Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-96-0270City of Miami, Florida, has made a formal request to the Director of Public Works to permit an existing wall encroachment to remain within the dedicated right-of-way of Tigertail Avenue adjacent to said property address; and WHEREAS, the property owner has furnished a building permit dated June 17, 1981 as proof that the wall was built prior to :x > t WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 54-105 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the City Commission after a, properly advertised public hearing, may permit an existing wall encroachment to remain within the dedicated right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has evaluated the aforesaid request to permit an existing wall encroachment to remain within 1: the dedicated right-of-way and, with the condition that the existing wall be modified to remove the obstruction within the required vision clearance at an intersection, finds no negative effect on the health, welfare or safety of the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The existing wall encroachment adjacent to 1641 Tigertail Avenue in the City of Miami, Florida, shall be permitted to remain within the dedicated right-of-wayof Tigertail. Avenue conditioned upon: (1) in accordance with the findings as set forth hereinabove; (2) subject to the recording of a covenant to run with the land executed by the owner, said covenant to be prepared by the City of Miami to conform with the requirements of Section 54-105 of the Code of the City of.Miami, as amended, and in a'form acceptable to the City Attorney, with 'a the payment, by the owner, of the requisite fees for preparation 06- 270 ; 4 r t Y�'9af`b171t kY i{•Y1411 �1i. 1� _ T r(. 1 .I.t. 1 ., . .. ..... .. i !: .; .1 t and recording of said covenant; (3) with the provision that the public hearing shall be at the expense of the owner; and (4) subject to the condition thattheexisting wall be modified to remove the obstruction within -the required vision clearance at an intersection. -Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its 'adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this Z5th day ri l 1996. N P. CLARK, MAYOR ATTEST TER J. E CITY CLERK ''rt�5.