HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #08 - Discussion Item�i
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Meri
City
CITY OF MIAM: FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDU
SEP 16 1996 - -
Resolution Authorizing Issuance
-r RFP for Virginia Key Boat Yard
UDP/Selection CPA firm &
Appoint Review Committee
® =_',CLo5u0=s Proposed Resolution /Draft RFP
For Commission mtg. September 26, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Resolution
authorizing the issuance of a Request For Proposals ("RFP"), in substantially the form attached,
for a Unified Development Project ("UDP") consisting of the development of a boat yard facility
and optional ancillary marine -related retail, food service and, recreational uses on approximately
6.6 acres of City -owned waterfront property located at 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia
Key, Miami. Florida, and the inclusion of a future option for the development of the adjacent
leasehold site, the Rickenbacker Marina, with 21.448 acres of waterfront City -owned property,
located at 3301 Rickenbacker Causeway. Thi's�l esolution further selects a certified public
accounting firm and appoints members to a review committee to evaluate proposals and report
findings to the City Manager as required by the City Charter and Code.
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Community Planning and Revitalization recommends that the City
Commission adopt the attached Resolution in order to implement the UDP process for the
development of the aforementioned City -owned property.
On April 25, 1996 by Resolution No. 96-283, as amended the City Commission declared the
development of a boat yard facility and optional ancillary marine -related retail, food service and
recreational uses on approximately 6.6 acres of City -owned waterfront property located at 3501
Rickenbacker Causeway. Also included in the UDP, by amendment, is the adjacent leasehold
site, the Rickenbacker Marina, with 21.448 acres of waterfront City -owned property, located at
3301 Rickenbacker Causeway on Virginia Key, a UDP pursuant to City Charter Section 29-A(c)
and City Code Section 18.52.9. As further required, a public hearing has been scheduled this day
to take testimony regarding the contents of the RFP and to consider its issuance. Furthermore,
the Charter and Code go on to require that a certified public accounting firm (CPA) be selected
and a review committee be appointed to evaluate proposals to be received in response to the
RFP.
I
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Page two
A competitive selection procedure was conducted by the Development Division of the
Department which solicited proposals for evaluation services from CPA firms. Proposals were
received and evaluated according to established criteria and a value point system by members of
City staff. The top ranked firm was awarded a contract under this same solicitation for the
Dinner Key UDP, consequently it is recommended that the award for the Virginia Key Boat
Yards go to the second ranked firm: Verdeja and Gravier, a Hispanic - owned firm located within
Dade County at 999 Ponce deLeon Blvd., Coral Gables, Florida..
The City Manager recommends that the following individuals be appointed to serve on the
review committee for this UDP project. Members have been recommended based on their
experience and knowledge in fields related to the subject development.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
David Berley, Waterfront Board Member
j
Neil Shaver, Attorney
Jorge Luzarraga, Restauranteur
Spencer Meredith, Marina Operator
CITY OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES
Nancy Fernandez, Asset Management
Enrique Nunez, Department of Community Planning and Revitalization
Phil Luney, Finance Department
Z.
1i
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
• INTER -OFFICE MEMORANL I
l TO Walter J. FoemaIl DATE September 12, 1996 -FILE
I City Clerk SUBJECT
II Request for Public Hearing Ads
Commission Meeting of 9/26/96
FROM Jack L REFERENCES.
Direct _
Co unity 1 g and Revitalization ENCLOSURES
The Department of Community Planning and Revitalization requests your assistance in
advertising the "Notice of Public Hearing" in connection with the following Unified
Development Project at the time and date specified below. Copies of the advertisement and a
computer disk are attached.
I
I
PROJECr'777'
DATE
Virginia Key Boat Yard
September 26, 1996
9:00 a.m.
Redevelopment Project
Issuance of RFP, Selection of CPA
and Appointment of Review
Committee
i -
Please charge the costs of advertisement to Account No. 561301 - 287. Should you have any
questions, please contact Gareth Leuschner at 416 - 1427.
i
I
i
cc: Christina Cuervo, Assistant City Manager
Arlene Weintraub, Assistant Director
Dianne Johnson, Development Chief (�
Elvi Gallestegui, Agenda Coordinator -/
Gareth Leuschner t 1
i
L I G tad Z I d3S 95
ant! ��; ',^`,`�'�'•{ 1 1 '"'
sc`''6
3
I
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE ALL TAKE NOTICE THAT a public hearing will be held by the City
Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, on September 26, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. in the
City Commission Chambers at City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, for
the purpose of hearing any comments from any interested parties regarding the contents
of the draft request for proposals for the "VIRGINIA KEY BOAT YARDS
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT', a unified development project for. the redevelopment
of a boat yard facility and optional ancillary marine -related retail, food service and
recreational uses on approximately 6.6 acres of City -owned waterfront property located at
3501 Rickenbacker Causeway on Virginia Key, Miami. The Unified Development
Project and RFP would also include the adjacent leasehold site, the Rickenbacker Marina,
with 21.448 acres of waterfront City -owned property, located at 3301 Rickenbacker
Causeway, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida, as a future optional site for redevelopment and
operation of a boat yard facility, marina and optional ancillary marine -related retail, food
service and recreational uses. As further required by City Charter Section 29-A(c) and
City Code Section 18.52.9, at the public hearing the City Commission will also consider
the selection of a certified public accounting (CPA) firm and the recommendation of the
City Manager for the appointment of persons to serve on a review committee to evaluate
unified development project proposals and report findings to the City Manager.
All interested persons are invited to appear and may be heard concerning this matter.
Should any person desire to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to
any matter considered at this hearing, that person shall ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, including all testimony and evidence upon which any appeal
may be based.
s ,
Walter J. Foeman
City Clerk I
_r
i
1 �
,.. �• I 5
G
J-96-586
9/17/96
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTAC'iW�S, AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER, TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR
7PROPOSALy ("RT'F") ► IN .0tMSTANTIALLY 'I M
A71"ACHED FORM, FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT CONSISTING OF THE
DMLOPMENT OF A BOAT YARD FACILITY AND
OPTIONAL ANCILLARY MARINE-R-ELATED RETAIL,
FOOD SERVICE AND RECREATIONAL USES ON
APPROXIMATELY 6.6 ACRES OF CITY -OWNED
WATBRFROiTi PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3501 RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY, VIRGINIA KEY,
MIAMI, FLORIDA, AND INCLUDING AS AN OPTION
FUR YVI:URi. WSVSLUh'N1bNT, AV AL)LUTIO NA14 21,448
ACRES OF CITY -OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY KNOWN
AS THE RICRTNAACKER MAAINA, LOCATMD AT 3301
RICEMACXER CAUSEWAY, FOR MARINA, BOAT YARD
AND OPTIONAL ANCILLARY MARINE-F2LA= RETAIL,
FOOD SERVICE AND RECREATIONAL USES;
APPOINTING MMIB13RS TO A RRVIEW COMMITTEE AND
SHLECrING A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINC
("CPA'" FIRM TO EVALUATE PROPOSALS AND REPORT
FINDING TO THE CITY MANAGER; AND FURTHER
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO N13CO'IA'TU AND
BXHCM AN AGREE=Tr, IN X FORM ACCEPTABLE TO
TEM CITY ATTORNEY, WITH T10 S]3LECTE.D CPA
FIRM, FOR THE EVALUATION OF SAID R PS .
WHEREAS, Section, 29A (c) of the Charter of the City of Miami,
Florida,
as amended, and Section 18-52.9 of the Code of the City
of Miami,
Florida, as amended, provide for a (°Unified Development
ProjeCt"
("`MP") process to govern the development of
inTrovements►
to real property owned or to be acquired by the City
of Miami;
and
t
WHEPWS, t a Apri1 25, 1996, purs,.ant to ReroluL.IQLI
No. 96-283, as amended, the City Commission determined that the
development of a boat yard facility and optional ancillary
marine -related retail., food service and recreational uses on
approximately 6.6 acres of City -owned waterfront property located
at 35.Ul Rickenba.cker Causeway, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida,
would boat bo accompliched using the MP proceEc to obtain an
integrated package of development services from the private
sector that includes planning, design, construction, leasing and
management of the proposed improvements; and
WHERE, by action of the City Commission on July 11, 1996,
said UDP is to include, as a future optional site, the adjacent
City -owned waterfront site known as thP Ri rIcAnharker Marina,
CoMosed of 21.448 acres of submerged and upland property,
located at 3302 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia Key, Mjatrd.,
Florida, for development and operation of a marina, boat yard and
optional ancillary marine -related retail, food service and
recreational uses; a=d
WHEPJ S, as directed by said Resolution, the City Manager
has authorized the Department of Commmity planning and
Revitalization to prepare the attached Request for proposal
("RFP") for the subject MP, which is being considered at a duly
advertised public hearing; and
W=RMAS, the City Charter roquirro that UDP ptoposals be
evaluated by a reviews committee consisting of an appropriate
number of City officials or employees and an equal number plus
one of members of the public, whose names shall be submitted by
the City Manager; aad
2 -
ep
WfMRSAS, review committee membership has been recommended by
the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter also requires that L'DP proposals
be evaluated by an independent Certified Public Accountancy (CPA)
firm, which shall include at least one member with previous
experience in the type of development in question; and
WFM=A,S, competitive selection procedures wet'e followed to
recommend the CPA firm named herein; and
WHEREAS, in order to have the CPA firm in place to begin
evaluations of the proposals immediately upon their receipt, it
is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to negotiate
and, immediately execute the necessary agreement with said firm;
NOW, =MF0P.?, B9 IT R.RS4LVRD 13Y TAR CommisSloN oP TXg CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
s
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
issue a Request for Proposals ("RFP"), in substantially the
attached form, for a Unified Development. Project ("TJDP") , to
consist of a boat yard facility and optional ancillary marine -
related retail, food service and recreational .uses on
approximately 6.6 acres of City -owned waterfront property Located
at 3S01 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida, and
including, as an option for future development, an additioaal
21.488 acres of City -owned waterfront property known as the
Rickenbacker marina located at 3301 Rickenbacker Causeway,
- 3 -
Virginia Key, M.Lami, Florida, for marina, boat yard and optional
ancillary marina -related retail, food service and recreational
uses.
Section. 3, The Certified Public Accounting firm of
Verdeja and Gravier is hereby selected to evaluate development
proposals received in connection with said RFP for the Virginia
Xey Boat Yard and the optional property of Richenbacker.
Section 4. The City Manager is hereby authorizedl/ to
negotiate and execute an agreement, in a form acceptable to the
I City Attorney, with the Certified Public Accounting firm of
Verdeja and Gravier for said proposal evaluations.
Section 5. The following individuals are hereby
i
appointed as membere of the review committee which is to evaluate
each proposal and render a written report of its findings to the
City Manager, including any minority opinions:
MMME 2S Oki ITE PUBLIC
DevId Berley, imcorfr= noard x=ber
Ly= Lery .a, Atto=ejr
Norge Lazarraga, Resta=ateur
4 Spencer Htarid nth, Marina Gporator
i
r'ITY oF'FIX 3 jRMP OYBES
N�rfe� F�rr9�.nr3�z, A���t gem8!nk
r-sique ftnez, Dep:rrtamt of comity P2awing and .Re7italizatior2
Dl212 Luney, Flnmce De�remenc
Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective
i
immediately upon its adoption.
t
i
The herein authorigation is further subject to cotuplsance
with all requirements that may be imposed by the City
Attorney, including but not limited to those pre2cribed by
applicable City Charter and Code provisions.
4 .
10 nn rtir 1
REQUEST FOR
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
FOR
THE VIRGINIA KEY
BOAT YARDS
RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY
Miami, Florida
ISSUE DATE: October 9,1996
CITY or, TALI
Joe Caroilo, Mayor
Wifredo (Willy) Gort, Vice -Mayor
Richard P. Dunn, II, Commissioner
Tomas Regalado, Commissioner
J.L. Plummer, Jr., Commissioner
Merrett R. Stierheim, City Manager
A. Quinn Jones, III., City Attorney
Prepared by:
Department of Community Planning and Revitalization
Development Division
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
Tel. (305) 416-1400
Proposals Due:
2:00 p.m., Thursday, January 23,1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PUBLIC NOTICE....................................................................................................................................................I
II. OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................:....................................................2
A. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................2
B. AREA LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS...........................................................................................4
C. DESCRIPTION OF SITE....................................................................................................................................7
1. LOCATION..............................................................................................................................:.......................7
2. AREA................................................................................................................7
3. EXISTINGFACILITIES.......................................... ........ ......: ...........'.... ..............,...........?
4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.........................................7
S. ADJACENT USES ......................................................... ........9
6. EXISTING UTILITIES....................................................... .. ..........9
7. REVIEWOFAD.IACENTCITYLEASES .....................................:. ......... .......: .......:..............10
8. BAYSIDE SEAFOOD RESTAURANT INC....................................................... ............. .............................. 10
D. LEASE TERM............................................................................................ ..............10
E. FINANCIAL.. RETURN TO DIE CITY - FAIR MARKET VALUE..............................:................................10
1. FORM OF LEASE PAYMENTS.....................................................................................................................10
2) MINIMUM RENT.................................................................................................:............c..........................I1
3) APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE .............................. ........................ 11
4) PAYIENTSCHEDULE................................................................................. . ...........12
F. TAXES................................................................................................................ ..... ................12
G. ZONING....................................................................................................................... ............13
.. ......................
H. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS..............................................................14
I. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE (TENTATIVE).............................................................16
III. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS»..........».............................................17
A. DECLARATION AS A UDP......................................................................... .......................17
B. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS................................................................................... ............. ......................... 17
C. COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY............................................................... ... . ..................... is
....... .....................
D. COMMITMENT OF SERVICES AND MATERIALS.....................................................................................19
E. EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS ..................................................................................................................19
F. RIGHT OF TERMINATION.........................................................................................................................19
IV. ELEMENTS OF PROPOSALS ..» ........................ ».......... ».............. ......».....»»,..»...... »»... ......... ................. »20 .
A. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES....................................................................................................................20!
B. USE OF PROPERTY.........................................................................................................................................20
1. REQUIRED PRINCIPAL USES............................................................. .. ........................ . 20
2. PERMITTED ANCILLARY USES FOR BOAT YARD...................................................................................
3. REQUIRED ACCESSORYAND ANCILLARY USES................................................................................... 22
C. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS..................................................... .................:..........:............I ................ 23
1. STRUCTURES.............................................................25
..... ...........
2. LANDSCAPING.................................................................. ...........25
3. MARINA AND BOAT YARD ............................................... ......... 25
4. PARKING AND CIRCULATION ........................................ ' : A 25 ...
S. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES?
D. PERMITTING AND LICENSING ......................................... ................ 626
E. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST.....................................................................................27
F. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE...................................................... .:........................27
G. PROPOSED CUSTOMER AND PUBLIC SERVICES ...................... ................................................I....27
Isc.�.:
14
[i
B.MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ............................................................................. 28
lFINANCING STRATEGY .................................................... ............................................................................. 8
lCOMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE b0TITY6i
CONSULTANTS.................................................................................................................................................... 29
/. GENERAL ............................. ............................................................................ ............................................ 2V
2. C...................................................'.......'......'......^'...^^^'...^.........~^...^^^'^^...^^^''`...'.... 29
3. A&D QUALIFICATIONS ------.-,.~....._---.........-,.......-....29
4. CHANGES TO THE TEAM --.,_—...~.~.........-..~..........,...,..30
5. BACKGROUND CHECKS -----------.--.,.............-..-.-...-.....~.--'....J0
~ ADDITIONAL ^ -------------~-'~^--'-'~--''~'^-r—~'^-''---~~--~`
y���DNOBITY6tLOCAL Fl8D� -__...'-.....--..~-....._~.'.'-..--.-...' 1
V. PROPOSAL
A.3DBMITDALPROCEDURES .......................................................................................................................... 32
B. DEVELOPNENT PROPOSAL CONTENTS ............. ..................................................................................... 33
VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA
A.INITIAL REVIEW OFPROPOSALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH R.FP......................................................... 36
I3.REVIEW CDN%H7TEEEVALUATION CRITERIA ..................................................................................... 37
y' 0 VERALL PLAN& DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ---...-----.---.----..37
Z PROPERTY ENHANCEMENT ---------------------------'~-~^------~-''~~
3. INCL USION OF ------_----'_-'_-_.'--.-_-..~_--_'--JB
4. AL4NAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
%.-............................................................................................ 38
Y�3]��K�3�'----_----' 39
S. FINANCL4L CAPABILITY --'--'--_-----------._------. ' 391
OF THE PROPOSING ENTITY '.........................'.................... ...... 39
7 CAPABILITY OF THE DE VEL OPMEAIT ENTITY AND CONSUL TAArTS _-. -....-4B
8. EXTENT OF ----------------..-.--.--..,.....---.--48
9\ OF LOCAL EL4yfjS ---.----.---------.-.----'_....-._--...--4J
C.CPA FIRM EVALUATION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 4l
VXI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED LEASE ,42
A. AUTHORIZATION ---._.-.--_--------.-_-...--'-_~--'-----'-.--.-_'...~.----.-_4%
EkTERMSAND CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................ 42
'
VIII. OPTION
A. OVERVIEW . ~ ,^ . ^~ .^ ~.^~^~.' . ' ^ . 43 �
B.}QEQDEST
_ ELEMENTS -' PROPOSALS ............................................................... ..-_,~.-.-.-.---_
i'5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A.
City of Miami Charter and Code - applicable sections
APPENDIX B.
Pertinent Legislation
APPENDIX C.
Summary - Dade County Manatee Protection Plan
APPENDIX D.
City of Miami Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards and
Guidelines
APPENDIX E.
City of Miami Minority and Women Business Affairs end
Procurement Program: Article IV.S., Sections 18-67 - 18-77
of the Code of the City of Miami; Ordinances 10062, 10538
and 11272 '
APPENDIX F.
Source List
APPENDIX G.
Option Request Form
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1.
Sketch of Survey (includes Legal Description)
EXHIBIT 11.
Declaration, Professional Information, and Financial Forms
EXHIBIT III.
Minority Participation Forms; Office Location Affidavit
EXHIBIT IV
Sketch of Survey (Optional Property, Rickenbacker Marina)
]FIGURES 4
FIGURE I
Regional Location Map
FIGURE 11
Area Location Map
FIGURE III
Site Location Map. I'
FIGURE IV
Powerboat Racing Pit Area Map '
FIGURE V
Option Property Location Map
FIGURE VI
Option Property Site Location Map
I. PUBLIC NOTICE
The City is seeking Unified Development Project Proposals for the development of certain
commercial and recreational water -dependent facilities, and ancillary related uses on up
to 28.08 acres of City -owned, waterfront property and adjacent bay bottom lands located
on Virginia Key, Miami, Florida (the "PROPERTY"). The City, through this offering, seeks to
procure from the private sector an integrated package of services consisting of planning and
design, construction, leasing and management of the proposed commercial and recreational
development.
The PRIMARY PROPERTY being offered includes 5.625 acres of upland contiguous to the
Marina Stadium Basin and up to 1.007 acres of adjacent submerged (bay bottom) lands in the
Marina Stadium Basin, a total of 6.632 acres, located at 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway.
Development shall include a boat yard, dry storage, marina and ancillary related uses including
marine related retail and a prepared foods concession. As an optional offering, a Proposer may
elect to include in its proposal an interest in acquiring the optional rights to enter into a
subsequent lease agreement for the development and operation of the "OPTION PROPERTY", a
21.448 acre parcel located at 3301 Rickenbacker Causeway, said rights to be exercised at the
conclusion of the lease of the existing tenant in the year 2009. Development and use of the
OPTION PROPERTY shall include marina, and ancillary marine -related retail, and a prepared
food concession. For the purposes of this RFP, the "PROPERTY" shall be taken to mean both
the "PRIMARY PROPERTY" and "OPTION PROPERTY".
All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Request for Proposals document (RFP)
which may be obtained on or after the issue date from the City of Miami Department of
Community Planning and Revitalization; contact by mail at PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida
33233-0708, in person 444 SW Second Avenue - 3rd Floor, or telephone (305) 416-1400. This
document contains detailed and specific information regarding the parcel of land contemplated
for development, the uses the City is seeking, the submission requirements and selection
procedures pertinent to this Unified Development Project. The cost of the RFP document is $20
per copy, and requests for the RFP should be accompanied by check (cashier's check or money
order preferred). The cost of the RFP may be reimbursable only upon the return of a clean,
unmarked document to the City within two (2) weeks of the deadline for submittals.
The City will conduct a Pre -Submission Conference on October 23, 1996 at the Community
Plar:!ning and Revitalization Department offices. While attendance at the Pre -Submission
Conference is not a condition for offering proposals, all prospective developers are invited to
attend. The Pre -Submission Conference is intended to provide opportunities to review the
contents and requirements of the RFP, to answer questions of potential proposers, and for
prospective parties to network toward forming development teams. The City will conduct an
on -site inspection tour of the PRIMARY PROPERTY immediately following the Pre -Submission
Conference.
Proposals must be delivered to Walter Foeman, City Clerk, City Hall, 3500 Pan American
Drive, Miami, Florida 33133, by 2:00 p.m., Thursday, January 23, 1996 and those proposals
received will be opened publicly on that day.
The City of Miami reserves the right to accept any proposal deemed to be in the best interest of
the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposal, or to reject any or all proposals and to re -
advertise for new proposals, in accordance with the applicable sections of the City Charter and
Code regarding Unified Development Projects. Furthermore, until such time as a lease
agreement is executed by the City, the selected proposer shall not have any vested rights, nor
title or interest in the PRIMARY PROPERTY or in the development proposed thereon.
Merrett R. Stierheim
City Manager
Adv. No. ****
18
1
II. OVERVIEW
A. INT'RODUCT'ION
The City is seeking Unified Development Project Proposals for the
development of certain commercial and recreational water -dependent
facilities, and ancillary related uses on up to 28.08 acres of City -owned,
water front property and adjacent bay bottom lands located on Virginia Key,
in Miami Florida (the "PROPERTY"). The City through its offering, seeks to
procure from the private sector an integrated package of development services
consisting of planning and design, construction, leasing and management of
the proposed commercial and recreational development.
. The PRIMARY PROPERTY being offered includes 5.625 acres of upland
contiguous to the Marina Stadium Basin, and up to 1.007 acres of adjacent
i submerged (bay bottom) lands in the Marina Stadium Basin, a total of 6.632
acres, located at 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway. Development shall include a
boat yard, dry storage, marina, and ancillary related uses, including marine
related retail and a prepared food concession. As an optional offering, a
Proposer may elect to include in its proposal an interest in acquiring the
optional rights to enter into a subsequent lease agreement for the development
and operation of "OPTION PROPERTY", a 21.448 acre parcel located at 3301
Rickenbacker Causeway, said rights to be exercised at the conclusion of the
existing lease in the year 2009. Development and use of the OPTION
PROPERTY shall include marina, and ancillary marine -related retail, and a
prepared food concession. For the purposes of this RFP, the "PROPERTY" shall
be taken to mean both the "PRIMARY PROPERTY" and "OPTION PROPERTY".
The City Commission has adopted Resolution No. 96-283, as amended
declaring that the most advantageous method to develop certain improvements
at the PROPERTY is through the Unified Development Project (the "UDP")
process that seeks to procure an integrated development package from the
i private sector including planning and design, construction, .leasing and,
management of the PROPERTY.
On September 26, 1996, the City Commission adopted Resolution No.:---
---- authorizing the issuance of this Request for Proposals (the "RFP" )' as
required by the City Charter and Code in applicable sections governing UDP's.
Pertinent legislation referenced herein is included in Appendix A. The City
Commission shall appoint members to a review committee and select a
Certified Public Accounting firm to evaluate proposal submissions and report
findings to the City Manager as required by the City Charter and Code sections
regarding UDP's.
Proposals must present a definitive development program, completion
schedule, financial strategy, and management plan respecting all requirements
} 2
t,9
t
20
of this Request for Proposals to form the basis for selection by the City.
Proposals submitted in response to this RFP shall also include planning and
design, financing, and construction of proposed improvements appropriate to
the character of the site and the Virginia Key waterfront. The PROPERTY,
which is owned by the City, is to be developed, leased, operated, managed and
maintained at no cost to the City by the selected proposer who is chosen by the
City Commission to develop the PROPERTY under a long term property lease
agreement with the City. Any lease agreement entered into for the development
of the PROPERTY shall comply with the requirements of Section 3 (f) (iii) of the
City Charter, included herein for reference in Appendix A, pertaining to public
access and view corridor requirements for City -owned waterfront.
The City will conduct a Pre -Submission Conference at 10:00 a.m. on
October 23, 1996 at the Community Planning and Revitalization Department,
444 SW 2nd Ave., Miami, Florida, for the purposes of explaining the RFP and to
provide opportunities for prospective proposers to raise questions or issues on
the RFP, or to network with others who may be interested in forming or joining
development teams. While attendance at the Pre -Submission Conference is not
a condition for offering proposals, all prospective proposers are invited and
encouraged to attend. The City will conduct an on -site inspection tour of the
PRIMARY PROPERTY immediately following the Pre -Submission Conference.
Proposals must be delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, (First Floor
Counter) City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133 by 2:00
p.m., 'Thursday, January 23, 1997. A list of proposers will be made public on
that day.
Unless specifically authorized by the City, no additions or modifications
may be made to the proposals and the entities they represent subsequent to
the submission deadline. New and/or current personnel who are not identified
in the proposal may not be introduced as part of the proposal entity or its
consultants subsequent to the submission deadline, unless specifically
approved by the City.
Except for public hearings and scheduled presentations, contact with the.
City regarding this RFP or any aspect of a proposal by a proposer or any
representative of a proposer shall be limited to the City Manager or his
designee, Jack Luft, Director, Department of Community Planning and
Revitalization, until such time as the successful proposer is determined by the
City Commission. All questions or requests for additional information should
be addressed in writing to Jack Luft, Director, City of Miami, Department of
Community Planning and Revitalization, PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida
33233-0708. Any response to such questions or requests that could
potentially impact proposals will be furnished to all proposers in the form of an
addendum to this RFP.
v
The City of Miami reserves the right to accept any proposals deemed to be
in the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposals, or
to reject any or all proposals and to re -advertise for new proposals, in
accordance with applicable sections of the City Charter and Code. Any
proposal deemed to be non -responsive or not responsible will be rejected. A
responsible proposer is one that has the capability in all respects to fully
perform -the requirements set forth in the proposal and the proposed lease, and
that has the integrity and reliability which will assure good faith performance.
A responsive proposer is one that has submitted a proposal that conforms in
all material. respects to the RFP. Thus, for example, a proposal that has not
substantiated the financial capability of a prospective proposer may be
rejected.
To identify the proposal deemed most advantageous to the City, the City's
consideration shall include, but not be limited to: the proposer's experience,
the capability of the development entity and its consultant(s), the amount of
return offered to the City, the proposer's financial qualifications and capability,
the overall design of the proposed development, the extent of minority
participation, and the evaluation by the City of all information submitted in
support or explanation of the proposed development of the PROPERTY.
Furthermore, until such time as a lease agreement is executed by the CITY, the
selected proposer shall not have any vested rights, nor title or interest in the
PROPERTY or in the development proposed thereon.
Right To Re'ect all Proposals: Pursuant to City Charter Section 29-A, sub-
section (c)(6), the City reserves the right to reject all proposals and further, to
terminate the UDP process and/or contract after a public hearing in the event
of any substantial increase in the City's commitment of funds, property, or
services, or in the event of any material alteration of any contract thus
awarded.
Reservation: The information contained in this RFP is published solely for the;
purpose of inviting prospective proposers to consider the development
opportunity described herein. Prospective proposers should make their own
investigations, projections, and conclusions without reliance upon the material
contained herein.
B. AREA LOCATION AND CHARACTEIRISTICS
The PRIMARY PROPERTY to be developed is located in the area of Miami
Mknown as Virginia Key, which is an island to the east of the City as shown in
Figure 1. - Regional Location Map and Figure 2. - Area Location Map. Virginia
Key is entirely publicly owned and consists of a diverse natural and man made
environment ranging from mangrove forests to regional tourist marine
4 � ,Ca
_m..
.1e 21
AelVIRGII11I1 Key nowryflRr4
Regional location Fig.1
221C..-,
attractions, a public high school, rowing clubs and public beaches. Adjacent to
the PRIMARY PROPERTY is Marine Stadium, a 6600 seat grandstand facility
for the staging of marine shows, concerts and boat races. The island is directly
accessed from Interstate 95 and U.S. Highway 1 on the mainland four miles to
the west by Rickenbacker Causeway, a four lane, median divided toll roadway.
Along Rickenbacker Causeway one mile to the southeast: of the Property is Key
Biscayne, an island known for its large regional public recreational beaches
and parks and the community of Key Biscayne
C. DESCRIPTION OF SITE
1. LOCATION
As shown in Figure 3. Site Location Map the Property is bordered on the
east by Marine Stadium, on the north by the Marine Stadium Basin
waterfront, in the west by Rickenbacker marina (the OPTION PROPERTY)
and on the south by a parking lot and Rickenbacker Causeway
2. AREA
I
The area of the PRIMARY PROPERTY is a maximum total of 6.632 acres,
the boundaries of which are shown on the Sketch of Survey included herein
as digit I. The PRIMARY PROPERTY consists of 5.625 acres upland and
1.007 acres submerged lands.
3. EXISTING FACILITIES
The existing publicly -owned improvements are to be included in the future
leasehold. Other than the inspection conducted on the date of the pre -
Submission Conference, the PRIMARY PROPERTY and its facilities will be
open for inspection by appointment only. Contact Raul de la Torre, Marinas
yManager, Dinner Key Marina (305) 579-6980 to schedule an appointment
Existing Facilities Include:
m Office/retail structure of approximately 4000 square feet of enclosed
floor area
Restaurant concession consisting of approximately 4000 square feet.,'
of outdoor deck dinning area and 2000 feet of enclosed kitchen and
dinning area.
Boat ramp
® Approximately 290 dry rack slips (existing rack structures are
included in this leasehold offering)
2,000 gallon fuel storage tank (single wall) with dispenser.
m Assumption of lease contract for term balance on Fork Lift.
4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS:
The PRIMARY PROPERTY includes a maximum of approximately 1.007
acres of bay bottom land located in the Miami Marine Stadium Basin. Any
7
24 ''"p
L
26
proposed development shall conform to the prescriptions and requirements
of effective environmental regulations governing same. As of the issue date
for this RFP, there are no areas located within the PRIMARY PROPERTY that
are considered sensitive or protected habitats. Note that all operations of
the proposed development shall also conform to existing environmental
regulations and permitting requirements.
Under the Manatee Protection Plan, as drafted by Metropolitan Dade
County's Department of Environmental Resources Management, Major
regions of the navigable waters in Biscayne Bay are designated Essential
Manatee Habits. The PRIMARY PROPERTY is located outside of Essential
Manatee Habitats, as Miami Marine Stadium Basin is not designated an
essential manatee habitat. However, The Proposer should be aware that
adjacent waters of Biscayne Bay are designated essential manatee habits
and a copy of the Manatee Protection. Plan should obtained and reviewed by
The Proposer. A summary of the Dade County Manatee Protection Plan is
included as Appendix C.
Prior to the execution of a lease agreement by the parties, the CITY will
allow the successful proposer to conduct environmental investigation(s) of
the PRIMARY PROPERTY, subject to such conditions and limitations as may
be imposed by the City Manager, including, without limitation, requirements
for supervision by the City, disposition of reports, and execution of any legal
documents. The resolution and/or remediation of the results of such
investigation(s), if or as required, shall be the subject of negotiation between
the City and the successful proposer.
5. ADJACENT USES
The PRIMARY PROPERTY is bordered to the west by a wet slip marina and
dry rack storage boat yard (both components of the OPTION PRIMARY
PROPERTY) and the Rusty Pelican.
East of the PRIMARY PROPERTY is the Miami Marine Stadium, a 6,000 seat
amphitheater facility for marine events and concerts, the Miami Rowing .
Club and the Marine Science and Technology (MAST) High School of thy`
Dade County School System's magnet program.
The Seaquarium, a 30 acre marine entertainment park, lies one half mileto
the southeast on the south side of Rickenbacker Causeway
The PRIMARY PROPERTY and it's facilities will be open for inspection to..
prospective proposers by appointment only . Contact Eduardo Rodriguez,
Director of Assets Management, at telephone (305) 416-1450 for an
appointment.
6. EXISTING UTILITIES
The site and structures are currently served by water, sanitary sewer,
electric and telephone utilities. Plans showing detail of underground utilities
9 ISCIA
r
may be available from the City Public Works Department, Central Files, PO
Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33233-0708 or 444 "SW Second Avenue,
telephone (305) 416-1200.
7. REVIEW OF ADJACENT CITY LEASES
It is strongly recommended that proposers review the terms and conditions
of leases and subleases for the other City -owned parcels, copies of which are
on file with the City's Office of Asset Management. Said files for the
PRIMARY PROPERTY and adjacent City facilities will be open for inspection
to prospective proposers by appointment only. Contact Nancy Fernandez of
the Office of Asset Management, (305) 416-1450 for an appointment.
8. BAYSIDE SEAFOOD RESTAURANT INC.
At the May 30, 1996 meeting, the City Commission adopted Resolution No.
96-334, whereby Bayside Seafood Restaurant Inc. (the "Permittee"), located
at 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, was granted approval to undertake a
maximum of $25,000 worth of repairs to the restaurant facility plus another
maximum of $10,000 worth of repairs to the restroom facilities, for a total of
$35,000 worth of repairs.
The City of Miami . is to provide a credit on the Permittee's monthly use fee
for a maximum period of one year until the total cost of the repairs made by
the Permittee are repaid.
If the selected proposer of this RFP were to enter into a lease agreement with
the City of Miami for the Virginia Key Boatyard before the Permittee is fully
repaid, then the selected proposer would be required to pay off the
outstanding balance, if any, due by the City to the Permittee for the stated
repairs.
D. LEASE TERM
The City will enter into a lease agreement with the selected proposer for the,;
development of the PROPERTY described herein for a maximum term of 25'
(twenty-five) years, with 2 (two), 5 (five) year renewal options. Proposals for
shorter lease terms are preferable to the City. The structure and the term' of
the lease will be a matter for negotiations with the successful proposer.
E. FINANCIAL. RETURN TO THE CITY - FAIR MARKET VALUE
1. FORM OF LEASE PAYMENTS
In accordance with City Charter Section 29B, the City may not consider any
sale or lease of City property unless the City shall receive fair market value
for such sale or lease. In submitting a proposal, each Proposer shall make
e
10
��27
J
an offer of annual lease payments to the City which shall conform to the
following format: a minimum annual guarantee or a percentage of gross
receipts, whichever jLgLeater. Different percentages of gross receipts may be
offered for the different operations included in the proposal. Proposals shall
include sufficient analyses of costs and revenue to justify the proffered
figure as "fair market value" according to the details of its development and
management programs. Each Proposer shall specifically state in its
Proposal that it agrees that its annual lease payments will meet or exceed
fair market value, if its proposal is accepted by the City.
2) MINIMUM RENT
Annual lease payments (base rent and/or the percentage(s) of gross
receipts) offered to the City in a proposal may be negotiated upwards by the
City depending on the extent and quality of improvements proposed, and
may similarly be subject to incremental escalation over the lease term.
Additionally, minimum annual lease payments may be adjusted annually
according to the Consumer Price Index over the lease term.
The City has required in a previous Request for Proposal (Issued May
30,1995) a minimum annual lease payment of $180,000 (which may be
adjusted annually subject to Consumer Price Index increases over the lease
term) or the combined minimum percentages of gross revenues as follows:
10% of gross boatyard revenues, and 7% of gross retail sales including fuel
and commercial sublease revenues, and 7% of gross prepared food and
beverage sales.
6
il APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE
Fair market value will be determined according to the following process.
The proposal that is conditionally accepted by the City Commission will be
subject to an appraisal of the use as proposed by two (2) Master Appraiser
Institute (MAI) qualified appraisers, which will be selected by the City and
have documented experience in assessing properties of the same or similar
uses. The proposer submitting said proposal will be given an opportunity
to present its' proposal, as well as supporting documentation, to the
appraisers. Should the result of those two appraisals reveal that the
Proposer's offer does not meet fair market value, then the Proposer shall be
given the opportunity to revise its' offer so that it meets or exceeds said
value. In the event said Proposer is unable (or unwilling) to revise its
original offer, it may remove its proposal from consideration or it may, at
its own cost and expense, procure a reconciliation appraisal. The
appraiser performing the reconciliation appraisal shall also be MAI
11 �,�`c��� � P �•
3
qualified, have documented experience in assessing properties of the same
or similar uses, and be subject to the approval of the City.
In the event a conditionally accepted proposal is removed from
consideration during this process to determine fair market value, the City
may then, at its option, conditionally accept the proposal ranked next by
the Review Committee, or the City Manager, as applicable, or the City may
terminate the active RFP process and solicit new proposals. A proposer
whose proposal is thus removed from consideration will reimburse the City
for City's costs in securing appraisals.
4) PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Lease payments to the City are due and payable upon the commencement of
the lease, and the minimum guarantee is generally divided into twelve
monthly installments due in advance of each month. The City may, during
the course of negotiations with the Successful Proposer, consider alternative
payment schedules, as may be suggested in the proposal, to address initial
permitting, construction and start-up phases of the project. Alternative
payment schedules, if accepted by the City, shall be considered only an
interim deferral of the required rental payment(s) and not a reduction or waiver
of them. Further, since. annual payments cannot be waived by law, any
deferred payments may be subject to market interest payable to the City.
All payment schedules shall be subject to the ultimate approval of the City
Commission.
E. TAXES
All entities contracting with the City under the UDP process shall be
obligated to pay whichever is the greatest of the following: (1) all applicable
ad valorem tames that are lawfully assessed against the PRIMARY
PROPERTY, or (2) an amount equal to what the ad valorem taxes would be if
the PRIMARY PROPERTY were privately owned and used for a profit -
making purpose. Such taxes shall not be credited against any revenue/
accruing to the City under any contract that may be awarded under the
UDP process.
Estimated Current Ad Valorem Taxes: Assuming an estimated appraised
land value of $1,140,000 and an estimated project improvement cost of
$1,500,000 the total assessed value for both land and improvements would
be estimated at $2,640,000 representing 80% of the total estimated
appraised value. The resulting estimated annual property tax, based on the
1995 millage rate of 30.7275 would be $81,121 These estimates are for
illustrative purposes only. Ad Valorem taxes, if assessed, will depend on the
value of the proposed improvements and the then current assessed value 'of
the land.
1
12 )
G. ZONING
i
The City of Miami is presently undertaking all necessary actions to secure a
1 C-1 Restricted Commercial zoning designation for the subject property,
pursuant to all applicable State and City approvals. The successful
proposer shall be responsible for obtaining the applicable zoning permit(s)
and or variances from the City of Miami, as well as approval from Dade
f County Shoreline Review Committee prior to construction.
As described in Ordinance 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Miami, Florida, the following uses are allowable in districts with a zoning
designation of C-1 Restricted Commercial:
1. Commercial marinas, boat rentals and piers.
2. Recreational buildings and facilities.b
3. Playgrounds, play fields and parks.b
4. Parking lots, parking garages.a
5. rental establishments.a
6. Restaurants, cafes and private clubs.a
a) Permitted outright as principle uses.
b) Subject to " Class I Special Permit" administrative review by the zoning
division.
c) Subject to "Special Exception" public hearing procedure and compliance
with standards and limitations set forth on section 924 of Ordinance 11000,
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Mial-ni.
By virtue of the public hearing process pursuant to which this RFP obtained
official sanction from the City Commission, the uses described in this
document have been approved in concept. Procedurally certain uses
I allowed under this RFP will require review by pertinent City agencies,..,
departments and/or boards as to the design and appropriateness of the"%
{ proposed facilities. Such reviews processes are intended to ensure
compliance with the intent and provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and City
Code.
All prospective proposers must ensure that their proposed development
complies with all applicable zoning laws. For details of allowable uses and
applicable requirements of the C-1 Restricted Commercial zoning district
please contact the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization,
attn.: Lourdes Slazyk, Assistant Director, PO Box 330708, Miami, Florida,
33233-0708 or 444 SW second Avenue-3rd Floor, telephone (305) 416-1435.
i
30 13
f
H. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS
The proposal selection process is set forth in Section 29-A(e) of the Charter
of the City and Section 18-52.9 of the Code of the City. This process shall
be implemented
as follows:
1.
Solicitation of development proposals from qualified developers.
2.
Initial review of proposals received in response to the RFP by City
staff, to determine compliance with RFP minimum submission
requirements as set forth in Section VI.A.
3.
Evaluation of responsive proposals by a Certified Public
Accounting firm in accordance with criteria specified in Section
VI.C.
4.
Evaluation of responsive proposals by Review Committee appointed
by the City Commission in accordance with criteria specified
herein in Section VI.13.
5.
Independent report of findings and recommendations submitted to
City Manager by CPA firm and Review Committee.
6.
City Manager. recommendation to the City Commission of one or
more of the proposals, based on the findings of the CPA firm and
recommendations of the Review Committee, or alternatively, the
City Manager's recommendation that all proposals be rejected.
7.
City Commission acceptance/rejection of City Manager's
i
recommendation and authorization to negotiate a lease agreement
with the selected proposer whose proposal is determined most
advantageous to the City, subject to the parties concurrence as to
Fair Market Value.
8.
Determination of Fair Market Value and concurrence of the
parties.
9.
Negotiation of lease agreement between the City and the selected
proposer.
10.
City Commission authorization to execute the negotiated lease
agreement with the selected proposer. The selected proposer shall
have no vested rights, nor title or interest in the PROPERTY or' in
the development proposed thereon until such time as a lease
agreement is fully executed. Scheduling of the proposed lease
agreement on the ballot of the next available referendum for
approval of the voters if less than three (3) proposals were received.
11.
Approval of the lease agreement by a majority of the municipal
electorate at a referendum, if less than three (3) proposals are
received by the City in response to this RFP.
ti
14
' F' 31
Issuance of the RFP
Wednesday, October 9, 1996
Proposal Pre -Submission Conference/Site
Tuesday, October 23, 1996
Inspection
10:00 a.m.
Location: Dept. Community Planning &, Revitalization
444 SW Second Avenue - 3rd Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
Site: 2640 S. Bayshore Drive
Coconut Grove
Proposal Submission Deadline
Thursday, January 23, 1997
Location: Office of the City Clerk
2:00 p.m.
Miami City Hail - First Floor Counter
3500 Pan American Drive
Dinner Ivey
Miami, Florida 33133
Initial Review of Proposals'(by staffl
Friday, January 24 , 1997
Review Committee Meeting for Instruction
January 29, 1997
CPA Firm's initial evaluation of Proposals made
February 10, 1997
available to Committee
Review Committee Meeting(s): CPA Firm presents its
February 17, 1997
Findings to Committee, Committee Interviews
Qualified Proposers
Recommendations from the Review Committee and
February 23, 1997
® CPA Firm to the City Manager
Recommendation from the City Manager to the City
March 12, 1997
Commission for Selection of One or More
Proposals and Authorization to Negotiate Lease -
or - Rejection of all Proposals
Determination of Fair market Value by appraisal
March 1997
rocess
Begin Lease Negotiations with Selected Proposer
Aril 1997
City Commission Authorization to Execute Negotiated
May 1997
Lease and, if necessary, Scheduling of
Referendum Ballot Item
Referendum of Voters if necessary)
May 1997
Execution of Lease
June 1997
f
III. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS
This RFP is being issued in accordance with City of Miami Charter Section 29
and City Code Section 18-52.9, which are incorporated herein by reference and
included as Appendix A. The following information highlights certain (but not
all) requirements for UDPs.
A. DECLARATION AS A UDP
The City Commission determined and declared by Resolution that, for the
development of improvements on City -owned property or property to be
acquired by the City, it is most advantageous to the City to procure from the
private sector one or more of the following integrated packages: (1) planning
and design, construction and leasing; or (2) planning and design, leasing, and
management; or (3) planning and design, construction, and management; or (4)
planning and design, construction, leasing and management from a private
entity.
The City Commission adopted Resolution No. 96-286, as amended, declaring
that the most advantageous method to develop certain improvements on the
PROPERTY is by a UDP process that seeks to procure an integrated
development package from the private sector including planning and design,
construction, leasing and management of the PROPERTY.
B. COMMITMENT OF FUNDS
1. City: The City shall not provide funds or financing for the development
contemplated by this RFP.
2. Selected proposer:
a) Debt Financing, Rent & Reimbursements: The selected proposer is
required to provide adequate equity and commitment for debt
financing to finance all aspects of the proposed Unified Development;
of the PROPERTY. The selected proposer is required to provide the
City with a minimum guaranteed annual rent as specified in Section
II. E. "Financial Return to the City".
Upon both parties' execution of the lease agreement, the selected
proposer shall reimburse the City for any and all direct costs incurred.
in evaluating all proposal submissions, including but not limited to:
appraisal fees, the professional services of the certified public
accounting firm selected by the City Commission, and all advertising
and printing costs related to this UDP, as well as any costs which may
be incurred by the City during permitting processes. (Refer to Section
IV. D. Permitting and Licensing", page 26.) The City shall deposit in
local banking institutions all moneys collected as a result of this
UDP/ RFP.
b) Performance Bond: Simultaneous with execution of the lease
agreement, the selected proposer shall be required to furnish the City
with a Performance and Payment Bond, in customary form utilized for
commercial transactions involving private sector principals in Dade
-County, and in the amount equal to the total estimated cost of the
PROJECT improvements, but not less than $1,000,000 as stated in
Section ICI. Estimated CONSTRUCTION Cost" on page 27 of this
RFP.
c) Security Deposit: Simultaneous with execution of the lease
agreement the selected proposer shall be required to furnish the City
a security deposit equal to the one half (50%) of the first year's
minimum rent. Such security deposit shall be in the form of cash,
cashier's check or an acceptable Irrevocable Letter of Credit issued by
a financial institution acceptable to the City. Such security shall be
used for purposes deemed appropriate solely by City, including
delinquent lease payments, and is to be replenished by Lessee within
a time period specified by City.
d) Proposal Deposit: Submission of the proposal shall include, as
evidence of the proposer's creditworthiness and ability to meet its'
proffered financial commitment for the development, $25,000 in the
form of cash or a cashier's check. Such funds collected by the City
shall be reimbursed to all but the Selected Proposer upon the
selection of the apparent most advantageous proposal. Note that the
City may require the submitter of the next ranked proposal to return
said deposit in the event the conditionally accepted proposal is
removed from consideration during the appraisal process (see Section
II.F.2. "appraisal to Determine fair market value" on page 11).
C. COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY
The PROPERTY and its improvements are offered "as is" by the City for
development and long term management. No representations or warranties
whatsoever are made as to the condition, state or characteristics . Expxess
warranties and implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose or use
and habitability are hereby disclaimed.
Testing, audits, appraisals, inspections, and the like desired or necessary to
submit a proposal shall be at the sole expense of the prospective proposer.
Reports regarding the PROPERTY, including any appraisal reports, that the
City may have in its possession are available as public records.
The City intends to enter into a lease agreement for the PRIMARY PROPERTY
with the selected proposer. (Refer to Section II.D) The term of the lease
p � 1
'3 5
agreement to be entered into between the selected proposer and the City shall
be a maximum of forty (40) years, though the City prefers a shorter term. The
lease agreement shall be structured to provide the City with a minimum
jguaranteed annual rent or a percentage of gross revenues, whichever is
greater.
City -owned property is held in public trust and cannot be mortgaged, pledged,
liened or subordinated in any way as a part of the lease agreement. All
leasehold improvements shall become the sole property of the City upon the
expiration of the lease agreement.
D. COMMITMENT OF SERVICES AND MATERL4,LS
All City services such as police and fire protection, which are routinely provided
I to any private development within the City, shall be provided to the selected
proposer by the City.
E. EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS
Upon the conclusion of the UDP process as required by applicable City Charter
and Code provisions, including any required voter approval, the lease
agreement for the PROPERTY shall be signed by the City Manager or his duly
authorized designee after approval thereof by the City Commission. The
selected proposer shall not have any vested right, title or interest in the
PROPERTY until such time as the leasehold agreement is executed by the City.
F. RIGHT OF TERMINATION
In addition to any other right of termination available, any substantial increase
in the City's commitment of funds, property, or services, or any other material
alteration of any contract awarded for a Unified Development Project shall
entitle the City Commission to terminate any contract including the lease after
a public hearing. Prior to such public hearing, the Commission shall seek and
obtain a report from the City Manager and from the Review Committee that
evaluated the proposals for said project, concerning the advisability of the City.
exercising its right. The City shall have no liability with regard to its exercise of
said right and the selected proposer shall bear all of its own costs with respect
thereto.
As stipulated in Subsection (e)(4) of Charter Section 29-A(c), "substantial
increase" shall be defined as a 10% or more increase to the City's proposed.
commitment of funds, property and/or services, and "material alteration" shall
be defined as a failure to comply with all aspects of the proposal except as may
be specifically permitted in writing by the City Manager.
{ 36 19 ,,.�•��51
7_1;1
IV. ELEMENTS OF PROPOSALS
Respondents to this RFP are advised that the following factors should be
addressed in the proposals and each will be critically evaluated.
A. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Proposals must meet the City's development objective of compatibfle
public/private utilization of the Property. Proposals must preserve, provide
and maintain marine boat yard services for the boating community, enhance
public access to and enjoyment of the Biscayne Bay waterfront at Virginia Key.
Aesthetics of the development will be an important consideration in the
evaluation of proposals. Whether a proposal is to refurbish and expand
existing .facilities or to build new facilities, the City expects the improvements
to respect the local environment and be responsive to the waterfront setting.
Of special concern is the view of the boat rack storage facilities from the
waterfront and from Rickenbacker Causeway and proposed landscape
treatment to screen such views.
B. USE OF PROPERTY
The principle use of the PRIMARY PROPERTY shall be a dry rack storage boat
yard facility. Ancillary uses of the facility allowed by the City, at the option of
the Proposer including marine -related retail space, restaurant and convenience
services for recreational boat users as options. All uses provided for shall be
non-exclusive uses. Please note that the City reserves the right to review and
approve any subleases that may arise from this RFP and a clause to that effect
may be included in the lease agreement. Any additional proposed or allowable
uses not considered by this document, such as Gambling or similar type uses
that may become legal during term of this lease will be subject to the City's
review, approval and renegotiated terms and conditions including the
Provisions for lease payments and percentages of gross revenues attributable to
such uses.
1. REQUIRED PRINCIPAL USES
al Boat Yard Facility
The Successful Proposer shall be required to provide, enhance and
maintain a boat yard facility which may offer boat hauling, dry rack
storage for up to 296 vessels (or the maximum permitted by law), boat
cleaning, and minor repairs and basic maintenance services for marine
water craft. Minimum or maximum vessel size and weight will be
dependent upon the depth of the adjacent waterway.
20 f '"
37
m
The boat yard facility may provide for minor boat repairs and basic
maintenance by marine trades persons which may include, without
limitation, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, planking, rigging, carpentry,
hull and engine repairs. The successful proposers the additionally allow
the opportunity for individual boat owners to perform repairs, general
maintenance and to make improvements to their private vessels,
independent of such services as may be provided by the operator or
tenants.
It shall be the responsibility of the successful proposer to ensure that
any hull repairs, painting, scraping and engine repairs allowed by Lessee
be conducted in full compliance with all applicable City, County, State
and federal regulations governing noise, odor and air pollution controls.
Proposers are additionally advised that any improvements to the existing
boat yard and dry rack storage facilities must comply with current
federal, state and local code requirements including life safety
regulations.
Required Services: The proposal shall include the services listed below,
as well as such additional improvements as may be required to
accommodate same.
(a) dock master services during normal working hours to
oversee hauling and departure activities.
(b) twenty-four (24) hour security and other emergency
services as may be required by the U.S. Coast Guard, local
police, and other agencies with jurisdiction
+ 2. PERMITTED ANCILLARY USES FOR BOAT YARD
Ual Boat Yard / Marina Office
The redevelopment plan may include space for use as the dock master's
office, offices for the management and slip rental operations of the boat `
yard, and office space for marine/boat yard trades, craftsmen, and/or/�
designers and for other permitted uses and activities. The City
recommends a maximum of 5,000 square feet for this purpose.
(b) Marine Fueling Facility
Proposers are offered, as an option, the right to sell and pump marine
fuel (diesel and/or gasoline) from the PRIMARY PROPERTY. Other than
existing equipment, fuel tanks (above ground tanks are preferred) and
dispensing equipment shall be constructed at Proposer's sole cost and
expense and shall conform to all local, state and federal regulations.
Said right to sell and dispense fuel shall be non-exclusive. As a City
leasehold, the operator may be required by the U.S. Coast Guard, local
41
21
� R
police and other enforcement agencies to provide after-hours and/or
emergency fueling.
jet Marine Recreation Concessions & Amenities
Marine related concessions may be provided and may include charter
fishing and dive boats, sail boat, canoe and/or kayak rental, and related
seivices and amenities, such as picnic facilities.
Jet ski rentals, such as those currently existing, are permitted. However,
proposers are advised that long term use of the stadium basin for jet skis
may be inconsistent with recent Dade County imposed bans on jet ski
use in surrounding waters of Biscayne Bay due to conflicts with
recreational boaters, swimmers, wind surfers, manatee and other
protested wildlife. The City may at any time impose a ban on jet ski use
within the Marine stadium Basin, and, within 90 days notice, terminate
all rental or sales of jets skis on the PRIMARY PROPERTY.
(d) Food Service Concession
One (1) prepared food and beverage concession is permitted for service to
Boat Yard tenants, employees and visitors. Such concession may offer
indoor and outdoor seating, the design and operation of which shall be
compatible with and complimentary to the character of the adjacent
waterfront.
(e) Boat Yard / Marine Related Retail
The boat yard may include an array of marine and boat yard related
retail to serve the needs of the boaters and boat yard tenants to include
general provisioning (such as a "ships' store"), packaged and fresh foods,
marine electronics, parts and equipment, sundry goods, convenience
supplies, marine apparel, and boating, marine, scuba, fishing and
related goods. A recommended guideline is a maximum of 6,000 sq. ft. of
total enclosed floor area for this purpose. Marine retail facilities may,,
also include boat brokerage or boat dealer operations.
3. RE_pUIRED ACCESSORY AND ANCILLARY USES
Proposers are advised that the below listed accessory and ancillary uses
are a requirement of any proposed development program for the
PROPERTY.
a) Public Boat Ramp
Proposers shall maintain a boat ramp for public launching. However, the
Lessee may be permitted to close the ramp to the general public at
certain times, with CITY approval. The successful proposer may
additionally seek authorization from the CITY to charge a fee for the use
of the boat ramp.
0
22 S '
t 39
B) Marine Stadium Pit Area
Proposers are advised that primary use of the marine stadium basin is
for the staging of marine related events, most notably power boat races
and other similar uses. In the past these events have necessitated the
use of a portion of the marina site (fronting on the water) and the
protected inlet adjacent to the boatyard facility, directly in front of the
existing seawall, for use as a staging area and pit stop during events.
The crews for these vessels require an area to launch the boats prior to
the event and to perform work on them during the race. If the marine
stadium site cannot accommodate this use within its own property, then
it will be necessary, during certain scheduled days of the year, to locate
them on the boatyard property along the shoreline. This use does not
preclude the ingress and egress of vessels stored at the boatyard, which
will utilize a dedicated channel parallel to the shoreline. Please review
Figure 4. "Powerboat racing pit -area", for more information.
C) B ay Walk
The proposed development project shall provide and maintain for the
community's benefit, a bay walk along the sea wall edge at the Marine
Stadium Basin, and shall include seating, lighting and landscaping.
D) Parking
Proposed development projects shall provide and maintain on the
PROPERTY parking area(s) to service the primary and ancillary uses of
the project, in sufficient quantity to comply with the City of Miami zoning
ordinances. Emphasis should be given to the configuration and
landscaping of parking areas, including the minimization of impervious
surfaces. All maintenance of parking facilities will be the responsibility of
the successful proposer.
:,
C. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The proposal shall schematically describe all proposed improvements tothe
PRIMARY PROPERTY including site improvements, structures and the general.
uses pertaining thereto. All improvements, including those to existing
structures, shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal codes and
ordinances, including the South Florida Building Code. The Selected Proposer
will be responsible to obtain all required permits and approvals from all
agencies having jurisdiction.
23
�o
40
42
1. STRUCTURES
The design of new structures and/or the refurbishing of existing
structures shall be aesthetically designed to harmonize with the
subtropical climate of South Florida, the natural environment of
Biscayne Bay, and Virginia. Key waterfront. Design concepts will be
critically evaluated in the selection process. The overall height, mass
and location of any new structures shall not diminish the natural beauty
of the waterfront, which should remain the dominant feature(s) of the
site. The construction of any new structures shall conform with the view
corridor and public access requirements set forth in Section 3(mm) of the
City Charter included in the RFP under Appendix A.
2. LANDSCAPING
A schematic landscape plan shall be submitted identifying areas of
proposed vegetation - existing (to be retained) and new plantings -
accompanied by a typical landscape materials list. Public and
circulation areas shall be aesthetically enhanced by appropriate
landscape treatments. Xeriscape design and use of native plant species
are encouraged. Landscaping shall generally meet "xeriscape" design
standards incorporating native plant species with drought- and salt -
tolerant characteristics.
3. MARINA AND BOAT YARD
Improvements to the PRIMARY PROPERTY for boat yard use shall be
aesthetically harmonious with the subtropical climate of South Florida,
the natural environment of Biscayne Bay, and shall complement or
enhance the character of the Virginia Key waterfront. Roofing of all
storage racks for protection of vessels, and siding to visually screen the
racks is considered desirable.
4. PARKING AND CIRCULATION
The selected proposer shall be required to design and construct parking.
facilities on site in sufficient quantity to service all primary and
secondary uses included in the project and in compliance with applicable
zoning requirements. Such required on -site parking, and all utility,
loading and/or service areas shall be organized, appropriately
landscaped, and bermed or screened from surrounding areas, streets
and adjacent property. Proposals shall also include a compatible, safe
and effective pedestrian and vehicular circulation system to service the
proposed development, in addition to the public access amenities
required along Biscayne Bay (the bay walk) and compatibility and access
to adjacent properties.
25
� SIT
5. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES?
a) Wherever possibie, and particularly in public areas, utility lines
shall be located underground, concealed within architectural
and/or landscaping features, or suspended below walkways.
b) Electric service shall be principally through a primary meter
e) - Vehicular circulation roads shall, be paved.
d) A unified design for all components of signage will be required, and
shall be compatible with the general character of the site.
D. PERMITTING LAND LICENSING
The Selected Proposer, at its sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for
I acquiring all required permits, licenses and approvals from all agencies with
i jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, the City, Metropolitan Dade County,
the State of Florida and public utilities. All improvements must comply with all
applicable building, fire, zoning, health and other code requirements. The City
will assist through expedited review procedures, to the extent permitted by law
j and regulations.
Developments of Regional Impact - The City makes no representations and
has no analysis or information as to whether the development contemplated by
this RFP constitutes a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) as defined by
Florida Statutes Section 380.06. If it is determined that the proposed
development is subject to Development of Regional Impact review and
procedures (or a successor or similar law), the selected proposer shall be solely
responsible for making all applications and/or seeking all authorizations
required by law, at the proposer's sole cost and expense. For more information
on. this process please contact Ms. Julia Trevarthan at the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, 1-800-985-4416.
Impact Fees - Current City of Miami impact fee regulations provide that;
the proposed development of the PROPERTY is not subject to the
imposition or payment of City developmental impact fees. It is the
responsibility of the proposer to determine, based upon the full proposed
development scheme and all uses for the PROPERTY, the full extent of all
impact fees to be assessed by Metropolitan Dade County and/or other agencies
with jurisdiction. The City will assist the selected proposer in securing the
most equitable assessment of impact fees for the final approved project.
tl
26 ��C,
r::]
ME
E. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
The proposal must include a detailed construction cost estimate for the entire
proposed development. The total cost of all physical improvements shall be not
less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). The value of any existing
improvements on the site shall not be credited towards meeting the required
one million dollar cost of all improvements. The City is seeking net added value
to the PRIMARY PROPERTY of not less than $1,000,000 in new improvements.
P. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
The City will require the development of proposed improvements to commence
within three months from the transfer of the leasehold PROPERTY to the
selected proposer. The proposal must include a development schedule which
takes into account the commencement date required by the City and which
delineates the development of each significant improvement. Termination and
force majeure clauses will be included within the lease agreement to insure
reasonable compliance with the proposed development schedule.
In evaluation of proposals, the timetable for completion of the proposed
construction shall be considered along with the proposer's plans and
commitment to minimizing the impact of construction on the use of the site.
All proposed development must be completed within the time period specified
in the schedule given in the proposal. Any and all proposed physical
improvements to the PROPERTY must be completed and capable of public use
within 18 months from the date of transfer of the leasehold PROPERTY to the
selected Proposer. Extensions of time may be granted by City only in cases of
extreme circumstances beyond the control of the ,Successful Proposers, such as
unusual permitting delays.
G. PROPOSED CUSTOMER AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Each Proposal shall describe levels of customer and public services to be
provided by the operator, including, but not limited to
1. Security and Emergency Preparedness - Policies, procedures and proposed
staffing for providing 24 hour security to the PROPERTY; emerggTicy
preparedness procedures, particularly for marina and boat yard operations,
as well as the waterfront in general.
2. Customer Service Programs - Detailed information should be provided on
developer/operator experience in the marina and boat yard industry. Each
proposal shall include plans to implement customer service programs to
assure high levels of consumer satisfaction for users and visitors.
27� �'G t�a�--
3. Employee Guidelines - Provisions for training employees and maintaining
standards of conduct to ensure quality delivery of customer and visitor
services including proposed guidelines for employee appearance and
uniforms.
4. Public Access & Amenities - Proposals shall describe the type and extent of
access and amenities offered for the benefit of the general public from the
Property.
H. MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
The proposal must include a narrative describing the management and
operation of the entire proposed development. Proposers are reminded that the
City intends that the PROPERTY be maintained and operated in a manner
consistent with the highest industry standards for facilities of its type. The
description shall include, at minimum, mission statement, an organizational
chart, job descriptions of key positions, brief outline of operating procedures,
annual budget, ten year revenue projections, how and where the
activities/operation will be advertised, indication of which businesses are
intended to be operated by proposer and Which businesses are intended to be
subleased or to be operated under a management contract, sublease
requirements (if any), operating schedule, and maintenance program, including
planned major maintenance schedule. If independent management services
are to be involved, then the applicable forms included herein as Exhibit If to
this document must be completed by management contractors.
I. FINANCING STRATEGY
The proposer shall provide, as part of the proposal, a description of the
financing strategy for all building and site improvements including public
spaces and amenities associated with the development. Prior to its execution
of a lease agreement, the City will require written evidence of a firm and
irrevocable commitment of all funds necessary to construct, equip, and initiate;
operation of the proposed Project for a stabilization period determined by the
City. The City reserves the right to further evaluate and/or reject fznanc�ng
commitments when the term, the identity of the financing source or other aspect of
such financing is deemed not in the best interest of the City or the project.
A ,�
J. COMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT
(PROPOSING) ENTITY & CONSULTANTS
I 1. GENERAL
Proposals shall include the professional qualifications and credentials that
demonstrate the development entity's ability to successfully undertake and
complete development of the PROPERTY. The proposal must contain
information sufficient to demonstrate the ability of the development entity
and its consultant(s), if any, to plan, design, construct, lease and manage a .
campground facility with any and all related services and amenities
proposed in accordance with the development program outlined herein in
this Section.
The Development Entity is hereby defined as the proposing entity (the
legal entity: corporation, joint venture, partnership, one or more
individuals) with whom the City will contract for the leasehold
agreement.
2. CONSULTANTS
The consultant(s) to the Development Entity, if any, may be one firm
possessing all the required expertise or may be several individuals or firms
which combined possess all the required expertise. Consultants may
include professional planning and design consultants and sub -consultants,
general contractor and/or construction manager, and operational and
management consultant(s). Consultants and subconsultants may submit
with more than one Development Entity. However, the Development Entity
(including individual members thereof) shall only submit as part of one
submission and shall not be part of any other submission in any capacity.
3. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
The Development Entity, itself or through its consultant(s), if any, shall;
substantiate its experience in all aspects of development and management
of the facilities proposed, subject to compliance with the qualifying criteria
specified in Section VI.B.1.
The Development Entity and/or its consultant(s) shall, at minimum,
demonstrate professional expertise in each of the below listed disciplines.
Copies of currently effective licenses (for both individuals and businesses, as
applicable) shall be included in the proposal.
Architectural: registered to practice architecture in the State of Florida as
required by Chapter 481, Part I of the Florida Statutes, Architecture, and
46 29�c1 •
AM
shall have substantiated experience in the design and development of the
specified primary uses.
Engineering: registered to practice engineering in the State of Florida as
required by Chapter 471 of the Florida Statutes, Professional Engineers
and shall have substantiated experience in the design and development of
primary use facilities contained in the proposal.
Landscape Architectural: registered to practice landscape architecture in the
State of Florida as required by Chapter 481, Part II, Landscape Architecture,
of the Florida Statutes.
General Contracting or Construction Management: licensed as a general
contractor in the State of Florida and shall have substantiated experience in
managing and performing construction of facilities of similar type and scope
as the primary use facilities contained in the proposal.
Operations and Management: shall have proven experience in marina and
boat yard operations and management, and relevant service and industry
experience.
If ancillary services .are proposed as part of the development, the
Development Entity and/or its consultant(s) shall document measurable
relevant experience in each field(s) or area(s) of such ancillary services, i.e.,
educational, cultural, commercial leasing, retail operations.
4. CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Unless specifically authorized by the City, no additions or modifications may
be made to the proposals and the entities and/or consultants they represent
subsequent to the submission deadline. New and/or current personnel who
are not identified in the proposal may not be introduced as part of the
proposal entity subsequent to the submission deadline, without City
approval. Respondents must notify the City in writing immediately if any
firm or individual presented in its original submission, either as part of they
Development Entity or its consultants, becomes unavailable to continuer
Any such change may result in the removal of the proposal from
consideration, at the City's option.
5. BACKGROUND CHECKS
All principals of the development entity may be subject to a background
check by the Miami Police Department. (For the purposes of this RFP,
principal" shall be defined as the general partners, stockholders owning 5%
or more of the corporate stock, and all corporate officers.).
6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Exhibits II and III include forms soliciting detailed information which must
be completed and submitted with the proposal.
K. MINOYtITY & LOCAL FIRM PARTICIPATION
Respondents will be required to comply with all applicable federal, state and
local affirmative action legislation and regulations, including the City's
Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program included
herein in .Appendix E. The City of Miami adopted Ordinances No. 10062 and
10538, and subsequent amendments, to stimulate participation of qualified
minority/worian-owned firms/sole proprietors (M/WBE's) in all City
projects.
Minorities are expected to be an integral part of the development entity and
its consultants, to participate substantially in construction contracts and
I jobs, and to comprise a significant part of the permanent management
team, ancillary businesses and work force created by the development. For
the purpose of proposal evaluation, "significant" minority participation in
the Development shall be defined as not less than 30% of the proposing
entity with each minority group (black, Hispanic, and female) having not
less than 5% each. As evidence of minority compliance, proposers are
required to complete the applicable forms included in Exhibit III.
All firms/sole proprietors seeking to participate as M/WBE's must be
certified with the City's Minority/Women Business Program and meet all
requirements of the above cited Ordinances prior to the submission of a
proposal. All firms/sole proprietors, regardless of minority status, must
submit an affirmative action policy statement, in compliance with; said
Ordinances, a sample of which is included in Exhibit III.
Respondents are encouraged to include in the composition of the
Development Entity, businesses or firms whose primary offices are located
in the City of Miami. City occupational licenses shall be provided as proof of
location for businesses located in the City. In addition, included in Exhibit
III herein is the City's "Local Office Affidavit Form" which shall be completed,
by Proposers as appropriate. For proposal evaluation purposes, the Review
Committee shall award points for local firm participation based on the
criteria established herein. (Refer to Section VI.B.)
A local firms) shall be defined as a firm having its primary business office
established within the City municipal limits. The firm shall have a current
occupational license issued by the City and shall have submitted a
completed Office Location Affidavit. Credit shall be given those proposals
which include local firms as participants.
0
48 31 g ���
V. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Submissions received in response to the RFP shall meet all requirements
specified in this Section. Submissions deficient in providing the required
information shall be determined non -responsive by the City and shall be
ineligible for further consideration.
A. SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
A complete proposal submission package shall be delivered to the City as
follows:
1. One (1) original and nineteen (19) copies of bound proposals in an 8-1 /2"x
11" format and one set of board- mounted illustrative drawings not to
exceed 30" x 40".
2. Proposal submissions must be marked "Unified Development Project
Proposal for Virginia Key Boatyard Redevelopment" and addressed to:
Jack Luft, Director
City of Miami
Community Planning and Revitalization Department
3. Proposals must be received at:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Miami, City Hail
(First Floor Counter)
3500 Pan American Drive
Dinner Ivey
Miami, Florida 33133
4. The submission package shall be submitted not later than:
2:00 P.M.
Thursday, January 23, 1997 i
The time deadline and proposal receipt location will be strictly adhered to
by the City. No proposals shall be received or accepted after 2:00
p.m., January 23, 1997 or at any other City office location, other
than the City Clerk's Office (First Floor Counter).
5. Proposal submissions must be accompanied by:
A Proposal Application Fee: a non-refundable cashier's check in the
amount of $2,000 made payable to the City of Miami.
Funds accompanying the proposal submission will be used by the City to
cover actual expenses for advertising, printing, and mailing incurred by
the City in preparing and issuing the RFP. Expenses incurred in
32
7 8 Asr
49
evaluating proposal submissions, in excess of the total amount collected
from all proposers, shall be reimbursed to the City by the selected
proposer upon the City's execution of a lease agreement.
B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONTENTS
1 Prospective proposers shall address and include the following items as part of
their proposals:
la. Development Plan:
Narrative description of all aspects of the plan and a schedule of
amenities, including:
• Overall site development
• Number of new buildings, if any, and use, square footage,
height of each
• Description of disposition, renovation and adaptive reuse of
existing facilities
• Number, size, type and description of recreational, educational,
and/or other ancillary or public amenities
• Description of proposed operations by unit and category
(marina, boat storage, retail, food and beverage, office, etc.) and
approximate square footage
• Architectural features
• Methods of construction
• On site parldng requirements
• Permitting and environmental issues
1b. Illustrative Drawings:
Prepared by a registered design professional and board -mounted,
size not to exceed 30" x 40"
Conceptual Site Plan - Schematic site plan showing use areas by
type, vehicular access and circulation roads, pedestrian paths
and schematic planting plan, existing buildings to be renovated
and all proposed new structures.
Perspective -isometric illustrations are not required.
Models will not be accepted for review.
2. Development Schedule: a graphic time line or schedule detailing
all phases of the development including planning and design,
permitting, construction, and operations.
3. Capital Investment: a written statement indicating the dollar
amount to be spent on permanent physical improvements to the
PROPERTY, and an inventory or schedule of said improvements.
4. Management/Operating Plan: A narrative detailing the
management approach to the PROPERTY, including, without
33 �f ,'
AM
5.
limitation: mission statement, operating parameters and budget,
revenue projections, cash flow analysis, sublease requirements (if
any), operating schedule, organizational structure of operations,
job descriptions of key positions, employment plan and proposed
customer & public services.
Marketing and Feasibility Plana - Identification of primary and
secondary markets for each type of primary (and major secondary)
facility and/or service proposed and a description of the strategies
to be utilized for attracting acid strengthening those markets. The
market analysis should be sufficient to address the economic
feasibility of the development as proposed.
Return to the City - A stated commitment of annual lease
payments to the City in the format of a minimum guaranteed rent
versus percentage(s)� of gross revenues. A stated commitment to
adher,n to the City Charter requirement for compensation at least
equal to fair market value.
Financing Strategy and Evidence of Financial Capability:
A. Financing Strategy - a description of the financing strategy
to be utilized for capital construction and initiation of
operations, to be accompanied by revenue projections
through 10 years of operation.
B. Letters of reference from financial institutions demonstrating
proposer's relationship to same and documenting the
proposer's ability to finance all aspects of. the proposed
development, and indicating commitments to extend such
financing.
C. Financial Statements - Recent (as of 1996) Financial
Statements (audited statements preferred) for each principal
of the proposing entity. (For the purposes of this RFP,
"principal" shall be defined as the general partners,-`
stockholders owning 5% or more of the corporate stock, and
all corporate officers.) Note that financial statements are
exempt from disclosure under public records regulations,
therefore these documents shall be placed separately in a
sealed package or enveloped and marked "Financial
Statements".
D. Proposal Deposit - The required $25,000 payment stipulated
in Section III.B. Commitment of Funds" beginning on page
17.
I. Organization and Experience
A. Table of Organization - The organizational structure
presented in graphic form depicting the proposing entity and
its professional consultants, including the names, affiliation
and addresses of all principals. This includes any and all
- general partners, stockholders owning 5% or more of the
corporate stock, corporate officers, and executives and top
management of the Development Entity.
B. Forms - Completed Declaration, Financial and Professional '
Information forms as detailed and included as Exhibit 11.
C. Resumes of key individuals to be involved in the proposed
development
D. Other documentation of the proposer's (Development
Entity's) and consultants' past experience in development
and management of projects of similar scope and complexity
within the same or clearly similar sphere on endeavor.
E. Licenses - Individual Engineers, Architects and Landscape
Architects must submit current Certificates of Registration
or Licenses, and corporations or partnerships in those fields
must submit current Certificates of Authorization
II. Minority Participation and Affirmative Action Plan. Completed
Minority Participation Documentation forms from Exhibit 111, as
evidence of minority participation pursuant to the goals set forth in
the City's Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement
i
Program, and a copy of Proposer's currently affective Affirmative
Action program. '
III. Local Firm Participation: City occupational license(s) and City
"Office Location Affidavit" from Exhibit I11, demonstrating the j
participation of local firm(s), if any, in the Development Entity or
its consultants.
I
R
35
52 �8`"
VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA
6
1
Review procedures and the selection processes are set by the City
Charter and Code of which applicable excerpts are included in Appendix
A. of this document.
At a public hearing held September 26, 1996, the City Commission
authorized the City Manager to issue the RFP. The City Commission
shall also appoint a review committee from recommendations submitted
by the City Manager and select a certified public accounting (CPA) firm,
both to evaluate submitted proposals.
The review committee appointed by the City Commission will render a
written report to the City Manager of its evaluation of all responsive and
responsible proposals. The review committee shall evaluate each
proposal based on the criteria established herein. The review committee
has the authority to recommend one or more, or none, of the proposals
as it deems to be in the best interest of the City. The recommendation of
the committee shall be accompanied by written justification of its
decision.
The certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission will
render an independent report of its analysis of proposals to the City
Manager. The accounting firm shall analyze each proposal based on the
criteria established herein. The accounting firm shall present its
preliminary findings regarding each proposal to the review committee
prior to the review committee completing its deliberations.
A. INITUL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS, FOR COMPLUNCE WITH RFP
Proposals shall be reviewed initially by City staff for compliance with all
requirements set forth in the RFP. Each proposal shall be checked to
ensure that:
1. . All development proposal elements and documentation listed in
Section IV. and V. have been included in the proposal submission.
2. The required number of copies and one original of the proposal; the
board -mounted illustrative drawings, and the proposal application fee of
$2,000, have been received by the deadline date and time and at the
correct location.
During this initial review, and prior to the start of deliberations by the
review committee, Proposing Entities may be contacted to cure proposals
which contain non -material, non -substantive defects as determined
solely by staff, such as an out of date certification. If notified of such
0
36
deficiency, the proposer shall correct such deficiency within five (5)
working days of its receipt of notification.
B. REVIEW COMMITTEE EVALUATION CRITERIA
The following specific evaluation criteria and their respective assigned weights
shall be used by the Review Committee for purposes of rating and ranking the
proposal- submissions. In accordance with City administrative policy, each
proposal is given a subjective score (from 0 to 6) for each criteria, which is then
multiplied by the respective weight.
Weighted
Criteria Value
Overall plan & design of the proposed development ............. 10
Property Enhancement........................................................ 10
Inclusion of Option.................................................................5
Management & operations ................................................... 15
Financial return to the City ................................................. 10
Financial capability of the Development Entity
Experience of the Development Entity .................................. 10
Capability of the Development Entity & Consultants............ 10
Extent of minority participation ........................................... 10
c
Local firm(s) participation...................................................... S
Total 105
s:
Proposers are encouraged to format their proposals to conform to the
outline of factors described below, which will be utilized by the review .'
committee in evaluating the proposals:
1. OVERALL PLAN 8a DESIGN OF TIME PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(weighted value 10 points)
• Fulfillment of the City's established development objective; extent and
commitment to the required primary and ancillary uses; demonstrated
commitment for public access and water -dependent and recreational
uses.
• Appropriateness and quality of the design as a boat yard and marina,
and as related to the character of the site and the waterfront.
v
37
54
• Harmonious and/or complementary integration of optional primary uses
into the site.
• Appropriateness and quality of the design of any new structures and any
reuse of existing structures.
• Successful and harmonious interface and/or connection to adjoining
public property.
• Imaginative and creative treatment of: public access, particularly at
water front, other public spaces, exterior space, circulation, view
corridors, landscaping, graphics, signage and lighting.
• Efficiency of site design and organization, and compatibility of uses.
• Range and mix of uses and amenities; extent of public access and
amenities.
2. PROPERTY ENHANCEMENT
(weighted Value 10 points)
• Specific experience of development entity or consultant(s) in the
rehabilitation of commercial property.
• Sensitivity of overall design to the tropical environment which is the
essence of the Virginia Ivey waterfront.
• Extent and continuity of enhancements throughout the site
1' • Provision of facilities for the use by community organizations for
educational purposes.
• Provision of legible and complimentary signage.
i;
t -
3. INCLUSION OF OPTION PROPERTY
(weighted value 5 points)
• Inclusion of the OPTION PROPERTY offered in Section VIII of this
proposal is considered valuable to the success of the overall project.
• A vision of the unified project for the future.
• Applicable plans and program of development.
4. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
(weighted value 15 points)
• Appropriateness and practicality of stated goals, objectives and policies
of management plan.
• Viability, practicality and comprehensiveness of management plan,
including such elements as: mission, operating parameters and budget,
k. revenue projections and cash flow analysis, personnel organization and
staffing plan.
a
,.'
38. �"' 8 1,1 55
56
• Extent and feasibility of marketing plan, proposed facilities and services;
and appropriateness of strategies to be utilized for attracting and
strengthening those markets.
• Management approach to ancillary operations and businesses,
particularly relative to stated experience and capabilities and City's
objectives.
• Extent and quality of programs for maintenance, security, public access,
cultural/ educational programs and public and customer services, as
applicable.
4. FINA.NCUL RETURN TO THE CITY
(weighted value 10 points)
• Annual lease payment including a guaranteed minimum annual rental
payment or a percentage of gross revenues, whichever is greater.
• Term of lease
• Dollar value, extent, and timing of capital improvements.
• Any additional financial benefit to the City.
S. FINANCIAL CA.PAEILITY
(weighted value 15 points)
• Demonstrated financial capability of the proposing entity as being
sufficient to successfully undertake and complete this development.
• Proposing entity's track record of financing comparable developments
and to successfully finance this development.
• Viability of financing strategy, financing mechanism, and funding
sources.
• Demonstrated feasibility of all aspects of the proposed development
substantiated by a market analysis.
S. EXPERIENCE OF THE PROPOSING ENTITY
(weighted value 10 points)
• Qualifications and experience of the proposing entity in planning, design,
construction, leasing and management of projects of similar size and
scope.
• Specific experience of the proposing entity in development, design,
leasing and management of marinas, boat yards, and in each of the
ancillary types of uses proposed. A minimum of three (3) years
experience in boat yard/marina development, management and
operation is required. Proposers offering to include optional primary
39 � E
uses shall demonstrate a minimum of three (3) years responsible
experience in the development, management and operation of the
respective facility or facilities.
7. CAPABILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITY AND CONSULTANTS
(weighted value 10 points)
• Overall composition of the Development Entity and its consultant team,
including professional qualifications and capability of members, project
managers, consultants and subconsultants as related to mandatory
primary uses (marinas, boat yard).
• Composition and capability of the Development Entity and its consultant
team as related to development; construction and management of
projects of similar size and scope.
• Adequacy of personnel and other resources to successfully undertake
and complete the development proposed.
• Good past performance in the administration and management of other
developments and cooperation with former clients.
• Demonstrated ability to meet time schedules and budget.
• Architectural/engineering capability and range of experience on similar
developments comparable in scope, complexity, and magnitude.
• General contracting or construction management capability and range of
experience on similar developments comparable in scope, complexity,
magnitude.
• Qualifications, organization and experience of operational, leasing,
and/or management team members.
• Qualifications and specified experience of key personnel, project
managers and professional consultants in development and
management of marinas, boat yards.
S. EXTENT OF MINORITY PARTICIPATION '
(weighted value 10 points)
• Significant minority/women participation within the proposing entity.,;-
• Significant minority/women participation within the consultants to the
proposing entity.
• Subcontracting and hiring practices during construction.
• Opportunities for minorities/women, hiring outreach and training
opportunities in relation to leasing, management, operation and
maintenance of facilities.
• Affirmative Action Plans of Development Entity members.
40 f ,
57
(weighted value 5 points)
• Proposal submitted by a proposing entity that includes is a local firm or
that consists of one or more local firms.
• Proposal includes local firm(s) as consultants in the design, construction,
leasing, management and/or operations fields.
C. CPA FIRM EVALUATION CRITERIA
The certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission will
evaluate each proposal prior to evaluation by the review committee.
Specifically, the certified public accounting firm shall assess these elements:
• the financial viability of the proposing entity, including prior record and
experience
• the viability of the proposal's financing strategies, sources and structure
• the (comparative) short term and long range economic and fiscal return to
the City
o the proposal's market analysis and marketing plan
• the economic feasibility of the proposed development
• viability and appropriateness of management plan
During the course of its analysis, the CPA firm will examine all materials
provided by proposer as well as materials which may be available from other
financial institutions such as Dunn &, Bradstreet, and TRW. The accounting
firm shall present its findings regarding each proposal to the Review Committee
prior to said Committee completing its deliberations. The CPA firm will render
an°independent report of its findings to the City Manager.
VII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED LEASE
AGREEMENT
A. AUTHORIZATION
Upon authorization of the City Commission, the City Manager or his designee
shall negotiate all aspects of a lease agreement with the selected proposer.
The City Attorney's office will provide assistance to the City •Manager or his
designee during the negotiation of the lease agreement and must approve the
lease agreement as to legal form and correctness prior to its execution. The
lease agreement shall comply with all applicable City Charter and Code
provisions. Until such time as the lease agreement is executed by the City,
the selected proposer has no vested right, title or interest in the subject
PROPERTY.
B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The lease agreement _shall address, but not be limited to the following terms
and conditions:
1. Lease Term
2. Rent
3. Conditions For Lease (City Charter Section 29-B Requirements).
4. Insurance
{ 5. Performance and Payment Bond
6. Indemnification
7. Assignment of Lease
8. Restrictions on Use
9. Design, Engineering and Construction of Improvements
10. Preparation of Premises for Development
j 11. Operation and Management of Leased Premises
j 12. Equity Capital and Mortgage Financing
13. Public Charges/Fees
14. Taxes
15. Maintenance, Repair and Replacement`
16. Condemnation and City "Buy -Out" Provisions
17. Default - Termination
18. Examination of Premises
19. Audit Rights
20. Award of Agreement
21. Conflict of Interest
22. Non -Discrimination
23. Rules and Regulations
24. Compliance with Federal, State and Local Laws
25. Minority Procurement
26. Force Majeure
27. Miscellaneous
42
i e 59
DX�7 �
i
Li
VIII.OP'TION ON THE RICKENBACKER MARINA
A. OVERVIEW
1. INTRODUCTION
In conjunction with the RFP for the PRIMARY PROPERTY, the City of
Miami is offering Proposers the option to enter into lease negotiations
with the City for an additional property in the future. The City of Miami
has determined that a positive economic relationship could be formed by
unifying management of the Rickenbacker Marina and the Virginia Key
Boat Yard. To this end, the City of Miami is including, as an option in
this Request for Proposal, the adjacent leasehold site, the Rickenbacker
Marina (the "OPTION PROPERTY"), located 3301 Rickenbacker
Causeway. The option, if and when exercised, and subject to lease
negotiations with the City , would require the Successful Proposer (or
LESSEE) to the PRIMARY PROPERLY, to provide an integrated package
of development services for the OPTION PROPERTY, consisting of
planning and design, construction, leasing and management of the
proposed commercial and recreational development.
The unification of these facilities would result in significant advantages
to the CITY and the boating community in terms of property
management, physical improvements and marina/boat yard operations.
Proposers are encouraged to consider the inclusion of this additional
property in their submissions to this RFP. This option, if selected by the
Successful Proposer and accepted by the CITY, is intended to be carried
by the Successful Proposer through the end of the existing tenant's lease
term in the year 2009, with annual compensation to the City until such
time as the option may be exercised. Including the option would entitle. ;
the Successful Proposer to negotiate a lease with the City, but is NOT a `
guarantee of successful negotiations. The process will follow
substantially the same requirements as those in this RFP, as listed
below.
By virtue of Resolution No. , and Resolution No. 96-283, the City
Commission has determined that the most advantageous method to
develop certain improvements at the OPTION PROPERTY and the
PRIMARY PROPERTY is through the Unified Development Project (the
"UDP").
60 43 �����
The remaining provisions of Section II.A. of this RFP shall equally
apply to the OPTION PROPERTY. Proposers are advised to take
particular note of these provisions given on p. 4: "Right to Reject
All Proposals", and "Reservation.'!
2. AREA LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS
The OPTION PROPERTY is known as the Rickenbacker Marina located at
3301 Rickenbacker Causeway on Virginia Key, in the City of Miami,
Florida. Virginia Key is an island located to the east of the mainland
area of the City, as shown in Figure 1. Regional Location Map and Figure
5.Optional Marina Location Map.
The remaining provisions of Section II.E. of this RFP shall equally.
apply to the OPTION PROPERTY.
3. DESCRIPTION OF SITE
a) Location
ti
j b) . Area
The OPTION PROPERTY consists of approximately 21.448 acres of
upland and submerged area, as depicted in the survey enclosed as
j EXHIBIT IV.
j c) Existing Facilities
The marina facilities include 182 wet slips and 260 dry slips.
Additionally there are three significant structures on the upland
property including a 10,000 square foot restaurant building, a 1,500
sq. ft. building housing a dock masters office, convenience store and
restrooms, and a 1,000 sq. ft. maintenance structure.
d) Environmental Conditions j.
The OPTIONAL PROPERTY includes approximately 21.448 acres of
bay bottom and upland. Any proposed development within ,the
OPTION PROPERTY shall conform to the prescriptions and
requirements of effective environmental regulations governing same.
As of the issue date of this RFP, there are no areas located within the
OPTION PROPERTY that are considered sensitive or protected
habitats. Note that all operations of any proposed development shall
also conform to existing environmental regulations and permitting
requirements.
44�
A
w
at1t7�t:ix?r�Z4t
h.sq
j'k\ya '{ tt:d,� ♦ } Si�J ! {� l�tri0. t+ 1 to jtt
i s T } ♦ . yy.. m r � �j f JV
♦Z ' O i. r .. tt t•
r��t�� is � �� Er � i!, '++t! �` ' .'ii�u- c�r'7 ♦ C lt,
r -ire`
-1 ._ .� 3d y�'+o'isii.. �����...,.-rti �' � s r•± t � t� - � r,
•�• -� 'i moo. ! r`Of{ .'^ y, 1 j) +.r ! I `. ,}.
� �.{ r �,r= 7 '} i j t#£ _ r YwU'y aK�w ii ! •r y ,a 7..
1.
!•+ .\„fe i '.�. .7i ,� }' taf \ i $ �� t � 4 t y r
(. �` ' I � .+� r .� • ' �� ^tR,.ir}ram f'� � _ � t .,+r l � . :.
M.
The remaining provisions of Section II.C.4. of this RFP shall
equally apply to the OPTION PROPERTY.
e) Adjacent Uses
The provisions of Section II.C.S. of this RFP shall relationally
apply to the OPTION PROPERTY.
f) Existing Utilities
The provisions of Section II.C.f. of this RFP shall, apply to the
OPTION PROPERTY.
g) Review of Adjacent City_ Leases
The provisions of Section II.C.7. of this RFP shall equally apply to
the OPTION PROPERTY.
4. LEASE TERM
The lease term for the OPTION PROPERTY will run concurrently with the
PRIMARY PROPERTY. The term will be for the balance of the 'time
remaining on the lease for the PRIMARY PROPERTY at the date the
option is executed
5. FINANCIAL RETURN TO THE CITY -FAIR MARKET VALUE
a) Form of Lease Payments
In accordance with City Charter Section 29B, the City may not
consider any sale or lease of City property unless the City shall receive
fair market value for such sale or lease. At the time the option is
exercised, the Lessee of the PRIMARY PROPERTY shall make an offer
of annual lease payments to the City which shall conform to the
following format: a minimum annual guarantee or a percentage of gross
receipts, whichever. is greater. Different percentages of gross receipts..
may be offered for the different operations included in the proposal.;'
The offer shall include sufficient analyses of costs and revenue to
justify the proffered figure as "fair market value" according to the
details of its development and management programs.
Each Proposer shall specifically state in its Proposal that it agrees
that its annual lease payments will meet or exceed fair market value
for both the PRIMARY PROPERTY and the OPTION PROPERTY, if
elected, should its proposal is accepted by the City.
b) Minimum Rent
Annual lease payments (base rent and/or the percentage(s) of gross
receipts) offered to the City in a proposal may be negotiated upwards
by the City depending on the extent and quality of improvements
' IS eut- r,�
47 w V+-W
0
proposed, and may similarly be subject to incremental escalation over
the lease term. Additionally, minimum annual -lease payments may
be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index over the
lease term. The City has not previously stipulated a threshold
minimum rent for the OPTION PROPERTY.
c) Appraisal to Determine Fair Market Value
"At the time the option is exercised by the Lessee of the PRIMARY
PROPERTY, fair market value for the OPTION PROPERTY will be
determined according to the following process. The option offer will
be subject to an appraisal of the use as proposed by two (2) Master
Appraiser Institute (MAI) qualified appraisers, which will be selected
by the City and have documented experience in assessing properties
of the same or similar uses. The Lessee will be given an opportunity
to present its offer, as well as supporting documentation, to the
appraisers. Should the result of those two appraisals reveal that the
Lessee's offer does not meet fair market value, then the Lessee shall
be given the opportunity to revise its offer so that it meets or exceeds
said value. In the event said Lessee is unable (or unwilling) to revise
its original offer, it may remove its offer from consideration or it may,
at its own cost and expense, procure a reconciliation appraisal. The
appraiser performing the reconciliation appraisal shall also be MAI
qualified, have documented experience in assessing properties of the
same or similar uses, and be subject to the approval of the City.
d) Payment Schedule
The provisions of Section II.E.4. of this RFP shall equally apply to
the OPTION PROPERTY.
6. TAXES
The provisions of Section II.F. of this RFP shall equally apply to the
OPTION PROPERTY. Current (1995) taxes on the OPTION PROPERTY
were $56,951.68.
7. ZONING
The provisions of Section II.G. of this RFP shall equally apply to the
OPTION PROPERTY.
8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS
Proposals which include the OPTION PROPERTY submitted in response
to this RFP will undergo the review and selection process described in
Section II.H. A separate process will not be conducted.
9. UNFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE (,TENTATIVE)
Proposals which include the OPTION PROPERTY submitted in response
to this RFP will undergo the review and selection process according to
48
= 7 8 Id 65
l
the tentative schedule described in Section II.I. A separate process will
not be conducted. -
i
B. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Declaration as UDP
The provisions of Section III.A. of this RFP apply as written.
2. Commitment of Funds
a. City: The City shall not provide funds or financing for the
I development contemplated by this RFP, nor in the exercise of any options
l thereunder..
b. Selected Proposer or Future Lessee:
i) Debt Financing, Rent & Reimbursements: The selected
proposer or future LESEE is required to provide adequate equity
and commitment for debt financing to finance all aspects of the
proposed Unified Development of the PROPERTY. The selected
proposer -or future LESEE is required to provide the City with a
minimum guaranteed annual rent as specified in Section II. E.
"Financial Return to the City".
Upon both parties' execution of the lease agreement for the
OPTION PROPERTY, the selected proposer/future Lessee shall
reimburse the City for any and all direct costs incurred in
evaluating the all or all offers by Lessee, including but not limited
to: appraisal fees, the professional services of the certified public
accounting firm selected, any advertising and printing costs, as
well as any costs which may be incurred by the City during
permitting processes.
ii) Performance Bond: Simultaneous with execution of the lease
agreement for the OPTION PROPERTY, the selected
proposer/future Lessee shall be required to furnish the City with a,.;
Performance and Payment Bond, in customary form utilized for`
commercial transactions involving private sector principals in Dade
County, and in the amount equal to the total estimated cost of the
PROJECT improvements for the OPTION PROPERTY, but not Aess
than$1,000,000 as stated in Section III, B of this RFP.
iiijSecuri�Deposit: Simultaneous with execution of the lease
agreement FOR THE option property the selected proposer shall be
required to furnish the City a security deposit equal to the one half
(50%) of the first year's minimum rent. Such security deposit shall
be in the form of cash, cashier's check or an acceptable Irrevocable
Letter of Credit issued by a financial institution acceptable to the
66 49
Letter of Credit issued by a financial institution acceptable to the
City. Such security shall be used for purposes deemed appropriate
solely by City, including delinquent lease payments, and is to be
ithin a time period specified by City.
replenished by Lessee w
iv) Proposal Deposit: Submission of the proposal shall include, as
evidence of the proposer's creditworthiness and ability to meet its
proffered financial commitment for the development, $25,000 in
the form of cash or a cashier's check. Such funds collected by the
City shall be reimbursed to all but the Selected Proposer upon the
selection of the apparent most advantageous proposal. Note that
the City may require the submitter of the next ranked proposal to
return said deposit in the event the conditionally accepted proposal
is removed from consideration during the appraisal process (see
Section III, B.
3. Commitment of Pro e
The provisions of Section III, C of this RFP apply as written.
4. Commitment of Services and Materials
The provisions of Section III, D of this RFP apply as written.
5. Execution of Contracts
The provisions of Section 111, E of this RFP apply as written.
6. Right of Termination
The provisions of Section III, F of this RFP apply as written.
C. ELEMENTS OF PROPOSALS
1. Development Obyectives
The provisions of Section III, F of this RFP apply as written.
2. Use of Pro e
This section applies as written with the following exceptions.
a. REQUIRED PRINCIPLE USES
The OPTIONAL PROPERTY current has in operation 182 wet..
slips and 260 dry slips, this will continue to be operated, as a
full service marina.
b. PERMITTED ANCILLARY USES FOR BOATYARD AND
MARINA
4
j 68
Marine related concessions will be allowed within the facility
and may include charter fishing, dive boat, boat rental and
related services.
Boat Yard/ Marina may include boat brokerage. The City
recommends not more than 15% of total manna slips.
4. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The provisions of Section IV,C of this RFP applies'as written.
1. STRUCTURES
2. LANDSCAPING
3. MARINA AND BOATYARD
4. PARKING AND CIRCULATION_
5. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINE
5. PERMITTING AND LICENSING
The provisions of Section IV, D of this RFP applies as written.
6. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
This section is written to include an additional $1,000,000 of
investment to be used for the improvement of the OPTION PROPERTY.
This investment minimum of $1,000,000 is not a guaranteed amount,
it should be regarded as a minimum figure and could increase over
the life of the option.
7. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
The provisions of Section IV, F applies as written.
S. PROPSED CUSTOMER AND PUBLIC SERVICES
This section should be written to include the to Properties together. If
the proposer has elected to secure the option on the adjacent/
property, the completed proposal should include a description of this
section for the two properties together. Refer to Section ITT, G.
9. MANAGEMENT, MAINTENACE AND OPERATIONS
This section should be written to include the to Properties together. If
the proposer has elected to secure the option on the adjacent
property, the completed proposal should include a description of this
section for the two properties together. Refer to Section IV, H.
The remaining items in this section will remain the same as
written in the RFP.
10.FINANCING STRATEGY
II.COMPOSTION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMETN
(PROPOSING) ENTITY 8s CONSULTANTS
A. GENERAL
B. CONSULTANTS
C. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
D. CAHNGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM
E. BACKGROUND CHECKS
F. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
12.MINORTY & LOCAL FIRM PARTICIPATION
D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT
The items in this section will remain the same as written in the
RFP.
1. Submittal Procedures
2. Development Proposal Contents
E. _EVALUTATION CRITERIA
INTIAL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITHRFP
REVIEW COMMITTEE EVALUATION CITERIA
1. OVERALL PLAN 8s DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PROPERTYENHANCEMENT
INCLUSION OF PROPEWfY
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL RETURN TO THE CITY
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY
EXPERIENCE OF THE PROPOSEING ENTITY
CAPABILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITY AND CONSULTANTS
EXTENT OF MINORITY PARTICIPATION
PARTICIPPATION OF LOCAL. FIRMS
CPA FRIM EVALUATION CRITERIA
VI TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED LEASE AGRREMENT
The items in this section will remain the same as written in the
RFP.
A. AUTHORIZATION
B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1i
VII OPTION ON THE RICKENBACKER MARINA
A. TERMS FOR THE LEASEHOLD OPTION
The successful proposer for the leasehold interest in the PROPERTY
(Virginia Key Boatyard) will have the right to secure an option for the
leasehold interest in the adjacent Rickenbacker Marina property, herein
referred to as the OPTION PROPERTY, as described in the survey and legal
description in EXHIBIT IV.
Such option will begin upon the expiration of the current lease with
Rickenbacker Marina, Inc. On January 7, 2009, or at any time prior to the
expiration of the Rickenbacker Marina ,Inc. Lease subject to said lessee's
approval and the approval of the City of Miami. Upon exercising said option
the leasehold term for the OPTION PROPERTY shall run concurrently with
the leasehold term for the PRIMARY PROPERTY. The lease agreement for
the OPTION PROPERTY shall contain terms and conditions substantially
similar to those of the lease agreement for the PRIMARY PROPERTY.
Financial return to the City for the .leasehold of the OPTION PROPERTY
shall be determined by the appraisal process described in Section II, E, 2 of
this Request for Proposal.
The terms to secure the above described option will be as follows:
1. Completion of the attached Option Form enclosed in EXHIBIT H
2. Proposers interested in securing an option on the Rickenbacker Marina'
should include with the proposal submission consideration totaling
$5,000.This option will run for a period of one year from the date of the
execution of the lease and will be renewable annually for $5,000 until such
time as the leasehold property is successfully transferred at the end of the
current lease or the option holder successfully , with the current lessee's
approval, agrees to renegotiate the current lease term and conditions with
the City. All option moneys will be returned expect that of the successful
proposer.
3. The option does not entitle the option holder to a lease on the OPTION
PROPERTY, but to retain the exclusive rights to negotiate and enter into a
mutually acceptable lease agreement between the City Miami and the
70
53 S
6/28/96
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 96-283
ADOPTED APRIL 25, 1996 BY INCLUDING AN
ADDITIONAL CITY --OWNED PROPERTY, THE
RICKENBACKER MARINA LOCATED AT 3301
RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY, AS A FUTURE OPTION
UNDER THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("UDP")
DETERMINED PURSUANT TO SAID RESOLUTION FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF A BOAT YARD
AND ANCILLARY MARINE RELATED FACILITIES AT
THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE VIRGINIA KEY BOAT
YARD, LOCATED AT 3501 RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY,
WITH SAID ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED
AS A FUTURE OPTION IN THE REQUEST FOR
PROPOSAL ("RFP") ISSUED FOR SAID UDP.
WHEREAS, the City Commission, by Resolution No. 96-283
adopted April 25, 1996, determined that the most advantageous
method to develop certain improvements to designated City -owned
waterfront property was as a UDP; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution further authorized the City Manager
to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the development and
a
operation of a boat yard and ancillary marine.related facilities
at the property known as the Virginia Key Boat Yard (also known j
as the marine stadium marina), located at 3501 Rickenbacker]
Causeway; and
r
f
WHEREAS, it was subsequently learned that inclusion of ,the
adjacent leasehold site, the Rickenbacker Marina, located at 3301•
Rickenbacker Causeway, in the UDP offering would result in
significant advantages to the CITY and the boating community in
terms of property management, physical improvements and
marina/boat yard operations; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that this additional property be
included in the UDP as an option to.be carried by the Successful
Proposer through the end of the existing tenant's lease term in
the year 2009, with annual compensation to the City until such
I time as the option may be exercised;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are incorporated herein as if fully
set forth in this Section.
Section 2. Section 2 of Resolution No. 96-283 adopted April
f 25, 1996 is hereby amended in the following particulars i�:
"Section 2. The development of a boat yard and
ancillary marine related facilities on City -owned
waterfront property known as the Virginia Key Boat Yard
(also known as the Marine Stadium Marina), located at
3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, with the
future option to undertake the development of a marina,
' boat yard and ancillary marine related facilities on
the adjacent City -owned. property known as the
Rickenbacker Marina, located at 3301 Rickenbacker
Causeway, is hereby determined to be a Unified
Development Project ("UDP"), for which the City shall
seek to secure from the private sector an integrated
package of services to include planning and design,
construction, leasing and management of said proposed
development."
1� Words and/or figures underlined shall be added. Words
and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Asterisks
represent omitted and unchanged material.
•- i
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to include
said additional property, the Rickenbacker Marina, as a future
option in the RFP issued for said UDP.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1996.
Wifredo (Willy) Gort '
Vice -Mayor
ATTEST:
WALTER FOEMAN, CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
LINDA KELLY KEARSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
J-96-375
4/25/96
RESOLUTION NO. 9 6` 283
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE MOST
ADVANTAGEOUS METHOD TO DEVELOP CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS ON CITY -OWNED WATERFRONT
PROPERTY IS AS A UNIFIED DETELOPMENT PROJECT
("UDP"); AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGElt TO
PREPARE A DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ("RFP")
FOR SAID UDP, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BOAT
YARD AND ANCILLARY MARINE RELATED FACILITIES
AT THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE VIRGINIA KEY
' BOAT YARD (ALSO KNOWN- AS THE MARINE STADIUM
MARINA), LOCATED AT 3501: RICKENBACKER
CAUSEWAY, VIRGINIA KEY, MIAMI, FLORIDA.
I
WHEREAS, City of Miami Charter Section 19-A(c) and Code
Section 18-52.9 provide for the."Unified Development Project
("UDP") process to govern the development of improvements to real
property owned or to be acquired by the City; and
WHEREAS, said UDP process further provides that under
certain circumstances it may be most advantageous for the City to
procure from, the private sector one or more of the following
integrated packages for the development of said improvements:
planning and design, construction and leasing;
planning and design, leasing -and management;
planning and design, construction, and management; or
planning and design, construction, leasing and management;,Y
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager was directed to initiate a,"' UDP
process for the development of a boat yard and related marine
facilities at City -owned property known as the Virginia Rey Boat
CONIIaIISSIC?
. G
e
5 1996
76 SC.'Ou gun Ha
Yard (also know as the Marine Stadium Marina), located at
3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Commission formally
determine that said development be considered a UDP; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Charter and Code
provisions, a public hearing will be scheduled. at a later date
,and time to consider the contents of the RFP, and to continue the
implementation of the UDP-process'for said project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MI.AMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The development of a boat yard and ancillary
marine related facilities on City -owned waterfront property known
as the Virginia Key Boat Yard (also known as the Marine Stadium
Marina), located- at 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia Key,
Miami, Florida, is hereby determined to be a Unified Development.
Project ( "UDP") , for which the City shall seek to procure fry
the private sector an integrated package of services to inclliae
planning and design, construction, leasing and management of ,;.said
proposed development.
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorizedl/ to
prepare a draft Request for Proposals for said'UDP, as set forth
in Section 2 hereinabove.
I
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day off April 1996.
S N P . CLARK, MAYOR
ATTEST:
WALTER J.
CITY Cialdc
PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY:
LINDA K. KEARSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY7
APPROVED AS TO DORM AND CORRECTNESS:
f
i A. QTANNIJQ�Mg, II
CITY A6TT
tP
W845:BSS
C
d
i
i
i� The herein authorization is further subject to compliance
with all requirements that may be imposed by the City
Attorney, including but not limited to those prescribed by
applicable City Charter and Code provisions. ,
3
78
6
DADE COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION PLAN
Summary and Fact Sheets
A preliminary draft of the Dade County Manatee Protection Plan was
completed by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources
Management (DERM) in June 1992 following several years of data
collection and review with an informal discussion group including
representatives of environmental interest groups, government agencies
and the regulated community. Following a series of six public
workshops, representatives of the regulated community requested
establishment of a citizen's committee to review the draft plan. At
the ;request of the Environment and Land Use Committee of the Dade
County Board of .County Commissioners, then chaired by Commissioner
Harvey Ruvin, the Director of DERM appointed thirteen persons to the
Manatee Protection Plan Review Committee. This committee includes
representatives of boating and marine interest groups, environmental
and civic organizations, and the South Florida Water Management
District. The committee began monthly public meetings in October 1992
and continued a section -by -section review of the draft plan through
June 1995. The final draft plan reflects the recommendations of the
Review Committee with exact language as approved by simple majority
vote of committee members present.
The final draft plan contains background information, recommendations,
and policies relating to habitat and water quality protection,
manatee -human interactions (including mortality caused by water control
and drainage structures), land development (including siting or marine
facilities), law enforcement, education and awareness, and governmental
coordination. To assist readers in assimilating the recommended
actions contained in the lengthy narrative, all objectives and policies
have also been extracted and compiled in a separate chapter at the end
of the plan document. The most significant groups of recommendations
relate to eliminating manatee mortality at flood gates and drainage
structures and to the siting or operation of marinas and other vessel
launching, storage or docking facilities. Highlights of these
complicated portions of the plan are summarized in this section.
Flood Gates and DrainacTe Structures
The objective of this section of the plan is to reduce to zero;: the
number of manatee mortalities related to flood gates and drainage
culverts. Twenty separate recommended actions have been developed
related to this objective, many of which have already been implemented.
o Flood gates are to be equipped with pressure -sensitive devices
which cause the gate to open if it closes on an object.
Prototypes have already been installed on some gates. Engineering
and installation of improved designs is in progress.
o Back-up manatee protection strategies, including "over -the -top"
discharge designs, sonar or acoustic devices, barriers,. and
improved operation procedures should be developed. A U.S. Army
_ Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) study of such alternatives is in progress.
o The SFWMD shall be required to provide reports, operating records,
permit applications, and other information concerning manatee
protection to the appropriate regulatory agencies on a regular
basis. Such information shall also be made available to the
public through annual reports and workshops.
o Barriers have been constructed at two drainage canals at the Miami
International Airport to prevent manatees from entering stormwater
culverts. Regular maintenance and reporting will be required to
assure compliance.
,Siting of Marinas and Other Vgssel Facilities
The objective of this section of the plan is to reduce additional
impacts to manatees or their habitats caused by development and
operation of new or expanded vessel facilities. Many regulations
protecting seagrass, wetlands, water quality, and other natural
resources are already in place and would continue to be implemented as
they always have been. To reduce the risk of vessel -manatee collisions
and disturbance of critically sensitive manatee behavior, increased
density of commercial power boat facilities in essential manatee
habitat and in or near no -entry zones is not recommended, unless it. can
be demonstrated that the proposed project would not adversely affect
manatees. Since manatees occur most often in canals, tributaries, and
shallow nearshore areas, especially seagrass beds, most of these areas
are designated as essential habitat (please refer to attached map).
Year-round no -entry zones for manatee protection have been established
northwest of Virginia Key and in portions of the Black Creek canal and
marina basin. Development of marinas, boat ramps, dry storage and
{ other vessel facilities is encouraged outside of essential manatee
areas or near open water destinations favored by most boaters.
o No new restrictions are recommended for regulation of
single-family residential docks. Single-family residential docks
may be constructed anywhere in Dade County in accordance with
existing regulations Construction of single-family docks located
in seasonal "no entry" zones shall be permitted during the summer
(May 1 - November 1-4). Emergency repairs necessary for human
safety may be permitted at any time.
o All existing facilities, regardless of location, may rebuild,
renovate or reconfigure as long as there is no net increasein the*
total number of wet and dry power boat slips. For the purpose of
this plan, any marine facility in use or operating on or after
October 28, 1984 is considered an existing facility.
o New or expanded multi -family residential docking facilities may be
constructed anywhere they are not otherwise prohibited. However,
in essential manatee habitat, multi -family residential docking
facilities with more than five slips would be limited to one power
boat per 100 feet of developable shoreline. Additional slips
could be occupied by sailboats. Vessels docked at the facility
1 must be registered to residents.
IIII 81
814
i
Fi
o New or expanded commercial marinas, dry storage, fuel docks and
transitory docks for power boats may be permitted outside of
essential manatee habitat. No new limit would be placed on number
of power vessel slips. Generally recommended areas include the
eastern side of Biscayne Bay from Haulover to Government Cut,
Keystone Point, Dinner Key, portions of Crandon Park, or Matheson
Hammock.
o New or expanded special use marinas, such as facilities for large,
luxury yachts, charter boats, and certain commercial fishing boats
may be permitted outside of essential manatee habitat without
limit on number of slips. New special use marinas may also be
,suitable for some sites within essential manatee habitat, such as
Watson Island.
o New or expanded courtesy docks and docks for water taxis or
similar public transportation vessels; or certain commercial
fishing vessels may also be permitted in the Miami River from the
5th Street bridge to the mouth and along the west shoreline of
Biscayne Bay from the Port of Miami to SW 15th Road with a maximum
density of 1 power boat per 500 feet of shoreline, including
existing slips. outside of essential manatee habitat, such docks
may be permitted without limitation in any area where they are not
otherwise prohibited.
o New or expanded freight terminals or large vessel berthing
facilities may be permitted along Government Cut and the
Government Cut turning basin. Existing and new large vessel
facilities will be required to utilize fenders or other mooring
design that provides 4 feet of standoff during operation. • On the
Miami River, 3 feet of standoff will be required. New or expanded
large vessel berthing facilities will also be permitted on the
Miami River, provided standoff requirements above are met.
o Expansion of existing boat yards is preferred to the construction
of new facilities. New boat yards should also be permitted along
Government Cut, along the east side of north Biscayne Bay, or
along certain canals in Dumfoundling Bay, where compatible with
existing land use and zoning.
o Any project that does not meet the above density or siting
limitations may still be permitted provided it does not adversely
affect manatees in accordance with a series of performance
criteria. These criteria were developed to provide a mechanism
for obtaining a variance from the above requirements.
o New or expanded boat ramps shall be permitted in the same areas as
commercial marinas. Boat ramps may be permitted at alternative
locations provided that they comply with the performance criteria
as described above:
82
Li
84
r
DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
I. Baywalk/Riverwalk design standards and guidelines.
A. General principles.
Public access waterfront walkways shall:
1. Feel public. No one should feel as if he or she is intruding on private property. the
F
public should'feel welcome and at ease to move along the entire length of the bay/river
walk. Signage should clearly establish the public's right to use the walkway.
2. Be usable. Young and old, handicapped and joggers, lovers, fisherpen, business and wen
and women, "eryone should find the Day/riverwalk usable. Potential conflicts between
active and passive users should be prevented through segregation of bay/river walk use
zones. (See DESIGN STANDARDS below).
3. Provide visual access. The attraction is the water. Ali;landscaping, furniture,
lighting guard rails end planters should be subordinated to enhance maxim visibility
to the water. Simplicity of design Is preferred. The views of adjacent private
development should not be obstructed.
4. Enhance visual quality. Parking and service areas oust be coopletety screened iron the
walkway. Materials, color and fors should eooplenent the natural shoreline
environment: °
S. Connect to other public areas. Public parks, transit stops, thoroughfares. midbloek
walkways, shopping areas, and publicly accessible plazas should cmect to the bay/river
walk.
ti. —Take advantage of bay/river setting. mere practical, boating and fishing activities
should be incorporated into Dap/Rlverwalk destgus. Elevated viewing areas, historically
Interpretive eearkers and signs are desirable,.
B. Design standards.
i
The Bay/River Valk shall be a ainiam of twenty (ZO) feet wide overall and shalt consist of {
five distinct zones: an edge zone, a safety buffer zone, a circulation zone. a passive
zone, and a transition and security zone.
B*C •
I. The top of the bulkhead or seawall shall be at a constant elevation for the length '
of the bay/river walk. It shall be 16 to 30 inches wide at the top.
2. Safety ladders of stainless steel or galvanized steel shall be placed a maxisua of '
100 feet apart along the face of the seawall or bulkhead, to allow for climbing out f
of the water at lov tide.
3. The top of the seavall/buikhead shall be 5 to 9 inches higher than the surface of 1
the baywalk circulation zone.
4. The inside edge of the seawall/bulkhead shall be beveled.
S. The top surface of seawall/bulkhead shall be textured and of a lighter color than
the surface of the circulation zone. r
Safety buffer zone.
I. Since railings. walls and/or other barriers are not desirable along the waters
edge, bay/river walk users need to be warned when coming close to the water with a 3- i
to S foot wide safety buffer zone consisting of a rough textured surface that
discourages walking.
2. Paving within the safety buffer zone shall be a type of cobble stone with 'river , 1
rock% approximititely 3/4 to 1 1/2 inches In diameter, set in concrete leavi
relief or 1/4 to 1/2 Inches or similar.
r,
� I
? Orculaficn =ie.
1. The bay/river .talk circulation tone shall consist of a linear pedestrian walkway or
promenade and shall be 8 to 12 feet wide.
2. The walkway may meander along the shoreline: however all offsets In the alignment of
the walkway shalt not exceed 6 feet and be spaced not less than 50 feet apart.
3. Obstructions to movement (trees, bollards, lighting, etc.) within the circulation
zone shall not reduce the clear width of the walkway to leis than 8 feet at any
point.
4. Variable textures and materials say be used to surface the, promenade.
S. The promenade surface shall be at a constant elevation, and shall be accessible to
handicapped persons throughout the entire length of the bay/river walk.
e
rhssiue =rX.
1. The area for sitting..accent landscaping and concessions shall be located along the
inland side of the bay/river walk, and shall be not less than 4 feet wide.
2. Short lengths of the passive zone may be elevated 18 to 24 inches above the level of
the promenade for enhanced bay uW river views.
- l 3. All benches shall have back rests, and their placement shall emphasize direct views
of the water.
4. Seating surfaces shall be Purple Heart. Western Red Cedar or Redwood.
i S. All furniture shall be permanently installed preferably by direct burial in
concrete.
6. Appropriate additional furniture including trash receptacles.'overhead canopies or
shelters. drinking fountains. etc.. shall be confined to the passive zone.
•� 7. The passive zone may be paved in plain concrete or the paver on the main circulation
zone.
Ti�siticn and s�ity zrsr�.
1. To buffer private development from the adjacent bay/river walk a mini" 3 foot wide
• transition zone shall border the bay/river walk facility.
i
2. This visual and functional transition from public to private space shall generally
be marked by low level shrubbery and overhead shade or ornamental trees.
3. Security to limit public access to private property Ray be provided by fences, grade
changes or retaining walls. All screens and walls shall be landscaped to reduce ,
their visual impact on the walkway.
4. For adjacent developments that serve the public (i.e., restaurants, shops. hotels.
entertainment, etc.) provision of wide. visible and easy pedestrian access to :the
bay/river walk shall be assured.
S: In general, landscaping and security barriers shall not visually screen the
j bay/river walk from adjacent active uses, such as retail restaurants. or .
entertainment.
i
450A
C. Standards and guidelines for design elements.
� Inrxlsagrirg;.
11. Shade trees shall be confined to the inland edge of the passive zone.
. 2. Pales may be used along either edge of the bay/river walk, but Coconut Palms 'or j
Sabal Palms are particularly appropriate for the water's edge.
i
j 3. Raised planters, if used, shall be confined to the passive zone, and all planter
`i walls shall double as sitting wails. 15 to 30 inches in height.
1 4. Plant material shall be priaarily native salt.tolerant species. `
l Light irg.
1. Lighting at the water's edge shalt be confined to Wnch diameter bollards, which
shall be 24 to 30 Inches high and spaced approximately 20 feet on center.
2. 8ollards shall be 100 Watt HV with down 'Illumination not exttndlaq beyond the
bulkhead line.
f 3. overhead lighting shall be confined to the passive Lane and consist of down
lighting with lamps not over 14 feet high, 175 watt MY, and spaced approximately 50
feet on center.
!( 4. Up lighting of landscaping, particularly shade trees, shall be confined to the
passive zone and transition zone.
S. Mercury vapor, octal halide lamps or similar *white, light luainalres shall be
used.
6. Colored lighting. except for.private signs, shall not be used.
t
7. Simple contemporary fixture design shall be used as opposed to highly stylized.
vintage or period designs.
Signr.Q;e. r
t.
1. All public access bay/river walks shall be narked with the standard 'Public Shore' {
• sign.
c
2. All major public access points, including park walkways. roadways, dedicated
midblock walks and public plazas, shall be marked with Public Shore' signs.
1. Adjacent accessible publicly oriented private development. such as cafes or shops,
shall identify the use with signage in the transition zone.
4. uniformly designed historic or environmental markers and descriptive plaques shall }
be placed In the passive zone.
f
S. Signage shall identify acc"e mints and adjacent activities, (cafes, shops. etc.)
for boaters.
86
- it
i'
i
Li
APPENDIX L. SOURCE LIST
Department of Community Planning and Revitalization
by mail PO Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
street address 444 SW Second Avenue - Third Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
telephone (305) 416-1400
facsimile (305) 416-2156
General [ntormateon or wantications -
Department of CPR (as above) or call
Dianne Johnson, Chief of Development
(305) 416-1426
or Jeanette Garcia, Real Estate Specialist
(305) 416-1429
Substantive Questions
must be addressed in burning to
Jack Luf#, [director
Department of CPR (as above)
Copies of RFP -
Department of CPR (as above) or call
Jeanette Garcia Real Estate Specialist
(305) 416-1429
or Francoise Smith (305) 416-1430
Zoning Information
Department of CPR (as above) or call
Lourdes Slazyk, Asst. Director
(305) 416.1407
City Historic Preservation
Department of CPR (as above) or call
Sarah Eaton, Historic Preservation Officer
(305) 4164409
Zoning Interpretations
Adjacent Property Leases
Department of Building & Zoning
Office of Asset Management
addresses above - 40 Floor
addresses above - 3rd Floor
Juan Gonzalez, Zoning Official
Eduardo Rodriguez, Director
(305) 416-1100 or -1178
(305) 416-1450 t
Inspections of Property
Existing Buildings, Construction Plans
Department of Public Works
Department of Public Facilities
addresses above - 8th Floor
Marinas Division i
Allan Poms, Chief Designer
Raul de la Tone, marinas Manager I
(305) 416-1245
2640 S. Bayshore Sr.
Miami, FL. 33131
(305) 579-6980
City Improvements f
Department of Public Works Coastal Systems International
Allan Poms, Chief Designer as above Harvey Sasso, PE, President f
or 454 S. Dixie Highway
State Historic Preservation
Florida Department of State
Bureau of Historic Preservation
R.A. Gray Building
500 S. Bronough Street
Tallahassee, FL. 32399-0250
Attn.: David Ferro
(940) 487-2333
Coral Gables, FL. 33146
(305) 661-3655
Federal Historic Preservation
Department of the Interior !
National Park Service
Preservation Services Division
Southeast Regional Office
75 Spring Street SW - Room 1140
Atlanta, GA. 30303
(404) 331-2632
DRI Information
Environmental Issues & Permitting
South Florida Regional Planning Council
Metropolitan Dade County
3430 Hollywood Blvd. - Suite 140
Department of Environmental Resources
Hollywood, FL. 33021
Management (DERM)
attn.: Julia Trevarthan
33 SW Second Avenue
in Dade & Palm Beach
Miami, FL. 33130-1540
(800) 985-4416
attn.: Craig Grossenbacker
in Broward (954) 985-4416
(305) 372-6789 or -6584
David O'Neal, Consultant
MRA Intemational, Inc.
(public markets)
Michael Lawry
170$pring Lane
3600 Market Street - Suite 501
Phhadelphia, PA. 19128
Philadelphia, PA. 19104
(215) 482-5130
(215) 772-9713
Historical Association of South Florida
Shake -A -Leg Miami, Inc.
Randy Nimnick, President
Harry Horgan
101 W. Flagler Street
2600 S. Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33130-1538
Miami, Florida 33133
(305) 375-1492
(305) 858-5550
Miami Museum of Science & Space Transit
Planetarium
Russell Etling, Executive Director
3280 S. Miami Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
(305)285 5801
- A.*
BOUNDARY SURVEY
VIRGINIA KEY MARINA 1995 LEASE AREA
r-- - - - - - MIAMI MANE STAMM LAGOON • rarrr'rw• .!
1�1
EDGE OF SEA NAIL E
svmn «Ie
p.A 1
fMlr I
J^til � 'a Jea1n nn
w ,.r vea•n w r..ala w t •a...•am 1H¢.. ,^•, � r•
in• Y
7
r r.
a+ir>,!t wut
I s y a+ r C rA Y 11Y 1 ■ 1>X q
u1f. 31i"'
-Ir.1 _ .n
i
-aw" low
n�w
OF rip ar '7aac(7mincls nllvv.r _
rw...
111tU1. Gf ar/r IfH l«« Mr.
��1
1
Cwrr1 at I4 Sbli.«1 trw e/ L111r 77. I.wrill S• Swn, fpq, l7 (w t;
Hf 0•Ia V'w 1. flrliz w.rr dry u. rwn IL• •r r•,r J.ru., 17. nvru
�/wl
•
�n wre. (ror tTSr lr w1f rr LlH tl b 111 (•Ir.en lr .7P W frlr ll» a
'itCltD!lM71 CUA[rr• oe o1.r J• •U• wl1-111w 0.•. C-11 W1.4N ll»'
P
�•�• .rrr/try 11 LA. plot 1wN«t . r«rb/ 1. /1.t wJ 7r, .t I.i• f. S-1 ... 7
to ly MI/1 rwrh .I O.a• G••If, IIr " I'-' .1" «Ir a.•, r. II•. Irr[•
w:r1r wrf rr 1 i71N lul; IN»r wrlJ IrIY73• I.,; !r M m 1w1
w1=111/' 11tJ7 ar r} llw. U «IJ 'fl(SSIMaff G./1'nr 1. u. hhl .l
/plrly rl 14 (allwlry r..11y1./rnl .I IK s
trllavl rrlt Il �..I Ir»
l. urea r3'fYOY wa tr 173� rnl:
to- jrsi
SA..H flrll trJl"Sl• (nl !r 11 t.M llrl 1e 11. 1•f.rrn7lr
.Ilia 17»
►rdld Of ..t 41 fwt Irrl.«.I rlf It 14 rrlrll.r 01.14 'Il0R74aDy
CQXUI'; I.- -4 rt! 0r01,1 il» -I. M:!'Or wll rr ILI 17 1-:
lAwra IYIII IrJT SI• twl rr 150.57 fw 1. D• rn wrlN•Il 11» I .)/«�
«rwil; Uw, 11 rt 14 I. Iw. .I r.t1 .wwll s..n IS'7T'oY («1 rp
rrn
(nt Ur} 1t. rr«Iwb l rrlr» rp a M I«I:
/a1C 14wr1 Swu 71•("I
la.n. Styli LT -
rlonj la• wrrtw t. .Jr.71»Ilr 711. 3] I«I: tar•r.
C.'a ,
,Yr IJ N'Ir l3• 4.1 .Ipy ,y w«Irl• .rr.il» Ir Il n rol; 1.ru yP
11•tr (1• (wt rI.•! 14 ayrrlrl. Mra14 Is XII I.rl; I,rrl Sw.l. 31'71'IJ'
[wl dory it. W.1 rb 1wr11•. Ir xU b.f: 1•.vr Sw t1 iT1?0T twl
drr.!r W 1prrwlblr 1wl1lr Ir 27.11 t,.l: I- s- wir31' ara Ir
• lI117 f«t 1. tM ALC
or1611rinr
4.td.1ry 1.5079 apr. I,,I r 1l73 «..v r•• r ;..• yn
!.r AfIN IaM M.e
C+•nrr 1 f4 L+Iyn! .rwr r/ Lal.. I7. tww..ls fa S.�I,, I.•r. r) (.rl:
flw. ,iL ofNla►, Lawrr airy ur rw . 11•r .r r.,I l.er[r ,1, nor i
M •.II /r tMtY !«I ILlr.raliw
to Il. • I, 1•• «•Ir11ft .l
W14LO
•flf7lfrrrOtIt Gt.3.l Y, « .1w• la 'ur wiflri llw C.ntr I..I u.N li»'
)I w1 1, /In a..Ir, .1 /•}r I.
.rrr ry 1) l4 .I U«n/ )k T•.1 •a 7'
M
t Mlf[ Irrn •(r: ""'
r7r11r II-'Isdrr Ia111+I rr II•. MU
•r)•!r
I, la.nr.
y wd rr 31ne7 (.r1: n.ru ,r Jrsr (.n
K Mr14«Ir1r 1(pJ1 ar q. /1» r1 raI 'IIOQ�6.KfU uV.(rar; I.wr. rs•tl».
to.rli I!'jr yJ' (nl !r 311f7 I«1 fa :.r hl,l a wrl ri+r a I•r lal..l•t
• I-`• . pr«I 1/ in
Irr•rrrllww /irfi II')rl1• (wl /I1 1.,1; Ii•11 grill, ••.1 rr
e au q.c .••.*. ru JI.7r.Y wetf Ir 1t ll rwt: c u..•.. rri• n•!r n' nr
rr S1. 11 Ia1I; f5.re sw It J/')/'71• w.l rr ]7. .1 r.11; i.w. Mrli tl'Sr 77'
.-I It, J34l. fw: tA•.I. lr la rl•71'J' MI Ir 11. 'J rl•,: I +r 1•
•la.».
if JI'q!' qvl Ir t U f«I; 14+rr 14•fi d'I7'OY 4a !r /r7. rJ Irrl;
s..le Ir)1 33 Not rn 3a ca I«t 1. nr 1•Ir«alw a .. n.. rrala al.
r1IF JILS7 N.t w14r.lrly •1 !A. wlrllu .1 ,•II 'li fl(X,pc() C,7aJnI' 1.
IJr li Il.r era •..•.1t,.». art Iy « pll Iwo .l .ail
3
«.wll
. If I. IS'7r 0Ywt IN
1 1`11«, IS ',,1;
Sty lI, a»r 3wli rl'JI'T' (..1 rlr nt
bps.lrla a.r.= /r 1[9r
4r41 r1I •.r.71» it lO, f{ Iol; P«r. L.0 t.T1Y»' fw1 •Ipy 14
wrwlr7t u•.r•IIM /N 11131 r.11: 1- aru 1l•11'13' twl •I-n.
brrnlrlo Mr111r Ir flit 1w: I,rll L.I, 11.03 ft' f.11 rlrl I.,
brrlrfl pwlllr fr X)J I«l: liprr L.I. 51'7Y rY («!
brrlrlr sJv.all» Ir x1/ f.a; 14»• S«li ir;5'Or twl rlry r•r
4Ynlrio o!r•!14 /r r7, SI I.rf la 11• RI.1 ar L}I+Iry
(rlrl•Ily t1164 s .r. rw a• L coy •v« Ira r I.I r.
)t11fi77r5 /Ot(S
2.2S' Srw/ If— """,
Will. d Inc *-Utlrc (.4IwUr d .II ;rww .r nap.. Nr• Arr Lr,1 a
Ault b1r.
l.11t rr Melry.l C-if4 .r •flt5me,c)a (Haar• 4r,• Ir 1. Il•u'!r sli
(lo. 11- 1 • fr 1. City, .l art wf ql•e w blr•1_v/ frw wllln•f wMllr
5rn1 r..r,n1 r•31) 1w11•4 .t mill S,NIw 1. -1 Y. n rr.l >< [ r, d 11211 w
r1I7J6r •...tl1•I if Cl l)rl rfa70. tw1 I- tr w l r drr( t( L f)• 7. 1j,
rlf. CL r..1 [ L
flow.
..r uatw Mr. Ir eI >rt, mw+la wl .ur wuwr •etro .Ipw rw w u•
PA.)
Mrnrp
Mile
ilt 31r 1wwy.
k 0•1 Iwtra111r1 fls. tit Mlle Jr., q.rlwwf w ir.. IN.I« rlr w fw
rIIR
..
al. S.IItlg1 w! IL r.•r.1 rN 14 1wr) 114 .rt•.
r .w F.r r.tltllr s..w 1-- 1. r ...a..larr.. .-.. .. .•.. _.. �___..- -. ___
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Virginia Key Marina 1995 Lease Area
Commence at the Southeast corner of section
17,Twonships 54 South , Range 42 East; Dade County, Florida; thence
along the south line of said Section 17, North 890 56'49.5" West For
2,649.84 feet to its intersection with the centerline of "RICKENBACKER
CAUSEWAY", as shown in "the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line"
according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 9 , Sheet
/no. 2 of the public records of Dade County, Florida; thence along said center
line North 45' 22' 07" West For 3,073.07 feet; thence North 44' 37' 53"
i' East for 200.00 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of said
"RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY" to the Point Beginning of the following
described parcel of land;
thence continue along said right of way line North 45' 22' 07" West For
520.00 feet; thence North 440 37' 53" East For 161.00 feet to its intersection
with a line parallel with and 361northeaterly of the centerline of said
"RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY"; thence along said parallel line North
45° 22'07" West for 285.17 feet; thence North 440 37'53" East For 444.45
feet; thence South 48' 34'09" East along the approximate shoreline for 19.99
feet; thence South 71' 24'33" East along the approximate shoreline for
231.52 feet; thence North 840 26' 15" East along the approximate shoreline
for 15.89 feet; thence South 41' 03'11" East 36.27 feet; thence South 67'
10'07" East along the approximate shoreline for 27.57 feet; thence South 44"
37'53" West for 513.87 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 245039 square feet or 5.625 acres more or less.
AND
Bay Bcl_tom Land Area
Commence at the Southeast corner of Section 17, Township 54 South, Range
42 East; Dade County, Florida; thence along the south line of said
Section 17, North 89' 56' 49.5" West for 2,649.84 feet to its intersection with
the centerline of "RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY", as shown in "the
Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line" according to the plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 9, Sheet no.2 of the public records of Dade
County, Florida; thence along said center line North 45' 22' 07" West For
A
�81:7
Am
3,073.07 feet; thence North 44137' 53" East For 200.00 feet to the
northeasterly right of way line of said "RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY";
thence continue along said center line North 44' 37'53" East For 513.87 fe
to the point of Beginning of the following described parcel of land;
thence continue North 44°37'53" East For 53.85 feet; thence North
67°10'07"West for 40.68 feet; thence North 51°28'47" West for 27.24 feet
;thence North 41 °03' 11" West for 57.46 feet; thence South 84°26' 15" Wes
For 44.38 feet: thence North 48°43'09" West for 8.48 feet; thence North
45°22'07" West for 442.92 feet; thence South 440 37' 53" West for 50.00
feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and 511.57 feet northeasterl,
of the centerline of said "RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY' to the most
northerly line of a 2-foot seawall; thence along easterly face of said seawat
South 45022'07" East For 444.45 feet; thence South 48°34'09" East along
the approximate shoreline for 19.99 feet: thence South 71°2433" East alor
the approximate the shoreline for 60.86 feet: thence South 85°57'25" East
along the approximate shoreline for 231.52 feet; thence North 84' 26' 15"
East along the approximate shoreline for 15.89 feet; thence South 41 ° 03' 1
East along the approximate shoreline for 36.27 feet; thence South 51'28' 4'
East along the approximate shoreline for 38.69 feet; thence South 67010'07
East along the approximate shoreline for 27.57 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
Containing 43866 square feet or 1.007 acres more or less.
et
{
[i
Cesar H. Od.io
City Manager
City of Miami, Florida
DECLARATION
Submitted 1996
The undersigned, as proposer, declares that the only person interested in this proposal are named .
herein, that no other person has any interest in this proposal or in the agreement of lease to which
/the proposal pertains, that this proposal is made without connection nor agreement with any other
person and that this proposal is in every respect fair, in good faith, and without collusion or
fraud.
The proposer further declares that he/she has complied in every respect with all of the
instructions to proposers, that he/she has read all addenda, if any, and that he/she has satisfied
him/herself fully with regard to all matters and conditions with respect to the lease to which the
proposal pertains.
The proposer agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to execute an appropriate lease agreement for
the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship between the proposer and the City of
Miami, Florida, for the performance of all requirements to which this proposal pertains.
The proposer states that this proposal is based upon the proposal documents issued May 31,
1996, entitled "Request For Unified Development Proposals for the Dinner Key Waterfront
Redevelopment, 2640 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida" and addenda, if any.
Name of Firm, Individual or Corporation
Signature Signature
Title Title
Address
TelelShone
t
e
i
- i
i
i
i
CONSULTANT'S PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION FORM[
This form is to be completed by each consultant or subconsultant to the Proposing Entity.
SECTION A.
Name:
Address:
Telephone : __ Facsimile
` Professional Registration Number:
Name of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the design and engineeru
of the project.
Name
Name
Title Title
SECTION B.
SURETY INFORMATION
Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon your default?
Yes ( ) No ( )
If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date, amount of bond, and th
circumstances surrounding said default and performance.
SECTION C. 1
BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION
Have you ever declared bankruptcy?
Have you ever been declared bankruptcy?
If yes to either of the preceding questions, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities and
amount of assets.
,:SECTION D.
i
PENDING LITIGATION
:Provide here and/or on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation, liens, or
Claims involving any participant in the proposal.
Consultant Name:
PROPOSER NAME:
PAGE 2
98
Address:
Telephone: (�!�
Nature and magnitude of business association:
r
100
PROPOSER'S PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION FORM
This form is to be completed by the Proposing (Development) Entity (the legal entity:
corporation, joint venture, partnership, one or more individuals, that will enter into the leasehold
agreement with the City) and each joint venture partner, principal or major stockholder to that
entity, if applicable.
SECTION A.
Name:
Address:
Telephone : Facsimile;
Name of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the planning and
management of the project:
Name Name
Title Title
Proposer is a: [ ] Sole Proprietorship [ ] Corporation
• [ ] Partnership [ ] Other
If Proposer is a Sole proprietorship stop here.
SECTION B.
is
If proposer is a partnership, answer the following:
i�
1. Date of organization
2. General Partnership ( )
Limited Partnership ( }
3. Statement of Partnership recorded Yes () No( }
Date Book Page County State
PROPOSER NAME: rx
4. Has the partnership done business in the State of Florida?
Yes ( ) No ( ) When? Where:
5. Name address, and partnership share of each general and limited partner.
General or
6. Attach a complete copy of the Partnership Agreement.
SECTION C.
If proposer is incorporated, answer the following:
1. Is the corporation authorized to do business in Florida?
Yes( ) No ( )
2. The corporation is held: Publicly () Privately ( )
3. If publicly held, how and where is the stock traded?
4. List the following:
AUTHORIZED
ISSUED OUTSTANDING
Number of voting shares
Number of nonvoting
shares
PROPOSER NAME:
j
Number of shareholders
Value per share of
Common Stock/PAR
BOOK
Market
5. Furnish the name, title, address and the number of voting and nonvoting shares of stock
held by each officer, director and shareholder owning more than 5% of any class of stock.
If more than 5% of any class of stock is held by a corporations, then each owner -
corporation must also complete separate pages (type corporation name on said pages -for
identification purposes.) and furnish the required financial statement for each.
If said owner -corporations are owned by other corporations, then these other corporations
must also complete separate pages (type corporation name on said pages for identification
purposes) and furnish the audited financial statement required on each page. The City
requires information on all corporations that directly or indirectly have an ownership
interest in the proposer -corporation.
6. If an individual or corporation will be guaranteeing performance of the Proposing Entity,
state name here :
If a corporation, provide name of corporation on corresponding pages for identification
purposes and furnish audited financial statement(s) as required.
SECTION D.
Surety Information : -Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon
your default?
Yes( ) No( )
If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date, amount of bond, and the
circumstances surrounding said default and performance. t
f.
h
SECTION E.
Bankruptcy Information : Has company ever declared bankruptcy?
Have you ever been declared bankrupt? Yes( ) No( )
PROPOSER NAME:
Yes( ) No( )
E
102 ) 1
If yes to either of the preceding questions, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities and
amount of assets.
SECTION F.
Pending Litigation
Provide here and/or on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation, liens, or
claims involving any participant in the proposal.
}
SECTION G.
References
List four persons or firms with whom you have conducted business transactions during the past
three years. At least two of the references named are to have knowledge of your debt paym9ht
history. At least one reference must be a financial institution.
Reference No. 1
Name:
Firm:
Title:
PROPOSER NAME:
6
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association, purchase, sale or loan:
Reference No. 2
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association, purchase, sale or loan:
Reference No. 4
Name:
Finn:
Title:
104
PROPOSER NAME:
AFFIRivIATIVE ACTION POLICY
FOR
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
POLICY STATEMENT
It is the policy of (Company Name) to base its hiring
and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not
influenced and that its employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age,
marital status, veteran and handicapped status. '
One of the management duties of all principals at
(Company Name) is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied:
1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless
of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and
handicapped status.
2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and
promotion of employees.
3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being
provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin,
sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status.
(Company Name) is committed to take affirmative action and
aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees and applicants opportunities
available throughout this organization.
Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual,
despite the full support of management. And so, to. monitor our efforts, `
(Company Name) has - assigned one of its principals as the
Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program.
Employees may contact (Name of assigned principal) at (telephone number) regarding this {
Affirmative Action Policy.
Date
Signature
Title
Company:
i
107
1f
r
EXHIBIT B
INFORMATION SHEET
MINORITY/WOMEN CLASSIFICATION AND PARTICIPATION
1. Indicate MINORITY CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(SUBMITTER):
( )Black ( )Hispanic ( )Women ( )Other (Non-
Minority/Female)
2.' Detail MINORITYIWOMEN PARTICIPATION within your firm,
or as it may apply to the Submission, if awarded:
' A. Joint Venture: Provide information regarding Minority/Women fi
participation as such, and the extent of participation.
Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service
B. SUBCONTRACTORS: Provide information regarding
Minority/Women firms that will be subcontractors for this Service, and their extent
of the work.
Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service
e
C. SUPPLIERS: Provide information regarding Minority/Women firms
P
that will supply you with goods or services for this Service.
i
Firm Name/Address Gender/Ethnicity % of Service
s�
D. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM POLICY
If existing, date implemented (include a copy of your policy in the Submission):
R
a>s
- .. alsarrw!it<wril�/a1�rrPraopiw•irir sna a i '�,� t J
rras e w wrr / a1•ir riGl i Irrl ael,a k Y sY rPria•r r
o r a• i a arl+i �.eV r .. W r'warvw.rq - / Rs.e .. -•"•
. r Yar aR wl rr l „tarW aan r aorr•aW P aw .r M1ew m
r�r rra•I wr aa./ t+swa avlr, >b Ilri r iriavrw Ir+rr ra
Iararra,.rraatr.rPaar.r bra r•rern»,ama, aem rltrra. 2•
r•TI►raleeAPrrrlrsOl..lnr.QraiRwrmir•trtr' ;i
•- aaawmrawrer. olewr. wwrwea•e,lW rra:w w. wgy�
ltl, d ra re W oraa :� a.r W, ara d ta.r.'a:. r to w Y.,
R+6r-a4 IIrY •n rrAY1SW. Pl1i�.In sY tr 1rr W P Pl.r Y•, a
trio O 1L•I wS. •qi,f ara w rw t�tw r-i W aO• , r e} T k
won/nalr an, r vur R.rrsa r w iar•eu W i awwaw �•r;rare � .
.-•"" .-•� art. IwYrr,.rrra aY>r, aer YawRval arrrw
BOUNDARY
m.Ii.ar r6wr•Iler�wraal• Pr t6•fr •/rr wY ,Ine
• 1•n. Aiva lalll aaq. ma to lta
/ • . - rr Yana UI. $•I
Yr+w•r4 I err}/
• , Y•OEI r A /Yfrf rr f Eft Ir, I.t..i r /err, ur Y •.r. ery !� 1 3 •
- . YIr, R nrra lee Yw'r[r•� rr , v Y• w, lwr.r � w m a•�- 4a
t1N ww ira o•w {rlmrm•YirY•ew wrraRw C v ;
- A wrr arrr• t!, Ierrr n A rut r®v. Y 6fir ■ tar a.w if. P
IWO
'! • r .. Ir •. !• R a P A Mw r•fa• P wl/ aaa., wear, Aa +a•r law y
arR l,a,r eL r, a+arraew msl•msr •rns see WrA � 3� � • 3 t-
- f arrrwls+.r/gm arrars,ynm ran rls a!r Wsrrr rr ® n� :�
� / lY,w IrO w R rrsl f a eia mrr+r w R wr r/r! I rtr P rr•.w
I.nn.n...tvt■..�e.a.�..,.1s,Y..r.'rorr..,.a..,�r. i" ii' � Fd
' arrYalall rY•MIt J•Y' If T1 r.n NPnRr.ffr� 7� � �. .2
_. —_.. •IiwA�rrr wavrrrm i.awl+r•rrrar Yo,rwa sw ]7
WY/ w r a.rerr, mrex w re ur Yrrr rw r rrr l rrr . fl !"
. r.wN)lw rrrat la•wsa•Yr•r wr•KV rYtaa �,>*
ua rw•Ys it eruaarou rurrr rr /r n+w.+e n. i= E
. Mn lrarr•M IT T/ Y/rOrna wolaaa raoln A.r,. �3
_ /• w• ,urrrlwriYaa we. ura,rp to s.s•�+•vv tsar. �� I �yj
• '•"""" j � ..•�i••+ Ire• aaln.w Jarl nara l r v •jinn Jm n A r•mI a sas I r rr 7 l 7
%^/ - ���� •rrr+rr •.,w ar rr qa.n rt �. .,. �S �Ij!
r /%,`'� �..�.. o•sr•rq i/:aa •U/iarll, � y' _ ��.
� % '� _ ..... i �f I w aL � roe r R sm es r armr n. roars Y •rra •o•a w ra, rw¢ !
i/ % - YsrRw..tawaan rmnr/.vKw,Ta z.w,w rmwmwaQ.
� / � _'� �••• i� / W •trs A We ltr I fa>♦Yrs tr®I•. Y rw i •R wnrwni •.n
/� I � •' �•�• » E � wra iwY lit•• Iwrelss r A M <rsl. Y ®na r w rY n. O r•n �, -
�
'I ` � [ lr/.frTTt �Af.w Pr}r lap,V )T MIiRw rw/AA wfwr _i
! I ieasiAwaarR rl�JYlb l..ialr nrie.••r Y.e.u•w j I �.lf. t'/n• rw.YrfaJ •�.Y•Y/ la Y ffi `O®! O_irI r0i Yr W [ y,.w�"�•�--- c t• � ..w ��,�- yam. '� •"'���7t.le•rr"-•�:.r p� area lm. • T rr •T ► w.r ry w A Tarr r a ara. Y.r.. w R � 7 2 ['�
•Ir•r..
s�`l • . - C «•-tit) ,...••s•:.rwpr.wv �,u. r,.�e..l r�w.P. t.... aa..�w�r�i r.v ar n.�r , fwv T �
•r. r♦rr wwwro r.•r+rearrlrw rr Iw.r mwmrrracr rn •A wfe 9
fA r f..•J Iam• ar art oa,t ter, r arw r ,as v me w r+•w rr ari �
rarlP W . Y K r 11w.w f1a/ t® Yrr R rirQ11/ wrsr ri • (1J
- / rrrrvller ananeertr aOrrY tYa rar•rw Cniwrr � Y
Iltarlq r NWn OraOQ4 �r ram rx�- Ir�t I w {�
' LOCATION MAP SCALE 1-300'
' rrn rrrlVRT, M.w r!)rgr•V lr ir.Y.w WwRma (D
Was �iO I / rrJr a#1 IarYp r'I,r rrre rr YW l V fT 'z
V•w/.Po raw•rr r.wl.lr eer rrOlw•Ir V.ru,Y •ar uj
wlrrwrtiv.Ia ao Arruo-r.rare.mwnvr..r. 1 Y
. _ rrrarr aen aaa, ry a ra '
r`/ GQlll/s 1Y nlln» IluwYu am. Mugu nr m- r //sot r. l tr a Rl ror1O' WrI
\
i•rlut W saw II» IIf[f I/>a our Y+•a 1>w watmll rO r «n I lar. Iua
.. �/• NMI Iran /1
rrrrr I•tl A ata nn » rma s:r+we, >ti
�' ar.rrrr rl reo n Mm tail rM 1.0m "IN ,
�� rovwnr r Ir Yruo w nruwu w n ■ Irw n ania ar+ra r Ilur. lea WAa leer
f.-k
smarretk n I.r, arJcrvn In, I.rrrr, nn d tma WIN,
rr 11 aranr r »RlrnallO w alrtno w wqa Yllarr n ni f V'.er..r rL trt.... /1t! YYr awwrrft m 1
_ E+O Y au vertaft! Wa r1 rpQr. .1Yr1. alaan M/e tst/taa Iulr /11/IJ111 tm �� rlan.
w r+af1l laln W rA Yr O nfl r/W / r
I /� e,ta rafrrllme I, raJ na 1w itrtl u P011f. if 11 Mf , OrtPltlTfr P m p=in, ftwift in. f
faN.•I/nsk rtmta alar/ lar aIIIKT r. ants. - _xJ+Y-w
N /w IwY rrs IrQfYaa a+rr w, rfs .'• I ru wells./ r A rtict
� ram wnareat. r aeP+r ar IM�I:'ROi�, to ou rafno .
S me a rrtn'r ter1a Iar nrN• C/Y lf/ fi- q+• /M
tl Irnu a A7 arv. WE. AI tar Wtavfr rafaa r. aePu rI
TO aaL rnserrr;
rove! ,am awl sr r mrnfarr Irasitro s r®vIn� rt.
• wn rI, rwr, Irsa a I r • r m Iiw seelsr/'tnewt - - 2 +` ♦`"s
.� , 61. O+gif ■ tY4 OIrI. 011tQ r1C(.t'A Ual�. Y NLLre y • / s 9.V
. • •� 0 frltrl r laC I10. iris//!O lwL1(j•:
.
_ lar[tl, oat r loom /1u !f.•Jr a Iaaa ra< IIr, ///r f u-I /a
WID ar ,w, 1'aP I'm. ICp et[
TlQW r U,tnmll taAttaRra r sR14n04 /sat +It rrr lror IrM, /rnl we-w. 0.vY/ Flll7l.11.11. a 1nt[fta itlnr ar IIIry.
a ml taa/Q lmW a Iwo a tK /a{tt ae/NW r nu lrlr Iin-IH41 wf,I r11 arf ta•eYef Ilu FPJI, a Plniat ste01
Lisa trnl. ire IIIJIIJtIJttA1Hf-ts fm.l . Isla Fantle ; • AG
Aa rl.r•r w ,rn lenarl rw r•t Irrrtr.t m w / �.. / • �.+. s«r J i ....• .I.� �,,.•f
aw rmoaun amr.rAmnwn•Ina rn �"s � •r"r _ r �.•f"• ••�• t
,a vs n alr wrap ram. +raw.► ... ..�.., /ry♦ ` : .....a �-n..rfi
- l•t6 4oq•;Mray+•r !r•1+i.y+r� IJ+�I'., i�
�, �� lsrw . tta4[GO ,aaa de /r IDIe i1 Y aaW Ialw P • al• Ir m • Ow..w eF4n umn a 6r�.pTl IrJ rl »tt q 1( t wwarpw /•r m a•r,r r A rw erwr 1.OP/r w. onto• PrU O awwfrr
,= ^�+ ��) Ella Hn0 Irr p+r1C Mf//. I Y.Ir wa6nr n Rsa r w' wpr r r+lfl wt) Pr0 rarr•1 mwa R wrW
'� I•t atrstot ! I,RiMbAt G`seaf. tR/ ttra+rt. 1letK fRle 11, IrOriUa arri, In Jc•e,A IY/IY wrr r w swRJ r tfMO vale ltata
! .�-.i+' eafrr a lelt; twR It+ lal1, PrrmlrrtR rll. IMwYf» Irwa artiwr, rlwna ruan ar w.
r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Restaurant are, being a part of the above -described area No.2 commence at
the point of beginning (P.O.B.) of lease area No. 2, as shown hereon, and
run N 45°22'07" W, along the Northerly right-of-way line of
"RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY" a distance of 502.00 feet to a point of
intersection with the Westerly line of 60.00 foot access road running
Northerly from said "RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY" said point of
intersection being the point of beginning(P.O.B.) of the restaurant area
hereinafter described; thence continue N 45° 22' 07" W along the last
mentioned course, a distance of 83.00 feet; thence run 44' 37' 53" W, a
distance of 32.00 feet, more or less, to the mean high water line of Biscayne
Bay, said mean high water line reference to 0.00 feet, mean sea level, U.S.C.
and O.S. datum (N.G.V.D.); thence run Northeasterly ,meandering the mean
high water line of Biscayne Bay, a distance of 73.00, more or less, to the
intersection of a line bearing S 45122' 07" E, being parallel with and 93.00
feet Northerly line of aforesaid "RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY'; thence
run S 44' 37' 53" W, along with the westerly line of access road, 93.00 feet
to the point of beginning(P.O.B.) . Area described contains 6400 square feet,
more or less, or 0.147 acres, more or less
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Marina Biscayne, LTD.
Lease Area NO. 3
Commence at the Southeast corner of section 17, township 54 South, range
42 East; thence along the South line of said section 17 N 89" 56' 49.5" W
2,649.84 feet to its intersection with the center line of "RICKENBACKER
CAUSEWAY", as shown on "the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead
line", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Platt Book 74, at page
9,sheet NO.2 of the public records of Dade County, Florida; thence along
said center line N 45' 22' 07" W 4,065.00 feet to its intersection with the
center line of the access road to the "Rusty Pelican Restaurant"; thence along
said center line N 44' 37' 53" E 350.00 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave to the West having a radius of 270.00 feet; thence Northeasterly
Northerly and Northwesterly 349.16 feet along said curve through a central
angle of 74' 05' 36"; thence N 44' 37' 53" E 31.07 feet to the point of
beginning of the hereinafter described parcel No.3, said point of beginning
being on a curve concave to the Southwest ,concentric to the last mentioned
curve and having a radius of 300.00 feet (to which point of being a radius
e
113
bears N 58' 54' 42" E; thence Northwesterly 74.77 feet along said curve
through a central angle of 14' 16' 49" to a point of tangency; thence N 45'
22' 07" W 54.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast
having a radius 340.00 feet; thence along said curve Northwesterly 42.08
feet through a central angle of 7° 05' 26"; thence N 44' 37' 53 Viz 117.40 fet;
thence S 45' 22' 07" E 170.00 feet; thence S 44' 37' 53" W 129.27 feet to
the point of beginning.
Containing 20,594 square feet or 0.473 acre.
]LEGAL DESCRIPTION
07"E 170.00 feet; thence S 44' 37' 53" W 129.27 feet to the point of
beginning.
Containing 20,594 square feet or 0.473 acre.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lease Area NO.2
Commence at the Southeast corner of section 17; township 54 South, range
42 East; thence along the South line of said section 17 N 89' 56' 49.5" W
2,649.84 feet to its intersection with center line of "RICKENBACKER
i CAUSEWAY", as shown on " the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead
1 Line", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 74, at page 9 ,
sheet No. 2, of tithe public records of Dade County ,Florida; thence along
said center line N 45' 22'07" W 3,593.07 feet; thence N 44°37'53"E 200.00
feet to the point of beginning of the hereinafter described'tract No. 2, said
point of beginning being also on the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said
"RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY"; thence N 45°22'07"W 761.08 feet to
the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of
1,632.40 feet; thence Northwesterly and Westerly 1,296.84 feet along said
curve through a central angle of 45' 31' 05" to a point of tangency; thence
along said right-of-way S 89' 06' 48" W 139.26 feet to its intersection with
"The Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line", as shown in said Plat Book
74; thence along said Bulkhead Line N 44' 06' 48" E 908.00 feet; thence
along the southwesterly property line of the tract of land described in revised
exhibit "A" leas between "the City of Miami" (Lessor) and specialty
restaurant corporation "Rusty Pelican Restaurant" (Lessee) S 45' 22' 07" E
1,024.40 feet; thence N 44' 37' 53" E 250.00 feet; thence S 450 22'07" E
114,
•