Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-96-0078J-96-89 1/25/96 RESOLUTION NO. 9 6 "' 78 i A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1111 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SIX (356) RESIDENTIAL UNITS, FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY- FOUR (544) PARKING SPACES, AND ACCESSORY OFFICE, COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL SPACE; APPROVING SAID MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND DRAWING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING AFFECT; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, on November 18, 1995, Stephen J. Helfman, Esq., on i behalf of the New York Life Insurance Company (hereinafter I collectively referred to as "Applicants"), submitted a complete i application for Major Use Special Permit for The Yacht Club at Brickell Project pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for that parcel located at approximately f, 1111 South Bayshore Drive (more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto, and also incorporated in "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto); and i CWHEREAS, development of The Yacht Club at Brickell Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the. ATTACHPAE3T(s) C® N TAIMED CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF JA N 2 5 1996 Resolution No. 96— 78 City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on May 22, 1995, and the Urban Development Review Board met on May 16, 1995, to consider the proposed project and offer their input; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have modified the submittal to reflect suggestions received at said Large Scale Development Committee and Urban Development Review Board meetings; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on January 17, 1996, Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-1-96 by a vote of nine to zero (9-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1996, the City Commission conducted an advertised public hearing to consider the application for Major Use Special Permit and determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Major Use Special Permit Development Order had been complied with; and ti WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter 1 ! set forth; i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY i OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: i Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "Al' and made a part hereof, is hereby approved with conditions as specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Yacht Club at Brickell Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by The New York Life Insurance Company, at approximately 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the fconstruction of up to Six Hundred Seven Thousand Six Hundred and eighty-two (607,682) square feet; One Thousand Nine Hundred and seventy-one (1,971) square feet of retail area; Five Thousand Eight Hundred and thirty-six (5,836) square feet of office space; i and Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifteen (11,915) square feet of lobby, fitness center, recreation and meeting room space. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: la. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended; and r b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 district zoning classification of Ordinance No. 11000, the i - 3 - 95- 78 c Cm Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, off-street parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $79 million, and to employ approximately nine (9) permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $1.3 million annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1996 I E dollars). The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance - 4 - `b,. with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT relative to safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage preservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall be binding upon the Applicants and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Major Use Special Permit which was submitted by the Applicants on November 18, 1995, and which is on file with the Community Planning and Revitalization Department of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is 30 days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section B. The City Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Resolution and attachments to the Applicant: The New York Life Insurance Company, c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq., Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A., 2655 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204, Miami, Florida, 33133. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for The Yacht Club at Brickell Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "All and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for The Yacht Club at Brickell -Project (Exhibit "A"), is i hereby granted and issued. Ulm Section 11. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed. Section 12. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January 1996. STE EN P. CLARA, MAYOR AT S . WALTER J. OE CITY CLERK' PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ?�y EL. MAXW LL A. CITY ATTORNEY CITY ATT dEY W563:BSS:mis i 7 - 96- 78 Y 1 M EXHIBIT A THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for The Yacht Club at Brickell Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1111 South Bayshore Drive; see legal description on "EXHIBIT B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT and, subject to the following conditions, approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Yacht Club at Brickell, the proposed development, is a high-rise rental residential apartment tower with accessory office and retail space use development located at approximately I 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is - 1 - 96- 0 located on approximately 3.23 gross acres and 2.41 net acres of 1 land. The remainder of the project summary details are attached hereto as composite "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The Yacht Club at Brickell will have 356 apartment units f located in one tower thirty-two (32) stories high and a four (4) ' level parking structure. A One Thousand Nine Hundred and seventy-one (1,971) sq. ft. retail area and a Five Thousand Eight Hundred and thirty-six (5,836) sq. ft. office area will be provided in the first five levels of the tower. In addition, a Two Thousand Seven Hundred and twenty-five (2,725) sq. ft. club room, a Five Thousand Three Hundred and twenty-five (5,325) sq. ft. fitness center and a Three Thousand Eight Hundred and sixty- five (3,865) sq. ft. lobby, all located in the first five floors will be provided for the residents of the complex. There will also be a walk along Biscayne Bay which provide benches, lighting } and safety features. Among the amenities which are being 1 provided, there is a swimming pool, whirlpool, tennis court, i racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces located through the first five floors. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the walk along Biscayne Bay. In the event the property is converted to condominium ownership, the ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of f l Covenants and Restrictions. f M The project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's location on Biscayne Bay. The residential tower will compliment the Brickell Avenue Office District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. The project consists of wide, well integrated baywalk I which borders the project's eastern waterfront edge. The final i j submittal has been modified slightly from its original form in response to comments received by the City's Large Scale Development Committee at its meeting of 5/27/95. The Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 5/16/95 approved the proposal as submitted with no comments. No variances, special exceptions, rezonings or land use changes will be required for this application. The project will be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Cohen, Freedman & Encinosa Architects P.A., signed and sealed on June 8, 1995, however may be permitted to be modified solely by means necessary to comply with the conditions for approval f imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review i and approval of the Director of the Community Planning and Revitalization Department ("Planning") prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 zoning district, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mixture of commercial and residential uses. The I - 3 - 96- 78 application for development approval also includes: a required i j approval of a Class II Special Permit to allow development of the I property which lies between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated I right of way as set forth in Section 1511 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended; a Class I Special Permit to allow permanent outdoor swimming pool, a whirlpool and other active recreation facilities accessory to the development as set forth in Section 906.6 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate requests referenced above. The PROJECT may be constructed with up to Six Hundred Seven Thousand Six Hundred and eighty-two (607,682) square feet; One Thousand Nine Hundred and seventy-one (1,971) square feet of i retail space; Five Thousand Eight Hundred and thirty-six (5,836) square feet of office space; and Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred and I Fifteen (11,915) square feet of lobby, fitness center, recreation l and meeting room space. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANTS, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR !' SEVERALLY, SHALL: 4, 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development ` regulations, ordinances and other laws; 2. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which T approvals and/or pp / permits shall be obtained prior to - 4 - 1 l i i I 4 rg l initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each; 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Community Planning and Revitalization { Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of Community Planning and Revitalization why such recommendations are impractical; 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S i coordination with members of the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review 1 procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire i protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular i access and water supply; >f ! 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of r: assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANTS must use its best efforts to follow; 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANTS must use its best efforts to follow; 8. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that in the event the property is converted to condominium ownership, the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities shall be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; i 9. Record a certified copy of the development order within six (6) months of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicants, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally; 1: 10. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development property; order, a Unity of Title for the subject 11. Notify the Dade County Archeologist prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Yacht Club at Srickell Project, proposed by the Applicant, Stephen J. Helfman, Esq., on behalf of the New York Life Insurance Company, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with 1 local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: The project will have a favorable impact on the economy i of the City; and i The project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and The project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and - The project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and - 7 - (5) The project will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) The project will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and (7) The project will not adversely affect public safety; and (8) The public welfare will be served by the project; and (9) Any potentially adverse effects of the project will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the currently adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the project i.e., ingress and egress, off-street parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of I potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of E issuing individual building permits and certificates of s EXHIBIT B All of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 84 at Page 24 of the Public Records of --Dade County, Florida less the south fifty (50) feet thereof. The south fifty (50) feet of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" together with all of Tract "A" of "FORTE PROPERTIES SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 113 at Page 29 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. i f i i 0 -, EXHIBIT C PROJECT SUMMARY FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT - NO. 9513 NOVEMBER, 1995 • THE FOLLOWING DATA SUMMARIZES THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED AT THE BRICKELL APARTMENT PROJECT PROPERTY, PURSUANT TO SD-5 ZONING GUIDELINES: A. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. STREET FRONTAGE: SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE..*. ....... IRREGULAR 2. NET LOT AREA .................................................... 104,976.6 S.F. 3. GROSS LOT AREA .............................................. 140,698.8 S.F. 4. F.A.R. ALLOWED ..................................... w........................ 4.25 5. F.A.R. PROVIDED.........................................................0... 3.15 f 6. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA ALLOWED ........... 597,969.9 S.F. 7. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA PROVIDED ............ 444,225 S.F. 8. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (15% GROSS LOT AREA) ..... 21,104 S.F. + 9. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (31.7%) ............................... 44,700 S.F. 10. BUILDING COVERAGE .............................................. 55,535 S.F. t 11. REQUIRED SETBACKS BY THE CITY OF MIAMI: REQUIRED PROVIDED SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE 20' 20' SIDE (NORTH) _ 17' 20' SIDE (SOUTH) 40' 54' BAYFRONT 50, 50' MAX ALLOWED PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT NO LIMIT 327' GARAGE 42' 9..6 - 78 Fji . PROJECT SUMMARY PAGE 2 B. BUILDING AREA COMPUTATIONS 1. TOTAL GROSS AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ........................607,682 S.F. :. =, 2. TOTAL NET APARTMENT AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES)........ 359,371 S.F. DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: — CIRCULATION 53,190 S.F. — SUPPORT SERVICES 6,525 S.F. — BALCONIES 46,477 S.F. LOBBY 3,865 S.F. i — FITNESS CENTER 5,325 S.F. — CLUB ROOM 2,725 S.F. BUSINESS CENTER 5,836 S.F. � • s:� 3. ......................................... TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS - 356 UNITS 4. TOTAL S.F. OF COMMERCIAL ........................................:....... 19971 S.F. r• TOTAL S.F. OF BUSINESS CENTER ........................................ .5,636 S.F. a 5. TOTAL GROSS S.F. FOR PARKING I GARAGE (4 FLOORS).......................................................... 163,457 S.F. 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ........................................... 358 PARKING SPACES (356 UNITS X 1 = 356) + (1971 SFf 1000 = 2 SPACES) OFF STREET LOADING REQUIRED ............................................ 4 BERTHS OFF STREET LOADING PROVIDED ........................................... 4 BERTHS TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (INCLUDING 10 HANICAPPED SPACES) ................. 544 PARKING SPACES 7. EXCESS PARKING .:................................................ 186 PARKING SPACES EXHIBIT C .J w UNIT TYPE TOTAL TOTAL LEVELS A As A" B C co D E F F' Flo G G' H I J UNIT S.F. BALL .F. LEVEL I 20131) 2028) LEVEL 2 1184 ■ 2214 • 1456 1224 6,138 2(16) 2(18) 186 ■ 152 • 156 215 169 2(1184) 2(1131) 2(128) LEVEL 3 ■ 2368 1228 ■ 2214 ■ 1456 1224 8�50 2(186) 2(16) 2(18) 1,141 ■ 312 186 ■ 152 ■ 156 215 211184J 211131) 2(128) 1224 8,550 LEVEL 4 ■ 2368 1228 ■ 2214 ■ 145(b 2(186) 2(16) 2(18) 1,141 ■ 312 186 ■ 152 ■ 156 215 3(1184) 211131) 4(128) • LEVEL 5 ■ 3552 ■ 2214 ■ 2912 118 125 13%, IIr636 3(i86) i 2(1b) 4118) 13 REC. DECK ■ 558 152 1 ■ 312 16 18 186 3(1184) 3(i131) 4(128) 12,048 X 19 TYP. LEVELS ■ 3552 ■ 3411 • 2912 118 13W • 228,912 3086) 3(16) 4(18) I360X 19 ■ 25,8402�48 (19 LEVELS) ■ 558 228 ■ 312 16 186 TYP. LEVELS 3(1184) 3(1131) 4(128) 1 X 1 (1 LEVELS . 3552 ■ 3411 ■ 2912 118 1395 . 84 EXTENDED 3(335) 3(16) 4611) 2,112 k ;l . 14,184 BALCONY) 1005 228 • 468 16 335 2(128) 2(1235) 20125) 2(1150) PENTHOUSE 1456 118 195 2410 - 2250 = 3500 11,249 LEVEL 32 2(IIl) 2(205) 2011) 2(205) • 234 16 16 • 410 234 ■ 410 2 359�11 d6 411 ` TOTAL 65 21 2 86 86 30 21 1 20 1 3 I 1 2 2 • y,Yt trilf, yr8.. 14, f J 9 _ ti rtfl`/t' �"q�'wJ��lj.�fl t� �.� •_ G S WALTER J. FOEMAN City Clerk fit# of C tautt G,(Y OF,y ,93 Z�1 F CESAR H. ODIO City Manager February 16, 1996 The New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2655 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, FL 33133 RE: MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT Dear Mr. Helfman: The City of Miami Commission, at its meeting of January 25, 1996, passed and adopted Resolution No. 96-76, and requested the City Clerk to transmit said instrument to you. Attached hereto, please find the above -cited Resolution, which is self-explanatory. Respectfully submitted, jf'�fJ/1j'J� � ( Walter J. Leman City Clerk f Enc. a/s qI -?19 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330708/Miami, Ft. 33233/(305) 250-5360/FAX: (305) 858-1610 r Stephen J. Helfman PLANNING FACT SHEET P'Zm3 REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit, for a residential apartment tower located at 1111 So. Bayshore Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office) PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit, pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, for the development of a 32 story apartment tower containing 356 residential units with ancillary retail and office components - to be located at 1111 South Bayshore Drive in Downtown Miami. VOTE: Pending action on 1/17/96. January 17, 1996 Item f 1 Page 1 96- '�S .M ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL 1111 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE The Department of Community Planning and Revitalization is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit for the Yacht Club at Brickell Project to be located at approximately 1111 So. Bayshore Drive with the conditions specified herein. The project as proposed, will require a Major Use Special Permit due to the fact that it consists of over 200 dwelling units and over 500 parking spaces. See project description and accompanying applications for specific details. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Yacht Club at Brickell Project is proposed to be located at 1111 South Bayshore Drive; within the SD-5 Brickell Avenue Area Office -Residential District in Downtown Miami. The project as proposed will consist of a high- rise rental residential apartment tower with office and retail space. The development consists of a single parcel of land with a net lot area 2.41 acres and a gross lot area of 3.23 acres. The Yacht Club at Brickell will have 356 apartment units located in one tower 32 stories high and a four level parking structure. A 1,971 sq. ft. retail area and a 5,836 sq. ft. office area will be provided in the first five levels of the tower. In addition, a 2,725 sq. ft. club room, a 5,325 sq. ft. fitness center and a 3,865 sq. ft. lobby, all located in the first five floors will be provided for the residents of the complex. The retail area and business center will be available for the use of the public. There will also be a walk along Biscayne Bay which will provide benches, lighting and safety features. The tower will have 607,682 adjusted gross square feet. Parking, as previously stated will be available on levels one through four, providing 544 spaces including 10 s aces for the handicapped. Floors two (2) through five (5) will provide one (1� and two (2) bedroom apartments and floors six (6) to penthouse (PH) will also include three (3) bedroom units. The amenities which are being provided to the tenants include a swimming pool, whirlpool, tennis court, racquetball court, a health club and several multipurpose spaces located throughout the first five floors. Amenities available to the public, as well as the tenants, include the walk along Biscayne Bay, the business center and retail areas. 96- 78 } lu x ANALYSIS The Brickell Point project has been designed with the goal of maximizing the property's location on Biscayne Bay. The residential tower will compliment the i Brickell Avenue Office District and offer magnificent views of Downtown Miami, Biscayne Bay and Miami Beach. The project consists of a wide, well integrated Baywalk which borders the project's eastern waterfront edge. The final submittal has been modified slightly from its original form in response to comments received by the City's Large Scale Development Committee at its meeting of 5/22/95. The Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of 5/16/95 approved the proposal as submitted with no comments. RECOMMENDATION- AND FINDINGS OF FACT The Department of Community Planning and Revitalization is recommending approval of the proposed development with the following conditions: i . 1. Meet all applicable building ,codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws 2. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation -of development and the permit or approval required of each; 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any,, have been incorporated into the PROJECT i security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations -are impractical; 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection - Services Department indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Fire Rescue and Inspection Services Department in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply; 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that The Yacht Club at Brickell has addressed all concerns of the said Department; 95- 78 0 F 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this Major Use Special Permit to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, it being understood that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow; 8. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity.* 9. Record a certified copy of the development order within 90 days of its effective date with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the development order runs with the land and is binding on the applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Record, within six (6) months of the effective date of the development order, a Unity of Title for the subject property. 11. The Dade County Archeologist shall be notified prior to any ground disturbing activities so that archeological monitoring can take place. The recommendation of approval of the proposed residential project is based on the following findings: 1) The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami; the project requires no variances, special exceptions, rezonings or changes in land use; the project is further compatible the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan which allows the mixture and intensity of the proposed development. 2) Upon compliance with the conditions outlined above, the project will be in compliance with all of the criteria as listed in Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000 and will be beneficial to the city by providing new housing opportunities within the Brickell area; also finding that, with the above specified modifications, the project will have no adverse effects on the surrounding area. s Note: The attached application for development approval also includes requested approval of the following: 1. A Class II Special Permit to allow development of the property which lies between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right of way as set forth in Section 1511 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, and 2. A Class I Special Permit 'to allow a permanent outdoor swimming pool, a whirlpool and other active recreation facilities. accessory to the development as set forth i'n Section 906.6 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, and 3. A request for waiver of any applicable Waterfront Charter requirements not being met by the final plans. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit(s) shall be considered sufficient for the two subordinate.requests'referenced above. 1 y g �-T7 I g / R e` n ."••-•.j ( -„"+ter �•i, .) o ';� �-o �1OI• n t� �' :� ° 41. 111 110 �e ST 5 s .�� . �. I I i r •� I E` 1 �L y s U °°oopo o° a "•"'-• $ 1 5 75 14 8 > 1Q4 a (.>C h ..J r • o 'J.c -` a°pDOD r � o ST m S.W. II ST. o°' w Qo-r;.. o f �•. I s h s z5= o s ' •'i'° C I T Y 5 a r e•T. s �: s s 85 /��.`�. o { O � .' >0 12 ST z� J s• s f °c I U 4 a S. �. J p r�'ER !-, pROAERT t to 90 89 n 00 p000a / WS/ 0 E� ie xn s .1 r: 5 s ra + it .=IUTHSIDE ELEM `c ° 0 2 s SCHOOL. w 13 S F, S.E. 13 ST. •� o° 5 o f o t o Q' L' e t r s i .• a ♦_ t.: o° s 8D/ V aa.♦.I+a'�' -40 a• •: �, a is a is it rJ a Is �J re rt if zn 100 ° o° Co%,IR sIr "• • .1,, o° r a Ie s, � �• ne a fe ,•� s � a n � a S.W. 14 SI " o° r z UCF 'U8 zq r: r, •Q t S ' 14 `, .. �� er e + e a . z ` tq ~ S L �►$ �r r j , Joe `t".�.. y • - F•• ., � ,♦ s it ° Rv Q ° 4,/ OR b �q 5t 5r1 ft 5o u2J 5 O AL e•*° �(r O.i `Jtw S.W.. 14 TERR. "C o C..> r»acra4zq U5e ° Lt a'lYr '. 'T/�� e9e6s♦ 99 `°° 0] f.seYrJ/4 TERgr: - `t• � b 4rf.S? krt� lah. '' 0 0 r,0 J` 1 lx 1J 5. N It �' O�,P¢ 50� ~an,,r"1 a • r n ,r is e I z, >' i I Q Lit h• o4 t' 1%i i t D RaEr I y .' T ° ® ♦ t b 'b'S 5a sSUB E COSTA StE78LA pmc lu i). rA } ` to , d e 3. `� a ,,` + , �, iE A re9 ? r t• 14 19 78 l� J s APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that.major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of ci.tywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall. be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and. may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly- for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section-1301.5.) I, Stephen J. Helfman, hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129 Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): 356.Unit Residential Apartment Building Preliminary Application - I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing. ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the' like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any 'required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). Pace 1 of 2 Y APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (continued) B. Other (Be specific): See attached supplemental documents 9. Fee of $22,977.85 , based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or s varianceshall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Buildin (s): Other Specify): Total: $22,977.85 Final Application I attach the fotiowing additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature Stephen J. Helfm1z qd gen !tame: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: i This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Sergio Kocriguez, Director. Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL CLASS I AND CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT This Major Use Special Permit Application incorporates a request for a Class I and Class II Special Permit. The Class I Special Permit request is to allow permanent outdoor swimming pools, whirlpools and other similar active recreation facilities accessory to the high rise residential development all in accordance with Section 906.6 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance and as depicted in the various drawings under Tab 7, Article III. The Class II Special Permit request is to allow the development of the property which lies between Biscayne Bay and South Bayshore Drive (first dedicated right-of-way) as required by Section 1511 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 96- 13 78 0 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF DADE } A Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally .appeared Stephen J. Helfman , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: ! 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, 1 submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real I t - property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on. the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full f and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. (Name) OF Stephen J . Helfman Sworn to and Subscribed before me this It day of NTH !rn er 19 orida 'A C s OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name New York Life Insurance Company r Mailing Address c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Weiss Serota S Helfman, P.A. Miami, Florica 33133 Telephone Number (305) 854-0800 Legal Description: ' See Exhibit °tA" Owner's Name Nailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Nailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description New York Life Insurance Company See attached Exhibit "Rig Heitman, sq. Weiss Serota 8 Helfman, P.A. ys ore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 96- EXHIBIT "A" All of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 84 at Page 24 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida less the south fifty (50) feet thereof. f r. EXHIBIT "B" The south fifty (50) feet of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" together with all of Tract "A" of "FORTE PROPERTIES SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 113 at Page 29 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. /7 96- 78 i . r DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP I. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A." Property is located north of S.E. 12 Street between South Bayshore Drive and Biscayne Bay with the street address of 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note:. City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect. in the subject matter of a. presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Owner of the Property is New York Life Insurance Company. New York Life Insurance Company is a mutual insurance company owned by all the policy holders. The Related Group of Florida, a general partnership, is a joint venture partner with New York. Life Insurance Company in the development of the Property. The Disclosure of Ownership for the Related Group of Florida is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 12, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. l See Exhibit "C." STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } Stephen J . Flelfman , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question tl, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership fora on behalf of the owner. �S SWORN TO AND SUBSCRla D before are this 1 5%_ day ofNovember, 19 95 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: (Name) Notary Public, State of Florida at Large 96- 7819 F 1• OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE -#-ZHU 1 The Related Group of Florida _ A Florida General Partnership General Partner — Related Florida, Ltd. 50.50% Limited Partner — Related General of Florida, Ltd. 49.50% ENTITY ENTITY Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited PartnershipCorporation General Partner — Related Florida, Inc. 1.00% Limited Partner — Jorge M. Perez 99.00% Related Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation Jorge M. Perez — 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez — President Marcelo A. Alvarez — Vice President Angel A. Hernandez — Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way — Penthouse Miami, Fl. 33145 (305)-460-9900 Related General of Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner —RCMP, Inc. 1.00% Limited Partner — The Related Companies, L.P. 99.00% Officers: Stephen M. Ross — President James Flood — Executive Vice President Susan J. McQuire — Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, M.Y. 100200 (212) 421-6333 Exhibit 111311 j 6 - 01!11/g8 11: 36 W�EIS S`ERQT Uj,F, ,, 1 .ro.aa tiaa�awa-ldy`+ r Moos 1. RCM INC. Sbar"dw. 7ho WWW Corapwdo, L.P. 100.00% 2. THE RELATED COMANIE.S, L.P. G erAnd Partner; The IWtod Realty Group, Inc. 1.00% Limited Farme n: SUR Fwxbg, L.P. 49.000% staphm M. Ross 11.765 % Six -Related Assaciaft LP. 11.765% Fbhe r.ANYC LialbW P'aron ship 11.70 % W NY, Ltd. 9.805% Seventh Gnm AsaadWn, L.F 3.920% Andrew D. Augen6lick 0.930% i i i!! E f i i EXHIBIT "C" The south fifty (50) feet of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" together with all of Tract "A" of "FORTE PROPERTIES.SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 113 at Page 29 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. I � l t ; ARCHITECT: ACCOUNTANT: •C . �t5i�� CONTRACT PURCHASER: LEGAL: TRAFFIC ENGINEERS: THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Cohen Freedman Encinosa Architects, P.A. 8603 South Dixie Highway, Suite 205 Miami, Florida 33143 669-9383 Mr. Larry Freedman Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Certified Public Accountants One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33133 374-1574 Mr. Kris Weimerskirch New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 854-0800 The Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33128 460-9900 Mr. Roberto Rocha Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 854-0800 Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. Bermello-Ajamil & Partners 2601 South Bayshore Drive, loth Floor Miami, Florida 33133 859-2050 Mr. Rob Curtis RESOLUTION PAB A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING --------- OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL, A.HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL APPARTMENT TOWER, TO BE LOCATED AT 1111 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE IN DOWNTOWN MIAMI. ATTEST: Jack Luft, Director Department of'Conmunity Planning and Revitalizaton ZS 95- rol '4�1 1,; r�. TABLE OF CONTENTS THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL November,1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Introduction B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit C. Class I and Class II Special Permit Request D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principals G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 46 H. City of Miami Future Land Use Map I. Aerial and Location Map J. Ownership List K. Project Data Sheet and Summary ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study } ARTICLE III. Tab 1 Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5 Tab 6 Tab 7 Supporting Documents f Survey of Property j Site Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Site Utility Study i Economic Impact Study } i Minority Construction Employment Plan t Architectural and Landscape Drawings r ARTICLE I PROJECT INFORMATION THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Introduction B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit C. Class I and Class II Special Permit Request D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory 7 p of Project Principals G. City Of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 46 H. Aerial and Location Maps I. City of Miami Future Land Use Map J. Ownership List K. Project Data Sheet and Summary THE.YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL INTRODUCTION The Yacht Club at Brickell is a 32 story 356 luxury high rise residential apartment development (the "Development") located at Y 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129. The property is zoned SD-5 (Brickell Avenue Area Office -Residential District). The Property is designated Office in the City's Future Land Use Map. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (the "Plan") allows high density multi -family residential development in the Office designation. Therefore, the proposed Development is consistent with the Plan and is compatible with other high rise developments in the area. APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that.major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall, be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of. the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and, may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section-1301.5.) I, Stephen J. Helfman, hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129 Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): 356 Unit Residential Apartment Building Preliminary Application* I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing. ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest: form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan desiona- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. S. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any 'required variances, t special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for G a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). �5— '78 Pace 1 of 2 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): See attached supplemental documents 9. Fee of $22,977.85 , based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Buildin (s): Other Specify): Total: $22,977.85 Final Application _ I attach the fotiowing additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature Stephen J Heifmlz 4gen��� Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Sergio Rodri guez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: Page 2 of 2 96-- 78 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL CLASS I AND CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT This Major Use Special Permit Application incorporates a All request for a Class I and Class II Special Permit. The Class I Special Permit request is to allow permanent outdoor swimming pools, whirlpools and other similar active recreation facilities accessory to the high rise residential development all in accordance with Section 906.6 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and as depicted in the various drawings under Tab 7, Article III. The Class II Special Permit request is to allow the development of the property which lies between Biscayne Bay and South Bayshore Drive first dedicated right-of-way) ( aced right of way) as required by Section 1511 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 96- 78 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP I. Legal description and street address of subject teal property: See attached Exhibit "A." Property is located north of S.E. 12 Street between South Bayshore Drive and Biscayne Bay with the street address of 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a. presentation, request or 4; petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Owner of the Property is New York Life Insurance Company. New York Life Insurance Company is a mutual insurance company owned by all the policy holders. The Related Group of Florida, a general partnership, is a joint venture partner with New York Life Insurance Company in the development of the Property. The Disclosure of ownership for the Related Group of Florida is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) arced by any party listed in answer to question 12, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. See Exhibit "C." MW ATTORNEY FkdWHERStep n J. He STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } Stephen J. Helfman being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question tl, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. (Name) . SWORN TO AND SU®SCRI before me this pj, }; day ofNovember, 19 95 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 7 r EXHIBIT "All A All of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 84 at Page 24 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida less the south fifty (50) feet SA thereof. 96- 78 •� a OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ENTITY The Related Group of Florida A Florida General Partnership General Partner — Related Florida, Ltd. Limited Partner — Related General of Florida, Ltd. ENTITY Y Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited PartnershipCorporation General Partner — Related Florida, Inc. Limited Partner — Jorge M. Perez Related Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation Jorge M. Perez — 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez — President Marcelo A. Alvarez — Vice President Angel A. Hernandez — Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way — Penthouse Miami, FI.33145 (305)-460-9900 ENTITY Related General of Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner —RCMP, Inc. Limited Partner — The Related Companies, L.P. Officers: �c Stephen M. Ross — President James Flood —Executive Vice President Susan J. McQuire — Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, N.Y. 100200 / (212) 421-5333 50,50% 49.50% 1.00% 99.00% 1.00% 99.00% Exhibit "B" 9 6 — 78 EXHIBIT "C" r The south fifty (50) feet of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" together with all of Tract "A" of "FORTE PROPERTIES SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 113 at Page 29 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 4 t 96`". 78 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF DADE } to Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally .appeared Stephen J . Heifman , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modifica- tion of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the the real property of which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. rn A ) (Name) Stephen J . Heifman Sworn t and Subscribed before me this day of No er 19r orida a c e - 78 a �xq Fri OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Weiss Serota S Helfman, P.A. Mailing Address mi, Floricia 33133 Telephone Number (305) 854-0800 Legal Description: See Exhibit "A" Owner's Name _ Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: • Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description New York Life Insurance Company See attached Exhihit uRo Hellman, sq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A.- 2665 SUM ays ore Urive, Mite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 J Street Address Legal Description { Legal Description Street Address 96- 78 j�, EXHIBIT "A" All of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 84 at Page 24 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida less the south fifty (50) feet thereof. 96 - 78 i EXHIBIT "B" The south fifty (50) feet of Tract "A" of "BAYSHORE GARDENS" together with all of Tract "A" of "FORTE PROPERTIES SUBDIVISION" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 113 at Page 29 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 96- 78 it- ARCHITECT: ACCOUNTANT: A a, OWNER: CONTRACT PURCHASER: LEGAL: TRAFFIC ENGINEERS: a �rt THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Cohen Freedman Encinosa Architects, P.A. 8603 South Dixie Highway, Suite 205 Miami, Florida 33143 669-9383 Mr. Larry Freedman Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Certified Public Accountants One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33133 374-1574 Mr. Kris Weimerskirch New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 854-0800 The Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33128 460-9900 Mr. Roberto Rocha Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 854-0800 Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. Bermello-Ajamil & Partners 2601 South Bayshore Drive, 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 859-2050 Mr. Rob Curtis 96- 78 N II III _ iie u } ........... XMI O Z-7 lly . i6lom M a AIM S W` V 1 / SUBJECT" PROPERTY 96- 78 I i I f' Florida Real Estate Decisions, Inc. acayne Blvd. Suite 31 Miami, F1. 33181 (305)757-6884 3195 N. Powerline Bd. Suite 104 Pompano Beach, Pl. 33069 June 12, 1995 ( 305) 942-0344 180 St. David's way West Palm Beach, F1. 33414 City of Miami (407)798-4423 Hearing Boards Division Planning, Building and Zoning Division 275 N.W. 2 Street, Room 226 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Property Owners List Within 375 feet of: BAYSHORE GARDENS PB 84-24 TRACT A 1111 S BAYSHORE DR FORTE PROPERTIES SUB PB 113-29 TRACT A 1155 S BAYSHORE DR This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners* within 375 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on file in the Dade County Tax Assessor's office. Sincerelv. �. t RNH/lv *PER REQUEST BY CLIENT, BEEN NOTIFIED. ONLY THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS HAVE cc: Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. WEISS SEROTA & HELFMAN, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 0210 030 105 10 801 SE BAYSHORE DR MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 LOTS 8 THRU 13 LYG E OF SE BAYSHORE DR & SUBMERGED LAND LYG ELY & ADJ EXTNDG TO BLKHD/L BLK 104 LESS THE FOUR AMBASSADOR CONDO TOWERS ONE THRU FOUR N/A/W 01-4207-001 0210 030 105 40 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-117 LOT 11 LESS N43.29FT & LOTS 12 & 13 LYG W OF SE BAYSHORE DR BLK 104 A/K/A PHASE 2 LOT SIZE 91299 SQ FT 0210 030 109 00 999 BRICKELL AVE MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 LOTS 14 & 15 LYG WLY OF SE BAYSHORE DR BLK 104 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR U S PROPERTIES INC 1925 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129-1737 EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR SOC OF US 6600 N ANDREWS AVE SUITE 160 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33309 UCCELLO IMMOBILIEN GMBH 999 BRICKELL AVE SUITE 508 MIAMI FL 33131-3041 0210 030 111 00 INVERSORA BANCO INDUSTRIAL 1101 BRICKELL AVE DE VENEZUELA C A MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 1101 BRICKELL AVE LOTS 16-17 & 18 LYG W OF SE BAY MIAMI FL 33131-3104 SHORE DR BLK 104 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 0210 030 112 00 BRICKSEA CORP 1111 BRICKELL AVE % INVERCAME USA INC MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 2655 LEJEUNE RD #612 W400FT LOT 19 BLK 104 CORAL GABLES FL 33134 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 0210 030 112 30 BRICKSEA CORP % INVERCAME USA INC MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 2655 LEJEUNE RD #612 THAT PORT N25FT LOT 19 LYG WLY OF CORAL GABLES FL 33134 SE BAYSHORE DR LESS W400FT LOT SIZE 3718 SQUARE FEET �Y FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 96- 78 1 0210 030 115 00 BRICKSEA CORP 157 SE 12 ST % INVERCAME USA INC MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 2655 LEJEUNE RD #612 E15OFT OF W450FT LOT 20 CORAL GABLES FL 33134 BLK 104 LOT SIZE 16200 SQUARE FEET 0210 030 116 00 BRICKSEA CORP 125 SE 12 ST % INVERCAME USA INC MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 E175FT OF W30OFT OF LOT 20 2655 LEJEUNE RD CORAL GABLES FL #612 33134 BLK 104 LOT SIZE 18900 SQUARE FEET g; 0210 050 302 00 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS 1275 SE BAYSHORE DR P 0 BOX 0107011 MIRADO COURT A RE -SUB PB 14-44 MIAMI FL 33101 N1/2 LOT B LESS S50FT & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L LOT SIZE 19242 SQ FT 0210 050 401 00 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 010711 HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 MIAMI FL 33101 LOTS 1 TO 4 INC & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LESS R/W FOR SO BAY SHORE DR LOT SIZE 64186 SQ FT 0210 050 402 00 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS } P 0 BOX 010711 HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 MIAMI FL 33101 LOTS 5 6 & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LESS R/W FOR SO BAY SHORE DR �. LOT SIZE 35057 SQ FT rs 0210 050 403 00 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS t P O BOX 010711 HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 MIAMI FL 33101 PRIVATE LANE S OF LOT 6 & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LOT SIZE 3683 SQ FT 1 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 4: 2 96- 78 0210 050 416 00 190 SE 12 TER HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOT A BLK 3 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 120 0210 050 417 00 186 SE 12 TER HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOT B BLK 3 73R2418 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 120 0210 050 418 00 170 SE 12 TER HIBISCUS PL PB 3-110 LOTS 1-2-3 LESS N5FT & IOFT STRIP OF LAND MARKED PRIVATE ALLEY LYG S OF & ADJ TO LOTS 1-2-3 BLK 3 73R2419 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 125 0210 050 425 00 HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOFT STRIP S OF LOTS A & B BLK 3 LOT SIZE SITE VALUE 0210 050 501 00 1201 BRICKELL AVE 1.679 AC MUTUAL OF OMAHA SUB PB 84-57 TRACT A LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 4138 035 001 00 1001 S BAYSHORE DR THE RENAISSANCE PB 118-19 TR A LOT SIZE 80150 SQ FT CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133-5504 FOTIS A TAQUIS &W YOLANDA % C SUAREZ 170 SE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3210 FOTIS A TAQUIS &W YOLANDA % C SUAREZ 170 SE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3210 DONALD VICTOR SHAFFNER 6751 CYPRESS RD#106 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33317 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS CO PO BOX 711 MIAMI FLA 33101 BRICKELL BAY TOWER LTD 1001 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131-4900 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 9 S e 78 3 4138 040 001 00 BRICKELL SHORE TOWER PB 122-25 TR A LOT SIZE .66 AC M/L 4207 001 000 10 THE FOUR AMBASSADORS CONDO PH I THRU IV DESC MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 THAT PORT OF LOTS 8 THRU 13 LYG E OF SE BAYSHORE DR & SUBMERGED LAND LYG ELY & ADJ EXTNDG TO BLKHD/L BLK 104 AS DESC IN OR 11121-1614 .rJ BRICKSEA CORP % INVERCAME USA INC 2655 LEJEUENE RD #612 CORAL GABLES FL.33134 FOUR AMBASSADORS ASSOC INC 801 S BAYSHORE DR BOX 8 MIAMI FL 33131-2942 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC.. IIII (I 1/ 1 1NF � 01 /O S l %V 7� sa 5 T s E. V/T sr. S 4 zz ... _. _ /Ol ' 9 ^ 7? J� 5. 1 516. S= is i C 9 5 /l ' !T .4 n feq rc 4 L—" /s S /Oa S rpD ti° 1 57 r SE a/ S'' r S 8 fo !SO re rp 9; S L• Z - T G,a,�Jo Su •J. S -i/s rl 0 / 104 O �S h THE alas, RY,r•�yoR 'art/ Hpt'yJ Subject SE W FC7RTE MUT PROPEPTIEr /3Ty 3 r i_• t IO tom• f /ao L:l U. "z / 4 / C. p s htr 'sr TR rr r r 9 zz /r,ati 13 r• -I 1g y ST 'ro' x A ? ra A r c IJV /4 M D( p rJ1SoI/fJlf , FORiE fLA r 1, 4 sr SJ: I4rN TEPR t° ;.. �f TRACT v a it ' S a 9 Sy +1 _ P • K iy u ' � ar r° lq TOW, COSTA 9 LLA. \ S(�g ��. DEVEL�MEN1' � �• � ' t T,R', a SUB �107-14)14 a CK) CC) 1 BRIODUl BAY TOWER LTD 1001 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131-4900 DONALD VICTOR SHAFFNER 6751 CYPRESS RDp106 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33317 FOUR AMBASSADORS ASSOC INC 801 S BAYSHORE DR BOX 8 fi MIAMI FL 33131-2942 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 010711 MIAMI FL 33101 { r., r� 3 i i BRICESEA CORP % INVERCAME USA INC 2655 1EJE1 RD #612 CORAL GABLES FL 33134 EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR SOC OF US 6600 N ANDREWS AVE SUITE 160 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33309 INVERSORA BANCO INDUSTRIAL DE VENEZUELA C A 1101 BRICEELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131-3104 U S PROPERTIES INC 1925 BRICRELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129-1737 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133-5504 FOTIS A TAQUIS 6W YOLANDA % C SUAREZ 170 BE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3210 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS CO PO BOX 711 MIAMI FLA 33101 UCCELLO IMMOBILIEN GMBH 999 BRICrXLL AVE SUITE 508 MIAMI FL 33131-3041 PROJECT SUMMARY FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT NO. 9513 NOVEMBER, 1995 THE FOLLOWING DATA SUMMARIZES THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED AT THE BRICKELL APARTMENT PROJECT PROPERTY, PURSUANT TO SD-5 ZONING GUIDELINES: A. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ;. 1. STREET FRONTAGE: SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE ........... IRREGULAR 2. NET LOT AREA .................................................... 104,976.6 S.F. 3. GROSS LOT AREA .............................................. 140,698.8 S.F. 4. F.A.R. ALLOWED............................................................... 4.25 5. F.A.R. PROVIDED............................................................. 3.15 6. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA ALLOWED ........... 597,969.9 S.F. 7. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA PROVIDED 444,225 S.F. 8. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (15% GROSS LOT AREA) ..... 21,104 S.F. 9. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (31.7%) ............................... 44,700 S.F. 10. BUILDING COVERAGE ......... 55,535 S.F. i 11. REQUIRED SETBACKS BY THE CITY OF MIAMI: REQUIRED PROVIDED SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE 20' 20' SIDE (NORTH) 17' 20' SIDE (SOUTH) 40' 54' BAYFRONT 50' 50' MAX ALLOWED PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT NO LIMIT 327' GARAGE 42' 96" 78 PROJECT SUMMARY PAGE 2 B. BUILDING AREA COMPUTATIONS 1. TOTAL GROSS .AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ........................607#682 S.F. 2. TOTAL NET APARTMENT AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ........ 359,371 S.F. DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: — CIRCULATION 53,190 S.F. — SUPPORT SERVICES 6,525 S.F. — BALCONIES 46,477 S.F. — LOBBY 3,865 S.F. — FITNESS CENTER 5,325 S.F. — CLUB ROOM 2,725 S.F. — BUSINESS CENTER 5,836 S.F. 3. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS ......................................... 356 UNITS 4. TOTAL S.F. OF COMMERCIAL ........................................ :...... 6 19971 S.F. TOTAL S.F. OF BUSINESS CENTER ........................................ .5,836 S.F. 5. TOTAL GROSS S.F. FOR PARKING GARAGE (4 FLOORS).......................................................... 163,457 S.F. 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ........................................... 358 PARKING SPACES (356 UNITS X 1 = 356) + (1971 SF/1000 = 2 SPACES) ; OFF STREET LOADING REQUIRED .........................................,o. 4 BERTHS OFF STREET LOADING PROVIDED ........................................... 4 BERTHS TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (INCLUDING 10 HANICAPPED SPACES) ................. 544 PARKING SPACES wy 7. EXCESS PARKING .................................................. 186 PARKING SPACES UNIT TYPE UNIT # TYPE A/C SQ. FT. BALCONY SQ. FT. GROSS SQ. FT. REMARKS A 2 5R/2B 1184 le* 1310 CORNER A' 2 5R/25 I184 335 Isis CORNER (EXTENDED BALCJ A" 2 BR/25 1228 186 1414 COMER (3rd., 4th LVS.) B 2 15R/215 1131 i(o 1213 INTERIOR SPLIT C i BR/IB 128 l8 wro INTERIOR Cl I BR/IB 128 Ili 804 INTERIOR (EXTENDED BALCJ D 1 BR/IB 118 16 854 ADJACENT TO 3 BR E 1 15WI5 IF5 i6 801 RECREATION DECK F 3 BR/25 13W IS& Is81 CORNER F' 3 5R/25 13s5 335 1130 CORNER (EXTENDED BALCJ F" .2 5R/25 1224 215 14ss CORNER (2nd., 3rc1., 4th LVSJ co I BR/IB ills ir'o 854 PENTHOUSE (INTERIOR) G1 1 BR/IB ls5 '16 8i1 PENTHOUSE (INTERIOR) H 21 5R/25 1235 205 1440 PENTHOUSE (CORNER) 1 2 BRJ25 1125 11*1 1242 PENTHOUSE ( INTERIOR) J 3 BRJ25 1150 205 Is55 PENTHOUSE (CORNER) 96-- 78 UNIT TYPE LEVELS A A' All B C C' D E F LEVEL I 20131) 2026) LEVEL 2 1184 = 2214 = 145ro 2(16) 2(1$) 186 = 152 = 156 2(1184) 2(1131) 2028) LEVEL 3 = 23ro8 1228 2214 145(o 2086) 2((o) 208) =312 186 =152 =15ro 2(1184) 2(1131) 2026) LEVEL 4 = 2368 1228 = 2214 = 1456 208(o) 2(1(o) 2(18) = 312 186 = 152 15(o 30184) 2(1131) 4028) LEVEL 5 3552 2214 = 2B12 11$ -125 13s:' REC. DEC4C 3(186) 2(1(o) 4(18) = 558 = 152 = 312 1(o 18 184, 3(1184) 30131) 4026) TYP. LEVELS = 3552 = 3411 = 2912 118 139: (le LEVELS) 3(186) 3(lro) 4(18) = 558 = 226 312 1(o 1$�Y TYP• LEVELS (1 LEVELS - EXTENDED -BALCONY) 3(1184) = 3552 30131) = 3411 4(128) = 2SI2 11$ 3(335) = 1005 3(16) = 228 4(111)` = 468 1(0 PENTHOUSE 2(128) _ 1456 1: LEVEL 32 2011).�� = 234 1 P TOTAL r05 21 2 86 86 30 21 ; TOTAL UNITS = 35ro UNITS TOTA G' I H I I I J II UN TT SLF. I BALC SLF. # 1335 IX 335 2f 1235) 2f 11251 20150) 116 195 = 2410 = 22501 = 3500 2(205) 2011) 2(205) 16 16 =410 =234 =410 1 3 E 1 2 2 2 15, Y1 F (0,136 169 8,550 8,550 E1,636 1,362 12,045 X 19 228,912 1,3(o0 X 19 = 25,840 12048 X 1 = 84,336 2,112 X I = 14,184 11,249 359,311 1 46,411 96- 78 fr` i ARTICLE N PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT ARTICLE II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study 96- 78 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development or activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. The Yacht Club at Brickell is a rental apartment development located at 1111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida lying between South Bayshore Drive and Biscayne Bay, north of S.E. 12 Street. The property has a gross lot area of approximately 3.23 acres and is currently developed with an unoccupied 12 story office building. This building will be demolished prior to commencing the development. The Yacht Club at Brickell will have approximately 356 rental units. The development will consist of one tower of 32 stories with a -separate parking structure. Among the amenities provided there will be a shoreline walkway with a bay observation deck and gazebo, one swimming pool, a lap pool, sauna, tennis court, a club room, fitness center, an office area and a small retail area to serve the needs of the tenants and users of the building. The project has been extensively landscaped as shown on the Landscape Plans included under Tab 7, Article III. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 7, Article III. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping area, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. A location map and an aerial map indicating the surrounding streets and properties are included in Article I. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site Plan is located under Tab 2, Article III. 96— 78 (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 1, Article III. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing structures located on the property is shown on the survey located under Tab 1, Article III. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic: A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 3, Article III. Essentially, vehicular access for users will be from South Bayshore Drive. The internal circulation ramps are located within the property and will provide an efficient and secure access for the users. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located on the 4 story parking structure immediately north of the building. Loading/delivery areas are provided at the first level. The project contains four loading bays, with sizes and clearance in compliance with Code. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown on various drawings under Tab 7, Article III. Amenities include a recreation deck with swimming pool and spa, a 25 meter lap pool, tennis court, passive landscape areas, a fitness center containing an exercise room and club room. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscape and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 through L-4 under Tab 7, Article III. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by the City of Miami or by a private company. 96- 78 tfY L (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. All utilities shall be underground. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in Site Utility Study located under Tab 4, Article III. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. (1) The various permitted uses. Land Use Parking Garage and Residential Tower Building Footprint: 96,097 gross s.f. _ 140,698.8 gross s.f. = 68.316 (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by structures is 68.3% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above. The minimum total number of Offstreet parking spaces required is 358. The total number of spaces provided is 544. The offstreet loading area show on Sheet A.la., Tab 7, Article III, provides 4 loading berths on the north side of the building. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential tower will consist of 356 apartment units. The residential project density per acre will be as follows: 356 residential dwelling units _ 3.23 gross acres = 110 dwelling units per gross acre 356 residential dwelling units _ 2.41 net acres = 148 dwelling units per net acre (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how much common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. 96- 78 (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study under Tab 4, Article III. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use with 356 apartments. The exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type are included in the Project Data Sheet and Summary under Article I. Typical floor plans for residential units are included in Sheets A-6, A.6a and A.6b under Tab 7, Article III. (j) Plans for signs, it any. An identification sign will be located along South Bayshore Drive. The design will be compatible with the area and in compliance with the required regulations. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. See Sheets L-1 through L-4 under Tab 7, Article III. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including Y location and general description of buildings for such use. a a Recreational facilities provided will include a recreation deck with swimming pool and spa, a 25 meter_ lap pool, a club room, and a fitness center with an exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities. It will also include an administration area which will offer assistance to tenants. A small commercial area with a grocery convenience center will also be included for the use of the tenants and visitors. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations and sections depicting the architectural � - 78 character of the Building are included in Sheets A-7 through A-11 and are located under Tab 7, Article III. A rendering showing the entire project is also included under Tab 7, Article III. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special A Permit are provided in Article I. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 1, Article III. 1 (d) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (c) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. (e) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-5- Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office and is shown on the land use map located in Article I. (f) Analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adopted comprehensive neighborhood plan. The future land use element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designates the property Office. The Office designation allows high density multi -family residential development. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the City's plan. The Traffic Impact Analysis and Site Utility Study (Tab 3 and Tab 4 of Article III, respectively) indicate adequate infrastructure capacity to meet the impact of this development. MR 11 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 7, Article III. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. j This project conforms to the SD-5 zoning for this property. The City's future land use map designation is consistent with the proposed development. The applicant is also requesting a Class I Special Permit for the permanent location of swimming pools and spa. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted on the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 3, Article III. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 5, Article III. (c) A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 356 apartment units. The rental price of the apartments will range from $1000 to $2500 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. 96- 78 ki Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. The ultimate design of the building will incorporate energy conservation measures when applicable. (e) Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. (f) Environmental Zone. The Property is not located within an Environmental Preservation District. (g) Dade County Shoreline Development Review. This project has been recommended for approval by the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 96-- IS ji ARTICLE III I SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. Tab 1 Tab 2 .s Tab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5 Tab 6 Tab 7 { z F THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL Supporting Documents Survey of Property Site Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Site Utility Study Economic Impact Study Minority Construction Employment Plan Architectural and Landscape Drawings TAB r. �• is { ! • ! s? � f x / •0 � }}fit : ' , �� "' 7. -' u` • / 7 » P,: J„> 6/aGYNf 4�°"��`'w• _� sou>" `� a C�� J ,t°t. ' \\ •*� O d I a~•l ifJf co[n>oN rAy Zy �` / "` ' � ti m" •b• � q> �� '°`r� '�` - - / � day � I � # .V „e ,�' ,J f o ' .~ d J D . ,' s / `iy dt ° L,� ' %>o•,, v.« r,..� 4- 41 141 It � � fi�ola' ds'� e' a r>r r>o ; S(�` � � 1 / ��r[>oaa�� a�a�,{` r.r..o /'• ` �' E J • �J �r ,� ......�.+...�._ � .. ," OV g�. o �'°, `� tT enrr ~ �Y � 1J`rF�i' S `/ i::`�uai� \� y l� •' \ la � ^� .�.._.. A• � � n �., ,31 +rye- a e • ) - _� _ 7i ,\ < £ > a< ° . •,.e � �1 : �� i°e;�l � � � --.. _ ,,,°f.� ` tF / /a ; t ti i" a / _ ...� `. +L' 2d ': S'. ;'A C 'j0 '^ "''• Wiz... .M r� L.' / .... _..n o �•.,. a �' i ", _ �� ' �N,< •N �'a._.�io.._ __.—. ,+ <..� c,.v ' ' � ''a�.� ^J !'�': i .r •' ?a,ar / ,�yv `" ./1�'-'�� �.. ur„mm,P , ...T��v� j(/f`_m �y � ip0: .i , i ��lt• .. �.� � — '. �a. `" � � O °' �%• . ..r>°i j' �' .u,.>cuA, `_.--e. __... 1 '�r�w+ 4c"l r:on i' .. .1�"/ '1% �' e�� �.... �... . �, D~ , •v >er» � - -'�_ ,�_" ri; 'TOo>y i� \�� iP �' ... � t './ -. ,��-....�--..0 6q ABTA/A[SN LAND Jl TL< SURVEY � aw• a.ocw,<. ,.e a,rn°s •^A„n .....r ••••• e «,r.w.c •.ca• n+. .rv<..e,.r a� cwre" . o aar <.arawm em. •,... • .. oa�•�••'�,�vo,.,,.o-v 'T. 11M..[w<R cy „<e � /•e.<qr, a w ,ry .T> /°<.o N/Meq c, r, a/ - rnw,r/,. ,. A, rN, „ • ,r •Vr — __—w_— — >+<.. ,. ' C ce,?<A c/qe e•,•„Y _ ^'• , a... ew..r .vw.o. '- ••'�•~ n.°e wa•.o ,.<+ eTu c.es e,ve u ` ""' �o./r---___ /J,� ---_." _� .... «Q O THE RELATED GROUP OF FLOR/DA FORTEFROPERT/ES SUBDIVISION �•� '�"- BOUNDARYAND ®_ AND B/SCAYNE GARDENS TOPOGRAPN/C SURVEY CITY OF MMUL DADS COONTY, r20R/DA t i 1 t i d M , S z 4 ze fYdvit .. 0,27 'ACRES — t1,764.2 S.F. 2.41 ACRES 104,976,E S. 'ITE DATA TONING: SO-5 I. LAND AREA: band area within property lines 104,976.1 Additional area 90'-0* into biscayae bay 23 0111 .6.2' it 90' Addltlonal axes, to mid -point s, bayshars dr. irregular x 35, t t 764 Total Area 140.698.i 3. FUOR AREA AL WMt (4.25) 597.969.9 3. FLOOR AREA INDICATED: (444,225 - 140,898.8) - 3.12 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS: level 1 0 units level 2 8 units hovels 3.4 16 units Iavel 5 (roe. deck) 12 units levels 8 thru 31 (26 tin.) 312 units level 32 (ph) 10 units TOTAL 356 units 5. PARKING REQUIRED: 356 apt. units O 1 car/unit 358 care 1971 s.f. retell O l car/1000 S.f. 2 care Total can required 358 can Total cars provided 544 can Handicapped spaces required 10 cars Handicapped spaces provided 10 cars Off street loading required 4 berths Off street loading provided 4 berths n. PARKING INDICATED: lot level 108 cars 2nd level 142 can 3rd level 142 cars 4th level 152 cars Total Cars 344 cars 8. SETBACK REQUIREM F —1 cn'Y 0 BUILDING SETBACKS: REQUIREB: PROVIDED: FRONT: - 20' SIDE WORTHY 17, 20. SIDE (SOUTH): 40' 54. BAYFRONT: 5o. 50• 7. LMSCAPED OPEN SPACE: REQUBtgD: PROVIDED: lblt (21,104 S.F.) 31.7% (44.700 S.F.) S. BUDDING COVERAGE: 55.535 S.P. prop" line NOTE: �' 1 see sheets A.1a, A.1b, A.1c, A.1d, for 1:20 scale lower level plans \ c. 1 i ' 1 11 > ' Yt �L lv I 4.� O;' .(A T m N. �t a O ,tt , 1,: � 0.40 ACRES - 17 424 S F FIRST LEVEL PLAN ELEV. 4'-U" _ +t4'-a NGVD SCALE: ' C 90' tv THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL 111AFFIC EWACT STUDY Submitted to The City of Miami s Prepared by Hermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. November 11, 1995 �im 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background .......................................... I 1.2 Study Area Identification ...................................... 1 1.3 Study Purpose..............................................I EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 2.1 Roadway Network ........................................... 1 2.2 Public Transportation ......................................... 4 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Signal Timing Plans .................................. 4 3.2 Existing Traffic Counts • 4 3.3 Existing Roadway Level of Service .............................. 4 ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONS WITH FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 4.1 Future Background Traffic ..................................... 7 4.2 Planned and Programmed Transportation Improvements ............. 7 4.3 Level of Service with Future Background Traffic ................... 7 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 5.1 Project Trip Generation ...................................... 10 5.2 Project Trip Distribution ..................................... 10 5.3 Future Background and Project Traffic .......................... 11 5.4 Level of Service with Future Background and Project Traffic ........ 11 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................II 96- 78 [in Figure 1.1 Figure 2.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 '1 Figure 5.4 } LIST OF FIGURES ProjectStudy Area Map ....................................... 2 Roadway Network in the Study Area ............................ 3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................... 5 Existing Level of Service ..................................... 6 PM Peak Hour Volumes with Future Background Traffic ............ 8 Level of Service with Future Background Traffic ................... 9 Project Trip Distribution (Inbound Traffic) ....................... 12 Project Trip Distribution (Outbound Traffic) ..................... 13 PM Peak Hour Volumes with Future Background and Project Traffic .. 14 Level of Service with Future Background and Project Traffic ........ 15 ii 96-- 78 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background Brickell Apartment is a high-rise apartment complex proposed in the Brickell area. It 4Z consists of 32 stories with 356 apartment units and 550 parking spaces. The building will be constructed on a 3.21-acre lot at the corner of S. Bayshore Drive and SE 12th Street. The apartment is expected to be open in the third quarter of 1997. 1.2 Study Area Figure 1.1 shows the study area for this traffic impact analysis. The study area is bounded by S. Bayshore Drive on east, SE 15th Road on south, Brickell Avenue on west and SE 8th } Street on north. 1.3 Study Purpose The traffic study was conducted within the study area to identify the existing transportation facilities, to analyze the current operational characteristics, and to project the impact of the proposed development on traffic conditions at signalized intersection and along roadway arterials. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 2.1 Roadway Network Figure 2.1 shows the roadway network in the study area. Brickell Avenue is a four -lane divided roadway with raised median. So is the SE 8th Street east of Brickell Avenue. S. Bayshore Drive, SE 12th Terrace, and SE 15th Road all are two-lane undivided roadways. There are four signalized intersections in the study area, namely, SE 8th Street at S. Bayshore Drive, Brickell Avenue at SE 8th Street, Brickell Avenue at SE 13th Street, and Brickell Avenue at SE 15th Road. The lane configurations at these intersections are displayed in Figure 2.1. There are pedestrian signal buttons at all the signalized intersections. All vehicles of the proposed development heading south on Brickell Avenue will have to use the intersection of SE 8th Street and S. Bayshore Drive, Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street, or Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road since left turn movement is prohibited for westbound I traffic at all unsignalized intersections with Brickell Avenue. There are extensive on -street parking meters in the study area, as shown in Figure 2.1, as well as off-street parking facilities provided by the businesses or apartment owners. z 0 CO CO Brlcke II Ave Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 7 FIGURE Architecture • Engineering • Planning B r l c k e l I Project Study Area Map p Interior Design • Landscape Architecture 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 Apartment 1.1 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACAD FILE\BRICKELL\MAP. DWG c� a^` 4� W w rn 1� rim � cU y — li m y Project Site Biscane Bay Q Signalized Intersection — On —Street Meter Parking Bermello, Ajamil k Partners, Inc. Architecture -Engineering -Planning Brickell Roadway Network within the I FIGURE Interior Design • IAandscape Architecture 2601 S. Bayahore Drive, Suite 1000 Apartment Stud Area 2.1 Miami,' Florida 33133 T` y (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\ .DWG 2.2 - Public Transportation The residents of the study area are provided with an excellent transit service. The Metromover station on SE 14th Terrace is within walking distance from the proposed development. Six Metromovers operate at a 150-second headway from there, each with a capacity of 12 passengers. Besides, Brickell Avenue is served by transit bus routes B, 48, and 24. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Signal Timing Plans rt Signal timing plans for the four signalized intersections were obtained from Dada County Traffic Control Center. 3.2 Existing Traffic Counts The PM Peak period was identified as the critical time period to analyze the traffic condition as per the City of Miami guidelines. It was decided to use available traffic data as much as possible. Therefore, traffic counts collected by B&A staff in April 1995 at the three signalized intersections on Brickell Avenue were used in this study. The vehicular turning movement count was done at the intersection of SE 8th Street and S. Bay Shore Drive on November 1, 1995. The data was collected from 4:30 PM through 6:30 PM. All the data collected is contained in Appendix A. Figure 3.1 displays the existing PM peak hourly traffic volumes at all four signalized intersections. Existing roadway arterial traffic volumes were estimated by averaging -ingress traffic volumes at upstream intersection and egress traffic volumes at downstream intersection. The resulting hourly link volumes during PM peak period are also displayed in Figure 3.1. SE 8th Street between Brickell Avenue and S. Bayshore, however, was not analyzed for an arterial segment because it is a very short roadway segment, and, therefore, the intersection approaches are effectively the arterial segment. 3.3 Existing Roadway Level of Service The level of service analysis was performed for the signalized intersections using HCM/CINEMA, the software based the Chapter Nine procedures of the Highway Capacity 4 96- '78 o` �R 411 a Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. FIGURE Architecture -Engineering -Planning Brickell Existing PM Peak Hour Interior Design- Landscape Architecture 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, suite 1000 Apartment Traffic Volumes 3.1 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F•\ FNrr\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG a 00 V; fl: rM S Arterial Level of Service E Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture -Engineering -Planning FIGURE Interior Design -Landscape Architecture Brickell Existing Level of Service 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 3.2 * Miami,Florida 33133 Apartment (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG IL i i Manual. The results of the analysis are summarized in Figure 3.2. The figures also include the results of the roadway link analysis using the FDOT LOS Software. The detailed outputs of the analysis are contained in Appendix B. Although the analysis indicates that all intersections and road links operate at acceptable levels of service, extensive delay occurs for several particular movements at the Brickell Avenue intersections. These movements are the following: 1. Brickell Avenue and SE 8th Street: The Level of Service at westbound approach is E and drivers experience extensive delay. So is the northbound left turn movement. 2. Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street: Westbound through traffic is operating at a Level of Service F and has a delay of 80 second/vehicle. 3. Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road: Due to the heavy opposing volume, the capacity of the northbound left turn movement is very much reduced. Delay time for the traffic turning left from that approach is therefore very long. A further analysis shows that some minor adjustments to the existing timing plan will reduce the delay significantly without adversely impacting the levels of service for the roadway network. Appendix C contains the details. ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONS WITH FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 4.1 Future Background Traffic A 2% annual growth factor was used to project future background traffic in the study area. This figure was used by a number of studies conducted within the Brickell area. The projected future background traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 4.1. 4.2 Planned or Programmed Transportation Improvement The 1995 Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shows no roadway improvement planned or programmed within the study area. 4.3 Level of Service with Future Background Traffic Level of service analysis was performed for the roadway network loaded with future background traffic (1997). The adjusted timing developed in section 3.3 was used in the summarized in Figure 4.2. There is no change from the existing analysis. The results are summ g conditions. The detailed data is contained in Appendix D. VA 96- 78 f,: N t Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture•Engineering•Planning Brickell Interior Design -Landscape Architecture 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 Apartment f Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 CD M Biscane Bay PM Peak Hour Volumes with FIGURE 4.1 Future Background Traffic F:\EN G\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\B RiCKELL\TRAFFIC. D W G C B Arterial Level of Service C rn M Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 7 7 Architecture- Engineering -Planning BrlCkell Level Of Service with Future FIGURE Interior Design -Landscape Architecture 2601 S. Bayshore Drive. Suite 1000 Ap artment Back round Traffic 4.2 Miami, Florida 33133 r g (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC IMPACT FROM THE PROJECT 5.1 Project Trip Generation The ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition suggests an average trip generation rate of 0.35 vehicles per apartment unit during PM peak hour. The project site is considered average in terms of vehicle occupancy rate but better than average in terms of transit usage. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the average trip rate to reflect the difference in transit usage. Provided that 10% of the project trips use the transit service and the Trip Generation Manual uses a transit usage factor of 5% for high-rise apartments, a modified trip rate of 0.3316 vehicles per unit (0.35*0.90/0.95=0.3316) was used to determine the number of trips generated from the proposed development during PM peak hour. Using the 61 %-39% entering -exiting directional split given by the Manual, the PM peak hour traffic volumes generated from the project are shown as follows: PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Entering 72 Exiting 46 Total 118 5.2 Project Trip Distribution The cardinal distribution of the traffic for the study area was obtained from Metro -Dade County travel model and is listed as the following: We #I,� W• , �, m . '� 1r• North, Northwest 30% North, Northeast 19% East, Northeast 4% East, Southeast 0% South, Southeast 1% South, Southwest 2% West, Southwest 23% West, Northwest 21 % Total 100% The project traffic distribution for the roadway links was developed based on the existing travel pattern and the above cardinal distribution. Since left turn movement from westbound 10 96- 78 approaches is prohibited at all unsignalized Brickell Avenue intersections, the inbound traffic and the outbound traffic generated by the project will be distributed over the roadway network differently. Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2 show the trip distributions for the inbound project traffic and the outbound traffic, respectively. t 5.3 Future Background and Project Traffic The trips generated by the project were distributed over the roadway network based on the trip distributions developed above. The total future traffic was then obtained by adding the future background traffic and the project traffic. The results are shown in Figure 5.3. 5.4 Level of Service with Future Background and Project Traffic Figure 5.4 summarize the levels of service on the roadway network with future background and project traffic. Again, the adjusted tinting developed in section 3.3 was used. It appears that no change in traffic operation condition will occur in terms of level of service. It is therefore concluded that the proposed project will not affect the roadway system in the study area significantly. The detail results are contained in Appendix E FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With respect of the traffic operating condition in the study area, it is found that: 1. 4J 3. Fs 4. s t t The overall existing traffic condition in the roadway network is good. All signalized intersections and roadway links operate at acceptable levels of service. However, extensive delay occurs for several particular movements at the Brickell Avenue intersections. A further analysis shows that some minor signal timing adjustments will reduce the delay significantly. There Will be no change in traffic operating condition over the next two years in terns of level of service given that no major developments are planned in the area; With the traffic generated by the project, operating condition will not change on the roadway network in terms of level of service. It is therefore concluded that the proposed project will not affect the roadway system in the study area significantly. 11 96- 78 '` CO Cr"'? a^` Q� M Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture -Engineering -Planning Br1Ckell Pt Trip Distribution FIGURE Project Interior Design -Landscape Architecture p 1 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 5.1 Miami,' Florida 33133 Apartment (Inbound Traffic) (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG 41 0 Biscane Bay Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc- FIGURE Architecture -Engineering -Planning Brickell Project Trip Distribution Interior Design. Landscape Architecture 5.2 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 Apartment (Outbound Traffic) Miami,'Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F-\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG I., Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture • Engineering •Planning Interior Design -Landscape Architecture j 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 Miami,' Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 41 Brickell Apartment w Biscane Bay PM Peak Hour Volumes FIGURE' with Future Background 5.3 and Project Traffic F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG 9 0, B Biscane Bay C Arterial Level of Service Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture -Engineering -Planning Level of Service with FIGURE Interior Design - Landscape Architecture Brickell Future Back 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 ground Miami,* Florida 33133 Apartment and Project Traffic 5.4 1(305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWGi APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC COUNTS i� SE 8th St @ S. Bayshore Dr 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 06:15 PM 06:30 PM LT Reg. 8 11 6 4 6 7 5 5 52 Hvy. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH Reg. 58 53 56 55 64 71 66 60 489 EB Hvy. 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 RT Reg. 25 32 35 37 24 30 41 33 262 Hvy. 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 LT Reg. 16 17 24 15 34 25 20 18 172 Hvy. 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 TH Reg. 89 80 112 85 107 95 89 78 746 WB Hvy. 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 RT Reg. 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 7 Hvy. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 LT Reg. 58 46 103 80 67 43 60 54 514 Hvy. 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 TH Reg. 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 NB Hvy. 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 RT Reg. 15 11 16 17 8 11 11 10 102 Hvy. 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 LT Reg. 0 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 9 Hvy. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 TH Reg. 7 6 7 16 19 14 14 12 96 SB Hvy. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT Reg. 12 28 31 29 25 18 28 24 197 Hvy. 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 297 292 400 349 361 318 340 296 2,653 PEDESTRIAN COUNTS 4 WB 2 2 6 1 2 1 1 2 17 EB 5 6 6 4 6 5 4 3 39 C,p L� TOTAL i 7 8 12 5 8 6 5 5 56 APPENDIX B. EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 96- 78 9 9 ,1 1 I HCH Summarg Results for Case: XI-E SE BTH AVE 8 S. BAYSHORE DR X Delay Lane Y/s V!c (s8c/ App Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS EB L .00 .06 6.8 B *TR .14 .23 5.8 B All 5.8 B .11 .28 10.1 B .14 .25 8.9 B 9.8 B .14 .42 23.2 C .14 .43 19.9 C .05 .15 17.5 C 20.9 C .01 .02 19.7 C .11 .34 18.9 C 19.8 C 1 Intersect .29 .38 11.9 B e 1 SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSMEE Ph PEAK EXISTING Version 2.83 48 99 15 I I L 4 `- 373 I I r' 86 ----------- t=------ --------�---------- 6� i 26� III 245 " I I 131--� t �+ 257 51 4 1 2 3 ilu -fir �• �-- 7 3 68 4 1,35 4 1 9G- 78 i i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SE 8TH AVE ® S. BAYSHORE DR SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSHORE SUMMARY ------------------------- ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING CASE: X1-E --------------------------------------------------------------.------------ LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data --------- L- --- R-- L-- T-- -R-- -L-- -T-- -R-- L- T R -- --- Mvt Vol (vph) 26 245 131 86 373 4 257 4 51 5 48 99 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 tHvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 15 15 15 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 t Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 10 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: SEMI -ACTUATED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP GREEN 7 60 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.0 SEC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) ----- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- Group ----- Ratio ----- (sec/veh) --------- LOS --- (sec/veh) -------- --- --- EB ----- L 126 .06 .63 L .00 6.0 B 5.8 B TR 2031 .23 .63 TR .14 5.8 B WB L 495 .20 .55 L .11 10.1 B 9.0 B TR 1851 .25 .55 TR .14 8.8 B NB L 359 .42 .33 L .14 23.2 C 20.9 C LT 362 .43 .33 LT .14 19.9 C i R 401 .15 .33 R .05 17.5 C SB L 303 .02 .33 L .01 19.7 C 19.0 C TR 500 .34 .33 TR .11 18.9 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 11.9 SEC/VEH Xc = .30 LOS = B Sum(v/s)CR = .29 �im JJ l 9 1 HCM Summary Results for Case: X2-E BRICULL AVE 0 SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE /BRICREU DR Ph PEAL{ EXISTING Version 2.83 X Delay II 11 668 I I I I Larne v/s v/c (sec/ 50 I I I I !�P Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS � 312 EB *L .12 .26 1C4 B IIIIIII`I I I TR .11 .23 14.3 B +ItiFI 'I I I r 191 All 14.3 B WB L .11 .82 51.8 E SLR .11 .83 54.8 E - - - - -+ R .11 .83 54.4 E I I All 53.3 E 316 I till I 11 I 1 NB *T .27 .96 46.0 E 99 --, I I I I R .04 .15 M. 8 C 196 I I All 44.6 E I ( I 67 I I I 81B SB *L .02 .31 39.6 D 1 IL 2 I 3 4 T .15 .43 21.4 C i tIN J L All 22,7 C 6 3 29 1 550 4 1 12 4 1 Intersect .51 .55 32.9 D 78 f HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE Q SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY -- ===ANALYST: JUN-MIAO --------------------====ANALYSIS DATE. 11-02-95 X2-E ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING - CASE: - - - LANESGEOMETRY: - MOVEMENTS SERVICED 3 - BYLANEAND Lane 4 LANE WIDTHS (FT) Lane 5 Lane 6 App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane EB 4 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 0 NB 3 3 L T 12.0 12.0 LR 12.0 T 12.0 R R 12.0 12.0 SB 5 3 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH i L-- -- -R-- -L-- --- -R-- ----_Data----- Mvt Vol (vph) ---- 316 -T-- 99 -R-- 196 -L-- 191 -T-- 0 -R-- 312 -L-- 0 818 67 50 668 0 PHF .90 .95 .90 .90 2 .90 2 .95 2 .90 2 .90 2 .95 2 ?6Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 ------6z- 1 1 RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour --------9---- 20 20 13 20 0 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 t Grade 0 0 0 0 Y Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED PHASE: 1 2 - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T GREEN 6 29 50 12 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 RED 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8.0 SEC ? -CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group ----- Ratio ----- (sec/veh) LOS --------- --- (sec/veh) -------- --- --- ----- ----- EB L 1436 ----- .26 ----- .46 L .12 14.4 B 14.3 B TR 1404 .23 .46 TR .11 14.3 B 4 WB L 210 .82 .13 L .11 51.8 E 53.3 E LR 195 .83 .13 LR .11 54.0 E R 188 .83 .13 R .11 54.4 E NB T 942 R 400 .96 .15 .28 T .28 R .27 .04 46.0 23.8 E C 44.6 E SB L 190 .31 .06 L .02 39.6 D 22.7 C T 1811 .43 .36 T .15 21.4 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 32.9 SEC/VEH Xc = .55 LOS = D Sum(v/s)CR - .51 9f - 78 1 m NCH Summary Results for Case: X3-E SE 13RD AVE MICHELL DR BRICKELL AVE @ SE 13RD AVE FM PEAK EXISTING Version 2.03 X Delay 2835I911 Lane V/s V/C (Sec/ 4 I I AM Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I I 25 EB L .05 .31 32.9 D I I I I ,- 248 ,mLT .06 .48 33.7 D I�111 I I I I r- 65 R .03 .21 32.2 D -- - - -- All 33.1 D '- WB L .05 .2B 32.1 D ------ *T .17 1.01 79.8 F R .02 .15 31.2 D 67 I III All 67.1 F 84 NB *L .23 .37 8.2 B 39 I I I l TR .09 .14 6.7 B t All 7.2 B I I M 12 I I 242 SB L .01 .02 6.2 B 1 JI1, 3 J L T .17 .27 7.4 B ,i,11rr --j r'--- R .16 .25 7.3 B 69 ill 4 15 4 1 16 4 1 All 7.3 B Intersect .46 .48 22.9 C i a a a 96- 7R HCM Summary Results For Case: WE BRICXELL AVE R SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD MICHELL DR Ph PEAR EXISTING Version 2.03 1013 I I Lane vfs X v!c Delay (sec/ 30139 I I I I AApZ Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS I I L I I 12 EB LT .04 .14 23.7 C R .04 .15 23.7 C 38 i t I All 23.7 C r— 30 .20 24.1 C .04 23.0 C 24.0 C .81 46.2 E .46 6.3 B 8.1 B .16 4.® A .93 17.4 C 17.1 C .72 14.7 B 1 f ,l I [tit 14� I II 3B 40 —1 I I 1 I 43 45 i I B60 1 2 �I 29 4 1 76 1 i�r 4 1 1i HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY ===.ANALYST -JUN MIAO=====--------------------=====ANALYSIS DATE 11-02-95==- ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING CASE: X4-E -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE Lane 4 Lane WIDTHS 5 (FT) Lane 6 App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 EB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 . WB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 1:2.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH R- L- T-- -R-- -L-- -T -- R --- -----Data----- Mvt Vol (vph) -L-- 14 -T-- 38 - 40 -L-- 30 --- 38 -R- 12 43 860 45 39 1813 38 ;b9 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 %Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 -------------- 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------- 2 2 2 ;;= -------------- RTOR Vol (vph) -------------- 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 20 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR SB LTR GREEN 29 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: - 4."0 SEC - - CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE)- APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group -- Ratio -- (sec/veh) LOS ----- -- (sec/veh) ---- � - --- -- EBLT 440 - .14 .28 LT .04 23.7 C 23.7 C R 320 .15 .28 R .04 23.7 C C .:777 WB r.� NB LT 404 .20 R 400 .04 L 59 .81 TR 2310 .46 SB L 269 .16 TR 2319 .93 .26 LT .28 R .69 L .69 TR .69 L .69 TR .06 24.1 .01 23.0 .56 46.2 .31 6.3 .11 4.8 .64 17.4 C 24.0 C C E 8.1 B B C 17.1 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 14.,7 SEC/VEH Xc = .72 LOS = B Sum(v/s)CR = .69 9,66- 7 HCM Analysis: M-E NORTHBOUND: PROTECTED LEFT -TURN PHASE WARRANTED Due to heavy opposing volume, it is recommended that the phasing plan Be modified to provide a protected phase for traffic turning left from the NORTHHOLM approach. Otherwise, the capacity of this left turn movement will Be very low. It is also recommended that the left -most lane on this approach be channel ized exclusively for left turn traffic if this is not already the case. This is required if a protected left -turn phase is provided. Do you wish to bake these editing changes now before continuing the analysis? I______ _________ _________ ________ _________________________== ( Florida Department of Transportation - District 4 I ( Arterial Level of Service Estimate j ( Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ( ART PLAN Version 1.2 Developed by: W.McShane, E.Shenk, and G.Sokolow 12-14-91 ( Modified by: FDOT District Four 5-18-92 ( DESCRIPTION ( ROAD NAME: Brickell (SE 8th St to SE 15th Rd) IPEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB I OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK ( Analysis Date: Nov 8, 1994 User's Notes: Existing/Adj Timing (TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS - - - - - -- - - -- I I AADT: 15,140 K FACTOR: 0.100 I D FACTOR: 0.597 PHF: 0.950 I ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 ( % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 39 I ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS I NUMBER OF THRU LANES PEAK DIRECTION: 2 ( OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 2 ( URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR ( RURAL DEVELOPED (U/T/R): U I ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) I FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) I For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free flow speed of: I Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 ( Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 I Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 I Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 (SIGNALI7ATiON CHARACTERISTICS I ARRIVAL TYPE ( PEAK DIRECTION: 4 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 3 TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 2 (1=ACTUATED ( 2=PRETIMED I 3=SEMIACTUATED) ( SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH: 115 I WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.55 9r- 7-S 77, 1 SB PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS 1 { % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE { { FROM LENGTH g/C { { PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL I i LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 2-20 2-20 (FT) TYPE i { 1-2 904 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,825 4 { 2-3 1,227 2.063492 2 115 0.68 1,425 4 { { 3-4 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 4-5 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 5-6 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 6-7 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 7-8 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 8-9 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 9-10 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 110-11 0 39,04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 41 111-12 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 112-13 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 113-14 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 114-15 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 115-16 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 116-17 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 117-18 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 41 118-19 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 119-20 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 1 NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS { { % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE { { FROM LENGTH g/C { { PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL I <` I LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 19-1 19-1 (FT) TYPE { 1 I 120-19 0 12 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 119-18 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { 118-17 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 117-16 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { 116-15 0 39,04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 115-14 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 114-13 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 113-12 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 112-11 0 39,04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3I 111-10 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 110-9 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 { 9-8 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 ' 18-7 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 =` 17-6 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 16-5 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { 1 5-4 0 39.04382 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { 4-3 0 39.04382 2 115 0.68 1,760 3{ 3-2 633 33.15789 2 115 0.55 1,425 3 I 1 2-1 610 7.570621 2 115 0.32 1,825 3 1 °96- 78 JSB - PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS - - THRU -- -- ARTERIAL THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 1-2 580 0.28 7.5 B 26.3 B 2-3 1265 0.49 4.8 A 25.8 B 145 0 1 5-6 0 1 6-7 0 1 7-8 0 1 8-9 0 1 9-10 0 r; ' 1 10-11 0 1 11-12 0 1 12-13 0 1 13-14 0 1 14-15 0 1 15-16 0 1 16-17 0 F: 1 17-18 0 1 18-19 0 1 19-20 0 J SB Arterial Speed = 26.1 mph LOS = B J NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULT THRU ARTERIAL THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 1 20-19 0 1 19-18 0 1 18-17 0 1 17-16 0 1 16-15 0 1 15-14 0 1 14-13 0 1 13-12 0 1 12-11 0 111-10 0 t} 1 10-9 0 1 9-8 0 1 8-7 0 1 7-6 0 6-5 0 5-4 0 1 4-3 0 ' 1 3-2 445 0.21 9.9 B 21.9 C 1 2-1 593 0.49 24.4 C 18.0 D J NB Arterial Speed = 19.5 mph LOS = C NOTE: PRESS ALT-P TO CALCULATE AND PRINT SPREADSHEET 96- 78 APPENDIX. C. EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH ADJUSTED SIGNAL TIMING 7 9 9 1 l 7 HCH Summary Results for Case: X2-E-A SE 8TH AVE /BRICKELL DR BRICXEI.L AVE @ SE 8TH AVE PH PEAL{ EXISTING/ADJ Version 2.83 II II X Delay'8 �50 I I I I Lane v/s a/c (sect I I I !I II I Group Ratio Ratio ueh) LOS 312 EB *L .12 .32 19.5 C III II_I I I TR .11 .29 19.2 C 1191 All 19.4 C WI) L .11 .61 36.2 D *LR .11 .62 36.7 D _--_--� -------- R .11 .62 36.8 D l i All 36.5 D 316 ` I I till I I NB *T .27 .83 31.3 D 99 -` I I I ! R .04 .13 21.8 C 196 i I I I I I 1 All 38.7 D I I I 67 I I 818 SB *L .02 .31 39.6 D 1 IL 2 ( 3 4 i T .15 .38 18.6 C Ir4 -iAll 29.1 C 6 3 34 1 48 4 1 17 4 1 Intersect .51 .55 26.1 D 1 96-- 7 r 11 HCM/.Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY ANALYST: JUN MIAO - - ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING/ADJ CASE: X2-E-A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 4 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 0 L 3.2.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 3 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB 5 3 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH -----Data----- -L-- -T-- -R-- ---- -T-- -R-- -L-- -T-- -R-- -L-- -T-- -R-- Mvt Vol (vph) 316 99 196 191 0 312 0 818 67 50 668 0 PHF .90 .95 .90 .90 .90 .95 .90 .90 .95 %Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 9 62 13 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 % Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------•------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T GREEN 6 34 40 17 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 RED 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8.0 SEC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- C PROCEDURE) APPROACH• CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (H M . Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio - - - Ratio - - - - - Group - - - - - Ratio - - - - - (sec/veh) - - - - - - - - - LOS - - - (sec/veh) - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - EB L - - - - - 1165 - - .32 .37 L .12 19.5 C 19.4 C TR 1139 .29 .37 TR .11 19.2 C r; WB L 280 .61 .17 L .11 36.2 D LR 260 .62 .17 LR .11 36.7 D Y R 250 .62 .17 R .11 36.8 D NB T 1089 .83 .32 T .27 31.3 D R 463 .13 .32 R .04 21.0 C SB L 190 .31 .06 L .02 39.6 D T 2032 .38 .40 T .15 18.6 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 26.,1 SEC/VEH Xc = .55 LOS = D Sum(v, 36.5 a D 30.7 D 20.1 C /s) CR = .51 96- '7R NCH Sumary Results for Case: X3-E-A SE 13RD AVE MICHELL DR BRICULL AVE 9 SE 13RD AVE PM PEAR EXISTING/ADJ Version 2.83 X Delay I I 459 I i Lane V/s V/C (sec/ 283 11 I I I I OpE Group Ratio Ratio Veh) LOS fl I� I I L 25 EB L .05 .31 32.9 D I I I I •- 248 *LT .06 .48 33.7 D I I I I 65 R .03 .21 32.2 D All 33.1 D WB L .05 .28 26.9 D - - - - - *T .17 .71 34.7 D --- R .02 .18 26.2 D I I I 67 I I I All 32.6 D 84 NB *L .24 .43 11.9 B 39 - I I I ! TA .09 .15 9.4 B I I t All 10.2 B i I 126 12 I I 242 SB L .01 .02 8.7 B 1 J11 2 3 L T .17 .30 10.4 Br R .16 .28 10.3 B 61 ill 4 1 15 4 1 24 4 1 All 10.3 B Intersect .47 .49 17.8 C 96- 71 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE 0 SE 13RD AVE SE 13RD AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY _==ANALYST. JUN MIAOANALYSIS DATE ^11-02-95=_= ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING/ADJ CASE: X3-E-A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 4 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data L T R L T R L T R L T R -------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Mvt Vol (vph) 67 84 39 65 248 25 126 242 12 11 459 283 PHF !kHvy Vehicles .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .92 .92 .92 .82 .82 .82 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 90 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 t Grade 0 0 0 0 t"n Parkers/Hour 0 20 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR SB LTR GREEN 61 15 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6.0 SEC F, - - CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS-(HCM-PROCEDURE) - APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------------- ----------- -- EB L 252 .31 .16 L .05 32.9 D 33.1 D LT 265 .40 .16 LT .06 33.7 D R 225 .21 .16 R .03 32.2 D WB L 378 .20 .23 L .05 26.9 D 32.6 D T 397 .71 .23 T .17 34.7 D R 270. .10 .23 R .02 26.2 D NB L 318 .43 .56 L .24 11.9 B 10.2 B TR 1871 .15 .56 TR .09 9.4 B SB L 609 .02 .56 L .01 8.7 B 10.3 B T 1884 .30 .56 T .17 10.4 B R 801 .28 .,56 R .16 10.3 B k' cc�o__c_==c_c_coos=co_c_000_ccooccoo_c-csc-.o.-o=cc==o_.o=_o=ono._=oc=c=====oo=o INTERSECT: DELAY n 17.8 SEC/VEH Xc = .49 LOS = C Sum(v/s)CR = .47 96- 78 r t HCH Samarg Results for Case: WE -A BRICULL AVE 0 SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD MICHELL DR PH PEAR EXISTING/ADJ Version 2.03 1813y I 1 Lane v/s X v/c Delay (sec/ 38 1 39 y I Group Ratio Ratio veh). WS I I Ell LT .04 .16 26.0 D I I I •►-- 38 R .04 .17 26.1 D III I j — 30 All 26.1 D 1+i i .23 .89 26.5 25.3 D D { ItI 26.3 D i4 I III 3B .45 10.0 B I I .44 5.0 B 5.2 B I ' 43 45 060 .16 4.0 A 1 , 2 3 .93 17. C .L Irz "IF 4 1 17.1 C 25 4 1 2 76 .73 13.9 B �6- 78 u HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE Q SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK EXISTING/ADJ CASE: X4-E-A -------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH -----Data----- -L-- --- R- L-- T-- -R-- -L- T-- -R-- -L R -- --- --- Mvt Vol (vph) 14 38 - 40 30 38 12 43 860 45 39 1813 38 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 %Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 % Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 20 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR LTR SB LTR GREEN 25 2 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.0 SEC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio --.04 (sec/veh) - LOS -D- (sec/veh) - EB- -LT-- --385 - .16 -.24 LT 26.0-- 26.1 D- R 280 .17 .24 R .04 26.1 D WB LT 351 .23 .24 LT .06 26.5 D 26.3 D R 350 .04 .24 R .01 25.3 D NB L 42 .45 .72 L .01 10.0 B 5.2 B TR 2426 .44 .72 TR .31 5.0 B SB L 269 .16 .69 L .11 4.8 A 17.1 C TR 2319 .93 .69 TR .64 17.4 C INTERSECT. DELAY - 13.9 SEC/VEH Xc .73 LOS B Sum(/ ) 5 96- 78 I Florida Department of Transportation - District 4 J Arterial Level of Service Estimate I J Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual J ART PLAN Version 1.2 J J Developed by: W.McShane, E.Shenk, and G.Sokolow 12-14-91 J I Modified by: FDOT District Four 5-18-92 I J DESCRIPTION J J ROAD NAME: Brickell (SE 8th St to SE 15th Rd) I IPEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB I OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: NB J Study Time Period: PM PEAK J J Analysis Date: Nov 8, 1994 J I User's Notes: Existing i J TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS I I J AADT: I 15,140 I I K FACTOR: 0.100 J J D FACTOR: 0.597 I J PHF: 0.950 J ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 J J % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 39 J J ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS -- - -- I J NUMBER OF THRU LANES J PEAK DIRECTION: 2 I J OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 2 J J URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR J I RURAL DEVELOPED (UMR): U i ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) J ` FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) J ti I J For Arterial Type and Class: J Use Free flow speed of: J I Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 J Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 I J Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 J E.: J Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 I I Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 J J SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS J I I ARRIVAL TYPE I J J PEAK DIRECTION: 4 J J OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 3 J J TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 2 (1=ACTUATED i 2=PRETIMED J J 3=SEMIACTUATED) I J SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH: J--WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C:------- 115 0_63I ------------------ 4 96 " u r SB PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE ( FROM LENGTH g/C ( PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL( ( LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 2-20 2-20 (FT) TYPE I ( 1-2 904 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,825 4 ( 2-3 1,227 2.063492 2 115 0.68 1,425 4 1 34 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 ( 4-5 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 1 5-6 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 ( 6-7 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 ( 7-8 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 ( 8-9 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 ( 9-10 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 110-11 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 111-12 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 112-13 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 113-14 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4I 114-15 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 115-16 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 116-17 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 117-18 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 4 118-19 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 41 119-20 0 39.04382 2 115 0Y63 1_760 4 i 1= I NB - OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS ( ' 1 % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE 1 FROM LENGTH g/C 1 PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL( ( LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 19-1 19-1 (FT) TYPE I 120-19 0 12 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 119-18 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 .`' 118-17 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 3 117-16 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 116-15 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 115-14 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 114-13 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 113-12 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 3 1 112-11 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 111-10 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 £' 110-9 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 1 9-8 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 3 1 8-7 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 3 1 tr. i 7-6 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 3 1 I6-5 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 15-4 0 39.04382 2 115 0.63 1,760 31 14-3 0 39.04382 2 115 0.68 1,760 31 13-2 633 33.15789 2 115 0.63 1,425 3 i 12-1 610 7.570621 2 115 0.27 1,825 31 96- 78 i 1====== I SB --=====--=======-----===== PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS ----===== ====--=== THRU =-----=== ARTERIAL { THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 11-2 580 0.24 5.1 B 28.2 B 2-3 1265 0.49 4.8 A 25.8 B 1 3-4 0 1 4-5 0 1 5-6 0 1 6-7 0 1 7-8 0 1 8-9 0 1 9-10 0 110-11 0 111-12 0 112-13 0 113-14 0 114-15 0 115-16 0 116-17 0 117-18 0 118-19 0 119-20 0 1 1 SB Arterial Speed = 27.1 mph 1 1 LOS = B (NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULT THRU ARTERIAL 1 THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK 1 LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 120-19 0 1 119-18 0 1 118-17 0 1 117-16 0 1 116-15 0 1 115-14 0 1 114-13 0 1 113-12 0 1 112-11 0 1 111-10 0 1 11.0-9 0 1 1 9-8 0 1 1 8-7 0 1 1 7-6 0 1 1 6-5 0 1 164 0 1 4-3 0 13-2 445 0.19 6.8 B 24.2 B 1 2-1 593 0.57 27.9 D 16.9 D 1 1 NB Arterial Speed = 19.4 mph LOS = C NOTE: PRESS ALT-P TO CALCULATE AND PRINT SPREADSHEET 96- 78 APPENDIX D. S, LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC HCH Summary Results for Case: XI-B SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSHORE SE 8TH AVE 0 S. BAYSHORE DR PH PEAL{ BACXGROUMD Version 2.03 X Delay 50 183 4 Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 51I I I App Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 4 4 EB L .00 .66 6.0 B I 308 *TR .15 .24 6.9 B r- 89 All 6.0 B UB L .12 .22 18.2 B TR .14 .26 19.4 B ---- - - - - -- --- - - - -__ All 10.4 B 27 �r I I I 255 -' I I NB L .15 .44 23.6 C 136 -� *LT .15 .46 23.7 C 4 R .05 .15 20.7 C 267 53 All 23.2 C 4 SB L .61 .02 19.7 C 1 2, 3 i Y TR .12 .36 22.4 C J All 22,3 C 7 3 68 4 1 35 i�i 4 1 1 Intersect .30 .31 13.5 B 96- 78 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SE 8TH AVE @ S. BAYSHORE DR SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSHORE SUMMARY ----------------------------------------------------------------------=----- ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND CASE: X1-B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data L T R L T R L T R L T R -------------- Mvt Vol (vph) ---- 27 ---- 255 ---- 136 ---- 89 ---- 388 ---- 4 ---- 267 ---- 4 ---- 53 ---- 5 ---- 50 ---- 103 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 %Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 15 15 15 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 10 0 Buses/Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 r' SIGNAL SETTINGS: SEMI -ACTUATED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP GREEN 7 60 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.0 SEC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) r--- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --------- -- -------- --- EB L 126 .06 .63 L .00 6.0 B 6.8 B TR 2031 .24 .63 TR .15 6.9 B WB L 485 .22 .55 L .12 10.2 B 10.4 B TR 1851 .26 .55 TR .14 10.4 B NB L 353 .44 .33 L .15 23.6 C 23.2 C LT 356 .46 .33 LT .15 23.7 C R 401 .15 .33 R .05 20.7 C i SB L 295 .02 .33 L .01 19.7 C 22.3 C TR 500 .36 .33 TR .12 22.4 C ---------------- INTERSECT: DELAY = 13.5 SEC/VEH Xc = .31 LOS = B Sum(v/s)CR = .30 96- 78 HCH Summary Results for Case: X2-B-A SE 8TH AVE MICHELL DR BRICXELL AVE 8 SE 8TH AVE PM PEAL{ BACXGROUND/ADJ Version 2.83 X Delay 695 II II I I ! I Lane Y/s v/c (sec/ �52 6EE Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS'�- -- I I I I I 325 ED *L .12 .33 19.6 C I I I I I I TR .11 .38 19.3 C 199 All 19.5 C WD L .11 .65 37.1 D - - _ - _- LR .11 .64 37.3 D -- --____-- *R .ii .65 37.6 D I i All 37.3 D 329 I till I 1111 MB *T .28 .86 33.1 D 183 "" I ! 1 I R .04 .13 21.8 C 284 II I f All 32.3 D I I I 78 I I 1 B51 SB *L .82 .32 39.7 D i ILZj14 T .16 .48 18.8 C IN --► All 28.2 C 6 3 34 1 48 4 1 17 4 1 i Intersect .53 .57 26.8 D HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY _-________________=________-"� _-="z -_-------""2 ----___=___==_______ ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND/ADJ CASE: X2-B-A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 4 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 0 L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 3 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB 5 3 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L-- EAST WEST T- R-- NORTH L-- SOUTH R Data -T-- -R-- -L-- -T -- --- ---------- Mvt Vol (vph) 329 -T-- 103 -R-- 204 -L-- 199 0 325 0 851 70 52 695 0 PHF .90 .95 .90 .90 .90 .95 .90 .90 .95 !kHvy Vehicles 2 -------------- 2 2 2 -------------- 2 -------------- 1 2 2 2 -------------- 2 -------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 9 65 14 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 s% Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0 ° Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T GREEN 6 34 40 17 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW RED 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8.0 SEC _____________' ANALYSIS RESULTS - rCAPACITY (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) r _ i r EB L 1165 .33 .37 L .12 19.6 C 19.5 C. TR 1139 .30 .37 TR .11 19.3 C WB L 280 .65 .17 L .11 37.1 D 37.3 D LR 259 .64 .17 LR .11 37.3 D 4: R 250 .65 .17 R .11 37.6 D r NB T 1089 .86 .32 T .28 33.1 D 4 32.3 D R 463 .13 .32 R .04 21.0 C r SB L 190 .32 .06 L .02 39.7 D 20.2 C T 2032 .40 .40 T .16 18.8 C, ________________ INTERSECT: DELAY = 26.8 SEC/VEH Xc = .57 LOS = D Sum(v/s)CR = .53 . t ��"` 78 r WCM Summary Results For Case; X3-B-A SE 13RD AVE /BRICHELL DR BRICXELL AVE 8 SE 13RD AVE PM PEAL{ BACXGROUND/ADJ Version 2.83 I I 478 X Delay 29411 Lane v/s v/c (sec/ I I I I Mpg Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS 26 EB L .05 .33 33.0 D IIIII I '�- 258 *LT .06 .41 33.0 D Iiltl I �" 68 R .03 .22 32.3 D - ------ _ All 33 2 D WB L .05 .20 26.9 D *T .17 .74 35.8 D R .03 .11 26.3 D All 33.4 D NB *L .26 .47 12.5 B TR .09 .16 9.4 B All 10.4 B SB L .01 .02 8.7 B T .17 .31 10.4 B R .16 .29 10.3 B All 10.4 B Intersect .50 .53 18.0 C ------.:4 I It 70 I I I I 87 41 I I I I f I 131 t 12 i I 252 1 ��s, 2 � 3 L 61 1 IIr 4 1 5 4 1 24 4 1 96- 78 r HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 13RD AVE SE 13RD AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY --=ANALYST: JUN MIAOANALYSIS DATE 11-02-95-=- ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND/ADJ CASE: X3-B-A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 4 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data L T R L T R L T R L T R -------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Mvt Vol (vph) 70 87 41 68 258 26 131 252 12 11 478 294 PHF !kHvy Vehicles .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .92 .92 .92 .82 .82 .82 RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 94 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 20 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR SB LTR GREEN 61 15 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6.0 SEC - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) E--- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------------- ----------- --- EB L 252 .33 .16 L .05 33.0 D 33.2 D LT 265 .41 .16 LT .06 33.8 D R 225 .22 .16 R .03 32.3 D WB L 378 .20 .23 L .05 26.9 D 33.4 D T 397 .74 .23 T .17 35.8 D R 270 .11 .23 R .03 .26.3 D NB L 303 .47 .56 L .26 12.5 B 10.4 B TR 1871 .16 .56 TR .09 9.4 B SB L 601 .02 .56 L .01 8.7 B T 1884 .31 .56 T .17 10.4 B R 801 .29 ..56 R .16 10.3 B 10.4 B INTERSECT: DELAY = 18.0 SEC/VEH Xc = .53 LOS C Sum(v/s)CR .50 96- 78 HCH Summary Results for Case: X4-B-A BRICULL AVE 0 SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD MICHELL DR Ph PER BACXGROUMD/ADJ Version 2.03 1886 I I Lane v/s X v/c Delay (sec/ 48 1 41 I I I I AM Croup Ratio Ratio veh).LOS I I t` I I 12 EB LT .04 .17 26.1 D 48 R .04 .17 26.2 D III ! All 26.1 D 31 .24 .04 26.6 25.3 D D 26.4 D 15 48 .40 11.1 B 42 I I I I h .45 5.1 B I I t 5.4 B i I I I 45 47 895 5.0 A 1 2 3 J!y .19 L t2 r 4 1 21.6 C 25 4 1 2 .76 16.8 C a i i i ,a HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY -==ANALYST: JUN MIAOANALYSIS DATE 11-02-95=== ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND/ADJ CASE: X4-B-A --------------------------------------------------------------=----------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 E; EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data L T R L T R L T R L T R -------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Mvt Vol (vph) 15 40 42 31 40 12 45 895 47 41 1886 40 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 i %Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- `- RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 ,- °s Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 20 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: SEMI -ACTUATED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR LTR SB LTR GREEN 25 2 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.0 SEC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------------- ----------- --- EB LT 381 .17 .24 LT .04 26.1 D 26.1 D R 280 .17 .24 R .04 26.2 D WB LT 347 .24 .24 LT .06 26.6 D 26.4 D R 350 .04 .24 R .01 25.3 D NB L 42 .48 .72 L .01 11.1 B 5.4 B TR 2426 .45 .72 TR .33 5.1 B SB L 245 .19 .69 L .13 5.0 A 21.6 C TR 2319 .97 .69 TR .67 22.0 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 16.8 SEC/VEH Xc = .76 LOS = C Sum(v/s)CR = .74 9o- �A Florida Department of Transportation - District 4 I Arterial Level of Service Estimate Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART PLAN Version 1.2 Developed by: W.McShane, E.Shenk, and G.Sokolow 12-14-91 I Modified by: FDOT District Four 5-18-92 I DESCRIPTION I ROAD NAME: Brickell (SE 8th St to SE 15th Rd) (PEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: NB I I Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: Nov 8, 1994 ,. I User's Notes_----- Future Background/Adj Timing I --------------- - - - ---- (TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ba I I AADT: 15,750 K FACTOR: 0.100 I D FACTOR: 0.597 PHF: 0.950 ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 I % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 39 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS j I I NUMBER OF THRU LANES PEAK DIRECTION: 2 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 2 j URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR I RURAL DEVELOPED (UiT/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) I FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free flow speed of: Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 I Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 k I Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 I Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 J SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS I I ARRIVAL TYPE I PEAK DIRECTION: 4 I OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 3 I TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 2 (1=ACTUATED 2=PRETIMED I 3=SEMIACTUATED) I SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH: 115 I WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.55 ��- 78 1 (SB PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS { % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE { ( FROM LENGTH g/C { PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL{ { LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 2-20 2-20 (FT) TYPE ( 1-2 941 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,825 4 {2-3 1,276 2.084392 2 115 0.68 1,425 4 (3-4 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 (4-5 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 15-6 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 ( 6-7 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { (7-8 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { 8-9 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 9-10 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 {10-11 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { {11-12 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 112-13 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 113-14 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 114-15 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { :- 115-16 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 116-17 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 {17-18 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { {18-19 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { 119-20 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 { { NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS { ( % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE { { FROM LENGTH g/C { { PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL { LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 19-1 19-1 (FT) TYPE { 120-19 0 12 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 {19-18 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 (18-17 0 3$.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 j - 117-16 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 116-15 0 36.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 {15-14 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 {14-13 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { 113-12 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { p . {12-11 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { {11-10 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 10-9 { 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { (9-8 { 8-7 0 0 38.95275 38.95275 2 2 115 115 0.55 0.55 1,760 1,760 3 3 {7-6 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { {6-5 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 {5-4 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 { { 4-3 0 38.95275 2 115 0.68 1,760 3 { ( 3-2 659 33.16456 2 115 0.55 1,425 3 { {2-1 634 7.600434 2 115 0.32 1,825 3 { - 78 i I====== (SB ========= ====--=====-_=__=======--- ====== PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS THRU === =======__ ARTERIAL THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 1 1-2 605 0.29 7.5 B 26.3 B 1 2-3 1315 0.51 4.9 A 25.7 B 1 3-4 0 1 4-5 0 1 5-6 0 1 6-7 0 1 7-8 0 1 8-9 0 1 9-10 0 110-11 0 1 11-12 0 1 12-13 0 1 13-14 0 114-15 0 1 15-16 0 1 16-17 0 1 17-18 0 1 18-19 0 1 19-20 0 1 J SB Arterial Speed = 26.0 mph j i LOS = B J NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULT THRU ARTERIAL THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS 1 20-19 0 1 19-18 0 1 18-17 0 1 17-16 0 1 16-15 0 1 15-14 0 1 14-13 0 113-12 0 1 12-11 0 1 11-10 0 110-9 0 1 9-8 0 1 8-7 0 1 7-6 0 j 6-5 0 1 5-4 0 1 4-3 0 1 3-2 464 0.22 10.0 B 21.9 C 1 2-1 617 0.51 24.6 C 17.9 D . J NB Arterial Speed = 19.4 mph I LOS = C NOTE: PRESS ALT-P TO CALCULATE AND PRINT SPREADSHEET 96-- 78 APPENDIX E. LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH FUTURE BACKGROUND AND PROJECT TRAFFIC 1 HCH Sumary Results ,for Case: Xi-F SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSHORE SE 8TH AVE @ S. BAYSHORE DR PM PEAL{ FUTURE Version 2.83 X Delay 50 i I Lane v/s Y/c (sec/ 183151 I App Group Ratio Ratio veh). LOS �/ L -- 4 EB L .00 .06 6.0 B I �' 388 *TR .17 .2.6 7.8 B I r- 90 All 7.0 B 4B L .13 .23 10.3 B - - 7 TR .14 .26 10.4 B - - -- - -- --- - - - - - - A l l 10.4 B 27 -s I II 255 I I HD L .16 .49 24.3 C 174 *LT .17 .58 24.5 C f R .05 .16 20.7 C 296 54 All 23.8 C 4 SB L .01 .02 19.7 C 1 2 TR .12 .36 22.4 C Al] �,3 C 7 3 69 4 1 35 4 1 Intersect .33 � M� .35 13.8 B HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. SE 8TH AVE @ S. BAYSHORE DR SE 8TH AVE /S. BAYSHORE SUMMARY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK FUTURE CASE: XI-F -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data --------- L-- T- R-- -L-- -T-- -R-- -L-- -T-- -R R -- --- --- --- Mvt Vol (vph) 27 255 174 90 388 4 296 4 54 5 50 103 �PHF Hvy Vehicles .82 .82 .82 .8� .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .8� .82 .8� ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 15 15 15 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 %- Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 10 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- '_` SIGNAL SETTINGS: SEMI -ACTUATED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP GREEN 7 60 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW RED0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.0 SEC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH:.' Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------------- ----------- --- i EB L 126 .06 .63 L .00 6.0 B 7.0 B TR 2012 .26 .63 TR .17 7.0 B WB L 458 .23 .55 L .13 10.3 B 10.4 B TR 1851 .26 .55 TR .14 10.4 B K NB L 353 .49 .33 L .16 24.3 C 23.8 C LT 355 .50 .33 LT .17 24.5 C S R 401 .16 .33 R .05 20.7 C s s, SB L 278 .02 .33 L .01 19.7 C 22.3 C ! TR 500 .36 .33 TR .12 22.4 C INTERSECT: DELAY.- 13.8 SEC/VEH Xc = .35 LOS = B Sum(v/s)CR .33 r y HCM &mart' Results for Case: X2-F-A SE 8TH AVE /BRICHELL DR BAICM1 AVE R SE 8TH AVE PM PEAR FUTURE/ADJ Version 2.83 X Delay 696 I I ( I I I I ! Lane ws vfc (sec/ �55 I I I I Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS11354 ED L .12 .33 19.6 C 1I1 1(�I *TR .12 .33 19.6 C �IiI�I 'l I I r 199 All 19.6 C WB L .12 .68 38.2 D *LR .12 .68 38.7 D - - - - --- R .12 .68 38.8 D I I ittI All 38.6 D 329 I I �IlI NB *T .28 .87 33.7 D 138 R .84 .13 21.8 C I i I 285 All 32.9 D I I I 78 I I 1 862 SB *L .02 .34 39.8 D 1 IL 2 I 3 4 i t T .16 .48 18.8 C r �I � r- Al l 20.3 C 6 3 34 4 1 48 4 1 17 4 1 Intersect .54 .58 27.2 D �A HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY ANALYST: JUN MIAO ANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK FUTURE/ADJ CASE X2 F-A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 4 2 L 12.0 L 3.2.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 0 L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 3 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB 5 3 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data ---------- L- T- R-- --- -T-- R-- L- -T-- -R-- --- -T R -- -- Mvt Vol (vph) 329 138 205 199 0 354 0 862 70 55 696 0 PHF .90 .95 .90 .90 .90 .95 .90 .90 .95 °sHvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RTOR Vol (vph) 9 71 14 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 15 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 % Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- '` SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T GREEN 6 34 40 17 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 0 1 RED1 1 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8.0 SEC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS -(HCM- PROCEDURE) - APPROACH: Lane Cap v/C g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) - ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------------- ---------- --- EB L 1165 .33 .37 L .12 19.6 C 19.6 C TR 1152 .33 .37 TR .12 19.6 C WB L 280 .68 .17 L .12 38.2 D 38.6 D LR 257 .68 .17 LR .12 38.7 D R 250 .68 .17 R .12 38.8 D NB T 1089 .87 .32 T .28 33.7 D 32.9 D rr`R 463 .13 .32 R .04 21.0 C SB L 190 .34 .06 L .02 39.8 D 20.3 C T 2032 .40 .40 T .16 18.8 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 27.2 SEC/VEH Xc = .58 LOS = D Sum(v/s)CR = .54 9 6 - i 7S n NCH Summary Results for Case: X3-F-A SE 13RD AVE MICHELL DR BRICXELL AVE 9 SE 13RD AVE PM PEAR FUTURE/ADJ Version 2.83 478 I I X Delay I I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 294 1 11 i I Amp Group Ratio Ratio veh) . LQS 26 EB L .05 .34 33.1 D 276 *LT .88 .40 34.7 D itl�l I �" 72 R .03 .22 32.3 D _ _ _ 33 a D - All WE L .05 .22 27.8 D *T .19 .79 38.6 D R .03 .11 26.3 D 78 All 35.5 D M NB *L .26 .47 12.5 B 41-i I I I { TR .09 .16 9.5 B I 1 t All 10.4 B I I 131 15 I i 253 SB L .01 .02 8.7 B 1 �1± 2 3 1 t r T .17 .31 10.4 B --1 �r- R .16 .29 10.3 B 61 1� 4 1 15 4 1 24 4 1 All 10.4 B Intersect .52 .55 18.9 C �- 78 r. HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 13RD AVE SE 13RD AVE /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY ===ANALYST JUN MIAO--=-=--------------------==--=ANALYSIS DATE. 11-02-95 - ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK FUTURE/ADJ CASE: X3-F-A LANES - - GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 1 L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SE 4 2 It 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data -------------- L T R L T R L T R L T R Mvt Vol (vph) ---- 70 ---- 105 ---- 41 ---- 72 ---- 276 ---- 26 ---- 131 ---- 253 ---- 15 ---- 11 ---- 478 ---- 294 HF %Hvy .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .92 .92 .92 .82 .82 .82 Vehicles -------------- RTOR Vol (vph) -------------- 0 -------------- 0 -------------- 0 -------------- 94 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 k Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 0 20 0 0 Buses/Hour --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 '' SIGNAL SETTINGS: PRETIMED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR SE LTR GREEN 61 15 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 RED 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 '. LOST TIME PER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6.6 SEC "` CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh)--_ EB L 252 .34 .16 L .05 33.1 D 33.8 D LT 265 .48 .16 LT .08 34.7 D R 225 .22 .16 R .03 32.3 D WB L 378 .22 .23 L .05 27.0 D 35.5 D T 397 .79 .23 T .19 38.6 D i R 270 .11 .23 R .03 26.3 D NB L 303 .47 .56 L .26 12.5 B 10.4 B E. TR 1869 .16 .56 TR .09 9.5 B SB L 598 .02 .56 L .01 8.7 B 10.4 B T 1884 .31 .56 T .17 10.4 B R 801 .29 ..56 R .16 10.3 B INTERSECT: DELAY = 18.9 SEC/VEH Xc = .55 LOS = C Sum(v/s)CR-= .52 �f i vi HCH Summary Results for Case: X4-F-A SE MH RD MICHELL DR BRICXELL AVE 9 SE 15TH RD PM FEAR FUTURE/ADJ Version 2.03 1888 i I X Delay 41 41 I I Lane v/s v/c (sec/ I I A-pE Gran-p Ratio Radio Leh), L0-8 I I EB LT .04 ,IB 26,2 D I I I R .04 .17 26.2 D IIl I *+ 41 All 26.2 D IjI I 36 WB *LT .06 .26 26.0 D R .01 .04 25.3 D All 26.6 D i7 I II 40 MB *L .01 .40 11.1 B 42 � I I I i TR .33 .46 5.1 B 4 All 5.4 B I I I I 45 4B 901 SB L .13 .19 5.0 A 1 2 3 *TR .67 .97 22.2 C -* •-- , rr 'IN 4 1 All 21.9 C 25 4 2] Iff 1rr 2 76 Intersect .74 .77 17.8 C 5- 78 HCM/Cinema V2.03 ORGANIZATION: B and A Partners, Inc. BRICKELL AVE @ SE 15TH RD SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL DR SUMMARY -ANALYST JUN-MIAOANALYSIS DATE: 11-02-95-== ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK FUTURE/ADJ CASE: X4-F-A --------------------------------------------------------------=----------- LANES GEOMETRY: MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT) App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB 2 1 LT 12.0 R 12.0 NB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 Pn EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH Data L- T- -T-- -R-- -L-- T -- R --- ---------- Mvt Vol (vph) 17 40 --- 42 -L-- 36 -T-- 41 -R-- 12 -L-- 45 901 48 41 1888 41 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ?kHvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 RTOR Vol (vph) 0 0 0 0 Peds/Hour 20 20 20 20 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 °s Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour 20 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS: SEMI -ACTUATED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH: 115 PHASE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR LTR SB LTR g GREEN 25 2 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 YELLOW RED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2.0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 4.6 SEC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH: Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) --- EB LT 371 .18 .24 LT .04 26.2 D 26.2 D R 280 .17 .24 R .04 26.2 D WB LT 340 .26 .24 LT .06 26.8 D R 350 .04 .24 R .01 25.3 D NB L 42 .48 .72 L .01 11.1 B TR 2424 .46 .72 TR .33 5.1 B SB L 240 .19 .69 L .13 5.0 A TR 2319 .97 .69 TR .67 22.2 C 26.6 D 5.4 B 21.9 C INTERSECT: DELAY = 17.0 SEC/VEH Xc = .77 LOS = C Sum(v/s)CR = .74 F 9 6 - 78 r J Florida Department of Transportation - District 4 J I Arterial Level of Service Estimate I J Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual J ART PLAN Version 1.2 J I Developed by: W.McShane, E.Shenk, and G.Sokolow 12-14-91 J J Modified by: FDOT District Four 5-18-92 J J DESCRIPTION J I ROAD NAME: Brickell (SE 8th St to SE 15th Rd) (PEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB t J OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: I Study Time Period: NB PM PEAK I Analysis Date: Nov 8, 1994 I User's Notes: Future Total/Adj Timing r (TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS J AADT: 15,910 J K FACTOR: 0.100 D FACTOR: 0.593 J PHF: 0.950 ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,900 j J % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 39 J ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS I I NUMBER OF THRU LANES 1 J PEAK DIRECTION: 2 J OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 2 J URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR J RURAL DEVELOPED (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) J FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) J For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free flow speed of: J Rural 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 I Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 J Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 J Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 I SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS I J ARRIVAL TYPE @v J PEAK DIRECTION: 4 I OFF-PEAK DIRECTION: 3 I TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 2 (1=ACTUATED 2=PRETIMED J 3=SEMIACTUATED) I SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH: 115 WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.55 96- 78 [AM SB PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE FROM LENGTH g/C LINK PEAK HOU VOLUME EXCLUS. LANES LANES SIGNALS 2-20 SIGNALS 2-20 LENGTH (FT) ARRIVALI TYPE I 1-2 944 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,825 4 I 2-3 1,280 2.081218 2 115 0.68 1,425 4 I 13-4 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 14-5 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 5-6 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 6-7 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 7-8 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 8-9 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 9-10 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 10-11 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 11-12 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 112-13 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 13-14 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 14-15 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 r- 115-16 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4I 1 16-17 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 17-18 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 I 1 18-19 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 1 19-20 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 4 J NB OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS % TURNS CYCLE EFFECTIVE I FROM LENGTH g/C PEAK HOU EXCLUS. SIGNALS SIGNALS LENGTH ARRIVAL LINK VOLUME LANES LANES 19-1 19-1 (FT) TYPE 1 20-19 0 12 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 19-18 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 118-17 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 17-16 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 16-15 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 I 1 15-14 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 I 114-13 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 13-12 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 12-11 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 I i, 1 11-10 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 10-9 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 19-8 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 18-7 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 1 I7-6 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 31 6-5 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 15-4 0 38.95275 2 115 0.55 1,760 3 4-3 0 38.95275 2 115 0.68 1,760 3 3-2 667 32.83208 2 115 0.55 1,425 3 2-1 647 7.470651 2 115 0.32 1,825 3 i 7 8 J SB PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS THRU ARTERIAL J J THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK J LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS J 1-2 - 607 J 0.29 7.5 B 26.3 B J 12-3 1319 0.51 5.0 A 25.7 B J J 3-4 0 J 4-5 0 I J 5-6 0 J J 6-7 0 J J 7-8 0 J J 8-9 0 J 9-10 0 J y 110-11 0 J J 11-12 0 J 12-13 0 ! r" J 13-14 0 ! J 14-15 0 I J 15-16 0 I J 16-17 0 .' . J 17-18 0 I J 18-19 0 ! j19-20 0 ! J SB Arterial Speed = 26.0 mph ! LOS = B J NB - OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULT THRU -- ARTERIAL THRU V/C THRU APPROAC SPEED LINK ! J LINK FLOW RAT RATIO DELAY LOS (MPH) LOS ! J 20-19 0 i J 19-18 0 J 18-17 0 I J 17-16 0 I J 16-15 0 ! ! 15-14 0 J 14-13 0 ! J J 13-12 0 J 12-11 0 r J 11-10 0 J 110-9 0 J 9-8 0 J k_ J 8-7 0 ! 7-6 0 ! ! J 6-5 0 1 5-4 0 J t J 4-3 0 r J 3-2 472 0.22 10.0 B 21.9 J C J 2-1 I 630 0.52 24.8 C 17.8 D J J NB Arterial Speed = 19.4 mph ! J 1 LOS = C NOTE: PRESS ALT-P TO CALCULATE AND PRINT SPREADSHEET 96- 78 TAB 4 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL SITE UTILITY STUDY 96- 78 r i THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICRELL SITE UTILITY STUDY I. Drainage A. Drainage Area The site which is located between South Bayshore Drive and Biscayne Bay, just north of S.E. 12th Street has N approximately 320 feet of frontage on South Bayshore Drive. It consists of a total of 2.41 acres. e» �., After development, approximately 85% of the site will be impervious areas and approximately 15% of the site will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas runoff. The coefficient of run-off is arrived at as follows: 0.85 (impervious) x 0.90 = 0.765 +0.15 (pervious) x 0.30 = 0.045 overall coefficient 0.810 B. Existing Drainage System The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system for South Bayshore Drive. The existing roadway systems are of sufficient capacity to handle the present conditions. C. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system of this building will consist of drainage wells which will allow the stormwater runoff to be fully contained on -site. No off -site runoff is anticipated from this building. It is anticipated that three drainage well will be sufficient to handle the run- off (See Table 1 for drainage calculations). The stormwater will be collected thru a system of catch basin inlets and transported by pipes to the well locations. The wells will allow the stormwater to flow into the Biscayne Aquifer. The wells will be designed to handle the stormwater runoff and tested for capacity as they are installed. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas will be diverted thru detention structures which will capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the wells. 96— 78 II. Water Distribution The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 12 inch water main along South Bayshore Drive. The water connections to serve the building will be done from this 12 inch main at the front of the building. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic water and irrigation water. No on -site wells are planned for this project. The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes Residential Apartments 356 Apts. @ 200 G.P.D./Apt. Business/Commercial 6,272 Sq. Ft. @ 10 G.P.D./100 Sq. Ft. Total flow demand 71,800 G.P.D. 71,200 gal. 627 gal. 71,827 gal. III. Sanitary Sewer The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 12 inch gravity sewer line along South Bayshore Drive. It is anticipated that a single gravity connection to the 12 inch line will be sufficient to serve this project. No pump t station will be built onsite to serve this project. Table 3, i below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Table 3 Sewage Flows Average Flow (from Table 2) Average Flow Peak Flow 50 x 3.5 71,800 G.P.D. 50 G.P.M. 175 G.P.M. r �A 9 IV. Solid Waste Generation Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standardized on -site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided by either private hauling companies and/or The City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's Disposal or Recycling facilities. The projected volumes of solid waste generation are shown in table 4, below. Table 4 Solid Waste Generation Residential Apartments 356 Apts. @ 8 lbs./Day = Business/Commercial 2,848 lbs. 6,272 Sq. Ft. @ 4 lbs./100 Sq. Ft./Day = 251 lbs. Total Solid Waste Generation 3,099 lbs. t (1.55 tons/day) 96- 78 �; i Table 1 Drainage calculations Runoff Generations 1. Total Gross Area 2.41 Acres a. Impervious 85% or 2.05 Acres . b. Pervious 15% or 0.36 Acres r�11 2. Average Runoff Coefficient (.85)(.9)+(.15)(.3)=0.81 3. Design Storm 5 years 4. Time of Concentration 10.00 min 5. Rainfall Intensity 6.10 in/hr 6. Peak Runoff (Q) = CiA (.81) (6.10) (2.41)=11.91 CFS Assume each 24" diameter drainage well flows at 650 gpm per foot of head - using 3 feet of head: 3 x 650 gpm = 1,950 gpm per well 1,950 gpm = 4.31 CFS 2.76 Wells ` (F1 w per 4.31 CFS Provide1 Provide 3 - 24" diameter wells 4;- Detention Tank: Providing 1 1/2 minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,950 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,950 gpm x 1.5 min = 2,925 gal/tank or 391 cubic feet each. Provide 2 tanks each with the following interior dimensions: 6' (width) x 71 (height) x 101 (length) = 420 cubic feet. Provide 3 tanks w/420 cubic feet volume each 96- 78 TAB 5 00 r- r, THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC AND TAX BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI 5 4± Prepared for The Related Companies t by SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 November 14 1995 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF BENEFITS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction Objectives Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact Measures of Economic Impact Description of Results THE PROJECT OVERVIEW DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Employment Wages Output Local Taxes OTHER CONSIDERATIONS E 1 Public Sector Cost Impact Fees SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS PAGE 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 15 15 16 17 96-i 78 0 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS) The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Yacht Club at Brickell development: Construction Period Impact Annual RnEt Economic Activity Stimulated: Output $67,160,022 $4,088,441 Taxes 1,855,403 1,289,017 Wages 10,430,000 231,000 Total $79,445,425 $5,608,458 Jobs created 157 9 2 96-- 78 r THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS s� t r ti i FA THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a modern apartment complex located at 111 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida (the Project). The Project is 356 rental units in a 32 story building. There will be 29 typical apartment wz- floors (3rd thru 31 st) consisting of approximately 12 units per floor and a Penthouse Suite on the 32nd floor. The 2nd floor, which is the Health Club, consists of a Fitness Center, Racket Ball Courts =" and a Health Spa with a sauna, showers and a locker room. The parking garage is next to the building and has 4 floors of parking and the topl5th floor contains a sun deck and a pool. There is a 25 meter lap pool on south side of building. The Ground Floor contains the lobby, Business Center, and potential other commercial spaces. The site contains approximately 3.3 gross acres. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both the development and operational phases of the project. Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of The City of Miami. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. 3 96- 78 I n: THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Salaries to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. 4 78 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEIFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact was 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact was 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in The City of Miami. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. • Wage s include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits.. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage- earner resides. • Local Taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. 96— �1 W THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICICE LL - INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact (Continued) acquisition, site sums expended for land ac Direct Expenditures include those p Q preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project. Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described above. • Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories. (1) Development (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the apartment complex. 6 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL THE PROJECT OVERVIEW w THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The proposed Project is a 356 unit modern apartment complex located on a 3.151 available net acre parcel at 111 South Bayshore Drive. The site contains approximately 3.3 gross acres. Construction is expected to commence in May of 1996. The construction period is expected to be 22 months. Occupancy of the constructed units is expected to begin no later than July 31, 1998. F i� J t.- 7 78 k THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Y k f y.- f_ al t� (� i. THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL (DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami, A summary of such impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 157 $10,430,000 $36,894,058 30,265,964 $1,855,403 $49,179,461 30,2651964 Total Development Impact 157 $10,430,000 $67,160,022 $1,855,403 $79,445,425 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 9 $231,000 $2,079,150 2,009,291 $1,289,017 $3,599,167 2,009,291 Total Operational Im act 9 $231,000 $4,088,441 $1,289,017 $5,6083458 8 96- 78 THEYACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL IDISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Impact of Construction: The approximately $37 million for site preparation and construction expenditures within Greater Miami would create approximately 157 new full time equivalent jobs with the maximum number of 225 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $10.4 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the above chart, spending for site preparation and project construction would result in a total estimated impact of $77.6 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct site preparation and project construction expenditures, including wages, and the multiplied effects of resulting indirect benefits. Impact of Ongoing Operations Asa result of the on -going operation of the 356 unit apartment complex, Greater Miami will gain z approximately 9 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $231,000 thousand annually. These figures do not include sub -contract agreements for other maintenance services. The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of $4.3 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of residential units as well as the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of $1.8 million and an estimated annual tax benefit of $1.3 million. The specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 14. 96- 78 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR THE YACH T CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to'be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to The City of Miami by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. l Employment �r Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for The City of Miami residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A fportion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the tenants in area businesses. Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going management of the apartment complex. As can be seen in Exhibit 1, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 157 employees over a two year period and the total on -going employment will average 9 not including sub -contract agreements for various services. The total on going positions can be summarized as follows: i� Management • Security/Police l� • Parking • Maintenance and Clean -Up t i M 9G 8 10 r 11 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in The City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: • Eating/Drinking Grocery • Auto Rental Other Transportation Service Station Recreation • Retail F Although it is known that these expenditures will be made, in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be difficult to contend that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from out of town rather that other parts of the city or county. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly p gg Y related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. a d a 96- 78 il 11 fli THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Developer cost expected to be expended in Miami (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of Management Company • New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners Exhibit 2 shows a summary of the development cost expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in The City of Miami, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. The multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. We tested the reasonableness of the multiplier used by comparing it to both economist and the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consist of land acquisition and site preparation, soft cost and hard cost which includes constriction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. To incorporate the effect of respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami we applied a multiplier to the total direct output. This created total output created from the development phase of the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami another $96.64 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $36,894,058. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $30,265,964. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $67,160,022. 96- 7R 12 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the apartment units and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the apartment complex. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in The City of Miami. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operation of the apartment complex except for wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $2,079,150, Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $2,009,291. Total output created from ongoing operations is $4,088,441. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. 6T4 13 78 r THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The total development phase real property taxes, are expected to be $1,855,403 and the real property taxes expected to be generated annually are $1,289.017. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. Annual One -Time City Operating $416,888 $600,069 Schools 386,901 556,903 County Operating 281,849 405,688 Debt Service - City 86,932 125,129 Debt Service - County 32,569 46,879 South Florida Water 22,579 32,500 Library Operating 13,581 19,548 School Debt Service 41,939 60,368 Florida Inland Navigation 1,651 2,377 Environmental Projects 4,128 1 5,942 Total $1,289,017 1 $1,855,403 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. 14 MM r THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS f f' F °96- 78 �7 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which could involve increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. VA Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: K Public Safety (police and fire) Highways • Health and Environmental Services a Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infra structure) • Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objective to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. i.� Impact Fees >; A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being ;Ye measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below: • City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee 0 Administrative Fee • City of Miami Developmental Impact • Building Permit Fee • Dade County Roadway Impact Fee 0 Other Fees 0 Installation Energy Fee t For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1,320,088 and other fees total approximately $818,970. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VIII. 4 15 96- 78 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the Yacht Club at Brickell Project, it appears evident that such a development can clearly bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on Greater Miami as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the Project direct employment and employment created in the a surrounding community through new residents spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 157 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project will be approximately 9 not including sub -contract agreements for various operations of the Projects. Tax Revenue 3 The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: $1,855,403 $1,289,017 The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost and outgoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of responding within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $67,160,023 Annual $ 4,088,441 16 96- 78 r r, Exhibit I Exhibit II Exhibit III Exhibit IV Exhibit V Exhibit VI Exhibit VII THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL EXHIBIT LIST Summary of Economic Impact Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Computation of Indirect Benefits Schedule of Project Development Cost Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Operating Assumptions Exhibit VIII Impact and Other Fees 78 17 h THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT 4 ........................ n� s t 1 OUTPUT $36,894,058 2,079,150 $38,973,209 $30,265,964 $2,009,291 $32,275,256 WAGES $10,430,000 231,000 $10,661,000 EMPLOYMENT 157 166 EXHIBIT I $1,855,403 1,289,017 $3,144,420 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS 4 TAXES k � r EES WAGES DIRECT COST AD V&UUJKbf% $6,375,000 155 $10,360,000 $24,543,258 $1,855,403 2 $70,000 $330,000 5,645,800 157 $10,430,000 $36,894,058 $1,855,403 9 $231,000 $2,079,150 $1 289 017 166 $10 661 000 38 973,209 3,14414201 96- 78 r THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ! COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS EXHIBIT III TOTAL APPLICABLE COMPUTED INDIRECT tIPTION EXPENDITURE MULTTPLTRR RRNrrTT THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST SPENT IN TYPR nr rnQm % I A FA EXHIBIT IV $15,010,276 $37,525,689 $41,278,258 3.12% 3.12% 3.12% NOTE: 2 MONTHS IN DEVELOPMENT FOR 1988 nQ Go $41,278,258I 3.12% FL, : .: a 1 K1pi.dYb W.�s.liiV 0i-..3� Mpi� ni➢Yd&� . :- THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICRELL EXHIBIT VI ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES ALLOCATION ALLOCATION OF APPLICABLE OF ANNUAL ONE TIME DESCRIPTION BASIS MILLAGE TAXES RATIO TAXES 41,278,258 0.5000 20 639 1. 60 $ $29,708 41 27 8 258 9.3730 $386,901 30.02$ 556 $903 , #3:aided`3#7tri�y<�:.:> 2 8 41 278 5 $ o 6.82 80 2 848 S 81 21.87$ 40 5 690 41 2 78 258 2.1060 $86,932 6.74$ $125,129 41278258 0.7890 32 569 3 2. 5 $ 7 $46 ,89 41 278 258 0.5470 22 579 .7 1 5� 32 500 $41r 2 78 258 , 0.3290 $13,581 1.05?s 19 548 41 278 258 1.0160 4 939 1 3 25% $60 366 ��..Iz43�a.:ii.T1a.3....:ice.::::::::::::.::.. 7 258 8 $S 0 .0400 1 651 . 0.13$ 2,37741,2.. 41 278 258 0.1000 4 128 0.32% $5 942 41 2 78 258 31 .2275 $1 289 017 0 1 0� 1 S855,403 0 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL EXHIBIT VII ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 444,225 359,371 356 1,009 $1.65 1,971 5,836 163,457 53,190 6,525 46,477 3,865 5,325 140,699 104,977 55,535 May-96 22 $6,375,000 $405,000 $0 $28,000,000 $1,000,000 $400,000 $0 $400,000 $400,000 $2,559,200 $2,145,800 $3,500,000 $8,500,000 $39,000,000 $9,800,000 $800,000 $560,000 $70,000 150 225 2 3 2 $15.00 $2,310,150 $231,000 9 1.9664 96- 7 J�� THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND'OTHER FEES EXHIBIT VIII Square Footage 444,225 444,225 359,371 163.457 Amount $311,210 111,207 9,336 $431,753 $333,216 555,119 $888,335 $1,320,088 $420,000 86,175 0 61,549 40,000 22,362 14,000 6,155 160,000 5,539 1,111 1,050 945 50 35 $818,970 NOTE: THIS PROJECT MAY BE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY ROAD IMPACT FEE. IF THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE ROAD IMPACT FEE THE TOTAL IMPACT FEES DUE WILL BE $986,872. THIS NUMBER MAY AFFECT THE TOTAL ECONOMIC OUTPUT FROM THIS PROJECT BASED ON THE MULTIPLIERS USED. 9 6 w 7 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY MILLAGE RATES Source: Property Appraiser of Dade County, Real Estate Section, 1995 Final Millage Chart -� 78 e TAB 6 6' it 2 The Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse Suite Miami, Florida 33145 .J Tel. (305) 460-9900, Fax (305) 460-9911 I. POLICY STATEMENT Our company policy is to provide equal employment opportunities to all applicants and employees without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicapped condition or status as a disabled and/or Vietnam Era veteran and to affirmatively seek to advance the principles of equal employment opportunity. The company takes affirmative action to insure that applicants and employees are not discriminated against because of their status as handicapped persons. µ We affirm that the above policy and the Affirmative Action Program herewith reflect the company's attitude and its intention to: 1. Recruit, hire, train and promote for all job classifications without regard to handicapped condition. 2. Base decisions on employment so as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity for qualified handicapped persons. 3. Insure that all other personnel actions such as compensation, promotions, benefits, transfers, terminations, Company -sponsored training, educational tuition assistance, social and recreational programs are administered without regard to handicapped condition. The company, in compliance with the Rehabilitation Act of £`. 1973, maintains a written Affirmative Action Program. The t+ Affirmative Action Program is made available to employees, upon, request, in the Personnel Department during working hours. Overall responsibility for directing and implementing the policy enunciated herein and the Company's Affirmative Action Program for qualified handicapped persons has been assigned to Wanda Ponce, Personnel and Payroll administrator, 2828 Coral Way, Miami, FL 33145, 305-460-9900, who serves as the company's Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. All personnel actions are analyzed to insure that this policy and the Affirmative Action Program are being properly implemented. The company is determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the law and of the Affirmative Action Program. 96-- 78 0 & October 23,1995 Architects PA MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees 8603 South Dixie Highway Suite 205 FROM: Stuart Cohen i- Miami, Florida 33143.7807 Tel. 305.669.9RE: AFF I RM I T I VE ACTION FLAN Fax. 305.669.0126 Lic. No. AA C000779 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: it is the policy of COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. to base employment on merit, qualifications and competency and its personnel practices will not be in+luenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place o+ birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status.. One of the management duties of all principals at COHEN-FREEDMAN- ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. is to ensure that the +ollowing personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmitive action to attract and retain "., qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, y, training, compensation and promotion of employees. j 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECT'S P.A. is committed 'to take ' a++irmitive action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and p c„ enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this organization. J d Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty +or any individual despite the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. has assigned Mr. Guillermo J. Encinosa, Vice - President for the Firm in charge of Personnel, as the A++irmitive Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. A+firmitive Action Plan, as approved by Metropolitan Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the +irm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The +irm is and will continue to Pxceed the plan goals and objectives. 96- 78 r E� The A+firmitive Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to +ind and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially Black minorities. One of the most important things that the firm has been doing is ac ively seeking Black: pro+essionals in the fields of expertise thaN the it practicing. t Cohen - A.I.A. Zrua I d e n t I C� A ■ t r LAS©N SYSTEM'S ING. E.31. . 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149.900-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 THE FOLLOWING IS AN IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES bl, r 00 60, ;"tip t lri' � ilggr�,n _ • y 1ii �•,r1ya .. I U , 1� INIF Iwra; •1 �r1Y1_.'Syti��11A a; I '�7r ' � •i�4ii ��Ilru;;aV��iA �� Lap ll Vr.l arw► { i� ��"'i ef r; �, .Ali* ':/•. 1. . .I:... .__..^` �r 1k, r'•.'h�-■1•;-pY4wi�M a I:L. i....�.L _... ��"I�ae Y■ '•+�•, t kl ilrr j __ 11 �}IA I1 V' i 111 J. 40. limp "i 1. Ji9 R>il 1Y111M� I I Inq MI�IIq' � 1 ul „� nu• �u� ful 1 rr��, Y•� � . r. IIIRIi 11� Y. Y.,w 16rR Ml il 'iota. r111,N � 1\ 1iHi In,• un, pu Ai+i MM� I srarwrl i„ Il � 11:1 k r►. I' I tl 1 , ilYlr r' � q .i n11� 'nnr Inr. MI t IrpIwP�II uur I�(Irww J ..I 1tl1I '111/r a 1,1/II 1►1 1\ n' t r. � l ri ¢Rdp1111FN , r.ws �; un� ,r i�i� 11 s ! Ilil, .....L' >•` Id II\ t r re 1 /rY.:ilill'�P YYYwwwlll �, Xt.t . +1.a�1 �ji 1r1 I� �,, -r i nqj _ 1 �i o�11 r�l ❑ j+ .✓ ��� ..' '; f /� li 7. I�►1 �1 .Irw_aF,IMP t DIY r, 3 i i - � � » i ,+ � ,,\ �►� . 1` } t�11M � 11 '.. M, � +w ' kJ,-...+R IR�� .,r, �y x Y 1 T 1 j i.' t►yT A( .:3A'�` as=r71 `I-( il,l 7:�, 33rt. I� � a r 11M1•� �' I ' '4a �Y5 mot. , •--�'� L � '.:ram' e`'" \� �9 F r ter` i,• •I,+r•" '�i .. I f w 1 .r• w� � /,7� Its ' �".'11,1 L �: � .i '.' ��.. ._ e'�• � � '� `p'S� i ,s •%"^^ � �.r.�7 y�,� .'., a".d� e.g� a.i lliki :�'9r'T� , r4+;k! � �$R. ,mac +•4ac .d� :yUM. �,,pgY�rt�2 JI i�� � �� Y N L•• - �+ , '� i. Wes" bP9' � `mot-nNM'+"+Y�' 2 +•o q f•. rE IS rIr�I11If tt 411114t �+IM■ ;_ Isar, Ilk gro �*\G tyr•� lam -I' . r' tr:w • u .At r,� J .J•� is I ,IYI ' llme ,�til-4rsalr;� _j .1, tlTlil rol 7--1L-I-_A__ I ry ul rd r !•• tA.—{ 1H .f$", A. 1 IrJt 'jrr -/pa I 1 I ❑ i a 3TRIr;y 44 is iI 'J •r11S I rl< - •'_' A s.""Yi,-- mot Its f- w{ u' i,.r.►l ,1,�-► r; j1 Irul ■1_-_"rr—a �; 'aA�y_ 1 r ■ ,..i ,��',li , � �� r•• 1 "' l�l. it it f,�_—a�W:.__e NIC lei:_■-yJirwW A.:�. { I�MI _.11E71iw ■tr'. it url 'tdt11_�' :rac:,m ■ rt 1 ,14 r111 �f , 11 ram,:. Llw II�Y ,.R 4.. 'P i U nLIA:H�W "1. t - ■ ohm q — ,. ■ _ w ' i � -{ H . 1 Illlr ' Il It ■�� �� ' I.• `�`,t t flu 1� 1 r■ nn� R� Rt .r layw •:rwr�in f�l N:. u.l n!Ir une �u,.. P, H4AB' u ,n •nl e■fIP"I� ., � .Y•''t ,t , ■ ,�,4 r A 'Iilla ulw ' 11 a rl � aa'nr, 3. l� ... 1yi� / JLI 1 rl'.A lot nts1 4. •' ll■u t +,s. rup I 1'ly� f`-+ [,(�,�� r' tr0 $_.1_retlam�{ A''iw 11 •� f�l 0 lu sir+�i� .fir-'»i M�@iV '44 11\;+ ti �n lilk� (•, _'-- U1�•tcrr.• ?�i . r. •'i L?{,' .J Hlq t\, (.: 11!'. /tint; , ..,,::Mit �; t .' t u�'4, , rl t■If11 • rcafw. wi ,tl �lrt -•� I - - .r at 19. l � • irx. it � �4��� .'l�i 4 , � A,1 ��f ���t. �1 4"` it , -' ' Alt. � R. • 1 �I I f #��r i r.� r Y � t , r,"'•ri y �; Y''�rr � r f .i..r <a'm.,r� ,.: i. t MI�II �'c*r � �. t..+t '�R �"R• +�'r'�`.�' '�♦ a r° .�a a � � ,,.a ar 00 ..✓ p t -i,� yW''4 •✓,+ h 7 s "" ,, _ X'Poo (i'II}v'..: $Irx~ rr?7ff zr ..w"• it i,r ` _ J ... T K ae*:� D3nY fa*'. !/ KIM ♦ e � 1'- '�rflt P } r i ) } � \ � 10 / ^ . � \ \� \ % � /\/\. S' ' :k��:. r - �Il�liiiiilllliililililll - ��. �Illpllllllllllllifillllllllilllr IfFfil1111{�RNi!#ii 1IBM0 t�ti t y6� III�JIIi�iillllllnll I�I[�� gl(IiClllil#11��111�) 12 AIL li>flIuiiiirpullll�iil(liiliu nilu�lluipuilUq19TH LEVEL �•�",`J M4^'Y lDd uti t� pm�q Ley Y,"ii•'3�-., `. - - it f=iO:fl�if: F, r h 1. � I r �F>> 1 7TH LEVEL EL •t5p'-�' 9, hip1. n. a IJ!!i �I!yT 0a;l __.._�.�.. �'j�� .1 Ii 1l� ) 1! i�.t ) ' i r I i� t it 1 i. QA •a:�e: paz a __ i 16TH LEVEL .ia' EL t-p` vil Ap- 1 I 15TH.LEVEL. -. :.___._.. EL •t3:"•� ;` � fir !�'• t� r� ,�; � :1� In 14TH LEVEL EL. •II3'.0' "� �a � �x ma's' � ,r � ��•;�i�, � T H LEVEL I:iT EL: •tta .p 'F� Y r r qv i ETH LEVEL EL, •1�J� •D• PARTIAL WEST _ELEVATION 1/e' SCALE k PRELIMIMARY DESIGN FOR BRICKEL APARTMENT PROJEC COHEN • FREEDMAN • ENCl,N0'S l►lr,: MIAMI, FLORIDA " ArChit+eCtS P� - 8603 Sa Diliie 1I61 Awa SWEe 20S " '"Miem Plurlda 33E�13� Stli'66�.9! k , ' r l : ' ,1 { r T x w•s ttrax 20' sotbsek ACRES \ a s 2.41 ACRES ' 104.976.6 S.F. c t \ 50�� rz rr+ T, ISO 7 a } ti �i i y I x r moommom alai 0 z u z z bay eniitdn6lom tin, w z w 19 BISCAYNE BAY 0 u w 0 cr- ir DD Ne ul All r r Ll trh SECOND LEVEL PLAN EL. +15'-0 SCALE: V 30' y 0,40 ACRES H Wears 36 ae ack 9A58' It I • I raffy ch bay .etba • 1 1 1 u � GAGARAGE , t! bay extenalon ' bdywalk ' BISCAYNE BAY — a4Rl/M 1 l';k2 9678 ri pr"tq time -1 THIRD LEVEL PLAN j EL. +24'-0" SCALE: 1" = 30' R I property IWW i . 17TTT front eeiback s t p \ \ � PART \ \ s \ * so 1R \ 11 j: t i 1 X hh s ca 4 4 Q) L 0 j 'rh FOURTH LEVEL PLAN f ,�. i 557, i EL. +33'-0" SCALE; 1" 30' i 0.40 ACRES ----I--•—: 17.207 &K e aa} ,.ti gare e e ack 4'1458' 6 I I bey extension I I .r -- ramramo do 1 bay eetba I I I I i l 1 1 I 1J_L1_L�L NG GARAGE Ilne of pool I I e 1 I 1lo CAAs above 1 1 11 I 9fD'- I �. bayeak I I BISCAYNE BAY In to on an 1 I ZD 1 1 1 I N I 1 ' . _ . — . 310.P10 naw property Itme I 9 I orlglnal property One I I I I 4 V z Z fil � p 1 V) y rT� o U , e4flom I F;k4 A H �I a i� 105" �l— j bay exlenHon I I i bey �etba 1 I POOL � I j RECREATION DECK 1 1 _ - m I m I/1 1 u u I ba Ik ' `� I - { ► i BISCAYNE BAY 'm - - in --- --- --- In �m an --^^ - ---- t - -�- ---- ^ -- I - -- i i I j 53= shoreline view corridor um LAP POOL L_J � 1 1 j _ new property line 1 I --------------------------- ... 1 I original property line I I 1 i 1 1 i t 1.83 ACRES I i I ► I � 1 i I 79,548 S.F. i i j i i i 1 I i i I ! 1 ---------------•---------- ----- --•- ---------____J S.E. 12th STREET a>.m• ;k5 96-- 78 r . tee el. 4 3 BR 1395 S.F. j STAIR s' 2 BR -f 1194 S.F. rm tea e.r. a S k Li Li 335 33. RALCM r I 111'4U11 I$ 1A hl I mor WYN Alm I-IT1111TH ._ �, }. ffr7-55 ._� _ice � _i �� � r� 1' 1' 1 �1�-1 , OIIIII�IYI� 1 _ IIIIIIIIIIIIII11i1i11118C1111fllllllllllll111rlllllilllil{11111111111i1i11 iilllllllllll(Illllllllllli[IlfllllllilElllllilil[Illllilll�llillllilllll{ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIf11111111111.111111111111111.IIIllillillllllllll if 11 (11Will lil�lllillll(Illlllll111111II1i1111111111111111i11llllllillllllll�llll�l 1 � � ; �� IIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllull(IIIIIOIIiilll111111111111111(Illllllllllfl IiIIIIEIIII(IIll111EI(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII((flllllllll(Iil(IIIIIIII!!II IIIIIIIIIII((I11111111NIIllillllilllll!(1(IIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111Eilllll Illlllllll111�II11111111111111111111ElIINI�IIIIIIII(Illllilllli(IIIIIIII IIEIIII101lIllllllillllllllllilill II(►il(Iilllllill��,,, IIII� I�111(iill�l IIII(IIIlllliill Illlillllll�lllllllllllllllilllllil � - - -- ��u�nr��nn m �� (1111111111i111111flllllllli1111111 _ smooth stucco Finish (tip.) ( sou. maisd) Xro high aluminum rail (natural patina) - 24TH LEVEL Z6-----,---I-�---- IIiIIlilllllllit11111111111i!{iI111Z3RD LEVEL- - - Iiill.illllllllllllllllnlllllllllll22ND LEVEL EL. 4cJ5'-O' 11111f11ff11if111fiiFIIIII01 =- - {{I111l1111111111111111111u1I I10120TH LEVEL EL. 411'-0* - Illllllllllllllliplllll111111111� - = - - - uilflllfuiffliu uffuf1u111f1IBTH LEVEL EL 45T-0. - iul�utiilllufl{ulullil{if►{l� IIIIIIIII 11111111f 11111111111111111111111111111111111iI111111111111111III11MI1111011111111 1lIIhI11111111iillflliill11111fI11111111111lIfIIIIIfIIif111111f11111f 1111111111111fI111if11111111111 .• EL 111111111111111111111f lllll 1111111111111111iIIEVEL IIIIIIl11lIII111111111111Illlililllllllllll(li(i_llllllll14TH LEVEL EL. 423'-V' 13TH LEVEL EL. I 5. idI01111111IM111111101 11{ifil{l12TH LEVEL EL. 409'-0' PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION 1/8•• SCALE 01 D PFiEL1M1MAfDY DESIGN FM.COH E N • FREEDMAN - ENC I N0 9r a BR1CKE- L APARTivlENT PROJECT MIAMI, FLpRDA Architects PA n, W 8603 So. Dixie Highway, Suite 205 Miamn Florida 33143 305.669.9393 i n a 9AYSHOW DR WAML FL 33129 :3 S ��nMn■f`■` s; ' 'mil■sW�y q rr�Iul nm2�nlu lP�;adg;Arualrio vmw IIJIIII 00111 C011(,71PIP IgllMI1111NG � 1 MCI pCIlI lI9I I.11I.,,IC!I�719mIM lig Flitlt r 79l,lllr C £: (fli171 9111 IIIIl OE C.�II173 GIt I1F � 7�8..lf; I.MV , rvuIt CW9971111 dill 11 �� 1�. llllbl ! 11 III Cluj •6 � P,ll I'?; `' I�1�!3� �!� }4 +�l�. far!• ��; v vn i0.011pxIIIIJi'dlfltlDll ICit'IA.! Ii�i iw its ti u k r;'uaa.l IQ P1TIIfT.1611gIYII1C401' fSfrl�ii �uao-lurlel.ir�urtuuu '"" iulruau `� .n �� CI!1111CB;IC0;111116IICII IClf.lq.l ilClll'illl0tlllfm1mtl61` � lin111!9' frill 141T1 ITMIMT Imm} t f� Siii ii, i 4 f,. IIICPRCIP nC'CiCIIiIII � �!%'FC9711IR'A11911NIM'pIW1191C(9@p101 tY617G'7 @91FUTFC nl611 1114 411n111YIiIIIiPOC 1N1 YC7 %imiaenm•rlFlum�uaitina,atuurnllu � rord,�ri I a zs ea 5gt .' qp uillu l Il inn nlmldr ' nos nll Clnlll li6fixplllAl11M96 " C )P.IJlxnl /affiF"��E `Is�l, 9 C`td1 t�R3 Si.�i 1800IRf141NICI 1llN. � Ialra - I6a SF.i: r? .'to flldlill101161C7C11p111I0..r 1!('C131 nnriloulp Moto 0.1hl Iill!I II tlC hi SIII NCS � .Omni ilaimll�lnwl�>Rllu ' iulurat •���' - rz t %�" CC1I!'IIIIItl,ClCilll{gUt I%1N'dl ��� � �--IIIIICIIillln Itl111111IIlIL v INAfBi'1 IN m L w ma-M NORTH EMATiON V'r96)_ '78 EMI ,__ TOP OF PEAS EL. -371'•0' -• . l4t•C MpVD —_... _. —..._ MACHINE RLI. EL. .301�4• ROOP LEVEL i- EL. •744'.0• 3EH0 LEVEL i' EL '7fA'•0' AM. _ --- b s 3MH MEL EL .7�1�•O• ..1' APT. ry� -•..._ --_. b LEM EL. W-O.0' 2M EL •24yl.0' LAI VL EVEL �' � � V N zTTx APT. LEVU o EL..240-0' � .n .—_-..._ �__— y 24TH LEVEL 4' EL W APT. � — � a UTH LEM b EL A21_0' m 14TH LEVEL F EL Iuv-o• 4) b �• �,- 1t31tD 18VEL. m EL -204—'-C as" 12M OIL- OW-01 21ST LEVEL h EL. -%b6'•0' u 20Tti LEVEL EL. 411i •0• LEVEL n EL .We,•O: IBTH LEVEL EL .Y3!'•O' APT. —� 9 APT. _ _ .�.,.._.... __._ 17TH LEVEL. EL. APT. ._.__14TH LEVEL-_ EL.141'-0' .�y APT. _.-.- ._.-_. ..... ._ . ...� „__ _ 16TH LEVEL EL. 432'•0' j APT. 14TH LEVEL m EL •123_C' a^: —.�. ...—.__. A.R.. 13TH LEVEL n EL AM. _..._ __ •___"__' .-.._�_ y�19T'H LEVEL m at..•WS'•0• tt.TH LEVEL EL..9b'•0' L] APT. -. LOTH LEVEL m EL. .AI'•O' (G� ' APT. .. _....... _.. OTH LEVEL A' EL. Ile,' _ C� Q 01 BTH LEVEL EL.'65'-V TS 0 U VVtL� ' APT.. TTN LEVEL 0EL. •69;•0' g i GTH LEVEL T'+ EL 31.•0 Ui% a: •Q APT, Li.t APT. STH LEVEL m , EL. •42-00'- ' 9 1 . A� 4TH LEVEL m EL..33'-0' PROPERTY'- LINE -_._..- _ - Q APT. - 31D LEVEL m EL. 24'•O' ' C APT. 1 END LEVEL 0 EL.PS'-0'_ ,.... w• ..__.-_� _ 1 __�• - 3"= MAE Lr. - 1 s a91STEELBBT H� V p CROSS�F� i I/It ruu t EA - STAIR a Roor LEY - 4 z v ----31TII LEVEL 29TH LEVEL b APT. .' APT. ' Z47" LEVEL APT. —21ST APT. —20TH APT. txm El - —lom AM 18TH LEVEL APT. 14TH 70 APT. —im LEVEL in ITH 1-1 ui | / APT. OTH LE M BUSINESS ` QUIMLL COURT prop—Y We / ..CLUB W.O. ok ' CROSS SPMON / .. l ' � ;.t m MH n 11 1,x gVej,;j "i r�ti �� iCl +PJ a6ilCiiAY4�AYY1� I��11QtWI10111I1p1 IIIMBI�RI6tl117911AW1lNIILIp�I 1ARMON 1 mllcrottuela'�+��QIQ �aluomwnwl� swat " iMlII „•,.. ,..h ti..II >'�1�®lfidlBl: M�~{j IM1 q��d�R'1i7�0lI �. i11RCIFEIIIC01tAEIC tkQ11WI.ma l�gN��SQ�lB nr/m ar�w AIp��C'A{M17 ASQ[NQWI ra911QiB1�Q •� ��� r i:� i��itoll WQBGw1�70FQEIL'dl I11�'IQQN9tll96 asnrommQZQeQ QERQCIYIIRII�RI®1 IAgAt9�ilf�l 11 MIT 777Mlog C rulaa�fQ�miQu i�l�>Q�als Firm bai�llg�,u,�acarme I�Qurramaa '^ is�r�aImQ�QQ¢minln�In�IQlI om�aQ��tiQ�naeQ�alroeQl�a g�; APikQ�MNPJL'dglYllClUk'IW1�19QfflfL'Qg011D11 IIIfUIYMI(pIAp7M01{9BEQm1811M11�I1 YMl1Q'IYI'le9B11�QIAQ1�19BNQBflFI1QN �R1161lNIVIPJII1�I11�111911R1�m W!9tf-0,1!IitSflEffJk •� IRII�6RRgi!<R ITJtW1�9WW,I1Qlk iMp�AN� J :, � EpRFCAr�T1•'1laCl !/, rro� RABIElBpB'I airul�elna�lm lamllllrsl� al���aa ra�Q � ISM, •/:14.7 /A A9 NYTI61eC�AL7lQQ7N r� i 111a �l ` 1 _ C � t yl I `a •� .� Cy.+ j *M-4 o V z �• u , AL z M a i o 0 N m x' Wto t of Gal` 1 I I i Iv I i I O IZ �ft W ++ IZ E CD I W CL g W O �s f—! ® MI n 1 9678 E SpECIFICATICINS = �?.� i DESCRIPTION The r 03 pool sham be a onu ll«n arcdd fe. :*Me; one, Maim) steep laps walh a ins la IW losKsm and classic consist thp« and Imiles base. The Post Mad Art" SIMI Lammppa calmbg number CXX Rb FRPISK MATERIALS The peat malfle than ba non cerros" Ilbfrglan rflnbrC Po°ha+:eiNo 10 the caroplala deb, Tenon, Anchor ben dale, and Amiga cool she be emstaluminum Am hardr••arl sham be lamp« nsl«aat palnla Nast. Anther belle to W hot dipped gallawied. DIMENSIONS The Post NAY be X'•XX'M nagl wllh s 2C dametar Date TIIB P sh«I Imp« hem ■ --k- pl P the lop al the be" to a rpminun a.s' al the pest lop. An IAlegfal at IAAInch letwin shad lop b 44mnmmOre�pmrMgn BIBTALLATION The poll "I be Provdad vnih 1 Ire AmmeMr W IS• brig Ltype antehp boa, N bd WIa1Wd on a l e' Don tlrcN. An misete door sink W INorid•c h IM bow W eslpAlrg elx.Yror WA! W aNnnp seas,. FINISH The post the# be shipped pane sthW Mth A g11«yxe0 e#phatr reaped, Col.Ir pd" ate tL ftk l71mv NadabN an olmeA IBNI (1«eprm Apahl. can Wonu 1001 old«k Mn100I. Cu.. colored )CC?ptsts e:e also availabit. CIM-FRIs/BK LIGHT POST 1i 51'EC(FICATION5 W 9Npn lumhNh Olelm� • "SCRIP" C-CYIn ass door iysA2S UWIA23W TM Nm:k Mad be caul shlnllnun awA620 UWAB2/w cOnalnAYsin.leofred and fluted vain a - .... - ....... _. sYeua:doubN laperm0 Wse. AotoW Ilona) Tope Mlbr wdh hlegral enCbAOd bsaMsl housing, and a dlcomWe tme pees with 19. neck The Iulmnaln .. FAvp In fwhwll �M Metal Tap S. In—) height and Gnu Man manure IJ' inFln ; j• i - -.. _.LYP_. .. ... 45'dlameler«theWllnm ¢h P r+aMe MATERIALS I 'vr'v^^ a,swA•hrr,ty 1'BN er. :LBNPC raS The vn1M«re bate .1nd bAfl,1V hausax i ,lisp be he." all caflalunxlwm I Ixn l,•rI MPC fro rrra IOrnxld two to the Mhein w:ih crxn01e10 Uetmf OWbe mAta,%band be clear 1CL .ur.tm •.YCCPC twwrw I _ Iflandlyd) or 0119. ludul«I pp1fcarb011- ale All hardM«a Shall to SIA1010 SIU01 - Light Source An uslenor herdNale shall be lamoer r Wia S,i,.r r w m.n rr. se roslttanl. _ WNC ve INSTALLATION 'JHSO N w�NAvt vrw lA1 the lunlinaea Shah math) on A T' 0.0 }HIS n.r ua.vr err killZenon LLN100 •sl+�rr•urrvr• rt wth its 1W that focknl tam $Cfnws .1.Nt Ta .t•orwrs w The gbh, sham be secured lot unl. H730' ,�.rr ur,«. rrw ri naveour IOur tia•dm. wckel NI wuws eAswr xo Thn Wdn11 and Sbctsl auallbly,had bin in.a .FN17s •r Sxr wsx an luln,Shod in a ou+.k dlxaMoct plug 1M290• M.r_rr.r SY And rr10ent on srfnWWl4 ball,,)plate. 1 he ballast Olala inan bd rarnorM by 4SSl n.r Af' hrr.+ta►. re kwSenlnnpp tw wewf. A smmn rNNI Shah J•Ssh s..r •.a l,rr,w sw.. kill 1410It xNnnwr.ae,w .O IN ad M the kowrlane he ow M0 1Mhill r.r Mam.ar S.aa+ea Qurck Ontonrx.cl phrgbtwlo pall rArn :1•Slso IY.r 1.A in dace .!•Silo' Yl.n nr r•a..rrMwe all FIN14N • ra.r r.rr r wf n 1 ... .... ..._._ _.. The IumMare sham be 3).wpoJ rahn• ; vox shod with a INR_ Ca101y1 •t�oawre. Mans Coal MQ or all Uplic p01yas1« J'120 Jr208 UI2,0 powder coal Colors "'AllNbin are bI •,11277 Ulau Ur,__ niardand), dark bone, cal 4 Arden u Custom. FrNN INIMIad alto trvs I- .. .......... I I I Opliorul EqulpeMrN LaNTBouRce Lumalavee"Whirnah od vnlh«thsr '�'v I►x.rnwsrA.++rHs an H.LO b31ASI and Socket aseembty of an lrc�ndeeeeM toeket. AN atopritAl '!n srra.r ter Awu.rwHf Shia be UL approved. MTeompplenit . ah.e be;[Sad PpalaM n"Ul // ar n"vm bAim. wan a Ctlpp« Adoy %HSS I—Sa Yer .xcka1CMacunnr shall and canto anlatl. BIIInI INS be Cord and cod. J•LBR ,r+.rr r•awtar ewss•w high power ISpp. rpulalMg hDe. start rrr�r.aM,altf inn 1 ■ae.Sr OROERp10 INFORMATION I .FPEC —.Iru•rc.+:+1121— Fat Catalog tlumotrf M miler skla pl«s boxes t) build and b Check appre J•PEC2 I+a«K+e Ga.etW vr/S j alabg Winter We"Ample Whw a N'SA25F•CA/BK•NIap120•I4PEC•F I .}F1 S.MrM III. Ni,r rlrwfS Fill overall dimonvore end opllonAl 'lF7 arrr 4sy nelral M .f eq.npmenl fell other Sdo. ANTIQUE Strdel Lamps, Inc. pusewee.w wr.r.rrwr ntbtstgin 10 �1) I KVTR[1� INC ra Iba ;lu• • nn.rtwrlYxk II vr4 \lea! . Tel GS 9•S {SII • I,a WS:A,NI;ty I m.N p,yxlL.r Ixu h ur* rxndnal .t• r t' rd m.ndxTv LVA,+IaI uI sir IaIM arrv.d 1 pJC•IAIs In lurout.n un.yuc t'uulmn Ildr slab. TI1u h' Inlgth m41CIA IndUJ! rMC 1 /2' wklr M• ! /B' Ilk l .Ink an.ln crap, rhlln IMF K k+IKlh mrJvlt 1n.iuda• IM trnlCr Hap ell wrll a. nru u.J rinq+. Hv ualnF Hrah m ad.lnem In Ilrti• I�ah•.lalr. L.aal warlSlp,• 1• rirhsdlT .Yhmnatad. n. ulhnA hl Y kn.A•L.In.F dural•Ia lY•Ix•h for All mnJ,xu Applkanon. I'hsly n•ler w apAyrkAlhnn kin (hlhr Aa i,o IA\I:'alal ul•Ilnnf as will Aa :Iscl u4frmenH:.111' h•Idr with ISr high will. 04f m f, nr e' h•nelh. 6 U <t 0 r kin• ur Ilx' mnN rinyl,•. ••I bay;lx N To,• h N...•Iq.h In, r'n Ihr• mark' I. Ili. %1,0 I "kill" i,u•uw Inn u•n.g uxwn. . J' nova)1 vndrr. .hlh\I In Ilx• 2' u.Jo I.. I /A' tllx I vr. I nap II,n111�n.ItIK )/Y'...1r44:.'lxdr• fb-lr'llnnl •d.•••I nr x .rd.h d hur •1 .avrouemn+,q sin real I ln. nr:.;.\I n\rlxark Inrm IxInK naulnl har, \...dn1:h .cllh ol•u,na.l •odm.' IMmnl t .A ....... •.. .•n• ulrlmlr,l. alva..nr.nrnl+: ]O qal :Y duru•'Irr 1•s 2F''nph. 12 Kn1 1r,u,r;Innrr h. H•IIII;I. SITE FURNITURE i� L y° L_ 1 l t FENCE DETAIL eaw.. fAWR heli AyC,PWP-- & 7ae /r0 WASH FLIP D ohvk,E I NR/U4RC CGiLa2 CY1VCO7E atAeD I fpYEA?SLA/OO�r/ $AA/D i CrPilS.S�D S..+�—. SLAW 96 Fr,P *Wfl)"Cr i PROMENADE SECTION vzbr-a' 0- raAM. C F/cLO: MaAK/FArc'ew 1lN/•LL�CG��CGL'AQM/y,i' � -RFD - CxA�e) Ay TU¢ED Yri►LBV Ar1£R SfAbNS a 4x8 RATXG+r'A: _ ITT MAID • CHAIeWN T ..._......._.._,12�0�..__ V/A/yL C WPSD CfIA/U �E71cl,Et/ EYE Mares /A/ 80444•PP6 ---- ;, TYPICAL PROMENADE PORTION eiWAYue 64Y 96— '78 V W O off., W W W to � W Q U V W _ t ter•. it 5. 4� • 45 [, arvlsro r 4•?4.95 f; INIF. E. J. P. ue � nr vrluNu�nr r i' L-3 or Three U rry I vy. em�wr�.a d eaNMav Ca go Ewc/im �r�Aor a C! 20 (WWA1"UM NaWrUc MAstNooc CAI 7 CUPS A//M/F C CA 3 04//*'9 eosE I7Ck AA cU Z urrFEnw fSN fl Picas Nina+ Cr/asw cA� LG l UV167As/en WlMeN5,, aH/Nese QC yJ O�'NROS/A �'tu//Io7 KGi�si�f PG Z r; Pkoeu/X owm+RV me SP G SAB.9L .�, 1 TAP1F_9t/�/1 oAcuar A'VK 7Rl/k vm f VK/1Ch�/A MERR/L!/ . G4y,Pi's1 Nl� WR IkJRSH/uGJDAl� Irv, Fuster Design Usoc- BRICKELL APARTMENT PROJECT I — EXISTING TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION IM SL SAYSHOFd--- M nLA FL �3= 1p