Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-97-0844
J-97-796 11/18/97 RESOLUTION NO. 9 e— 8 4 4 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1155 BRICKELL BAY DRIVE (F/K/A SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE), MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 355 UNITS, ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 465 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 19, 1997, the applicant, Stephen J. Helfman for The Related Group of Florida, submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No., 11000, for the property located at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (f/k/a South Bayshore Drive), Miami, Florida, as legally described herein; and WHEREAS, development of the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and l cm COMESSION MEETING 4F, NOV 2' 6 1997 Resolution Nm 9,7- 844 WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on September 3, 1997, to consider the proposed project and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed project to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on September 24, 1997, to consider the proposed project and recommended approval of the project as presented; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on October 29, 1997, Item No. 3, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 61-97 by a vote of five to zero (5-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development - 2 - 97- 844 Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by The .Related Group of Florida ("APPLICANT"), at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (f/k/a South Bayshore Drive), Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Tract "B" of Yacht Club, recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33 of the Public Records of Dade County. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to three hundred fifty five (355) residential units, accessory commercial and recreational space and four - hundred and sixty-five (465) parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and - 3 - 9'7 844 egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $52.2 million (with an additional approximately $33 million in construction period economic benefits), and to employ approximately 157 workers during construction (FTE); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 9 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $1.4 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (1997 dollars) . e . The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; - 4 7 97- 844 (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in .the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. - 5 - 97- 844 Section 7. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANTS and any successors in interest. Section 8. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 19, 1997, and on file with the Department of Planning and Development of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 9. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 10. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Development to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: The Related Group of Florida, 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse, Miami, Fl. 33145. Section 11. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 12. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 13. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court - 6 - 97- 844 or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: GEORGE Ifl WYSON , I ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO A, QIUINN J O N S, I I I CITY ATTORNVY W1989:GKW.BSS AND CORRECTNESS: day of November , 1997. XAVIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval;..,[' this legislation by signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now becomes effective with the elapse often (10) days from eclat regarding same, without the Mayor exercising ve ,, ,� MAN, CITY CLERK - 7 - 97- 844 0 • EXHIBIT "A" YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (f/k/a South Bayshore Drive), Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit A-111, attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: - 1 - 97-- 844 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Yacht Club at Brickell II Project is a residential development located at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (f/k/a South Bayshore Drive), Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 122,866 square feet and a net lot area of approximately 79,932 square feet of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit A-111, incorporated herein by reference) The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT A-211, and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than three hundred fifty-five (355) residential units in a single thirty-six (36) story tower with approximately 4,605 square feet of a convenience commercial space including a 3900 square foot restaurant; the PROJECT also includes a recreation deck with a swimming pool and tennis court; the PROJECT also includes an approximately 4,786 square foot fitness center and a club room of approximately 2,552 square feet The PROJECT will also provide a total of four hundred sixty-five (465) parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. - 2 - 97- 844 9 .0 The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Yacht Club at Brickell II Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority Clearance letter;. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for a swimming pool; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3, for development within the SD-5 District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511, for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL.PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.5, for outdoor dining activity; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.4.4, for relocation of the required 30% retail/services along pedestrian pathways (12th Street and the waterfront) within the structure; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.4.4, for relocation of the required 15% retail/services along South Bayshore Drive.within the structure; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for reduction of the required 23 ft. backup for parking area to 22 ft.; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.9, for development in waterfront yards; . CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.8.3, to allow an urban plaza, modifying the maximum setbacks as follows: Required along S.E. 12th Street (first 18 ft.): 20 ft. max. Proposed (pursuant to Class II): 34.4 ft. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and requested referenced above. - 3 - 97= 844 The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Cohen, Freedman, Encinosa Architects, dated September 1997; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Fuster Design Associates, dated September, 1997; said design and. landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix of commercial and residential uses. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of - 4 - 97 844 development and the permit or approval required of each. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Development, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning and Development Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire - Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, with the understanding that the provisions of Chapter 18, - 5 - 9'7- 844 Article IX, of the City of Miami Code, entitled the City's Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program, is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, with the understanding that the provisions of Chapter 18, Article IX, of the City of Miami Code, entitled the City's Minority and Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program, is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record a certified copy of the Development Order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: 1) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or 2) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of - 6 - 97- 844 title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 11. Provide the Public Works Department of the City of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a modified landscape plan and design details pertaining to the waterfront walkway for design review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. THE CITY SHALL: Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty '(30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. - 7 - 9'7 8 4 4 The Yacht Club at Brickell II Project, proposed by the applicant, The Related Group of Florida ("APPLICANT"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities;.and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the -City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. - 8 - 97- 844 The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. - 9- 97- 844 EXHIBIT "A-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract "B" of Yacht Club recorded in plat book 149, page 33 of the public records of Dade County. 97-- 844 EXHIBIT PROJECT SUMMARY FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II PROJECT NO. 9745 SEPTEMBER, 1997 THE FOLLOWING DATA SUMMARIZES THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED AT THE BRICKELL II APARTMENT PROPERTY, PURSUANT TO SD-5 ZONING GUIDELINES: A. DEVELOPMENT P 1 1. STREET FRONTAGE: ' WEST AVENUE .............................. IRREGULAR 2. NET LOT AREA ................................................................. 79,932 S.F. 3. GROSS LOT AREA ............................................................... 122,866 S.F. 4. F.A.R. ALLOWED............................................................. 4.25 5. F.A.R. PROVIDED............................................................. 4.04 6. MAMMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA ALLOWED ................. 522,181 S.F. 7. DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 496,533 S.F. 8. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (15% GROSS LOT AREA) ........... 18,430 S.F. 9. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (29%)........................................ 35,773 S.F. 10. BUILDING COVERAGE .................................................... 43,913 S.F. 11. REQUIRED SETBACKS BY THE CITY OF MIAMI: SOUTH BAYHSORE DRIVE SIDE (NORTH) SIDE STREET (SOUTH) BAYFRONT A BUILDING HEIGHT GARAGE Fg:• i� 29 20' 19 2Y 15' min., 29 max. 34' 5Y 59 REQUIRED PROVIDED NO LIMIT 377- V 62'-2" 97- 844 PROJECT SUMMARY PAGE 2 1. TOTAL GROSS AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ........................ 653,743 S.F. 2. TOTAL NET APARTMENT AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ...... 397,472 S.F. DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: - CIRCULATION. 65,667 S.F. - SUPPORT SERVICES 7,812 S.F. . - BALCONIES 47,256 S.F. - LOBBY 1,584 S.F. - HEALTH CLUB & 4,786 S.F. FACILITIES - CLUB ROOM 2,552 S.F. - BUSINESS CENTER 1,114 S.F. RENTAL OFFICE 2,185 S.F. OPEN OFFICE 8,756 S.F. 3. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS 355 UNITS 4. TOTAL S.F. OF COMMERCIAL ................................................. 705 S.F. TOTAL S.F. OF RESTAURANT .................................................. 3,900 S.F. 5. TOTAL GROSS S.F. FOR PARKING GARAGE (5 LEVELS) .............................................. 157,210 S.F. 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED................................................................. 355 SPACES OFF STREET LOADING REQUIRED ......................................... .4 BERTHS OFF STREET LOADING PROVIDED ......................................... 4 BERTHS TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED............................................................... 465 SPACES (INCL. 9 HANDICAPPED SPACES) ?. EXCESS PARKING.............................................................. 110 SPACES 97- 844 0 PLANNING FACT SHEEO APPLICANT HEARING DATE REQUESTILOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PETITION PLANNING RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Department of Planning and Development. October 29, 1997. Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the property located at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (f.k.a. South Bayshore Drive) Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Yacht Club at Brickell II project to allow a Residential Development consisting of 355 residential units and accessory commercial space with 465 parking spaces. Approval with conditions. Please see attached analysis and recommendation. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 97-042 VOTE: 5-0 Item #3 .........................................................................................................................................................................._.................................................... _ CITY OF MIAMI . DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR •MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435 • Date: 1 Page 97- 844 :7 ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Yacht Club at Brickell II CASE NO: 97-042 The requested Major Use Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Residential Development project consisting of 355 units and accessory commercial space with 465 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 1155 Brickell Bay Drive (fk.a. South Bayshore Drive) within the Brickell area. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Department of Planning and Development has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed residential development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on 9/3/97 and has modified the proposed project to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements as well as waterfront walkway improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant should submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department of Planning and Development is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. + It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project pursuant to a public meeting held on September 24, 1997. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. 1 97- 844 • Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the requested Residential Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following. documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or. severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the- applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. Pursuant to comments from the Shoreline Development Review Committee and the' Planning Department, additional design details and landscape plan modifications shall be prepared to address the waterfront walkway; said plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 2 97-- 844 I I ' T' S7 I LLJ > . 2 56 Z• ss o\NjfaGeP NIJWQ I 0 0`v` xox, xxxlx Qo o, sr rrA,' o \ ST S.W. 9 ST S.E -9 ST o ei O 8 i. O • O a l 16 ,•, 12 b o y f C O , ° O O00 > I 72 C 101 ° o° ' o° , 0 ° O .a R I:a IH O �o r S T. S.W. 0 S T. Q S- o 1 I 75 5. 1 3 2 z' °pO�Oi :z1 _ I :c 74 m o° z - 104 11 2, ¢ I U Ir I •! i is is n le ., 20 x. .2I23 2 O , Q -He O• �. :4y— 3 co- ".a. ,e S 6+ P =•1, ,_ • ° - pE. 11S�p 0p0 S T o S.W. 11 S T s o o° rRq ^��C .° era ,o ,o • W 0 t° Ta C I T Y .. + e T{ ! , z '1 7 c ° 94 o0 85 N O o rs o; Y OR .a .,' 1, n .a Ir,a z. 2x xs to CAR O& S t2 ST 6 0° ° c 11 _ 3 2 i i 1 z _ I s 70 zo .1 R U N Is I• r, I u O .•... °w + • 3 T c s s 90 2 zo ° O fI , O I 7 c s ! z `o , e o ,oy BgIQf4 •.,.� v It i f - s I • '0 100 o SHO $,1. o E'ER I- .,.'�p:. .SOUTHSID£ ELcM./ 21 x• z! o Mai °p l2 `• CIS ' SCHOOL �J S T. S.E. 13 ST S.E o, c 4 z o e T a s, z /. ° SUepl �K a ! RR pI 94 z 95 2, Q - o y► rRACr.A I a e ' e• Cn,° .. S.W. � I, Ise x .. •e of a � 14 ST ° r w a UCR S(� xo xz y B I. / ; °a T ... s. -. ,e s . i. f. ea S • �e 77? O 1 a 0 9 6 r 4 � _ `�'' ,� •e, � ¢ ,ue ,° so eo+s � FO ° Y PT E ° a S T o � S.W. 14 TERR. cd C..) r,.Cr LAZ4 a Y�l , a ,r O'Y IQ 'J • 9 ` o a a y ao Pro ul = cr SpP��c•�S Pig`' 0� =�41, • w ~ o 1, z` 2x xP a . L . ° • �• ON'E ^OSBELLA UB. 7A v Q t .o • � � S •s� l �e'' � ? r 'A mom ' P •o ,o • CJ t• .h1 C a .9 �/ ;r �y p ll° <1 ems\ V •' •y \ r , o 9 7 + 844 LEGEND -- 0 . 0 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PER-v1IT It is intended that major use special pertain be required whom specified use ardor occupancies involve deemed to be of citywide or cure -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special ":::tits. (See Article 17 of Ordinance 11008, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Flo. -Ida.) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisor, Board and to the Director of the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization for rccor.m=dations. and may nakc referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either thmugh the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization, or directly, for review, analysis and/ur technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Sec Section 1301.5 of Ordinance 11000, as amended. the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. Florida,) 1, Stephen J. Helfman , hereby apply to the Director of the Departtncn: of Communiy Planning and Revitalization at the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. 1155 S . Bayshore Drive , Miami, Florida Addrzssofpraperty. NE corner of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street NatureofproposcdUse(bespecific): 355 unit residential apartment building Application materials: I anaeh the following in support and explanation of the application: tat 1. TWo copies of a surrey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Rcgistcrcd Land Surveyor. a2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of propel v wvcmd by appiication and disclosure of i^ a ~rt for.- (arach Forts 4-33 and 4a-83 to application). C53. Certified list of owner of -mal :state within a 375-foot radius from the outside bound=.= of property covered by this application (arach form (-83 to appiicatinn). Lts. Maps of. (a) existing caning: and (b) adopted comer -pensive plan designations fo-. a _as on and around tl:e property covered by this aopiication. ZX5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major st.=ets, seitools, cxistirtg utilities, shopping areas, important physical fratums :n and adjcining the proiecc, and the likx. L 6. Concept Plan: - z) Site ,tar. and —.levant informxion per Sec:ien 13001.2.1 (d ta:Jugh n). b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses and activities, sys er..s and faciiitits. ;,t: Section 1702.3.2a. Cj How concept affects existing Zoning and adopted comp -pensive pian prineipiez a.-ld d sigaa:icns: burn ia- o` any required variances, special perrnits, change of zoning or exemptions, per Scctton 1702.3.2b 97- 844 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (continued) Q( 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). ®8.Other (be specific): See attached Article III, Supporting Documents. See also attached Exhibit "A" for additional approval requests. R 9. Fee of S $ 2 5 , 9 4 9 . 15 *, for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set fortis in Chapter 62 of the Code of the, City of Miami, as amended. O 10. Additional fee of S -, for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: S $25,949.15 Weiss Serota & e fman, P.A. By Signature:����. GDYAfr or Authori Agent Stephen J. Hel an, Esq. Print name hers 2665 9. Bayshore Drive, #420 Address Miami City Florida 33133 State Zip (305) 854-0800 Phone Number Final approval of this application for Major Use Special Permit shall consist of an executed Resolution by the Miami City Commission and a Development Order attached thereto which specifies the conditions under which thi. Major Usc Special Permit Application is approved: if approved by the City Commission, said Resolution and Dcvclopmcnt Order shall, upon execution thereof, be transmitted to the Owner or Authorized Agent at the address specified above. *This figure includes $24,826.65 filing fees;$122.50 mail notice fee and $1,000.00 surcharge for advertising. 1(9 97- 844 * .. - - iiis s sa�-ssoxIE DR • (ZONED SD-5) AAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 is amended art 17 sec 1701(1), to permit a residential development of 355 units. The major Use encompasses the following special permits: • Class I special permit for FAA clearance (Art 9 sec 915.2). • Class I for swimming pool (Art 9 sec 906.6). • Class II for development in the SD-5 District (art 6 sec 605.31). • Class 11 special permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way. (Art 15 sec IS 11) • Class II for outdoor dinning acdivity (Art 6sec 605.5) • Class II for relocation of the required 30% retail/services along pedestrian pathways (12`s ST and the waterfront), within the structure (art 6 sec 605.4.4). • Class II for relocation of the required 15% retail/services along S. Bayshore Dr_, within the structure (art 6 sec 605.4.4). • Class II for reduction of the required 23ft backup for parking area to 22 ft. • Class 11 as per art9 sec 908.9 for development in waterfront yards. • Class II, as per art 6 sec 605.9.3 to allow an urban plaza, modifying the maximum setbacks as follows: Subject to: Requirement along S.E 12 required first 18ft: 20ft max proposed: 34.4 ft. • Obtaining an FAA clearance letter. • All conditions as set forth on architect's letter attached. • Approval from Shoreline Review Board. CITY COMNIISSION APPROVAL REQUIRED, to reduce the required aggregate side setback -(City Charter) of 25% : ■ required -67.5 ft ■ proposed - 54.4 ft. Javier Carbonell Zoning Imp II September 19,1997 97- 844 /" A F F I o® v 1 STATE OF FLORMA } } �S COUNTY OF DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Stephen J. Helfman ,he beinq by en first duly suer", upon oath, deposes and says: 1. net he 1s the o Kd*Xx)SxRheclrgal ry P"Wtative of the comer. submitting the accoiaWgirq application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 1100 of thin Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described wd listed an the pagan attached to this affidavit and aade a part thereof. 2. That all owwn ellicfk he nwresants, if any. have given their full and comelete perlissim for his to act is their bahaif for the Chang or medifice- Lion of a classification or regulation of tonirq a• sat cut in the acclapoying petition. ). That the p,yas attarheid Aerate ant Oda a pert of this offidarit contain the current mar, aniline adlsmses. phone nos ad lags) descriptions for the the real pr"MM of Wlich he is the MW or 101e1 reprvserstati». a. The faett at nprasanted in the application ant dos mmnts submitted in Conjunction eia wS affidwit are true and correct. fL"Mr 1ff1wt 34"" not. (Naga) Ste hen Helf Esq. suer" to MGM SYiseribad we" • this 2day aft of-7 Notary Nbltc tata of Florida at Marge My Commission Eapiras:;; MIWLYNSDMDDEVILLA my COMMGS "i CC 472957 E)OFES: SWwbK 13,19" gq� ltru NoterY Pubk IN�dNwlOe�s �3 9i= 844 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name New York Life Insurance Companv Mailing Address c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Weiss Serota & Helfman. P.A. Telephone Number (305) 854-0800 Legal Description: Tract "S" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The property is located at the NE comer of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street, Miami, Florida. Street Address: 1155 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing, Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as folloows: Street Address Legal Description New York Life Insurance Company New York Life Insurance Company owns c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Tract "A" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Weiss Serota & Helfman. P.A. Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records 2665 South Bayhsore Drive, Suite 204 of Dade County, Florida. Street Address: Miami, Florida 33133 1111 S. Bavhsore Drive. (Miami. Fl. 33129 Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP I. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Tract "B" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The property is located at the NE corner of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street, Miami, Florida. Street Address: 1155 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question i2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Owner of the Property is New York Life Insurance Company. New York Life Insurance Company is a mutual insurance company owned by all the policy holders. The Related Group of Florida, a general partnership, is a joint venture partner with New York Life Insurance Company in the development of the Property. The Disclosure of Ownership for the Related Group of Florida is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 3. Legal description and street addrdss of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question i2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. New York Life Insurance Company owns Tract "A" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Street Address: 1111 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129. NWEPOR ATTORN Y FOR Stepehn J. Helffn n, Esq. STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } Stephen J. Helfman being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question 01, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. \ (SEAL) (N e SWORN TO AND SUBSCRI ED 1 before le this ! day of , 1917 7 Notary Pubhe, State of Florida at Large YN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: '` _ L MISSION I CC 472M :•? 19N y ra; ap,F : SeO tlYiebu�l�s �' � eaid�0 Ttau 1lofry Pubsc 97- 844 /(P OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ENTITY The Related Group of Florida A Florida General Partnership General Partner - Related Florida, Ltd. 50.50% Limited Partner - Related General of Florida, Ltd. 49.50% ENTITY Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation General Partner - Related Florida, Inc. 1.00% Limited Partner - Jorge M. Perez 99.00% Related Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation Jorge M. Perez - 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez - President Roberto S. Rocha - Senior Vice President Angel A. Hernandez - Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way - Penthouse Miami, Florida 33145 (305) 460-9900 ENTITY Related General of Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner - RCMP, Inc. Limited Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.00% Officers: Stephen M. Ross - President James Flood - Executive Vice President Susan J. McQuire - Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 421-5333 97-- 844 • THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS ARCHITECT: Cohen Freedman Encinosa Architects, P.A. 8085 N.W. 155h Street Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Tel: 826-3999 Mr. Larry Freedman ACCOUNTANT: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Certified Public Accountants One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 374-1574 Mr. Anthony Jackson OWNER: New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfinan, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 854-0800 CONTRACT PURCHASER: The Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33145 Tel: 460-9900 Mr. Roberto Rocha LEGAL: Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel. 854-0800 Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. TRAFFIC ENGINEERS: Bermello-Ajamil & Partners 2601 South Bayshore Drive, I0'j' Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 859-2050 Mr. Vish Chowdhary 97- 844 17 0 .0 RESOLUTION PAB - 61-97 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II PROJECT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 355 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL SPACES PER THE CONDITIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PREPARED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 1f HEARING DATE: October 29, 1997 ITEM NO. 3 VOTE: 5-o ATTES �Cet,� ck Luft Dire or Y Department of Planning and Development l THIS IS A COMPANION TO �= pZ-2 r157 HIA i ?� 1 v :i !N'� 1 IS�LL'1151' L LLs�.P ���-ice—� � 1 • �eV � �� � � rZ���lx�fl li�I � f•1'ri1��l�'� �'} . lams rk !:s 4. J rLTt V,l( �rlm,,4111 Aw � i' ' `r�'�►9 Uzi `I 0 11 I ' 1 I ��1�� �1�s-1�18L�pPR 1 1 }�y,,T_I�•' II ,! ,iT \75Izvve: b o�s�ye, t , 2 t.,— fit i 1 11 1 M 1 September, 1997 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II - TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Introduction B. Application for a Major_ Use Special Permit C. Disclosure of Ownership D. Ownership Affidavit E. Directory of Project Principals F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 37 G. City of Miami Future Land Use Map H. Aerial and Location Map I. Ownership List J. Project Data Sheet and Summary ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Survey of Property Tab 2 Site Plan Tab 3 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 4 Site Utility Study Tab 5 Economic Impact Study Tab 6 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 7 Architectural and Landscape Drawings 97- 814 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II PROJECT INFORMATION ' ARTICLE I. A. Introduction B. Application. for a Major Use Special Permit C. Disclosure of Ownership D. Ownership Affidavit E. Directory of Project Principals F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map - Page 37 G. Aerial and Location Maps ' H. City of Miami Future Land Use Map I. Ownership List 1 J. Project Data Sheet and Summary F] tTHE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II i f 1 1 1 1 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II INTRODUCTION The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II is a 36-story mixed use luxury high rise development (the "Development") featuring 355 residential units, and 8,700 square feet of office space and a 3,900 square foot Restaurant with outdoor terrace. The Development is located at 1155 South Bayshore Drive, Miami Florida 33129. The Property is zoned SD-5 (Brickell Avenue Area Office -Residential District). The property is designated Office in the City's Future Land Use Map. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (the "Plan") allows high density multi -family residential development in the Office designation. Therefore, the proposed Development is consistent with the Plan and is compatible with other high rise developments in the area. 07- 8, 4 4 'I I n r n APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PEPMIT Ic is intended that major use special peimits be required whe r specified uses and/or occupancies involve nna= s deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance, The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations an applications for major use special permits. (Sec Article 17 of Ordinance 11000. as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida.) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special pennits to the. Planning Advisory Beard and to the Director of the Dcpartrnent of Community Panning and Revitalization for recommendations, and may make referrals to agcneics, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Community Planning and Revitalization, or directly; for review, analysis and/ur technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Scc Sez ion 1301.5 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida.) 1 Stephen J. Helfman , hey apply to the Director of the Department of Communiy Planning and Revitalization of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special ?=mit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. 1155 S . Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Pam" Addressof ro NE corner of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street P NarureofproposcdUse(bespaciftc): 355 unit residential apartment building Application materials: 1 attach the following in support and explanation of the application: (71. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 1X2. Affidavit disclosing ownership o, propct'y covered by application and disclosure of foram (attach Forms 4-83 and 4A-83 to application), C�:3. Certified list of owners of teal estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundarics of property covcrcd by this application (attach form 6-83 to application). Lh4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning; and (b) adopted comprehensive pian designations fcr areas on a,d around die property covered by this appiication. L 5. General location map showing relation, to the site or activity to major streets, schools, cxistirtg utilities, shopping areas, important physica; fcaiures in and adjoining the proiect, and the like. 96. Concept Plan: - a) Site plat, and relevant information per Sc—:ion 1304.2.1 (d through h). b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses and activities, syster..s and faciiiti:s, per S:c:ien 1702.3.2a Cj How concept a:Tect-t existing zoning and adopted comprehensive piar, principies and dcsigtta_iens: t oulaticn of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or cxcmpcions, per Section 1702.32b. - I 97`� I I 11 11 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERIMIT (continued) Of 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). MS. Other (be specific): See attached Article III, Supporting Documents. See also. attached Exhibit "A" for additional approval requests. � 9. Fee of 5 2 5 , 9 4 9 . 15 * for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. O 10. Additional fee of S. for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Ft: :S $25,949.15 Weiss Serota & e fman, P.A. By Signature: QtKtW or Authoriz6d Agent Stephen J. Helf an, Esq. Print name hero 2665 S. Bayshore Drive, #420 Address Miami City Florida 33133 State Zip (305) 854-0800 Phone Number Final approval of this.application for Major Use Special Permit shall consist of an executed Resolution by the Miami City Commission and a Dcvclopment Order attached thereto which specifies the conditions under which this ;Major Use Special Permit Application is approved-, if approved by the City Commission, said Resolution and Dcvclopment Order shall, upon execution thereof, be transmitted to the Owner or Authori7 d Agent at the address specified above. *This figure includes $24,826.65 filing fees;$122.50 mail notice fee and $1,000.00 surcharge for advertising. 2 " 8441 1115 S BAY SHORE DR - (ZONED SD-5) MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, as per City of-N i.am- Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended art 17 sec 1701(1), to permit a residential developmmeat of 355 units. The major Use encompasses the following special permits' • Class I special permit for FAA clearance (Art 9 .sec 9.15.2)_ • Class I for swimming pool (Art 9 sec 906.6). • Class II for development in the SD-S District (art 6 sec 605.3 ). • Class 11 special permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way, (Art 15 sec 1511) ' Class H for outdoor dimming activity (Art 6sec 605.5) • Class Il for relocation of the required 30% retail/services along pedestrian pathways (12' ST and the waterfront), within the structure (art 6. sec 605.4.4). • Class H for relocation of the required 15% retail/ser7ices along S. Bayshore Dr_, within the structure (art 6 sec 605.4.4). • Class H for reduction of the required 23ft backup for parking area to 22 ft. • Class Il as per art9 sec 908.9 for development in waterfront yards_ • Class II, as per art 6 sec 605.8.3 to allow an urban plaza, modifying the maximum setbacks as follows: Requirement along S.E. 12' ST required first 18ft: 201i max proposed: 34.4 ft. Subject to: • Obtaining an FAA clearance letter. • All conditions as set forth on architect's letter attached. • Approval from Shoreline Review Board. CITY CON VUSSION APPROVAL RE to educe the e QUII�ED, r required aggregate side setback (City Charter) of 25% : ■ required -67.5 ft A proposed - 54.4 ft_ Javier Carbonell Zoning Insp II September 19,1997 ` DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Tract "B" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page-33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The property is located at the NE corner of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street, Miami, Florida. Street Address: 1155 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. ICJ 11 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question i2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with.their addresses and proportionate interest. The Owner of the Property is New York Life Insurance Company. New York Life Insurance Company is a mutual insurance company owned by all the policy holders. The Related Group of Florida, a general partnership, is a joint venture partner with New York Life Insurance Company in the development of the Property. The Disclosure of Ownership for the Related Group of Florida is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question f2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. New York Life Insurance Company owns Tract ".A" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Street Address: 1111 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33129. UM R ATTOR.�k FOR Stepehn J. Helf n, Esq. STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUNTY OF DADE } Stephen J. Helfman , being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in answer to question /1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRI@ED before me this ! TT7 day of19 IMY COMMISSION EXPIRES: (SEAL) (N e ------------ Notary Pub ic, State of Florida at _Large MARILYN Z IODEVILLA MY COMMISSION # CC 472937 ,���e�yy(,��P,ITRLEwS:��S�yeq��tyemybe r 133,, 119�9�.9MwniS BMWN hfu WM OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ENTITY The Related Group of Florida A Florida General Partnership General Partner - Related Florida, Ltd. 50.50% Limited Partner - Related General of Florida, Ltd. 49.50% ENTITY Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation General Partner - Related Florida, Inc. 1.00% jLimited Partner - Jorge M. Perez 99.00% Related Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation Jorge M. Perez - 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez - President Roberto S. Roclia - Senior Vice President Angel A. Hernandez - Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way - Penthouse Miami, Florida 33145 (305) 460-9900 ENTITY Related General of Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner - RCMP, Inc. 1.00% ILimited Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.00% Officers: Stephen M. Ross - President James Flood - Executive Vice President Susan J. McQuire - Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 421-5333 97- 844 A F F 1 0 A V I STATE OF FLORIDA * I COUNTT OF OADE } SS } Before me, the unden igned autherity, 'hit day personally appeared Stephen J. Helfman who being by as first duty sworn, upon oath, deDo se% and says: 1. That he is the eaY.WW;(x4 KAWKlegal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public haring as required by ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Mimi, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of hiami. as describ" and listed an the pagan attached to this affidavit and awe.a part thereof. i Z. That all awwrs which he reprwants, if any, have given their full and caaolete persission for hi■ to act in their behalf for the chaq+a or Wdifica- tlon of a classification or regulation of toning as set out in the wtump awing petition. 3. That the pages attadld hereto and amde a part of ails affidavit contain the current nam, smiling ammses. phone nnarmrs end legal deseripties"s for the thQ reel Of OW t7 of Iftich he is the "W or 10gei regrsastative. a. TAe facts as r"reswid in the application acid doammnts submitted in conjunetieef via this affidavit ary tow and correct. sv+tw a"Im %a t" not. (Mamie) Ste hen Helf , 'Esq. soar" to and Sub crib" bete" me this /-Tillay of 19 % Notary pudt tt, fate of Florida at Lane MY Coa1ssian Espiwas; :; M aLYNSOWDEVILLA ciR• ��'�� MyCOMMISSION S CC 472937 EXPIRES: September 13,1999 y. Bwdad Thru Notary WA Underwriters 97— u I F1 .1 11 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name New York Life Insurance Company Mailing Address c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. Telephone Number (305) 854-0800 Legal Description: Tract "B" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of bade County, Florida. The property is located at the NE corner of South Bayshore Drive and SE 12 Street, Miami, Florida. Street Address: 1155 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as folloows: Street Address New York Life Insurance Comoan c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman. P.A. 2665 South Bayhsore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 Street Address Street Address Legal Description New York Life Insurance Comoanv owns Tract "A" of Yacht Club recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 33, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Street Address: 1111 S. Bavhsore Drive, Miami, FI. 33129 Legal Description Legal Description 97_ 44 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS ARCHITECT: Cohen Freedman Encinosa Architects, P.A. 8.085 N.W. 155`h Street Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Tel: 826-3999 Mr. Larry Freedman ACCOUNTANT: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Certified Public Accountants One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 374-1574 Mr. Anthony Jackson OWNER: New York Life Insurance Company c/o Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Mian�, Florida 33133 Tel: 854-0800 CONTRACT PURCHASER: The Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33145 Tel: 460-9900 Mr. Roberto Rocha LEGAL: Weiss Serota & Helfman, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 204 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 854-0800 Stephen J. Helfman, Esq. Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. TRAFFIC ENGINEERS: Bermello-Ajamil & Partners 2601 South Bayshore Drive, I Oh Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 859-2050 Mr. Vish Chowdhary 9 — 841-1 �7- 8,44 OVA C or A ..► . \-ice oor, .—A Om-z i r - orOooR OrrORR r om Um Subject i IlL WWI -We I jr I ZJf 77— z For iijililip I 97_ Sid Florida Real Estate Decisions, Inc. 13899 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 110 Miami, F1. 33181 (305)757-6884 3195 N. Powerline Rd. Suite 104 Pompano Beach, F1. 33069 August 13, 1997 (954)761-9003 180 St. David's Way West Palm Beach, F1. 33414 . (561)798-4423 City of Miami Hearing Boards Division Planning, Building and Zoning Division 275 N.W. 2 Street, Room 226 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Property Owners List. Within 375 feet of: FORTE PROPERTIES SUB PB 113-29 TRACT A 1155 S BAYSHORE DR This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real estate.property and property owners within 375 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on file in the Dade County Tax Assessor's office. Sincerely, j Ra unt RNH/lv cc: Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. WEISS SEROTA & HELFMAN, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 420 Miami, Florida 33133 -.Ji Nell GO qa. 7 LJ 01-0210-030-11.10 1101 BRICKELL AVE MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 LOTS 16-17 & 18 LYG W OF SE BAY SHORE DR BLK 104 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0210-030-1120 1111 BRICKELL AVE MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 W40OFT LOT 19 BLK 104 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0210-030-1123 1164 S BAYSHORE DR MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 THAT PORT N25FT LOT 19 LYG WLY OF SE BAYSHORE DR LESS W40OFT LOT SIZE 3718 SQUARE FEET 01-0210-030-1150 157 SE 12 ST_ MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 E150FT OF W450FT LOT 20 BLK 104 LOT SIZE 16200 SQUARE FEET 01-0210-030-1160 125 SE 12 ST MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 E175FT OF W30OFT OF LOT 20 BLK 104 LOT SIZE 18900 SQUARE FEET 01-0210-030-3010 1111 S BAYSHORE DR 38 54 41 & 42 2.76 AC BAYSHORE GARDENS PB 84-24 TRACT A LOT SIZE 120225 SQUARE FEET 01-0210-050-3020 1275 S BAYSHORE DR MIRADO COURT A -RE -SUB PB 14-44 N1/2 LOT B LESS S50FT & FILLED ' LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L. LOT SIZE 19242 SQ FT INVERS* BANCO INDUSTRIAL DE VENEZUELA C A 1101 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131-3105 BRICKSEA CORP % RILEA CORP 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI FL 33131-2943 BRICKSEA CORP % RILEA CORP 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI FL 33131-2943 BRICKSEA CORP % RILEA CORP 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI.FL 33131-2943 BRICKSEA CORP $'RILEA CORP 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI FL 33131-2943 NEW YORK LIFE INS CO % GREYSTONE REALTY CORP 2 PICKWICK PLAZA GREENWICH CT 06830 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 0107011 MIAMI FL 33101 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 57- 844 1 • 01-0210-050-4010 1420 S BAYSHORE DR ' HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOTS 1'T0 4 INC & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LESS-R/W FOR SO BAY SHORE DR LOT SIZE 64186 SQ FT 1 I 01-0210-050-4020 1420 S BAYSHORE DR HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOTS 5 6 & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LESS R/W FOR SO BAY SHORE DR LOT SIZE 35057 SQ FT 01-0210-050-4030 1420 S BAYSHORE DR HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 PRIVATE LANE S OF LOT 6 & FILLED LANDS SELY TO BLKHD/L BLK 1 LOT SIZE 3683 SQ FT 01-.0210-050-4150 1201 BRICKELL AVE HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 THAT PORTION OF LOFT STRIP MARKED PRIVATE ALLEY LYING N OF LOTS 1 TO 10 INC BLK 2 LOT SIZE 5000 SQUARE FEET 01-0210-050-4160 190 SE 12 TERR HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOT A BLK 3 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 120 01-0210-050-4170 1420-S 13AYSHORE DR HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOT B BLK 3 73R2418 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 120 MUTUAA OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 010711 MIAMI FL 33101 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 010711 MIAMI FL 33101 MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS P 0 BOX 010711 MIAMI FL 33101 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133-5504 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133-5504 FOTIS A TAQUIS &W YOLANDA % C SUAREZ 170 -SE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3221 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 97- 8411- 2 • 01-0210-050-4180 1420 S BAYSHORE DR ' HIBISCUS PL PB 3-110 LOTS 1-2-3 LESS N5FT & 1OFT STRIP OF LAND MARKED PRIVATE ALLEY LYG S OF & ADJ TO LOTS 1-2-3 BLK 3 ' 73R2419 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 125 01-0210-050-4250 1420 S BAYSHORE DR ' HIBISCUS PLACE PB 3-110 LOFT STRIP S OF LOTS A & B BLK 3 LOT SIZE SITE VALUE 01-0210-050-5010 ' 1201 BRICKELL AVE 1.679 AC MUTUAL OF OMAHA SUB PB 84-57 ' TRACT A LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-4138-035-0010 1001 S BAYSHORE DR ' THE RENAISSANCE PB 118-19 ' TR A LOT SIZE 80150 SQ FT ' 01-4138-040-0010 1198 S BAYSHORE DR BRICKELL SHORE TOWER PB 122-25 TR A LOT SIZE .66 AC M/L .1 FOTIS AQAQUIS &W YOLANDA % C SUAREZ 170 SE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3221 DONALD VICTOR SHAFFNER 6751 C17PRESS RD#106 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33317 BRICKELL BAY PLAZA INC 100 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 1100 MIAMI FL 33131 BRICKELL BAY TOWER LTD 1001 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131-4900 BRICKSEA CORP % RILEA CORP 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI FL 33131-2943 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 3 S7- 81 - S E. - •� - /a � s� sa .� . ivo Ty : 7 4 .3 /J�! i 516 5 5 l i3 / I NTE R CA P SUB. 1 4 e5 I 2/ I 24 " 8 /O , A /Z 99 , x 7 • - . a J sr 5. E. V& 5T. ' z, 2 / 9 I S /o/71 l(/ 0 Hil YJ 107- 4 y � 5T .. SE s (rr�lglssgn� n r° 'ia SJ s' 9 S / 87 '✓'T� �(% A' � yJ ' ZI Z4 S/. 3 /00 SE FORTE 81j 7-IjgLS,OF i�T// -- 1PROPE�� IES, SUB-> /3Ty 3 ST SE /3�� sr. s E. TR. q" f4h4 s; rya�� „Q 3 I: o L y..,6 s 4 7 K. SUB /5 /00 .i sue, 14 iu o c 'qo SUB ij H 2/-9�sr 3 hcry Co I6 - 9fo .12 /i!/4!., \� r s m TE PLAZA 4Ty 9 FOR sw J4i-H r",e zj V %o ST s' s° :.. V TRALT o N s 3 I ! ( A., 9 5 I g 9 S V /¢r f 104 33 234 se r 36. As� r / •� 50 S, o �S S F 4s le o- (� / 34 N J_ +.°; 7,0tu COSTA BRICKELL BAY TOWER LTD BRICKELI, BAY PLAZA INC BRICKSEA CORP 1001 S BAYSHORE DR 100 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 1100 8 RILEA CORP ' MIAMI FL 33131-4900 MIAMI FL 33131 848 BRICKELL AVE #1010 MIAMI FL 33131-2943 CITY OF MIAMI DONALD VICTOR SHAFFNER FOTIS A TAQUIS 6W YOLANDA 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR 6751 CYPRESS RDB106 B C SUAREZ ' MIAMI FL 33133-5504 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33317 170 SE 12 TERR MIAMI FL 33131-3221 ' INVERSORA BANCO INDUSTRIAL MUTUAL OF CMAHA INS NEW YORK LIFE INS CO DE.VENEZUELA C A P 0 BOX 010711 % GREYSTONE REALTY CORP 1101 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33101 2 PICKWICK PLAZA ' MIAMI FL 33131-3105 GREENWICH CT 06830 8 i ' PROJECT SUMMARY FOR THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II PROJECT NO. 9745 SEPTEMBER, 1997 THE FOLLOWING DATA SUMMARIZES THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED AT THE BRICKELL II APARTMENT PROPERTY, PURSUANT TO SD-5 ZONING GUIDELINES:. A. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. 1. STREET FRONTAGE: WEST AVENUE .............................. IRREGULAR 2. 3. NET LOT AREA................................................................. GROSS LOT AREA............................................................ 79,932 S.F. 122,866 S.F. ' 4. F.A.R. ALLOWED............................................................. 4.25 5. F.A.R. PROVIDED............................................................. 4.04 6. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA ALLOWED ................. 522,181 S.F. 7. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 496,533 S.F. 8. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (15% GROSS LOT AREA) ........... 18,430 S.F. 9. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (29%)........................................ 35,773 S.F. 10. BUILDING COVERAGE .................................................... 43,913 S.F. 11. REQUIRED SETBACKS BY THE CITY OF MIAMI: REQUIRED PROVIDED ' SOUTH BAYHSORE DRIVE SIDE (NORTH) 20' 19 29 29 SIDE STREET (SOUTH) 15' min., 29 max.' 34' BAYFRONT 59 59 REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT NO LIMIT 377'-1" GARAGE 62'-2" 97- 844 PROJECT SUMMARY ' PAGE 2 I B. BUILDING AREA COMPUTATIONS 1. TOTAL GROSS AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ........................ 653,743 S.F. 2. TOTAL NET APARTMENT AREA (EXCLUDING BALCONIES) ...... 397,472 S.F. DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: - CIRCULATION - SUPPORT SERVICES 65,667 S.F. 7,812 S.F. - BALCONIES - LOBBY 47,256 S.F. 1,584 S.F. - HEALTH CLUB & FACILITIES 4,786 S.F. CLUB ROOM BUSINESS CENTER 2,552 S.F. 1,114 S.F. - RENTAL OFFICE OPEN OFFICE 2,185 S.F. 8,756 S.F. ' 3. 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS TOTAL S.F. OF COMMERCIAL :..:..:..:..: ..:.. ................... ... 355 UNITS 705 S.F. ' 5. TOTAL S.F. OF RESTAURANT .................................................. TOTAL GROSS S.F. FOR 3,900 S.F. ' 6. PARKING GARAGE (5 LEVELS) .............................................. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING 157,210 S.F. SPACES REQUIRED................................................................. 355 SPACES OFF STREET LOADING REQUIRED ......................................... 4 BERTHS OFF STREET LOADING PROVIDED ......................................... 4 BERTHS TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED............................................................... 465 SPACES (INCL. 9 HANDICAPPED SPACES) 1 7. EXCESS PARKING.............................................................. 110 SPACES 97- 844 L_J PROJECT SUMMARY PAGE 3 NIT BREAKDOWN UNIT # TYPE A/C SQ. FT. BALCONY SQ. FT. GROSS SQ. FT. REMARKS UNIT A 213R / 213 1204 158 1362 CORNER UNIT B 213R / 213 1128 68 1196 INTERIOR UNIT C IBR / 113, 756 130 886 INTERIOR UNIT C1 IBR / 113 738 130 820 INTERIOR UNIT C2 IBR / 113 752 68 867 PENTHOUSE UNIT C3 113R / IB 737 130 838 PENTHOUSE UNIT C4 IBR / 1B 770 68 838 PENTHOUSE UNIT D 313R / 3B 1456 158 1614 PENTHOUSE UNIT E 3BR / 3B 1522 198 1720 CORNER UNIT F 1BR / IB 760 130 890 REC. DECK UNIT G 213R / 21/2 B 1501 192 1693 PENTHOUSE UNIT H 213R / 2B 1350 128 1478 PENTHOUSE UNIT I 213R / 2B 1112 130 1242 PENTHOUSE UNIT Imod. 213R / 2B 1100 130 1230 PENTHOUSE UNIT J 313R / 3B 1867 196 2063 PENTHOUSE UNIT K IBR / 1B 980 158 1138 CORNER UNIT L IBR / 1B 962 158 1120 CORNER 'TOTAL L "A' $ C2 C4- :4r E F mocl j K L OF UNITS (LO55y) SECOND 1 2 4 THIRD 1 2 2 1 ro FOURTH 2 2 2 FIFTH 2 2 2 SIXTH 2 2 (R.EC DECK) TYP FLS Clth-34rd- 3xZan 64 3X25C 84 2 x 252 5(0 28 28 26 LEVELS) .25 FENT FLR I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 10 J(LEVEL 35) PENT FLR 2 (LEVEL 36) TOTAL 93 94 (05 29 I I I 29 2e I I I I 1 2 4 2 355 Total ............................... 355 Apartments THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL PHASE II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT ARTICLE II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan , 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study 142003\art-2.915 9 7 8 441., THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICRELL PHASE II Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development or activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are ' provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the .character and intended use of the development or activity.. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II is a rental apartment development located at the northeast corner of South Bayshore Drive and S.E. 12 Street and has a street address of 1115 S. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. The development abuts Biscayne Bay. The property has a lot area of approximately 1.83 acres and is . currently ' undeveloped. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II will have approximately 355 rental units and 8,756 square feet of office space. The development will consist of one tower of 36 stories with a separate but attached parking ' structure. Among the amenities provided there will be a landscape shoreline walkway, one swimming pool, sauna, pool pavilion, tennis court, a health club; racquetball court, an approximate 3,900 square foot restaurant designed to occupy the southeast corner of the ground floor to meet the requirement of Sec. 605.4.4.2.. of the ' a City's Zoning Code, an administrative office areand a small retail area to serve the needs of the tenants and users of the building. The project has been extensively landscaped as shown on the Landscape Plans included under Tab 7, Article III. A small scale urban. plaza has been designed for the - ' southwest corner of the project. It will consist of a fountain, landscaped planters and passive areas. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 7, Article III. (c) General location map, showing relation of the .site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping area, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. ' 9,7- 844 A location map and an aerial map indicating the surrounding streets and properties are included in Article I. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site Plan is located under Tab 2, Article III. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section ' lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the ' survey located under Tab 1, Article III. .(2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing structures located on the property is shown on the survey ' located under Tab 1, Article III. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic Mill be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic: A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 3, Article III. Access to the parking facilities and loading areas is through South Bayshore Drive. The main entrance to the building is on S.E. 12 Street. Valet parking for visitors and patrons is available at ' the main entrance. A landscaped cantilevered porte cochere has been designed to enhance and provide protection for valet users. In accordance with the requirements of the City's Public Works Department, SE 12 Street will terminate in a cul de sac, the north one half (1/.2) of which will be constructed as part of this development. ' (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located on the 5 story parking structure immediately north and abutting the building. Handicap parking, as well as, loading/delivery areas are provided at the first level. The project contains four loading bays, ' with sizes and clearance in compliance with Code. 2 9�- 844 There is access to the baywalk from the northeast corner of the parking structure. (5) Recreational facilities -locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown on various drawings under Tab 7, Article III. Amenities include a recreation deck on top of the parking structure consisting of a swimming pool, spa, a pool cabana with ornamental trellis and ' landscape planters, and tennis court; passive landscape areas and a racquetball court, a health e club and fitness center containing an exercise room, bathroom facilities, and lockers, all located within the building. ' (6) Screens and buffers; Landscape and buffer areas are indicated on the ' Landscape Plans under Tab 7, Article III. (7) 'Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by the City of Miami or by a private company. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. All utilities shall be underground. Access and ' connections to site utilities are discussed in Site Utility Study located under Tab 4, Article III. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the ' percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. (1) The various permitted uses. Parking Garage and Residential Tower Building Footprint: 43,913 gross s.f. _ 122,866 gross s.f. = 35.740 ' The office use is included in the above totals. (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by structures is 3.5.740 of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and ' offstreet loading spaces shown 'in (d) above. 3 97- 844 The minimum total number of offstreet parking spaces required is 355. The total number of spaces provided is 465. Four offs.treet loading spaces are required and four are provided. See Sheet A-1, Tab 7, Article III. tNine handicap spaces are required and nine are provided. See Sheet A-1, Tab 7, Article III. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The residential tower will consist of 355 apartment units. The residential project density per acre ' will be as follows: 355 residential dwelling units _ 2.82 gross acres = 126 dwelling units per gross acre 355 residential dwelling units - 1.83 net acres = 194 dwelling units per net acre There will also be 8,756 square feet of office ' space occupying the 36th floor of the building. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how much common facilities are to be provided and permanently ' maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study under Tab 4, Article III. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and ' types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will include residential use with .355 apartments. The exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type are included in the Project Data Sheet and Summary under ' Article I. .Typical floor plans for residential units are included ' under Tab 7, Article III. 4 97-- 84/1 ' (j) Plans for signs, if any. ' An identification sign will be located .at the intersection of South Bayshore Drive and S.E. 12 Street. The design will be compatible -with the area and in compliance with the required regulations. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. See Landscape Plans under Tab 7, Article III. ' (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities provided will include a landscaped recreation deck with a swimming pool, spa, pool cabana, and tennis court all located on the top ' level of the parking structure. A racquetball court, health club, and fitness center with lockers and sanitary facilities on the second level of the building. ' Additional amenities include a commercial area consisting of a.grocery convenience center and an administrative area all designed to serve the needs of the tenants and ' visitors. An approximate 3,900 square feet restaurant will occupy the southeast corner of the building's first level. The restaurant will have an outdoor dinning terrace. A small scale urban plaza has been designed for the southwest corner of the property. The plaza will consist of a fountain, landscaped planters, and passive areas. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. ' The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. ' (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. ' Elevations and sections depicting the architectural character of the Building are included under Tab 7, Article III. A rendering showing the entire project is also included under Tab 7, Article III. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) ProPerty ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest 5 97- 844 a • • within the boundaries of the area proposed -for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 1, Article III. ' ; (d) Materials to demonstratethe relationship of the elements ' listed in (c) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. (e) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around, the lands ' proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-S. Page 46 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The ' comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office and is shown on the land use map located in Article I. (f) Analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adopted comprehensive neighborhood.plan: The future land use element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designates the property Office. The Office designation allows high density multi -family ' residential development. Therefore, 'the proposed development is consistent with the City's. plan. The Traffic Impact Analysis and Site Utility Study (Tab 3 and Tab 4 of Article III, respectively) indicate adequate ' infrastructure capacity to meet the impact of this development. ' 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future.uses. 6 97_.,4 Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of drawings ' submitted is found under Tab 7, Article III. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the. SD-5 zoning for this property. The City's future land use map designation is consistent with the proposed development. The applicant is also requesting Class I and II Special Permits, see Tab B, Article I. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study. ' (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted on the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 3, Article III.. (b) Economic impact data shall, be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment,and permanent employment and shall ' demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. ' The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 5, Article III. ' (c) A housing impact assessment. The property will be residential with 355 apartment units. The rental price of the apartments will range from $1200 to $3000 per month. ' (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Energy saving lamps, ' ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. The ultimate design of the building will r 97— 844 incorporate energy conservation measures when applicable. (e) Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. (f) Environmental Zone. The Property is not located within an Environmental Preservation District. (g) Dade County Shoreline Development Review. This project has been submitted for approval by the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 142003\zon-res.915 Cul 9,7_, 844 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II Documents ARTICLE III. Supporting • Tab I Survey of Property Tab 2 Site Plan Tab 3 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 4 Site Utility Study Tab 5 Economic Impact Study Tab 6 Minority Construction Employment Plan ' Tab 7 Architectural and Landscape Drawings 1 1 1 1 1 97- 844 (-A aw 7NC7' A ran 7?14 rc LEGEND SNOW MMMM rwsi m 0 �G�w = ao =uMpm vw�pug A A 4� Rwmas� - -=Wpmmw PC -/ivsvwor law satewwowi no : iw� m" Alp WAVEYoors caffnrrAm ro" SK as ma s.m TAM amomm. N& -MAML THE RELATED GROUP OF THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC FLORIDA CITY OF WAMI SURVEY MAP g FLORID AWEVt M • BY ]Eth 81Bt28T MCAYNH BAY J J W Y U m �a U h PHASE I & PHASE II SITE PLAN i/3x scu.e 11 97- 8.41-1 YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL -- PHASE 11 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF, MUMI PREPARED FOR: THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA PREPARED BY: BERMIELL09 AiANnL PARTNERS, INC. SEPTEMBEk 24,1997 ITable of Contents Section Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................1 1.1 Project Background ............................................. I 1.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................ 1 1.3 Study Area....................................................I ' 2. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ................................... 4 2.1 Existing Roadway Network ....................................... 4 ' 2.2 2.3 Existing Traffic Volumes ......................................... Existing Signal Timing Plans ..................................... 4 7 2.4 Transit Routes and Stations ........................................ 7 2:5 Existing Roadway Level of Service (LOS) .......................... 7 3. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS AND IMPACTS ...................................... 11 3.1 Trip Generation.............................II 3.2 .................. Trip Distribution ............................ 11 3.3 Future Background Traffic ....................................... 12 ' 3.4 Committed Traffic Impact ....................................... 12 3.5 Programmed and Planned Developments ............................ 16 3.6 Project Transportation Impacts .................................. 16 ' 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................ 21 ' 5.APPENDICES.........................................................23 Appendix 1: The 1995 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume for Brickell Apartment Proj ect ' Appendix 2: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996 Appendix 3: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions ' Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background and Committed Traffic Conditions Appendix 6: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions Appendix 7: Optimized SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions Appendix 8: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Optimized Conditions 97- 844 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II proposed plan includes a 355-unit apartment high-rise, 8,500 square feet (SF) of office space, and 4,000 SF sit-down restaurant in the Brickell area of the Miami Downtown area. It also consists of a five story parking garage that provides approximately 465 parking spaces. The building will be constructed on a 1.83 net acre lot at the northeastern corner of S. Bayshore Drive and SE 12� Street. The high-rise is expected to be open by the year 2000. The first Phase of the project (previously known as Brickell Apartment) is immediately north of the project site (see Figure 1) and is currently under construction. Transportation impact analysis of the Brickell Apartment - Phase I was completed on November 11, 1995 by Bermello, Ajamil and Partners (B&A) and was approved by the City of Miami. The 1995 study reportprovides information of traffic related conditions that are relevant for this analysis. 1.2 Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and ' roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analyses. This report discusses the following items: 1 1 • Existing traffic volumessland levels of service for major roadways within the study area. • Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. • Future background and project traffic conditions and level of service. • Determination if the impacts of the, proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards and development of solutions to mitigate adverse impacts, if any. 1.3 Study Area The study area boundary includes SW 8`' Street on the north, SE 15`' Road on the south, Brickell Avenue on the west, and South Bayshore Drive on the east. Figure 1 shows the site location and major roadway network in the vicinity of the proposed development. The project study area intersections and roadway links to be analyzed in the vicinity of the site were identified in consultation with the City of Miami. Four signalized intersections within the study area were identified for analysis: South Bayshore Drive & SE 81h Street, Brickell Avenue & SE e Street, Brickell Avenue & SE 13t' Street, and Brickell Avenue & SE 15' Road. The Brickell Avenue corridor from SE 8'h Street to SE 15t' Road was also identified for the link capacity analysis. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 1 L I I I IJ I I I I L� I I I I I I F-.\ENG\TRAN5\TRAN,S\ACAD:-n-V\YYACHT-CLUB\BASE;2.DWU 9 4 4- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • The study area boundaries and intersections to be analyzed were determined using the methodology outlined in the Brickell Apartment (Phase I) Traffic Impact Study of 1995 which was approved by the City of Miami. Since Phase I of the project is in the immediate vicinity, this provided a sound basis for study area determination and traffic analysis methodology for the Yacht Club at Brickell -- Phase II project. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. September 24, 1997 Page 3 97—z-1 2. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS The 1996 and 1997 existing physical and operational characteristics of the study area roadway network related to the scope of this study were collected from Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department and from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). . Furthermore, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (B&A) conducted a transportation impact study for Brickell Apartment -- Phase I project in November 1995, which is in the immediate vicinity of the Yacht Club at Brickell -- Phase II project. As such, and in consultation with the City of Miami, the 1995 Brickell Apartment study was used as another source of information as needed. 2.1 Existing Roadway Network Within the study area, Brickell Avenue is a four -lane divided arterial with raised median; so is the SE 8'' Street east of Brickell Avenue. The remaining roadways within the study area are all two-lane ' undivided facilities. There are four signalized intersections in the study area as listed. The lane configurations at these intersections are shown in Figure 2. All four signalized intersections are equipped with pedestrian signal buttons. There are extensive on -street parking meters in the study area, as shown in Figure 2. Left turn movements are prohibited for westbound traffic at all non -signalized intersections at ' Brickell Avenue within the study area. All vehicles of the proposed development heading south on Brickell Avenue will have to use the intersection of SE 8th Street and S. Bayshore Drive, Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street, or Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road. 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ' A review of the existing FDOT and Metro -Dade County traffic counts within the study area and the vicinity was conducted. There are five FDOT count stations within the study area and vicinity. The 1 most updated, 1996, peak hour volume, average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume, peak hour factors (PHF), and directional split factors (D) were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation, Planning Division. The 1997 traffic volume were calculated by applying 2% ' background growth to 1996 traffic volumes. The 1995 Brickell Apartment Traffic Impact Study established the PM peak hour turning movement traffic which was counted at the four signalized intersections within the study area as presented in Appendix 1. At the time the aforementioned study was conducted, there was roadway construction along Brickell Avenue and Brickell Bridge over the Miami River. As such, traffic volume and ' turning movement counts along Brickell Avenue were impacted by the construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. r Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. _ Page 4 SE 8t4 St �/� / SI ,76 �c r -�— Lane Configurations Signalized Intersection On —Street Meter Parking ® 2601 5 Bayshore Drive Yacht Club at Brickell — ExistingGeometric and Miami, Florida 33133 ! FIGURE CE■MELLa•A1AM II (3OS) 859-2050 Phase II Traffic Characteristics Within O PA RTRF RS•IRC Transportation Impact Study The Study Area 2 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADF=\YYACHT_CLUB\BASE2.DWG 97- 844 rReview of the AADT volumes from FDOT count stations within the study area indicated that from year 1995 to 1996 there was a 25 percent increase along SE 13' Street. However, traffic volume increase along Brickell Avenue -between 1995 and 1996 ranged from 10 percent south of SW 15' Road to 66 percent south of SE 8' Street. This sharp increase in traffic volume over one year span was due to resumption of pre -construction traffic pattern after the end of construction and opening of the Brickell Bridge. A review of traffic volume trends from count stations between 1993 (before construction) and 1996 (after construction) within the study area indicated that traffic volumes over this period did not increase, i.e., the 1996 AADT volumes are less than or equal to the 1993 AADT volumes. The 1996 traffic volume within the study area regressed to approximately the 1993 traffic volume level, see Appendix 2. PM peak hour volumes for eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13`h Street were obtained from the FDOT traffic count stations in the immediate vicinity. However, there is no count station that accounts for the westbound approach traffic volume approach at this intersection. In addition, traffic count stations within the study area are relatively remote -from the intersection of SE 15`h Road and Brickell Avenue and, therefore, would not accurately account for approaches's traffic volumes. rAs previously mentioned, the 1996 AADT volume along SE 13`' Street increased by 25 percent compared to the previous year. The AADT volumes at the count station adjacent to the intersection of SE 15`h Street'and Brickell Avenue increased by 10 percent. Therefore, the PM peak hour traffic volumes reported in Brickell Apartment report for westbound SE 13' Street and the intersection of SE 151h Road and Brickell Avenue approaches were increased by 25 percent and 10 percent, respectively to calculate the 1996 PM peak volumes. The 1996 PM peak -hour .traffic volume for southbound Brickell Avenue at SE 8`h Street was calculated by increasing the 1995 PM peak -hour volume by 66 percent as per the FDOT traffic counts. However, FDOT traffic counts along SE 8' Street just west of Brickell Avenue for the last four years showed that traffic volume decreased from 14,000 vehicles per day during 1993 to 11,000 vehicles per day during 1996. Therefore, a conservative approach was followed, and it was assumed that traffic growth rate along that section would follow the natural growth rate within the study area (assumed to be 2%). Same approach was used for the intersection of South Bayshore Drive and SE 8`h Street. The turning -volume percentages reported in the 1995 Brickell Apartment study were maintained for most of the turning volumes. This was determined in consultation with the City of Miami. The southbound traffic percent right -turn for Brickell Avenue at SE 13' Street in 1995 was found to be high because of construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. To address this, the count station (Station #86) located at SE 13`h Street immediately west of Brickell Avenue was looked into for its westbound traffic volume data. This data was used to balance westbound volume along SE 13`h Street with the intersection's turning volumes as calculated above. In other words, the 1996 Brickell ' Avenue southbound right -turn volume at SE 13`h Street was calculated by subtracting from Station #86 westbound traffic the 1996 PM peak northbound left -turn and westbound through traffic. r Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 6 97- 844 The Brickell Apartment study established that the natural annual traffic 'growth rate' for the Brickell area was two percent. Therefore, the 1997 existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections were determined by increasing the 1996 traffic volume by 2%. The 1997 existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. 2.3 Existing g g Signal Timing Plans Existing signal timing plans for the signalized intersections identified in the study area were obtained from the Dade County Traffic Control Center. The timing plans were used in analyzing existing levels of service. Existing signal timings are shown in Appendix 3. 2.4 Transit Routes and Stations The residents of the study area are provided with an excellent transit service. The project area is served by Metromover which has two nearby stations located on SE 14t' Street and SE 10'' Street. Both stations are 5 to 10 minutes walking distance from the proposed development. Metromover runs at headways of 3 minutes during peak hours and 5 minutes during off peak periods. Also Brickell Avenue is served by bus routes B, 48, and 24. Each Metromover:car has a capacity of 75 persons and each Metrobus has seating capacity of 40 persons. Currently, the City of Miami is using 150% of seated capacity for Metrobuses as LOS standard. Metrobus routes run at headways ranging from 15-60 minutes during peak hours to 30-60 minutes during off peak periods. This extensive transit network within the vicinity of the development is of great importance for future residents, employees and visitors to the development who would have an excellent access to transit services. This will decrease the impact of the development on the study area roadways as people would have access to use transit services as an alternative to private automobiles. 2.5 Existing Roadway Level of Service Roadway capacity is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a given point during a specific period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. The Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department also adopts the roadway capacity as the service volume at level of service "E." The level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that characterizes operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and passengers. The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, with LOS "A " representing the best operating conditions and LOS "F" representing the worst. The existing level of service for roadway segments and intersections were calculated according to the HCM procedure using the SIG/CINEMA software. The LOS for arterial was calculated using the FDOT ART -TAB program. The summary of existing LOS for roadway segments within the study area during the PM peak -hour is shown in Figure 4. Detailed LOS analyses are shown in Appendix 3. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 7 11 1 r: \r•Nc:\ i tuvv � � i ccw�v a �x�twr u.r. �,....a,_.,....., �,.. o.............. I fl I F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADYlL, :\YAI;H 1_ULVn\t--.u-- 1 9?, - 844 1 0 0 G 'I The City of Miami transportation concurrency standards are based on the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP). This document sets the roadway LOS at "E" within the City of Miami in general. However, the Downtown Miami roadways are governed under Special Transportation Area (STA), which allows for 20% of signalized intersections within the Downtown Miami DRI area (within STA) to operate below LOS "E.", The intersection of SE 13' Street & Brickell Avenue is operating below LOS "E" for the 1997 conditions. This, in large part, is due to permissive only phase for northbound left turn and not sufficient green time available for westbound through movement. The intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 86 Street is operating at LOS "D", the westbound approach, however, is operating at LOS "F" due to primarily the heavy turning volumes. However, a further analysis shows that some minor adjustments to the existing timing plan will reduce the delay significantly without adversely impacting the levels of service for the roadway network. Appendix 3 contains the detailed analysis of SIG -CINEMA outputs. As for arterial analysis, both northbound and southbound traffic of Brickell Avenue is operating at good levels of service: LOS "C" and LOS `B," respectively. This is due to sufficient green time (g/C) for through movements along Brickell Avenue. The detailed outputs of the analysis are contained in Appendix 3. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. September 24, 1997 Page 10 97-- 844 1 Ll r 3. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS AND IMPACTS 3.1 Trip Generation The Yacht Club at Brickell -- Phase II project proposed plan includes a 355-unit apartment high-rise, 8,500 SF office space, and 4,000 SF quality restaurant. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual 5'h Edition was used to determine the number of PM peak hour trips that would be generated by the proposed project. Trips generated by the proposed land uses are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Summary of Trip Generation for the Yacht Club at Brickell -- Phase II Project The 1989 Downtown Miami Master Plan estimated the transit ridership for the Brickell area to be approximately 10 percent. In addition, the ITE Manual allows for using capture rates for multi -use developments to account for internal trips within the multi -use site. The ITE Manual cited several studies of multi -use developments throughout the U.S. with internal capture rates ranging from 7 to 45 percent, depending on the size and location of the project. However, a conservative approach was used in this study and a five percent reduction factor was used to account for transit and internal capture rates. Therefore, the modified trips to be generated by the proposed project were calculated as shown in Table 1. The proposed project would generate a net impact of approximately 137 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the AM peak period, 174 VPH during the PM peak period, and 2,088 vehicles per day. The PM peak period is more critical than the AM peak in Downtown Miami area due to heavy commute pattern; therefore, traffic analysis was conducted for the PM peak period. 3.2 Trip Distribution Metropolitan Dade County, Public Works Department maintains historical data trends on directional trip distribution for locations within the county, referred to as "Cardinal Trip Distribution. " The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 11 97.- 844 1 9 0 quadrants are divided into eight directions: NNE, ENE, ESE, SSE, SSW, WSW, WNW, and NNW. The Cardinal Trip Distribution (CTD) provides percentages of trips originated at each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) to every one of the above directions. The proposed project lies within Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 670. The cardinal trip distributions for TAZ 670 were NNE =19%, ENE = 4%, ESE = 0%, SSE =1 %, SSW = 2%, WSW = 23%, WNW = 21 %, and NNW = 30. Dividing this into four quadrants yields to the following distributions: north = 49%, east = 4%, south = 3%, and west 44%. The traffic impact study for Brickell Apartment project (1995), which is located in the same TAZ and analyzed the same study area, distributed project trips based on CTD and existing travel pattern within the study area. Therefore, the same trip distribution percentages were used for this study as well. Since left turn movement from westbound approaches is prohibited at all non -signalized intersections along Brickell Avenue within the study area, the inbound traffic and the outbound traffic generated by the project were distributed over the roadway network differently. The inbound and outbound trip distribution percentages and number of trips within the study area are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. 3.3 Future Background Traffic The project's study area (Brickell) is within the Downtown Miami DRI boundaries and is substantially built out. Therefore, limited traffic growth is expected in this area. The 1995 Brickell Apartment study established a 2% annual growth rate for the same study area, which is relatively rhigh for such a built out area. A conservative approach was followed and a 2% annual growth rate was used for this study to project future traffic volumes. The project's opening year is 2000. 1 Therefore, the projected PM peak hour traffic volume for the study area was calculated as follows: Volz000 = V011997 x (1 + 0.02)3 3.4 Committed Traffic Impact I,] In Downtown Miami Brickell area there are other developments previously approved but not yet completed. One such development is Brickell Apartment - Phase I, adjacent to the proposed project site (as shown in Figure 1). It has a direct contribution to the proposed project impact. At the present time, this project is under construction and is expected to be open by early 1998. The Brickell Apartment project trips, as distributed in 1995 report, were added to the year 2000 background trips. The year 2000 PM peak hour background plus committed trips are shown in Figure 7. The impacts of background and committed PM peak hour traffic were analyzed according to the HCM procedures using SIG/CINEMA and FDOT LOS Software. It was found that the intersections of Brickell Avenue & SE 1 P Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 8`' Street would operate at LOS "F." However, the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road would operate at LOS `B" and the intersection of SE 8" Street and South Bayshore Drive would operate at LOS "C" with the existing Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 12 97- 844 SE gth Sf�� so SE 13th �j w Q) CO U 2601 S Bayshore Drive Yacht Club at Brickell — 0 FIGURE Miami, Florida 33133 Project inbound Trip EEEYELLO•AJAMIL (305) 859-2050 Phase II , &PARTNERS-INC Distribution by Percent Transportation Impact Study 97- 844 11 1 1� �l 97- 844 Fi '1, F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFI E\YACHT_CLUB\trafficZ.DWG I e 0 (1997) signal timing plans. The operating LOS for northbound Brickell would be "C" and the LOS for southbound Brickell Avenue would be `B." The resulting future intersections and arterial levels of service are shown in Figure 8. Detailed intersections LOS analysis is included in Appendix 5. 1 3.5 Programmed and Planned Developments The 1997 Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2015 Metro -Dade ' Transportation Plan Long Range Element, and the 1996 Metro -Dade Transit Development Program were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the study area that may have an impact related to the scope of the proposed project. The above documents showed no programmed or planned projects within the study area. 1 3.6 Project Transportation Impacts F1 it r F1, The proposed development is expected to be open in early year 2000. Future traffic conditions of background plus committed plus project traffic were calculated as shown in Figure 9. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and link level of service. Detailed output of LOS analysis using the existing signal timing plans is included in Appendix 6. At the present time and without project impacts, traffic operation conditions at the intersection of Brickell Avenue & SE 8t' Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 13t' Street are within the City of Miami standards. However, as previously noted, some of the intersection movements were operating at LOS "F." Therefore, signal timing optimization analysis was performed using the SIG/CINEMA program. Then, a link analysis along Brickell Avenue, using the 1995 FDOT ART -TAB Program, for the optimized signal timing was performed. Appendices 7 and 8 contain intersection and arterial analyses for future background plus committed plus project traffic conditions using the optimized signal timing plans. Summary of intersections and links LOS optimized results are shown in Figure 10. The analysis showed that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`h Road with its current signal timing is operating at the optimum. Minimum green time (7 seconds) is provided for cross street traffic (along SE 15`h Road) which carries minimal traffic volume. The remaining green time within a cycle (98 seconds) is provided for Brickell Avenue traffic which carries the majority of traffic. The intersection would operate at LOS `B," as shown in Figure 10. The analysis also showed that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'h Street with its current signal timing is not operating at its optimum. Therefore, the signal timing and phasing at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street were changed to develop the optimal setting to maximize turning movements throughput without adversely impacting the progression and LOS along Brickell Avenue. Due to the heavy northbound left -turn volume (250 VPH) along Brickell Avenue at SE 13d' Street, an exclusive (protected) left turn phase was added to reduce movement's excessive delay. Signal analysis details are included in Appendix 7. The intersection would operate at LOS "D" as shown in Figure 10. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 16 [-1 L u F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADF L! E\YACHT_ CLUB\ traffic2.DWG 1 97- 8a1- p iJ F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\YACHT_ CLUB\ traffic2.DWG 97-- 844 Fi 1 p u E F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADYME\YACHT_ CLUB\ traffic2.DWG 1 97- 844 u Optimization at the intersection of SE 8 h Street and South Bayshore Drive slightly improved the overall intersection delay by allocating more green time to SE 8' Street traffic as shown in Appendix 7. However, significant LOS improvement was achieved by optimizing signal timing at the intersection of SE 8' Street and Brickell Avenue. By allocating more green time to traffic along SE 8`' Street (eastbound and westbound) the intersection overall LOS improved from LOS "F" to LOS "C." Detailed LOS analysis is presented in Appendix 7. As for level of service along Brickell Avenue, the ART -TAB analysis showed that the northbound and southbound traffic would be operating at LOS "C," as presented in Figure 10. F P 1 Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 20 1 0 0 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed project is located in Brickell area of Downtown Miami. The project's proposed plan is a 355-unit high-rise apartment, 8,500 square feet office space, and 4,000 square feet quality restaurant, in addition to a five -story parking garage. • The Brickell Apartment - Phase I project, which is currently under construction and will be open by mid 1998, is in the immediate vicinity to the project site. This project contributes directly to the transportation impact of the proposed project. Therefore, the Brickell Apartment project was considered in this analysis as a committed development. • Inventory of the existing physical and operational conditions within the study area related to the scope of this project has been collected from Dade County and Florida Department of Transportation. The study area roadways and intersection PM peak hour traffic volumes were determined from FDOT traffic count stations and from Brickell Apartment study report, 1995, which was approved by the City of Miami. The project is expected to be operational 1 by year 2000. A conservative 2% annual traffic growth rate was used for the study area. • Analysis of PM peak hour existing traffic conditions for signalized intersections and roadway ' links within the study area showed that, except for northbound left -turn traffic along Brickell Avenue at SE 13t' Street and westbound right -turn traffic along SE 8' Street at Brickell Avenue, all other approach movements and roadways would operate within the City of ' Miami transportation concurrency limits (LOS "E"). The intersections of Brickell Avenue and SE 8t' Street and the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'' Street would operate at LOS "F"; however, they are still within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits for the Special Transportation Area (up to 20% of signalized intersections can operate below LOS "E"), within which this project is located. Brickell Avenue corridor would also operate at LOS well within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits. • The Yacht Club at Brickell -- Phase II proposed project would generate approximately 2,204 vehicles per day, 137 vehicles per AM peak hour, and 184 vehicles per PM peak hour. The I d net external trips during the PM peak hour, which is the critical period, was calculated as 174 VPH. The PM peak period inbound/outbound traffic volume split was calculated to be 95/79. • The proposed project's vehicular trips were distributed according to the 1995 Brickell Apartment study which was based on the "Cardinal Trip Distribution " provided by Metropolitan Dade County Public Works Department and access constraints. Future analysis with background plus committed development plus proposed project traffic showed that signal timings and phasing at Brickell Avenue & SE 13`' Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 8`h Street need to be optimized to improve traffic conditions at both intersections and reduce excessive delay. As such, the signal phasing at the intersection of SE 13'' Street and Brickell Avenue was optimized, and the existing three-phase signal was modified to a four -phase signal as shown in Appendix 7. The signal timing at the intersection Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. September 24, 1997 Page 21 F� 97- 844 of SE 8'h Street and Brickell Avenue was also optimized by allocating more green time to SE 8`' Street traffic. As a result, the optimized signal timing plans would significantly improve traffic operations of the overall intersection, and both intersection's LOS would be operating at better than LOS "E." This study concludes that the traffic impacts of the Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II proposed planwill be within the City of Miami concurrency standards. Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. September 24, 1997 Page 22 97® 841-1 C 0 El I 1 5. APPENDICES Appendix 1: The 1995 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume for Brickell Apartment Project Appendix 2: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996 Appendix 3: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background and Committed Traffic Conditions Appendix 6: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions Appendix 7: Optimized SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions Appendix 8: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Optimized Conditions Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II September 24, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 23 9`�- 81�. Il F 0 C F Appendix 1: The 1995 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume for Brickell Apartment Project 11 97- �a !! M i M_ M ® i M ® M® M M M M M i e� 0 w Biscane Bay 11 11 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architecture• Engineering -Planning Brickell Existing PM Peak Hour FIGURE Interior Design • Landscape Architecture b 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1000 Apartment rtm e n t 3.1 Miami, Florida 33133 p Traffic Volumes (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 859-7835 F:\ENG\TRANS\TRANS\ACADFILE\BRICKELL\TRAFFIC.DWG C .7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix 2: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996 U 9'�� 844 AADT Trends Between 1993 and 1996 Within the Study Area * Source: Florida Department of Transportation - Division of Planning, District VI. 1 1 1 1 9_ Sal 1 0 0 F I SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1997 Exstng PM PeaK Vol CASE: EXT BAY8 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 1 600 1 100 1 100 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 27 ---- 255 ----- 136 ---- 50 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 89 388 4 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 267 4 53 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 5 50 103 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 27 255 136 50 WB 89 388 4 0 NB 267 4 53 20 SB 5 50 103 30 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 97 - �� 1 1 Appendix 3: ' SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions 97- HCM Summary IRA& for Case: EXT_BAYB SE 8 . /S. BAYSHORE SE BTH STREET 8 S. BAYSHORE DR. 1997 Exstng FM Pear Vol Version 1.8 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L .Delay L 58 IT 5 1 Lane X (sec/ O (sec/ 0 Grp v/s v/c Leh) S veh) S i i 4 EB Lper 8.88 5.6 B �--8 Lpro *8.82 8.88# 5.2 B 89 TR 0.12 8.19 5.7 B UB L *8.15 0.27 9.8 B 8.9 TR 0.14 0.25 8.8 B ----------` --------- 27 `r i 255 --� MB L *0.27 0.83 38.4 D 33.3 D 136 z LT 8.88 0.26 21.5 C t R 0.83 0.88 20.1 C 267 53 4 SBL 0.000.01 19.7C 21.7 C1 i t2+ 3 .ilia TR 0.10 0.29 21.8 C 360 4 1 35 Int. 0.44 8.46 15.8 B #L TOTAL 97� �d� j J u k SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1997 Exstng PM PeaK Vol CASE: EXT BAY8 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE ' LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WE 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 1 600 1 100 1 100 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WE L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS. APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 27 255 136 ---- 50 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WE 89 388 4 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 267 4 53 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 5 50 103 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 27 255 136 50 WE 89 388 4 0 NB 267 4 53 20 SB 5 50 103 30 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 97_ 8,11-1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-2 ' SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI-ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED --------------------- ---------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- --- --- --- --- --- -�- --- Green 7.0 60.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 ' TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' -------------------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R --- --- ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 2 0 --- --- --- 2 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 2 ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 CURB PARKING N 0 0 N N 0 N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 ' PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 17.5 17.5 ' 97- 844 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS,INC. SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v I P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp_ (vph) Lns Fact (vph) -LT- -RT----- EB L 27 1.00 27 0.85 32 L 32 1 1.00 32 1.00 0.00 T 255 1.00 255 0.85 300 TR 401 2 1.00* 401 0.00 0.25 ' R 136 1.00 136 0.85 101+ WB L 89 1.00 89 0.85 105 L 105 1 1.00 105 1.00 0.00 T 388 1.00 388 0.85 456 TR 461 2 1.00* 461 0.00 0.01 R 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 1 NB L 267 1.00 267 0.85 314 L 251 1 1.00 251 1.00 0.00 T 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 LT 68 1 1.00 68 0.93 0.00 R 53 1.00 53 0.85 38+ R 38 1 1.00 38 0.00 1.00 SB L 5 1.00 5 0.85 6 L 6 1 1.00 6 1.00 0.00 T 50 1.00 50 0.85 59 TR 145 1 1.00 145 0.00 0.59 R 103 1.00 103 0.85 86+ ' + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user ' --------------------SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET-_--------_------_-- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB Lper .319 545 Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .956 1.00 3270 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.'000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .416 711 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3345 ' NB L 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .549 920 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .481 806 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .746 1276 ' TR 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .897 1.00 1503 1 97-- 841- SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 'SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-4 **************************************************************************** '--WORKSHEET_ FOR -PERMITTED -LEFT. -TURNS -OPPOSED -BY-A- MULTI -LANE -APPROACH -.,,,-- TTTI T.T 1TT 1 Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 'Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 'Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 9q gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT [l+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5) } ] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g 'fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [l/ (1+PL (ELl-1) } ] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N IWORKSHEET FOR A SECOND LANE GROUP �n I 115 115 115 115 70.0 60.0 35.0 35.0 65.0 63.0 38.0 38.0 63.0 73.0 38.0 38.0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 32 105 314 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 461 401 145 68 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.02 3.35 10.03 0.19 7.36 6.40 4.63 2.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.37 0.67 0.67 7.64 0.00 4.75 1.02 57.36 63.00 33.25 36.98 0.59 0.62 0.78 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.77 2.41 1.59 1.30 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.32 0.42 0.55 0.75 0.32 0.42 0.55 0.75 EB WB NB** SE Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 Actual Green, G 35.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 38.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 38.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 314 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.93 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 145 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 10.03 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 4.63 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 gf=G** (-0.860*LTC**.629) -tL, gf<=g 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.67 gq 4.75 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 33.25 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.78 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4. 5) } ] 0.93 EL1 1.88 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g 0.10 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/(1+PL (EL1-1)) ] 0.48 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.48 * Exclusive left turn lane ** Shared left turn lane 37- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET Q S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-5 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET LSD T.TD ATn r.n Adjusted LT volume, v ' v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green,. g Secondary green interval, gq ' Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/ (3600 (max (X, 1)) ) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures,ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,QL 1 Residual queue, Qr Uniform delay, di 11 32 0.08 8.00 7.64 57.36 42.00 0.01 0.45 0.17 0.06 0.12 1 0.37 0.07 0.00 • i SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ S. BAYSHORE DR. SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c ' App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio Ratio Ratio EB Lper 0 ------ 545 ----- 0.00 ----- 0.57 ---(vph) 308 ------ -------------- 0.00 ' * Lpro TR 32 401 1624 3270 0.02 0.12 0.07 0.63 113 2076 421# 0.28 0.08# 0.19 WB * L 105 711 0.15 0.55 390 0.27 TR 461 3345 0.14 0.55 1832 0.25 NB * L 251 920 0.27 0.33 304 0.83 ' LT 68 806 0.08 0.33 266 0.26 R 38 1412 0.03 0.33 467 0.08 SB L 6 1276 0.00 0.33 422 0.01 TR 145 1503 0.10 0.33 497 0.29 * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum(v/s)crit = 0.44 Xc = 0.46 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec ' LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --X-- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS Ell L 0.08 TR 0.19 0.63 0.63 6.1 6.6 ---- 0.85 0.85 ----- 421 2076 ----- 16.0 16.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 ----- 5.2 5.7 --- ----- --- B 5.6 B B WB L 0.27 0.55 10.5 0.85 390 16.0 0.1 9.0 B 8.9 B TR 0.25 0.55 10.4 0.85 1832 16.0 0.0 8.8 B NB L 0.83 0.33 26.9 1.00 304 16.0 11.5 38.4 D 33.3 D LT 0.26 0.33 21.4 1.00 266 16.0 0.1 21.5 C R 0.08 0.33 20.1 1.00 467 16.0 0.0 20.1 C SB L 0.01 0.33 19.7 1.00 422 16.0 0.0 19.7 C 21.7 C TR 0.29 0.33 21.7 1.00 497 16.0 0.1 21.8 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 15.0 B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HCM Stumary Resfts for Case: EXST-BST SE 8TFMT. XBRICHELL AUE SE BTH STREET @ SRICHELL AUEMUE 1997 Exstng PM PeaX Vol Uersion 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 11I31 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 + $ I Grp vas vac aeh) S vehl S 11324 EB L *0.11 0.24 12.2 B 12.1 B TR 0 09 0 20 11 9 B I I I �I I UB L LR R IMBT R 0.09 0.70 37.4 D 77.3 F - - - - -- 0.11 0.88 M. 6 E -0 4 1.14 125.4 F 329 *0.26 0.95 44.3 E 43.3 E 103 0.03 0.12 23.5 C 1 204 SB L *0.03 0.47 41.1 E 25.6 D i IL T 0.24 0.66 24.4 C i 6 Int. 0.55 0.59 35.9 D 2 3 3 29 Ir4 i 5d tr 73 841 4 +- r 4112 41 9 7 � 8,11 1 0 0 'SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 J 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1997 Exstng PM PeaK Vol CASE: EXST_8ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 4 2 600 0 0 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 200 SB 5 3 600 2 200 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T' 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU . RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 329 103 204 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 199 0 324 50 1.00 1.00 NB 0 841 73 30 1.00 1.00 SB 85 1131 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 329 103 204 50 WB 199 0 324 50 NB 0 841 73 30 SB 85 1131 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 97-- a I II� C SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 **************************************************************************** SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ---------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB L P NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 6.0 29.0 50.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD % HEAVY VEHICLES ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ' PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR ' PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST L T R 0 0 3 3 NORTH L T R 2 0 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH 50 50 50 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 23.5 23.5 17.5 SOUTH L T R 0 2 3 3 SOUTH N 0 0 N 17.5 9'7-- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util. Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 329 1.00 329 0.90 366 L 366 2 1.00* 366 1.00 0.00 T R 103 204 1.00 1.00 103 204 0.95 108 TR 0.90 171+ 279 2 1.00* 279 0.00 0.61 WB L 199 1.00 199 0.90 221 L 148 1 1.00 148 1.00 0.00 ' T 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 LR 173 1 1.00 173 0.42 0.58 R 324 1.00 324 0.90 304+ R 204 1 1.00 204 0.00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 T 885 2 1.00* 885 0.00 0.00 ' T 841 1.00 841 0.95 885 R 48 1 1.00 48 0.00 1.00 R 73 1.00 73 0.90 48+ SB L 85 1.00 85 0.90 94 L 94 2 1.00* 94 1.00 0.00 T 1131 1.00 1131 0.95 1191 T 1191 3 1.00* 1191 0.00 0.00 R 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 ' + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user - SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg - EB ----- L ---- 1900 --- 2 ----- 1.000 ---- ----- 1.00 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ---- ---- ---- .900 1.00 .950 ---- 3249 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .893 1.00 3054 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LR 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .900 .979 1507 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 ' NB T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1454 SB L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3249 T 1900 3 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 5027 1 9?- 81-1a v 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 8TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio EB * L 366 3249 ----- 0.11 ----- 0.46 ---(vph) ---- 1497 ----Ratio----- 0.24 ' TR 279 3054 0.09 0.46 1407 0.20 ' WB L LR 148 173 1624 1507 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.13 212 r97 0.70 0.88 * R 204 1412 0.14 0.13 184 1.11 ' NB * T 885 3352 0.26 0.28 933 0.95 R 48 1454 0.03 0.28 405 0.12 SB * L 94 3249 0.03 0.06 198 0.47 T 1191 5027 0.24 0.36 1792 0.66 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.55 Xc = 0.59 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec ' LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.24 0.46 14.3 0.85 ----- 1497 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 0.0 12.2 --- B ----- --- 12.1 B ' TR 0.20 0.46 14.0 0.85 1407 16.0 0.0 11.9 B WB L 0.70 0.13 36.4 0.85 212 16.0 6.5 37.4 D 77.3 F LR 0.88 0.13 37.3 0.85 197 16.0 22.9 54.6 E R 1.11 0.13 38.0 0.85 184 16.0 93.1 125.4 F NB T 0.95 0.28 30.9 1.00 933 16.0 13.4 44.3 E 43.3 E R 0.12 0.28 23.5 1.00 405 16.0 0.0 23.5 C ' SE L 0.47 0.06 39.7 1.00 198 16.0 1.4 41.1 E 25.6 D T 0.66 0.36 23.7 1.00 1792 16.0 0.7 24.4 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 35.9 D 97m- 844 HCM Suwary Re is for Case: EXT13 ST SE BT MICMI AVE SE 13TH STREET 9 MICHELL AVENUE 1997 Exstng PM Peals Vol Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - + 1296 t Lane X Delay (sec/ L 0 .Delay L (sec/ 0 2 4 124 t t + Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S 4 t t + L t + 32 EB L 0.05 0.35 33.2 D 35.3 D t t + + "- 316 LT *8.10 0.62 37.4 D t t + + r- 83 R 0.040.25 32.5 D --- - - - - -- UB L 0.05 0.32 32.4 D - F NOW -=sr -------- T *0.191.15 - - t + + R 0.02 0.10 31.0 D 107 - 13B t + MB L *1.76 2.90 - - - F 64 t + TR 0.14 0.23 6.1 B t + f + 236 21 + + 453 SB L 0.05 0.07 5.4 B 8.7 B 1 +�i ►+. J 3 a .+ T 0.40 0.64 9.2 B R 8.14 0.22 6.0 B 69 ++ 4 1 15 4 1 16 4 1 Int. 2.04 2.16 - F 9 7 - 8.4,11 1 0 , 1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 1 1 u u IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1997 Exstng PM PeaK Vol CASE: EXT13 ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 200 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 107 138 64 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 83 316 32 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 236 453 21 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 24 1296 284 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 107 138 64 10 WB 83 316 32 10 NB 236 453 21 10 SB 24� 1296 284 100 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1 9%- 844 1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS --------------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SE LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 69.0 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ---------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 9 % - - 844- SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g ' Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane .Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp_ -- - (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LTRT- EB L 107 1.00 107 0.97 110 L 88 1 1.00 88 1.00 0.00 T 138 1.00 138 0.97 142 LT 164 1 1.00 164 0.13 0.00 R 64 1.00 64 0.97 56+ R 56 1 1.00 56 0.00 1.00 WB L 83 1.00 83 0.97 86 L 86 1 1.00 86 1.00 0.00 T 316 1.00 316 0.97 326 T 326 1 1.00 326 0.00 0.00 R 32 1.00 32 0.97 23+ R 23 1 1.00 23 0.00 1.00 NB L 236 1.00 236 0.96 246 L 246 1 1.00 246 1.00 0.00 T 453 1.00 453 0.96 472 TR 484 2 1.00* 484 0.00 0.02 R 21 1.00 21 0.96 12+ ' SB L 24 1.00 24 0.96 25 L 25 1 1.00 25 1.00 0.00 T 1296 1.00 1296 0.96 1350 T 1350 2 1.00* 1350 0.00 0.00 R 284 1.00 284 0.96 192+ R 192 1 1.00 192 0.00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user- '--------------------SATURATION_FLOW_ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg -- EB ----- L ---- 1900 --- 1 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ---- .900 ---- ---- 1.00 .950 ---- 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .993 1698 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 I WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 T 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 SB L 1900 1 1.000 .1.00 1.000 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 .900 1624 1710 1412 1.00 .082 140 .996 1.00 3338 1.00 .322 551 1.00 1.00 3352 .826 1.00 1412 97- 844 1 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 'SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** ' WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH Vn Wn ?"M n Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT,. PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 'Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs= (875- . 625*vo) /1000, fs>=0 'PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 .5)) ] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g 'fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [l/ (1+PL (EL1-1) )] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 115 115 69.0 69.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 1 1 2 2 246 25 1.00 1.00 1350 484 2.0 2.0 7.86 0.80 21.56 7.73 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 23.80 4.68 48.20 67.32 0.03 0.57 1.00 1.00 8.20 2.90 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.32 0.08 0.32 i SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. iSE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ----------------------------- v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph)Ratio EB L 88 1624 0.05 0.16 --- ---- 254 ---- 0.35 * LT 164 1698 0.10 0.16 266 0.62 R 56 1412 0.04 0.16 221 0.25 ' WB * L T 86 326 1624 1710 0.05 0.19 0.17 0.17 268 283 0.32 1..15 R 23 1412 0.02 0.17 233 0.10 NB * L 246 140 1.76 0.63 88 2.80 TR 484 3338 0.14 0.63 2090 0.23 ' SB L 25 551 0.05 0.63 345 0.07 T 1350 3352 0.40 0.63 2099 0.64 R 192 1412 0.14 0.63 884 0.22 ' * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 2.04 Xc = 2.16 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec ' LEVEL OF ------------------------- ----- Delay 1 - Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.35 0.16 32.9 1.00 ----- 254 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 0.3 33.2 --- ----- --- D 35.3 D ' LT 0.62 0.16 34.4 1.00 266 16.0 3.0 37.4 D R 0.25 0.16 32.4 1.00 221 16.0 0.1 32.5 D ' WB L 0.32 0.17 32.2 1.00 268 16.0 0.2 32.4 D - F T 1.15 0.17 283 16.0 - - - R 0.10 0.17 31.0 1.00 233 16.0 0.0 31.0 D ' NB L 2.80 0.63 - - 88 16.0 - - - - F TR 0.23 0.63 7.1 0.85 2090 16.0 0.0 6.1 B SB L 0.07 0.63 6.4 0.85 345 16.0 0.0 5.4 B 8.7 B T 0.64 0.63 10.2 0.85 2099 16.0 0.5 9.2 B R 0.22 0.63 7.1 0.85 884 16.0 0.0 6.0 B Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 1 97- 844 HCN Summary Re is for Case: EXSTI5RD SE 15Tff RD /BRICKELL AVE SE 15TH RD @ BRICXELL AVE, NO PEDS 1997 Exstng PM PEAR'Vol Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 2834 Lane x (see/ 0 (sect 0 �3 1 44 Grp vrs sic veh) S_ veh) S EB LTR 8.04 8.46 33.2 D 33.2 D i L 13 '°— 43 34 UB LTR *0.85 8.60 36.4 D 36.4 D ________- 15� 43 i t NB L 0.41 8.46 3.3 A1.2 A 45 -76 I TR 0.39 8.45 1.1 A t 40 51 965 SBL 0.280.32 1.3A 4.5A 1 .iji. 2+ , 98 +ili�4 1 7 4 1 Int. 8.88 8.03 5.3 B 97- 'SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 �7 11 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1997 Exstng PM PEAK Vol CASE: EXST15RD INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0 WB 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV, WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 TR 12.0 WB LT 9.0 TR 9.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 15 43 45 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 34 43 13 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 48 965 51 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 44 2034 43 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 15 43 45 10 WB 34 43 13 0 NB 48 965 51 10 SB 44 2034 43 20 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 97-- 841- SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict 1 TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- --- --- --- --- --- -�- --- Green 98.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 ' LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 ' TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R --- ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- --- --- . HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N Y Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 20 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 1 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v ,P g ' e Pak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 15 1.00 15 0.85 18 LTR 110 2 1.05 115 0.16 0.37 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 R 45 1.00 45 0.85 41+ WE L 34 1.00 34 0.85 40 LTR 106 2 1.05 111 0.38 0.14 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 R 13 1.00 13 0.85 15 NB L 48 1.00 48 0.90 53 L 53 1 1.00 53 1.00 0.00 ' T 965 1.00 965 0.90 1072 TR 1118 2 1.05 1174 0.00 0.04 R 51 1.00 51 0.90 46+ SB L 44 1.00 44 0.96 46 L 46 1 1.00 46 1.00 0.00 T 2034 1.00 2034 0.96 2119 TR 2143 2 1.05 2250 0.00 0.01 R 43 1.00 43 0.96 24+ ' + RTOR volume not included _----- SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App, Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- EB ----- LTR ---- 1900 --- 2 ----- 1.000 ---- ----- ---- ---- 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- .900 ---- ---- .935 .898 ---- 2872 WB LTR 1900. 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .975 .786 2123 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .076 130 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .993 1.00 2995 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .097 166 ' TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3010 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** ' -_WORKSHEET- FOR -PERMITTED -LEFT -TURNS -OPPOSED -BY_A_MULTI-LANE -APPROACH -^T-- 1-1T7 T.TT1 w� Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 'Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 'PL=PLT[1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) }] ELl fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g 'fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (1+PL (EL1-1) } ] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N fl 115 115 115 115 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 •2 18 40 53 46 0.16 0.38 1.00 1.00 111 115 2250 1174 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.57 1.28 1.69 1.47 1.77 1.84 35.94 18.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.87## 0.45# 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 1.34 1.46 21.33 4.77 8.13 8.54 79.67 96.23 0.81 0.80 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.52 1.54 10.40 9.85 0.26 0.34 0.04 0.04 0.89 0.66 0.08 0.10 0.90 0.79 n_nR n In # gf for Multi -Lane 1 97 814 • • SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 'SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY -ANALYSIS _WORKSHEET=====_________________ v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio---(vph) ----Ratio----- ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------ EB LTR 115 2872 0.04 0.09 250 0.46 IWB * LTR 111 NB L 53 TR 1174 SB L 46 * TR 2250 2123 0.05 0.09 130 0.41 0.88 2995 0.39 0.88 166 0.28 0.88 3010 0.75 0.88 185 114 2630 146 2644 0.46 0.45 0.32 0.85 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.80 Xc = 0.83 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec ' ------------------------LEVEL -OF- SERVICE -WORKSHEET--_---_--_-----_-----_-^- ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C dl DF c m d2 Delay Delay 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App --- Grp. ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS ' EB LTR 0.46 0.09 37.9 0.85 ----- 250 ----- 16.0 ----- 1.0 ----- 33.2 --- D ----- --- 33.2 D WB LTR 0.60 0.09 38.4 0.85 185 16.0 3.8 36.4 D 36.4 D ' NB L 0.46 0.88 1.1 1.00 114 16.0 2.2 3.3 A 1.2 A TR 0.45 0.88 1.1 1.00 2630 16.0 0.1 1.1 A SB L 0.32 0.88 0.9 1.00 146 16.0 0.4 1.3 A 4.5 A TR 0.85 0.88 2.6 1,00 2644 16.0 2.1 4.6 A Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 5.3 B 97- 8 44 I L Appendix 4: ' FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. iJ P 1 97--841 • ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue From: SE 15 Road To: SE 8 Street EAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: NB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: July 29, 1997 Number of Lanes:4 LD AADT: 23,000 User Notes:1997 Existing Conditions File: 97EXSTNB.WK1 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS -Range- K FACTOR: 0.088 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.650 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 16 0 - 100 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.6 MEDIANS (Y/N): y LEFT TURN BAYS /N SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 2 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P, S, or A) (P=Pretimed, S=Semiactuated, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT C: 0.44 0.20 - 0.80 OUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME udes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 77NE 33 I01eL& ti90§�Ler mile Level of Service B C D E A N/A 600 850 950 2 N/A NIA 1,280 1,750 1,940 3 N/A N/A 1,970 2,680 2,910 4 N/A N/A 2,650 3,620 3,880 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 3$3333 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 930 1,300 1,470 4 N/A N/A 1,970 2,700 2,980 6 NIA N/A 3,020 4,130 4,470 8 NIA NIA 4,080 5,580 5,960 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 333333 Intersectionsper mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 NIA N/A 10,500 14,800 16,700 4 N/A N/A 22,300 30,700 33,900 6 N/A N/A 34,400 46,900 50,800 8 NIA NIA 46,400 63,400 67,800 NIA means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA NIA 0.62 0.87 0.98 2 N/A N/A 0.66 0.90 1.00 3 N/A N/A 0.68 0.92 1.00 4 N/A N/A 0.68 0.94 1.00 0 C, C 1 0 11 ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue From: SE 8th Street To: SE 15 Road EAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: September 15, 1997 Number of Lanes:4 LD AADT: 23,000 User Notes:1997 Existing Conditions File: 97EXSTSB.WK1 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS -Range - K FACTOR: 0.088 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.650 (0.50 -1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 10 0 - 100 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.6 MEDIANS (YIN): y LEFT TURN BAYS /N SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 2 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P, S, or A) (P=Pretimed, S=Semiactuated, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT /C: 0.75 0.20 - 0.80 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.a333.3 Intel iections o _nte Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 1,170 1,390 1,500 1,540 2 N/A 2,440 2,880 3,040 3,080 3 N/A 3,750 4,400 4,590 4,630 4 N/A 5,080 5,930 6,140 6,170 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 333$33_ lOieLee01(9nSr mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 1,800 2,140 2,310 2,370 4 N/A 3,760 4,420 4,680 4,740 6 N/A 5,770 6,760 7,070 7,120 8 NIA 7,810 9,120 9,450 9,490 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 333333 l0ters &Pns oer i Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 20,400 24,300 26,200 27,000 4 N/A 42,700 50,300 53,200 53,900 6 N/A 65,600 76,800 80,300 80,900 8 N/A 88,800 103,600 107,400 107,800 NIA means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.76 0.90 0.97 1.00 2 N/A 0.79 0.93 0.99 1.00 3 N/A 0.81 0.95 0.99 1.00 4 NIA 0.82 0.96 1.00 1.00 Appendix 5: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background and Committed Traffic Conditions �_ Sal NCtt Sumn►ary Resits for Case: BGC_BAYS SE BTH 1S . BAYSFIORE 2688 Background + Coeaaitted Traffic PM Peak Version 1.8 - Lane Grp - - App - 53 Delay L Delay L 1 g 5 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 4 , Grp Yis v/c Leh) S - Leh) S t- q EB Lper 0.8@ 5.8 B do 411 Lpro a6.82 O.BB# 5.3 B 94 TB 6.15 8.23 5.8 B _ _ _ _ _ _ -- ---- - - - - -- WB L *8.18 0.34 9.5 B 9.0 B - - - - - - - TR 6.15 8.27 8.9 B ,,#i 29 270 MB L #8.28 0.85 41.3 E 34.2 D M z LT 0.15 0.44 M. 8 C f R 8.83 0.09 20.2 C 301 57 4 SBL 0.010.02 19.7C 21.9C ij 2+ {- 3 TR 0.10 0.31 22.8 C �ili�4 3 60 q l 35 1 Int. 0.49 0.51 15.3 C #L TOTAL 97- 8�A 1 0 0 n u 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BGC BAY8 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 1 600 1 100 1 100 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 29 270 182 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 94 411 4 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 301 4 57 20 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 SB 5 53 109 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 29 270 182 50 WB 94 411 4 0 NB 301 4 57 20 SB 5 53 109 30 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 97- 844 1 0 0 SI.G/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-2 1 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ------------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 7.0 60.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 I CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 1 WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 -- --- --- 2 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 14.5 14.5 17.5 17.5 1 11- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 1 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g ' Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion ' App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 29 .1.00 29 0.85 34 L 34 1 1.00 34 1.00 0.00 ' T 270 1.00 270 0.85 318 TR 473 2 1.00* 473 0.00 0.33 R 182 1.00 182 0.85 155+ WB L 94 1.00 94 0.85 111 L ill 1 1.00 ill 1.00 0.00 ' T 411 1.00 411 0.85 484 TR 489 2 1.00* 489 0.00 0.01 R 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 ' NB L 301 1.00 301 0.85 354 L 248 1 -1.00 248 1.00 0.00 T 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 LT ill 1 1.00 111 0.95 0.00 R 57 1.00 57 0.85 43+ R 43 1 1.00 43 0.00 1.00 ' SB L 5 1.00 5 0.85 6 L 6 1 1.00 6 1.00 0.00 T 53 1.00 53 0.85 62 TR 155 1 1.00 155 0.00 0.60 R 109 1.00 109 0.85 93+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg -- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB Lper .298 510 Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 ' TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .943 1.00 3225 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .352 602 ' TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3345 ' NB L 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .528 885 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .454 761 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .627 1072 TR 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .896 1.00 1502 97- � � I 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic' SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB* SE Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 115 115 Actual Green, G 70.0 60.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 65.0 63.0 38.0 38.0 Opposing -Effective Green, go 63.0 73.0 38.0 38.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 1 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 34 ill 354 6 Proportion of LT, PLT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 489 473 155 111 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 1.09 3.55 11.31 0.19 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 7.81 7.55 4.95 3.55 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.45 0.37 0.67 0.67 gq 8.17 0.00 5.26 3.06 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 56.83 63.00 32.74 34.94 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0- 0.57 0.58 0.78 0.81 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5) )] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 EL1 2.93 2.84 1.63 1.47 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.11 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/(1+PL(EL1-1) )] 0.30 0.35 0.53 0.63 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 0.30 0.35 0.53 0.63 WORKSHEET FOR A SECOND LANE GROUP EB WB NB** SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 Actual Green, G 35.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 38.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 38.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 354 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.95 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 155 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 11.31 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 4.95 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, q-ro=l-Rpo*(go/C) 0.67 gq 5.26 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 32.74 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.78 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 .5) )] 0.95 EL1 1.94 fmin=2*(l+PL)/g 0.10 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/(l+PL (EL1-1) )] 0.45 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.45 * Exclusive left turn lane ** Shared left turn lane ; 9'�- 844 7 F� M • SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-5 **************************************************************************** ------------------SUPPLEMENTARY UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET L+D T.Tn TTT r1T Adjusted LT volume, v v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary green interval, gq Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures, ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,QL Residual queue, Qr Uniform delay, di 34 0.08 8.00 8.17 56.83 42.00 0.01 0.45 0.16 0.07 0.13 1 0.40 0.08 0.00 F '19 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. '2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB Lper 0 510 ----- 0.00 ----- 0.57 ------------ 288 -------------- 0.00 * Lpro 34 1624 0.02 0.07 113 401# 0.30 0.08# ' TR 473 3225 0.15 0.63 2047 0.23 ' WE * L TR 111 489 602 3345 0.18 0.15 0.55 0.55 330 1832 0.34 0.27 ' NB * L 248 885 0.28 0.33 292 0.85 LT 111 761 0.15 0.33 251 0.44 R 43 1412 0.03 0.33 467 0.09 SE L 6 1072 0.01 0.33 354 0.02 TR 155 1502 0'.10 0.33 496 0.31 ' * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum(v/s)crit = 0.49 Xc = 0.51 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec ' LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) Fact ----- ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.08 0.63 6.2 0.85 ----- 401 ----- ----- 16.0 0.0 ----- 5.3 --- ----- --- B 5.8 B ' TR 0.23 0.63 6.8 0.85 2047 16.0 0.0 5.8 B WE L 0.34 0.55 11.0 0.85 330 16.0 0.2 9.5 B 9.0 B TR 0.27 0.55 10.5 0.85 1832 16.0 0.0 8.9 B NB L 0.85 0.33 27.2 1.00 292 16.0 14.0 41.3 E 34.2 D LT 0.44 0.33 22.9 1.00 251 16.0 0.8 23.8 C ' R 0.09 0.33 20.2 1.00 467 16.0 0.0 20.2 C SB L 0.02 0.33 19.7 1.00 354 16.0 0.0 19.7 C 21.9 C TR 0.31 0.33 21.8 1,00 496 16.0 0.1 22.0 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 15.3 C 1 9' � 844 HCM Summary ResMs for Case: .BGC-BST SE BTHMST. /BRICMI AVE 2000 Background $ Committed Traffic PH Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay LIBe I I Lane K (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 } 9I4 Grp ups v/c veh) S -veh) S 4 it 1 L I I I I 361 EB L *0.12 0.26 12.3 B 12.0 B III TR 0.87 0.15 11.6 B II II 211 UB L 8.12 0.8B 54.1 E - F ' - ` ' ' _IYJ LA 0.08 0.59 33.8 D - - - - ---� R *0.20 1.50 - - I I 349�111 I MB T *0.28 1.01 57.6 E 55.8 E 143 I I I I R 0.04 0.13 23.6 C 117 z I I I 177 I I f SE L *0.03 0.53 41.9 E 26.3 D i IL 2 1 3 4 T 0.25 0.70 25.1 D ,- 6 3 29 Ir4 1 5d 4 1 12 4 1 Int. 0.63 0.68 - F 97- 841 H SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 **************************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: 2000 BGC INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ----------- LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 4 2 600 0 0 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 200 SB 5 3 600 2 200 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 349 143 117 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 211 0 361 50 1.00 1.00 NB 0 899 77 30 1.00 1.00 SB 94 1200 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 349 143 117 50 WB 211 0 361 50 NB 0 899 77 30 SB 94 1200 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 1 97- 8a1-1 H 0 L 1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB L P NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 6.0 29.0 50.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS - ------------------ AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST L T. R 0 0 3 3 NORTH L T R 2 0 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH 50 50 50 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 23.5 23.5 17.5 SOUTH L T R 0 2 3 3 SOUTH 0 N 0 0 N 17.5 1 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 '2000-Background **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v ,P g Peak Lane U v ' Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp_ (vph) Lns Fact (vph) -LT- -RT- EB L 349 1.00 349 0.90 388 L 388 2 1.00* 388 1.00 0.00 T 143 1.00 143 0.95 151 TR 225 2 1.00* 225 0.00 0.33 ' R 117 1.00 117 0.90 74+ WE L 211 1.00 211 0.90 234 L 187 1 1.00 187 1.00 0.00 T 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 LR 116 1 1.00 116 0.41 0.59 ' R 361 1.00 361 0.90. 345+ R 276 1 1.00 276 0.00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 T 946 2 1.00* 946 0.00 0.00 ' T 899 1.00 899 0.95 946 R 53 1 1.00 53 0.00 1.00 R 77 1.00 77 0.90 53+ ' SB L 94 1.00 94 0.90 104 L 104 2 1.00* 104 1.00 0.00 T 1200 1.00 1200 0.95 1263 T 1263 3 1.00* 1263 0.00 0.00 R 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1900 --- 2 ----- 1.000 ---- ----- 1.00 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ---- .900 ---- 1.00 ---- .950 ---= 3249 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .943 1.00 3225 WE L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LR 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .897 .980 1503 ' R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 NB T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1454 SB L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3249 T 1900 3 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 5027 9%- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * L 388 3249 0.12 0.46 --- 1497 ---- ---- 0.26 TR 225 3225 0.07 0.46 1486 0.15 WB L 187 1624 0.12 0.13 212 0.88 LR 116 1503 0.08 0.13 196 0.59 * R 276 1412 0.20 0.13 184 1.50 NB * T 946 3352 0.28 0.28 933 1.01 R 53 1454 0.04 0.28 405 0.13 SB * L 104 3249 0.03 0.06 198 0.53 T 1263 5027 0.25 0.36 1792 0.70 * Critical Lane Group Sum (v/s)crit = 0.63 Xc = 0.68 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle,L = 8.0 Sec LEVEL OF =i== SERVICE WORKSHEET =2======-Ln _----App Delay ------ --- Delay --- Grp X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) Fact ----- ---- (vph) ----- Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS ' EB L 0.26 TR 0.15 0.46 0.46 14.4 0.85 13.7 0.85 1497 1486 ----- ----- 16.0 16.0 ----- 0.0 12.3 0.0 11.6 --- ----- --- B 12.0 B B WB L 0.88 0.13 37.3 0.85 212 16.0 22.3 54.1 E - F LR 0.59 0.13 35.8 0.85 196 16.0 3.4 33.8 D R 1.50 0.13 - - 184 16.0 - - - NB T 1.01 0.28 31.5 1.00 933 16.0 26.1 57.6 E 55.8 E R 0.13 0.28 23.6 1.00 405 16.0 0.0 23.6 C SB L 0.53 0.06 39.8 1.00 198 16.0 2.0 41.9 E 26.3 D T 0.70 0.36 24.2 1.00 1792 16.0 0.9 25.1 D 1 Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 1 9 7 - 844 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 HCM Summary Rests for Case: BGC-BST SE 131 2000 Background + Committed Traffic PH Peak - Lane Grp - - Apg - 1375 Delay L Delay L Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 1 2 Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S EB L 0.06 0.39 33.7 D 37.1 D LT *9.11 0.70 40.4 E R 0.04 0.27 32.6 D UB L 0.06 0.35 32.6 D - F T *8.21 1.26 - -------- R 0.02 0.11 31_.0 D 114� 164 NB L *t.97 3.13 - - - F 68 -i TR 0.16 0.25 6.2 B T /BR ICIt U AVE Version 1.0 � I I I I I I I I 34 346 IIiI I 90 ---------- I (}I I I I I I I ► I I I I 250 24 483 SBL O.B5B.B8 5.5B 9.2B 1 4111 21 3 T 0.43 0.68 9.7 B #iji. r R 0.15 0.24 6.1 B 69 ii 4 1 1 4 1 16 4 1 Int. 2.29 2.41 - F 97 - 841-1 1 0 0 n r I F L I SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BGC 13ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES .(FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 200 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 114 164 68 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 90 346 34 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 250 483 24 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 25 1375 301 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 114 164 68 10 WB 90 346 34 10 NB 250 483 24 10 SB 25 1375 301 100 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 9 "� " �I 1 I SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A AITNERS, INC. 2000.Background + Committed Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 69.0 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS --------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 1 9%-- 844 ® • SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- EB L 114 1.00 114 0.97 118 L 100 1 1.00 100 1.00 0.00 T 164 1.00 164 0.97 169 LT 187 1 1.00 187 0.10 0.00 R 68 1.00 68 0.97 60+ R 60 1 1.00 60 0.00 1.00 WB L 90 1.00 90 0.97 93 L 93 1 1.00 93 1.00 0.00 T 346 1.00 346 0.97 357 T 357 1 1.00 357 0.00 0.00 R 34 1.00 34 0.97 25+ R 25 1 1.00 25 0.00 1.00 ' NB L 250 1.00 250 0.96 260 L 260 1 1.00 260 1.00 0.00 T 483 1.00 483 0.96 503 TR 518 2 1.00* 518 0.00 0.03 R 24 1.00 24 0.96 15+ SB L 25 1.00 25 0.96 26 L 26 1 1.00 26 1.00 0.00 T 1375 1.00 1375 0.96 1432 T 1432 2 1.00* 1432 0.00 0.00 R 301 1.00 301 0.96 210+ R 210 1 1.00 210 0.00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ------------------------------- ------------ ---------------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00. .995 1701 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 i T 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .077 132 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .995 1.00 3335 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .298 510 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 97- 844 t , , SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 Actual Green, G 69.0 69.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 72.0 72.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 72.0 72.0 Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No 1 2 1 2' Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 260 26 Proportion of LT, PLT 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 1432 518 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 8.31 0.83 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 22.87 8.27 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 gf=G** (-0.860*LTC**.629) -tL, gf<=g 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.37 0.37 yq 26.40 5.23 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 45.60 66.77 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.00 0.55 PL=PLT [1+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5) } ] 1.00 1.00 EL1 8.20 3.11 fmin=2* (1+PL) /g 0.06 0.06 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ { 1+PL (EL1-1) } ] 0.08 0.30 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 0.08 0.30 11 n 1 9?- Sid SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio EB L 100 1624 0.06 0.16 ---(vph)---- 254 ----Ratio---- 0.39 * LT R 187 60 1701 1412 0.11 0.04 0.16 0.16 266 221 0.70 0.27 WB L 93 1624 0.06 0.17 268 0.35 * T 357 1710 0.21 0.17 283 1.26 R 25 1412 0.02 0.17 233 0.11 NB * L 260 132 1.97 0.63 83 3.13 TR 518 3335 0.16 0.63 2088 0.25 SB L 26 510 0.05 0.63 319 0.08 T 1432 3352 0.43 0.63 2099 0.68 R 210 1412 0.15 0.63 884 0.24 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 2.29 Xc = 2.41 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.39 0.16 33.1 ---- 1.00 ----- 254 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 0.5 33.7 --- ----- --- D 37.1 D ' LT 0.70 0.16 34.9 1.00 266 16.0 5.5 40.4 E R 0.27 0.16 32.5 1.00 221 16.0 0.2 32.6 D WB L 0.35 0.17 32.3 1.00 268 16.0 0.3 32.6 D - F T 1.26 0.17 283 16.0 - - R 0.11 0.17 31.0 1.00 233 16.0 0.0 31.0 D NB L 3.13 0.63 - - 83 16.0 - - - - F TR 0.25 0.63 7.2 0.85 2088 16.0 0.0 6.2 B SB L 0.08 0.63 6.4 0.85 319 16.0 0.0 5.5 B 9.2 B T 0.68 0.63 10.7 0.85 2099 16.0 0.7 9.7 B ' R 0.24 0.63 7.2 0.85 884 16.0 0.0 6.1 B Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 1 97- 844 HCM Summary Rests for Case: BGC-15RD SE 15TnD /BRICMI AVE 2888 Background + Committed Traffic PH Peak Version 1.8 - Lane Grp - - App - I .Delay L Delay L 2160 6 47 Lane K (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 � t Grp v/s vlc veh) S veh) S t I L EB LTR *0.86 0.74 41.9 E 41.9 E t i 14 47 t I IV— 39 WB LTR 8.86 0.72 42.7 E 42.7 E -- - - - - -—--- - -_ - - - 52 I I I lilt 47 I I � NB L 8.45 8.51 4.3 A 1.3 A 48 �' I TR 8.39 0.45 1.2 A t i 51 54 I 1831 SBL 0.300.35 1.5A 4.9A 1 2+ yili` +_ TR *0. 76 0.86 4.9 A i �ili;4 ff "'— 98 1 7 4 1 Int. 8..82 0.85 6.4 B 97- 844 0 I I I SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 Background + Committed Traffic SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BGC 15RD INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0 WE 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 TR 12.0 WB LT 9.0 TR 9.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 52 47 ----- 48 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 39 47 14 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 51 1031 54 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 47 2160 46 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 52 47 48 10 WB 39 47 14 0 NB 51 1031 54 20 SB 47 2160 46 20 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 1 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL -SETTINGS -=- OPERATIONAL -ANALYSIS ----------------------�--------- CONTROL TYPE . SEMI -ACTUATED i _____________________PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED --------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- --- --- --- --- --- -�- --- Green 98.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------------------------------------------------------ AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- L T R L --- ---- T R ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 --- --- 0 --- 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING 0 N 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 20 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 1 97- 844 � ® i SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC.. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 52 1.00 52 0.85 61 LTR 160 2 1.00* 160 0.38 0.28 T 47 1.00 47 0.85 55 R 48 1.00 48 0.85 44+ WE L 39 1.00 39 0.85 46 LTR 117 2 1.00* 117 0.39 0.14 T 47 1.00 47 0.85 55 R 14 1.00 14 0.85 16 NB L 51 1.00 51 0.90 57 L 57 1 1.00 57 1.00 0.00 T 1031 1.00 1031 0.90 1146 TR 1184 2 1.00* 1184 0.00 0.03 R 54 1.00 54 0.90 38+ SB L 47 1.00 47 0.96 49 L 49 1 1.00 49 1.00 0.00 T 2160 1.00 2160 0.96 2250 TR 2277 2 1.00* 2277 0.00 0.01 R 46 1.00 46 0.96 27+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB LTR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .952 .759 2471 WB LTR NB L TR SB L TR 1900 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .976 .691 1868 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .075 128 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 2998 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .095 162 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000. .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3010 97- 844 r P 1 11 I SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, NERS INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT [l+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) }] EL1 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [l/ { 1+PL (EL1-1) } ] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N LID TIM TTn nn 115 115 115 115 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2. 61 46 57 49 0.38 0.39 1.00 1.00 117 160 2277 1184 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.95 1.47 1.82 1.57 1.87 2.56 36.37 18.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00# 0.19# 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 1.53 2.88 22.10 4.86 8.47 7.12 78.90 96.14 0.80 0.77 0.00 0.14 0.72 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.55 1.73 10.40 10.06 0.34 0.36 0.04 0.04 0.61 0.47 0.08 0.09 0.76 0.69 0.08 0.09 # gf for Multi -Lane 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-Background + Committed Traffic SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY _ANALYSIS _WORKSHEET=====_________________ v s V/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c t App. Group --__ _-_-- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * LTR 160 2471 ----- 0.06 ----- 0.09 ____________ 215 ______________ 0.74 WB LTR 117 1868 0.06 0.09 162 0.72 ' NB L 57 128 0.45 0.88 112 0.51 TR 1184 2998 0.39 0.88 2633 0.45 SB L 49 162 0.30 0.88 142 0.35 * TR 2277 3010 0.76 0.88 2644 0.86 * Critical Lane Group Sum (v/s)crit = 0.82 Xc = 0.85 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec ------------------------LEVEL -OF- SERVICE _WORKSHEET--------_-----_---__-_--- ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LTR 0.74 0.09 39.0 ---- 0.85 ----- 215 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 8.8 41.9 --- ----- --- E 41.9 E ' WB LTR 0.72 0.09 38.9 0.85 162 16.0 9.7 42.7 E 42.7 E NB L 0.51 0.88 1.2 1.00 112 16.0 3.1 4.3 A 1.3 A TR 0.45 0.88 1.1 1.00 2633 16.0 0.1 1.2 A r SB L 0.35 0.88 0.9 1.00 142 16.0 0.6 1.5 A 4.9 A TR 0,86 0,88 2.7 1,00 2644 16.0 2.3 4.9 A Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 6.4 B ' 97 - 844 n Appendix 6: SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions 1 97- 8 ' HCH Summary ResaM for Case: BCP BAY SE OTHTT. /S. BAYSHORE 2000 BG + Com + Project Traffic PM Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - 53 Delay L Delay L 119 � 5 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 I Grp v/s v✓c Leh) S Leh) S q EB Lper 0.00 5.9 B '°`- 411 Lpro *0.02 0.09# 5.3 B 96 TR 0.170.26 6.0B UB L *0.21 0.39 10.1 B 9.1 B - ------ - TR 6.15 0.27 8.9 B 29 i 270 -` HB L *0.27 0.BB 36.9 D 32.2 D 232 J LT 0.21 0.64 28.7 D t R 0.03 0.10 20.2 C- 332 59 4 SB L 0.01 0.02 19.7 C 21.9 C � 2 3 , TR 0.10 0.31 22.0 C +ili�4 � 3 60 �} 1 35 1 Int. 6.50 0.53 15.0 C #L TOTAL 9_.1 o a d LJ J SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCP BAY INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WE 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 1 600 1 100 1 100 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WE L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 29 270 ----- 232 ---- 50 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WE 96 411 4 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 332 4 59 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 5 53 109 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 29 270 232 50 WE 96 411 4 0 NB 332 4 59 20 SB 5 53 109 30 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 97- 84 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-2 SIGNAL -SETTINGS -=- OPERATIONAL -ANALYSIS -------------------------------- CONTROL TYPE . SEMI -ACTUATED ---------------------PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP LTP WB LTP NB LTP ' SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------= --- --- --- --- -5- --- -�- --- Green 7.0 60.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ----------------------------------------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R --- ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- --- --- o HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 2 0 --- --- --- 2 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 2 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 CURB PARKING N 0 0 N N 0 N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 14.5 14.5 17.5 17.5 .8441 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 1 2000-BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v -P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion ' App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 29 1.00 29 0.85 34 L 34 1 1.00 34 1.00 0.00 T R 270 232 1.00 1.00 270 232 0.85 318 TR 0.85 214+ 532 2 1.00* 532 0.00 0.40 WB L 96 1.00 96 0.85 113 L 113 1 1.00 113 1.00 0.00 T 411 1.00 411 0.85 484 TR 489 2 1.00* 489 0.00 0.01 R 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 NB L 332 1.00 332 0.85 391 L 235 1 1.00 235 1.00 0.00 T 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 LT 161 1 1.00 161 0.97 0.00 R 59 1.00 59 0.85 45+ R 45 1 1.00 45 0.00 1_00 ' SB L 5 1.00 5 0..85 6 L 6 1 1.00 6 1.00 0.00 T 53 1.00 53 0.85 62 TR 155 1 1.00 155 0.00 0.60 R 109 1.00 109 0.85 93+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user -------------SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ---------------------------------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- EB ----- Lper ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- .298 ---- 510 Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 ' TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .930 1.00 3181 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .313 535 ' TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3345 NB L 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .528 885 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .451 756 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 SE L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .516 882 TR 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .896 1.00 1502 I S7'--- 844 1 E fl SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000,BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-4 **************************************************************************** --WORKSHEET- FOR -PERMITTED -LEFT -TURNS -OPPOSED -BY-A- MULTI -LANE -APPROACH ----- 'VD T.TD TTT1 i nn Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G** (-0.860*LTC**.629) -tL, gf<=g Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs= (875- . 625*vo) /1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT[l+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) )] EL1 fmin=2*(l+PL)/g fm= [gf /g] + [gu/g] [ l/ (l+PL (ELl -1)) ] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N WORKSHEET FOR A SECOND LANE GROUP 115 115 115 115 70.0 60.0 35.0 35.0 65.0 63.0 38.0 38.0 63.0 73.0 38.0 38.0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 34 113 391 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 489 532 155 161 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.09 3.61 12.49 0.19 7.81 8.50 4.95 5.-14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.37 0.67 0.67 8.17 0.00 5.26 5.56 56.83 63.00 32.74 32.44 0.57 0.54 0.78 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 3.19 1.63 1.65 0.06 0.06 0.11 0._11 0.30 0.31 0.53 0.52 0.30 0.31 0.53 0.52 EB WB NB** SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 Actual Green, G 35.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 38.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 38.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 391 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.97 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 155 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 12.49 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 4.95 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.67 gq 5.26 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 32.74 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.78 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) )] 0.97 EL1 1.94 fmin=2*(l+PL)/g 0.10 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/(1+PL (EL1-1) )] 0.45 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.45 * Exclusive left turn lane ** Shared left turn lane 97- 844 11 I u 11 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000,BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-5 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Vn r.m Adjusted LT volume, v v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary green interval, gq Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures, ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,QL Residual queue, Qr Uniform delav, di 34 0.08 8.00 8.17 56.83 42.00 0.01 0.45 0.16 0.07 0.13 1 0.40 0.08 0.00 ti 1 4 97_ 8441 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C--------c-------------X------- Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c ' App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio Ratio EB Lper 0 510 0.00 0.57 ---(vph)---- 288 0.00 ' * Lpro TR 34 532 1624 3181 0.02 0.17 0.07 0.63 113 2019 401# 0.30 0.08# 0.26 WB * L 113 535 0.21 0.55 293 0.39 ' TR 489 3345 0.15 0.55 1832 0.27 NB * L 235 885 0.27 0.33 292 0.80 LT 161 756 0.21 0.33 250 0.64 R 45 1412 0.03 0.33 467 0.10 ' SB L 6 882 0.01 0.33 291 0.02 TR 155 1502 0.10 0.33 496 0.31 ' * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum(v/s)crit = 0.50 Xc = 0.53 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay - Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) Fact ----- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS Ell L 0.08 TR 0.26 0.63 0.63 ---- 6.2 0.85 7.0 0.85 ----- 401 2019 ----- 16.0 16.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 ----- 5.3 6.0 --- ----- --- B 5.9 B B WB L 0.39 0.55 11.3 0.85 293 16.0 0.4 10.1 B 9.1 B TR 0.27 0.55 10.5 0.85 1832 16.0 0.0 8.9 B NB L 0.80 0.33 26.7 1.00 292 16.0 10.3 36.9 D 32.2 D LT 0.64 0.33 24.9 1.00 250 16.0 3.9 28.7 D R 0.10 0.33 20.2 1.00 467 16.0 0.0 20.2 C SB L 0.02 0.33 19.7 1.00 291 16.0 0.0 19.7 C 21.9 C TR 0.31 0.33 21.8 1.00 496 16.0 0.1 22.0 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 15.0 C 9'� 844 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HCM SumMary Rests for Case: BGCP-BST SE BT[M . /BRICKELL AVE 2000 BG + Com + Project Traffic PM Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - lase Delay L Delay L ti Lane k (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 9 Grp Vas V/c Veh) S -veh) S EB L *0.12 0.26 12.3 B 12.1 B TR 0.08 0.10 11.8 B WE L LR R I MB T R 0.10 0.77 42.1 E - F - - - - -- 0.11 0.05 51.0 E _ - - - -- _V, *8.16 1.23 - - 349 *8.28 1.02 59.9 E 58.8 E 190 0.02 0.07 23.2 C 117 SB L *0.03 0.55 42.3 E 26.4 D 1 IL T 0.25 0.70 25.1 D i 6 Int . 0.60 0.64 - F Z rr 3 29 1415d t-- 392 211 r 177 906 4112 41 - 844 0 tSIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 1 H IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BGCP 8ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 4 2 600 0 0 0 0 WB 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 200 SB 5 3 600 2 200 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH --------------------- ------------------------------------------ EB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- RTOR ---- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 349 190 117 50 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WE 211 0 392 100 1.00 1.00 NB 0 906 77 50 1.00 1.00 SB 98 1200 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 349 190 117 50 WB 211 0 392 100 NB 0 906 77 50 SB 98 1200 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. ' 2000,BG + Com + Project .Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 H SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ---------------------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB L P NB TR SE LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 6.0 29.0 50.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS -------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 1 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR ' PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR ' PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST L T R 0 0 3 3 NORTH L T R 2 0 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH 50 50 50 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 23.5 23.5 17.5 SOUTH L T R 0 2 3 3 SOUTH 0 N 0 0 N 17.5 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v -P g ' Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 349 1.00 349 0.90 388 L 388 2 1.00* 388 1.00 0.00 T 190 1.00 190 0.95 200 TR 274 2 1.00* 274 0.00 0.27 ' R 117 1.00 117 0.90 74+ WB L 211 1.00 211 0.90 234 L 164 1 1.00 164 1.00 0.00 ' T 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 LR 168 1 1.00 168 0.42 0.58 R 392 1.00 392 0.90 325+ R 227 1 1.00 227 0.00 1-00 NB L 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 T 954 2 1.00* 954 0.00 0.00 T 906 1.00 906 0.95 954 R 30 1 1.00 30 0.00 1.00 R 77 1.00 77 0.90 30+ ' SB L 98 1.00 98 0.90 109 L 109 2 1.00* 109 1.00 0.00 T 1200 1.00 1200.0.95 1263 T 1263 3 1.00* 1263 0.00 0.00 R 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user ----------------.----SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg -- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3249 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.0'0 .900 .953 1.00 3259 1 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LR 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .899 .980 1-507 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 NB T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1454 1 SB L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3-249 T 1900 3 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 5027 ' ��[YA ge SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. + Com + Project Traffic SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 '2000-BG **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c ' App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio EB * L 388 3249 0.12 0.46 --- 1497 ---- ------- 0.26 ' TR 274 3259 0.08 0.46 1502 0.18 WB L 164 1624 0.10 0.13 212 0.77 ' LR 168 1507 0.11 0.13 197 0.85 * R 227 1412 0.16 0.13 184 1.23 NB * T 954 3352 0.28 0.28 933 1.02 ' R 30 1454 0.02 0.28 405 0.07 ' SB * L 109 3249 0.03 0.06 198 0.55 T 1263 5027 0.25 0.36 1792 0.70 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.60 Xc = 0.64 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C d1 DF c m d2 Delay Delay- 'Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) ----- Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.26 0.46 14.4 0.85 1497 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 0.0 12.3 --- ----- --- B 12.1 B TR 0.18 0.46 13.9 0.85 1502 16.0 0.0 11.8 B ' WE L 0.77 0.13 36.8 0.85 212 16.0 10.8 42.1 E - F LR 0.85 0.13 37.2 0.85 197 16.0 19.4 51.0 E R 1.23 0.13 - - 184 16.0 - - - e+ NB T 1.02 0.28 31.5 1.00 933 16.0 28.4 59.9 E 58.8 E R 0.07 0.28 23.2 1.00 405 16.0 0.0 23.2 C SB L 0.55 0.06 39.9 1.00 198 16.0 2.5 42.3 E 26.4 D T 0.70 0.36 24.2 1.00 1792 16.0 0.9 25.1 D Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 97- 844 HCM Summary ResWs 2000 BG + Comm + for Case: BCP_138T SE M Project Traffic PM Peak /BEICRU AVE Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - 1375 ti Delay L Delay L 1 1 Lane X (see/ 0 (seer 0 1 25 r Grp v/s a/c weh) S veh) S 34 EB L 0.06 0.37 33.4 D 41.8 E 366 LT *6.13 0.82 47.9 E 94 R 0.04 0.27 32.6 D -------- --------- UB L 0.06 0.36 32.8 D - F - _:F. - T *0.22 1.33 - - I R 0.01 0.06 30.8 D i14 188 MB L *1.97 3.13 - - - F 68 TR 0.16 0.25 6.2 B I t 250 28 495 SB L 0.05 0.08 5.5 B 9.2 B 1 i�i. 2- . T 0.43 0.68 9.7 B R 0.15 0.24 6.1 B 69 4 1 1� 4 1 16 4 1 Int. 2.32 2.45 - F 1 9 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 **************************************************************************** 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ' WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCP 13ST d 7 L INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 200 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT ----------------------------- TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- RTOR LEFT -------------- THRU RIGHT EB 114 188 68 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 94 366 34 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 250 485 28 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 25 1375 301 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 114 188 68 10 WB 94 366 34 20 NB 250 485 28 10 SB 25 1375 301 100 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 9 7- 1 0 - 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. ' 2000-BG + Comm + Project Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 n 1 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ----------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 Green 69.0 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS --------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 11 EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g ' Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- EB L 114 1.00 114 0.97 118 L 94 1 1.00 94 1.00 0.00 ' T 188 1.00 188 0.97 194 LT 218 1 1.00 218 0.11 0.01 R 68 1.00 68 0.97 60+ R 60 1 1.00 60 0.00 1.00 WE L 94 1.00 94 0.97 97 L 97 1 1.00 97 1.00 0.00 T 366 1.00 366 0.97 377 T 377 1 1.00 377 0.00 0.00 R 34 1.00 34 0.97 14+ R 14 1 1.00 14 0.00 1.00 NB L 250 1.00 250 0.96 260 L 260 1 1.00 260 1.00 0.00 T 485 1.00 485 0.96 505 TR 524 2 1.00* 524 0.00 0.04 R 28 1.00 28 0.96 19+ ' SB L 25 1.00 25 0.96 26 L 26 1 1.00 26 1.00 0.00 T 1375 1.00 1375 0.96 1432 T 1432 2 1.00* 1432 0.00 0.00 R 301 1.00 301 0.96 210+ R 210 1 1.00 210 0.00 1.00 ' + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1-00 .900 1.00 .995 1701 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 WE L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 T 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 2710 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .077 132 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 3331 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .295 504 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 ' 97� 844 1 0 . 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000�BG + Comm + Project Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH r: n r.Tn wTn 1. r. Cycle Length C, (sec) ' Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 ' Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 1 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 '. PL=PLT[1+{ (N-1) *g/(fs*gu+4.5) }] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ { 1+PL (EL1-1) } ] fLT = [fm + .91 '* (N-1) ] / N 11 f� 115 115 69.0 69.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 1 1 2 2 260 26 1.00 1.00 1432 524 2.0 2.0 8.31 0.83 22.87 8.37 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 26.40 5.33 45.60 66.67 0.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 8.20 3.14 0.06 0.06 0.08 0_29 0.08 0.29 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Traffic SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY -ANALYSIS -WORKSHEET=====_________________ v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio Ratio EB L 94 1624 ----- 0.06 ----- 0.16 ---(vph) ------ 254 -------------- 0.37 * LT R 218 60 1701 1412 0.13 0.04 0.16 0.16 266 221 0.82 0.27 WB L 97 1624 0.06 0.17 268 0.36 * T 377 1710 0.22 0.17 283 1.33 R 14 1412 0.01 0.17 233 0.06 NB * L 260 132 1.97 0.63 83 3.13 TR 524 3331 0.16 0.63 2085 0.25 SB L 26 504 0.05 0.63 316 0.08 T 1432 3352 0.43 0.63 2099 0.68 R 210 1412 0.15 0.63 884 0.24 1 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 2.32 Xc = 2.45 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ---------------- ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay 1 Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L LT 0.37 0.82 0.16 0.16 33.0 35.7 1.00 1.00 ----- 254 266 ----- ----- 16.0 16.0 ----- 0.4 33.4 12.3 47.9 --- ----- --- D 41.8 E E R 0.27 0.16 32.5 1.00 221 16.0 0.2 32.6 D ' WB L 0.36 0.17 32.4 1.00 268 16.0 0.4 32.8 D - F T 1.33 0.17 283 16.0 R 0.06 0.17 30.8 1.00 233 16.0 0.0 30.8 D NB L 3.13 0.63 - - 83 16.0 - - - - F TR 0.25 0.63 7.3 0.85 2085 16.0 0.0 6.2 B SB L 0.08 0.63 6.4 0.85 316 16.0 0.0 5.5 B 9.2 B T 0.68 0.63 10.7 0.85 2099 16.0 0.7 9.7 B ' R 0.24 0.63 7.2 0.85 884 16.0 0.0 6.1 B Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 1 97- 844 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HCH Summary ResW for Case: BCP_ M SE 15 D ,BRICKELL AVE 2886 BG + Comm + Project Traffi PH Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 2163 5147 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sect 0 I i Grp v/s vic veh) S veh) S I L EB LTR 0.07 0.76 43.3 E 43.3 E I I 14 49 I i i 43 ---------I�--------- UB LTR #8.07 0.79 48.2 E 48.2 EI--- - - - - - - NB L 0.45 0.51 4.3 A TR 0.40 0.45 1.2 A SB L 0.31 0.36 1.6 A TR *0.76 0.86 5.0 A Int . 0.03 0.06 6.7 B I 52 48 —' I I 1.3 A 481 i I I I 4.9 A 1 .1�i, 2 + , - 98 ili 4 1 7 4 ---------- I tf 51 54 1041 97- �a 1 0 0 iSIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Traffi SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 F1 L r C 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCP 15RD INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0 WB 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT 12.0 TR 12.0 WB LT 9.0 TR 9.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 52 48 ----- 48 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 43 49 14 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 51 1041 54 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 47 2163 46 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 52 48 48 10 WB 43 49 14 0 NB 51 1041 54 20 SB 47 2163 46 20 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. ' 2000-BG + Comm + Project Traffi SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED ---------------------PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED --------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP ' SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -1- --- --- --- --- Green 98.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --- -�- 0.0 0.0 --- 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 ' LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 ' TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R --- --- ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- --- o HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 ' PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 CURB PARKING N 0 0 Y Y 0 Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 20 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 ' PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 1 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Traffi SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v p g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 52 1.00 52 0.85 61 LTR 161 2 1.00* 161 0.38 0.27 T 48 1.00 48 0.85 56 R 48 1.00 48 0.85 44+ WB L 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 LTR 125 2 1.00* 125 0.41 0.13 T 49 1.00 49 0.85 58 R 14 1.00 14 0.85 16 ' NB L 51 1.00 51 0.90 57 L 57 1 1.00 57 1.00 0.00 T 1041 1.00 1041 0.90 1157 TR 1195 2. 1.00* 1195 0.00 0.03 R 54 1.00 54 0.90 38+ ' SB L 47 1.00 47 0.96 49 L 49 1 1.00 49 1.00 0.-00 T 2163 1.00 2163 0.96 2253 TR 2280 2 1.00* 2280 0.00 0.01 R 46 1.00 46 0.96 27+ + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user ' --------------------SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET-_-------------_--_- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB LTR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .952 .745 2426 WB LTR NB L TR SE L ' TR 1900 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .978 .677 1834 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .075 128 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 2998 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .092 157 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3010 9%- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Traffi SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** --WORKSHEET- FOR -PERMITTED -LEFT -TURNS -OPPOSED -BY-A- MULTI -LANE -APPROACH -�--- 'PT:z TAT MM CT] Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go ' Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT ' Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g ' Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 'PL=PLT [l+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5) } ] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g 'fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/{1+PL (EL1-1) }] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 115 115 115 115 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 2 2 1 1 2' 2 2 2 61 51 57 49 0.38 0.41 1.00 1.00 125 161 2280 1195 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.95 1.63 1.82 1.57 2.00 2.57 36.42 19.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00# 0.00# 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 1.78 2.92 22.18 4.96 8.22 7.08 78.82 96.04 0.80 0.77 0.00 0.13 0.72 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.58 1.73 10.40 10.30 0.34 0.36 0.04 0.04 0.58 0.44 0.08 0.09 0.74 0.68 0.08 0_0q # gf for Multi -Lane ' 97- 8AI L� SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Traffi SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 -CAPACITY-ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------------ -------------- EB LTR 161 2426 0.07 0.09 211 0.76 WB * LTR 125 1834 0.07 0.09 159 0.79 ® NB L 57 128 0.45 0.88 112 0.51 L TR 1195 2998 0.40 0.88 2633 0.45 SB L 49 157 0.31 0.88 138 0.36 * TR 2280 3010 0.76 0.88 2644 0.86 ■ Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.83 Xc = 0.86 ® Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec L._ LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET L=' ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay ® Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LTR 0.76 0.09 ----- ---- 39.0 0.85 ----- 211 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 10.1 43.3 --- ----- --- E 43.3 E L ■ WB LTR 0.79 0.09 39.1 0.85 159 16.0 14.9 48.2 E 48.2 E ■ L' NB L 0.51 0.88 1.2 1.00 112 16.0 3.1 4.3 A 1.3 A TR 0.45 0.88 1.1 1.00 2633 16.0 0.1 1.2 A ■ SB L 0.36 0.88 0.9 1.00 138 16.0 0.7 1.6 A 4.9 A TR 0.86 0.88 2.7 1.00 2644 16.0 2.3 5.0 A ■ L Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 6.7- B �J ■ 97- 844 0 Appendix 7: 1 Optimized SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Background Plus Committed Plus Project Traffic Conditions I 11 97- 844 HCM Summary Bes is for Case: BCPO_BAY SE 8TH /S. BAYSHORE 2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized PH Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 53 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 17 1 5II 4 i Grp v/s vac veh) S -veh) S L- 4 EB Lper 0.00 9.1 B 411 Lpro *8.82 0.10# 8.0 B TR 0.17 0.30 9.1 B96 --------- --------- UB L *8.21 0.44 13.6 B 12.2 B - - - TR 0.15 0.31 11.9 B ---------- --------- 29 270 NB L *0.25 0.68 21.7 C 20.2 C 232 LT 0.20 0.48 19.5 C t R 0.03 0.88 15.3 C 332 59 4 SB L 0.01 0.82 14.9 B 16.5 C 1 2+ TR 0.10 0.25 16.6 C 5 �1l1�4 3 2 i 45 1 Int. 0.48 8.51 13.6 B #L TOTAL 9 7 - 8 • SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-1 ' IDENTIFYINGINFORMATION 11 EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: S. BAYSHORE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCPO_BAY INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WE 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 1 600 1 100 1 100 SB 2 1 600 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WE L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR -LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS -------------- APP. ------------------ LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 29 270 232 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WE 96 411 4 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 332 4 59 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 5 53 109 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 29 270 232 50 WE 96 411 4 0 NB 332 4 59 20 SB 5 53 109 30 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. '2000-BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-2 **************************************************************************** 1 L 1 1 LJI SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR LTR WE LTR NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 5.0 52.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------------------ AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH -L- T R -L- T R L T R -L- T R --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 14.5 14.5 17.5 17.5 97= 8-4m SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. '2000-BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g ' Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion ' App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 29 1.00 29 0.85 34 L 34 1 1.00 34 1.00 0.00 T 270 1.00 270 0.85 318 TR 532 2 1.00* 532 0.00 0.40 ' R 232 1.00 232 0.85 214+ WE L 96 1.00 96 0.85 113 L 113 1 1.00 113 1.00 0.00 T 411 1.00 411 0.85 484 TR 489 2 1.00* 489 0.00 0.01 R 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 NB L 332 1.00 332 0.85 391 L 235 1 1.00 235 1.00 0.00 T 4 1.00 4 0.85 5 LT 161 1 1.00 161 0.97 0.00 R 59 1.00 59 0.85 45+ R 45 1 1.00 45 0.00 1.00 SB L 5 1.00 5 0.85 6 L 6 1 1.00 6 1100 0.00 T 53 1.00 53 0.85 62 TR 155 1 1.00 155 0.00 0.60 R 109 1.00 109 0.85 93+' + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user --------------------SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET-------------------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB Lper 284 486 Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .940 1.00 3215 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .313 535 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3345 ' NB L 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .558 935 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .476 798 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .547 935 TR 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .896 1.00 1502 97- 844 P, h SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-4 **************************************************************************** --WORKSHEET- FOR -PERMITTED -LEFT -TURNS -OPPOSED -BY-A- MULTI -LANE -APPROACH -,.r-- Tn rnn Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT[l+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) )] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/{1+PL (ELl-1) )] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N WORKSHEET FOR A SECOND LANE GROUP 115 115 115 115 60.0 52.0 45.0 45.0 57.0 55.0 48.0 48.0 55.0 63.0 48.0 48.0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 34 113 391 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 489 532 155 161 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.09 3.61 12.49 0.19 7.81 8.50 4.95 5.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.45 0.58 0.58 9.43 0.00 4.31 4.-58 47.57 55.00 43.69 43.42 0.57 0.54 0.78 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 3.19 1.63 1.65 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.28 0.31 0.56 0.55 0.2A n _ -�i n c;ti n c; c; EB WB NB** SE Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 Actual Green, G 45.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 48.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 48.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 391 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.97 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 155 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 12.49 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 4.95 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.58 gq 4.31 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 43.69 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.78 PL=PLT [1+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 .5) )] 0.97 EL1 1.94 fmin=2* (l+PL) /g 0.08 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/{l+PL (ELl-1) )] 0.48 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.48 * Exclusive left turn lane ** Shared left turn lane 917- 844 r 11 0 L� �J 1� SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-5 **************************************************************************** ------------------SUPPLEMENTARY -UNIFORM -DELAY _WORKSHEETT-----__^_------_-- Adjusted LT volume, v v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary green interval, gq Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures,ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform delay, di 34 0.10 6.00 9.43 47.57 52.00 0.01 0.45 0.16 0.07 0.20 1 0.49 0.09 0.00 9.44 ■ 97- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC.. 2000-BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /S. BAYSHORE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio EB Lper 0 486 ----- 0.00 ----- 0.50 ---(vph) 241 ------ ----Ratio ------- 0.00 * Lpro TR 34 532 1624 3215 0.02 0.17 0.05 0.55 85 1761 326# 0.40 0.10# 0.30 WB * L 113 535 0.21 0.48 256 0.44 ' TR 489 3345 0.15 0.48 1600 0.31 NB * L 235 935 0.25 0.42 390 0.60 LT 161 798 0.20 0.42 333 0.48 R 45 1412 0.03 0.42 589 0.08 SB L 6 935 0.01 0.42 390 0.02 TR 155 1502 0.10 0.42 627 0.25 * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum (v/s)crit = 0.48 Xc = 0.51 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET --X-- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) Fact ----- ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L TR 0.10 0.30 0.55 0.55 9.4 0.85 10.7 0.85 ----- 326 1761 ----- ----- 16.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 ----- 8.0 9.1 --- ----- --- B 9.1 B B WB L 0.44 0.48 15.1 0.85 256 16.0 0.8 13.6 B 12.2- B TR 0.31 0.48 13.9 0.85 1600 16.0 0.0 11.9 B 1 NB L 0.60 0.42 19.8 1.00 390 16.0 1.9 21.7 C 20.2 C LT 0.48 0.42 18.6 1.00 333 16.0 0.9 19.5 C ' R 0.08 0.42 15.3 1.00 589 16.0 0.0 15.3 C SB L 0.02 0.42 14.9 1.00 390 16.0 0.0 14.9 B 16.5 C TR 0.25 0.42 16.5 1.00 627 16.0 0.0 16.6 C Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 13.6 B ■ 97 - 844 HCM Summary Resuu Ms for Case: BCP0-BST SE 8TH W. rBRICKELL AVE 2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized PM Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 12I92 Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 ¢ 9II7 Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S 4 EB L *0.12 0.72 37.9 D 36.2 D TR 0.08 0.51 33.9 D WB L 0.12 0.53 31.5 D 36.6 D - - - - - LR 0.07 0.34 29.1 D -* R *0.18 0.82 43.5 E 349 MB T *0.29 0.50 15.9 C 15.8 C 190 -' ► i R 0.02 0.04 11.4 B 117 -71, SB L *0.03 0.64 45.0 E 13.8 B i IL 2 I 3 T 0.25 0.45 11.1 B i _1 5 3 54 114 1 16 Int. 0.62 0.66 22.1 C 392 � 211 177 911 4 t r- 4122 4: 97_ 81-4 1 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 **************************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------- EAST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 8TH ST. SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ' ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCPO_8ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN ' APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH --POCKET--- --POCKET--- --- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 4 ----- 2 ------ 600 ----- ------ ----- ------ 0 0 0 0 WE 3 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 0 0 1 200 1 SB 5 3 600 2 200 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE'4 LANE 5 LANE 6 ' APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ------------------------------ ---- EB ---------- L 12.0 ---------- L 12.0 --=------- T 12.0 TR 12.0 1 WE L 12.0 LR 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 SB L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN ' LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS -------------- APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 349 190 117 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WE 211 0 392 100 1.00 1.00 NB 0 911 77 50 1.00 1.00 SB 97 1202 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 349 190 117 50 WE 211 0 392 100 NB 0 911 77 50 SB 97 1202 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 1 90- 844 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 ' SIGNAL -SETTINGS -=OPERATIONAL -ANALYSIS - -------------------------------- CONTROL TYPE : PRETIMED ---------------------PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ------------------------------------------- APP.. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR WB L R NB TR SB LT T L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict ' TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ' -1- 2 3 4 6 g -5- Green 5.0 54.0 16.0 22.0 0.0 -7 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R ----- L T R ----- L T R --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 ' PERCENT GRADE 0 CURB PARKING N 0 0 N 0 N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 23.5 23.5 17.5 17.5 L 1 97- 844 i SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. '2000 BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** ------------------=====VOLUME -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET=====_____________________ P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT EB L 349 1.00 349 0.90 388 L 388 2 1.00* 388 1.00 0.00 T 190 1.00 190 0.95 200 TR 274 2 1.00* 274 0.00 0.27 R 117 1.00 117 0.90 74+ WB L 211 1.00 211 0.90 234 L 187 1 1.00 187 1.00 0.00 T 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 LR 112 1 1.00 112 0.42 0.58 R 392 1.00 392 0.90 325+ R 260 1 1.00 260 0.00 1.00 NB L 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 T 959 2 1.00* 959 0.00 0.00 T 911 1.00 911 0.95 959 R 30 1 1.00 30 0.00 1.00 R 77 1.00 77 0.90 30+ SB L 97 1.00 97 0.90 108 L 108 2 1.00* 108 1.00 0.00 T 1202 1.00 1202 0.95 1265 T 1265 3 1.00* 1265 0.00 0.00 R 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user ' --------------------SATURATION -FLOW -ADJUSTMENT -WORKSHEET-------------------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg -- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3249 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .959 1.00 3280 WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 LR 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .913 .979 1528 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1454 NB T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1454 SE L 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 3249 T 1900 3 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 5027 97- 844 r SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000,BG + Com + Project Optimized SE 8TH ST. /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 i CAPACITY _ANALYSIS -WORKSHEET=====_______________`_ v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c 1 App. Group ---- ----- (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio Ratio EB * L 388 3249 ----- 0.12 ----- 0.17 ---(vph) ------ 537 ----Ratio ------- 0.72 TR 274 3280 0.08 0.17 542 0.51 WB L 187 1624 0.12 0.22 353 0.53 LR 112 1528 0.07 0.22 332 0.34 * R 260 1454 0.18 0.22 316 0.82 NB * T 959 3352 0.29 0.50 1661 0.58 R 30 1454 0.02 0.50 721 0.04 SB * L 108 3249 0.03 0.05 170 0.64 T 1265 5027 0.25 0.57 2841 0.45 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.62 Xc = 0.66 tCycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec ------------------------LEVEL -OF- SERVICE -WORKSHEET----_---------- ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. --- ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) ----- Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.72 0.17 34.6 1.00 537 ----- ----- 16.0 ----- 3.3 37.9 --- D ----- --- 36.2 D TR 0.51 0.17 33.2 1.00 542 16.0 0.7 33.9 D WE L 0.53 0.22 30.2 1.00 353 16.0 1.2 31.5 D 36.6 D LR 0.34 0.22 28.9 1.00 332 16.0 0.2 29.1 D R 0.82 0.22 32.6 1.00 316 16.0 10.9 43.5 E NB T 0.58 0.50 15.6 1.00 1661 16.0 0.4 15.9 C 15.8 C R 0.04 0.50 11.3 1.00 721 16.0 0.0 11.4 B SB L 0.64 0.05 40.6 1.00 170 16.0 5.2 45.8 E 13.8 B T 0.45 0.57 11.0 1.00 2841 16.0 0.1 11.1 B Cycle = 115 Sec Intersection 22.1 C 9?- 8,14 HCM Summary Resin for Case: BCP0138T SE 13TMT /BRIC1�ELL AVE 2000 BG + Comm + Project Optimized PM Peak Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 1375 I Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 3 1 2 Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S I I t 34 EB L 0.06 0.42 35.1 D 51.7 E 366 LT *8.13 0.92 63.7 F -F- 94 R 0.04 0.30 34.0 D --- --- ------ UB L 0.06 0.26 27.9 D 54.6 E - T *0.22 0.97 62.5 F ----------------- R 0.01 0.04 26.4 D 114 I TT 188 I t NB Lper *0. 48 33.9 D Go Lpro *0.12 1.00# 69.8 F I TR 0.16 0.35 16.1 C I i 250 28 t 405 SB Lper 0.00 32.2 D 1 2 3 L 4 Lpro 0.02 0.87# 8.2 B r T 0.43 0.96 35.1 D 4 1 23 4 1 12 4 49 ii 3 1 R 0.15 0.34 16.0 C Int. 0.95 1.03 38.1 D #L TOTAL 97= 84 1 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC.. 2000 BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 9/15/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak CASE: BCP013ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WE 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 200 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WE L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT ---- THRU ---- RIGHT ----- ---- EB ---- 114 ---- 188 ----- 68 ---- 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 WE 94 366 34 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 250 485 28 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 25 1375 301 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 114 188 68 10 WE 94 366 34 20 NB 250 485 28 10 SB 25 1375 301 100 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 **************************************************************************** SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE PRETIMED-----_____________________ ---------------------PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED ---------------------------------------------- APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR WE LTR NB L LTP SB L LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 13.0 23.0 12.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION -OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 1 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- ---- L T R L T R --- --- ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- --- . HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 CURB PARKING N 0 0 N N 0 N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 0 0 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v ,P g 1 Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- EB L 114 1.00 114 0.97 118 L 94 1 1.00 94 1.00 0.00 T 188 1.00 188 0.97 194 - LT 218 1 1.00 218 0.11 0.00 R 68 1.00 68 0.97 60+ R 60 1 1.00 60 0.00 1.00 WE L 94 1.00 94 0.97 97 L 97 1 1.00 97 1.00 0.00 T 366 1.00 366 0.97 377 T 377 1 1.00 377 0.00 0.00 R 34 1.00 34 0.97 14+ R 14 1 1.00 14 0.00 1.00 NB L T 250 485 1.00 1.00 250 485 0.96 0.96 260 L 505 TR 260 524 1 1.00 260 1.00 2 1.00*- 524 0.00 0.00 0.04 R 28 1.00 28 0.96 19+ SB L 25 1.00 25 0.96 26 L 26 1 1.00 26 1.00 0.00 T 1375 1.00 1375 0.96 1432 T 1432 2 1.00* 1432 0.00 0.00 R 301 1.00 301.0.96 210+ R 210 1 1.00 210 0.00 1.00 + RTOR volume not included * Value set by user SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 900 1.00 950 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .995 1701 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 _9nn Ran i nn IACIA WE L T R NB Lper Lpro TR SB Lper Lpro R r] 1900 1 1.000 1900 1 1.000 1900 1 1.000 1900 1 1.000 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 .075 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1624 1710 1454 128 1624 3331 .253 433 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 9?7- 841- 1 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB Sp Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 Actual Green, G 65.0 65.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 53.0 53.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 51.0 51.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 260 26 Proportion of LT, PLT 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 1432 524 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 0.0 0.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 8.31 0.83 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 22.87 8.37 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.56 0.56 ' gq 42.27 10.90 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 10.73 42.10 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.00 0.55 PL=PLT[l+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) )] 1.00 1.00 EL1 8.20 3.14 fmin=2*(l+PL)/g 0.08 0.08 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [l/ { 1+PL (EL1-1)) ] 0.08 0.25 ' fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 0.08 0.25 RAA 10 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. '2000-BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** ------------------SUPPLEMENTARY -UNIFORM -DELAY -WORKSHEET------�----_------- TT T') T.TT TTT nT Adjusted LT volume, v v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary green interval, gq Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures,ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,QL Residual queue, Qr Uniform delav, di n 1 260 26 1.00 0.07 14.00 14.00 42.27 10.90 10.73 42.10 48.00 48.00 0.07 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.18 0.15 2.03 0.06 0.71 0.07 3 1 5.41 0.35 3.05 0.08 1.94 0.00 e SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 2000-BG + Comm + Project Optimized SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY -ANALYSIS -WORKSHEET=====___-------------- v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat, Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group ---- (vph) ----- (vphg) Ratio Ratio EB L 94 ------ 1624 ----- 0.06 ----- 0.14 ---(vph) 226 ------ ----Ratio ------- 0.42 * LT R 218 60 1701 1454 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.14 237, 202 0.92 0.30 WE L * T 97 377 1624 1710 0.06 0.22 0.23 0.23 367 387 0.26 0.97 R 14 1454 0.01 0.23 329 0.04 NB * Lper 62 128 0.48 0.46 63 0.98 * Lpro 198 1624 0.12 0.12 198 261# 1.00 1.00# TR 524 3331 0.16 0.44 1477 0.35 ' SE Lper 0 433 0.00 0.46 200 0.00 Lpro 26 1624 0.02 0.12 198 398# 0.13 0.07# T 1432 3352 0.43 0.44 1487 0.96 R 210 1412 0.15 0.44 626 0.34 * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum(v/s)crit = 0.95 Xc = 1.03 ' Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec ------------------------LEVEL -OF- SERVICE -WORKSHEET--------------------- ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio --- ---- ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB L 0.42 0.14 34.4 1.00 ----- 226 ----- ----- 16.0 0.7 ----- 35.1 --- D ----- --- 51.7 E i LT 0.92 0.14 37.1 1.00 237 16.0 26.6 63.7 F R 0.30 0.14 33.8 1.00 202 16.0 0.3 34.0 D ' WE L 0.26 0.23 27.8 1.00 367 16.0 0.1 27.9 D 54.6 E T 0.97 0.23 33.6 1.00 387 16.0 29.0 62.5 F R 0.04 0.23 26.4 1.00 329 16.0 0.0 26.4 D NB L 1.00 0.58 28.0 1.00 261 16.0 41.8 69.8 F 33.9 D TR 0.35 0.44 16.1 1.00 1477 16.0 0.1 16.1 C SE L 0.07 0.58 8.1 1.00 398 16.0 0.0 8.2 B 32.2 D T 0.96 0.44 23.6 1.00 1487 16.0 11.4 35.1 D R 0.34 0.44 15.9 1.00 626 16.0 0.1 16.0 C Cycle = 115 Sec Intersection 38.1 D 9�-- 844 1 0 0 r� 1 Appendix 8: 1 FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Optimized Conditions 1 1 9%- 844 • n ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation August 1995 , DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue From: SE 8th Street To: SE 15 Road EAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: September 18, 1997 Number of Lanes:4 LID AADT: 25,000 User Notes: Year 2000 BG + Project Cond. File:20BGP SB.WK1 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS -Range - K FACTOR: 0.088 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.650 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 10 0 - 100 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 0.6 MEDIANS (YIN): y LEFT TURN BAYS /N SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 2 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P, S, or A) (P=Pretimed, S=Semiactuated, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENTg/C: 0.66 0.20 - 0.80 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 33:= 1RIeI6fld.per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 780 1,180 1,290 1,360 2 N/A 1,630 2,430 2,640 2,710 3 N/A 2,480 3,710 3,990 4,070 4 N/A 3,340 5,000 5,340 5,430 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 3z3333 lIltsL&e�tionr mil@ Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 1,210 1,820 1,990 2,090 4 N/A 2,500 3,750 4,060 4,170 6 N/A 3,810 5,710 6,140 6,260 8 N/A 5,130 7,690 8,220 8,350 AVERAGE -ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 33. 33333 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 13.700 20,700 22,600 23,700 4 N/A 28,400 42,600 46,200 47,400 6 N/A 43,300 64,800 69,800 71,200 8 N/A 58,300 87,400 93,400 94,900 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.58 0.87 0.95 1.00 2 N/A 0.60 0.90 0.97 1.00 3 N/A 0.61 0.91 0.98 1.00 4 N/A 0.61 0.92 0.98 1.00 9%- 844 rTHE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II SITE UTILITY STUDY 1. Drainage A. Drainne Area The site which is located between South Bayshore Drive and Biscayne Bay, just north of S.E. 12`h Street has approximately 238 feet of frontage on South Bayshore Drive. It consists of a total of 1.83 acres. After development, approximately 85% of the site will be impervious areas and approximately 15% of the site will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways ' and landscape areas runoff. The coefficient of run-offs is arrived at as follows: 0.85 (impervious) x 0.90 = 0.765 +0.15 (pervious) x 0.30 = 0.045 overall coefficient 0.810 B. Existing Drainage System The city of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system for South Bayshore Drive. The existing roadway systems are of sufficient capacity to i handle the present conditions. C. Proposed Drainage System ' The primary drainage system of this building will consist of drainage wells which will allow the stormwater runoff to be fully contained on -site. No off -site runoff is anticipated from this building. It is anticipated that three drainage wells will be sufficient to handle the run-off (see Table I for drainage calculations). ' The stormwater will be collected thru a system of catch basin inlets and . transported by pipes to the well locations. The wells will allow the stormwater to flow into Biscayne Aquifer. The wells will be designed to handle the stormwater runoff and tested for capacity as they are installed. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas will be diverted thru detention structures which will capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the wells. 1 II 97- 844 Table 1 Drainage Calculations Runoff Generations 1. Total Gross Area 1.83 Acres a. Impervious 85% or 1.55 Acres b. Pervious 15% or 0.27 Acres 2. Average Runoff Coefficient (.85) (.9) + (.15) (.3) = 0.81 3. Design Storm 5 years 4. Time of Concentration 10.00 min 5. Rainfall Intensity 6.10 in / hr 6. Peak Runoff(Q) = CiA (.81) (6.10) (1.83) = 9:04 CFS Assume each 24" diameter drainage well flows at 650 gpm per foot of head - using 3 feet of head: 3 x 650 gpm = 1,950 gpm per well 1,950 gpm = 4.31 CFS (Peak runoff) 9.04 CFS = 2.10 Wells (Flow per well) 4.31 CFS Provide 3 - 24" diameter wells Detention Tank: Providing 1 '/z minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,950 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,950 gpm x 1.5 min = 2,925 gal / tank or 391 cubic feet each. Provide 2.tanks each with the following interior dimensions: 6' (width) x 7' (height) x 10' (length) = 420 cubic feet. Provide 3 tanks w / 420 cubic feet volume each 0 97- 844 II. Water Distribution The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 12 inch water main along South Bayhsore Drive. The water connections to serve the building will be done from this 12 inch main at the front of the building. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic water and irrigation water. No on -site wells are planned for this project. The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes ' Residential Apartments 355 Apts. @ 200 G.P.D. / Apt. 7 1, 000 gal. ' Business / Commercial 15,546 Sq. Ft. @ 10 G.P.D. / 100 Sq. Ft. 1,554 gal. Total flow demand 72,554 G.P.D. III. Sanitary Sewer The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 12 inch ' gravity sewer line -along South Bayhsore Drive. It is anticipated that a single gravity connection to the 12 inch line will be sufficient to serve this project. Table 3, below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Table 3 Sewage Flows ' _ Average Flow Table 2) 72,554 G.P.D. (from Average Flow 50.3 G.P.M. Peak Flow 50.3 x 3.5 176 G.P.M. ' 97- 84,41 11 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IV. Solid Waste Generation Solid Waste generated by this project will be collected in standardized on -site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided by either private hauling companies and/or The City.of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's Disposal or Recycling facilities. The projected volumes of solid waste generation are shown in table 4, below. Table 4 Solid Waste Generation Residential Apartments 355 Apts. @ 8 lbs. / Day Business / Commercial 15,546 Sq. Ft. @ 4 lbs. / 100 Sq. Ft. / Day = Total Solid Waste Generation 2,840 lbs. 622 lbs. 3,462 lbs. (1.73 tons / day) 97-- .844 11 ' THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL -PHASE II ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA PREPARED BY: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 September 15, 1997 97-r 841-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 40.- � 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF BENEFITS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction Objectives Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact Direct and Indirect Effects Measures of Economic Impact Description of Results THE PROJECT OVERVIEW DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues' DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Employment Wages Output Local Taxes OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost Impact Fees SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III: Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV: Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V: Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI: Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII: Impact and Other Fees PAGE 1 3 4 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 10 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 In 97- 8AA 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Resident and Visitor Spending Impacting Local Businesses: • Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Septe #;5,4997 8 � !� Page 1 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS (ECONOMIC IMPACT) The following table summarizes the economic impact of the The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase H development: Construction Period I ct Annual Recurring Economic Activity Stimulated: output $75,197;850 $4,083,230 Taxes ' 195,675 1,388,277 Wages 10,596,000 231,000 Total $85,989,525 $5,702,507 Jobs created 157 9 The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15,19W Page 2 9'. _ 8 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 11 The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase H INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS 97- 8AI 9 0 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a modem residential rental complex located at 1155 South Bayshore Drive in Downtown Miami (the Project). The Project consists of a 36 story 355 unit luxury high rise, with both residential and office components, and a parking garage. The building will have a lobby, a restaurant and leasing offices on the ground floor. Floor 2 will have an emporium, a health club, a spa, showers, a locker room, racketball court and apartments. A clubhouse, a business center and apartments will be on floor 3. There will be 32 floors of apartments from floors 4 through 35. There will also be 8,750 square feet of office space on the 36th floor. The garage is a separate structure with 5 levels for parking. Additionally, it will have a rooftop pool, a spa, a sundeck and tennis courts. This analysis encompasses the Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both the development and operational phases of the Project. Objectives. The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City of Miami. (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of the City. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15,1997 Page 3 97- 844 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon virtually every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting; indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15, 1997 9a�e V 81 r1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS I Direct and Indirect Effects tThe total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end ' with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. ' Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide array of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases of goods and services, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modem society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct resources, require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15,1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 5 9"1)— 8,14 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase.. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact was 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of " 2 " would imply that the total impact was 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided by the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City of Miami. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage- earner resides. • Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 7age 6844 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact (continued) • Direct expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the Project. • Indirect expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described above. •Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: (1) Development (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Qperational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the residential complex. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15, 1997 Page 7 97- 844 • The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase II THE PROJECT OVERVIEW �J The Project • PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Project consists of a 36 story 355 unit luxury high rise residential complex with both office and residential components. The Project is located at 1155 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. The site contains approximately 1.83 net acres. Construction is expected to commence in March of 1998. The construction period is expected to be 22 months. Occupancy of the constructed units is expected to begin not later than July, 2000. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15,19W Page 8 97— 844 ' The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase H DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS 9'�- 84 I is 1., 0 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such.impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 157 $10,596,000 $41,417,172 33,780,678 $195,615 $52,208,847 33,780,678 Total Development Impact 157 $10,596,000 $75,197,850 $195,675 $85,989,525 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 9 $231,000 $2,076,500 2,006,730 $1,388,277 $3,695,777 2,006,730 Total Operational impact 9 $231,000 $4,083,230' . '$1,388,277 $5,702.507 The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15,1997 Page 9 97- 844 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR 1 . Impact of Construction: The $37.3 million for construction expenditures within Greater Miami would create approximately 157 new full time equivalent.jobs with the maximum number of 232 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $10.6 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the chart on Page 9, spending for project construction would result in a total estimated impact of approximately $86 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct project construction expenditures, including wages, and the multiplied effects of the ' resulting indirect benefits. Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on -going operation of the 355 unit residential complex, Greater Miami will gain approximately 9 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $231,000 annually. ' The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of $5.7 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of residential units and the multiplied effects of such spending. ® Impact on Local Tax Revenues i As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of $195,675 and an estimated annual tax benefit of $1.4 million. The specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 15. The Yacht Club at Bricke11 Phase II - Economic Impact Study STWmber 15,1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. be TV 10 8 4 4 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the development. We identified the major phases of the development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City of Miami by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City of Miami residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing ' activity, and a portion is longer .term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the tenants in area businesses. . Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going management of the residential complex. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 157 employees over a two year period and there will be total on -going employment of 9 individuals. The total on -going positions can be summarized as follows: • Leasing Staff ' • Management • Security/Parking . • Maintenance and Clean -Up • Restaurant • Shopping The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15,1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 11 9 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents' spending in the City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: • Eating/Drinking • Grocery • Auto Rental f Other Transportation • Service Station • Recreation • Retail ■ Although it is known that these expenditures will be made,. in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be. incorrect ' to assume that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from areas outside of the City. 1 Wages The computation of wages is a direct by-product of employment. As . discussed in the above section, both on -site and off, -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with new employment, we started with budgeted data .directly related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from ' construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. I The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A.Tage 128 1 Output 11 F d li L I DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures: • Developer costs expended in'the City (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of the management company • New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners Exhibit H shows a summary of the development costs expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. Exhibit IV gives a detailed breakdown of the development costs. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City of Miami, a multiplier was applied to total direct'output. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami another $96.64 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a 'result of developer costs. This cost consists of land acquisition, soft and .hard costs which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages and taxes during the development phase is $41,417,172. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is 333,780,678. Thus total output from the development of the Project is $75,197,850. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15,1W7 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. p6 9 -- 8 4 4 k DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the residential units and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the residential complex. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated operational expenses of the residential complex rexclusive of wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, .we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Exhibit III shows a summary of indirect benefits. Total direct output created from operating ' expenditures is $2,076,500. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $2,006,730. Total output created from ongoing operations is $4,083,230. Local Taxes i A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operational phases of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. n The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15,1997 Sharpton, Brunson &Company; P.A. Page 14 p 97` `� .1 1 [I 1 1 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the .real property. We computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The total development phase real property taxes are expected to be $195,675 and the real property taxes expected to be generated annually are $1,388,277. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue (see Exhibit VI for details). Annual One -Time City Operating $431,798 $60,860 City Miscellaneous 22,491 3,170 Schools 420,844 59,317 County Operating 290,983 41,013 Debt Service - City 94,730 13,352 Debt Service - County 34,815 4,907 South'Florida Water 25,729 3,626 Library Operating 15,249 2,149 School Debt Service 45,431 6,403 Florida Inland Navigation 1,709 241 Environmental Projects 4,498 634 11 Total $1,388,277 $195,675 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project. The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. September 15,19W Page 15 97- 844 The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase U OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 97- 844 1 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS r rPublic Sector Costs When a community embarks on economic development which could involve increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the costs associated with the various forms of development. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having rclearly adverse effects. rSome of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (Police and Fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services • Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infrastructure) • Schools IMeasuring the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of the Project is not the objective of this report. Nor was this report's objective to compare the fiscal benefits with costs that may result from the Project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. rImpact Fees ' A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being ' measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region .within which the development is to occur. A summary -of the fees are listed below: , • City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee • Administrative Fee • City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee • Building Permit Fee • Dade County School Impact Fee • Installation Energy Fee For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1,078,444 and other fees total $736,753. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VH. r The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15, 19W Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 16 97- 8441 ' The Yacht Club at Brickell -Phase II ' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1 rJ SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the The Yacht Club at Brickell - Phase Il Project, it appears that such a development can. create significant economic benefits to' Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits to Greater Miami as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the Project direct employment and employment created in the surrounding community through new residents spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 157 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance and ongoing operation of the Project will be approximately 9. Tax Revenue The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impacts, for purposes of this project such costs have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the Project. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: Output One Time Annual $ 195,675 $1,388,277 The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development costs and outgoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $75,197,850 Annual. $ 4,083,230 The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study September 15,1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. page 17 97- 844 11 El Exhibit I Summary. of Economic Impact Exhibit II Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII Impact and Other Fees The Yacht Club at Brickell Phase II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. EX MIT LIST x�nciuuct u, iryi Pam 18 97- 844 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT EXHIBIT I 9 �844 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE 11 ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS EXHIBIT II 97- 8441 THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF OF INDIRECT BENEFITS EXHIBIT III gr),_N • I -] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT IV THE YACHT,CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST % SPENT IN " TYPE OF COST DADE AMOUNT HARD COSTS:. BASE ,BUILDING /PARKING'' 100% $32,600,000 LAND 100% 6,340,000 IMPACT, FEES 100% 1,078,444 PERMIT " FEES. 100% 736,753 COST". OF ::MODELS 100% 500,000 CONTINGENCIES 100% 725,000 TOTAL _HARD COSTS- 100% $41,980,197 BUDGETED SOFT ,COSTS 100% 3,500,975 PROJECT..COST BEFORE-, .FINANCING & MARKETING 100% $45,481,172 MARKETING COSTS 100% $400,000 FINANCING COST: FINANCING COSTS AND FEES 100% $2,062,000 INTEREST 100% 4,070,000 TOTAL FINANCING: "`COST $6,132,000 TOTAL' PROJECT; COST .:: .` :: 100% $52,013,172 97- 8 4" 1 EXHIBIT V THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DESCRIPTION_ 1998 1999 & Beyond REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPED PROJECT, 'VALUE*, $38,641,172 ",.,M.ILLAGE TAX RATE 30.8635 ' COMPUTED'R/E TAX $1,192,603 ' LAND:; ".. VALUE $6,340,000 $6,340,000 MILL -AGE TAX RATE 30.8635 30.8635 COMPUTED R/E TAX' ". _ $195,675 $195,675 TOTAL" , $195,675 $1,388,277 * Does not include cost of models. 1 ' A • Li THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES 3PLICABLE ONE TIM MILLAGE BASIS 9.5995 $6,340,000 0.5000 6,340,000 9.3560 6,340,000 6.4690 6,340,000 2.1060 6,340,000 0.7740 6,340,000 0.5720 6,340,000 0.3390 6,340,000 1.0100 6,340,000 0.0380 .6,340,000 0.1000 6,340,000 30.8635 $6,340,000 TAXES ANNUAL TAX BASIS $60,860 $44,981,172 3,170 44,981,172 59,317 44,981,172 41,013 44,981,172 13,352 44,981,172 4,907 44,981,172 3,626 44,981,172 2,149 44, 981,172 6,403 44,981,172 241 441,981,172 634 44,981,172 $195,675 $44,981,172 EXHIBIT VI TAXES TAX $431, 798 22,491 420,844 290,983 94,730 34,815 25,729 15,249 45,431 1,709 9° - 844 EXHIBIT VII ' THE YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL - PHASE II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES Development A. S.quare,Footages: ... Square Footage 9) Total gross building area (excluding 'balcoriies)" 496,533 2) Maximum developmentwea'(FAR) 522,048 3)- Nefapactrnentarea 392,630 ' 4) Gfoss parking area 157,210 B: Impact Fees; .. Amount ' 1) Dade County School Impact Fee i $577,694 2)'City of,Miami DevelopmeRf Impact Fee (Ord. 10426) . 370,589 3) City of Miami ,Development Impact Admin. Fee 11,118 .; 4} ,Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461 } 119,042 Total of all Impact fees $1,078,444 C. Non-Impac 'Fees: "connection 1) Miarr�i Dade W.A.S.A. fees" $451,560 :.:.2j.Building Permiffee 138,382 ' 3) installation Energy Fee 68,427 4):Re-plat (legal i,Survey) 20,000 5) Major Use. Special. Permit Application Fee 30,000 ' 6) Dade County Code Compliance `. 7) Radon Gas Fee :. 16,300 3,421 8) Fire Plan RevieW Fee 6,676 9) Ground .Cover Fee 1 Q) Land Use/Zoning - 878 799 11) Zoning Review<for Building Permit Fee- 60 12) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 13) Application.Fee 35 Total of all Non -impact Fees $736,753 Total .of all Fees, for Project $1,815,197 Note: Fees above were calculated using information obtained from ' the City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, May 12, 1997. 97- 844 The. Related Group of Florida 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse Suite Miami. Florida 33145 Tel. (305) 460-9900, Fax (305) 460-991 l r_J ' I. POLICY STATEMENT Our company policy is to provide equal employment opportunities to all applicants and employees without regard to ' race, color religion, sex, age, national origin, handicapped condition or status as a disabled and/or Vietnam Era veteran and to affirmatively seek to advance the principles of equal ' employment opportunity. The company takes affirmative action to insure that applicants and employees are not discriminated against because of their status as handicapped persons. ' We of f irm that the above policy and the Af f irmative Action Program herewith reflect the company's attitude and its intention to: 1. Recruit, hire, train and promote for all job classifications without regard to handicapped condition. 2. Base decisions on employment so as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity for qualified handicapped persons. 3. Insure that all other personnel actions such as ' compensation, promotions, benefits, transfers, terminations, Company -sponsored .training, educational tuition assistancel social and recreational programs are administered without regard to -handicapped condition. The company, in compliance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, maintains a written Affirmative Action Program. The Affirmative Action Program is made available to employees, upon request, in the Personnel Department during working hours. Overall responsibility for directing and implementing the policy enunciated herein and the Company's Affirmative Action Program for qualified handicapped persons has been assigned to Wanda Ponce, Personnel and Payroll administrator, 2828 Coral Way, Miami, FL 33145, 305-460-9900, who serves as the company's Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. All personnel actions are analyzed to insure that this policy and the Affirmative 'Action Program are being properly implemented. The company is determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the law and of the Affirmative Action Program. 97 841-1 '860.3 South Dixie Highway Suite 205 Miami, Florida 33143.7807 tTd..305.669.9383 Fax. 305.669.0126 Lic. No. AA C000779 January 2, l 997 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees FROM: Stuart Cohen RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: Architects PA It is the policy of COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. to base employment on merit, qualifications and competency and its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. t, One of the management duties of all principals at COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: ' 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being ' provided to all employees. COHEN-FREEDMAN-ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary Y an duty for individual Y despite the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, COHEN - FREEDMAN - ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. has assigned Mr. Guillermo J. Encinosa, Vice -President for the firm in charge of personnel, as the Affirmative Action director to monitor all activities of this program. ' COHEN - FREEDMAN - ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS P.A. Affirmative Action Plan as ' approved by Metropolitan Dade county, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the firm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the ' plan goals and objectives. I . 97- g44- The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County Community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is ' advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially black minorities. tOne of the most important things that the firm has been doing is actively seeking black i o ssionals in the fields of expertise that the firm is practicing. ' -L rt Cohen - A. I. A. President U 1 C 1 97844 1MVISEII VAII.77 DATE EF. DRAWN BY APPROVED RY Tbir;'—'ng is the properly of fur ter Design "Societal P.A. It is n InevVm<nt of SfrNee thet cannot he ,,,*I I'll In en7 +S. +ithout +r1Ren consent. SHEET L-1 OF FOUR TOP OF PEAK E1.•363'-9' 0 MACHINE RM. n EL. •338'-I' A ROOF LEVEL. r- EL. 6 _ . 36TH LEVEL EL.-321'-1' — 35TH LEVEL �^ EL. •311'-5' 4 - 34TH LEVEL my EL. •301'-10'. -.. 33RD LEVEL m FL. •297'-11' 32ND LEVEL O EL. •284'•0' 31SP LEVEL mV EL. •2l5'-II' 30TH LEVEL oV EL. •266'4' 29TH LEVEL EL. -251'-3' 28TH LEVEL Y EL. •748'-A' ...� MH LEVEL v FL. •23T-5' 26TH LEVEL mV EL. -230'-b' 25TH LEVEL cy EL. -221'-1' 24TH LEVELm4 EL. •2•2O'-e' —C 23RD LEVEL C^ EL. •203'-9' E V tl 22ND LEVEL '�� EL. 45A'-10' 21SI LEVEL C EL. •IBS-11' 20TH LEVEL C EL. dill-0' 19TH LEVEL c FL. 468'-1' LOTH LEVEL o�EL •155'-2' ITTH LEVEL my EL. •150'-3' 16TH LEVEL m� EL. 44V-m V 15TH LEVEL 10Y EL. •131'-5' 14TH LEVEL m4 EL. •123'-b' 13TH LEVEL FL..114'-l' 12TH LEVEL 0 EL. 405'-e' IITH LEVEL O EL.•9b'-9' �I lWM LEVEL cy EL-8l'-I0' 9TH LEVEL LEVEL o�EL •18'-II•l8'-II' _ `` 8TH LEVEL m EL. •l0'-0' 7TH LEVEL °Dn_EL. 61'-1' - L STH LEVEL Qn EL. 31 -:' -, Rt[. IiYLL . , ,., ac'—�*� F'.k- y'.n^eb `�'_=."',�.y�" ""..n�'F•g.,, roai{.�[_, EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 " = 16 ". 'z1 �" � L•'S � 8 > 13 6Y� a m p m K � e Vd a v YACHT CLUB (O BRICKELL II LANDSCAPE ELEVATION FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. laad�e�pe �1eAileCtOlt. (P516) A SL14 M.M g Prolmlb l A—Wtim, Emilia P.Au, LSLA. 269G Collla� 1¢ SW4 115 Wool lkme4. FL MM 7,1,,hone (3051 535-80N F z (3051 535,1149 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ IIIIII .F� � II ill I ,I � . "' lil IIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII117 1111111i111l it IiIIl111,111 u ` _ I I L' h f�I IJPIIII,illl'. yn _...: — lil3illill 11 .,1',il"-'- r �umwuuu�ll�l -•-'. -- ":...' — I � : Im --- a unulul muluml : 1 _ •iumml�lminiuiillu nIiULWII.iG;IU — I �� .`" ""'111161nIiIIIIJIII UII — mMQINRU"" •' IIIIUIUIIIIIIIUUIIUN Uf l i; IIIII �� Illln�l ll.I _ Ill I NI mH9IN I ' I II II ul�l u "".". `'"'.."UuuUIU luuuum I — tlWIU11WIWlllllllilllnll — — '— IIIIO UWI —� '--• -.'.' "NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO — Innmm�mlllunuur ——m-'mlllmluu.mninm — ummlmmumlll�llllm — _ — mll �. Iw uumuummlunl. — III'III]I:mll lllmllllllll Imlllmlmlll IUUImnl6111m1 •"�"'""'. .'"..". 'lllll!IUIiII.I:IIILII,I.� IIIiIII11111111Ellllll6111111r — — U IWI II I m�ln�--- ..Imummlumiumm mulmulalNmm'�Irmc — — — mmUMMUMMI umNnni nmu®mllllmll — IIIIIiIIIIIIIiIIIIIII1111J11 — rIIIIIUI I:p' Um � i I IIIUImu ""'� _ '�` _ . ""IIIIIIIIIII U II IIIIII H — NIUNII III � i I "IIIII I IIIhUOCmmI I nn!IIII �- IIiIIIIUI Ilmlflulllul — alul � IUIIIIIU1mUlIlUW Imll 911111N!II;I .'!I,i� IIIIIIImINIImIUUI nriUll@IUIIII--- — """II!I'llUlllllll!Illlllllil — !II IIINI',Id UIIIIII Illu UI Will III """" "IIIhIIUIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIlli6il . ihl — � IIIIIIImII IIUI UI Iy,Ug!i�l --'—• I�;iiSimlfl,;;;gq;lg — IUOiIGI!I lu _ - U :"'... .':" "'llllol Illilulmll m91mUl� ""' ""' IIIIIUIIINmII®Ie IIIIIIIIUIINIIpU® � 1111I 111 — — IIIIIIIi71Uf IUIIUIIU ""IfflillUlfillu(IIIIIN — 1111111111i1' .' r,l — Illllllnlll I I III In """ "•" "IIIIIIUIII!!IIIIIIIIIIII — II IIIIII J i Illlfl! I i .61II flllllllUl I INIII(�'--'—"""'""--"•IIIUnUIIIUIIilllillllf — 7UIIIY11NIh INI+h' I I — II 1111 B 11! �i UI Il '—'" """' UU,Ilnla Illlllllil,ll — EST SOUth Bayshorc Drivc SOUTH ELEVATION ao _ .. — SCALE: 1 ,; _ 1 Fi N 9m>m,�m YACHT CLt-TB C BRICKELL I.I c 11 Z n O K LANDSCAPE ELEVATION 1 FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. IwnEae.pe Architecture (1516) A Sit. N."o 9 I'roleaaiund Aueciaion, Eluilie Foster. A.sJ_A. 26n collies An- Suits 115 Mi.lei Newt, FL 3311e TI.-h—, MM SM-1N1ss F.. IM51 5:15- 1114 • 0 iJ YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II RENTAL APARTMENT BUILDING ARCHITECTURE: COHEN, FREEDMAN, & ENCINOSA ARCHITECTS, P.A. 8085 N.W. 155th STREET MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA 33016 TEL. (305) 826-3999 FAX (305) 826-4155 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES P.A. 2699 COLLINS AVENUE SUITE #113 MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33140 TEL. (305) 535-8044 FAX (305) 535-1148 INDEX OF SHEETS ARCHITECTURE A-0 TITLE SHEET A-1 SITE PLAN/ FIRST LEVEL PLAN 1/16- SCALE A-2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/16' SCALE A-3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1/16' SCALE A-4 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1/16" SCALE A-5 FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 1/16" SCALE A-6 SIXTH FLOOR PLAN/RECREATION DECK 1/16" SCALE A-7 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 1/6' SCALE A-8 PENTHOUSE LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 1/8" SCALE A-9 PENTHOUSE LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN 116' SCALE A-10 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" SCALE A-11 EAST ELEVATION 1/16' SCALE A-12 NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" SCALE A-13 WEST ELEVATION 1/16" SCALE A-14 BUILDING SECTION 1/16" SCALE A-15 BUILDING SECTION 1/16" SCALE A-16 PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION 1/8" SCALE A-17 PHASE I & PHASE II SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 SOUTH ELEVATION L-3 EAST ELEVATION L-4 PROMENADE DETAILS MIAMI . FLORID, SITE DATA ZONING: 3D-5 1. LAND AREA: Land area within property lines........................................79,932 s.f. Additional area 90'-0' into Biscayne Bay ...................... 28,548 al. Additional area to mid —point S. Bayahore Or................16.386 al. and S.Z. 12th Street Grose Lot Area ................................ 122.8136 al. (2.82 acres) 2. FLOOR AREA ALLOWED: 122.866 al. i 4.25..............................................................622,181 91. I 3. FLOOR .AREA INDICATED: 122,88tt al. z 4.04 ..............................................................496,633 al. AREA INDICATED (NON—RESIDENTIAL): 122. 813 al. z .10..............................................................12,666 al. 5. PARKIN' REQUHM: 355 ap';' units ® 1 car/unit.............................366 cars Handicapped spaces required ............................ 9 cars Handicapped spaces provided ...................I .... I... 9 cars Off street loading required...............................4 berths Off street loading provided...............................4 berths 6. PARKIN-7 INDICATED: Level Cne ............................. 87 cars LevelIwo ............................. 94 cars Level Three ......................... 94 cars Level "'our ........................... 93 cars Level Five ............................. 95 care Total Care ....................443 care 7. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: City of Miami Building Setbacks: Required: Provided: S. Layshore Drive: 20' 20, Side (North): 19, 20' Side Street (South): 15'min.,20'ma:. 34' Bayfront: 50. 50, Required: Provided: Building Height: No Limit 349'-5' (N.G.V.D.) to roof Garnge Height: 74'—a'' (N.G.V.D.) 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS: 9. UNIT BREAKDOWN: IAIIT • TYPE AIC 8<2 FT. BALCON ba FT. GROW 9GL Fr. REMARK" WIT A 2 DWID 904 e6 062 CgRgR Wrt e 2 DRnD eta w I'll etrtialoR Wrt C I DRAD 1e6 me ee6 o4fER1CR WIT CI 1 5RM Tie ee Wo MTERIOR WIT .:7 1 mows! 1b2 w e6T PENTHOUSE WIT C9 I BRAG 131 00 sae FlaM OUSE WIT C 4 I E RAe Tie 6e M Pe4THaee WIT,D 9 BRIM Wes, be 1614 PENTHOUSE Wu seR/M MW No me CQe4ER Wrc P I DR/ID 'we DO Ose REC. DECK WR v 2eRa "p eel let *W P1041cu" WIT H 2 BRRB nee me we PENn-m E WR 1 2 BWlB IIm 00 1242 FWWAM R W d 2 Mnb 1100 DO 1390 PENTWCISE WIT J 9 BR/M V*1 M& 2e63 PEITICISE WIT K I BRAD we De IDe COWER WIT L I dwe W2 1 M ate Cge4ER 10. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: Open Space Required 122,886 al. s.15—............................................. 18,430 al. Open Space Provided (36.773) / (122,866) = 20%..............................35,773 al. 11. BUILDING COVERAGE: ........................... 43,913 e.f. CMMMIM od om��o�m oo�oo��a 1 I Total Number of Units: .............................. 355 Apartments 9 7 _ — 4 1 h-r 3"0,. it prop" line I U XX V• � M ------------ -------------- ------ 1 I 22 it g��p -- fi\ ramp d I r=p down C •n•-0' \\\� ,s V ~ �11 'I• \ } P1 ~.% D � 11 � jI �`\ s yo•'� r`�' rn it j 1 t O , s }s �• i� I 0 romp W } ------ ------ ®� 16 916 I U PARKING GARAGE 'd�` � `, „•.® ;I BISCAYNE BAY 87 CARS 0 s° o o TO Acconooare �' fi yea } �, temp uD 1i - ramp uD 9 OERNQrlcwrA!a. tsm•-n' 'f I - s' I aLOAIMA o IM?CM AMU s n�m5 ij } MACK rn x WAM � /0.61 ACRES x0011 GZKXPAR I I 26 s naa " ,548 S.F. TZMAM p ROOa . Vm � ,•�,..�`V 1 a► per + ----- - RESTAURANT{ 71 I yy-m. - -- 310 s• °@8RP`� — 3900 S.F. r I W 's ! o soe a m i a ,1,st. sssi I if - LOBBY ane-w -M ,jLMO;BIB ��---- _----- 1:HAMM ---------- --- ----1 OP---------V---i----- ------t~ ' % I }—ca Pup= SV — c } II c VLJ i sera¢El I ---� — raonraw ` S eo®e aID dlTMMa PLAZA a �aLL 28651 1 s 0.38 ACRES car 16,386 S.F. - - = _ _ — TvMUMUND I 0 — — — — — — — — — — S.E. 12th STREET FIRST LEVEL PLAN 1116' SCALE U (�7— 844 PARKING GARAGE 94 CARS • i i IL-Jit �yrs,i I it BISCAYNE BAY ji Woos or RWAXMA" Effam AM BMOW -- !� tt. 1.11 ��� �' I� —`� ramp up so romp do t' •' __ 1 � ,f bay ,,teed`• t;�, PARMG GARAGE ii it 94 CARS !' i �i M i� um T > m j - aoavt oPPm CLUBROOM y — � __ �• m ae ma an � 'T 0 d _ VJ I — . I wm • aaae r 1 mm r 0 1 i I I BISCAYNE BAY I AIX t; 1 i4 — S.E. 12th STREET -- THIRD LEVEL PLAN 9 7 - &.4 1/16' SCALE A—3 ,I !` I 16 I t it i1 ramp do e BISCAYNE BAY PARKING GARAGE it 110 CARS llr �. — — — ; �'11, k _. warILL=Q-\ I j I I �J 1 > j, i, La Li La 'i 'i 11 I t A POOL bay °atb El E t TENNIS COURT t i I FE] 13 i } i 1 1 BISCAYNE BAY ^1 BISCAYNE BAY ALK UMG DVWG ROOM RWM LJMG ItAgm FDOX onfam BEDROOM #2 UNIT V UNIT 'A' DO ROOM MASTER -qL�3 RIO �v A IN k ffill� ll I&SW 'o f W.W.8 N_---. �--fie � . ♦: ---_--._ _ —_—_ -- � _ _ --- 97- 844 I O z V z w � of , �" ► i�4 0 © ® 0 0 0 I 10 100 M�� MOMMM �'r�1� ccr, — � oo I •��L-J � Lam. LJ _ I • V 1. PENTHOUSE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 35 1/0- SCALE 917- 8a 1111111 li U O Q OPEN OFFICE SPACE 8756 S.F. —4— PENTHOUSE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 36 118r SCALE (D 0 co A --Gill �i 0 NEC TMMCE B HANW," RWU ME \-n mccmmca mom * D' E i �i TEMCE 9 7 - IRS 4 -1- A-9 ngg---j C iElr ill11101111111I �■� . ,, ;, i■I IIIIIII) II wl�. 77� 101.11.Idll illlildill ill111!J_.. IIall77 --, -i. ulili:ilolll 111 IL11 ul uuiu' illm-s m, IuN III uluuluhhlluhll' "IUId In III �, - ■ EI 111_ I IIIIIIIIIIuIII I I I L'a���� � II - 11111 ILL_ .' 11I hill, ,gill Illlff IIIIOIillullll II If IIIIIIIIIIIIII ,�-� IdIIIIIIIIII11111I11' "' ':"' ' "hmwlllllllllllllll ®I 'I � B� illldlllllil !II'.IIIJIIIII II I����� �IIII111i[il0j111111111 I1111Illullllllal'.. _ .IIIIIIudIIIIIIIIIIIII _ .: i®� _ ■ it III IIIiI. 19 �' ■ � I® ®Il ® i III � �IIIIIIIIIII!��-,III IIdu;lilllllui 11mI1i!di11 1 im-11 � F - lhlwJlllllllllllNllldlllJliIl lllf' M1,:I ' I"'o®j4tlll:IIIIIII: lil I .i CE I 9 E■'" E Bill Imirr!:.i.. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� Il luulhllllllllll" -.... .. ""'IIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ®�oullllhlll.11�, i® III Ilh ddl"1111111 oIITH I ''YF" eei ��louulliiuuiiillmi� �a u1uuII:11I1„11EEE� E ®unlluumuuumdl ®lmlumlrl ®� II Iu111�u III rIl li:: I F� Ill 'lI11,111111Hlllll BulluIIIIIIILtlIIIIIIIIJI" ....... ".... " . ..... IIIIIII IIIIIII IIIL ® 111111J.; 11 ��_�� !� 911111111111111111111111 11 _W u EM ��__' 11 f�� 1111uInllluumi® ®°u'111m1u ml ®�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIII'®� uu I MilmBa11111111 I I II���I . '. �� � �� iEr I I Illlllllllhlhll - � IIIIi_Jlibu w IIII ��IUIIIIIIII11111i11 IIIIII ��� � IWII' Ilillllllllll�Il `IIII II .., II CluIaIll.tl111111111IEE�� p ® I ,, II ,,.;_� rE �`��� _ ®u�llumullliulll l ®�Ilulluulllum Mill � � � Illllloalflluulualrllluul ILI u I tlulllf IIIIII 11JIII IIIIII lul!�1 II III d�111 _I. III' 1u il117111!IIIp1u u_ ® Bill IIIIII lullll'dlllullllll116 III 1 ',IIIIIiIi!Illlll tlll ll tlll� � �e1�Illlllllll61.II'.II LI�.I III III IIIP.Illhutli ' ',iI,II III llumd.l � �111111111111111111 IIIIII � IIII II Ufll! IIIIIII llllllf 'lllllIll :�IIIIIIIIiI'� � �IIIIIIlIi11111111III111111i wuu.I® � ® II I nul a __ � � III IIIIIIIII1111111 Eil I GI IIII oal uIIIIGIuilliLl I .IItlIIIIIi 1 _ � � �� _ Irll,ullli�El® EI p 1�1'I,I I I l' noml I €��B® II �� � � d11161111 Itllllllllllf EII � ■ I I® EI � I II o F■ dIIIIIPalllll d l l ,1®���� Il� IIIIIII!9_IJIIII III �® Illllllllllnllllllllllll' luetlllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIilill willI sr .al u _ WIN I'.1 ,®� ■I � I � - `ICI [� I ®! � � 11 �L:' �I ; � ■ ®. 'lifl� 'ilillllllull IIII Illlh� ��ees� �IIIIIIIIIIIidlllll IIII eeeee unuluuulll1111i1:I . "IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' ®�I Illllllllllillll IIIIII � �i li lu I,Icu IIIIIII pill IIIIIIII':8111111IIIII I II�19� �' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(I'I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII°" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��1111111111161111 IIIII ®� IPII IIIII11ll®i1111■1111 ® 411111 IIIIIIhIIIB IIII• uuo11111uuu ,.8� ae� ®luummliullululll mluumluumur" mulumiiui ��uulmuuull11111u e� 1111��11111111fil l i A1111� 0104 PM 111u1111111.lulul l ` La p 1111 10111uu11u111� f- -�-®ullllllll lulullui� ®�IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII lllfll IM m IIU... u11u.....I�II fll 1 nlllll IIIIIII u11'llluIIIIIIt1uiI1111no �Ti�!Iulllllllllll'II:IIt olullllluulllllallll auuumuNlululr�11iIIIluflllllll IIIIIII Bi® IIIII1,� �I Veeii�llliutl,tl,m 11II Ill ll lllllullllitl�® E'p hlldlllllllllllllllllli d�llllll l_.IJn IIII�I �,m ��IIIII Mill IIII®l0� lllllhl � lid" 11IIfl_IIIIIIIIII C� II IIII�.Icl.l,llilllll' ewolluullulll!IIII lllillllllllllll IIIIIImom IIIIII 111111191111111'.IIIIII �I lllIl�i�a _�. 1if.. IIIIIIIIIhlllllIlra� l IIIIIII � I l� � � ®I.e 1 ul Ilidlil ��1.luulluu.lu IPIII� , •e�et\ )III IIIIIIIr.IIIIIItIIIIIi II!il V_ IrmaI� Il:adi,w1111111 uudrull!uu.luu "rl.nuullflllldNll ® 1 IIIIIII IIIIIICJIIIIIIdllllll tip 1� w�e•� I �. �lirl Itlll I I ilil ldCl: �I;I I I F;y� I lu L„1.1..,I � � Itllllul dlu I II, I �+n+b� 1111111111111111111111111111 I l I IE■ p ®- I all WIN Q III11111 I IIIIIIIIIIII Iw�_ ��®�. � IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII.11lllll -W MLA ME I vfimff 1 �[���-� 1�� raw® — Illlf Illllfil It " A�'=Wb1 - E19�J; A6 A F.�. 16 ✓'5+ III ■ I I® If 7 16 RV IM n � ®im �Ir,i'a�A� Ada �Grw � ..._. .1 od All tit�r-�--a-- •L � � F tn�lll l 'IBC 'u9o- 6p[ % b 9 i II Erl - . it 6q_ =m1m };W_ A o i>,S�sG'" .+� S 6 4.IR® Ril I MIN WV ■ ® III Is 11 IN II�!1 `! Is II III 1- E p E yI EII�; ®' �-8 ''® l�1`: I, . r I� ®� l IIII ullll uuI� I� 1: ® ®�. ® ®Ili M F ............ GCAM Loa (TVP4CAL) Elm WIN 010 TU=O 77 ®LA,, z.E ST ELEVATION A ALE iimm�ffil ",=M a Mill iflu; Rul" V.112 1 ;[1119 ligi TputlilliMMIN InUllf,411111, IIIwI u ailmum 111I6NIOUVIIIIJ IXINIIIAIJu I:AIR 1191 7 -7 litiffiRlu 1191M t I.. �c ;! I j J WISHMINI �MY nall Will 111:11011ta6i WL Id Ito III LA . .. ......... ...... .... .. .. .... .. YIIIIIPIIIINIIIIInllll NNIfltlnN NINI XII 111611.IIIIp111dpIN, NI N%Jlpil!I!INIIIMI M141111 HIM INIIIIi Will MAIIIIIIIIIII.1y IIPINIIINNIIntVI HIII(mmillillmil IIIIIIA111111111INU 10;Rli I WH4!1 IMI'll ANTI Mil mal la 1191111 V111:111111111 IftirlIVIIIIIH1111r;.- INIP111111111411111 RINAIIIIIIIIIIM l 1w sw _j j— am 4,114 illml 041, UtIM1111191,11M 2 1 m (UP qfqfi wihip'll Wille.1111VOI, .... . .. .. WWII iz- It' Will 1111111 �Iil- 1191111 IIIIIIIIIrlimili Ifolu fog Will IIR 11MIP141111111 IIIIIIIIIII I IIIII 11,11111,11illithIllillill 110IIIIIIIIIIII IRM - IIIIXIA IIrAiLpXllll--'YnIXIINII'dlilllkll IIIIii fliliq mill clim ro IBM" Its . ........ al 1,19111 �Iflil 111111- m9mmillilin IN511 MIR ITH MI 0 WIN - food W1 A's —�-, i iO IIII[II IIIIII, NUNN[ ..m a MF r y� 2 a ;R fop or PHUAK 1%11.11 mm ROOF ism i. wm ism EL. kw2l-sl ROOM umm, t , ; BLOW ELEW ' --- -'-' --- 1. AMC WCT ODOM All. 'I APIA ROOM AM Arvo '-- --- --- --- MraT Ills IBM FL 4e6l-v AFIV Room d� ~| b am LEM ��� ���� ���� Mr. am --- ---'�| ---' AIM Room -4 io -_- _-- _-- ~ --�! --- ---� --- ( | WOO" —RDM laun cm AST LIM NAVDy IN NMI -4am—1 NMI aISCAYm BAY r�_ ��~_di "^^ _ 1 n Y4CCe7NN OIL EL a4r-9' ROOF LSvBI. F- EL 43w. ' _ 3cm IS'm n EL a22'-e' - 0 861s Iavm EL a1r-e — — 84TH LEM • EL 1%01'-14• -- p BARD IBM i EL 4M2'-11' - am Lever. b EL .7E4'4r 216! umn EL .211V-B' am IEM c EL 4661a' 1 an Lavn o EL-251'4' - - 2rMM L6V81. io EL. .24•'•4' w am ISM Y EL .2m.9' 26M Ism • EL. 430'-6' - 2m Lvn • EL .22r.1• i 247E L2vB1 a EL..2o'-•' 28RD LVU a EL Qari'-v 21er UMM a EL 40'-11' WM ISM 2 EL .n1'-0' 19M IEM o EL 4"'-r IBM tzm ° EL 4"..2' IM Lim Y EL. 4"..3' Ism Levn • EL 441'.4' Im LSve1 a EL 4e214' -. 147E LBv6L i0 EL..123'-6' 6 1819 Lwn Y EL .IM'-1' I= LEM o EL 4M.-•' 117E Ism b EL..e•'-8' . sc lom LXM • EL 4S1'-10' - •7E ISvIm c EL •1•'-11• . am ISVEL o EL TM Ism • EL 41'-r spu+a 1 o.34.-4. WD ISM • EL 49'-6' 4 2eD LH9e1 EL -w-W eruct am n m. IN • BUILDING SECTION 97- 842 O z V z W � Z fey y • u J U a: W ID �Ja }Uo gU� asr� uc r anmvDi M� A-15 Ned Sea 10 1343: 21 1997 TOP OF PEAK � EL. 0 ROOF LEVEL EL. +331'-1' 0 36TH LEVEL EL. +322'-5' 35TH LEVEL EL. +311'-9' e 34TH LEVEL EL. +301'-10' m 33RD LEVEL EL. +252'-II' m 32ND LEVEL EL. +284'-0' io 31ST LEVEL EL. +215'-II' iQ 30TH LEVEL EL. +266'-2' 29TH LEVEL EL. +251'-3' a 28TH LEVEL EL. +248'-4' 27TH LEVEL EL. +239'-5' io 26TH LEVEL EL. +230'-6' ed 25TH LEVEL EL. io 24TH LEVEL EL. +212'-8' i0 23RD LEVEL EL. +203'-9' Q 22ND LEVEL EL. +154'-10' i0 21ST LEVEL EL. 485'4' 0 20TH LEVEL EL. +Ill'-0' 0 19TH LEVEL EL. +I68'-P a� 18TH LEVEL EL. +159'-2' �o 17TH LEVEL EL. +150'-3' m 16TH LEVEL EL. +141'-4' PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION 1iir sCM2 MG SEAM ROOF STORIC COLOR 51. H STUCCO (ryl. b6 FI STUCCO (T7F) 6 14 STUCCO (TYp) 0 GLASS GREEN HIGH RAIL IISTORIC COLOR T18 M4 STUCCO (TYF') 186 41 * I D m� PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR COHEN • FRIFT'DMAN • ENCINOSA 14 YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II MIAMI, FLORIDA 'Architects PA 9603 So. Dixie Highway, Suite 205 Miami, Florida 33143 305.669.9383