals ("RFP") for the subject UDP, which is being considered at a duly advertised public hearing; and WHEREAS, at a later date, the City Commission will be asked to select a certified public accounting firm and to appoint members to a review committee (consisting of a number of City officials or employees and an equal number, plus one, of members of the public whose names shall be recommended by the City Manager), in accordance with prescribed UDP procedures; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. 2 - 96- 360 Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized!/ to issue a. Request for Proposals, in substantially the attached form, for a UDP to consist of the development of commercial and recreational water -dependent facilities, with optional facilities, and ancillary related uses on approximately 13 acres of City -owned waterfront property known as the Dinner Key Boat Yard, located in Coconut Grove at 2640 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd da of Mai 1996. ATTEST, WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: L KELLY K ARS ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORK! AND CORRECTNESS: A. QU NN N , III CITY ATT BSS:W864 The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposed by the City Attorney, including but not limited to those prescribed by applicable City Charter and Code provisions. - 3 - b6- 360 �dTY OF �? "{ INCH RATEO IB BN�Q V,'t,0 j i i i 1 2640 South. Bayshore Drive III I } Miami, Florida I F.. ISSUE DATE: MAY 31 1996 lCITY of MIAMI Stephen P. Clark, Mayor Wifredo (Willy) Gort, Vice -Mayor Miller J. Dawkins, Commissioner l Joe Carollo, Commissioner } J.L. Plummer, Jr., Commissioner Cesar H. Odio, City Manager A. Quinn Jones III., City Attorney Prepared by: Department of Community Planning and Revitalization Development Division P.O. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Tel. (305) 416-1400 Proposals Due: 2:00 P.M. FRIDAY, August 30,1996 U9® ��>� r TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PUBLIC NOTICE....................................................................................................................................................1 II. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................2 I A. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................2 B. AREA LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS .......................................... :...................................4 C. DESCRIPTION OF SITE................................................................ ....... .......................7 1. LOCATION.......................................................................... ......... .................... . 7 2. AREA-- ............................................................................................:..7 3. EXISTING FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS : .................:.. .. 9 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS : ............................................ 9 5. POST HURRICANE ANDREW CONDITIONS AND PLANS .... 6. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY ........................... ..... ............. 12 7. EXISTING AND HISTORICAL USES ........................................... 73 8. HISTORIC DESIGNA TION AND INCENTIVES .................. 14 9. EXISTING UTILITIES: ......`....................................... I5 10. ADJACENT USES & CONDITIONS: ...... 15 D.LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK E. LEASE TERM............................................................ .... .:; 16 F. FINANCIAL RETURN TO THE CITY - FAIR MARKET VALUE......... ...:: ....... c.16' 1. FORM OF LEASE PAYMENTS ............................. 16 2 MINIMUM RENT ...........:..................................................... ... 16 3. APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE ...................................... 16 4. PAYMENT SCHEDULE.................................................................................. .17 G. TAXES............................................................................................................. .. A7 H. ZONING.............................................................................................................. .18 I. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS ................................ 21 J. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE (TENTATIVE) ..................................... ,.22 I11. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ............................ ..... ... .....: 23 A. DECLARATION AS A UDP.............................................................. .... .2.3 B. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS.......................................................... .23 C. COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY........................................................ .24 D. COMMITMENT OF SERVICES AND MATERIALS .......... E. EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS ................................. 25 F. RIGHT OF TERMINATION ................................................. ......:.......:........." 25 IV. ELEMENTS OF PROPOSALS ................................. ......... ......... ................. ..: ........26' A. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ....................................... .: 26 B. USE OF PROPERTY ................................................. .......: ......:... ..... .....:: .....: (:..27 1. REQUIRED PRINCIPAL USES ............. 6.............. .... .27 � r. 2. OPTIONAL PRINCIPAL USES ................................. 30 3. REQUIRED ACCESSORYAND ANCILLARY USES ........ .....: .... : .......... 34 C. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ............................ .......................... : r: :....:.....35 1. STRUCTURES... .................................................: .35 2. LANDSCAPING.......................................................... .............. ............ ` .......:.. ,....: ...... 36 3. MARINA AND BOAT YARD ............ .................... ::........:....... ....::........ ... ..:'......... :.................36 4. PARKING AND CIRCULATION ....................::::.. ......: : .: ...... .......:...... :.... ::.:...36 5. PUBLIC AMENITIES ...........................:... ........ .......:......... ........ 'l ........... .............37 6. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES.:. .......:: ........: . .:., ....::...:37 1 D. PERMITTING AND LICENSING .......................................... .....•.................................... ..,. ...•....,.......••.•..37 i E. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST............................................................. .................... ...............38 F. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ............................................... ............. 11,............... ....... ........ ................ I ........... 38 G. PROPOSED CUSTOMER AND PUBLIC SERVICES..............................................................•.....................39 H. MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS................................•............................................39 I. FINANCING STRATEGY.................................................................................................................................40 J. COMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT (PROPOSING) ENTITY & CONSULTANTS....................................................................................................................................................40 1. GENERAL......................................................................................................................... ..........-.......1.40 2. CONSULTAN7S................................................................................................................. .........-,.........40 3. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS........................................................ ........ .... .41 I 4. CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM ...................................... I ....... .................................................42 I 5. BACKGROUND CHECKS ...................................................... .42 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ........................ ....42 K. MINORITY &: LOCAL FIRM PARTICIPATION .............. ..42 V. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS .................................. ........ ........ ...1.... .............44 A. SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES ............................................ 44 B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONTENTS ....45 VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA............................................................................................... ......... .............48 A. INITIAL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RFP ...48 B. REVIEW COMMITTEE EVALUATION CRITERIA ....49 1. OVERALL PLAN & DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................... ....49 2. HISTORIC PRESERI'ATION EXPERIENCE, DESIGNAND ENHANCEMENT .... ......... .............50 3. PRESER ['ATION OF SECOND dL4NG,4R.................................................................... 50 4. AANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS ....................................... ..50 5. RETURN TO TIIE CITY.......................................................................................................... ............51 6. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY ............................................ 51 7. EXPERIENCE OF TIIE PROPOSING ENTITY.......................................................:. .51 8. CAPABILITY OF TdIE DEVELOPMENT ENTITYAND CONSULTANTS .............. ..... ...:....52 9 EXTENT O_F AINORITY PART ICIPATION.......:. ...........52 ................................................................. 10. PARTICIPATIONOF.LOCAL FIRM(S)........................................................................ .......:. ...........53 C. CPA FIRM EVALUATION CRITERIA ........................... :............................................................ ..53 I VII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED LEASE AGREEMENT............ .............54 I A. AUTHORIZATION...................................................................................................... ...............54 i i f _ i B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS................................................................................... ........ ......... ..............54 , ill 96- 360 r `1 APPENDICES APPENDIX Al. City of Miami Charter. and Code - applicable sections APPENDIX A2. Pertinent Legislation APPENDIX B. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation APPENDIX C. Summary - Dade County Manatee Protection Plan APPENDIX D. Site Rehabilitation Completion Orders from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection APPENDIX E. Structural Condition Assessment for the Dinner Key Waterfront Complex, dated July 25, 1994, prepared by Bliss & Nitray, Inc. (selected excerpts) APPENDIX F. Dinner Key Facilities - Feasibility Study of Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Conditions, prepared by SDI Consulting Engineers, Inc. (selected excerpts) APPENDIX G. Post -Hurricane Planning Information: Resolution No. 94-782 and (excerpts from) "Virrick Gym at Dinner Key Study", Planning, Building & Zoning Department, March 1994 APPENDIX H. Dinner Key Strategies for Improvement: INTERIM REPORT, dated September 27, 1994, prepared by MRA International (selected excerpts) APPENDIX I. Memorandum of Understanding - Grove Key Marina Lease APPENDIX J. City of Miami Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards and Guidelines APPENDIX K. City of Miami Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program: Article IV.5., Sections 18-67 - 18-77 of the Code of the City of Miami; Ordinances 10062, 10538 and 11272 APPENDIX L. Source List EXHIBIT'S EXHIBIT 1. Sketch of Survey (includes Legal Description) EXHIBIT If. Permit Sketches for the City's Boat Yard/Marina Renovation Project EXHIBIT III. Declaration, Professional Information, and Financial Forms EXHIBIT IV. Minority Participation Forms; Office Location Affidavit iv 96- 360 I. PUBLIC NOTICE The City is seeking Unified Development Project Proposals for the development of commercial and recreational water -dependent facilities, and ancillary related uses on up to 13.5 acres of City -owned, waterfront property and adjacent bay bottom lands located at Dinner I{ey, in the Coconut Grove area of Miami, Florida (the "PROPERTY").. The City, through this offering, seeks to procure from the private sector an integrated package of services consisting of planning and design, construction, leasing and management of the proposed commercial and recreational development.. The PROPERTY being offered includes 6.9± acres of upland contiguous to Biscayne Bay/Atlantic Ocean and up to 6.6 acres of adjacent submerged (bay bottom) lands in Biscayne Bay. Development shall include a boat yard, marina and related uses including retail and office, and may optionally include a public market and/or historic interactive/interpretive facility and like related uses for general public access. It should be noted that the PROPERTY contains historically significant structures that shall be restored for adaptive reuse according to Secretary of the Interior Standards for (Historic) Rehabilitation. All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Request for Proposals document (RFP) which may be obtained on or after the issue date from the City of Miami Department of Community Planning and Revitalization; contact by mail at PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33233-0708, in person 444 SW Second Avenue - 3rd Floor, or telephone (305) 416-1400. This document contains detailed and specific information regarding the parcel of land contemplated for development, the uses the City is seeking, the submission requirements and selection procedures pertinent to this Unified Development Project. The cost of the RFP document is $20 per copy, and requests for the RFP should be accompanied by check (cashier's check or money order preferred). The cost of the RFP may be reimbursable only upon the return of a clean, unmarked document to the City within two (2) weeks of the deadline for submittals. The City will conduct a Pre -Submission Conference on Tuesday, June 18, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. at the Community Planning and Revitalization Department offices. While attendance at the Pre -Submission Conference is not a condition for offering proposals, all prospective developers are invited to attend. The Pre -Submission Conference is intended to provide opportunities to review the contents and requirements of the RFP, to answer questions of potential proposers, and for prospective parties to network toward forming development teams. The City will conduct an on -site inspection tour of the PROPERTY immediately following the Pre -Submission Conference. Proposals must be delivered to Walter Foeman, City Clerk, City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133 by 2:00 p.m., Friday, August 30, 1996 and will be publicly opened on that day. The City of Miami reserves the right to accept any proposals deemed to be in the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposals, or to reject any or all proposals and to re -advertise for new proposals, in accordance with the applicable sections of the City Charter and Code regarding Unified Development Projects. Furthermore, until such time as a lease agreement is executed by the City, the selected proposer shall not have any vested rights, nor title or interest in the subject property or in the development proposed thereon. Adv. No. 0331 ._1 Cesar H. Odio City Manager 1 ! 96- 360 r i i II. OVERVIEW A. INTRODUCTION The City of Miami (the "City") is seeking Unified Development Project ("UDP") Proposals from qualified and experienced developers for the development of a multiple use facility including commercial and recreational uses. Proposals shall include, at a minimum, the development of a boat yard, marina and related uses on the approximately 13.5 acre (maximum) site. Proposals may include, as optional use(s), a public market and/or a historical interpretive/interactive facility. Specified related uses, including retail and office, are also permitted, provided they are ancillary to the stated primary uses. The property (the "PROPERTY"), located at Dinner key in the area of Miami known as the village of Coconut Grove, includes ±6.9 upland acres and up to 6.6 submerged acres. On January 12, 1995 the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 95-48 declaring that the most advantageous method to develop certain improvements at the PROPERTY is through the Unified Development Project (the "UDP") process that seeks to procure an integrated development package from the private sector including planning and design, construction, leasing and management of the PROPERTY. On May 23, 1996, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 96-360 authorizing the issuance of this Request for Proposals (the "RFP") as required by the City Charter and Code in applicable sections governing UDPs. Pertinent legislation referenced herein is included in Appendix A. The City Commission shall appoint members to a review committee and select a Certified Public Accounting firm to evaluate proposal submissions and report findings to the City Manager as required by the City Charter and Code sections regarding UDP's. Proposals must present a definitive development program, completion schedule, financial strategy, and management plan respecting all requirements of this Request for Proposals to form the basis for selection by the City. Proposals submitted in response to this RFP shall also include planning and design, financing, and construction of proposed improvements appropriate to the character of the site and the Dinner Key waterfront. The PROPERTY, which is owned by the City, is to be developed, leased, operated, managed and maintained at no cost to the City by the selected proposer who is chosen by the City Commission to develop the PROPERTY under a long term property lease agreement with the City. Any lease agreement entered into for the development of the PROPERTY shall comply with the requirements of Section 3 (f (iii) of the City Charter, included herein for reference in Appendix A, pertaining to public access and view corridor requirements for City -owned waterfront. 2 96- 360 The City will conduct a Pre -Submission Conference on Tuesday, .tune 18, 1996, 10:00 a.m. at the Community Planning and Revitalization Department offices for the purposes of explaining the RFP and to provide opportunities for prospective proposers to raise questions or issues on the RFP, or to network with others who may be interested in forming or joining development teams. While attendance at the Pre -Submission Conference is not a condition for offering proposals, all prospective proposers are invited and encouraged to attend. The City will conduct an on -site inspection tour of the PROPERTY immediately following the Pre -Submission Conference. Proposals must be delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, (First Floor Counter) City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133 by 2:00 p.m., Friday, August 30, 1996. A list of proposers will be made public on that day. Unless specifically authorized by the City, no additions or modifications may be made to the proposals and the entities they represent subsequent to the submission deadline. New and/or current personnel who are not identified in the proposal may not be introduced as part of the proposal entity or its consultants subsequent to the submission deadline, unless specifically approved by the City. Except for public hearings and scheduled presentations, contact with the City regarding this RFP or any aspect of a proposal by a proposer or any representative of a proposer shall be limited to the City Manager or his designee, Jack Luft, Director, Department of Community Planning and Revitalization, until such time as the successful proposer is determined by the City Commission. All questions or requests for additional information should be addressed in writing to Jack Luft, Director, City of Miami, Department of Community Planning and Revitalization, -PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33233-0708. Any response to such questions or requests that could potentially impact proposals will be furnished to all proposers in the form of an addendum to this RFP. The City of Miami reserves the right to accept any proposals deemed to be in the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposals, or to reject any or all proposals and to re -advertise for new proposals, in accordance with applicable sections of the City Charter and Code. Any proposal deemed to be non -responsive or not responsible will be rejected. A responsible proposer is one that has the capability in all respects to fully perform the requirements set forth in the proposal and the proposed lease, and that has the integrity and reliability which will assure good faith performance. A responsive proposer is one that has submitted a proposal that conforms in all material respects to the RFP. Thus, for example, a proposal that has not substantiated the financial capability of a prospective proposer may be rejected. 3 96- 360 dw I To identify the proposal deemed most advantageous to the City, the City's consideration shall include, but not be limited to: the proposer's experience, the capability of the development entity and its consultant(s), tile amount of return offered to the City, the proposer's financial qualifications and capability, the overall design of the proposed development, the extent of 1 minority participation, and the evaluation by the City of all information submitted in support or explanation of the proposed development of the PROPERTY. Furthermore, until such time as a lease agreement is executed by the CITY, the selected proposer shall not have any vested rights, nor title or interest in the subject PROPERTY or in the development proposed thereon. Right To Reject all Proposals: Pursuant to City Charter Section 29-A, sub- section (c)(6), the City reserves the right to reject all proposals and further, to terminate the UDP process and/or contract after a public hearing in the event of any substantial increase in the City's commitment of funds, property, or services, or in the event of any material alteration of any contract awarded under subsection (c) Unified Development Projects, of Charter Section 29-A. Reservation: The information contained in this RFP is published solely for the purpose of inviting prospective proposers to consider the development opportunity described herein. Prospective proposers should make their own investigations, projections, and conclusions without reliance upon the material contained herein. B. AREA LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS The PROPERTY to be developed is located in the area of Miami known as Dinner Key, which lies in the southeastern quadrant of the City as shown in Figure 1. - Regional Location Map and Figure 2. - Area Location Map. i Dinner Key initially was a small island in Biscayne Bay. During the late 1800's, it served as a center for the settlers' social life and community commerce. The island was joined to the mainland during World War I to provide a training ground for the U.S. Navy. The subject PROPERTY is a portion of a larger complex that was subsequently developed in the 1930's by Pan American Airways for a commercial seaplane base, and was later acquired by the City along with adjacent parcels. These parcels and adjacent waterfront lands comprise the Dinner Key area and continue under public ownership for I use as boating clubs (the Coconut Grove Sailing Club), public park lands and recreational facilities (Virrick Gym and Boat Ramp, Seminole Boat Ramp, and Kenneth Myers Park), an exhibition hall (Coconut Grove Exhibition Center), municipal offices and chambers (Miami City Hall), restaurants (the Chart House, Scotty's Landing), specialty commercial concerns (Monty's Trainer's 4 rJ 96- 369 i i mm A Figure 2 -Area Location Map �R M WATWROHT RMWITTHT 6- 360 Restaurant & Specialty Center a.k.a. Grove Marina Market), and marinas (Grove Key Marina, Monty's Dinner Key Marina). Dinner Key has a 150-year history of public activities that link the area to the growth of the City from the earliest days of South Florida's pioneer settlement. The PROPERTY is located within the historic neighborhood of Coconut Grove. It continues to serve both local and regional needs for commercial and recreational marina use by residents and visitors in South Florida. The site is directly accessed from Interstate 95 and U.S. Highway 1. To the north of Dinner Key is Downtown Miami, which features a major financial and business district, a retail center considered to be the largest in the southeast, dozens of exciting attractions, hotel and conference facilities, and an emerging housing market. Surrounding and to the south of Dinner Key is Coconut Grove, a well known and picturesque neighborhood which is a mixture of high rise residences, waterfront estates, modest homes, restaurants, theaters, retail shops and boutiques, and parks. To the west is the city of Coral Gables which was founded in 1925 and today maintains its historic past and charm while it features its own dynamic downtown. and excellent restaurants. C. DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1. LOCATION As shown in Figure 3. - Site Map, the PROPERTY is bordered on the south by Grove Key Marina and the Chart House Restaurant (both leaseholds on City property), on the north by the Elizabeth Virrick Gym and Boat Ramp (historically known as the Dinner Key Coast Guard Air Station, also City owned), on the west by South Bayshore Drive, and on the east by Biscayne Bay. Miami City Hall is located within close proximity, immediately to the south of Grove Key Marina, followed by the Coconut Grove Exhibition Center and Dinner Key Marina, both of the latter being City -owned and operated. Monty Trainer's Bayshore Restaurant and Marina, another City leasehold operation, is located north of the Virrick Gym/Coast Guard Station, which are separated from that site by a surface parking lot. 2. AREA The area of the PROPERTY is a maximum total of + 13.5 acres, the boundaries of which are shown on the Sketch of Survey included herein as Exhibit I. Parcel A, approximately 11.2 acres, consists of ±6.9 acres upland and ±4.3 acres submerged lands. Proposers are advised that the submerged 7 95- 290 a ro 0-:3 a d o t e allr Spe, i ty Wa�ty s �. arina irric ym Boat o arm Project _'' '' Site muture Pub Ic arking v Grove chart House Key estaurant Marina SLanding Y �9� . �''c,. oat lift oconut prove inner Kid J convention Cent /� �arIna N I r-J r] �= R rm wamrRoff mhzkzvzlL-nWVT Figure 3 - Site Location 96-- 360 lands depicted as Parcel B, consisting of approximately 2.3 acres, may be included at the Proposer's option for the sole purpose of marina expansion, and shall be included in the lease only upon the demonstrated commitment of the Lessee to construct same. 3. EXISTING FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS: Existing property improvements for the PROPERTY are shown on Figure 4. - Existing Conditions. The existing publicly -owned improvements are to be included in the future leasehold. (As detailed later in this RFP, future improvements planned and constructed by the City, are also to be included in the leasehold.) Other than the inspection conducted on the date of the pre -Submission Conference, the PROPERTY and its facilities will be open for inspection by appointment only. Contact Raul de la Torre, Marinas Manager, Dinner Key Marina (305) 579-6980 to schedule an appointment Existing facilities include: • One (1) large hangar, approximately 38,450 s.f., of steel frame and corrugated metal construction. Dimensions are 211.5 ft. wide, 181.8 ft. long and 54 ft. high. The structure currently includes an upper loft level with divided office areas along both sides. This structure was built by Pan American Airways and was used for large vessel dry storage and repair operations. NOTE that it is a requirement of any proposed development plan that this building is to be restored in accordance with Secretary of the Interior Standards for (Historic) Rehabilitation (excerpts included herein as Appendix B), but it may be adapted for reuse. • One (1) smaller hangar, approximately 18,560 s.f., also of steel frame and corrugated metal construction, that is commonly referred to as the "Machine Shop". Dimensions are 102.1 ft. wide, 181.8 ft. long and 37 ft. high. The interior of the hangar has been altered to provide office space. Proposers are given the option to retain and utilize this structure or to demolish it, according to the needs of their individual development plans. If this structure is to be utilized under a proposed development scenario, it shall be renovated in accordance with Secretary of the Interior Standards for (Historic) Rehabilitation and may be adapted for reuse. • miscellaneous small structures • a marina basin, once holding approximately 75 wet slips and a fuel dock • Sea wall of approximately 1091.5 linear feet 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS: The PROPERTY includes a maximum of approximately 6.6 acres of bay bottom land located in Biscayne Bay, which is designated as an aquatic preserve. Any proposed development shall conform to the prescriptions and 0 36_ 360 k\TIM OF17T i`U WATZRIMMiT RUVIOPpv\Z,11T Figure 4 - Aerial\ Existing Conditions w. 96-- 360 requirements of effective environmental regulations governing same. As of the issue date for this RFP, there are no areas located within the PROPERTY that are considered sensitive or protected habitats. Note that all operations of the proposed development shall also conform to existing environmental regulations and permitting requirements. Under the proposed Manatee Protection Plan, as drafted by Metropolitan Dade County's Department of Environmental Resources Management and currently being considered by the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, there appear to be no limitations as to the type of vessel allowed to utilize/dock at the PROPERTY. Being located outside of essential manatee habitats, said Plan goes on to recommend the Dinner Key area as one exempt from any new limits on expanded commercial marinas, dry storage fuel docks and transitory decks. A summary of the Dade County Manatee Protection Plan is included as Appendix C. In 1989 and 1990, three separate environmental audits (both Phase I and II) were conducted on the PROPERTY in connection with a previous RFP. Of 27 wells and 20 soil test locations, only 4 areas were found to bear evidence of petroleum product contamination. (Copies of those assessment reports are available to prospective proposers for inspection only by contacting the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization, attn. Jeanette Garcia, (305) 416-1400 for an appointment.) Consequently, the City removed five (5) underground fuel tanks and one (1) waste oil tank from the PROPERTY. As of February 1995, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection completed its review of both the Contamination Assessir_ent Report (CAR) and the No Further Action Proposal (NFAP) for these activities and effectively released the City from further obligation to conduct site rehabilitation on the PROPERTY. Copies of the Site Rehabilitation Completion Orders are included as Appendix D. Prior to the execution of a lease agreement by the parities, the CITY will allow the successful proposer to conduct environmental investigation(s) of the PROPERTY, subject to such conditions and limitations as may be imposed by the City Manager, including, without limitation, requirements for supervision by the City, disposition of reports, and execution of any legal documents. The resolution and/or remediation of the results of such investigation(s), if or as required, shall be the subject of negotiation between the City and the successful proposer. 5. POST HURRICANE ANDREW CONDITIONS AND PLANS f The PROPERTY suffered significant damage to all of its in -water improvements as a result of Hurricane Andrew in August of 1992. All 75 previously existing wet slips, piers and concrete docks were impacted to the 1 extent that they required subsequent demolition by the City. Additionally, the concrete sea wall failed in sections hit by an unsecured freighter during 11 96- 360 I the storm. Comparatively, and in relation to the age of the structures, hurricane damages to the hangar buildings were not significant. Included as Appendix E to this RFP is an excerpt from an engineering report 4 commissioned by the City and performed by Bliss & Nitray, Inc. entitled "Structural Condition Assessment for the Dinner Key Waterfront Complex: July 25, 1994". Appendix P provides excerpts from Dinner Key Facilities - Feasibility Study of Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection { Conditions, prepared by SDI Consulting Engineers, Inc. at the same time. l These reports cover only the hangars on the PROPERTY. Note that the 1 recommendations and findings contained in these reports are those of the consultants and are not necessarily the requirements of local building codes, the City and this RFP. To inspect the complete text and test results contained in these reports, contact Allan 1. Poms, Chief Designer, Department of Public Works, PO Box 330708, Miami 33233-0708 or 444 SW Second Avenue - 8th Floor, phone (305) 416-1200. i Proposers are advised that the PROPERTY and the adjacent City -owned site known as the Virrick Gym were the subjects of an involved study by the „ City's Planning, Building & Zoning Department, which included a process j with significant public input called a "charrette". The results of the charrette were presented to the City Commission on October 27, 1994 and were adopted as policy of the City for the redevelopment of these sites by Resolution No. 94-782 on that date. This RFP and, particularly, the allowed uses of the PROPERTY and the selection criteria upon which proposals will be judged, have been drawn directly from the charrette process and planning study. Appendix G to the RFP provides a copy of that Resolution and excerpts from the charrette/planning study. Additionally, the City commissioned a study by MRA International, Inc. to assist in devising a ' development strategy based on the community charrette. That study, "Dinner Key Strategies for Improvement - Interim Report", excerpts of which are included as Appendix H, formed the basis for the development objectives outlined in this RFP. 6. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY The City has initiated a renovation and improvement program for the PROPERTY which is funded in the estimated amount of $2,400,000. This project will involve the below listed scope of work, pending continued available funding and receipt of all required permits and approvals: • reconfiguration, repair and/or replacement of the existing bulkhead j with a new sea wall, including the removal of the existing peninsula • construction of approximately 52 wet slips, including piers and { utilities (electric, water and fire lines as required by code) • permitting for an additional 92 wet slips (estimated), for a total of 144 wet slips j • minimal grading, paving and drainage improvements to the upland area immediately adjacent to the sea wall • improvements to parking facilities in the southeastern most section of s the Property, adjacent to Chart House • construction of a small storage building Design of the new facilities and permit applications will provide for the future installation of fueling facilities and one or more travel lifts, which will not be furnished by City. Copies of conceptual sketches and related materials submitted for environmental permitting of the project are enclosed as Exhibit U. The above improvement program does not include any repair or ! modification to the hangars or to the remainder of the site. The proposed improvements are expected to be completed in early 1997. If scheduling of j ! the RFP and lease negotiations permit, the Successful Proposer will be 'i allowed input into the final design and construction drawings. Proposers may make arrangements to review available specifications, plans, and other I documents for said improvements by contacting Allan I. Poms, Chief l Designer, Department of Public Works, PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida i 33233-0708, or 444 SW Second Avenue, telephone (305) 416-1200. i ' 7. EXISTING AND HISTORICAL USES a In the period around the turn of the century, Dinner Key was an island off the Coconut Grove waterfront and a gathering spot for area residents. The name "Dinner Key" derives from the then -island's use for picnicking and public social activities. The island was joined to the mainland during I World War I. In 1930, Dinner Key was selected by the newly -formed Pan American } Airways System as the base for its inter -American operations. The hangar facilities at Dinner Key, including those built on the PROPERTY in 1938, were utilized for storage, maintenance, repair and machine shops associated _. with the commercial seaplane service. ! Since acquired by the City from Pan American Airways in 1946, the i PROPERTY has functioned as a boat yard and marina to serve the boating community of the greater Miami area. From 1949 to 1984, the PROPERTY was leased by the City to Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Company. From the expiration of that lease agreement in July 1984 until some time in 1989, Merrill Stevens continued its operation of the boat yard as a tenant at will. In 1989, the City assumed control over the day-to-day operation of the yard j and, for a brief period after Hurricane Andrew, approximately December 1992 to July 1993, a group of boat yard tenants incorporated and entered 13 l 96- 360 into contract with the City for the management of the boat yard. Note that the marina was rendered inoperable by the 1992 hurricane, therefore y operations since then have been restricted to those of the boat yard. The City subsequently resumed control of the operation and presently runs the facility under the Marinas Division of the Department of Public Facilities. 8. HISTORIC DESIGNATION AND INCENTIVES As part of the Pan American Airways base built in the 1930's, both the i large and small hangars on the PROPERTY and those on adjacent parcels were the first such structures constructed exclusively for commercial passenger seaplane service. The site plan developed by Pan Am was designed for both aerial and land views, calling for a number of hangars, including those on the PROPERTY to be placed in a line forming a "V" with the terminal building (now City Hall) at the apex of the "V" and at the end of a long drive, thus forming a shape reminiscent of an airplane. The PROPERTY, as part of the Pan American Seaplane Base, is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the federal government's official list of properties worthy of preservation. National Register listing imposes no - requirements on a property unless a proposed action involves federal assistance, permitting, or licensing. A listing in the National Register may, however, make a property eligible for potential federal tax incentives. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 provides for a 20 per cent investment tax credit with a full adjustment to basis for rehabilitating historic income -producing buildings. Additionally, the State of Florida provides historic preservation grants to local governments and non-profit organizations. The City of Miami ' would be willing to participate with the Lessee in seeking state, federal or private grant funds as may be available -for the preservation aspects of this project. The PROPERTY is also locally designated as a historic site, and is subject I to the provisions of Chapter 23.1 of the Miami City Code, which provides that any exterior alterations, additions and/or new construction are subject to the review and approval of the City's Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. Proposed demolition may be subject to a possible six month delay, and decisions of the Board may be appealed to the City Commission. i 1 The PROPERTY is eligible for a tax abatement under a Dade County regulation in effect since April 1, 1993. This legislation exempts the } incremental value added to a property by authorized historic improvements from the County's portion of ad valorem tax assessments. City staff is currently drafting similar legislation for Commission approval which would ! allow a property tax abatement for the City's portion of such tax _.a assessments for a period of up to ten (10) years for properties "improved" I I ' 14 96- 360 Ii i through historic preservation. As of the date this RFP is issued, this proposed City legislation has not been adopted. There is no assurance that it will become City law, or if so, in what form. 9. EXISTING UTILITIES: i The site and structures are currently served by water, sanitary sewer, electric and telephone utilities. Because existing utility lines within the PROPERTY are the original installations, it is anticipated that new hook-ups will be required. Subject to availability, detailed plans showing ii underground utility installations may be obtained from the City's Public I - Works Department, Central Files, PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33233- 0708 or 444 SW Second Avenue, telephone (305) 416-1200. 10. ADJACENT USES & CONDITIONS: 1 The subject PROPERTY is bordered to the north by the City -owned property known as the Virrick Gym and Boat Ramp, also known historically as the U.S. Coast Guard Air Station. On this site is another hangar building and an office annex, both of which were initially constructed by the Coast Guard. These structures previously housed water sport and other } recreational programs of the City and private non-profit organizations. Since Hurricane Andrew rendered the hanger unusable, the programs have been scaled back and operate in only a limited capacity from the office annex. The entire Virrick site is subject to a federally imposed deed restriction jwhich limits its use to public park and recreational purposes. With the ' support of the National Park Service, the City intends to utilize the site as an expanded community -based recreational center for water -dependent 1programs (sailing, kayaking, diving and the like) and for historic interactive and/or interpretive exhibits. Subject to requisite state and federal approvals, the City intends to demolish the office portion and to historically restore the hangar under a public -private partnership effort. A qualified private firm will be identified to undertake fund-raising for and management ? of the Virrick Gym site. The integration of uses and accesses of the subject S PROPERTY with the Virrick site is strongly encouraged. To the south of the subject PROPERTY are Grove Key Marina, a City leasehold with a term expiring in 2012, and the Chart House Restaurant, a sublease of Grove Key Marina. The former includes both wet slips and dry i rack storage. Proposers' attention is directed to the fact that the April 1, J 1976 Grove Key lease agreement gives this entity the exclusive right at Dinner Key to haul and store boats up to and including 28 feet in length. Appendix I is a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding of the Grove Key j Marina lease detailing this issue. 15 96- 360 It is strongly recommended that proposers review the terms and conditions of leases and subleases for the adjacent City -owned parcels, copies of which are on file with the City's Office of Asset Management. Said files, the PROPERTY and facilities will be open for inspection to prospective proposers by appointment only. Contact Raul de la Torre, Marinas Manager, Dinner Key Marina, telephone (305) 579-6980 for an appointment. E. LEASE TERM The City will enter into a lease agreement with the selected proposer for the development of the PROPERTY described herein for a maximum term of forty (40) years including any renewal options. Proposals for shorter lease terms are preferable to the City. The structure and the term of the lease will be a matter for negotiations with the successful proposer. F. FINANCIAL RETURN TO THE CITY - FAIR MARKET VALUE 1. FORM OF LEASE PAYMENTS In accordance with City Charter Section 29B, the City may not consider any sale or ]ease of City property unless the City shall receive fair market value for such sale or lease. In submitting a proposal, each Proposer shall make an offer of annual lease payments to the City which shall conform to the following format: a minimum annual guarantee or a percentage of gross receipts, whichever is greater. Different percentages of gross receipts may be offered for the different operations included in the proposal. Proposals shall include sufficient analyses of costs and revenue to justify the proffered figure as "fair market value" according to the details of its development and management programs. Each Proposer shall specifically state in its Proposal that it agrees that its annual lease payments will meet or exceed fair market value, if its proposal is accepted by the City. 2. MINIMUM RENT Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the City expects a minimum annual rent of not less than $300,000. Annual lease payments (base rent and/or the percentage(s) of gross receipts) offered to the City in a proposal may be negotiated upwards by the City depending on the extent and quality of improvements proposed, and may similarly be subject to incremental escalation over the lease term. Additionally, minimum annual lease payments may be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index over the lease term. 3. APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE Fair market value will be determined according to the following process. The proposal that is conditionally accepted by the City Commission will 16 96-- 360 be subject to an appraisal of the use as proposed by two (2) Master Appraiser Institute (MAI) qualified appraisers, which will be selected by -; the City and have documented experience in assessing properties of the same or similar uses. The proposer submitting said proposal will be given an opportunity to present its proposal, as well as supporting documentation, to the appraisers. Should the result of those two appraisals reveal that the Proposer's offer does not meet fair market value, then the Proposer shall be given the opportunity to revise its offer so that it meets or exceeds said value. In the event said Proposer is unable (or unwilling) to revise its original offer, it may remove its proposal from consideration or it may, at its own cost and expense, procure a reconciliation appraisal. The appraiser performing the reconciliation appraisal shall also be MAI qualified, have documented experience in assessing properties of the same or similar uses, and be 1 subject to the approval 'of the City. I In the event a conditionally accepted proposal is removed from ` consideration during this process to determine fair market value, the City may then, at its option, conditionally accept the proposal ranked next by the Review Committee, or the City Manager, as applicable, or the City may terminate the active RFP process and solicit new proposals. A proposer whose proposal is thus removed from - 1 consideration will reimburse the City for City's costs in securing appraisals. 1 4. PAYMENT SCHEDULE Lease payments to the City are due and payable upon the commencement of the lease, and the minimum guarantee is generally ! divided into twelve monthly installments due in advance of each month. The City may, during the course of negotiations with the Successful Proposer, consider alternative payment schedules, as may be suggested jin the proposal, to address initial permitting, construction and start-up ~' phases of the project. Alternative payment schedules, if accepted by the City, shall be considered only an interim deferral of the required rental payment(s) and not a reduction or waiver of them. Further, since annual payments cannot be waived by law, any deferred payments may be subject to market interest payable to the City. All payment schedules shall be subject to the ultimate approval of the City Commission. G. TAXES All entities contracting with the City under the UDP process shall be obligated to pay whichever is the greatest of the following: (1) all applicable ad valorem taxes that are lawfully assessed against the Property, or (2) an amount equal to what the ad valorem taxes would be if the Property were privately owned and 17 ' 96— 360 1 used for a profit -making purpose. Such taxes shall not be credited against any revenue accruing to the City under any contract that may be awarded under the UDP process. Estimated Current Ad Valorem Taxes: Assuming an estimated appraised land value of $3,830,000 and an estimated project improvement cost of $3,000,000, the total assessed value for both land and improvements would be estimated at $5,464,000, representing 80% of the total estimated appraised value. The resulting estimated annual property tax, based on the 1995 millage rate of 30.7275 would be $167,895. These estimates are for illustrative purposes only. Ad valorem taxes, if assessed, will depend on the value of the proposed improvements and the then current assessed value of the land. H. ZONING Pursuant to City of Miami Zoning Code, the upland portion of the PROPERTY is zoned PR - Parks and Recreation. (Please see Figure 5. - Zoning Map.) The bay bottom acreage is a part of Biscayne Bay, an aquatic preserve. The Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Act prohibits the filling of bay bottom. The successful proposer shall be responsible for obtaining the requisite zoning permit(s) and/or exceptions from the City of Miami, if required, and approval from the Dade County Shoreline Review Committee prior to construction. As described in the official City of Miami Zoning Code Regulations and as delineated on the official Zoning Atlas of the City of Miami, allowable uses in Parks and Recreation zoned areas include: a) public or private parks and recreational facilities, including marinas b) living quarters for caretakers, watchmen or other necessary personnel. c) In existing marinas, such facilities as boat docks, slips, piers, and moorages 1 for commercial & official vessels and private pleasure craft, boat rental and i charters By virtue of the public hearing held in connection with the issuance of this RFP, { the uses prescribed in this RFP document have been conceptually approved by the City. Procedurally, certain additional uses allowed under the RFP will require subsequent review by appropriate City agencies and/or boards, as to the design and appropriateness of the proposed facilities, and the grant of particular permits j or exceptions. Such review processes are not intended to deny permitted uses, merely to guide the ultimate form and context those uses are to take. Thus, a Special Exception granted by the City Commission at a public hearing will allow: a) supporting social. and entertainment services such as restaurants, cafes and retailing, exhibit and educational facilities, marine and marina facilities and other entertainment facilities, provided they are integral to the park j design and recreational function b) retail sales of boating, diving and recreational equipment and supplies, c) retail specialty shops 18 r 96- 360 Special Permits would be required for these additional permitted uses: d) repair or servicing of boats, marine motors, marine accessories or equipment (by Class II Special Permit, administratively issued) e) fishing piers (by Class I Special Permit, administratively issued) f) major structures (involving in excess of 1500 parking spaces) such as museums and exhibition space (by Major Use Special Permit, which also j requires City Commission approval at a public hearing) All prospective proposers must ensure that their proposed development complies with all applicable zoning laws. For details of allowable uses and applicable �I requirements of the PR zoning district, please contact the Department Community Planning and Revitalization, attn: Lourdes Slazyck, Assistant Director, PO Box i 330708. Miami. Florida 33233-07nS nr 444 Rw RPrnnrl Avnni7a - IrA Pl.,.,r F 9) PROJEC Cry PERMJ „- M UHHUl FT WATUROHT RUV10'rMliT Figure 5 - Zoning Map 96- 360 I. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS The proposal selection process is set forth in Section 29-A(c) of the Charter of the City and Section 18-52.9 of the Code of the City. This process shall be implemented as follows: 1. Solicitation of development proposals from qualified developers. 2. Initial review of proposals received in response to the RFP by City staff, to determine compliance with RFP minimum submission requirements as set forth in Section VI.A. 3. Evaluation, of responsive proposals by a Certified Public Accounting firm in accordance with criteria specified in Section VI.C. 4. Evaluation of responsive proposals by Review Committee appointed by the City Commission in accordance with criteria specified herein in Section VI.B. 5. Independent report of findings and recommendations submitted to City Manager by CPA firm and Review Committee. 6. City Manager recommendation to the City Commission of one or more of the proposals, based on the findings of the CPA firm and recommendations of the Review Committee, or alternatively, the City Manager's recommendation that all proposals be rejected. 7. City Commission acceptance/rejection of City Manager's recommendation and authorization to negotiate a lease agreement with the selected proposer whose proposal is determined most advantageous to the City, subject to the parties concurrence as to Fair Market Value. 8. Determination of Fair Market Value and concurrence of the parties. 9. Negotiation of lease agreement between the City and the selected proposer. 10. City Commission authorization to execute the negotiated lease agreement with the selected proposer. The selected proposer shall have no vested rights, nor title or interest in the PROPERTY or in the development proposed thereon until such time as a lease agreement is fully executed. Scheduling of the proposed lease agreement on the ballot of the next available referendum for approval of the voters if less than three (3) proposals were received. 11. Approval of the lease agreement by a majority of the municipal electorate at a referendum, if less than three (3) proposals are received by the City in response to this RFP. 12. Execution of lease agreement between the City and the selected proposer 21 96- 360 F J. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE (TENTATIVEI Issuance of the RFP Tiiesda , May 31,1996 Proposal Pre -Submission Conference/Site Tuesday, June 18, 1996 Inspection 10:00 a.m. Location: Dept. Community Planning & Revitalization 444 SW Second Avenue - 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Site: 2640 S. Bayshore Drive Coconut. Grove Proposal Submission Deadline Friday, Aug. 30, 1996 Location: Office of the City Clerk 2:00 P.M. Miami City Hall - First Floor Counter 3500 Pan American Drive Dinner key Miami, Florida 33133 Initial Review of Proposals (by staff) August 30,1996 Review Committee Meeting for Instruction September 2, 1996 CPA Firm's initial evaluation of Proposals made September 10, 1996 available to Committee Review Committee Meeting(s): CPA Firm presents its September 16, 1996 Findings to Committee, Committee Interviews Qualified Proposers Recommendations from the Review Committee and September 20, 1996 CPA Firm to the City Manager Recommendation from the City Manager to the City September 26, 1996 Commission for Selection of One or More Proposals and Authorization to Negotiate Lease - or - Rejection of all Proposals Determination of Fair market Value by appraisal October 18, 1996 process Begin Lease Negotiations with Selected Proposer October 21, 1996 City Commission Authorization to Execute Negotiated November 14, 1996 Lease and, if necessary, Scheduling of Referendum Ballot Item Referendum of Voters if necessary) February 1997 Execution of Lease February 1997 i !j 22 96- 360 F III. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS This RFP is being issued in accordance with City of Miami Charter Section 29 -52.9, which are incorporated herein by reference and and City Code Section 18 included as Appendix A. The following information highlights certain (but not all) requirements for UDPs. A. DECLARATION AS A UDP The City Commission determined and declared by Resolution that, for the development of improvements on City -owned property or property to be acquired by the City, it is most advantageous to the City to procure from the private sector one or more of the following integrated packages: (1) planning and design, construction and leasing; or (2) planning and design, leasing, and management; or (3) planning and design, construction, and management; or (4) planning and design, construction, leasing and management from a private entity. On January 12, 1995 the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 95-48 declaring that the most advantageous method to develop certain jimprovements on the subject PROPERTY is by a UDP process that seeks to procure an integrated development package from the private sector including +1 planning and design, construction, leasing and management of the PROPERTY. B. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS 1. City: The City shall not provide funds or financing for the development contemplated by this RFP. 2. Selected proposer: a) Debt Financing Rent & Reimbursements: The selected proposer is required to provide adequate equity and commitment for debt financing to finance all aspects of the proposed Unified Development } of the PROPERTY. The selected proposer is required to provide the City with a minimum guaranteed annual rent as specified in Section H. F. "Financial Return to the City". Upon both parties' execution of the lease agreement, the selected proposer shall reimburse the City for any and all direct costs incurred in evaluating all proposal submissions, including but not limited to: appraisal fees, the professional services of the certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission, and all advertising and printing costs related to this UDP, as well as any costs which may be incurred by the City during permitting processes. (Refer to Section IV. D. Permitting and Licensing", page 37.) The City shall deposit in 23 96- 360 r local banking institutions all moneys collected as a result of this UDP/RFP. b) Performance Bond: Simultaneous with execution of the lease agreement, the selected proposer shall be required to furnish the City with a Performance and Payment Bond, in customary form utilized for commercial transactions involving private sector principals in Dade County, and in the amount equal to the total estimated cost of the PROJECT improvements, but not less than $2,000,000.00 as stated in Section IV.. Estimated CONSTRUCTION Cost" on page 38 of this RFP. i c) Security Deposit: Simultaneous with execution of the lease agreement the selected proposer shall be required to furnish the City a security deposit equal to the one half (50%) of the first year's minimum rent. Such security deposit shall be in the form of cash, cashier's check or an acceptable Irrevocable Letter of Credit issued by a financial institution acceptable to the City. Such security shall be used for purposes deemed appropriate solely by City, including delinquent lease payments, and is to be replenished by Lessee within a time period specified by City. � d) Proposal Deposit: Submission of the proposal shall include, as 1 evidence of the proposer's creditworthiness and ability to meet its proffered financial commitment for the development, $25,000 in the ` form of cash or a cashier's check. Such funds collected by the City -.� shall be reimbursed to all but the Selected Proposer upon the selection of the apparent most advantageous proposal. Note that the City may require the submitter of the next ranked proposal to return said deposit in the event the conditionally accepted proposal is removed from consideration during the appraisal process (see Section II.F.2. "3. appraisal to Determine fair market value" on page 16). 1 f C. COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY The PROPERTY and its improvements are offered "as is" by the City for development and long term management, except as otherwise provided in Section II.C.6. "PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY" on page 12. No j representations or warranties whatsoever are made as to its condition, state or characteristics. Express warranties and implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose or use and habitability are hereby disclaimed. Testing, audits, appraisals, inspections, and the like desired or necessary to submit a proposal shall be at the sole expense of the prospective proposer. Reports regarding the PROPERTY, including any appraisal reports, that the City may have in its possession are available as public records. 24 96- 360 The City intends to enter into a lease agreement for the PROPERTY with the selected proposer. (Refer to Section II.E.) The term of the lease agreement to be entered into between the selected proposer and the City shall be a maximum of forty (40) years, though the City prefers a shorter term. The lease agreement shall be structured to provide the City with a minimum guaranteed annual rent or a percentage of gross revenues, whichever is greater. City -owned property is held in public trust and cannot be mortgaged, pledged, liened or subordinated in any way as a part of the lease agreement. All leasehold improvements shall become the sole property of the City upon the expiration of the lease agreement. D. COMMITMENT OF SERVICES AND MATERIALS All City services such as police and fire protection, which are routinely provided to any private development within the City, shall be provided to the selected proposer by the City. E. EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS Upon the conclusion of the UDP process as required by applicable City Charter and Code provisions, including any required votes- approval, the lease agreement for the PROPERTY shall be signed by the City Manager or his duly authorized designee after approval thereof by the City Commission. The selected proposer shall not have any vested right, title or interest in the PROPERTY until such time as the leasehold agreement is executed by the City. 1 F. I IGHT OF TERMINATION In addition to any other right of termination available, any substantial increase in the City's commitment of funds, property, or services, or any other material i alteration of any contract awarded for a Unified Development Project shall entitle the City Commission to terminate any contract including the lease after a public hearing. Prior to such public hearing, the Commission shall seek and obtain a report from the City Manager and from the Review Committee that evaluated the proposals for said project, concerning the advisability of the City exercising its right. The City shall have no liability with regard to its exercise of said right and the selected proposer shall bear all of its own costs with respect thereto. As stipulated in Subsection (e)(4) of Charter Section 29-A(c), "substantial increase" shall be defined as a 10% or more increase to the City's proposed commitment of funds, property and/or services, and "material alteration" shall be defined as a failure to comply with all aspects of the proposal except as may be specifically permitted in writing by the City Manager. IV. ELEMENT'S OF PROPOSALS Respondents to this RFP are advised that the following factors should be addressed in the proposals and each will be critically evaluated. A. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES public/private utilization of Property providing access to the site & facilities, to the waterfront and open space • water -dependent uses that capitalize the maritime character of Dinner Key • preservation & enhancement of PROPERTY's historic character and structures o multiple uses are preferred i • proposal must address parking Proposals must meet the City's development objective of compatible public/private utilization of the subject waterfront PROPERTY. Proposals shall provide, enhance and maintain as primary uses, both a full -service boat yard and a recreational marina, with related and ancillary marine services and amenities. At the same time, proposals shall preserve and improve the viability of one or both historic structures located on the PROPERTY, in accordance ' with the requirements of this RFP and Secretary of the Interior Standards for (Historic) Rehabilitation. The development shall additionally enhance public access to the waterfront at Dinner Key. To this end, a multiple use development project is preferred, with adaptive reuse of existing historic facilities for optional primary uses consisting of historic interpretive or interactive exhibits and/or a public market. The preferred project is intended to serve all segments of the local resident and tourist population, with an j emphasis on marine and boating enthusiasts, historic associations, and small business owners (including artisans and farmers). Given the unique and historic attributes of the structures on the site and consistent with the development objectives of this RFP, the City believes that an extraordinary opportunity exists to develop select recreational, commercial, educational or cultural facilities that effectively utilize the 3-dimensional volume of interior space in the historic structures. Additional emphasis should be given the integration of site borders, possibly through cross accesses, and to an overall design which should attempt to integrate and harmonize neighboring uses, along the bay from Monty Trainer's to the Coconut Grove Exhibition j Center. Of particular importance will be the relationships and integration of uses and accesses between the PROPERTY and the adjacent Virrick Gym site. i 26 96- 360 Aesthetics of the development will be an important consideration in the evaluation of proposals. The City expects the improvements to respect and enhance the local environment and be responsive to the waterfront setting. Proposals must meet the City's development objective of compatible public/private utilization of the PROPERTY. B. USE OF PROPERTY The required principal uses of the PROPERTY shall be water -dependent, taking i the forms of both a full service marina and a boat yard. Ancillary uses to the specified primary facilities shall be limited to marina/ boat -yard related office and marina/boat-yard related retail. Optional primary uses for the PROPERTY shall be limited to a public, urban or community market of retail food stuffs and similar merchandise, and/or a historic interpretive/interactive facility, with ancillary support services (related retail and/or office) for such uses. Proposers are reminded that it is a requirement of this RFP that any proposed use configuration shall historically preserve the large hangar for adaptive re- use. Furthermore, proposed development projects which additionally preserve j and re -rase the smaller hangar (machine shop) will receive added consideration during the evaluation of proposals. Proposer's are encouraged to again review ( the results of the post -hurricane planning processes for the PROPERTY which are included as Appendices G and H. All uses provided shall be non-exclusive uses. Note that the City reserves the right to review and approve any subleases that may arise from this RFP and a clause to that effect shall be included in the. lease agreement. i 1. REQUIRED PRINCIPAL USES Boat Yard Facility The Successful Proposer shall be required to provide, enhance and maintain a "full service" boat yard facility, which shall offer a broad i range of boating and marine activities comparable with other local full service facilities and compatible with adjacent recreational t uses. Services and activities may include, without limitation, boat hauling, storage, repair and maintenance services for vessels greater than twenty-eight (28) feet in length. (By virtue of the j City's existing lease dated April 1, 1976, the tenant of the adjacent site, Grove Key Marina, has exclusive right for city -owned facilities in the Dinner Key area to haul and store boats up to and including 28 feet in length. See Appendix I for more information.) } I 27 1 �- 360 1� f i The facility may offer the opportunity for individual boat owners to perform repairs, general maintenance and to make improvements to their private vessels, independent of such services as may be provided by the operator or tenants. i The boat yard facility must provide for full service boat repairs and may include, without limitation, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, planking, rigging, carpentry, hull and engine repairs. The boatyard facility shall include showers and restrooms for users, employees, customers. It is intended that the Boat Yard be a "working yard" where all aspects of boat and marine engine repair occur and, subject to liability issues, can be observed publicly. -, It shall be the responsibility of the successful proposer to ensure j' that any hull repairs, painting, scraping and engine repairs allowed by Lessee be conducted in full compliance with all i applicable City, County, State and federal regulations governing 1 noise, odor and air pollution controls. b) Marina Recognizing the City's plan for marina renovations as detailed in Section II.C.6. "PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY" on page 12, proposers shall include a detailed plan to upgrade, improve, operate and maintain recreational/commercial marina facilities in a manner and quality consistent with other first class marinas in the Miami metropolitan area. The marina facility is to include wet slip storage for vessels of any length, and hauling for vessels greater than 28 feet in length. '(See Appendix I for information on vessel length limitations for hauling and dry storage.) (1) Optional Marina Expansion: Proposers are given the option to expand the size of the marina operation within the boundary depicted as Parcel B on the survey (see Exhibit i) by increasing the number of wet slips to the maximum permittable under current environmental and developmental regulations and which the site may functionally accommodate. To that end, the City seeks to obtain the required environmental permits for up to 144 wet slips. Any additional slips constructed by the successful proposer shall meet or exceed the specifications and amenities of slips constructed by the City. Note that the 2.3± acres comprising Parcel B will not be included in the lease unless the Lessee has demonstrated a viable commitment to construct and 28 i f 96- 360 operate an expanded marina. (Refer to Section II.C.6. "PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY", page 12.) (2) Required Marina Services: The proposal shall include the marina services listed below, as well as such additional improvements as may be required to accommodate same. (a) dock master services during normal working hours to oversee docking and departure activities. (b) twenty-four (24) hour security and other emergency services as may be required by the U.S. Coast Guard, local police, and other agencies with jurisdiction (3) Optional Dry Rack Storage: Proposals may include dry rack storage subject to the limitations of vessel length, DRI regulations and environmental permitting as previously stipulated. For those proposals that include this amenity, more favorable consideration will be given to covered dry rack storage. e) Permitted Ancillary Uses for Boat Yard and Marina (1) Boat Yard/Marina Office The redevelopment plan may include space for use as the dock master's office, offices for the management and slip rental operations of the boat yard, and office or studio space for marine/boat yard trades, craftsmen, designers and/or artisans, and for other permitted uses and activities. The City recommends a maximum of 5,000 square feet for this purpose. (2) Marine Fueling, Facility Proposers are offered, as an option, the right to sell and pump marine fuel (diesel and/or gasoline) from the PROPERTY. Fuel tanks (above ground tanks are preferred) and dispensing equipment shall be constructed at Proposer's sole cost and expense and shall conform to all local, state and federal regulations. Said right to sell and dispense fuel shall be non-exclusive in the Dinner Key area. As a City leasehold, the operator may be required by the U.S. Coast Guard, local police and other enforcement agencies to provide after-hours and/or emergency fueling. (3) Charter Boat Concession Operations Marine related concessions located within the PROPERTY may be provided and may include charter fishing and dive 29 96- 360 boats, boat rentals and related services. No jet ski rentals will be permitted. (4) Food Service Concession One (1) prepared food and beverage concession is permitted for service to Boat Yard and Marina tenants and visitors. Such concession should be of a "snack bar" type or similar such "open air" convenience food and beverage concession. The design and operation of the food concession shall be compatible with and complimentary to the character and history of the Dinner Key waterfront. The City recommends a maximum of 1,500 sq. ft. of total enclosed floor area for this purpose. (5) Convenience Services/Boater Amenities A marina comfort station is required and shall include full service public restrooms, showers, laundry machines, rental locker storage, and pay telephones. (6) Boat Yard/Marina Related Retail The boat yard/marina may include a general provisioning retail store, generally described as a "ships' store". This establishment will be for the needs of the boaters and boat yard tenants, with its inventory to include packaged and fresh foods, marine electronics and equipment, sundry goods, convenience supplies, and boating, marine, fishing and related goods. A recommended guideline is a maximum of 3,000 sq. ft. of total enclosed floor area for this purpose. (7) Boat Brokerage / Dealer Boat Yard/Marina may include a boat brokerage. As a guideline, the City recommends a maximum of 2,000 sq. ft. of enclosed floor area, and not more than 15% of total marina slips. (8) Marine Trades School Proposers may include facilities (classrooms, stalls, slips and/or outdoor areas) which may be utilized for the training and apprenticeships of persons in boat building crafts or marine repair trades. 2. OPTIONAL PRINCIPAL USES Uses designated as "optional" herein are supplemental or in additional to the "Required Primary Uses" and are not to replace or supplant said required uses. 30 96- 360 ji t 1 i aj Public/Urban/Community Market As an optional use for the PROPERTY, proposals may include the development and operation of a public, urban or community market. Taking advantage of one or other, or a portion of either of the historically significant, large scale hangar structures on the I PROPERTY, the market shall offer a broad range of products in a unique retail setting that does not replicate conventional - supermarket design. The concept embraces a permutation of farmers' markets and crafts markets, with permanent operation on a regular, seven-day per week basis preferred. Specifically, the operation of a "flea market" from the PROPERTY is unacceptable. The market is intended as a significant community amenity as well, providing meeting and gathering places and a connection to the rural or small town experience that many find lacking in an urban environment. It is intended that the market shall offer for sale to the public a i broad selection of quality food and non-food items, the depth and breadth of which shall echo the cultural diversity of the greater Miami community, in terms of both product range and sales ' presentations, displays, and methodology. The market shall emphasize specialty, unique, ethnic, and exotic aspects of { i subtropical and tropical cultures and cuisine. Conventional supermarkets, department stores, and other traditional retail shops (e.g., furniture, clothing and/or book stores) do not conform t j to the spirit of the community/urban market concept and are not i acceptable. ` Food items may include prepared and bulk foods, produce, dairy products, baked goods, meats, poultry, seafood, spices, coffees/teas, wines and beers, specialty foods/groceries, take- home foods, and such prepared foods as vinegar, jams, sauces, cider, or juices. Non-food items may include flowers/plants, and S hand -made crafts (not mass produced) such as baskets/ straw items, beads, candles and incense, fabrics and hand -made clothing, dried flowers, fine arts, printmaking, antique and collectable items, photography and woodwork. As a guideline, ` areas for the consumption of prepared foods within the premises of the market should comprise not more than 25% of the total building footprint. It is not the desire of the City to encourage a typical shopping mall food court, but to provide an area to allow patrons to leisurely consume food and beverages purchased in the j market as part of the market experience. 31 96- 360 r As an "urban market" and with an eye to fostering producer - consumer interaction, the market operation shall seek out locally - owned, owner -operated, independent businesses to sublease retail stalls within the facility. Day stall rentals are to be permitted so as to encourage a rotation of varied products and to provide enterpreneurship opportunities for small or fledgling businesses, while the majority of stalls may fall to longer term subleases to ensure continuity and quality of operation. Successful examples of public urban markets include the Reading Terminal (Philadelphia), the Pike Street Market (Seattle), the Lexington Market (Baltimore) and the Granville Island Market (Vancouver, B.C.). It shall be incumbent upon the developer/operator of the PROPERTY to regulate stall rentals and product sales so as to maintain the highest quality standards and to preclude a used merchandise, flea market operation. Alternatively, a "community market" is permitted. A community market places overall operations and inventory under a single commercial entity, which involves itself in the community in a number of ways: by donations of revenues, goods and services to the local community, by utilization of locally grown or manufactured products, and by organization of community special events. For the purposes of this RFP, we recommend. that a community market operation reserve minimum of 25% of the enclosed (sales floor) area for regular (on -going) or day stall operation by local producer -seller tenants. As with the urban market concept, a proposed community market shall present a unique shopping experience- to consumers in which the presentation and sales method is as important as the product sold. For additional information about public markets, contact David O'Neal, consultant, 170 Spring Lane, Philadelphia, Penn. 19128, (215) 482-1530. b) Historic Interpretive / Interactive Facility and/or Exhibits Proposers may elect to provide, maintain and operate a historic interpretive/interactive facility on the PROPERTY, utilizing one or the other, or a portion of either of the large-scale hangar structures on site. As a cultural and educational facility, it shall focus on the history of the PROPERTY and the Dinner Key waterfront and their prominence in early marine aviation. The facility shall illustrate and exhibit artifacts, memorabilia and events using state of the art techniques, interactive and entertaining methods as a means to display and communicate. Given the 3-dimensional volume of interior space in the hangar structures, ideal exhibits shall 32 96- 360 incorporate full-scale replicas and/or original, restored air and marine crafts as permanent components of the facility's collection, which may be augmented by touring and loaned exhibitions. Proposers are also encouraged to highlight the maritime and aviation history of the site through exterior exhibits and/or j displays, both two- and three-dimensional. Examples would include photo murals, dioramas, and walkways with artifacts on -� display. Any proposal offering a facility or amenities of this type shall demonstrate and verify its credentials by including recognized 7 historical association(s) as participating member(s) in the development entity, or by endorsement written by such bona fide associations. The Historical Association of Southern Florida is one potential source for potential collections, exhibits, materials and related information; contact Mr. Randy Nimnicht, President, 101 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130-1538, phone (305) 375- 1492. C) Permitted Ancillary Uses for Optional Primary Uses i (1) Historic Facility Related Retail Development projects which include a historic interpretive facility may additionally provide and operate a retail gift shop offering merchandise that is solely related to museum and historical exhibits. Typical gift shop inventory will include miniature replicas of exhibits, photographs, prints, books, educational toys or games, and museum souvenirs. The I recommended area for the museum gift shop is 2,000 square feet. (2) Meeting/ Conferencing Facility i Development projects which offer either a public market or a historical facility may additionally provide a small scale meeting or conferencing facility to augment the educational and/or cultural aspects of the specified uses. Such a facility may include such amenities as training rooms, meeting jrooms, and presentation or entertainment areas for fund- raising, community, or social events. The recommended I area for a meeting/ conferencing facility shall not exceed 3,000 square feet. (3) Educational Facility _J Proposed development may include an on -site educational facility related to any or all primary uses developed on the ._J 33 96- 360 i Property, including classroom and training rooms for such activities as boat -building, sail making, ship and seaplane design. (4) Market and/or Historic Facility Related Office , --i Proposed development projects may include office space necessary for the administration and management of the specified operations, and office or studio space for related trades, craftsmen, designers and/or artisans associated with permitted uses and activities. i i (5) Prepared Food Service Concession Development projects which include a historic facility may additionally provide and operate one prepared food and j beverage concession primarily for the museum employees ' and visitors. Such concession shall be of a cafe "snack bar" type, and may be either "open air" or enclosed. The design and operation of the food concession shall be compatible with and complimentary to the character and history of the Dinner Key waterfront. The recommended area for the historic facility food concession is a maximum of 1,500 sq. ft. enclosed floor area. 1 As previously indicated in Section IV.B.2.a), proposals which offer a public market may allow consumption of prepared foods within the premises. As a guideline, areas for the consumption of prepared foods within the premises of the market should comprise not more than 25% of the building footprint. It is not the desire of the City to encourage a typical shopping mall food court, but to provide an area to allow patrons to leisurely consume food and beverages purchased in the market as part of the market experience. 3. REQUIRED ACCESSORY AND ANCILLARY USES Proposers are advised that the below listed accessory and ancillary uses are a requirement of any proposed development program for the PROPERTY. a) Parking Proposed development projects shall provide and maintain on the PROPERTY parking area(s) to service the primary and ancillary uses of the project, in sufficient quantity to comply with the City of Miami zoning ordinances. Emphasis should be given to the configuration and landscaping of parking areas, including the minimization of impervious surfaces and the providing of y 34 1 95- 360 r i alternative parking suffices such as grass, pavers, stone, and the like. All maintenance of parking facilities will be the responsibility of the successful proposer. Recreational Amenities The proposed development project shall provide and maintain for the community's benefit, the below listed public amenities, which are further described in Section IV.C. Proposed Site Improvements" beginning on page 35. (1) A bay walk shall be provided along the sea wall edge at Biscayne Bay, and shall include seating, lighting and landscaping. (2) Picnic facilities (tables and benches) shall be provided in conjunction with the bay walk and may be provided with all other amenities. (3) Open/Green Space - a twenty (20) foot wide landscape buffer with a pedestrian walkway (sidewalk) shall be provided between the western edge of the PROPERTY and South Bayshore Drive. (4) A bicycle path shall be incorporated into the landscape buffer along Bayshore Drive. 1 C. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS J The proposal shall schematically describe all proposed improvements to the PROPERTY including site improvements, structures and the general uses pertaining thereto. All improvements, including those to existing structures, shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal codes and ordinances, including the South Florida Building Code. The Selected Proposer will be responsible to obtain all required permits and approvals from all agencies having jurisdiction. 1. STRUCTURES The design of new structures and/or the refurbishing of existing structures shall be aesthetically designed to harmonize with the subtropical climate of South Florida, the natural environment of Biscayne Bay, and with the historic character of the Dinner Key j waterfront. Design concepts will be critically evaluated in the selection process. The overall height, mass and location of any new structures shall neither diminish nor compete with the historic hangers, which should remain the dominant feature(s) of the site. The required restoration of the large hangar and the optional preservation of the small 35 I 96- 360 i I hangar shall conform in all respects to Secretary of the Interior Standards for (Historic) Rehabilitation. Preservation/adaptive reuse f experience and design, and the continuity of historic treatment throughout the development project will be given significant consideration in the evaluation of proposals. Additionally, the construction of any new structures shall conform with the view corridor and public access requirements set forth in Section 3(mm) of the City Charter included in the RFP under Appendix A. f 2. LANDSCAPING ` A schematic landscape plan shall be submitted identifying areas of proposed vegetation - existing (to be retained) and new plantings - accompanied by a typical landscape materials list. Public and circulation areas shall be aesthetically enhanced by appropriate landscape treatments. Xeriscape design and use of native plant species are encouraged. Landscaping shall generally meet "xeriscape" design standards incorporating native plant species with drought- and salt - tolerant characteristics. 3. MARINA AND BOAT YARD a Improvements to the PROPERTY for boat yard and marina use shall be aesthetically harmonious with the subtropical climate of South Florida, the natural environment of Biscayne Bay, and shall complement or enhance the historic character of the Dinner Key waterfront. The selected proposer shall be responsible to design and construct all i 1 improvements required for the operation of the marina and boat yard beyond those being constructed by the CITY, as detailed in Section II.C.6. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY beginning on page 12. The design of such facilities shall additionally complement marina facilities constructed by City. 4. PARKING AND CIRCULATION The selected proposer shall be required to design and construct parking facilities on site in sufficient quantity to service all primary and secondary uses included in the project and in compliance with applicable zoning requirements. Such required on -site parking, and all utility, loading and/or service areas shall be organized, appropriately landscaped, and bermed or screened from surrounding areas, streets and adjacent property. Proposals shall also include a compatible, safe } and effective pedestrian and vehicular circulation system to service the I proposed development, in addition to the public access amenities required along Biscayne Bay (the bay walk) and Bayshore Drive (right of way, bike path and side walk). 5. PUBLIC AMENITIES The selected proposer shall be required to design, construct and maintain specific amenities for public use and access to the PROPERTY, i specifically: a bay walk, picnic facilities, a landscape buffer, and a bike path. The bay walk shall be constructed along the sea wall edge at Biscayne Bay, and shall include seating, lighting and landscaping. The design and construction of the bay walk shall conform to pertinent sections of the City Charter and Code, including Section 3(mm) of the Charter, and to the City's Baywalk/ Riverwalk Design Standards and Guidelines included in this RFP as Appendix J. Picnic facilities, tspecifically tables and benches designed for outdoor use, shall be j provided in conjunction with the bay walk and may be provided with all other amenities. Additionally, a twenty (20) foot wide landscape buffer with a pedestrian walkway (sidewalk) shall be provided along the length } of the western edge of the PROPERTY at South Bayshore Drive. This buffer shall also include a bicycle path, with a minimum eight -foot width and appropriate separation for pedestrians. 6. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES r ! a) Wherever possible, and particularly in public areas, utility lines shall be located underground, concealed within architectural i and/or landscaping features, or suspended below walkways. b) Electric service shall be principally through a primary meter 4 c) Vehicular circulation roads shall be paved. d) A unified design for all components of signage will be required, and shall be compatible with the historic character of the site. D. PERMITTING AND LICENSING The Selected Proposer, at its sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for acquiring all required permits, licenses and approvals from all agencies with jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, the City, Metropolitan Dade County, the State of Florida and public utilities. All improvements must comply with all applicable building, fire, zoning, health and other code requirements. The City will assist through expedited review procedures, to the extent permitted by law and regulations. Developments of Regional Impact - The City makes no representations and has no analysis or information as to whether the development contemplated by this RFP constitutes a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) as defined by ? Florida Statutes Section 380.06. If it is determined that the proposed development is subject to Development of Regional Impact review and procedures (or a successor or similar law), the selected proposer shall be solely 4YI 96- 360 i responsible for making all applications and/or seeking all authorizations required by law, at the proposer's sole cost and expense. According to DRI regulations, the DRI threshold limits (100%) potentially applicable to this project are: boat yard/marina - 100 wet slips, or 300 combined total for wet & dry slips, and retail - 400,000 sq. ft. It should be noted, however, that individual components will be evaluated by the Florida Department of Community Affairs as a single multi -use development and may be subject to aggregation of threshold percentages. For more information on this process please contact Ms. Julia Trevarthan at the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1-800-985-4416. i Impact Fees - Current City of Miami impact fee regulations provide that the proposed development of this PROPERTY is not subject to the i imposition or payment of City developmental impact fees. It is the responsibility of the proposer to determine, based upon the full proposed development scheme and all uses for the PROPERTY, the full extent of all impact fees to be assessed by Metropolitan Dade County and/or other agencies with jurisdiction. The City will assist the selected proposer in securing the most equitable assessment of impact fees for the final approved project, taking into full account any and all credits available for historical use of the site. E. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST The proposal must include a detailed construction cost estimate for the entire proposed development. The total cost of all improvements shall be not less than two million dollars ( $2,000,000). F. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE i - The City will require the development of proposed improvements to commence within three months from the transfer of the leasehold PROPERTY to the selected proposer. The proposal must include a development schedule which takes into account the commencement date required by the City and which delineates the development of each significant improvement. Termination and force majeure clauses will be included within the lease agreement to insure reasonable compliance with the proposed development schedule. i In evaluation of proposals, the timetable for completion of the proposed construction shall be considered along with the proposer's plans and commitment to minimizing the impact of construction on the use of the site. All proposed development must be completed within the time period specified in the schedule given in the proposal. Any and all proposed physical improvements to the PROPERTY for a first phase (if built in phases) must be 38 96- 360 I completed and capable of public use within 24 months from the date of transfer of the leasehold PROPERTY to the selected Proposer. Subsequent phases should be completed within 48 months from the date of transfer of the leasehold PROPERTY to the selected Proposer. Extensions of time may be granted by City only in cases of extreme circumstances beyond the control of the Successful Proposers, such as unusual permitting delays. G. PROPOSED CUSTOMER AND PUBLIC SERVICES Each Proposal shall describe levels of customer and public services to be provided by the operator, including, but not limited to 1. Security and Emergency Preparedness - Policies, procedures and proposed staffing for providing 24 hour security to the PROPERTY; emergency preparedness procedures, particularly for marina and boat yard operations, as well as the waterfront in general. 2. Customer Service Programs - Detailed information should be provided on developer/ operator experience in the marina and boat yard industry. Each proposal shall include plans to implement customer service programs to assure high levels of consumer satisfaction for users and visitors. Similar Iinformation shall be provided for market and/or historic facilities, if included in the proposal. 3. Cultural or Educational Programs - For proposals which elect to offer the public market or historical facility uses, detailed information shall be provided on developer/ operator experience and plans to implement programs of a cultural, historical, social and/or educational nature . 4. Employee Guidelines - Provisions for training employees and maintaining standards of conduct to ensure quality delivery of customer and visitor services including proposed guidelines for employee appearance and I uniforms. 5. Public Access 8v Amenities - Proposals shall describe the type and extent of access and amenities offered for the benefit of the general public from the Property. H. MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS The proposal must include a narrative describing the management and operation of the entire proposed development. Proposers are reminded that the City intends that the PROPERTY be maintained and operated in a manner consistent with the highest industry standards for facilities of its type. The description shall include, at minimum, mission statement, an organizational chart, job descriptions of key positions, brief outline of operating procedures, annual budget, five to ten year revenue projections, how and where the activities/operation will be advertised, indication of which businesses are I 39 S6— 360 I t intended to be operated by proposer and which businesses are intended to be subleased or to be operated under a management contract, sublease -� requirements (if any), operating schedule, and maintenance program, including planned major maintenance schedule. if independent management services are to be involved, then the applicable forms included herein as Exhibit III to this document must be completed by management contractors. I. FINANCING STRATEGY l The proposer shall provide, as part of the proposal, a description of the financing strategy for all building and site improvements including public spaces and amenities associated with the development. Prior to its execution of a lease agreement, the City will require written evidence of a firm and irrevocable commitment of all funds necessary to construct, equip, and initiate operation of the proposed Project for a stabilization period determined by the City. The City reserves the right to further evaluate and/or reject financing commitments when the term, the identity of the fi?iancing source or other aspect of such financing is deemed not in the best interest of the City or the project. J. COMPOSIT%ON AND QYJAL%F%CATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT (PROPOSING) ENTITY & CONSULTANTS 1. GENERAL i Proposals shall include the professional qualifications and credentials that demonstrate the development entity's ability to successfully undertake and complete development of the PROPERTY. The proposal must contain j information sufficient to demonstrate the ability of the development entity and its consultant(s), if any, to plan, design, construct, lease and manage a campground facility with any and all related services and amenities proposed in accordance with the development program outlined herein in this Section. The Development Entity is hereby defined as the proposing entity (the legal entity: corporation, joint venture, partnership, one or more individuals) with whom the City will contract for the leasehold i agreement. j ! 2. CONSULTANTS The consultant(s) to the Development Entity, if any, may be one firm possessing all the required expertise or may be several individuals or firms which combined possess all the required expertise. Consultants may include professional planning and design consultants and sub -consultants, i 40 ( C _J 96- 360 i i i general contractor and/or construction manager, and operational and management consultant(s). Consultants and subconsultants may submit with more than one Development Entity. However, the Development Entity (including individual members thereof) shall only submit as part of one submission and shall not be part of any other submission in any capacity. ` 3. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS ? The Development Entity, itself or through its consultant(s), if any, shall I substantiate its experience in all aspects of development and management of the facilities proposed, subject to compliance with the qualifying criteria 1 i specified in Section VI.B.1. The Development Entity and/or its consultant(s) shall, at minimum, I demonstrate professional expertise in each of the below listed disciplines. Copies of currently effective licenses (for both individuals and businesses, as applicable) shall be included in the proposal. i Architectural: registered to practice architecture in the State of Florida as 1 required by Chapter 481, Part I of the Florida Statutes, Architecture, ' and shall have substantiated experience in the design and development of the specified primary uses. Substantial experience in the preservation of historic structures shall also be required. Engineering: registered to practice engineering in the State of Florida as required by Chapter 471 of the Florida Statutes, Professional Engineers, and shall have substantiated experience in the design and development of primary use facilities contained in the proposal. Landscape Architectural: registered to practice landscape architecture in the State of Florida as required by Chapter 481, Part II, Landscape Architecture, of the Florida Statutes. j General Contracting or Construction Management: licensed as a general contractor in the State of Florida and shall have substantiated j experience in managing and performing construction of facilities of similar type and scope as the primary use facilities contained in the proposal. Operations and Management: shall have proven experience in marina and boat yard operations and management, and relevant service and industry experience. Where applicable, Proposers shall additionally demonstrate substantiated experience in the operation and management of museums, interpretive/historic and/or cultural facilities and/or urban public markets, as applicable. 1 41 06- 360 1 , i If ancillary services are proposed as part of the development, the ! Development Entity and/or its consultant(s) shall document measurable relevant experience in each field(s) or area(s) of such ancillary services, i.e., educational, cultural, commercial leasing, retail operations. 4. CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM i Unless specifically authorized by the City, no additions or modifications may be made to the proposals and the entities and/or consultants they represent subsequent to the submission deadline. New and/or current personnel who are not identified in the proposal may not be introduced as part of the proposal entity subsequent to the submission deadline, without City approval. Respondents must notify the City in writing immediately if any firm or individual presented in its original submission, either as part of the Development Entity or its consultants, becomes unavailable to continue. Any such change may result in the removal of the proposal from consideration, at the City's option. 5. BACKGROUND CHECKS All principals of the development entity may be subject to a background check by the Miami Police Department. (For the purposes of this RFP, "principal" shall be defined as the general partners, stockholders owning 5% or more of the corporate stock, and all corporate officers.). 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Exhibits III and IV include forms soliciting detailed information which must be completed and submitted with the proposal. i a K. MINORITY & LOCAL FIRM PARTICIPATION Respondents will be required to comply with all applicable federal, state and local affirmative action legislation and regulations, including the City's Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program included herein in Appendix K. The City of Miami adopted Ordinances No. 10062 and 10538, and subsequent amendments, to stimulate participation of qualified minority/woman-owned firms/sole proprietors (M/WBE's) in all City projects. Minorities are expected to be an integral part of the development entity and its consultants, to participate substantially in construction contracts and jobs, and to comprise a significant part of the permanent management team, ancillary businesses and work force created by the development. For the purpose of proposal evaluation, "significant" minority participation in the Development shall be defined as not less than 30% of the proposing entity with each minority group (black, Hispanic, and female) having not less than 5% 42 96- 360 r i each. As evidence of minority compliance, proposers are required to complete the applicable forms included in Exhibit IV. All firms/sole proprietors seeking to participate as M/WBE's must be certified with the City's Minority/Women Business Program and meet all requirements of the above cited Ordinances prior to the submission of a proposal. All firms/ sole proprietors, regardless of minority status, must I submit an affirmative action policy statement, in compliance with said Ordinances, a sample of which is included in Exhibit IV. Respondents are encouraged to include in the composition of the Development Entity, businesses or firms whose primary offices are located in the City of Miami. City occupational licenses shall be provided as proof of location for businesses located in the City. In addition, included in Exhibit IV herein is the City's "Local Office Affidavit Form" which shall be completed by Proposers as appropriate. For proposal evaluation purposes, the Review Committee shall award points for local firm participation based on the criteria established herein. (Refer to Section VI.B.) A local firm(s) shall be defined as a firm having its primary business office established within the City municipal limits. The firm shall have a current occupational license issued by the City and shall have submitted a completed Office Location Affidavit. Credit shall be given those proposals which include local firms as participants. 43 96- 360 r V. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Submissions received in response to the RFP shall meet all requirements specified in this Section. Submissions deficient in providing the required - , information shall be determined non -responsive by the City and shall be ineligible for further consideration. I A A. SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES A complete proposal submission package shall be delivered to the City as follows: 1. One (1) original and nineteen (19) copies of bound proposals in an 8-1/2"x 11" format and one set of board- mounted illustrative drawings not to exceed 30" x 40". 2. Proposal submissions must be marked "Unified Development Project Proposal for Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment" and addressed to: Jack Luft, Director City of Miami Community Planning and Revitalization Department 3. Proposals must be received at: Office of the City Clerk City of Miami, City Mall (First Floor Counter) 3500 Pan American Drive Dinner Ivey Miami, Florida 33133 4. The submission package shall be submitted not later than: 2:00 P.M. Friday, August 30, 1996 The time deadline and proposal receipt location will be strictly adhered to by the City. No proposals shall be received or accepted after 2:00 p.m., August 30, 1996 or at any other City office location, other than the City Clerk's Office (First Floor Counter). 5. Proposal submissions must be accompanied by: A Proposal Application Fee: a non-refundable cashier's check in the amount of $2,000 made payable to the City of Miami. Funds accompanying the proposal submission will be used by the City to cover actual expenses for advertising, printing, and mailing incurred by the City in preparing and issuing the RFP. Expenses incurred in 44 96- 360 7 i i evaluating proposal submissions, in excess of the total amount collected from all proposers, shall be reimbursed to the City by the selected proposer upon the City's execution of a lease agreement. B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONTENTS Prospective proposers shall address and include the following items as part of their proposals: la. Development Plan: Narrative description of all aspects of the plan and a schedule of amenities, including: • Overall site development • Number of new buildings, if any, and use, square footage, height of each • Description of disposition, renovation and adaptive reuse of existing facilities • Number, type, size and construction of marina slips, boat yard repair booths or "areas" • Number, size, type and description of recreational, educational, and/or other ancillary or public amenities • Description of proposed operations by unit and category (retail, food and beverage, office, etc.) and approximate square footage • Architectural features • Methods of construction • On site parking requirements • Permitting and environmental issues lb. Illustrative Drawings: Prepared by a registered design professional and board -mounted, size not to exceed 30" x 40" Conceptual Site Plan - Schematic site plan showing use areas by type, vehicular access and circulation roads, pedestrian paths and schematic planting plan, existing buildings to be renovated and all proposed new structures. Perspective isometric illustrations are not required. Models will not be accepted for review. 2. Development Schedule: a graphic time line or schedule detailing all phases of the development including planning and design, permitting, construction, and operations. 3. Capital Investment: a written statement indicating the dollar amount to be spent on permanent physical improvements to the PROPERTY, and an inventory or schedule of said improvements. 45 96-* 360 a 5. X 7. Management/Operating Plan: A narrative detailing the management approach to the property, including, without limitation: mission statement, operating parameters and budget, revenue projections, cash flow analysis, sublease requirements (if any), operating schedule, organizational structure of operations, job descriptions of key positions, employment plan and proposed customer & public services. Marketing and Feasibility Plan - Identification of primary and secondary markets for each type of primary (and major secondary) facility and/or service proposed and a description of the strategies to be utilized for attracting and strengthening those markets. The market analysis should be sufficient to address the economic feasibility of the development as proposed. Return to the City - A stated commitment of annual lease payments to the City in the format of a minimum guaranteed rent versus percentage(s) of gross revenues. A stated commitment to adhere to the City Charter requirement for compensation equal to fair market value. Financing Strategy and Evidence of Financial Capability: a) Financing Strategy - a description of the financing strategy to be utilized for capital construction and initiation of operations, to be accompanied by revenue projections through 10 years of operation. b) Letters of reference from financial institutions demonstrating proposer's relationship to same and documenting the proposer's ability to finance all aspects of the proposed development, and indicating commitments to extend such financing. c) Financial Statements - Recent (as of 1995) Financial Statements (audited statements preferred) for each principal of the proposing entity. (For the purposes of this RFP, "principal" shall be defined as the general partners, stockholders owning 5% or more of the corporate stock, and all corporate officers.) Note that financial statements are exempt from disclosure under public records regulations, therefore these documents shall be placed separately in a sealed package or enveloped and marked "Financial Statements". d) Proposal Deposit - The required $25,000 payment stipulated in Section III.B. Commitment of Funds" beginning on page 23. 46 90- 360 j 8. Organization and Experience a) Table of Organization - The organizational structure presented in graphic form depicting the proposing entity and i its professional consultants, including the names, affiliation and addresses of all principals. This includes any and all j general partners, stockholders owning 5% or more of the corporate stock, corporate officers, and executives and top a management of the Development Entity. } b) Forms - Completed Declaration, Financial and Professional ' Information forms as detailed and included as Exhibit III. c) Resumes of key individuals to be involved in the proposed development 1 d) Other documentation of the proposer's (Development Entity's) and consultants' past experience in development j and management of projects of similar scope and complexity within the same or clearly similar sphere on endeavor. je) Licenses - Individual Engineers, Architects and Landscape Architects must submit current Certificates of Registration or Licenses, and corporations or partnerships in those fields must submit current Certificates of Authorization { 9. Minority Participation and A.tl"irmative Action Plan: Completed Minority Participation Documentation forms from Exhibit IV, as evidence of minority participation pursuant to the goals set forth in the City's Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement s Program, and a copy of Proposer's currently affective Affirmative I Action program. i 10. Local Firm Participation: City occupational license(s) and City j "Office Location Affidavit" from Exhibit IV, demonstrating the i participation of local firm(s), if any, in the Development Entity or its consultants. I i I I y f 47 96- 360 i 1 f i f i VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA Review procedures and the selection processes are set by the City Charter and Code of which applicable excerpts are included in Appendix A. of this j document. I At a public hearing held May 23, 1996, the City Commission authorized the City Manager to issue the RFP. The City Commission shall also appoint a review committee from recommendations submitted by the City Manager and select a certified public accounting (CPA) firm, both to evaluate submitted proposals. The review committee appointed by the City Commission will render a written report to the City Manager of its evaluation of all responsive and responsible proposals. The review committee shall evaluate each proposal based on the criteria established herein. The review committee has the authority to recommend one or more, or none, of the proposals as it deems to be in the best interest of the City. The recommendation of the committee shall be accompanied by written justification of its decision. I The certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission will I` render an independent report of its analysis of proposals to the City Manager. I The accounting firm shall analyze each proposal based on the criteria established herein. The accounting firm shall present its preliminary findings i regarding each proposal to the review committee prior to the review committee l i completing its deliberations. i i A. INITIAL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RFP I Proposals shall be reviewed initially by City staff for compliance with all requirements set forth in the RFP. Each proposal shall be checked to ensure that: 1. All development proposal elements and documentation listed in Section IV. and V. have been included in the proposal submission. 2. The required number of copies and one original of the proposal, the board - mounted illustrative drawings, and the proposal application fee of $2,000, have been received by the deadline date and time and at the correct location. During this initial review, and prior to the start of deliberations by the review committee, Proposing Entities may be contacted to cure proposals which contain non -material, non -substantive defects as determined solely by staff, such as an out of date certification. If notified of such deficiency, the proposer shall correct such deficiency within five (5) working days of its receipt of I notification. I 48 9'�- 360 i B. REVIEW COMMITTEE EVALUATION CRITERIA The following specific evaluation criteria and their respective assigned weights shall be used by the Review Committee for purposes of rating and ranking the 4 proposal submissions. In accordance with City administrative policy, each proposal is given a subjective score (from 0 to 6) for each criteria, which is then j multiplied by the respective weight. Weighted Criteria Value Overall plan & design of the proposed development ............. 10 Historic preservation Experience/Design/Enhancement...... 10 i + Preservation of second hangar Machine Shop) .......... 10 --! Management & operations ........ 15 Financial return to the City ................................................. 10 t Financial capability of the Development Entity .................... 15 Experience of the Development Entity ........ 10 j Capability of the Development Entity & Consultants. ......... 10 { Extent of minority participation ........................................... 10 Local firm(s) participation ..................... 6 i Total 106 -� Proposers are encouraged to format their proposals to conform to the outline of factors described below, which will be utilized by the review committee in evaluating the proposals: i 1. OVERALL PLAN & DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT i y _ (weighted value 10 paints) • Fulfillment of the City's established development objective; extent and commitment to the required primary and ancillary uses; demonstrated -' commitment for public access and water -dependent uses. • Appropriateness and quality of the design as a boat yard and marina, and as related to the character and history of the site and the waterfront. • Harmonious and/or complementary integration of optional primary uses ! into the site. • Appropriateness and quality of the design of any new structures and any reuse of existing structures. • Successful and harmonious interface and/or connection to adjoining public property and uses, particularly to the Virrick Gym site. 49 96- 360 �I • imaginative and creative treatment of. public access, particularly at water front, other public spaces, exterior space, circulation, view corridors, landscaping, graphics, signage and lighting. • Efficiency of site design and organization, and compatibility of uses. • Range and mix of uses and amenities; extent of public access and amenities. s f 2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION EXPERIENCE, DESIGN AND ENHANCEMENT (weighted value 10 points) • Specific experience of development entity or consultant(s) in the rehabilitation of historic structures for adaptive reuse for three (3) or more years. • Sensitivity of overall design to the historic uses and structures which are the essence of the Dinner Key waterfront. 1 Extent and continuity of historic treatments and enhancements through the site; adherence and commitment to preservation guidelines and historic integrity. • Provision of facilities for the use by community organizations for historic educational purposes. • Provision of interpretive and/or interactive exhibits, signage, public educational programming and/or trained personnel for historic j interpretive, cultural or educational facilities management. { 3. PRESERVATION OF SECOND HANGAR (10 points) Extent and commitment to historic restoration of the structure for adaptive reuse. 4. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS (weighted value 15 points) • Appropriateness and practicality of stated goals, objectives and policies i of management plan. • Viability, practicality and comprehensiveness of management plan, i including such elements as: mission, operating parameters and budget, revenue projections and cash flow analysis, personnel organization and staffing plan. j • Extent and feasibility of marketing plan, familiarity with primary and secondary user markets for proposed facilities and services; and I � 50 �� 96- 360 appropriateness of strategies to be utilized for attracting and strengthening those markets. • Management approach to ancillary operations and businesses, particularly relative to stated experience and capabilities and City's objectives. • Extent and quality of programs for maintenance, security, public access, cultural/educational programs and public and customer services, as applicable. 5. RETURN TO THE CITY (weighted value 10 points) • Annual lease payment including a guaranteed minimum annual rental payment or a percentage of gross revenues, whichever is greater. • Term of lease • Dollar value, extent, and timing of capital improvements. • Any additional financial benefit to the City. 6. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY (weighted value 15 points) • Demonstrated financial capability of the proposing entity as being sufficient to successfully undertake and complete this development. • Proposing entity's track record of financing developments comparable in magnitude and scope to successfully finance this development. • Viability of financing strategy, financing mechanism, and funding sources. • Demonstrated feasibility of all aspects of the proposed development substantiated by a market analysis. 7. EXPERIENCE OF THE PROPOSING ENTITY (weighted value 10 points) • Qualifications and experience of the proposing entity in planning and design, construction, leasing and management of projects of similar size and scope. • Specific experience of the proposing entity in development, design, leasing and management of marinas, boat yards, and in each of the ancillary types of uses proposed. A minimum of three (3) years experience in boat yard/marina development, management and operation is required. Proposers offering to include optional primary uses shall demonstrate a minimum of three (3) years responsible 51 96- 360 experience in the development, management and operation of the respective facility or facilities. 8. CAPABILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITY AND CONSULTANTS (weighted value 10 points) • Overall composition of the Development Entity and its consultant team, including professional qualifications and capability of members, project managers, consultants and subconsultants as related to mandatory primary uses (marinas, boat yard), and optional primary uses (museum or cultural facilities, public market), if any. • Composition and capability of the Development Entity and its consultant team as related to development, construction and management of projects of similar size and scope. • Adequacy of personnel and other resources to successfully undertake and complete the development proposed. • Good past performance in the administration and management of other developments and cooperation with former clients. • Demonstrated ability to meet time schedules and budget. • Architectural/engineering capability and range of experience on similar developments comparable in scope, complexity, and magnitude. • General contracting or construction management capability and range of experience on similar campground developments comparable in scope, complexity, magnitude. • Qualifications, organization and experience of operational, leasing, and/or management team members. - • Qualifications and specified experience of key personnel, project managers and professional consultants in development and management of marinas, boat yards, museum/cultural facilities, public markets. • Qualifications and specific experience of key personnel, project managers and professional consultants in relationship to development and management of the types of ancillary uses proposed. 9. EXTENT OF MINORITY PARTICIPATION (weighted value 10 points) • Significant minority/women participation within the proposing entity. • Significant minority/women participation within the consultants to the proposing entity. • Subcontracting and hiring practices during construction. 52 J 95- 360 • Opportunities for minorities/women, hiring outreach and training opportunities in relation to leasing, management, operation and maintenance of facilities. • Affirmative Action Plans of Development Entity members. 10. PARTICIPATION OF LOCAL FIRM(S) (weighted value 6 points) • Proposal submitted by a proposing entity that includes is a local firm or that consists of one or more local firms. • Proposal includes local firm(s) as consultants in the design, construction, leasing, management and/or operations fields. C. CPA FIRM EVALUATION CRITERIA The certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission will evaluate each proposal prior to evaluation by the review committee. Specifically, the certified public accounting firm shall assess these elements: • the financial viability of the proposing entity, including prior record and experience • the viability of the proposal's financing strategies, sources and structure • the (comparative) short term and long range economic and fiscal return to the City • the proposal's market analysis and marketing plan • the economic feasibility of the proposed development • viability and appropriateness of management plan During the course of its analysis, the CPA firm will examine all materials provided by proposer as well as materials which may be available from other financial institutions such as Dunn & Bradstreet, and TRW. The accounting firm shall present its findings regarding each proposal to the Review Committee prior to said Committee completing its deliberations. The CPA firm will render an independent report of its findings to the City Manager. 96- 360 VII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED LEASE AGREEMENT A. AUTHORIZATION Upon authorization of the City Commission, the City Manager or his designee shall negotiate all aspects of a lease agreement with the selected proposer. The City Attorney's office will provide assistance to the City Manager or his designee during the negotiation of the lease agreement and must approve the lease agreement as to legal form and correctness prior to its execution. The lease agreement shall comply with all applicable City Charter and Code provisions. Until such time as the lease agreement is executed by the City, the selected proposer has no vested right, title or interest in the subject PROPERTY. B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The lease agreement shall address, but not be limited to the following terms and conditions: 1. Lease Term 2. Rent 3. Conditions For Lease (City Charter Section 29-B Requirements). 4. Insurance 5. Performance and Payment Bond 6. Indemnification 7. Assignment of Lease 8. Restrictions on Use 9. Design, Engineering and Construction of Improvements 10. Preparation of Premises for Development 11. Operation and Management of Leased Premises 12. Equity Capital and Mortgage Financing 13. Public Charges/Fees 14. Taxes 15. Maintenance, Repair and Replacement 16. Condemnation and City "Buy -Out" Provisions 17. Default - Termination 18. Examination of Premises 19. Audit Rights 20. Award of Agreement 21. Conflict of Interest 22. Non -Discrimination 23. Rules and Regulations 24. Compliance with Federal, State and Local Laws 25. Minority Procurement 26. Force Majeure 27. Miscellaneous 54 95- 360 APPENDIX A i . F City of Miami Garter and G i r _.j applicable sections C,harter Sections 3(f) d 1 City Charter Sect i 3(f) Subpt. A CHARTER other evidence of city indebtedness shall be imposed on the bonds of the city. (b) Streets, parks, bridges, sewers, grade cross- ings, speed of vehicles, services and rates of motor vehicle carriers: To pave, grade, curb, repave, macadamize, remaeadamize, lay out, open, close, vacate, discontinue, widen, and otherwise improve streets, alleys, avenues, boulevards, lanes, sidewalks, parks, prom- enades, -and other public highways or any part thereof, and to hold liens therefor as hereinafter provided; to construct and main- tain bridges, viaducts, subways, tunnels, sewers, and drains, and regulate the use of all such highways, parks, public grounds, and works; to prevent the obstruction of such sidewalks, streets, and highways; to abolish and prevent grade crossings over the same by railroads; to regulate the op- eration and speed of all vehicles using the streets, highways, and railroads within the city; to regulate the service rendered and rates charged by busses, motor cars, cabs, and other vehicles for the carrying of pas- sengers and by vehicles for the transfer of baggage. (c) Special or local assessments: To impose spe- cial or local assessments for local improve- ments as hereinafter provided and to en- force payment thereof. (d) Contracting debts and borrowing money: Subject to the provisions of the Constitu- tion of Florida and of this charter, to con- tract debts, borrow money, and make and issue evidences of indebtedness. (e) Expenditures: To expend the money of the city for all lawful purposes. (f) Acquisition and disposition of property and services: (i) To acquire by purchase, gift, devise, condemnation or otherwise, real or per- sonal property or any estate or inter- est therein, inside or outside the city, for any of the purposes of the city; and to improve, sell, lease, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of such property or any part thereof. Supp. No. 27 §3 (ii) To acquire or dispose of services inside or outside the city, by purchase, gift, or otherwise for any purposes of the city. (iii) To lease to or contract with private firms or persons for the commercial use or management of any of the city's wa- terfront property, but only in conipli- ance with the other requirements of this charter and on condition that: (A) the terms of the contract allow rea- sonable public access to the water and reasonable public use of the property, and comply with other charter waterfront setback and view -corridor requirements; and (B) the terms of the contract result in a fair return to the city based on two independent appraisals; and (C) the use is authorized under the then existing master plan of the city; (D) the procurement methods prescribed by ordinances are observed. Any such lease or management agree- ment or proposed extension or modifi- cation of an existing such lease or man- agement agreement which does not com- ply with each of the above conditions shall not be valid unless it has first been approved by a majority of the vot- ers of the city. Nothing herein contained shall in any manner affect or apply to any project the financing of which has been pro- vided by the authorization of bonds to be issued by the city. (g) Public property and improvements: To make and maintain, inside and outside the city, public improvements of all kinds, includ- ing municipal and other public buildings, armories, markets, and all buildings and structures necessary or appropriate for the use of the city; to acquire by condemnation or otherwise all lands, riparian and other rights, and easements necessary for such improvements; and to rent or lease from any person any land or building within or without the city or any part thereof for any municipal purpose. 3 } 96- 360 City Charter Secti 3(mm) § 3 CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS Subpt. A to be contributed for maintenance of the fund. (11) Airports and landing fields: To acquire by purchase, lease, condemnation, or otherwise, lands inside or outside the city limits for use as landing fields or airports; to con- struct and equip thereon or on other prop- erty of the city such improvements as may be necessary for that purpose; to operate and maintain such facilities; to provide rules and regulations governing their use and the use of other property or means of trans- portation within or over the same; and to enter into contracts or otherwise cooperate with other government entities or other pub- lic or private agencies in all matters relat- ing to such facilities; otherwise to exercise such powers as may be required or conve- nient for such establishment, operation, and maintenance; -to levy taxes for any such purpose; unless such facilities shall have been acquired by lease, to issue bonds to pay the cost of such facilities; and to grant, deed or dedicate lands, with or without con- sideration, to other governmental entities for use as landing fields or airports. (Laws of Fla. (1929), ch. 14234) (mm) Building and zoning: (i) To provide by ordinance building, plan- ning, and zoning regulations and re- strictions governing the height, num- ber of stories, method of construction, type, and' size of buildings and other structures; the percentage and portion of the lot or site that may be occupied; the size of the front, rear, and side yards, courts, and other open spaces; the lo- cation, use of buildings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residences, apartment houses, and other purposes; and the widening and future widening of streets in zoned street areas that the city may establish. Such regulations may provide that a board of appeals or the city commission may determine and vary the application of building, plan- ning, or zoning ordinances in harmony with their general purpose and.intent. Supp. No. 27 0 (ii) In order to preserve the city's natural scenic beauty, to guarantee open spac- es, and to protect the waterfront, any- thing in this charter or the ordinances of the city to the contrary notwithstand- ing, neither the city nor any of its agen- cies shall issue building permits for any surface parking or enclosed struc- tures located on Biscayne Bay or the Miami River from its mouth to the N.W. 5th Street Bridge, (A.) which are not set back at least 50 feet from the seawall (where the depth of the lot is less than 200 feet, the setback shall be at least 25 percent of the lot depth), and (B) -which do not have average side yards equal in aggregate to at least 25 percent of the water frontage of each lot based on average lot width. (iii) The above setback and side -yard re- quirements may be modified by the city commission after design and site -plan review and public hearing only if the commission determine,, that the modi- fications requested provide public bene- fits such as direct public access, public walkways, plaza dedications, covered parking up to the floodplain level, or comparable benefits which promote a better urban environment and public advantages, or which preserve natural features. Wherever setback, side -yard, or site -plan review requirements of zon- ing ordinances are greater than the foregoing requirements, such greater requirements shall govern. (iv) These requirements shall not apply to docks and appurtenant structures, single- family residences and appurtenant struc- tures, and waterfront industrial uses along the Miami River and at the Port of Miami. Nothing herein contained shall in any manner affe-,t or apply to: the City of Miami/University of Miami James L. Knight International Center and hotel facility, including all improve- ments thereon, or to lands and projects which the city commission has approved 96- 360 • I City Charter Sec- § 27•E ns 29 A. - 29D. CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS Sec. 27-E. Assessor to have power of county assessor; general assessment roll. Note —The user's attention is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. Sec. 27-F. Signing and endorsing general as. sessment roll; return and presump. tion of validity. Note -The user's attention is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. S,ec. 27-G. Copy of assessment roll annexed to warrant commanding collec- tion. Note —The user's attention is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. Sec. 27-H. State law as to taxes applies. Note —This section has been substantially changed, by in- ference, inasmuch as assessment and collection of taxes is now the exclusive responsibility of Dade County. The user's atten- tion is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. (Sec. 27-I. Reserved.] Sec. 27-J. Discounts if taxes paid before cer- tain time. Note —The discount rates formerly set out in this section no longer apply; for present rates, see F.S. § 197.162. The user's attention is also directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. Sec. 27-M When taxes become delinquent; in- terest rates on delinquent taxes. Note —The user's attention is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. Sec. 27-L. Tax certificates; interest rate thereon. Note —The user's attention is directed to the editor's note to § 27-B of this charter. Sec. 28. Chief procurement officer. (a) The city manager shall appoint a chief pro- curement officer who shall supervise all purchases for the city in the manner provided by ordinance and who shall, under such procurement methods as may be prescribed by ordinance, supervise sales of all real and personal property of the city not Supp. No. 46 Subpt. A needed for public use or that may have become unsuitable for use. The chief procurement officer shall have charge of such storerooms and ware. houses of the city as the commission may by or- dinance provide. Before any purchase or sale, the chief procurement officer shall require that all prescribed procurement procedures be followed. Supplies shall not be furnished to any department unless there be to the credit of such department an available appropriation balance iri excess of all unpaid obligation sufficient to pay for such sup- plies. (b) No contract for furnishing supplies or ser- vices for the city, except as otherwise provided in this charter, shall be made for a period of more than one year. (c) The chief procurement officer shall see to it that all persons seeking to do business with the city not discriminate against any employee or ap- plicant for employment because of age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, or marital status; and that they take affirmative ac- tion to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their age, race, creed, color, re- ligion, sex, national origin, handicap, or marital status. (d) The chief procurement officer shall be re- sponsible for developing such minority procure- ment program as may be prescribed by ordinance and permitted by law. Sec. 29-A. Contracts for personal property,---� public works or improvements, unified development projects, and real property; safeguards. (a) Personal property. Any personal property, including but not limited to supplies, equipment, materials, and printed matter, may be obtained by contract or through city labor and materials, as provided by ordinance. All contracts for more than four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500.00) shall be awarded by the commission to the lowest responsible bidder, after public notice and using such competitive sealed bidding methods as may be prescribed by ordinance; pro- vided, however, . 30 96- 360 Subpt. A CHARTER .that if the amount of a bid or proposal submitted by a vendor whose primary office is located in the City of Miami is not more than ten (10) percent in excess of the lowest other responsible bidder or proposer, such local vendor may be awarded the contract, but the city manager or designee shall have the power to reject all bids and proposals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city manager may waive competitive sealed bidding methods by making a written finding which shall contain reasons supporting the conclusion that competi- tive sealed bidding is not practicable or not ad- vantageous to the city, which finding must be ratified by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the commission after a properly advertised public hear- ing. When competitive sealed bidding methods are waived, other procurement methods as may be prescribed by ordinance shall be followed. All invitations for bids, requests for proposals, or other solicitations shall contain a reservation of the foregoing right to reject all offers. All contracts for personal- property in excess of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500.00) shall be signed by the city manager or his designee after approval thereof by the commission. This section shall not apply to tnuisfers to the United States or any department or agency thereof, to the State of Mori- da, or to any political subdivision or agency thereof. (b) Public works or improvements. Any public work or improvement may be executed either by contract or by the, city labor force, as may be determined by the commission. There shall be a separate accounting as to each work or improve- ment. Before authorizing the execution by the city labor force of any work or improvement or phase thereof, the city manager sliall submit to the commission a description of the anticipated scope of work and related cost estimates. All con- tracts for more than ten thousand dollars ($10; 000.00), which shall include contracts under which improvements valued in excess of $10,000 are to - be constructed for the city, shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder after public notice and using such competitive sealed bidding meth- ods as may be prescribed by ordinance; provided, however, that if the amount of a bid or proposal submitted by a contractor whose primary office is located in the City of Miami is not more than ten (10) percent in excess of the lowest other respon- Supp. No. 29 § 29-A sible bidder or proposer, such local contractor may be awarded the contract, but the city manager or designee shall have the power to reject all bids and proposals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city manager may waive competitive sealed bid- ding methods by making a written finding that a valid emergency exists or that there is only one (1) reasonable source of supply, which finding must be ratified by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the commission after a properly advertised public hearing. When competitive sealed bidding meth- ods are waived, other procurement methods as may be prescribed by ordinance shall be followed. All invitations for bids, requests for proposals, or other solicitations shall contain a reservation of the foregoing right to reject all offers. Contracts for public works or improvements shall be signed by the city manager or his designee after approval thereof by the commission. When it becomes necessary in the opinion of the city manager to make alterations or modifica- tions in a contract for any public work or im- provement, such alteraiions or modifications shall be made only when authorized by the commission upon the written recommendation of the city man- ager. No such alteration shall be valid unless the price to be paid for the work or material, or both, under the altered or modified contract shall have been agreed upon in writing and signed by the contractor and the city manager prior to such authorization by the commission. (c) Unified development projects. A unified de- velopment project shall mean a project where an interest in real property is owned or is to be ac- quired by the city, is to be used for the develop- ment of improvements, and as to which the com- mission determines that for the development of said improvements it is most advantageous to the city to procure from a private person, as defined in the Code of the City of Miami, one or more of the following integrated packages: (1) planning and design, construction, and leas- ing; or (2) planning and design, leasing, and manage- ment; or (3) planning and design, construction, and man- agement; or 31 96- 360 § 29•A CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS Subpt. A (4) planning and design, construction, leasing, and management. So long as the person from whom the city pro- cures one of the above -mentioned integrated pack- ages provides all of the functions listed for that package, such person need not provide each listed function for the entire unified development project nor for the same part of the unified development project. Requests for proposals for unified development projects shall generally define the nature of the uses the city is seeking for the unified develop- ment project and the estimated allocations of land for each use. They shall also state the following: (1) the specific parcel of land contemplated to be used or the geographic area the city desires to develop pursuant to the unified develop- ment project; (2) the specific evaluation criteria to be used by the below -mentioned certified public account- ing firm; (3) the specific evaluation criteria to be used by the below -mentioned review committee; (4) the extent of the city's proposed commitment of funds, property, and services; (5) the definitions of the terms "substantial in- crease" and "material alteration" that will apply to the project pursuant to subsection (eX4) hereof; and (6) a reservation of the right to reject all propos- als and of the right of termination referred to in subsection (eX4), below. After public notice there shall be a public hear- ing at which the commission shall consider: (1) the contents of the request for proposals for the subject unified development project; (2) .the selection of a certified public accounting firm, which shall include at least one mem- ber with previous experience in the type of development in question; and (3) the recommendations of the city manager for the appointment of persons to serve on the review committee. Said review committee shall Supp. No. 29 32 consist of an appropriate number of city offi- cials or employees and an equal number plus one of members of the public, whose names shall be submitted by the city manager no fewer than five days prior to the above - mentioned public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing the com- mission shall authorize the issuance of a request for proposals, select a certified public accounting firm, and appoint the members of the review com- mittee only from among the persons recommended by the city manager. The procedure for the selection of an integrated package proposals shall be as follows: (1) all proposals shall be analyzed by a certified public accounting firm appointed by the com- mission based only on the evaluation criteria applicable to said certified public accounting firm contained in the request for proposals. Said certified public accounting firm shall render a written report of its findings to the city manager. (2) the review committee shall evaluate each pro- posal based only on the evaluation criteria applicable to said review committee contained in the request for proposals. Said review com- mittee shall render a written report to the city manager of its evaluation of each pro- posal, including any minority opinions. (3) taking into consideration the findings of the aforementioned certified public accounting firm and the evaluations of the aforementioned review committee, the city manager shall rec- ommend one or more of the proposals for ac- ceptance by the commission, or alternatively, the city manager may recommend that all proposals be rejected. If there are three or more proposals and the city manager recom- mends only one, or if the city manager rec- ommends rejection of all proposals, the city manager shall state in writing the reasons for such recommendation. In transmitting his recommendation or rec- ommendations to the commission, the city manager shall include the written reports; including any minority opinions, rendered to 96_ 360 Subpt. A CHARTER him by the aforementioned certified account- ing firm and review committee. (4) all contracts for unified development projects shall be awarded to the person whose pro- posal is most advantageous to the city; as determined by the commission. The commission may accept any recommenda- tion of the city manager by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members. In the event the com- mission does not accept a proposal recommended by the city manager or does not reject all propos- als, the commission shall seek recommendations directly from the aforementioned review commit- tee, which shall make a recommendation or rec- ommendations to the commission taking into ac- count the report of the aforementioned certified public accounting firm and the evaluation criteria specified for the review committee in the request for proposals. After receiving the direct recommendations of the review committee, the commission shall, by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members: (1) accept any recommendation of the review com- mittee; or (2) accept any previous recommendation of the city manager; or (3) reject all proposals. All contracts for unified development projects shall be signed by the city manager or designee after approval thereof by the commission. The city manager or designee shall be responsible for developing a minority procurement program as may be prescribed by ordinance and permitted by law in conjunction with the award of contracts for unified development projects. The provisions of this charter section shall supersede any other char- ter or code provision to the contrary. (d) Sales and leases of real property; prohibi- tion Except as otherwise provided in this charter section, there shall be no sale, conveyance, or disposition of any interest, including any lease- hold, in real property owned by the city, the de- partment of off-street parking, or the downtown development authority, unless there has been prior public notice and a prior opportunity given to the Supp. No. 29 33 § 29-A public to compete for said real property or inter- est. Any such sale, conveyance, or disposition shall be conditioned upon compliance with: the provi- sions of this section; such procurement methods as may be prescribed by ordinance; and any re- strictions that may be imposed by the city, the department of off-street parking, or the downtown development authority, as appropriate. Further, no right, title, or interest shall vest in the trans- feree of such property unless the sale, conveyance, or disposition is made to the highest responsible bidder, as is determined by the city commission, or the off-street parking board, or the downtown development authority board of directors. The city commission or the off-street parking board or the downtown development authority board of direc- tors, as appropriate, may by resolution waive the requirement of sale, conveyance, or disposition to the highest responsible bidder by means of the following procedure: the city manager, the direc- tor of the off-street parking authority, or the di- rector of the downtown development authority, as appropriate, must make a written finding that a valid emergency exists, which finding niust be ratified by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the commission after a properly advertised public hear- ing. When the requirement of sale, co--iveyance, or disposition to the highest responsible bidder is waived, other procurement methods as may be prescribed by ordinance shall be followed. The city or the department of off-street parking or the downtown development authority shall have the power to reject all offers. All invitations for bids, requests for proposals, or other solicitations shall contain a reservation of the foregoing right to reject all offers. This section shall not apply to transfers to the United States or any department or agency thereof, to the State of Florida, or to any political subdivision or agency thereof. (e) Safeguards. (1) All persons contracting with the city under this section shall be required to certify their compliance with the antitrust laws of the United States and of the State of Florida and to hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the city for any noncompliance by said persons with the above laws. 96- 360 § 29-A CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS (2) All persons contracting with the city under this section shall be obligated to pay which- ever is the greater of the following: (i) all applicable ad valorem taxes that are lawfully assessed against the property involved or (ii) an amount to be paid to the city equal to what the ad valorem taxes would be if the property were privately owned and used for a profit -making purpose. Such taxes shall not be credited against any revenues accruing to the city under any contract that may be awarded under this section. (3) Any proposal by a potential bidder or con- tractor that contemplates more than the es- timated extent of the chy's proposed commit- ment of funds, property, or services shall be ineligible f'or acceptance; by the city commission. (4) Any substantial increase in the city's com- mitment of funds, property, or services, or any material alteration of any contract awarded under subsection (c) of this section shall enti- tle the city commission to terminate the con- tract after a public hearing. Prior to such public hearing, the commission shall seek and obtain a report from the city manager and from the review committee that evaluated the proposals for the project, concerning the advisability of exercising that right. (Char. Amend. No. 3, 11-6-79; Ord. No. 9507, § 1, 10-28-82; Char. Amend. No. 1, 11-2-82; Char. Amend. No. 1, 11-4-86; Char. Amend. No. 3, 11-3-87) Editor's note —Ord. No. 9489, adopted by the commission on Sept. 17, 1982, set forth Charter Amendment No. 1 for approval/rejection at election on Nov. 2, 1982. On Oct. 28, 1982, Ord. No. 9507 amended the language of subsections (a) and (c) of § 53 as proposed by Ord. No. 9489. The election was to approve the language of Charter Amendment No.1, as amended by Ord. No. 9507. Subsequently, in light of Charter Amend- ment No. 2 of Nov. 3, 1987, the city attorney directed the coder to delete paragraph (ii) of subsection (d) as superseded by § 29-B. Annotations —For case decided prior to enactment by Char- ter Amendment No. 3 of 1979 of a competitive -bidding re- quirement for disposition of city property, see Mahoney v. Givens, 64 So. 2d 926. Said case held that competitive bidding is not required to lease city real estate. Material variance between plans bid upon and plans sub- mitted and adopted renders contract void, Glatstein v. City of Miami, 399 So. 2d 1005. Supp. No. 29 „J i i 34 Subpt. A Sec. 29-B. City -owned property sale or lease — Generally. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in this Charter or the City Code, except for the conveyance or disposition of city -owned property implementing city -assisted housing pro- grams or projects which are intended to benefit persons or households with low and/or moderate income by providing housing for such persons or households, such as, but not limited to, those funded programs or projects undertaken, pursuant to the Federal Housing Act of 1937 and the Florida Hous- ing Act of 1972, as those statutes may be amended or revised from time to time, implementing city - assisted housing programs as may be authorized by federal or state law, implementing projects authorized under the Florida Community Rede- velopment Act of 1969, and implementing pro- jects of any governmental agency or instrumen- tality, the city commission is hereby prohibited from favorably considering any sale or lease of property owned by the city unless there is a re- turn to the city of fair market value under such proposed sale or lease. The city commission is also hereby prohibited from favorably consider- ing any sale or lease of city -owned property un- less (a) there shall have been, prior to the date of the city commission's consideration of such sale or lease, an advertisement soliciting proposals for said sale or lease published in a daily newspaper of general paid circulation in the city, allowing not less than n.inety (90) days for the city's receipt of proposals from prospective purchasers or les- sees, said advertisement to be no less than one- fourth ('/a) page and the headline in the adver- tisement to be in a type no smaller than 18-point and, (b) there shall have been at least three (3) written proposals received from prospective pur- chasers or lessees; however, if there are less than three (3) such proposals received and if the guar- anteed return under the proposal whose accep- tance is being considered is equal to fair market value the city commission determines that the contemplated sale or lease will be in the city's best interest then, subject to the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the electorate at a referendum, the sale or lease may be consummat- ed. As a further exception to the above require- ments and any other requirement for competitive 96- 360 I CHARTER § 30 bidding procedures to be used in the disposition of city -owned property or any interest therein, the city commission is authorized to waive all such disposition requirements where the intended use of such property or interest therein is in further- ance of the objective of providing rental or sales housing within the economic affordability range of low and/or moderate income families and/or in- dividuals. In determining low and/or moderate in- come households as set forth above, the criteria shall be those provided for by federal and/or state law or by the city commission. (Char. Amend. No. 2, 11-3-87) Sec. 29-C. Same —Watson Island. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in the Charter or Code of the City of Miami, no sale, conveyance lease, management agreement, revocable use permit, or license agree- ment may be entered into for the management, occupancy or use of the area known as Watson Island unless (1) there shall have been, prior to the date of the city commission's consideration of such sale, lease, management agreement, revo- cable permit or license agreement, an advertise- ment soliciting proposals for said sale, lease, man- agement agreement, revocable permit, or license agreement published in a daily newspaper of gen- eral paid circulation in the city, allowing not less than ninety (90) days for the city's receipt of pro- posals from prospective purchasers or lessees, said advertisement to be no less than one-fourth page and the headline in the advertisement to be in a type no smaller than 18-point; and, (2) the pro- -posed transaction be approved by a majority of the votes cast by the electorate at a referendum to be held at the next regularly scheduled general election. The procedures for selection of proposals shall be those provided by Charter section 29A(c) or (d) as appropriate and/or by applicable City Code provisions. Nothing herein shall effect the ex- isting rights or privileges, if any, of any lessee, permittee, licensee or concessionaire currently sit- uated in said area; however, any enlargement, amendment, transfer, or increase in those rights or privileges as may be in existence at the time this amendment is adopted shall require compli- ance with the provisions of this amendment. This Charter Amendment shall not affect the city's use Supp. No. 47 or occupancy of the area, nor shall it apply to contracts for the construction of any city facilities or improvements in the area; further, nothing con- tained herein shall apply to projects of any gov- ernmental agency or instrumentality. (Char. Amend. No. 1, 11-3-87) Sec. 29-D. City -owned waterfront property; leases with nonprofit organiza- tions; authorization to waive com- petitive bidding and referendum requirements; terms of lease. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in the Charter or Code of the City of . Miami, the city commission is authorized to waive all competitive bidding and referendum require- ments when entering into a lease or extending an existing lease with a nonprofit, noncommercial, water -dependent organization which provides or seeks to provide marine -recreational services and/or activities to the community at any city owned waterfront property, provided all of the fol- lowing conditions are met: (A) The terms of the lease allow reasonable public access to the water and reasonable public use of the property, and complies with all waterfront setback and view - corridor requirements set forth in the Charter and Code; (B) The use is authorized under the then ex- isting master plan of the city; (C) The terms of the lease require that the prop- erty be used for public purposes only; (D) The terms of the lease result in a fair re- turn to the city based on two (2) indepen- dent appraisals; and (E) The terms of the lease comply with all re- quirements pertaining to membership pre- scribed by ordinance for organizations using city facilities. (Res. No. 93-485, § 2, 7-22-93) Sec. 30. Local improvements. (a) Definitions; divisions into classes. In this sec- tion the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings, unless some other meaning is plainly intended: 34.1 96- 360 r City Code Sectior 1.8-52.9 § 1852.7 MLAML CODE § 1852.9 rights. In the event of such cancellation or rejec- tion, the chief procurement officer shall promptly notify all affected bidders or offerors and make available to them a copy of the written explana- tion for such cancellation or rejection, which shall be a public record. (Ord. No. 9572, § 1, 2-10-83) Sec. 18-52.8. Sole -source contracts. (a) Conditions for use Since it is not practica- ble for the city to use competitive bidding meth- ods -to secure goods or services if there is any one (1) reasonable source of supply, sole -source awards may be made as an exception to the other meth- ods prescribed in this section under the following circumstances: (1) Where the compatibility of equipment, acces- sories, or replacement parts permits one (1) reasonable source of supply; (2) Where the goods or services available from a single source are needed for trial use or test- ing; and (3) Where the unique and specialized expertise of one (1) source of services is unlikely to be obtained from any other source. (b) Determination and approval The determi- nation that an award shall be made on a sole - source basis shall be made by the chief procure- ment officer to the city manager. Such determination shall be made in writing and provide complete justification as to why no other sources of goods or services could be obtained to meet .the city's requirements. The determination shall also cer- tify that the terms and conditions of the award have been negotiated so as to obtain the most favorable terms and conditions, including price, as may be offered to other customers or clients by the proposed contractor. The city manager may waive competitive bidding after he makes a writ- ten finding, supported by reasons, that only one (1) reasonable source of supply exists. Such find- ing must be ratified by an affirmative two-thirds M) vote of the city commission after a properly advertised public hearing. (c) Public notice and disclosure Notice that the city intends to award a sole -source contract shall be published at least once in a newspaper of gen- eral circulation in the city prior to contract award, Supp. No.10 but in any event at least fifteen (15) calendar days shall intervene between the last date of pub- lication and the date of award. Such notices shall state the intention to award a sole -source con- tract, the nature of goods or services to be ac- quired, the name of the proposed contractor, and the name and telephone number of a cognizant city official who may be contacted by other poten- tial sources who feel they might be able to satisfy the city's requirements. A record of such notices and responses thereto shall be maintained in the contract file along with the written determina- tion required above, and a compilation of all sole source awards shall be submitted by the city man- ager to the city commission on a quarterly basis to include: (1) The name of the sole -source contractor; (2) The nature of the goods or services procured; (3) The reasons no other source could satisfy city requirements; (4) The amount and type of contract; and (5) The identification number for each contract file. (Ord. No. 9572, § 1, 2-10-83) Sec. 18-52.9. Unified development projects. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this article IV, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Unifaed development project shall mean a proj- ect in which an interest in real property is owned or is to be acquired by the city, which is to be used for the development of improvements, and as to which the city commission determines that for the development of said improvements it is most advantageous to the city that the city procure from a private.person, as defined in the Code of the city, one (1) or more of the following inte- grated packages: (1) Planning and design, construction, and leas- ing; or (2) Planning and design, leasing, and manage- ment; or (3) Planning and design, construction, and man- agement; or 1208 9 9 - • - § 18.52.9 FINANCE § 18.52.9 (4) Planning and design, construction, leasing and management. (b) Conditions for use. A unified development project shall be used in those circumstances in which the city commission by resolution deter- mines that for the development of improvements it is most advantageous to the city that the city procure an integrated entity as defined in section 18-52.9(a). So long as the person from which the city procures one (1) of the above -mentioned inte- grated packages provides all of the functions listed for that package, such person need not provide each listed function for the entire unified devel- opment project nor for the same part of the uni- fied development project. (c) Requests for proposals. A request for pro- posals shall be issued which generally defines the nature of the project, the uses the city is seeking for the project, and the estimated allocations of land for each use. The request for proposals shall also include the following (1) Instructions and information to offerors con- cerning the proposal submission require- ments, including the time and date set for receipt of proposals, the address of the of- fice to which proposals are to be delivered, the maximum time for proposal acceptance by the city, and any other special informa- tion; (2) The specific parcel of land contemplated to be used or the geographic area the city de- sires to develop; (3) The specific criteria which shall be used to evaluate competing proposals by the below - mentioned certified public accounting firm; (4) The speck evaluation criteria which shall be used to evaluate competing proposals by the below -mentioned review committee; (5) A statement that written and oral -discus- sions may be conducted with offerors who submit proposals determined to be reason- ably susceptible of being selected for award, but that proposals may be accepted as sub- mitted without such discussions; (6) A statement of when and how financial con- siderations and return to the city should be submitted; Supp. No. 42 1209 (7) The contract terms and conditions, in- cluding warranty and bonding or other se. curity requirements as may be fixed and applicable; (8) The extent of the city's proposed commit- ment of funds, property, and services; (9) The definition of the terms "substantial increase" and "material alteration" that will apply to the project in accordance with section 29-A(c)(5) of,the Charter of the city; (10) A reservation of the right to reject all pro- posals and of the right of termination re- ferred to in section 29-A(c)(4)(6) of the Charter of the city; (11) The date, time and place at which any pre - proposal conferences may be held and whether attendance at such conferences is a condition for offering proposals; and (12) The place where any documents incorpo- rated by reference may be obtained. Before issuing a request for proposals, there shall be a public hearing, after public notice, at which the commission shall consider: (1) The contents of the request for proposals for the subject unified development project; (2) The selection of a certified public accounting firm, which shall include at least one (1) member with previous experience in the type of development in question; and (3) The recommendations of the city manager for the appointment of persons to serve on the review committee. Said review com- mittee shall consist of an appropriate number of city officials or employees and an equal number plus one (1) of members of the public, whose names shall be submitted by the city manager no fewer than five (5) days prior to the above -mentioned public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the com- mission shall authorize the issuance of a request for proposals, select a certified public accounting firm, and appoint the members of the review com- mittee only from among the persons recommended by the city manager. 96- 360 § 18.52.9 MIAMI CODE (d) Developer lists. Developer lists may be com- piled to provide the city with the names of devel- opers who may be interested in competing for var- ious types of city projects. Unless otherwise provided, inclusion or exclusion of the name of a developer does not indicate whether that devel- oper is responsible with respect to a particular procurement or otherwise capable of successfully performing a particular city project. (e) Public notice. Notice inviting proposals shall be published at least once in a newspaper of gen- eral circulation in the city to provide a reasonable time for proposal preparation considering the con- tent and complexity of the anticipated scope of work- In any event, at least fifteen (15) days shall intervene between the last date of publication and the final date for submitting proposals. Such no- tices shall state the general description of the scope of work, the place where a copy of the request for proposals may be obtained, and the time and place for receipt of proposals. The city manager may, in addition, solicit proposals from all responsible.pro- spective developers listed on a current developers list by sendir-g them copies of the public notice to acquaint them with the proposed procurement. (f) Preproposal conferences. Preproposal confer- ences may be conducted to explain the require- ments of the proposed procurement. They shall be announced to all prospective developers known to have received a request for proposals. The confer- ence should be held long enough after the request for proposals has been issued to allow developers to become familiar with it but sufficiently before proposal submission to allow consideration of the conference results in preparing proposals. Nothing stated at the preproposal conference shall change the request for proposals unless a change is made by written amendment. A summary of the confer- ence shall be supplied to all those prospective de- velopers known to have received a request for pro- posals. If a transcript is made, it shall be a public record. (g) Receipt of proposals. Proposals shall be opened publicly in the presence of two (2) or more city officials. After the closing date for receipt of proposals, a register of proposals shall be pre- pared by the city manager which shall include, but not be limited to, the name of each offeror and § 18.52.9 a summary description sufficient to identify the project. The register of proposals shall be open to public inspection. (h) Minority participation. The city's minority procurement program shall be referred to in the requests for proposals and shall apply to the awarding of contracts for unified development projects. W Evaluation of proposals. The procedure for the selection of an integrated package proposal shall be as follows: (1) All proposals shall be analyzed by a certi- fied public accounting firm appointed by the commission based only on the evaluation criteria applicable to said certified public accounting firm contained in the request for proposals. Said certified public ac- counting firm shall render a written report of its findings to the city manager. (2) The review committee shall evaluate each proposal based only on the evaluation cri- teria applicable to said review committee contained in the request for proposals. Said review committee shall render a written re- port to the city manager of its evaluation of each proposal, including any minority opin- ions. (3) Taking into consideration the findings of the aforementioned certified public ac- counting firm, the evaluations of the afore- mentioned review committee, and the de- gree of minority participation in city contracts, the city manager shall recom- mend one (1) or more of the proposals for acceptance by the commission, or alterna- tively, the city manager may recommend that all proposals be rejected. If there are three (3) or more proposals and the city man- ager recommends only one (1), or if he rec- ommends rejection of all proposals, the city manager shall state in writing the reasons for his recommendation. In transmitting his recommendation or recommendations to the commission, the city manager shall include the written reports, including any minority opinions, rendered to him by the aforemen- tioned certified accounting firm and review committee. Supp. No. 42 1210 96- 360 § 18-52.9 FINANCE § 1853 . 0) Award All contracts for unified development projects shall be awarded to the person whose proposal is most advantageous to the city, as de- termined by the commission. The commission may accept any recommenda- tion of the city manager by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members. In the event the com- mission does not accept a proposal recommended by the city manager or does not reject all propos- als, the commission shall seek recommendations directly from the aforementioned review commit- tee, which shall make a recommendation or rec- ommendations to the commission taking into ac- count the report of the aforementioned certified public accounting firm and the evaluation criteria specified for the review committee in the request for proposals. After receiving the direct recommendations of the review committee, the commission shall, by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members: (1) Accept any recommendation of the review com- mittee; or (2) Accept any previous recommendation_ of the city manager; or (3) Reject all proposals. All contracts for unified development projects shall be signed by the city manager or his desig- nee after approval thereof as to form and correct- ness by the city attorney and approval by the city commission. (Ord. No. 9572, § 1, 2-10-83) City code cross reference --Minority participation in uni- fied development contracts, § 18.73. Sec. 18-53. Types of contracts. (a) Subject to the limitations of this section, any type of contract which will promote the best interests of the city may be used, except that the use of a cost-plus contract is prohibited. (1) Fixed price contracts. Fixed -price contracts shall ordinarily be used for those purchases of goods and services or sales and leases where the terms, conditions, specifications and other fac- tors of the contract can be specified with a high degree of certainty and where use of a fixed -price contract will result in substantial competition between bidders or offerors will- ing to compete for the contract. Incentives Supp. No.10 1211 based on various performance factors and es- calation clauses or other economic adjustments may be included as appropriate to serve the best interests of the city in achieving the most economical contract performance. (2) Cost -reimbursement contracts. Cost -reim- bursement contracts shall ordinarily be used for those purchases of goods and services or sales and leases where the terms, conditions, specifications and other factors of the contract cannot be specified with a high degree of cer- tainty or the use of fixed -price contracts is not likely to result in substantial competi- tion between bidders or offerors willing to compete for the contract. Incentives based on various performance factors and escalation clauses or other economic adjustments may be included as appropriate to serve the best interests of the city in achieving the most economical contract performance. (3) Blanket orders. The chief procurement officer or individual purchasing agents may issue purchase orders for indeterminate amounts of repair parts, supplies and services to the account of any department or office, but only when based upon a definite contract or price agreement which shall be negotiated in the same manner as if the item to be purchased thereunder were to be individually purchased or contracted for under the provisions of arti- cles IV and V of this Code. Such orders shall state a specific monetary limit which may not be exceeded except on written approval by the chief procurement officer. (4) Multiyear contracts. (i) Unless otherwise provided by law, a con- tract for supplies or services, sales, or leases may be entered into for any period of time deemed to be in the best interests of the city, provided that the term of the contract and conditions for renewal or extension, if any, are included in the in- vitation for bids or request for proposals, and provided that funds are available for the first fiscal period at the time of con- tract award. Payment and performance obligations for succeeding fiscal period6 shall be subject to the availability and 96-- 360 ,I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT, AUTHORIZING I -I THE ISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS { ("RFP"), IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FORM ATTACHED, FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("UDP") TO I CONSIST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL AND I RECREATIONAL WATER -DEPENDENT FACILITIES, WITH OPTIONAL FACILITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND ANCILLARY RELATED USES ON APPROXIMATELY 13.5 ACRES OF CITY -OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY KNOWN 7 AS THE DINNER KEY BOAT YARD LOCATED AT 2640 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER AND CODE. i.: facility, on said property would best be accomplished using the UDP process to obtain an integrated package of services from the private sector including planning, design, construction, leasing and management of such improvements; and WHEREAS, as directed by said Resolution, the City Manager has authorized the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization to prepare the attached RFP for the subject UDP, which is being considered at a duly advertised public hearing; 96- 360 1� I � on approximately 13 acres of City -owned waterfront property known as the Dinner Key Boat Yard located in Coconut Grove at 2640 I South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1996. a 3 I 96- 360 J-95-44 1/4/95 t 1 Y I.7� • � Jl •' MJI'.1 Y � 1• `••�u1:A i7 • 7�IY n• . .40 iy. 1 n• 1� ••s ■•+ a Y:1 �N•1:A1 1 N ' • . � • ... �. i7• w• •• •/ • c�. �:, of �. I AN . ■ Y 1 • ' i7 • All LI . ' u17t • • 1 :1 I •+ ■ Il •1• :� it• A fy1• • • WHEREAS, City of Miami Carter Section 29-A(c) and Cade Section 18-52.9 allows for "Unified Development Projects" where an interest in real property is owned or is to be acquired by the City and is to be used for development of improvements; and WHME S, the City Ca=issi_on has detemined that for the development of a full.-servioe boat yard/marima facility and ancillary retail- uses, including the optional development of a public market facility and/or an historic interpretive facility on City -owned property located. at 2640 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, it is most advantageous for the City to procure from a private person one or more of the following integrated packages: - Plamdmg and design, construction and leasing; or - Planning and design, leasing and management; or - Planning and design, construction and management ; or - Planning and design, construction, leasing and SiLiWement ; 1 �1 CITY CC)VRMSSIO,i pIEETi3G OF JAN 1 2 T'S5 Aeeofution No• 95- 48 i WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-782, the City Camel-ssion directed the City Manger to initiate the process for a Unified Development Project for the 2640 South Bayshore Drive property; and WHEREAS, Section 29-A(c) of the City Charter further requires that the City Commission hold a public hearing to consider the contents of the Request for Proposals ("RFP"); and W2.EAS, Section 29--A(c) further authorizes, at the conclusion of the public c heasing, if the City Co¢ d ssi.on is disposed to proceed, issuance of a RFP, selection of a certified public accounting firm, aml appointment of members to a review committee from persons reoommende i by the City Manager; NOW, THEREFICRE, BE IT RESCLVED BY THE CC b MTSSICK OF 7E CIi'I'Y OF MTA E , FLCPIDA : Section 1. 71se recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The development of a full -service boat yard/marina, facility and ancillary marine -related retail use, including the optional development of a public market facility andJor an historic interpretive facility on City -awned waterfront property, located at 25Q South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, is hereby declared a Unified Development Project (UAP). Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to prepare a draft Request for Proposals (R:F?) to procure from a private person, an integrated package which consists of plate and design, construction, leasing and management of improvements for said UDP. Section 4. A public hearing is hereby scheduled. for May 11, 1995 at 10:00 A.M. to take testimony regarding the draft RFP for said UDP. 95— 48 -2- 96-- 360 i Section S. This Resolution sha11 butte effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12 th day of January 1995. STSHW P. y0R Note: To be eligible for Federal tax incentives, a rehabilitation project must meet all ten Standards. Thi application of these Standards to rehabilitation projects is to be the same as under the previous version so that a project previously acceptable would continue to be acceptable under these Standards. Certain treatments, if improperly applied, or certain materials by their physical properties, may cause or accelerate physical deterioration of historic buildings. Inappropriate physical treatments include, but are not limited to: improper repointing techniques; improper exterior masonry cleaning methods; or improper introduction of insulation where damage to historic fabric would result. In almost all situations, use of these materials and treatments will result in denial of certification. In addition, every effort should be made to ensure that the new materials and workmanship are compatible with the materials and workmanship of the historic property. Guidelines to help property owners, developers, and Federal managers apply the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation are available from the National Park Service, State Historic Preservation Offices, or from the Government Printing Office. For more information write: National Park Service, Preservation Assistance Division-424, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. March 1990 f y' 96- 360 96- 360 77:e Secretary of the Interior is responsible for establishing standards for all national preservation programs under Departmental authority and for advising Federal agencies on the preservation of historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The Standards for Rehabilitation, a section of the Secretary's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects, address the most prevalent preservation treatment today: rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is defined as the process of retunning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the pro- perty which are significant to its historic, archi- tectural, and cultural values. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for )Rehabilitation The Standards that follow were originally published in 1977 and revised in 1990 as part of Department of the Interior regulations (36 CFR Part 67, Historic Preservation Certifications). They pertain to historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and the interior of historic buildings. The Standards also encompass related landscape features and the building's site and environment as well as attached, adjacent or related new construction. The Standards are to be applied to specific rehabili- tation projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deteri- oration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sand- blasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 96- 360 Summary - Dade County Manatee Protection i 7 i DADE COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION PLAN Summary and Fact Sheets A preliminary draft of the Dade County Manatee Protection Plan was completed by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) in June 1992 following several years of data collection and review with an informal discussion group including representatives of environmental interest groups, government agencies and the regulated community. Following a series of six public workshops, representatives of the regulated community requested establishment of a citizen's committee to review the draft plan. At the request of the Environment and Land Use Committee of the Dade County Board of County Commissioners, then chaired by Commissioner Harvey Ruvin, the Director of DERM appointed thirteen persons to the Manatee Protection Plan Review Committee. This committee includes representatives of boating and marine interest groups, environmental and civic organizations, and the South Florida Water Management District. The committee began monthly public meetings in October 1992 and continued a section -by -section review of the draft plan through June 1995. The final draft plan reflects the recommendations of the Review Committee with exact language as approved by simple majority vote of committee members present. The final draft plan contains background information, recommendations, and policies relating to habitat and water quality protection, manatee -human interactions (including mortality caused by water control and drainage structures), land development (including siting or marine facilities), law enforcement,'education and awareness, and governmental coordination. To assist readers in assimilating the recommended actions contained in the lengthy narrative, all objectives and policies have also been extracted and compiled in a separate chapter at the end of the plan document. The most significant groups of recommendations relate to eliminating manatee mortality at flood gates and drainage structures and to the siting or operation of marinas and other vessel launching, storage or docking facilities. Highlights of these complicated portions of the plan are summarized in this section. Flood Gates and Drainaae Structures The objective of this section of the plan is to reduce to zero the number of manatee mortalities related to floodgates ;and -drainage culverts. Twenty separate recommended actions have I been developed related to this objective, many of which have -already 'been implemented. o Flood gates are to be equipped with pressure -sensitive devices which cause the gate to open if it closes on an object. Prototypes have already been installed on some gates.' Engineering and installation of improved designs is in progress.` o Back-up manatee protection strategies, including "over=the`-top discharge designs, sonar or acoustic devices, barriers,and improved operation procedures should be developed. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) study of such alternatives is in progress. 95-- 360 o The SFWMD shall be required to provide reports, operating records, permit applications, and other information concerning manatee protection to the appropriate regulatory agencies on a regular basis. Such information shall also be made available to the public through annual reports and workshops. o Barriers have been constructed at two drainage canals at the Miami International Airport to prevent manatees from entering stormwater culverts. Regular maintenance and reporting will be required to assure compliance. Sit-ina of Marinas and Other Vessel Facilities The objective of this section of the plan is to reduce additional impacts to manatees or their habitats caused by development and operation of new or expanded vessel facilities. Many regulations protecting seagrass, wetlands, water quality, and other natural resources are already in place and would continue to be implemented as they always have been. To reduce the risk of vessel -manatee collisions and disturbance of critically sensitive manatee behavior, increased density of commercial power boat facilities in essential manatee habitat and in or near no -entry zones is not recommended, unless it can be demonstrated that the proposed project would not adversely affect manatees. Since manatees occur most often in canals, tributaries, and shallow nearshore areas, especially seagrass beds, most of these areas are designated as essential habitat (please refer to attached map). Year-round no -entry zones for manatee protection have been established northwest of Virginia Key and in portions of the Black Creek canal and marina basin. Development of marinas, boat ramps, dry storage and other vessel facilities is encouraged outside of essential manatee areas or near open water destinations favored by most boaters. o No new restrictions are recommended for regulation of single-family residential docks. Single-family residential docks may be constructed anywhere in Dade County in accordance with existing regulations. Construction of single-family docks located in seasonal ,no entry" zones shall be permitted during the summer (May 1 - November 14). Emergency repairs necessary for human safety may be permitted at any time. . o All existing facilities, regardless of location, may rebuild, renovate or reconfigure as long as there is no net increase in the total number of wet and dry power boat slips. For the purpose of this plan, any marine facility in use or operating on or after October 28, 1984 is considered an existing facility. o New or expanded multi -family residential docking facilities may be constructed anywhere they are not otherwise prohibited. However, in essential manatee habitat, multi -family residential docking facilities with more than five slips would be limited to one power boat per 100 feet of developable shoreline. Additional slips could be occupied by sailboats. Vessels docked at the facility must be registered to residents. 96- 360 o New or expanded commercial marinas, dry storage, fuel docks and transitory docks for power boats may be permitted outside of essential manatee habitat. No new limit would be placed on number of power vessel slips. Generally recommended areas include the eastern side of Biscayne Bay from Haulover to Government Cut, Keystone Point, Dinner Key, portions of Crandon Park, or Matheson Hammock. o New or expanded special use marinas, such as facilities for large, luxury yachts, charter boats, and certain commercial fishing boats i may be permitted outside of essential manatee habitat without limit on number of slips. New special use marinas may also be suitable for some sites within essential manatee habitat, such as Watson Island. o New or expanded courtesy docks and docks for water taxis or similar public transportation vessels; or certain commercial ;. fishing vessels may also be permitted in the Miami River from the 5th Street bridge to the mouth and along the west shoreline of Biscayne Bay from the Port of Miami to SW 15th Road with a maximum density of 1 power boat per 500 feet of shoreline, including existing slips. Outside of essential manatee habitat, such docks may be permitted without limitation in any area where they are not ` otherwise prohibited. o New or expanded freight terminals or large vessel berthing facilities may be permitted along Government Cut and the Government Cut turning basin. Existing and new large vessel facilities will be required to utilize fenders or other mooring design that provides 4 feet of standoff during operation. on the Miami River, 3 feet of standoff will be required. New or expanded 4 large vessel berthing facilities will also be permitted on the Miami River, provided standoff requirements above are met. o Expansion of existing boat yards is preferred to the construction of new facilities. New boat yards should also be permitted along f Government Cut, along the east side of north Biscayne Bay, or along certain canals in Dumfoundling Bay, where compatible with existing land use and zoning. o Any project that does not meet the above density or siting limitations may still be permitted provided it does not adversely affect manatees in accordance with a series of performance criteria. These criteria were developed to provide a mechanism for obtaining a variance from the above requirements. o New or expanded boat ramps shall be permitted in the same areas as 1 commercial marinas. Boat ramps may be permitted at alternative locations provided that they comply with the performance criteria as described above. y � 360 SENT BY: 11-30-95 ;10 : 31 AM ; PUBLIC 4 OUS,'ADY! 1 N. Department of tRFt0R5A?- i Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Building lawma Chiles 2600 Blair Scone Road Governor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 February 8, 1995 Mr. Thomas Wammack City of Miami Public Works Department 275 Northwest Second Street Miami, Florida 33128 CITY OF MIAMI tT 2/ 7 Virginia B. Wetherell e -, RE: Dinner Key Boatyard (former waste oil tank area) 2640 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida DEP Facility #138505364 DERM UT-0185/File-6980 Dear Mr. Wammack: The Bureau of Waste Cleanup has reviewed the Contamination i Assessment Report (CAR) and No Further Action Proposal (NFAP) f dated August 1994 (received October 4, 1994), submitted for this site. Documentation submitted with the NFAP confirms that i criteria set forth in Section 52-770.600(5), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) , have been trtet . The NFAP is hereby incorporated by reference in this Order. Therefore, excel W; gel forth below, you are released from any further�Y�ligation to conduct site reha.bili.tation at the sub�ect si i If a subsequent discharge of petroleum or petroleum product I occurs at the site, the Department may require site rehabilitation I' f in order to reduce contaminant concentrations to the levels approved through review of the "no further action" proposal, or otherwise allowed by Chapter 62-770, F.A.C. Additionally, you are required to properly abandon all monitoring wells except ce�:pliance wells required by Chapter 62-761 F.A.C., for release detection. The wells must be abandoned C k in accordance with the requirements of Rule 62-532.500(4) Persons whose substantial interests are affected by this Site Rehabilitation Completion Order have the right to challenge the Department's decision. Such a challenge may include filing a 1 petition for an administrative determination (hearing) as described in the following paragraphs. However, pursuant to - Chapter 17--103, F.A.C., you may request an extension of time to file the Petition. All requests fQr extensjQns of >jw!Q to ; 1 a DQtition nr netit.ions for ��j,D.istrative deLerminat-i -mist be filed dirprt 1y with —the oepartment's Office of general Counsel at this , o .a e ( do not send them to the Bureau of Waste C. eanuip) . i t F,o:ecc, Curiserre a:?d MtingQ� f c::4n c Nattrcr; Kesu:rrce; ' C OIL- ++I Printac on rrcrciee pc�r. �,�� } 1 lr I Tf ye � rT " 1 95- 360 r SENT BY: 11-30-95 :10:32AM PUBLIC WORKS/ADMMIN.- CITY OF MIAlfI;#r U/ 7 ^ Mr. wammack February 8, 1995 Page Two Notwithstanding the above, a person whose substantial interests are affected by this Site Rehabilitation completion Order :nay petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) in accordance with Section 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400, within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file a petition within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to regi1est an administrative determination (hearing) under Section 120.57, F.S. The petition shall contain the following information: (a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner, the Department file number (DEP facility number), and the name and address of the facility; (b) A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Depart.ment's action or proposed action; (c) A statement of how each petitioner's substantial interests are affected by the Department's action or proposed action; (d) n statement of the material facts disputed by each petitioner, iff any; (e) A statement of facts which each petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department's action or proposed action; (f) A statement of which rules or statutes each petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the Department's action or proposed action; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by each petitioner, stating precisely the action each petitioner wants the Department to take with respect to the Department's action or proposed action. This Site Rehabilitation Completion Order is final and effective on the date of receipt of this Order unless a petition (or time extension) is filed in accordance with the preceding paragraphs. Upon the timely filing of a petition, this Order will not be effective until further order of the Department. When the Order is final, any party to the Order has the right to seek judicial review of the Order pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by filing of a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal, accompanied by the applicable filing fees, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The .Notice of Appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date the Final Order is filed with the clerk of the Department. SENT BY: 11-30-95 ;10:32A►i PUBLIC WORKS/ADMI N. c I t Y Or ! AM1t t ; �; Mr. Wammack February 8, 1995 Page Three j j The DEP Facility number for this site is 138505364. Please use this identification on all future correspondence with the '1 Department. Any questions you may have on the technical aspects of this Approval Order should be directed to Pedro F. Hernandez, P.E. at �! (305) 372--6700. Contact with the above named person does not constitute a petition for administrative determination. Sincerely, i John M. Ruddell, Director Division of Waste Management 1 JGD pc: Dallas Troutt - FDEP Pedro F. Hernandez, P.E. - DERM Jeff R. Day - PDG Environmental 1j � • I f i 1 , .,� 96- 360 T_ SENT BY: 11-30-95 ;10:32ANI ; PUBLIC WORKS!ADYiN.-+ CITY OV NIAN11;A Of r Lawton Cltileb Governor Florida Department of Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Building 2600 Blair Stone Road UE�� ,,yy (� G01 Tallahassee, I� lorida 32399-2400 T; I CI T i`Se lrriary Mr. Waldemar E. Lee November 30, 1993 Acting Director City of Miami - Public Works Dept. 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 RE: Dinner Key Boatyard 2640 South Sayshore Drive Miami, Florida DEP Facility i#138505364 DERM UT-0185/File-6980 Dear Mr. Lee: The Bureau of waste Cleanup has reviewed the Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) Addendum and No Further Action Proposal (NEAP) dated September 17, 1993 (received September 23, 1993) submitted for this site and addressing the former gasoline and diesel tanks area. Documentation submitted with the NFAP confirms that criteria set forth in Section 17--770.600(5), Florida Administrative Code (F,A,C.), have been met for this particular area. The NFAP is hereby incorporated by reference in this Order. Therefore, with the exce trion of the former waste oil tank area (which xs c ~ram released from any further obligation to conduct site rehabilitation at the subb, Ee site, except as set for.th_bpl.rQyr,. ____ _.._..... If a subsequent discharge of petroleum cr petroleum product occurs at the site, the Department may require -site rehabilitation in order to reduce contaminant concentrations to the levels approved through review of the "no further action" proposal, or otherwise allowed by Chapter 17-770, F.A.C. Additionally, you are required to properly abandon all monitoring wells except compliance wells required by Chapter 17-761 F.A.C., for release detection, and any wells being used for the assessment of the former waste nil tank area. The wells must be abandoned in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17-532.500(4) F.A.C. Persons whose substantial interests are affected by this Site Rehabilitation Completion Order have the right to challenge the Department's decision. Such a challenge !ga include filing a petition for an administrative determination (hearing) as described in the following paragraphs. However, pursuant to Chapter 17-103, F.A.C., you may request an extension of time to file the Petition. All requests for extensions of time to file a Detition or petitions for administrative determinations must be filed direCtly with the Department's _Office of General Counsel at the adcIress 21ven Selow !'rinttd+In retJrkei p•prr. kI i (SAS � ()f6SeLA&' T4S 96- 360 SENT BY: 11-30-95 ,10:33AM PUBLIC WORKS/ADMIN." CITY ur MIAMiim b, r within twenty-one (21) days of recea t of this notice (do not send theca to t e Bureau of waste clean,ua Notwithstanding the above, a person whose substantial interests are affected by this Site Rehabilitation Completion order may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) in accordance with section 120,57, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received) in the office of General Counsel of the Department at 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400, within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file a petition within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any .right such person may have to request an administrative determination (hearing) under Section 120.57, F.S. The petition shall contain the following information: (a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner, the Department file number (DEP facility number),, and the name and address of the facility; �• (b) A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Department's action or proposed action; (c) A statement of how each petitioner's substantial interests are affected by the Department's action or proposed action; (d) A statement of the material facts disputed by eanh petitioner, if any; (e) A statement of tacts which eacr: petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department's action or proposed action; (f) A statement of which rules or statutes each petitioner contends recquire reversal or modification of the Department's action or proposed action; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by each petitioner, stating precisely the action each petitioner wants the Department to take with I respect to the Department's action or proposed action. This Site Rehabilitation completion Order is final and effective on the date of receipt of this Order unless a petition (or time I extension) is filed in accordance with the preceding paragraphs. Upon the timely filing of a petition, this Order will not be effective until further order of the Department. When the Order is final, any party to the Order has the right to seek judicial review of the Order pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by filing of a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 2600 Hair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal, accompanied by the applicable filing fees, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date the Final Order is filed with the clerk of the Department. The DEP Facility number for this site is 138505364 Please use this identification on all future correspandence-with the Department. 6,2A, DIa�SE� TANS " F 11-30-95 ;10:33AM ; PUBLIC WORKS/ADMIN. CITY OF MIAMI;� 71 7 Any questions you may have on the technical aspects of this Approval Order: should be directed to Pedro F. Hernandez, P.E. at (305) 372-6700. Contact with the above named person does not constitute a petition for administrative determination. Sincerely, John M. Ruddell, Director "Supplemental" set. No report as referred to was found. 15. A series of 26 drawings, some unidentified, others titled "Estiniating Drawings for 1.80' Hangar" by L.B. Taylor dated 8/26142. "These drawings depict a timber truss systein and are not representative of the Hangars under investigation. These drawings may have been developed as an alternate or for another hangar but are not applicable to this facility. I I 1I. DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURES 2.1 Virrick Gym and Annex For continuity of identification this complex is described using the Block identification (figure 2) as developed in document reference #1 (Simpson Gumpertz). Block 1, Block 5 and Block 3 were part of the original Coast Guard Hangar. This facility was constructed, circa 1932, by + the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG Board of Survey 2 Novemher 1965). l Block I is a structural steel framed building consisting of a series of six steel "sses spaced at 20 feet on center spannint, approximately 102 ft. in the north-soutli direction. The trusses are fabricated from double angles, top and bottom chords and diagonals, with riveted joints. The trusses are of a modified "bowstring" type with a segmentally curved top chord and a horizontal bottom chord. The trusses support a wood roof deck of 1-1/4" tongue and groove plank on 8" steel channels spaced at 5' o.c. spanning between trusses. The trusses are supported by 12" H columns. The exterior walls are 16" clay file masonry with reinforced concrete lintels over the windows of Block 5, a reinforced concrete cap at the top of the parapet and some reinforced concrete (tie) columns. The exterior walls are stuccoed. The cast wall (facing the bay) is enclosed by a 100 ft. wide by 26 ft. high hangar door (Byrne Door). The original motorized door had the lower one third clad with stucco and the upper two thirds clad with ribbed wire glass. At sometime in the past the door was clad with transite (cement asbestos) panels. The door is totally inoperable and large sections of cladding are missing. The structure is laterally braced by horizontal and vertical steel cross bracing in the east and west end bays of the roof and of the north and south wall_ T The ground floor slab is a 6" thick concrete slab on grade reinforced with wire mesh. The slab jwas designed with a slope from west to east of 1 /4" per foot. The steel columns and exterior xs walls are supported on reinforced concrete grade beams founded on precast concrete piles. } 1 f a� i 4 of 23 95- 360 The one story buildings are framed with 8" concrete masonry bearing walls supporting wood framed roofs. The ground floor is a concrete slab on grade and based on our observations it is believed that the foundation consists of footings cast monolithically with the slab. A concrete tie beam supports 2x10 roof joists at 16" o.c. and is sheathed with tongue and groove wood decking. The two story building (Block 8) also is built with 8" concrete masonry bearing walls with a concrete slab on grade ground floor and reinforced concrete one-way slab and beam second floor. The floor beams span east -west from the exterior bearing walls to a north -south girder line at the middle of the building. This girder is supported by 12z12 reinforced concrete columns at approxjmately 15 ft. o.c. The roof is constructed of 2x10 sloped rafters at 16" o.c. and 2x6 ceiling joists at 16" o.c. The rafters and joists are connected with I x vertical members. Block 9 was added sometime after 1950. It is a one story building approximately 17x40 ft., of masonry bearing walls and open web steel joist roof. The ground floor is a concrete slab on grade. The steel roof joists are 12" deep spaced at 3' o.c. supporting a gypsum roof deck on bulb tees. 2.2 Pan American Hangar Buildings circa 1938 Hangar Building "D" - This building is the smaller of the two PanAm facilities being investigated. Hangar "D" is approximately 100 ft. x 180 ft. and was referred to as the "Machine Shop". There were no drawings available for this structure and the following information is based on our field investigation and from the limited available drawings for Hangar "C"_ The building is divided into 3 east -west bays and 9 north -south bays. The center (high) bay, which is 40 ft. wide, is spanned in the north -south direction by a series of Pratt trusses. The trusses are fabricated of rolled structural steel shapes with riveted connections. The trusses are supported by W 14 (H 14/12) steel columns spaced at 20 ft. o.c. The roof consists of W 10 purlins at 5' o.c. between trusses and supports a metal deck. The exterior, 30 ft. wide bays are considerably lower than the center and are spanned by W24 steel floor beams and W18 steel roof beams at each column line. The exterior columns are W10 (H10) steel sections. Roof purlins are W 10 at 5' o.c. The ground floor is a concrete slab on grade. It is reasonable to assume that the foundation consists of driven timber piles with reinforced concrete pile caps and grade beams. Hangar "C" is approximately 180 ft. x 210 ft. with a center bay 150 ft. wide (N-5) that is clear spanned by steel trusses at 20 ft. o.c. The trusses were fabricated from rolled steel sections with riveted connections. A series of W 14 columns create 9 - 20 ft. bays in the east -west direction. To the north there is a two story 30 ft. wide bay and to the south a three story 30 6 of 23 1 i 9�- 360 PEI ft. wide bay. These two hays are framed in a similar manner with NVIO columns at the exterior (20' o.c.) and W24 girders spanning N-S to the W 14 interior columns. Between the W24's the floor beams are W12 and W14 at 5' o.c. (E-W). These floor beams typically support 1-1/2" deep metal deck, over which is a wood floor. Over the years several layers of wood have been installed. In a few local areas, apparently shower and bathroom areas, the metal deck supports a concrete slab. The foundations are driven timber piles with reinforced concrete pile caps. The steel columns are supported at the top of reinforced concrete piers that extend up from the pile caps. The ground floor is about G" - 8" thick concrete slab on grade. Ill FIELD INVESTIGATION 13NI Representadve M. 1:onald Milmed, P-E., and City of Miami Representative Mr. Allan fonts, A1A conducted an extensive familiarisation wall: through on April 6, 1994. On May 10, 1994, Mr. Milmed and Mr. Charles Davis, BNI 1=ield Representative, conducted a similar walk through inspection. Mr. Davis then returned on May 18, 1994 and spent eleven full days and several partial days making detailed observations of the structural conditions at specific locations throughout the three complexes. Our observations are summarized below. Note: As used in this report the term "delamination" refers to the advanced stage of corrosion in which the structural steel begins to separate along the molecular planes created during the steel making process. While it is not necessary to observe such severe deterioration to have incurred some loss of section, the presence of delaminations is always indicative of section loss and therefore reduced capacity. Many of the structural steel sections in these facilities are older sections no longer rolled and whose nomenclature is no longer used. In those cases where specific identification is not feasible the current generic term, such as "wide flange" or "W" section is used. 3.1 Virrick Gym and Annex For purposes of this investigation and report the "Block" identification used in the Hurricane Andrew Damage Report (Ref. #/1) will be used herein. A copy of that Block Plan is reproduced as figure 2. East is taken as the old hangar entrance facing the bay. Block I ,n The tongue and groove wood roof deck has approximately 1.0,%-of.the deck missing. Of the remaining deck, the majority is in very poor condition, with age, dry rot, and water damage the predominant problems. See Photo 1. The 8" steel channel purlins, which are connected 7 of 23 96- 360 II- abuts the north wall of Block 7. See Photo 32. In the west wall two previous openings were closed in with concrete block and there is a hairline separation between the new and old masonry. The tie beam is in good condition with no visible cracks or spalls and when sounded with a hammer appears solid. The roof joists bear on a tie beam on the east wall and on a continuous 4"x8" bent plate with stiffeners at the west wall. The joists are. in good condition with only minor corrosion visible on the joists and bearing plate. The roof deck shows considerable water damage. See Photo 33. The slag on grade appears sound with no visible cracks and no voids apparent when sounded. 1310 k )A This small (10'x16') one story concrete block addition to the north and cast of Block 6 is in fair to poor condition. Access was not available since it was locked and no one could locate the keys. However, observing it from the outside showed a significant separation joint between 6A and 6. In addition there is a major crack between the concrete block and the concrete tie beam. This crack varies from 1/4" to 1/2" in width and probably extends through the wall. See Photo 34. 3.2 Machine Shop (Hangar "D") This structural steel framed building, circa 1937-1938, consists of three bays and has overall dimensions of about I00'xl80'. The center bay is a 40 ft. wide high roof bay framed by steel trusses spanning north -south. At the cast end there is a steel framed sliding door. See Photo 35. For purposes of identification the interior bays are numbered 1 through 9 beginning at the east end of the building. The roof deck is a corrugated, coated metal deck supported by W 10 steel purlins at 5' o.c. spanning east -west between trusses. See Photo 36. The deck is secured to the purlins by 1" metal straps at 12" o.c. The roof deck and the straps are in poor condition, being heavily corroded. There is horizontal bracing of the bottom chord of the trusses in bays 1, 3 and 9. See Photo 37. The W 10 roof purlins have moderate amounts of surface corrosion. The bolted connections to the trusses are in good condition with no missing bolts found. The trusses are in good condition with only minor surface corrosion observed. See Photo 38. On the south side at columns 6, 7 and 8 one rivet was found missing in the truss to column connection. The remaining truss to column, vertical and diagonal bracing connections appeared complete and in good condition. 13 of 23 96- 369 The trusses are supported by W14 steel columns. The columns evidenced only minor surf.ice corrosion except for the bottom two feet and the base connection. Here there is evidence of moderate to heavy surface corrosion and some delamination. The column base consists of 6"x6"x24"xl/2" bent plates riveted to each flange and anchored with 2 - 2" diameter anchor bolts. See Photo 39. The low bays on the north and south are framed with W 18 roof beams spanning north -south with W 10 purlins at 5' o.c. The purlins support the coated, corrugated metal roof deck. There is horizontal bracing consisting of steel angles and rods in hays 1, 5 and 9. The roof deck is in Poor condition with heavy corrosion, as are the metal straps which secure the: deck to the purlins. The structural steel framing is in good condition with only minor corrosion observed. The riveted connections observed are sound with no loose or missing rivets found. On the southeast side, Bay 1, there is a diagonal brace missing. The exterior (perimeter) columns, W10 steel sections, are rpieraily in good condition with only nifflor surface corrosion, except as noted herein. The exterior masonry wall, which infills between columns up to the window sills, is capped with a poured in place reinforced concrete tie beam and at the ends adjacent to the columns, with poured in place concrete from the end of the masonry into the web of the columns. At this intersection the column webs and exterior flanges have moderate to heavy corrosion with some delamination observed. See Photo 40. The column in the southeast corner has severe corrosion at this same sill elevation, which also coincides with the location of a horizontal wall girt. Here the corrosion has completely eaten through the web of the column. See Photo 41. The column bases are similar in both design and condition to those of the W 14 columns at the interior bays. See Photo 42. Located in bays 1 and 2 of both the north and south bays is a two story office and storage area. Framing for both is similar with W24 girders framing north -south to the columns and W12 floor beams at 5' o.c. spanning east -west. Beam to beam or beam to column connections are riveted and appear to be in good condition. See Photo 43. The structural steel framing is slightly to moderately corroded. The floor on the north side is concrete on 1-1 /2" deep metal deck and on the south side plywood over the same deck. The concrete appears to be in good condition with some small cracks but which still sounds solid when struck with a hammer. However, tests on a core sample indicate very high chloride contents of 1.7% to 5%. The metal deck is moderately corroded. The plywood floor on the south side is in poor condition with extensive termite damage. There is a stair tower in the northeast corner of Bay 1. The walls on the east are metal siding and on the other three sides they are infrli concrete block masonry. The masonr), walls are in good condition with only some minor cracks visible and minimal damage to one corner of the tie column. The stairs consist of 10" steel channel stringers with 8" diamond plate treads, 14 of 23 95- 360 J risers and landing. The stair was recently painted and appears to he in g(x)d condition. The handrail is secure and has only minor corrosion. A W24 girder runs inside the stair tower along the east wall. See Photo 44. It has a riveted connection to the W 10 column to the north and at the south there is an unusual (field modified) welded and riveted connection to another W 10 column. This connection has some moderate corrosion and undercutting of the welds. See Photo 45. Access to the second floor in the southeast is by a single run stair with one intermediate landing. This steel stair is not adequately supported. Connections are poor or non-existent and the condition is poor. This stair is unsafe and while beyond the scope of this investigation, it is an obvious code violation. See Photo 46. A grade beam and Pile cap were exposed at one location on the north side. See Photo 47. A concrete core sample was taken from the grade beam. Three 5" diameter holes have been chipped through the concrete beam north of the sliding door on the cast side. The concrete I appears to he in good condition with test results showing a strength of 4 M psi and a chloride content of only .15% and negligible carbonation. The timber piles were physically felt and observed at this same location and were found to be in good condition. The concrete slab on grade is in fair condition with several significant cracks (± 1/8") and evidence of 1 " - 2" settlement to the west, Bays 7, 8 and 9. At the south wall of Bays 5 and 6 there is evidence of up to 8" of settlement. Based on soundings with a hammer, no voids or hollow areas were found. See Photo 48. A core sample indicates a compressive strength i greater than 3500 psi, slight carbonation and 0.87% chloride content. The sill height masonry walls on the north and south elevations are in good condition. The corrugated, coated metal wall panels and many of their supporting steel girts are in poor condition. Many of the windows are broken or inoperable and their steel casements are severely corroded. See Photo 49. 3.3 Hangar "C" � This 180 ft. x 210 ft. steel framed building is the largest of the PanAm Hangars built at Dinner Key. Drawings for the ground floor and foundation (ref. 13) were available for this investigation. Column notations refer to those used on the referenced drawings. The center bay of 150 ft. is clear spanned, north to south, by steel trusses at 20 ft. o.c. There is a two story steel framed bay on the north and a three story steel framed bay on the south. The cast j and west walls of the center bay consist of two sets of full height, steel framed, sliding doors. See Photo 50. The north and south walls are concrete block masonry to the window sill height and corrugated, coated, metal siding on structural steel framing above and between windows. The roof deck of corrugated, coated, metal decking is in fair to poor condition throughout, I while the steel beam purlins are in fair to good condition, with extensive but not severe surface 15of23 95— 360 corrosion. Sce Phirto 51 The trusses, fabricated from rolled steel shapes with riveted connections, and their associated bracing members are in good condition with mostly light to moderate corrosion. See Photo 52. The W 14 interior columns supporting the trusses are in good condition. Column bases at columns 4 on the south and 16 on the north were exposed and found to be in good condition. Riveted, bent plate base connections similar to those in die Machine Shop (Hangar "D") are also used at these columns. The framing of the two and three story bays is similar, with NV24 girders spanning north -south from the W 14 interior columns to W 10 exterior columns. The floor beams are W 14 at 5' o.c. and the roof purlins arc W 12 Kearns at 5' o.c. The steel framing is generally in good condition with only surface corrosion affecting most members, the exception being at the exterior walls, especially the north and cast walls of the north (2 story) hay. Sec Photos 53 and 54. 13cginning with the stair in the northeast bays the structural members - columns, heams, girt-S etc. - are moderately to severely corroded. The stair is in very poor condition and has been closed to use. See Photo 55. Corrosion of fire nor-titeast corner column, and even more so the second column west of die corner, are severe, with significant delaminadon prevalent. The horizontal members at the wall line are also severely corroded, especially the channel girts which provide support for the wall panels. The corrosion reduces as you move toward the interior away from the worst water intrusion areas. The second floor is typically wood over 1-112" metal floor deck. There is a 2 bay area on the north, near the middle of the second floor, which is a concrete slab on the same metal deck. This area of floor is in fair condition. The wood floors are in poor condition with extensive termite damage and dry rot. The corrugated metal deck is in poor to fair condition with moderate to locally heavy corrosion, the worst area again being the northeast portion of the Mo story bay. Here the floor, both wood and metal, has virtually disintegrated and is completely; unsafe. See Photo 56. The conditions of the framing and floor members of the three story south bay is similar to the west portion of the north, two story, bay. The wood floors are in poor condition and the metal deck is fair to poor with moderate corrosion prevalent. There are no areas as severely deteriorated as the northeast hay of the two story section. There are four stair towers, one in each corner of the two and three story bays. The stair in the northeast of the two story bay has already been discussed. The stairs are typically framed with 10" channel stringers and diamond plate treads. Other than the northeast stair, the stairs are in good condition with only surface corrosion observed. 16of23 96- 360 There are t\k,o freight elevators, one near the southeast and one near the northwest. Neither elevator is operational. The framing around the elevators appears to be in good condition. The first floor is a concrete slab on grade designed as a 6" to 8" slab reinforced with wire mesh and cast on "rock" fill. The original slab was detailed with I", asphalt filled expansion joints and slip joints. The slip joints appear to have been asphalt filled cold joints, perhaps 1/8" or less wide. Most of the expansion joints are now 1-1/2" to 3-1/2" wide and the asphalt has completely deteriorated. Tile slab contains numerous cracks of varying sizes, as well as surface gouges. There is evidence of from 1/2" to 2" of settlement at various locations throughout the main hangar bay. The concrete appears sound when sounded by striking with a hammer. A 7" long core was taken and indicates a strength in excess of 4500 psi with a chloride content of only 0.33 o and no carbonation. The foundation for this hangar consists of 12" diameter wood piles which support reinforced concrete pile caps and grade beams. One such pile cap was uncovered and the pil-s and cap were observed to be in good condition. No cracks or spalled concrete were obsen ed in the cap or in the grade beam which was exposed and the concrete "rang" solid when struck with a hammer. A core sample from the grade beam indicates a compressive strength of 3500 psi with almost no carbonation and a very low 0.05 % chlorides. The exterior walls are similar to those of the machine shop, with masonry up to the first story window sills and metal siding above and between windows. The siding is supported by the primary structural frame and secondary steel girts and sag rods. The windows and their steel frames are in poor condition. The metal siding is in fair to poor condition. Generally the secondary framing (girts etc.) is in fair to good condition with some areas, northeast in particular, in poor condition. See Photo 57. The east and west sliding doors are in fair to good condition. The main door framing is good with only moderate corrosion of the steel. The upper track is heavily corroded and some track is missing. The doors presently are limited in their ability to slide as there are sections of track missing or unusable, as much as 70% on the west and to a lesser extent on the east. The low masonry walls are in good condition with some stucco cracks and, in the middle of the south wall, a 5" diameter hole in the concrete block. IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Virrick Gym and Annex The Virrick Gym (Block 1), constructed in 1932 by the U.S. Coast Guard as a hangar and air- sea rescue base, is a structural steel framed building with clay tile masonry walls. The 96- 360 17 of 23 needs replacement. About 25% - 50% of the 3x8 floor joists will also need to be replaced.. A new, structurally secure railing will need to be installed. Block This is similar to Block 4. The wood roof deck needs replacement. The steel joists need cleaning and recoating_ However, there are six 'oists that are severely corroded at the j' west end and may need repair or replacement, along with their bearing plates. As with the other blocks the masonry is structurally sound and is in need of only surficial repairs and refinishing. The wood framed mezzanine is in poor condition and should be removed. I Block 7 The concrete block walls and reinforced concrete are structurally sound and need f surface repairs and refinishing. The woad roof deck is in poor condition and needs replacement. The 2XI0 rafters are fair and about 25 % - 50% may need to be replaced. Block 8 This two story masonry and reinforced concrete building is, in general, structurally sound. The masonry and reinforced concrete are in good condition with only surf icial repairs and refinishing of the masonry walls needed. The wood roof deck is in poor condition and needs to be replaced. The 2x10 rafters are in fair condition and about 50% may need to be I replaced. 1 As with the other blocks the foundations appear sound with no significant settlement observed. j The exterior stair is in good condition but the supporting pipe columns need to be clea:ied and J recoated. The railing of the handicap ramp needs to have some welding repairs made. 113 ock 9 A -one story masonry bearing wall structure with steel joist roof framing, it is in good condition. There are some significant joint openings where the masonry walls meet the walls of Block 7_ These joints need to be sealed with an elastomeric sealant_ There are some other surface cracks which should be sealed and the masonry refinished. The steel joists are in good condition and need only cleaning and recoat.ing. The roof deck has suffered considerable water damage and should be replaced. The slab on grade is sound. The garage door is in fair f! condition_ Block 6A This one story masonry bearing wall building has some significant structural cracks. The roof is probably in need of replacement and the entire (10'x16') building should probably ! , be removed_ 4.2 PanAm Machine Shop (Hangar "D") This is a structural steel framed building which, in general, has a structurally sound primary frame. The structural steel will need to be cleaned and recoated. The interior columns which show heavier corrosion at the base will need some supplementary reinforcing and anchorage_ The exterior columns will need to have the masonry walls removed for a sufficient distance i 19 of 23 96- 360 - (±IG" each side) to allow cleaning and repair to the lower portion of the columns. Missing bracing should be replaced and missing or loose rivets replaced with new bolts. The cormgated, coated metal roof deck and siding are in poor condition and need to be replaced. The steel framed windows are severely corroded and should be replaced. The concrete second floor on the north is in good condition but the metal deck will need cleaning and recoating. The plywood floor on the south side needs to be replaced and the metal deck will probably also need replacement. The slab on grade may need topping and repairs or replacement depending on future occupancy. It is structurally adequate as is for occupancy similar to that now in use. All the visible evidence indicates that the foundation and grade beams are structurally sound. Isolated holes or cracks in concrete or masonry need to be repaired. 4.3 PanAm Hangar "C" This steel framed structure has, in general, a structurally sound frame. The trusses, primary and secondary steel framing members need to be cleaned and recoated but, for the most part, no replacement or major repairs to the trusses, columns, beams and bracing members will be needed. The corrugated, coated metal roof deck is in poor condition and needs replacement. This is true for the siding which is of the same material. About 10% - 20% of the wall gigs are severely corroded and will need to be replaced. The roof purlins are generally good and cleaning and coating is all that will be required for about 90%. The remaining 10% may need to be replaced. The wood floor decking of the two and three story bays is in poor condition and should be replaced. The corrugated metal deck below the wood wearing surface varies considerably in condition and 25% - 50% may need to be replaced. The northeast stair is severely corroded and should be replaced while the other three stairs can be cleaned and recoated. The elevators are inoperable and, if required, need to be replaced. The steel framed windows are in very poor condition and need replacement. The hangar doors can probably be saved as their primary framing members are in good condition; however, extensive repair and replacement of both the upper and lower track assemblies will be required to make them operational_ This will need to be done in order to enclose the building or they will need to be replaced by a wall system. The masonry and concrete wall elements are in good condition and require only surf icial 20 of 23 96- 360 repairs and reconditioning. Tlie investigation of die foundation and grade beams indicates that these are structurally sound and no repairs are needed. The slah on grade is acceptable for use as the facility is presently occupied. However, a change in occupancy may require repair or restoration of the slab. 4.4 We recommend the following structurally related work be undertaken if the buildings are to be put back in use for an extended period of time. The following list is not necessarily in the order of importance or the sequence required for construction. j 4.4.1 Virrick Gym and Annex jA. Remove finishes enclosing structural steel. B. Remove Gym (hangar) roof deck. j C. Sandblast structural steel and rccoat. j 1). l-valuaic cleaned steel and repair as necessary. As a minimunrSupplement base connection with new steel angles and anchors. Also supplement bolted connection of roof purlins by welding. j E. Remove and replace windows and siding. F. Replace roofing. G. Remove existing hangar door and replace with new wall. H. Demolish Block 2. 1. Remove all roof decks. J. Remove and replace or repair roof framing members as necessary. K. Repair masonry walls and reinforced concrete members. L. Demolish Block GA. M. Demolish or remove and replace existing wood mezzanines. 4.4.2 . Machine Shop -' PanAm' Hangar "D" A. Remove and replace roof deck. B. Remove and replace siding and windows. C Remove finishes adjacent to structural steel. D: Sandblast structural steel and recoat. E. Evaluate cleaned steel and repair as necessary- F. As a minimum supplement base connection with new steel angles and anchors. G. Clean and recoat metal floor deck. Replace as necessary. H. Remove and replace wood floor deck. 'f 1. Remove and replace southeast stair. J. Replace missing bracing and missing or loose rivets. 96- 360 in Conditions insulting Engineers, Inc. :d excerpts, nD— nen EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study is aimed at establishing the existing conditions of the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems for all three buildings. It also indicates a description of the repairs, replacement, and/or additions to these systems so they comply with current codes. The purpose is to define a base line of required work to bring these facilities into leasable conditions using the current occupancy as a guide. Larcge Pan Am Hangar "C" (old Merrill -Stevens Facility) This is the larger of the three structures which consists of a central open space (hangar proper) and shop spaces along the north and south sides. Mechanical There' is no existing mechanical ventilation except for very old, inoperable, wall mounted fans. In it's present occupancy, a ventilation system for the entire facility would have to be considered. Electrical The electrical system consists of a power distribution network and a lighting system. The electrical distribution within the building is very deteriorated and it's major components are obsolete. It must be totally replaced. The existing lighting system does not provide adequate coverage. It could be reused under the current occupancy after a required _ refurbishment. A complete exit light and emergency lighting system must be installed. There is no fire alarm system which is required. Plumbincr The plumbing system is the original installation and consists o f gang male and female toilets. These toilet facilities do not meet code requirements. New facilities are required. Fire Protection Currently, there is no fire protection system of any kind in this facility. This Hangar will require a full sprinkler system. Small Pan Am Hangar "D" (Old Merrill -Stevens Facility) This structure is located between Hangar "C" and the old Coast Guard Hangar. 96- 3600 r Plumbing The plumbing system is the original installation and consists of gang male and female toilets. These toilets do not meet code. New facilities will be required. If there is no variation in the present occupancy, no fire sprinklers will be required. Site The landside of both Hangars "C" and "D" is a large parking area which has virtually no outside lighting. The entire parking area will require a new outside lighting system ,to maintain the code prescribed minimum lighting levels. Similarly, the parking areas on the north side of the Coast Guard/Virrick Gym Building requires additional illumination. The oceanside of Hangars "C" and "D" is being used to work on a variety of boats. Work performed is mostly of a refinishing nature with operations such as sanding, sandblasting, painting, etc. The oceanside outdoor area by Hangars "C" and "D" must be restored and upgraded with outdoor lighting and power. DERM approved drainage and ventilation provisions for the refinishing functions must be provided. Mechanical There is currently no ventilation system in this Facility. General ventilation for the open spaces will be required. Electrical The entire power distribution is obsolete and in need of urgent repairs. There are numerous instances of potentially dangerous jury rigged installations which constitute code violations and safety hazards. The lighting system is very deficient. It must be upgraded to provide adequate lighting levels. There is no fire alarm system which is required. Plumbing 1 There is only a small individual toilet in this Facility. It is the original installation and consequently should be demolished and replaced. Fire Protection Currently this facility has no fire protection system. City of Miami Fire Department Representatives indicated that the requirement for a sprinkler system depended on the type of occupancy contemplated for this hangar. Old Coast Guard. Hangar (Virrick Gym/City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department) This structure is a combination of a hangar (metal structure with metal cladding) and masonry additions on three sides. Originally, it housed a U.S. Coast Guard Hangar and offices. Mechanical The existing mechanical ventilation system for the hangar section is inoperable. A new general ventilation system for the hangar must be installed. Electrical The existing systems are fed from a pad mounted transformer located across Bayshore Drive on the opposite side of the street. From there it reaches the building via underground conduits. Lighting on the hangar side is virtually non-existent. A new lighting system must be considered. A complete exit'.Light and emergency lighting system must be installed. There is no fire alarm system which is -required. 96— 360 SCOPE: The purpose of this study is to establish the current condition of the mechanical, electrical:, and plumbing systems for the three structures considered and to identify the steps required to restore the Facility to a safe operable condition in compliance with current codes. General Observations: Large Pan Am Hangar "C" (Old Merrill. -Stevens Facility) This is the larger of the three structures which consists of a central open space (hangar proper) and shop spaces along the north and south sides. The central area, presently houses a truck crane for boat lifting and several other vehicles and trailers, is not being used specifically. The shops along the north side are two levels and include gang toilets, a wood shop and an upholstery shop. The tenants on the south side are grouped in three levels and include a chandlery, a sail loft, machine shops, an ultra -light aircraft concessionaire, and storage spaces. The current occupancy could loosely be defined as a service boat yard. Mechanical There is no existing mechanical ventilation except for very old, inoperable, wall mounted propeller fans in the wood shop. See Photo No. 1. The upholstery and canvas shop have a ducted air conditioning system which is currently not running. In it's present occupancy, a ventilation system for the entire Page 2 r il 2 0 0 5 U 2 facility would have to be considered. This system should include standard ventilation for open spaces as well as specialized systems for toilet exhaust, woodworking shop, paint storage, machine shop, etc. Offices and chandlery should be provided with air conditioning systems. Electrical The electrical system consists of a power distribution network and a lighting system,for:,the general area and the shop spaces. See Photo No. 2. The. -power distribution is fed from an antiquated pad mounted transformer mat arrangement fenced on three sides and attached to the small Pan Am Hangar I'D" located.north of the larger one, Hangar "C". See Photo No. 3. This entire unit must be updated since it's equipment is obsolete and.some.yof it's components are considered exposed and dangerous. Florida Power & Light Representative has agreed that a main service upgrade and modernization is required. The electrical distribution within the building is very deteriorated and it's major components such as panels, and disconnects are obsolete. Recertification forms and photographs are enclosed in the main body of the report illustrating these conditions. Numerous potentially dangerous conditions were observed on panels where unorthodox power taps had been made to sub -feed the shops. (See Photos No's. 7 & 8). It must be assumed that the entire power distribution has to be updated and upgraded in capacity wherein very few, if any components which could be Page - 3 96- 360 Mreused. The upgrade in capacity will be a function of the occupancy considerations for this Hangar. There are two inoperable cargo elevator which should either be demolished completely or replaced with new ones complying with applicable codes. (See Photo No. 13). The existing lighting system, which consists of incandescent reflector downlights and three wall mounted flood lights, does Irdome not provide adequate uniform coverage. (See Photos No's. 9 & 10). Even though this is not .an energy efficient system, it could be reused under the current occupancy after a required refurbishment to provide adequate lighting levels. A complete exit light and emergency lighting system must be installed to„satisfy safety to life code requirements. There is no fire alarm system installed`. A new fire alarm system comprised of automatic fire/smoke4 detectors, manual pull stations, visual and audible signalling appliances, annunciator panels, etc. must be installed .'to satisfy present code r requirements. (� ® Each tenant space/shop will require a dedicated power/ lighting distribution system with individual sub -panels and possibly an individual metering system. This last statement enters into a separate area of consideration whose basis is the future occupancy considerations for the Hangar. Plumbincr The plumbing system is the original installation and consists Page 4 96- 360 LI L C' LVE L i L L of gang male and female toilets located on the north side of the building. They include lavatories, water closets, urinals and showers all in bad state of repair. See Photos No. 4, 5, 6. These toilet facilities do not meet capacity requirements set forth this facility. We toured the Hangar with two representatives of the City of Miami Fire Department. Due to the height, floor area, and up to three levels of tenant spaces on the sides, this Hangar will require a full sprinkler system. Depending on available water pressure and flows, a fire pump may be required emergency power provisions in the form of a generator. Page - 5 along with F 95- 360 Small Pan Am Hangar I'D" (old Merrill -Stevens Facility) This structure is located between Hangar "C" and the old Coast Guard Hangar (Virrick Gym)/City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department. It currently houses a variety of shops and yacht brokerage offices. The Facility is mostly a single level one with the offices on the second levels at the southeast and southwest corners of the Hangar. Mechanical There is currently' no ventil"ation system in this Facility. General' ventilation for the open spaces will be required as well as specialized ventilation forhe wood shop and other tenants. ' Additionally, if office configuration tenants are maintained, these spaces will require air conditioning. Electrical The existing electrical system is also fed from the old pad mounted transformer mat 'described in Hangar "C" (see Photo No. 3). This entire main service assembly and disconnect switches are fenced in an attachment to this middle hangar. The Main Disconnects, Panels and Gutters are located behind equipment and wood materials inside the locked wood shop. This present arrangement is in violation of the SFBC and NEC. (See Photos No. 11 & 12). The entire power distribution is obsolete and in need of urgent repairs. There are numerous instances of potentially Page - 6 96- 360 j dangerous jury rigged_ installations which constitute code violations and safety hazards. (See Photos No's. 14 & 15). The lighting system is very deficient (See Photo No. 16). It consists of incandescent downlight type fixtures at approximately twenty-five to thirty feet;,spacing. The system must be upgraded to provide adequate lighting levels. Emergency lights and exit lights need to be added throughout to comply with current code requirements. There is no existing fire alarm system in the building. A new fire alarm system with automatic fire/smoke detectors, manual pull stations, visual and audible: signalling. appliances, annunciator` panels,. etc. must be installed to satisfy safety to life code requirements. Tenant shops and offices will- each require a dedicated power/lighting distribution system with individual sub -panels and possibly an individual metering system. This last statement enters into separate area of consideration ,;whose basis is the future occupancy consideration's 'for,the.Hangar. Plumbing There is only a small individual toilet in this Facility. It is the original installation and consequently should be demolished and replaced. Under the current occupancy, new facilities for men and women must be introduced. They must meet ADA codes as well as gender parity requirements. Page 7 :o 96- 360 F I Fire Protection Currently this facility has no fire protection system. City of Miami Fire Department Representatives indicated that the requirement for a sprinkler system depended on the type of occupancy contemplated for this hangar. If any boat repair, refinishing, or similar activity is anticipated, then the sprinkler system would be required. Since these activities were currently observed during our visit, we must assume that a sprinkler system needs to be included in the restoration scope. Old Coast Guard Hangar (Virrick Gym/City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department) This structure is a combination of a hangar (metal structure with metal cladding) and masonry additions on three sides. Originally, it housed a U.S. Coast Guard Hangar and offices. The hangar was later used as the Virrick Gym and the two level office building are still being used mainly by the City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department and other City.,functions. The hangar side is currently used by "Shake A Leg" which is a sailing program for disabled individuals. This is the oldest of the three hangars dating back to 1932. Mechanical The existing mechanical ventilation system for the hangar section is inoperable; fans are rusted, not connected, missing motors, etc. (See Photo No. 17). A new general ventilation system for the hangar must be Page - 8 installed. Specialized ventilation systems for toilets, electrical rooms and storage spaces must be installed in the restoration effort. The City of Miami Park and Recreation Department offices have individual window type air conditioning units both at the Hangar and the offices. These units are still operating. However, if these office functions are to be retained in the restoration effort, then a central air conditioning system should be considered. The local utility, FP&L offers significant rebates for efficiency improvements in air conditioning equipment retrofits. Electrical The existing systems are fed from a pad mounted transformer located across Bayshore Drive on the opposite side of the street. From there it reaches the building via underground conduits. This is important to point out because upgrade of the system would probably imply working across through Bayshore Drive to extend new electricalservice feeders.' There'is no main electrical room, but a corridor like room which houses panels, disconnects, and transformers. (See Photo No. 18). Numerous materials are stored in this room making it difficult to access electrical equipment and constituting a code violation. Equipment is obsolete and needs replacement. Other panels throughout'the'building also require replacement since they are antiquated, fusible. type. (See Photos No. 19, 20).f i In general, the entire electrical system must be replaced with Page 9 96- 360 k-y ._, e7-94-951 I 10/27/94 9 - ! S, 2 j RESOLUTION NO. I_ A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION, ATTACHED HERETO AS I "ATTACHMENT 1" AND MADE A PART HEREOF, FOR A ' COMPREHENSIVE RESTORATION PROGRAM OF THE I DINNER KEY AREA, MORE SPECIFICALLY, FOR THE j (1) RENOVATION OF THE VIRRICK:GYM SITE FOR 1 COMMUNITY RECREATION AND POSSIBLE INTERPRETIVE HISTORIC PROGRAMS; AND (2) ADAPTIVE REUSE OF THE DINNER KEY BOAT ' YARD/MERRILL STEVENS PROPERTY UNDER A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ("UDP") FOR THE USE(S) STIPULATED IN SAID RECOMMENDATION; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO COMMENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAID RESTORATION PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CHARTER k AND CODE PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF A CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMPOSED OF INDIVIDUALS FROM THE COCONUT GROVE COMMUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN.THE DRAFTING OF THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE UDP. i -' WHEREAS, several City -owned properties in the Dinner Key ' area of Coconut Grove suffered severe damage as a result of Hurricane Andrew, in particular: the Virrick Gym, boat ramp and t i office annex, which together comprise the former Coast Guard Air Station, and the two (2) hangars, adjacent docks and piers which comprise the Dinner Key Boat Yard, formerly known as the Merrill Stevens Dry Dock; and WHEREAS, after a lengthy process of community planning and professional study, the City Manager has identified and presented to the City Commission on this date, a comprehensive program of restoration for said properties; and CITY COY 4ISSION ------ MEETING OF �p a m 1 y Resolution No. 94 1 WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Miami to identify specific funding in an amount not to exceed $4,500,000 to be used for the restoration of these properties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The City Manager's recommendation, attached hereto as "Attachment 1" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved and accepted for a Comprehensive Restoration Program of the Dinner Key Area, more specifically, for the (1) renovation of the Virrick Gym Site for Community recreation and possible interpretive historic programs; and (2) adaptive reuse of the Dinner Key Boat Yard/Merrill Stevens Property under a Unified Development Process ("IIDP") for the use(s) stipulated in said Recommendation. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to commence implementation of said Restoration Program in accordance with all applicable City Charter and Code provisions. Section 4. The following individuals from the Coconut Grove community are hereby appointed to a Citizens' Advisory Committee to participate in the drafting of the Request for Proposals for the IIDP :/ Said appointments shall be submitted in writing to the City Clerk. -2- 94- 782 96- 360 Lynn B. Lewis NOMINATED BY: Mayor Stephen P. Clark Vice -Mayor Miller J. Dawkins Commissioner Victor H. De Yurre Commissioner Wifredo Gort Commissioner J.L. Plummer, Jr. Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of October 1994. /? STEPHEN PNRK, MAYOR ATTE MATTY HIRAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: JII 0. BRU ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: A. QUXNN S , TIT CITY ATT EY DJ:BSS:M4748 M 91- "782 96-- 360 i I VMRICK GYM SITE The Virrick Gym Site will not be, included in the RFP. Virrick Gym will be reserved and renovated for: • Shake -A -Leg • City of Miami public sailing programs and other City sponsored recreational programs • Community Recreational Center • multi -sport aquatic center, if feasible (windsurfing, kayaking, scuba diving, with lessons and equipment rental) • annexes attached to the base building structure will be demolished to enhance open and green space on the site • any shared use program for the building will address the potential for use of the building to incorporate interpretative exhibit space related to the history of Dinner Key as a marine aviation center (i.e. museum, interactive exhibit space etc.) provided that such use is compatible with the history of the building as well ? as compatible with the use of the building for the other purposes set forth in this { section • Any net revenues from activities will be used for operating and capital costs of Virrick Gym i i ATTACHMENT 1 04- 782 5 96- 360 i I 1 I 1 .7 Dinner Key Request for Proposals for Adaptive Reuse of Hangars C and D The City will solicit a proposal or proposals for the adaptive reuse of either or both i Hangars C and D and adjacent apron and open space. ; Any qualified response must include the following provisions: Hangar C (the large hangar) must be preserved and rehabilitated under any ? proposal I I � • acceptable adaptive reuses must include: i a proposal for the financing, construction and management of a full service boatyard including: storage i I I commissioning brokerage repair and maintenance 1 provisions for public boat repair, launching and hauling and maintenance. • additional acceptable reuses in addition to a full service boatyard facility may include: " public market (no sit down restaurant or liquor sales allowed) i l " marine related retail sales maritime or marine related office space historic interpretative facility 1 941- '782 96- 360 j i any other use permitted by the PR District of the Miami Zoning Code, specifically excepting: hotel restaurantibar ; live entertainment j movie theatre I proposals may provide that Hangar D (the small hangar) may be: i jrestored i 1 incorporated into any reuse proposal i replaced demolished provided that, as set forth above, the large hangar is preserved I • any proposal must address: parking public amenities { public access to Biscayne Bay public recreational facilities (such as Baywalk, cycling path etc.) City Assistance The City of Miami may offer the following inducements or forms of assistance to make the proposed reuse of the facilities commercially feasible: up to 52 wet slips to be reconstructed by the City will be incorporated into the boatyard operation 2 9 - � .12 r up to an additional 80 slips may be constructed by the City, and, if so constructed, will be included in the boatyard operation the City will construct a fuel dock, including pipelines, storage facility and fuel pumps which will be included in the operation of the boatyard the City will reconstruct the seawall the City will assist in obtaining low interest loans, on behalf of the selected developer, for boatyard improvements the City will assist in obtaining available Federal and State historic rehabilitation credits, grants and other funds, and such other Federal and State funds as may be available for the renovation and rehabilitation of Hangars C and D the Citywill commit up to $100,000 to Bayshore Drive and Pan American ' Drive beautification the term of any lease will be negotiated based upon the economics of the accepted proposal RFF TERMS AND CONDITIONS • Fair market rental rates for uses as boatyard, public market, marine related retail, marine and maritime related office space, and any combination of those uses will be established by the City • Any acceptable alternative adaptive reuse will require an appraisal to establish fair market rental value der the proposal is received • In ranking proposals, total economic return to the City will be an important factor, but will not be dispositive. A sensitive reuse program that responds to concerns of the Coconut Grove community may be ranked higher than one with a more positive economic return to the City • Proposals which include an adaptive reuse proposal for both hangars may receive a scoring bonus of up to 25 points • Proposals which include an adaptive reuse which incorporates a significant historic interpretative and exhibit component may receive a scoring bonus of up to 15 points -j 94- '782 96- 360 F i fZ2�vudy circa 193� - - City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department March, 1994 i �' 96- 360 fZ2�vudy circa 193� - - City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department March, 1994 i �' 96- 360 History of the Site The U.S. Coast Guard Air Station at Dinner Key (Virrick Gym): Based on the historic research conducted at the National Archives and U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington, D.C., the U.S. Coast Guard Air Station at Dinner Key (Virrick Gym) is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This property possesses national significance for its role in the history of Coast Guard aviation. In 1915 the Coast Guard conceived the idea of using aircraft for search and rescue missions. An act of Congress in 1916 authorized the establishment of ten Coast Guard air stations along the coasts of the United States, but no funds were appropriated. Although the Coast Guard did establish early air stations in the 1920s on properties borrowed from the U.S. Navy, the Coast Guard expended no funds for construction. It was not until the early 1.930s that funding was made available for the construction of an air station, with South Florida being the preferred Location. Because of the amount of air traffic in the area, the Coast Guard viewed Miami as "the logical place for this first air life- saving -station" and began the search for a suitable location. With no funds available for the purchase of land and only limited funds available for the construction of a hangar, the Coast Guard approached the City of Miami and Pan American Airways for assistance. Pan American Airlines had recently established a i seaplane base at Dinner Key and had sublet the northeastern I section of the property to the City of Miami and Dade County for the construction of either a municipal airport or park. Recognizing the benefit to the area that a Coast Guard air station could provide, the City and County, in turn, agreed to lease its property on Dinner Key to the Coast Guard. In June 1932 the Coast Guard Air Station at Dinner Key was commissioned, and the construction of the seaplane hangar was completed. The station was expanded in 1.938, when the property across the street was acquired as a Location for a barracks building. The office annex was added in 1942. During its years of operation, the Dinner Key air station evolved into the busiest air -sea -rescue station in the world. After the unit moved to the Opa Locka airport, its present location, in 1965, the property was declared to be surplus and was acquired by the City of Miami in 1972 .- Deed restrictions on the property require that the property: (1) would be used for the public purposes for which it was conveyed; 2 96- 360 i i planes in Latin America forced Pan American to utilize flying boats and amphibious aircraft for its operations. i The facilities at Dinner Key were the first constructed exclusively for commercial passenger seaplane service and served as a model for those that followed in Rio de Janeiro, New York, and San Francisco. The site plan for the seaplane base developed by Pan American was designed for both the aerial and land view. The plan called for the construction of a 'IV,, shaped line of hangars to be used for machine shops, maintenance, operation, and storage. A terminal building was planned for the apex of the 'IV," at the end of a long driveway, thus forming a shape reminiscent of an airplane. The U.S. Coast Guard followed the site plan developed by Pan American when constructing its own hangar on the adjacent property. During the mid 1930s and early 1940s, approximately 50,000 passengers per year flowed through the Dinner Key terminal. In addition, the terminal averaged more than 30,000 visitors per month, with as many as 100,000 in the winter months. A third hangar and machine shop (the former Merrill Stevens Boatyard) were added during this period to house some of the larger planes that were being employed. The appearance of landing fields in Latin America during World War II decreased the need for seaplanes, and on August 9, 1945, Pan American's last flight to Dinner Key took place. Dinner. Key was purchased by the City of Miami the following year. i r �.a g 4 96— 360 The Existing Situation The subject of this study includes Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Boatyard (now on a month -to -month leasehold with the City of Miami), Virrick Gym which houses the Shake -a -Leg Program (presently on a month -to -month leasehold with the City of Miami), and the Virrick Annex which houses the City of Miami Parks and Recreation Handicapped Division, Day Care, Cable Office and Parking Task Force. In ,Tune of 1993, the City Commission adopted a resolution. authorizing the demolition of the Virrick Gym and Parks and Recreation Building (Resolution 93-374, June 29, 1993) because of damage suffered as a result of Hurricane Andrew. The Parks Department contemplated a plan which would provide a more open and accessible park with water resource -based and passive recreational amenities. However, the Federal Emergency Management Agency determined that the structure was considerably less than fifty percent destroyed and therefore would be eligible for federal disaster funds for rehabilitation costs not covered by the City's private insurer. It was subsequently, determined that the City's insurance reimbursement options would include the following: 1. Take the $898,000 and build another gym on another site. Any costs above the $898,000 would be borne by the City. - 2. Take the $898,000 and repair the existing gym. The $898,000 is the final negotiated estimate of hurricane damage to the existing facility. The City can utilize the $898,000 to repair, but it will be adjusted to the actual dollars as repairs are completed. (For instance, if the storm repairs cost $600,000, we would rebate $298,000 to the insurance carrier. If, however, the actual storm damage repairs cost $1.2 million, the carrier would pay the full amount. The carrier is obligated to pre -storm conditions, not new or like -new. 3. Take the $898,000 and demolish the existing facility and build a new gym facility on the same site. Any costs above the $898,000 would be borne by the City. -4. Take a cash settlement instead of doing any repairs or construction based on a depreciated amount of approximately $810,000. 96- 360 10 Determination of Eligibility If the Virrick Gym is determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, any actions affecting the property would be subject to the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This requirement is triggered by the deed restriction on the property, which requires approval by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, of any proposed change in utilization. This federal historic preservation requirement stipulates that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in Tallahassee be given an opportunity to comment on any action that would affect the property. If the proposed action would have an adverse affect, the City would be required to consult with the SHPO and the Advisory Council. on Historic Preservation, a federal agency, to seek agreement on ways to avoid or reduce the adverse effects. One possible compromise could involve the preservation of the hangar and the demolition of the Virrick Gym Annex, a structure that has little architectural value, The National Park Service must take all comments into consideration before approving or denying the City's proposal. i _i f _.J - - i j -12 96- 360 NI�1 A. The Virrick Gym would be retained and restored as a sailing center, ideally as a facility shared by "Shake -A -Leg", a sailing program for the handicapped; the U.S. Olympic Sailing Team and the City of Miami Parks Department sailing program using recreational sailing as a common theme, a recreational program for the general public is also visualized including exercise gym, health club and bike rentals. Shake -A -Leg has a small sailboat dock, also. Parking is available for handicapped and users. The office annex, which is contiguous on the north side of the Virrick Gym building proper is currently partially occupied by City of Miami offices. If Shake -A -Leg were to be allowed to follow through with their ambitious program for reusing the office annex as sailing team barracks, then the City offices (daycare, handicapped and cable) would have to be relocated to an unidentified location. Alternatively, during a long transition period, the use of the office annex could be divided between Shake -A -Leg and the City. B. The Hangar (formerly Merrill Stevens Drydock) would be retained once reused as a full service boatyard capable of servicing boats over 28 feet in length. This facility would be augmented by a repaired (or new) boat lift, and room for a forklift to maneuver'. Increasingly stringent environmental regulations dictate -that boat repairs activity take place in a controlled (indoor) environment so that the outside open is .used by boat to be repaired or dry boat storage (28' + in length). Sufficient parking on the north side of the building would be available for workers, clients and marina users. C. The Machine Shop formerl Merrill Stevens Drvdock is proposed as a Pan American Airways Coast Guard Air Marine Historical Museum (see letter of interest in Appendix from the Historical Museum). This proposal should not be received in isolation but rather in the context of Coconut Grove's other historic attractions such as the Barnacle, and City Hall, and the Virrick Gym at Dinner Key. Visitor parking would be available to the.north of the building. Alternatively, if the Historical Museum proposal ultimately is not found to be acceptable to the City, this building would •be included in the Request for Proposals for the full service boatyard (see below). D. The Marina has previously been included with the full service boatyard. However, it seems that the marina could be 14 96- 360 r operated separately if a dedicated parking area for users were located on the bay side of the machine shop or in part of the open space. The marina would include sixty-one (61) grandfathered slips, and perhaps forty (40) more new slips (which would have to be approved by Metro Dade County). Also included is a dockmaster's office, on -dock fuel facility (with onshore fuel storage tanks) and a marine art -in -public - places feature. The fuel facility is located to provide maneuverability for large boats; the continued use of the water area to the southeast as a "free" anchorage may interfere with this desirable maneuverability of larger boats destined for the fuel facility as the boat lift. E. The Boat Launching Ramps need to be renovated to facilitate launching (and retrieving) by boats. A vehicle -and -trailer parking area, for storage while the boat is in use, is located south of the Virrick Gym. F. The Sailing Dock is currently operated by Shake -A -Leg as part of their concession. The potential to expand the number of slips here is hampered by the need to provide an ample maneuvering area for the sailboats. However, the potential of expanding sailboat slips should continue to be explored. G. A 'Baywalk with pedestrian amenities is included, where appropriate. It is recognized that mangroves on the shore south of the parking area must be preserved. H. A New Green Space is located_ along the eastern edge of the .parking area to provide a "see through" and separation. A hard court area is included. I. The Parking Area has been reconfigured. A meter, decal or other form of parking validation should be considered to assure that use of the parking area is for patrons of Dinner Key and not visitors and workers destined for office buildings on the north side of South Bayshore Drive. Attention also needs to be given to security needs of the parking area and the vehicle -and -trailers storage area. Also to be incorporated is a stop for tram or shuttle to accessory parking at the Coconut Grove Exhibition Center or elsewhere, should such ever be required. J. The South Bayshore Drive Pedestrian -and -Bicycle Path is retained in the form of an overhead canopy is suggested by adding a parallel row of royal poincianas with adequate spacing to allow for future growth. No understory landscaping is proposed, for safety and security reasons. K. The triangular Open Space should only be altered by adding turf -block or similar "open cell" paving that would allow the use of green ground cover while still providing for overflow 15 96- 360 THE NEXT STEPS The City should: 1. Immediately authorize sufficient repairs to the Virrick Gym 4 to enclose it and protect it from the elements. 2. Prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Virrick Gym and Machine Shop, including boat launching ramp and sailing dock, to enable public interest non --profit groups to present proposals utilizing the recently enacted charter amendment. 3. Prepare. a Request for Proposals for a full service boatyard utilizing the large hanger and marina. As a part of the RFP, an additional optional proposal could be considered for the machine shop, so that alternative proposals could be available for machine shop from this RFP (above). 4. Seek a coastal management or open space grant to address the 4 baywalk segment, preservation of mangroves, and the installation of the green space and hard court. I 17 I� 1 1 j .. i 06- 360 Virrick GymlMerrill Stevens Charrette Goals and Objectives for the Site A majority of the audience agreed on the following general comments; other team comments apply to individual structures: 1. Mahe the conclusions of this charrette the foundation for all future requests for proposals for the site. 2. Use available FEP1 or insurance funds immediately to prevent further damage to the structures. 3. Preserve all structures; no demolition of historic structures. 4. Area should be reserved for the marine community and water - dependent uses. 5. No hotels or residential units; no high -intensity "Bayside-type" tourist facility or more theaters which would contribute to traffic and congestion problems. 6. Revenues collected from the site should be reinvested there and not returned to' the General Fund 7. Emphasis on youth recreation, particularly marine -related recreation. 8. If adequate parking for resulting uses cannot be provided onsite as surface parking, investigate the possibility of a tram or shuttle to accessory parking at the Coconut Grove Exhibition Center or elsewhere. 9. Preserve the existing views of the bay. 10. Preserve the existing mangroves. 11. Landscaping should prevail continuously along South Bayshore Drive; a marine -oriented feature should be incorporated into the landscaping design. lther Team Comments. Virrich Gym: 1. Preserve the Virrick Gym as a multi -use community center which might include a water sports training center and sailing educational center by retaining or expanding the Shahe-a-Leg facility, possibly in conjunction with the U.S. Olympic Training Center. 19 05- 360 2. Some indoor recreational facility such as a basketball court and/or boxing gym should be retained for indoor activity during inclement weather. Hangar: 1. Preserve the boatyard as a full -service boatyard including fueling, lift, drydock and storage facilities; if possible restore the marina to accommodate vessels up to fifty feet in length, both motor and sail. 2. Investigate the possibility of an offshore fueling station. 3. Rebuild the adjacent seawall. 4. Boatyard should be privately managed by a company with the expertise and resources to handle such an operation, not by the City of Miami. 5. The boatyard should accommodate as many boat slips as permissible to meet the existing need, make Dinner .Key a facility at least equivalent to the Miami River's boatyard (the only other functioning boatyard in the area), and make use of an existing under-utilized facility in an advantageous location. Machine Shop: 11 Preserve the building as a possible Pan Am and Coast Guard aviation/marine museum with retail components including marine accessories and other shops, a Coconut Grove historic market and/or farmers' market. 2. Do not locate commercial enterprises which would compete with existing business; retail should be complementary to the primary use of the property as a boatyard. Parking Area at Virrick: 1. Landscape the area for a park and a continuous lighted baywalk with lighted, low -intensity recreational facilities. 2. Any parking should be landscaped surface parking which is monitored for security. Area between South Bayshore and hangars: _1. _ Area should be retained as landscaped surface parking. 2. Any other use for the area should include lighted, low - intensity recreational facilities such as basketball or volley ball courts. 96- 360 i - j v ' O i V �P Q N i j i F I TERMINAL BUILDING(MIAMI CITY HALL) HANGAR (GROVE KEY MARINA) . HANGAR (GROVE KEY MARINA) HANGAR (GROVE KEY MARINA) MACHINE SHOP (MERRIL STEVENS DRY DOCK CO.) CHART HOUSE RESTAURANT . SCOTTY'S LANDING U.S. COAST GuAR.D HANGAR(ELIZABETH VERRICK GYM) U.S. NAVY HANGARS(COCONU`T GROVE CONVENTION CENTER) DINNER KEY MARINA DOCKMASTER'S OFFICE X H. EPORT 27, 1994, national (selected MS) 96-- 360 �t � � �.:-� .�. i Section II -Development Objectives o� Any development strategy must take into account the following public and private objectives: • preserve the maritime character of Dinner Key through retention of the public and private boating facilities, including marina and boat repair yard • preserve and enhance public access to the bayfront • enhance and improve public open and green space • optimize the economic return to the City from any private commercial uses allowed on Dinner Key as a result of the development recommendations consistent with the goals of the citizens of Coconut Grove and the City of Miami • preserve some portion of Dinner Key as a site for a significant marine aviation discovery center celebrating Dinner Key's history • preserve Virrick Gym as a community -oriented recreational center with compatible quasi -public uses • create and institute an overall parking management plan for the entire Key taking into account neighborhood concerns about off site parking for other Coconut Grove attractions as well as the de facto provision of commercial parking MRA International August 10,1994 Page 3 CO • leverage existing public funds available for hurricane damage restoration to attract maximum private investment • provide for development of amenities that are compatible with an overall visitor enhancement plan for the City of Miami, i.e. assure that development at Dinner Key is compatible, and not competitive with initiatives such as the FEC/Bicentennial tract, Watson Island, Virginia Key etc.. • take advantage of available public funding opportunities and attract maximum private investment l MRA International August 10,1994 i C> CD 7 C�7 Section III -Business Planning Criteria Busirtess Planning Criteria v� The proposed development strategy is designed to leverage existing assets, planned initiatives and potential development opportunities to create a vibrant public place at Dinner Key containing cultural, educational, a entertainment, leisure and limited commercial components. The purpose of this endeavor is to: • encourage public utilization of Dinner Key and its existing assets by creating a destination place that maintains the historic marine orientation and public access to Biscayne Bay while at the same time leveraging that marine orientation to the benefit of the City and its residents • create a mix of amenities and attractions that complement and enhance other initiatives throughout the City to create a City-wide critical mass of amenities designed to reinforce Miami's status as a destination, while taking care to preserve Dinner Key from excess commercial development incompatible with local community interests • foster desirable, community -oriented, forms of development at Dinner Key through careful strategic planning and development of existing initiatives to enhance and support longer term development opportunities. The strategy should build upon existing assets with recreation, entertainment, sports, cultural, educational and business enhancing facilities. This strategy will concentrate on defining a realistic framework that creates value for development by leveraging a number of public sector improvements and positioning private sector projects to create a critical mass of public amenities and facilities. MRA International August 10,1994 Page 5 This approach is intended to provide a business strategy for the sensitive development of Dinner Key. The strategy` will explore a process of linking development initiatives in such a way that they can serve as a foundation for future development as economic forces dictate. The strategy itself can serve as the basis for the preparation of a business plan. The business plan, in turn, will serve as a working document to attract participation in the project from investment interests, strategic partners and component developers. C> CG Section IV -Strategic Planning Objectives i Strategic Objective # I -Change the existing character of Dinner Key by maximizing development potential while at the same time maintaining and enhancing public access and utilization of traditional facilities. Miami as a whole is fortunate to have a waterfront presence on an attractive body of water. Throughout the United States, from Baltimore, to Cleveland, to Boston , to San Francisco, cities have capitalized on waterfront locations to create major public spaces. Miami has more opportunity than most cities due to the large number of attractive waterfront locations. A development strategy must recognize the value of these various locations and seek to develop them in such a way that they create an itinerary of individual attractions that serve to reinforce and support visitation and utilization of all of them. Dinner Key, in particular, is fortunate to be the anchor of a natural district that includes Coconut Grove, with its high name recognition. By reinforcing Dinner Key as the "waterfront" of Coconut Grove, any public facilities on Dinner Key are able to capitalize instantly on the Coconut Grove name with immediate recognition and visitor appeal. At present, the area is largely underutilized, with vacant and storm damaged buildings, unattractive public parking spaces, an underutilized convention center and badly maintained public open space. All of these features, however, offer opportunity for reuse and revitalization. A key strategic goal of the Dinner Key development process is to unlock the value inherent in this asset by creating a public amenity that is welcoming to both visitors and residents alike, with a series of carefully programmed events that act as magnets to increase public utilization of the area. MRA International August 10,1994 Page 7 C C i C1 The common element of all successful waterfront redevelopment projects is that they create a "people place"; one where people go to see and be seen and a place that enhances the quality of life for the community. Often this objective can be achieved with a surprisingly modest investment. The creation of an attractive, inviting place with public amenities can help to accomplish this goal without the need for enormous infrastructure and project investment. The key to changing the perception of the area is to create an attractive, accessible activity environment that can be easily "programmed" for multiple and varied events. Once Dinner Key is enhanced as a more appealing public place that is perceived as a desirable place to be, the likelihood of shifting the burden of public cost to the private sector becomes more feasible. MRA International August 10,1994 Page 8 _ C CC Strategic Objective # 2-Maximize existing development opportunities, i o� Current Initiatives/0m)ortunities Several current opportunities exist for use of some of the facilities. All of these opportunities must be evaluated in the context of the various alternatives developed for Dinner Key. Not all of the these existing initiatives and opportunities are appropriate for each use alternative; but each will be discussed. These opportunities include: Shake A Leg Shake A Leg is a local sailing school and program dedicated to enabling handicapped persons to participate in the sport of sailing. They are interested in expanding their facilities to provide for classroom, weight training and other forms of physical training as well as administrative, dormitory and boat storage space. They are currently located in Virrick Gym and have the capital assets to outfit the space if it were renovated to pre -hurricane condition. The City has approximately $800,000 available to it in the forrii of insurance proceeds to accomplish such a restoration. This would reconstruct damaged portions of the gym, install new electrical and mechanical systems and provide for the demolition of the portions of the building that have accreted over the years. These funds are available only for either pre -hurricane restoration or demolition of the structure; they cannot be used for alterations or modifications to the structure. There is some opportunity for integration of some aspect of the USOC's interest in creating a national sail training center at Kennedy Park with Shake -A -Leg. This could take the form of some capital investment by USOC to provide training and classroom facilities at Virrick Gym that could not be constructed at the Kennedy Park facility due to the interest of the Community in keeping the physical facility at Kennedy a relatively small structure. In addition, the apron at Virrick Gym could be used as a staging area for larger USOC events. MRA International August 10,1994 Page 9 Merrill Stevens Boatyard There is a certain level of interest in the operation of portions of the Merrill Stevens boatyard as a full service maintenance and storage facility under lease from the City, The attractiveness of this facility from a private operational perspective is enhanced by the recent recommendation of the Metro -Dade DERM to allow unlimited wet and dry slips to be constructed. This greatly expands the number of slips available for rental and increases potential revenue to both an operator and the City. The "apron" portion of the property, between the front of the hangar and Biscayne Bay offers the greatest potential source of income to the City for the site and also offers a potential revenue stream that could be used to subsidize other public uses on other parts of the property. This apron, with proper improvements, can provide an additional 125-175 storage spaces, of all sizes, a fuel dock, work area, ancillary site improvements, and , importantly, can be configured in such a way as to eliminate the current boat launching ramp at Grove Key , if the existing and new boatyards were combined. 'Phis will allow the development of a safer, more attractive baywalk as well as allow for road reconfiguration that will also create more attractive and efficient access and parking to the site and the existing and proposed attractions. This property should probably be reserved for private operation, pursuant to a carefully crafted RFP designed to maximize economic return to the City. The City, through a variety of funding sources that will be discussed in Section VI will be able to provide significant improvements, including boat storage racks, fuel dock facilities, improved drainage, landscaping and repaving. It must be noted that there are sufficient funds currently available to the City, which are earmarked for improvements of this type, that will not necessitate diversion from other uses. MRA, International August 10,1994 Page 10 C_ el Once these improvements are made, the City, in compliance with existing procurement policies, will be able to undertake a search for the operator best able to manage the property with maximum return to the City. Uses for this apron area can include: • boat storage on land • light repair and maintenance (services such as painting, fiberglassing and other services that pose some environmental risk should be evaluated as to their desirability) • commissioning of hulls • launching and hauling • ancillary retail, including marine hardware, clothing, sail loft etc. As will be further discussed, however, the large hangar building itself presents a variety of problems from the perspective of its potential incorporation into a boatyard. The cost of renovations and the configuration of the space do not lend themselves to use as an adjunct facility to a boatyard. Alternative uses will be discussed. MRA International August 10,1994 O CO CGD Historical Museum v, The Historical Museum has expressed interest in using the Machine Shop facility as a home for both its historic boat collection and as a center for a facility highlighting Dinner Key's history as one of the most important sites in early marine aviation. This importance derives from its history as the site of the first United States Coast Guard Air -Sea Rescue facility and as the original home of Pan American World Airways and its clipper base. The Museum presents two opportunities for the site: • the reuse of the Machine Shop as a location for large scale displays of boats, aircraft and other Pan Am memorabilia. The site offers a number of advantages, including the high ceilings, relative security from high water and possible opportunity for a large screen film presentation. • the opportunity to create an interpretive walk that combines open public walkways with marine aviation artifacts that enhance the creation of a district devoted to the history of marine aviation at Dinner Key. In addition, there is a longer term opportunity that would involve the reuse of City Hall in the event that the City determines to consolidate its operations in another location. MRA International August 10,1994 r Bayfront Walkway One of the primary concerns of the City and the citizens of the Coconut Grove area is the enhancement and maintenance of bayfront access and green space. The opportunity exists to create an integrated walkway from Monty's to the Coconut Grove Yacht Club that winds through all of the historic sites on Dinner Key. By connecting such a walkway with the existing paths in Kennedy Park, a significant public recreational amenity can be established, that can be used for walking, bicycling, in line skating etc.. As mentioned above, the walkway can be further enhanced with Pam Am and Coast Guard memorabilia celebrating the area's past as a center of marine aviation. The Pan Am Foundation and Chuck Cobb should be approached about donating suitable memorabilia for such a walkway. Virrick Gym Apron One of the key elements of a development strategy designed to accomplish the public objectives is the creation of a programmable open space for public festivals, celebrations and other events. The area in front of Virrick Gym to the waterfront offers a dual opportunity that serves to enhance the operation of the multi-user sailing facility as well as enhance the public environment. The plaza can be used as an event staging and set up area for sailing programs, regattas and other events. When not in use for that purpose, it can be designed to be available as a public plaza that takes advantage of all of the proposed amenities of the area, i.e. the Bayfront Promenade, the working boatyard and the enhanced open space and provides the central, public "people space" to attract the critical mass of users. This space can be configured with attractions such as an open public space for festivals and cultural/entertainment performances, amphitheater style seating, a children's playground with water feature such as those created by companies such as WET Design with chasing water jets, etc.. Such a plaza would also serve to support a restaurant located immediately adjacent to the plaza in front of the Pan Am machine shop. MRA International August 10,1994 Page 13 Section VI -Financial Issues , Obviously, a major concern of any development program .is the associated costs. As pointed out above, there is a balance that needs to be met between citizen desires for total preservation and City revenue needs. Any discussion of financial feasibility must focus first on available funds and costs of renovations. Available Funds At this point, the City has available to it for restoration of various aspects of Dinner Key approximately the following funds: Hangars B and C insurance proceeds for restoration or demolition $60,000 Virrick Gym insurance proceeds for restoration or demolition 800,000 low interest (3%) loan for boatyard/marine development at Dinner Key 2,000,000 50 additional wet slips 1000 feet of seawall fuel dock and pumps 200 boat storage ramps MRA International August 10,1994 Page 27 C> �O travel lift cs� fork lift insurance proceeds for reconstruction of marina slips (52 slips) 1,400,000 Pan American Drive Beautification 130,000 ............................oa...........................................................e................. Total loan proceeds, insurance and grants $4,350,000 Cost of Restoration Restoration costs include the following items: • skin t • roof • replacement of electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems to code • foundation and floor slab stabilization • windows and doors MRA international August 10,1994 Wage 28 • air conditioning • renovations to structure (insurance proceeds are only available for restoration to pre -hurricane condition) • site improvements to meet EPA requirements concerning disposal of various substances used in boat repair and maintenance • parking lot improvements • lighting • tenant improvements Estimated restoration costs of the Virrick Gym, Hangar C (the large hangar) and Hangar D (the Machine Shop) are y as follows (including a 25% contractor mark up for general conditions, overhead and profit, bonds and contingency): MRA International August 10,1994 Page 29 - CC M BUILDING RENOVATIONS Virrick Gym, excluding annexes $431,762 Virrick Gym annexes 906,651 Total Virrick Gym and annexes 1,338,414 Building C 3,153,450 Building D 1,606,889 Total Renovation Costs-Virrick Gym, annexes, Building C, Building D 6,098,753 SITE IMPROVEMENT COSTS Costs include reconstructing hard surface areas with drainage systems to DERM standards, landscaping and lighting on Bay side of buildings, and reconstruction of parking lots, lighting, drainage and landscaping on Bayshore Drive side of buildings. Virrick Gym total site improvements 671,920 Building C site improvements Bay side 576,567 Bayshore Drive side 479,378 MRA International August 10,1994 Page 30 C7 CO M Total Building C site improvements 1,055,945 Building D site improvements Bay side 279,272 Bayshore Drive side 208,006 z 4 4 Total Building D site improvements 1 487,279 Total Site improvements 2,215,144 Total Building and Site Improvements $8,313,897 In addition to the foregoing costs, there are a number of additional, fundamental improvements that would be required as a part of any development plan. These include: 1275 feet of Baywalk to City standard @$463 per lineal foot I 590,000 1 1000 feet of seawall including DERM rip/rap mitigation 660,000 Boat lift for boatyard 305,000 200 new boat storage racks 200,000 C.O M CC> Alternative Two -Preservation and Reuse of All Existing Structures This alternative also has several attractive components: • all historic structures are preserved, maintaining an important link with Miami's past • this alternative enhances the attractiveness of a long term strategy for Dinner Key that envisages a major historic district with a variety of attractions, including museum, retail, entertainment, conference center, enhanced convention center and support. hotel • this alternative responds directly to one of the primary citizen concerns • although the restoration costs are high, they range from $60-80 per square foot, which is substantially less than the cost of constructing a new building Negative factors include: • this alternative is the highest cost, and provides the least return, as the market for the rehabilitated space is severely limited by its configuration • although a substantial portion of capital costs may be available to the City through a variety of sources, operating costs are not available MRA International August 10,1994 Page 35 C:a CO M 1 • interviews with several marina and boatyard operators suggest that the large hangar is unsuitable for the proposed use as a marina facility (as suggested by the charrette participants) due to its interior configuration. The building does not lend itself to use as either a repair facility or showroom for brokerage. • while the Machine Shop is suitable for use by the Museum of Science and History, such as use would, in all likelihood, be a break even operation under the best of circumstances, with a high probability of need for some degree of subsidization the restoration costs of $60-80 per square foot would require rentals of $30-40 per square foot to support. The current tenants in the large hangar cannot support these rates. New tenants would increase the intensity of use. In addition, the Virrick Gym, due to deed restrictions, cannot be used for commercial uses, increasing the debt load on the large hangar and requiring even higher rents to amortize the restoration costs r Alternative Four -Preserve Virrick Gym and the Large Hangar/Dernolish the Machine Shop This alternative is very similar to Alternative Three, merely switching the renovation focus from the machine shop to the large hangar. All other elements, i.e. the boatyard, walkways, public amenities and infrastructure improvements remain the same. The major advantage of this alternative is that it preserves a more dramatic structure on the Key and more nearly preserves the original physical character of the Key from the time that it was the headquarters of Pan American and the location of the original Coast Guard air-sea rescue operation. The primary difficulty with this alternative is developing an adaptive reuse for the large hangar. As mentioned, the building does not lend itself to many types of reuse. Its sheer size, volume and interior support system makes it a difficult building for most uses. The consultant team has considered a variety of uses for the building, including boatyard, enclosed mall, artist and craftsman studio facility, museum, enclosed entertainment center and urban market. Of these uses, one of the more attractive options, at this time, appears to be an urban market. An urban market is a facility that is very different from a farmer's market, an alternative for Virrick Gym that was rejected by the charrette participants. Urban markets are characterized by permanent facilities operating 5-6 days a week, a range of vendors including food and non-food items, with prepared and bulk foods. A number of them have food preparation facilities on site including coffeehouses, bakeries, raw bars and brewpubs. In addition, many of these markets provide an entertainment function. The Reading Terminal in Philadelphia, for example, is the site of a variety of black tie charity functions at which the merchants stay open providing food and beverages for the MRA International August 10,1994 Page 41 Cg CO attendees. The markets provide a significant community amenity, providing lunchtime and weekend meeting places ec7 as well as providing a connection with the rural experience that many urban dwellers find missing in city life. The most successful and best known urban markets include the Reading Terminal in Philadelpl-iia, the Pike Street Market in Seattle, the Lexington Market in Baltimore and the Granville Island Market in Vancouver, B.C. Each of these markets has become a significant tourist attraction in its respective city as well as a major asset to the urban fabric of each. Larger markets attract up to 20,000 visitors a day with Pike Street in Seattle attracting 40,000 patrons a day on Summer Saturdays. Urban markets have also been developed in a number of other cities including New York, Columbus,OH, Nashville, New Orleans and Los Angeles. While most of these markets are publicly owned, or operated by quasi -public agencies, a number of private entrepreneurs are developing them as for -profit entities. Granville, Island and Pike Street Markets are both parts of larger districts that include a number of public purposes, among them low income and elderly housing, outreach and training programs and other purposes. Accordingly, it is difficult to determine the profitability of the pure market component of the developments. Some illustrative figures concerning sales and revenues do exist however: • the 140,000 square foot Dekalb Market in suburban Atlanta generates $50 Million in annual sales • Toronto's St. Lawrence Market generated over $700 per square foot in 1991 • Granville Island generated gross sales of $1215 per square foot in a 41,000 square foot market, with base rentals of $40-50 per square foot plus percentage rental. 1992 gross sales exceeded $32 Million. • two other private markets in Vancouver produce average sales of $430-500 per square foot MRA International August 10,1994 Page 42 MW • Pike Street generated over $5 Million in revenues in 1993 on $42 Million in sales �a • the Reading Terminal in Philadelphia has proven to be an asset in the marketing of the adjacent Convention Center The advantages of an urban market in this setting include: • preservation of one of the historic buildings on the Key through one of the few adaptive reuses that can take advantage of the unique building available • creation of a community oriented asset that offers a wide selection of foods that are typically more diverse, fresher and less expensive than those found in conventional supermarkets r i • the market offers an incubator for small businesses in the area • a market of this type is harmonious with the character and history of Coconut Grove f i MRA International August 10,1994 Page 43 i , MEMORANDUM OF MUTUAL INTERPRETATION OF LEASE AGREEMENT I This Memorandum of Mutual Interpretation of Lease Agreement between the City of Miami (hereinafter "City") and rove Key i Mar a, Inc. (hereinafter "GKM") is made this day of 1992. WHEREAS, the purpose of this Memorandum is to clarify the intent of a portion of Paragraph 3 of the Lease Agreement (hereinafter "Lease Agreement") entered into by the City of Miami t and Grove Key Marina, Inc. on April 1, 1976. WHEREAS, the portion hereby clarified states: "The City and the Company covenant and agree that the Company shall have the exclusive right at Dinner Key to haul and store boats up to and .: including 28' in length . WHEREAS, it was the original intent of the City in leasing l i the two properties known as 2640 South Bayshore and 3385 Pan ' American Drive, that 2640 would service large boats and 3385 would service small boats, and over the past 40 years that has been the practice of the two lessees. It was for this purpose that specific language was included in the April 1, 1976 Lease Agreement between the City and GKM. Relying on this exclusive right, GKM designed its facility and operation to service the small boats. Because the property known as 2640 is in the process of. being offered for a Unified Development Project, it is important that the original intent of the parties be clarified to avoid possible misinterpretation in the future between the adjacent lessees. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed that: 1. The area referred to in the Lease Agreement as "Dinner Key" (legally described in Exhibit I attached hereto and made a part hereof) includes the property known as 2640 South Bayshore Drive (formerly known as the "Merrill -Stevens" property). i 2. The term "boats" includes both sailboats and powerboats. 3. The term "haul" includes both the taking out of the water and/or putting into the water. 4. The term "store" shall refer only to boats that are out i. of the water, 'and shall include all forms of holding a boat out of the water, including racks, stands, blocks, davits, cradles, trailers or on the ground itself. The presence of a boat on the premises and out of the water shall constitute "storing" the boat. 5. "Up to and including 28' in length" means that the -� overall length of the boat as recorded on the state registration certificate or federal document certificate, determines whether i 9.6- 360 f h.A or not the boat is subject to the size exclusivity. The size exclusivity applies to boats with an overall length of 28'-6'" or less, and does not apply to boats with a greater overall length. 6. "Exclusive right" means that no other Lessee of the City (or the City itself acting as an operator or through an agent or manager) shall engage in hauling or storing boats in the Dinner Key area without previous written authorization of GKM, which authorization may be granted or may be withheld for any reason. GKM agrees to grant written authorization to the City or its Lessees, to haul and/or store a specific boat at a specific time, if GKM is unable or unwilling at that time to haul and/or store that boat. GKM shall give the City written notice of any violation of the exclusivity herein defined. Upon receipt of said notice, the City shall promptly investigate said violation and if necessary shall employ its best efforts to ensure that said violation ceases. 7. The exclusive right applies to the hauling and/or storing of boats on dry land, regardless of the reason for the boat being stored on dry land. The fact that a boat is to be hauled and/or stored so that it may be surveyed, repaired or offered for sale does not exclude it from being covered by this exclusive right. However, this exclusive right does not extend to the docking in the water of boats of any size, nor does it apply to charges for repairs of any type for boats of any size, nor.does it apply to income derived from the selling of boats of any size. 8. The exclusive right does not apply to those small boats less than 20'-0" in length such as dinghies, sailboards and auxiliary tenders with or without motors, which are specifically carried on board larger boats. 9. This Memorandum of Interpretation shall govern the actions of the parties hereto so long as the April 1, 1976 Lease Agreement between the parties remains in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Memorandum of Interpretation on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal Corporation of the State of Florida �- By r CESAR H. ODIO City Manager -2- 96-- 360 r LEGAL DESCRIPTION The certain tract of land lying and being in the City of Miami, County of Dade, State of Florida, known as DINNER KEY, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 34 at page 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, together with all and singular all common law and statutory riparian rights, wat r privileges and filled in lands and lands below high water ma k appurtenant and belonging thereto, which said tract of land is particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point on the southerly side of Aviation Avenue (formerly known as Trade Street), where the same intersects the high water line of Biscayne Bay; thence northwesterly along the southerly side of Aviation Avenue (formerly known as Trade Street), to the easterly side of South Bayshore Drive (formerly known as Rhodes Boulevard), to the east side of Southwest 27th Avenue (formerly known as Grapeland Boulevard); thence south along the east side of Southwest 27th Avenue (formerly known as Grapeland 3oulevard) to the high water line of Biscayne Bay; thence easterly and northerly meandering the high water line of Biscayne Bay as the same now exists to the point and place of beginning, together with all and singular all common law and statutory riparian rights, water privileges, filled in lands, and lands below high water line appurtenant and belonging thereto,' LESS the property condemned by the United States of America for use in connection with the Coast' Guard Base at Miami, Florida, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida, and more particularly described -as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly line of South Bayshore Drive with the southwesterly line of Aviation Avenue (formerly known as Trade Street) as shown by the Plat of Dinner Key recorded in Plat Book 34 at page 2 of the Pubic Records of Dade County, Florida, which intersection and point of beginning is marked by a brass pin monument set in concrete; thence run S51052'03"W along the southeasterly line of South Bayshore Drive a distance of 675.00' more or less to a point marked by a nail in a one inch diameter pipe set in concrete; then run S76025'57"E a distance of 599.16' more or less to a point marked by a cross cut on a brass pin s t on top of steel file bulkhead on high water line of Biscayne Ba�.; thence run N13 23'33"E along the above described steel pile bulkhead and high water line of Biscayne Bay a distance of 399.472, more or less to a point on the southwesterly line of Aviation Avenue formerly known as Trade Street) marked by a cross cut on a brass pin set in concrete; thence run N40 28'42"W along the said southwesterly line of Aviation Avenue (formerly known as Trade Street) a distance of 221.85' more or less to the point of beginning, containing approximately 4.464 acres more or less, with riparian rights and filled land and lands below high water line appurtenant and adjacent thereto. EXHIBIT I 96- 360 GROVE KEY MARINA, INC. r DESIGN STANDARDS A140 GUIDELINES Baywalk/Riverwalk design standards and guidelines. A. General principles. Public access waterfront walkways shall: 1. Feel public. No one should feel as if he or she is Intruding on private property. The public should' feel welcome and at ease to move along the entire length of the bay/river walk. Signage should clearly establish the public's right to use the walkway. 2. Be usable. Young and old, handicapped and joggers, lovers, fishermen, business and men and women, everyone should find the bay/riverwalk usable. Potential conflicts between active and passive users should be prevented through segregation of bay/river walk use zones. (See DESIGN STANDARDS below). 3. Provide visual access. The attraction is the water. Ail landscaping, furniture, lighting guard rails and planters should be subordinated to enhance maximum visibility to the water. Simplicity of design Is preferred. The views of adjacent private development should not be obstructed. 4. Enhance visual quality. Parking and service areas must be completely screened from the walkway. Materials, color and forms should complement the natural shoreline .environment. S. Connect to other public areas. Public parks, transit stops, thoroughfares, midblock walkways, shopping areas, and publicly accessible plazas should connect to the bay/river walk. '6. -Take advantage of bay/river setting. Where practical, boating and fishing activities should be incorporated into Bay/Rlverwalk designs. Elevated viewing areas, historically interpretive markers and signs are desirable. B. Design standards. The Say/River Walk shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide overall and shall consist of five distinct zones: an edge zone, a safety buffer zone, a circulation zone, a passive zone, and a transition and security zone. litge are. 1. The top of the bulkhead or seawall shall be at a constant elevation for the length of the bay/river walk. it shall be 1E to 30 Inches wide at the top. 2. Safety ladders of stainless steel or galvanized steel shall be placed a maximum of 100 feet apart along the face of the seawall or bulkhead, to allow for climbing out of the water at low tide. 3. The top of the seawall/bulkhead shall be 6 to 9 inches higher than the surface of the baywalk circulation zone. 4. The inside edge of the seawall/bulkhead shall be beveled. S. The top surface of seawall/bulkhead shall be textured and of a lighter color than the surface of the circulation zone. Safety buffer zme. 1. Since railings, walls and/or other barriers are not desirable along the water'.s edge, bay/river walk users need to be warned when coming close to the water with a 3- to 5 foot wide safety buffer zone consisting of a rough textured surface that discourages walking. 2. Paving within the safety buffer zone shall be a type of cobble stone with "river rock', approximibtely 3/4 to 1 1/2 inches In diameter, set in concrete leaving a relief of 1/4 to 1/2 Inches or similar. 96- 360 I I Orculativt zvte. i 1. The bay/river walk circulation zone shall consist of a linear pedestrian walkway or promenade and shall be 8 to 12 feet wide. 2. The walkway may meander along the shoreline; however all offsets in the alignment of the walkway shall not exceed 6 feet and be spaced not less than 50 feet apart. 3. Obstructions to movement (trees, bollards, lighting, etc.) within the circulation zone shall not reduce the clear width of the walkway to legs than 8 feet at any point. j 4. Variable textures and materials may be used to surface the, promenade. S. The promenade surface shall be at a constant elevation, and shall be accessible to j handicapped persons throughout the entire length of the bay/river walk. i r fizssive zzne. 1. The area for sitting, accent landscaping and concessions shall be located along the inland side of the bay/river walk, and shall be not less than 4 feet wide. - 2. Short lengths of the passive zone may be elevated 18 to 24 inches above the level of the promenade for enhanced bay and river views. 3. All benches shall have back rests, and their placement shall emphasize direct clews of the water. i 4. Seating surfaces shall be Purple Heart, Western Red Cedar or Redwood. ( 5. All furniture shall be permanently installed preferably by direct burial in concrete. 6. Appropriate additional furniture including trash receptacles, overhead canopies or shelters, drinking fountains, etc., shall be confined to the passive zone. 7. The passive zone may be pared in plain concrete or the paver on the main circulation zone. 7h=itiro aid security zone. 1. To buffer private development from the adjacent bay/river walk a minimum 3 foot wide transition zone shall border the bey/river walk facility. Z. This visual and functional transition from public to private space shall generally be marked by low level shrubbery and overhead shade or ornamental trees. 3. Security to limit public access to private property may be provided by fences, grade changes or retaining walls. All screens and walls shall be landscaped to reduce their visual impact on the walkway. i ! 4. For adjacent developments that serve the public (i.e., restaurants, shops, hotels, entertainment, etc.) provision of wide, visible and easy pedestrian access to the ij bay/river walk shall be assured. i 5. In general, landscaping and security barriers shall not visually screen the bay/river walk from adjacent active uses, such as retail restaurants, or , entertainment. f ,j • i i I C. Standards and guidelines for design elements. ' f i • Ltvxlsapiing. 1. Shade trees shall be confined to the inland edge of the passive zone. 2. Palms may be used along either edge of the bay/river walk, but Coconut Palms'or Sabal Palms are particularly appropriate for the water's edge. i 3. Raised planters, If used, shall be confined to the passive zone, and all planter walls shall double as sitting walls, 15 to 30 inches in height. t 4. Plant material shall be primarily native salt -tolerant species. i Ligitf izg;. 1 - 1. lighting at the water's edge shall be confined to 6-inch diameter bollards, which shall be 24 to 30 inches high and spaced approximately 20 feet on center. 2. 8oilards shall be 100 Watt MY with down illumination not extending beyond the bulkhead line. 3. Overhead lighting shall be confined to the passive zone and consist of down } lighting with lamps not over 14 feet high, 175 watt MY, and spaced approximately 50 feet on center. 4. Up lighting of landscaping, particularly shade trees, shall be confined to the passive zone and transition zone. S. Mercury vapor, metal halide lamps or similar 'white' light luminaires shall be 4 used. 6. Colored lighting, except forprivate signs, shall not be used. {� a 1. Simple contemporary fixture design shall be used as opposed to highly stylized, cvintage or period designs. 1. Ail public access bay/river walks shall be marked with the standard 'Public Shore' sign. j 4 2. All major public access points, including park walkways, roadways, dedicated imidbiock walks and public plazas, shall be marked with "Public Shore" signs. 3. Adjacent accessible publicly oriented private development, such as cafes or shops, 1 shall identify the use with signage in the transition zone. i 4. Uniformly designed historic or environmental markers and descriptive plaques shall be placed In the passive zone. 5. Signage shall identify acce— -pints and adjacent activities, (cafes, shops, etc.) i i i ,j for boaters. 96- 360 I J-95-486 05/23/95 ORDINANCE N0. 11272 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ENTITLED "FINANCE," OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY REDEFINING THE TERM "MINORITY AI WOMEN -OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE," IN SECTION 18-68 OF THE SAID CODE; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, Ordinance No_ 10062 pertaining to the Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program established the annual goal of awarding a minimum of fifty-one percent (51%) of the total annual dollar volume of all procurement expenditures to Black, Hispanic and women -owned business enterprises; and ToMRFAS, Ordinance No. 10062 was amended by Ordinance No. 10538 to, inter alia, define a minority/woman-owned business enterprise as being a small business enterprise in which at least fifty-one percent (51.%) of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, Hispanics or women whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more Blacks, Hispanics or women and who employ a maxi.mxim of twenty-five (25)employees or have a net worth not in excess of two million dollars; and 11272 96- 360 WHEREAS, the requirements to be met pertaining to the number of employees and net worth to be certified as a minority/women owned business enterprise have created a hardship for maaly minority/women-owned business enterprises who have achieved some Treasure of success and in effect have penalized tbem for being successful; NOW, THMFORR, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I. The recitals and findings contained in the preamble to this Ordinance are hereby adopted by reference thereto and included herein as -!f fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. Section 18-68, Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby amended in the following particulars:1 "Sec. 18-68. Defixtitions. For the purpose of this Article, the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the following meanings: Minority and women -owned &:Rail business enterprise means a business enterprise in which at least fifty-one percent (51%) of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, W.. Hispanics or women whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one (1) or more Blacks, ' Words and/or figures stricken through shalll be deleted. Underscored Words and/or figures shall be added'. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material. 2 1 11272 b6- �60 Hispanics or women L, err ]Snet of -two y , Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not he affected. Section 5. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure on the ground of urgent public need for the preservation of peace, health, safety, and property of the City of Miami, and upon the further grounds of the necessity to make necessary and required purchases of goods and supplies, and to generally carry on the functions and duties of municipal affairs. Section 6. The requirement of reading this Ordinance on two separate days is hereby dispensed with by an affirmative vote of not less than four -fifths of the members of the Cotmnission. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _1st day of June , 1995, ATTEST: WAFTER J EMAN CITY CLERK STS HEN P. cLARk, MAYOR 112'72 96- 360 a i PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: LI A KELLY KEAR�ON A Q N ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CI Y LKK/pb/W019 '1 i _i l J. C A _j J-SS-944 10/11/85 1 0 0 6 n ORDINANCE NO.�,� AN OA0INA9C£ REPEALING ORDINANCE N0. 977S. THE MINORITY PROCUREMENT PROGRAM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI' FLORIDA AND SUSSTITUTING THEREFOR A HEM! MI?ORFTY PROCUREMENT PROGRAN ORDINANCE TO BE KNOWN AND CITED AS .'THE MINORITY AMC WOKEN BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND PROCUREMENT ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.° ESTARLISHING A MINORITY AMU WOMEN BUSINESS AFFAIRS PROCUREMENT PROCRAK AND COXMITTEE; PROVIDING; FOR THE CREATION BY THE CITY MANAGER -OF Ali OFFICE OF MINORITY A90 WOMEN BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND PROCUREMENT; FURTHER SETTING 'FORTH A GOAL OF AWARDING AT LEAST 51'P£RCEn T OF THE CITY'S TOTAL ANNUAL DOLLAR VOLUME OF.ALL PROCUREMENT EXPENDITURES - TO SUSIiIESSES OUNEO BY BLACKS (17%1. HISPANIC$ (17S); AitD WOMEN (175); AUTHORIZING. THE CITY MANAGER TO PROVIDE FOR MINORITY AND WOMEN-4VNEO BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROCUREMENT SET -ASIDES AND CONTRACT PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES, MEASURES AXO RESOURCES TO IMPLEMENT SAID PROGRAM. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES; AND CONTAINING A SEYERASILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS; Ordinanca No. -9 75 dealing, with minority procurement has- been found to Lo In seed of revision and Modification t6 ztrangOav the of the City of Miami's Ninority ProcareaQnt Policy and Prograb; and MHEREAS; tho City Coed scion' in reponling Ordinance No. 9775 and in adopting and substituting thQrexfor the herein Minority and Macaws business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance is authorized pursuant to the Charter of the City of Miami, Sections $2 and 53; and the Runicipal Home Rule Povers Act of 1973- Chapter 166.001 et seq.® Florida Statutes, as aesanded; and VNER£AS; the U.S. Supreme Court has uphold Dade County Ordinance me. a2-67; adopted J91y 20, 1984; rtstricting bidding an eonstrvctfon propects to Black -owned firms when prior unwarranted discrimination has been proven; and WHEREAS. findings of a City of Miami Minority Procurement Disparity Study indicated a substantial exclusion of minority and women -owned businesses from the City`s procurement process for the fiscal years between 1971 and 1981;•and WHEREAS, this Ordinance will prQv*nt the perpetuation of the effects of prior unwarranted discrimination bhich has 96- 360 heretofort impairtd; limited or foreclosed procurement -and contracting opportunities for businesses owned by Blacks; Hispanics and Women With'tht City of Miaaei; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami has established a policy of constructive affiraative action to eliminate substantially the affects of prior di serial nation: and WHEREAS; the proposed Minority and Voraen Easiness Affairs and Procurement Program ,and Policy eantains requirtme,nts: (a) that those who contract with the City of Miami 1n the areas of procurement shall not discriminate against any business, employee or, applicant for coployment because of age; ethnicity, race; creed. color; religion; sex; national origin; handicap, or marital status; and (b) that such city contractors have, and implement an Afflmativ® Action or, £gugl Employaont Opportunity policy to ensare that such 6aslael;209; taplQyQOS or applicants for employnQnt ar-e troated Qqueally Ulthoc:t regard to age, ethnicity; rncem crowd, color; religion, sett, national origin, handicap or crari tal status, and WHEREAS, iap7eaonEatIOCT-01' this ®rdIA40ce will serve the best interait of thQ City and will Maximize tho opportu"ity for small business concQr:rs ova: d and controlled by Blacks, Hispanics And 11onen 'to procuro or contract with the City of Miami in the area of procurement; and WHEREAS; to be effective it is necessary and desirable to establish for the City of Miami a iiinority and Women Business Affairs Procartatat Program with the appropriate goals, objectives; administrative procedure and resources; and.. adopt legislation remedying the affected Hispanic, Black and Women - owned businesses: NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT 09DA19ED BY THE COMMISSION 6F THE CITY OF XIAXI; FLORIDA: Section 1. This Ordinance shall be known and way be cited as 'Tht Minority- mad NomeR Business Affairs and Procurement Program Ordinance of the City of Miami.* Section 2.. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following terms phrases, words. and their derivations sha1.1 cave the following meanings: 9 c 3 6 0 n 0 P1 6 2• �l i i jjf i i is 1 ' J 1• i I j 1 A. Business -Enterprise means any corporation; partnership; Individual; sole proprietorship. joint stock company, joint venture, professional association or any other legal entity that is properly licensed to do business with the City of Miami and/or Dade County and/or the State of Florida. a. Minority and Rouen -awned Business Enterprise means a business enterprise in which ,at least 51 percent of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, Hispanics cr Women- whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more Blacks; Hispanics or Women, C. Contract Goan$ agreements for the procurement of goods; services or construction of facilities for the City of Miami. 0. Facilities means all total -or partial publicly financed projects including; but without 11mitation, unified development projects, aunicipal public taorkst And municipal improvements to the extant tiaqy are 5'inAncad with City money. utilize City property; or rQquiro City sapviccs. E. Goods and •seravicoz include; without limitation, public wark , irrprovenantz; facilities, professional services. commodities; supplies. 04tar9ials and oquipuent. F. Goal means the percentages of the annual dollar volume of proturece nt expenditu.rds determined by this ordinance to be offered for Minority and Women business participation. 6. Set -aside is the term which will be used to designate a given purchase or contract or a portiom of a given Purchase or contract award for Black. Hispanic and/or lioaen- owned businesses. Set -asides may es>ly be utilized where it is determined; prior to tho iilvitatiom to •bid or request for proposals, that there are a smffieient number of certified 1 alaek, Hispanic and/or Wagon owned businesses to afford effective conpetition fo•r the purchase. H. Joint Yenture shall ■eau an association of persons or legal entities with the intent to engage in and carry out a -single business enterprise for profit. 96- 360 n Q 6 2 I Y. Procurowitht ExuYnditures shall •man a pu rchasr. payment, distribution; loan or advance for the purpose -f acquiring or proridial goods and services. �. Affirmative Action Plan shall include tho projected annual goals and the tlg4atabl*I which wilt be used ►; eoploy andlcr procure with wom*n and nlnorities it non- discrinination policy statement and any other actions which wi be used to ensure equity in.ouployment and the utilization of ainority and female -owned bazinesseg. Section 3. A Nisority, and llanea Business Affairs and Procurement Progran for the City of H1401 is hereby establish*( The City Manager's Office shall be held accountable for the full and forceful implementation of the Ninority and Rosen susinei Affairs and Procurement Program by providing appropriate recommendations for action by,th.a City Coaaissioa. A. For the purpose of assisting the City Manager i„ the implemovitation, ur. sal.. orugrea; a Minority and Von* tusiacas Affairs and Procurement Comittoe is hereb, establisho9A consisting of an appropriate allebor of numbers,- t be eppointed by tlta City flrntragav, with Stall rQpr(isantation o 1. Hispanics, Slacks 'and tloaaji to ba posponsible for aon1toriag tho isplemQntation ®f tho program and €raping reco 09datioas foi achieving Vic requir4aents of this Ordinance. The Coaafttee shall be responsible for generating yatrly progress reports t, the City Coission and the coranity at large. A. The City Manager shall, utilizing existinc resources, create an Office of iiinority and Homan Business Affairs and Procurement! and shall provide the appropriate staff and resources necessary for the performance of all such adsiaistrative duties-,, authorise and implement the administrative guidelines and procadures required; and ensure eo:pliance with the functions . required to promote the achievement of the program's goals and ob)ectivos of increasing the volume of City procurement .and contracts with slack. Hispanic and HOR*n-owned businesses. 10062 96- 360 I Section 4. The objective of the City is to achieve a goal of awarding a minimum of Sls of the total annual dollar volume of all procurement expenditures. to Blacks. Hispanics and uomen- owned business enterprises to be apportioned as follows: seventeen percent (17%) to Blacks; seventeen percent (17%) to Hispanics and seventeen percent (27%) to Women.i -A. To further the goal of increasing tho total annual volume of all procurement expenditures to minority and women - owned business enterprises$ authority for a minority and women - owned business enterprise procurement set -aside is hereby established for use by the City Manager as he or she may data Advisable or necessary to increase the participation of Black, Hispanic•' and Women -owned busiaosses in City procurement contracts. S. 1t shall be mandatory for all City of Miami contracts and/or procurement award documents to contain the following: (1.' A specific m fo rvnea to the applicability of the 01nority iTnd Houen Ruslnest Affairs.: -.and Procu recent Program ettablishad by thin OrdinancQ; (a.) A provision Beating the right of the City to terminate and cancel any contract or contractual agreement entered into; including elimination of the individual s) and/or business enterprises) from consideration and participation in future City contracts; on the basis of heving submitted deliberate and willful; false or misleading information as to his. her or its status as a Black, Hispanic and/or Women -owned business enterprise and/or the quantity and/or type of minority and women -owned business participation; (3.) A requirement -that each successful bidder or offeror agree ta.provide a sworn statement of compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance and its specific applicability to the purchase or contract award under consideration; such statement shall certify that the bidder or offeror, during the 1 Women, depending upon their own annual self-selection, shall be listed in only one (1) of the categories: race. ethnicity, gender. 9 5 - 1 alb% 2 course of time Involved in _..e performance of the contra i - sought by such bidder or offeror, shall not discriminate against any business; employee. or applicant for employment because Age, ethnicity; 'race; creed; color. religion; sex, national origin, handicap or marital status; 1 (4.) A statement of the extent to which the business enterprisa has as ane or aaore of Its partners principais persons who are Black, Hlspaalc or Woman'. or, is a joint venture comprised of a non -minority and minority'busine and/or women -owned eaterprlse. requirement that each bidder submit 4101 1 with tha bid or proposal an Affirmative Action Plan (UP). Any significant equity participants; joint venture participant. sub -contractors; suppliers or other parties to the bid �. shalt also be required to submit such plans. A provision specifying the requirements ft continued bidder Or offraror eligibility Including minority and female involreaQnt. Section S. aiddar•s ap offerors $frail be required to demonstrata o reasanablQ and good faith offort to Solicit At obtain the participation of qualified caioority and women -owned businesses in all bid and proposal docuuonts. Section 6. Except abero fedoral - or state law or regulatioas mandate to the contrary; the provisions of thl section will be applicable to all City of Pisani, prebid, bid. CORtract or other 4gree2ents eegotiated by U O City; Section 7. The Minarltp awd Momea Business Affairs and Procurement Program established herein shall be Irk effect onl until such time as the effects of oriar unwarranteu discrimination against Clacks; Hispanics and Women have bea- compeRsated for, at which tine the goals and set -asides provida_ for herein shall no longer be observed. Such need shall b - reviewed every two years by the City Commission, upon th recommendation of the City Manager. Section E. Ordinance No. 4775, the Minority. Procuremen Program Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida. Is hereby repealed. _ 1006`< 96- 360 ' ' ..:� I .. ......•.•\rJ..tJwJ.n.t.J...n.•-�SSA/f/tM1......i�w.'w 41wLLb1—.V...JUWIr.-�....... ....uu.... ...... VI � I Section 9. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance _i beideelartd by a Court of pompetent Jurisdiction to be fnvaltd. Same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinanctt as a vholo. PASSED*ON FIRST READING ST TITLE ONLY this 26rh day of i J 1 Novaaber , 19D5. PASSED AND AOOPTCO OH SECOND AND FINAL 'REAu'ING BY TITLE ONLY this 19th day of Oecoeber 19D5. } + ^' ATTEST: 1 � City Clerk` PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: 1 j Deputy City —Attorney f I APPROVED AS TO FOR" ANO CORRECTNESS: CUL'1'�"IP>T11 iil . 1 City Attorney AqJ/ape/Cb/ab/BI56 !. Clot a/47 Ow Cky of laetti, Fiends. Aerei� ntrcir• tfcsl .M thewL� _Aay..r_ t'1 a full true aaJ a•rrect .) ..t thti ala•re sea .wp4v S..ulh f7.•K J rf mz awe C—ty Cu.n (tw.e ►t 1&e pL ra �r�rt�J:d le.f w[irY am3 (7tlJ ielt{.+w. f,- at.xi..4 f .AW COP? t.. It, ptwj prc w i;J ttarcftK. v l M «ry IuaJ the "(5, of rat ..r %l/a�id HY C-fert ~ _t _i coos. r ORDINANCE NO. j.(jS3(3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ENTITLED 4FINANCE'r OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS•AMENDED, BY REDEFINING THE TERM 'MINORITY -AND WOMEN -OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND DEFINING THE TERM -VENDOR- IN SECTION 18-68; REQUIRING IN SECTION 18-72•. THAT THE GOAL OF AWARDING AT LEAST FIFTY-ONE PERCENT (51%) OF THE CITY'S TOTAL ANNUAL DOLLAR'VOLUME OF ALL PROCUREMENT EXPENDITURES TO MINORITY/WOMEN SMALL BUSINESSES BE APPLIED TO ALL CIT? OF MIA.MI BIDS AND CONTRACTS; REVISING SECTION 18-73 TO PROVIDE THAT ALL CITY OF MIAMI INVITATIONS, REQUESTS AND/OR ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS, PROPOSALS, QUOTES, LETTERS OF INTEREST AND/OR QUALIFICATION STATEMENTS CONTAIN THE APPROVED MINORITY/WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (M/W`BE) PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO CITY OF MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 10062 - MINORITY/WOMEN BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND PROCUREMENT PROGRAM; REQUIRING THAT ALL RESULTING AWARD AND/OR CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPLIANCE FORMS RELATIVE THERETO; REVISING SECTION 18-73(5) TO EXPAND -UPON THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITY BIDS AND CONTRACTS; ADDING SECTION 18-76 AUTHORIXING ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS TO ESTABLISH THE REQUIRED ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE;. FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTtES REGARDING, WITHHELD PAYMENTS OF CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS AND FURTHER ADDING SECTION 18-77 DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE. OF M/WBE AFFAIRS AS THE CITY OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING M/WBE BID AND CONTRACT PARTICIPATION - REQUIREMENTS, COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES, AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROCEDURES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL.ITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 10062 dealing with Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement established the annual goal of procuring/contracting fifty-one percent (51%) with minority/women owned and managed business enterprises; and WHEREAS, Administrative Policy Manual 4-86 (APM 4-86), issued October 1, 1986, provides for the administrative implementation of Ordinance No. 10062; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there is further need for legislative relief to obtain said goals, particularly as it 96- 360 10538 i relates to the City's bid, proposal and contract process and the + resulting documents on a bid/contract by bid/contract basis to achieve the annual goals; NOW, THEREFORE,.BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COHHISSION OF THE CITY ,;,• ; OF MIAHI, FLORIDA: i Section 1. Section 18-68, is hereby amended in the following particulars.I "Sec. 16-68. Definitions. I For. the purpose of this article, the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the following meanings: Minority and women -owned small business enterprise means a business enterprise in which at least fifty-one percent (51%) of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, Hispanics or Women whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more Blacks, Hispanics or Women and who emolov a maximums of twenty- five (2.51 m loyees or h,5ve a net worth not in _excess of two mill m dQ1 lars." ! I I vendor means any business entity providing goods, ` services or equipment to the City of Miami through a purchase, field or blanket order or contract.." I",IO �Ac` Section 2. Section 18-7Z (a )', is hereby amended by adding the following language: -(a) The objective of the City is to achieve a goal of awarding a minimum of fifty-one percent (51%) of the total annual dollar volume of all procurement expenditures to Black, Hispanic and Women -owned small business enterprises to be apportioned as i follows: i ! Seventeen percent (171) to Blacks, seventeen percent (17%) to Hispanics and seventeen percent (17%) to women; such coal shall be applied to all - city bids and contracts. Section 3. Section 18-73 is hereby amended by adding the L following language: "Sec. 16-73, Rpauired statements for Relic-itntionH or notices; requited statements on contracts and awards. a, 'Ut shall be mandato:-y foolicitations or notices c� Inviting bids, p nnanls, cuotes. letters of int.erQst and/or qualifications to contain the anor v d re uirPmanta for H/WBF I Words and/ figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material. _ 9 O53A into the resulting contract and/or bid _award documents. The City f Hiamt's Office of Lority/Women Bukim—O'a AffnS.rr� .1g to be conatllS� prier t4 thP_1uauance of any sUgh kjdvertiaements or soiicitatiflns for thF ptl .2gse ofd6termining the recommended (7oal (B ) or set -as des:_Uo be included, and mg8in ariQr to the signing of resulting contracts/bid awarde for the Du ee of yerifyinco compliance thereto It shall be mandatory for all City contracts and/or procurement award documents to contain the following: b • A (5) A requirement that each bidder, proposer, or vendor, submit along with the bid or proposal an affirmative action plan (AAP). Any significant equity participants, joint venture participants, subcontractors, suppliers or other parties to the bid or proposal shall, also be required to submit such plans. The obiective of the City is to rpc7.yire that �jdders. proposers. and vendors doing business with the City— pf Miami take stain actions designed to assure eag.itable participation of Blacks. n�.in their hiring a Qxgm4ti.on activitp_F.1n view of this obiective• (il All City vendors and &2ntractora shall implement Fagg -LLig_ rff t - atl'�e ac n_gj, ns aa9proved *xP J2setor of She 9 f M WB. affairs and ib- demonstrate a 000d .faith effgr to �,n a-T�O_clu++l eml?�o_vment pportunities fob: Bucks, HianaaiSs and Flomen on eagh ourchnse gr contract Vendors and contractors shall document these efforts fully and sha11 provide —re s as may be r.g=fired by the City. (iii Vendors and contractors shall Dermit access to their books records and accounts by the Office of M/WBE affairs or her designee for the_purQose of to aecertrin compliance with th!foregoing reauirem n s. Iiiit In the ev nt of vendors' or contractors_ noncompliance with the affirmative ac ion requirements of this sertion, the City Manager may suspend in whole or Dart. cancel or terminate the bid or contract award and/or impose other 8anrtions as may be determined to be appropriate, Section 4. The following new Section 18-76 is added in its entirety: "Sec. 18-76. Administrative Procedures. The Departments of Finance, Public Works and General Services Administration are authorized -to establish the required administrative procedures to insure compliance with the provisions as set forth herein. 1-UJ3a 96- $60 r I i The Finance Department is mandated to institute payment procedures which will insure, in those instances in which the M/WBE bid or contract requirements result in contracts, subcontracts or joint ventures for M/WBEs, that compensation provided pursusnt thereto shall be in the form of a check made payable to the- primary contractor, bidder or proposer, and (if appropriated jointly) to the minority/wom©n business enterprise subcontractor or joint venture partner in an amount not to exceed the .subcontracted or joint venture amount, based upon approved invoices submitted by the.. prime contractor, -proposer or joint venture, to the City. In the event a dispute should arise as to the performance. or .payment of the primary contractor or os bidder/proper or the M/WBE, under the terms and conditions of the City contract or procurement award document, compensation shall be withheld until such time as the dispute is resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Chapter for resolving such disputes. All Administrative Directors shall amend their existing policies and procedures or to create such new ones as may be required to insure and report on compliance with all aspects of this article. - Section 5. The following new Section 18-17. is added in its entirety! "Sec. 18-77. Designation of the Director of the Office of Minority/Women Business Affairs. The Director /of the Office of Minority/Women Business Affairs is designated as the official responsible for establishing M/WBE bid and contract/award requirements, creating end implementing. compliance guidelines, monitoring compliance, resolving" disputes, and reporting on all of the above to the City Manager." Section 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 7. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall not be affected. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 15th day of December , 19 88. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 12th day of January , 19 89. A T XAVIER 4L.�EZ, Mayor HA Y HIRAI City Clerk V)538 96 360 ARTICLE IV.5. MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND PROCUREMENT PROGRAM' Sec. 18-67. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as "The Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program Ordinance of the City of Miami." (Ord. No. 10062, § 1, 12-19-85) Sec. 18-68. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following terms phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the following meanings: Affirmative action plan shall include the pro- jected annual goals and the timetables which will be used to employ and/or procure with women and minorities a nondiscrimination policy state- ment and any other actions which will be used to ensure equity in employment and the utilization of minority and female -owned businesses. Business enterprise means any corporation, part- nership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture, professional association or any other legal entity that is properly licensed to do business with the city and/or county and/or the state. Contract means agreements for the procurement of goods, services, or construction of facilities for the city. *Editor's note —Ord. No. 10062, 18, adopted Dec. 19, 1985, repealed Ord. No. 9775, §§ 1-8, adopted Jm 19, 1984, codi- Fied as § 18.72, concerning the minority procurement program. At the discretion of the editor. I 1-7 of Ord. No. 10062 have been codified as art. TV.5, §§ 18.67-18.74. City code cross reference --Leas® of city -owned property to require minority procurement clause, § 2,%3. County code cross reference —Procedure to increase par- ticipation of Black vendors of commodities and services in county contracts, § 2-8.2. Supp. No. 32 § 18.68 Facilities means all totally or partially publicly financed projects including, but without limita. tion, unified development projects, municipal pub- lic works and municipal improvements to the ex- tent they are financed with city money, utilize city property, or require city services. Goal means the percentages of the annual dol. lar volume of procurement expenditures determined by this article to be offered for minority and women business participation. Goods and services include, without limitation, public works, improvements, facilities, professional services, commodities, supplies, materials and equipment. Joint venture shall mean an association of per. sons or legal entities with the intent to engage in and carry out a single business enterprise for profit. Minority and women -owned small business en- terprise means a business enterprise in which at least fifty-one (51) percent of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, Hispanics or women whose man- agement and daily business operations are con. trolled by one (1) or more Blacks, Hispanics or women and who employ a maximum of twenty- five (25) employees or have a net worth not in excess of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). Procurement expenditures shall mean a purchase, payment, distribution, loan or advance for the purpose of acquiring or providing goods and services. Set -aside is the term which will be used to des- ignate a given purchase or contract or a portion of a given purchase or contract award for Black, Hispanic and/or women -owned businesses. Set -asides may only be utilized where it is determined, prior to the invitation to bid or request for proposals, that there are a sufficient number of certified Black, Hispanic and/or women -owned businesses to afford effective competition for the purchase. Vendor means any business entity providing goods, services or equipment to the city through a purchase, field or blanket order or contract. (Ord. No. 10062, § 2, 12.19.85; Ord. No. 10538, § 1, 1-12-89) 1217 96- 360 § 18-69 MIAMI CODE § I8.73 Sec. 18-69. Established; components. (a) A minority and women business affairs and procurement program for the city is hereby estab- lished. The city manager's office shall be held accountable for the full and forceful implementa- tion of the minority and women business affairs and procurement program by providing appropri- ate recommendations for action by the city com- mission. (b) For the purpose of assisting the city man- ager in the implementation of said program, a minority and women business affairs and procure- ment committee is hereby established, consisting of an appropriate number of members, to be ap- pointed by the city manager, with full represen- tation of Hispanics, Blacks and women to be re- sponsible for monitoring the implementation of the program and making recommendations for achieving the requirements of this article. The committee shall be responsible for generating yearly progress reports to the city commission and the community at large. (c) The city manager shall, utilizing existing resources, create an office of minority and women business affairs and procurement; and shall pro- vide the appropriate staff and resources necessary for the performance of all such administrative duties; authorize and implement the administra- tive guidelines and procedures required; and en- sure compliance with the functions required to promote the achievement of the program's goals and objectives of increasing the volume of city procurement and contracts with Black, Hispanic and women -owned businesses. (Ord. No. 10062, § 3, 12-19-85) Cross reference —Department of general services adminis. tration to contain office of minority and women business af. fairs and procurement, § 2.263. Sec. 18-70. Duration of program. The minority and women business affairs and procurement program established herein shall be in effect only until such time as the effects of 'Prior unwarranted discrimination against BIacks, Hispanics and women have been compensated for, at which time the goals and set -asides provided for herein shall no longer be observed. Such need shall be reviewed every two (2) years by the city Supp. No. 32 1218 commission, upon the recommendation of the city manager. (Ord. No. 10062, § 7, 12-19-85) Sec. 18-71. Applicability. Except where federal or state law or regula. tions mandate to the contrary, the provisions of this article will be applicable to all city pre -bid, bid, contract or other agreements negotiated by the city. (Ord. No. 10062, § 6, 12-19-85) Sec. 18-72. Objectives; use of set -asides. (a) The objective of the city is to achieve a goal of awarding a minimum of fifty-one (51) percent of the total annual dollar volume of all procure- ment expenditures to Blacks, Hispanics and women - owned small business enterprises to be apportioned as follows: seventeen (17) percent to Blacks, sev. enteen (17) percent to Hispanics and seventeen (17) percent to women; such goal shall be applied to all city bids and contracts. (b) To fus-ther the goal of increasing the total annual volume of all procurement expenditures to minority and women -owned business enterprises, authority for a minority and women -owned business enterprise procurement set aside is hereby estab- lished for use by the city manager as he or she may deem advisable or necessary to increase the parti- cipation of Black, Hispanic and women -awned busi- nesses in city procurement contracts. (Ord. No. 10062, § 4A, 12-19-85; Ord. No. 10538, § 2, 1-12-89) Sec. 18-73. Required statements for solicita- tions or notices; required state- ments on contracts and. awards. (A) It shall be mandatory for all city solicita- tions or notices inviting bids, proposals, quotes, letters of interest and/or qualifications, to contain the approved requirements for M/WBE participa- tion and to have these requirements incorporated by reference, along with the inclusion of the ap- propriate compliance forms, into the resulting con- tracts and/or bid award documents. The city office of minority/women business affairs is to be con- sulted prior to the issuance of any such adver- tisements or solicitations for the purpose of de- termining the recommended goals or set -asides to be included, and again prior to the signing of 96- 360 § 18.73 FINANCE resulting contracts/bid awards for the purpose of verifying compliance thereto. (B) It shall be.. mandatory for all city contracts and/or procurement award documents to contain the following: (1) A specific reference to the applicability of the minority and women business affairs and pro- curement program established by this article. (2) A provision stating the right of the city to terminate and cancel any contract or contrac- tual agreement entered into, including elim- ination of the individual and/or business en- terprise from consideration and participation in future city contracts, on the basis of hav- ing submitted deliberate and willful, false or misleading information as to his, her or its status as a Black, Hispanic and/or women - owned business enterprise and/or the quan- tity and/or type of minority and women -owned business participation. (3) A requirement that each successful bidder or offeror agree to provide a sworn statement of compliance with the provisions of this article and its specific applicability to the purchase or contract award under consideration; such statement shall certify that the bidder or of- feror, during the course of time involved in the performance of the contract sought by such bidder or offeror, shall not discriminate against any business, employee or applicant for employment because of age, ethnicity, race, creed, color, religion, sex, national origin, handi. cap or marital status. (4) A statement of the extent to which the busi- ness enterprise has as one (1) or more of its partners or principals persons who are Black, Hispanic or women, or is a joint venture com- prised of a nonininority and minority busi- ness and/or women -owned enterprise. (5) A requirement that each bidder, proposer, or vendor submit along with the bid or proposal an affirmative action plan (AAP). Any signif. icant equity participants, joint venture par- ticipants, subcontractors, suppliers or other Supp. No. 32 § 18.74 parties to the bid or proposal shall also be required to submit such plans. The objective of the city is to require that bidders, propos- ers, and vendors doing business with the city take certain actions designed to assure equi. table participation of Blacks, Hispanics and women in their hiring and promotion activi. ties. In view of this objective: (a) All city vendors and contractors shall im- plement specific affirmative action plans as approved by the director of the office 11'I/WBE affairs and shall demonstrate a good faith effort to ensure equal employ- ment opportunities for Blacks, Hispanics and women on each purchase or contract. Vendors and contractors shall document these efforts fully and shall provide re- ports as may be required by the city. (b) Vendors and contractors shall permit ac- cess to their books, records and accounts by the office of NVWBE affairs or her designee for the purpose of investigation to ascertain compliance with the forego- ing requirements. (c) In the event of vendors' or contractors' noncompliance with the affirmative ac- tion requirements of this section, the city manager may suspend in whole or par-t, cancel or terminate the bid or contract award and/or impose other sanctions as may be determined to be appropriate. (6) A provision specifying the requirements for continued bidder or offeror eligibility includ- ing minority and female involvement. (Ord. No. 10062, § 4B, 12-19-85; Ord. No. 10538, § 3, 1-12-89) Croe• reference—Affu-mative action division, § 2.236.1. Sec. 18-74. Good -faith effort required. Bidders or offerors shall be required to demon- strate a reasonable and good faith effort to solicit and obtain the participation of qualified. minority and women -owned businesses in all bid and pro- posal documents. (Ord. No. 10062, § 5, 12-19-85) 1219 96- 360 §-18.75 MIAMI CODE See. 18-75. Contractor's certificate of compe- tency. (a) For the purpose of this section, the follow- ing terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the following meanings: (1) Business enterprise means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture, professional association or any other legal entity. (2) Construction contract means agreements for the erection, alteration, demolition, or repair of any public building or any other kind of public work or improvement. (3) Minority and women -owned business enterprise means a business enterprise in which at least fifty-one .(51) percent of said enterprise is owned by Blacks, Hispanics or women whose man- agement and daily business operations are controlled by one (1) or more Blacks, Hispan- ics or women. (b) The owner$ of minority or women business enterprises submitting bids for construction con- tracts to be let by the city must be certified in the field for which the contract is to be let, pursuant to chapter 489, Florida Statutes or Chapter 10, Code of Metropolitan Dade County in order to qualify for the minority or women preference on such contract. (Ord. No. 10332, §§ 1, 2, 10-22-87) Editor's note —Sections 1 and 2 of nonamendatory Ord. No. 10332, adopted Oct. 22, 1987, have been codified as 4 18.75 at the editor's discretion. Section 6 of the ordinance provides an effective date of January 1, 1989. Sec. 18-76. Administrative procedures. The departments of finance, public works and general services administration are authorized to establish the required administrative procedures to insure compliance with the provisions as set forth herein. The finance department is mandated to insti- tute payment procedures which will insure, in those instances in which the M/WBE bid or con- tract requirements result in contracts, subcontracts or joint ventures for M/WBEs, that compensation provided pursuant thereto shall be in the form of Supp. No. 32 1220 § 18.78 a check made payable to the primary contractor, bidder or proposer, and (if appropriated jointly) to the minority/women business enterprise subcon- tractor or joint venture partner in an amount not to exceed the subcontracted or joint venture amount, based upon approved invoices submitted by the prime contractor, proposer or joint venture, to the city. In the event a dispute should arise as to the performance or payment of the primary contrac- tor or bidder/proposer or the M/WBE, under the terms and conditions of the city contract or pro- curement award document, compensation shall be withheld until such time as the dispute is re- solved in accordance with the procedures set forth in this chapter for resolving such disputes. All administrative directors shall amend their existing policies and procedures or to create such new ones as may be required to insure and report on compliance with all aspects of this article. (Ord. No. 10538, § 4, 1-12-89) Sec. 18.77. Designation of director as respon- sible official for bid requirements, guidelines, etc. The director of the office of iinority/women business affairs is designated as the official re- sponsible for establishing M/WBE bid and con- tract/award requirements, creating and implement- ing compliance guidelines, monitoring compliance, resolving disputes, and reporting on all of the above to the city manager. (Ord. No. 10538, § 5, 1-12-89) ARTICLE V. SALE OF REALTY* Sec. 18-78. Methods and procedures for sales and leases. Any sale, conveyance or disposition of any in- terest, including any leasehold in real property, owned by the city, the off-street parking depart- ment, or the downtown development authority shall be made in the manner set forth in this *Note —See the editor's note for Art. IV of this chapter. City charter references —Powers with respect to acquir- ing and disposing of property, § 3(f); contracts for sales or lease of real property, § § 29-A(d), 29-B. 96- 360 i by mail street address telephone facsimile APPENDIX L. SOURCE LIST Department of Community Planning and Revitalization PO Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 444 SW Second Avenue - Third Floor Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 416-1400 (305) 416-2156 General Information or Clarifications - Copies of RFP - Department of CPR (as above) or call Department of CPR (as above) or call Dianne Johnson, Chief of Development Jeanette Garcia Real Estate Specialist (305) 416-1426 (305) 416-1429 or Jeanette Garcia, Real Estate Specialist or Francoise Smith (305) 416-1430 (305) 416-1429 Substantive Questions Zoning Information must be addressed in writing to Department of CPR (as above) or call Jack Luft, Director Lourdes Slazyk, Asst. Director Department of CPR (as above) (305) 416-1407 City Historic Preservation Department of CPR (as above) or call Sarah Eaton, Historic Preservation Officer (305) 416-1409 Zoning Interpretations Department of Building & Zoning addresses above - 41" Floor Juan Gonzalez, Zoning Official (305) 416-1100 or -1178 Existing Buildings, Construction Plans Department of Public Works addresses above - 8th Floor Allan Poms, Chief Designer (305) 416-1245 Department of Public Works Allan Poms, Chief Designer as above or State Historic Preservation Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation R.A. Gray Building 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL. 32399-0250 Attn.: David Ferro (940) 487-2333 Adjacent Property Leases Office of Asset Management addresses above - 3rd Floor Eduardo Rodriguez, Director (305) 416-1450 Inspections of Property Department of Public Facilities Marinas Division Raul de la Torre, marinas Manager 2640 S. Bayshore Sr. Miami, FL. 33131 (305) 579-6980 City Improvements Coastal Systems International Harvey Sasso, PE, President 454 S. Dixie Highway Coral Gables, FL. 33146 (305)661-3655 Federal Historic Preservation Department of the Interior National Park Service Preservation Services Division Southeast Regional Office 75 Spring Street SW - Room 1140 Atlanta, GA. 30303 (404) 331-2632 96- 360 DRI Information Environmental Issues & Permitting South Florida Regional Planning Council Metropolitan Dade County 3430 Hollywood Blvd. - Suite 140 Department of Environmental Resources Hollywood, FL. 33021 Management (DERM) attn.: Julia Trevarthan 33 SW Second Avenue in Dade & Palm Beach Miami, FL. 33130-1540 (800) 985-4416 attn.: Craig Grossenbacker in Broward (954) 985-4416 (305) 372-6789 or -6584 David O'Neal, Consultant MRA International, Inc. (public markets) Michael Lawry 170 Spring Lane 3600 Market Street - Suite 501 Philadelphia, PA. 19128 Philadelphia, PA. 19104 (215) 482-5130 (215) 772-9713 Historical Association of South Florida Shake -A -Ley Miami, Inc. Randy Nimnick, President Harry Horgan 101 W. Flagler Street 2600 S. Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33130-1538 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 375-1492 (305) 858-5550 Miami Museum of Science & Space Transit Planetarium Russell Etling, Executive Director 3280 S. Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33129 (305)285-5801 /I? a toes• rr�4sca Q+ a/+) r t®¢ twa� « ma aaa a t¢ is i'rL eYW 1nG i rwa.�. uaa ra®corn �¢r efx r �t as car to •sr @a rr,r r sv �! IItT atnr ca a 'li[ ¢i' r eofn r 1tC R e a tri t r � IaL aeae r i earai flit Sac sa+Mte�mrr Zaca flee rer: m arav' ue tmw lee n a teat aoc sr is �z xs a rmrz �.� em wt arc ma[ r ae1 lrr a®ea �vr- ras aces m m ttr -MOM rz tetre fees sow t¢wzaffi ra¢ "mneas a m r afs >.a ttnr rs ,ea r@ w a ar< r � �traf aw M- Aftwcr wm— t R'L te0 �N of far te: L noq tas tall'!S m I@ wet¢ �v annf as u rm t tr>¢ so +terms tar a»a fcr t tF'C. ®Yyrf ri @r 4 n a tee race a re rra tm � tls Y tvme ye ro erae r aer ret arm � � are u rp w >e tar r roarer ae Jes Ra !rate 1e iota wary aaatirta SPECIFIC Z� wt r+euft arc ♦ arrrwtY q AL fwe Yteae + • ra tft trrc eaea.ft rtc ara oamta aro � aauar ea teas ro w..e u.e ri. T✓• • atrnc tr,t r a etev eymaf � ria 4 PURPOSE SURVEY qµi ♦♦ . sJOEL&=�J ,f®.meraats�emt Re rLgw ar,aa Ate? � f as a sas « aaa a ret noet tit ras i tas®ev .� macaw® ® tamt�=r —er lmtmcKrrar a eaicaraa rrar ®.rimer errs g eaoaem'mM,rm�rtm.r 1 rra rrs s vaa is n a tar rao an tm ■emir a sa ®r ra tm taame ua r -rea @ar aw r'rxv .ta..r atr e m mM .W& at rr MM cl >rmu rr� rav eta arc tm w a PJ 7� rrmr®sue m ® e arm®�: ! ��Ilririwimr .t c�t asc a�oc fz ttr ats¢ r rsmr wav m au tec �fa®tr LC a t my �nr am �sr R fg�l. ea9 rrR tm a R 1 n m amtars+ am r as®r OUT earsz aieatAtw e¢iaaaa / as aClq ea a to / at®raa�fr ri�Q Ou :AAa � � ,� 9® / �nit�sea�favtrti �� a>marcrwmamas nos I J/�y loo.Camarnaicana 1 ,f 1 e r a tea eaaa r ua a+et tra, t� eac s mr reaoa to r r ! m � �'rtnw car w a tm / -eu 1 aam eav ave tts r,¢ rrr+r >r ,ar tvra J a. -�..m_.. atir mcear u�a .. aKr ue m c at.s J was ttry r ru w¢ rry arc f.r R mr2 me A raitQ rarR tiff rav a«er tQ mr R em Now: rm i a as a ,wmirmt I . / _ WaRtaQ7 Pam J t rre.. rm r.a. •. ro i nr rm �J ■..e.c aas,r t bry �.,�wa.lr.7t9a.aae•�taV v17R !o, . rtlCmt L Ib V ►11t 4 r�4 .I.R 96- 360 S 3RAITE :AP SECTION G—G SCALE 1" = 4' 36— 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COA8 AL 41 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTION Q-<3 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, rlarida 3914d lf/ 1Y Tel: 306/681-3o66 Fax: 3o6/eel-1o14 JOB N0. 94700 DATE: 05/23/96 v A gMe Coartal, Ln,iro=&.ta4 Cl+H, rag..rtog and ><—&--- I DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET l0A OF 12 DOCK DESIGNATION AMOUNT SLIP DIMENSION I A-1 1 55' X 32' SLIPS A-2 THRU A-6 5 55' X 19.5' SLIPS A-7 THRU A-11 5 65' X 21.5' SLIPS B-12 THRU B-14 3 55' X 19.5' SLIPS B-15 THRU B-20 6 60' X 21.5' SLIPS C-21 THRU C-26 6 40' X 16.5' SLIPS C-27 THRU C-30 .4 55' X 19.5' SUPS C-31 THRU C-32 2 60' X 21.5' MARGINAL C-33 THRU C-37 5 45' X 18.5' SUPS C-38 THRU C42 5 40' X 16.5' SLIPS D-43 THRU D-53 11 50' X 19.5' SUPS D-54 1 35' X 13' SUP D-55 THRU D-65 11 50' X 19.5' SUPS E-66 THRU E-70 5 55, X 19.5' SUPS E-71 THRU E-81 11 55' X 21.5' SLIPS E 82 1 40' X 16.5' MARGINAL F-83 THRU F-92 10 35' X 16' SLIPS F-93 THRU F-94 2 40' X 16' MARGINAL F-95 THRU F-104 10 35' X 16' SLIPS G-105 THRU G-114 10 35' X 16' SLIPS G-115 TI-IRU G-116 - - 2 40' X 16' MARGINAL IQJAL SLIP DIMENSION AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 65' X 21.5' SLIPS 5 60' BOAT MAXIMUM 60' X 21.5' SLIPS 6 55' BOAT MAXIMUM 60' X 21.5' MARGINAL 2 55BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 32' SLIP 1 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 21.5' SLIPS 11 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 19.5' SLIPS 17 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 50' X 19.5' SLIPS 22 45' BOAT MAXIMUM 45' X 18.5' SUPS 5 40' BOAT MAXIMUM 40' X 16.5' SLIPS 11 35' BOAT MAXIMUM 40' X 16.5' MARGINAL 5 35' BOAT MAXIMUM 35' X 16' SLIPS 40 30' BOAT MAXIMUM 120 y6- 366 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 C O A S T A L 'SLIP DIMENSIONS C j COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. t 4 South Ot={e Highway, Cored Gablea, Florida 33146 ' V T. 006/E61-3666 Faa: :M/661-1014 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 SYS BMe Coa.tal, Environmental, Civil, Engineering and Yanagemant DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 11 OF 12 NOTES All elevations are referenced to the Notional Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. A benthic survey was performed by Coastal Systems International, INC. on 08/20/95. A bothymetric survey was performed by SEA SYSTEMS CORPORATION on 01 /03/95. An upland survey was performed by BISCAYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION on 02/03/92. These drawings are permit "sketches" intended to provide sufficient data for review and evaluation by regulatory agencies. These drawings are not intended for construction. All new piling shall be driven to 6 feet into rock or 10 feet into any other substrate. Construction will require a combination of land based and water based (barge) equipment. Turbidity curtains will be placed around each segment of construction to maintain ambient water quality in the project vicinity during all phases of construction. The docking facility is proposed to provide a permanent sewage pumpout facility. The facility will include fuel dispensers and piping. Underground fuel tanks will be installed upon future redevelopment of upland site. i i i i a: 96- 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL W ! COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. NOTES 484 South Alzl• highway, Coral Ca6lea, rlorlda 3314E ( Tel: 30e/0e1-3656 Fax: 306/6et-1014 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 r >lYe.Bwe Coa.tal, Enr1ronment►l, Civil, Engineering and Yaneg.ment DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 120E 12 PARCEL A UPLAND: A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (S.W %) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "SW 27"' AVENUE" WITH "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT OF "DINNER KEY," AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, AT PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE, ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" NORTH 36'30'03" EAST 1131.38 FEET TO A POINT BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY. FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "DARWIN STREET" WITH SAID SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE", THENCE, CONINUING ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 76'25'57" EAST 98.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN AFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST BEARING: SOUTH 76'25'57 EAST 542.16 FEET TO THE LINE OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF "BISCAYNE BAY", THENCE, ALONG SAID DEMARCATION LINE: SOUTH 1 B'23'03 EAST 552.25 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF "CHART HOUSE ROAD" AS SHOWN ON THE SKETCH OF SURVEY, DATED JANUARY 14, 1985, REFERRED FILE No. MISC. 61-139 REV. AND PREPARED BY "SCHWESKE & SHISKIN AND ASSOCIATES. THENCE, ALONG SAID R/W LINE, FOR THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES: 1. NORTH 75'42'04" WEST 240.75 FEET 2. THENCE, NORTH 30'43'05" WEST 70.18 WEST 3. THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57" WEST 93.00 FEET 4. THENCE, NORTH 54'03'38" WEST 60.50 FEET 5. THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57" WEST 215.80 FEET 6. THENCE, SOUTH 71'02'60" WEST 46.60 FEET 7. THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57" WEST 78,00 FEET 8. THENCE, NORTH 31'44'11"WEST 237.20 FEET PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 22.22 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE;" THENCE, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE: NORTH 36'30'03" EAST 245.49 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 76'07'32" EAST 5.25 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 13'19'03" EAST 17.90 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 5V52'03" EAST 8.30 FEET; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 302,861 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 6.9527 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A SUBMERGED LAND: A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (S.W %) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERESECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "SW 27T" AVENUE" AND "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT OF "DINNER KEY." AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, AT PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE, ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 36'30'03" EAST 1131.36 FEET TO A POINT BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "DARWIN STREET" AND SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET: THENCE, SOUTH 76'25'57" EAST 640.28 FEET TO THE LINE OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF "BISCAYNE BAY" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST BEARING: SOUTH 76'25'57" EAST 424.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 40'51'19" EAST 168.44 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 13'34'03" WEST 372.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 76-25-57 WEST 267.86 FEET; TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH SAID DEMARCATION LINE BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAN "BISCAYNE BAY"; THENCE, ALONG SAID DEMARCATION LINE: NO 18'23'03" WEST 580.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 180.070 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR OR 4.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL B SUBMERGED LAND: A PORTION OF THE SOUTWEST ONE -QUARTER Y.) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANC EAST, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE MONUMENT LINES OF "SW 27T" AVENUE" AND "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" AS SHOWN ON THA CERTAIN PLAT OF "DINNER KEY," AS RECORDEI PLAT BOOK 34, AT PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECI OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE, ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 36'30'03" EP 1131.38 FEET TO A POINT BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE INTERSECTION 0 CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "DARWIN STREET" P SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE CITY MONUA LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORI 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 76'25'57' EAST 640.28 FEET TO LINE OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN UPLAND ANC SUBMERGED LAND OF "BISCAYNE BAY" THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCF LINE: SOUTH 76'25'57" EAST 424.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 40'51'19" EAST 168.44 FEET;,:` THENCE, SOUTH 13'34'03" WEST 89.00 FEET; TO POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL: THENCE, SOUTH 7625'57 EAST 351,00 FEET;';` THENCE, SOUTH 13'34'03" WEST 283.00 FEET; , THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57" WEST 351.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13'34'03" EAST 283.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 99,333 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR L OR 2.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. I cur or Q 4GZ YDtICO O YW4 INDEX OF SHEETS 1. LOCATION MAP 2, VICINITY MAP 3. EX!STING CONDITIONS 4. EXCAVATION/FILL •5. LAYOUT PLAN 6. TURBITY SCREEN LAYOUT 7. WAVE BAFFLE/SECTION A -A 8. SECTIONS B-B. C-C 9. SECTIONS D-D, E-E 10. SECTION F-F 1'.. SLIP DIMENSION TABLE 12. NOTES � 1 r 1 I L'� SCAL M rm Gs W �` a t4l V) US 41 PROJECT LOCATION SEC. 22. T. 54 S., R. 41 E. LATITUDE: 25' 44' N. LONGITUDE: 80' 14' W. �OjJO o MIAMI BEACH G �,Z:a KEY BISCAYNE d V l� Q 11 CITY OF MIAMI 'DINNER KEY BOAT YARD' 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. I LOCATION MAP COASTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL. CAVIL JOB No. 94700 DATE; 10/4/95 ENOINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY; SAM SHEET 1 OF 12 6- 360 a, a = q N H 4o OoQ BEACH US 41 PROJECT LOCATION oeur �5 ot1017[ f SECT. 22. T. 54 S.. 4I E. LATITUDE: 25' 44' N. KEY LONClTUOE: ECT 14' W. 815UYNE 2 m V O W rU J 2 s m e 4 — � a 1rn 2sm y W SO11 M /[[i h o' a 0 1 DC�L�ffi� M S.N. 27 -AT .} 27 UJ4 S S.W. 25 STACEY 9 + 4rA w � 6 a� o+ PROJECT SITE SECTION 22, T. 54 S. R. 41 E. CITY OF MIAMI 'DINNER KEY BOAT YARD' 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. VICINfTY MAP COASTAL. ENVIRONMENTAL. CML JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10 f 4 /95 ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET 2 OF 12 N U h 0 s a c MONTY'.S. RESTAURANT' - ' y9 6P PUBLIC FACILITY i EXISTING BOAT DOCKS • • RAMP EXISTING: •• BUILOING 9 PUBLIC DOCK ' c EXrSTINO HANGAR EXISTING BULKHEAD :DINNER KEY; •BOAT'Y.ARD. \ �o •' EXISTING a EXISTING VACANT AREA • ; .HANGAR BOTTOM -T TO -8' DEEP " �•"L• CRY OWNED SUBMERGED LANDS ' O •,. ` / 70 BE DEDICATED TO DOCKING FACILITY EXISTING BULKHEAD THE •CHARTHOUSE RESTAURANT NOTE: _ �`` J DOCKS AND PILINGS WERE DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR BY HURRICANE ANDREW AND WERE REMOVED. BASIN HAS EXISTING SHEET PILE BULKHEAD. xxt °' rm SEC. 22. T. 54 S.. R. 41 E. CITY OF MIAMI "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. EXISTING CONDITIONS COASTAL, ENVIRONAAENTAL, CIVIL JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 ENCINEERINC1 AND MANAQE-=MENT 464 SouUi Dixie Highway, Cora] Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3555 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET OF 1 L 4 96-- 360 i MONTY'S RESTAURANT' DOCKS PUBLIC DOCK SEC. 22, T. 54 S., R 41 E. CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. COASTAL. ENVIRONMENTAL. CML ENQ1NEEFnNG ANC] MANAGEMENT 464 South Dicie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" DOCKING FACILITY EXCAVATION/FILL JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 DRAWN BY: SAM Zh�E T 4 4F I .f .r--.1 W .. _ PRDPOSEO NEW9uLXNW DMINO BUXWAD 1 S \\ EXISTING j7 %2 . ROPOSEO HANGAR Sf 7 Rx z56 -`-°-. iNc-Ac{utt �ii ;!Sea r,D,a EXISTING ` a HANGAR PROPOSED' D i7�. %' W- wALK*kY a•„ i PAYEMENT a O-Ja Wnx STRUCTURE - ry4 C _ 7 '• � veb M1„ a 1.. �. ..� a D� & r: Jt / � h4• JQxa"aa ?'"'� f �' r�0. .. � 7a / (^ a 'may-•.�, .,_'`f,-1-• o, a � `' Y`.._ ,;•, ��, l tl w o C ,y'^N a-Ja N f.ry ! / / . A>a � � Cad, f- `1 r r.� "•''` I �U 5•,0'9 Sw> tl6'y° D.iJ O �q .ro f.y7 -+aD J`y1 056 ' lv DOC-4 rrtu �%A 0 75 '50 zutE"`m SEC. 22. T• 54 S., R. 41 E. CITY OF MIAMi "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. LAYOUT PLAN COASTALENGNEE4INQVANDNMANAC,:EMENT JOB No. 94700 ©ATE: 10j4J9� 464 South Dixie Higbatay. Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-561-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SA4 SHEET 1tGLm Exvsnw. eu.KWAD ryti ruRacm ScRaH SEC. 22, T 54 S., R. 41 E. CITY OF MIAMI "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TURBIDITY SCREEN LAYOUT COASTAL, ENVIRCNKAENTAL. CML JOB No. 9470Q DATE. 10/4/95 ENGINEERING ANC> MANACEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3555 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAHEET b OF 12 �)b-- 360 12'-0" 3' -0' 6' -0' 3' -0' FIBER GLASS GRATE ELEV +5' NGVD 12' 14" 12" PRECAST 2 CONCRETE BEAM 2'-0" CONCRETE 2'-0' ' PILE CAP MHW (+1.5' NGVD) ". . SIDEWALL RAILINGS 2' -0 8"x 10" PLASTIC WOOD 0' NGVD XW (-0.5' NGVD) : f Vo ROCKS 14" SO. BATTERED CONCRETE PILE 2'0 BOULDERS Z :% 2 12 :.. ' . 12 GRAVEL BEDDING LAYER . WATER DEPTH (VARIES -T TO =B' NGVO) 1' YXI WAVE BAFFLE STRUCTURE SECTION A -A 0 S 4 Stu N rm CITY OF MIAMI "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. WAVE BAFFLE/SECTION A -A a COASTAL. ENVIRONMENTAL. CIVIL ENGINEERINGJOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 c ANC) MANAGEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET 7 OF 12 4 95-- 360 0 V c 3 c a a: W a ci 4 V 12'-0" 3'-0' 6'-0' 3'-0' FIBER CLASS ! CRAiE £LEV. +5' NOVO �4•• ? j•YP,, "' 2 12" PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 2'0' CONCRETE PILE CAP ELEV. +2' NGVD MHW (+1.5' NGVD) 0' NGVD 17 MLW (-0.5' NGVD) - 14' SO. CONCRETE PILES '. • is WATER DEPTH VARIES (-7' TO -8' NM) SECTION B-B 8.-0. 21-0' 4-0' 2'-0' FIBER CLASS GRATE ELEV +5' NGVD ,,. •.., �YYP .�4' y- }� ^� .• 12- PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 210' CONCRETE PILE CAP ELEV. +2' NGVD MHW (+ 1.5NGVD) r, 0' NGVO MLW (-0.5' NGVD) _ 14"`SO. CONCRETE PILES '•r WATER DEPTH VARIES (-7' TO —8' NOVD) SECTION C-C swt w rm CITY OF MIAMI "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTIONS B-B & C-C COAENGINEERI ENVIRONMENTAL- NC) MA MEN; JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET 8 OF 12 56- 360 5'-0• ELEV. +5' NGVD a a , e. ELEV. +2.5' NGVD MHW (+ 1.5' NGVD) �• 0' NGVD a a • e a. WAFER DEPTH VARIES (-7' FO —8 NGVD) • •� \", $Cµ(M rm U 3 0 a SECTION E-E 9' PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 2'-0" CONCRETE PILE CAP 14" SO. CONCRETE PILES LIl, 1 ' CITY OF MIAMI "DINNER KEY BOAT YARD" 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI. FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTIONS D-D & E-E COASTAL. ENVIRONMENTAL, CIVIL ENJOB No. 94700 DATE: i 0/4/95 ENGINEERING,AND MANACEMEM 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET 9 OF 12 96-- 360 n � e SfJI(H tCn 3" (Trl #5 0 7" c TOP & SO' ACROSS TRAVEL LIFT BASIN — SECTION F—F TRAVEL LIFT DOCK — TYPICAL SECTION -0• 18' CONCRETE SLAB STEEL WHEEL GUARD (TYP.) r L 14" BATTERED CONC. PILE (TYP.) CITY OF MIAMI 'DINNER KEY BOAT YARD' 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECnON F—F COASTAL. EWRONMENTAL, CML JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 ENGINEERING2 ANC) MANAGEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33146 Tel. 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 DRAWN BY: SAM SHEET 100E 12 96- 360 FIXED DOCKAGE DOCK DESIGNATION AMOUNT DESCRIPTION A-1 thru A-13 13 40' X 17.5' SLIPS A-14 1 50' X 17.5' SLIP B-15 thru B-19 5 50' X 18.5' SLIPS B-20 thru B-25 6 55' X 18.5' SLIPS C-26 thru C-31 6 35' X 16.5' SLIPS C-32 thru C-36 5 50' X 16.5' SLIPS C-37 thru C-41 5 40' X 16.5' SLIPS C-42 thru C-47 6 35' X 16.5' SLIPS D-48 thru D-61 14 45' X 18.5' SLIPS D-62 1 55' X 18.5' SLIP D-63 thru D-75 13 45' X 18.5' SLIPS E-76 thru F-119 .44 35' X 15.5' SLIPS G-120 1 60' X 20.5' SLIP G-121 thru G-135 15 55' X 20.5' SLIPS G-136 thru G-141 6 55' X 19.5' SLIPS G-142 thru G-144 3 55' X 16' SLIPS TOTAL 144 DOCK DESIGNATION AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 60' X 20.5' SLIP 1 55' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 20.5' SLIPS 15 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 19.5' SLIPS 6 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 18.5' SLIPS 7 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 55' X 16SLIPS " 3 50' BOAT MAXIMUM 50' X 18.5' SLIPS 5 45' BOAT MAXIMUM 50' X 17.5' SLIP 1 45' BOAT MAXIMUM 50' X 16.5' SLIPS 5 45' BOAT MAXIMUM 50' X 17.5' SLIP 1 45' BOAT MAXIMUM 45' X 18.5' SLIPS 27 40' BOAT MAXIMUM 40' X 17.5' SLIPS 12 35' BOAT MAXIMUM 40' X 16.5' SLIPS 5 35' BOAT MAXIMUM 35' X 165SLIPS 12 30' BOAT MAXIMUM 35' X 15.5' SLIPS 44 30' BOAT MAXIMUM TOTAL 1 144 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 'DINNER KEY BOAT YARD' DOCKING FACILITY SLIP DIMENSION TABLE 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 3Y: SAM SHEET 11 OF 12 0c�_ 360 NOTES All elevations are referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. A preliminary benthic "survey was performed by COASTAL SYSTEMS INT'L., INC. on 8/20/95 A bothymetric survey was performed by SEA SYSTEMS CORPORATION on 01 /03/95. The upland survey was performed by BISCAYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION on 02/03/92. These drawings are "permit sketches" intended to provide sufficient data for review and evaluation by regulatory agencies. These drawings are not intended for construction. All new piling shall be driven to 6 feet into rock or 10 feet into any other substrate. Construction will require water based (barge) equipment. CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE MIAMI• FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. COASTAL, EWAONUENTAL• CML ENGINEcRING ANO MANAGEMENT 464 South Dixie Highway. Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 Fax: 305-661-1914 'DINNER KEY BOAT YARD' DOCKING FACILITY NOTES JOB No. 94700 DATE: 10/4/95 DRAWN B`': SAf4 SNrL. 12 OF 12 �6- 360 Cesar H. Odio City Manager City of Miami, Florida DECLARATION Submitted 1996 The undersigned, as proposer, declares that the only person interested in this proposal are named herein, that no other person has any interest in this proposal or in the agreement of lease to which the proposal pertains, that this proposal is made without connection nor agreement with any other person and that this proposal "is in every respect fair, in good faith, and without collusion or fraud. The proposer further declares that he/she has complied in every respect with all of the instructions to proposers, that he/she has read all addenda, if any, and that he/she has satisfied him/herself fully with regard to all matters and conditions with respect to the lease to which the proposal pertains. The proposer agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to execute an appropriate lease agreement for the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship between the proposer and the City of Miami, Florida, for the performance of all requirements to which this proposal pertains. The proposer states that this proposal is based upon the proposal documents issued May 31, 1996, entitled "Request For Unified Development Proposals for the Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment, 2640 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida" and addenda, if any. Name of Firm, Individual or Corporation Address Telephone 90- 360 F , PROPOSER'S PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION FORM j This form is to be completed by the Proposing (Development) Entity (the legal entity: corporation, joint venture, partnership, one or more individuals, that will enter into the leasehold agreement with the City) and each joint venture partner, principal or major stockholder to that entity, if applicable. SECTION A. f y Name: Address: Telephone : Facsimile: Name of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the planning and management of the project: Name Name lTitle Title Proposer is a: [ ] Sole Proprietorship [ ] Corporation [ ] Partnership [ ] Other If Proposer is a Sole proprietorship stop here. 1 .. SECTION B. If proposer is a partnership, answer the following: 1. Date of organization y j 2. General Partnership ( ) ` Limited Partnership ( ) 3. Statement of Partnership recorded Yes( ) No ( ) { Date Book Page County State PROPOSER NAME: �� _i i 4. Has the partnership done business in the State of Florida? Yes ( ) No ( ) When? Where:_ 1 5. Name address, and partnership share of each general and limited partner. SHARE 6. Attach a complete copy of the Partnership Agreement. SECTION C. If proposer is incorporated, answer the following: 1. Is the corporation authorized to do business in Florida? Yes ( ) No( } 2. The corporation is held: Publicly( ) Privately( ) 3. If publicly held, how and where is the stock traded? 4. List the following: AUTHORIZED ISSUED OUTSTANDING Number of voting shares Number of nonvoting shares PROPOSER NAME: page 2 96-- 360 0 Number of shareholders Value per share of Common Stock/PAR BOOK Market 5. Furnish the name, title, address and the number of voting and nonvoting shares of stock held by each officer, director and shareholder owning more than 5% of any class of stock. If more than 5% of any class of stock is held by a corporations, then each owner - corporation must also complete separate pages (type corporation name on said pages for identification purposes.) and furnish the required financial statement for each. If said owner -corporations are owned by other corporations, then these other corporations must also complete separate pages (type corporation name on said pages for identification purposes) and furnish the audited financial statement required on each page. The City requires information on all corporations that directly or indirectly have an ownership interest in the proposer -corporation. 6. If an individual or corporation will be guaranteeing performance of the Proposing Entity, state name here : If a corporation, provide name of corporation on corresponding pages for identification purposes. and furnish audited financial statement(s) as required. SECTION D. Surety Information : Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon your default? Yes( ) No( ) If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date, amount of bond, and the circumstances surrounding said default and performance. SECTION E. Bankruptcy Information : Has company ever declared bankruptcy? Have you ever been declared bankrupt? Yes( ) No( ) page 3 95- 360 If yes to either of the preceding questions, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities and amount of assets. SECTION F. Pending Litigation Provide here and/or on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation, liens, or claims involving any participant in the proposal. SECTION G. References List four persons or firms with whom you have conducted business transactions during the past three years. At least two of the references named are to have knowledge of your debt payment history. At least one reference must be a financial institution. Reference No. 1 Name: Firm: Title: PROPOSER NAME: page 4 360 Address: Telephone: (__) Nature and magnitude of business association, purchase, sale or Ioan: Reference No. 2 Name: Firm: j Title: j Address: Telephone: i ) i Nature and magnitude of business association, purchase, sale or loan: i i i f Reference No. 3 j Name: jFirm: i Title: j Address: l Telephone: Nature and magnitude of business association , n, purchase, sale or loan: Reference No. 4 Name: Firm: Title: PROPOSER NAME: page 5 t 96- 360 �� Address: Telephone: L) Nature and magnitude of business association, purchase, sale or loan: Reference No. S page 6 96- 360 CONSULTANT'S PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION FORD This form is to be completed by each consultant or subconsultant to the Proposing Entity. SECTION A. Name: Address: Telephone : Facsimile Professional Registration Number: Name of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the design and engineering of the project. Name Name Title Title i SECTION B. SURETY INFORMATION I ' Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon your default? - Yes ( ) No( ) If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date, amount of bond, and the . circumstances surrounding said default and performance. SECTION C. .,. f BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION I Have you ever declared bankruptcy? Yes ( ) No Have you ever been declared bankruptcy? Yes ( } No ( ) Consultant Name: PROPOSER NAME: PAGE] 96- 360., IIf yes to either of the preceding questions, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities and amount of assets. I I • I ' i I SECTION D. i D'P .MTM(l T TTTC'TATTON Address: Telephone: (_) Nature and magnitude of business association: INFORMATION SHEET MINORITY/WOMEN CLASSIFICATION AND PARTICIPATION 1. Indicate MINORITYIWOMEN CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (Submitter): O Black O Hispanic O Women O Other (Non-Minority/Female) 2. Detail MINORITY/WOMEN PARTICIPATION within your firm, or as it may apply to the Submission, if awarded: A. Joint Venture: Provide information regarding Minority/Women firm participation as such, and the extent of participation. Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service B. SUBCONTRACTORS: Provide information regarding Minority/Women firms that will be subcontractors for this Service, and their extent of the work. Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service C. SUPPLIERS: Provide information regarding Minority/Women firms that will supply you with goods or services for this Service. Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service 96- 360 S�1V�PZ.E AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY i POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of (Company Name) to base its hiring and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not i influenced and that its employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, i marital status, veteran and handicapped status. I One of the management duties of all principals at (Company Name) is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and I handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. (Company Name) is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees and applicants opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual, despite the full support of management. And so, to monitor our efforts, (Company Name) has assigned one of its principals as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. Employees may contact (Name of assigned principal) at (telephone number) regarding this Affirmative Action Policy. Date Signature Title Company: i i F 1 �,tYo City of Miami + PRIMARY OFFICE LOCATION - Affidavit .Please type or print clearly. This Affidavit must be completed in full, signed and notarized for local preference consideration. Legal Name of Firm: Entity Type: ( � t-x oNy) Q PartnershiF Q Sote Proprietorship Q Corporation Corporation Doc. No: Date Established: Occupational License No: Date of Issuance: Street Address: e-- z u, "' State: How long at this location: U3 Street Address: 0 W City: State: Now long at this location: cc According to the City of Miami's Charter29-A as amended: All contracts shall be awarded by the Commission to the lowest responsible bidder,... provided, however, that if the amount of a bid or proposal submitted by a vendor whose primary office is located in the City of Miami is not more than ... 10% in excess of the lowest other responsible udder or I proposer, such local vender may be awarded the contract. " The intention of this section is to benefit local bona fide vendorslproposers to promote economic development within the City of Miami_ I 1 (we) certify, under penalty of perjury, that the primary office location of our firm has not been established with the sole purpose of obtaining the advantage granted bona fide local vendors/proposers by this section. Authorize Signature '•.�..' Print Name 1 Title 1 Authorize Signature Print Name Title RE�. (Must be signed by the corporate secretary of a Corporation or one general partner of a partnership or the proprietor of a sole proprietorship or all partners of a joint venture.) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE 0 Personally known to me; or Subscribed and Swom before me that this is a true statement this day of 199 ❑ Produced identification: Notary Public, State of Florida Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires` Please submit with your bid, copies of occupational License, professional and/or trade License to verity Total status, The City of Miami,) also reserves the right to request a copy of the corporate charter, corporate income tax filing return and any other document(s) to verify i the location of the firm's primary office. 95- 360 F )ACK L. LUFT Director CITT-tv of 4Matttt- It t, CESAR H. ODIO City Manager June June 20, 1996 NOTICE INFORMATION PACKAGE NO. I To: ALL RECIPIENTS OF CITY OF MIAMI REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE DINNER KEY WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT, ISSUE DATE MAY 31, 1996 Subject: Updated Information with regard to the Request for Proposal (RFP) Subsequent to issue date and Pre -Submission Conference Please find enclosed the following materials which will provide new information and clarifications to Request for Proposal issued May 31, 1996: 1. Updated survey of subject project (Replaces Exhibit 1, "Sketch of Survey") 2. Updated sketches (permits) (Replaces Exhibit II, "Permit Sketches for the. In addition, please be advised that on June 27, 1996 the City Commission will consider an Addendum to the Request for Proposal which would allow an additional optional primary use at the site, namely a film or multimedia production facility. This item is being taken up as a public hearing beginning after 4 p.m., in the Commission Chambers City Hall (3500 Pan American Drive, Coconut Grove, FL, 33133). If approved, a formal addendum will be issued with copies to all holders of the RFP. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND REVITALIZATION 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue/Miami, Florida 33130/(305) 416-1400/Telecopier (305) 416-2156 _ O Mailing Address:P.O. BOX 330708/Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Should you have any questions regarding the aforementioned, please feel free to contact Dianne Johnson or Jeannette Garcia, of Community Planning and Revitalization at 41 G-1400. 7S' •ely, J ck . Lu , Director om iuni y Planning and Revitalization cc: Linda Kearson Dianne Johnson Jeannette Garcia ail i f 96- 360 cu r cr y T� uEwco Q uv,u t THIS PROJECT INDEX OF SHEETS 1. LOCATION MAP 2. VICINITY MAP 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4. EXCAVATION/FILL PLAN 4A.EXCAVATION/FILL SECTIONS 5. LAYOUT PLAN 5A.LAYOUT PLAN ALTERNATIVE 2 58.EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6. TURBIDITY SCREEN LAYOUT 7. WAVE BAFFLE/SECTION A —A B. SECTIONS B—B, C—C 9. SECTIONS D—D, E—E 10. SECTION F—F 10A. SECTION G—G 11. SLIP DIMENSION TABLE 12. NOTES a »m tomv �1 1 7AI NW v L ( , , IGR WAM I 3EACH 4E Z J SEC. 22, T. 54 S., R. 41 E. LATITUDE: 25' 44' N. LONGITUDE: 80' 14' W. 96-- 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. LOCATION MAP 464 South Dula Highway, Coral Gablaa, Florida 33140 Tals 305/681-3666 Fa:t 306/661-1914 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 CoasUl, tnvtronmanlal, Moil. Fjltnaarina and Yana`amant DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 1 OF 12 c a 0 W CL O 8 AS", AS", 0p PUBLIC FACILITY J� 50 �� M IRRfCK GYM EXISTING HANGAR Q DINNER KEY BOAT YARD EXISTING HANGAR 0 MONTY'S RESTAURANT .BOAT @� J DOCKS RAMP`�C r ,rriwonn \EDQnNG DOCK • u.a un rv. ouaw ranr EXISTING BULKHEAD \ \ c EZISTLNG VACANT AREA \ /BOTTOM —7' 10 —E' DEEP \ \\ CITY OWNED SUBMERGED LANDS EXISTING \ TO BE DEDICATED TO DOCKING FACILITY BULKHEAD ICI w ym THE CHARTHOUSE _ RESTAURANT ` m NOTE; DOCKS AND PILINGS WERE DAMAGED J BEYOND REPAIR BY HURRICANE ANDREW AND WERE REMOVED. BASIN HAS EXISTING SHEET PILE BULKHEAD. a Iro too rxc " rar SEC, 22, T. 54 S., R. 41 E. 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 -- CQA.BTALCOASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 I ` �� r 464 South Utzf• Nighwa,Y, Corrl "blaa, Florida 091.4E A�1l Tel: 00E/EEL-96EE Fac:00E/6Et-1.G1.4 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 Y! . Coastal, Bnvtronmantal. Civil. r 11ins.ring and Yanagvmant DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 3 OF 12 vi a LEGEND 0 AREA TO BE BACKFlLIED ® AREA TO BE EXCAVATED -- PROPOSED NEW BULKHEAD �. EXISTING BULKHEAD O ro`t`C� PUBLIC FACILITY VIRRICK mw 7PDINNER Q KEY AT YARD 1 MONTY'S RESTAURANT EXISTING COCK r rtc ,rr ror ! oaoosr r.nm n \ � w w THE CHARTHOUSE RESTAURANT ` ) .00 ,roar. J NOTE: ALL CLEAN EXCAVATED MATERIAL IS TO BE USED TO BACKFILL THE EXISTING HARBOR ONSITE. OTHER EXCAVATED MATERIAL WILL BE DISPOSED OF AT THE DADE COUNTY LANDFILL. rxt"� SEC. 22. T. 54 S., R 41 E. 9 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 L COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. EXCAVATION/FILL PLAN 464 SouLh Dl[l• Htthway, Coral Gabla.. Florida 96146 T.h 306/661-0666 Fait 306/661-1914 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 E Caa.tal, Environmental, Clall, engin.aring and Hanagaraant DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 4 OF 12 1/1...�ilearL \94700\D-P-4A\ 1:1 P.S. 325 LINEAR FEET OF EXISTING SHEET PILE BULKHEAD TO BE c� REMOVED 6� j WIDTH VARIES (+1.5') MHW 0' - 60' WIDE EXISTING GRADE (-0.5') MLW MSL (-)6' TO (-)7' =� o .m > :� m > EXISTING HARBOR BOTTOM ELEV. (-)7' NGVD 8 7; 0 E o o m �o DESIGN ELEV. (-)7' NGVD ' UPLANDS TO BE EXCAVATED 0 0 & a >o C7 2,337 CUBIC YARDS 5 p a -mot -9 z ELEV. (-)20' NGVD 1 o pm�l SECTION 1-1 " cn 0 K: SCALE: 1" = 10' VER. z L4 D 1" = 20' HOR. y fo i ; L'< EXISTING UPLANDS AREA TO BE BACKFILLED a 711 GRADE TO MATCH EXISTING 3.650 CUBIC YARDS p 0 0 70' 6 - _ z a ° r B � _ (+1.5') MHW z MSL (-0.5') MLW CD W , z Z Y f -c to n Z t . O p D m 100 LINEAR FEET OF � CC PROPOSED SHEET PILE ,i CT� 100 LINEAR FEET OF EXISTING HARBOR BOTTOM BULKHEAD m m 0 o y EXISTING SHEET PILE BULKHEAD ELEV. (-)7' NGVD i • . ELEV. -20' NGVD TO 8E REPLACED CD D CD I� N o �' SECTION 2— 2 NOTE: BEL CONSTRUCTED EITHER ENT SAME Q' SCALE: 1" = 10' VER. FOOTPRINT AS EXISTING OR WITHIN 12 OF EXISTING WETFACE OF SHEET 1" = 20' HOR. 96- 3 6 U F M 0 W a 0 \94700\OK-PER58\ 10 P.S. MONTY'8 RESTAURANT '� O � +LILLLIY i to r ySaO� PROPOSED FILL AREA 0} PUBLIC FACILITY EXIST. UPLAND 1fl BE EXCAVATED EXIST. UPLAND • O Ln m eita cc `��177 xt u C7 �R D> O ry EXIST. OOCXS o r - D tJ /� PROPOSED COCKS i *1 Z y EXIST. BULKHEAD a . TA O D / PROPOSED BULKHEAD i v O fTt 4-e -� , DINNER KEY u _ L+D BOAT YARD 1 °. o n Z Nods a = Ccli -3s3 LA ION ELEVATS ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCED g I' 2 W /: "3 j TO 0.0 14CV6 c 9 f 1 1 / `� SURVEY BY SEA SYSTEMS CORPORATIDK 1995 a o Z fTl •I �' . _ 8 1 9 c A T 11 L YEAH LOW WATER (MLW) 1 • • I t A T MEAN MICH WATER (MHW) - ♦ 1.'.S' u Z THE CHARTHOUSE RESTAURANT -° `\ ITT ' \ Z x m CO Z To x\,w{� CA `\ F=,1 C n O �\ T?T n F= D 144' `•\ O -i D 0 2DO 400 rs Z `\ O G A p O SCALE IN FEET ~ O N SCALE 1' 300' C -Tl \cri z fV 96-- 360 15'-0" 4'-9' 5'-6' 4'-9' FIBER GLASS ELEV. +5' NGVD GRATE 12' 14^ 2., TYP.:.. 12" PRECAST CONCRETE BEAM 12' h • 2'-0" CONCRETE 2'-0' PILE CAP MHW (+1.5' NGVD) SIDEWALL RAILINGS 2'-0' 8" x 1 O" PLASTIC WOOD 0' NGVD MLW (-0.5' NGVD) 1 '0 ROCKS 14" SO. BATTERED CONCRETE PILE 2'0 BOULDERS 2 . 2 12 12 GRAVEL BEDDING LAYER WATER DEPTH (VAR/ES -7' TO -B' NGVD) 1' WAVE BAFFLE STRUCTURE SECTION A -A NTS 96- 3.60 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 � COASTAL COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. WAVE BAFFLE/SECTION A -A t/ 464 South Dixie lilghwa,y. Coral Gables, Florida 39148 o l l Te1: 305/ee1-3866 Fax: 306/ee1-1G14 JOB No, 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 WEMCoastal, Environmental, Civil. Engineering and Management EDWN� BY: JAO SHEET 7 OF 12 12'--0 3'-0' 6'-0' 3-0' FIBER CLASS CRATE fLEY +5' NGVO :'.;. �4' 2' 3T'�:— 12' PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB X-0' r .` 2'0' CONCRETE PILE CAP ELEV.+2' NCVD MNW (+ 1.5' NGVD) l 0' NGVD _ MLW (-0.5' NGVD) 14 1 f' SO. CONCRETE PILES 1 +,t •, 4' ,y WATER DEPTH VARIES (-7' TO -8' NGVD) {} SECTION B-B I i I 2'-0' 4-0' 2'-01 FIBER GLASS GRATE ELEV. +5' NGVD 2. TVP 12' PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 2'0' CONCRETE PILE CAP ELEV. +2' NG$o AINW (+1.5, NGVD) r 0' NGVD MLW (-0,5' NGVD) _ • r i 14' SO. CONCRETE PILES i i •,i WATER DEPTH VARIES (-7' TO -8' NGVD) n: SECTION C-C Xatm 96— 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD / 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY / COAST -,AL MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTIONS B-B & C-C o' 464 South Dixio Highway, Coral Gahlea. Florida ,3146 Tel: 306/661-3666 Fax: 306/661-1G14 JOB No, 94700 DATE: 05/02f96 8Y8 HMH Coutal, Enrireamental. Civil. Engineering and Management DRAWN BY; JAO -•� SHEET 8 OF 12 a 5'-0' ELEV. +5' NGVD 9" PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB 2'-I16' . , 2'-0" CONCRETE PILE CAP ELEV. +2.5' NGVD _- MHW (+1.5- NGVD) �. 0' NGVD MLW (-0.5- NGVD) _ e ° 14' SO. CONCRETE PILES e e WATER DEPTH VARIES (-7- TO -B NGVD)' ' FINGER PIER (TYP.) SECTION D-D 1" GAP 10'-0' ELEV. +5.0- (NGVD) 24' 3'-0' 4-0' 3'-0' FIBERGLASS GRATE GRATE ELEV. +5.0' '+1 12' PRECAST. CONC, BEAM NEW CONCRETE PILE CAP �•'' 3'-0' -_____ 2'=0" CONC.'PILE CAP j ELEV. +2.0' 14" so. CONCRETE PILES (BEYOND) ..... ............ .. ........ .............................MHW: (+1.5- NGVD) .•.. •• r 0.0' (NGVD) MLW (-0.5' NGVD) NEW STEEL OR CONCRETE BULKHEAD S PROPOSED RIPRAP MITIGATION S- 160 CUBICIYARDSK BOULDERS) 1 WATFR ❑FPTH (VARIFc -7- Tn -A' Nrftfn1 QUAY & BULKHEAD (TYP.) SECTION E-E Yxir� 96- 360 CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 350D PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 COASTAL COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTIONS D-D & E-E 4d4 Sonlh Dixie Highway, Coral Cables, Florida 33140 Tel: 305/eel-3066 Fa.: 306/eel-1Cl4 pre sue JOB No, 94700 DATE: 05/02 j96 Ce.ele,, Environmental, Civil, Engineering and Management DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 9 OF 12 1 3 v a a o + e WNW 3" (TYI #507" C TOP do BOl ACROSS TRAVEL LIFT BASIN - SECTION F-F ';,_n" TRAVEL LIFT DOCK - TYMCAL SECTION 18" CONCRETE SLAB STEEL WHEEL GUARD (TYP.) 14" BATTERED CONC. PILE (TYP.) -�--i 9 6- 360 % CITY OF MIAMI DINNER KEY BOATYARD 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE DOCKING FACILITY MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 C ETAL COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECTION F-F Y4E4 South pixie Highway, Coral Gables. Florida 33140 TO: 300/001-3006 Fax: 306/001-1914 JOB No. 94700 DATE: 05/02/96 YE . Coastal, Environmental, Civil, Engineering and Management DRAWN BY: JAO SHEET 100F 12 r LASON Systems, Inc. S.E.. j , , 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 } 305-477-9149 •800-287-4799 . FAX 305-477-7526 FOUND CITY OF MIA MI MONUMENT =OUND NAIL �t &L r % \ S76.2557^ '� P.0.6. PARCEL A N131903E" .` � PLAN .7.90 i `SJ FWND CITY OF _ UTAMI MONUMENTS 4Y-�„ SET RE- i ,r�``.....Dt1ND NNA1IL W 1 J a�R jC jL UCHAIN NK FENCE— 5.25 Y ASPHALT PAYE1 `I GRASS U01T Pod POLE ♦� 11 G` 5 rGRASS ' � , 2ss 1 t �s• A ALT P.Q.C. 1 S4 RE -BAR EC. CAP- l� 115 ' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1�} 11b i 1 1M11 r� 1RE It, 11k BOSS i r ^x /v CHAIN I�/UNK FENCE 1? P.O.B. PARCEL A Ns -WND NAIL ;IF 4LB-87 E1 kE-?AR CHAIN 7 R.U. ;AP FEN 5Z 0, I PAVEM GRASS OA/— LIGHT POLE FLAG i POLE 'A sz jj A ALT PAVEMENT ""14t 7 PA W)4% r STEEL FRAME & FIBERGLASS PANEL HANGAR Ile FIRE HYDRAN W/GIJARD POSTS k, 9GN..., J.P ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER RE HOSE e ox STEEL LID BOX PAT k BROKEN 8 R EN PATCHED ASPHALT PAVEMENT CHAIN y C7.Box ELECTRIC 4 I psi /1JNK FENCE L ME 8 Box 0 16 FPL WATER VALVE W/GUARD POSTS 01 ONE STORY ALUMINUM BUDING Will 1 11,111 all PURPOSEIFIC SURVE' A T INNER KEY MAR a A OF MIAMI T PAS. PARCEL A SUBMERGED LAND 5 6 FOUND 1/2.0 IRON 0 WfCAP ILB-37 FPL '1 10 ENCE M POOR 6. 11�CONDITION OSTS 6• ` `" 1 11 STEEL. �' • .SS *. 1gi 1j1 MEAD 1• r Erb DNE STORY 1p1�9� 5 3 U4l GUIDING �•� 1 120' 19 9ROKFN g PATCNE6� } p91 ° ASPHALT PATIENT j LEGAL llBS(.9MMON PARCBI. A SUBMMED A PORTTON OF THR SOiITHN297 ONE-QUiARTER' — M A R ICE f;i avac� y(�,Jj sso� G+' aa+c1 ar ra�►,�ac�+ud► Iss e�.i►ofs. ov' 1/`' !^"` _' moREFUNG UtimPANYs INCIS �• planners . Surveyors `PAMPA RDAI.E STRIP 10770 N. 45th STREET SUITE B-150 VA 33313 RL RACE, FLORIDA 33167 �M IS-1800 T!D= FAX (313) g7g-199� t9-!5628 ORDER f DATE F.B. # nz= 2238-A ADDITIONAL SPOT ELEVATIONS AS INDICATED ON A PLAN FURNISHED TO US. tt/05i95 02/01/96 2238-A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY EYFOR DINNER KEY BOAT YARD AND PROPOSED 1 FOR D 3/22/96 N/A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR SUBMERGED LANDS ,3/96 2238A REVISED ELEVATIONS 6b 1121n,h 11� ; I II' I li ii I� N—] i � III. M. 1• , .,gyp I 5, ( Ef14!!10 IEGAL DLCIL ON PARCEL A UH AMM A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (S.W 1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH. RANGE 41 EAST, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOAS: COIGdENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF 'SIT 27M AVENUE" WITH "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT OF "DINNER KEY," AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, AT PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE, ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE'": NORTH 300'03' EAST 1131.38 FEET TO A POINT, BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY. FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "DARWIN STREET" WM SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE;" THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT. LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE: NORTH 51'52'03" FAST 33.42 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 7625'57' EAST 98.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN AFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL: THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST BEARING: SOUTH 7625'57" EAST 542.16 FEET TO THE LINE OF DEMARCATION BE'TVEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF "BISCAYNE BAY;" THENCE, ALONG SAID DEMARCATION LINE: SOUTH 18'23'03" EAST 552.25 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF "CHART HOUSE ROAD" AS SHOWN ON THE SKETCH OF SURVEY. DATED 1ANUARY L4, 1985, REFERRED FILE No. MISC. 61-139 REV. AND PREPARED BY "SCHWEBKE & SHISION AND ASSOCIATES. THENCE, ALONG SAID R/W LINE, FOR THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES: 1. NORTH 7642*04' WEST 240.75 FEET 2. THENCE, NORTH 394TOT WEST 70.18 FEET 3. THENCE. NORTH 78'25'57" WEST 93.00 FEET 4. THENCE, NORTH 54'03'38' WEST 60.50 FEET 5. THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57' WEST 215.80 FEET 6. THENCE. SOUTH 71'02'50" 'BEST 46.60 FEET 7. THENCE, NOPTH 76'25'57' WEST 78.00 FEET S. THENCE, NORTH 31*44'11- WEST 237.20 FEET TO A LINE PARAILEL WITH AND 22.22 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT—OF— WAY LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE; THENCE, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE: NORTH 38'3W03" FAST 245.49 FEET: THENCE, SOUTH 76'07'32" EAST 5.25 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 13'19'03" EAST 17.90 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 8.30 FEET; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 302,861 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 6.9527 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MONITORING 'HELLS MONITORING/ WELL — ;()UN 2' IRON PIPE W/ 4LB-87 FOUND 1/2' IRON \ / i PIPE W/C kP AL3-87 5 V 7 h 1 LPI.G O LIGHT POLE �,¢ �' O MONITORING bi S �T. WELLS T2M 41 j ELEV. 7.02-' f ASPHALT PAVENENT•J SET P.K. NAIL ^TANG SET P.K. 'IPES —"'� , NAIL ET P.K. I 2' CONCRETE 4AIL VALLEY GUTTER ASPHALT I ABBREVIATIONS: S.E.C. a BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY 4 - MONUMENT LINE P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING l'S . CATCH BASIN :.P - LIGI',T POLE 1 ) a MEASURED M-A•S. - MUNICIPAL ATLAS SHEET SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE WE HEREBY CERTIFY: That the attached "SPECIFIC PURPOSE; of the above described property is true and correct to of our knoxledge and belief as recently surveyed and plate our direction; also that there are no risible encroachmen shown thereon. Examination of the Abstract of Title wil be made to determine recorded instruments, if any, affe Property. Location and identification of utilities 0 adjacent to the property were not secured as such ini was not requested. Ownership is subject to Opinion of Ti 3urrev meets the Minimum Technical Standards set fort :Florida State Hoard of Land Surveyors :.n Chapter 8107--1• Administrative Uccle, pursuant to Seeticn 472.027, Florida NOT YALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN 914BOSSED SURVEYC L"iscayn- Engineering Company, Inc. 329 West Flagier Street Miami. Florida 33130 Ph: (305) 324-7371 By: ,--;1*1 L. GAJQUI PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND STATE OF FLORID;. �• � 11p �,5 STEEL FRAME do FIBERGLASS a �` PANEL. HANGAR tit ONE STORY 65 ,� GREEN AREA '11. 1CONCRETE' tit ..'.•• . -�_ •'� 2' CONCRETE CURB G'"cEN ac GUTTER (TIP.} �1 AREA �� "� -`_ ✓/ STANDING PIPE (XiNCRETE'• N 76 )) AIR COND. 4 ' ��1$ �> UNIT •' ]�' r , . "{� �` W 215.8 BOAT � 0 DOCKAGE S76 Jc s 7 b STAN0 61 0�` �. r L EDGE ONE ONE STORY C.S.S. SET K GREEN TBN I# er NAIL ELEV, 6,23 EXISTINGnr76s.S7w �% ) 9ULDING �- FOUNO NAILk 9%3. fL8-87 FOUNO I i IRON ' V' CONCRETE R �g3 6p GREEN 2' CONCRETE ' PIPE W/CAP "-87 �� ,MONITORING c�91 AREA � VALLEY GUTTER • a w£L1 S76•�5.57" 84 SET P.K. SET P.K. S L 96 611 NAIL d � 6, CHNFE 4 � BROKEN § PATCHED 2' CONCRETE CU 6 ASPHALT PAVF]IENT5 do GUTTER (TYP.) 661 , FOUND N • 4 c DISC. AB-8 SET P.K. D NAIL 6' CONCRETE 6' CHAIN C8 CURB LINK FENCE -\ A$PkAL r PAR!(/ArC TBM f3 ELEV. 5.67 S7S*4Z'0 4 ° "e �. ASPHALT PAVEMENT LEGEND est to the best TREE oao POLE VATH DOUBLE LUMINAIRE rE SURVEY" TREE CATCH BASIN -*- JOINT UTILITY POLEect t ad platted under v FIRE HYDRANT o•o POLE AND SINGLE LUMINAIRE achments unless - ifle will have to OS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GUY WIRE iv, affecting the O DRAINAGE MANHOLE a LIGHT POLE ties on and/or D ich information o MANHOLE O TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE a of Title. This Ict forth by the m CONCRETE LIGHT PULL BOX N TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER CABINET i G17--6, Florida ® GAS METER PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD 91orida Statutes. ® GAS VALVE -9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD SURVEYOR'S NOTES'- )RVEYOR S SEAL. ® SOUTHERN BELL BOX z- SIGN 1. Elevations shoes hereon refer to City -O- POWER POLE F0L FPL MANHOLE BenchMark Reference: X VALVE m TRAFFIC K. PULL BOX Description: P.nail & brass washes /- of sidewalk 12'f westerly of the west ` a-E ELECTRIC METER SQ SEWER VALVE of "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" & about / westerly extension of the centerline c A}QUI 0,,, WATER METER a CONCRETE ELEVATION "stamped" 5.376 feet. AND MAPPER #3194 HIGH MAST UGHTING TOWER �P SPRINKLER HEAD 'LORIDA 2. Bearings shown hereon are based on SCHWEBKE, SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC 02/07/92. 1), AINAIRE NAIRE 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE Dl1ER CABINET AD �o GREEN �q� AREA �0 1 0`r'A �t ONE STORY 1 O.B.S. N o bh GREEN ,• H AREA P, AREA BOAT DOCKAGE • .. 1• ONE STORY b6 MONITORING WELLb �h b;lt b A� b BROKEN & PATCHED to t 5• •—`'� GAREA REEN 1 �� .�y $ STORY TELEPHONE 'Cf� ONE R C.B.S Pox ASPHALT PAVELIENT 5' '.• F GREEN 6" CONCRETE '' AREA CURBLZ , ASpH� T PARS A TBM #3 C ELEV, 5.67�5 4 ASPHALT PAVEMENT b1iEDGES OAD 282.9�, / CHART HOUSE RESTAURANT ONE STORY BLOCK & GLASS BULDWG SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. Elevations shown hereon refer to City of Miami Datum: BenchMark Reference: Description: P.K. nail & brass washer set at top of curb of sidewalk 12't westerly of the westerly edge of pavement of "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE" & about 1't northerly from the westerly extension of the centerline of "PAN AMERICAN DRIVE". ELEVATION "stamped" 5.376 feet. 2. Bearings shown hereon are based on a "SKETCH OF SURVEY" prepared by SCHWEBKE, SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. File No. D-700. Last revised 02/07/92. `• •"••^+••. v {A{.Fl 1{i 1LFCN.11i411\!lV Vl' l' MONUMENT LINES OF "SH 2"7'I'TI AVENUE"' tN BAYSHORE DRIVE' AS SHOWN ON TILAT CT"KT, 'DINNER KEY," AS RECORDED IN PIAT WM 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUDE COWIT THENCE, ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE � "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE': NORTH 3Si30 OT EAST 1131.38 TWEET '10 BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHWFSMLY FROM INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT I "DARWIN FMEI;`I'" AND SAID "SOUTH BAY: THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE CITY MONT: OF SAID "SOUTH IIAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET, THENCE, SOUTH 76"25'57" EAST 640.28 FI';L"' LINE OF DEMARCATION BErWM UPLAND A-jI SUBMERGED LAND OF 'BISCAYNE DAY" AND `i OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESC1,3, THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE L.t.ST BRe SOUTH' 71725'57" BAST 424.00 FEE`r, THENCE, SOUTH 4O'51'19" EAST 168.44 FEE THENCE, SOUTH 13'34'03" WEST 372.00 F :E THENCE, NORTH 76'25'57" WEST 267.86 FEL TO ITS INTERSECTION WM SAID DEMARCA9'IC; BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND C^ BAY:" THENCE, ALONG SAID DEMARCATION LINE: NORTH 18'23'03" WM 580.44 FEET TO `r BEGINNING. CONTAINING 180,070 SQUARE FEET. MORE (T; 4.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. FOUND NAIL & DISC. M-87 2.7 W. OF E. FACE OF AWALL: ELEV. 6.16' o _ e � - SET P.K. NAIL A 7 ' 2.8' W. OF E. FACE OF N���'��v1111$�„ OF SEAWALL, ELEV. 6.16' REFEFZENCE MATERIAL: 1. Paving & Drainage Plans (three sheets) Sketch P 297 dated 10/12/81 by E.R. Brownell & Assoc. 2. Specific Purpose Survey Order No. 01-72839 Dated 8/11/95 our drawing No. DC-4036. 3. "SKETCH OF SUT.VEY" prepared by Schwebke. Shiskin & Associates, Inc. File No. D-700 last revised 02/07/92. 'i City of Miami Datum: usher set at top of curb westerly edge of pavement )out 1't northerly from the ine of "PAN AMERICAN DRIVE'. on a "SKETCH OF SURVEY' prepared by INC. File No. D-700. Last revised MONUMENT LINES OF "Sif 27TIIAVL�NIJE" AND "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE' AS SHORN ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT OF "DINNER KEY," AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, AT PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE, ALONG THE CITY HONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE": NORTH 311'30'03" EAST 1131.38 FEET TO A POINT BEING 2.27 FEET SOUTHYESIR, LY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINES OF "DARIIV STREET" AND SAID "SOUTH RAYSHORE DRIVE" THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE CITY MONUMENT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE': NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 76'2557" EAST 640.28 FEET TO THE LINE OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF "BISCAYNE BAY' AND THE POINT OF BE91R ING OF THri HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; TERN E, CONTRdUrJG ALONG THE L.1.S'I' DEA=G: SOUTH' 76'2M5'57" EAST 424.00 FEET; THRICE, SOUTH 40'51'19" EAST 168.44 FEET: j. THENCE, SOUTH 13734'03" REST 372.00 FEET; (' THENCE, NORTH 7T25'57" WEST 267.86 FEET: TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH SAID DEMARCATION LINE / BETWEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF *BISCAYNE / BAY: - THENCE. ALONG SAID DEMARCATION LINE: / NORTH 1T23'03" WM 580.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. / CONTINUING 180,070 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR / 4.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. / i$ i FOUND NWL DISC. AB-87 _ 2.7 W. OF E. FACE OF WALL: ELEV. 6.16' SET P.K. NAIL 1 % 2.8' W. OF E. FACE OF N5`�. ` OF SEAWALL. ELEV. 6.16' / yr e 1 61gg6- REFERENCE MATERIAI-- 1. Paving & Drainage Plans (three sheets) Sketch P 297 dated 10/12/81 by E.R. Brownell & Assoc. 2. Specific Purpose Survey Order No. 01-72839 Dated 8/11�5 our drawing No. DC-4036. 3. "SKETCH OF SURVEY prepared by Schwebke, 5'hiskin & Associates, Inc. File No. D-700 last revised 02/07/92. �J P.0 3. PARCEL B SkkMl "r(G0 LTA 1 LEGAL DCSCfi1Pi{QN PA_M R J A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE —QUARTER (S.A 1/4) OF .� J SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, DADE �` o COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY $ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CITY f ',W 'SOUTH J ., MONUMENT LINES OF 27TH AVENUE" AND N BAYSHORE DRIVE" AS SHOTIN ON THAT CERTAIN PIAT OF "DINNER KEY; AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34. AT PAID I 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLOrgk THENCE, ALONG THE CITY HONLT)f&iT LINE OF SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE: I; NORTH 3630'03" EAST 1131.38 FEET TO A POINT I BEING 2.27 FFTsT SOUTHN i'ERIY FROH THE Ii INTERSECTION OF THE CITY MONUMENT LINKS OF J "DARTiIN I AND SAID "SOUTH BAYSHORE J THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG ITIE CITY MONUMENT LINE "SOUTH J OF SAID BAYSHORE DRIVE": I NORTH 51'52'03" EAST 33.42 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 76'25'57 EAST 640.2B FEET TO THE J LINE OF DEMARCATION BKMEEN UPLAND AND SUBMERGED LAND OF 'BISCAYNE BAY" THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LRR- SOUTH' 76'25'57" EAST 424.00 FEET; 1 THENCE, SOUTH 40'51'19" EAST 168.44 FEET; I THENCE. SOUTH 13'34'03" TEST 89.00 FEET; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER J DESCRIBED PARCEL: THENCE, SOUTH 76'25'57" EAST 351.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13'34'03" WEST 283.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 76'25'57' TEST 351.00 FEET; I ' THENCE NORTH 13'34'03" EAST 283.00 FEET TO J POINT OF BEGINNING. 1L CONTAINING 99.333 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR J 2.28 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.618 I ring, � ` I 6 R",m Z` �[i1C]LxJ� C7 �c"A CJ.'^!. EyCr7� �o�i� p ��CD� / C. m o tj A CD I g - �i 2 o� " H �� oo"5RS�� Fec W 1W. co l�D� wbw"� pt7 W o � 1= SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY FOR: CITY OF MIAMI SCALE: t"-40' DESIGNED BY: DRAM BY: H.L. CHECKED BY: J.M. DATE: a�/11�g� APPROVED BY: M,LG, FIELD BOOK No. 223�-A PAGE No. 4 9�cb. ciraivyn�. :a K.. BISCAYNE -fConsulting End 1� .6 4.1-Ir MIAMI rotelow Ina 529 WEST FLAGLER STREET ROMA. 33130 PH: (305) 324-7671 FAX (305) 324-0809 1 DINNER KEY MARINA BOATYARD TENANT LIST i (HANGER 1) QOMPANY.NAME *South Florida Ultra Lights OWNER SERVICE Sales, Manufacturing Jay Kurtz Aircraft Instruction Ship Wrecks Red Townson Diesel Engine Repair, c/o SAP's Crew Marine AC, Welding Sig Ralph Dinner Key Ship's Randy & June Ship's storage, new Chandley Marie & used gear Atlantic System Bob Barnett Pressure Cleaning, I Rigging, bottom work, repairs Ship's Crew Marine John Woodruff Yacht repairs, carpentry, i electrical, mechanical, hull refinishing j Michael and Company Michael Bronnia Sail Making & Repairs j *Miami Hand Gliding James Tildle Manufacturing of instruments, capstans, winches Coconut Grove Marine Eric Manuela Upholstery & canvas work & Upholstery Olaf Custom Woodworking Olaf Stenrud Marine carpentry, repairs, j Corbin Briggs cabinetry Miller Marina Rick Miller Diesel/gasoline outboard/ inboard engine repair and Iinstallation i Yacht Construction & Repair Bob Campbell Painting, Plumbing, Specialists Carpentry & Fiberglass Grauiton System Roberto Lopez Electronics & electricity `I *Art Gallery Jose Maria Gundin Painting & exhibits *Errth Depot John B. Broughton Solar Power cells & electric generators 96- 360 r^ DINNER KEY MARINA BOATYARD TENANT LIST (HANGER 2) COMPANY NAME OWNER SERVICE Terry & Barbara Terry Chanclers Boat Signs James Cushion James Cushion Boat Storage Bob Christi Bob Christi Boat Storage Lee Strong Lee Strong Marine Equipment Easy Sailing Bob Lawless Storage Bill Steward Bill Steward Yacht Brooker Jeff Christi Jeff Christi Art Studio Richard Diaz Richard Diaz Decorations Ballonport Don Kaplan Trailer Storage Pectel Peter Michell Metal work George Marlian George Marlian Painter Carl Lemirix Car Lemirix Carpenter i Katherine Oerking Katherine Oerking Signs 4 , r 4 ,1 96-- 360 2nd Floor 1st Floor cv w .o-aa® %JJ 1IN 4 r. E bleBee T lst Floor Richard Deaz m Alley Pectel P Marlian == - - A Floor y t. I� Oerking• 2nd Floor S 2nd Floor 1st Floor S to o iva , - i Ralph a L1 ghts Ship s Crew Marine g S F l oo r T tlanti Shi M'$ Cry ,' A 2nd A Systems ine Michael & Corpany I Floor Storage otf'�- S 3 rd 96-- 360 Ctv o/ Miansi, J10ricla PRE -SUBMISSION CONFERENCE x *** JUNE 18f 1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Joanne Clingerman Name Eldon Scott Company D.E.R.M. Company URBAN SPACE MANAGEMENT Address 33 SW 2nd Ave City/ Zip Miami, Fl 33130 Phone 372-6575 1 Fax 372-6630 Name Kevin Cote Company D.E.R.M. Address 33 SW 2nd Ave City/Zip Miami, F133130 Phone 372-6575 1 Fax 372-6630 Name Jeff Berkowitz Company BERKOWITZ DEVELOPMENT Address 2665 S. Bayshore Drive City/Zip Miami, F1 33133 Phone 854-2800 1 Fax 854-0077 Name Eric Reynolds Company URBAN SPACE MANAGEMENT Address Camdon Lock City/Zip London, UK Address 131 Greene Street City/Zip New York, NY 10012 Phone 212-529-9262 Fax 212-5094155 11ME6 Ls Name Adair Ratliff Company WES 1TREC Address 700 Sequoia Tr City/Zip Maitland, Fl. 32751 Phone 407-740-5551 11 Fax l Name Gary Groenewood Company WE, STREC MARINAS Address 801 NE 3,d St City/Zip Dania, Fl 33004 Phone 954-926-0300 1 Fax 954-922-54.85 Name Jolm Harrison, Jr. Company HARRISON CONSTRUCTION CORP. Address 1000 NW 54Lh St. city/Zip Miami, Fl 33127 96-- 360 • City 0/ Miami, _716,ridla PRE -SUBMISSION CONFERENCE **** JUNE 18f 1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Macon C. Toledano Name Catherine Lackner Company BERKOWITZ DEVELOPMENT Company MIAMI TODAY GROUP Address 2556 S. Bayshore Dr., Suite 1200 Address P.O.Box 1368 City/Zip Coconut Grove, Fl. 33133 City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33101 Phone 854-2800 Fax Phone 3582663 Fax "Fi Name Joseph Scarpa Name Lawrence Terry Company WHOLLY HARVEST MARKET Company Address 2 E. Camft-io Road, Suite 108 Address 1896 Tigertrail Ave City/Zip Boca Raton, Fl. 33432 City/Zip Coconut Grove, F1 33133 Phone 407-395-4533 Fax 407-391-7511 Phone 856-9347 Fax 854-5495 T'N 1 4. 11 2 01 44. Name Cia Mooney Name Scott Wessel Company RPM WORLDWIDE, INC. Company GROVE KEY MARINA Address 210 -A 23rd St. Address 3385 Pan American Dr. City/Zip Miami, Beach, Fl. 33139 City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33133 Phone 672-1998 Fax 673-4411 Phone 858-6527 Fax gwGN11 11PA11R1. INqF' V Name James Reyl (RCI) Name Spencer Meredith Company MIAMI BEACH MARINA Company GROVE KEY MARINA Address 300 Alton Road Address 3385 Pan American Dr. City/Zip Miami Beach, Fl. 33139 City/Zip Miami, Fl 33133 96- 360 City o f Man2i, Jlorida PRE -SUBMISSION CONFERENCE **** JUNE 18,1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner ][fey Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Tony Zamora, Jr. Name Carl B. Straw Company HARBOUR Company GREATER MIAMI MANAGEMENT MARINA COUNCIL Address 7785 SW 86dh St., #E214 Address 3430 SW 271h St City/Zip Mianu, Fl. 33143 City/Zip Ft. Lauderdale, Fl. 333124:707 Phone 2748596 Fax 2741988 Phone 587-2428 Fax 587-4742 v^"""."'."'"o°'�"'''S' +1 f ✓. 4 l�� 1 , ZF w^ 1 1 tty ipali'` I 1.1 4 i { R' C } 1 3T I..1 il4 ( - i t i r 11 5 { �t��1'�4�}' L Name Rebecca Martel Name Raymond McElroy Company BERMELLO, AJAMIL Company R. F. McELROY & PARTNERS & COMPANY Address 2601 S. Bayshore Dr. Address 2355 SW 27th Lane City/Zip Coconut Grove, Fl. 33133 City/Zip Alianu, Fl 33133 Phone 860-3706 Fax 859-7835 Phone 856-0131 Fax 856-1777 +Ffr.rY .r ro1 i r4 r++lk� IL - Phi, y'y � Jsr� .� $.. '�� � 7� s 1r - � � 'f.I ti''1y. �+ y ME ea• irrr s h Si -it+' �Yq�/1''t A4f�Yr .,rl 1•. +..�1ze � a1�li Name Bill Stewart Name Vicky Leiva Company ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN Company BILL STEWART YACHT & MELLOT _ BROKERAGE Address 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1850 Address 2640 S. Bayshore Dr. City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33131 City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33133 Phone 347-3818 Fax 372-9400 Phone 85�8�-65427 Fax �r(c4. u .J rt S S ly'F �r F rd� h r'i! iet r'4 rd 1 rQ 5'IY tl�[7 �, IFi V y .�: i�j 1 v.. `C"S 4�� �fY-' IvF a"7'�l,�ij�i �l�y ikka'V.}yfi �`✓( �.h'il`r.�.{: A �M�ii'.e4�}iF�1y7�1„eY1 _�'F•-AR' n S� E ;:•3 h'p'�IH{�.stx+'�i•. pr' li4'��3 y SYtka rl'.II �41 7 F. hi�^N�V� �Td', -^y °•L�_..t_,.{/,.iiliv',,,..� 1 l.x.,� ?� i �r a v, ..:tt„q �� '^-y_T_• �`t�' /4 _'',�� Name Greg Kessel Name Trisha D. Stone Company GRUBB & ELLIS Company D.E.R.M. Address 2601 S. Bayshore Dr., Suite 1700 Address 33 SW 2nd Ave., Suite 100 City/ Zip Miami, Fl. 33133 Phone 858-9777 ext.1204 City/Zip Miami, H. 33130 Fax 372-6630 96- 360 et t� o/ Mi a in i, To , idla PRE -SUBMISSION CONFERENCE * *** JUNE 18,1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Jeff Cowan Name Sonny I-Ioltzman Company ATEC ASSOCIATION, INC. Company HOLTZMAN, I<RINZMAN, _ EQUELS & FURZJA - Address 9955 NW 116u� Way Address 2601 S. Bayshore Dr., Suite 600 City/Zip Miami, F133178 City/Zip Mianu, Fl. 33133 Phone 882-8200 Fax 882-1200 Phone 860-7104 Fax 859-9996 y f .YT^PAY, Name Carlos Lacasa Name Elena M. Buigas Company VRMD, INC. Company SPATIAL REALITY Address 3191. Coral Way, 3rd Floor Address 1249 Venetia Ave City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33145 City/Zip Coral Gables, F133134 Phone 443-6163 Fax 443-7686 Phone 567-1706 Fax Lima ��W Name Luis Revuelta Company JESSLA CONSTRUCTION Company LUIS O. R}:VUELTA, P.A. Address 8360 W. Flagler Street Address 4260 SW 73rd Ave City/Zip Miami, F133144 City/Zip Mianu, F133155 Phone 554-7229 Fax 551-7254 Phone 265-8985 Fax 263-9732 t if .'- ! r `^.'✓! �. �i a A '+ 71 j, „ 2 apt t R., \! r YN G �� .fib_ i l,�+ Yy 4 �'f2 t / } `�:' 'xf Name Felix Lima Name Bert Leon Company LIMA DEVELOPMENT Company LUIS O. REVUELTA PP.A. Address 8360 W. Flagler Street Address 4260 SW 73rd Ave City/Zip Miami, F133144 Ci r/7in IU;1 ,,: r., 001=C! 1. 95- 360 ( ilv o/ Miaini, Jlol'icla q C�.,l V..ItS��i y-.�'1!'J {4 '' ht�..irP^ Sb(�� .ihNi.rtuTN' Q �t .Yr{t rd� � •1` ; Y'� Y}.-� -q , �� �' _ •! t' - PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE JUNE 1$,1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Bruce Reep Name Robert Christoph Company Company RCI Group Address 3530 E. Fairview St. Address 300 Alton Road, Suite 303 City/Zip Miami, Fl. 33133 City/Zip Miami Beach, Fl 33139 Phone 858-6260 Fax Phone 672-5588 Fax 673-5995 x I } C Name Burt Compton Name Juan M. Villar Company AVIATION HISTORIAN Company A.D.A. ENGINEERING, INC. Address 1.0330 SW 102 Ave Address 11401 SW 40uh St, Suite 470 City/Zip Miami, Fl 33176 City/Zip Miami, F133165 Phone 271-6880 Fax 271-0329 Phone 551:Z Fax 551-8977 x .. f g,..� } tir�4.i`.7d:*'uj•�frq'"i ✓ �i1�(';''}�1' Y. -4 . s+} e . Y,M1.j J,VJ rrh 4l:FAA�Y`�' 4' '�' �� i � tll�,F���.�� `�.M1 .to.:.i-�:�SaG�'..i-iZ'.��.•�rv�. J! ^'tl �, �,> Name Daniel Baumgard Company IMA Address 1575 San Ignacio City/Zip Phone�y� 661-0110 Coral Gables, Fl. 33146 Fax 7i'.q.?i.1��{{S1t�r . 1�}t ST ).t�«;FM,.-kA 1'"{rft l.r P>E. ..�+,r�'is Z'J,� C 4� t� •71+M1 r fC '�'�C�$'7H^ �V"�' �.''" �'41 },''F,��,1k f t j1 Yi•`' ;I•. L� i K!t rw'Cci T .,P 1Z-L�.7� ,yt '} '� f�L rS� i.�y C =�1'�' xif�i f c.!(�4µ �t�„4�� l.'`M1i47iK7 J&J7f �Jr 4 Y: . !EtYt '} f ' �4 ,. TL 'h �• F't,Y a7 yd�`C�!.' S}.3._. Name Name Company Company Address Address City/ Zip City/ Zip Phone Fax Phone Fax �' r ���• t � 96-_ 1160 ( ity o/ Miami, 31oriala PRE -SUBMISSION CONFERENCE * * *x JUNE 1$,1996 SIGN IN SHEET RFP: Dinner Ivey Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name Terry Buice Name Nancy M. Fernandez Company CITY OF MIAMI Company CITY OF MIAMI Address city/Zip Phone 579-6341 Fax Name Christina Abrams Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Public Facilities City/ Zip Address Asset Management City/Zip Phone 416-1540 Fax 416-2156 Name Linda K.earson Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Assistant City Manager City/Zip Name Jack Luft Name Dianne Jolunson Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Director of Community Planning & Revitalization City/Zip Phone Fax t 2 ('ka,bz�{n �1yiSi'ZS� �y :F fl z t atetirr":' Name Maria Perez Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Community Planning & Revitalization City/ Zip Phone Fax t Name Name Company Address City/Zip Phone Fax Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Community Planning & Revitalization City/Zip Phone Fax Name Jeanette Garcia Company CITY OF MIAMI Address Community Planning & Revitalization city/Zip Company Address City/Zip Phone Fax 96- 360 City o/ wi a m i, Jlorida RFP RECEIPT LOG RFP: Dinner I<ey Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name��� �Dl 114je Company Address ao G i Y o � � City/Zip �) r'tl�j � C .� Phor Fax 13 3d L # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date Staff Name COmpaIly Address'��t�csl rC>l1 QY�1� r-we, City/zip �CS� 1m` 1 3Ch ,_EL-2 �I-560 Phonei —c=- l _ If-, A. Fax # of Copies: 1 Amount Rec'd: Date (DWqb-) Staff-' Name A, L! � Company Address 9k city/Zip � , it Phone J2 Fax -72'f # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date r /., //.-, J Staff Name O "7, Q • 5er Company ICE. - �� 5w S„1 Address � 8 � ti R rn Upa u . w )02. City/Zip Phone Fax 0 - o # of Copies: i Amount Rec'd: Date 6 /� o Staff Name Je' Company /G%rri/� SfP.�rPsrS��y�an Addressle'laz // S e e-w-A- City/Zip Phone,,, . _ Fax j26 _ / / # of Copies: / Amount Rec'd: Date Staff Name Company '1-4 r S v It N Address g % � 6 3 S,-9v P n� city/Zip Ni[=_ Phone 7f30/ a Faxa; -7�p� # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date / // / Staff Name Company /,P-n P��/�✓�� s� Address S. �aris�rore lam✓• �. city/ Zip Phone Fax # of Copies: Amount Rec'd` 020� r Date / �/ Staff Name Company Address 7,7, two - City/ Zip .3 2- 7Z-/ # of Copies: r Amount Rec'd: o?�� Date � /9� Staff Page 2- 3 6 — 360 (fitV o/ Mi a in i, Jlorida RFP RECEIPT LOG RFP: Dinner Ivey Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31, '1996 Name CAI f C-0[ h r) Name Company C nrnniryi Dridq companyLl e�� wee rs,«oaMP. �F Address 1�� , Address City/Zip City/Zip Phone -) Fax _ �, �' Phonez _ - 9 Z6 2.- I 5 # of Copies: Amount Rec'dqoo DD # of Copies: ` Amount Rec'd: c� Date f . �,� Staff Date 6 f (L ( 9 Staff °u ✓ - i F t U', �i r{i e J ui :�- p { •rs[ wife l r ct.*St f � y, '"f'%J�'"'1 °"� [ —7 ' 1�� .>�"4 tY. * .1 ` .,;�4.•.:.1.(z.vSu.L �:iuY2.�s"x�a:a�a{t i, . _,e r S..Zuas..�i.Yu�` '.�".s.ivi.L.l:�.u�..i:'�u:S,:b`'...�.sew.•::,::,vL.;.�.�i!, �. i.yi Name 6 � r6 l Name Company I ,� - •-- Company i TD2 is AT [AAAJ CO(ICY khA� Address (� � Address -701 (�Q ( �� ,� u1 '-� SUITE KW City/Zi t 44D'40! City/Zip M(AMI Phone ,�� Fax t/� JI.� Phone 2Y _ p/d' Fax ��Z- -7100 # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date( Staff Date k /� / Staff F 4� �c ^'�-+^-,....� -IT �.1 }tan �.w...e ^r..�.r•+=+',_� 't " ""{R" ' e: t ... [':ti(T ,rr 5�x �� tls•'� .+1i �s Vl l-, �q 5f�i._:i z �'SLs ELM Name Name Name Company G � , ass kT5S Company Address , n 575` tl LJ q-1 4 F, Address City/Zip �q-till FL— e5 117 City/Zip Phone 6-R '6735- Fax �� ,o�S� Phone Fax # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: QU. # of Copies: Amount Rec'd:' Date i 1,4 (3/_ Staff Date Staff Name Name Company C' t.fL-�u�� -- �%1C [f i f 1 U� S Company Address 9 ( CD c • Address City/Zip �(; �� ��� City/Zip Phone rJ ` _ tQ26 Fax �-rt �- ( Phone Fax # of Copies: ( Amount Rec'd: # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date ( Staff Date Staff Page 96— 360 (fty 0/ Vi a in i, Jfloricla RFP RECEIPT /tOG RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Urdfied Development Project - Issue Date May 31,1996 Name (' gc v t— �.�/Qif! S, ,�- Name Company Company,t;% Address � S `r � v Ad�-dres--s--,2,,, Cifi}r/Zip ,ell �7L City/zip"/ # of Cooties: Nance Company Address Cith,/7in , %�•t n i : l .�. r cl f" # of Covirs�-- 1 Amount Rec'd: Cori Address � `' City/ Zip(' C1i t (fir i0Ly� Pho_ttr: Fat # of Copies: , Amount Rec'�r�` --� Date �' } `{ Staff Name Company, Address Od©�Ala-1��57�,, A . } A, 1.4 Address 2.6 of GJ =140' city/zip Cc r r ar1G 1[� 1 !,'! r i i�L ti Address City/Zip ��^,4G'�e4c�o Phonerc� Fax R of Copies: Amount Reed: Date 1 Staff Page 95- 9060 City 0/ Miaml. 26ricla RFP RECEIPT LOG RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31,1996 Name ?a :� C-- Company F02 /'L�,s�r���� ��r• Address c2 2 Z-an P City/Zip _ 3 Phone �- _ o I \ Fax # of Copies: Amount Reed: Zo ay Date &/ I Is I I b I Staff Name Company (3, S • y a / + % r,,-)k c ",e Address a(, o S City/Zip iQ 11.k 3 I 3 Phone � tiq - I' U �)-1 Fax # of Copies: I Amount Reed: Date l qb Staff Name Company Cr Address city/Zip Name Company Address City/ Zip Phone Fax # of Copies: ( Amount Reed: y 0 , ,rb Date 6(t y b Staff Page 7 Name - 31AC-1 AA Company �1 1 • A • �H� � �,,�c,r�_� �,c Address 11 u0l 51-o �o S.� City/Zip _ Phone5S! - "Os Fax5-51 -&9 77 #of Copies: I Amount Reed: Date &// 91% Staff Name Company ,� r (o , L >Pvp�o�,�,r� Address a r��� S • City/ Zip Phone lFax # of Copies: r3 I Amount Reed: 1&, jo Date 6// 3ki Staff Name Company Z. Address City/Zip Name 2 ejAe-L 01 . 13 lti � E%,9 5 Company Address City/Zip i 'o 1 3 Phone vi(, 7 _ / 7 o Fax # of Copies: Amount Reed: Ze, Date Staff 96- 360 6tv 0/ M a in i, JCorida RFP RECEIPT LOG RFP: Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment Request For Proposals for Unified Development Project Issue Date May 31, 1996 NameWo bf-b 1, 9 - A L/b WA Name CompanyROCOA)f- AUA45P. Company Address -L, q 64 AU i AT-�00 j ,V t F(1 Address NAM Pt/ -3 � ISZ City/Zip -ci'Y/ziP Phone AA? Fax 445 l Phone Fax # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date Staff Date Staff 7 .777, 7' 4WE ' 01010211� L Name titi Name Company (-,P Gas I VA 0 � Z, Company Address Address City/Zip AA, I VK City/Zip Phone Fax Phone Fax # of Copies: 1 Amount Rec'd: W.Oo # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date Staff Date Staff Name Name Company Company Address Address City/Zip City/Zip Phone Name Name Company Company Address Address City/Zip City/Zip Phone Fax Phone Fax # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: # of Copies: Amount Rec'd: Date Staff Date Staff Page 7 96— 360 :Sack. - FYI �y. C R 0 V E KEY MAK.`;`` 1NC. P- 3385 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, DINNERXff*,``.M1A`IV11, FLORIDA 33133 OFFICE: (305) 858 6527 DOCKMASTER: (305Jc 14- 38` r,1t �tQffi05) 858-0250 May 29, 1996 Mr. Cesar H. Odio City Manager City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 RE: Lease Agreement between the City of Miami and Grove Key Marina, Inc., dated April 1, 1976, as amended (the "Lease Agreement") Dear Mr. Odio: Pursuant to our discussion of May 28, 1996 and in accordance with Paragraph 6 of the Memorandum of Understanding (the "Memorandum") dated September 8, 1992, Grove Key Marina, Inc. (IIGKMII) hereby authorizes any Florida licensed boat dealer who is a lessee, sublessee or licensee of the City of Miami to sell new boats that are less than 28' in length on the City -owned property located at 2640 South Bayshore Drive (the "Property"). The maximum number of said boats less than 28' that are authorized to be on the Property i at any one time is one boat of each hull model in the dealer's product line. Said new boats less than 28' may be stored on the Property during the time they are owned by said licensed boat ` dealer but said boats shall be removed from the Property within ten 1 days after being sold. The City shall, in any such lease, sublease or license include a provision that any boat less than 28' in length be removed .from the property within ten days after being I sold, and that the failure of the lessee, sublessee or licensee to remove the boat within said ten day period shall constitute a f breach of the lease, sublease or license for which the City shall be entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each day said violation exists. In such event, the i City shall forward fifty percent (500) of such liquidated damages collected to GKM. Said lease, sublease or license shall further provide that the City may terminate said agreement for lessee's, sublessee's or licensee's failure to correct the violation, after l providing ten days written notice to the lessee, sublessee or { licensee. The effective date of the above authorization shall be upon execution of a written agreement between the City and a lessee, sublessee or licensee at the Property. It is agreed that the City shall notify GKM within ten days of the execution of a written agreement with any lessee, sublessee or licensee. } 96- 360 I i i i Notwithstanding the above authorization, no other terms or conditions of the Memorandum are herein modified. Nothing herein shall amend the above referenced Lease Agreement and amendments and } addendums thereto. Your signature below shall constitute acceptance of the terms and conditions of the above authorization. sin erel.y, Scott Wessel President Cesar H. Odio, City Manager 1 I Date: i I 1 i 1 1 • i 96- 360 M (ITT of MT T C JACK L LUFT F = CESAR H. ODIO ���� City Manager i Director c „ „ � Y 8 Y'J � 1 A If NOTICE i ADDENDUM # 1 June 28, 1996 TO: All Recipients of Dinner Key Waterfront Request For Proposal, Issue date May 31, 1996 RE: Modification to Section IV.B.2. "Optional Principal Uses" i Please be advised that the City Commission, at a public hearing held June 27, 1996, 1 approved an addendum to the subject RFP to allow for an additional optional use of the Property. Accordingly, Section IV. 13.2. shall be modified in the following particulars': } "2. OPTIONAL PRINCIPAL USES Uses designated as "optional' herein are supplemental or in additional to the "Required Prima Principal Uses" and are not to replace or supplant said required uses. ( a) Public/Urban/Community Market b) Historic Interpretive/Interactive Facility and/or Exhibits i c) Film and/or Multimedia Production Facility Proposers mU elect to provide maintain and operate a film or multimedia .production facility on the PROPERTY utilizing one or the other. or a portion of either large scale hangar on the site. 1 Words and/or figures double -underlined shall be added. Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Asterisks represent omitted and unchanged i material. i i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND REVITALIZATION 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue/Miami, Florida 33130/(305) 416-1400/felecopier (305) 416-2156 (� L+ O Mailing Address:P.O. BOX 330708/Miami, Florida 33233-0708 9U DINNER KEY WATER ANT RFP ADDENDUM # 1 page 2 Such a facilit shall serve to promote th_e_local film and entertainment Loduction Indus and rnaX include such facilities anderations as:. sound_ stae•_i_ecording stttclio;Jset ciesi n, set construction art direction, art department, castingJjghtinz, editing,_wardrobe azid fiir tting�llaand mal.-u,_prot accommodations dressin rooms) It is the intention of th_e City that this facility be operational_ on a rcilar�on_going basis and in s_u_ch a manner that marina and boat yard operations are _not ne�ativel r impacted. d) C4 Permitted Ancillary Uses for Optional Princ al n3z Uses (1) Historic or Multimedia Production Facility Related Retail Development projects which include a historic interpretive facility or a film_and multimedia production facil y may additionally provide and operate a retail gift shop offering merchandise that is solely related to museum and historical exhibits or to the rrQduction facility. Typical gift shop inventory will include miniature replicas of exhibits or production equipment, photographs, prints, books, educational toys or games, and museum orjnroduction souvenirs. The recommended area for the museum or _rp oduction facilit gift shop is 2,000 square feet. (2) Meeting Conferencing Facility Development projects which offer either a multimedia production facilit public market or a historical facility may additionally provide a small scale meeting or conferencing facility to augment the educational and/or cultural aspects of the specified uses. Such a facility may include such amenities as training rooms, meeting rooms, and presentation or entertainment areas for fund- raising, community, or social events. The recommended area for a meeting/conferencing facility shall not exceed 3,000 square feet. LL Educational Facility Proposed development may include an on -site educational facility related to any or all primary uses developed on the Property, including classroom and training rooms for such activities as boat -building, sail making, ship and seaplane design, or film and/or multimedia production. (4) Multimedia Production Market and/or Historic Facility Related Office Proposed development projects may include office space necessary for the administration and management of the specified operations, and office or studio space for related trades, craftsmen, designers and/or artisans associated with permitted uses and activities. CITY OF MIAMI - DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND REVITALIZATION PO BOX 3307081Miami, Florida 33233-0708 444 SW Second Avenue - Third Floor/Miami, Florida 33130 Phone (305)416-1400 Fax: (305)416-2156 96- 360 DINNER KEY WATER )NT RFP ADDENDUM # 1 Page 3 (5) Prepared Food Service Concession Development projects which include a historic facility or film and/or multimedia production may additionally provide and operate one prepared food and beverage concession primarily for the rnuseu-m employees and visitors of said facilities. Such concession shall be of a cafe "snack bar" or_eomm_ isstype, and may be either "open air" or enclosed. The design and operation of the food concession shall be compatible with and complimentary to the character and history of the Dinner Key waterfront. The recommended area for the historic, facility food concession is a maximum of 1,500 sq. ft. enclosed floor area. As previously indicated in Section IV.13.2.a), proposals which offer a public market may allow consumption of prepared foods within the premises. As a guideline, areas for the consumption of prepared foods within the premises of the market should comprise not more than 25% of the building footprint. It is not the desire of the City to encourage a typical shopping mall food court, but to provide an area to allow patrons to leisurely consume food and beverages purchased in the market as part of the market experience. At the direction of the City Commission, we have been asked to advise all prospective proposers that development programs which seek to preserve the majority of the rear apron of the PROPERTY (the existing asphalt area between the hangars and the sea wall) for boat yard use are preferred. Should you require clarification regarding this addendum, you may contact Jeanette Garcia, Dianne Johnson, or myself at (305)416-1400. ely, V Ja L ft c: Linda Kearson D. E. Johnson Jeanette Garcia { CITY OF MIAMI - DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND REVITALIZATION PO BOX 330708/Miami, Florida 33233-0708 444 SW Second Avenue - Third Floor/Miami, Florida 33130 Phone (305)416-1400 Fax: (305)416-2156 06- 360 1 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM 20 Honorable Mayor and Members ro : of the City Commission DATE :"SAY 1990 FILE Approve Issuance of RFP for suaiEcr : Dinner Key Boat Yard s� FROM : REFERENCES Cesar dio ENCLOSURES: City ger Resolution, Draft RFP RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to issue a Request for Proposals ("RFP") for a unified development project ("UDP") for the City -owned waterfront property known as the Dinner Key Boat Yard, located at 2640 South Bayshore Drive in Coconut Grove. The project is to consist of the development of commercial and recreational water - dependent facilities, with the option for certain additional facilities and ancillary related uses on a total of approximately 13.5 acres. The attached legislation has been prepared by the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization. In accordance with the procedures for Unified Development Projects outlined in the City Charter and Code, and as authorized by Resolution 95-48, the administration has prepared the attached Request for Proposals for the subject UDP, which is being considered at a duly advertised public hearing. The RFP was prepared with considerable input and direction from community residents, appointed and elected boards, and representatives of the targeted industries in the private sector. The subject property, the former Merrill Stevens Boat Yard, consists of approximately 6.9 acres of upland and as much as 6.6 acres of submerged lands. This RFP is to meant to facilitate the development of a boat yard, marina and related retail and office facilities, with the option to develop a public market and/or historic interpretive/interactive facility, on the subject property. The integrated package of services sought from the private sector includes planning, design, construction, ' leasing and management of such improvements. At a later date, the City Commission will be asked to select a certified public accounting firm and to appoint members to a review committee (consisting of a number of City officials or employees and an equal number, plus one, of members of the public whose names shall be recommended by the City Manager), in accordance with prescribed UDP procedures. e 96- 360 1 �1--�-•CITY Off' MI'AMI,IF`LORIDA To : Walter Foeman DATE April 23, 1996 FILE City Clerk sua,ECT : Request for Advertisement to Schedule Public Hearings for UDP Process FROM : Jack Luft REFERENCES Director ENCLOSURES: �l Community 1 g and Revitalization The Department of Community Planning and Revitalization requests your assistance in advertising the attached "Notice of Public Hearing" for the Dinner Key Waterfront Redevelopment project. The Agenda Office has advised the date and time of the hearing to be May 9, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. in connection with the regularly scheduled City Commission Meeting. The following account can be charged for the cost of advertisement, No. 590101-287. Thank you for your prompt attention and assistance in this matter. cc: Linda Kearson, Assistant City Attorney Elvi Gallestegui, Agenda Office Dianne E. Johnson, Chief of Development { j 1 f 3 96- 360 } -- CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC i i PLEASE ALL TAKE NOTICE THAT a public hearing will be held by the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, on May 9, 1996 at 9:00 a.m., in the City j Commission Chambers at City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, for the purpose of hearing any comments from any interested parties regarding the contents of the draft request for proposals for the "DINNER KEY WATERFRONT j REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT", a unified development project for commercial and recreational water -dependent facilities, and ancillary related uses on city -owned property located at 2640 South Bayshore Drive in Coconut Grove. The facilities must include the development of a boat yard and marina, and may optionally include a public market and/or a historic interpretive facility. All interested persons are invited to appear and may be heard concerning this matter. Should any person desire to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this hearing, that person shall ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including all testimony and evidence upon which any appeal i may be based. , i 5 96-- 360